JP2942142B2 - Low hydrogen coated arc welding rod - Google Patents

Low hydrogen coated arc welding rod

Info

Publication number
JP2942142B2
JP2942142B2 JP6086056A JP8605694A JP2942142B2 JP 2942142 B2 JP2942142 B2 JP 2942142B2 JP 6086056 A JP6086056 A JP 6086056A JP 8605694 A JP8605694 A JP 8605694A JP 2942142 B2 JP2942142 B2 JP 2942142B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
welding
less
welding rod
amount
lime
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
JP6086056A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JPH07276081A (en
Inventor
成瀬省三
登 笠井
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Kobe Steel Ltd
Original Assignee
Kobe Steel Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Kobe Steel Ltd filed Critical Kobe Steel Ltd
Priority to JP6086056A priority Critical patent/JP2942142B2/en
Publication of JPH07276081A publication Critical patent/JPH07276081A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP2942142B2 publication Critical patent/JP2942142B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Landscapes

  • Nonmetallic Welding Materials (AREA)

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

【0001】[0001]

【産業上の利用分野】本発明は溶接作業性が良好で、特
に低電流域でのアークの安定性、耐ショート性に優れた
低水素系被覆アーク溶接棒に関するものである。以下、
低水素系被覆アーク溶接棒を便宜上「低水素系溶接棒」
と称する。
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to a low hydrogen coated arc welding rod having good welding workability, particularly excellent arc stability in a low current range and short-circuit resistance. Less than,
"Low hydrogen welding rod" for convenience
Called.

【0002】[0002]

【従来の技術及び発明が解決しようとする課題】低水素
系溶接棒は、溶接金属の耐割れ性や機械的性質が優れて
いるため、高張力鋼や低温用鋼を使用する重要構造物や
厚板を使用する大型構造物などの溶接に適用されている
が、このような重要構造物では溶接金属の強度や低温靭
性を確保するため、溶接入熱が制限されることが多く、
そのため、低電流でもアークが安定した溶接が求められ
ていた。
2. Description of the Related Art Low hydrogen welding rods have excellent crack resistance and mechanical properties of the weld metal. It is applied to welding of large structures using thick plates, but in such important structures, welding heat input is often limited in order to secure the strength and low-temperature toughness of the weld metal,
Therefore, welding with stable arc even at a low current has been required.

【0003】ところが、低水素系溶接棒では、被覆剤に
有機物を含有している非低水素系溶接棒と異なり、アー
クの吹き付けが弱く、そのため低電流域での溶接ではア
ークが不安定となったり、溶接中ショートし易いという
問題があり、熟練溶接工でなければ溶接が困難であると
の欠点があった。
[0003] However, unlike a non-low hydrogen welding rod containing an organic substance in a coating material, the low hydrogen welding rod is weak in arc spraying, so that the arc becomes unstable when welding in a low current range. In addition, there is a problem that welding is short-circuited easily during welding, and welding is difficult unless a skilled welder is used.

【0004】こういったアークが不安定になるという問
題に対し、例えば、特開平5−169296号では硅砂
の粒度を制限する方法や、また、特開平4−29489
2号では珪石灰を用いる方法が提案されている。両方法
ともアークの安定性を増すことでスパッタの発生量を減
少させることを狙った発明であり、低電流域でのアーク
の安定性、耐ショート性を解決できる手段とはなり得て
いない。
To cope with such a problem that the arc becomes unstable, for example, Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 5-169296 discloses a method for limiting the particle size of silica sand and Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 4-29489.
No. 2 proposes a method using silica lime. Both methods are inventions aimed at reducing the amount of spatter generated by increasing the stability of the arc, and cannot be a means for solving the arc stability and short-circuit resistance in a low current range.

【0005】一方、溶接棒を使用する産業界では、熟練
溶接工の不足が深刻な問題となっており、いつまでも熟
練工に頼ることが難しくなってきている。このため、非
熟練工でも、安定した溶接が可能な溶接作業性のよい低
水素系溶接棒の開発が強く要望されているのが現状であ
る。
On the other hand, in the industry using welding rods, the shortage of skilled welders has become a serious problem, and it has become difficult to rely on skilled workers forever. For this reason, at present, there is a strong demand for the development of a low-hydrogen welding rod with good welding workability that enables stable welding even for unskilled workers.

【0006】本発明は、前述した実情に鑑み、特に低電
流域でのアーク安定性、耐ショート性に優れた低水素系
被覆アーク溶接棒を提供することを目的とするものであ
る。
The present invention has been made in view of the above-mentioned circumstances, and has as its object to provide a low-hydrogen-based coated arc welding rod excellent in arc stability and short-circuit resistance particularly in a low current range.

【0007】[0007]

【課題を解決するための手段】前記課題を解決するため
に、本発明者らは、被覆剤組成を吟味した結果、従来の
低水素系溶接棒よりも溶接作業性が良好で、特に低電流
域でのアークの安定性、耐ショート性が格段に優れた低
水素系溶接棒を見い出したものである。
Means for Solving the Problems In order to solve the above problems, the present inventors examined the coating composition and found that the welding workability was better than that of conventional low hydrogen welding rods, We have found a low-hydrogen welding rod with remarkably excellent arc stability and short-circuit resistance in the basin.

【0008】すなわち、本発明は、 被覆剤重量%で、 炭酸石灰:25〜55%、 ホタル石:5〜24%、 ルチール:2〜9%、 Mn及び/又はMn合金(Mn換算量):1〜5%、 Si及び/又はSi合金(Si換算量):2〜8%、を含有
し、かつ、前記炭酸石灰の粒度が、炭酸石灰の重量%
で、 3μm未満の粒子(A):20%以下、 3μm以上16μm未満の粒子(B):15〜40%、 但し、A/B≧1/3、 125μm以上の粒子:10〜45%、であることを特
徴とする被覆剤を鋼心線の外周に塗布してなる低水素系
被覆アーク溶接棒を要旨としている。
That is, the present invention relates to a coating agent in weight%, carbonate lime: 25 to 55%, fluorite: 5 to 24%, rutile: 2 to 9%, Mn and / or Mn alloy (in terms of Mn): 1 to 5%, Si and / or Si alloy (Si conversion amount): 2 to 8%, and the particle size of the carbonated lime is the weight% of the carbonated lime.
Particles of less than 3 μm (A): 20% or less, particles of 3 μm or more and less than 16 μm (B): 15 to 40%, provided that A / B ≧ 1/3, particles of 125 μm or more: 10 to 45%. The gist of the present invention is a low-hydrogen-based coated arc welding rod obtained by applying a coating agent characterized in that it is applied to the outer periphery of a steel core wire.

【0009】また、他の本発明は、更に、マイカを、被
覆剤重量%で、3%以下に抑制したことを特徴としてい
る。
Another feature of the present invention is that mica is suppressed to not more than 3% by weight of the coating agent.

【0010】[0010]

【作用】以下に本発明を更に詳述する。The present invention will be described below in more detail.

【0011】低電流でアークを持続させるためには、ア
ーク長を通常よりも短かく保つ必要があり、その際、溶
接棒先端の保護筒が鋼板に接触してしまうが、従来の低
水素系溶接棒は軽く接触しただけで保護筒がくずれ、そ
の結果、ショートを引き起こしていることが観察され
た。
In order to maintain the arc at a low current, the arc length must be kept shorter than usual. At this time, the protection cylinder at the tip of the welding rod comes into contact with the steel plate. It was observed that the protective sheath was broken by only slight contact of the welding rod, resulting in a short circuit.

【0012】その原因は、被覆剤原料同志の固着力が不
足していると考えられたので、固着剤の種類や量を種々
変えてテストしてみたが、満足のいく結果は得られなか
った。一方、微粒原料を使用し、フラックスを緻密にす
ることで被覆剤原料同志の結合力の強化も図ってみた。
確かに保護筒は硬くはなったが、溶接棒製造時に被覆剤
の乾燥割れによる歩留りの低下や被覆内部に内在した割
れのため輸送中の振動により被覆剤が脱落したり、また
溶接中保護筒に微少な割れが生じ、かえって耐ショート
性を劣化させることもあった。
[0012] The cause was considered to be that the adhesive force between the coating materials was insufficient, so that tests were carried out by changing the type and amount of the adhesive, but no satisfactory results were obtained. . On the other hand, we tried to strengthen the bonding force between the coating material materials by using fine material and making the flux dense.
Certainly, the protection tube became harder, but the coating agent dropped off due to vibration during transportation due to a decrease in yield due to dry cracking of the coating material during welding rod manufacture and cracks inside the coating, and the protection tube during welding. In some cases, micro cracks were formed, and the short-circuit resistance was rather deteriorated.

【0013】そこで、乾燥割れを発生させることなく、
かつ、被覆剤原料同志の結合力も向上させる最適な原料
粒度について、鋭意検討を重ねた結果、特に低水素系溶
接棒の主要原料である炭酸石灰の粒度を特定の範囲に規
制することで解決できることを見い出し、本発明に至っ
たものである。まず、炭酸石灰の粒度構成について説明
する。
Therefore, without causing dry cracking,
In addition, as a result of intensive studies on the optimal raw material particle size that also improves the bonding strength between the coating material raw materials, it can be solved particularly by regulating the particle size of carbonate lime, which is the main raw material of low hydrogen welding rods, to a specific range. Have been found, and have led to the present invention. First, the particle size composition of carbonated lime will be described.

【0014】炭酸石灰の粒度構成:3μm以上16μm未
満の微粒子(B)は、大きな粒子間を埋め、被覆剤原料同
志の結合力を向上させるのに必要で、炭酸石灰重量%に
て15%以上で効果を発揮する。但し、被覆剤の固着強
度を増し、所定の保護筒の強度を得るためには、このよ
うな微粒子同志間を埋める3μm未満の超微粒子(A)の
存在が重要で、その量は3μm以上16μm未満の粒子
(B)の1/3以上が必要である。
Particle size composition of carbonated lime : Fine particles (B) having a size of 3 μm or more and less than 16 μm are necessary for filling large particles and improving the bonding force between coating materials, and 15% or more by weight of carbonated lime. Effective with However, in order to increase the fixing strength of the coating agent and obtain the strength of the predetermined protective cylinder, it is important that the ultrafine particles (A) having a size of less than 3 μm to fill the space between the fine particles are present. Less than particles
At least 1/3 of (B) is required.

【0015】一方、微粒子の量が多くなると乾燥割れが
発生するようになるので、その量は制限され、3μm未
満の超微粒子(A)では炭酸石灰重量%にて20%以下、
3μm以上16μm未満の微粒子(B)では炭酸石灰重量%
にて40%以下とする必要がある。
On the other hand, when the amount of fine particles increases, dry cracking occurs, so the amount is limited. For ultrafine particles (A) having a particle size of less than 3 μm, 20% or less in terms of lime carbonate weight%,
For fine particles (B) having a size of 3 μm or more and less than 16 μm, lime carbonate weight%
At 40% or less.

【0016】更に、125μm以上の粒子は、乾燥割れ
を防ぐために有効で、炭酸石灰重量%にて10%以上の
添加で効果を発揮する。しかし、45%を超えて添加す
ると被覆の強度が劣化し、保護筒が欠け易くなる。よっ
て、この範囲の粒子は炭酸石灰重量%にて10〜45%
が適当である。なお、粒度の測定はレーザー回折式粒度
測定装置を用いた。
Further, particles having a size of 125 μm or more are effective for preventing dry cracking, and exhibit an effect when added in an amount of 10% or more by weight of lime carbonate. However, if it is added in excess of 45%, the strength of the coating is degraded, and the protective cylinder is easily chipped. Therefore, particles in this range are 10 to 45% by weight of carbonated lime.
Is appropriate. The particle size was measured using a laser diffraction particle size analyzer.

【0017】本発明は、被覆剤として上記の粒度構成の
炭酸石灰を添加することを必須とするが、この炭酸石灰
並びに他の原料成分の限定理由は以下のとおりである。
なお、添加量は被覆剤重量%である。
According to the present invention, it is essential to add carbonated lime having the above-mentioned particle size composition as a coating agent. The reasons for limiting the carbonated lime and other raw material components are as follows.
In addition, the addition amount is a coating agent weight%.

【0018】炭酸石灰:25〜55% 炭酸石灰は被覆剤の主成分となるもので、スラグ生成剤
及びガス発生剤等としての作用を有する。しかし、25
%未満ではガス発生量が不足し、大気中の窒素や酸素を
十分に遮断できず、溶接金属の耐ピット性及び耐ブロー
ホール性が劣化し、X線性能が著しく悪化する。一方、
55%を超えるとアークが弱くなりすぎ、大粒のスパッ
タが多発し、しかも凸ビードとなる。よって、被覆剤中
の炭酸石灰は25〜55%の範囲とする。
Carbonated lime: 25% to 55% carbonated lime is a main component of the coating agent and has an action as a slag forming agent, a gas generating agent and the like. But 25
%, The amount of generated gas is insufficient, nitrogen and oxygen in the atmosphere cannot be shut off sufficiently, the pit resistance and blowhole resistance of the weld metal deteriorate, and the X-ray performance deteriorates remarkably. on the other hand,
If it exceeds 55%, the arc is too weak, spatters of large grains occur frequently, and moreover, it becomes a convex bead. Therefore, the content of carbonated lime in the coating agent is set in the range of 25 to 55%.

【0019】ルチール:2〜9% ルチールはスラグ生成剤、粘性調整剤及びアークの安定
性等、溶接作業性調整剤としての作用を有している。し
かし、2%未満ではアークが不安定となり、アンダーカ
ットが発生し、スパッタが増える。一方、9%を超える
とアークが弱くなりすぎ、溶け込み不足等の欠陥が発生
する。よって、被覆剤中のルチール量は2〜9%の範囲
とする。
Rutile: 2 to 9% rutile has a function as a slag forming agent, a viscosity controlling agent, and a welding workability controlling agent such as arc stability. However, if it is less than 2%, the arc becomes unstable, undercuts occur, and spatter increases. On the other hand, if it exceeds 9%, the arc becomes too weak, and defects such as insufficient penetration occur. Therefore, the amount of rutile in the coating agent is in the range of 2 to 9%.

【0020】ホタル石:5〜24% ホタル石はスラグの粘性調整剤としての作用を有してい
る。しかし、5%未満ではスラグの粘性が高くなりす
ぎ、スラグがビードを均一に覆わず、ビード外観が劣化
し、しかもピットが発生する。一方、24%を超えると
スラグの粘性が著しく低下するので、スラグが被りすぎ
てスラグが邪魔し、スラグの巻き込み、融合不良等の欠
陥が発生する。よって、被覆剤中のホタル石の量は5〜
24%の範囲とする。
Fluorite: 5 to 24% fluorite acts as a viscosity modifier for slag. However, if it is less than 5%, the viscosity of the slag becomes too high, the slag does not uniformly cover the bead, the bead appearance deteriorates, and pits are generated. On the other hand, if it exceeds 24%, the viscosity of the slag is remarkably reduced, so that the slag is excessively covered and hinders the slag, causing defects such as slag entrainment and poor fusion. Therefore, the amount of fluorite in the coating agent is 5 ~
The range is 24%.

【0021】Mn及び/又はMn合金(Mn換算量):1〜
5% Mnが1%未満になると脱酸不足になり、ピット、ブロ
ーホールが発生してX線性能を低下させる。一方、5%
を超えると脱酸過剰になり、ピット、ブローホールが発
生してX線性能を低下させる。よって、Mn量は1〜5
%の範囲とする。なお、Mnの添加方法は金属Mnのほ
か、Fe−Mn、Fe−Si−Mn等のMn合金の形で添加が
可能であり、Mn合金の場合はMn換算量とする。
Mn and / or Mn alloy (Mn conversion amount): 1 to 1
If 5% Mn is less than 1%, the deoxidation becomes insufficient, and pits and blowholes are generated to lower the X-ray performance. 5%
Exceeding the range results in excessive deoxidation, and pits and blowholes are generated to lower the X-ray performance. Therefore, the Mn amount is 1 to 5
% Range. In addition, Mn can be added in the form of Mn alloy such as Fe-Mn and Fe-Si-Mn, in addition to metal Mn. In the case of Mn alloy, the Mn conversion amount is used.

【0022】Si及び/又はSi合金(Si換算量):2〜
8% Siが2%未満になると、母材と溶接金属とのなじみが
著しく悪化し、溶接金属が垂れ易くなり、ビード外観も
悪くなると同時に脱酸不足になり、ピット、ブローホー
ルが発生してX線性能を低下させる。一方、8%を超え
ると脱酸過剰になり、ピット、ブローホールが発生して
X線性能を低下させる。よって、Si量は2〜8%の範
囲とする。なお、Siは、Fe−Si、Fe−Si−Mn或い
はCa−Si等の合金の形で添加でき、Si合金はSi料に
換算した量で添加する。
Si and / or Si alloy (Si conversion amount): 2
When 8% Si is less than 2%, the conformity between the base metal and the weld metal is significantly deteriorated, the weld metal is easily dripped, the bead appearance is also deteriorated, and the deoxidation is insufficient, and pits and blow holes are generated. Decreases X-ray performance. On the other hand, if it exceeds 8%, deoxidation will be excessive, and pits and blow holes will be generated, lowering X-ray performance. Therefore, the Si amount is in the range of 2 to 8%. Note that Si can be added in the form of an alloy such as Fe-Si, Fe-Si-Mn or Ca-Si, and the Si alloy is added in an amount converted to a Si material.

【0023】マイカ:3%以下 マイカは塗装性を改善し、生産性、歩留りの向上に寄与
する原料であり、スラグ生成剤としての作用も有する。
しかし、3%を超えるとスラグ量、粘性が増し、スラグ
巻き込み融合不良等の欠陥が発生すると共に、含有する
結晶水により溶着金属の拡散性水素量が増加(溶接継手
の耐割れ性の劣化)するため、本発明においては、必要
に応じて、3%以下に抑制するのが望ましい。
Mica: 3% or less Mica is a raw material that improves paintability, improves productivity and yield, and also has a function as a slag forming agent.
However, if it exceeds 3%, the amount of slag and viscosity increase, defects such as poor slag entrainment and fusion occur, and the amount of diffusible hydrogen in the deposited metal increases due to the contained crystallization water (deterioration of the crack resistance of the welded joint). Therefore, in the present invention, it is desirable to suppress the content to 3% or less as necessary.

【0024】なお、アークの強さ、なじみ性、、クレー
タの広がり等の溶接作業性の調整を図るために、炭酸バ
リウム、マグネサイトのような炭酸塩や、タルク、硅砂
のような珪酸塩、或いは、溶接金属の機械的性質の改善
を図るためにNi、Mo、Cr、Ti、B等の合金成分を適
量被覆剤中に添加することができる。
In order to adjust the welding workability such as arc strength, conformability, and spread of the crater, carbonates such as barium carbonate and magnesite, silicates such as talc and silica sand, Alternatively, alloy components such as Ni, Mo, Cr, Ti, and B can be added to the coating material in an appropriate amount in order to improve the mechanical properties of the weld metal.

【0025】次に本発明の実施例を示す。Next, examples of the present invention will be described.

【0026】[0026]

【実施例】表1に示す被覆剤を有する被覆アーク溶接棒
を以下の方法により製作し、溶接作業性、X線性能、生
産性を調査した。その結果を表1に示す。
EXAMPLES A coated arc welding rod having the coating agent shown in Table 1 was produced by the following method, and welding workability, X-ray performance, and productivity were investigated. Table 1 shows the results.

【0027】〈溶接棒の製作〉3.2mmφ×350mmL
の軟鋼心線の回りにそれぞれの被覆剤を被覆率25〜3
5%となるように塗装し、最高温度450℃で乾燥して
製作した。
<Production of welding rod> 3.2 mmφ × 350 mmL
Of each coating agent around the mild steel core wire of 25 to 3
It was painted to 5% and dried at a maximum temperature of 450 ° C.

【0028】〈溶接試験法(溶接作業性及びX線性能)〉 開先形状:図1に示す。 鋼種:SM490 形状寸法:9mmt×150mmw×500mmL 溶接姿勢:上向 溶接電源:AC(交流) 溶接方法:表溶接後、裏はつりし、裏溶接 溶接電流:80〜90Amp(3.2mmφ棒の低電流域に属
する) 溶接作業性の判定基準:○(良好)、△(やや不良)、×
(不良)(特にアーク安定性、耐ショート性を重点に評価) X線性能の判定基準:JIS Z 3104に基づく等級
で1級(良)(○)、2級(やや不良)(△)、3級以下(不良)
(×)の3段階。
<Welding test method (welding workability and X-ray performance)> Groove shape: shown in FIG. Steel type: SM490 Shape dimensions: 9mmt × 150mmw × 500mmL Welding posture: Upward Welding power supply: AC (AC) Welding method: After front welding, the back is suspended and back welding Welding current: 80 to 90 Amp (3.2mmφ rod low current Judgment criteria for welding workability: ○ (good), △ (slightly poor), ×
(Defective) (Evaluation with particular emphasis on arc stability and short-circuit resistance) Judgment criteria for X-ray performance: Grade based on JIS Z 3104: Class 1 (Good) (○), Class 2 (Slightly poor) (△), Class 3 or lower (bad)
(X) three stages.

【0029】〈生産性〉塗装・乾燥工程において被覆に
乾燥割れの入った不良品の全溶接棒に対する割合が1%
以下を良品(○)、1%を超え3%以下をやや不良(△)、
3%を超えるものを不良(×)の3段階で評価した。その
際、製品を梱包する5kg紙箱に選別済の良品溶接棒を詰
め、1mの高さから鋼板上に落下させ、脱落した被覆の
重量が5.0gを超えたものは被覆内部に割れが内在して
いた可能性があることを考え、1ランク下の等級に判定
変更した。
<Productivity> In the coating / drying process, the ratio of defective products having dry cracks in the coating to all welding rods is 1%.
The following are good (○), more than 1% and slightly less than 3% (%),
Those exceeding 3% were evaluated in three stages of bad (x). At that time, the selected good welding rods were packed in a 5 kg paper box for packing the product, dropped on a steel plate from a height of 1 m, and if the weight of the dropped coating exceeded 5.0 g, cracks were present inside the coating. Considering that it may have been done, the judgment was changed to a grade one rank lower.

【0030】表1において、No.1〜No.14は本発明
例であり、いずれも低電流域での溶接で優れたアーク安
定性、耐ショート性を示し、X線性能も良好である。ま
た乾燥割れもなく歩留りも良好で脱落試験でも被覆剤の
脱落はなかった。
In Table 1, No. 1 to No. 14 are examples of the present invention, all of which show excellent arc stability and short-circuit resistance when welded in a low current range, and have good X-ray performance. Also, there was no drying crack, the yield was good, and the coating did not fall off in the dropping test.

【0031】これに対し、比較例No.15〜No.26の
うち、No.15とNo.16は炭酸石灰につき3μm未満
の超微粒子が少なく、かつ、No.15は125μm以上
の粒子も多く、被覆剤原料同士の結合力がなく、溶接作
業性、X線性能のいずれも不良である。
On the other hand, of Comparative Examples No. 15 to No. 26, No. 15 and No. 16 have few ultrafine particles of less than 3 μm per lime carbonate, and No. 15 has many particles of 125 μm or more. In addition, there is no bonding force between the coating material materials, and both the welding workability and the X-ray performance are poor.

【0032】比較例No.17は、炭酸石灰につき3μm
以上16μm未満の微粒子はあるが、3μm未満の超微粒
子が不足し、被覆剤原料同士の結合力が十分でないた
め、溶接作業性、X線性能ともやや不良である。
Comparative Example No. 17 was 3 μm / carbonate lime.
Although fine particles having a particle size of less than 16 μm exist, ultrafine particles having a particle size of less than 3 μm are insufficient, and the bonding force between the coating material materials is not sufficient.

【0033】比較例No.18は、炭酸石灰につき16μ
m未満の微粒子は十分あるが、125μm以上の粗目が不
足したため、歩留りは“良”の範囲であったが、脱落試
験で5.0g以上被覆剤の脱落が認められたのでランクは
やや不良である。また溶接中も時々保護筒に割れが入り
溶接が難しく、溶接作業性、X線性能ともやや不良であ
る。
Comparative Example No. 18 is 16 μm
Although the fine particles having a particle size of less than m were sufficient, the yield was within the range of “good” because the coarseness of 125 μm or more was insufficient. However, in the drop test, 5.0 g or more of the coating material was found to have fallen, so the rank was slightly poor. is there. In addition, the protective tube sometimes cracks during welding, making it difficult to weld, and the welding workability and X-ray performance are somewhat poor.

【0034】比較例No.19とNo.20は、炭酸石灰に
つき16μm未満の微粒子が多すぎ、かつ125μm以上
の粗目が少なすぎたため、歩留りそのものが“不良”の
範囲であり、被覆剤の脱落も多く、当然溶接中の保護筒
の欠けも激しく、溶接作業性、X線性能、生産性とも不
良である。
In Comparative Examples No. 19 and No. 20, the yield itself was in the range of “poor” because the amount of fine particles of less than 16 μm per carbonate lime was too large and the coarseness of 125 μm or more was too small. Of course, the protection tube during welding is severely chipped, and welding workability, X-ray performance, and productivity are poor.

【0035】比較例No.21は炭酸石灰が少なく、ホタ
ル石が多いため、X線性能が不良で、スラグの巻込み、
融合不良が発生した。比較例No.22はルチールが多い
ため、アークが弱く溶け込み不良が発生した。
Comparative Example No. 21 has a low X-ray performance due to a small amount of carbonated lime and a large amount of fluorite, and entrainment of slag.
Poor fusion occurred. In Comparative Example No. 22, since the amount of rutile was large, the arc was weak and poor penetration occurred.

【0036】比較例No.23はSi、Mnが多く、ピッ
ト、ブローホールの発生でX線性能が不良であったが、
溶接作業性は良好であった。比較例No.24はSi、ホ
タル石が少く、ビード外観が劣化し、脱酸不足でピッ
ト、ブローホールが発生した。比較例No.25はMnが
少なく、ピット、ブローホールの発生でX線性能が不良
であったが、溶接作業性は良好であった。
Comparative Example No. 23 contained many Si and Mn, and had poor X-ray performance due to generation of pits and blowholes.
The welding workability was good. In Comparative Example No. 24, the content of Si and fluorite was small, the bead appearance was deteriorated, and pits and blowholes were generated due to insufficient deoxidation. In Comparative Example No. 25, Mn was small, and X-ray performance was poor due to generation of pits and blowholes, but welding workability was good.

【0037】比較例No.26は、炭酸石灰が多く、ルチ
ールが少ないため、アークが弱く、不安定で、スパッタ
が増加した。
In Comparative Example No. 26, since the amount of lime carbonate was large and the amount of rutile was small, the arc was weak, unstable, and spatter increased.

【0038】[0038]

【表1】 [Table 1]

【0039】[0039]

【発明の効果】以上詳述したように、本発明によれば、
溶接作業性が良好で、特に低電流域でのアークの安定
性、耐ショート性に優れた低水素系被覆アーク溶接棒を
提供することができ、非熟練溶接工でも安定した溶接が
可能である。
As described in detail above, according to the present invention,
It is possible to provide a low hydrogen coated arc welding rod having excellent welding workability, particularly excellent arc stability and short-circuit resistance in a low current range, and stable welding can be performed even by an unskilled welder. .

【図面の簡単な説明】[Brief description of the drawings]

【図1】溶接試験における開先形状を説明する図であ
る。
FIG. 1 is a diagram illustrating a groove shape in a welding test.

───────────────────────────────────────────────────── フロントページの続き (56)参考文献 特開 昭59−179292(JP,A) 特開 昭54−102254(JP,A) 特公 昭63−58077(JP,B2) 特公 昭60−5397(JP,B2) ──────────────────────────────────────────────────続 き Continuation of the front page (56) References JP-A-59-179292 (JP, A) JP-A-54-102254 (JP, A) JP-B-63-58077 (JP, B2) JP-B-60 5397 (JP, B2)

Claims (2)

(57)【特許請求の範囲】(57) [Claims] 【請求項1】 被覆剤重量%で、 炭酸石灰:25〜55%、 ホタル石:5〜24%、 ルチール:2〜9%、 Mn及び/又はMn合金(Mn換算量):1〜5%、 Si及び/又はSi合金(Si換算量):2〜8%、 を含有し、かつ、前記炭酸石灰の粒度が、炭酸石灰の重
量%で、 3μm未満の粒子(A):20%以下、 3μm以上16μm未満の粒子(B):15〜40%、 但し、A/B≧1/3、 125μm以上の粒子:10〜45%、であることを特
徴とする被覆剤を鋼心線の外周に塗布してなる低水素系
被覆アーク溶接棒。
1. Coating agent weight%, carbonate lime: 25-55%, fluorite: 5-24%, rutile: 2-9%, Mn and / or Mn alloy (Mn equivalent): 1-5% , Si and / or Si alloy (in terms of Si): 2 to 8%, and the particle size of the carbonated lime is less than 3 μm by weight% of carbonated lime (A): 20% or less, Particles (B) having a size of 3 μm or more and less than 16 μm: 15 to 40%, provided that A / B ≧ 1/3 and particles having a size of 125 μm or more: 10 to 45%. Low hydrogen coated arc welding rod applied to
【請求項2】 マイカを、被覆剤重量%で、3%以下に
抑制したことを特徴とする請求項1に記載の低水素系被
覆アーク溶接棒。
2. The low hydrogen coated arc welding rod according to claim 1, wherein mica is suppressed to 3% or less in terms of coating weight%.
JP6086056A 1994-03-31 1994-03-31 Low hydrogen coated arc welding rod Expired - Lifetime JP2942142B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP6086056A JP2942142B2 (en) 1994-03-31 1994-03-31 Low hydrogen coated arc welding rod

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP6086056A JP2942142B2 (en) 1994-03-31 1994-03-31 Low hydrogen coated arc welding rod

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPH07276081A JPH07276081A (en) 1995-10-24
JP2942142B2 true JP2942142B2 (en) 1999-08-30

Family

ID=13876040

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP6086056A Expired - Lifetime JP2942142B2 (en) 1994-03-31 1994-03-31 Low hydrogen coated arc welding rod

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP2942142B2 (en)

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN100460137C (en) * 2007-03-30 2009-02-11 徐州师范大学 Low-alloy steel welding wire containing cerium oxide
JP5890280B2 (en) * 2012-08-20 2016-03-22 株式会社神戸製鋼所 Low hydrogen coated arc welding rod
JP6046022B2 (en) * 2013-10-29 2016-12-14 日鐵住金溶接工業株式会社 Low hydrogen coated arc welding rod

Family Cites Families (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS539250A (en) * 1976-07-14 1978-01-27 Kobe Steel Ltd Covered electrodes
JPS591155B2 (en) * 1978-01-31 1984-01-10 株式会社神戸製鋼所 coated arc welding rod
JPS599277B2 (en) * 1978-03-18 1984-03-01 株式会社神戸製鋼所 Low hydrogen coated arc welding rod
JPS5922633B2 (en) * 1980-11-07 1984-05-28 株式会社神戸製鋼所 Low hydrogen coated arc welding rod
JPS59179292A (en) * 1983-03-31 1984-10-11 Nippon Steel Corp Coated arc welding electrode for steel for low temperature service
JPS605397A (en) * 1983-06-23 1985-01-11 富士通電装株式会社 Miscommunication prevention system
JPS6358077A (en) * 1986-08-29 1988-03-12 株式会社東芝 Refrigerator
JPH03264193A (en) * 1990-03-14 1991-11-25 Nippon Steel Corp Low hydrogen type coated arc welding electrode

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JPH07276081A (en) 1995-10-24

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JPH05200586A (en) Electrode and flux for arc-welding of stainless steel
JP5367312B2 (en) High cellulosic coated arc welding rod
KR100355581B1 (en) Flux cored wire for gas shield arc welding
JP2942142B2 (en) Low hydrogen coated arc welding rod
JP6688163B2 (en) Low-hydrogen coated arc welding rod
JP5448497B2 (en) Flux-cored wire for 2-electrode horizontal fillet gas shielded arc welding
JP5157653B2 (en) Low hydrogen type coated arc welding rod for DC power welding machine
JP2878593B2 (en) Low hydrogen coated arc welding rod
JPH11216593A (en) Low hydrogen system covered arc electrode
JP4311888B2 (en) Low hydrogen coated arc welding rod
JPH0521677B2 (en)
JPH03294092A (en) Flux cored wire electrode for gas shielded arc welding
JP2592951B2 (en) Flux cored wire for ultra-fine diameter self-shielded arc welding
JP7506043B2 (en) Shielded metal arc welding electrodes
JPH07110431B2 (en) Low hydrogen system coated arc welding rod for weathering steel
JP6832836B2 (en) Shielded metal arc welding rod
JP7346328B2 (en) Low hydrogen coated arc welding rod for horizontal fillet welding
JP7039353B2 (en) Low hydrogen coated arc welding rod
JPH06269985A (en) Composite wire for mig brazing
JP3051251B2 (en) Low hydrogen coated arc welding rod
JP6999461B2 (en) High titanium oxide-based shielded metal arc welding rod
JP2023056937A (en) Shielded arc welding rod
JPH07100692A (en) Stainless steel flux cored wire
JPH06269989A (en) Low hydrogen shield arc welding rod
JPH05237691A (en) Arc welding electrode for coating cast iron

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20080618

Year of fee payment: 9

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20090618

Year of fee payment: 10

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20100618

Year of fee payment: 11

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20100618

Year of fee payment: 11

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20110618

Year of fee payment: 12

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20120618

Year of fee payment: 13

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20130618

Year of fee payment: 14

EXPY Cancellation because of completion of term