JP2021117780A - Resource accommodation support device and resource accommodation support method - Google Patents

Abstract

To provide a resource accommodation support device and resource accommodation support method in which optimal resource allocation is achieved in consideration of the difference in the provision form for each resource.SOLUTION: A resource accommodation support device 10 has a matching processing unit 32. A matching processing unit 32 acquires a resource-providing offer list 117 showing a resource-providing form of the resources capable of being provided by a resource provider, and a resource-providing wish list 118 showing the resource-providing form wished by a resource receiver. The matching processing unit determines the combination between the resource provider for delivering resources and the resource receiver on the basis of these information. The resource-providing offer list 117 and the re-resource-providing wish list 118 include information showing the type of the resources, respectively. The matching processing unit 32 determines the combination on the basis of the type of the resources.SELECTED DRAWING: Figure 4

Description

The present invention relates to a resource accommodation support device and a resource accommodation support method.

Compared to other countries, Japan is a country where natural disasters such as typhoons, heavy rains, and earthquakes occur more frequently, and disaster countermeasures are an important issue. Among them, especially in the case of damage response in the event of a disaster, appropriate proactive measures and resource allocation for early recovery are required. Therefore, for example, as a mechanism for dealing with infrastructure damage in the event of a disaster, research on a method for supporting the determination of recovery priority of infrastructure equipment and a method for allocating insufficient resources to disaster victims has been promoted in recent years.

For example, the following Patent Document 1 is known as a conventional technique for dealing with damage in the event of a disaster. Patent Document 1 describes information on resources including at least a facility that is operated as a business facility in normal times and provides services by reservation, a reservation information storage means that stores information on reservation of the resource as reservation information, and the disaster. The target person information storage means for storing the target person information about the target person registered in advance as a user who uses the resource at the time of occurrence, and the target person information and the reservation information are matched based on the received disaster information. It is equipped with a reservation information specifying means for specifying the reservation information of the resource suitable for the evacuation of the target person and an output control means for outputting the specified reservation information, and for evacuating the tourism resource in the event of a disaster. An evacuation support device that supports the use of the facility is disclosed.

Japanese Unexamined Patent Publication No. 2016-38698

In the evacuation support device described in Patent Document 1, accommodation facilities such as hotels and guest houses are assumed as tourism resources to be allocated to each target person. Such a resource allocation method in the event of a disaster is based on the premise that the allocated resources for infrastructure restoration and the means for allocating the resources are fixed, and does not consider the case where there are multiple types of resources and means for providing resources.
However, there are various types of resources that are useful for restoration as a lifeline of infrastructure, and the form of provision differs for each resource. For example, in the case of electric power interchange, in addition to the interchange on the grid, there are multiple means such as dispatching electric vehicles and providing generators, and if there is equipment such as a fuel cell, gas provision is different. Restoration by providing resources is also conceivable. However, no technology has been proposed to support resource accommodation in the event of a disaster, considering these multiple means of resource accommodation.

Therefore, an object of the present invention is to provide a resource accommodation support device and a resource accommodation support method that provide the optimum resources for infrastructure recovery in the event of a disaster by the optimum means in consideration of the difference in the provision form of each resource. do.

The resource accommodation support device according to the first aspect of the present invention supports the accommodation of the resources between the resource provider who provides the resources used in the event of a disaster and the resource recipient who receives the resources. The resource provisionable information indicating the provision form of the resource that can be provided by the resource provider and the resource provision desired information indicating the provision form of the resource that the resource recipient desires to provide. It includes an information acquisition unit to be acquired, and a matching processing unit that determines a combination of the resource provider and the resource recipient who exchanges the resource based on the resource provisionable information and the resource provision desired information. The resource-providable information and the resource-provided information include information indicating the type of the resource, and the matching processing unit determines the combination based on the type of the resource.
The resource accommodation support device according to the second aspect of the present invention supports the accommodation of the resources between the resource provider who provides the resources used in the event of a disaster and the resource recipient who receives the resources. This is to be added in order to improve the resilience evaluation value for damage in the event of a disaster, and the information acquisition unit that acquires resource-providable information indicating the resource provision form that can be provided by the resource provider. A bottleneck evaluation unit that formulates a resilience improvement plan indicating candidates for the resource to be prepared for each predetermined area, and the resource provider and the resource that give and receive the resource based on the resource availability information and the resilience improvement plan. It is provided with a matching processing unit that determines a combination of recipients.
The resource accommodation support device according to the third aspect of the present invention supports the accommodation of resources used in the event of a disaster, and provides a resilience evaluation unit that evaluates resilience to damage in the event of a disaster for each predetermined area. Be prepared.
The resource accommodation support method according to the fourth aspect of the present invention supports the accommodation of the resources between the resource provider who provides the resources used in the event of a disaster and the resource recipient who receives the resources. Resource provision availability information indicating the resource provision form that can be provided by the resource provider and resource provision request indicating the resource provision form that the resource recipient desires to provide by the computer. The resource provider and the resource recipient who acquire the information and give and receive the resource based on the information indicating the type of the resource included in the resource provision available information and the resource provision desired information by the computer, respectively. Determine the combination of people.
The resource accommodation support method according to the fifth aspect of the present invention supports the accommodation of the resources between the resource provider who provides the resources used in the event of a disaster and the resource recipient who receives the resources. In order to acquire resource-providable information indicating the provision form of the resource that can be provided by the resource provider by a computer, and to improve the evaluation value of resilience for damage in the event of a disaster by the computer. A resilience improvement plan indicating the candidate of the resource to be added to the above is drafted for each predetermined area, and the resource provider who gives and receives the resource based on the resource provisionable information and the resilience improvement plan by the computer. The combination of the resource recipients is determined.

According to the present invention, it is possible to provide a resource accommodation support device and a resource accommodation support method that realize the optimum resource allocation in consideration of the difference in the provision form for each resource.

It is a conceptual diagram of the resource accommodation support apparatus which concerns on one Embodiment of this invention. It is a figure which shows the configuration example of the resource accommodation support apparatus which concerns on one Embodiment of this invention. It is a figure which shows the software structure of the resilience evaluation part. It is a figure which shows the software structure of the matching processing part. It is a flowchart which shows the whole processing procedure by the resource accommodation support apparatus which concerns on one Embodiment of this invention. It is a flowchart which shows the detail of the resilience evaluation process which concerns on one Embodiment of this invention. It is a flowchart which shows the detail of the bottleneck evaluation process which concerns on one Embodiment of this invention. It is a figure which shows an example of the screen of the resilience evaluation result. It is a flowchart of resource accommodation matching processing which concerns on one Embodiment of this invention. It is a flowchart which shows the detail of the resource visualization processing which concerns on one Embodiment of this invention. It is a flowchart which shows the detail of the optimum matching process which concerns on one Embodiment of this invention. It is a figure which shows the specific example of the data used in the resource accommodation support apparatus which concerns on one Embodiment of this invention. It is a figure which shows the specific example of the data used in the resource accommodation support apparatus which concerns on one Embodiment of this invention. It is a figure which shows the specific example of the data used in the resource accommodation support apparatus which concerns on one Embodiment of this invention.

Hereinafter, embodiments of the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the drawings.

<Overview>
The resource accommodation support device 10 according to an embodiment of the present invention is between a resource provider who provides a resource used in the event of a disaster and a resource recipient who receives the resource. , A device that supports the accommodation of resources. In order to realize this, the resource accommodation support device 10 evaluates the resilience to damage in the event of a disaster for each predetermined area predetermined according to administrative divisions and the like. Resilience is an index showing resilience and resilience to disasters, and areas with lower resilience require priority support in the event of a disaster. Then, by determining the shortage of resources that is a bottleneck for improving resilience, a resilience improvement plan is formulated. Furthermore, the resource provision availability information, which is information indicating the resource provision form that can be provided by the resource provider, and the resource provision request information, which is information indicating the resource provision form that the resource recipient desires to provide, are acquired. By matching between the resource provider and the resource recipient based on this information, it is possible to support the smooth exchange of resources between the two.

FIG. 1 is a conceptual diagram of a resource accommodation support device 10 according to an embodiment of the present invention. As described above, the resource accommodation support device 10 performs resilience evaluation for each area and matching of resource accommodation between the resource provider and the resource recipient. The conceptual diagram shown in FIG. 1 (a) is a diagram for explaining the concept of resilience evaluation for each area, and the conceptual diagram shown in FIG. 1 (b) is a diagram between a resource provider and a resource recipient. It is a figure explaining the concept of resource flexibility matching.

As shown in FIG. 1A, in the resilience evaluation for each area, the resource accommodation support device 10 first acquires the area information for each area from the infrastructure manager. The information in the area is information indicating the available resources in the area, the facilities owned, the status of residents, and the like. Then, while referring to the acquired information in the area, the resilience evaluation for each area is executed, and the evaluation result is provided to the infrastructure manager. Furthermore, for areas with low resilience evaluation values, the resource that is the bottleneck is determined, and the determination result is notified to the infrastructure manager as a resilience improvement plan for improving resilience. This will help infrastructure managers eliminate bottlenecks and improve resilience.

Further, as shown in FIG. 1 (b), in the resource accommodation matching, the resource accommodation support device 10 acquires the above-mentioned area information from the infrastructure manager, and also provides the resource provisionable information from the resource provider to the resource recipient. Obtain resource provision request information from each person. Then, while referring to the acquired information and the above-mentioned resilience improvement plan, between the resource provider who is the provider of the resources required in the event of a disaster and the resource recipient who is the provider of the resources. The matching process for finding the appropriate combination is executed, and the matching result is provided to the infrastructure administrator, resource provider, and resource recipient, respectively. Specifically, the resource accommodation support device 10 provides the infrastructure manager and the resource recipient with the resource provider information as a matching result, and provides the resource provider with the resource recipient as a matching result. Provide information about the person. This helps ensure smooth resource interchange between resource providers and resource recipients. At this time, the infrastructure manager may be the resource recipient.

In resource accommodation matching, if there are insufficient resources that can be provided to the infrastructure administrator or resource recipient, the resource provider is notified so that the resource can be added. You may urge the provider. Furthermore, when resources that can be provided by the resource provider are added, it is possible to notify the resource provider and the infrastructure manager of the degree of resilience improvement due to the addition.

<Configuration of resource accommodation support device>
Next, the configuration of the resource accommodation support device 10 will be described.

FIG. 2 is a diagram showing a configuration example of the resource accommodation support device 10 according to the embodiment of the present invention. As shown in FIG. 2, the resource accommodation support device 10 includes a calculation unit 21, a memory 22, an input unit 23, an output unit 24, a communication unit 25, and a storage device 26, and includes a resource recipient and a resource. It is connected to the electronic terminals 12, 13, and 14 owned by the provider and the infrastructure administrator, respectively, via the communication network 11.

The storage device 26 is configured by using an appropriate non-volatile storage element such as a hard disk drive (HDD) or a solid state drive (SSD). The storage device 26 stores and holds programs for realizing the resilience evaluation unit 31 that performs resilience evaluation for each area and the matching processing unit 32 that performs resource accommodation matching. The memory 22 is configured by using a volatile memory element such as a RAM (Random Access Memory). The calculation unit 21 is configured by using a calculation element such as a CPU (Central Processing Unit), and controls the entire resource accommodation support device 10 by executing the program held in the storage device 26 by reading it into the memory 22 or the like. Control, various determinations, calculations, control processing, and the like for realizing the resilience evaluation unit 31 and the matching processing unit 32 are executed. The input unit 23 is a device that accepts a user's input operation, and is configured by using, for example, a keyboard or a mouse. The output unit 24 is a device that outputs the processing result of the calculation unit 21, and is configured by using, for example, a display or the like. The communication unit 25 is a network interface that connects to the communication network 11 and performs communication processing with external electronic terminals 12, 13, and 14, respectively.

The resource accommodation support device 10 may be a local server installed at a specific location, or may be provided as a cloud server in the form of SaaS (Software as a Service) or the like.

The electronic terminal 12 of the resource recipient, the electronic terminal 13 of the resource provider, the electronic terminal 14 of the infrastructure administrator, and the like are connected to the communication network 11. The electronic terminal 12 accepts the input of the resource provision desired information from the resource recipient, and presents the matching result of the matching processing unit 32 with the resource provider to the resource recipient. The electronic terminal 13 accepts the input of the resource provisionable information from the resource provider, and presents the matching result of the matching processing unit 32 with the resource recipient to the resource provider. The electronic terminal 14 accepts input of information in the area from the infrastructure manager, and presents the resilience evaluation result for each area and the resilience improvement plan by the resilience evaluation unit 31 to the infrastructure manager. Further, the matching result of the resource provider and the resource recipient by the matching processing unit 32 may be presented to the infrastructure manager.

The exchange of the above-mentioned various information between the electronic terminals 12, 13 and 14 and the resource accommodation support device 10 is realized by the function of the communication unit 25 included in the resource accommodation support device 10. That is, the communication unit 25 functions as an information acquisition unit that acquires resource provisionable information, resource provision desired information, and area information from the outside, and outputs and provides matching results, resilience evaluation results, and resilience improvement plans to the outside. Functions as an information provider.

<Resource accommodation support function>
Next, the resource accommodation support function of the resource accommodation support device 10 will be described. The resource accommodation support function is the above-mentioned function described with reference to the conceptual diagram of FIG. Specifically, the resilience to disasters in each area is judged from the sufficiency of lifelines and the status of residents, and the bottleneck resources are determined by a loop search for resilience improvement evaluation for each resource to be provided. To formulate a resilience improvement plan. Furthermore, the resilience improvement plan or the resource provision request information from the resource provider is compared with the resource provision availability information from the resource provider, and based on these comparison results, the resilience improvement degree and the resource provision cost Determine the optimal combination of resource provider and resource recipient to transfer resources, taking into consideration conditions such as profit merits in normal utilization. With these functions, a resource accommodation support function is realized.

The resource accommodation support device 10 of the present embodiment has a resilience evaluation unit 31 and a matching processing unit 32 in order to realize the above-mentioned resource accommodation support function. These are stored and held as programs in the storage device 26, and are realized by executing the program by the arithmetic unit 21 which is a computer.

FIG. 3 is a diagram showing a software configuration of the resilience evaluation unit 31. As shown in FIG. 3, the resilience evaluation unit 31 has modules of the area resilience evaluation unit 31a and the bottleneck evaluation unit 31b as its software configuration.

The area resilience evaluation unit 31a has modules of an available resource prediction unit 41, an available equipment prediction unit 42, a lifeline sufficiency evaluation unit 43, an area-specific resident support level evaluation unit 44, and an area resilience determination unit 45.

The available resource prediction unit 41 refers to the in-area resource 101 and the in-area damage prediction 102, and predicts the resources that can be used in the event of a disaster for each area. The in-area resource 101 is information indicating the type and amount of resources for each area that are normally supplied. The damage prediction 102 in the area is information indicating the damage prediction status for each area when a disaster occurs. This information is stored in the storage device 26. The prediction result of the available resources for each area by the available resource prediction unit 41 is recorded in the storage device 26 as the available resources 107.

The available equipment prediction unit 42 refers to the in-area equipment 103 and the in-area damage prediction 102, and predicts the infrastructure equipment that can be used in the event of a disaster for each area. The infrastructure equipment referred to here is equipment that provides public services that are indispensable for the daily lives of residents, and is managed by an infrastructure manager such as a specific infrastructure company. For example, supply equipment such as electric power, gas, water and sewage, and public transportation such as railways correspond to infrastructure equipment. The in-area equipment 103 is information indicating the type and amount of infrastructure equipment existing in each area, and is stored in the storage device 26. The prediction result of the available equipment for each area by the available equipment prediction unit 42 is recorded in the storage device 26 as the available equipment 108.

The lifeline sufficiency evaluation unit 43 refers to the above-mentioned available resources 107 and available equipment 108 and the resource-equipment constraint 109, and calculates and evaluates the sufficiency of the lifeline for each area at the time of a disaster. .. The resource-equipment constraint 109 is information indicating the constraint conditions of the infrastructure equipment necessary for each resource to function as a lifeline, and is stored in the storage device 26. The lifeline sufficiency for each area calculated by the lifeline sufficiency evaluation unit 43 is recorded in the storage device 26 as the lifeline sufficiency 110.

The area-specific resident support level evaluation unit 44 calculates and evaluates the level of support required for residents in the event of a disaster for each area based on the resident attribute 105 and the resident dynamics 106. The inhabitant attribute 105 is information indicating the attribute of the inhabitant for each area, and includes, for example, the total number of inhabitants in the area and the number of inhabitants requiring nursing care support. The inhabitant dynamics 106 is information showing the dynamics of the inhabitants for each area, and includes, for example, the staying time rate. This information is stored in the storage device 26. The degree of support required by the residents for each area by the area-specific degree of support required by residents 44 is recorded in the storage device 26 as the degree of support required by residents 111.

The area resilience determination unit 45 performs a process of determining the resilience of each area based on the lifeline satisfaction level 110, the area importance level 104, the resident support level 111, and the area environmental risk level 112. The area importance level 104 is information indicating the degree of importance for each area, and the area environmental risk level 112 is information indicating the degree of danger for each area. This information is stored in the storage device 26. The resilience determination result for each area by the area resilience determination unit 45 is recorded in the storage device 26 as the area resilience determination result 113.

The bottleneck evaluation unit 31b has a resilience improvement planning unit 46. The resilience improvement planning unit 46 has a shortage resource assumption unit 47, a sufficiency evaluation unit 48 for each lifeline at the time of resource provision, and a resilience improvement evaluation unit 49.

The shortage resource assumption unit 47 refers to the provided resource candidate 114 and performs a process of assuming a shortage resource for each area when a disaster occurs. The provided resource candidate 114 is information representing a resource candidate for each area provided by the resource provider when a disaster occurs, and is stored in the storage device 26.

The sufficiency evaluation unit 48 for each lifeline at the time of resource provision evaluates the sufficiency for each lifeline when the shortage resource assumed by the shortage resource assumption unit 47 is provided by the resource provider.

The resilience improvement degree evaluation unit 49 performs a process of evaluating the resilience improvement degree at the time of resource provision based on the evaluation result of the sufficiency degree for each lifeline by the lifeline-specific sufficiency degree evaluation unit 48 at the time of resource provision. Then, if the resilience improvement degree does not reach the default end condition, the shortage resource assumption unit 47 is made to assume another shortage resource, and the above process is repeated. On the other hand, when the resilience improvement degree reaches the default end condition, the resource is registered in the bottleneck resource candidate determination result 115 as a bottleneck resource candidate which is a resource candidate to be added when a disaster occurs. The bottleneck resource candidate determination result 115 is recorded in the storage device 26 and is used by the matching processing unit 32.

FIG. 4 is a diagram showing a software configuration of the matching processing unit 32. As shown in FIG. 4, the matching processing unit 32 has each module of the resource visualization unit 51 and the optimum matching unit 52 as its software configuration.

The resource visualization unit 51 has a resource public offering information creation unit 61.

The resource public offering information creation unit 61 creates resource public offering information 116 based on the bottleneck resource candidate determination result 115 registered by the resilience evaluation unit 31 and the resource provision request list 118 recorded in the storage device 26. .. The resource provision request list 118 is information representing a list of resources that the resource recipient wishes to provide, and corresponds to the above-mentioned resource provision request information. The resource public offering information 116 is information for publicly offering necessary resources in the event of a disaster, is stored in the storage device 26, and is notified to the resource provider through the electronic terminal 13 according to the operation of the resource provider. .. For example, among the resource public offering information 116, information satisfying the conditions specified by the resource provider is searched, and the search result is transmitted by the communication unit 25 to the electronic terminal 13 of the resource provider.

The optimum matching unit 52 includes a matching combination provisional determination unit 62 and a matching result evaluation unit 63.

The matching combination provisional determination unit 62 uses the bottleneck resource candidate determination result 115 registered by the resilience evaluation unit 31, the above-mentioned resource provision request list 118, and the resource provision offer list 117 stored in the storage device 26. Therefore, the combination of the resource provider and the resource recipient who give and receive resources in the event of a disaster is tentatively determined. The resource provision offer list 117 is information representing a list of resources that can be provided by the resource provider, and corresponds to the above-mentioned resource provision availability information.

The matching result evaluation unit 63 evaluates the matching result for the combination of the resource provider and the resource recipient tentatively determined by the matching combination provisional determination unit 62. The matching result evaluation unit 63 has, for example, a resilience improvement degree evaluation unit, a resource cost evaluation unit, a normal merit evaluation unit, and the like, and matching is performed using the evaluation results performed by these evaluation units based on their respective evaluation indexes. Evaluate the results. The resilience improvement evaluation unit evaluates the matching result using the resilience improvement as an evaluation index, and evaluates how much the resilience is improved by the tentatively determined combination. The resource cost evaluation unit evaluates the matching result using the cost as an evaluation index, and evaluates how much cost is incurred by providing the resources of the tentatively determined combination. The normal time merit evaluation unit evaluates the matching result using the normal time merit as an evaluation index, and evaluates the economic merit when it is possible to provide the tentatively determined combination of resources even in normal time. For example, when photovoltaic power generation is provided as a resource, the economic merits of normal times can be considered according to the ratio of provision during normal times and disasters. The above-mentioned evaluation units and evaluation indexes in the matching result evaluation unit 63 are examples, and it is possible to evaluate the matching results using various evaluation indexes other than the above.

The matching result evaluation unit 63 integrates the respective evaluation results, and if the predetermined termination condition is not reached, causes the matching combination provisional determination unit 62 to provisionally determine another combination of the resource provider and the resource recipient. The above process is repeated. On the other hand, when the predetermined termination condition is reached, the combination is registered in the resource matching result 119 as the optimum combination of the resource provider and the resource recipient. The resource matching result 119 is recorded in the storage device 26, and is transmitted by the communication unit 25 to the electronic terminals 12, 13, and 14 owned by the resource recipient, the resource provider, and the infrastructure administrator, respectively.

Next, in relation to the above-mentioned resource accommodation support function, the contents of the processing executed by the resource accommodation support device 10 according to the embodiment of the present invention will be described. In the following, each module shown in FIGS. 3 and 4 will be described as an execution subject of each process, but in practice, the arithmetic unit 21 executes the process based on the program stored in the storage device 26. Needless to say.

<Overall processing>
FIG. 5 is a flowchart showing the entire processing procedure by the resource accommodation support device 10 according to the embodiment of the present invention. As described above, the resource accommodation support device 10 performs the resilience evaluation process (step S201) by the resilience evaluation unit 31, and then performs the resource accommodation matching process (step S202) by the matching processing unit 32.

<Resilience evaluation processing>
FIG. 6 is a flowchart showing details of the resilience evaluation process according to the embodiment of the present invention.

When the resilience evaluation process is started, the resilience evaluation unit 31 first acquires the area resource 101 and the area damage prediction 102 from the storage device 26 by the available resource prediction unit 41 of the area resilience evaluation unit 31a, and these. Based on the information in (Step S301), the resources available in the area are predicted for each area when a disaster occurs (step S301). Specifically, the available resource prediction unit 41 executes the process of step S301 as follows, based on, for example, the in-area resource 101 and the in-area damage prediction 102 composed of the information shown in FIG.

In FIG. 12, the resource 101 in the area is configured to include information indicating the types of resources (distribution / substation power, EV (Electric Vehicle), city gas, etc.) that can be used for each area and the amount thereof. The in-area damage prediction 102 is configured to include information indicating the reduction rate of resources and infrastructure equipment for each area due to damage assumed at the time of a disaster. In step S301, the amount of available resources for each resource type in each area at the time of a disaster is predicted by multiplying the amount of each available resource for each area by the reduction rate based on this information. Then, the prediction result is registered in the available resource 107. As a result, information as shown in FIG. 12 showing the predicted amount of resources that can be used at the time of a disaster for each area and each resource type is recorded in the storage device 26 as the available resources 107.

Next, the resilience evaluation unit 31 acquires the in-area equipment 103 and the in-area damage prediction 102 from the storage device 26 by the available equipment prediction unit 42 of the area resilience evaluation unit 31a, and based on this information, the area at the time of a disaster occurs. Predict the infrastructure equipment that can be used within each area (step S302). Specifically, the available equipment prediction unit 42 performs the process of step S302 as follows, based on, for example, the in-area equipment 103 and the in-area damage prediction 102 composed of the information shown in FIG.

In FIG. 12, the equipment 103 in the area is configured to include information indicating the types of infrastructure equipment (power distribution equipment, V2G (Vehicle to Grid) equipment, cogeneration equipment, etc.) existing in each area and the amount thereof. As described above, the in-area damage prediction 102 is configured to include information indicating the reduction rate of resources and infrastructure equipment for each area due to damage assumed at the time of a disaster. In step S302, based on this information, the amount of available infrastructure equipment for each type of equipment in each area at the time of a disaster is predicted by multiplying the amount of available infrastructure equipment for each area by the reduction rate. Then, the prediction result is registered in the available equipment 108. As a result, information as shown in FIG. 12 showing the predicted amount of infrastructure equipment that can be used at the time of a disaster for each area and each equipment type is recorded in the storage device 26 as the available equipment 108.

Next, the resilience evaluation unit 31 acquires the available resources 107, the available equipment 108, and the resource-equipment constraint 109 from the storage device 26 by the lifeline sufficiency evaluation unit 43 of the area resilience evaluation unit 31a, and based on these, the resilience evaluation unit 31 acquires the available resources 107, the available equipment 108, and the resource-equipment constraint 109. Predict the degree of lifeline sufficiency at the time of a disaster (step S303). Specifically, the lifeline sufficiency evaluation unit 43 is based on, for example, the available resource 107, the available equipment 108, and the resource-equipment constraint 109 composed of the information shown in FIG. 12, in step S303 as follows. Perform the processing of.

In FIG. 12, the resource-equipment constraint 109 is a constraint condition of the infrastructure equipment for making each resource function as a lifeline, the types of resources and infrastructure equipment that can be combined, and the types of lifelines realized by the combination. It is configured to include information representing. In step S303, based on this information and the above-mentioned information on the available resources 107 and the available equipment 108, the amount of resources that the resources available at the time of a disaster actually function as a lifeline is determined for each resource type. Calculate and determine the degree of sufficiency for each lifeline from the calculation result.

For example, in the combination of the first line of the resource-equipment constraint 109 shown in FIG. 12, in order to provide the residents with the power from the distribution substation as a lifeline, distribution equipment such as utility poles and columnar transformers is used as the constraint condition. Indicates that it is necessary. Therefore, the distribution substation that can be used in the event of a disaster based on the available amount of power of the distribution substation in each area indicated by the available resource 107 and the available amount of the distribution equipment in each area indicated by the available equipment 108. Calculate the amount of power that can actually be provided as a lifeline.

Similarly, in the combination of the second line of the resource-equipment constraint 109 shown in FIG. 12, in order for the power generated by the EV to function as a lifeline, a V2G facility connecting the power system and the EV is required as the constraint condition. It means that it will be. Therefore, of the EV power available in the event of a disaster, based on the EV available amount in each area indicated by the available resource 107 and the available amount of V2G equipment in each area indicated by the available equipment 108. , Calculate the amount of electricity that can actually be provided as a lifeline.

The lifeline sufficiency evaluation unit 43 calculates the sufficiency amount (electric energy, etc.) of the lifeline provided by each resource as described above, and calculates the calculation result for each lifeline category (electric power, residence, etc.). By adding up, the degree of sufficiency for each lifeline at the time of a disaster is calculated. Then, the information as shown in FIG. 12 showing the calculated sufficiency value for each area and each lifeline item is recorded in the storage device 26 as the lifeline sufficiency 110.

Through the processing of the lifeline sufficiency evaluation unit 43 as described above, the resilience evaluation unit 31 acquires the constraint information of the infrastructure equipment necessary for each resource to function as a lifeline, and this constraint information and the disaster occurrence occur. Based on at least one prediction result of resources and infrastructure equipment that are available at times, the lifeline sufficiency at the time of a disaster can be calculated for each area and registered in the lifeline sufficiency 110.

Next, the resilience evaluation unit 31 acquires the inhabitant attribute 105 and the inhabitant dynamics 106 from the storage device 26 by the area-specific inhabitant support level evaluation unit 44 of the area resilience evaluation unit 31a, and based on this information, the area at the time of a disaster occurs. The degree of support required, which indicates the degree of residents who need support within the area, is evaluated for each area (step S304). Specifically, the area-specific inhabitant support level evaluation unit 44 carries out the process of step S304 as follows, based on, for example, the inhabitant attribute 105 and the inhabitant dynamics 106 composed of the information shown in FIG.

In FIG. 12, the inhabitant attribute 105 is configured to include information representing the total number of inhabitants and the number of inhabitants requiring protection for each area. Residents requiring protection are residents who need assistance during evacuation, such as the elderly, children, and inpatients. The inhabitant dynamics 106 is configured to include information representing the inhabitants' dynamics for each area, for example, the average staying time rate. The average staying time rate is set in consideration of the daily movement and frequency of commuting to work and school by each inhabitant. In step S304, based on this information, for example, the actual number of inhabitants staying in the area is calculated by multiplying the number of inhabitants by using the average staying time rate for each area as a coefficient, and the inhabitants of each area are calculated by the following formula (1). The degree of support required S is calculated. In formula (1), A and B represent predetermined coefficients, G represents the total number of inhabitants in each area, N represents the number of inhabitants requiring protection in each area, and Ts represents the average staying time rate in each area. ..
S = A × G × Ts + B × N × Ts ・ ・ ・ (1)

The area-specific resident support level evaluation unit 44 calculates the resident support level for each area as described above. Then, the information as shown in FIG. 12 showing the calculated value of the support required degree for each area is recorded in the storage device 26 as the resident support required degree 111.

By the processing of the inhabitant support level evaluation unit 44 for each area as described above, the resilience evaluation unit 31 is based on the information indicating the inhabitant situation including at least one of the number of inhabitants, the inhabitant attribute and the inhabitant dynamics in each area. The degree of support required for residents at the time of a disaster can be calculated for each area and registered in the degree of support required for residents 111.

Next, the resilience evaluation unit 31 acquires the lifeline sufficiency degree 110, the resident support degree 111, the area importance degree 104, and the area environmental risk degree 112 from the storage device 26 by the area resilience determination unit 45 of the area resilience evaluation unit 31a. , Based on this information, determine the resilience of each area at the time of a disaster (step S305). Specifically, the area resilience determination unit 45 is based on, for example, a lifeline satisfaction level 110 composed of the information shown in FIG. 12, a resident support level 111, an area importance level 104, and an area environmental risk level 112. In this way, the process of step S305 is carried out.

In FIG. 12, the area importance 104 is configured to include information indicating the importance of each area. The importance of each area is determined in advance by the infrastructure manager or the like based on, for example, the amount of facilities existing in the area and the presence or absence of important facilities such as hospitals and countermeasure headquarters. The area environmental risk level 112 is configured to include information indicating the environmental risk level for each area. The environmental risk of each area is a value set according to the geographical environment of each area, and the infrastructure manager in advance considers the potential of factors that hinder recovery in the event of a disaster, such as landslides and tsunamis. Etc. are set. In step S305, based on these pieces of information and the above-mentioned information on the lifeline sufficiency level 110 and the resident support level 111, the sufficiency level of each lifeline, the supportability of the resident, the importance of the area, and the dangerous environment are determined. By comprehensively evaluating the presence or absence, the resilience of each area at the time of a disaster is evaluated.

For example, the area resilience determination unit 45 calculates the resilience R of each area by the following mathematical formula (2). In the formula (2), C and D each represent a predetermined coefficient, Re represents the resilience of electric power in each area, and Rf represents the resilience of food in each area.
R = C × Re + D × Rf ・ ・ ・ (2)

The resilience Re of the electric power infrastructure in the formula (2) can be calculated by, for example, the following formula (3). In the formula (3), Le represents the sufficiency of the electric power infrastructure in each area, Im represents the importance of each area, and He represents the risk of each area. Further, S represents the degree of support required of the residents in each area calculated by the above-mentioned mathematical formula (1).
Re = Le × S × Im × He ・ ・ ・ (3)

In the above formula (2), an example of calculating the resilience R of each area by summing the resilience Re of electric power and the resilience Rf of food is shown, but the resilience R is further considered in consideration of other resilience factors. May be calculated. For example, for each lifeline item included in the lifeline sufficiency degree 110, the resilience of each area is calculated, and the resilience of each calculated lifeline item is totaled for each area to calculate the resilience R of each area. It is possible to do. In addition to this, it is possible to calculate the resilience for each area in consideration of various resilience factors.

The area resilience determination unit 45 calculates the resilience for each area as described above. Then, the information as shown in FIG. 12 showing the calculated resilience value for each area is recorded in the storage device 26 as the area resilience determination result 113.

By the processing of the area resilience determination unit 45 as described above, the resilience evaluation unit 31 determines the resilience to the damage in the event of a disaster based on the calculation results of the degree of satisfaction of the lifeline in the event of a disaster and the degree of support required for the residents. Can be evaluated for each predetermined area, and the evaluation result can be registered in the area resilience determination result 113.

Next, the resilience evaluation unit 31 aims to improve the resilience of the area where the resilience evaluation value is low among the areas where the resilience determination result was obtained in step S305 by the resilience improvement planning unit 46 of the bottleneck evaluation unit 31b. , The bottleneck evaluation process is carried out (step S306). Here, the bottleneck evaluation process is performed as follows.

FIG. 7 is a flowchart showing details of the bottleneck evaluation process according to the embodiment of the present invention. When the bottleneck evaluation process is started in step S306 of FIG. 6, the resilience improvement planning unit 46 first assumes the shortage resource by the shortage resource assumption unit 47 (step S401). Here, for example, based on the provided resource candidate 114 composed of the information shown in FIG. 13, a resource considered to be a factor for lowering the resilience evaluation value of the area is assumed as a shortage resource.

In FIG. 13, the provision resource candidate 114 is configured to include information indicating the type and amount of the resource candidate for each area that the resource provider desires to provide. In step S401, based on this information, among the resource candidates for the area, those that are considered to be factors that lower the resilience evaluation value of the area are assumed as insufficient resources.

Next, the sufficiency evaluation unit 48 for each lifeline at the time of resource provision evaluates the sufficiency of the lifeline at the time of providing insufficient resources (step S402). Here, the lifeline sufficiency at the time of providing the deficient resource is evaluated by calculating the lifeline sufficiency when the deficient resource assumed in step S401 is newly added by the same method as in step S303 described above.

Subsequently, the resilience improvement degree evaluation unit 49 evaluates the resilience improvement degree (step S403). Here, the resilience of the area at the time of providing insufficient resources is calculated based on the lifeline sufficiency calculated in step S402 by the same method as in step S305 described above. Then, the degree of resilience improvement is evaluated by obtaining the difference between the calculated resilience and the original resilience.

As described above, if the resilience improvement degree for the area when the insufficient resource is provided can be evaluated, it is determined whether or not the evaluation value has reached the default end condition (step S404). As a result, if the evaluation value of the resilience improvement degree does not reach the default end condition (step S404; No), the process returns to step S401, causes the shortage resource assumption unit 47 to assume the shortage resource again, and then performs the above processing. repeat. On the other hand, if the evaluation value of the resilience improvement degree reaches the predetermined end condition (step S404; Yes), the resilience improvement planning unit 46 determines the resilience improvement degree finally obtained in step S403 for each insufficient resource. After recording the bottleneck resource candidate determination result 115 as shown in FIG. 13 in the storage device 26, the bottleneck evaluation process is terminated.

A specific example of the bottleneck evaluation process will be described. In step S401, the shortage resource assumption unit 47 assumes a shortage resource by, for example, randomly selecting one candidate from a plurality of resource candidates indicated by the provided resource candidate 114. In the provided resource candidate 114, for example, the number of resource candidates desired to be provided by each resource provider is specified for each area and each resource in the data format as shown in FIG.

In step S402, the sufficiency evaluation unit 48 for each lifeline at the time of resource provision uses the resource candidate selected as the hypothesized insufficient resource in step S401 and the information of the above-mentioned available resource 107 in the resource candidate when a disaster occurs. Calculate the amount of possible resources, and based on this, calculate the degree of sufficiency for each lifeline. The calculation of the sufficiency by lifeline is the same as the lifeline sufficiency evaluation process (step S303) described above.

In step S403, the resilience improvement degree evaluation unit 49 calculates the resilience of the area where the candidate is provided based on the lifeline-specific sufficiency newly calculated in step S402. The resilience calculation is the same as the area resilience determination process (step S305). Then, the resilience improvement degree is calculated by taking the difference between the newly calculated resilience and the current resilience stored in the area resilience determination result 113. The degree of resilience improvement may be calculated for each area, or the total degree of improvement in resilience in all areas may be used as the evaluation value.

In step S404, the resilience improvement degree obtained in step S403 is compared with a predetermined end condition, and the assumption of insufficient resources and the resilience improvement degree evaluation process are repeated until the end condition is satisfied. As a result, one or more provided resource candidates whose resilience improvement degree is equal to or higher than a predetermined threshold value are drafted as resilience improvement plans.

By the processing of the resilience improvement planning unit 46 as described above, the bottleneck evaluation unit 31b formulates a resilience improvement plan indicating resource candidates to be added in order to improve the resilience evaluation value for each predetermined area. It can be registered in the bottleneck resource candidate determination result 115.

After that, the resilience evaluation unit 31 returns to the flowchart of FIG. 6, and the resilience determination result for each area obtained in step S305 and the determination result of the bottleneck resource candidate obtained by the bottleneck evaluation process in step S306, that is, step S404 Notify the infrastructure manager of the resilience improvement plan drafted by satisfying the termination condition in (step S307). Specifically, for example, the resilience evaluation unit 31 uses the communication unit 25 of the resource accommodation support device 10 to transmit information indicating these processing results to the electronic terminal 14 of the infrastructure manager via the communication network 11. do. The electronic terminal 14 displays the received information on the screen and presents it to the infrastructure manager. This makes it possible to notify the infrastructure administrator.

FIG. 8 is a diagram showing an example of a screen of the resilience evaluation result displayed on the electronic terminal 14 in step S307. On the display screen 80 shown in FIG. 8, the resilience evaluation value of the entire management area of the infrastructure manager and the degree of resilience evaluation value of each area in which the management area is divided into a plurality of areas are visually displayed. .. Further, as detailed information of the area A selected on the screen, the resilience evaluation value of the area A and the size of each resilience of electric power, food, and residence, which are the breakdown information thereof, are displayed. The operation buttons 81 to 85 shown at the upper part of the display screen 80 are operation parts for switching the information to be displayed on the display screen 80. The infrastructure manager can make the resource accommodation support device 10 present desired information via the electronic terminal 14 by arbitrarily selecting the operation buttons 81 to 85 on the electronic terminal 14.

When the notification to the infrastructure manager is completed in step S307, the resilience evaluation unit 31 ends the resilience evaluation process shown in the flowchart of FIG.

<Resource flexibility matching process>
FIG. 9 is a flowchart of the resource accommodation matching process according to the embodiment of the present invention.

When the resource accommodation matching process is started, the matching processing unit 32 first performs the resource visualization process (step S501) by the resource visualization unit 51, and then performs the optimum matching process (step S502) by the optimum matching unit 52.

FIG. 10 is a flowchart showing details of the resource visualization process according to the embodiment of the present invention. When the resource visualization process is started in step S501 of FIG. 9, the resource visualization unit 51 first determines the bottleneck resource candidate determined by the resource public recruitment information creation unit 61 in the resilience evaluation unit 31, that is, the resilience improvement plan. And the resource provision desired information from the resource recipient (step S601). Here, for example, as the determination result of the bottleneck resource candidate, the bottleneck resource candidate determination result 115 shown in FIG. 13 described above is acquired, and as the resource provision desired information, the resource provision composed of the information shown in FIG. 14 is provided. Get the wish list 118.

In FIG. 14, in the resource provision request list 118, information regarding resources that each resource recipient desires to provide in the event of a disaster is registered for each item. For example, information such as a desired area for providing resources, a type of resource (EV, LP gas, etc.) desired to be provided, a quantity, a desired incentive form, and whether or not a resource is desired to be provided in normal times is listed and registered. The resource recipient may include the infrastructure administrator as described above. The desired incentive form is information indicating in what form the resource recipient wishes to pay for the resource provision. For example, it is possible to specify a form in which a fixed amount is paid as a resource reservation fee, or a performance-based form in which compensation is paid only when provided in the event of a disaster. Further, the request for provision in normal times is information that specifies whether or not the resource recipient wishes to provide the resource not only in the event of a disaster but also in normal times. For example, for PV (photovoltaic power generation) power connected to the same system as the resource recipient, the resource recipient wishes to receive a predetermined amount of power generation even in normal times. ..

Next, the resource visualization unit 51 serves as reference information for the resource provider based on the bottleneck resource candidate determination result 115 and the resource provision request list 118 acquired in step S601 by the resource public offering information creation unit 61. Create resource public offering information (step S602). Specifically, the resource public offering information creation unit 61 executes the process of step S602 as follows, for example.

In step S602, the resource visualization unit 51 first uses each candidate ID indicated by the bottleneck resource candidate determination result 115 as a key, and from the provided resource candidate 114 shown in FIG. 13, the resource that the resource recipient wishes to provide. Refer to the candidate information. Then, based on the referenced information, the required potential indicating how much each resource candidate is required for each area is calculated. In the calculation of the required potential, the magnitude of the resilience improvement degree for each candidate ID may be taken into consideration. For example, it is possible to consider that a product having a large degree of resilience improvement has a high probability of being required, and set a higher required potential of a resource candidate associated with the candidate ID. Further, the required potential may be calculated based on the information in the resource provision offer list 117, calculating the quantity and the average offer price in the current offer for each resource candidate.

The required potential for each area and resource calculated in this way is registered in the resource public offering information 116 as the resource public offering information in the configuration shown in FIG. 14, for example. In FIG. 14, the resource public offering information 116 is configured to include information indicating an area in which the resource provider is requested to provide the resource, the type of the resource, the required number potential, the quantity in the offer, and the average offer price. Has been done.

Next, the resource visualization unit 51 makes the resource public offering information creation unit 61 publish the resource public offering information created in step S602 at a predetermined timing, for example, on a Web page, to a business operator who desires to provide resources. Notify (step S603). This will openly solicit resource providers and encourage businesses considering resource provision to participate as resource providers.

By the processing of the resource visualization unit 51 as described above, the matching processing unit 32 is based on the resilience improvement plan drafted by the bottleneck evaluation unit 31b for each area and the resource provision request information from the resource recipient. It is possible to create public offering information for resources and notify resource providers using the public offering information.

FIG. 11 is a flowchart showing details of the optimum matching process according to the embodiment of the present invention. When the optimum matching process is started in step S502 of FIG. 9, the optimum matching unit 52 first determines the bottleneck resource candidate determination result obtained by the resilience evaluation unit 31, that is, the resilience improvement plan and the resource recipient. Acquire the resource provision desired information (step S701). Here, as in step S601 of FIG. 10, for example, the bottleneck resource candidate determination result 115 shown in FIG. 13 is acquired as the determination result of the bottleneck resource candidate, and the resource provision desired information is obtained in FIG. Acquire the resource provision request list 118 shown in.

Next, the optimum matching unit 52 acquires the resource provisionable information from the resource provider (step S702). Here, for example, as the resource provisionable information, the resource provision offer list 117 composed of the information shown in FIG. 14 is acquired.

In FIG. 14, in the resource provision offer list 117, information regarding resources that each resource provider offers to provide in the event of a disaster is registered for each item. For example, information such as an area where resources can be provided, types of resources that can be provided (EV, LP gas, etc.), quantity, incentive form, amount of provision, availability in normal times, etc. are listed and registered.

Next, the optimum matching unit 52 uses the matching combination provisional determination unit 62 to obtain resources based on the determination result of the bottleneck resource candidate or the resource provision desired information acquired in step S701 and the resource provision available information acquired in step S702. The combination of the resource provider and the resource recipient to which the above is transferred is tentatively determined (step S703).

Subsequently, the optimum matching unit 52 executes a matching result evaluation process for evaluating the combination tentatively determined in step S703 by the matching result evaluation unit 63 (steps S704 to S707). Here, for example, the resilience improvement degree evaluation (step S704) for evaluating how much the resilience of each area is improved by the combination of the tentatively determined resource provider and the resource recipient, and the cost incurred by providing the resource are evaluated. At least one of the resource cost evaluation (step S705) to be evaluated and the normal merit evaluation (step S706) to evaluate the merit generated by the resource provision in normal times is performed. Then, a comprehensive evaluation (step S707) for performing a comprehensive evaluation based on these evaluation results is performed, and the matching result evaluation process is completed.

Here, a specific example of executing the matching result evaluation process for the combination of the resource provider and the resource recipient that is tentatively determined based on the determination result (resilience improvement plan) of the bottleneck resource candidate will be described. In this case, for example, in step S703, for each candidate ID of the bottleneck resource candidate determination result 115, the provider ID is selected from the resource provision offer list 117 so that each resource associated with the candidate ID can be procured. Tentatively determine the combination of resource recipient and resource provider. Further, in step S705, the incurred cost for the combination tentatively determined in step S703 is calculated based on the information on the provision amount for each provider ID included in the resource provision offer list 117. By doing so, it is possible to compare the resilience improvement degree and the incurred cost for each combination of the resource recipient and the resource provider. In subsequent step S707, a comprehensive evaluation is performed on the combination of the resource recipient and the resource provider tentatively determined in step S703 based on the resilience improvement degree calculated in step S704 and the incurred cost calculated in step S705. For example, a combination having a high degree of resilience improvement and a low incurred cost can be adopted as the best improvement plan for the infrastructure manager corresponding to the combination.

In addition, a specific example of executing the matching result evaluation process for the combination of the resource provider and the resource recipient that is tentatively determined based on the resource provision desired information from the resource recipient will be described. In this case, for example, in step S703, for each desired person ID assigned to each resource recipient in the resource provision request list 118, the desired area, the desired provision resource, the quantity, and the desired incentive form shown in the resource provision request list 118. By searching the resource provision offer list 117 for information that matches at least one of the items such as, and referring to the provider ID assigned to the information, the resource recipient and the resource provider Tentatively determine the combination. In step S707, a comprehensive evaluation is performed on the combination of the resource recipient and the resource provider tentatively determined in step S703 based on the degree of matching for each of these items. For example, the combination in which the most items match between the resource provision request list 118 and the resource provision offer list 117 and the offer amount is low may be adopted as the best combination for the resource recipient corresponding to the combination. can.

After completing the above matching result evaluation process for the combination of the resource provider and the resource recipient tentatively determined in step S703, the optimum matching unit 52 determines whether or not the evaluation result has reached the predetermined end condition. (Step S708). If the predetermined end condition is not reached (step S708; No), the process returns to step S703, the matching combination provisional determination unit 62 is made to provisionally determine the combination again, and then the above processing is repeated. On the other hand, if the evaluation result for the tentatively determined combination of the resource provider and the resource recipient reaches the predetermined end condition (step S708; Yes), the matching result evaluation unit 63 is finally obtained in step S707. The resource matching result 119 as shown in FIG. 14 showing the combinations is recorded in the storage device 26, and the resource recipient, the resource provider, and the infrastructure manager are notified (step S709). Specifically, for example, the matching result evaluation unit 63 uses the communication unit 25 included in the resource accommodation support device 10 to provide information indicating the combination of the resource provider and the resource recipient registered in the resource matching result 119. It is transmitted to the electronic terminal 12 of the resource recipient, the electronic terminal 13 of the resource provider, and the electronic terminal 14 of the infrastructure administrator via the communication network 11, respectively. The electronic terminals 12, 13 and 14 display the received information on a screen and present it to the resource recipient, the resource provider, and the infrastructure manager, respectively. This makes it possible to notify the resource recipient, the resource provider, and the infrastructure administrator.

When the notification to the resource recipient, the resource provider, and the infrastructure manager is completed in step S709, the optimum matching unit 52 ends the optimum matching process shown in the flowchart of FIG.

As described above, the resource accommodation support device 10 formulates a resilience improvement plan by seeking a bottleneck resource candidate by the resilience evaluation unit 31, and also formulates a resilience improvement plan and a resource recipient by the matching processing unit 32. Compare the resource provision request information from the resource provider with the resource provision availability information from the resource provider. As a result, it is possible to determine the optimum matching between the resource recipient and the resource provider who give and receive the resource, considering the degree of resilience improvement and the influence on the economic merit. It should be noted that the above processing can be executed at a predetermined timing such as when searching for each user.

<Effect>
As described above, in the resource accommodation support device 10 of the present embodiment, the resilience for damage in the event of a disaster is evaluated for each area, and the lack of resources, which is the bottleneck of each business operator, is determined to make a resilience improvement plan. Make a plan. Furthermore, the resource provider and the resource recipient who give and receive the resource are matched based on the resource provideable information from the resource provider and the resource provision request information or the resilience improvement plan from the resource recipient. With such a configuration, it is possible to provide a resource accommodation support device and a resource accommodation support method that realize the optimum resource allocation in consideration of the difference in the provision form for each resource.

According to this embodiment, the following effects are exhibited.

(1) The resource accommodation support device 10 supports resource accommodation between a resource provider who provides resources to be used in the event of a disaster and a resource recipient who receives the resources. The resource accommodation support device 10 provides resource provision information (resource provision offer list 117) indicating a resource provision form that can be provided by the resource provider, and resource provision that indicates the resource provision form that the resource recipient desires to provide. A combination of an information acquisition unit (communication unit 25) that acquires desired information (resource provision request list 118), and a resource provider and a resource recipient who transfer resources based on resource provision available information and resource provision request information. A matching processing unit 32 for determining the above is provided. The resource-providable information and the resource-provided information include information indicating the resource type, and the matching processing unit 32 determines the combination based on the resource type. Since this is done, it is possible to provide the resource accommodation support device 10 that realizes the optimum resource allocation in consideration of the difference in the provision form for each resource, and the resource accommodation support method using this resource accommodation support device 10. can.

(2) The resource accommodation support device 10 includes a resilience evaluation unit 31 that evaluates resilience to damage in the event of a disaster for each predetermined area. The matching processing unit 32 determines the combination based on the resilience evaluation result (bottleneck resource candidate determination result 115) by the resilience evaluation unit 31 (steps S701 to S709). By doing so, it is possible to realize the optimum resource allocation in consideration of the difference in disaster durability and resilience in each area.

(3) The resilience evaluation unit 31 determines the degree of lifeline sufficiency at the time of a disaster based on at least one prediction result (available resources 107, available equipment 108) of resources available at the time of a disaster and infrastructure equipment. It is calculated for each area (steps S301 to S303), and resilience is evaluated based on this sufficiency (step S305). Since this is done, the resilience of each area can be appropriately evaluated in consideration of the degree of lifeline sufficiency predicted at the time of a disaster.

(4) The resilience evaluation unit 31 acquires the constraint information (resource-equipment constraint 109) of the infrastructure equipment necessary for the resource to function as a lifeline, and calculates the sufficiency of the lifeline based on this constraint information. (Step S303). In this way, considering the types of resources and infrastructure equipment that can be combined when providing lifelines and the types of lifelines realized by the combination, the degree of lifeline sufficiency predicted in the event of a disaster is appropriate. Can be calculated.

(5) Resilience Evaluation Department 31 provides residents in the event of a disaster based on information (resident attributes 105, inhabitants 106) that indicates the inhabitants' status, including at least one of the number of inhabitants, inhabitants' attributes, and inhabitants' dynamics in the area. The degree of support required is calculated for each area (step S304), and resilience is evaluated based on this degree of support required (step S305). In this way, the resilience of each area can be appropriately evaluated in consideration of the degree of support required by the residents in each area at the time of a disaster.

(6) The resilience evaluation unit 31 uses the bottleneck evaluation unit 31b to formulate a resilience improvement plan (bottleneck resource candidate determination result 115) indicating candidates for resources to be added in order to improve the resilience evaluation value for each area. (Steps S401 to S404). By doing so, it is possible to formulate a resource candidate that can appropriately improve the resilience of each area as a resilience improvement plan.

(7) The matching processing unit 32 can determine the combination based on at least one of the degree of improvement of the evaluation value by the resilience improvement plan, the cost of providing resources, and the merit in normal times (steps S701 to 1). S709). In this way, optimal resource allocation can be realized in consideration of the degree of improvement in resilience and the impact on economic merits of resource provision.

(8) The matching processing unit 32 creates resource public offering information (resource public offering information 116) based on the resilience improvement plan and resource provision request information (steps S601 to S602), and uses this public offering information to inform the resource provider. Is notified (step S603). Since this is done, it is possible to call on the resource provider to provide resources so that the optimum resource allocation can be realized.

(9) When the resource provisionable information is added, the matching processing unit 32 may notify the degree of improvement in resilience due to the addition. In this way, it is possible to reliably inform the resource provider and the infrastructure manager of the effect of improving resilience by providing the resource.

(10) Resource provision information and resource provision request information are at least one of resource type, resource provision area, resource quantity, incentive form for resource provision, and availability of resource in normal time. Contains information about each of the two items. The matching processing unit 32 can determine the combination based on the degree of matching for each item between the resource provision available information and the resource provision desired information (steps S703 and S707). In this way, the optimum combination can be determined in consideration of the wishes of the resource recipient.

The present invention is not limited to the above embodiment, and can be implemented by using any component within a range that does not deviate from the gist thereof. For example, the relationship between the infrastructure manager, the resource recipient, and the resource provider is not limited to one-to-one. Specifically, for example, resources provided by one resource provider are jointly owned by a plurality of resource recipients or infrastructure managers, and resources are allocated at the time of a disaster according to the allocation at the time of matching. It may be configured.

The embodiments and modifications described above are merely examples, and the present invention is not limited to these contents as long as the features of the invention are not impaired. Moreover, although various embodiments and modifications have been described above, the present invention is not limited to these contents. Other aspects conceivable within the scope of the technical idea of the present invention are also included within the scope of the present invention.

10 ... Resource accommodation support device, 11 ... Communication network, 12, 13, 14 ... Electronic terminal, 21 ... Calculation unit, 22 ... Memory, 23 ... Input unit, 24 ... Output unit, 25 ... Communication unit, 26 ... Storage device, 31 ... Resilience evaluation department, 32 ... Matching processing department

Claims (15)

A resource accommodation support device that supports the accommodation of the resources between the resource provider who provides the resources used in the event of a disaster and the resource recipient who receives the resources.
An information acquisition unit that acquires resource-providable information indicating the resource provision form that can be provided by the resource provider and resource provision desired information indicating the resource provision form that the resource recipient desires to provide. ,
A matching processing unit that determines a combination of the resource provider and the resource recipient who exchanges the resource based on the resource provisionable information and the resource provision desired information is provided.
The resource-providable information and the resource-provided information include information indicating the type of the resource, respectively.
The matching processing unit is a resource accommodation support device that determines the combination based on the type of the resource. In the resource accommodation support device according to claim 1,
Equipped with a resilience evaluation department that evaluates resilience for damage in the event of a disaster for each predetermined area
The matching processing unit is a resource accommodation support device that determines the combination based on the evaluation result of the resilience by the resilience evaluation unit. In the resource accommodation support device according to claim 2.
The resilience evaluation unit calculates the lifeline sufficiency for each area based on the prediction result of at least one of the resources and infrastructure equipment available at the time of a disaster, and based on the sufficiency. A resource accommodation support device for evaluating the resilience. In the resource accommodation support device according to claim 3.
The resilience evaluation unit is a resource accommodation support device that acquires constraint information of the infrastructure equipment necessary for the resource to function as a lifeline and calculates the sufficiency of the lifeline based on the constraint information. In the resource accommodation support device according to claim 2.
The resilience evaluation department calculates the degree of support required for residents in the event of a disaster for each area based on information indicating the inhabitant status including at least one of the number of inhabitants, inhabitant attributes, and inhabitant dynamics in the area. A resource accommodation support device that evaluates the resilience based on the degree of support required. In the resource accommodation support device according to claim 2.
The resilience evaluation unit is a resource accommodation support device that formulates a resilience improvement plan indicating a candidate for the resource to be added in order to improve the evaluation value of the resilience for each area. In the resource accommodation support device according to claim 6.
The matching processing unit is a resource accommodation support device that determines the combination based on at least one of the improvement degree of the evaluation value by the resilience improvement plan, the provision cost of the resource, and the merit in normal times. In the resource accommodation support device according to claim 7.
The matching processing unit is a resource accommodation support device that creates public offering information of the resource based on the resilience improvement plan and the resource provision desired information, and notifies the resource provider by using the public offering information. In the resource accommodation support device according to claim 2.
The matching processing unit is a resource accommodation support device that notifies the degree of improvement in resilience by adding the resource-providable information. In the resource accommodation support device according to claim 1,
The resource provisionable information and the resource provision desired information include the type of the resource, the provision area of the resource, the quantity of the resource, the incentive form for the provision of the resource, and the availability of the resource in normal times. , Each containing information about at least one of the items,
The matching processing unit is a resource accommodation support device that determines the combination based on the degree of matching for each item between the resource provision available information and the resource provision desired information. A resource accommodation support device that supports the accommodation of the resources between the resource provider who provides the resources used in the event of a disaster and the resource recipient who receives the resources.
An information acquisition unit that acquires resource-providable information indicating a form of provision of the resource that can be provided by the resource provider, and an information acquisition unit.
A bottleneck evaluation department that formulates resilience improvement plans for each predetermined area that indicate candidates for the resources that should be added in order to improve the resilience evaluation value for damage in the event of a disaster.
A resource accommodation support device including a matching processing unit that determines a combination of the resource provider and the resource recipient who give and receive the resource based on the resource provisionable information and the resilience improvement plan. It is a resource accommodation support device that supports the accommodation of resources used in the event of a disaster.
A resource accommodation support device equipped with a resilience evaluation unit that evaluates resilience for damage in the event of a disaster for each predetermined area. It is a resource accommodation support method that supports the accommodation of the resources between the resource provider who provides the resources used in the event of a disaster and the resource recipient who receives the resources.
The computer acquires the resource-providable information indicating the provision form of the resource that can be provided by the resource provider and the resource provision desired information indicating the provision form of the resource that the resource recipient desires to provide.
The computer determines the combination of the resource provider and the resource recipient to which the resource is transferred, based on the information indicating the type of the resource included in the resource provision available information and the resource provision desired information, respectively. Resource accommodation support method. It is a resource accommodation support method that supports the accommodation of the resources between the resource provider who provides the resources used in the event of a disaster and the resource recipient who receives the resources.
The computer acquires the resource-providable information indicating the provision form of the resource that can be provided by the resource provider, and obtains the resource-providable information.
Using the computer, a resilience improvement plan indicating candidates for the resources to be added in order to improve the resilience evaluation value for damage in the event of a disaster is drafted for each predetermined area.
A resource accommodation support method in which the computer determines a combination of the resource provider and the resource recipient who transfer the resource based on the resource provision information and the resilience improvement plan. It is a resource accommodation support method that supports the accommodation of resources used in the event of a disaster.
A resource accommodation support method that uses a computer to evaluate the resilience of damage in the event of a disaster for each predetermined area.

Images