JP2023092766A - Transaction system - Google Patents

Transaction system Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP2023092766A
JP2023092766A JP2021207966A JP2021207966A JP2023092766A JP 2023092766 A JP2023092766 A JP 2023092766A JP 2021207966 A JP2021207966 A JP 2021207966A JP 2021207966 A JP2021207966 A JP 2021207966A JP 2023092766 A JP2023092766 A JP 2023092766A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
buyer
seller
terminal
information
property
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
JP2021207966A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP7130836B1 (en
Inventor
春樹 峠
Haruki Toge
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Toge Chieko
Original Assignee
Toge Chieko
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Toge Chieko filed Critical Toge Chieko
Priority to JP2021207966A priority Critical patent/JP7130836B1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP7130836B1 publication Critical patent/JP7130836B1/en
Publication of JP2023092766A publication Critical patent/JP2023092766A/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Landscapes

  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)

Abstract

To provide a transaction system for eliminating variations in ability and information amount capable of corresponding to each of a seller side and a buyer side for each intermediary.SOLUTION: A transaction system 10 comprises a seller terminal 1, a buyer terminal 3, an intermediary terminal 7 and an information processing unit 2. The information processing unit 2 includes: a trading object information storage unit 11 for storing trading object information input from the seller terminal 1; an information retrieval unit 12 for outputting the trading object information to be proposed to a buyer from among pieces of the trading object information; a commission calculation unit 13 for calculating commissions to be borne by a seller and the buyer based on the trading object information; and a contract execution unit 14 for executing a contract among the seller terminal 1, the buyer terminal 3, and the intermediary terminal 7 and procedure accompanying the contract. The commission calculation unit 13 determines commission to be borne by the seller and the buyer based on a procedure difficulty index that indicates difficulty of the procedure of the intermediary set for each piece of the trading object information.SELECTED DRAWING: Figure 1

Description

本発明は、不動産物件等の各種の取引に用いられる取引システムに関する。 The present invention relates to a transaction system used for various transactions such as real estate transactions.

各種の分野の商取引において、インターネット等のネットワークを用いた取引システムが運用されている。また、不動産物件を扱う商取引においても、各種の取引システムが提案されている。不動産物件を扱う商取引(以下、不動産取引と称する)では、法令上、売買を扱う不動産業者が、買主に対して重要事項説明等の所定の手続き行うことが義務付けられている。また、不動産取引では、売買後の不動産登記や各種融資の手続きが必要であることが多いことから、一般に、買主と売主とを仲介する不動産業者が介在するケースがほとんどである。このため、不動産取引システムは、他の分野の商取引で用いられる取引システムとは異なる機能が求められる。 In commercial transactions in various fields, transaction systems using networks such as the Internet are operated. Various transaction systems have also been proposed for commercial transactions involving real estate properties. In commercial transactions dealing with real estate properties (hereafter referred to as real estate transactions), real estate agents who handle buying and selling are legally obligated to perform prescribed procedures such as explaining important matters to buyers. In addition, real estate transactions often require real estate registration and various financing procedures after the transaction, so in most cases, a real estate agent intervenes between the buyer and the seller. For this reason, real estate transaction systems are required to have functions different from transaction systems used in commercial transactions in other fields.

インターネット等のネットワークを用いた不動産取引システムとして、例えば、特許文献1~4に記載のものがある。 Patent Documents 1 to 4, for example, disclose real estate transaction systems using networks such as the Internet.

特許文献1には、不動産業者の立ち合いを必要とすることなく、予め配置した内覧ロボットを用いて無人の建物を内覧することができ、また、建物の内部の破損などを抑制することができる無人内覧システムを含む不動産取引システムが開示されている。 In Patent Document 1, an unmanned building can be viewed using a pre-arranged viewing robot without requiring the presence of a real estate agent, and an unmanned building can be prevented from being damaged inside the building. A real estate transaction system including a viewing system is disclosed.

また、特許文献2には、会員登録システム、物件情報検索システム、メッセージシステム、書類生成システム等を備えた不動産取引システムが開示されている。特許文献2のシステムでは、会員登録システムに登録された買主は、物件情報検索システムで不動産の売物件情報を検索し、気に入った物件情報があれば、売主に対してメッセージシステムを経由して問い合わせ、内覧の申し込み、価格交渉、購入申し込みを行うことができる。また、売主は即座に買主に対して問い合わせ対応を行うことができる。ここで、不動産業者は、専門的な知見から、売物件情報に対して、情報の確認、編集、補完を行うことができる。不動産業者は、売主と買主が物件の売買取引において合意が完了した際に、両者の連絡を受けてメッセージシステムを閲覧し、取引におけるやり取りのデータを確認した後に契約の仲介を行う。その際に、書類生成システムにより書類を生成することができ、不動産業者は売主及び買主の個人情報、物件情報、取引のやり取りのデータをより参照しながら一般的な手法による仲介業務を行うことができるとされている。 Patent document 2 discloses a real estate transaction system including a member registration system, a property information search system, a message system, a document generation system, and the like. In the system of Patent Literature 2, a buyer registered in a member registration system searches real estate property information for sale in a property information search system, and if there is property information that he likes, inquires of the seller via a message system. , can apply for viewing, negotiate price, and apply for purchase. In addition, the seller can immediately respond to inquiries from the buyer. Here, the real estate agent can confirm, edit, and supplement the information on the property for sale based on their professional knowledge. When the seller and the buyer complete an agreement on a property sales transaction, the real estate agent receives communication from both parties, browses the message system, and after confirming the exchange data in the transaction, mediates the contract. At that time, the documents can be generated by the document generation system, and the real estate agent can refer to the personal information of the seller and the buyer, the property information, and the data of the exchange of transactions, and perform the brokerage business by a general method. It is said to be possible.

また、特許文献3には、不動産物件の取引条件を設定する取引条件設定部と、設定された取引条件に基づいて取引に必要な書面を生成する権利書データ等生成部と、生成した書面の正当性を保証する保証システムと連携する連携部と、連携部により得られた保証に基づいて不動産物件の取引を実行する不動産取引実行部を備えた不動産仲介システム(不動産取引システム)が開示されている。取引条件設定部は、売主若しくは買主又は両者による抽選操作に基づいて、取引対象に係る仲介手数料、又は、割引率を含む取引条件の一部をランダム演算により決定し、決定された取引条件を設定するとされている。 Further, Patent Document 3 describes a transaction condition setting unit that sets transaction conditions for a real estate property, a deed data generation unit that generates documents necessary for transactions based on the set transaction conditions, and a generated document Disclosed is a real estate brokerage system (real estate transaction system) comprising a cooperation unit that cooperates with a guarantee system that guarantees legitimacy, and a real estate transaction execution unit that executes transactions of real estate properties based on the guarantee obtained by the cooperation unit. there is The transaction condition setting unit determines part of the transaction conditions, including the brokerage commission or discount rate for the transaction object, by random calculation based on a lottery operation by the seller or the buyer, or both, and sets the determined transaction conditions. It is said that

さらに、特許文献4には、不動産業者端末から受信した不動産の物件データを管理する物件データ管理部と、施工業者端末から受信した施工例データを管理する施工例データ管理部と、希望者端末から指定される物件条件と適合する物件データを検索し、見つかった物件データを希望者端末へ送信でき、かつ、希望者端末から指定される施工条件と適合する施工例データを検索して希望者端末へ送信できる検索実行部を備えた不動産仲介システム(不動産取引システム)が開示されている。特許文献4によれば、物件希望者の希望する望ましい物件データの検索と、望ましい施工例データの検索とを1つのシステムで効果的に行うことができるとされている。 Furthermore, in Patent Document 4, a property data management unit that manages real estate property data received from a real estate agent terminal, a construction example data management unit that manages construction example data received from a contractor terminal, Search for property data that conforms to specified property conditions, transmit the found property data to the applicant's terminal, search for construction example data that conforms to the construction conditions specified from the applicant's terminal, and search for the applicant's terminal A real estate brokerage system (real estate transaction system) is disclosed that includes a search execution unit that can transmit to. According to Patent Document 4, it is possible to effectively search for desired property data desired by a property applicant and search for desirable construction example data in one system.

特許第6870885号公報Japanese Patent No. 6870885 特開2016-218986号公報JP 2016-218986 A 特許6434086号公報Japanese Patent No. 6434086 特開2020-30824号公報JP 2020-30824 A

ところで、近年、不動産物件の取引に関わる法令の改正等により、買主保護の観点から、不動産業者及び売主に対する取引の厳格化が求められつつある。例えば、取引される不動産物件に対する不動産業者の説明責任が強化されつつある点や、取引時における重要事項説明の項目の増加等が挙げられる。 By the way, in recent years, due to the revision of laws and regulations related to transactions of real estate properties, from the viewpoint of buyer protection, stricter transactions with real estate agents and sellers are being demanded. For example, the fact that the accountability of real estate agents for real estate properties being traded is being strengthened, and the number of items for explaining important matters at the time of transactions is increasing.

このような昨今の取引環境を反映して、不動産業者は、売買金額が安いものの、後々買主との間でクレームに繋がる要素がある(低価格且つ高リスクである)ような、クセのある物件を敬遠する傾向が強くなっている。クセのある物件とは、例えば、建物や土地の一部に要修繕箇所がある物件や、何らかの瑕疵を含む物件、周辺環境等に問題がある物件、事故物件、その他いわゆるワケあり物件と呼ばれるものが挙げられる。このようなクセのある物件、すなわち、不動産業者が取り扱うのを敬遠しがちな物件を、以下、特定不動産物件と称する。このような特定不動産物件は、上記特許文献1~4に記載の不動産取引システムにおいても取扱うことが難しい。 Reflecting such a recent transaction environment, real estate agents are looking for peculiar properties that have low transaction prices, but which may lead to complaints with buyers later (low prices and high risks). There is a growing tendency to shy away from Properties with peculiarities include, for example, properties that require repair in part of the building or land, properties that contain some kind of defect, properties that have problems with the surrounding environment, etc., properties that have accidents, and other properties that are known as so-called properties with defects. is mentioned. Properties with such peculiarities, that is, properties that real estate agents tend to avoid dealing with are hereinafter referred to as specific real estate properties. Such specific real estate properties are difficult to handle even in the real estate transaction systems described in Patent Documents 1 to 4 above.

不動産業者が取り扱いを敬遠する特定不動産物件の受け皿として、例えば、インターネット上で提供されている無料物件紹介サイトがある。無料物件紹介サイトは、売主である個人と買主である個人を直接仲介するものである。また、無料物件紹介サイトでは、売り主と買主との間で合意した売買に関し、その売買に求められる所定の手続きのみを、その無料物件紹介サイトの管理者が設定した不動産業者が行う。しかし、取扱う物件が特定不動産物件であるがゆえ、売買価格は安く、手数料も少額であるにも関わらず、その手続きを仲介する不動産業者の労力の負担は大きいといえる。 For example, there is a free property introduction site provided on the Internet as a receptacle for specific real estate properties that real estate agents are reluctant to handle. A free property introduction site directly mediates between an individual who is a seller and an individual who is a buyer. In addition, on the free property introduction site, the real estate agent set by the manager of the free property introduction site performs only the prescribed procedures required for the purchase and sale agreed between the seller and the buyer. However, since the property to be handled is a specific real estate property, the transaction price is low and the commission is small.

一方で、特定不動産物件ではない通常の不動産物件は、不動産業者にとって高価格且つ低リスクであり、市場での流動性が高い。このため、不動産業者が運営するウェブサイト上の不動産取引システムでは、売主側の立場からすると、すぐに売れる物件であるにも関わらず、その高価格ゆえ高額の手数料を支払うこととなる。また、買主側も、ウェブサイト上の不動産取引システムを介して、希望の物件を見つけた場合、簡単な物件内容の確認だけで即断で購入する意思があるにも関わらず、何度も現地確認を繰り返して長期間熟考を繰り返すような物件と同様に、一律の高い手数料を取られてしまうという問題がある。また、買主が即断で購入を決めるような足の速い物件は、その高価格ゆえ高額の手数料が必要な割に、それを取り扱う不動産業者(不動産取引システムの管理者)が、その物件に対して買主が満足するような充分な情報を持っていないという点に、買主が不満を抱く例もみられる。また、旧来の地場を本拠としている中小の不動産業者は、依然として物件不足であり、少しでも取り扱う物件を増やすべく苦慮している状況も見られる。 On the other hand, ordinary real estate properties that are not specific real estate properties are high-priced and low-risk for real estate agents, and have high liquidity in the market. For this reason, in the real estate transaction system on the website operated by the real estate agent, from the standpoint of the seller, although the property can be sold quickly, the high price means that the seller pays a high commission. In addition, when the buyer finds a desired property through the real estate transaction system on the website, even though he or she intends to make an immediate decision to purchase the property by simply confirming the details of the property, he or she repeatedly checks the site. As with properties that require repeated consideration over a long period of time, there is a problem that a uniform high fee will be charged. In addition, the real estate agent (manager of the real estate transaction system) who handles the property, which requires a high fee due to its high price, is a fast-moving property that the buyer decides to purchase on the fly. In some cases, buyers are dissatisfied that they do not have enough information to satisfy them. In addition, small and medium-sized real estate agents based in traditional local areas are still facing a shortage of properties, and some are struggling to increase the number of properties they handle, even if only a little.

以上のように、不動産取引では、特定不動産物件と、特定不動産物件ではない通常の不動産物件のそれぞれにおいて問題が存在する。すなわち、不動産取引では、それを取り扱う不動産業者によって、売主側、買主側のそれぞれに対応できる能力や情報量にバラつきが大きいといえる。さらに、不動産取引では、その取り扱う物件によっても、不動産業者に求められる労力や情報量に大きなバラつきがある。このため、売主及び買主が、ともに自身が支払ったコストに対して満足できるサービスが提供されているとはいえず、これは、取引の活性化を阻害する要因となっている。また、不動産以外を対象とする取引においても、例えば、自動車や船舶等の取引においては、売買の合意は取引システム上で行い、正式な譲渡や登録の手続き等は、仲介業者に委ねられるケースが存在する。このため、このような仲介業者が介在する物件(物品、サービスを含む)の取引では、不動産取引と同様の問題が生じている。 As described above, in real estate transactions, there are problems in both specific real estate properties and normal real estate properties that are not specific real estate properties. In other words, in real estate transactions, it can be said that there is a large variation in the capacity and amount of information that can be applied to each of the seller side and the buyer side depending on the real estate agent that handles the transaction. Furthermore, in real estate transactions, there are large variations in the amount of effort and information required of real estate agents depending on the property to be handled. For this reason, it cannot be said that both sellers and buyers are provided with satisfactory services for the costs paid by themselves, and this is a factor that hinders the activation of transactions. In addition, even in transactions other than real estate, for example, in transactions of automobiles, ships, etc., there are cases where purchase agreements are made on the transaction system, and formal transfer and registration procedures are entrusted to brokers. exist. For this reason, transactions of property (including goods and services) mediated by such intermediaries have the same problems as real estate transactions.

そこで、本発明の課題は、取引の内容を売買に反映させることで取引を活性化できる取引システムとすることである。 Therefore, an object of the present invention is to provide a trading system that can activate trading by reflecting the content of the trading on trading.

上記の課題解決のために、本発明は、取引される物件(物品、サービスを含む)の内容に応じた適正な手数料、つまり、仲介業者の労力に見合った手数料を設定する不動産取引システムとすることを基本とする。 In order to solve the above problems, the present invention is a real estate transaction system that sets an appropriate fee according to the content of the property (including goods and services) to be traded, that is, a fee that is commensurate with the labor of the broker. based on that.

すなわち、本発明は、ネットワークを介した電子商取引で用いられる取引システムにおいて、売主が用いる売主端末と、買主が用いる買主端末と、前記売主と前記買主とを仲介する仲介業者が用いる仲介業者端末と、前記売主端末、前記買主端末及び前記仲介業者端末を結ぶ情報処理部を備え、前記情報処理部は、前記売主端末から入力された売買対象情報を記憶する売買対象情報記憶部と、前記買主端末から入力された条件情報に基づいて前記売買対象情報の中から前記買主に提案する売買対象情報を出力する情報検索部と、前記売買対象情報に基づいて前記売主と前記買主が負担する手数料を算定する手数料算定部と、前記売主端末、前記買主端末及び前記仲介業者端末間の契約とその契約に伴う手続きを実行する契約実行部とを備え、前記手数料算定部は、前記売買対象情報毎に設定され前記仲介業者の手続きの難易度を示す手続き難易度指標に基づいて、前記売主と前記買主が負担する手数料を決定する不動産取引システムを採用した。 That is, the present invention provides a transaction system used in electronic commerce via a network, including a seller terminal used by a seller, a buyer terminal used by a buyer, and an intermediary terminal used by an intermediary that mediates between the seller and the buyer. , an information processing unit that connects the seller terminal, the buyer terminal, and the intermediary terminal, the information processing unit includes a trading object information storage unit that stores trading object information input from the seller terminal, and the buyer terminal an information search unit for outputting information on a trading object to be proposed to the buyer from among the information on the trading object based on the condition information input from; and a contract execution unit for executing a contract among the seller terminal, the buyer terminal, and the intermediary terminal and procedures associated with the contract, wherein the commission calculation unit is set for each of the trading object information A real estate transaction system is adopted in which commissions to be borne by the seller and the buyer are determined based on a procedure difficulty index indicating the difficulty of the procedures of the broker.

ここで、前記手数料算定部(13)は、前記手続き難易度指標が高いほど、前記売主及び前記買主が負担する手数料を高く設定する構成を採用できる。あるいは、前記手数料算定部(13)は、前記手続き難易度指標が高いほど、前記売主又は前記買主の少なくとも一方が負担する手数料を高く設定する構成を採用できる。 Here, the commission calculation unit (13) can employ a configuration in which the higher the procedure difficulty index is, the higher the commission to be borne by the seller and the buyer is set. Alternatively, the commission calculation unit (13) can adopt a configuration in which the commission to be borne by at least one of the seller and the buyer is set higher as the procedure difficulty index is higher.

前記手続き難易度指標は、前記売買対象情報が前記売主端末から入力された後の経過時間長いほど高く設定される構成を採用できる。 The procedure difficulty index can be set higher as the elapsed time after the trading object information is input from the seller terminal is longer.

前記手続き難易度指標は、その売買対象に求められる前記仲介業者の説明責任対象事項の度合いを示す説明責任指標、その売買対象に関わる融資の難易度を示す融資難易度指標に基づいて決定される構成を採用できる。 The procedure difficulty index is determined based on an accountability index indicating the degree of accountability of the intermediary required for the transaction target, and a financing difficulty index indicating the difficulty of financing related to the transaction target. configuration can be adopted.

さらに、前記情報処理部は、前記買主端末から入力された売買対象に対する評価に基づいて、前記売買対象情報毎に設定される前記買主側の評価である売買対象評価指標を算出する売買対象評価算出部を備え、前記手続き難易度指標は、前記売買対象評価指標が低いほど高く設定される構成を採用できる。 Further, the information processing unit calculates a trading object evaluation index, which is the buyer's evaluation set for each trading object information, based on the evaluation of the trading object input from the buyer terminal. section, wherein the procedure difficulty index is set higher as the trading object evaluation index is lower.

前記売買対象評価指標は、前記買主が購入を見送った理由、前記売買対象の評価、前記売主への問い合わせに対する前記買主への回答の評価に基づいて決定される構成を採用できる。 The trading object evaluation index may be determined based on the reason why the buyer postponed the purchase, the evaluation of the trading object, and the evaluation of the buyer's response to the inquiry to the seller.

この発明によれば、取引の内容を売買に反映させることで取引を活性化できる取引システムとすることができる。 According to this invention, it is possible to provide a trading system that can activate trading by reflecting the content of the trading on the trading.

本発明のシステムを示す概略図である。1 is a schematic diagram of a system of the invention; FIG. 本発明のシステムで扱う中古物件の仲介手数料比較Comparison of brokerage fees for used properties handled by the system of the present invention

以下、本発明の実施形態を、図面に基づいて説明する。図1は、本発明の取引システム10の構成を示している。実施形態では、売買対象を不動産とする取引システム10であるので、以下、これを、不動産取引システム10と称する。不動産取引システム10は、インターネット等のネットワーク(通信回線)を介して、情報の提供と電子商取引を行う機能を有している。 BEST MODE FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION Hereinafter, embodiments of the present invention will be described based on the drawings. FIG. 1 shows the configuration of a trading system 10 of the present invention. In the embodiment, since the trading system 10 deals with real estate, it is hereinafter referred to as the real estate trading system 10 . The real estate transaction system 10 has a function of providing information and conducting electronic commerce via a network (communication line) such as the Internet.

図1において、符号1は、売買対象である不動産物件の売主が用いるユーザー端末を示している。ユーザー端末はネットワークに接続可能である。ここでは、ユーザー端末としてパソコンを想定しているが、スマートフォン等の他のデバイスであってもよい(後述の各端末においても同様)。以下、この売主が用いるユーザー端末を売主端末1と称する。また、売買対象である不動産物件を単に物件と称し、その物件に関する情報を物件情報(売買対象情報)と称する。符号3は、売買対象である不動産物件の買主が用いるユーザー端末であり、以下、この買主が用いるユーザー端末を買主端末3と称する。買主には、実際に物件の売買の成約に至ったユーザーだけなく、購入する物件を探しているユーザーも含まれる。また、符号7は、売主と買主とを仲介する仲介業者が用いるユーザー端末であり、以下、この仲介業者が用いるユーザー端末を仲介業者端末7と称する。 In FIG. 1, reference numeral 1 denotes a user terminal used by a seller of a real estate property to be traded. A user terminal is connectable to a network. Here, a personal computer is assumed as the user terminal, but it may be another device such as a smart phone (the same applies to each terminal described later). Hereinafter, the user terminal used by the seller will be referred to as the seller terminal 1 . Further, a real estate property to be traded is simply referred to as a property, and information about the property is referred to as property information (trading target information). Reference numeral 3 denotes a user terminal used by the buyer of the real estate property to be traded. Buyers include not only users who have actually concluded a contract for buying and selling properties, but also users who are looking for properties to purchase. Reference numeral 7 denotes a user terminal used by an intermediary who acts as an intermediary between the seller and the buyer.

図1において、符号2は、この不動産取引システム10の主要部を構成する情報処理部2である。情報処理部2は、売主端末1と、買主端末3と、仲介業者端末7とをネットワークで結ぶ管理サーバーであり、取引で用いられる情報の管理と制御を行っている。この実施形態では、情報処理部2を特定のサイト運営業者(管理者)が管理しているが、仲介業者となり得る不動産業者が、この情報処理部を管理する態様も考えられる。 In FIG. 1 , reference numeral 2 denotes an information processing section 2 that constitutes the main part of this real estate transaction system 10 . The information processing section 2 is a management server that connects the seller terminal 1, the buyer terminal 3, and the intermediary terminal 7 via a network, and manages and controls information used in transactions. In this embodiment, the information processing section 2 is managed by a specific site operator (administrator), but a real estate agent who can act as an intermediary may manage this information processing section.

情報処理部2は、売主端末1から入力された物件情報を記憶する売買対象情報記憶部11(この実施形態では物件情報記憶部11と称する)と、買主端末3から入力された条件情報に基づいて物件情報の中から買主に提案する物件情報を出力する情報検索部12と、物件情報に基づいて売主と買主が負担する手数料を算定する手数料算定部13とを備えている。また、情報処理部2は、売主端末1、買主端末3及び仲介業者端末7間の契約とその契約に伴う手続きを実行する契約実行部14とを備えている。 The information processing unit 2 stores the property information input from the seller terminal 1 (referred to as the property information storage unit 11 in this embodiment) for sale information storage unit 11, and based on the condition information input from the buyer terminal 3 and an information retrieval unit 12 for outputting property information to be proposed to the buyer from the property information, and a commission calculation unit 13 for calculating commissions to be borne by the seller and the buyer based on the property information. The information processing section 2 also includes a contract executing section 14 for executing contracts between the seller terminal 1, the buyer terminal 3, and the intermediary terminal 7 and procedures associated with the contract.

売主は、売主端末1を通じて、自身の情報(住所、氏名、年齢、職業)を情報処理部2に送信する。送信された売主に関する情報は、ユーザー情報記憶部16に保存される。また、買主は、買主端末3を通じて、自身の情報(住所、氏名、年齢、職業、現在の住居の種別等)を情報処理部2に送信する。送信された買主に関する情報は、ユーザー情報記憶部16に保存される。 The seller transmits his/her own information (address, name, age, occupation) to the information processing section 2 through the seller terminal 1 . The transmitted information on the seller is stored in the user information storage unit 16 . In addition, the buyer transmits his/her own information (address, name, age, occupation, type of current residence, etc.) to the information processing section 2 through the buyer terminal 3 . The transmitted information about the buyer is saved in the user information storage unit 16 .

物件情報記憶部11に記憶される物件情報とは、例えば、売主が売却を希望する物件の所在地、建物の情報(間取りや面積、図面等)、土地の情報、物件の経歴(新築年、リフォーム歴、施工業者等)、外観や内観、眺望等の画像や映像といった各種の情報が挙げられる。 The property information stored in the property information storage unit 11 includes, for example, the location of the property that the seller wishes to sell, building information (floor plan, area, drawing, etc.), land information, property history (new construction year, renovation history, contractor, etc.), exterior and interior views, views and other images and videos.

情報検索部12は、買主端末3からの要求である条件情報に応じて、必要な物件情報の提供を行う機能を有している。情報検索部12において、買主端末3から入力される条件情報とは、例えば、希望するエリア(都道府県・市町村等の行政区分、鉄道沿線名等)、希望する物件の種別(戸建て、集合住宅等)、希望する物件の間取り、希望する価格帯、希望する物件の築年数等が挙げられる。情報検索部12は、買主端末3からの要求に該当する物件情報を、画像や音声の情報として買主端末3に送信する。買主は、それらの情報の提供を受けて、自身が購入する、又は、購入の候補となる物件情報を買主端末3で選択することができる。 The information search unit 12 has a function of providing necessary property information according to condition information requested from the buyer terminal 3 . In the information search unit 12, the condition information input from the buyer terminal 3 includes, for example, the desired area (administrative division such as prefectures and municipalities, names along railway lines, etc.), the type of desired property (detached house, collective housing, etc.) ), the floor plan of the desired property, the desired price range, and the desired building age of the property. The information search unit 12 transmits the property information corresponding to the request from the buyer terminal 3 to the buyer terminal 3 as image and sound information. The buyer can use the buyer terminal 3 to select property information that he/she will purchase or that will be a candidate for purchase by receiving such information.

買主は、情報検索部12から得られる物件情報を通じて、自身が希望する物件の外観、内観、周辺環境等を、現地に足を運ぶことなくバーチャル的に見学することができる。ここで、自身が希望する場合は、現地を訪問して見学する意思があることを、売主端末1、又は、システム管理者端末8を通じて相手方に申し出ることができる。買主は、売主又はシステム管理者が指定した仲介業者等と日程の調整を行い、双方立ち合いのもと現地の見学をすることもできる。 Through the property information obtained from the information search unit 12, the buyer can virtually observe the exterior, interior, surrounding environment, etc. of the desired property without visiting the site. Here, if he or she desires, he or she can inform the other party through the seller terminal 1 or the system manager terminal 8 that he/she intends to visit and observe the site. The buyer can coordinate the schedule with the intermediary company designated by the seller or the system administrator, and can visit the site in the presence of both parties.

手数料算定部13は、物件情報毎に設定された仲介業者の手続きの難易度を示す手続き難易度指標に基づいて、売主と買主のそれぞれが負担する手数料を決定する機能を有している。この手数料の額に関する情報は、情報検索部12から買主端末3に提供される情報に含まれる。ここで、手数料算定部13は、手数料の額を、その物件情報に記載の売買価格を基準に比率でもって決定する。この手数料を決定する基準となる価格を、以下、手数料算定基準額と称する。手数料算定基準額は、通常は、その物件の売買価格(税抜き)である。すなわち、手数料算定部13は、手数料算定基準額に対する比率(%)で、売主が負担する手数料の額、及び、買主が負担する手数料の額を決定する機能を有している。 The fee calculation unit 13 has a function of determining the fees to be borne by the seller and the buyer based on the procedure difficulty index indicating the difficulty of the procedure of the broker set for each piece of property information. Information on the amount of this commission is included in the information provided from the information retrieval unit 12 to the buyer terminal 3 . Here, the fee calculation unit 13 determines the amount of the fee as a ratio based on the transaction price described in the property information. The price that serves as the basis for determining this fee is hereinafter referred to as the fee calculation reference amount. The fee calculation standard amount is usually the transaction price (excluding tax) of the property. In other words, the commission calculation unit 13 has a function of determining the amount of commission to be borne by the seller and the amount of commission to be borne by the buyer as a ratio (%) to the reference amount for commission calculation.

契約実行部14は、売主端末1、買主端末3及び仲介業者端末7間の契約とその契約に伴う手続きを実行する。契約は、情報管理部2において行われる電子処理上の購入手続き(仮購入の手続きと解する)であるが、正式な契約は、仲介業者である不動産業者を通じて書面で行うこととなる。契約に伴う手続きとは、法令上、不動産売買に義務付けられている重要事項説明の他、金融機関による融資の手続き、各種保険契約上の手続き、登記上の手続き、物件引き渡し上の書面手続き等が挙げられる。 The contract execution unit 14 executes a contract between the seller terminal 1, the buyer terminal 3 and the intermediary terminal 7 and the procedures associated with the contract. A contract is an electronic purchase procedure (understood as a provisional purchase procedure) performed in the information management unit 2, but a formal contract is made in writing through a real estate agent as an intermediary. Procedures associated with the contract include explanations of important matters required by law for real estate transactions, procedures for financing by financial institutions, procedures for various insurance contracts, procedures for registration, document procedures for property delivery, etc. mentioned.

手数料算定部13は、物件情報毎に設定された手続き難易度指標が高いほど、売主及び買主が負担する手数料を高く設定する。あるいは、手数料算定部13は、物件情報毎に設定された手続き難易度指標が高いほど、売主又は買主の少なくとも一方が負担する手数料を高く設定する。これにより、従来のように、売買価格等を基準とした一律の比率による手数料ではなく、物件の内容に応じた適正な手数料、つまり、仲介業者の労力に見合った手数料を柔軟に設定することができる。その決定された手数料は、売主端末1及び買主端末3において、物件情報の一部として閲覧することができる。手数料が労力に見合った適正な額であれば、売主及び買主にこの不動産取引システムを利用したいというインセンティヴが働き、その結果、不動産市場に流通する物件数が増加して市場が活性化する効果が期待できる。 The commission calculation unit 13 sets the commission to be borne by the seller and the buyer higher as the procedure difficulty index set for each item of property information is higher. Alternatively, the fee calculation unit 13 sets a higher fee to be borne by at least one of the seller and the buyer as the procedure difficulty index set for each property information is higher. As a result, it is possible to flexibly set an appropriate fee according to the content of the property, that is, a fee that matches the effort of the broker, instead of the conventional fee based on a uniform ratio based on the transaction price. can. The determined commission can be viewed as part of property information on the seller terminal 1 and the buyer terminal 3 . If the commission is an appropriate amount commensurate with the amount of effort put into it, it will give sellers and buyers an incentive to use this real estate transaction system. I can expect it.

ここで、手続き難易度指標とは、仲介業者が行う手続きの難易度を表す指標であり、この実施形態では、以下の[1][2][3]の算定項目に基づいて、数値でもって段階的に(例えば、5段階で)決定する。
[1]その物件の売買に関わる手続きの項目の数(x項目)
[2]その物件の売買に関わる手続きに要する時間数(y時間)
[3]その物件の売買に関わる手続きに含まれる要注意項目の数(z項目)
ここで、要注意項目とは、前述の特定不動産物件が有している項目であり、例えば、建物や土地の一部に要修繕箇所がある物件や、何らかの瑕疵を含む物件、周辺環境等に問題がある物件、事故物件、その他いわゆるワケあり物件が有しているマイナス評価の項目である。
Here, the procedure difficulty index is an index that indicates the difficulty of the procedure performed by the intermediary. Decide step by step (for example, in 5 steps).
[1] Number of procedural items related to the sale of the property (x items)
[2] Number of hours required for procedures related to the sale of the property (y hours)
[3] Number of caution items included in procedures related to the sale of the property (z items)
Here, items requiring special attention are items that the above-mentioned specific real estate property has. This is a negative evaluation item for properties with problems, accidents, and other properties with so-called problems.

例えば、[1]その物件の売買に関わる手続きの項目の数(x項目)に関し、
[第1段階(手続き難易度指標1)]xが3未満
[第2段階(手続き難易度指標2)]xが3以上5未満
[第3段階(手続き難易度指標3)]xが5以上7未満
[第4段階(手続き難易度指標4)]xが7以上9未満
[第5段階(手続き難易度指標5)]xが10以上
と設定し、手続き難易度指標1では売主側の手数料率を-0.3%(買主側の手数料も-0.3%)、手続き難易度指標2では売主側の手数料率を-0.15%(買主側の手数料も-0.15%)、手続き難易度指標3では売主側の手数料率を±0%(買主側の手数料も±0%)、手続き難易度指標4では売主側の手数料率を+0.1%(買主側の手数料も+0.1%)、手続き難易度指標5では売主側の手数料率を+0.2%(買主側の手数料も+0.2%)とすることができる。手続き難易度指標の数値と、それに対応する売主側、買主側のそれぞれの手数料率の増減は、この例に限定されず、物件の種別や内容に応じて適宜変更が可能である。また、手続き難易度指標の段階数は5段階に限定されず、その段階数は適宜設定できる。さらに、売主側の手数料率の増減量と、買主側の手数料率の増減量を互いに異ならせてもよい。これらの設定のバリエーションについては、後述のそれぞれの例において、同様である。
For example, [1] Regarding the number of procedural items (x items) related to the sale of the property,
[1st stage (procedure difficulty index 1)] x is less than 3 [2nd stage (procedure difficulty index 2)] x is 3 or more and less than 5 [3rd stage (procedure difficulty index 3)] x is 5 or more Less than 7 [fourth stage (procedure difficulty index 4)] x is 7 or more and less than 9 [fifth stage (procedure difficulty index 5)] x is set to 10 or more, and for procedure difficulty index 1, the seller's commission -0.3% (the buyer's commission is also -0.3%), and in the procedure difficulty index 2, the seller's commission rate is -0.15% (the buyer's commission is also -0.15%), In procedure difficulty index 3, the seller's commission rate is ±0% (buyer's commission is also ±0%), and in procedure difficulty index 4, the seller's commission rate is +0.1% (buyer's commission is also +0. 1%), and with procedure difficulty index 5, the commission rate on the seller side can be +0.2% (the commission on the buyer side is also +0.2%). The numerical value of the procedure difficulty index and the corresponding increase/decrease in the commission rate on the seller's side and the buyer's side are not limited to this example, and can be appropriately changed according to the type and content of the property. Further, the number of steps of the procedure difficulty index is not limited to five steps, and the number of steps can be set as appropriate. Furthermore, the amount of increase/decrease in the commission rate on the seller's side and the amount of increase/decrease in the commission rate on the buyer's side may be made different from each other. Variations of these settings are the same in each example described later.

また、[2]その物件の売買に関わる手続きに要する時間数(y時間)に関し、
[第1段階(手続き難易度指標1)]yが3未満
[第2段階(手続き難易度指標2)]yが3以上5未満
[第3段階(手続き難易度指標3)]yが5以上7未満
[第4段階(手続き難易度指標4)]yが7以上9未満
[第5段階(手続き難易度指標5)]yが10以上
と設定し、手続き難易度指標1では売主側の手数料率を-0.2%(買主側の手数料も-0.2%)、手続き難易度指標2では売主側の手数料率を-0.1%(買主側の手数料も-0.1%)、手続き難易度指標3では売主側の手数料率を±0%(買主側の手数料も±0%)、手続き難易度指標4では売主側の手数料率を+0.1%(買主側の手数料も+0.1%)、手続き難易度指標5では売主側の手数料率を+0.2%(買主側の手数料も+0.2%)とすることができる。
In addition, [2] Regarding the number of hours (y hours) required for procedures related to the sale of the property,
[1st stage (procedure difficulty index 1)] y is less than 3 [2nd stage (procedure difficulty index 2)] y is 3 or more and less than 5 [3rd stage (procedure difficulty index 3)] y is 5 or more Less than 7 [4th stage (procedure difficulty index 4)] y is 7 or more and less than 9 [5th stage (procedure difficulty index 5)] y is set to 10 or more, and for procedure difficulty index 1, the seller's commission -0.2% (the buyer's commission is also -0.2%), and in the procedure difficulty index 2, the seller's commission rate is -0.1% (the buyer's commission is also -0.1%), In procedure difficulty index 3, the seller's commission rate is ±0% (buyer's commission is also ±0%), and in procedure difficulty index 4, the seller's commission rate is +0.1% (buyer's commission is also +0. 1%), and with procedure difficulty index 5, the commission rate on the seller side can be +0.2% (the commission on the buyer side is also +0.2%).

さらに、[3]その物件の売買に関わる手続きに含まれる要注意項目の数(z項目)に関し、
[第1段階(手続き難易度指標1)]zが1未満
[第2段階(手続き難易度指標2)]zが1以上2未満
[第3段階(手続き難易度指標3)]zが2以上3未満
[第4段階(手続き難易度指標4)]zが3以上4未満
[第5段階(手続き難易度指標5)]zが5以上
と設定し、手続き難易度指標1では売主側の手数料率を+0.1%(買主側の手数料も+0.1%)、手続き難易度指標2では売主側の手数料率を+0.2%(買主側の手数料も+0.2%)、手続き難易度指標3では売主側の手数料率を+0.3%(買主側の手数料も+0.3%)、手続き難易度指標4では売主側の手数料率を+0.4%(買主側の手数料も+0.4%)、手続き難易度指標5では売主側の手数料率を+0.5%(買主側の手数料も+0.5%)とすることができる。
Furthermore, [3] Regarding the number of items requiring attention (z items) included in the procedures related to the sale of the property,
[First stage (procedure difficulty index 1)] z is less than 1 [second stage (procedure difficulty index 2)] z is 1 or more and less than 2 [third stage (procedure difficulty index 3)] z is 2 or more Less than 3 [Fourth stage (procedure difficulty index 4)] z is 3 or more and less than 4 [fifth stage (procedure difficulty index 5)] z is set to 5 or more, and for procedure difficulty index 1, the seller's commission +0.1% (buyer's fee is also +0.1%), procedure difficulty index 2, seller's fee rate is +0.2% (buyer's fee is also +0.2%), procedure difficulty index For 3, the seller's commission rate is +0.3% (buyer's commission is also +0.3%), and for procedure difficulty index 4, the seller's commission rate is +0.4% (buyer's commission is also +0.4%). ), the commission rate on the seller side can be +0.5% (the commission on the buyer side is also +0.5%) for procedure difficulty index 5.

なお、上記[1][2][3]に挙げられるような複数の要素を総合的に判断し、手続き難易度指標を、以下のように段階的に決定することもできる。例えば、
[第1段階(手続き難易度指標1)]x+y+zが15未満
[第2段階(手続き難易度指標2)]x+y+zが15以上20未満
[第3段階(手続き難易度指標3)]x+y+zが20以上25未満
[第4段階(手続き難易度指標4)]x+y+zが25以上30未満
[第5段階(手続き難易度指標5)]x+y+zが30以上
ここで、上記算定項目[1][2][3]のうち、一部項目を、例えば、[3]の項目を[1][2]の項目よりも重視して、手続き難易度指標の算定に加味してもよい。例えば、x+y+zの算定式に代えて、x+y+2zの算定式や、x+y+3zの算定式を採用してもよい。手続き難易度指標の数値と、それに対応する売主側、買主側のそれぞれの手数料率の増減の数値を、物件の種別や内容に応じて適宜設定できる点は同様である。
It is also possible to comprehensively judge a plurality of factors such as those listed in [1], [2], and [3] above, and determine the procedure difficulty index step by step as follows. for example,
[Step 1 (Procedure Difficulty Index 1)] x + y + z is less than 15 [Step 2 (Procedural Difficulty Index 2)] x + y + z is 15 or more and less than 20 [Step 3 (Procedural Difficulty Index 3)] x + y + z is 20 or more Less than 25 [Step 4 (procedure difficulty index 4)] x + y + z is 25 or more and less than 30 [Step 5 (procedure difficulty index 5)] x + y + z is 30 or more Here, the above calculation items [1] [2] [3] ], for example, the item [3] may be more important than the item [1] [2], and may be added to the calculation of the procedure difficulty index. For example, instead of the calculation formula of x+y+z, the calculation formula of x+y+2z or the calculation formula of x+y+3z may be adopted. Similarly, the numerical value of the procedure difficulty index and the corresponding numerical value of increase/decrease in the commission rate on the seller's side and the buyer's side can be appropriately set according to the type and content of the property.

また、それ以外にも、手続き難易度指標として、例えば、
[4]物件情報が売主端末1から入力された後の経過時間t
を用いてもよい。物件情報が売主端末1から入力された後の経過時間tが長いほど、手数料は高く設定される。入力された後の経過時間が長い物件情報、すなわち、掲載期間が長い物件情報は、いわば売れにくい物件であり、何らかの売れない理由を包含している可能性が高いと考えられる。売れにくい物件は、それを仲介する仲介業者としての説明責任や瑕疵担保責任も大きいことから、売買に関わる手続きの難易度は高いと考えられる。このため、その物件情報の掲載時間の長短に基づいて、手続き難易度指標を算定することが有効である。
In addition, as a procedure difficulty index, for example,
[4] Elapsed time t after property information is input from seller terminal 1
may be used. The longer the elapsed time t after the property information is input from the seller terminal 1, the higher the commission is set. Property information with a long elapsed time after being input, that is, property information with a long posting period is, so to speak, a property that is difficult to sell, and it is highly possible that it includes some reason for the unsellability. For properties that are difficult to sell, the degree of difficulty in the procedures related to the sale is considered to be high because the brokers who mediate them have a large accountability and defect warranty liability. Therefore, it is effective to calculate the procedure difficulty index based on the length of time the property information is posted.

例えば、[4]物件情報が売主端末1から入力された後の経過時間t(物件情報の掲載時間t)に応じて、以下のように(例えば、5段階で)手続き難易度指標を段階的に決定することができる。
[第1段階(手続き難易度指標1)]その物件情報が入力された後の経過時間tが24時間未満
[第2段階(手続き難易度指標2)]その物件情報が入力された後の経過時間tが24時間以上1週間以内
[第3段階(手続き難易度指標3)]その物件情報が入力された後の経過時間tが1週間を超えて1ケ月以内
[第4段階(手続き難易度指標4)]その物件情報が入力された後の経過時間tが1ケ月を超えて6ケ月以内
[第5段階(手続き難易度指標5)]その物件情報が入力された後の経過時間tが6ケ月を超えている
For example, [4] Depending on the elapsed time t (property information publication time t) after the property information is input from the seller terminal 1, the procedure difficulty index is set in stages as follows (for example, in 5 stages) can be determined to
[Step 1 (procedure difficulty index 1)] Elapsed time t after the property information was entered is less than 24 hours [Step 2 (procedure difficulty index 2)] Elapsed time after the property information was entered Time t is 24 hours or more and within 1 week [Step 3 (procedure difficulty index 3)] Elapsed time t after the property information is entered exceeds 1 week and is within 1 month [Step 4 (procedure difficulty Index 4)] Elapsed time t after the property information is input exceeds 1 month and is within 6 months [Step 5 (procedure difficulty index 5)] Elapsed time t after the property information is input more than 6 months

さらに、手続き難易度指標として、例えば、
[5]物件に求められる前記仲介業者の説明責任対象事項の度合いを示す説明責任指標
に基づいて決定する手法もある。例えば、説明責任対象事項の項目数をp、としたときに、以下のように(例えば、5段階で)手続き難易度指標を段階的に決定することができる。
[第1段階(手続き難易度指標1)]pが10未満
[第2段階(手続き難易度指標2)]pが10以上20未満
[第3段階(手続き難易度指標3)]pが20以上30未満
[第4段階(手続き難易度指標4)]pが30以上40未満
[第5段階(手続き難易度指標5)]pが40以上
Furthermore, as a procedure difficulty index, for example,
[5] There is also a method of making a decision based on an accountability indicator that indicates the degree of accountability of the agent required for the property. For example, when the number of items to be accountable for is p, the procedure difficulty index can be determined step by step (for example, in five steps) as follows.
[First stage (procedure difficulty index 1)] p is less than 10 [second stage (procedure difficulty index 2)] p is 10 or more and less than 20 [third stage (procedure difficulty index 3)] p is 20 or more Less than 30 [Step 4 (procedure difficulty index 4)] p is 30 or more and less than 40 [fifth step (procedure difficulty index 5)] p is 40 or more

さらに、手続き難易度指標として、例えば、
[6]物件に関わる融資の難易度を示す融資難易度指標
に基づいて決定する手法もある。例えば、物件に関わる融資の手続き項目数をqとしたときに、以下のように(例えば、5段階で)手続き難易度指標を段階的に決定することができる。
[第1段階(手続き難易度指標1)]qが10未満
[第2段階(手続き難易度指標2)]qが10以上20未満
[第3段階(手続き難易度指標3)]qが20以上30未満
[第4段階(手続き難易度指標4)]qが30以上40未満
[第5段階(手続き難易度指標5)]qが40以上
Furthermore, as a procedure difficulty index, for example,
[6] There is also a method of determining based on a financing difficulty index that indicates the difficulty of financing related to the property. For example, when the number of loan procedure items related to a property is q, the procedure difficulty index can be determined stepwise (for example, in five steps) as follows.
[Step 1 (Procedure Difficulty Index 1)] q is less than 10 [Step 2 (Procedural Difficulty Index 2)] q is 10 or more and less than 20 [Third Step (Procedural Difficulty Index 3)] q is 20 or more Less than 30 [Step 4 (procedure difficulty index 4)] q is 30 or more and less than 40 [Step 5 (procedure difficulty index 5)] q is 40 or more

さらに、他の手続き難易度指標の決定手法として、
[7]物件評価指標(売買対象評価指標)
に基づいて決定する手法もある。この場合、情報処理部2は、買主端末3から入力された物件に対する評価に基づいて、物件情報毎に設定される買主側の評価である物件評価指標を算出する売買対象評価算出部15(実施形態では物件評価算出部15と称する)を備えている。物件評価算出部15において算出された物件評価指標が低いほど、すなわち、物件に対する評価が低いほど、手続き難易度指標は高く設定される。
Furthermore, as another procedure difficulty index determination method,
[7] Property evaluation index (trading target evaluation index)
There is also a method of making a decision based on In this case, the information processing unit 2 calculates the property evaluation index, which is the buyer's evaluation set for each property information, based on the evaluation of the property input from the buyer terminal 3 (implementation (referred to as a property evaluation calculation unit 15 in the form). The lower the property evaluation index calculated by the property evaluation calculator 15, that is, the lower the evaluation of the property, the higher the procedure difficulty index is set.

ここで、物件評価指標とは、例えば、過去にその物件情報に対して買主(購入を検討した者)が購入を見送った理由、その時の物件の評価、その物件情報に対して売主への問い合わせに対する買主への回答の評価に基づいて決定することができる。例えば、過去にその物件情報に対して購入を見送った理由を、a=1(自己都合),a=2(価格上の理由),a=3(自身の好み),a=4(物件上の要修理箇所の存在),a=5(物件上の瑕疵)と、その理由に応じて数値で段階的に示し、以下のように(例えば、5段階で)手続き難易度指標を段階的に決定することができる。
[第1段階(手続き難易度指標1)]a=1
[第2段階(手続き難易度指標2)]a=2
[第3段階(手続き難易度指標3)]a=3
[第4段階(手続き難易度指標4)]a=4
[第5段階(手続き難易度指標5)]a=5
また、購入を見送った理由aに代えて、その見送った時の物件に対する評価bを数値でもって段階的に示したり、その物件情報に対して売主への問い合わせに対する買主への回答の評価を、数値でもって段階的に示して、その段階的な数値を物件評価指標としてもよい。
Here, the property evaluation index is, for example, the reason why the buyer (person who considered purchasing) postponed the purchase of the property information in the past, the evaluation of the property at that time, and the inquiry to the seller regarding the property information. may be determined based on an evaluation of Buyer's responses to For example, the reasons for not purchasing the property information in the past are: Existence of parts requiring repair), a = 5 (defect on the property), and numerically indicated in stages according to the reason, and the procedure difficulty index is shown in stages as follows (for example, in 5 stages) can decide.
[Step 1 (procedural difficulty index 1)] a = 1
[Second stage (procedural difficulty index 2)] a = 2
[Step 3 (procedure difficulty index 3)] a = 3
[Step 4 (procedure difficulty index 4)] a = 4
[Step 5 (procedural difficulty index 5)] a = 5
In addition, instead of the reason a that the purchase was postponed, the evaluation b of the property at the time of postponement was indicated in stages by numerical values, or the evaluation of the buyer's response to the inquiry to the seller regarding the property information, It is also possible to use numerical values in stages, and use the numerical values in stages as the property evaluation index.

具体的には、物件購入に際して、最初に問い合わせた方がそのまま不動産を購入するケースは稀と想定され、購入を見送った理由、物件自体の評価、売主の問い合わせに対する評価を仲介手数料に反映することで、買主が当該物件購入を検討する際に参考となり、売主、買主のミスマッチを防ぐ効果があると想定される。また、売主も問い合わせをしてきた相手(= 将来的な買主)を評価し、他物件でのその相手の対応評価を確認し、購入の本気度合いを図れる情報が入手できる。また、購入後トラブルにつながりそうな買主との売買を回避できる等、メリットがある。 Specifically, when purchasing a property, it is assumed that it is rare for the person who made the initial inquiry to purchase the property as is, so the reason for not purchasing the property, the evaluation of the property itself, and the evaluation of the seller's inquiry should be reflected in the brokerage fee. Therefore, it is assumed that it will be helpful when the buyer considers purchasing the property, and that it will have the effect of preventing a mismatch between the seller and the buyer. In addition, the seller can also evaluate the person who made the inquiry (=future buyer), check the evaluation of the person's response to other properties, and obtain information that can measure the seriousness of the purchase. In addition, there are merits such as avoiding buying and selling with buyers who are likely to lead to troubles after purchase.

このように、仲介手数料の試算に際して、売主に対する買主の評価を反映することで、物件に応じたより適正な手数料を提示することが可能となる。評価の内容に関しては、他サイトでの評価を取り込むことも可能であるが、この不動産取引システム10が備える評価サーバー5に、このような情報を蓄積しておくことが現実的である。 In this way, by reflecting the buyer's evaluation of the seller in the trial calculation of the brokerage commission, it is possible to present a more appropriate commission according to the property. As for the content of the evaluation, it is possible to import evaluations from other sites.

(手数料の算定例)
手数料の算定例を図2に示す。図2の左側欄に記載のcase:1は、掲載後すぐに買い手が決定するような買主に人気の高い通常優良物件を示している。一般市場の手数料率は、その物件の手数料算定基準額(掲載の売買価格)に対して、売主・買主ともに3.0%である。すなわち、売主が負担する手数料率と、買主が負担する手数料率を合算すると、6.0%である。これに対して、この発明の不動産取引システムでは、ネットワークを用いた個人間取引と、WEB内覧の採用により現地での内覧を簡素化したことを前提に、売主が負担する手数料率1.2%、買主が負担する手数料率1.6%とし、両者を合算すると、2.8%としている。
(Example of fee calculation)
Fig. 2 shows an example of fee calculation. Case: 1 shown in the left column of FIG. 2 indicates a normal excellent property that is highly popular with buyers and that buyers decide immediately after posting. The commission rate in the general market is 3.0% for both the seller and the buyer of the property's commission calculation standard amount (listed trading price). That is, the sum of the commission rate borne by the seller and the commission rate borne by the buyer is 6.0%. On the other hand, in the real estate transaction system of the present invention, on the premise that the on-site viewing has been simplified by adopting interpersonal transactions using the network and web viewing, the commission rate borne by the seller is 1.2%. , the commission rate borne by the buyer is 1.6%, and the total of the two is 2.8%.

その算定根拠は、ベースとなる手数料率が、売主側、買主側でそれぞれ1.7%である。このcase:1の物件では、サイト使用料として、売主側、買主側でそれぞれ1.2%とし、前述の
[7]物件評価指標
による手数料の補正として、売主側、買主側でそれぞれ-0.1%としている。また、重要事項説明、契約の仲介に関する手数料として、売主側、買主側でそれぞれ0.6%としているが、これは、買主が自身で手続きを行う場合は不要である。
The basis for the calculation is that the base commission rate is 1.7% for both the seller and the buyer. In this case: 1 property, the site usage fee is 1.2% for both the seller and the buyer, and the correction of the fee based on the property evaluation index in [7] above is -0. 1%. In addition, the fee for explanation of important matters and mediation of contract is set at 0.6% for both the seller and the buyer, but this is not required if the buyer carries out the procedures by himself/herself.

さらに、このcase:1の物件では、住宅診断(耐震性、老朽化度合い等の診断)の経歴があることから、
[8]住宅診断評価指標
による手数料の補正として、売主側の手数料を-0.3%としている。ここで、住宅診断に基づく手続き難易度指標は、b=1(住宅診断有り),b=2(住宅診断無し)として、以下のように(例えば、2段階で)段階的に決定することができる。
[第1段階(手続き難易度指標1)]b=1
[第2段階(手続き難易度指標2)]b=2
図2の例では、手続き難易度指標1の際に、売主側の手数料-0.3%、買主側の手数料±0%、手続き難易度指標2の際に、売主側の手数料±0%、買主側の手数料±0%、としている。
Furthermore, since this case: 1 property has a history of housing diagnosis (diagnosis of earthquake resistance, degree of deterioration, etc.),
[8] The seller's fee is -0.3% as a correction of the fee based on the housing diagnosis evaluation index. Here, the procedure difficulty index based on the housing diagnosis can be determined stepwise as follows (for example, in two stages) with b = 1 (with housing diagnosis) and b = 2 (without housing diagnosis). can.
[First step (procedure difficulty index 1)] b=1
[Second stage (procedure difficulty index 2)] b=2
In the example of FIG. 2, when the procedure difficulty index is 1, the seller's commission is -0.3%, the buyer's commission is ±0%, and when the procedure difficulty index is 2, the seller's commission is ±0%, The buyer's fee is ±0%.

さらに、このcase:1の物件では、住人が居ないものの、プロである空き家管理業者が定期的に管理をしている物件であることから、
[9]空き家管理物件評価指標
による手数料の補正として、売主側の手数料を-0.1%としている。ここで、空き家管理物件評価指標に基づく手続き難易度指標は、c=1(住人が居ない空き家であるが、空き家管理物件である),c=2(住人が居ない空き家であり、空き家管理物件でない)として、以下のように(例えば、2段階で)段階的に決定することができる。
[第1段階(手続き難易度指標1)]c=1
[第2段階(手続き難易度指標2)]c=2
図2の例では、手続き難易度指標1の際に、売主側の手数料-0.1%、買主側の手数料±0%、手続き難易度指標2の際に、売主側の手数料±0%、買主側の手数料±0%、としている。
Furthermore, although this case: 1 property has no residents, it is regularly managed by a professional vacant house management company.
[9] As a correction of the fee based on the vacant house management property evaluation index, the seller's fee is -0.1%. Here, the procedure difficulty index based on the vacant house management property evaluation index is c = 1 (a vacant house with no residents, but a vacant house management property), c = 2 (a vacant house with no residents, vacant house management property) can be determined step by step (for example, in two steps) as follows.
[First step (procedure difficulty index 1)] c=1
[Second stage (procedure difficulty index 2)] c=2
In the example of FIG. 2, when the procedure difficulty index is 1, the seller's commission is -0.1%, the buyer's commission is ±0%, and when the procedure difficulty index is 2, the seller's commission is ±0%, The buyer's fee is ±0%.

さらに、このcase:1の物件では、WEB内覧の採用により現地での内覧を簡素化している物件であることから、
[10]WEB内覧対応指標
による手数料の補正として、売主側、買主側の手数料をそれぞれ-0.1%としている。ここで、WEB内覧対応指標に基づく手続き難易度指標は、d=1(WEB内覧対応物件である),d=2(WEB内覧対応物件でない)として、以下のように(例えば、2段階で)段階的に決定することができる。
[第1段階(手続き難易度指標1)]d=1
[第2段階(手続き難易度指標2)]d=2
図2の例では、手続き難易度指標1の際に、売主側の手数料-0.1%、買主側の手数料-0.1%、手続き難易度指標2の際に、売主側の手数料±0%、買主側の手数料±0%、としている。
Furthermore, in this case: 1 property, since it is a property that simplifies on-site viewing by adopting web viewing,
[10] As a correction of the fee based on the WEB preview correspondence index, the fee for the seller side and the buyer side is -0.1%. Here, the procedure difficulty index based on the WEB preview support index is as follows (for example, in two stages) with d = 1 (property for WEB preview) and d = 2 (property not for WEB preview). It can be determined step by step.
[First step (procedure difficulty index 1)] d=1
[Second stage (procedure difficulty index 2)] d=2
In the example of FIG. 2, when the procedure difficulty index is 1, the seller's commission is -0.1%, the buyer's commission is -0.1%, and when the procedure difficulty index is 2, the seller's commission is ±0. %, and the buyer's commission ± 0%.

図2の右側欄に記載のcase:2は、買主に人気が無く、スムーズな販売が困難な特定不動産物件を示している。一般市場の手数料率は、その物件の手数料算定基準額(掲載の売買価格)に対して、売主・買主ともに3.0%である。すなわち、売り主が負担する手数料率と、買主が負担する手数料率を合算すると、6.0%である。また、この発明の不動産取引システムでは、売主が負担する手数料率2.2%、買主が負担する手数料率1.3%とし、両者を合算すると、3.5%としている。 Case: 2 described in the right column of FIG. 2 indicates a specific real estate property that is not popular with buyers and difficult to sell smoothly. The commission rate in the general market is 3.0% for both the seller and the buyer of the property's commission calculation standard amount (listed trading price). That is, the sum of the commission rate borne by the seller and the commission rate borne by the buyer is 6.0%. In the real estate transaction system of the present invention, the commission rate borne by the seller is 2.2% and the commission rate borne by the buyer is 1.3%, and the total of the two is 3.5%.

その算定根拠として、ベースとなる手数料率は、売主側、買主側でそれぞれ1.7%である。このcase:2の物件でのサイト使用料、[7]物件評価指標による手数料の補正、重要事項説明、契約の仲介に関する手数料、[10]WEB内覧対応指標による手数料の補正は、case:2の物件と同様である。ただし、[8]住宅診断評価指標による手数料の補正、[9]空き家管理物件評価指標による手数料の補正は、それぞれ、売主側の手数料±0%、買主側の手数料±0%、としている。 As the basis for the calculation, the base commission rate is 1.7% for both the seller and the buyer. The site usage fee for this case: 2 property, [7] correction of the fee based on the property evaluation index, explanation of important matters, contract brokerage fee, and [10] correction of the fee based on the WEB viewing index are the case: 2 Same as property. However, [8] Correction of fees based on housing diagnosis evaluation index and [9] Correction of fees based on vacant house management property evaluation index are assumed to be ±0% for the seller and ±0% for the buyer, respectively.

このcase:2では、[3]その物件の売買に関わる手続きに含まれる要注意項目の数(z項目)に基づく手数料の補正として、売主側で+0.5%、買主側で-0.2%としている。 In this case: 2, [3] +0.5% on the seller side and -0.2 on the buyer side as a correction of the fee based on the number of items requiring attention (z item) included in the procedure related to the sale of the property %.

また、このcase:2では、[4]物件情報が売主端末1から入力された後の経過時間tに基づく手数料の補正として、売主側で+0.1%、買主側で-0.1%としている。 Also, in this case: 2, as a correction of the fee based on the elapsed time t after [4] property information was input from the seller terminal 1, +0.1% on the seller side and -0.1% on the buyer side there is

以上のように、この発明の不動産取引システムでは、仲介業者の労力の度合いを示す手続き難易度指標に基づいて、売主と買主が負担する手数料をそれぞれ決定するので、その労力に見合った適正な手数料の設定が可能である。また、手続き難易度指標は、上記の[1]~[10]の例に示すような複数の要素(指標)の中から、単一の又は複数の手続き難易度指標を選択的に採用することができる。手数料算定部13は、これらの手続き難易度指標が高いほど(手続きの難易度が高いほど)、手数料算定基準額に対する売主が負担する手数料の比率(及び額)、及び、手数料算定基準額に対する買主が負担する手数料の比率(及び額)を高く設定する。これにより、仲介業者に求められる労力に見合った手数料設定が可能である。このため、手続き難易度指標が低いほど、売主と買主のそれぞれが負担する手数料の比率が低くなるので、買主に人気の高い物件、すなわち、仲介業者に求められる労力が少ない物件は、その低い手数料ゆえ、この不動産取引システムを利用して当該物件を購入したいというインセンティヴが働く効果が期待できる。また、手続き難易度指標が高いほど、売主と買主のそれぞれが負担する手数料の比率が高くなるので、従来の不動産取引では仲介業者が敬遠しがちであった特定不動産物件を、扱うことができる受け皿を確保することができる。 As described above, in the real estate transaction system of the present invention, the fees to be borne by the seller and the buyer are respectively determined based on the procedural difficulty index indicating the degree of effort of the intermediary. can be set. In addition, as the procedure difficulty index, a single or multiple procedure difficulty indexes should be selectively adopted from among the multiple elements (indicators) shown in examples [1] to [10] above. can be done. The commission calculation unit 13 determines the ratio (and amount) of the commission borne by the seller to the commission calculation standard amount and the buyer's commission set a high proportion (and amount) of fees to be borne by As a result, it is possible to set a commission commensurate with the effort required of the intermediary. For this reason, the lower the procedural difficulty index, the lower the ratio of commissions borne by each of the seller and the buyer. Therefore, it can be expected that there will be an incentive to purchase the property using this real estate transaction system. In addition, the higher the procedure difficulty index, the higher the ratio of commissions borne by both the seller and the buyer. can be ensured.

上記の実施形態では、不動産取引を対象とする取引システム10を例に、この発明の構成を説明したが、売買対象は、この実施形態のような不動産には限定されない。すなわち、不動産以外を売買の対象とする各種物件(物品、サービスを含む)を売買対象とする取引に、この発明を適用できる。例えば、自動車や船舶等の物品の取引だけでなく、転職斡旋等の各種の人材斡旋の業務や、結婚相談所等の紹介業務、その他各種サービス等が挙げられる。 In the above-described embodiment, the configuration of the present invention has been described using the transaction system 10 for real estate transactions as an example, but the transaction target is not limited to real estate as in this embodiment. That is, the present invention can be applied to transactions in which various properties (including goods and services) other than real estate are traded. For example, not only transactions of goods such as automobiles and ships, but also various types of human resource placement services such as job placement services, introduction services such as marriage agencies, and other various services can be mentioned.

人材斡旋の業務場合、その斡旋の対価(報酬)を仲介業者に支払うのは、受け入れ側である雇い主となるため、紹介を希望している人材(転職希望者等=売主に相当)の情報が売買対象に該当する。また、受け入れ先(買主に相当)は、企業、団体、その他事業者等である。これらの人材斡旋では、採用条件や採用後の待遇等によって、紹介(転職等)の成約がすぐに成り立つ案件もあるし、なかなか紹介(転職等)の成約が成り立たない場合もあり、仲介業者に求められる労力は、その案件によって異なる。このため、仲介業者は、仲介手数料としてその仲介業務の労力に見合った報酬を設定することができ、この発明の取引システムを適用できる余地がある。また、結婚相談所の紹介業務の場合、形式的に、男性側又は女性側のいずれか一方が売主に、他方が買主に相当すると解する。例えば、お見合い等の各種イベント料をそのセッティングの都度回収する場合もあるが、ネットワーク上での1対1の紹介業務においては、同じく仲介業者に求められる労力は、その案件(売主及び買主)によって異なるといえる。このため、仲介業者は、仲介手数料としてその仲介業務の労力に見合った報酬を設定することができ、この発明の取引システムを適用できる余地がある。すなわち、権利の譲渡、移転や登録等、あるいは、サービスの提供に関わる各種手続き等のために仲介業者が介在する各種取引に、この発明を適用できる。 In the case of recruitment work, it is the employer, who is the accepting side, who pays the consideration (compensation) for the recruitment to the intermediary. Applicable to trading. In addition, the receiving party (equivalent to the buyer) is a company, an organization, or other businesses. In these human resource placements, depending on the hiring conditions and post-employment treatment, there are cases where a contract for introduction (such as changing jobs) is immediately concluded, and there are cases where it is difficult to conclude a contract for introductions (such as changing jobs). The amount of effort required varies from case to case. For this reason, the intermediary can set a remuneration commensurate with the labor of the intermediary business as the intermediary commission, and there is room for applying the transaction system of the present invention. In addition, in the case of the introduction business of a marriage agency, either the male side or the female side is understood to correspond to the seller and the other to the buyer. For example, there are cases where various event fees such as matchmaking are collected each time the setting is made, but in the one-to-one introduction business on the network, the effort required of the intermediary also depends on the case (seller and buyer) It can be said that it differs depending on For this reason, the intermediary can set a remuneration commensurate with the labor of the intermediary business as the intermediary commission, and there is room for applying the transaction system of the present invention. In other words, the present invention can be applied to various transactions in which an intermediary intervenes for assignment, transfer, registration, etc. of rights, or for various procedures related to provision of services.

1 売主端末
2 情報処理部
3 買主端末
5 評価サーバー
7 仲介業者端末
8 システム管理者端末
10 取引システム(不動産取引システム)
11 物件情報記憶部(売買対象情報記憶部)
12 情報検索部
13 手数料算定部
14 契約実行部
15 物件評価算出部(売買対象評価算出部)
16 ユーザー情報記憶部
1 seller terminal 2 information processing unit 3 buyer terminal 5 evaluation server 7 broker terminal 8 system manager terminal 10 transaction system (real estate transaction system)
11 property information storage unit (sales target information storage unit)
12 Information search unit 13 Commission calculation unit 14 Contract execution unit 15 Property evaluation calculation unit (sales target evaluation calculation unit)
16 User information storage unit

Claims (6)

ネットワークを介した電子商取引で用いられる取引システム(10)において、
売主が用いる売主端末(1)と、買主が用いる買主端末(3)と、前記売主と前記買主とを仲介する仲介業者が用いる仲介業者端末(7)と、前記売主端末(1)、前記買主端末(3)及び前記仲介業者端末(7)を結ぶ情報処理部(2)を備え、
前記情報処理部(2)は、前記売主端末(1)から入力された売買対象情報を記憶する売買対象情報記憶部(11)と、前記買主端末(3)から入力された条件情報に基づいて前記売買対象情報の中から前記買主に提案する売買対象情報を出力する情報検索部(12)と、前記売買対象情報に基づいて前記売主と前記買主が負担する手数料を算定する手数料算定部(13)と、前記売主端末(1)、前記買主端末(3)及び前記仲介業者端末(7)間の契約とその契約に伴う手続きを実行する契約実行部(14)とを備え、
前記手数料算定部(13)は、前記売買対象情報毎に設定され前記仲介業者の手続きの難易度を示す手続き難易度指標に基づいて、前記売主と前記買主が負担する手数料を決定する取引システム。
In a trading system (10) used in electronic commerce over a network,
A seller terminal (1) used by a seller, a buyer terminal (3) used by a buyer, an intermediary agent terminal (7) used by an intermediary that mediates between the seller and the buyer, the seller terminal (1), and the buyer An information processing unit (2) that connects the terminal (3) and the intermediary terminal (7),
The information processing section (2) stores the trading target information storage section (11) that stores the trading target information input from the seller terminal (1), and the trading target information storage section (11) based on the condition information input from the buyer terminal (3). An information search unit (12) for outputting information on a trading object to be proposed to the buyer from among the information on the trading object, and a commission calculation unit (13) for calculating a commission to be borne by the seller and the buyer based on the information on the trading object. ), and a contract execution unit (14) that executes a contract between the seller terminal (1), the buyer terminal (3) and the intermediary terminal (7) and the procedures associated with the contract,
The transaction system, wherein the commission calculation unit (13) determines commissions to be borne by the seller and the buyer based on a procedure difficulty level index that is set for each of the trading object information and indicates the degree of difficulty of the procedure of the intermediary.
前記手数料算定部(13)は、前記手続き難易度指標が高いほど、前記売主及び前記買主、あるいは、前記売主又は前記買主の少なくとも一方が負担する手数料を高く設定する請求項1に記載の取引システム。 The transaction system according to claim 1, wherein the higher the procedure difficulty index, the higher the commission calculation unit (13) sets the commission to be borne by the seller and the buyer, or at least one of the seller and the buyer. . 前記手続き難易度指標は、前記売買対象情報が前記売主端末(1)から入力された後の経過時間長いほど高く設定される請求項1又は2に記載の取引システム。 3. The trading system according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the procedure difficulty index is set higher as the elapsed time after the trading object information is input from the seller terminal (1) is longer. 前記手続き難易度指標は、その売買対象に求められる前記仲介業者の説明責任対象事項の度合いを示す説明責任指標、その売買対象に関わる融資の難易度を示す融資難易度指標に基づいて決定される請求項1から3のいずれか一つに記載の取引システム。 The procedure difficulty index is determined based on an accountability index indicating the degree of accountability of the intermediary required for the transaction target, and a financing difficulty index indicating the difficulty of financing related to the transaction target. Trading system according to any one of claims 1 to 3. 前記情報処理部(2)は、前記買主端末(1)から入力された売買対象に対する評価に基づいて、前記売買対象情報毎に設定される前記買主側の評価である売買対象評価指標を算出する売買対象評価算出部(15)を備え、
前記手続き難易度指標は、前記売買対象評価指標が低いほど高く設定される請求項1から4のいずれか一つに記載の取引システム。
The information processing section (2) calculates a trading object evaluation index, which is the buyer's evaluation set for each trading object information, based on the evaluation of the trading object input from the buyer terminal (1). A trading object evaluation calculation unit (15) is provided,
5. The trading system according to any one of claims 1 to 4, wherein the procedure difficulty index is set higher as the trading object evaluation index is lower.
前記売買対象評価指標は、前記買主が購入を見送った理由、前記物件の評価、前記売主への問い合わせに対する前記買主への回答の評価に基づいて決定される請求項5に記載の取引システム。 6. The trading system according to claim 5, wherein the trading object evaluation index is determined based on the reason why the buyer postponed the purchase, the evaluation of the property, and the evaluation of the buyer's response to the inquiry to the seller.
JP2021207966A 2021-12-22 2021-12-22 trading system Active JP7130836B1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2021207966A JP7130836B1 (en) 2021-12-22 2021-12-22 trading system

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2021207966A JP7130836B1 (en) 2021-12-22 2021-12-22 trading system

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP7130836B1 JP7130836B1 (en) 2022-09-05
JP2023092766A true JP2023092766A (en) 2023-07-04

Family

ID=83152184

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2021207966A Active JP7130836B1 (en) 2021-12-22 2021-12-22 trading system

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP7130836B1 (en)

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2001331729A (en) * 2000-05-24 2001-11-30 Tetsuo Otani System for supporting advertisement of immovables and mediation contract
JP2002351963A (en) * 2001-05-30 2002-12-06 Houseman Homes:Kk System and method for processing information on real estate-related dealings information and software therefor
JP2007233991A (en) * 2006-02-01 2007-09-13 Tsukasa Watanabe Device for processing real estate commission data, method for processing real estate commission data, and computer program for processing real estate commission data
WO2016009682A1 (en) * 2014-07-15 2016-01-21 ソニー株式会社 Information processing device, information processing method, and program
JP2020013447A (en) * 2018-07-20 2020-01-23 Zホールディングス株式会社 Determination device, determination method, and determination program

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2001331729A (en) * 2000-05-24 2001-11-30 Tetsuo Otani System for supporting advertisement of immovables and mediation contract
JP2002351963A (en) * 2001-05-30 2002-12-06 Houseman Homes:Kk System and method for processing information on real estate-related dealings information and software therefor
JP2007233991A (en) * 2006-02-01 2007-09-13 Tsukasa Watanabe Device for processing real estate commission data, method for processing real estate commission data, and computer program for processing real estate commission data
WO2016009682A1 (en) * 2014-07-15 2016-01-21 ソニー株式会社 Information processing device, information processing method, and program
JP2020013447A (en) * 2018-07-20 2020-01-23 Zホールディングス株式会社 Determination device, determination method, and determination program

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP7130836B1 (en) 2022-09-05

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US10269054B1 (en) Computerized process to, for example, automate the home sale, mortgage loan financing and settlement process, and the home mortgage loan refinancing and settlement processes
US8433650B1 (en) Computerized process to, for example, automate the home sale, mortgage loan financing and settlement process, and the home mortgage loan refinancing and settlement processes
US7130810B2 (en) Method and system for property valuation in an on-line computing environment
US7389242B2 (en) Interactive processing of real estate transactions
JP5150948B2 (en) Application device and method
US7725359B1 (en) Electronic realty systems and methods
US7548883B2 (en) Construction industry risk management clearinghouse
US20020004775A1 (en) Online patent and license exchange
US20050125334A1 (en) Automated method and system for processing mortgage leads
US20020002524A1 (en) Online patent and license exchange
US20060080229A1 (en) Automated method and system for processing mortgage leads
US8650049B1 (en) Online system and method for processing life insurance applications
US20120072332A1 (en) Public Offering Risk Management
JP2002541592A5 (en)
US11393059B1 (en) Computerized process to, for example, automate the home sale, mortgage loan financing and settlement process, and the home mortgage loan refinancing and settlement processes
US20070214073A1 (en) Facilitator arrangement, method and computer program product for managing a real-estate portfolio
US20130018664A1 (en) Construction industry risk management clearinghouse
WO2001039056A1 (en) Method of dealing ideas in internet
US20140032432A1 (en) Distressed properties marketing system and method
US20060167776A1 (en) Affordable for-sale housing program
JP7130836B1 (en) trading system
US11379897B1 (en) Computerized process to, for example, automate the home sale, mortgage loan financing and settlement process, and the home mortgage loan refinancing and settlement processes
WO2001093154A2 (en) Online patent and license exchange
JP2002140560A (en) Financial planning support system
WO2006110121A1 (en) Construction industry risk management clearinghouse

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A871 Explanation of circumstances concerning accelerated examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A871

Effective date: 20211222

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20220408

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20220520

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20220808

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Ref document number: 7130836

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150