JP2021105755A - Power transaction contract calculation device and power transaction contract calculation method - Google Patents

Power transaction contract calculation device and power transaction contract calculation method Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP2021105755A
JP2021105755A JP2019235576A JP2019235576A JP2021105755A JP 2021105755 A JP2021105755 A JP 2021105755A JP 2019235576 A JP2019235576 A JP 2019235576A JP 2019235576 A JP2019235576 A JP 2019235576A JP 2021105755 A JP2021105755 A JP 2021105755A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
contract
unit
electric power
power transaction
calculation
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
JP2019235576A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP7204635B2 (en
Inventor
綾子 松岡
Ayako Matsuoka
綾子 松岡
森 一之
Kazuyuki Mori
一之 森
健人 内藤
Kento Naito
健人 内藤
聖一 北村
Seiichi Kitamura
聖一 北村
俊幸 宮本
Toshiyuki Miyamoto
俊幸 宮本
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Mitsubishi Electric Corp
Osaka University NUC
Original Assignee
Mitsubishi Electric Corp
Osaka University NUC
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Mitsubishi Electric Corp, Osaka University NUC filed Critical Mitsubishi Electric Corp
Priority to JP2019235576A priority Critical patent/JP7204635B2/en
Publication of JP2021105755A publication Critical patent/JP2021105755A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP7204635B2 publication Critical patent/JP7204635B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y04INFORMATION OR COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES HAVING AN IMPACT ON OTHER TECHNOLOGY AREAS
    • Y04SSYSTEMS INTEGRATING TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO POWER NETWORK OPERATION, COMMUNICATION OR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES FOR IMPROVING THE ELECTRICAL POWER GENERATION, TRANSMISSION, DISTRIBUTION, MANAGEMENT OR USAGE, i.e. SMART GRIDS
    • Y04S50/00Market activities related to the operation of systems integrating technologies related to power network operation or related to communication or information technologies
    • Y04S50/10Energy trading, including energy flowing from end-user application to grid

Abstract

To provide a power transaction contract calculation device and a power transaction contract calculation method that can perform appropriate contract calculation.SOLUTION: In a power transaction contract calculation system 1, a power transaction contract calculation device 2 comprises an operation unit 24 that performs contract calculation of a power transaction in which block bidding is executed. The operation unit 24 comprises: a contract calculation execution unit 32 that evaluates the plurality of values including a unit cost for a demand adjustment power of one or more selling bids and a unit cost for the amount of activation adjustment electric power based on buying bid data and selling bid data, and performs contract determination for the one or more selling bids based on the plurality of values; and a contract result settlement unit 33 that settles a contract result based on a result of the contract determination.SELECTED DRAWING: Figure 2

Description

本開示は、電力取引約定計算装置及び電力取引約定計算方法に関する。 The present disclosure relates to a power transaction contract calculation device and a power transaction contract calculation method.

互いに連続する複数の基本時間帯にまたがる入札であるブロック入札を行うための従来の約定計算として様々な技術が提案されている。例えば、ブロック入札を基本時間帯の単位に分割してマッチングを行い、ブロック入札のうち一部の基本時間帯でマッチングできなかった場合には条件を変えて再度マッチングを行うという組み合わせ最適化計算手法が提案されている(例えば特許文献1)。 Various techniques have been proposed as conventional contract calculations for making block bids, which are bids that span a plurality of consecutive basic time zones. For example, a combination optimization calculation method in which block bids are divided into units of basic time zones and matching is performed, and if matching cannot be performed in some of the basic time zones of block bids, matching is performed again by changing the conditions. Has been proposed (for example, Patent Document 1).

また、リアルタイム方式での売り入札と買い入札とのマッチングに失敗したブロック入札に対して、ネゴシエーション方式の取引へ移行する、または再度マッチングを行うことにより、約定機会を増やす手法が提案されている(例えば特許文献2)。 In addition, for block bids that have failed to match sell bids and buy bids in the real-time method, a method has been proposed to increase contract opportunities by shifting to negotiation-type transactions or by matching again (). For example, Patent Document 2).

特開2004−229363号公報Japanese Unexamined Patent Publication No. 2004-229363 特開2005−025333号公報Japanese Unexamined Patent Publication No. 2005-0253333

需給調整市場においては、需給調整力の希望単価(ΔkW単価)、及び、発動調整電力量の希望単価(kWh単価)などの複数の価値を提示して売り入札が行われる。そして、買い入札者は売り入札者に、需給調整力の調達に対する費用(ΔkW費用)と発動調整電力量の運用に対する費用(kWh費用)との合計を支払う。しかし、複数の価値を考慮した約定計算手法は確立されていない。 In the supply and demand adjustment market, a bid is made by presenting a plurality of values such as a desired unit price of supply and demand adjustment power (ΔkW unit price) and a desired unit price of activation adjustment electric energy (kWh unit price). Then, the buy bidder pays the sell bidder the total of the cost for procuring the supply and demand adjustment power (ΔkW cost) and the cost for operating the activation adjustment electric energy (kWh cost). However, a contract calculation method that considers multiple values has not been established.

また、需給調整市場ではブロック入札が可能になる見込みである。買い入札者が支払う費用を抑えるためには、各時刻の必要量を確保しながら費用が小さくなるように複数の売り入札を組み合わせて約定する必要がある。しかし、上記のようなマッチングを行う従来の約定計算手法では、計算時間が長くなる場合や、最適解が得られない場合があるなどの問題が生じると考えられる。 In addition, block bidding is expected to be possible in the supply and demand adjustment market. In order to reduce the cost paid by the buy bidder, it is necessary to execute a combination of multiple sell bids so that the cost is reduced while securing the required amount at each time. However, in the conventional contract calculation method for matching as described above, it is considered that problems such as a long calculation time and a case where an optimum solution cannot be obtained may occur.

そこで、本開示は、上記のような問題点を踏まえてなされたものであり、適切な約定計算を行うことが可能な技術を提供することを目的とする。 Therefore, the present disclosure has been made in consideration of the above-mentioned problems, and an object of the present disclosure is to provide a technique capable of performing an appropriate contract calculation.

本開示に係る電力取引約定計算装置は、互いに連続する複数の基本時間帯にまたがる売り入札であるブロック入札が実施される電力取引の約定計算を行う演算部を備え、前記演算部は、買い入札データ及び売り入札データを集約する入札データ集約部と、前記入札データ集約部で集約された前記買い入札データ及び前記売り入札データに基づいて一以上の売り入札の需給調整力の単価及び発動調整電力量の単価を含む複数の価値を評価し、前記複数の価値に基づいて一以上の売り入札の約定判定を行う約定計算実行部と、前記約定計算実行部で行われた前記約定判定の結果に基づいて約定結果を確定する約定結果確定部とを備える。 The electric power transaction contract calculation device according to the present disclosure includes a calculation unit that performs a contract calculation of a power transaction in which a block bid, which is a sell bid over a plurality of consecutive basic time zones, is carried out, and the calculation unit is a buy bid. A bid data aggregation unit that aggregates data and sell bid data, and a unit price and activation adjustment power for supply and demand adjustment of one or more sell bids based on the buy bid data and the sell bid data aggregated by the bid data aggregation unit. A contract calculation execution unit that evaluates a plurality of values including a unit price of a quantity and determines a contract for one or more sell bids based on the plurality of values, and a result of the contract judgment performed by the contract calculation execution unit. It is provided with a contract result determination unit that determines the contract result based on the contract result.

本開示によれば、ブロック入札が実施される電力取引において、一以上の売り入札の複数の価値を評価し、当該価値に基づいて約定判定を行い、約定判定の結果に基づいて約定結果を確定する。このような構成によれば、適切な約定計算を行うことができる。 According to the present disclosure, in an electric power transaction in which a block bid is carried out, a plurality of values of one or more sell bids are evaluated, a contract judgment is made based on the values, and a contract result is determined based on the result of the contract judgment. do. According to such a configuration, an appropriate contract calculation can be performed.

需給調整市場における、送配電事業者の買い入札データ及び調整力供出事業者の売り入札データの例を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the example of the buy bid data of a power transmission and distribution business operator and the sell bid data of a power supply provider in a supply and demand adjustment market. 実施の形態1に係る電力取引約定計算システムの構成の一例を示すブロック図である。It is a block diagram which shows an example of the structure of the electric power transaction contract calculation system which concerns on Embodiment 1. FIG. 実施の形態1に係る電力取引約定計算システムの動作を示すフローチャートである。It is a flowchart which shows the operation of the electric power transaction contract calculation system which concerns on Embodiment 1. 実施の形態1に係る電力取引約定計算システムの動作を説明するための図である。It is a figure for demonstrating operation of the electric power transaction contract calculation system which concerns on Embodiment 1. FIG. 実施の形態4に係る電力取引約定計算システムの動作を示すフローチャートである。It is a flowchart which shows the operation of the electric power transaction contract calculation system which concerns on Embodiment 4. 実施の形態5に係る電力取引約定計算システムの構成の一例を示すブロック図である。It is a block diagram which shows an example of the structure of the electric power transaction contract calculation system which concerns on Embodiment 5.

以下に、実施の形態に係る電力取引約定計算装置を図面に基づいて詳細に説明する。なお、以下の実施の形態により本開示が限定されるものではない。 The electric power transaction contract calculation device according to the embodiment will be described in detail below with reference to the drawings. The present disclosure is not limited to the following embodiments.

<実施の形態1>
太陽光発電や風力発電などの再生可能エネルギーの増加に伴い、将来的に需給調整力が不足することが懸念されている。現在の日本では、送配電事業者は公募で需給調整力の調達を行っているが、需給調整力の確保を効率化することを目的に2021年に需給調整市場が開設される予定である。需給調整市場は電力の安定供給のために需給調整力を取引する市場であり、送配電事業者が必要となる需給調整力の量[ΔkW]を買い入札し、それに対して需給調整力を供出できる事業者(調整力供出事業者)が、需給調整力の供出可能量[ΔkW]、需給調整力の希望単価(ΔkW単価)[円/ΔkW]、実際に発動された需給調整力の量(発動調整電力量)[kWh]の希望単価(kWh単価)[円/kWh]を提示して売り入札する市場になる見込みである。なお、調整力供出事業者は、例えば、発電事業者、VPP(Virtual Power Plant)事業者、小売電気事業者などである。
<Embodiment 1>
With the increase in renewable energy such as solar power generation and wind power generation, there is concern that the supply and demand adjustment capacity will be insufficient in the future. In Japan today, power transmission and distribution companies are procuring supply and demand adjustment capabilities through open recruitment, but a supply and demand adjustment market is scheduled to open in 2021 with the aim of streamlining the securing of supply and demand adjustment capabilities. The supply and demand adjustment market is a market that trades supply and demand adjustment power for the stable supply of electric power, and the power transmission and distribution company buys and bids the amount of supply and demand adjustment power [ΔkW] required, and provides the supply and demand adjustment power to it. The amount of supply and demand adjustment power that can be provided [ΔkW], the desired unit price of supply and demand adjustment power (ΔkW unit price) [yen / ΔkW], and the amount of supply and demand adjustment power actually activated by the business operator (adjustment power supply business operator) It is expected to become a market for selling and bidding by presenting the desired unit price (kWh unit price) [yen / kWh] of the activation adjustment electric energy) [kWh]. The coordinating power provider is, for example, a power generation company, a VPP (Virtual Power Plant) company, a retail electric power company, or the like.

送配電事業者は、調整力供出事業者に対して、需給調整力[ΔkW]の調達に対する費用(ΔkW費用)と発動調整電力量[kWh]の運用に対する費用(kWh費用)との合計を、需給調整市場を介して支払うこととなる。調整力供出事業者が売り入札する需給調整力の供出可能量の合計が、送配電事業者が買い入札する需給調整力の必要量よりも大きい場合、送配電事業者は利益を高めるために、何らかの約定ロジックによりなるべく支払いが少なくなるように落札者を決める必要がある。 The power transmission and distribution business operator tells the adjustment power provider the total of the cost for procuring the supply and demand adjustment power [ΔkW] (ΔkW cost) and the cost for operating the activation adjustment power amount [kWh] (kWh cost). It will be paid through the supply and demand adjustment market. If the total amount of supply and demand adjustment power that the power transmission and distribution company sells and bids is greater than the required amount of supply and demand adjustment power that the power transmission and distribution business operator buys and bids, the power transmission and distribution business operator will increase profits. It is necessary to decide the winning bidder so that the payment will be as small as possible by some contract logic.

送配電事業者の支払う費用を抑えるためには、ΔkW単価及びkWh単価といった異なる複数の価値を考慮して約定計算を行う必要があるが、約定を行う時点では発動調整電力量[kWh]の大きさは不明であるため、kWh費用は決まらない。そこで本実施の形態1では、発動調整電力量の大きさについては、何らかの仮定を置くか、過去の発動調整電力量などに基づく予測を行うなどにより設定することとする。 In order to reduce the cost paid by the power transmission and distribution business operator, it is necessary to perform the contract calculation in consideration of multiple different values such as the ΔkW unit price and the kWh unit price. Since it is unknown, the kWh cost is not fixed. Therefore, in the first embodiment, the magnitude of the activation adjustment power amount is set by making some assumptions or making a prediction based on the past activation adjustment power amount and the like.

図1は、需給調整市場における、送配電事業者の買い入札データ及び調整力供出事業者の売り入札データの例を示す図である。図1のドットハッチングが付されたブロック入札では、供出可能量または希望売単価を基本時間帯の単位(図1では30分)に分割して基本時間帯ごとに取引することはできない。例えば図1では、第1売り入札者は、1:00から2:00までの1時間の供出可能量を、1:00から1:30までの基本時間帯と、1:30から2:00までの基本時間帯とに分けて取引できないブロック入札で提示していることが示されている。なお、以下の説明では、基本時間帯を時刻または時間帯と記すこともある。 FIG. 1 is a diagram showing an example of buy bid data of a power transmission and distribution business operator and sell bid data of a power transmission and distribution business operator in a supply and demand adjustment market. In the block bidding with dot hatching in FIG. 1, it is not possible to divide the available amount or the desired selling unit price into units of the basic time zone (30 minutes in FIG. 1) and trade for each basic time zone. For example, in FIG. 1, the first selling bidder sets the amount that can be offered for one hour from 1:00 to 2:00 in the basic time zone from 1:00 to 1:30 and from 1:30 to 2:00. It is shown that it is presented in a block bid that cannot be traded separately from the basic time zone up to. In the following description, the basic time zone may be referred to as a time or a time zone.

需給調整力の必要量を確保しながら送配電事業者の支払う費用を抑えるためには、組み合わせ最適化計算を行う必要がある。しかし、ブロック入札が含まれ、かつ、入札者が多くなって組み合わせが多数になると、上記の異なる複数の価値を考慮する難しさに加え、最適化計算が複雑となり約定計算に長い時間を要したり最適解が得られなかったりする可能性がある。そこで、本実施の形態1に係る電力取引約定計算装置は、ブロック入札を基本時間帯の単位によって分解せずにΔkW単価及びkWh単価といった異なる複数の価値を評価し、当該複数の価値に基づいて約定判定を行う、という発見的手法を用いる。このような構成によれば、約定判定の結果に基づく約定ロジックによって需給調整市場における取引を円滑に成立させることが可能となる。なお、以下では発見的手法として、ブロック入札を基本時間帯の単位によって分解せずにΔkW単価及びkWh単価といった異なる複数の価値を評価して、準最適解(最適に近い暫定解)が高速に得られるGreedy Heuristicを用いる例について説明するが、これに限ったものではない。 In order to reduce the cost paid by the power transmission and distribution business operator while securing the required amount of supply and demand adjustment ability, it is necessary to perform the combination optimization calculation. However, when block bidding is included and the number of bidders increases and the number of combinations increases, in addition to the difficulty of considering multiple different values mentioned above, the optimization calculation becomes complicated and the execution calculation takes a long time. Or the optimum solution may not be obtained. Therefore, the electric power transaction contract calculation device according to the first embodiment evaluates a plurality of different values such as a ΔkW unit price and a kWh unit price without decomposing the block bid by the unit of the basic time zone, and based on the plurality of values. A heuristic method of making a contract judgment is used. According to such a configuration, it is possible to smoothly close a transaction in the supply and demand adjustment market by the contract logic based on the result of the contract determination. In the following, as a heuristic method, multiple different values such as ΔkW unit price and kWh unit price are evaluated without decomposing the block bid by the unit of the basic time zone, and the quasi-optimal solution (provisional solution close to the optimum) is accelerated. An example using the obtained Greedy Heuristic will be described, but the present invention is not limited to this.

図2に本実施の形態1に係る電力取引約定計算システムの構成の一例を示す。図2のように、電力取引約定計算システム1は、電力取引約定計算装置2と、通信ネットワーク3と、複数台の買い入札者端末装置4と、複数台の売り入札者端末装置5とを備えている。 FIG. 2 shows an example of the configuration of the electric power transaction contract calculation system according to the first embodiment. As shown in FIG. 2, the electric power transaction contract calculation system 1 includes an electric power transaction contract calculation device 2, a communication network 3, a plurality of buy bidder terminal devices 4, and a plurality of sell bidder terminal devices 5. ing.

買い入札者端末装置4は、需給調整市場の買い入札者である送配電事業者が自社の事務所等に備えられるパソコン等の情報端末装置である。売り入札者端末装置5は、需給調整市場の売り入札者である調整力供出事業者が自社の事務所等に備えられるパソコン等の情報端末装置である。買い入札者端末装置4及び売り入札者端末装置5は、光回線やLAN(Local Area Network)等の通信ネットワーク3を介して電力取引約定計算装置2と相互にデータ通信を行うことができる。 The buying bidder terminal device 4 is an information terminal device such as a personal computer provided in the office or the like of a power transmission and distribution business operator who is a buying bidder in the supply and demand adjustment market. The selling bidder terminal device 5 is an information terminal device such as a personal computer provided in the office or the like of the adjusting power provider who is a selling bidder in the supply and demand adjustment market. The buy bidder terminal device 4 and the sell bidder terminal device 5 can perform data communication with the power transaction contract calculation device 2 via a communication network 3 such as an optical line or a LAN (Local Area Network).

電力取引約定計算装置2は、インターフェース部21と、記憶部22と、通信部23と、演算部24とを備える装置であり、需給調整市場を運営する送配電事業者の代表者などの事務所等に備えられるサーバ等の情報端末装置である。通信部23は、通信ネットワーク3を介して、買い入札者端末装置4及び売り入札者端末装置5と相互にデータ通信を行うことができ、スイッチングハブやルーター、パソコンやサーバに備わる通信機能等で構成される。 The electric power transaction contract calculation device 2 is a device including an interface unit 21, a storage unit 22, a communication unit 23, and a calculation unit 24, and is an office such as a representative of a power transmission and distribution business operator that operates a supply and demand adjustment market. It is an information terminal device such as a server provided in the above. The communication unit 23 can perform data communication with the buy bidder terminal device 4 and the sell bidder terminal device 5 via the communication network 3, and is provided with a communication function provided in a switching hub, a router, a personal computer, or a server. It is composed.

インターフェース部21は、入力部21aと出力部21bとを備えている。入力部21aは、需給調整市場の運営者が取引に必要となるデータをキーボードやマウスを使って入力可能に構成されている。出力部21bは、取引における買い入札に関する情報、売り入札に関する情報、落札に関する情報をディスプレイ装置などに出力可能に構成されている。 The interface unit 21 includes an input unit 21a and an output unit 21b. The input unit 21a is configured so that the operator of the supply and demand adjustment market can input data necessary for transactions by using a keyboard or a mouse. The output unit 21b is configured to be able to output information on a buy bid, information on a sell bid, and information on a successful bid in a transaction to a display device or the like.

記憶部22は、通信部23が通信ネットワーク3を介して取得した買い入札に関する情報(買い入札データ)、及び、売り入札に関する情報(売り入札データ)、並びに、演算部24で求められた落札に関する情報(約定結果データ)などを記憶するハードディスク等の記憶装置で構成される。なお、買い入札データは、例えば、需給調整力の必要量[ΔkW]、及び、需給調整力の必要時間帯を含む。売り入札データは、例えば、需給調整力の供出可能量[ΔkW]、需給調整力の供出可能時間帯(供出可能時刻)、需給調整力の希望売り単価[円/ΔkW]、及び、発動調整電力量の希望売り単価[円/kWh]を含む。約定結果データは、例えば、落札した売り入札の組み合わせ、需給調整力の約定量[ΔkW]、及び、約定価格[円/ΔkW、円/kWh]を含む。 The storage unit 22 relates to information on buy bids (buy bid data) acquired by the communication unit 23 via the communication network 3, information on sell bids (sell bid data), and successful bids obtained by the calculation unit 24. It is composed of a storage device such as a hard disk that stores information (contract result data) and the like. The buy bid data includes, for example, the required amount of supply and demand adjustment power [ΔkW] and the required time zone of supply and demand adjustment power. The sell bid data includes, for example, the supplyable amount of supply and demand adjustment power [ΔkW], the supply and demand adjustment power available time zone (delivery time), the desired selling unit price of supply and demand adjustment power [yen / ΔkW], and the activation adjustment power. Includes the desired selling unit price [yen / kWh] for the quantity. The contract result data includes, for example, a combination of successful bids, a quantitative amount of supply and demand adjustment [ΔkW], and a contract price [yen / ΔkW, yen / kWh].

演算部24は、互いに連続する複数の基本時間帯にまたがる売り入札であるブロック入札が実施される電力取引の約定計算を行う。演算部24は、入札データ集約部31と、約定計算実行部32と、約定結果確定部33とを備えており、CPU(Central Processing Unit)やメモリ等からなる演算処理装置で構成される。 The calculation unit 24 performs a contract calculation of an electric power transaction in which a block bid, which is a sell bid over a plurality of consecutive basic time zones, is carried out. The calculation unit 24 includes a bid data aggregation unit 31, a contract calculation execution unit 32, and a contract result determination unit 33, and is composed of a calculation processing device including a CPU (Central Processing Unit), a memory, and the like.

入札データ集約部31は、通信部23などを経由して得られた送配電事業者からの買い入札データと、調整力供出事業者からの売り入札データとを集約する。 The bid data aggregation unit 31 aggregates the buy bid data from the power transmission and distribution business operator obtained via the communication unit 23 and the like, and the sell bid data from the adjustment power provider.

約定計算実行部32は、価値評価部32aと、約定判定部32bとを備える。価値評価部32aは、入札データ集約部31で集約された各売り入札についてΔkW単価及びkWh単価の両方を含む複数の価値を評価する。約定判定部32bは、価値評価部32aで評価された複数の価値に基づいて、各売り入札の約定判定を行う。 The contract calculation execution unit 32 includes a value evaluation unit 32a and a contract determination unit 32b. The value evaluation unit 32a evaluates a plurality of values including both the ΔkW unit price and the kWh unit price for each sell bid aggregated by the bid data aggregation unit 31. The contract determination unit 32b makes a contract determination for each sell bid based on a plurality of values evaluated by the value evaluation unit 32a.

このため、約定計算実行部32は、入札データ集約部31で集約された買い入札データ及び売り入札データに基づいて一以上の売り入札の需給調整力のΔkW単価及び発動調整電力量のkWh単価を含む複数の価値を評価し、当該複数の価値に基づいて一以上の売り入札の約定判定を行う。本実施の形態1では、約定計算実行部32は、Greedy Heuristicなどの発見的手法を用いて売り入札データの中から落札者(複数の売り入札の組み合わせ)を選定する演算処理部である。これにより、入札データ集約部31で集約された買い入札データの需給調整力の必要量を確保しながら、ΔkW費用とkWh費用との合計を小さくすることが可能となる。 Therefore, the contract calculation execution unit 32 sets the ΔkW unit price of the supply / demand adjustment ability of one or more sell bids and the kWh unit price of the activation adjustment electric energy based on the buy bid data and the sell bid data aggregated by the bid data aggregation unit 31. Evaluate a plurality of values including, and make a contract judgment of one or more sell bids based on the plurality of values. In the first embodiment, the contract calculation execution unit 32 is an arithmetic processing unit that selects a successful bidder (combination of a plurality of sell bids) from the sell bid data by using a heuristic method such as Greedy Heuristic. As a result, it is possible to reduce the total of the ΔkW cost and the kWh cost while securing the required amount of the supply and demand adjustment ability of the buy bid data aggregated by the bid data aggregation unit 31.

約定結果確定部33は、約定計算実行部32で行われた約定判定の結果に基づいて約定結果を確定する。本実施の形態1では、約定結果確定部33は、約定計算実行部32による計算結果を約定結果として確定する演算処理部である。約定結果確定部33は、確定した約定結果を約定結果データとして記憶部22に保存するとともに、通信部23及び通信ネットワーク3を介して買い入札者端末装置4及び売り入札者端末装置5に約定結果データを送信する。 The contract result determination unit 33 determines the contract result based on the result of the contract determination performed by the contract calculation execution unit 32. In the first embodiment, the contract result determination unit 33 is an arithmetic processing unit that determines the calculation result by the contract calculation execution unit 32 as the contract result. The contract result confirmation unit 33 stores the confirmed contract result as contract result data in the storage unit 22, and also stores the contract result in the buy bidder terminal device 4 and the sell bidder terminal device 5 via the communication unit 23 and the communication network 3. Send data.

<動作>
図3は、本実施の形態1に係る電力取引約定計算システム1の動作を示すフローチャートである。次に、この動作について、図3を参照して説明する。
<Operation>
FIG. 3 is a flowchart showing the operation of the electric power transaction contract calculation system 1 according to the first embodiment. Next, this operation will be described with reference to FIG.

需給調整市場の商品毎(需給調整力が発動されてからの応動時間と、需給調整力の供出の継続時間とに区別して商品が用意されている)、及びその受け渡し日時毎に、所定の日時になると取引が開始される。取引が開始されると、まずステップS1にて、送配電事業者は、買い入札者端末装置4を使って必要となる需給調整力の量を買い入札し、調整力供出事業者は、売り入札者端末装置5を使って需給調整力の供出可能量、希望ΔkW単価、希望kWh単価を売り入札する。これにより、買い入札及び売り入札が受け付けられる。 For each product in the supply and demand adjustment market (products are prepared separately for the response time after the supply and demand adjustment power is activated and the duration of supply of the supply and demand adjustment power), and for each delivery date and time, a predetermined date and time When it becomes, the transaction is started. When the transaction is started, first, in step S1, the power transmission and distribution business operator buys and bids the amount of supply and demand adjustment power required by using the buy bidder terminal device 4, and the power transmission and distribution business operator bids for sell. The person terminal device 5 is used to sell and bid the supplyable amount of supply and demand adjustment power, the desired ΔkW unit price, and the desired kWh unit price. As a result, buy bids and sell bids are accepted.

ステップS2にて、需給調整力の商品毎、及び、その受け渡し日時毎に、所定の日時の取引が終了すると、入札データ集約部31は、各基本時間帯の買い入札データと売り入札データとを記憶部22に保存して集約する。 In step S2, when the transaction on the predetermined date and time is completed for each product having the supply and demand adjustment ability and for each delivery date and time, the bid data aggregation unit 31 collects the buy bid data and the sell bid data in each basic time zone. It is stored in the storage unit 22 and aggregated.

ステップS3からステップS6において、約定計算実行部32は、Greedy Heuristicを用いて、各基本時間帯の必要量を確保しながら買い入札者が支払う費用ができるだけ小さくなるように落札者を選定する。なお、ここでいう落札者は、複数の売り入札の組み合わせに相当する。以下、ステップS3からステップS6について詳細に説明する。 In steps S3 to S6, the contract calculation execution unit 32 uses Greedy Heuristic to select the winning bidder so that the cost paid by the buying bidder is as small as possible while securing the required amount for each basic time zone. The winning bidder here corresponds to a combination of a plurality of selling bids. Hereinafter, steps S3 to S6 will be described in detail.

ステップS3にて、価値評価部32aは、各売り入札の価値をΔkW単価及びkWh単価の両方を考慮して評価する。このとき、価値評価部32aは、ブロック入札を基本時間帯の単位によって分解せずに複数の価値を評価する。 In step S3, the value evaluation unit 32a evaluates the value of each sell bid in consideration of both the ΔkW unit price and the kWh unit price. At this time, the value evaluation unit 32a evaluates a plurality of values without decomposing the block bid by the unit of the basic time zone.

ステップS4にて、約定判定部32bは、ステップS3で評価された複数の価値に基づいて各売り入札の約定判定を行う。 In step S4, the contract determination unit 32b makes a contract determination for each sell bid based on the plurality of values evaluated in step S3.

ステップS5にて、約定計算実行部32は、ステップ3で約定すると判定された需給調整力の量を差し引くことで買い入札の残り必要量を更新する。 In step S5, the execution calculation execution unit 32 updates the remaining required amount of the buy bid by subtracting the amount of the supply and demand adjusting power determined to be executed in step 3.

ステップS6にて、約定計算実行部32は、全ての時刻(基本時間帯)において買い入札の必要量が確保できたか否か(残り必要量が0以下になったか否か)を判定する。まだ確保できていない時刻があると判定された場合、処理がステップS3に戻る。これにより、全ての時刻において買い入札の必要量が確保できるまでステップS3からステップS6までの動作が繰り返し行われる。全ての時刻において買い入札の必要量が確保できたと判定された場合、処理がステップS7に進む。 In step S6, the contract calculation execution unit 32 determines whether or not the required amount of the buy bid can be secured at all times (basic time zone) (whether or not the remaining required amount becomes 0 or less). If it is determined that there is a time that has not been secured yet, the process returns to step S3. As a result, the operations from step S3 to step S6 are repeated until the required amount of the buy bid can be secured at all times. If it is determined that the required amount of the buy bid has been secured at all times, the process proceeds to step S7.

ステップS7にて、約定結果確定部33は、ここまでの約定判定の結果を約定結果として確定する。 In step S7, the contract result determination unit 33 determines the result of the contract determination up to this point as the contract result.

ステップS8にて、約定結果確定部33は、確定した約定結果データ(時刻ごとの約定量、落札した売り入札データ)を記憶部22に保存する。また、約定結果確定部33は、通信部23及び通信ネットワーク3を介して買い入札者端末装置4及び売り入札者端末装置5に約定結果データを送信する。ただし、売り入札者端末装置5に送信される約定結果データでは、他の落札者の情報は除かれる。 In step S8, the contract result confirmation unit 33 stores the confirmed contract result data (reduction amount for each time, successful bid data) in the storage unit 22. Further, the contract result determination unit 33 transmits the contract result data to the buy bidder terminal device 4 and the sell bidder terminal device 5 via the communication unit 23 and the communication network 3. However, the information of other successful bidders is excluded from the contract result data transmitted to the selling bidder terminal device 5.

次に、ステップS3からステップS6で用いられるGreedy Heuristicについて説明する。Greedy Heuristicは、組み合わせ最適化問題の一つである多重集合被覆問題(Weighted Multiple Set Covering Problem)において準最適解を高速に得ることができる手法であり、アルゴリズムは以下で表される。 Next, the Greedy Heuristic used in steps S3 to S6 will be described. Greedy Heuristic is a method that can obtain a quasi-optimal solution at high speed in the Weighted Multiple Set Covering Problem, which is one of the combination optimization problems, and the algorithm is expressed below.

ここで、各変数及び定数を次のように定義する。
M:集合{1,2,・・・,m}
:Mに対するn個の部分集合のうちのj番目(次式(1)が成り立つ)
α:正定数(Mの重み)
:n項組みの変数(y ,…,y
t:n項組みの正定数(t,…,t
Here, each variable and constant are defined as follows.
M: Set {1, 2, ..., m}
M j : The jth of n subsets for M (the following equation (1) holds)
α j : Positive constant (weight of M j)
y * : n-term set of variables (y * 1 , ..., y * n )
t: Positive constant of n-term set (t 1 , ..., t n )

Figure 2021105755
Figure 2021105755

<ステップ0’>
約定計算実行部32は、全てのj(1,…,n)についてy =0と設定する。
<Step 0'>
The contract calculation execution unit 32 sets y * j = 0 for all j (1, ..., n).

<ステップ1’>
全てのiについてt=0である場合、約定計算実行部32は、そのときのyを解と判定する。それ以外の場合、約定計算実行部32は、次式(2)及び次式(3)のように設定する。なお、次式(2)のargmaxは、その関数の括弧内の値が最大となるインデックスjを求める関数である。
<Step 1'>
If it is t i = 0 for all i, contract calculation execution unit 32 determines that the solution of y * at that time. In other cases, the contract calculation execution unit 32 sets as in the following equation (2) and the following equation (3). Note that argmax in the following equation (2) is a function for finding the index j that maximizes the value in parentheses of the function.

Figure 2021105755
Figure 2021105755

Figure 2021105755
Figure 2021105755

<ステップ2’>
約定計算実行部32は、y =y +tと設定する。約定計算実行部32は、i∈Mとなる全てのiについて、t=t−tと設定する。約定計算実行部32は、t=0となるiがある場合、全てのjについてMからiを除く。ステップ2’の後、処理がステップ1’に戻る。
<Step 2'>
The contract calculation execution unit 32 sets y * k = y * k + t * . Commitments calculation execution unit 32, for all i, the I∈M k, is set as t i = t i -t *. Commitments calculation execution unit 32, when there is i to be t i = 0, except for i from M j for all j. After step 2', the process returns to step 1'.

本実施の形態1に係る約定計算実行部32は、上記ステップ0’〜2’のアルゴリズムを、以下のステップ0〜2のように、ブロック入札を含む需給調整市場についてΔkW単価及びkWh単価の両方を考慮した約定計算に応用する。つまり、約定計算実行部32は、複数の価値の評価及び約定判定を多重集合被覆問題として扱う。 The contract calculation execution unit 32 according to the first embodiment applies the algorithm of steps 0'to 2'to both the ΔkW unit price and the kWh unit price for the supply and demand adjustment market including the block bid, as in steps 0 to 2 below. It is applied to the contract calculation considering. That is, the contract calculation execution unit 32 treats a plurality of value evaluations and contract determinations as a multiple set cover problem.

ここで、各変数及び定数を次のように定義する。
T:集合{1,2,・・・,m}(取引対象時刻)
:Tに対するn個の部分集合のうちのj番目(売り入札jの供出可能時間帯(供出可能時刻)であり、次式(4)が成り立つ)
:正定数(売り入札jのΔkW単価[円/ΔkW])
:正定数(売り入札jのkWh単価[円/kWh])
:m項組みの非負定数(cj,1,…,cj,m)(売り入札jの時刻1〜mにおける供出可能量[ΔkW])
d:m項組みの非負変数(d,…,d)(買い入札の時刻1〜mにおける必要量[ΔkW])
d’:m項組みの非負定数(d’,…,d’)(買い入札の時刻1〜mにおける残り必要量[ΔkW])
D:m項組みの非負変数(D,…,D)(時刻1〜mにおける発動調整電力量[kWh]の予測値)
:n項組みの二値変数(x ,…,x )(売り入札1〜nの選択有無)
L:m項組みの非負変数(L,…,L)(時刻1〜mの約定した需給調整力[ΔkW])
Here, each variable and constant are defined as follows.
T: Set {1, 2, ..., m} (transaction target time)
T j : The jth of n subsets for T (the available time zone for the sell bid j (the available time), and the following equation (4) holds)
p j : Positive constant (ΔkW unit price of selling bid j [yen / ΔkW])
q j : Positive constant (kWh unit price of sell bid j [yen / kWh])
c j : Non-negative constant of m term set (c j, 1 , ..., c j, m ) (Amount available for sale at time 1 to m of sell bid j [ΔkW])
d: Non-negative variable of m term set (d 1, ..., dm) (required amount [ΔkW] at time 1 to m of buy bid))
d': Non-negative constant of m term set (d'1, ..., d' m ) (remaining required amount at buy bid time 1 to m [ΔkW])
D: Non-negative variable of m term set (D 1, ..., D m ) (predicted value of activation adjustment electric energy [kWh] at time 1 to m)
x * : N-term set of binary variables (x * 1 , ..., x * n ) (whether or not sell bids 1 to n are selected)
L: Non-negative variable of m term set (L 1, ..., L m ) (contracted supply and demand adjustment force [ΔkW] at time 1 to m)

Figure 2021105755
Figure 2021105755

<ステップ0>
約定計算実行部32は、全てのj(1,…,n)について、x =0と設定する。約定計算実行部32は、全てのt(1,…,m)について、L=0、d’=dと設定する。約定計算実行部32は、全てのj(1,…,n)、全てのt(1,…,m)について、T’j,t=Tj,tと設定する。
<Step 0>
The contract calculation execution unit 32 sets x * j = 0 for all j (1, ..., n). Commitments calculation execution unit 32, all the t (1, ..., m) for, set the L t = 0, d 't = d t. The contract calculation execution unit 32 sets T'j, t = T j, t for all j (1, ..., n) and all t (1, ..., m).

<ステップ1>
全てのtについてd’≦0である場合、約定計算実行部32は、そのときのx及びLを解と判定する。それ以外の場合、約定計算実行部32は、次式(5)のように設定し、x =1と設定する。なお、次式(5)のargminは、その関数の括弧内の値が最小となるインデックスjを求める関数である。
<Step 1>
When d't ≤ 0 for all t, the contract calculation execution unit 32 determines x * and L at that time as solutions. In other cases, the contract calculation execution unit 32 sets as in the following equation (5) and sets x * k = 1. Note that argmin in the following equation (5) is a function for finding the index j that minimizes the value in parentheses of the function.

Figure 2021105755
Figure 2021105755

<ステップ2>
約定計算実行部32は、t∈Tとなる全てのtについて、L=L+cと設定する。約定計算実行部32は、t∈T’となる全てのtについて、d’=d’−cと設定する。約定計算実行部32は、d’≦0となるtがある場合、全てのjについてT’からtを除く。ステップ2の後、処理がステップ1に戻る。
<Step 2>
Commitments calculation execution unit 32, for all t for the T∈T k, is set as L t = L t + c k . Commitments calculation execution unit 32, 'for all t for the k, d' t∈T set as t = d 't -c k. Commitments calculation execution unit 32, 'when there is t to be t ≦ 0, for all j T' d except t from j. After step 2, the process returns to step 1.

<約定計算の例>
このアルゴリズムを用いた約定計算の一例を説明する。買い入札データの必要量、売り入札データの供出可能時刻(供出可能時間帯)時間帯、単価、供出可能量、発動調整電力量の予測値は図4に示す通りである。図4の例では、D={1.5,1.5,1,2,1,2}、d={4,3,2,5,3,4}、p={2,6,4,3,5}、c={2,3,2,2,4}、q={6,10,8,7,9}である。p〜p、つまり第1〜第5売り入札は、ブロック入札である。基本時間帯の単位は例えば30分であるが、これに限ったものではなく、一定でなくてもよい。以下、次式(6)のように式(5)の一部をρと表して説明する。
<Example of contract calculation>
An example of contract calculation using this algorithm will be described. The required amount of buy bid data, the available time (available time zone) time zone of the sell bid data, the unit price, the available amount of supply, and the predicted value of the activation adjustment electric energy are as shown in FIG. In the example of FIG. 4, D = {1.5,1.5,1,2,1,2}, d = {4,3,2,5,3,4}, p = {2,6,4 , 3,5}, c = {2,3,2,2,4}, q = {6,10,8,7,9}. p 1 ~p 5, i.e. first to fifth sell bid is a block bid. The unit of the basic time zone is, for example, 30 minutes, but the unit is not limited to this and does not have to be constant. Hereinafter, a part of the equation (5) will be described as ρ j as in the following equation (6).

Figure 2021105755
Figure 2021105755

<1巡目のステップ0>
価値評価部32aは、x={0,0,0,0,0}、L={0,0,0,0,0,0}、d’={4,3,2,5,3,4}と設定する。価値評価部32aは、T’={2,3,4}、T’={3,4,5,6}、T’={1,2,3,4}、T’={1,2}、T’={4,5,6}と設定する。
<Step 0 of the first round>
The value evaluation unit 32a has x * = {0,0,0,0,0}, L = {0,0,0,0,0,0}, d'= {4,3,2,5,3 , 4}. Valuation unit 32a, T '1 = {2,3,4} , T' 2 = {3,4,5,6}, T '3 = {1,2,3,4}, T' 4 = {1,2}, it is set to T '5 = {4,5,6}.

<1巡目のステップ1>
価値評価部32aは、以下のようにρ〜ρを求めることにより、売り入札の需給調整力の単価及び発動調整電力量の単価を含む複数の価値を評価する。
ρ=2×6/6+4.5/10×6×4.5/4.5=4.7
ρ=6×12/11+6/14×10×6/6=10.83
ρ=4×8/8+6/14×8×6/6=7.43
ρ=3×4/4+3/7×7×3/3=6
ρ=5×12/11+5/12×9×5/5=9.20
<Step 1 of the first round>
The value evaluation unit 32a evaluates a plurality of values including the unit price of the supply and demand adjusting power of the selling bid and the unit price of the activation adjustment electric energy by obtaining ρ 1 to ρ 5 as follows.
ρ 1 = 2 × 6/6 + 4.5 / 10 × 6 × 4.5 / 4.5 = 4.7
ρ 2 = 6 × 12/11 + 6/14 × 10 × 6/6 = 10.83
ρ 3 = 4 × 8/8 + 6/14 × 8 × 6/6 = 7.43
ρ 4 = 3 × 4/4 + 3/4 × 7 × 7 × 3/3 = 6
ρ 5 = 5 × 12/11 + 5/12 × 9 × 5/5 = 9.20

例えば、ρの1項目は、p×(c+c+c+c)/(min(d’,c)+min(d’,c)+min(d’,c)+min(d’,c))に対応している。例えば、ρの2項目は、(D+D+D+D)/(d+d+d+d)×q×(D+D+D+D)/(D+D+D+D)に対応している。 For example, one item of ρ 2 is p 2 × (c 2 + c 2 + c 2 + c 2 ) / (min (d' 3 , c 2 ) + min (d' 4 , c 2 ) + min (d' 5 , c 2). ) + Min (d' 6 , c 2 )). For example, the two items of ρ 2 are (D 3 + D 4 + D 5 + D 6 ) / (d 3 + d 4 + d 5 + d 6 ) × q 2 × (D 3 + D 4 + D 5 + D 6 ) / (D 3 + D 4). It corresponds to + D 5 + D 6).

約定判定部32bは約定判定を行う。この例では、ρはj=1のとき最小であるため、約定判定部32bは、k=1と設定し、x={1,0,0,0,0}と更新する。このときT’={2,3,4}であり、c=2である。 The contract determination unit 32b makes a contract determination. In this example, since ρ j is the minimum when j = 1, the contract determination unit 32b sets k = 1 and updates x * = {1,0,0,0,0}. It is this time T '1 = {2,3,4}, is c 1 = 2.

<1巡目のステップ2>
={2,3,4}であり、c=2であるため、約定計算実行部32は、L,L,Lに2を加え、d’,d’,d’から2を引くことで、残り必要量を更新する。これにより、L=0+2=2,L=0+2=2,L=0+2=2となり、L={0,2,2,2,0,0}と更新される。また、d’=3−2=1,d’=2−2=0,d’=5−2=3となり、d’={4,1,0,3,3,4}と更新される。
<Step 2 of the first round>
Since T 1 = {2, 3, 4} and c 1 = 2, the execution calculation execution unit 32 adds 2 to L 2 , L 3 , and L 4 , and d'2 , d' 3 , d. ' By subtracting 2 from 4 to update the remaining required amount. As a result, L 2 = 0 + 2 = 2, L 3 = 0 + 2 = 2, L 4 = 0 + 2 = 2, and L = {0,2,2,2,0,0}. Further, d' 2 = 3-2 = 1, d' 3 = 2-2 = 0, d' 4 = 5-2 = 3, and d'= {4,1,0,3,3,4}. Will be updated.

d’≦0となったので、約定計算実行部32はT’から3を除くことにより、T’={4,5,6}、T’={1,2,4}、T’={1,2}、T’={4,5,6}と更新される。 'Since a 3 ≦ 0, contractual calculation execution unit 32 is T' d by removing 3 to j, T '2 = {4,5,6 }, T' 3 = {1,2,4}, T is updated with '4 = {1,2}, T ' 5 = {4,5,6}.

<2巡目のステップ1>
価値評価部32aは、以下のようにρ〜ρを求めることにより、売り入札の需給調整力の単価及び発動調整電力量の単価を含む複数の価値を評価する。なお、先のステップ2で残り必要量を更新したことにより、無駄になった期間の価値が考慮され、残りの売り入札の価値であるρ〜ρが適宜高く見積もられる。
ρ=6×12/9+6/12×10×6/5=14
ρ=4×8/6+6/12×8×6/5=10.13
ρ=3×4/4+3/7×7×3/3=6
ρ=5×12/11+5/12×9×5/5=9.20
<Step 1 of the second round>
The value evaluation unit 32a evaluates a plurality of values including the unit price of the supply and demand adjustment power of the sell bid and the unit price of the activation adjustment electric energy by obtaining ρ 2 to ρ 5 as follows. By updating the remaining required amount in the previous step 2, the value of the wasted period is taken into consideration, and the values of the remaining sell bids, ρ 2 to ρ 5, are estimated appropriately.
ρ 2 = 6 × 12/9 + 6/12 × 10 × 6/5 = 14
ρ 3 = 4 × 8/6 + 6/12 × 8 × 6/5 = 10.13
ρ 4 = 3 × 4/4 + 3/4 × 7 × 7 × 3/3 = 6
ρ 5 = 5 × 12/11 + 5/12 × 9 × 5/5 = 9.20

例えば、ρの1項目は、p×(c+c+c+c)/(min(d’,c)+min(d’,c)+min(d’,c))に対応している。例えば、ρの2項目は、(D+D+D)/(d+d+d)×q×(D+D+D+D)/(D+D+D)に対応している。 For example, one item of ρ 2 is p 2 × (c 2 + c 2 + c 2 + c 2 ) / (min (d' 4 , c 2 ) + min (d' 5 , c 2 ) + min (d' 6 , c 2). )) Is supported. For example, the two items of ρ 2 are (D 4 + D 5 + D 6 ) / (d 4 + d 5 + d 6 ) × q 2 × (D 3 + D 4 + D 5 + D 6 ) / (D 4 + D 5 + D 6 ). It corresponds.

約定判定部32bは約定判定を行う。この例では、ρはj=4のとき最小であるため、約定判定部32bは、k=4と設定し、x={1,0,0,1,0}と更新する。このときT’={1,2}であり、c=2である。 The contract determination unit 32b makes a contract determination. In this example, since ρ j is the minimum when j = 4, the contract determination unit 32b sets k = 4 and updates x * = {1,0,0,1,0}. It is this time T '4 = {1,2}, is c 4 = 2.

<2巡目のステップ2>
={1,2}であり、c=2であるため、約定計算実行部32は、L,Lに2を加え、d’,d’から2を引くことで、残り必要量を更新する。これにより、L=0+2=2,L=2+2=4となり、L={2,4,2,2,0,0}と更新される。また、d’=4−2=2,d’=1−2=−1となり、d’={2,−1,0,3,3,4}と更新される。
<Step 2 of the second round>
Since T 4 = {1, 2} and c 4 = 2, the contract calculation execution unit 32 adds 2 to L 1 and L 2 and subtracts 2 from d'1 and d'2. Update the remaining required amount. As a result, L 1 = 0 + 2 = 2, L 2 = 2 + 2 = 4, and L = {2,4,2,2,0,0} is updated. Further, d' 1 = 4-2 = 2, d' 2 = 1-2 = -1, and d'= {2, -1, 0, 3, 3, 4} is updated.

d’≦0となったので、約定計算実行部32はT’から2を除くことにより、T’={4,5,6}、T’={1,4}、T’={4,5,6}と更新される。 'Since a 2 ≦ 0, contractual calculation execution unit 32 is T' d by removing from 2 j, T '2 = {4,5,6 }, T' 3 = {1,4}, T ' It is updated as 5 = {4,5,6}.

<3巡目のステップ1>
価値評価部32aは、以下のようにρ、ρ、ρを求めることにより、売り入札の需給調整力の単価及び発動調整電力量の単価を含む複数の価値を評価する。
ρ=6×12/9+6/12×10×6/5=14
ρ=4×8/4+6/9×8×6/3.5=17.14
ρ=5×12/11+5/12×9×5/5=9.20
<Step 1 of the 3rd round>
The value evaluation unit 32a evaluates a plurality of values including the unit price of the supply and demand adjusting power of the selling bid and the unit price of the activation adjustment electric energy by obtaining ρ 2 , ρ 3 , and ρ 5 as follows.
ρ 2 = 6 × 12/9 + 6/12 × 10 × 6/5 = 14
ρ 3 = 4 × 8/4 + 6/9 × 8 × 6 / 3.5 = 17.14
ρ 5 = 5 × 12/11 + 5/12 × 9 × 5/5 = 9.20

約定判定部32bは約定判定を行う。この例では、ρはj=5のとき最小であるため、約定判定部32bは、k=5と設定し、x={1,0,0,1,1}と更新する。このときT’={4,5,6}であり、c=4である。 The contract determination unit 32b makes a contract determination. In this example, since ρ j is the minimum when j = 5, the contract determination unit 32b sets k = 5 and updates x * = {1,0,0,1,1}. It is this time T '5 = {4,5,6}, is c 5 = 4.

<3巡目のステップ2>
={4,5,6}であり、c=4であるため、約定計算実行部32は、L,L,Lに4を加え、d’,d’,d’から4を引くことで、残り必要量を更新する。これにより、L=2+4=6,L=0+4=4,L=0+4=4となり、L={2,4,2,6,4,4}と更新される。また、d’=3−4=−1,d’=3−4=−1,d’=4−4=0となり、d’={2,−1,0,−1,−1,0}と更新される。
<Step 2 of the 3rd round>
Since T 5 = {4,5,6} and c 5 = 4, the execution calculation execution unit 32 adds 4 to L 4 , L 5 , and L 6 , and d'4 , d' 5 , d. ' By subtracting 4 from 6 to update the remaining required amount. As a result, L 4 = 2 + 4 = 6, L 5 = 0 + 4 = 4, L 6 = 0 + 4 = 4, and L = {2,4,2,6,4,4} is updated. Further, d' 4 = 3-4 = -1, d' 5 = 3-4 = -1, d' 6 = 4-4 = 0, and d'= {2, -1, 0, -1,- Updated as 1,0}.

d’≦0、d’≦0、d’≦0となったので、約定計算実行部32はT’から4,5,6を除くことにより、T’=φ、T’={1}と更新される。 'Because became 6 ≦ 0, contractual calculation execution unit 32 is T' d '4 ≦ 0, d' 5 ≦ 0, d by removing 4,5,6 from j, T '2 = φ, T' It is updated as 3 = {1}.

<4巡目のステップ1>
価値評価部32aは、以下のようにρ、ρを求めることにより、売り入札の需給調整力の単価及び発動調整電力量の単価を含む複数の価値を評価する。
ρ=6×12/0+6/0×10×6/0=∞
ρ=4×8/2+6/4×8×6/1.5=64
<Step 1 of the 4th round>
The value evaluation unit 32a evaluates a plurality of values including the unit price of the supply and demand adjustment power of the sell bid and the unit price of the activation adjustment electric energy by obtaining ρ 2 and ρ 3 as follows.
ρ 2 = 6 × 12/0 + 6/0 × 10 × 6/0 = ∞
ρ 3 = 4 × 8/2 + 6/4 × 8 × 6 / 1.5 = 64

約定判定部32bは約定判定を行う。この例では、ρはj=3のとき最小であるため、約定判定部32bは、k=3と設定し、x={1,0,1,1,1}と更新する。このときT’={1}であり、c=2である。 The contract determination unit 32b makes a contract determination. In this example, since ρ j is the minimum when j = 3, the contract determination unit 32b sets k = 3 and updates x * = {1,0,1,1,1}. It is this time T '3 = {1}, is c 3 = 2.

<4巡目のステップ2>
={1,2,3,4}であり、c=2であるため、約定計算実行部32は、L,L,L,Lに2を加え、d’,d’,d’,d’のうち0以下でないd’から2を引くことで、残り必要量を更新する。これにより、L=2+2=4,L=4+2=6,L=2+2=4L=6+2=8となり、L={4,6,4,8,4,4}と更新される。また、d’=2−2=0となり、d’={0,−1,0,−1,−1,0}と更新される。
<Step 2 of the 4th round>
Since T 3 = {1, 2, 3 , 4} and c 3 = 2, the contract calculation execution unit 32 adds 2 to L 1 , L 2 , L 3 , and L 4 , and d'1 , The remaining required amount is updated by subtracting 2 from d'1 which is not 0 or less among d'2 , d' 3 , and d' 4. As a result, L 1 = 2 + 2 = 4, L 2 = 4 + 2 = 6, L 3 = 2 + 2 = 4L 4 = 6 + 2 = 8, and L = {4,6,4,8,4,4} is updated. Further, d' 1 = 2-2 = 0, and d'= {0, -1, 0, -1, -1, 0} is updated.

<5巡目のステップ1>
全てのtについてd’≦0となったので、約定計算実行部32は、そのときのx={1,0,1,1,1}、L={4,6,4,8,4,4}を解と判定する。その後、約定結果確定部33は、判定された結果を約定結果として確定する。つまり、約定結果確定部33は、第1売り入札、第3売り入札、第4売り入札、第5売り入札を落札するという約定結果を確定する。
<Step 1 of the 5th round>
Since d't ≤ 0 for all t, the contract calculation execution unit 32 has x * = {1,0,1,1,1}, L = {4,6,4,8, at that time. 4,4} is determined to be the solution. After that, the contract result determination unit 33 determines the determined result as the contract result. That is, the contract result determination unit 33 determines the contract result of winning the first sell bid, the third sell bid, the fourth sell bid, and the fifth sell bid.

なお、上記では、「上げ調整力」(供給量の不足に対応するための調整力)である場合について説明したが、需給調整市場では「下げ調整力」(供給量の余剰に対応するための調整力)も取引の対象となる見込みである。下げ調整力の取引においては、需給調整力[ΔkW]の調達については上げ調整力と同様に送配電事業者が調整力供出事業者に費用を支払うが、発動調整電力量[kWh]については送配電事業者が調整力供出事業者から費用を受け取ることになる。発動調整電力量[kWh]に対する費用はkWh単価[円/kWh]と発動調整電力量の大きさ[kWh]との積であるため、送配電事業者にとってはkWh単価が高い売り入札と約定することが望ましい。以上のことを踏まえて、上記の手順を次のように変更することで、下げ調整力に対応することが可能となる。上げ調整力に対する下げ調整力の相違点は以下のとおりである。
C:m項組みの非正変数(C,…,C)(時刻1〜mにおける発動調整電力量[kWh](予測値))
In the above, the case of "up adjustment power" (adjustment power to cope with the shortage of supply amount) was explained, but in the supply and demand adjustment market, "down adjustment power" (to cope with the surplus of supply amount). Coordinating power) is also expected to be the target of transactions. In the transaction of downward adjustment power, the power transmission and distribution business operator pays the adjustment power supply business operator for the procurement of supply and demand adjustment power [ΔkW] in the same way as the upward adjustment power, but the activation adjustment power amount [kWh] is transmitted. The power distribution company will receive the cost from the coordinating power provider. Since the cost for the activation adjustment electric energy [kWh] is the product of the kWh unit price [yen / kWh] and the magnitude of the activation adjustment electric energy [kWh], it is contracted as a sell bid with a high kWh unit price for the power transmission and distribution business operator. Is desirable. Based on the above, by changing the above procedure as follows, it is possible to cope with the lowering adjustment force. The differences between the raising adjustment force and the lowering adjustment force are as follows.
C: Non-positive variable of m term set (C 1, ..., C m ) (Activation adjustment electric energy [kWh] (predicted value) at time 1 to m)

<ステップ1>
全てのtについてd’≦0である場合、約定計算実行部32は、そのときのx及びLを解と判定する。それ以外の場合、約定計算実行部32は、次式(7)のように設定し、x =1と設定する。
<Step 1>
When d't ≤ 0 for all t, the contract calculation execution unit 32 determines x * and L at that time as solutions. In other cases, the contract calculation execution unit 32 sets as in the following equation (7) and sets x * k = 1.

Figure 2021105755
Figure 2021105755

<実施の形態1のまとめ>
以上のような本実施の形態1に係る構成及び処理フローにより、一以上の売り入札について、需給調整力の単価及び発動調整電力量の単価を含む複数の価値を評価し、当該複数の価値に基づいて約定判定を行い、約定判定の結果に基づいて約定結果を確定する。このように、需給調整力の必要量の確保と調達費用の抑制とを両立させる約定計算の速度を高めることが可能となり、適切な約定計算を行うことができる。
<Summary of Embodiment 1>
Based on the configuration and processing flow according to the first embodiment as described above, for one or more sell bids, a plurality of values including the unit price of the supply and demand adjustment power and the unit price of the activation adjustment power amount are evaluated, and the plurality of values are evaluated. The contract is determined based on the result of the contract, and the result of the contract is determined based on the result of the contract. In this way, it is possible to increase the speed of contract calculation that achieves both securing the required amount of supply and demand adjustment ability and suppressing procurement costs, and it is possible to perform appropriate contract calculation.

<実施の形態2>
送配電事業者が支払う需給調整力[ΔkW]の調達に対する費用(ΔkW費用)は、各時刻のΔkW単価[円/ΔkW]と供出可能量[ΔkW]との積和で決定される。同様に、発動調整電力量[kWh]の運用に対する費用(kWh費用)は、各時刻のkWh単価[円/kWh]と発動調整電力量[kWh]との積和で決定される。精算時の費用算出に使用されるΔkW単価及びkWh単価に関して、2021年に開設される需給調整市場では、当面、価格決定方式にマルチプライスオークション方式が採用される見込みであるが、将来的にシングルプライスオークション方式を採用することも検討されている。シングルプライスオークション方式が採用された場合の詳細な価格決定方法は不明である。しかし、採用される可能性のある方法としては、約定済み売り入札の希望単価について時刻ごとの最高値を求めて約定価格とし、約定価格をその時刻の全ての約定済み売り入札の精算に適用する方法などが考えられる。
<Embodiment 2>
The cost (ΔkW cost) for the procurement of the supply and demand adjusting power [ΔkW] paid by the power transmission and distribution business operator is determined by the sum of products of the ΔkW unit price [yen / ΔkW] at each time and the deliverable amount [ΔkW]. Similarly, the cost (kWh cost) for the operation of the activation adjustment electric energy [kWh] is determined by the sum of products of the kWh unit price [yen / kWh] and the activation adjustment electric energy [kWh] at each time. Regarding the ΔkW unit price and kWh unit price used for cost calculation at the time of settlement, the supply and demand adjustment market to be opened in 2021 is expected to adopt the multi-price auction method as the pricing method for the time being, but in the future it will be single. Adopting a price auction method is also being considered. The detailed pricing method when the single price auction method is adopted is unknown. However, as a method that may be adopted, the highest price for each time of the desired unit price of the contracted sell bid is calculated and set as the contract price, and the contract price is applied to the settlement of all the contracted sell bids at that time. The method etc. can be considered.

本実施の形態2においては、約定結果確定部33が、精算時の費用算出に使用するΔkW単価及びkWh単価を決定して、精算価格を算出する。マルチプライスオークション方式の場合には、約定結果確定部33は、約定計算実行部32で落札者として選定された各売り入札の希望ΔkW単価を、次式(8)のようにそのまま約定価格として用いてΔkW費用を算出する。シングルプライスオークション方式の場合には、まず、約定結果確定部33は、約定計算実行部32で落札者として選定された各売り入札(約定済み売り入札)のΔkW単価に基づいて、時刻(基本時間帯)ごとに単一の約定価格を求める。例えば、約定結果確定部33は、各時刻の単一の約定価格として、次式(9)のように各時刻の最高希望ΔkW単価を求める。そして、約定結果確定部33は、次式(10)のように各時刻の単一の約定価格をその時刻の全ての約定済み売り入札に適用してΔkW費用を算出する。 In the second embodiment, the contract result determination unit 33 determines the ΔkW unit price and the kWh unit price used for cost calculation at the time of settlement, and calculates the settlement price. In the case of the multi-price auction method, the contract result determination unit 33 uses the desired ΔkW unit price of each sell bid selected as the winning bidder by the contract calculation execution unit 32 as the contract price as it is as in the following equation (8). Calculate the ΔkW cost. In the case of the single price auction method, first, the contract result determination unit 33 sets the time (basic time) based on the ΔkW unit price of each sell bid (contracted sell bid) selected as the winning bidder by the contract calculation execution unit 32. Find a single contract price for each band). For example, the contract result determination unit 33 obtains the maximum desired ΔkW unit price at each time as a single contract price at each time as in the following equation (9). Then, the contract result determination unit 33 applies the single contract price at each time to all the contracted sell bids at that time to calculate the ΔkW cost as in the following equation (10).

約定結果確定部33は、ΔkW費用の算出と同様に、マルチプライスオークション方式の場合に次式(11)を用いてkWh費用を算出し、シングルプライスオークション方式の場合に次式(12)及び(13)を用いてkWh費用を算出する。 Similar to the calculation of the ΔkW cost, the contract result determination unit 33 calculates the kWh cost using the following equation (11) in the case of the multi-price auction method, and the following equations (12) and (12) in the case of the single price auction method. The kWh cost is calculated using 13).

Figure 2021105755
Figure 2021105755

Figure 2021105755
Figure 2021105755

Figure 2021105755
Figure 2021105755

Figure 2021105755
Figure 2021105755

Figure 2021105755
Figure 2021105755

Figure 2021105755
Figure 2021105755

なお、式(8)から式(13)における変数及び定数の定義は以下の通りである。
cost_kWmulti:マルチプライスオークション方式におけるΔkW費用[円]
cost_kWsingle:シングルプライスオークション方式におけるΔkW費用[円]
cost_kWhmulti:マルチプライスオークション方式におけるkWh費用[円]
cost_kWhsingle:シングルプライスオークション方式におけるkWh費用[円]
j:約定済み売り入札番号(1,…,n’)
:約定済み売り入札jの希望ΔkW単価[円/ΔkW]
:約定済み売り入札jの希望kWh単価[円/kWh]
j,t:約定済み売り入札jの時刻tにおける需給調整力の供出可能量[ΔkW]
j,t:約定済み売り入札jの時刻tにおける発動調整電力量[kWh]の予測値(上げ調整力の場合は非負定数、下げ調整力の場合は非正定数)
T:集合{1,2,・・・,m}(取引対象時刻)
:Tに対するn’個の部分集合のうちのj番目(約定済み売り入札jの供出可能時間帯であり、式(4)においてnをn’に置き換えた式が成り立つ)
The definitions of variables and constants in equations (8) to (13) are as follows.
cost_kW multi : ΔkW cost in multi-price auction method [yen]
cost_kW single : ΔkW cost in the single price auction method [yen]
cost_kWh multi : kWh cost in multi-price auction method [yen]
cost_kWh single : kWh cost in the single price auction method [yen]
j: Contracted sell bid number (1, ..., n')
p j : Desired bid ΔkW unit price [yen / ΔkW] for contracted sell bid j
q j : Desired kWh unit price of contracted sell bid j [yen / kWh]
c j, t : Amount of supply and demand adjustment power available at time t of the contracted sell bid j [ΔkW]
D j, t : Predicted value of the activation adjustment electric energy [kWh] at time t of the contracted sell bid j (non-negative constant in the case of increase adjustment force, non-positive constant in the case of decrease adjustment force)
T: Set {1, 2, ..., m} (transaction target time)
T j: The jth of the n'subsets for T (the available time zone for the contracted sell bid j, and the formula in which n is replaced with n'in formula (4) holds)

<実施の形態2のまとめ>
以上のような本実施の形態2に係る構成によれば、マルチプライスオークション方式及びシングルプライスオークション方式に関して適切な約定計算を行うことができる。
<Summary of Embodiment 2>
According to the configuration according to the second embodiment as described above, it is possible to perform appropriate contract calculation for the multi-price auction method and the single-price auction method.

<実施の形態3>
シングルプライスオークション方式を採用する場合、実施の形態1及び2では必ずしも最適な約定結果(精算価格が最小となる約定結果)となるとは限らない。本実施の形態3では、実施の形態1の手順を次のように変更することで、シングルプライスオークション方式に適用する場合に、より精算価格を抑えることが可能となっている。
<Embodiment 3>
When the single price auction method is adopted, the optimum contract result (contract result at which the settlement price is minimized) is not always obtained in the first and second embodiments. In the third embodiment, by changing the procedure of the first embodiment as follows, it is possible to further suppress the settlement price when applied to the single price auction method.

ここで、各変数及び定数を次のように定義する。
T:集合{1,2,・・・,m}(取引対象時刻)
:Tに対するn個の部分集合のうちのj番目(売り入札jの供出可能時間帯であり、式(4)が成り立つ)
:正定数(売り入札jのΔkW単価[円/ΔkW])
:正定数(売り入札jのkWh単価[円/kWh])
:m項組みの非負定数(cj,1,…,cj,m)(売り入札jの時刻1〜mにおける供出可能量[ΔkW])
d:m項組みの非負定数(d,…,d)(買い入札の時刻1〜mにおける必要量[ΔkW])
d’:m項組みの非負定数(d’,…,d’)(買い入札の時刻1〜mにおける残り必要量[ΔkW])
D:m項組みの非負変数(D,…,D)(時刻1〜mにおける発動調整電力量[kWh]の予測値)
:n項組みの二値変数(x ,…,x )(売り入札1〜nの選択有無)
L:m項組みの非負変数(L,…,L)(時刻1〜mの約定した需給調整力[ΔkW])
Here, each variable and constant are defined as follows.
T: Set {1, 2, ..., m} (transaction target time)
T j : The jth of n subsets for T (the available time zone for the sell bid j, and equation (4) holds)
p j : Positive constant (ΔkW unit price of selling bid j [yen / ΔkW])
q j : Positive constant (kWh unit price of sell bid j [yen / kWh])
c j : Non-negative constant of m term set (c j, 1 , ..., c j, m ) (Amount available for sale at time 1 to m of sell bid j [ΔkW])
d: Non-negative constant of m term set (d 1, ..., dm) (required amount at buy bid time 1 to m [ΔkW])
d': Non-negative constant of m term set (d'1, ..., d' m ) (remaining required amount at buy bid time 1 to m [ΔkW])
D: Non-negative variable of m term set (D 1, ..., D m ) (predicted value of activation adjustment electric energy [kWh] at time 1 to m)
x * : N-term set of binary variables (x * 1 , ..., x * n ) (whether or not sell bids 1 to n are selected)
L: Non-negative variable of m term set (L 1, ..., L m ) (contracted supply and demand adjustment force [ΔkW] at time 1 to m)

<ステップ0>
約定計算実行部32は、全てのj(1,…,n)について、x =0と設定する。約定計算実行部32は、全てのt(1,…,m)について、L=0、d’=dと設定する。約定計算実行部32は、全てのj(1,…,n)、全てのt(1,…,m)について、T’j,t=Tj,tと設定する。
<Step 0>
The contract calculation execution unit 32 sets x * j = 0 for all j (1, ..., n). Commitments calculation execution unit 32, all the t (1, ..., m) for, set the L t = 0, d 't = d t. The contract calculation execution unit 32 sets T'j, t = T j, t for all j (1, ..., n) and all t (1, ..., m).

<ステップ1>
全てのtについてd’≦0である場合、約定計算実行部32は、そのときのx及びLを解と判定する。それ以外の場合、約定計算実行部32は、n’をここまでの手順で約定した売り入札数として、次式(14)〜(16)のように設定し、x =1と設定する。
<Step 1>
When d't ≤ 0 for all t, the contract calculation execution unit 32 determines x * and L at that time as solutions. In other cases, the execution calculation execution unit 32 sets n'as the number of sell bids executed in the procedure up to this point as in the following equations (14) to (16), and sets x * k = 1. ..

Figure 2021105755
Figure 2021105755

Figure 2021105755
Figure 2021105755

Figure 2021105755
Figure 2021105755

<ステップ2>
約定計算実行部32は、t∈Tとなる全てのtについて、L=L+cと設定する。約定計算実行部32は、t∈T’となる全てのtについて、d’=d’−cと設定する。約定計算実行部32は、d’≦0となるtがある場合、全てのjについてT’からtを除く。ステップ2の後、処理がステップ1に戻る。
<Step 2>
Commitments calculation execution unit 32, for all t for the T∈T k, is set as L t = L t + c k . Commitments calculation execution unit 32, 'for all t for the k, d' t∈T set as t = d 't -c k. Commitments calculation execution unit 32, 'when there is t to be t ≦ 0, for all j T' d except t from j. After step 2, the process returns to step 1.

以上の発展形アルゴリズムにより約定計算を行った後、約定結果確定部33においてp及びqを約定価格とし、約定結果を確定する。以上により、約定計算実行部32は、一の売り上げ入札を約定した場合の約定価格の上昇を考慮した総支払い費用を用いて、複数の価値の評価及び約定判定を行うことが可能となる。なお、上記では上げ調整力を想定して記述したが、上記の手順を次のように変更することで、下げ調整力に対応することが可能となる。相違点は以下のとおりである。
C:m項組みの非正定数(C,…,C)(時刻1〜mにおける発動調整電力量[kWh](予測値))
After performing the contract calculation by the above-mentioned advanced algorithm, the contract result determination unit 33 sets p + and q + as the contract price and determines the contract result. As described above, the contract calculation execution unit 32 can evaluate a plurality of values and perform a contract determination by using the total payment cost in consideration of the increase in the contract price when one sales bid is executed. In the above description, the raising adjustment force is assumed, but by changing the above procedure as follows, it is possible to cope with the lowering adjusting force. The differences are as follows.
C: Non-positive constant of m term set (C 1, ..., C m ) (Activation adjustment electric energy [kWh] (predicted value) at time 1 to m)

<ステップ1>
全てのtについてd’≦0である場合、約定計算実行部32は、そのときのx及びLを解と判定する。それ以外の場合、約定計算実行部32は、次式(17)のように設定する。
<Step 1>
When d't ≤ 0 for all t, the contract calculation execution unit 32 determines x * and L at that time as solutions. In other cases, the contract calculation execution unit 32 is set as in the following equation (17).

Figure 2021105755
Figure 2021105755

<実施の形態3のまとめ>
以上のような本実施の形態3に係る構成によれば、シングルプライスオークション方式の約定計算の精算価格をより抑えることが可能となる。
<Summary of Embodiment 3>
According to the configuration according to the third embodiment as described above, it is possible to further suppress the settlement price of the contract calculation of the single price auction method.

<実施の形態4>
約定計算実行部32が、ブロック入札を時刻によって分解せずに複数の価値を評価し当該複数の価値に基づいて約定判定を行う手法では、高速に解が得られるが、得られる解は最適に近い準最適解であるため、より良い解が存在する場合がある。そこで、本実施の形態4に係る演算部24が、実施の形態1から3で得られた約定判定の結果を初期解とする予め定められた探索手法を用いて、約定判定の結果を改善することで、買い入札者が支払う調達費用をより低く抑えることを可能にする。
<Embodiment 4>
In the method in which the contract calculation execution unit 32 evaluates a plurality of values without decomposing the block bid by time and makes a contract judgment based on the plurality of values, a solution can be obtained at high speed, but the obtained solution is optimal. Better solutions may exist because they are close quasi-optimal solutions. Therefore, the calculation unit 24 according to the fourth embodiment improves the result of the contract determination by using a predetermined search method in which the result of the contract determination obtained in the first to third embodiments is the initial solution. This makes it possible to keep the procurement costs paid by the buying bidders lower.

図5は、本実施の形態4に係る電力取引約定計算システム1の動作を示すフローチャートである。この図5のフローチャートでは、図3のフローチャートのステップS6の後にステップS9として探索手法による約定結果の改善を追加した。ステップS9は演算部24によりステップS6とステップS7との間で行われる。 FIG. 5 is a flowchart showing the operation of the electric power transaction contract calculation system 1 according to the fourth embodiment. In the flowchart of FIG. 5, improvement of the contract result by the search method is added as step S9 after step S6 of the flowchart of FIG. Step S9 is performed between step S6 and step S7 by the calculation unit 24.

ステップS9にて、演算部24は、ステップS3からステップS6における約定計算実行部32での約定判定の結果、ひいては約定計算で得られた結果を初期解とし、探索手法により解を改善していく。 In step S9, the calculation unit 24 sets the result of the contract determination by the contract calculation execution unit 32 in steps S3 to S6, and eventually the result obtained by the contract calculation, as the initial solution, and improves the solution by the search method. ..

次のステップS7にて、約定結果確定部33は、改善された解を、約定結果として確定する。ステップS8にて、約定結果確定部33は、確定した約定結果データを記憶部22に保存し、通信部23及び通信ネットワーク3を介して買い入札者及び売り入札者へ送信する。 In the next step S7, the contract result determination unit 33 determines the improved solution as the contract result. In step S8, the contract result confirmation unit 33 stores the confirmed contract result data in the storage unit 22, and transmits the confirmed contract result data to the buy bidder and the sell bidder via the communication unit 23 and the communication network 3.

上記探索手法としては、例えば、約定計算実行部32で約定計算を行った後、演算部24が、落札されていない売り入札の中から落札済の売り入札と入れ替えが可能なものを探索し、必要量を確保しながら調達費用が改善できるものがあれば入れ替えるという手法が挙げられる。このとき、1件の落札済売り入札と2件の未落札売り入札との入れ替え、及び、2件の落札済売り入札と1件の未落札売り入札との入れ替えなどが許容されてもよい。また、落札済売り入札の供出量の合計が必要量を超える場合で、かつ、ある落札済売り入札を除外しても各時刻の必要量を確保できる場合は、その売り入札を約定対象から除外することが許容されてもよい。 As the above search method, for example, after the contract calculation execution unit 32 performs the contract calculation, the calculation unit 24 searches for the unsuccessful bids that can be replaced with the successful bids. If there is something that can improve the procurement cost while securing the required amount, there is a method of replacing it. At this time, one successful bid may be replaced with two unsuccessful bids, two successful bids may be replaced with one unsuccessful bid, and the like may be allowed. In addition, if the total amount of bids offered for successful bids exceeds the required amount, and if the required amount at each time can be secured even if a certain successful bid bid is excluded, that sell bid is excluded from the contract target. May be allowed to do.

上記探索手法の他の例としては、分枝限定法が挙げられる。例えば、演算部24が、約定問題として定式化された組み合わせ最適化問題を分枝限定法で解く際の初期解として、発見的手法で得られた暫定解を使用するという手法である。 Another example of the above search method is a branch-and-bound method. For example, the arithmetic unit 24 uses a provisional solution obtained by a heuristic method as an initial solution when solving a combination optimization problem formulated as a contract problem by a branch-and-bound method.

<実施の形態4のまとめ>
以上のような本実施の形態4に係る構成及び処理フローによれば、約定計算実行部32で得られた約定結果が改善されるので、買い入札者が支払う調達費用をより低く抑えることが可能となる。
<Summary of Embodiment 4>
According to the configuration and processing flow according to the fourth embodiment as described above, the contract result obtained by the contract calculation execution unit 32 is improved, so that the procurement cost paid by the buying bidder can be suppressed to a lower level. It becomes.

<実施の形態5>
VPP事業者などの調整力供出事業者は、需給調整市場で売るための需給調整力を、需要家などが供出する分散型エネルギーリソース(太陽光発電、DR(Demand Response)などによるもの)を集めることによって調達する場合がある。この構成を図6に示す。
<Embodiment 5>
Coordinating power of VPP businesses, etc. Procurement businesses collect the decentralized energy resources (solar power generation, DR (Demand Response), etc.) provided by consumers, etc., to collect the supply and demand adjustment power for selling in the supply and demand adjustment market. It may be procured by This configuration is shown in FIG.

本実施の形態5では、実施の形態1〜4で説明したブロック入札が実施される電力取引における買い入札者は、VPP事業者などの調整力供出事業者である。VPP事業者43は、需給調整市場で売る需給調整力を集めるため、需給調整力の取引を実施する。この取引は需給調整力取引システム44で行われる。この取引において、VPP事業者43は調達したい需給調整力の量を買い入札し、それに対して需要家45が需給調整力の供出可能量及び希望単価、発動調整電力量の希望単価を提示して売り入札する。需給調整力取引システム44は、VPP事業者43が調達したい量を確保しながら調達費用が小さくなるように複数の売り入札を組み合わせて約定する。 In the fifth embodiment, the buying bidder in the electric power transaction in which the block bidding described in the first to fourth embodiments is carried out is a coordinating power providing business operator such as a VPP business operator. The VPP operator 43 conducts a transaction of the supply and demand adjustment power in order to collect the supply and demand adjustment power to be sold in the supply and demand adjustment market. This transaction is carried out by the supply and demand adjustment power transaction system 44. In this transaction, the VPP operator 43 buys and bids for the amount of supply and demand adjustment power that it wants to procure, and the consumer 45 presents the available amount of supply and demand adjustment power, the desired unit price, and the desired unit price of the activation adjustment power amount. Sell and bid. The supply and demand adjustment power trading system 44 makes a contract by combining a plurality of selling bids so that the procurement cost is reduced while securing the amount desired to be procured by the VPP operator 43.

この取引は、需給調整市場42において送配電事業者41がVPP事業者43から需給調整力を調達する取引と同様である。本実施の形態5では、上記実施の形態1〜4が、VPP事業者などの調整力供出事業者が需要家などから需給調整力を調達する際の需給調整力取引システムに適用される。 This transaction is similar to the transaction in which the power transmission and distribution business operator 41 procures the supply and demand adjustment power from the VPP business operator 43 in the supply and demand adjustment market 42. In the fifth embodiment, the first to fourth embodiments are applied to a supply and demand adjustment power trading system when a supply and demand adjustment power supply business operator such as a VPP business operator procures supply and demand adjustment power from a consumer or the like.

<実施の形態5のまとめ>
本実施の形態5に係る構成では、上記実施の形態1〜4が、VPP事業者などの調整力供出事業者が需給調整市場で売るための需給調整力を調達する際の取引に適用される。このような構成によれば、当該取引に関して適切な約定計算を行うことができる。なお、この構成は、次の実施の形態6においても適用されてもよい。
<Summary of Embodiment 5>
In the configuration according to the fifth embodiment, the above-described first to fourth embodiments are applied to transactions when a supply and demand adjustment power provider such as a VPP business operator procures a supply and demand adjustment power for sale in the supply and demand adjustment market. .. With such a configuration, it is possible to perform an appropriate contract calculation for the transaction. In addition, this configuration may be applied also in the following Embodiment 6.

<実施の形態6>
約定計算実行部32が、ブロック入札を時刻によって分解せずに複数の価値を評価し、当該複数の価値に基づいて約定判定を行う手法では、高速に解が得られるが、得られる解は最適に近い準最適解である。この約定計算では、評価値の良い入札から約定するため、約定計算の序盤では最適な約定結果に含まれる入札が選ばれる可能性が終盤よりも高く、約定計算の終盤では最適な約定結果に含まれない入札が選ばれる可能性が序盤よりも高い。
<Embodiment 6>
In the method in which the contract calculation execution unit 32 evaluates a plurality of values without decomposing the block bid by time and makes a contract judgment based on the plurality of values, a solution can be obtained at high speed, but the obtained solution is optimal. It is a quasi-optimal solution close to. In this contract calculation, bids with good evaluation values are executed first, so it is more likely that the bid included in the optimal contract result will be selected at the beginning of the contract calculation, and it will be included in the optimal contract result at the end of the contract calculation. It is more likely that a bid that will not be selected will be selected than in the early stages.

一方、入札件数が多い場合に組み合わせ最適化計算で約定計算をすると、厳密な最適解が得られるが計算時間が長くなる場合や、最適解が得られない場合がある。そこで、高速に解を得る約定計算と、厳密な最適解を得る組み合わせ最適化とを融合させることで、良好な約定結果を比較的高速に得られる手法を以下で説明する。 On the other hand, when the number of bids is large, if the contract calculation is performed by the combination optimization calculation, the exact optimum solution may be obtained, but the calculation time may be long, or the optimum solution may not be obtained. Therefore, a method for obtaining good contract results at a relatively high speed by fusing the contract calculation for obtaining a solution at high speed and the combination optimization for obtaining an exact optimum solution will be described below.

まず、売り入札の条件はそのままで、演算部24は、各商品の需給調整力の必要量[ΔkW]及び発動調整電力量[kWh]に0より大きく1より小さい第1定数α(例えば、α=0.7)を掛ける。演算部24は、その演算後の各商品の需給調整力の必要量[ΔkW]及び発動調整電力量[kWh]を改めて各商品の需給調整力の必要量[ΔkW]及び発動調整電力量[kWh]とした上で、約定計算実行部32で行われた約定判定の結果を第1約定結果Aとする。第1約定結果Aに含まれる入札は、評価値が比較的良いと考えられるため、元の需給調整力の必要量[ΔkW]及び発動調整電力量[kWh]に対する厳密な最適解に含まれる可能性が高い。 First, the conditions for selling and bidding remain the same, and the calculation unit 24 sets the required amount [ΔkW] of the supply and demand adjusting power of each product and the activation adjustment power amount [kWh] to the first constant α (for example, α) that is greater than 0 and less than 1. = 0.7) is multiplied. The calculation unit 24 changes the required amount [ΔkW] and the activation adjustment power amount [kWh] of the supply and demand adjustment power of each product after the calculation, and changes the required amount [ΔkW] and the activation adjustment power amount [kWh] of the supply and demand adjustment power of each product. ], And the result of the contract determination performed by the contract calculation execution unit 32 is referred to as the first contract result A. Since the bid included in the first contract result A is considered to have a relatively good evaluation value, it can be included in the strict optimum solution for the required amount of the original supply and demand adjustment power [ΔkW] and the activation adjustment power amount [kWh]. Highly sexual.

次に、売り入札の条件はそのままで、演算部24は、各商品の需給調整力の必要量[ΔkW]及び発動調整電力量[kWh]に1より大きい第2定数β(例えば、β=1.3)を掛ける。演算部24は、その演算後の各商品の需給調整力の必要量[ΔkW]及び発動調整電力量[kWh]を改めて各商品の需給調整力の必要量[ΔkW]及び発動調整電力量[kWh]とした上で、約定計算実行部32で行われた約定判定の結果を第2約定結果Bとする。第2約定結果Bに含まれない入札は、評価値が比較的悪いと考えられるため、元の需給調整力の必要量[ΔkW]及び発動調整電力量[kW]に対する厳密な最適解に含まれない可能性が高い。 Next, while the conditions for selling and bidding remain the same, the calculation unit 24 has a second constant β (for example, β = 1) that is greater than 1 in the required amount [ΔkW] of the supply and demand adjusting power of each product and the activation adjustment power amount [kWh]. .. Multiply 3). The calculation unit 24 changes the required amount [ΔkW] of the supply and demand adjusting power of each product and the activation adjustment power amount [kWh] after the calculation, and changes the required amount [ΔkW] of the supply and demand adjustment power of each product and the activation adjustment power amount [kWh]. ], And the result of the contract determination performed by the contract calculation execution unit 32 is referred to as the second contract result B. Bids that are not included in the second contract result B are considered to have relatively poor evaluation values, and are therefore included in the strict optimal solution for the original supply and demand adjustment power requirement [ΔkW] and activation adjustment power amount [kW]. Most likely not.

次に、演算部24は、元の需給調整力の必要量[ΔkW]及び発動調整電力量[kWh]に対して、第1約定結果Aに含まれる入札を約定するものと確定し、第2約定結果Bに含まれない入札を約定しないものと確定し、そのどちらでもない入札(第1約定結果Aに含まれず、第2約定結果Bに含まれる入札)を組み合わせ最適化で約定する対象とする。ただし、組み合わせ最適化の目的関数は、需給調整力の調達に対する費用(ΔkW費用)及び発動調整電力量の運用に対する費用(kWh費用)との合計の最小化とする。 Next, the calculation unit 24 determines that the bid included in the first contract result A is executed with respect to the original required amount of supply and demand adjustment power [ΔkW] and the activation adjustment power amount [kWh], and the second It is decided that bids that are not included in the contract result B will not be executed, and bids that are neither of them (bids that are not included in the first contract result A and are included in the second contract result B) will be combined and executed by optimization. do. However, the objective function of the combination optimization is to minimize the total of the cost for procuring the supply and demand adjustment power (ΔkW cost) and the cost for operating the activation adjustment electric energy (kWh cost).

組み合わせ最適化で得られた約定結果と、第1約定結果Aとを合わせたものを、元の需給調整力の必要量[ΔkW]及び発動調整電力量[kWh]に対する約定結果とする。このようにすることで、組み合わせ最適化の対象となる売り入札の件数を削減でき、組み合わせ最適化計算の計算時間を短縮することができる。また、約定結果も厳密な最適解か、それに近いものになることが期待できる。 The combination of the contract result obtained by the combination optimization and the first contract result A is used as the contract result for the original required amount of supply and demand adjustment power [ΔkW] and the activation adjustment power amount [kWh]. By doing so, the number of sell bids to be targeted for combination optimization can be reduced, and the calculation time for the combination optimization calculation can be shortened. In addition, it can be expected that the contract result will be a strict optimal solution or close to it.

<実施の形態6のまとめ>
本実施の形態6に係る構成では、約定計算実行部32で売り入札の中から評価値の良い入札は約定させることを確定し、評価値の悪い入札は約定させないことを確定し、確定していない残りの入札に対して組み合わせ最適化により約定するかどうかを決定する。このため、計算時間を短縮し、買い入札者が支払う調達費用をより低く抑えることが可能となる。
<Summary of Embodiment 6>
In the configuration according to the sixth embodiment, the contract calculation execution unit 32 determines that the bid with a good evaluation value is executed from the sell bids, and the bid with a bad evaluation value is not executed, and is confirmed. Decide whether to execute by combination optimization for no remaining bids. Therefore, it is possible to shorten the calculation time and keep the procurement cost paid by the buying bidder lower.

なお、各実施の形態を自由に組み合わせたり、各実施の形態を適宜、変形、省略したりすることが可能である。 It is possible to freely combine each embodiment, and to appropriately modify or omit each embodiment.

1 電力取引約定計算装置、24 演算部、31 入札データ集約部、32 約定計算実行部、33 約定結果確定部、42 需給調整市場、43 VPP事業者。 1 Electric power transaction contract calculation device, 24 calculation unit, 31 bid data aggregation unit, 32 contract calculation execution unit, 33 contract result confirmation unit, 42 supply and demand adjustment market, 43 VPP operator.

Claims (12)

互いに連続する複数の基本時間帯にまたがる売り入札であるブロック入札が実施される電力取引の約定計算を行う演算部を備え、
前記演算部は、
買い入札データ及び売り入札データを集約する入札データ集約部と、
前記入札データ集約部で集約された前記買い入札データ及び前記売り入札データに基づいて一以上の売り入札の需給調整力の単価及び発動調整電力量の単価を含む複数の価値を評価し、前記複数の価値に基づいて一以上の売り入札の約定判定を行う約定計算実行部と、
前記約定計算実行部で行われた前記約定判定の結果に基づいて約定結果を確定する約定結果確定部と
を備える、電力取引約定計算装置。
It is equipped with a calculation unit that calculates the contract of electric power transactions in which block bids, which are sell bids that span multiple basic time zones that are continuous with each other, are carried out.
The calculation unit
A bid data aggregation unit that aggregates buy bid data and sell bid data,
Based on the buy bid data and the sell bid data aggregated by the bid data aggregation unit, a plurality of values including the unit price of the supply / demand adjustment ability of one or more sell bids and the unit price of the activation adjustment power amount are evaluated, and the plurality of values are evaluated. The contract calculation execution unit that determines the contract of one or more sell bids based on the value of
An electric power transaction contract calculation device including a contract result determination unit that determines a contract result based on the result of the contract determination performed by the contract calculation execution unit.
請求項1に記載の電力取引約定計算装置であって、
前記約定計算実行部は、
前記ブロック入札を前記基本時間帯の単位で分解せずに、前記複数の価値の評価及び前記約定判定を行う、電力取引約定計算装置。
The electric power transaction contract calculation device according to claim 1.
The contract calculation execution unit
An electric power transaction contract calculation device that evaluates a plurality of values and makes a contract determination without decomposing the block bid in units of the basic time zone.
請求項2に記載の電力取引約定計算装置であって、
前記複数の価値の評価及び前記約定判定を、多重集合被覆問題(Weighted Multiple Set Covering Problem)として扱う、電力取引約定計算装置。
The electric power transaction contract calculation device according to claim 2.
An electric power transaction execution calculation device that handles the evaluation of a plurality of values and the execution determination as a Weighted Multiple Set Covering Problem.
請求項3に記載の電力取引約定計算装置であって、
前記約定計算実行部は、
Greedy Heuristicを用いて、前記複数の価値の評価及び前記約定判定を行う、電力取引約定計算装置。
The electric power transaction contract calculation device according to claim 3.
The contract calculation execution unit
A power transaction contract calculation device that evaluates the plurality of values and determines the contract using Greedy Heuristic.
請求項1から請求項4のうちのいずれか1項に記載の電力取引約定計算装置であって、
前記約定結果確定部は、
前記約定計算実行部で行われた前記約定判定の結果で選定された各売り入札の希望単価を約定価格として用いることにより、マルチプライスオークション方式の精算価格を算出する、電力取引約定計算装置。
The electric power transaction contract calculation device according to any one of claims 1 to 4.
The contract result confirmation unit is
An electric power transaction contract calculation device that calculates the settlement price of a multi-price auction method by using the desired unit price of each sell bid selected as a result of the contract determination performed by the contract calculation execution unit as the contract price.
請求項1から請求項4のうちのいずれか1項に記載の電力取引約定計算装置であって、
前記約定結果確定部は、
前記約定計算実行部で行われた前記約定判定の結果で選定された各売り入札の希望単価に基づいて、前記基本時間帯ごとに単一の約定価格を求め、当該約定価格を用いることにより、シングルプライスオークション方式の精算価格を算出する、電力取引約定計算装置。
The electric power transaction contract calculation device according to any one of claims 1 to 4.
The contract result confirmation unit is
Based on the desired unit price of each sell bid selected based on the result of the contract determination performed by the contract calculation execution unit, a single contract price is obtained for each basic time zone, and the contract price is used. An electric power transaction contract calculation device that calculates the settlement price of the single price auction method.
請求項1から請求項4のうちのいずれか1項に記載の電力取引約定計算装置であって、
前記約定計算実行部は、
シングルプライスオークション方式の約定計算を行う場合に、一の売り上げ入札を約定した場合の約定価格の上昇を考慮した総支払い費用を用いて、前記複数の価値の評価及び前記約定判定を行う、電力取引約定計算装置。
The electric power transaction contract calculation device according to any one of claims 1 to 4.
The contract calculation execution unit
Electric power transaction in which the plurality of values are evaluated and the contract is determined by using the total payment cost considering the increase in the contract price when one sales bid is executed when the contract is calculated by the single price auction method. Contract calculator.
請求項1から請求項7のうちのいずれか1項に記載の電力取引約定計算装置であって、
前記演算部は、
前記約定計算実行部で行われた前記約定判定の結果を初期解とする予め定められた探索手法を用いて、前記約定判定の結果を改善する、電力取引約定計算装置。
The electric power transaction contract calculation device according to any one of claims 1 to 7.
The calculation unit
An electric power transaction contract calculation device that improves the result of the contract determination by using a predetermined search method in which the result of the contract determination performed by the contract calculation execution unit is used as an initial solution.
請求項1から請求項8のうちのいずれか1項に記載の電力取引約定計算装置であって、
前記電力取引を行う市場は、需給調整市場である、電力取引約定計算装置。
The electric power transaction contract calculation device according to any one of claims 1 to 8.
The market for conducting the electric power transaction is a supply and demand adjustment market, which is an electric power transaction contract calculation device.
請求項1から請求項8のうちのいずれか1項に記載の電力取引約定計算装置であって、
前記電力取引における買い入札者は、調整力供出事業者である、電力取引約定計算装置。
The electric power transaction contract calculation device according to any one of claims 1 to 8.
The buying bidder in the electric power transaction is an electric power transaction contract calculation device which is a coordinating power provider.
請求項1から請求項7のうちのいずれか1項に記載の電力取引約定計算装置であって、
前記演算部は、
需給調整力の必要量及び発動調整電力量に0より大きく1より小さい第1定数を掛けて前記約定計算実行部で行われた前記約定判定の結果を第1約定結果とし、
前記需給調整力の必要量及び前記発動調整電力量に1より大きい第2定数を掛けて前記約定計算実行部で行われた前記約定判定の結果を第2約定結果とし、
第1約定結果に含まれる売り入札の約定を確定し、
第2約定結果に含まれない売り入札の非約定を確定し、
約定及び非約定のいずれも確定していない売り入札を組み合わせ最適化で約定するかどうかを決定する、電力取引約定計算装置。
The electric power transaction contract calculation device according to any one of claims 1 to 7.
The calculation unit
The result of the contract determination performed by the contract calculation execution unit is defined as the first contract result by multiplying the required amount of supply and demand adjustment power and the amount of activation adjustment power by the first constant larger than 0 and smaller than 1.
The result of the contract determination performed by the contract calculation execution unit by multiplying the required amount of the supply and demand adjustment force and the activation adjustment power amount by a second constant greater than 1, is used as the second contract result.
Confirm the contract of the sell bid included in the first contract result,
Confirm the non-contract of the sell bid that is not included in the second contract result,
An electric power transaction execution calculation device that determines whether or not to execute by combining sell bids that are neither executed nor unconfirmed.
互いに連続する複数の基本時間帯にまたがる売り入札であるブロック入札が実施される電力取引の約定計算を行う演算として、
買い入札データ及び売り入札データを集約し、
集約された前記買い入札データ及び前記売り入札データに基づいて一以上の売り入札の需給調整力の単価及び発動調整電力量の単価を含む複数の価値を評価し、前記複数の価値に基づいて一以上の売り入札の約定判定を行い、
前記約定判定の結果に基づいて約定結果を確定する、電力取引約定計算方法。
As an operation to calculate the contract of an electric power transaction in which a block bid, which is a sell bid over a plurality of consecutive basic time zones, is carried out
Aggregate buy bid data and sell bid data,
Based on the aggregated buy bid data and the sell bid data, a plurality of values including the unit price of the supply and demand adjustment power of one or more sell bids and the unit price of the activation adjustment electric energy are evaluated, and one based on the plurality of values. After making the above sell bid execution judgment,
An electric power transaction contract calculation method for determining a contract result based on the result of the contract determination.
JP2019235576A 2019-12-26 2019-12-26 Power transaction contract calculation device and power transaction contract calculation method Active JP7204635B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2019235576A JP7204635B2 (en) 2019-12-26 2019-12-26 Power transaction contract calculation device and power transaction contract calculation method

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2019235576A JP7204635B2 (en) 2019-12-26 2019-12-26 Power transaction contract calculation device and power transaction contract calculation method

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2021105755A true JP2021105755A (en) 2021-07-26
JP7204635B2 JP7204635B2 (en) 2023-01-16

Family

ID=76918813

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2019235576A Active JP7204635B2 (en) 2019-12-26 2019-12-26 Power transaction contract calculation device and power transaction contract calculation method

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP7204635B2 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP7377392B1 (en) 2023-05-24 2023-11-09 関西電力送配電株式会社 Apparatus, method and program

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2001184433A (en) * 1999-12-24 2001-07-06 Sumitomo Corp Electric power bidding system and electric power bidding method
JP2015001975A (en) * 2013-06-18 2015-01-05 三菱電機株式会社 Electric power transaction market contract calculation apparatus, electric power transaction market contract calculation method, and electric power transaction market contract calculation program
US20190130423A1 (en) * 2017-10-31 2019-05-02 Hitachi, Ltd. Management apparatus and management method

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2001184433A (en) * 1999-12-24 2001-07-06 Sumitomo Corp Electric power bidding system and electric power bidding method
JP2015001975A (en) * 2013-06-18 2015-01-05 三菱電機株式会社 Electric power transaction market contract calculation apparatus, electric power transaction market contract calculation method, and electric power transaction market contract calculation program
US20190130423A1 (en) * 2017-10-31 2019-05-02 Hitachi, Ltd. Management apparatus and management method

Non-Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
TUOMAS SANDHOLM: "Winner Determination in Combinatorial Auction Generalizations", AAMAS'02: PROCEEDINGS OF THE FIRST INTERNATIONAL JOIN CONFERENCE ON AUTONOMOUS AGENTS AND MULTIAGENT, vol. part 1, JPN6022040332, 15 July 2002 (2002-07-15), US, pages 69 - 76, XP058155622, ISSN: 0004881371, DOI: 10.1145/544741.544760 *
毛利 貴之: "自動メカニズムデザインを利用した組合せオークションのルール抽出アルゴリズムの提案", 情報処理学会論文誌 [ONLINE], vol. 第53巻, 第8号, JPN6022040334, 15 August 2012 (2012-08-15), JP, pages 2006 - 2017, ISSN: 0004881372 *

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP7377392B1 (en) 2023-05-24 2023-11-09 関西電力送配電株式会社 Apparatus, method and program

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP7204635B2 (en) 2023-01-16

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN108335182B (en) Cloud platform Web service transaction system and method based on bilateral auction mechanism
US7283979B2 (en) Method of transformational bidding with rebates and discounts
CA2544785C (en) System and method for a hybrid clock and proxy auction
JP5875971B2 (en) Electricity trading system, market-based service system
US20140304098A1 (en) System and Method for a Dynamic Auction with Package Bidding
Pei et al. Sourcing flexibility, spot trading, and procurement contract structure
Vytelingum The structure and behaviour of the continuous double auction
US20210118056A1 (en) Bundles for an efficient auction design
Wang et al. Auction based resource allocation in cloud computing
US20160232603A1 (en) Rationing rules and bidding formats for an efficient auction design
Algarvio Risk-Sharing Contracts and risk management of bilateral contracting in electricity markets
Ramesh et al. An optimal power flow solution to deregulated electricity power market using meta-heuristic algorithms considering load congestion environment
US7840476B1 (en) Transformation bidding with tooling requirements
JP2021105755A (en) Power transaction contract calculation device and power transaction contract calculation method
JP7345287B2 (en) Power trading contract processing device and power trading contract processing method
JP7323673B2 (en) Management device and management method
Balseiro et al. Dynamic revenue sharing
JP2017146761A (en) Supply-demand adjustment device
Zhang et al. Continuous double auction for cloud market: Pricing and bidding analysis
JP2021105757A (en) Power transaction contract calculation device and power transaction contract calculation method
Raouf Sheybani et al. Impacts of premium bounds on the operation of put option and day-ahead electricity markets
JP7166242B2 (en) Power transaction contract calculation device and power transaction contract calculation method
JP4763969B2 (en) Computer system for supporting power transaction contract processing
Zhu et al. On truthful auction mechanisms for electricity allocation with multiple time slots
Das Adaptive Price Mechanism and a Sequential Reverse Negotiation Model in Social Commerce

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20200110

A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20211109

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20220927

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20220927

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20221028

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20221206

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20221228

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Ref document number: 7204635

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150