JP2020187713A - Ai-teacher - Google Patents

Ai-teacher Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP2020187713A
JP2020187713A JP2019099758A JP2019099758A JP2020187713A JP 2020187713 A JP2020187713 A JP 2020187713A JP 2019099758 A JP2019099758 A JP 2019099758A JP 2019099758 A JP2019099758 A JP 2019099758A JP 2020187713 A JP2020187713 A JP 2020187713A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
teacher
school
teachers
evaluation
lesson
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
JP2019099758A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Inventor
知記 松田
Tomoki Matsuda
知記 松田
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Individual
Original Assignee
Individual
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Individual filed Critical Individual
Priority to JP2019099758A priority Critical patent/JP2020187713A/en
Publication of JP2020187713A publication Critical patent/JP2020187713A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Landscapes

  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)

Abstract

To solve a problem that, in a constitution of a lesson in a school education, a genus element depending on a teacher is strong, thus causing the generation of a large number of problems by the teachers resulting from a concentration of a right, in particular, a lesson evaluation of "an interest, an intension and an attitude" and "a thinking, a determination and an expression" in the lesson is most liable to be varied depending on the teachers, and unfairness generated at schoolchildren and guardians is also strong because the evaluation is surely executed by human beings, on the other hand, in a conventional education, it is mandatory for the teacher to grasp and evaluate learning activities of the schoolchildren one by one in parallel with the progress of the lesson, however, it is impossible for one teacher to simultaneously perform all the processing in terms of human resources.SOLUTION: Since the work of a teacher is manualized in fact, an evaluation of school children which should be performed by a school teacher is substituted by an AI-teacher using artificial intelligence. A sound collector is introduced into a school lecture room. Voiceprints of the school children and the teachers are registered in advance, and minutes of utterances are created by voice recognition. Feelings which can be estimated from the number of utterances and voices at a voice analysis are recorded, and a distribution to a lecture participation and an argument is digitalized by natural language processing. Score evaluations by the digitalized lessen data of the school children and feelings of the teachers are accumulated as big data, and the big data are used as training data which are necessary for a determination process of the artificial intelligence. The accuracy of the analogical reasoning of the artificial intelligence is enhanced, and made to further approximate an expert determination which is performed by the teacher, and a genus evaluation method depending on a teacher individual is changed to a standardized and equal evaluation method. By automating the evaluation of the school children, human resources of the school teachers are saved.SELECTED DRAWING: None

Description

電気・電子 Electricity / electronics

人工知能の発達により可能となった音声解析(議事録作成・声紋認証・感情把握)、自然言語処理(言語理解)、専門的な判断(訓練データからの類推処理)を用いて学校教員が果たす役割を人工知能による評価処理装置が代替する。School teachers perform by using voice analysis (minute minutes creation, voiceprint authentication, emotion grasping), natural language processing (language understanding), and professional judgment (analogous processing from training data) made possible by the development of artificial intelligence. The role is replaced by an artificial intelligence evaluation processing device.

学校教育では教員1人に対して生徒児童数が最大40人である。一人の教員が大勢の生徒児童を処理する都合から授業に幅を持てず学習活動が固定化している。生徒児童にとって望ましい教育を実現するためには教員数の確保が必要だが、国と自治体が用意できる予算から人的資源は限られる。そのため変化する時代に適合した教育改革の実現は難航している。
従来の教育では教員が授業進行と並行して生徒児童一人ひとりの学習活動を把握し評価することが義務付けられている。しかし私自身の教員経験を踏まえるに教員一人が授業進行をしながら生徒一人ひとりの学習活動を把握して個別に学習活動の評価付けを行うことは人的資源から考えて不可能であると結論付けた。
授業時数の都合もあり現在の授業構成では生徒児童が意思表示を行う機会が極めて少なく、教員は生徒児童一人ひとりの学習活動を把握できていない。そのため生徒児童・保護者からのクレーム対策に明確な数字として現れるペーパーテストの成績から類推して評価の観点である「関心・意欲・態度」や「思考・判断・表現」の評価を下している。しかし本来ペーパーテストは授業科目における「関心・意欲・態度」や「思考・判断・表現」の評価を決定する材料ではない。
全教科を通じて行われる評価の観点はペーパーテストによる「知識・理解」以外は教員によって評価が大幅に変動する属人的な要素が強く、生徒児童・保護者から見て評価は人間が行うからこそ不公平感が生じやすく納得できない場合が多い。しかし成績評価の権限は教員に一任されているために異議を唱えることが難しく、権限の集中から教員自体が問題となるケースも数多く見受けられる。さらには特別の教科として成績評価の対象となった道徳の教科における「道徳心」や「愛国心」の評価付けを行うことはいかなる教員であっても困難を極めている。
評価を決定するには評価の材料が必要であり、現在の授業構成では生徒児童が発言する機会が少なく生徒児童の意思表示を得ることも困難である。また、生徒児童の成績評価のみならず教員の能力を評価する材料が保護者によるクレームの数しか存在しないことも学校教育を歪める大きな問題である。
そのため教育改革を実現するためには従来教育で生じている問題を解決するためのツールが必要であると考える。本案は教員の負担を軽減し、人件費に比較して低価格で質の良い学校教育を社会に普及するための発明である。
In school education, the maximum number of students per teacher is 40. Because one teacher handles a large number of students, the lessons are not wide and learning activities are fixed. It is necessary to secure the number of teachers in order to realize desirable education for students, but human resources are limited due to the budget available by the national and local governments. Therefore, it is difficult to realize educational reform that suits the changing times.
In conventional education, teachers are obliged to grasp and evaluate the learning activities of each student in parallel with the progress of the lesson. However, based on my own experience as a teacher, I conclude that it is impossible for each teacher to grasp the learning activities of each student and evaluate the learning activities individually while proceeding with the lesson, considering human resources. It was.
Due to the number of class hours, there are very few opportunities for students to express their intentions in the current class structure, and teachers cannot grasp the learning activities of each student. Therefore, "interest, motivation, attitude" and "thinking, judgment, expression", which are the viewpoints of evaluation, are evaluated by analogy with the results of the paper test, which appears as clear numbers in the measures against complaints from students, children and parents. .. However, the paper test is not originally a material for determining the evaluation of "interest, motivation, attitude" and "thinking, judgment, expression" in the lesson subject.
From the viewpoint of evaluation conducted throughout all subjects, there is a strong personal element that the evaluation fluctuates greatly depending on the teacher except for "knowledge / understanding" by the paper test, and it is not possible because the evaluation is performed by human beings from the viewpoint of students, children and parents. In many cases, a sense of fairness is likely to occur and it is not convincing. However, since the authority to evaluate grades is left to the faculty members, it is difficult to disagree, and there are many cases in which the faculty members themselves become a problem due to the concentration of authority. Furthermore, it is extremely difficult for any teacher to evaluate "morality" and "patriotism" in the moral subject that was the subject of grade evaluation as a special subject.
Evaluation materials are needed to determine the evaluation, and with the current class structure, there are few opportunities for students to speak, and it is difficult to obtain manifestations of the students' intentions. In addition, the fact that there are only the number of complaints made by parents as materials for evaluating not only the grades of students and children but also the abilities of teachers is a big problem that distorts school education.
Therefore, in order to realize educational reform, we think that tools for solving problems that have arisen in conventional education are needed. This proposal is an invention for reducing the burden on teachers and disseminating high-quality school education at a low price compared to labor costs to society.

課題を解決する手段は、評価者である教員個人に依存した属人的な評価方法から人工知能により標準化された客観的な評価方法に変えることである。
学校教室に集音器を導入する。予め生徒児童と教員の声紋認証を行い、音声認識によって授業中の発言議事録を作成する。
音声解析の際に発言の回数と声から推察できる感情を記録し、自然言語処理によって授業参加と議論への貢献を数値化する。
数値化された生徒児童の授業データと教員の感覚による成績評価をビッグデータ化して、人工知能の訓練データとして用いる。
人工知能の類推処理が行う精度を教員が行う専門的な判断により近づけ、評価方法を属人的なものから標準化へと変える。
保護者が教員にクレームを入れる原因は不透明な成績評価基準と学校に預けた子供の生活実態を年3回の成績通知時の数行でしか知り得ない不安からである。音声認識によって発言議事録を作成する際に異常な言動を自動検知することによって教員による問題発言と生徒児童の生活実態を自動報告する。AI先生の導入によって社会から閉ざした学校実態を改革し生徒児童の人権を保障する。
現在の授業構成からは生徒の発言回数が限られていることから成績判断を行うためのデータを得ることは困難である。そのため生徒児童が授業中に簡易な回答と教員の支配が及ばない休み時間中に投票を行うためのボタン式の入力機能、そして集音器と同じ音声認識技術を用いて個別に発言者の音声を入力する機能を備えた小型のリモコン装置を配布する。
The means to solve the problem is to change from a personal evaluation method that depends on the individual teacher who is the evaluator to an objective evaluation method that is standardized by artificial intelligence.
Introduce a sound collector to the school classroom. Voiceprint authentication of students and teachers is performed in advance, and minutes of remarks during class are created by voice recognition.
During voice analysis, the number of remarks and emotions that can be inferred from the voice are recorded, and the contribution to class participation and discussion is quantified by natural language processing.
The digitized lesson data of students and the grade evaluation by the teacher's sense are converted into big data and used as training data of artificial intelligence.
The accuracy of artificial intelligence analogy processing will be brought closer to the professional judgment made by teachers, and the evaluation method will be changed from personal to standardized.
The reason why parents make complaints to teachers is that they can only know the unclear grade evaluation criteria and the actual living conditions of children entrusted to the school with only a few lines at the time of grade notification three times a year. By automatically detecting abnormal words and behaviors when creating the minutes of remarks by voice recognition, problematic remarks by teachers and the actual living conditions of students and children are automatically reported. With the introduction of AI teachers, we will reform the school situation that is closed from society and guarantee the human rights of students and children.
From the current class structure, it is difficult to obtain data for grade judgment because the number of times students speak is limited. Therefore, students can answer easily during class, use a button-type input function to vote during breaks that teachers do not control, and use the same voice recognition technology as the sound collector to individually speak the speaker's voice. Distribute a small remote control device with a function to input.

学校教室に集音器を導入し、個人を判別できるように声紋認証データを用意する。音声認識によって生徒と教員の発言を記録する。
自然言語処理により授業中の発言内容を把握。発言回数と感情と発言内容から授業への参加と議論への貢献度を測定する。測定されたデータを参考値として教員が成績評価を下す。AI先生を導入した各学校各自治体によって蓄積されたビッグデータを訓練データとして用いることで専門的な判断精度をより実物の教員に近づける。将来的にはAI先生が自動で評価を判断実行する。
A sound collector will be installed in the school classroom, and voiceprint authentication data will be prepared so that individuals can be identified. Record student and teacher remarks by voice recognition.
Understand what you said during class by natural language processing. Participation in class and contribution to discussion are measured from the number of remarks, emotions, and remarks. The faculty member evaluates the grades using the measured data as a reference value. By using the big data accumulated by each school and local government that introduced the AI teacher as training data, the accuracy of professional judgment will be closer to that of a real teacher. In the future, AI teacher will automatically judge and execute the evaluation.

Claims (1)

人工知能による音声認識・自然言語理解・類推処理を用いた、学校教育における生徒児童教員の評価方法標準化と成績評価自動化を行う装置。 A device that standardizes the evaluation method of students, children and teachers in school education and automates grade evaluation using voice recognition, natural language understanding, and analogy processing by artificial intelligence.
JP2019099758A 2019-05-13 2019-05-13 Ai-teacher Pending JP2020187713A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2019099758A JP2020187713A (en) 2019-05-13 2019-05-13 Ai-teacher

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2019099758A JP2020187713A (en) 2019-05-13 2019-05-13 Ai-teacher

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2020187713A true JP2020187713A (en) 2020-11-19

Family

ID=73223245

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2019099758A Pending JP2020187713A (en) 2019-05-13 2019-05-13 Ai-teacher

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP2020187713A (en)

Citations (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2003228272A (en) * 2002-02-06 2003-08-15 Univ Saga Educational material learning system
JP2007171944A (en) * 1996-10-02 2007-07-05 Sri Internatl Method and apparatus for automatic text-independent grading of pronunciation for language instruction
JP2014191556A (en) * 2013-03-27 2014-10-06 Nippon Telegraph & Telephone East Corp Operator training support system, operator training support method and program
JP2016085284A (en) * 2014-10-23 2016-05-19 Kddi株式会社 Program, apparatus and method for estimating evaluation level with respect to learning item on the basis of person's remark
JP2017134184A (en) * 2016-01-26 2017-08-03 株式会社ウォーカー Learning support system having continuous evaluation function of learner and teaching material
JP2018032276A (en) * 2016-08-25 2018-03-01 株式会社内田洋行 Educational learning activity support system
WO2018203122A1 (en) * 2017-05-04 2018-11-08 International Business Machines Corporation Computationally derived assessment in childhood education systems
JP2019061189A (en) * 2017-09-28 2019-04-18 株式会社デジタル・ナレッジ Teaching material authoring system

Patent Citations (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2007171944A (en) * 1996-10-02 2007-07-05 Sri Internatl Method and apparatus for automatic text-independent grading of pronunciation for language instruction
JP2003228272A (en) * 2002-02-06 2003-08-15 Univ Saga Educational material learning system
JP2014191556A (en) * 2013-03-27 2014-10-06 Nippon Telegraph & Telephone East Corp Operator training support system, operator training support method and program
JP2016085284A (en) * 2014-10-23 2016-05-19 Kddi株式会社 Program, apparatus and method for estimating evaluation level with respect to learning item on the basis of person's remark
JP2017134184A (en) * 2016-01-26 2017-08-03 株式会社ウォーカー Learning support system having continuous evaluation function of learner and teaching material
JP2018032276A (en) * 2016-08-25 2018-03-01 株式会社内田洋行 Educational learning activity support system
WO2018203122A1 (en) * 2017-05-04 2018-11-08 International Business Machines Corporation Computationally derived assessment in childhood education systems
JP2019061189A (en) * 2017-09-28 2019-04-18 株式会社デジタル・ナレッジ Teaching material authoring system

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Klainin Practical work and science education I
Tatiana et al. Assessment and evaluation techniques
Canuto Reflections on Theory and Pedagogy of Challenges in Facilitating Children's Dialogues in the Community of Inquiry.
Osadebe Evaluation of Continuous Assessment Practice by University Lecturers.
Prananda et al. The effect of cooperative learning models of stad type on class v science learning learning sd
Rajabboyevna Organization of English lessons based on advanced pedagogical techniques
Ekpiken et al. Repositioning teacher education in Nigeria for sustainable national development
Yu et al. Group-based Formative Assessment: A Successful Way to Make Summative Assessment Effective.
Hoffmann Fairly certifying competences, objectively assessing creativity
JP2020187713A (en) Ai-teacher
Wiens et al. Five years of video-based assessment data: Lessons from a teacher education program
Alshehri et al. The Influence of Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching towards Elementary Teachers' Mathematical Self-Efficacy.
Jones et al. A framework for assessing teachers’ readiness for pedagogical transformation
Meihami et al. An investigation into the effects of prompt selection on writing complexity, accuracy, and fluency: The case of Iranian learners at different proficiency levels
Khan A Comparison of an Inquiry Lab Teaching Method and Traditional Lab Teaching Method upon Scientific Attitudes of Biology Students.
Gursoy et al. Development or training: The matter of clinical supervision in EFL student teachers' teaching practice
Wang et al. Using grey SP chart to evaluate english reading performances
Alduais An account of teaching strategies which promote student-initiation
Machromah et al. Analyze of The Creative Thinking Level of Students Junior High School Viewed From Mathematics Anxiety
Chaudhary et al. A critical study of teacher educators teaching effectiveness in relation to their teaching subjects and teaching experience
Zainuri et al. Improving Scientific Literacy and Science Process Skills for Prospective Teachers of Islamic Education Science (PAI) through Microteaching Class
TSUCHIYA The effects of a teacher’s formative feedback on the self-regulated learning of lower-proficiency Japanese university learners of English: A qualitative data analysis using TEM
Salamah et al. The Implementation of Authentic Assessment Based on the 2013 Curriculum for the Student of 8th Grade At SMP Negeri 3 Colomadu
Khalifasati Application of The Jigsaw Type Cooperative Learning Model to Improve English Learning Outcomes
Sangi et al. The effect of computer anxiety and computer self-efficacy on Iranian EFL learners’ performance in the speaking section of the TOEFL iBT

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20201106

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20220125

A02 Decision of refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A02

Effective date: 20220726