JP2593902B2 - Plastic sheet filled with mica powder and method for producing the same - Google Patents

Plastic sheet filled with mica powder and method for producing the same

Info

Publication number
JP2593902B2
JP2593902B2 JP278188A JP278188A JP2593902B2 JP 2593902 B2 JP2593902 B2 JP 2593902B2 JP 278188 A JP278188 A JP 278188A JP 278188 A JP278188 A JP 278188A JP 2593902 B2 JP2593902 B2 JP 2593902B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
weight
polypropylene
mica
polyethylene
sheet
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
JP278188A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JPH01178542A (en
Inventor
清伸 藤井
尚之武 堀
健次 奥野
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Kuraray Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Kuraray Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Kuraray Co Ltd filed Critical Kuraray Co Ltd
Priority to JP278188A priority Critical patent/JP2593902B2/en
Publication of JPH01178542A publication Critical patent/JPH01178542A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP2593902B2 publication Critical patent/JP2593902B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】 〔産業上の利用分野〕 本発明は一般的に用いられている押出機を用いて製造
される安価で、組成斑が少く、かつ高剛性の雲母粉末充
填プラスチツクシートに関する。本発明のシートはその
優れた剛性等を活かして、土木建築資材、電気機器、自
動車部品、雑貨等の分野で幅拡く用いられる。
Description: FIELD OF THE INVENTION The present invention relates to an inexpensive, low-moisture composition and high-rigidity mica powder-filled plastic sheet manufactured using a commonly used extruder. . The sheet of the present invention is widely used in the fields of civil engineering and construction materials, electric equipment, automobile parts, miscellaneous goods and the like by utilizing its excellent rigidity and the like.

〔従来の技術〕[Conventional technology]

雲母粉末を配合したプラスチツクのシート材料が優れ
た性能を有することは、例えばA.D.Osborne and F.W.Ma
ine,SPI 29th.Ann.Tech.Conf.,24−E(1974)や特開昭
54−162743、特開昭57−154994において公知である。し
かしながら従来一般に用いられているプロセス、すなわ
ち雲母粉末とプラスチツクを溶融混練して一旦ペレツト
化した後、該ペレツトを再度押出機に供給してシート状
に押出し、該シートを冷却するプロセスで製造される雲
母粉末充填プラスチツクシートは、その製造コストの高
い点が問題であつた。更に該プロセスで製造される雲母
粉末充填プラスチツクシートは、二度にわたる押出機で
の溶融混練工程によりフレーク形状の雲母粉末が破壊
し、得られるシートの力学的性質の低下することが問題
であつた。
The excellent performance of plastic sheet materials containing mica powder is demonstrated, for example, by ADOsborne and FWMa.
ine, SPI 29th. Ann. Tech. Conf., 24-E (1974) and
54-162743 and JP-A-57-154994. However, it is manufactured by a process generally used conventionally, i.e., a process in which mica powder and plastic are melt-kneaded and once pelletized, the pellet is again supplied to an extruder, extruded into a sheet shape, and the sheet is cooled. The plastic sheet filled with mica powder has a problem in that its production cost is high. Further, the plastic sheet filled with mica powder produced by the process has a problem that the mica powder in the form of flakes is broken by a melt-kneading step in an extruder twice, and the mechanical properties of the obtained sheet are deteriorated. .

これらの問題点の解決のため、雲母粉末とプラスチツ
クペレツトを押出機に供給し、押出機で溶融混練しなが
らシート状に押出し、該シートを冷却するプロセスを用
いることが考えられる。しかし、該プロセスを用いて作
製した雲母充填プラスチツクシートは、シートの長さ方
向および幅方向における雲母粉末の混合率のバラツキが
大きい上、雲母粉末のプラスチツクへの分散性が悪く、
実用には耐えなかつた。
In order to solve these problems, it is conceivable to use a process in which the mica powder and the plastic pellet are supplied to an extruder, extruded into a sheet while being melt-kneaded by the extruder, and the sheet is cooled. However, the mica-filled plastic sheet produced by using this process has a large variation in the mixing ratio of the mica powder in the length and width directions of the sheet, and the dispersibility of the mica powder in the plastic is poor.
It was unbearable for practical use.

〔本発明が解決しようとする問題点〕[Problems to be solved by the present invention]

本発明の目的は、雲母粉末充填プラスチツクシートの
優れた性質を損うことなく、安価な雲母粉末充填プラス
チツクシートを製造することにある。更に詳しくは、雲
母粉末とプラスチツクペレツトを押出機に供給し、押出
機で溶融混練をしながらシート状に押出すプロセス(以
下1段シート化プロセスと称する)において、シート内
における雲母粉末混合率のバラツキおよび雲母粉末の分
散不良等の問題を解決することが、本発明の目的であ
る。
An object of the present invention is to produce an inexpensive mica powder-filled plastic sheet without impairing the excellent properties of the mica powder-filled plastic sheet. More specifically, in a process in which mica powder and plastic pellets are supplied to an extruder and extruded into a sheet while being melt-kneaded by the extruder (hereinafter referred to as a one-stage sheet forming process), the mixing ratio of mica powder in a sheet is determined. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION It is an object of the present invention to solve the problems such as the dispersion of mica powder and poor dispersion of mica powder.

〔問題点を解決するための手段〕[Means for solving the problem]

本発明者らは、上記問題点を解決するために種々研究
を重ねた結果、雲母粉末、顆粒状ポリプロピレンま
たはそれとポリプロピレンペレツトとの混合ポリプロピ
レン、およびポリエチレンペレツトから成る組成物を
用いることにより、1段シート化プロセスで、安価でか
つ優れた性能を有するシートが得られることを見出し、
本発明を完成させるに至つた。
The present inventors have conducted various studies in order to solve the above problems, and as a result, by using a composition comprising mica powder, granular polypropylene or a mixed polypropylene thereof and a polypropylene pellet, and polyethylene pellet, It was found that inexpensive sheets with excellent performance can be obtained by the single-stage sheeting process,
The present invention has been completed.

本発明は、顆粒状ポリプロピレン、ポリエチレンおよ
び雲母粉末を必須成分とし、該顆粒状ポリプロピレンの
配合率が20重量%以上87重量%以下であり、ポリエチレ
ンの配合率が3重量%以上20重量%以下であり、更に、
雲母粉末が重量平均フレーク径15μm以上500μm以
下、嵩比重が0.15以上、配合率が10重量%以上60重量%
以下である配合物(以下配合物Aと略す)よりなるプラ
スチックシートであり、またメルトフローレートが0.2
〜5g/10minの顆粒状ポリプロピレンとペレット状ポリプ
ロピレンからなり、成分の20重量%以上が顆粒状ポリプ
ロピレンであるポリプロピレン、ポリエチレンおよび雲
母粉末を必須成分とし、該ポリプロピレンの配合率が20
重量%以上87重量%以下であり、ポリエチレンの配合率
が3重量%以上20重量%以下であり、顆粒状ポリプロピ
レンおよびポリエチレンのメルトフローレートが230
℃、2160gの荷重の条件下で測定したときに、同条件下
で測定したペレット状ポリプロピレンのメルトフローレ
ート以上であり、更に、雲母粉末が重量平均フレーク径
15μm以上500μm以下、嵩比重が0.15以上、配合率が1
0重量%以上60重量%以下である配合物(以下配合物B
と略す)よりなるプラスチックシートであり、更に上記
配合物AまたはBを溶融混練しながらシート状に押し出
し、冷却する、所謂一段シート化プロセスによるプラス
チックシートの製造方法である。
The present invention comprises granular polypropylene, polyethylene and mica powder as essential components, the blending ratio of the granular polypropylene is 20% by weight or more and 87% by weight or less, and the blending rate of polyethylene is 3% by weight or more and 20% by weight or less. Yes, and
The mica powder has a weight average flake diameter of 15 μm or more and 500 μm or less, a bulk specific gravity of 0.15 or more, and a compounding ratio of 10% to 60% by weight.
A plastic sheet comprising the following compound (hereinafter abbreviated as compound A), and having a melt flow rate of 0.2
55 g / 10 min of granular polypropylene and pelletized polypropylene, wherein at least 20% by weight of the components are granular polypropylene, polypropylene, polyethylene and mica powder as essential components.
% By weight to 87% by weight, the mixing ratio of polyethylene is 3% by weight to 20% by weight, and the melt flow rate of granular polypropylene and polyethylene is 230% by weight.
° C, when measured under the condition of a load of 2160 g, the melt flow rate of the pelletized polypropylene measured under the same conditions is greater than or equal to, and further, the mica powder has a weight average flake diameter
15 μm or more and 500 μm or less, bulk specific gravity of 0.15 or more, compounding ratio is 1
0% by weight or more and 60% by weight or less (hereinafter referred to as B
This is a method for producing a plastic sheet by a so-called one-stage sheet forming process, in which the compound A or B is extruded into a sheet while being melt-kneaded and then cooled.

本発明において用いられるペレット状または顆粒状の
ポリプロピレンとしては230℃、2160gの荷重の条件下に
測定したメルトフローレートが0.2g/10min〜5g/10minの
ものであり、これらの改質、変性、ブレンド物が目的に
応じて使用され得る。また、本発明において用いられる
ポリプロピレン成分中に、顆粒状ポリプロピレンが20重
量%以上含まれることが必要である。ここで顆粒状とは
平均粒径100〜1200μm粒子が98重量%以上有り、嵩比
重0.5以上のものを言う。ポリプロピレン成分として顆
粒状ポリプロピレンをペレツト状ポリプロピレンと併用
する場合、顆粒状ポリプロピレンについて、温度230
℃、荷重2160gの条件下に測定したメルトフローレート
が同条件下に測定したペレツト状ポリプロピレンのメル
トフローレート以上であることが必要である。顆粒状ポ
リプロピレンのメルトフローレートがペレツト状ポリプ
ロピレンのメルトフローレート未満であるか又は顆粒状
ポリプロピレンの配合量が20重量%未満であると、押出
機で溶融混練され、成形されたシート中の雲母の分散性
及び表面状態が悪く、雲母の組成斑が大きくなる。望ま
しくは30〜90重量%の範囲が好ましい。本発明は樹脂成
分としてポリプロピレンとポリエチレンが必須成分であ
り、ポリプロピレンの一部としてペレツト状ポリプロピ
レンを使用する場合、本発明に用いられるポリエチレン
としては温度230℃、荷重2160gの条件下に測定したメル
トフローレートが同条件下に測定したペレツト状ポリプ
ロピレンのメルトフローレート以上であることが必要で
ある。またポリエチレンの配合量は3重量%以上、20重
量%以下であることが必要である。ポリエチレンのメル
トフローレートがペレツト状ポリプロピレンのメルトフ
ローレート未満であると押出機で溶融混練され、成形さ
れたシート中の雲母の分散性及び表面状態が悪く、雲母
の組成斑が大きくなる。又ポリエチレンの配合量が3重
量%未満であると成形されたシート中の雲母の分散性が
悪く、雲母の組成斑が大きくなる。20重量%を越えると
成形されたシートの剛性が充分でなく、本発明の目的を
達成し得ない。望ましくは5〜20重量%の範囲が好まし
い。
The pelletized or granular polypropylene used in the present invention has a melt flow rate of 0.2 g / 10 min to 5 g / 10 min measured under the conditions of 230 ° C. and a load of 2160 g. Blends can be used for any purpose. It is necessary that the polypropylene component used in the present invention contains at least 20% by weight of granular polypropylene. Here, the term “granular” means particles having an average particle size of 100 to 1200 μm in a content of 98% by weight or more and a bulk specific gravity of 0.5 or more. When granular polypropylene is used in combination with pellet polypropylene as the polypropylene component, the temperature of 230
It is necessary that the melt flow rate measured under the conditions of 2 ° C. and a load of 2160 g is equal to or higher than the melt flow rate of the pellet-like polypropylene measured under the same conditions. If the melt flow rate of the granular polypropylene is less than the melt flow rate of the pellet polypropylene or the blending amount of the granular polypropylene is less than 20% by weight, the mica is melt-kneaded in an extruder and the The dispersibility and surface condition are poor, and the composition unevenness of mica increases. Desirably, the range is 30 to 90% by weight. In the present invention, polypropylene and polyethylene are essential components as resin components, and when a pellet-like polypropylene is used as a part of the polypropylene, the polyethylene used in the present invention is a melt flow measured at a temperature of 230 ° C. and a load of 2160 g. It is necessary that the rate be equal to or higher than the melt flow rate of the pellet-like polypropylene measured under the same conditions. It is necessary that the blending amount of polyethylene is 3% by weight or more and 20% by weight or less. If the melt flow rate of the polyethylene is lower than the melt flow rate of the pellet-like polypropylene, it is melt-kneaded by an extruder, the dispersibility and surface state of the mica in the formed sheet are poor, and the composition unevenness of the mica increases. If the amount of polyethylene is less than 3% by weight, the dispersibility of the mica in the formed sheet is poor, and the composition unevenness of the mica increases. If it exceeds 20% by weight, the rigidity of the formed sheet is not sufficient, and the object of the present invention cannot be achieved. Desirably, the range is 5 to 20% by weight.

本発明に用いられる雲母粉末としては金雲母(フロゴ
パイト)、白雲母(マスコバイト)、合成雲母等から適
宜選択することが出来るが、これらは重量平均フレーク
径15μm以上、500μm以下であり嵩比重0.15以上であ
ることが必要である。重量平均フレーク径が15μm未満
では成形されたシートの剛性が充分でなく、雲母の分散
性が悪くなる。一方重量平均フレーク径が500μmを越
えると得られたシートの表面粗れが起り、製造上の困難
をまねく。又嵩比重0.15未満の雲母の場合押出機への噛
み込みが悪く、雲母の配合量の変動が大きいばかりか生
産量を低下してシート状に成形することが困難である。
望ましくは0.2以上の嵩比重を有する雲母粉末が望まし
い。これらの雲母粉末は全成分中に10重量%以上、60重
量%以下配合されることが必要である。雲母粉末10重量
%未満では得られたシートの剛性の改良効果が充分でな
く、60重量%を越えると押出機での溶融混練が困難でシ
ート状に成形し得ない。望ましくは15重量%〜50重量%
の範囲が好ましい。
The mica powder used in the present invention can be appropriately selected from phlogopite (phlogopite), muscovite (muscovite), synthetic mica, etc., and these have a weight average flake diameter of 15 μm or more and 500 μm or less and a bulk specific gravity of 0.15. It is necessary to be above. If the weight average flake diameter is less than 15 μm, the rigidity of the formed sheet is not sufficient, and the dispersibility of mica deteriorates. On the other hand, if the weight average flake diameter exceeds 500 μm, the surface of the obtained sheet will be roughened, leading to difficulty in production. Further, in the case of mica having a bulk specific gravity of less than 0.15, biting into the extruder is poor, and not only the amount of the mica compounded fluctuates greatly, but also it is difficult to form a sheet by reducing the production amount.
Desirably, mica powder having a bulk specific gravity of 0.2 or more is desirable. These mica powders need to be blended in an amount of 10% by weight or more and 60% by weight or less in all the components. If the mica powder is less than 10% by weight, the effect of improving the rigidity of the obtained sheet is not sufficient, and if it exceeds 60% by weight, melt kneading with an extruder is difficult, and the sheet cannot be formed. Desirably 15% to 50% by weight
Is preferable.

本発明において得られるプラスチックシートは、上記
顆粒状ポリプロピレン若しくは成分の20重量%以上が顆
粒状ポリプロピレンであるポリプロピレン、ポリエチレ
ンおよび雲母粉末を必須成分とし、該顆粒状ポリプロピ
レン若しくは成分の20重量%以上が顆粒状ポリプロピレ
ンであるポリプロピレンの配合率が20重量%以上87重量
%以下、ポリエチレンの配合率が3重量%以上20重量%
以下および雲母粉末の配合率が10重量%以上60重量%以
下である配合物よりなるが、該プラスチックシートの各
物性を損わない程度に酸化防止剤、カツプリング剤、離
型剤、着色剤、難燃剤等を添加することは何らさしつか
えない。
The plastic sheet obtained in the present invention comprises, as essential components, polypropylene, polyethylene and mica powder in which at least 20% by weight of the above-mentioned granular polypropylene or the component is a granular polypropylene, and at least 20% by weight of the granular polypropylene or the component is a granular polypropylene. Polypropylene is 20% to 87% by weight, and polyethylene is 3% to 20% by weight.
Or less, and a compounding ratio of mica powder of 10% by weight or more and 60% by weight or less, but an antioxidant, a coupling agent, a release agent, a colorant, Addition of a flame retardant or the like can be no problem.

本発明に用いるプラスチツクシートとは厚さ0.1〜5mm
の範囲のシート状物を言い、該シートを製造する装置と
しては溶融混練には汎用の単軸押出機、二軸押出機等が
あげられ、混練用スクリューとしてはフルフライトスク
リュー、ダルメージスクリュー、ダブルフライトスクリ
ュー等があげられる。又押出機への材料の供給方法とし
てはコイルフイーダー、二軸フイーダー、電磁フイーダ
ー等による各々、もしくは組成物をタンブラー等で全量
混合しての定量供給方式、組成物を全量タンブラーで混
合して押出機ホツパーへ投入するナチユラルフイード方
式等があげられる。シート状に成形するには汎用のT−
ダイ及びシート引取機等を用いて行われる。
The plastic sheet used in the present invention is 0.1 to 5 mm thick
The sheet-like material in the range of, the apparatus for producing the sheet is a melt-kneading general-purpose single-screw extruder, a twin-screw extruder and the like, as a kneading screw full-flight screw, dalmage screw, Double flight screw and the like. Also, as a method of supplying the material to the extruder, a coil feeder, a twin-screw feeder, an electromagnetic feeder, etc., respectively, or a quantitative supply method in which the composition is mixed in a tumbler or the like in a fixed amount, a composition is mixed in a tumbler in a total amount. There is a natural feed type feeding into an extruder hopper. General-purpose T-
This is performed using a die and a sheet take-off machine.

しかし本発明は前記装置に限定されるものではなく、
雲母粉末を配合した厚さ0.1〜5mmのプラスチツクシート
を1回の溶融混練で製造できる装置であればどんなもの
でも良い。
However, the invention is not limited to said device,
Any device can be used as long as it can produce a plastic sheet having a thickness of 0.1 to 5 mm containing mica powder by one melt-kneading process.

以下実施例によつて本発明を説明するが本発明は何ら
これらに制限されるものではない。
Hereinafter, the present invention will be described with reference to Examples, but the present invention is not limited thereto.

実施例1 35μmの平均粒径、0.23の嵩比重を有する金雲母(商
標名 スゾライトマイカ)15重量%、0.8g/10minのメル
トフローレートを有するポリプロピレンペレツト(以下
PPと略す)67重量%、1.5g/10minのメルトフローレート
を有する顆粒状ポリプロピレン(以下顆粒PPと略す)15
重量%および1.5g/10minのメルトフローレートを有する
高密度ポリエチレンペレツト(以下PEと略す)3重量%
をそれぞれフイーダーを用いて定量供給し、フルフライ
トスクリューを組み込んだ65mmφ押出機を用いて溶融混
練し、幅1150mmのT−ダイを用いてシート状に押出した
後冷却して、厚さ2mmのシートを成形した。得られたシ
ートについて以下に述べる4項目を測定した結果、表面
状態、雲母の分散性、雲母混合率のバラツキおよび比弾
性率ともに良好であり、結果をまとめて表1に示した。
Example 1 15% by weight of phlogopite (trade name Szolite Mica) having an average particle size of 35 μm, a bulk specific gravity of 0.23, and a polypropylene pellet having a melt flow rate of 0.8 g / 10 min (hereinafter, referred to as “polysilica”)
15) Granular polypropylene (hereinafter abbreviated as PP) having a melt flow rate of 67% by weight and 1.5 g / 10 min
3% by weight of high-density polyethylene pellets (hereinafter abbreviated as PE) having a melt flow rate of 1.5 g / 10min and 1.5% by weight
Is supplied in a fixed amount using a feeder, melt-kneaded using a 65 mmφ extruder incorporating a full flight screw, extruded into a sheet shape using a T-die having a width of 1150 mm, and then cooled to obtain a sheet having a thickness of 2 mm. Was molded. The obtained sheet was measured for the following four items. As a result, the surface state, the dispersibility of the mica, the variation of the mica mixing ratio and the specific elastic modulus were all good, and the results are shown in Table 1.

表面状態:肉眼で面粗れ観察。Surface condition: Surface roughness observed with the naked eye.

雲母の分散性:押出し方向、幅方向各10ケ所より小片を
切り取り、平板熱プレス機を用いて厚さ約0.2mmの薄板
にし、肉眼で雲母の分散性判定。
Dispersibility of mica: A small piece was cut out from each of 10 places in the extrusion direction and the width direction and made into a thin plate having a thickness of about 0.2 mm using a flat plate heat press machine.

雲母混合率のバラツキ:押出し方向、幅方向各20ケ所よ
り小片を切り取り灼熱減量法により雲母の混合率を測定
し、平均値よりのバラツキを測定。
Variation in mica mixing ratio: Cut out small pieces from each of 20 places in the extrusion direction and width direction, measure the mixing ratio of mica by the burning loss method, and measure the variation from the average value.

比弾性率:シートの押出し方向よりASTM D790に準拠し
て曲げ弾性率を測定し、シート比重で除して比弾性率を
計算する。
Specific modulus: The flexural modulus is measured from the sheet extrusion direction in accordance with ASTM D790, and divided by the sheet specific gravity to calculate the specific modulus.

実施例2 実施例1と同一の粒径および嵩比重を有する金雲母を
30重量%、実施例1と同一のメルトフローレートを有す
るPPを40重量%、顆粒PPを25重量%、PEを5重量%用い
る他は実施例1と同じ方法で同一の装置を用いて厚さ2m
mのシートを成形した。得られたシートについて実施例
1と同様な性能評価を行つた結果表面状態、雲母の分散
性、雲母混合率のバラツキおよび比弾性率ともに良好で
あり、結果をまとめて表1に示した。
Example 2 Phlogopite having the same particle size and bulk specific gravity as in Example 1 was prepared.
30% by weight, 40% by weight of PP having the same melt flow rate as in Example 1, 25% by weight of granular PP, and 5% by weight of PE. 2m
m sheets were formed. The obtained sheet was subjected to the same performance evaluation as in Example 1. As a result, the surface state, the dispersibility of the mica, the variation in the mica mixing ratio, and the specific elastic modulus were all good, and the results are summarized in Table 1.

実施例3 実施例1と同一の粒径および嵩比重を有する金雲母を
50重量%、実施例1と同一のメルトフローレートを有す
る顆粒PPを45重量%、PEを5重量%用いる他は実施例1
と同一方法で同一の装置を用いて厚さ2mmのシートを成
形した。得られたシートについて実施例1と同様な性能
評価を行つた結果表面状態、雲母の分散性、雲母混合率
のバラツキおよび比弾性率ともに良好であり、結果をま
とめて表1に示した。
Example 3 Phlogopite having the same particle size and bulk specific gravity as Example 1 was prepared.
Example 1 except that 50% by weight, 45% by weight of granules PP having the same melt flow rate as in Example 1 and 5% by weight of PE were used.
A sheet having a thickness of 2 mm was formed by the same method and using the same apparatus. The obtained sheet was subjected to the same performance evaluation as in Example 1. As a result, the surface state, the dispersibility of the mica, the variation in the mica mixing ratio, and the specific elastic modulus were all good, and the results are summarized in Table 1.

実施例4 実施例2と同一のメルトフローレートを有するPEを15
重量%、PPを30重量%用いる他は実施例2と同一組成、
同一方法で同一の装置を用いて厚さ2mmのシートを成形
した。得られたシートについて実施例1と同様な性能評
価を行つた結果、表面状態、雲母の分散性、雲母混合率
のバラツキおよび比弾性率ともに良好であり、結果をま
とめて表1に示した。
Example 4 A PE having the same melt flow rate as
% By weight, except that 30% by weight of PP is used.
A sheet having a thickness of 2 mm was formed by the same method using the same apparatus. The obtained sheet was evaluated for performance in the same manner as in Example 1. As a result, the surface state, the dispersibility of mica, the variation in the mixing ratio of mica, and the specific elastic modulus were all good, and the results are summarized in Table 1.

実施例5 18μmの平均粒径、0.20の嵩比重を有する白雲母(K.
K.クラレ製、商標名、クラライトマイカ)を用いる他は
実施例2と同一組成、同一方法で同一の装置を用いて厚
さ2mmのシートを成形した。得られたシートについて実
施例1と同様な性能評価を行つた結果、表面状態、雲母
の分散性、雲母混合率のバラツキおよび比弾性率ともに
良好であり、結果をまとめて表1に示した。
Example 5 Muscovite having an average particle size of 18 μm and a bulk specific gravity of 0.20 (K.
A sheet having a thickness of 2 mm was formed using the same apparatus and the same composition as in Example 2 except that K. Kuraray (trade name, Clarite Mica) was used. The obtained sheet was evaluated for performance in the same manner as in Example 1. As a result, the surface state, the dispersibility of mica, the variation in the mixing ratio of mica, and the specific elastic modulus were all good, and the results are summarized in Table 1.

実施例6 280μmの平均粒径、0.35の嵩比重を有する金雲母
(商標名 スゾライトマイカ)を用いる他は実施例2と
同一組成、同一方法で同一の装置を用いて厚さ2mmのシ
ートを成形した。得られたシートについて実施例1と同
様な性能評価を行つた結果、表面状態、雲母の分散性、
雲母混合率のバラツキおよび比弾性率ともに良好であ
り、結果をまとめて表1に示した。
Example 6 Except for using phlogopite (trade name: Szolite Mica) having an average particle size of 280 μm and a bulk specific gravity of 0.35, a sheet having a thickness of 2 mm was formed using the same apparatus and the same method as in Example 2 using the same apparatus. Molded. As a result of performing the same performance evaluation as in Example 1 on the obtained sheet, the surface state, the dispersibility of mica,
Both the variation of the mica mixing ratio and the specific elastic modulus were good, and the results are summarized in Table 1.

比較例1 実施例1と同一の粒径および嵩比重を有する金雲母を
5重量%、実施例1と同一のメルトフローレートを有す
るPPを77重量%を用いる他は実施例1と同一組成、同一
方法で同一の装置を用いて厚さ2mmのシートを成形し
た。得られたシートについて実施例1と同様な性能評価
を行つたところ雲母の分散性、表面状態および雲母の混
合率バラツキは良好であつたが比弾性率が低かつた。そ
の結果を表1に示す。
Comparative Example 1 The same composition as in Example 1 except that 5% by weight of phlogopite having the same particle size and bulk specific gravity as in Example 1 and 77% by weight of PP having the same melt flow rate as in Example 1 were used. A sheet having a thickness of 2 mm was formed by the same method using the same apparatus. When the performance evaluation of the obtained sheet was performed in the same manner as in Example 1, the dispersion of the mica, the surface state and the variation in the mixing ratio of the mica were good, but the specific elastic modulus was low. Table 1 shows the results.

比較例2 実施例3と同一の粒径および嵩比重を有する金雲母を
70重量%、実施例3と同一のメルトフローレートを有す
る顆粒PPを25重量%を用いる他は実施例3と同一組成、
同一方法で同一の装置を用いてシートを成形しようとし
たが混練が困難でシート化出来なかつた。その結果を表
1に示す。
Comparative Example 2 Phlogopite having the same particle size and bulk specific gravity as in Example 3 was prepared.
70% by weight, the same composition as in Example 3 except that 25% by weight of granules PP having the same melt flow rate as in Example 3,
An attempt was made to form a sheet by the same method using the same apparatus, but kneading was difficult and the sheet could not be formed. Table 1 shows the results.

比較例3 実施例2と同一のメルトフローレートを有するPPを45
重量%、PEを配合しない他は実施例2と同一組成、同一
方法で同一の装置を用いて厚さ2mmのシートを成形し
た。得られたシートについて実施例1と同様な性能評価
を行なつたところ比弾性率は実施例2と同等であつたが
PEを配合していない為に表面状態、雲母の分散性が劣
り、雲母混合率のバラツキが実施例2の約2倍と悪かつ
た。その結果を表1に示す。
Comparative Example 3 PP having the same melt flow rate as
A sheet having a thickness of 2 mm was formed using the same apparatus and the same method as in Example 2 except that the weight% and PE were not used. When the performance evaluation of the obtained sheet was performed in the same manner as in Example 1, the specific elastic modulus was equivalent to that of Example 2.
Since PE was not added, the surface condition and the dispersibility of mica were poor, and the variation in the mica mixing ratio was as bad as about twice that of Example 2. Table 1 shows the results.

比較例4 実施例2と同一のメルトフローレートを有するPPを20
重量%、PEを25重量%用いる他は実施例2と同一組成、
同一方法で同一の装置を用いて厚さ2mmのシートを成形
した。得られたシートについて実施例1と同様な性能評
価を行つたところ、表面状態、雲母混合率のバラツキは
良好であつたが雲母の分散性が悪く、比弾性率が低かつ
た。その結果を表1に示す。
Comparative Example 4 PP having the same melt flow rate as in Example 2 was added to 20
% By weight, the same composition as in Example 2 except that 25% by weight of PE was used.
A sheet having a thickness of 2 mm was formed by the same method using the same apparatus. When the performance evaluation of the obtained sheet was performed in the same manner as in Example 1, the dispersion of the surface state and the mica mixing ratio was good, but the dispersibility of the mica was poor, and the specific elastic modulus was low. Table 1 shows the results.

比較例5 メルトフローレート0.6g/10minのPEを5重量%用いる
他は実施例2と同一組成、同一方法で同一の装置を用い
て厚さ2mmのシートを成形した。得られたシートについ
て実施例1と同様な性能評価を行つたところ比弾性率は
良好であつたが雲母の分散性が悪く、表面状態が劣り、
雲母混合率のバラツキが悪かつた。その結果を表1に示
す。
Comparative Example 5 A sheet having a thickness of 2 mm was formed using the same apparatus and the same method as in Example 2, except that 5 wt% of PE having a melt flow rate of 0.6 g / 10 min was used. When the performance evaluation of the obtained sheet was performed in the same manner as in Example 1, the specific elastic modulus was good, but the dispersibility of mica was poor, and the surface state was poor.
The variation of the mica mixing ratio was bad. Table 1 shows the results.

比較例6 メルトフローレート0.5g/10minの顆粒PPを25重量%用
いる他は実施例2と同一組成、同一方法で同一の装置を
用いて厚さ2mmのシートを成形した。得られたシートに
ついて実施例1と同様な評価を行つたところ比弾性率は
良好であつたが雲母の分散性が悪く、表面状態が劣り、
雲母混合率のバラツキが悪かつた。その結果を表1に示
す。
Comparative Example 6 A sheet having a thickness of 2 mm was formed using the same apparatus and the same method as in Example 2 except that 25% by weight of granules PP having a melt flow rate of 0.5 g / 10 min was used. When the same evaluation as that of Example 1 was performed on the obtained sheet, the specific elastic modulus was good, but the dispersibility of mica was poor, and the surface state was poor.
The variation of the mica mixing ratio was bad. Table 1 shows the results.

比較例7 実施例2と同一のメルトフローレートを有するPPを65
重量%、顆粒PPを用いない他は実施例2と同一組成、同
一方法で同一の装置を用いて厚さ2mmのシートを成形し
た。得られたシートについて実施例1と同様な評価を行
つたところ比弾性率は良好であつたが顆粒PPを用いない
為に雲母の混合率のバラツキが非常に悪く、雲母の分散
性、表面状態も劣つていた。その結果を表1に示す。
Comparative Example 7 PP having the same melt flow rate as in Example 2 was 65
A sheet having a thickness of 2 mm was formed using the same apparatus and the same method as in Example 2 except that the weight% and the granular PP were not used. When the obtained sheet was evaluated in the same manner as in Example 1, the specific elastic modulus was good, but the mixing ratio of mica was very poor because granules PP were not used, and the dispersibility and surface state of mica Was also inferior. Table 1 shows the results.

比較例8 10μmの平均粒径、0.20の嵩比重を有する白雲母(試
作品)を用いる他は実施例5と同一組成、同一方法で同
一装置を用いて厚さ2mmのシートを成形した。得られた
シートについて実施例1と同様な評価を行つたところ表
面状態、雲母混合率のバラツキは良好であつたが雲母の
平均粒径が小さい為に雲母の分散性が悪く、比弾性率が
劣つていた。その結果を表1に示す。
Comparative Example 8 A sheet having a thickness of 2 mm was formed using the same composition and the same method as in Example 5 except that a muscovite (prototype) having an average particle diameter of 10 μm and a bulk specific gravity of 0.20 was used. When the obtained sheet was evaluated in the same manner as in Example 1, the dispersion of the surface state and the mixing ratio of mica was good, but the dispersibility of the mica was poor due to the small average particle size of the mica, and the specific elastic modulus was low. Was inferior. Table 1 shows the results.

比較例9 650μmの平均粒径、0.35の嵩比重を有する金雲母
(商標名 スゾライトマイカ)を用いる他は実施例6と
同一組成、同一方法で同一の装置を用いて厚さ2mmのシ
ートを成形した。得られたシートについて実施例1と同
様な評価を行つたところ雲母の分散性、雲母混合率のバ
ラツキおよび比弾性率は良好であつたが雲母の平均粒径
が大きい為に表面状態が非常に悪かつた。その結果を表
1に示す。
Comparative Example 9 A sheet having a thickness of 2 mm was prepared using the same apparatus and the same method as in Example 6, except that phlogopite (trade name: Szolite Mica) having an average particle diameter of 650 μm and a bulk specific gravity of 0.35 was used. Molded. The same evaluation as in Example 1 was performed on the obtained sheet. As a result, the dispersibility of mica, the variation of the mixing ratio of mica, and the specific elastic modulus were good, but the surface state was very large because the average particle size of mica was large. Evil. Table 1 shows the results.

比較例10 実施例2と同一組成物をそれぞれフイーダーを用いて
定量供給し、フルフライトスクリューを組み込んだ65mm
φ押出機を用いて溶融混練して雲母を30重量%含有した
ペレツトを製造した。得られたペレツトを良くタンブリ
ングした後、フルフライトスクリューを組み込んだ65mm
φ押出機で再溶融、混練し、幅1150mmのT−ダイを用い
てシート状に押出し、厚さ2mmのシートを成形した。得
られたシートについて実施例1と同様な評価を行つたと
ころ、雲母の分散性、表面状態及び雲母の混合率バラツ
キは良好であつたが実施例に比較して比弾性率が劣つて
いるとともに溶融混練を2回実施している為にコスト的
に不利である。その結果を表1に示す。
Comparative Example 10 The same composition as in Example 2 was quantitatively supplied using a feeder, and a full-flight screw-incorporated 65 mm
A pellet containing 30% by weight of mica was produced by melt-kneading using a φ extruder. After thoroughly tumbling the obtained pellet, 65 mm incorporating a full flight screw
The mixture was remelted and kneaded with a φ extruder, extruded into a sheet shape using a T-die having a width of 1150 mm, and a sheet having a thickness of 2 mm was formed. When the same evaluation as that of Example 1 was performed on the obtained sheet, the dispersion of the mica, the surface state, and the variation in the mixing ratio of the mica were good, but the specific elastic modulus was inferior to that of the example, and Melting and kneading are performed twice, which is disadvantageous in cost. Table 1 shows the results.

〔発明の効果〕 本発明により、雲母粉末充填組成物の優れた性質を損
うことなく、1段シート化プロセスを用いることにより
安価な雲母粉末充填プラスチツクシートを提供すること
ができる。
[Effect of the Invention] According to the present invention, an inexpensive mica powder-filled plastic sheet can be provided by using a one-stage sheeting process without impairing the excellent properties of the mica powder-filled composition.

Claims (4)

(57)【特許請求の範囲】(57) [Claims] 【請求項1】顆粒状ポリプロピレン、ポリエチレンおよ
び雲母粉末を必須成分とし、該顆粒状ポリプロピレンの
配合率が20重量%以上87重量%以下であり、ポリエチレ
ンの配合率が3重量%以上20重量%以下であり、更に、
雲母粉末が重量平均フレーク径15μm以上500μm以
下、嵩比重が0.15以上、配合率が10重量%以上60重量%
以下である配合物よりなるプラスチックシート。
An essential component is a granular polypropylene, polyethylene and mica powder, wherein the compounding ratio of the granular polypropylene is 20% by weight or more and 87% by weight or less, and the compounding ratio of polyethylene is 3% by weight or more and 20% by weight or less. And, furthermore,
The mica powder has a weight average flake diameter of 15 μm or more and 500 μm or less, a bulk specific gravity of 0.15 or more, and a compounding ratio of 10% to 60% by weight.
A plastic sheet comprising the following composition.
【請求項2】メルトフローレートが0.2〜5g/10minの顆
粒状ポリプロピレンとペレット状ポリプロピレンからな
り、成分の20重量%以上が顆粒状ポリプロピレンである
ポリプロピレン、ポリエチレンおよび雲母粉末を必須成
分とし、該ポリプロピレンの配合率が20重量%以上87重
量%以下であり、ポリエチレンの配合率が3重量%以上
20重量%以下であり、顆粒状ポリプロピレンおよびポリ
エチレンのメルトフローレートが230℃、2160gの荷重の
条件下で測定したときに、同条件下で測定したペレット
状ポリプロピレンのメルトフローレート以上であり、更
に、雲母粉末が重量平均フレーク径15μm以上500μm
以下、嵩比重が0.15以上、配合率が10重量%以上60重量
%以下である配合物よりなるプラスチックシート。
2. A polypropylene comprising a polypropylene having a melt flow rate of 0.2 to 5 g / 10 min and a pellet polypropylene, wherein at least 20% by weight of the component is a granular polypropylene, polyethylene and mica powder. 20% to 87% by weight of polyethylene and 3% by weight or more of polyethylene
20 wt% or less, and the melt flow rate of granular polypropylene and polyethylene is 230 ° C, when measured under the condition of a load of 2160 g, is equal to or higher than the melt flow rate of pelletized polypropylene measured under the same conditions, , Mica powder is weight average flake diameter 15μm or more and 500μm
Hereinafter, a plastic sheet comprising a compound having a bulk specific gravity of 0.15 or more and a compounding ratio of 10% by weight or more and 60% by weight or less.
【請求項3】顆粒状ポリプロピレン、ポリエチレンおよ
び雲母粉末を必須成分とし、該顆粒状ポリプロピレンの
配合率が20重量%以上87重量%以下であり、ポリエチレ
ンの配合率が3重量%以上20重量%以下であり、更に、
雲母粉末が重量平均フレーク径15μm以上500μm以
下、嵩比重が0.15以上、配合率が10重量%以上60重量%
以下である配合物を溶融混練しながらシート状に押し出
し、冷却することを特徴とするプラスチックシートの製
造方法。
3. Granular polypropylene, polyethylene and mica powder are essential components, and the blending ratio of the granular polypropylene is 20% to 87% by weight, and the blending ratio of polyethylene is 3% to 20% by weight. And, furthermore,
The mica powder has a weight average flake diameter of 15 μm or more and 500 μm or less, a bulk specific gravity of 0.15 or more, and a compounding ratio of 10% to 60% by weight.
A method for producing a plastic sheet, comprising extruding the following compound into a sheet while melting and kneading the mixture, followed by cooling.
【請求項4】メルトフローレートが0.2〜5g/10minの顆
粒状ポリプロピレンとペレット状ポリプロピレンからな
り、成分の20重量%以上が顆粒状ポリプロピレンである
ポリプロピレン、ポリエチレンおよび雲母粉末を必須成
分とし、該ポリプロピレンの配合率が20重量%以上87重
量%以下であり、ポリエチレンの配合率が3重量%以上
20重量%以下であり、顆粒状ポリプロピレンおよびポリ
エチレンのメルトフローレートが230℃、2160gの荷重の
条件下で測定したときに、同条件下で測定したペレット
状ポリプロピレンのメルトフローレート以上であり、更
に、雲母粉末が重量平均フレーク径15μm以上500μm
以下、嵩比重が0.15以上、配合率が10重量%以上60重量
%以下である配合物を溶融混練しながらシート状に押し
出し、冷却することを特徴とするプラスチックシートの
製造方法。
4. Polypropylene, polyethylene and mica powder having a melt flow rate of 0.2 to 5 g / 10 min, comprising granular polypropylene and pelletized polypropylene, wherein at least 20% by weight of the component is granular polypropylene. 20% to 87% by weight of polyethylene and 3% by weight or more of polyethylene
20 wt% or less, and the melt flow rate of granular polypropylene and polyethylene is 230 ° C, when measured under the condition of a load of 2160 g, is equal to or higher than the melt flow rate of pelletized polypropylene measured under the same conditions, , Mica powder is weight average flake diameter 15μm or more and 500μm
A method for producing a plastic sheet, comprising extruding a compound having a bulk specific gravity of 0.15 or more and a compounding ratio of 10% by weight or more and 60% by weight or less into a sheet while melting and kneading the mixture, followed by cooling.
JP278188A 1988-01-08 1988-01-08 Plastic sheet filled with mica powder and method for producing the same Expired - Lifetime JP2593902B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP278188A JP2593902B2 (en) 1988-01-08 1988-01-08 Plastic sheet filled with mica powder and method for producing the same

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP278188A JP2593902B2 (en) 1988-01-08 1988-01-08 Plastic sheet filled with mica powder and method for producing the same

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPH01178542A JPH01178542A (en) 1989-07-14
JP2593902B2 true JP2593902B2 (en) 1997-03-26

Family

ID=11538880

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP278188A Expired - Lifetime JP2593902B2 (en) 1988-01-08 1988-01-08 Plastic sheet filled with mica powder and method for producing the same

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP2593902B2 (en)

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP3730364B2 (en) * 1997-06-03 2006-01-05 株式会社クラレ Base material for wallpaper
CN115418043B (en) * 2022-08-24 2024-01-30 浙江瑞堂塑料科技股份有限公司 Rotational molding composite material with large meteor-like patterns and molding process thereof

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JPH01178542A (en) 1989-07-14

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US4891392A (en) Production process of polyolefin resin composition containing inorganic filler
KR101851952B1 (en) Electrically conductive resin composition and method of preparing the same
KR101830957B1 (en) Method for manufacturing conductive resin composition
WO2022052408A1 (en) Carbon nanotube master batch, and preparation method therefor and application thereof
EP0013872B1 (en) A process for the production of particulate polyolefinic moulding materials containing conductive carbon black, and their use in the production of mouldings
JP6705881B2 (en) Conductive resin composition and method for producing the same
US4313873A (en) Novel method for reducing the processing temperature of thermoplastic polymers
JP2593902B2 (en) Plastic sheet filled with mica powder and method for producing the same
CN108329579A (en) A kind of oil resistant PP composite material and preparation method thereof
EP2428597B1 (en) All-polymer fibrillar nanocomposites and method for manufacture thereof
JPS5822056B2 (en) Heat resistant rubber composition
JP6095761B1 (en) Granular composition with carbon-based conductive material and method for producing the same
JP2000127152A (en) Manufacture of master batch pellet
CN116199937B (en) Preparation method and application of carbon nanotube dispersion and polystyrene composite material
JPH10265630A (en) Reinforced polypropylene composition
CN113001941B (en) Double-screw extruder and feeding method thereof
JP7422708B2 (en) Thermoplastic polymer granules and their manufacturing method
JP2593684B2 (en) Ultra high molecular weight polyethylene composition
JPH0730211B2 (en) Method for producing thermoplastic resin composition
JPS61188424A (en) Production of thermoplastic resin containing liquid additive
JP3484678B2 (en) Polypropylene resin composition, automotive parts comprising the same, and method for increasing extrusion rate of polypropylene resin composition
JPS59207947A (en) Thermoplastic resin composition containing metal fiber and its preparation
JPS6139340B2 (en)
EP3620489A1 (en) Electrically conductive resin composition and preparation method thereof
JPS61157561A (en) Mica composition