JP2799114B2 - Aluminum alloy plate with excellent press workability - Google Patents

Aluminum alloy plate with excellent press workability

Info

Publication number
JP2799114B2
JP2799114B2 JP4288819A JP28881992A JP2799114B2 JP 2799114 B2 JP2799114 B2 JP 2799114B2 JP 4288819 A JP4288819 A JP 4288819A JP 28881992 A JP28881992 A JP 28881992A JP 2799114 B2 JP2799114 B2 JP 2799114B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
aluminum alloy
alloy plate
press workability
excellent press
surface roughness
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Fee Related
Application number
JP4288819A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JPH06134504A (en
Inventor
良 隆 明 比
口 耕 一 橋
本 義 裕 松
倉 健 一 小
永 晋 拓 安
伯 芳 久 佐
田 実 幕
登 林
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
THE FURUKAW ELECTRIC CO., LTD.
Honda Motor Co Ltd
JFE Steel Corp
Original Assignee
THE FURUKAW ELECTRIC CO., LTD.
Honda Motor Co Ltd
JFE Steel Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by THE FURUKAW ELECTRIC CO., LTD., Honda Motor Co Ltd, JFE Steel Corp filed Critical THE FURUKAW ELECTRIC CO., LTD.
Priority to JP4288819A priority Critical patent/JP2799114B2/en
Publication of JPH06134504A publication Critical patent/JPH06134504A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP2799114B2 publication Critical patent/JP2799114B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current

Links

Landscapes

  • Metal Rolling (AREA)
  • Shaping Metal By Deep-Drawing, Or The Like (AREA)

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

【0001】[0001]

【産業上の利用分野】本発明は自動車ボディーに用いら
れるアルミニウム合金板に関するものである。
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to an aluminum alloy plate used for an automobile body.

【0002】[0002]

【従来の技術】最近、地球環境問題から自動車車体を軽
量化するニーズが高まり、板厚を薄肉化した高張力鋼板
の採用とか、比重の軽いアルミニウム合金板の適用が検
討され、いくつかの部品に対してはすでに実用化されて
いる。しかしながら特にアルミニウム合金板はその機械
的性質が従来の薄鋼板に比べて格段に悪く、例えばプレ
ス加工性を支配する深絞り指標であるr値は0.6〜
0.8と薄鋼板の半分以下であり、また張り出し性指標
の一つである伸びElも従来材に比べて6〜8割程度と
小さい。従って、使用部品が軽度の加工で済むボンネッ
ト等に限定されているのが実状である。
2. Description of the Related Art Recently, there has been an increasing need to reduce the weight of an automobile body due to global environmental problems, and the use of a high-strength steel sheet having a reduced thickness or the use of an aluminum alloy sheet having a low specific gravity has been studied. Has already been put into practical use. However, aluminum alloy sheets are particularly poor in mechanical properties compared to conventional thin steel sheets. For example, the r value, which is a deep drawing index that governs press workability, is 0.6 to
0.8, which is less than half that of a thin steel sheet, and the elongation El, which is one of the indices of overhang property, is as small as about 60 to 80% as compared with the conventional material. Therefore, the actual condition is that the parts to be used are limited to bonnets or the like that require only a slight processing.

【0003】これに対して、例えば特開昭61−130
452号では高Mg添加により伸びElが改善されるア
ルミニウム合金板の製造方法が開示されている。該方法
においては金属間化合物を生成させ、伸びを劣化させる
Fe、Si等の不純物をできるだけ少なくすることも必
要条件であり、そのためには高価な高純度のアルミニウ
ム地金を使う必要がある。しかしながら、こうした方法
を駆使しても伸びは高々40%であり、従来の薄鋼板の
8割程度であるし、また深絞りの指標値であるr値はほ
とんど改善されない。
On the other hand, for example, Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No.
No. 452 discloses a method for producing an aluminum alloy sheet whose elongation El is improved by adding high Mg. In this method, it is also a necessary condition that impurities such as Fe and Si that generate intermetallic compounds and deteriorate elongation are reduced as much as possible. For that purpose, it is necessary to use expensive high-purity aluminum metal. However, even if such a method is used, the elongation is at most 40%, which is about 80% of the conventional thin steel sheet, and the r value which is an index value of deep drawing is hardly improved.

【0004】[0004]

【発明が解決しようとする課題】したがって、本発明
は、加工性の良好なアルミニウム合金板を提供すること
を目的とする。
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION Accordingly, an object of the present invention is to provide an aluminum alloy plate having good workability.

【0005】[0005]

【課題を解決するための手段】本発明者らはプレス加工
性を支配する因子について種々検討を加え、加工性の良
好なアルミニウム合金板を見い出した。すなわち、本発
明は、Mgを3〜8wt%含有するアルミ合金板もしく
はMg+Siを0.5〜3wt%含有するアルミニウム
合金板に対し、冷間圧延またはスキンパスによって表面
粗度を0.1〜0.6μmに調整し、その表面に固形潤
滑被膜を塗布したことを特徴とするプレス加工性に優れ
たアルミニウム合金板を提供するものである。
Means for Solving the Problems The present inventors have conducted various studies on factors governing press workability and found an aluminum alloy plate having good workability. That is, according to the present invention, the surface roughness of an aluminum alloy plate containing 3 to 8 wt% of Mg or an aluminum alloy plate containing 0.5 to 3 wt% of Mg + Si is reduced to 0.1 to 0. 0 by cold rolling or skin pass. An object of the present invention is to provide an aluminum alloy plate excellent in press workability, characterized in that the thickness is adjusted to 6 μm and a solid lubricating film is applied to the surface thereof.

【0006】以下に本発明をさらに詳細に説明する。ま
ず、本発明における化学成分の限定理由について説明す
る。本発明が対象にするアルミニウム合金の一つはMg
を3〜8wt%含有することを特徴とするが、その下限
値は自動車ボディーの必要強度から規定されるもので、
Mg量が3wt%未満ではMg原子の固溶体強化機構が
十分発揮できないため必要強度が得られない。また上限
値は鋳造時、熱間圧延時の加工性の劣化(割れ)等、製
造上の問題から限定される。
Hereinafter, the present invention will be described in more detail. First, the reasons for limiting the chemical components in the present invention will be described. One of the aluminum alloys targeted by the present invention is Mg
Is contained in an amount of 3 to 8 wt%, the lower limit of which is defined by the required strength of the automobile body,
If the amount of Mg is less than 3 wt%, the required strength cannot be obtained because the solid solution strengthening mechanism of Mg atoms cannot be sufficiently exhibited. In addition, the upper limit is limited due to manufacturing problems such as deterioration of workability (cracking) during casting and hot rolling.

【0007】一方、本発明が対象にするアルミニウム合
金のもう一つはMg+Siを0.5〜3wt%含有する
ことを特徴とする。先述した材料は、主に自動車ボディ
ーの内板部分に用いられる材料であるが、この材料は主
に外板部分に用いられるものである。両者の最も大きな
違いは後者がひずみを受けた後に所定の温度に加熱され
ると、添加元素Mg、Siの効果によって降伏応力が増
加する、いわゆるベイクハード性を示すことである。こ
の効果は自動車の生産ラインでプレス加工を受けた材料
が、塗装され、その後に焼き付けられる過程で付与され
る。プレス加工時には軟質な方が金型の形状になじみや
すく、かつ弾性的な復元が小さいために形状性の厳しい
外板に適用されるのである。しかしながら先述した必要
強度が得られないために、その後の塗装焼き付け過程で
硬くする必要がある。このベークハード性の確保と、プ
レス加工性の両方からMg+Si量が0.5〜3wt%
に規定される。
On the other hand, another aluminum alloy targeted by the present invention is characterized by containing 0.5 to 3 wt% of Mg + Si. The above-mentioned materials are mainly used for the inner plate portion of the automobile body, and this material is mainly used for the outer plate portion. The biggest difference between the two is that when the latter is heated to a predetermined temperature after being strained, it exhibits a so-called bake hardening property in which the yield stress increases due to the effects of the added elements Mg and Si. This effect is imparted in the process of coating and subsequently baking a material that has been pressed on an automobile production line. During the press working, the softer one is more easily adapted to the shape of the mold and the elastic recovery is small, so that it is applied to the outer plate having a severe shape. However, since the required strength described above cannot be obtained, it is necessary to harden in the subsequent baking process. The amount of Mg + Si is 0.5 to 3% by weight from the viewpoint of securing the bake hardness and press workability.
Stipulated.

【0008】次に材料表面の粗度、潤滑剤について以下
に説明する。まず、プレス加工性を支配する因子につい
て説明すると、これまで述べた材料の機械的性質と、プ
レス加工時の金型と材料表面との摩擦の2つが主な因子
である。図1に例示するように実際のプレス加工はダイ
1としわ押さえ2間に薄板材料3を所定のしわ押さえ荷
重で挟んだ後にパンチ4が上昇し、図2に例示するよう
な部品5を成形する。図1に示すように材料3はポンチ
のストロークと共にダイ1としわ押さえ2間、およびダ
イ肩部を通過して引き込まれる。この時の引込抵抗が材
料の破断抵抗より強ければ、材料は破断し、所望の製品
が得られない。従って引込抵抗が小さく、材料の破断抵
抗となる破断限界荷重が大きい材料がプレス加工性に優
れることになる。機械的性質は材料の変形様式にも関連
する。例えばr値はその値が大きいほど破断限界荷重を
増加させ、ダイ下の縮みフランジ変形抵抗を減少させ
る。また、変形様式によらず金型と材料間の摩擦係数が
小さい方が引込抵抗が減少し、プレス加工性に優れるこ
とになる。機械的性質は従来技術で述べたように格別の
向上がさほど期待できず、ここではいかに金型との摩擦
係数を小さくできるかということに着目した。
Next, the roughness of the material surface and the lubricant will be described below. First, the factors governing the press workability will be described. The two main factors are the mechanical properties of the material described above and the friction between the die and the material surface during the press working. As illustrated in FIG. 1, in actual press working, the punch 4 rises after sandwiching the thin sheet material 3 between the die 1 and the wrinkle retainer 2 with a predetermined wrinkle retainer load, and forms a part 5 as illustrated in FIG. 2. I do. As shown in FIG. 1, the material 3 is drawn along with the punch stroke between the die 1 and the wrinkle holder 2, and past the die shoulder. If the pull-in resistance at this time is higher than the breaking resistance of the material, the material breaks and a desired product cannot be obtained. Therefore, a material having a small pull-in resistance and a large breaking limit load, which is a breaking resistance of the material, has excellent press workability. Mechanical properties are also related to the mode of deformation of the material. For example, the larger the r value is, the greater the breaking limit load increases, and the lower the shrinkage flange deformation resistance under the die. Also, regardless of the deformation mode, the smaller the coefficient of friction between the mold and the material, the lower the draw-in resistance and the better the press workability. As described in the prior art, the mechanical properties cannot be expected to be significantly improved, and the focus here is on how the coefficient of friction with the mold can be reduced.

【0009】摩擦に関連する要素としては材料の表面粗
度、潤滑剤がある。この組み合わせで摩擦係数を調査し
た結果を以下に説明する。実験に用いた材料は板厚1.
2mmのJIS5182のアルミニウム合金板であり、
Mg量は4.5wt%である。その表面粗度(平均粗さ
Ra)をスキンパス圧延により0.2〜1.2μmに調
整した。潤滑剤は自動車パネルの通常のプレスラインで
用いられている低粘度(4センチストークス)の洗浄油
(出光興産(株)製オイルコートRL55)と、主成分
を固形ワックスとする固形潤滑剤(花王(株)製花王ル
ーブW2)の2種類を用いた。洗浄油はプレスラインと
同程度の油量を材料表裏面に塗布した。固形潤滑剤は、
塗布ムラとかプレス時に潤滑被膜の剥離が生じない範囲
を選び片面当たり0.4±0.1g/m2 を塗布した。
Factors related to friction include the surface roughness of the material and the lubricant. The result of examining the friction coefficient with this combination will be described below. The material used for the experiment was 1.
A 2 mm JIS5182 aluminum alloy plate,
Mg content is 4.5 wt%. The surface roughness (average roughness Ra) was adjusted to 0.2 to 1.2 μm by skin pass rolling. The lubricant is a low-viscosity (4 centistokes) washing oil (oil coat RL55, manufactured by Idemitsu Kosan Co., Ltd.) used in a normal press line of an automobile panel, and a solid lubricant (Kao) whose main component is solid wax. Kao Lube W2 manufactured by Co., Ltd.) was used. The same amount of cleaning oil as the press line was applied to the front and back surfaces of the material. Solid lubricants are
A range in which no uneven coating or peeling of the lubricating film occurs during pressing was selected, and 0.4 ± 0.1 g / m 2 was applied per side.

【0010】摩擦試験は図3に示すように、アルミニウ
ム合金板12の表裏面に工具10を所定の面圧、Pで押
しつけ、板の端部をチャック11で掴んで25mm/s
ecの速度で引き抜き、この時の引き抜き荷重、Dをチ
ャック後方に連結されたロードセル13で測定した。摩
擦係数μはμ=D/(2P)で求めた。図4に表面粗度
を変化させた材料に対し固形潤滑剤を片面当たり0.4
g/m2 を塗布した場合、および洗浄油を塗布した場合
の摩擦係数μの測定結果を示す。面圧Pは5kgf/mm2
した。材料の表面粗度が小さい場合、洗浄油を使用する
とμは非常に大きな値を示すが固形潤滑剤を使用した場
合、逆に非常に小さいμを示すことがわかる。
In the friction test, as shown in FIG. 3, a tool 10 is pressed against the front and back surfaces of an aluminum alloy plate 12 with a predetermined surface pressure and P, and the end of the plate is gripped by a chuck 11 to be 25 mm / s.
Withdrawing at a speed of ec, the pulling load at this time, D, was measured with a load cell 13 connected to the back of the chuck. The friction coefficient μ was determined by μ = D / (2P). FIG. 4 shows that the solid lubricant was added to the material having the changed surface roughness by 0.4% per side.
The measurement results of the friction coefficient μ when g / m 2 was applied and when the cleaning oil was applied are shown. The surface pressure P was 5 kgf / mm 2 . When the surface roughness of the material is small, μ shows a very large value when the cleaning oil is used, but it turns out that when a solid lubricant is used, it shows a very small μ.

【0011】また、表面粗度が増加すると固形潤滑剤を
用いた場合のμが増加し、逆に洗浄油を用いた場合のμ
が減少することがわかる。SRaが0.6μmを越える
と洗浄油と固形潤滑剤のμはほとんど同じ値を示し、固
形潤滑剤の有効性が薄れる。従って、表面粗度が0.6
μm以下の材料に対して、固形潤滑剤を塗布することが
プレス加工性に対して有効である。また、表面粗度が小
さい方が、塗装後の面が美麗になる。図4のように材料
の表面粗度を小さくすることは固形潤滑剤の効果を十分
発揮させ、プレス加工性に対しては有利になるが、材料
のハンドリング等によって表面に擦り傷等が生じ、かつ
目立ちやすいため、これが製品表面欠陥として残る恐れ
がある。また、あまりμを減少させると図1で説明した
引込抵抗が小さくなりすぎて、逆にシワなどの不良が生
じることがある。以上の理由により0.1μm未満の表
面粗度は好ましくない。
When the surface roughness increases, μ in the case of using a solid lubricant increases, and conversely, μ in the case of using a cleaning oil.
It can be seen that is reduced. When SRa exceeds 0.6 μm, μ of the cleaning oil and the solid lubricant show almost the same value, and the effectiveness of the solid lubricant is reduced. Therefore, when the surface roughness is 0.6
Applying a solid lubricant to a material having a size of not more than μm is effective for press workability. Also, the smaller the surface roughness, the more beautiful the surface after painting. Reducing the surface roughness of the material as shown in FIG. 4 sufficiently exerts the effect of the solid lubricant and is advantageous for press workability. However, scratches and the like occur on the surface due to handling of the material, and Since it is conspicuous, it may remain as a product surface defect. Further, if μ is reduced too much, the pull-in resistance described with reference to FIG. 1 may become too small, and conversely, defects such as wrinkles may occur. For the above reasons, a surface roughness of less than 0.1 μm is not preferred.

【0012】[0012]

【実施例】以下、実施例によって本発明の効果を説明す
る。 (実施例1)上記実験で用いた材料のうち、表面粗度が
0.3μmと0.9μmの材料を用い、自動車の内板パ
ーツを成形した。潤滑剤の塗布量は実験と同じにし、し
わ押さえ荷重を変化させ、破断が生じる限界のしわ押さ
え荷重で評価した。第1表に結果を示す。○は破断なく
成形できたことを、×は破断が生じたことを示す。また
△は一部ネッキングが生じたことを表わす。本発明材の
場合、17.5トンのしわ押さえ荷重まで成形可能であ
るのに対し、粗度の大きい材料は7.5トンが限界のし
わ押さえ荷重である。また、洗浄油を塗布した場合は粗
度の大小によらず5トンでも割れが生じた。
EXAMPLES The effects of the present invention will be described below with reference to examples. (Example 1) Of the materials used in the above experiments, materials having surface roughnesses of 0.3 μm and 0.9 μm were used to mold inner plate parts of automobiles. The amount of the lubricant applied was the same as in the experiment, the wrinkle holding load was changed, and the evaluation was made based on the limit wrinkle holding load at which breakage occurred. Table 1 shows the results. ○ indicates that molding was possible without breakage, and X indicates that breakage occurred. In addition, △ indicates that some necking has occurred. In the case of the material of the present invention, it is possible to mold up to a wrinkle holding load of 17.5 tons, whereas the wrinkle holding load of a material having a large roughness is 7.5 tons. Further, when the cleaning oil was applied, cracking occurred even at 5 tons regardless of the roughness.

【0013】 [0013]

【0014】[0014]

【発明の効果】MgまたはMg+Siの含有量を適切に
選定したアルミニウム合金板の表面粗度を調整し、これ
に固形潤滑被膜を被覆することにより、プレス加工性の
良好なアルミニウム合金板が得られ、これは特に自動車
ボディなどに適用するのに好ましい。
According to the present invention, by adjusting the surface roughness of an aluminum alloy plate having an appropriately selected content of Mg or Mg + Si and coating it with a solid lubricating film, an aluminum alloy plate having good press workability can be obtained. This is particularly preferred for application to automobile bodies and the like.

【図面の簡単な説明】[Brief description of the drawings]

【図1】 プレス工程を模式的に示した断面図である。FIG. 1 is a cross-sectional view schematically showing a pressing step.

【図2】 プレス後に得られる製品の一例の斜視図であ
る。
FIG. 2 is a perspective view of an example of a product obtained after pressing.

【図3】 摩擦試験装置の全体を示す図である。FIG. 3 is a view showing the entire friction test apparatus.

【図4】 摩擦試験結果を示すグラフである。FIG. 4 is a graph showing the results of a friction test.

【符号の説明】[Explanation of symbols]

1 ダイ 2 しわ押さえ 3 薄板材料 4 ポンチ 5 部品 10 摩擦試験の押しつけ工具 11 チャック 12 アルミニウム合金板 13 ロードセル DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 1 Die 2 Wrinkle holder 3 Thin plate material 4 Punch 5 Parts 10 Press tool for friction test 11 Chuck 12 Aluminum alloy plate 13 Load cell

───────────────────────────────────────────────────── フロントページの続き (72)発明者 橋 口 耕 一 千葉県千葉市中央区川崎町1番地 川崎 製鉄株式会社技術研究本部内 (72)発明者 松 本 義 裕 千葉県千葉市中央区川崎町1番地 川崎 製鉄株式会社技術研究本部内 (72)発明者 小 倉 健 一 東京都千代田区丸の内2丁目6番1号 古河アルミニウム工業株式会社内 (72)発明者 安 永 晋 拓 埼玉県和光市中央1丁目4番1号 株式 会社本田技術研究所内 (72)発明者 佐 伯 芳 久 埼玉県和光市中央1丁目4番1号 株式 会社本田技術研究所内 (72)発明者 幕 田 実 埼玉県和光市中央1丁目4番1号 株式 会社本田技術研究所内 (72)発明者 林 登 埼玉県和光市中央1丁目4番1号 株式 会社本田技術研究所内 (56)参考文献 特開 昭62−81221(JP,A) 特開 平2−211902(JP,A) (58)調査した分野(Int.Cl.6,DB名) B21B 1/22 - 1/28 B21B 3/00 B21D 22/20────────────────────────────────────────────────── ─── Continuing on the front page (72) Inventor Koichi Hashiguchi 1 Kawasaki-cho, Chuo-ku, Chiba City, Chiba Prefecture Inside the Technical Research Headquarters, Kawasaki Steel Works (72) Inventor Yoshihiro Matsumoto Kawasaki, Chuo-ku, Chiba City, Chiba Prefecture No. 1, Kawasaki Steel Engineering Co., Ltd. (72) Inventor Kenichi Ogura 2-6-1 Marunouchi, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo Inside Furukawa Aluminum Industry Co., Ltd. (72) Inventor Susumu Yasunaga Taku, Saitama 1-4-1, Chuo, Honda R & D Co., Ltd. (72) Inventor Yoshihisa Saeki 1-4-1, Chuo, Wako, Saitama Pref. Honda R & D Co., Ltd. (72) Minoru Makita Wako, Saitama 1-4-1 Chuo-shi, Ichigo Honda R & D Co., Ltd. (72) Inventor Noboru Hayashi 1-4-1 Chuo Wako-shi, Saitama Pref. House (56) Reference Patent Sho 62-81221 (JP, A) JP flat 2-211902 (JP, A) (58 ) investigated the field (Int.Cl. 6, DB name) B21B 1/22 - 1 / 28 B21B 3/00 B21D 22/20

Claims (2)

(57)【特許請求の範囲】(57) [Claims] 【請求項1】Mgを3〜8wt%含有するアルミニウム
合金板に対し、冷間圧延またはスキンパスによって表面
粗度を0.1〜0.6μmに調整し、その表面に固形潤
滑被膜を塗布したことを特徴とするプレス加工性に優れ
たアルミニウム合金板。
1. An aluminum alloy sheet containing 3 to 8 wt% of Mg, the surface roughness of which is adjusted to 0.1 to 0.6 μm by cold rolling or skin pass, and a solid lubricating film is applied to the surface. Aluminum alloy plate with excellent press workability characterized by the following.
【請求項2】Mg+Siを0.5〜3wt%含有するア
ルミニウム合金板に対し、冷間圧延またはスキンパスに
よって表面粗度を0.1〜0.6μmに調整し、その表
面に固形潤滑被膜を塗布したことを特徴とするプレス加
工性に優れたアルミニウム合金板。
2. An aluminum alloy sheet containing 0.5% to 3% by weight of Mg + Si is adjusted to have a surface roughness of 0.1 to 0.6 μm by cold rolling or skin pass, and a solid lubricating film is applied to the surface. An aluminum alloy sheet with excellent press workability, characterized in that:
JP4288819A 1992-10-27 1992-10-27 Aluminum alloy plate with excellent press workability Expired - Fee Related JP2799114B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP4288819A JP2799114B2 (en) 1992-10-27 1992-10-27 Aluminum alloy plate with excellent press workability

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP4288819A JP2799114B2 (en) 1992-10-27 1992-10-27 Aluminum alloy plate with excellent press workability

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPH06134504A JPH06134504A (en) 1994-05-17
JP2799114B2 true JP2799114B2 (en) 1998-09-17

Family

ID=17735151

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP4288819A Expired - Fee Related JP2799114B2 (en) 1992-10-27 1992-10-27 Aluminum alloy plate with excellent press workability

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP2799114B2 (en)

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0690142A1 (en) * 1994-06-09 1996-01-03 The Furukawa Electric Co., Ltd. Aluminium alloy sheet for auto body sheet, method for manufacturing same and method for forming same
FR2851579B1 (en) * 2003-02-26 2005-04-01 Pechiney Rhenalu METHOD OF PADDING WITH ALLOY PARTS A1-Mg
JP4847878B2 (en) * 2007-01-12 2011-12-28 日本工作油株式会社 Lubricant lubricating performance test method and friction test apparatus

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JPH06134504A (en) 1994-05-17

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP4019082B2 (en) Aluminum alloy plate for bottle cans with excellent high temperature characteristics
US7730753B2 (en) Lubricant for elevated temperature forming
JP4019083B2 (en) Aluminum alloy cold rolled sheet for bottle cans with excellent high temperature characteristics
RU2203767C2 (en) Method of aluminum alloy strips manufacture by thin-walled continuous casting between rollers
Mori et al. Cold deep drawing of commercial magnesium alloy sheets
JP2799114B2 (en) Aluminum alloy plate with excellent press workability
WO2007015560A1 (en) Aluminum alloy sheet for can body, di can, and method for manufacture of the di can
JP3676933B2 (en) Al-Mg-Si Al alloy plate for press forming
JP3155678B2 (en) Manufacturing method of aluminum alloy sheet for automobile body sheet
JP4019084B2 (en) Aluminum alloy cold rolled sheet for bottle cans with excellent high temperature characteristics
RU2718370C1 (en) Aluminum alloy and aerosol can from said alloy
JPH06235039A (en) Aluminum alloy sheet covered with hard material
JPH07313931A (en) Aluminum alloy panel for car body excellent in press processability and after-painting sharpness
GB2090289A (en) Wrought Aluminum Base Alloy Having Refined Intermetallic Phases
JP3144496B2 (en) Aluminum plate material for forming and lubricant for forming aluminum
JP2020062822A (en) Aluminum sheet coated with lubricating coating
JP4102145B2 (en) Resin-coated steel sheet and seamless can body for dry-drawing and ironing cans
JPH07188956A (en) Surface treatment of mg-containing aluminum alloy sheet for automobile body
JPH08168826A (en) Aluminum alloy sheet for forming and its forming method
JP3425223B2 (en) High-rigidity, high-corrosion-resistant surface-treated thin steel sheet for drawn or drawn and ironed cans
JPH05140767A (en) Aluminum alloy sheet excellent in press formability and corrosion resistance
JP3483406B2 (en) Counter-hydraulic forming method of Al-Mg based aluminum alloy sheet
JP3456459B2 (en) Surface-treated steel sheet with excellent drawability and ironability after drawing
JPH05202442A (en) Aluminum alloy sheet having superior formability
JPH06145869A (en) Aluminum alloy sheet for high speed forming and its production

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 19980602

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

S531 Written request for registration of change of domicile

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313531

R350 Written notification of registration of transfer

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R350

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20080703

Year of fee payment: 10

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20090703

Year of fee payment: 11

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20090703

Year of fee payment: 11

S111 Request for change of ownership or part of ownership

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313117

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20090703

Year of fee payment: 11

R350 Written notification of registration of transfer

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R350

LAPS Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees