JP2019209402A - Vehicle body assembly precision inspection method - Google Patents

Vehicle body assembly precision inspection method Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP2019209402A
JP2019209402A JP2018105398A JP2018105398A JP2019209402A JP 2019209402 A JP2019209402 A JP 2019209402A JP 2018105398 A JP2018105398 A JP 2018105398A JP 2018105398 A JP2018105398 A JP 2018105398A JP 2019209402 A JP2019209402 A JP 2019209402A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
vehicle body
inspection
assembly
assembly accuracy
welding
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
JP2018105398A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Inventor
豊 黒田
Yutaka Kuroda
豊 黒田
直人 舩川
Naoto Funakawa
直人 舩川
殿山 大次郎
Daijiro Tonoyama
大次郎 殿山
赤石 崇
Takashi Akaishi
崇 赤石
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Daihatsu Motor Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Daihatsu Motor Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Daihatsu Motor Co Ltd filed Critical Daihatsu Motor Co Ltd
Priority to JP2018105398A priority Critical patent/JP2019209402A/en
Publication of JP2019209402A publication Critical patent/JP2019209402A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Landscapes

  • Automatic Assembly (AREA)

Abstract

To provide a vehicle body assembly precision inspection method capable of inspecting easily assembly precision of a vehicle body.SOLUTION: In a vehicle body assembly precision inspection method, inspection of assembly precision of a vehicle body 2 is performed on an assembly line 1 of the vehicle body 2, on at least either condition between a condition before welding with each positioned body component, and a condition before coating after welding each body component, to thereby perform inspection easily without requiring transfer of the vehicle body 2 to a dedicated inspection station.SELECTED DRAWING: Figure 3

Description

本発明は、車体の組立精度を検査する車体組立精度検査方法に関する。   The present invention relates to a vehicle body assembly accuracy inspection method for inspecting the assembly accuracy of a vehicle body.

自動車製造工場などにおいては、生産開始前の準備調整作業や生産開始後の品質管理のために、従来から車体の組立精度の検査が行われている。   In automobile manufacturing factories and the like, inspection of the assembly accuracy of a vehicle body has been conventionally performed for preparatory adjustment work before starting production and quality control after starting production.

例えば、特許文献1(特開平4−236304号公報)には、三次元測定機を用いて車体の三次元座標データを測定し、測定された座標データと基準値とを比較して、車体の組立精度を検査する方法が提案されている。   For example, in Patent Document 1 (Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 4-236304), three-dimensional coordinate data of a vehicle body is measured using a three-dimensional measuring machine, the measured coordinate data is compared with a reference value, A method for inspecting assembly accuracy has been proposed.

特開平4−236304号公報JP-A-4-236304

ところで、従来は、車体の組立精度を検査するにあたって、専用の検査ステーションへ車体を移送し、そこで車体の組立精度の検査を行っていた。   Conventionally, when inspecting the assembly accuracy of the vehicle body, the vehicle body is transferred to a dedicated inspection station, where the assembly accuracy of the vehicle body is inspected.

しかしながら、専用の検査ステーションで車体を検査する方法は、車体の移送などに要する時間や工数が多くかかるため、検査を迅速に行うことができず、検査結果を素早くフィードバックして工程管理や調整に用いることが難しかった。   However, the method of inspecting the vehicle body at a dedicated inspection station requires a lot of time and man-hours required for the transportation of the vehicle body, so the inspection cannot be performed quickly, and the inspection results are fed back quickly for process management and adjustment. It was difficult to use.

そこで、本発明は、斯かる事情に鑑み、車体の組立精度の検査を簡易に行うことが可能な車体組立精度検査方法を提供することを目的とする。   Therefore, in view of such circumstances, an object of the present invention is to provide a vehicle body assembly accuracy inspection method capable of simply performing inspection of vehicle body assembly accuracy.

上記課題を解決するため、本発明は、車体の組立精度の検査を、車体の組立ライン上で、ボデー部品同士を位置決めした溶接前の状態と、ボデー部品同士を溶接した塗装前の状態との、少なくとも一方の状態で行う車体組立精度検査方法を提供する。   In order to solve the above-mentioned problems, the present invention is to inspect the assembly accuracy of a vehicle body between a state before welding in which the body parts are positioned on the assembly line of the vehicle body and a state before painting in which the body parts are welded together. A vehicle body assembly accuracy inspection method performed in at least one state is provided.

このように、車体の組立精度の検査を組立ライン上で行うことで、車体を専用の検査ステーションに移送することなく、簡易に検査を行うことができる。   In this way, by inspecting the assembly accuracy of the vehicle body on the assembly line, the vehicle body can be easily inspected without being transferred to a dedicated inspection station.

本発明によれば、車体の組立精度の検査を、組立ライン上で簡易に行うことができるので、検査を迅速に行うことができ、その結果をフィードバックして組立工程の管理や調整に用いることができるようになる。また、本発明のような簡易検査を行うことで、その後、車体を専用の検査ステーションに移送して検査する場合であっても、当該検査が行われる前の早い段階で不具合を見つけることができ、専用の検査ステーションでの検査後に大幅な修正が必要になる可能性を減らすことができる。これにより、専用の検査ステーションでの検査回数を減らすことができ、結果的に検査に要する時間や工数を削減できるようになる。また、簡易に検査が行えることで、検査頻度を多くすることができるようになり、組立精度の向上も図れる。   According to the present invention, since the inspection of the assembly accuracy of the vehicle body can be easily performed on the assembly line, the inspection can be quickly performed, and the result is fed back and used for management and adjustment of the assembly process. Will be able to. In addition, by performing a simple inspection as in the present invention, even if the vehicle body is subsequently transferred to a dedicated inspection station for inspection, defects can be found at an early stage before the inspection is performed. This can reduce the possibility of significant modifications after inspection at a dedicated inspection station. As a result, the number of inspections at a dedicated inspection station can be reduced, and as a result, the time and man-hours required for inspection can be reduced. Further, since the inspection can be easily performed, the inspection frequency can be increased, and the assembly accuracy can be improved.

車体の組立ラインの概略図である。It is the schematic of the assembly line of a vehicle body. 組立精度の検査に用いる三次元測定機及び情報処理端末の概略図である。It is the schematic of the three-dimensional measuring machine and information processing terminal which are used for an inspection of assembly accuracy. 組立ライン上で測定者が三次元測定機を用いて車体の組立精度の検査を行う様子を示す図である。It is a figure which shows a mode that a measurer inspects the assembly precision of a vehicle body using a coordinate measuring machine on an assembly line. 組立精度の検査結果を組立工程にフィードバックするフローを示す図である。It is a figure which shows the flow which feeds back the test result of an assembly precision to an assembly process.

以下、添付の図面を参照しつつ、本発明に係る車体組立精度検査方法について説明する。まず、当該検査が行われる車体の組立ラインについて説明する。   Hereinafter, a vehicle body assembly accuracy inspection method according to the present invention will be described with reference to the accompanying drawings. First, an assembly line for a vehicle body where the inspection is performed will be described.

図1は、自動車の車体を組み立てる組立ラインの概略図である。   FIG. 1 is a schematic view of an assembly line for assembling a car body of an automobile.

図1に示すように、組立ライン1には、車体2を構成する所定のボデー部品を搭載して搬送する搬送体3と、搬送体3が移動する搬送経路4と、複数のロボット5とが設置されている。   As shown in FIG. 1, an assembly line 1 includes a transport body 3 that transports a predetermined body part constituting a vehicle body 2, a transport path 4 along which the transport body 3 moves, and a plurality of robots 5. is set up.

搬送体3は、例えば無人搬送車(AGV:Auto Guided Vehicle)であり、床面に敷設された磁気テープが発する磁気により誘導されて搬送経路4上を自動で走行する。また、搬送体3は、レールに沿って移動するパレットなどであってもよい。   The conveyance body 3 is an automatic guided vehicle (AGV), for example, and is automatically guided on the conveyance path 4 by being guided by magnetism generated by a magnetic tape laid on the floor surface. Further, the transport body 3 may be a pallet that moves along a rail.

複数のロボット5は、搬送経路4の両側に設置されており、車体2を構成する所定のボデー部品同士の位置決め、溶接、あるいはそれらの両方を行う多関節ロボットである。例えば、各ロボット5は、フロアパネルに対して、サイドメンバ、ルーフメンバ等の部品を位置決めし、溶接作業を行うことによりこれらを一体に構成して成る車体2を組み立てる。   The plurality of robots 5 are articulated robots that are installed on both sides of the conveyance path 4 and perform positioning, welding, or both of predetermined body parts constituting the vehicle body 2. For example, each robot 5 positions parts such as a side member and a roof member with respect to the floor panel, and performs a welding operation to assemble the vehicle body 2 formed integrally with these.

次に、図2及び図3を参照しつつ、車体組立精度検査に用いる三次元測定機、及びこれを用いた検査方法について説明する。   Next, with reference to FIG. 2 and FIG. 3, a three-dimensional measuring machine used for vehicle body assembly accuracy inspection and an inspection method using the same will be described.

図2に示すように、三次元測定機11は、測定者が把持する把持部12と、把持部12に設けられた測定ヘッド部13とを有する、レーザ式又は光学式の非接触式携帯型三次元測定機である。三次元測定機11は、接触式のものであってもよい。また、三次元測定機11は、パーソナルコンピュータ等の情報処理端末14とデータ通信可能に接続されている。三次元測定機11と情報処理端末14との間での通信形態は、有線通信でもよいし、無線通信であってもよい。情報処理端末14は、三次元測定機11によって得られた車体の三次元測定情報(三次元座標データ)を記憶する測定情報記憶部や、車体の三次元測定情報に基づいて測定対象物(車体)の立体形状を表示する表示部、車種ごと(車体形状ごと)の設計情報を記憶する設計情報記憶部、車体の三次元測定情報と車体の設計情報とを比較して組立誤差(ずれ量)を算出する組立誤差算出部等の機能を有している。   As shown in FIG. 2, the coordinate measuring machine 11 has a gripping part 12 held by a measurer and a measurement head part 13 provided on the gripping part 12. It is a three-dimensional measuring machine. The three-dimensional measuring machine 11 may be a contact type. The coordinate measuring machine 11 is connected to an information processing terminal 14 such as a personal computer so that data communication is possible. The communication form between the coordinate measuring machine 11 and the information processing terminal 14 may be wired communication or wireless communication. The information processing terminal 14 is a measurement information storage unit that stores the three-dimensional measurement information (three-dimensional coordinate data) of the vehicle body obtained by the three-dimensional measuring machine 11, and a measurement object (vehicle body based on the three-dimensional measurement information of the vehicle body). ) 3D shape display unit, design information storage unit for storing design information for each vehicle type (for each vehicle body shape), vehicle body 3D measurement information and vehicle body design information are compared for assembly error (deviation amount) It has a function such as an assembly error calculation unit for calculating.

車体の組立精度の検査は、図3に示すように、車体2が組立ライン1上でロボット5などにより所定位置に位置決めされた状態又は図示しない支持機構によって支持された状態で、測定者が三次元測定機11を用いて行う。測定者は、三次元測定機11の把持部12を把持し、測定ヘッド部13を車体2の検査対象部位に接近させて、検査対象部位の三次元座標データを取得する。三次元測定機11によって取得された三次元測定情報は情報処理端末14に送られ、測定情報記憶部に記憶される。その後、情報処理端末14によって車体2の三次元測定情報と予め記憶されている車体2の設計情報とが比較されて組立誤差(ずれ量)が算出される。そして、算出された誤差が許容範囲の上限値又は下限値を超えないかどうか確認することで、車体2の組立精度の評価を行う。   As shown in FIG. 3, the inspection of the assembly accuracy of the vehicle body is performed by the measurer in a state where the vehicle body 2 is positioned at a predetermined position on the assembly line 1 by a robot 5 or supported by a support mechanism (not shown). This is performed using the original measuring machine 11. The measurer grips the grip portion 12 of the coordinate measuring machine 11 and brings the measurement head portion 13 close to the inspection target portion of the vehicle body 2 to acquire the three-dimensional coordinate data of the inspection target portion. The three-dimensional measurement information acquired by the three-dimensional measuring machine 11 is sent to the information processing terminal 14 and stored in the measurement information storage unit. Thereafter, the information processing terminal 14 compares the three-dimensional measurement information of the vehicle body 2 with the previously stored design information of the vehicle body 2 to calculate an assembly error (deviation amount). Then, by checking whether the calculated error does not exceed the upper limit value or the lower limit value of the allowable range, the assembly accuracy of the vehicle body 2 is evaluated.

図4は、組立精度の検査結果を組立工程にフィードバックするフローを示す図である。   FIG. 4 is a diagram showing a flow of feeding back the inspection result of the assembly accuracy to the assembly process.

図4に示すように、組立ラインにおいて車体の組立工程が開始されると、組立ラインに設置されたロボット等によって車体を構成するボデー部品同士が位置決めされる(Step1)。そして、このようにボデー部品同士が位置決めされた状態で、測定者が三次元測定機を用いて上述の方法で車体の組立精度の検査を行う(Step2)。そして、検査結果から組立精度の評価を行い、組立誤差が許容範囲から外れていれば(Step3で「NO」の場合)、その組立誤差に応じて車体の位置決め条件(ロボットによる位置決めポジション等)の修正を行う(Step4)。   As shown in FIG. 4, when the assembly process of the vehicle body is started in the assembly line, the body parts constituting the vehicle body are positioned by a robot or the like installed in the assembly line (Step 1). Then, in a state where the body parts are positioned in this way, the measurer inspects the assembly accuracy of the vehicle body by the above-described method using the coordinate measuring machine (Step 2). Then, the assembly accuracy is evaluated from the inspection result, and if the assembly error is out of the allowable range (in the case of “NO” in Step 3), the positioning condition of the vehicle body (positioning position by the robot, etc.) according to the assembly error Correction is performed (Step 4).

その後、新たに車体の位置決め工程を行い(Step1)、その状態で再び組立精度の検査を行う(Step2)。そして、組立誤差が許容範囲内になるまで、これらの工程を繰り返し行い、組立誤差が許容範囲内となった場合に(Step3で「YES」の場合に)、次の溶接工程へ進む。   Thereafter, a new vehicle body positioning step is performed (Step 1), and the assembly accuracy is inspected again in this state (Step 2). These processes are repeated until the assembly error is within the allowable range. When the assembly error is within the allowable range (when “YES” in Step 3), the process proceeds to the next welding process.

溶接工程に進んだ場合は、組立ライン上で車体がロボット等によって位置決めされた状態でボデー部品の溶接が行われる(Step5)。溶接が完了すると、組立ライン上で、上述の位置決め後の検査と同様に測定者が三次元測定機を用いて溶接後(塗装前)の車体の組立精度を検査する(Step6)。このとき、車体は、ロボット等による位置決めが維持された状態であってもよいし、位置決めの一部又は全部が解除され、車体を搬送体あるいはその他の支持機構によって支持した状態であってもよい。位置決めが解除されることに伴う車体の変位量(組立誤差)を確認したい場合は、できるだけ多くの箇所の位置決めを解除した状態で検査するのが望ましい。   When the process proceeds to the welding process, the body parts are welded in a state where the vehicle body is positioned on the assembly line by a robot or the like (Step 5). When the welding is completed, the measurer inspects the assembly accuracy of the vehicle body after welding (before painting) using the coordinate measuring machine on the assembly line in the same manner as the inspection after positioning described above (Step 6). At this time, the vehicle body may be in a state in which positioning by a robot or the like is maintained, or may be in a state in which a part or all of the positioning is released and the vehicle body is supported by a carrier or other support mechanism. . When it is desired to check the displacement amount (assembly error) of the vehicle body due to the release of the positioning, it is desirable to inspect in the state where the positioning of as many locations as possible is released.

そして、検査結果から組立精度の評価を行い、組立誤差が許容範囲から外れていれば(Step7で「NO」の場合)、その組立誤差に応じて、車体の溶接条件(打点位置や溶接順序等)又は車体の位置決め条件(ロボットによる位置決めポジション等)あるはこれら両条件の修正を行う(Step8)。そして、修正後、新たに車体の位置決め工程を行い(Step1)、車体が位置決めされた状態で再び組立精度の検査を行う(Step2)。なお、溶接条件だけの修正を行い、位置決め条件の修正を行わなかった場合など、位置決め後の再検査が不要であれば省略しても構わない。   Then, the assembly accuracy is evaluated from the inspection result, and if the assembly error is out of the allowable range (in the case of “NO” in Step 7), the welding conditions of the vehicle body (spot position, welding sequence, etc.) according to the assembly error ) Or vehicle body positioning conditions (positioning position by the robot, etc.) or both of these conditions are corrected (Step 8). Then, after the correction, a new vehicle body positioning step is performed (Step 1), and the assembly accuracy is checked again with the vehicle body positioned (Step 2). In addition, if only the welding conditions are corrected and the positioning conditions are not corrected, it may be omitted if re-inspection after positioning is unnecessary.

その後、再び溶接工程に移行し(Step5)、ボデー部品の溶接後、組立精度の検査を行う(Step6)。そして、組立誤差が許容範囲内になるまで、上述の工程(Step1〜Step8)を繰り返し行い、組立誤差が許容範囲内となったところで(Step7で「YES」の場合)、一連の組立精度の検査を完了する。   Thereafter, the process proceeds to the welding process again (Step 5), and the assembly accuracy is inspected after the body parts are welded (Step 6). Then, the above steps (Step 1 to Step 8) are repeated until the assembly error is within the allowable range. When the assembly error is within the allowable range (in the case of “YES” in Step 7), a series of assembly accuracy inspections are performed. To complete.

以上のように、図4に示す例では、車体の組立精度の検査を、ボデー部品同士を位置決めした溶接前の状態と、ボデー部品を溶接した塗装前の状態との、各状態でそれぞれ行っているが、いずれの検査も組立ライン上で行うようにしている。このように、本発明では、車体の組立精度の検査を組立ライン上で行うことで、簡易に検査を行うことができ、検査を迅速に行って、その結果をフィードバックして組立工程の管理や調整に用いることが可能である。また、本発明のような簡易検査を行うことで、その後、車体を専用の検査ステーションに移送して検査する場合であっても、当該検査が行われる前の早い段階で不具合を見つけることができ、専用の検査ステーションでの検査後に大幅な修正が必要になる可能性を減らすことができる。これにより、専用の検査ステーションでの検査回数を減らすことができ、結果的に検査に要する時間や工数を削減できるようになる。また、簡易に検査が行えることで、検査頻度を多くすることができるようになり、組立精度の向上も図れる。   As described above, in the example shown in FIG. 4, the inspection of the assembly accuracy of the vehicle body is performed in each state of the state before welding in which the body parts are positioned and the state before painting in which the body parts are welded. However, all inspections are performed on the assembly line. As described above, in the present invention, the inspection of the assembly accuracy of the vehicle body is performed on the assembly line, so that the inspection can be easily performed, the inspection is quickly performed, and the result is fed back to manage the assembly process. It can be used for adjustment. In addition, by performing a simple inspection as in the present invention, even if the vehicle body is subsequently transferred to a dedicated inspection station for inspection, defects can be found at an early stage before the inspection is performed. This can reduce the possibility of significant modifications after inspection at a dedicated inspection station. As a result, the number of inspections at a dedicated inspection station can be reduced, and as a result, the time and man-hours required for inspection can be reduced. Further, since the inspection can be easily performed, the inspection frequency can be increased, and the assembly accuracy can be improved.

なお、専用の検査ステーションでの車体の組立精度の検査は、行ってもよいし、行わなくてもよい。例えば、生産開始前の準備段階では、本発明に係る簡易検査を行った後に、車体を専用の検査ステーションに移送して組立精度の検査を行うことで、車体の組立精度の高精度化を図り、生産開始後の定期的な品質管理では、専用の検査ステーションでの検査を省略し、本発明に係る簡易検査のみを行うようにするなど、必要性に応じて専用の検査ステーションでの検査の要否を決定すればよい。   The inspection of the assembly accuracy of the vehicle body at the dedicated inspection station may or may not be performed. For example, in the preparatory stage before the start of production, after performing a simple inspection according to the present invention, the vehicle body is transferred to a dedicated inspection station and the assembly accuracy is inspected, thereby improving the assembly accuracy of the vehicle body. In periodic quality control after the start of production, inspection at the dedicated inspection station is omitted, and only simple inspection according to the present invention is performed. What is necessary is just to determine.

また、上述の例では、車体の組立精度の検査を、ボデー部品同士を位置決めした溶接前の状態と、ボデー部品を溶接した塗装前の状態との、両方の状態でそれぞれ行うようにしているが、位置決め状態と溶接後の状態のいずれか一方の状態のときのみ組立精度の検査を行うようにしてもよい。例えば、生産開始前の準備段階では、位置決め状態と溶接後の状態との両方で検査を行うことで、車体の組立精度の向上を図ることができる。すなわち、両方の状態で検査を行うことで、位置決め工程と溶接工程の各工程における特有の事情に起因する組立誤差を確認することができるので、それぞれの組立誤差に対する対策及び改善を図ることができる。一方、生産開始後の定期的な品質管理では、位置決め状態での検査を省略し、溶接後の検査のみを行うようにしてもよい。また、必要に応じて、位置決め状態での検査のみ行い、溶接後の検査を省略することも可能である。   In the above-described example, the inspection of the assembly accuracy of the vehicle body is performed in both the state before welding in which the body parts are positioned and the state before painting in which the body parts are welded. The assembly accuracy may be inspected only in one of the positioning state and the state after welding. For example, in the preparatory stage before the start of production, inspection can be performed in both the positioning state and the state after welding, thereby improving the assembly accuracy of the vehicle body. That is, by performing inspections in both states, it is possible to check assembly errors caused by unique circumstances in each step of the positioning process and the welding process, so that countermeasures and improvements for the respective assembly errors can be achieved. . On the other hand, in periodic quality control after the start of production, the inspection in the positioning state may be omitted and only the inspection after welding may be performed. Further, if necessary, it is possible to perform only the inspection in the positioning state and omit the inspection after welding.

また、上述の例のように、組立ラインの搬送経路をAGV等の無人搬送車が走行可能な凹凸の無い(同一平面状の)床面とすることで、携帯型の三次元測定機を用いた検査が行いやすくなる。すなわち、搬送体用のレール等が床面に敷設されていないことで、測定者が組立ライン上の車体に近づいて作業しやすくなり、携帯型の三次元測定機を用いた検査が行いやすくなる。また、携帯型の三次元測定機を用いることで、組立ラインに大型の三次元測定機を設置するためのスペースを確保しなくてもよくなるので、設備の小型化も図れるようになる。   In addition, as in the above-described example, a portable three-dimensional measuring machine can be used by setting the conveyance path of the assembly line to a floor surface having no unevenness (coplanar) on which an automated guided vehicle such as AGV can travel. This makes it easier to perform inspections. In other words, since the rails for the carrier are not laid on the floor surface, it becomes easier for the measurer to work closer to the vehicle body on the assembly line, and to perform inspection using a portable coordinate measuring machine. . Further, by using a portable coordinate measuring machine, it is not necessary to secure a space for installing a large coordinate measuring machine on the assembly line, so that the equipment can be downsized.

以上、本発明に係る車体組立精度検査方法について説明したが、本発明は、上述の例に限らず、本発明の要旨を逸脱しない範囲で種々の変更を加え得ることは勿論である。   Although the vehicle body assembly accuracy inspection method according to the present invention has been described above, the present invention is not limited to the above-described example, and it is needless to say that various modifications can be made without departing from the gist of the present invention.

1 組立ライン
2 車体
3 搬送体
4 搬送経路
5 ロボット
11 三次元測定機
12 把持部
13 測定ヘッド部
14 情報処理端末
DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 1 Assembly line 2 Car body 3 Conveyance body 4 Conveyance path 5 Robot 11 CMM 12 Gripping part 13 Measuring head part 14 Information processing terminal

Claims (1)

車体の組立精度の検査を、車体の組立ライン上で、ボデー部品同士を位置決めした溶接前の状態と、前記ボデー部品同士を溶接した塗装前の状態との、少なくとも一方の状態で行うことを特徴とする車体組立精度検査方法。   Inspection of the assembly accuracy of the vehicle body is performed in at least one of a state before welding in which the body parts are positioned on the assembly line of the vehicle body and a state before painting in which the body parts are welded together. Car body assembly accuracy inspection method.
JP2018105398A 2018-05-31 2018-05-31 Vehicle body assembly precision inspection method Pending JP2019209402A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2018105398A JP2019209402A (en) 2018-05-31 2018-05-31 Vehicle body assembly precision inspection method

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2018105398A JP2019209402A (en) 2018-05-31 2018-05-31 Vehicle body assembly precision inspection method

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2019209402A true JP2019209402A (en) 2019-12-12

Family

ID=68846135

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2018105398A Pending JP2019209402A (en) 2018-05-31 2018-05-31 Vehicle body assembly precision inspection method

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP2019209402A (en)

Citations (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH01153388A (en) * 1987-12-10 1989-06-15 Nissan Motor Co Ltd Assembly of automobile body
JPH04240028A (en) * 1991-01-18 1992-08-27 Fuji Heavy Ind Ltd Assembling method for automotive car body
JPH06179136A (en) * 1992-12-15 1994-06-28 Mazda Motor Corp Assembly device
JPH0725371A (en) * 1993-07-08 1995-01-27 Nissan Motor Co Ltd Adjustment support device for body assembling jig
JP2002002566A (en) * 2000-06-20 2002-01-09 Daihatsu Motor Co Ltd Method of measuring assembly accuracy of fitting member by three-dimensional digitizer
JP2006072800A (en) * 2004-09-03 2006-03-16 Toyota Auto Body Co Ltd Controller for automated transfer cart
JP2008207735A (en) * 2007-02-27 2008-09-11 Honda Motor Co Ltd Welding device of vehicle body, and vehicle body manufacturing method
JP2017096637A (en) * 2015-11-18 2017-06-01 三菱自動車エンジニアリング株式会社 Measurement method of three-dimensional shape

Patent Citations (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH01153388A (en) * 1987-12-10 1989-06-15 Nissan Motor Co Ltd Assembly of automobile body
JPH04240028A (en) * 1991-01-18 1992-08-27 Fuji Heavy Ind Ltd Assembling method for automotive car body
JPH06179136A (en) * 1992-12-15 1994-06-28 Mazda Motor Corp Assembly device
JPH0725371A (en) * 1993-07-08 1995-01-27 Nissan Motor Co Ltd Adjustment support device for body assembling jig
JP2002002566A (en) * 2000-06-20 2002-01-09 Daihatsu Motor Co Ltd Method of measuring assembly accuracy of fitting member by three-dimensional digitizer
JP2006072800A (en) * 2004-09-03 2006-03-16 Toyota Auto Body Co Ltd Controller for automated transfer cart
JP2008207735A (en) * 2007-02-27 2008-09-11 Honda Motor Co Ltd Welding device of vehicle body, and vehicle body manufacturing method
JP2017096637A (en) * 2015-11-18 2017-06-01 三菱自動車エンジニアリング株式会社 Measurement method of three-dimensional shape

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US20170341229A1 (en) Stocker for receiving cassettes and method of teaching a stocker robot disposed therein
US10877468B2 (en) Self-monitoring manufacturing system
US10525589B2 (en) Robot system, method for controlling robot, and robot controller
EP2480383B1 (en) Quality control system and method for manufactured parts
US11294363B2 (en) System and method for positioning workpiece in a workstation using an automatic guided vehicle
KR20010040092A (en) Improved automatic motor vehicle body assembly and welding station
CN109129019A (en) A kind of on-line measuring device and its detection method of miniature workpiece flexible production line
JP6598898B2 (en) Core misalignment detection apparatus and core misalignment detection method
JP5228469B2 (en) Mixed work line system using automated guided vehicles
JP2019209402A (en) Vehicle body assembly precision inspection method
JP7051228B2 (en) Body assembly accuracy inspection method
CN110650815B (en) Method and control unit for controlling a joining station
WO2015075775A1 (en) Robot system
JP2020062724A (en) Work-piece grasping device
KR102113636B1 (en) A car body manufacturing system using displacement sensor
WO2004069465A1 (en) Work welding system, work welding method, and work welding program
WO2021176384A1 (en) System for locating and treating surface defects on objects, in particular motor vehicle bodies
JP7111633B2 (en) Automated 3D measurement inspection system for processed products
JP2016187851A (en) Calibration device
JP2006334731A (en) Product transport carriage, robot position measuring system and its measuring method
US10088304B2 (en) Composite carrier and automated thickness measurement and calibration system and method
JP2022117583A (en) Inspection method for accuracy in assembling vehicle body
US20220413467A1 (en) Method of and apparatus for maintaining a transport system
US20240124079A1 (en) Method and system of automated vehicle body routing system employing predicted vehicle body imperfections and vision detection system
US20230070525A1 (en) System and method for work quality assurance in vehicle manufacturing

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20210203

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20211216

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20211222

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20220217

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20220428

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20220622

A02 Decision of refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A02

Effective date: 20220824