JP2022054521A - Round inspection work evaluation system, round inspection work evaluation device, operation terminal, position detection terminal, and round inspection work evaluation method - Google Patents

Abstract

To provide a round inspection work evaluation system that eliminates a need for necessarily providing a sending device of a work completion signal to a work place, and evaluates whether a worker correctly inspects an inspection object facility.SOLUTION: A round inspection work evaluation system 500a includes: an operation terminal 2a to which an inspection result of an inspection object facility is inputted by a worker; a position detection terminal 1a for detecting a position of a worker at each of a plurality of pieces of time and for storing the detection positions and pieces of detection time as position detection information associatively; and a round inspection work evaluation device 3a having an inspection record input information acquisition part for acquiring inspection result input time, a position detection information acquisition part for acquiring position detection information, a work position extraction part 36a for extracting a position of a worker corresponding to the inspection result input time, a position relationship calculation part 37a for calculating a value regarding a positional relationship between an inspection work position and a position of an inspection object facility, and a work evaluation part 38a for evaluating that inspection is performed correctly when a value regarding the positional relationship is within a predetermined range.SELECTED DRAWING: Figure 1

Description

The present disclosure relates to a patrol inspection work evaluation system that evaluates whether the patrol inspection work of equipment has been performed correctly, and a patrol inspection work evaluation device, an operation terminal, a position detection terminal, and a patrol inspection work evaluation method of the patrol inspection work evaluation system. It is a thing.

The manager needs to evaluate whether the worker who patrols the equipment to be inspected has performed the inspection work correctly. Fixed-point monitoring by managers to assess whether workers were performing inspection work correctly is time consuming and inefficient. Therefore, in Patent Document 1, a work completion signal transmission device is installed in the work place, and when the work is completed, the worker holds his / her position measuring device over the transmission device to store the work completion flag in the device. , It is described that it is taken back to the office (see, for example, Patent Document 1).

Japanese Unexamined Patent Publication No. 2017-68450

However, in such a conventional technique, it is necessary to provide a work completion signal transmission device in the work place in advance.

This disclosure is made in order to solve the above-mentioned problems, and it is not always necessary to provide a work completion signal transmission device as in Patent Document 1 at the work place, and the work of conducting a patrol inspection of the equipment to be inspected. To provide a patrol inspection work evaluation system capable of evaluating whether or not a member has performed the inspection work correctly, and a patrol inspection work evaluation device, an operation terminal, a position detection terminal, and a patrol inspection work evaluation method of the patrol inspection work evaluation system. With the goal.

The patrol inspection work evaluation system according to the present disclosure detects the position of the operation terminal at which the inspection result of the equipment to be inspected is input by the worker and the position of the worker at each of a plurality of times, and the detected position and the time of the detection. Position from the position detection terminal that stores the time of the above as position detection information, the inspection record input information acquisition unit that acquires the inspection result input time, which is the time when the worker inputs the inspection result to the operation terminal, and the position from the position detection terminal. A position detection information acquisition unit that acquires detection information, a work position extraction unit that extracts the position of the worker corresponding to the inspection result input time as an inspection work position from the position detection information, and an equipment information storage unit that stores the position of the equipment to be inspected. , Positional relationship calculation unit that calculates the value related to the positional relationship between the inspection work position and the position of the equipment to be inspected. It is provided with a patrol inspection work evaluation device having a work evaluation unit that evaluates that the inspection is not performed correctly if the value related to the relationship is out of the range, and a result display unit that displays the evaluation of the work evaluation unit. ..

The patrol inspection work evaluation method according to the present disclosure detects the position of the operator at each of a plurality of times and the operation terminal in which the inspection result of the equipment to be inspected is input by the worker, and the detected position and the time of the detection. It is a patrol inspection work evaluation method in a patrol inspection work evaluation system having a position detection terminal that stores the time of the above as position detection information and a patrol inspection work evaluation device that evaluates whether the inspection is performed correctly. A step in which the patrol inspection work evaluation device acquires the inspection result input time, which is the time when the staff inputs the inspection result to the operation terminal, and the patrol inspection work evaluation device acquires the position detection information from the position detection terminal. Patrol inspection work that extracts the position of the worker corresponding to the inspection result input time as the inspection work position from the position detection information, and the value related to the positional relationship between the inspection work position and the position of the equipment to be inspected. If the step calculated by the evaluation device and the value related to the positional relationship are within the predetermined range, it is evaluated that the inspection was performed correctly, and if the value related to the positional relationship is out of the range, the inspection is performed correctly. It has a step that the patrol inspection work evaluation device evaluates if it is not done.

In the patrol inspection work evaluation system according to the present disclosure, it is not always necessary to provide a work completion signal transmission device at the work place, and the inspection work of the worker can be evaluated.

In the patrol inspection work evaluation method according to the present disclosure, it is not always necessary to provide a work completion signal transmission device at the work place, and the inspection work of the worker can be evaluated.

It is a functional block diagram of the patrol inspection work evaluation system which concerns on Embodiment 1. FIG. It is a schematic diagram which shows the flow of the patrol inspection which concerns on Embodiment 1. FIG. It is a flowchart which shows the flow of the patrol inspection shown in FIG. It is a hardware block diagram of the operation terminal which concerns on Embodiment 1, and the patrol inspection work evaluation apparatus. It is a hardware block diagram of the patrol inspection work evaluation apparatus which concerns on Embodiment 1. FIG. It is a figure which shows the example of the position detection information which the position detection information storage part which concerns on Embodiment 1 accumulates. It is a figure which shows the example of the screen which inputs the inspection result which concerns on Embodiment 1. FIG. It is a figure which shows the example of the inspection record stored in the inspection record storage part which concerns on Embodiment 1. FIG. It is a figure which shows the example of the inspection record input information which the inspection record input information storage part which concerns on Embodiment 1 store. It is a figure which shows the example of the movement route of the worker which the route display part which concerns on Embodiment 1 displays. It is a figure which shows the example of the position of the equipment to be inspected stored in the equipment information storage part which concerns on Embodiment 1. FIG. It is a flowchart which shows the process flow of the positional relationship extraction part which concerns on Embodiment 1. FIG. It is a figure which shows the example of the distance between the movement path of a worker, and the position of the equipment to be inspected. The flow of calculating the distance between the inspection work position and the position of the equipment to be inspected is shown. It is a figure which shows the flow of calculating the angle difference between the direction of a worker at the inspection work position, and the direction from the inspection work position to the inspection target equipment. It is a figure which shows the flow of calculating another example of the value about a positional relationship. It is a figure which shows the position of the worker who is within the range of a predetermined time. It is a figure which illustrates the flow which the work evaluation part evaluates whether the inspection was performed correctly. It is a figure which shows the example of the position of the worker staying in the predetermined range. It is a figure which shows the flow of calculating the residence time of a worker. It is a functional block diagram of the patrol inspection work evaluation system which concerns on Embodiment 3. It is a figure which shows the flow of evaluation in the photographing work evaluation part which concerns on Embodiment 3. FIG.

Embodiment 1.
FIG. 1 is a functional block diagram of a patrol inspection work evaluation system according to the present embodiment. As shown in FIG. 1, the patrol inspection work evaluation system 500a according to the present embodiment includes a position detection terminal 1a, an operation terminal 2a, and a patrol inspection work evaluation device 3a. FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram showing the flow of patrol inspection using the patrol inspection work evaluation system 500a according to the present embodiment.
First, the outline of the patrol inspection work evaluation system 500a shown in FIG. 1 will be described, and the details of each configuration shown in FIG. 1 will be described later.

In the present embodiment, the worker w wears the position detection terminal 1a, carries the operation terminal 2a, and performs a patrol inspection.
The position detection terminal 1a detects the position and orientation of the worker w at each of a plurality of times such as every second, and stores the detected positions and orientations as position detection information in association with the time at the time of detection. do.
In the operation terminal 2a, the inspection result of the equipment to be inspected is input by the worker w, the inspection result is stored as an inspection record, and the inspection result input time, which is the time when the inspection result is input, is input as the inspection record input information. Remember as.

The patrol inspection work evaluation device 3a acquires the position detection information stored in the position detection terminal 1a and the inspection result input time stored in the operation terminal 2a. Then, the patrol inspection work evaluation device 3a extracts the position of the worker w at the inspection result input time as the inspection work position from the acquired position detection information, and also extracts the position of the worker w at the inspection result input time from the position detection information. Is extracted for inspection work.
Further, the patrol inspection work evaluation device 3a calculates the distance from the extracted inspection work position to the position of the inspection target equipment stored in advance, and the direction from the inspection work position to the inspection target equipment, and calculates the distance. When the distance is within a predetermined range, or when the difference between the calculated direction and the extracted inspection work direction is within a predetermined range, it is evaluated that the inspection work has been performed correctly.

In FIG. 1, the position detection terminal 1a, the operation terminal 2a, and the patrol inspection work evaluation device 3a are configured as separate devices from each other, and the communication unit 30a of the patrol inspection work evaluation device 3a detects the above-mentioned position from the position detection terminal 1a. It functions as a position detection information acquisition unit that acquires information. Further, the communication unit 30a functions as an inspection record input information acquisition unit that acquires inspection record input information including the above-mentioned inspection result input time from the operation terminal 2a.

FIG. 3 is a flowchart showing the flow of the patrol inspection shown in FIG. Hereinafter, the flow of this patrol inspection will be described with reference to FIGS. 2 and 3.

First, the worker w wears the position detection terminal 1a and carries the operation terminal 2a at the office F2 to start the patrol inspection. When the worker w arrives at the inspection work place F1 where the inspection target equipment is installed, the worker w performs the inspection work of the inspection target equipment. This inspection work is performed by the worker w inspecting the equipment to be inspected and inputting the inspection result into the operation terminal 2a (step FC101). The operation terminal 2a stores the inspection result input by the worker w as an inspection record, and also stores the inspection result input time, which is the time when the inspection result is input, as the inspection record input information.

After the inspection work is completed, the worker w returns to the office F2 where the manager s is located, and returns the position detection terminal 1a and the operation terminal 2a. At that time, the worker w reports the completion of the patrol inspection to the manager s, and also reports any other report items. The administrator s collects the position detection terminal 1a and the operation terminal 2a returned from the worker w (step FC102). The position detection terminal 1a detects the position and orientation of the worker w at predetermined time intervals, for example, every second, over the entire period from the departure of the worker w from the office F2 to the return, and detects them. The position and orientation are associated with the time at the time of detection and stored as position detection information.

Next, the manager s connects the position detection terminal 1a and the operation terminal 2a to the patrol inspection work evaluation device 3a. This connection may be wired or wireless. The patrol inspection work evaluation device 3a acquires the position detection information from the position detection terminal 1a, acquires the inspection record input information including the inspection result input time from the operation terminal 2a, and from the acquired information, as described above. Evaluate whether the inspection work was performed correctly and display the evaluation result. The manager s sees the evaluation result displayed by the patrol inspection work evaluation device 3a and confirms whether or not the inspection work has been performed correctly (step FC103).

The patrol inspection work evaluation device 3a may also acquire and display the inspection result of the equipment to be inspected from the operation terminal 2a. Further, if there are other factors that should be determined that the inspection work is not performed correctly, such as the inspection result is not input correctly, the patrol inspection work evaluation device 3a uses the above-mentioned evaluation result as the factor. After making corrections, it may be displayed.

Next, the hardware configuration of the position detection terminal 1a, the operation terminal 2a, and the patrol inspection work evaluation device 3a will be described.
FIG. 4 is a hardware configuration diagram of the operation terminal 2a according to the present embodiment. The operation terminal 2a is, for example, a tablet-type terminal having a display 101 and capable of inputting by touching the screen with a finger or a pen. The hardware configuration of the patrol inspection work evaluation device 3a is the same as that in FIG. 4, but the patrol inspection work evaluation device 3a may be operated stationary in the office, or may be configured by a stationary terminal instead of a tablet type. good. Further, the input to the patrol inspection work evaluation device 3a may be performed by a mouse, a keyboard, a voice input, or the like.

In FIG. 4, the storage device 103 stores a basic OS (Operating System) that controls the operation terminal 2a, and also stores a program for realizing the function of the operation terminal 2a according to the present embodiment. .. The storage device 103 is, for example, an SSD (Solid State Drive), a hard disk drive, or the like. The CPU (Central Processing Unit) 102 of FIG. 4 executes those basic OSs and programs. The inspection record stored in the operation terminal 2a is stored in the storage device 103. The storage device 103 may be an external recording medium such as a card type that can be attached to and detached from the operation terminal 2a. The display 101 of FIG. 4 displays a screen for the worker w to input the inspection result.

The hardware configuration of the patrol inspection work evaluation device 3a is the same as the hardware configuration of FIG. The storage device 103 of FIG. 4 stores a program for realizing the function of the patrol inspection work evaluation device 3a according to the present embodiment, and the display 101 of FIG. 4 shows whether or not the inspection work has been performed correctly. The evaluation result and the inspection result acquired from the operation terminal 2a are displayed.

FIG. 5 is a hardware configuration diagram of the position detection terminal 1a according to the present embodiment. The position detection terminal 1a also includes a CPU 201 and a storage device 202 as in FIG. 4, and the storage device 202 stores a program for realizing the function of the position detection terminal 1a according to the present embodiment. The position detection terminal 1a further has a GPS (Global Positioning System, Global Positioning System) signal receiving device and a beacon receiving device (not shown) as the position detecting unit shown in FIG. 1, and the position detecting terminal 1a of the own terminal detects from the received signal. The current position is stored in the storage device 202 as the position of the worker w in association with the time at the time of detection. In FIG. 5, the position detection terminal 1a does not have a display unit, but may further have a display unit that displays the detected current position and the like.

Here, the position detection terminal 1a, the operation terminal 2a, and the patrol inspection work evaluation device 3a are each configured as separate devices, but the function of the position detection terminal 1a is incorporated into the operation terminal 2a to form a position. The detection terminal 1a and the operation terminal 2a may be realized by an integrated terminal. Further, the functions of the position detection terminal 1a and the patrol inspection work evaluation device 3a may be incorporated into the operation terminal 2a, and they may be configured as an integrated terminal. In that case, as a hardware configuration for realizing each of these functions, a CPU, a storage device, or the like may be shared by a plurality of functions.

Next, the details of each configuration of the position detection terminal 1a, the operation terminal 2a, and the patrol inspection work evaluation device 3a shown in FIG. 1 will be described. First, the configuration of the position detection terminal 1a shown in FIG. 1 will be described. In FIG. 1, the position detection terminal 1a has a position detection unit 10a, a position detection information storage unit 11a, an orientation detection unit 12a, and a communication unit 13a.

The position detection unit 10a numerically detects the position of its own terminal, that is, the position detection terminal 1a by receiving, for example, a GPS signal or a signal from a beacon transmitter provided in the vicinity of the equipment to be inspected. Since the worker w wears the position detection terminal 1a, the position detected by the position detection terminal 1a can be used as the detection result of the position of the worker w.

More specifically, when the position detection unit 10a performs position detection by GPS signals, it receives GPS signals from a plurality of GPS satellites and detects the position of the worker w from those GPS signals by latitude and longitude. When the position detection unit 10a detects the position by the beacon signal, one or a plurality of beacon transmitters are arranged in advance in the vicinity of the place where the patrol inspection work is performed, and when the worker w passes by the beacon transmitter, The position detection unit 10a receives the beacon signal. The position detection unit 10a stores in advance the position corresponding to the ID included in the received beacon transmission, and detects the position as the position of the own terminal, that is, the worker w. Alternatively, the position detection unit 10a may receive the respective beacon signals from the plurality of beacon transmitters and detect the position of the own terminal with respect to the positions of the plurality of beacon transmitters from the reception intensities of the plurality of beacon signals. good.

Here, as the position detection method used by the position detection unit 10a, a GPS signal or a beacon signal is used, but the method is not limited to this, and the distance or rotation from the reference point such as latitude / longitude and polar coordinate system is used. Any method may be used as long as it can numerically detect the position of the worker w such as an angle. The position detection unit 10a performs such position detection of the worker w at a plurality of times such as every second, and associates the detected position of the worker w with the time at the time of detection, and position detection information. Output to the storage unit 11a.

Further, the orientation detection unit 12a detects how much the visual direction of the worker w is rotated from a predetermined reference direction as the orientation of the worker. The orientation detection unit 12a detects the orientation of the worker at a plurality of times, for example, every second, and associates the detected orientation of the worker with the time at the time of detection to detect the position. Output to the storage unit 11a.

In such a method of detecting the orientation of the worker in the orientation detection unit 12a, for example, the geomagnetic direction from south to north is detected, and the difference between the geomagnetic direction and the orientation of the orientation detection unit 12a is used as the orientation of the worker. To detect. Alternatively, a gyro sensor or an acceleration sensor may be used, and the direction detected by the sensor at a certain point in time may be set as the reference direction, and how much rotation from the reference direction may be detected as the direction of the worker. As long as the orientation detection unit 12a can numerically detect the orientation of the worker, the detection method is not limited.

The position detection terminal 1a is fixed to the worker's body as much as possible so that the orientation detection unit 12a also rotates in accordance with the rotation of the worker's body so that the orientation detection unit 12a can accurately detect the orientation of the worker. It is preferable to wear it. In FIG. 2, the position detection terminal 1a is an example of a spectacles type worn on the worker's face, but it may be worn on a body or the like that is not the worker's face. When the position detection terminal 1a detects only the position of the worker and does not detect the direction of the worker, the position detection terminal 1a tells the worker to the extent that the position of the position detection terminal 1a can be regarded as the position of the worker. You just have to wear it.

FIG. 6 shows an example of the position detection information accumulated by the position detection information storage unit 11a according to the present embodiment. The position detection information storage unit 11a stores the position of the worker w detected by the position detection unit 10a and the direction of the worker w detected by the orientation detection unit 12a as position detection information in association with the time at the time of detection. do. FIG. 6 illustrates a case where the time when the position detection unit 10a detects the position of the worker and the time when the orientation detection unit 12a detects the direction of the worker coincide with each other. The detection times of the detection units 12a may be different from each other. In FIG. 6, the position of the worker at each time every second is stored in latitude and longitude, and the direction of the worker at the same time is stored in the angle of difference from the geomagnetic direction.

The communication unit 13a of FIG. 1 transmits the position detection information stored in the position detection information storage unit 11a to the communication unit 30a of the patrol inspection work evaluation device 3a. The communication interface of this communication unit may be any wired or wireless network such as a wireless LAN such as IEEE802.11a / b / g / n, Bluetooth (registered trademark), and a mobile phone network such as a 5th generation mobile communication system (5G). Communication method can be used.

Next, the configuration of the operation terminal 2a shown in FIG. 1 will be described. The operation terminal 2a has an inspection record input unit 20a, an inspection record storage unit 21a, an inspection record input information storage unit 22a, and a communication unit 23a.

The inspection record input unit 20a is an input device for the worker to input the inspection result of the equipment to be inspected, and is, for example, a touch panel of a tablet type terminal. FIG. 7 shows an example of a screen 300 for inputting an inspection result displayed on the touch panel. In FIG. 7, the screen 300 includes an inspection target equipment selection list 301, an inspection record history selection list 302, a date / time input box 303, a status selection box 304, an inspection record input text box 305, and an information update button 306, but the inspection result is Any input method may be used as long as the interface allows input.

The input operation of the inspection result of the worker w in FIG. 7 will be described.
The inspection target equipment selection list 301 is a drop-down list for inputting the name / ID of the inspection target equipment, and here, the name / ID of each inspection target equipment is registered in advance. The worker w selects the name of the equipment to be inspected for inputting the inspection result from the equipment selection list 301 to be inspected.

The inspection record history selection list 302 is a drop-down list for switching between a mode for inputting a new inspection result and a mode for correcting an inspection result input in the past. When the worker w newly inputs the inspection result, the inspection record history selection list 302 is not selected, and when the input of the past inspection result is corrected, the inspection record history selection list 302 is set to, for example, ". Make it a state of choices such as "last time" and "two times before". For example, when "previous" is selected in the inspection record history selection list 302, the contents of the previously input inspection record are displayed in the date / time input box 303, the status selection box 304, and the inspection record input text box 305, and the worker w The contents can be modified.

In the date / time input box 303, enter the date and time when the inspection was performed. Here, it is instructed by the work procedure manual or the like that the worker w inputs the inspection result on the screen 300 during or immediately after the inspection, and the worker w sets the date and time at the time of the input as the date and time. Input to the input box 303. By pressing the information update button 306, which will be described later, the date and time at the time of pressing may be automatically input to the date and time input box 303.

The status selection box 304 is a drop-down list for inputting the status of the equipment to be inspected, which is the inspection result. For example, the appearance of the equipment to be inspected (for example, “no damage”, “damaged”) or the inspection target. Input options such as the state at the time of operating the equipment (for example, "no abnormal noise", "with abnormal noise") are registered in advance. The worker w selects the state of the equipment to be inspected, which is the result of this inspection, from this drop-down list.

The inspection record input text box 305 is a text box for inputting other information about the inspection result of this time. In addition to the selection in the status selection box 304, the worker w inputs the comment in the inspection record input text box 305 when further commenting on the status of the equipment to be inspected. When the input of the inspection result on the screen 300 is completed, the worker w presses the information update button 306.

When the information update button 306 is pressed, the content input to the screen 300 is stored in the inspection record storage unit 21a and the inspection record input information storage unit 22a of FIG. More specifically, when the information update button 306 is pressed, the input contents to the inspection target equipment selection list 301, the date and time input box 303, the status selection box 304, and the inspection record input text box 305 are sent to the inspection record storage unit 21a. It is stored as an inspection record. Further, the input contents in the inspection target equipment selection list 301 and the inspection record history selection list 302 are associated with the input time of the inspection result, and are stored in the inspection record input information storage unit 22a as the inspection record input information. ..

When the information update button 306 is pressed with the "previous" selected in the inspection record history selection list 302, the "previous" inspection record already stored in the inspection record storage unit 21a of FIG. 1 is displayed. It is corrected by the contents of the date and time input box 303, the status selection box 304, and the inspection record input text box 305 input this time.

FIG. 8 is an example of an inspection record stored by the inspection record storage unit 21a of FIG. In FIG. 8, the “inspection date” is the date input by the date / time input box 303 in FIG. 7. The “equipment name / ID” in FIG. 8 is the name / ID of the equipment to be inspected entered by the inspection target equipment selection list 301 in FIG. 7. The “equipment state” in FIG. 8 is the state of the equipment to be inspected input by the state selection box 304 in FIG. 7. The inspection record storage unit 21a also stores a comment (not shown) input to the inspection record input text box 305 of FIG. 7.

The inspection record input information storage unit 22a stores, together with a part or all of the inspection record, information related to the operation when the worker w inputs the inspection record as the inspection record input information. FIG. 9 is an example of the inspection record input information stored in the inspection record input information storage unit 22a. The "inspection record input information" in FIG. 9 is composed of "input time", "input time", "inspection target equipment name and its ID", and "operation type".

The “input time” in FIG. 9 is the input time of the inspection result by the worker w, for example, the date and time when the information update button 306 is pressed. This "input time" may be the date and time entered by the worker w in the date and time input box 303 of FIG. 7, but the program automatically detects the date and time when the information update button 306 is pressed from the internal clock of the OS, GPS signals, and the like. It is preferable to improve the reliability of the date and time by setting the date and time. This "input time" may be another date and time during the inspection result input of the worker w, such as when the worker w starts inputting the inspection result (for example, when the screen 300 is opened).

The “input time” in FIG. 9 is the elapsed time from the time when the worker w starts inputting the inspection result to the time when the input of the inspection result is completed (for example, the time when the information update button 306 is pressed). .. In the "operation type" of FIG. 9, the "mode for newly inputting the inspection result" input by the inspection record history selection list 302 is set to "new", and the "mode for correcting the inspection result input in the past" is "corrected". It is something to remember as.

The communication unit 23a of FIG. 1 transmits the inspection record input information stored in the inspection record input information storage unit 22a to the communication unit 30a of the patrol inspection work evaluation device 3a. Similar to the communication unit 13a, the communication interface of this communication unit includes a wireless LAN such as IEEE802.11a / b / g / n, Bluetooth (registered trademark), a mobile phone network such as a 5th generation mobile communication system (5G), and the like. , Any wired or wireless communication method can be used. The communication method used by the communication unit 13a of the position detection terminal 1a and the communication method used by the communication unit 23a of the operation terminal 2a may be the same or different from each other.

Next, the configuration of the patrol inspection work evaluation device 3a shown in FIG. 1 will be described.
The patrol inspection work evaluation device 3a includes a communication unit 30a, an inspection record input information storage unit 31a, a position detection information storage unit 32a, a route calculation unit 33a, a route display unit 34a, an equipment information storage unit 35a, a work position extraction unit 36a, and a position. It includes a relationship calculation unit 37a, a work evaluation unit 38a, and a result display unit 39a.

The communication unit 30a acquires the position detection information from the communication unit 13a of the position detection terminal 1a and stores it in the position detection information storage unit 32a. Further, the communication unit 30a acquires the inspection record input information from the communication unit 23a of the operation terminal 2a and stores it in the inspection record input information storage unit 31a.

The route calculation unit 33a obtains the movement route of the worker w by using the position detection information stored in the position detection information storage unit 32a, and displays the movement route on the route display unit 34a. Specifically, the position of the worker w at each time stored in the inspection record input information storage unit 31a is plotted on a map, and the image in which the plots are connected by a line segment in the order of the time is moved by the worker w. As a route, it is displayed on the route display unit 34a. At this time, the direction of the worker w at each time stored in the inspection record input information storage unit 31a may be superimposed and displayed on each of these plots with an arrow or the like. The route display unit 34a and the result display unit 39a may be shared by one display device, or may be separate display devices from each other.

FIG. 10 is an example of the movement route of the worker w displayed by the route display unit 34a. In FIG. 10, a worker w at each time stored in the inspection record input information storage unit 31a on a map on which equipment i and equipment j which are inspection target equipment, equipment x which is non-inspection target equipment, and the like are described. The positions of are plotted with black circles, and the plots are connected by lines in the order of time.

The equipment information storage unit 35a of FIG. 1 stores the position of the equipment to be inspected. In this embodiment, the position of the equipment to be inspected is stored in advance. FIG. 11 is an example of the position of the equipment to be inspected stored in the equipment information storage unit 35a according to the present embodiment. The equipment information storage unit 35a stores the equipment name and ID of the equipment to be inspected, and the position of the equipment to be inspected. In FIG. 11, the position information is represented using latitude and longitude, but other representation methods may be used.

The work position extraction unit 36a of FIG. 1 reads the inspection result input time of the worker w from the inspection record input information stored in the inspection record input information storage unit 31a, and the worker w stored in the position detection information storage unit 32a. From the position detection information of, the position and orientation of the worker w at the inspection result input time are extracted.

FIG. 12 is a flowchart showing the processing flow of the work position extraction unit 36a. In step FC201, the work position extraction unit 36a reads out the inspection result input time of the worker w from the inspection record input information stored in the inspection record input information storage unit 31a. In step FC202, the work position extraction unit 36a extracts the position of the worker w at the inspection result input time as the inspection work position from the position detection information of the worker w stored in the position detection information storage unit 32a.

More specifically, the work position extraction unit 36a stores the position of the worker w at a time corresponding to the inspection result input time of the worker w in the position detection information stored in the position detection information storage unit 32a. In that case, the position is extracted as the inspection work position. If the position of the worker w at the time corresponding to the inspection result input time is not stored in the position detection information, the work position extraction unit 36a is stored in the position detection information and the inspection result is obtained. The position of the worker w at the time closest to the input time is extracted as the inspection work position. Alternatively, the position of the worker w at the nearest time advanced from the inspection result input time may be extracted as the inspection work position. Alternatively, the inspection work position may be extracted by an arbitrary estimation formula based on the position detection information.

In FIG. 12, the case where the work position extraction unit 36a extracts the inspection work position of the worker w is shown, but the same applies to the case where the work position extraction unit 36a extracts the direction of the worker w at the inspection work position. Can be extracted.

The positional relationship calculation unit 37a of FIG. 1 calculates a value related to the positional relationship between the inspection work position of the worker w and the position of the equipment to be inspected. The positional relationship value calculated here is at least one of the following (1) and (2), and in the present embodiment, both of the following (1) and (2) are calculated.
(1) Distance between the inspection work position and the position of the equipment to be inspected.
(2) Angle difference between the orientation of the worker w at the inspection work position and the orientation from the inspection work position to the equipment to be inspected.

First, the calculation of (1) described above in the positional relationship calculation unit 37a will be described. FIG. 14 shows the flow of calculation in (1) above. The positional relationship calculation unit 37a calculates the distance between the inspection work position extracted by the work position extraction unit 36a and the position of the inspection target equipment as the positional relationship between the inspection work position and the position of the inspection target equipment.
FIG. 13 shows an example of the distance between the movement route of the worker w and the position of the equipment i to be inspected. The black plot in FIG. 13 is the position of the worker, and the white plot is the inspection work position extracted by the work position extraction unit 36a.

In step FC301 of FIG. 14, the positional relationship calculation unit 37a acquires the equipment name / ID of the equipment to be inspected i and the position Li of the equipment to be inspected _i from the equipment information storage unit 35a.

In step FC302 of FIG. 14, the distance Li between the inspection work position extracted by the work position extraction unit 36a and the position of the inspection target equipment _i is calculated. When the inspection record is corrected, there will be a plurality of inspection records for the equipment i to be inspected. That is, there are a plurality of inspection work positions for the equipment i to be inspected. The number of inspection records for the equipment i to be inspected is k (1, 2 ... k), and the inspection work positions of the equipment i to be inspected are represented by the inspection work positions _{Li, k} in order. Then, the distances Di and _k between the position of the equipment i to be inspected and the respective inspection work positions Li _{and k} are calculated. For example, in FIG. 13, there are two inspection work positions, inspection work positions _{Li, 1} and _{Li, 2} . Therefore, the distance between each inspection work position and the equipment to be inspected i is calculated as the distances _{Di, 1} and the distances _{Di, 2} .

In FC303, when there are a plurality of inspection work positions of the inspection target equipment i, the smallest distance Di, _k from the inspection target equipment i is selected. In FIG. 13, the distance Di, 1 which is the smaller of the distances Di _{, 1} and the distances _{Di, 2} is selected by the positional relationship calculation unit 37a as a value related to the positional relationship. In this way, the positional relationship calculation unit 37a calculates the distance between the inspection work position and the position of the equipment to be inspected as a value related to the positional relationship according to steps FC301 to FC303.

Next, the calculation of (2) described above in the positional relationship calculation unit 37a will be described. The positional relationship calculation unit 37a has an angle between the orientation of the worker at the inspection work position and the direction from the inspection work position to the inspection target equipment as the positional relationship between the inspection work position of the worker w and the position of the inspection target equipment. Calculate the difference.

FIG. 15 shows a flow in which the positional relationship calculation unit 37a calculates the angle difference between the orientation of the worker at the inspection work position and the orientation from the inspection work position to the equipment to be inspected. In FC401 of FIG. 15, the positional relationship calculation unit 37a acquires the direction α _i of the worker at the inspection work position of the inspection target equipment i from the work position extraction unit 36a. Subsequently, in the FC402, the positional relationship calculation unit 37a calculates the direction β _i from the inspection work position to the inspection target equipment. Next, in the FC403, the positional relationship calculation unit 37a calculates the angle difference ω _i between the orientation α _i of the worker and the orientation β _i toward the equipment to be inspected.

In this way, the positional relationship calculation unit 37a calculates the angle difference between the orientation of the worker at the inspection work position and the orientation toward the equipment to be inspected at the inspection work position as a value related to the positional relationship according to steps FC401 to FC403. do.

The positional relationship calculation unit 37a may calculate the following (3) instead of the above calculation of (2).
(3) The minimum value of the angle difference between the direction of the worker w and the direction to the equipment to be inspected within a predetermined time from the inspection result input time.

The above-mentioned calculation of (3) in the positional relationship calculation unit 37a will be described. The positional relationship calculation unit 37a determines the positional relationship between the inspection work position of the worker w and the position of the equipment to be inspected, the direction of the worker w at each time within a predetermined time from the inspection result input time, and each time. The minimum value of the angle difference from the position of the worker w to the direction to the equipment to be inspected is calculated.

FIG. 16 shows a flow of calculating a value related to the positional relationship. FIG. 17 is an example of a diagram showing the position of the worker w within a predetermined time range in the equipment i to be inspected. The black plot and the white plot in FIG. 17 are the positions of the worker w at each time stored in the inspection record input information storage unit 31a, and the white plot is within a predetermined time range from the inspection result input time. It is the position of the worker w.

In FC501, the positional relationship calculation unit 37a acquires the inspection result input time for the inspection target equipment i from the inspection record input information storage unit 31a, and the worker within a predetermined time range centering on the inspection result input time. The position of w is extracted as the inspection work position. However, since the worker w may move away from the inspection target equipment i within the time range, the distance from the inspection target equipment i among the extracted worker positions is within a predetermined range. You may try to extract only certain things.

For example, in FIG. 17, for example, ± 10 minutes centered on the inspection result input time is set as a predetermined time range, and the inside of a circle having a radius M from the inspection target equipment i is set within a predetermined distance M. Then, the position and orientation of the worker w within the time range and the distance M range are extracted from the position detection information stored by the position detection information storage unit 32c. The size of the radius M may be different for each equipment to be inspected, may be the same for all, or may be changed under arbitrary conditions. Further, as the range, a region having a polygonal shape or a complicated shape may be set for each equipment to be inspected, instead of being within a simple circle.

In FIG. 17, for the equipment i to be inspected, the position of the worker w extracted within the time range and within the circle of the radius M is defined as k (1, 2, ... k) in the order of the detection time. , _{Li, M, k} . Further, the orientation of the worker w at the position of the worker w is represented by φ _{i, M, k} .

In FIG. 17, a worker position within a predetermined time range (for example, ± 10 minutes or -10 minutes) from the inspection result input time of the inspection target equipment i and a distance from the inspection target equipment i within the range of M. The worker positions _{Li, M, 1} , the worker positions _{Li, M, 2} , and the worker positions _{Li, M, 3} are extracted. Further, as the orientation of the worker at each of the positions _{Li, M, k} (k = 1 to 3) of the worker w, the orientation of the worker φ _{i, M, 1} , the orientation of the worker φ _{i, M, 2} (not shown) and worker orientation φ _{i, M, 3} (not shown) are extracted.

In FC502, for each of the positions Lii, _{M, k} (k = 1 to 3) of the worker w, the orientation from the worker positions Lii, _{M, k} to the equipment i to be inspected is obtained. In FIG. 17, the positions _{Li, M, k} of the worker and the straight line passing through the equipment to be inspected i are represented by li, _M , k, and the angle φ formed by the straight line li _{, M, k} and the reference direction Y. ^´i _{, M, k are obtained as the direction from the position Lii, M, k of} the worker w to the equipment i to be inspected. In FIG. 17, φ ^′ _{i, M, 1} are shown as directions from the positions φ _{i, M, 1} of the worker w to the equipment i to be inspected, and φ ^′ _{i, M, 2} and φ ^′ _{i, M, 3} are shown. Is omitted.

In FC503, the calculation result of FC502 is used to determine the worker directions φ _{i, M, k} and the equipment to be inspected for each of the positions Li _{, M, k} (k = 1 to 3) of the worker w. Calculate the angle difference ω _{i, M, k} from the direction φ ^´ _{i, M, k} . That is, the angle difference ω _{i, M, k =} | φ _{i, M, 1} − φ ^´ _{i, M, 1} | is calculated.

In FC504, ω _i , which is the smallest value among the calculated angle differences ω _{i, M, and k} , is selected as shown in the following equation 1.

As described above, as shown in steps FC501 to FC504, the positional relationship calculation unit 37a is the worker w at each of the plurality of positions of the worker w within the range of the predetermined time from the inspection result input time. The angle difference between the direction of and the direction from the position to the equipment i to be inspected is calculated, and the smallest value among the calculated angle differences is calculated as a value related to the positional relationship.

Next, the work evaluation unit 38a of FIG. 1 will be described. The work evaluation unit 38a evaluates whether the inspection work has been performed correctly based on the values related to the positional relationship calculated by the positional relationship calculation unit 37a.

FIG. 18 illustrates a flow in which the work evaluation unit 38a performs the evaluation.
In FC701, the work evaluation unit 38a acquires the value related to the positional relationship calculated by the positional relationship calculation unit 37a. For example, the work evaluation unit 38a acquires the values related to the above-mentioned positional relationships (1) and (2) calculated by the positional relationship calculation unit 37a.
In FC702, the work evaluation unit 38a evaluates whether or not the value related to at least one of these (1) and (2) positional relationships is within a predetermined range. The work evaluation unit 38a evaluates that the inspection has been performed correctly if it is within the range, and evaluates that the inspection has not been performed correctly if it is out of the range.

Specifically, the work evaluation unit 38a evaluates that when the value related to the positional relationship in (1) above is the distance _Di , if the distance _Di is within the predetermined range γ, the inspection is correctly performed. If this distance _Di is out of the range γ, it is evaluated that the inspection is not performed correctly.

Further, the work evaluation unit 38a evaluates that when the value related to the positional relationship in (2) above is the angle difference ω _i , the inspection is performed correctly if the angle difference ω _i is within the predetermined range θ. If it is out of the range θ, it is evaluated that the inspection is not performed correctly.

Here, the work evaluation unit 38a evaluated that the inspection was performed correctly if any of the values related to the positional relationship of (1) and (2) described above was within a predetermined range. When the value related to the positional relationship is within a predetermined range, it may be evaluated that the inspection has been performed correctly. That is, if at least one of the distance D _i and the angle difference ω _i is out of the range, it may be evaluated that the inspection is not performed correctly. This makes it possible to strictly evaluate whether the inspection was performed correctly.

Further, the work evaluation unit 38a may use the above-mentioned value related to the positional relationship (3) for the evaluation instead of the above-mentioned value related to the positional relationship (2). The result display unit 39a of FIG. 1 displays the evaluation result evaluated in this way by the work evaluation unit 38a.

As described above, in the present embodiment, the inspection of the worker w is performed from the position of the worker w detected by the position detection terminal at each of the plurality of times and the input time of the inspection result to the operation terminal 2a by the worker w. The work position is calculated, the value related to the positional relationship between the inspection work position and the position of the equipment to be inspected is calculated, and it is evaluated from the calculation result whether the inspection was performed correctly. It is possible to evaluate whether the inspection was performed correctly without installing a device that sends a work completion signal in the vicinity of.

In the present embodiment, a device for sending a work completion signal is installed in the vicinity of the equipment to be inspected as in the conventional case, and the work evaluation unit 38a performs the above evaluation using the record of whether or not the work completion signal is received. You may do so. In that case, if the device that sends the work completion signal fails, it may be possible to evaluate whether or not the inspection has been performed correctly without using the record of the presence or absence of reception.

Embodiment 2.
The difference between the first embodiment and the second embodiment is the time during which the worker w stays within a predetermined distance centering on the equipment to be inspected when evaluating whether the inspection is performed correctly. It is a point to evaluate using. In the following, only the differences from the first embodiment will be described, and the description of the same or corresponding parts will be omitted. Regarding the reference numerals, the same or corresponding parts as those in the first embodiment are the same reference numerals, and the description thereof will be omitted.

In the present embodiment, the positional relationship calculation unit 37a of FIG. 1 has the following (4) in addition to the above-mentioned values related to the positional relationship of (1) and (2) or (3) shown in the first embodiment. Calculated as a value related to the positional relationship.
(4) The residence time of the worker w within a predetermined distance centering on the equipment to be inspected.

FIG. 19 is an example of a diagram showing the position of the worker w within a predetermined distance N centered on the equipment i to be inspected with a white plot. Also, the black plot is the position of the worker w outside that range. FIG. 20 shows a flow for calculating the residence time in (4) above.

In step FC701 of FIG. 20, the number p _{i, N} of the positions of the worker w within the range of the predetermined radius N is acquired around the equipment i to be inspected. In this embodiment, as shown in FIG. 19, the number of the positions is _{pi, N} = 6.

In step FC702, the residence time of the worker w within the range of the radius N is obtained. When the detection interval of the position of the worker _w is expressed by Δt and the residence time is expressed by ti, the residence time ti can be obtained by ti _{= pi , N} × Δt. In the present embodiment, since p _{i , N} = 6 and the detection interval Δt = 1 second, the residence time ti = 6 × 1 second = 6 seconds. That is, 6 seconds is calculated as the value related to the positional relationship of (4) described above.

In addition to the evaluation based on the values related to the positional relationship of (1) to (3) above, the work evaluation unit 38a also calculates the value related to the positional relationship of (4) above, and the value related to the positional relationship of (4) is predetermined. If it is above the standard value, it is evaluated that the inspection was performed correctly. That is, when the residence time is shorter than the reference value, the work evaluation unit 38a evaluates that the inspection is not performed correctly. If any of the values related to the positional relationship of (1) to (4) above is within a predetermined range, the work evaluation unit 38a may evaluate that the inspection has been performed correctly, or (1) of them. )-(4) may be evaluated as having been performed correctly if all of them are within the predetermined range.

In the present embodiment, the residence time of (4) is calculated as a value related to the positional relationship in this way, and based on the residence time, it is evaluated whether the inspection work is performed correctly. Therefore, it is checked whether the inspection work is performed correctly. It can be evaluated strictly.

Embodiment 3.
The difference between the first and second embodiments of this embodiment is that at least one of a still image or a moving image at the time of inspection of the equipment to be inspected is recorded, and the recording is also used to evaluate whether the inspection work is performed correctly. It is a point to do. In the following, only the differences from the first and second embodiments will be described, and the description of the same or corresponding parts will be omitted. Regarding the reference numerals, the same or corresponding parts as those of the first and second embodiments are the same reference numerals, and the description thereof will be omitted.

FIG. 21 is a functional block diagram of the patrol inspection work evaluation system 500c according to the present embodiment. In the present embodiment, as shown in FIG. 21, the operation terminal 2c further includes a photographing unit 24c and an image information storage unit 25c in addition to the configuration of the operation terminal 2a of FIG. Further, the patrol inspection work evaluation device 3c further includes an image information storage unit 40a and a photographing work evaluation unit 41a in addition to the configuration of the patrol inspection work evaluation device 3a of FIG.

The photographing unit 24c is provided with a lens (not shown) in the housing of the operation terminal 2c, and has a function of photographing at least one of a still image and a moving image. The worker w inputs the inspection result of the equipment to be inspected to the inspection record input unit 20a, and takes a picture of the equipment to be inspected by the photographing unit 24c. A so-called shutter button for operating the shooting of the shooting unit 24c is provided on the screen 300 for inputting the inspection result shown in FIG. 7, for example (not shown).

The image information storage unit 25c stores the image of the equipment to be inspected captured by the photographing unit 24c as the image information of the equipment to be inspected in association with the inspection result input to the screen 300. More specifically, the image information of the equipment to be inspected stored in the image information storage unit 25c is the name / ID of the equipment to be inspected, at least one of a still image or a moving image of the equipment to be inspected captured by the photographing unit 24c, and the image thereof. It consists of the shooting time.

The inspection target equipment image information stored in the image information storage unit 25c is stored in the image information storage unit 40c of the patrol inspection work evaluation device 3c via the communication unit 23a of the operation terminal 2c and the communication unit 30a of the patrol inspection work evaluation device 3c. It will be remembered.

The photographing work evaluation unit 41c evaluates whether or not the worker w was in the vicinity of the inspection target equipment when the worker w input the inspection record from the inspection target equipment image information stored in the image information storage unit 40c. FIG. 22 shows the flow of the evaluation in the photographing work evaluation unit 41c.

In step FC901, the shooting work evaluation unit 41c acquires the shooting time of the image from the inspection target equipment image information stored in the image information storage unit 40c.

In step FC902, the shooting work evaluation unit 41c extracts the position of the worker w at the shooting time acquired in step FC901 from the position detection information stored in the position detection information storage unit 32a as the shooting position of the worker w. If the position of the worker w at the time corresponding to the shooting time is not included in the position detection information, the position of the worker w at the time closest to the shooting time is extracted as the shooting position. Alternatively, the position of the worker at the nearest time advanced from the shooting time may be extracted as the shooting position.

In step FC903, it is evaluated whether or not the shooting position of the worker w is within a range of a predetermined distance z centering on the equipment to be inspected. If it is within the range of the distance z, it is evaluated that the worker w has performed the inspection work correctly. If it deviates from the distance z, it is evaluated that the worker w is not performing the inspection work correctly. The shooting work evaluation unit 41c displays the evaluation result on the result display unit 39a. That is, the result display unit 39a displays the evaluation result by the shooting work evaluation unit together with the evaluation result by the work evaluation unit 38a. Further, the result display unit 39a extracts and displays an image of the shooting time used for the evaluation from the inspection target equipment image information stored in the image information storage unit 40c.

The operation terminal 2c may further have a function of displaying an image such as a still image or a moving image taken in the past of the inspection target equipment from the inspection target equipment image information accumulated by the image information storage unit 25c. As a result, when inspecting, it is possible to inspect while evaluating the situation as compared with the past while comparing the image or the moving image displayed by the display function. As a result, more accurate inspection can be performed.
Further, the previously shot image may be displayed as a transparent image on the shooting screen displayed at the time of shooting so that the images can be shot in an overlapping manner. As a result, the equipment to be inspected can be photographed at the same angle as when the photograph was taken last time.

In the present embodiment, as evidence of the patrol inspection work, the worker can leave at least one of a still image or a moving image of the state of the equipment to be inspected, and whether the patrol inspection work is correctly performed from the shooting position. Can be evaluated more strictly.

1a position detection terminal, 2a operation terminal, 3a patrol inspection work evaluation device, 10a position detection unit, 11a position detection information storage unit, 12a orientation detection unit, 13a communication unit, 20a inspection record input unit, 21a inspection record storage unit, 22a. Inspection record input information storage unit, 23a communication unit, 24c imaging unit, 25c image information storage unit, 30a communication unit, 31a inspection record input information storage unit, 32a position detection information storage unit, 33a route calculation unit, 34a route display unit, 35a equipment information storage unit, 36a work position extraction unit, 37a positional relationship calculation unit, 38a work evaluation unit, 39a result display unit, 40c image information storage unit, 41c shooting work evaluation unit

Claims (16)

An operation terminal where the inspection results of the equipment to be inspected are input by workers, and
A position detection terminal that detects the position of the worker at each of a plurality of times and stores the detected position and the time at the time of detection as position detection information.
Inspection record input information acquisition unit that acquires the inspection result input time, which is the time when the worker inputs the inspection result to the operation terminal.
A position detection information acquisition unit that acquires the position detection information from the position detection terminal,
A work position extraction unit that extracts the position of the worker corresponding to the inspection result input time as an inspection work position from the position detection information.
Equipment information storage unit that stores the position of the equipment to be inspected,
A positional relationship calculation unit that calculates a value related to the positional relationship between the inspection work position and the position of the equipment to be inspected.
And, if the value related to the positional relationship is within the predetermined range, it is evaluated that the inspection has been performed correctly, and if the value related to the positional relationship is out of the range, it is evaluated that the inspection has not been performed correctly. A patrol inspection work evaluation device with a work evaluation unit,
Patrol inspection work evaluation system equipped with. The patrol inspection work evaluation system according to claim 1, wherein the positional relationship calculation unit calculates the distance between the position of the inspection target equipment and the inspection work position as a value related to the positional relationship. The position detection terminal further detects the orientation of the worker at each of the plurality of times, and stores the information in which the detected position and the time at the time of the detection are associated with each other in the position detection information.
The work position extraction unit extracts the direction of the worker corresponding to the inspection result input time from the position detection information as the inspection work direction.
The patrol according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the work evaluation unit calculates an angle difference, which is the difference between the direction from the inspection work position to the position of the inspection target equipment and the inspection work direction, as a value related to the positional relationship. Inspection work evaluation system. The position detection terminal further detects the orientation of the worker at each of the plurality of times, and stores the information in which the detected position and the time at the time of the detection are associated with each other in the position detection information.
Based on the position detection information, the positional relationship calculation unit may perform the inspection target from the position of the worker for each of the plurality of positions of the worker within a predetermined time range including the inspection result input time. The invention according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the difference between the orientation to the equipment and the orientation of the worker at the position of the worker is calculated, and the smallest value among the calculated differences is calculated as the value of the positional relationship. Patrol inspection work evaluation system. The patrol inspection work evaluation system according to claim 3 or 4, wherein the position detection terminal detects the visual direction of the worker as the direction of the worker. The patrol inspection work evaluation system according to any one of claims 3 to 5, wherein the position detection terminal has the same time when the position of the worker is detected and the time when the direction of the worker is detected. The positional relationship calculation unit further calculates the residence time, which is the time during which the worker stays within a predetermined range centered on the equipment to be inspected.
The patrol inspection work evaluation system according to any one of claims 1 to 6, wherein the work evaluation unit evaluates whether or not the inspection is performed correctly based on the value related to the positional relationship and the residence time. The operation terminal has a photographing unit for photographing the equipment to be inspected.
The patrol inspection work evaluation device acquires the shooting time when the shooting unit shoots the inspection target equipment from the operation terminal, and sets the position of the worker corresponding to the shooting time as the shooting position from the position detection information. The invention according to any one of claims 1 to 7, which has a photographing work evaluation unit that extracts and evaluates whether or not the inspection is performed correctly based on the distance between the photographing position and the position of the inspection target equipment. Patrol inspection work evaluation system. The position of the worker detected by the position detection terminal is any one of claims 1 to 8, which is the position of the position detection terminal calculated from the GPS signal when the position detection terminal receives the GPS signal. Patrol inspection work evaluation system described in. The position of the worker detected by the position detection terminal is described in any one of claims 1 to 8, which is a position corresponding to the ID included in the beacon signal when the position detection terminal receives the beacon signal. Patrol inspection work evaluation system. The patrol inspection work evaluation system according to any one of claims 1 to 10, wherein the patrol inspection work evaluation device has a display unit for displaying the evaluation of the work evaluation unit. The patrol inspection work evaluation system according to any one of claims 1 to 10, wherein the patrol inspection work evaluation device has a route calculation unit that displays a movement route of the worker on a display unit based on the position detection information. The operation terminal where the inspection result of the equipment to be inspected is input by the worker and the position of the worker at each of a plurality of times are detected, and the detected position and the time at the time of the detection are associated with each other as position detection information. The patrol inspection work evaluation device of the patrol inspection work evaluation system having a position detection terminal to be stored and a patrol inspection work evaluation device for evaluating whether or not the inspection is performed correctly.
An inspection record input information acquisition unit that acquires an inspection result input time, which is the time when the worker inputs the inspection result to the operation terminal.
A position detection information acquisition unit that acquires the position detection information from the position detection terminal, and
A work position extraction unit that extracts the position of the worker corresponding to the inspection result input time as an inspection work position from the position detection information, and a work position extraction unit.
The equipment information storage unit that stores the position of the equipment to be inspected,
A positional relationship calculation unit that calculates a value related to the positional relationship between the inspection work position and the position of the equipment to be inspected.
If the value related to the positional relationship is within a predetermined range, it is evaluated that the inspection has been performed correctly, and if the value related to the positional relationship is out of the range, it is evaluated that the inspection has not been performed correctly. A patrol inspection work evaluation device having an evaluation unit. The operation terminal where the inspection result of the equipment to be inspected is input by the worker and the position of the worker at each of a plurality of times are detected, and the detected position and the time at the time of the detection are associated with each other as position detection information. The position detection information is acquired from the position detection terminal to be stored, the inspection record input information acquisition unit for acquiring the inspection result input time which is the time when the worker inputs the inspection result to the operation terminal, and the position detection terminal. A position detection information acquisition unit, a work position extraction unit that extracts the position of the worker corresponding to the inspection result input time as an inspection work position from the position detection information, and an equipment information storage unit that stores the position of the equipment to be inspected. If the positional relationship calculation unit that calculates the value related to the positional relationship between the inspection work position and the position of the equipment to be inspected and the value related to the positional relationship are within a predetermined range, it is evaluated that the inspection was performed correctly. The operation terminal of the patrol inspection work evaluation system having a patrol inspection work evaluation device having a work evaluation unit for evaluating that the inspection is not performed correctly if the value related to the positional relationship is out of the range. ,
An inspection record input unit where the inspection results are input by workers, and
An inspection record input information storage unit that stores the time when the worker inputs the inspection result to the operation terminal,
An operation terminal including a communication unit that transmits the time stored in the inspection record input information storage unit to the inspection record input information acquisition unit of the patrol inspection work evaluation device as the inspection result input time. The operation terminal where the inspection result of the equipment to be inspected is input by the worker and the position of the worker at each of a plurality of times are detected, and the detected position and the time at the time of the detection are associated with each other as position detection information. The position detection information is acquired from the position detection terminal to be stored, the inspection record input information acquisition unit for acquiring the inspection result input time which is the time when the worker inputs the inspection result to the operation terminal, and the position detection terminal. A position detection information acquisition unit, a work position extraction unit that extracts the position of the worker corresponding to the inspection result input time as an inspection work position from the position detection information, and an equipment information storage unit that stores the position of the equipment to be inspected. If the positional relationship calculation unit that calculates the value related to the positional relationship between the inspection work position and the position of the equipment to be inspected and the value related to the positional relationship are within a predetermined range, it is evaluated that the inspection was performed correctly. The position detection terminal of the patrol inspection work evaluation system having a patrol inspection work evaluation device having a work evaluation unit for evaluating that the inspection is not performed correctly if the value related to the positional relationship is out of the range. hand,
A position detection unit that detects the position of the worker at each of a plurality of times,
A position detection information storage unit that stores the position detected by the position detection unit and the time at the time of the detection as the position detection information.
A position detection terminal including a communication unit that transmits the position detection information stored in the position detection information storage unit to the position detection information acquisition unit of the patrol inspection work evaluation device. The operation terminal where the inspection result of the equipment to be inspected is input by the worker and the position of the worker at each of a plurality of times are detected, and the detected position and the time at the time of the detection are associated with each other as position detection information. It is a patrol inspection work evaluation method in a patrol inspection work evaluation system having a position detection terminal to be stored and a patrol inspection work evaluation device for evaluating whether the inspection is performed correctly.
The patrol inspection work evaluation device acquires the inspection result input time, which is the time when the worker inputs the inspection result to the operation terminal, from the operation terminal, and the position detection information is obtained from the position detection terminal. The steps acquired by the work evaluation device and
A step of extracting the position of the worker corresponding to the inspection result input time as an inspection work position from the position detection information by the patrol inspection work evaluation device.
A step in which the patrol inspection work evaluation device calculates a value related to the positional relationship between the inspection work position and the position of the inspection target equipment, and
If the value related to the positional relationship is within the predetermined range, it is evaluated that the inspection has been performed correctly, and if the value related to the positional relationship is out of the range, the inspection is not performed correctly. The steps evaluated by the work evaluation device and
Patrol inspection work evaluation method.

Images