JP2022120862A - Differential pressure type (space) propulsion and stay-in-air (stay-in-space) system mainly applying imbalance of force - Google Patents
Differential pressure type (space) propulsion and stay-in-air (stay-in-space) system mainly applying imbalance of force Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- JP2022120862A JP2022120862A JP2021017885A JP2021017885A JP2022120862A JP 2022120862 A JP2022120862 A JP 2022120862A JP 2021017885 A JP2021017885 A JP 2021017885A JP 2021017885 A JP2021017885 A JP 2021017885A JP 2022120862 A JP2022120862 A JP 2022120862A
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- space
- force
- pressure
- propulsion
- fluid
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02T—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO TRANSPORTATION
- Y02T70/00—Maritime or waterways transport
- Y02T70/10—Measures concerning design or construction of watercraft hulls
Landscapes
- Control Of Position, Course, Altitude, Or Attitude Of Moving Bodies (AREA)
Abstract
Description
本発明は、主なる航空宇宙分野の推進技術云々に関するものである。 The present invention relates primarily to aerospace propulsion technology and the like.
先ず、この圧力(内圧)差式推進システムの根本的(初歩的)な推力生成上の基本原理(今だ、未知なる物理上の普遍の大原則)を改めて、世界共通の標準言語である(英数字入りの)英語にて、概ね、下記の通り、概略(簡略)的にも記しておく。
~A new frontier of physical (space) science based mainly on Newton’s […] laws of motion (fused justly the existing dynamics & statics)~
Principally, fundamental principle of modern spacecraft (rocket) propulsion has been based on Newton’s third law of motion : action and reaction by decisive (immovable) definition as follows.
For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction.
In other words,
if object A (1st body) exerts a force on object B (2nd body),
then the second body simultaneously exerts a force equal in magnitude and opposite in direction on the first body. (by NASA etc)
But, this description of the above forces equation (without dynamic external force) on the two different bodies would have been quite often misunderstood as static equilibrium of forces upon the one (undifferent) body.
*Note : It requires close attention that it couldn’t have been settled whether the object would have remained at rest or in uniform motion only with the fixed formula implicitly indicated equilibrium of forces in the statics : F = 0 (F1 + -F2 = 0).
---However, the above object’s alternative physical phenomenon of “at rest” or ”in motion” could (should) be so easily solved (selected) by the new (unknown) next equation [F1 + -.. = 0]….
Because the second (2nd) body has just returned naturally, equally the action force from the first body to the same (1st) body.
So, it should be properly interpreted that a spontaneous action force by the 2nd body itself has not been included in the interaction* between the two bodies.
For example, when a moving object 1 collides against an object 2 at rest with no action force spontaneously by itself, the dynamic body’s force (F1) and the static body’s force (F2) are obviously unbalanced at the collision (despite being established by the existing action reaction law as if F2 which ought to be just F0 with its (zero) velocity is the same as a standard for F1’s value), even though the momentum of the two bodies would have completely conserved before and after the collision....
*Note: The object 2 at rest has been certainly (undoubtedly) moved by the (external) force: F1, not the (internal) force: F2 at that collision.
And so, each basic equation related to the momentum conservation in this case is…
m1v1’- m1v1 = F1 (= dp1/dt) as to the object 1,
m2v2’ - m2v2 = -F1 (= dp2/dt) as to the object 2,
(not always m2v2’ - m2v2 = -F2 = dp2/dt)
--Because it’s been limited to equilibrium of forces with F1 only, if it is just -F2…
**As for the following fundamental equation of the momentum conservation,
m1v1 + m2v2 = m1v1’ + m2v2’
it could have been merely established by the (balanced) force in common: [F1=(-)F2].
But, this is nothing short of a blind spot for disregarding the true value of that (unbalanced) force: [F1≠(-)F2]....
**As for a pair of the above forces (F1&F2) acting on the two interacting objects, F2 should be a fictitious (inertial) force, not a real force, in case of the standard for F1’s value, regardless of any (non) inertial frame of reference….
After all, in the background of being quite capable of having a misunderstanding as if an action force of one body [A] & an action (not a reaction) force of the other body [B] had been equal at all in consideration of such an action-reaction between the same bodies [A & B], it is not too much to say that it has been confused by the definitional fixed word : “inter-Action” (like as action-action against action-reaction) and also, exactly the same formula [F1+(-)F2=0] for the force-equation (on one body) and the action-reaction (on two bodies) so far….
Therefore, the mathematical simple formula structure mainly (especially) in case of interaction with A&B’s (unbalanced) action forces : (F1≠F2, F1> F2 or F1 < F2) should be corrected as below.
F1 + (-)F1 = 0 F2 + (-)F2 = 0
(not F1 + -F2 = F net = 0 as Force equation)
F1 : an action force that a body [A] itself exerts.
(-)F1: a reaction force that the same body [A] is exerted.
F2 : an action force that a body [B] itself exerts.
(-)F2: a reaction force that the same body [B] is exerted.
Thus it is better (best) for the true formula of the action-reaction regarding it as force equation on each body, not both bodies, in case of being a difference (unbalance) between each action force of the interaction.
[The revised edition of the Newton’s third law]
(new)Third law
When one body exerts an action force on a second body, the first body simultaneously is exerted with a reaction force equal in magnitude and opposite in direction on the 1st body from the second body (whether an action force by the 2nd body itself is exerted or not).
And/or,
One body which exerts an action force to the 2nd body is simultaneously, equally reacted as (a kind of) reflection of the action force by the 1st body itself, not the other (another) force by the 2nd body.
And also,
For every action (force) by one object ((not by the two objects of interaction)) in nature there is an equal and opposite reaction (force) to its own object ((not to a pair of those objects with different forces)).
~~~
By the way, the law of momentum conservation which the total momentum is constant in a closed system has been implied by the action reaction principle and also it is a synonym for Newton’s first law that the velocity of the object is constant if the net force is zero.
F1 + -F2 = (F net) = 0 F1 = (-)F2
The above formula(s) shows only an object at rest in an inertial frame of reference.
This is still incomplete as to the same formula only compared to the next formulae (which could have expressed synchronously both states of the object at rest as well as uniform motion). .
F1 + (-)F1 = 0 and/or F2 + (-)F2 = 0 F1≠F2 (F1> F2 or F1 < F2)
The above formulae could indicate not only an object at rest, but also uniform motion, because of expressing a kind of synchronized physical phenomenon applying a principle of superposition in physics (quantum mechanics).
The superposition could have been defined by two simple properties ; additivity and homogeneity as follows.
Additivity F (x + y) = F (x) + F (y) [F (x, y) = x + y (= 0)]
Homogeneity F (ax) = aF (x) [= F (ay) = aF (y) = 0]
for scalar a. (F is a function)
x = F1 + (-)F1 (= 0) = F2 + (-)F2 = y
(F1&F2 are forces)
In conclusion, the following theorem(s) could have been proven really in accordance with Newton’ second law of motion (F=ma) which comes into effect (force) from the inequality (no equilibrium) of the action forces produced at the same time (moment) and a new unique concept for a closed [fluid] system on a frontier of modern physics (space science) would have been defined as below....
[The Zeroth law of Motion]
Even if there is no external forces (= 0) outside of the closed system, it could turn one object (a united body) from rest to (uniform) motion by unbalanced forces on each object of inter-action spontaneously without the movement of the center of mass (balance), regarding just a united spot of the mutual objects each other as that zero point (the starting point of the uniform motion)….
[The law of non conservation of momentum]
Especially in the closed fluid system device which has included a flowable substance in one hollow body, the momentum could not be conserved, as long as inner force (not internal force against external force of interaction) by internal pressure difference between both sides of the same hollow body has been exerted mainly in (outer) space, according to the principle of buoyancy which has justly produced buoyant force by external pressure difference between the top & bottom of a cube in the water of Earth….
Note1 : The above momentum in closed system is conserved only setting a standard of one force value of interaction in case of F1≠F2.
Note2 : Bernoulli’s principle in fluid dynamics is not always based on the law of momentum conservation, even though it corresponds to the law of conservation of energy.
Note3 : Although total pressure of dynamic pressure and static pressure is usually constant in the Bernoulli’s equation (regardless of an open or a closed system), it could never have been conserved in the closed fluid system devices which would have enabled to store up (potential) energy with non-steady flowable fluid (not the ideal = perfect fluid).
The buoyant force (= weight of displaced fluid) is equal to net force by the external pressure difference (see below).
(buoyancy) F = [eP2-eP1]*S
eP1: (external) Pressure which fluid pushes down to the top of the cube from the outside of the one body (the downward force on the cube)
eP2: (external) Pressure which fluid pushes up to the bottom of the cube from the outside of the one body (the upward force on the cube)
S: An area of the (exterior) surface upon the net force by the (external) pressure difference….
Then, substituting the next formula : [P = p0 + phg] of pressure in fluids in the atmosphere for P1 & P2 on the above formula, the buoyant force is described as below.
F = pVg (F = mg)
p : density of the fluid V : volume of the cube g : gravitational acceleration
Here, just in case of taking F1 & F2 for each action force by the fluid on P1 and P2, it may replace (interchange) their reaction forces (-F1 & -F2) equally with (apparent) action forces by the same cube(‘s both insides).
That means (indicates) the above forces which have been effective from the inside to the outside of that cube (as a kind of the hollow body).
So, pouring some fluid body appropriately into the above hollow body and producing pressure (unbalanced) force on fluid dynamics, not fluid statics, in some way (by certain methods), its body would (should) be able to be active by itself as a matter of course.
Therefore, the hollow body in the closed fluid system could be surely moved by the inner net force (named newly ”superer-force”) of the internal pressure difference between both sides of the same body, not by the reaction force….
Superer force : sF = [iP2-iP1]*S (= ma)
iP1: (internal) Pressure which fluid in a hollow body pushes backward to one side (an inner wall) of the same body (the backward force on the united body with the fluid in case of iP2 > iP1)
iP2: (internal) Pressure which fluid in a hollow body pushes forward to the other side (an inner wall) of the same body (the forward force on the united body with the fluid in case of iP2 > iP1)
S: An area of the (inner) surface upon the net force by the (internal) pressure difference….
m: Total (gross) mass of the united body with the fluid (etc)
Moreover, when the fluid is circulated in the hollow body repeatedly (many times), causing the pressure difference on the both sides of the same body, the one united (hollow) body would have been able to exert great-est power (the super-er force) with super high speed (of light) especially in the zero gravity space….
And in addition to that, this system device is the safest because of no rocket fuel and so forth.
*Needless to say, the superer force is distinguished from “super force” as unified force in a theory of everything.
[The supplement]
EM drive which really working of its thruster has been confirmed with engine tests by NASA etc has never violated the law of conservation of momentum, just applying that formula : F1 + (-)F1 = 0 and/or F2 + (-)F2 = 0, F1≠F2 (F1> F2 or F1 < F2).
And the driving device which belongs to a closed fluid system on account of including a kind of flowable substance : a photon(s) of an electromagnetic wave(s) inside its device as a closed container could have been propelled by net (unbalanced) force on the internal pressure difference, not the reaction force.
In summary, the above existing device has particularly different size as to each side (both areas of the inner surfaces on contact with the photon) of its hollow body, and therefore, the pressure difference between the both sides of the same body has been caused mathematically (necessarily).
P1≠P2 P1 = F/A1, P2 = F/A2 A1≠A2
~~~
Super Power Drive that exerts greater (greatest) power extraordinarily, incomparably than the EM drive which is said that it could get us in 4 hours to the moon has been already invented with brand-new several smarter ways (unique smartest methods) by this theorist (the inventor).
The above further information of the S.P.D. is mostly as described in these Japanese documents hereinto….
Especially, the space(craft) propulsion force with a lot of impulses by continuous circulation of the fluids sustainably causing the pressure difference will be able to bring about ultra high speed (semi-light speed) indeed to a brand-new unique spaceship (newly named "Super-Starship") with the super power drive engine, even the same one in the megaton range....
And also, just in case of (simultaneously) using super-er force (power) controllers and direction changing devices and so on, it could have really made the above spaceship stay at a (fixed) point in the (outer)space....
Therefore, the existing artificial satellites etc (which might be turned into space debris) required for orbiting around the earth will become unnecessary (obsolete) after this....
Furthermore, according to the new space apparatuses (and the like), it would (should) be able to achieve early realization of mainly Space Elevator, utilizing a flexible cable (space tether) etc with a very short length, not so long length (height) beyond the geostationary orbit, i.e., that means it's good enough for currently available materials (such as Kevlar etc), without mass production (difficultly manufacturing) of carbon nanotubes (CNTs)....and so forth.
<補足>
一般的に、(開いた系もしくは閉じた系を問わず)、任意のポンプ・管路内の全圧は、流路や流速が変わっても、以下の公式通り、一定であることが知られている。
全圧(総圧)=静圧+動圧
P0 = p + q q = 1/2pv2
p + 1/2pv2 =P0 (= constant)
しかしながら、上記の数式にかけては、特に(非圧縮性等の理想流体を主要に取り扱う)ベルヌーイの定理から、位置エネルギーの数値を抹消した(無視した)ものである為、たとえ、閉鎖流体系のもとであっても、適時(即時)、運動エネルギーへと変換し得る位置(ポテンシャル)エネルギーなど取り入れれば、(作為的にも局所的に、気体の圧縮等を起こしつつ、加圧もしくは減圧の高低差など付けられる)当該物体自体、図らずも、推進可能となり得る。
@尚、現代物理学に於いて、“系”の概念上、今だ、未定義の「閉鎖流体系」に属する(宇宙)推進体の発明品にあっては、既に本出願人によるものなど、多少たりとも、公開されているが、概ね、それ等など、特許法第二条のいう「自然法則」、即ち、自然科学の既定の物理法則(特に従前通りのニュートン力学・運動の第三法則)に照らし合わせれば、前々から、確固たる(不動の)作用反作用の法則 [F1 + -F2 = 0] に反したものだったと云わざるを得ず、以て、何人も、既存の発明品自体、主なる米国特許要件の有用性(産業上の利用可能性)等々、持ち合わせていない、、、などと頑なに見なしていたも同然であり、尚更、是をして、さほど、無知(無能)のごとく、長々しく黙認(黙殺)され続けてきた限り、専ら、特許法第29条第1~3項等で定められし、特許の要件の除外に関する「公知」と言える様な宇宙機器の代物でなかった、即ち、同特許法第二条にて定義する自然法則(・・法則)を利用した「発明」品類の対象でなかったことなど、予め、念の為にも付け加えておく次第なり。
First of all, the fundamental (rudimentary) basic principle of thrust generation of this pressure (internal pressure) differential propulsion system (the universal principle of physics that is still unknown) is reconsidered, and it is a universal standard language ( In English (with alphanumeric characters), it is generally described as follows.
~A new frontier of physical (space) science based mainly on Newton's […] laws of motion (fused just the existing dynamics & statics)~
Principally, fundamental principle of modern spacecraft (rocket) propulsion has been based on Newton's third law of motion: action and reaction by decisive (immovable) definition as follows.
For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction.
In other words,
if object A (1st body) exerts a force on object B (2nd body),
then the second body simultaneously exerts a force equal in magnitude and opposite in direction on the first body. (by NASA etc)
But, this description of the above forces equation (without dynamic external force) on the two different bodies would have been quite often misunderstood as static equilibrium of forces upon the one (undifferent) body.
*Note : It requires close attention that it couldn't have been settled whether the object would have remained at rest or in uniform motion only with the fixed formula implicitly indicated equilibrium of forces in the statics : F = 0 (F1 + -F2 = 0).
---However, the above object's alternative physical phenomenon of “at rest” or “in motion” could (should) be so easily solved (selected) by the new (unknown) next equation [F1 + -.. = 0]… .
Because the second (2nd) body has just returned naturally, equally the action force from the first body to the same (1st) body.
So, it should be properly interpreted that a spontaneous action force by the 2nd body itself has not been included in the interaction* between the two bodies.
For example, when a moving object 1 collides against an object 2 at rest with no action force spontaneously by itself, the dynamic body's force (F1) and the static body's force (F2) are obviously unbalanced at the collision (despite being established by the existing action reaction law as if F2 which ought to be just F0 with its (zero) velocity is the same as a standard for F1's value), even though the momentum of the two bodies would have completely conserved before and after the collision... .
*Note: The object 2 at rest has been certainly (undoubtedly) moved by the (external) force: F1, not the (internal) force: F2 at that collision.
And so, each basic equation related to the momentum conservation in this case is…
m1v1'- m1v1 = F1 (= dp1/dt) as to the object 1,
m2v2' - m2v2 = -F1 (= dp2/dt) as to the object 2,
(not always m2v2' - m2v2 = -F2 = dp2/dt)
--Because it's been limited to equilibrium of forces with F1 only, if it is just -F2…
**As for the following fundamental equation of the momentum conservation,
m1v1 + m2v2 = m1v1' + m2v2'
it could have been merely established by the (balanced) force in common: [F1=(-)F2].
But, this is nothing short of a blind spot for disregarding the true value of that (unbalanced) force: [F1≠(-)F2]....
**As for a pair of the above forces (F1&F2) acting on the two interacting objects, F2 should be a fictitious (inertial) force, not a real force, in case of the standard for F1's value, regardless of any (non) inertial frame of reference….
After all, in the background of being quite capable of having a misunderstanding as if an action force of one body [A] & an action (not a reaction) force of the other body [B] had been equal at all in consideration of such an action-reaction between the same bodies [A & B], it is not too much to say that it has been confused by the definitional fixed word: “inter-Action” (like as action-action against action-reaction) and also , exactly the same formula [F1+(-)F2=0] for the force-equation (on one body) and the action-reaction (on two bodies) so far….
Therefore, the mathematical simple formula structure mainly (especially) in case of interaction with A&B's (unbalanced) action forces : (F1≠F2, F1> F2 or F1 < F2) should be corrected as below.
F1 + (-)F1 = 0 F2 + (-)F2 = 0
(not F1 + -F2 = F net = 0 as Force equation)
F1 : an action force that a body [A] itself exerts.
(-)F1: a reaction force that the same body [A] is exerted.
F2 : an action force that a body [B] itself exerts.
(-)F2: a reaction force that the same body [B] is exerted.
Thus it is better (best) for the true formula of the action-reaction regarding it as force equation on each body, not both bodies, in case of being a difference (unbalance) between each action force of the interaction.
[The revised edition of the Newton's third law]
(new) Third law
When one body exerts an action force on a second body, the first body simultaneously is exerted with a reaction force equal in magnitude and opposite in direction on the 1st body from the second body (whether an action force by the 2nd body itself is exerted or not).
And/or,
One body which exerts an action force to the 2nd body is simultaneously, equally reacted as (a kind of) reflection of the action force by the 1st body itself, not the other (another) force by the 2nd body .
And also,
For every action (force) by one object ((not by the two objects of interaction)) in nature there is an equal and opposite reaction (force) to its own object ((not to a pair of those objects with different forces)) .
~~~
By the way, the law of momentum conservation which the total momentum is constant in a closed system has been implied by the action reaction principle and also it is a synonym for Newton's first law that the velocity of the object is constant if the net force is zero.
F1 + -F2 = (Fnet) = 0 F1 = (-)F2
The above formula(s) shows only an object at rest in an inertial frame of reference.
This is still incomplete as to the same formula only compared to the next formula (which could have expressed synchronously both states of the object at rest as well as uniform motion).
F1 + (-)F1 = 0 and/or F2 + (-)F2 = 0 F1≠F2 (F1> F2 or F1 < F2)
The above formula could indicate not only an object at rest, but also uniform motion, because of expressing a kind of synchronized physical phenomenon applying a principle of superposition in physics (quantum mechanics).
The superposition could have been defined by two simple properties; additivity and homogeneity as follows.
Additivity F (x + y) = F (x) + F (y) [F (x, y) = x + y (= 0)]
Homogeneity F(ax) = aF(x) [= F(ay) = aF(y) = 0]
for scalar a. (F is a function)
x = F1 + (-)F1 (= 0) = F2 + (-)F2 = y
(F1&F2 are forces)
In conclusion, the following theorem(s) could have been proven really in accordance with Newton's second law of motion (F=ma) which comes into effect (force) from the inequality (no equilibrium) of the action forces produced at the same time (moment) and a new unique concept for a closed [fluid] system on a frontier of modern physics (space science) would have been defined as below....
[The Zeroth Law of Motion]
Even if there is no external forces (= 0) outside of the closed system, it could turn one object (a united body) from rest to (uniform) motion by unbalanced forces on each object of inter-action spontaneously without the movement of the center of mass (balance), regarding just a united spot of the mutual objects each other as that zero point (the starting point of the uniform motion)….
[The law of non-conservation of momentum]
Especially in the closed fluid system device which has included a flowable substance in one hollow body, the momentum could not be conserved, as long as inner force (not internal force against external force of interaction) by internal pressure difference between both sides of the same hollow body has been exerted mainly in (outer) space, according to the principle of buoyancy which has justly produced buoyant force by external pressure difference between the top & bottom of a cube in the water of Earth….
Note1 : The above momentum in closed system is conserved only setting a standard of one force value of interaction in case of F1≠F2.
Note2 : Bernoulli's principle in fluid dynamics is not always based on the law of momentum conservation, even though it corresponds to the law of conservation of energy.
Note3 : Although total pressure of dynamic pressure and static pressure is usually constant in the Bernoulli's equation (regardless of an open or a closed system), it could never have been conserved in the closed fluid system devices which would have enabled to store up (potential ) energy with non-steady flowable fluid (not the ideal = perfect fluid).
The buoyant force (= weight of displaced fluid) is equal to net force by the external pressure difference (see below).
(buoyancy) F = [eP2-eP1]*S
eP1: (external) Pressure which fluid pushes down to the top of the cube from the outside of the one body (the downward force on the cube)
eP2: (external) Pressure which fluid pushes up to the bottom of the cube from the outside of the one body (the upward force on the cube)
S: An area of the (exterior) surface upon the net force by the (external) pressure difference….
Then, substituting the next formula : [P = p0 + phg] of pressure in fluids in the atmosphere for P1 & P2 on the above formula, the buoyant force is described as below.
F = pVg (F = mg)
p: density of the fluid V: volume of the cube g: gravitational acceleration
Here, just in case of taking F1 & F2 for each action force by the fluid on P1 and P2, it may replace (interchange) their reaction forces (-F1 & -F2) equally with (apparent) action forces by the same cube( 's both insides).
That means (indicates) the above forces which have been effective from the inside to the outside of that cube (as a kind of the hollow body).
So, pouring some fluid body appropriately into the above hollow body and producing pressure (unbalanced) force on fluid dynamics, not fluid statics, in some way (by certain methods), its body would (should) be able to be active by itself as a matter of course.
Therefore, the hollow body in the closed fluid system could surely be moved by the inner net force (named newly ”super-force”) of the internal pressure difference between both sides of the same body, not by the reaction force….
Super force : sF = [iP2-iP1]*S (= ma)
iP1: (internal) Pressure which fluid in a hollow body pushes backward to one side (an inner wall) of the same body (the backward force on the united body with the fluid in case of iP2 > iP1)
iP2: (internal) Pressure which fluid in a hollow body pushes forward to the other side (an inner wall) of the same body (the forward force on the united body with the fluid in case of iP2 > iP1)
S: An area of the (inner) surface upon the net force by the (internal) pressure difference….
m: Total (gross) mass of the united body with the fluid (etc)
Moreover, when the fluid is circulated in the hollow body repeatedly (many times), causing the pressure difference on the both sides of the same body, the one united (hollow) body would have been able to exert great-est power (the super -er force) with super high speed (of light) especially in the zero gravity space….
And in addition to that, this system device is the safest because of no rocket fuel and so forth.
*Needless to say, the superer force is distinguished from “super force” as unified force in a theory of everything.
[The supplement]
EM drive which really working of its thruster has been confirmed with engine tests by NASA etc has never violated the law of conservation of momentum, just applying that formula : F1 + (-)F1 = 0 and/or F2 + (-)F2 = 0, F1≠F2 (F1> F2 or F1 < F2).
And the driving device which belongs to a closed fluid system on account of including a kind of flowable substance : a photon(s) of an electromagnetic wave(s) inside its device as a closed container could have been propelled by net (unbalanced) force on the internal pressure difference, not the reaction force.
In summary, the above existing device has particularly different size as to each side (both areas of the inner surfaces on contact with the photon) of its hollow body, and therefore, the pressure difference between the both sides of the same body has been caused Mathematically (necessarily).
P1 ≠ P2 P1 = F/A1, P2 = F/A2 A1 ≠ A2
~~~
Super Power Drive that exerts greater (greatest) power extraordinarily, incomparably than the EM drive which is said that it could get us in 4 hours to the moon has been already invented with brand-new several smarter ways (unique smartest methods) by this theorist (the inventor).
The above further information of the SPD is mostly as described in these Japanese documents hereinto….
Especially, the space(craft) propulsion force with a lot of impulses by continuous circulation of the fluids sustainably causing the pressure difference will be able to bring about ultra high speed (semi-light speed) indeed to a brand-new unique spaceship (newly named "Super-Starship") with the super power drive engine, even the same one in the megaton range....
And also, just in case of (simultaneously) using super-er force (power) controllers and direction changing devices and so on, it could have really made the above spaceship stay at a (fixed) point in the (outer)space.. ..
Therefore, the existing artificial satellites etc (which might be turned into space debris) required for orbiting around the earth will become unnecessary (obsolete) after this....
Furthermore, according to the new space (and the like), it would (should) be able to achieve early realization of mainly Space Elevator, utilizing a flexible cable (space tether) etc with a very short length, not so long length ( height) beyond the geostationary orbit, ie, that means it's good enough for currently available materials (such as Kevlar etc), without mass production (difficultly manufacturing) of carbon nanotubes (CNTs)....and so forth.
<Supplement>
In general, it is known that the total pressure in any pump/line (whether open or closed) is constant according to the following formula, even if the flow path and flow velocity are changed: ing.
Total pressure (total pressure) = static pressure + dynamic pressure
P0 = p + qq = 1/2pv2
p + 1/2pv2 = P0 (= constant)
However, in the above formula, especially from Bernoulli's theorem (mainly dealing with ideal fluids such as incompressibility), the numerical value of the potential energy is canceled (ignored), so even in a closed fluid system Even so, if we take in potential energy that can be converted to kinetic energy in a timely manner (immediately), we can pressurize or depressurize while (intentionally and locally) compressing the gas. The object itself (with a height difference, etc.) can inadvertently become propellable.
@In modern physics, in terms of the concept of "system", the (space) propellant invention belonging to the undefined "closed fluid system" has already been made by the applicant. , to some extent, have been made public, but in general, the "laws of nature" referred to in Article 2 of the Patent Act, that is, the established physical laws of natural science (especially the conventional Newtonian mechanics and motion, In light of the law), it must be said that it has been contrary to the firm (immovable) law of action and reaction [F1 + -F2 = 0] for a long time. It was as if they stubbornly considered that they did not have the usefulness (industrial applicability) of the main US patent requirements, etc. As long as it has been acquiesced (ignored) for a long time like incompetence), the universe that can be said to be "publicly known" regarding the exclusion of patent requirements, as defined in Article 29, Paragraphs 1 to 3, etc. of the Patent Law It was not a substitute for equipment, that is, it was not subject to the category of "invention" using the law of nature (law) defined in Article 2 of the same Patent Act, etc. It's up to you.
既存の宇宙推進技法の主流たる(危険極まりない)ロケット推進などよりも、遥かに(桁違いに)効率的な(極力、安全性のある)宇宙推進技術を普く実現化させる上、既定の圧力(内圧)差式(宇宙)推進機器等よりも、数段、優れた推進効率の良いものなどを実質的に完成させる。 In addition to the common realization of space propulsion technology that is far (by orders of magnitude) more efficient (and as safe as possible) than rocket propulsion, which is the mainstream of existing space propulsion technology (which is extremely dangerous), given pressure (Internal pressure) Differential (space) propulsion equipment, etc., will be substantially completed with better propulsion efficiency by several steps.
改めて、上述通りの圧力(内圧)差式宇宙推進システムに於ける英数理上の推進技術論の正当性を確と実証すべく、概ね、ロケットエンジンのもととなる既定の理論上の数式: F1+(-)F2=0, F1=(-)F2に基づく(一種、力の釣り合いとも見誤ってしまう)物理現象でなく、新規の理論上の数式:F1+(-)F1=0= F2+(-)F2, F1≠F2に基づく(或種、力の不釣り合いとも見間違わない)自然現象を応用して、随時、閉鎖流体系(本中空体とその体内に各種の流体が混入する系)に、同中空体内で、各種類の流動性物質・流体(危険性のあるロケット液体燃料など、全く不要の混合・液体等含む)を作為的に循環させては、本体の両端あたりに、それ相当の圧力(内圧)差を生じさせながら、恰も、地球圏にて、圧力(外圧)差から生じる(重力軽減用の)浮力の様に、特段、宇宙圏にて、圧力(内圧)差から生じる(宇宙推進用の)効力(=超力と命名)を自ずと発生・生成し続ければ良い・・・・云々。
特に、従前よりの(本出願人自らの)考案品類などよりも、格段、優れた改良品(発明品)を製造するには、、、先んじて、同出願人自身により、ある一つの閉鎖流体系に属する(一種以上の流体を挿入した)中空体内にて、主に中央上部(前部)に配した推進(前進)用メインファン類から吹き出される強風(風力)等が、本体下部(後部)の内壁を押すことにより生じてしまう後進力(下降力)を少なからず、軽減させるエアバリアー装置等々を用いた圧力(内圧)差式推進システムなど考案されたが、専ら、その特種機器(主に気体などを封入した専用容器)の場合、さほど、エアバリアーの作用によって、本推進体の後方壁もしくは下方壁(内壁)にかかる後進力或いは下降力をそれ相応に抑制し得るものの、本体後方(下方)から、同体前方(上方)へと回り続ける空気循環の際、どうしても、(推進用空気流路とエアバリア用空気流路が一体化した)本体内部の所々での小規模な乱気流(渦巻き流)の局部的な発生とともに、主なる空気粒子が、自ずから、斜め方向沿いの後面(下面)の湾曲状の一部を押して、前面(上面)へと向かう際、それなりに後進力(下降力)が掛かってしまう傾向にあった為、先ず、さしたる流体(気体)の流れが、なおスムーズになるよう、本推進用の空気通り道(垂直方向沿いルート)と数段の(段々式の)エアバリアー用の空気通り道(水平方向沿いルート)をそれぞれ、必要空気量を確保したエアタンク類を付帯しつつ、適当に分けた上で、順次、主要な(垂直方向沿いの)推進用ルートでの空気循環につき、一旦、水平方向沿いの空気通り道(エア・バイパス)を介して、先に強風を吹き下ろした下降気流域とは、ちょうど、反対側の上昇気流域まで、これを迂回させ、尚も、稼働時の推進用メインファン類の下方噴射に伴い、連結上の(半)トーラス状等の空気管・エアチューブ類を介した上方への空気吸込み効果(隣接のメインファン類のブレードが空回りしないよう、別段、通風の速度調整など為し得る、通気口の小穴が多数、空いた整流板類を挟むことにより、予め、当該上面の面積をできる限り、大きく広く取った同上管類の頂上半部に、送風中の空気を一時的に蓄積させては、上方への圧力、即ち、押上力を高めた圧縮空気による押上効果)を応用して、本推進剤の空気粒子の大半が、本体下面にかかることなく、即ち、同体底面を押すことなく(換言すれば、下降力をかけることなく)、自ずから、(同期的にも)一気に吸い上げればよく、至って、こうすれば、本推進体自体、ほとんど、下降力が、(ほぼ)ゼロのまま、浮上させることができ、概ね、その基本形・基礎的な簡易構造をごく簡略的に鑑みれば、先ず、(比較的、大サイズの)浮き輪風の円形状のものなどを複数、準備し、順次、各容器内に適量の流体(気体)を入れ、水平方向沿いに気流を生じさせる(数段式の)ものと垂直方向沿いに気流を起こす(一段又は多段式の)ものを一部(局部的に)、交差させるように配置すれば良い・・・等々。
尚、(本系体内の流体を気体のみと為した場合に於ける)本推進剤となる空気粒子(の大半)が、本体下面(内面)を押しつつ、下降力を生じさせるものでない限り、推力重量比の計算上、本体総重量に、それほど、空気粒子の全部の重量(本体下面に接する部分のみの気体の質量から概算した一部の重量分除く)を加算する必要がないことに加え、さしたる気体に、必要以上の水蒸気など含まれている場合には、なるべく、飽和蒸気圧に達していない状態で、適程・適量に気流を起こすことなどが望ましい旨を予め、補填しておく。
Once again, in order to firmly demonstrate the validity of the alphamathematical propulsion technology theory in the above-mentioned pressure (internal pressure) differential space propulsion system, the fixed theoretical formula that is the basis of the rocket engine is roughly: A new theoretical formula, not a physical phenomenon based on F1+(-)F2=0, F1=(-)F2 (a kind of force balance): F1+(-)F1=0= F2+( -) Applying natural phenomena based on F2, F1 ≠ F2 (a kind of force imbalance), a closed fluid system (a system in which various fluids are mixed in the hollow body and its body) at any time In addition, in the same hollow body, various types of fluid substances and fluids (including completely unnecessary mixtures and liquids, such as dangerous rocket liquid fuel) are intentionally circulated, and around both ends of the body, While creating a considerable pressure (internal pressure) difference, just like the buoyancy (for gravity reduction) resulting from the pressure (external pressure) difference in the earth sphere, especially in the space sphere, from the pressure (internal pressure) difference It is enough to continue to generate and generate the effect (for space propulsion) (named superpower) by itself... and so on.
In particular, in order to manufacture improved products (inventions) that are significantly superior to the conventional (applicant's own) devised products, etc. In the hollow body (in which more than one kind of fluid is inserted) belonging to the system, the strong wind (wind force) etc. blown out from the main fan for propulsion (advance) mainly arranged in the upper center (front part) A pressure (internal pressure) differential propulsion system that uses an air barrier device to reduce the backward force (downward force) generated by pushing the inner wall of the rear) was devised. In the case of a dedicated container that mainly contains gas etc., the action of the air barrier can suppress the rearward or downward force applied to the rear wall or lower wall (inner wall) of the propellant body accordingly, but the main body When the air circulates continuously from the rear (lower) to the front (upper) of the body, inevitably, small-scale turbulence ( Along with the local generation of vortex flow), the main air particles naturally push a part of the curved rear surface (lower surface) along the oblique direction and move toward the front surface (upper surface). Since there was a tendency to apply force), first, in order to make the flow of the fluid (gas) smoother, the air passage for main propulsion (route along the vertical direction) and several stages (tiered type) Each air passage for the air barrier (horizontal route) is accompanied by an air tank that secures the required amount of air, and after dividing it appropriately, the main (vertical direction) propulsion route is used sequentially. Regarding the air circulation, once the strong wind blows down, the downdraft region that blows down the strong winds is bypassed to the updraft region on the opposite side through the horizontal air path (air bypass). Also, due to the downward injection of the main propulsion fans during operation, the air suction effect upwards through the (half) torus-shaped air pipes and air tubes on the connection (the blades of the adjacent main fans In order to prevent idling, it is possible to separately adjust the speed of the ventilation, etc., by inserting a rectifying plate that has many small holes in the ventilation port and is empty, in advance, the area of the top surface is made as large as possible. By temporarily accumulating the air being blown in the top half, the majority of the air particles of this propellant are , without touching the bottom surface of the body, that is, without pushing the bottom surface of the body (in other words, For example, without applying a descending force), it is possible to suck it up all at once (even synchronously). In general, considering its basic shape and basic simple structure, first, prepare a plurality of (relatively large size) floating ring-like circular ones, and then sequentially Place an appropriate amount of fluid (gas) in a container, and partially (locally ).
In addition, unless the air particles (most of them) that act as the propellant (assuming that the fluid in the system is gas only) are those that push the lower surface (inner surface) of the main body and generate downward force, In calculating the thrust-to-weight ratio, it is not necessary to add the total weight of the air particles (excluding the part of the weight roughly calculated from the mass of the gas in contact with the lower surface of the main body) to the total weight of the main body. If the gas contains water vapor more than necessary, it should be supplemented in advance that it is desirable to generate an appropriate amount of air flow in a state where the saturated vapor pressure is not reached as much as possible. .
何よりも先ず、本宇宙推進装置(空気循環式等の各種機器含む)の稼働により、(それ程の電気量など要さない必要最低限・最小限の電力が尽きない限り)、絶えず生成し得る(度重なる力積を加えた)推力にあっては、特段、宇宙圏の無重力空間にかけて、実に超高速(準光速)をもたらし、且つ又、同上装置と方向変換機器、位置角度センサー等を(同期的に)駆使すれば、専ら、本宇宙機自体、地球周回など要することなく、宇宙上の一点に定点滞空、否、滞宙し得ることから、本に、前々よりの地球周回要の人工衛星など、何ら、不要と相成り、尚且つ、さしたる滞空・滞宙上の保持力・補強力を応用して、大体、以下の各種の(複合)構造物建造にかかる物理学上の仕事をする能力、即ち、所定の物体を引っ張り上げようとする上昇力・押上力へと効力・効率的に転用させることにより、わざわざ、地球から、遥か遠方の静止軌道上をも超越したケーブル(テザー)など、延々と伸ばすまでもなく、概ね、前述通り、定点滞空(滞宙)上にも、(地上より、低めの)主なる垂直上の軌道に沿って、的確に建設し得る宇宙エレベーター等々の(新型の)宇宙構造物の早期実現化が、普く成し遂げられるだろう、、、、云々。 First and foremost, the operation of this space propulsion device (including various equipment such as air circulation type) can constantly generate In the case of thrust with repeated impulses, especially in the zero-gravity space of the outer space, it brings about a really ultra-high speed (quasi-light speed), and also the same device, direction change device, position angle sensor, etc. If you make full use of it, this spacecraft itself can stay in space at a fixed point in space, no, it can stay in space without needing to go around the earth. Satellites, etc., are unnecessary, and by applying the holding power and reinforcing power of staying in the air and staying in the air, the following physical work related to the construction of various (composite) structures is generally performed. In other words, by effectively and efficiently diverting it to a lifting force that tries to pull a predetermined object up, a cable (tether) that transcends even a geostationary orbit far away from the earth. , without needing to extend endlessly, as mentioned above, space elevators etc. ( The early realization of new (new) space structures will generally be achieved, and so on.
追って、手続補正にて表記する。 Later, it will be described in the procedure amendment.
追って、手続補正にて表記する。 Later, it will be described in the procedure amendment.
Claims (9)
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
JP2021017885A JP2022120862A (en) | 2021-02-07 | 2021-02-07 | Differential pressure type (space) propulsion and stay-in-air (stay-in-space) system mainly applying imbalance of force |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
JP2021017885A JP2022120862A (en) | 2021-02-07 | 2021-02-07 | Differential pressure type (space) propulsion and stay-in-air (stay-in-space) system mainly applying imbalance of force |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
JP2022120862A true JP2022120862A (en) | 2022-08-19 |
Family
ID=82849506
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
JP2021017885A Pending JP2022120862A (en) | 2021-02-07 | 2021-02-07 | Differential pressure type (space) propulsion and stay-in-air (stay-in-space) system mainly applying imbalance of force |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
JP (1) | JP2022120862A (en) |
-
2021
- 2021-02-07 JP JP2021017885A patent/JP2022120862A/en active Pending
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Yang et al. | Submersible unmanned aerial vehicle concept design study | |
JP2022120862A (en) | Differential pressure type (space) propulsion and stay-in-air (stay-in-space) system mainly applying imbalance of force | |
Jenkins | Sprinkler head revisited: momentum, forces, and flows in Machian propulsion | |
WO2018079754A1 (en) | Pressure (internal pressure) difference propulsion system | |
Berberan-Santos et al. | On the barometric formula inside the Earth | |
Zefreh | Design and CFD analysis of airborne wind turbine for boats and ships | |
WO2014061759A2 (en) | System for space propulsion and staying in space (staying in above-stratosphere air) | |
Rao | Simulation based engineering in fluid flow design | |
US20050017127A1 (en) | Mobile object with force generators | |
Yang | A computational fluid dynamics study of swirling flow reduction by using anti-vortex baffle | |
EP3418193B1 (en) | Aircraft | |
US20210123412A1 (en) | Wind-based electrical power generation system | |
US20170152063A1 (en) | Internal air pressure imbalance (IAPI) engine | |
US20220227502A1 (en) | Systems, methods, and devices for launching space vehicles using magnetic levitation, linear acceleration thermal energy scavenging, and water steam rockets | |
Provatidis et al. | A New Concept and Design Aspects of an'Antigravity'Propulsion Mechanism Based on Inertial Forces | |
US20220119132A1 (en) | Helium powered space elevator | |
Pasley | Propellant vortexing in a spinning spacecraft | |
Abdullah et al. | Flow behaviour assessment of smokey SAM rocket prototype | |
Koppel et al. | The AOCS'effects on the Propulsion Subsystem using the ESPSS Satellite Library' | |
JP2018058393A (en) | Space propulsion (pressure difference propulsion, mainly) and staying in space (staying on the stratosphere) systems | |
Koppel et al. | A SATELLITE LIBRARY IN ECOSIMPRO FOR THE AOCS'EFFECTS ON THE PROPULSION SUBSYSTEM | |
GB2531079A (en) | A heat engine inside a mechanical engine | |
JP2012219681A (en) | Space propulsion and space endurance flight system | |
JP2012087770A (en) | Tornado engine | |
JP2010112169A (en) | Cycle combined engine for preserving various energy |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
A521 | Request for written amendment filed |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523 Effective date: 20210212 |