JP2022019255A - Information processing device and program - Google Patents

Abstract

To allow for setting authority of a user to be involved with a specific document before the specific document is used.SOLUTION: An information processing device provided herein comprises a processor configured to store involvement information regarding involvement of users with documents in a memory, and set authority of a user to be involved with a specific document according to the involvement information of a document that satisfies predetermined conditions on a relationship with the specific document.SELECTED DRAWING: Figure 5

Description

The present invention relates to an information processing apparatus and a program.

In Patent Document 1, when defining an electronic document, the first setting is to select and set a combination of attributes to be reflected in the viewing authority setting after the approval of the electronic document among the personnel information of the user on the circulation path of the electronic document. Personnel information of the user involved in the approval of the electronic document, with only the attributes corresponding to the means and the attribute corresponding to the combination set by the first setting means at the time of approval of the electronic document as the viewing authority after the approval of the electronic document. Described is a workflow system comprising: a second setting means for controlling to reflect from.

Japanese Unexamined Patent Publication No. 2006-172377

There is a technique for setting the user's right to view a particular document after it has been approved, based on the user's involvement in this particular document before it has been approved. However, in this case, it was not possible to set the authority of the user's involvement in this particular document before it was used.
An object of the present invention is to set the authority of a user's involvement in a particular document before the particular document is used.

The invention according to claim 1 comprises a processor, wherein the processor stores information on involvement of a user in a document in memory, and the said document according to the document satisfying a predetermined condition regarding a relationship with a specific document. It is an information processing apparatus characterized in that the authority of the user's involvement in the specific document is set based on the involvement information.
The invention according to claim 2 includes the first involvement information regarding the user's involvement in the document by the first aspect and the second aspect regarding the second aspect different from the first aspect of the user with respect to the document. There is involvement information, and the involvement information relating to the document satisfying the above condition includes the first involvement information relating to the first user, but does not include the second involvement information relating to the first user. The first aspect of claim 1, wherein the processor grants the first user the authority to engage in the particular document according to the first aspect, while limiting the granting of the authority to engage in the second aspect. Information processing device.
The invention according to claim 3 is determined to be different from the first aspect, the second aspect, and any of the first aspect and the second aspect in the aspect of the user's involvement in the document. There is a third aspect, which is a later aspect of involvement in the document, the first aspect is an aspect of involvement in the document before approval, and the involvement information relating to the document satisfying the above conditions includes the above. Neither the first involvement information relating to the second user different from the first user nor the information relating to the third aspect is included, and the processor relates to the second user according to the first aspect to the specific document. The information processing apparatus according to claim 2, wherein the granting of the authority of the above-mentioned third aspect is restricted while the granting of the authority of the involvement according to the third aspect is granted.
According to a fourth aspect of the present invention, the processor grants the user the authority to participate in the specific document when the conditions specified for the involvement information regarding the user's involvement in the document satisfying the conditions are satisfied. The information processing apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the information processing apparatus according to claim 1 is characterized in that, when the conditions specified for the involvement information are not satisfied, the granting of the authority to participate in the specific document to the user is restricted.
The information processing apparatus according to claim 4, wherein the condition relating to the involvement information is defined with respect to a timing and / or a number of times of involvement with the document satisfying the condition. Is.
The invention according to claim 6 is defined for the involvement information related to the document that satisfies the condition by displaying a setting image on the terminal that accepts the setting of the authority for the user for the specific document. The information processing apparatus according to claim 1, wherein when the above conditions are satisfied, the information processing apparatus according to claim 1 displays the basis information regarding the basis of the setting for the user for the specific document together with the setting image.
According to a seventh aspect of the present invention, the processor grants the user the authority to the specific document, and the rationale information includes information on the rationale for which the authority is granted to the user. The information processing device according to claim 6, which is characterized by this.
The invention according to claim 8 is characterized in that the processor limits the granting of the authority to the user to the particular document, and the rationale information includes information regarding the rationale for the limitation. The information processing device according to claim 6.
The invention according to claim 9 is the case where the processor accepts the designation of the target user for setting the authority for the specific document via the terminal, and the designation of the specific user is made at the terminal. The information processing unit according to claim 1, wherein when the authority for the specific document is granted to the specific user, information prompting the designation of the specific user is displayed on the terminal. be.
According to a tenth aspect of the present invention, the processor stores attribute information regarding an attribute of the document and identification information for identifying a user in a memory, and the conditions are the attribute of the specific document and the attribute of the document. The first aspect of claim 1, wherein the processor grants the authority to a user specified from the identification information associated with the involvement information relating to the document which satisfies the condition. Information processing device.
The invention according to claim 11 relates to a function of storing information on a user's involvement in a document in a memory in a computer and the involvement information relating to the document satisfying a predetermined condition regarding a relationship with a specific document. Based on this, it is a program for realizing the function of setting the authority of the user's involvement in the specific document.

According to the invention of claim 1, the authority of the user's involvement in a specific document can be set before the specific document is used.
According to the second aspect of the present invention, the mode of involvement given to the user as the authority to participate in a specific document can be associated with the mode of involvement in a document satisfying the conditions.
According to the third aspect of the present invention, a user who was not involved before a document satisfying the conditions was approved can be involved in a specific document whose contents are defined.
According to the invention of claim 4, a user who is not suitable for granting the authority based on the mode of involvement in a document satisfying the condition, as compared with the case where the authority of involvement in a specific document is unconditionally granted to the user. Can be suppressed from granting the authority to participate in a particular document.
According to the invention of claim 5, the authority is granted based on the timing and / or the number of times of involvement in a document satisfying the condition, as compared with the case where the authority of involvement in a specific document is unconditionally granted to the user. It is possible to suppress granting the right to participate in a specific document to an unsuitable user.
According to the invention of claim 6, it is possible to make the person who sets the authority aware of the grounds for setting the authority in which the user is involved in a specific document.
According to the invention of claim 7, it is possible to make the person who sets the authority recognize the grounds for granting the authority to involve the user to a specific document.
According to the invention of claim 8, it is possible to make the person who sets the authority aware of the grounds that the granting of the authority involving the user to a specific document is restricted.
According to the invention of claim 9, the designated person who designates the target user for which the authority is set can be made to recognize the user who is authorized to participate in a specific document.
According to the invention of claim 10, it is not suitable to use the information involved in the setting of authority due to the relationship with the specific document, as compared with the case where the condition is determined regardless of the attribute of the specific document. It is possible to suppress granting the authority to participate in a specific document to the user who is involved in the document to which the document belongs.
According to claim 11, it is possible to set the authority of the user's involvement in a particular document before the particular document is used.

It is a figure which shows the whole structure example of the document use system by this embodiment. It is a figure which showed the hardware configuration of the management server apparatus. It is a block diagram which showed the functional configuration example of the management server apparatus. It is a figure which showed the document management table. It is a flowchart which showed the flow of authority setting process. It is a figure which showed the authority setting screen. It is a figure which showed the authority setting screen. It is a figure which showed the authority setting screen. It is a figure which showed the authority setting screen. It is a figure which showed the authority setting screen.

Hereinafter, embodiments of the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings.
<Configuration of document use system>
FIG. 1 is a diagram showing an overall configuration example of the document use system 1 according to the present embodiment. The document use system 1 of the present embodiment causes the user to use the document. More specifically, the document use system 1 sets an authority for each user regarding the user's involvement in the document, and causes the user to use the document within the range of the set authority. User involvement in a document includes, for example, editing the document, applying to approve the content of the document, approving the content of the applied document, viewing the approved document, and the like.

An example of the flow in which a user is involved in a document in the document use system 1 will be described. In the document use system 1, when a new document is created, a user who is authorized to edit the document edits the created new document. In addition, a user who is authorized to apply for approval of the contents of the document applies for the edited document. Then, the user who is authorized to approve the contents of the applied document approves or rejects the applied document. In addition, a user authorized to view an approved document will view the approved document. In this way, the document is used according to the mode of involvement for each user.

The document use system 1 includes a management server 10 and a plurality of terminals 20. The management server 10 and each terminal 20 are connected to each other via a network (not shown). Further, the plurality of terminals 20 are connected to each other via a network (not shown).

The management server 10 as an example of the information processing device is a server that manages information related to documents. More specifically, the management server 10 manages the document, the history of the user's involvement in the document, the authority of the user's involvement in the document, and the like.
The management server 10 of the present embodiment stores the history of the user's involvement in the document. Then, the management server 10 sets the authority of the user's involvement in the newly created document based on the history of the user's involvement in the document. More specifically, the management server 10 grants the user involved in the document related to the new document the authority to participate in the new document. Further, the management server 10 does not grant the authority to participate in the new document to the user who was not involved in the document related to the new document.

When the management server 10 grants the user the authority to participate in a new document, the management server 10 permits the user to participate in the new document using the terminal 20. Further, the management server 10 does not allow the user to participate in the new document using the terminal 20 when the user is not authorized to participate in the new document.
The management server 10 is realized by, for example, a computer. The management server 10 may be configured by a single computer or may be realized by distributed processing by a plurality of computers.

The terminal 20 is a terminal device used by the user. The document use system 1 of the present embodiment is provided with a terminal 20 for each user who uses the document. In other words, the document use system 1 of the present embodiment is provided with a terminal 20 corresponding to each user.
The user uses the document using the terminal 20. More specifically, the user uses the terminal 20 to use the document within the scope of the authority given to the management server 10.

In addition, the terminal 20 stores user identification information that identifies the user. More specifically, each terminal 20 stores user identification information related to the corresponding user. Then, when the user is involved in the document on the terminal 20, the document identification information for identifying the document, the involvement information regarding the involvement, the date identification information for identifying the date of involvement, and the user identification information are associated with each other and transmitted to the management server 10. do. Engagement information regarding involvement is information that indicates that the user has been involved in the document.
Examples of the terminal 20 include a computer, a smartphone, a tablet-type information terminal, and other information processing devices.

The type of the network connecting the management server 10, each terminal 20, and each of the plurality of terminals 20 is not particularly limited as long as data can be transmitted and received. The communication line used for transmitting and receiving data may be wired or wireless.
Further, in the example shown in FIG. 1, seven terminals 20 are shown, but the number of document use systems 1 is not limited to the seven shown in the figure. The document use system 1 may be provided with six or less terminals 20 or eight or more terminals 20.

<Configuration of management server device>
Next, the hardware configuration of the management server 10 will be described. FIG. 2 is a diagram showing a hardware configuration of the management server 10.
The management server 10 includes a processor 11 that controls the operation of the management server 10 through the execution of a program, a storage device 12 that stores a program executed by the processor 11 and various data, an operation reception device 13 that accepts a user's operation, and the operation reception device 13. It has a display device 14 that displays an operation screen confirmed by the user, and a network IF (= InterFace) 15 that realizes communication with the terminal 20. Each of these parts is connected by a signal line 16 such as a data bus, an address bus, and a PCI (Peripheral Component Interconnect) bus.

The processor 11 is composed of, for example, a CPU. Various functions are realized by the processor 11 executing the process based on the program stored in the storage device 12.
The storage device 12 is composed of, for example, a ROM in which a BIOS (= Basic Input Output System) or the like is stored, a RAM used as a work area, and a hard disk device in which a basic program, an application program, or the like is stored. However, it does not prevent the ROM and RAM from being included in a part of the processor 11.

The operation receiving device 13 is composed of, for example, a keyboard, a mouse, mechanical buttons, and switches. The operation receiving device 13 also includes a touch sensor that integrally constitutes a touch panel with the display device 14.
The display device 14 as an example of the terminal is composed of a liquid crystal display or an organic EL (= Electro Luminescence) display used for displaying information.

<Functional configuration of management server device>
Next, the functional configuration of the management server 10 will be described. FIG. 3 is a block diagram showing a functional configuration example of the management server 10.
FIG. 3 shows some of the functions realized through the execution of the application program by the processor 11.
The management server 10 includes an acquisition unit 101, a storage unit 102, a reception unit 103, an extraction unit 104, a grant unit 105, a notification unit 106, a management unit 107, and an output unit 108.

The acquisition unit 101 acquires the information transmitted to the management server 10 and the information input via the operation reception device 13 of the management server 10. The information acquired by the acquisition unit 101 is stored in the storage unit 102.
The storage unit 102 stores information. More specifically, the storage unit 102 stores the document, the history of the user's involvement in the document, the authority defined for the user's involvement in the document, and the like. The storage contents of the storage unit 102 will be described in detail later.

The reception unit 103 accepts an operation for setting the authority of the user's involvement in the document. In the present embodiment, the administrator who manages the user's authority instructs the management server 10 to set the authority of the user's involvement in the new document by operating the operation receiving device 13. In this case, the administrator sets the attributes of the document for which the authority is set. Document attributes include the type of document, the target customer in the document, the target product or service in the document, and the like. The type of document is the type of role of the document in business. Types of documents include quotations, designs, contracts, proposals, reports, and the like. The reception unit 103 receives an instruction to set the authority from the administrator, and acquires attribute information regarding the attribute of the document to which the authority is set. The attribute information regarding the attributes of the document is the information indicating the attributes of the document. The reception unit 103 transmits the acquired attribute information to the extraction unit 104.
In the following, the target document for which the authority is set may be referred to as a setting target document.

The extraction unit 104 extracts documents related to the document to be set among the documents stored in the storage unit 102. More specifically, the extraction unit 104 specifies the attribute of the document to be set from the attribute information acquired from the reception unit 103. Then, among the documents stored in the storage unit 102, the documents belonging to the same attributes as the setting target document are extracted as the documents related to the setting target document. The extraction unit 104 transmits the document identification information that identifies the extracted document to the grant unit 105 and the notification unit 106. When a plurality of documents belonging to the same attribute as the setting target document are stored in the storage unit 102, the extraction unit 104 extracts all of the plurality of documents.

The granting unit 105 grants the user the authority to participate in the document to be set. The granting unit 105 grants the authority to participate in the setting target document to the user involved in the document belonging to the same attribute as the setting target document. The document belonging to the same attribute as the document to be set is a document specified from the document identification information transmitted from the extraction unit 104 to the grant unit 105.

The notification unit 106 notifies the administrator of information regarding the authority to participate in the document to be set. More specifically, the notification unit 106 notifies the administrator of information on a user who is granted the authority to participate in the document to be set, information on a user who is not granted the authority to be involved in the document to be set, and the like.

The management unit 107 manages the use of the document by the user's terminal 20. When the user applies for the use of the document via the terminal 20, the management unit 107 causes the user to use the document within the scope of the authority given to the grant unit 105. On the other hand, the management unit 107 does not allow the user to use the document to the extent that the granting unit 105 is not authorized. As an example, the management unit 107 may receive an application for use of a document from a user who is authorized to apply for the document and is not authorized to approve the document via the terminal 20. In this case, the management unit 107 causes the terminal 20 to transmit the document in a mode in which the application for the document is possible and the document cannot be approved.
The output unit 108 outputs the information to the terminal 20. More specifically, the output unit 108 outputs the information instructed by the management unit 107 to the terminal 20.

FIG. 4 is a diagram showing a document management table. The document management table is a table for managing documents. The document management table is stored in the storage unit 102.
In the document management table, the document identification information is shown in "Document".
Further, in the document management table, the attribute to which the "document" belongs is shown in the "attribute". In the document management table, the type of document is indicated in "Type" of "Attribute". As an example, the "quote" associated with the document "A" means that the document "A" is a quote.

Further, in the document management table, the target customer in the "document" is shown in the "target customer" of the "attribute". As an example, the "x" associated with the document "A" means that the document "A" was created for the customer "x".
Further, in the document management table, the target product or service in the "document" is shown in the "target product, etc." of the "attribute". As an example, the "A" associated with the document "A" means that the document "A" is a document about the goods or services "A".

Further, in the document management table, the range of the amount of money to which the "target product, etc." in the "document" belongs is shown in the "amount (10,000 yen)" of the "attribute". As an example, "10 to 50" associated with "A" means that the amount of "A", which is a product or service, is in the range of 100,000 yen to 500,000 yen.
The "type", "target customer", "target product, etc." and "amount (10,000 yen)" shown in the document management table are all attributes set by the administrator for the document to be set.

Further, in the document management table, the history in which the user is involved in the "document" is shown in the "history". In the document management table, the user identification information of the user who applied for the approval of the "document" is shown in the "applicant" of the "history". As an example, the "d" associated with the document "A" means that the user "d" has applied for approval of the document "A".
In the present embodiment, when a user applies for a document using the terminal 20, the terminal 20 uses the user identification information of the user who applied for the document, the document identification information of the applied document, and the application history information indicating the application history. Is transmitted to the management server 10. The acquisition unit 101 of the management server 10 writes the acquired user identification information in the "applicant" associated with the "document" specified from the acquired document identification information.
The information shown to the "applicant" in the document management table is the involvement information transmitted from the terminal 20.

Further, in the document management table, the user identification information of the user who approves the "document" is shown in the "authorizer" of the "history". The "b" associated with the document "A" means that the user "b" has approved the document "A". In addition, "(acceptance)" shown in "authorizer" means that the "document" has been approved by the "authorizer". In addition, "(rejection)" shown in the "authorizer" means that the "document" has been rejected by the "authorizer".
The information shown to the "authorizer" in the document management table is the involvement information transmitted from the terminal 20.

Also, one of the application for the document and the approval of the document is regarded as the first aspect of the user for the document, and the other of the application for the document and the approval of the document is regarded as the second aspect of the user for the document. Further, one of the information shown to the "authorizer" and the information shown to the "applicant" in the document management table is regarded as the first involvement information regarding the involvement according to the first aspect. Further, the other of the information shown to the "authorizer" and the information shown to the "applicant" in the document management table is regarded as the second involvement information regarding the involvement according to the second aspect.

Further, in the document management table, the date when the "document" is approved is shown in the "settlement date". As an example, "2020/6/20" associated with the document "A" means that the document "A" was approved on June 20, 2020. The date indicated in the "Settlement Date" is the date on which the "Document" was approved or rejected.

In the present embodiment, when the user approves the document using the terminal 20, the terminal 20 indicates the user identification information of the user who approves the document, the document identification information of the approved document, and the date indicating the date when the document is approved. The information and the approval history information indicating the approval history are transmitted to the management server 10. The acquisition unit 101 of the management server 10 writes the acquired user identification information in the "authorizer" associated with the "document" specified from the acquired document identification information. Further, the acquisition unit 101 writes the acquired date information in the "settlement date" associated with the "document" specified from the acquired document identification information.

FIG. 5 is a flowchart showing the flow of the authority setting process. The authority setting process is a process in which the processor 11 of the management server 10 sets the authority of the user's involvement in the document to be set. In the present embodiment, when the administrator instructs the management server 10 to set the authority for involvement in the document, the authority setting process is started. When the administrator instructs to set the authority, the attribute of the document to be set and the user to set the authority are specified to the administrator. The user designated by the administrator as the target for setting the authority may be referred to as a designated user in the following.
Further, in the following, a case where the document to be set is the “quotation” and the designated user is “b” will be described. In the document to be set, "x" is specified as the target customer, "a" is specified as the target product or service, and "100,000 to 500,000 yen" is specified as the range of the amount to which the target product or service belongs. "Is assumed to be specified. In addition, the authority setting process shall be performed on July 1, 2020.

The granting unit 105 refers to the history of the user's involvement in the document related to the document to be set (S101). When the attribute of the setting target document is specified to the administrator, among the documents stored in the storage unit 102, the document belonging to the same attribute as the setting target document is extracted by the extraction unit 104. The granting unit 105 refers to the history of user involvement shown in the document management table (see FIG. 4) for the documents extracted by the extraction unit 104 as the history of involvement in documents related to the document to be set. In the following, a document related to the document to be set may be referred to as a related document.
In the above example, the document "A" in the document management table is "estimate" which is the same "type" as the document to be set, "x" which is "target customer", and "target product etc." It belongs to "10 to 50", which is "a" and "amount (10,000 yen)". In this case, the extraction unit 104 extracts the document of "A". Further, the granting unit 105 refers to the "history" associated with the document "A".

The granting unit 105 determines whether or not the history of the user's involvement in the related document includes the history of the user's involvement in the related document (S102). When a plurality of documents are extracted by the extraction unit 104, the processing of step 102 and subsequent steps is performed for each of the extracted documents.
In the above example, the designated user "b" is included in the "history" of the involvement of "A" in the document. Therefore, the granting unit 105 determines that the history of the user's involvement in the related document includes the history of the user's involvement in the related document (YES in S102).

When the history of the user's involvement in the related document includes the history of the user's involvement in the related document (YES in S102), the granting unit 105 starts from the date when the related document is involved to the date when the authority setting process is performed. It is determined whether or not the period is within the valid period (S103). The validity period is the period defined for the validity of the period from the date when the related document is involved to the date when the authority setting process is performed. In the present embodiment, the validity period is defined from the viewpoint of suppressing the granting of the authority to participate in the setting target document to the user who does not use the setting target document. The validity period may be any period, but is, for example, 3 months. The granting unit 105 makes the above determination depending on whether or not the period from the "settlement date" associated with the related document in the document management table to the date when the authority setting process is performed is within the valid period.

In the above example, the period from "June 20, 2020", which is the "settlement date" of the document "A", to "July 1, 2020", which is the date when the authority setting process is performed, is 3 Shorter than a month. Therefore, the granting unit 105 determines that the period from the date of being involved in the related document "A" to the date of performing the authority setting process is within the valid period (YES in S103).

When the period from the date of involvement in the related document to the date of the authority setting process is within the valid period (YES in S103), the granting unit 105 has a history of the involvement of the designated user in the related document in the document. It is determined whether or not the history is both application and approval (S104). The granting unit 105 makes the above determination depending on whether or not the user identification information of the designated user is shown to both the "applicant" and the "decisioner" associated with the related document in the document management table.
In the above example, in the "history" associated with the related document "A", the "authorizer" is shown the user identification information "b" of the designated user, while the "applicant". Does not show the user identification information of the designated user. Therefore, the granting unit 105 determines that the history of involvement of the designated user is not the history of both application and approval of the document (NO in S104).

When the history of involvement of the designated user is not the history of both application and approval of the document (NO in S104), the granting unit 105 determines whether or not the history of involvement of the designated user is the history of approval of the document. (S105).
In the above-mentioned example, in the "history" associated with the related document "A", the "authorizer" is shown the user identification information "b" of the designated user. Therefore, the granting unit 105 determines that the history of involvement of the designated user is the history of document approval (YES in S105).

When the history of involvement of the designated user is the history of document approval (YES in S105), the granting unit 105 tells the designated user to edit the setting target document, approve the setting target document, and set the setting target after approval. Grant the right to view the document (S106). In this case, the granting unit 105 does not grant the designated user the authority to apply for the document to be set.
In the above-mentioned example, the granting unit 105 grants the designated user “b” the authority to edit, approve, and view the document to be set (S106). In this case, when the management server 10 is requested to use the setting target document from the terminal 20 corresponding to "b", the management unit 107 can edit, approve, and view the setting target document after approval. The setting target document is transmitted to the terminal 20 in such a mode that the application for the setting target document is impossible.

Further, when the history of involvement of the designated user is not the history of approval of the document (NO in S105), it means that the history of involvement of the designated user is the history of application for the document. In this case, the granting unit 105 grants the designated user the authority to edit the setting target document, apply for the setting target document, and view the setting target document after approval (S107). In this case, the granting unit 105 does not grant the designated user the authority to approve the document to be set.

Further, there is a case where the history of involvement of the designated user is the history of both application and approval of the document (YES in S104). In this case, the granting unit 105 grants the designated user the authority to edit the setting target document, apply for the setting target document, approve the setting target document, and view the setting target document after approval (S108).

In addition, when the history of user involvement in related documents does not include the history of user involvement in related documents (NO in S102), the period from the date of involvement in related documents to the date of permission setting processing is There is a case (NO in S103) outside the valid period. In these cases, the granting unit 105 grants the designated user the right to view the document to be set after approval (S109). In this case, the granting unit 105 does not grant the designated user the authority to edit, apply, and approve the document to be set.

FIG. 6 is a diagram showing the authority setting screen 30. The authority setting screen 30 is an image for the administrator to set the authority of the user's involvement in the document to be set. In the present embodiment, when the administrator instructs the management server 10 to set the authority of the user's involvement in the document by operating the operation reception device 13 of the management server 10, the authority setting screen 30 is displayed. .. Further, the authority setting screen 30 is displayed on the display device 14 of the management server 10. The process of displaying an image on the authority setting screen 30 is performed by the processor 11 of the management server 10.
Further, in the following, as the attributes of the document to be set on the authority setting screen 30, the target customer is "x", the target product or service is "a", and the range of the amount of money to which the target product or service belongs is. It shall be "100,000 to 500,000 yen". Further, it is assumed that the authority setting screen 30 is displayed on July 1, 2020. That is, the same example as the example given in the explanation of the authority setting process (see FIG. 5) is used.

The authority setting screen 30 as an example of the setting image includes the target document information unit 31, the authority display unit 32, the mark image 33, the approval designation promotion unit 34, the application designation promotion unit 35, and the exclusion notification unit 36. , The stop section 37 and the decision section 38 are displayed.

Information about the setting target document is displayed in the target document information unit 31. More specifically, the target document information unit 31 shows information indicating the attributes of the setting target document. In the illustrated example, in the target document information unit 31, the target customer is "x", the target product or service is "a", and the range of the amount of money to which the target product or service belongs in the setting target document. Information indicating that is "100,000 to 500,000 yen" is shown. Further, the target document information unit 31 shows information indicating that the type of the target document is "estimate". In the illustrated example, the text of "authority setting of" a "estimate (100,000 to 500,000 yen) for" x "" is displayed in the target document information unit 31.

The authority display unit 32 displays the contents of the authority setting for each user regarding the involvement in the document to be set.
Information indicating whether or not the user has been designated by the administrator as the target for setting the authority is displayed in the "designation" of the authority display unit 32. If "Specify" is blank, it means that the user has not been specified by the administrator as the target for setting the authority.
Further, the user identification information is shown in the "name" of the authority display unit 32.
Further, in the "application (with grant condition)" of the authority display unit 32, information indicating whether or not the authority to apply for the document to be set is granted is displayed. If "Application (with grant condition)" is blank, it means that the authority to apply for the document to be set is not granted.

Further, in the "approval (with grant condition)" of the authority display unit 32, information indicating whether or not the authority for approval of the document to be set is granted is displayed. If "Approval (with grant condition)" is blank, it means that the authority to approve the document to be set is not granted.
Further, in the "viewing (no grant condition)" of the authority display unit 32, information indicating whether or not the authority to view the document to be set after approval is granted is displayed. If "View (no grant condition)" is blank, it means that the right to view the document to be set after approval is not granted.

In addition, "with grant condition" shown in "application (with grant condition)" of the authority display unit 32 is an application for the document to be set when the user is designated by the administrator as the target for setting the authority. It means that the conditions for granting the authority to the designated user are defined. Further, the "approval (with grant condition)" of the authority display unit 32 is a condition for granting the authority to approve the document to be set to the designated user when the user is designated as the target for setting the authority. Means that is defined. Further, in the "viewing (no granting condition)" of the authority display unit 32, when the user is designated as the target for setting the authority, the viewing authority for the document to be set is unconditionally granted to the designated user. Means that.

The mark image 33 is displayed around a specific item in the authority display unit 32. More specifically, the mark image 33 is displayed around the item to be notified by the notification unit 106. In the illustrated example, the "designated" item associated with the user "b", the "designated" item associated with the user "d", and the "decision (with grant conditions)" associated with the user "g". A mark image 33 is displayed around each of the items of.

Information that prompts the administrator to specify the user is displayed in the approval designation promotion unit 34. More specifically, the approval designation promotion unit 34 displays information prompting the administrator to specify the user in order to grant the approval authority for the document to be set. In the illustrated example, the approval designation promotion unit 34 with a balloon toward the user "b" is displayed. Also, in the illustrated example, the text "Do you need to specify? You will be granted approval authority" is displayed.

Here, as described above, the attributes of the document to be set are that the target customer is "x", the target product or service is "a", and the range of the amount of money to which the target product or service belongs is "100,000". It is "yen to 500,000 yen". Further, as illustrated in the description of the authority setting process (see FIG. 5), when the user "b" is a designated user in the authority setting process of the document to be set, the granting unit 105 has the authority to approve the document to be set. Is given to the user "b". In this case, as shown in the figure, the notification unit 106 causes the approval designation promotion unit 34 corresponding to the user “b” to be displayed on the authority setting screen 30. That is, in the present embodiment, the notification unit 106 displays the approval designation promotion unit 34 in association with the user to whom the authority to approve the document to be set is granted to the grant unit 105 when the user becomes the designated user. Even if the user becomes a designated user, if the granting unit 105 is not granted the authority to approve the document to be set, the notification unit 106 does not display the approval designation promoting unit 34 corresponding to this user.

The application designation promotion unit 35 displays information prompting the administrator to designate the user. More specifically, the application designation promotion unit 35 displays information that prompts the administrator to specify a user in order to grant the application authority to the document to be set. In the illustrated example, the application designation promotion unit 35 with a balloon toward the user "d" is displayed. Also, in the illustrated example, the text "Do you need to specify? You will be authorized to apply" is displayed.

Here, in the document "A" (see FIG. 4), which is a related document about the document to be set, the user "d" is associated with the "applicant" in the "history". In addition, the period from the "settlement date" of this "A" document to the present time is shorter than the valid period of 3 months. Therefore, when the user "d" becomes the designated user, the granting unit 105 grants the user "d" the authority to apply for the document to be set. In this case, as shown in the figure, the notification unit 106 causes the application designation promotion unit 35 corresponding to the user “d” to be displayed on the authority setting screen 30. That is, in the present embodiment, the notification unit 106 displays the application designation promotion unit 35 in association with the user to which the authority to apply for the setting target document is granted to the grant unit 105 when the user becomes the designated user. Even if the user becomes a designated user, if the granting unit 105 does not have the authority to apply for the document to be set, the notification unit 106 does not display the application designation promoting unit 35 corresponding to this user.

The exclusion notification unit 36 as an example of the basis information displays information indicating that the document to be set has been excluded from the subject of granting authority. The exclusion notification unit 36 contains information indicating the type of the excluded authority. In addition, the exclusion notification unit 36 contains information indicating that the period from the date of involvement in the related document for the setting target document to the present time is out of the valid period. In the illustrated example, the exclusion notification unit 36 displays the text "Because it has been vacant for a certain period or more since the previous approval, it was excluded from the subject of granting the authority for approval".

Here, in the document of "J" (see FIG. 4) which is a related document about the document to be set, the user "g" is associated with the "authorizer" of the "history". On the other hand, the period from the "settlement date" of this "J" document to the present time is longer than the valid period of 3 months. Therefore, when the user "g" becomes the designated user, the granting unit 105 does not grant the user "g" the authority to approve the document to be set. In this case, as shown in the figure, the notification unit 106 causes the exclusion notification unit 36 corresponding to the user “g” to be displayed on the authority setting screen 30. That is, in the present embodiment, the notification unit 106 displays the exclusion notification unit 36 in association with a user whose involvement authority for the setting target document is not granted to the grant unit 105 even when the user becomes a designated user. More specifically, the notification unit 106 is associated with a user who is excluded from the subject of authorization because the period from the date of involvement in the related document to the present time is out of the valid period, and the exclusion notification unit 36 Is displayed.

For example, when the administrator selects the item of "designation" corresponding to the user "d" in the permission display unit 32 of the permission setting screen 30, as shown in FIG. 7, the "designation" corresponding to the user "d" is selected. The check image 39 is displayed in the item of. The check image 39 displayed in the "designation" item means that the user has been designated by the administrator as the target for setting the authority. Further, in the present embodiment, when the "designated" item of any user is selected, the authority setting process (see FIG. 5) is performed with the selected user as the designated user. In the illustrated example, the authority setting process (see FIG. 5) is performed with the user “d” as the designated user.

Further, when the authority setting process is performed with the user "d" as the designated user, the item of "application (with grant condition)" and "viewing (without grant condition)" associated with the user "d" are performed in the authority display unit 32. A check image 39 is displayed in each of the items. The check image 39 displayed in the item of "application (with grant condition)" means that the authority to edit and apply for the document to be set is granted to the designated user. Further, the check image 39 displayed in the item of "viewing (no granting condition)" means that the viewing authority for the document to be set after approval is given to the designated user.

Further, in the authority display unit 32, the mark image 33 is displayed around the item of "application (with grant condition)" associated with the user "d". Further, the application basis image 40 is displayed on the authority setting screen 30. The application basis image 40 as an example of the basis information displays the basis that the designated user is given the authority to apply for the document to be set. More specifically, the application basis image 40 displays information indicating that the history of the application by the designated user exists as the basis for granting the authority to apply for the document to be set to the designated user. In the illustrated example, the text "The application authority has been granted because there was an application history in the past" is displayed on the application basis image 40. In the present embodiment, the notification unit 106 displays the application basis image 40 in association with the designated user to which the application authority is granted to the grant unit 105. If the designated user is not granted the application authority in the authority setting process, the notification unit 106 does not display the application basis image 40 corresponding to the designated user.

Further, in the authority display unit 32, the grant reception unit 41 is displayed in the item of "decision (with grant condition)" associated with the user "d". The grant reception unit 41 accepts grants by the administrator of the authority to be involved in the document to be set.
When a user is designated in the authority display unit 32, as shown in FIG. 7, the approval designation promotion unit 34 (see FIG. 6), the application designation promotion unit 35, and the exclusion notification unit 36 are hidden. Further, the mark image 33 displayed around the "designated" item of the designated user before the designated user is designated is hidden. On the other hand, the mark image 33 associated with a user different from the designated user maintains the display.

Here, when the administrator selects the item of "designation" corresponding to the user "b" in the permission display unit 32 of the permission setting screen 30, as shown in FIG. 8, the "designation" corresponding to the user "b" is selected. The check image 39 is displayed in the item. In this case, the authority setting process (see FIG. 5) is performed with the user "b" as the designated user.
Further, when the authority setting process is performed with the user "b" as the designated user, the item of "approval (with grant condition)" and "viewing (without grant condition)" associated with the user "b" are performed in the authority display unit 32. A check image 39 is displayed in each of the items. The check image 39 displayed in the item of "approval (with grant condition)" means that the designated user is granted the authority to edit and approve the document to be set.

Further, in the authority display unit 32, the mark image 33 is displayed around the item of "decision (with grant condition)" associated with the user "b". Further, the approval basis image 42 is displayed on the authority setting screen 30. The decision ground image 42 as an example of the ground information displays the ground that the designated user is given the authority to approve the document to be set. More specifically, the approval basis image 42 displays information indicating that the approval history of the designated user exists as the basis for granting the approval authority for the approval to the setting target document to the designated user. In the illustrated example, the text "Granted the authority to make a decision because there was a history of the decision in the past" is displayed on the decision basis image 42. In the present embodiment, the notification unit 106 displays the approval basis image 42 in association with the designated user to which the approval authority is granted to the grant unit 105. If the designated user is not granted the approval authority in the authority setting process, the notification unit 106 does not display the approval basis image 42 corresponding to the designated user.
Further, in the authority display unit 32, the grant reception unit 41 is displayed in the item of "application (with grant condition)" associated with the user "b".

Here, when the administrator selects the item of "designation" corresponding to the user "g" in the permission display unit 32 of the permission setting screen 30, as shown in FIG. 9, the "designation" corresponding to the user "g" is selected. The check image 39 is displayed in the item. In this case, the authority setting process (see FIG. 5) is performed with the user "g" as the designated user.
Further, when the authority setting process is performed with the user "g" as the designated user, the check image 39 is displayed in the "viewing (no granting condition)" item associated with the user "g" in the authority display unit 32. To. Further, the exclusion notification unit 36 corresponding to the item of "decision (with grant condition)" associated with the user "g" is displayed again. Further, in the authority display unit 32, the grant reception unit 41 is displayed in the item of "application (with grant condition)" and the item of "approval (with grant condition)" associated with the user "g", respectively.

Here, when the administrator selects the item of "approval (with grant condition)" corresponding to the user "g" in the authority display unit 32, as shown in FIG. 10, the "approval" corresponding to the user "g" is selected. The check image 39 is displayed in the item of "(with grant condition)". That is, in the present embodiment, even when the authority is not granted to the granting unit 105 in the permission setting process, the authority to participate in the setting target document is granted to the designated user by the instruction from the administrator.

When the administrator selects the discontinuation unit 37, the setting of the authority to participate in the document to be set is discontinued.
Further, when the administrator selects the determination unit 38, the granting unit 105 grants the authority to the setting target document to each user according to the content of the setting on the authority setting screen 30. Further, the relationship between the authority granted to the granting unit 105 and the user to which the authority has been granted is stored in the storage unit 102.

The user to whom the authority for the setting target document is granted on the authority setting screen 30 uses the setting target document by using the terminal 20. In the illustrated example, the user "d" edits the setting target document using the terminal 20 corresponding to this user, and applies for the edited setting target document. Further, the user "b" and the user "g" use the terminal 20 corresponding to each to approve the applied document to be set. Further, after the approval of the setting target document, the user "b", the user "d", and the user "g" browse the approved setting target document by using the terminal 20 corresponding to each.

As described above, in the present embodiment, the processor 11 of the management server 10 grants the authority of the user's involvement in the setting target document based on the involvement information related to the related document that satisfies the predetermined condition regarding the relationship with the setting target document. Set.

Further, in the present embodiment, when the involvement information related to the related document includes the first involvement information related to the user but not the second involvement information related to the user, the processor 11 sets the user. Grants the authority to engage in the document in the first aspect, while limiting the granting of authority in the second aspect.

Further, the mode of the user's involvement in the document is a mode different from any of the first aspect, the second aspect, the first aspect and the second aspect, and is the aspect of the user's involvement in the document to be set after the approval. There are three modes. The third aspect is, for example, viewing of the document to be set after the approval. Then, when the involvement information relating to the related document does not include any of the first involvement information relating to the user and the information relating to the third aspect, the processor 11 relates the user to the setting target document according to the first aspect. While limiting the granting of authority, the authority of involvement according to the third aspect is granted.

Further, in the present embodiment, when the processor 11 satisfies the condition defined for the involvement information of the user related to the related document, the processor 11 grants the user the authority to participate in the document to be set, and the condition defined for the involvement information. If the above is not satisfied, the authority to be involved in the document to be set is restricted to the user.
In particular, in this embodiment, the conditions for involvement information are defined with respect to the timing of involvement in related documents.

Further, in the present embodiment, when the processor 11 satisfies the condition defined for the involvement information related to the related document, the processor 11 displays the basis information regarding the basis of the setting for the user for the setting target document on the display device 14 together with the authority setting screen 30. Display.
In particular, in the present embodiment, the rationale information includes information on the rationale for which the user is authorized.
Further, in the present embodiment, the evidence information includes information regarding the basis for restricting the granting of authority to the user for the document to be set.

Further, in the present embodiment, the processor 11 displays information prompting the user's designation when the user is given the authority for the document to be set when the user is designated by the display device 14. To display.
Further, the processor 11 grants the authority of involvement in a specific document to the user specified from the user identification information associated with the involvement information related to the related document.

Further, in the present embodiment, the notification unit 106 is subjected to information prompting the designation of a specific user or a target for which the specific user is granted the authority before the authority to participate in the setting target document is granted to the granting unit 105. Notify the administrator of information indicating that it has been excluded.

In this embodiment, various information regarding the setting of the authority to participate in the document is displayed on the display device 14 of the management server 10, and the administrator sets the authority to participate in the document by using the management server 10. However, it is not limited to this.
For example, the processor 11 of the management server 10 may display various information regarding the setting of the authority of involvement in the document on the terminal 20. In addition, the administrator may set the authority to participate in the document by operating the terminal 20. That is, the terminal used for setting the authority to participate in the document may be any terminal.

Further, in the present embodiment, as a condition for granting the authority to apply for the document to be set to the designated user, it is stipulated that the period from the approval date of the related document to the present time is within the valid period, but the present embodiment is limited to this. Not done.
When the designated user applies for a related document, the terminal 20 may send the application date information indicating the application date to the management server 10. Then, the processor 11 of the management server 10 may grant the designated user the authority to apply for the document to be set when the period from the application date of the related document to the present time is within the valid period. That is, the condition for granting the authority to apply for the document to be set to the designated user may be defined for the timing of the involvement of the user different from the designated user in the related document, or the timing of the involvement of the designated user in the related document. May be done.

Further, in the present embodiment, it has been described that the terminal 20 corresponding to the user is provided for each user, but the present invention is not limited to this.
When the user uses the terminal 20, the terminal 20 may be associated with the user by inputting the user identification information into the terminal 20. That is, if the user and the terminal 20 are associated with each other when the terminal 20 is in use, the user and the terminal 20 may not be associated with each other in advance.

Further, in the present embodiment, the time of the approval date of the related document is defined as the condition for granting the authority to participate in the document to be set to the designated user, but the present embodiment is not limited to this.
For example, the number of related documents in which the designated user is involved in a specific mode may be defined as a condition for granting the authority to participate in the document to be set in a specific mode to the designated user. As an example, the processor 11 applies to the document to be set whether or not the number of related documents applied by the designated user among the plurality of related documents extracted by the extraction unit 104 is equal to or more than a valid number. It may be a condition of whether or not to grant the authority to the designated user. The valid number is the period defined for the validity of the number of related documents in which the designated user is involved. The valid number may be determined from the viewpoint of suppressing the granting of the authority to participate in the setting target document to the user who does not use the setting target document.

Further, for example, the frequency with which the designated user is involved in the related document in a specific mode may be defined in the condition for granting the authority to participate in the document to be set in a specific mode to the designated user. As an example, the processor 11 determines whether or not the frequency of application of the related document by the designated user among the plurality of related documents extracted by the extraction unit 104 is equal to or higher than the effective frequency of the application to the setting target document. It may be a condition of whether or not to grant the authority to the designated user. The validity frequency is defined as the number of related documents in which the designated user is involved in a predetermined period. The validity frequency may be determined from the viewpoint of suppressing the granting of the authority to participate in the setting target document to the user who does not use the setting target document.
That is, the conditions relating to the involvement information may be determined not only with respect to the timing of involvement with the related document, but also with respect to the number of times of involvement with the related document.

Further, for example, it may be stipulated that the related document applied by the designated user is not rejected in the condition of granting the application authority to the designated user for the document to be set. As an example, when the processor 11 does not show "(rejection)" in the "approver" of the related document in which the designated user is associated with the "applicant" in the document management table (see FIG. 4). , The designated user may be given the authority to apply for the document to be set. Further, the processor 11 is set when "(rejection)" is indicated in the "approver" of the related document in which the designated user is associated with the "applicant" in the document management table (see FIG. 4). Granting of application authority to a document to a designated user may be restricted.

Further, in the present embodiment, the extraction unit 104 extracts a document having the same attributes as the setting target document as a related document. In other words, the condition that the document used for granting the authority by the granting unit 105 is related to the setting target document is that all the attributes are the same as those of the setting target document.
Here, the extraction unit 104 may extract a document having at least one attribute of the same as the setting target document as a related document. Further, the extraction unit 104 may extract a document belonging to an attribute similar to the setting target document as a related document. Similar attributes mean, for example, that the target product or service in the document is similar, that the price range of the target product or service in the text is close, and that the target customer in the text is in a group company relationship. And so on. That is, the condition that the document used for granting the authority by the granting unit 105 has a relationship with the setting target document is not limited to the same all attributes as the setting target document.

Further, in the present embodiment, the granting unit 105 has described that the granting authority is not granted to the designated user as a limitation of granting the privilege of involvement in the setting target document to the designated user, but the present invention is not limited to this.
The granting unit 105 may limit the range of involvement in the setting target document in a specific manner as a limitation of granting the authority of involvement in the setting target document to the designated user. As an example, when the granting unit 105 restricts the granting of the approval authority for the document to be set to the designated user, the granting unit 105 grants the authority to approve a part of the document to be set to the designated user, while the setting target. The designated user may not be given the authority to approve other parts of the document.

Further, a user who has been granted editing authority to the setting target document may be able to edit the attributes of the setting target document. More specifically, the management server 10 may send the setting target document to the terminal 20 of the user to which the editing authority for the setting target document is granted, in such a manner that the attributes of the setting target document can be edited. ..

In addition, the mode of involvement in the document after approval is not limited to viewing the document. For example, the granting unit 105 may grant the designated user the authority to edit the approved document regardless of whether or not the designated user is involved in the related document. Here, the editing of the document after the approval is regarded as the third aspect, which is different from both the first aspect and the second aspect and is the aspect of involvement in the document after the approval.

In addition, the mode of involvement in the document before approval is not limited to the application and approval of the document. For example, the granting unit 105 may grant the designated user the right to view the document before the approval regardless of whether or not the designated user is involved in the related document. Further, the management server 10 may manage the browsing history of the document before the approval by the user. Then, the processor 11 of the management server 10 may grant the user the authority to view the document to be set before the approval when the user has a history of viewing the related document before the approval. Further, the processor 11 may limit the granting of the authority to view the document to be set before the approval to the user when there is no history of viewing the related document before the approval by the user.

Further, in the present embodiment, when the granting unit 105 grants the designated user the authority to apply for or approve the document to be set, the granting unit 105 also grants the designated user the authority to edit the document to be set, but the present invention is limited to this. Not done.
The management server 10 may manage, for example, the history of document editing by the user. Then, the processor 11 of the management server 10 may grant the user the authority to edit the document to be set when there is a history of editing the related document by the user. Further, the processor 11 may limit the granting of the authority to edit the setting target document to the user when there is no history of editing the related document by the user.

Further, the information displayed in the exclusion notification unit 36 as the basis information is not limited to the above example. For example, if the granting of permissions to a user is restricted because the user is not involved in a document with the same attributes as the document to be set, the user is not involved as the basis for limiting the granting of permissions to the user. Information indicating the attributes of the document may be displayed in the exclusion notification unit 36.
Further, the information displayed on the application basis image 40 as the basis information is not limited to the above example. For example, when the user applies for a document with the same attributes as the document to be set and the user is granted the authority, the information indicating the attribute of the document applied by the user is the basis for the application. It may be displayed in the image 40.
Further, the information displayed on the decision basis image 42 as the basis information is not limited to the above example. For example, when the user approves a document with the same attributes as the document to be set and the user is granted the authority, the information indicating the attribute of the document approved by the user is the basis for the approval. It may be displayed in the image 42.

Further, the processor 11 in the above-described embodiment refers to a processor in a broad sense, and is a general-purpose processor (for example, a CPU (= Central Processing Unit)) or a dedicated processor (for example, a GPU (= Graphical)). Processing Unit), ASIC (= Application Specific Integrated Circuit), FPGA (= Field Programmable Gate Array), program logic device, etc.) are included.
Further, the operation of the processor 11 in the above-described embodiment may be executed by one processor alone, or may be executed by a plurality of processors existing at physically separated positions in cooperation with each other. Further, the order of execution of each operation in the processor is not limited to the order described in the present embodiment described above, and may be changed individually.

1 ... Document use system, 10 ... Management server, 20 ... Terminal, 11 ... Processor, 12 ... Storage device, 101 ... Acquisition unit, 102 ... Storage unit, 103 ... Reception unit, 104 ... Extraction unit, 105 ... Grant unit, 106 … Notification unit, 107… Management unit, 108… Output unit

Claims (11)

Equipped with a processor
The processor
Stores involvement information about the user's involvement in the document in memory
An information processing apparatus for setting the authority of a user's involvement in a specific document based on the involvement information related to the document that satisfies a predetermined condition regarding the relationship with the specific document. The involvement information includes a first involvement information regarding the user's involvement in the document by the first aspect and a second involvement information regarding the second aspect different from the first aspect of the user with respect to the document.
The involvement information relating to the document satisfying the above conditions includes the first involvement information relating to the first user, but does not include the second involvement information relating to the first user.
The first aspect of the present invention is characterized in that the processor grants the first user the right of engagement according to the first aspect to the specific document, while limiting the granting of the right of involvement according to the second aspect. Information processing device. The mode of user's involvement in the document is different from the first aspect, the second aspect, and any of the first aspect and the second aspect, and the aspect of the user's involvement in the document after approval. There is a third aspect,
The first aspect is an aspect of involvement in the document before approval.
The involvement information relating to the document satisfying the above conditions does not include the first involvement information relating to the second user different from the first user and the information relating to the third aspect.
2. The second aspect of the present invention, wherein the processor restricts the granting of the right of engagement according to the first aspect to the specific document to the second user, while granting the authority of involvement according to the third aspect. Information processing device. When the processor satisfies the conditions specified for the involvement information regarding the user's involvement in the document satisfying the conditions, the processor grants the user the authority to participate in the specific document, and the involvement information is defined. The information processing device according to claim 1, wherein if the condition is not satisfied, the granting of the authority to participate in the specific document to the user is restricted. The information processing apparatus according to claim 4, wherein the condition relating to the involvement information is defined with respect to a timing and / or a number of times of involvement in the document satisfying the condition. The processor
A setting image that accepts the setting of the authority for the user for the specific document is displayed on the terminal.
When the conditions specified for the involvement information related to the document satisfying the above conditions are satisfied, the terminal is displayed with the setting image and the basis information regarding the basis of the setting for the user for the specific document. The information processing apparatus according to claim 1. The processor grants the user the authority over the particular document.
The information processing apparatus according to claim 6, wherein the basis information includes information regarding the basis for which the authority has been granted to the user. The processor limits the granting of said authority to said user over the particular document.
The information processing apparatus according to claim 6, wherein the evidence information includes information regarding the basis of the limitation. The processor
Accepting the designation of the target user for setting the authority for the specific document via the terminal,
When the designation of a specific user is made on the terminal and the authority to the specific document is given to the specific user, the information prompting the designation of the specific user is displayed on the terminal. The information processing apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the information processing apparatus is to be used. The processor stores attribute information about the attributes of the document and identification information that identifies the user in memory.
The conditions are defined with respect to the relationship between the attributes of the particular document and the attributes of the document.
The information processing device according to claim 1, wherein the processor grants the authority to a user specified from the identification information associated with the involvement information related to the document satisfying the above conditions. On the computer
A function to store information about the user's involvement in the document in memory,
A function to set the authority of the user's involvement in the specific document based on the involvement information related to the document that satisfies the predetermined condition regarding the relationship with the specific document.
A program to realize.

Images