JP2019039857A - Evaluation method of in-car noise due to rail wavy abrasion, in-car noise evaluation system, and rail maintenance method using the same - Google Patents

Evaluation method of in-car noise due to rail wavy abrasion, in-car noise evaluation system, and rail maintenance method using the same Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP2019039857A
JP2019039857A JP2017163119A JP2017163119A JP2019039857A JP 2019039857 A JP2019039857 A JP 2019039857A JP 2017163119 A JP2017163119 A JP 2017163119A JP 2017163119 A JP2017163119 A JP 2017163119A JP 2019039857 A JP2019039857 A JP 2019039857A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
vehicle
rail
noise
vehicle interior
data
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
JP2017163119A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Inventor
田中 博文
Hirobumi Tanaka
博文 田中
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Railway Technical Research Institute
Original Assignee
Railway Technical Research Institute
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Railway Technical Research Institute filed Critical Railway Technical Research Institute
Priority to JP2017163119A priority Critical patent/JP2019039857A/en
Publication of JP2019039857A publication Critical patent/JP2019039857A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Landscapes

  • Machines For Laying And Maintaining Railways (AREA)
  • Measurement Of Mechanical Vibrations Or Ultrasonic Waves (AREA)

Abstract

To provide an evaluation method of in-car noises due to rail wavy abrasion and in-car noise evaluation system capable of detecting rail wavy abrasion, which was hard to evaluate with a conventional rail wavy abrasion detection method, and capable of evaluating whether or not the rail wavy abrasion affects on in-car comfort, and a rail maintenance method using the same.SOLUTION: The evaluation method comprises the steps of: generating a piece of floor noise data on a floor of a car with first measurement means installed on the floor of the car; generating a piece of in-car noise data with second measurement means installed in the car; determining a generation segment of the rail wavy abrasion on the railroad using the floor noise data; and evaluating the in-car comfort due to the rail wavy abrasion using the in-car noise data.SELECTED DRAWING: Figure 2

Description

本発明は、レール波状摩耗に伴う車内騒音の評価方法およびこの評価方法を用いた車内騒音評価システム、並びにこれを用いたレールの保守方法に関する。   The present invention relates to a method for evaluating vehicle interior noise accompanying rail corrugated wear, a vehicle interior noise evaluation system using this evaluation method, and a rail maintenance method using the same.

従来、鉄道の軌道の保守管理を目的として、定期的に専用の軌道検測車等を用いて軌道検測データ等の波形データを取得し、当該軌道検測データに含まれる著大値を検出して、軌道に鉄道車両の走行安全を脅かすような不整や鉄道車両の乗り心地を低下させるような不整が生じていないかの確認を行い、その著大値と管理値の照査によって鉄道の軌道の修繕の実施を検討している。また、軌道検測は専用の軌道検測車を用いて在来線の場合は年に数回程度の頻度で、新幹線の場合は月に数回程度の頻度で軌道検測データの取得が行われていたところ、近年では営業車両に搭載可能な軌道検測装置を用いることによって、多い場合には一日に数回程度の高頻度で軌道検測データの取得を行うことが可能となってきている。   Conventionally, for the purpose of maintenance management of railway tracks, waveform data such as track inspection data is periodically acquired using a dedicated track inspection vehicle, etc., and a significant value included in the track inspection data is detected. The railway track is checked for irregularities that threaten the running safety of the railway vehicles and irregularities that reduce the riding comfort of the railway vehicles. We are considering the implementation of repairs. In addition, track inspection data is acquired several times a year for conventional lines using a dedicated track inspection vehicle, and several times a month for Shinkansen lines. However, in recent years, it has become possible to acquire trajectory inspection data with a high frequency of several times a day in many cases by using a trajectory inspection device that can be mounted on a commercial vehicle. ing.

また、近年では、豪華な観光列車を用いて客室サービスを向上させた観光列車の運行が実施又は計画されている。このような観光列車では、車内騒音が乗客に対して不快な印象を与えることから、レール波状摩耗に伴う車内騒音の発生を効率的に把握し、必要な対策を講じる手段について検討がなされている。なお、レール波状摩耗とは、鉄道車両の繰り返し走行に伴ってレール表面に形成される周期的かつ微細なレールの凹凸のことをいう。   In recent years, sightseeing trains have been implemented or planned with improved guest room service using luxurious sightseeing trains. In such a tourist train, the noise in the vehicle gives an unpleasant impression to the passengers, and therefore, means for efficiently grasping the generation of the noise in the vehicle due to the rail-like wear and taking necessary measures are being studied. . The rail wave wear refers to periodic and fine rail irregularities formed on the rail surface as the railway vehicle repeatedly travels.

ここで、レール波状摩耗の計測手法としては、従来、種々の計測手法が知られている。特許文献1に示すレール波状摩耗検出方法は、車両上で測定した振動加速度又は騒音データから時間軸データを生成し、当該時間軸データを車両の走行距離に関連付けられた空間軸データに変換し、この空間軸データを空間周波数軸上でフィルタ処理を施してフィルタ処理データを生成し、このフィルタ処理データによりレールの波状摩耗の発生区間を特定するという測定方法を採用している。   Here, various measuring methods are conventionally known as a measuring method of rail corrugated wear. The rail wave-like wear detection method shown in Patent Document 1 generates time axis data from vibration acceleration or noise data measured on a vehicle, converts the time axis data into spatial axis data associated with the travel distance of the vehicle, This spatial axis data is subjected to a filtering process on the spatial frequency axis to generate filtering data, and a measuring method is adopted in which the section where the wavy wear of the rail is specified is specified by the filtering data.

また、車内騒音の評価方法は種々の評価方法が知られており、例えば特許文献2に示すように、GPSアンテナ、3軸加速度センサ及び騒音計を用いた車両走行動揺/騒音解析システムを採用している。また、騒音計を車内に持ち込んで設置し、簡易的に騒音レベルを測定する方法も知られている。   Various evaluation methods are known for evaluating vehicle interior noise. For example, as shown in Patent Document 2, a vehicle running vibration / noise analysis system using a GPS antenna, a three-axis acceleration sensor, and a noise meter is adopted. ing. There is also known a method of simply measuring a noise level by bringing a sound level meter into a vehicle.

特許第5433516号公報Japanese Patent No. 5433516 特許第4914785号公報Japanese Patent No. 4914785

しかし、特許文献1に記載されたレール波状摩耗の検出方法によれば、時間軸データを空間軸データに変換してフィルタ処理を行うので、レール波状摩耗に起因する車内騒音を低減させるための保線作業の施工箇所の選定を容易に行うことができるという利点があるものの、発生したレール波状摩耗が車内の車内快適性にどのような影響を与えるのか、又はレール波状摩耗によって生じる騒音が車内快適性に影響を与えるものであるのかについて評価することができないものであった。   However, according to the rail corrugated wear detection method described in Patent Document 1, since the time axis data is converted into the spatial axis data and the filtering process is performed, the track maintenance for reducing the vehicle interior noise caused by the rail corrugated wear is performed. Although there is an advantage that the work location can be easily selected, the effect of the generated rail corrugation on the in-car comfort in the car, or the noise generated by the rail corrugation is in-vehicle comfort. It was not possible to evaluate whether it would affect

また、特許文献2に記載された車両走行動揺/騒音解析システムについても、レール波状摩耗が車内の車内快適性に与える影響まで評価するものではなく、レール波状摩耗に起因する車内快適性、あるいは車内快適性へのレール波状摩耗の寄与度について評価することができないという問題があった。   In addition, the vehicle running vibration / noise analysis system described in Patent Document 2 does not evaluate the influence of rail corrugation on the in-vehicle comfort in the vehicle. There was a problem that it was not possible to evaluate the contribution of rail corrugation to comfort.

車内快適性の評価は、本来であれば車内騒音を測定することで評価すべきであるところ、車内快適性を悪化させる要因となりうるレール波状摩耗を測定する方法や装置では、車内騒音を評価することができないものであり、1つの装置によってレール波状摩耗の発生の有無と車内快適性の評価を同時に把握及び管理することができないという問題があった。   Evaluation of in-vehicle comfort should be evaluated by measuring in-vehicle noise. However, in the method and apparatus for measuring rail wavy wear, which can cause in-vehicle comfort, the in-vehicle noise is evaluated. There is a problem that it is impossible to simultaneously grasp and manage the presence or absence of occurrence of rail corrugated wear and the evaluation of in-vehicle comfort with a single device.

そこで、本発明は上述した問題に鑑みてなされたものであり、従来のレール波状摩耗検出方法では評価できなかった、レール波状摩耗の発生を検出すると共に、当該レール波状摩耗によって車内快適性に影響があるか否かを評価することができるレール波状摩耗に伴う車内騒音評価方法及び車内騒音評価システム、並びにこれを用いたレールの保守方法を提供することを目的とする。   Therefore, the present invention has been made in view of the above-described problems, and detects the occurrence of rail corrugated wear, which could not be evaluated by the conventional rail corrugated wear detection method, and affects the interior comfort by the rail corrugated wear. It is an object of the present invention to provide an in-vehicle noise evaluation method and an in-vehicle noise evaluation system that can be used to evaluate whether or not there is a rail wavy wear, and a rail maintenance method using the same.

本発明に係る車内騒音評価方法は、軌道上を走行する車両の車内騒音評価方法であって、前記車両の車内の床面に設置した第1の計測手段によって前記車内の床面における床面騒音データを生成し、前記車両の車内に設置した第2の計測手段によって前記車内の車内騒音データを生成し、前記床面騒音データを用いて前記軌道のレール波状摩耗の発生区間を決定し、前記車内騒音データを用いて前記レール波状摩耗に伴う車内快適性の評価を行うことを特徴とする。   The vehicle interior noise evaluation method according to the present invention is a vehicle interior noise evaluation method for a vehicle traveling on a track, and the floor noise on the floor surface of the vehicle is measured by a first measuring means installed on the floor surface of the vehicle. Generating data, generating in-vehicle noise data in the vehicle by a second measuring means installed in the vehicle of the vehicle, using the floor noise data to determine the occurrence section of rail corrugated wear of the track, In-vehicle comfort data associated with the rail corrugated wear is evaluated using in-vehicle noise data.

また、本発明に係る車内騒音評価方法において、前記第1の計測手段は、収納箱に収納されていると好適である。   In the vehicle interior noise evaluation method according to the present invention, it is preferable that the first measuring means is stored in a storage box.

また、本発明に係る車内騒音評価方法において、前記収納箱は、下面のみに開口していると好適である。   In the vehicle interior noise evaluation method according to the present invention, it is preferable that the storage box is open only on the lower surface.

また、本発明に係る車内騒音評価システムは、軌道上を走行する車両の車内騒音評価システムであって、前記車内の床面における床面騒音データを生成する第1の計測手段と、前記車内の車内騒音データを生成する第2の計測手段と、前記床面騒音データ及び前記車内騒音データを用いて前記軌道のレール波状摩耗の発生区間の決定及び車内快適性の評価を行う情報処理手段とを備えることを特徴とする。   An in-vehicle noise evaluation system according to the present invention is an in-vehicle noise evaluation system for a vehicle traveling on a track, and includes first measuring means for generating floor noise data on a floor surface in the vehicle, A second measuring means for generating in-vehicle noise data; and an information processing means for determining a rail corrugated wear occurrence section of the track and evaluating in-vehicle comfort using the floor noise data and the in-vehicle noise data. It is characterized by providing.

また、本発明に係る車内騒音評価システムにおいて、前記第1の計測手段は、収納箱に収納され、前記収納箱は、前記床面に載置されると好適である。   In the vehicle interior noise evaluation system according to the present invention, it is preferable that the first measuring means is stored in a storage box, and the storage box is placed on the floor surface.

また、本発明に係る車内騒音評価システムにおいて、前記第2の計測手段は、前記車内に設置されると好適である。   In the in-vehicle noise evaluation system according to the present invention, it is preferable that the second measuring means is installed in the vehicle.

また、本発明に係るレールの保守方法は、上述した車内騒音評価システムを用いて判定された指標に基づき、レール波状摩耗を整備することを特徴とする。   The rail maintenance method according to the present invention is characterized in that rail-like wear is maintained based on an index determined using the above-described vehicle interior noise evaluation system.

本発明に係る車内騒音評価方法及び車内騒音評価システム、並びにレールの保守方法は、定期的に、例えば年に1回〜数回程度の頻度でレールの波状摩耗の有無を測定することによって、レール波状摩耗の管理に関する保守サイクルが確立できると共に、測定結果に応じて必要な箇所にレール削正あるいはレール交換などの車内騒音を低減させるための保線作業を指示することによって、定量的な車内快適性の向上を図ることができる。その際、車内騒音を同時に評価することによって、車内快適性の向上効果が高い区間を選定したり、車内快適性そのものを評価指標として施工することが可能となる。   An in-vehicle noise evaluation method, an in-vehicle noise evaluation system, and a rail maintenance method according to the present invention can be performed by measuring the presence or absence of wavy wear on a rail periodically, for example, once to several times a year. A maintenance cycle related to wavy wear management can be established, and quantitative in-vehicle comfort can be provided by instructing track maintenance work to reduce in-vehicle noise such as rail correction or rail replacement at necessary locations according to measurement results. Can be improved. At that time, by simultaneously evaluating the in-vehicle noise, it is possible to select a section having a high effect of improving the in-vehicle comfort, or to construct the in-vehicle comfort itself as an evaluation index.

本実施形態に係る車内騒音評価システムを備えた車両の概要図。1 is a schematic diagram of a vehicle provided with a vehicle interior noise evaluation system according to the present embodiment. 本実施形態に係る車内騒音評価システムの概要図。1 is a schematic diagram of a vehicle interior noise evaluation system according to the present embodiment. 本実施形態に係る車内騒音評価システムのデータ処理のフロー図。The flowchart of the data processing of the vehicle interior noise evaluation system which concerns on this embodiment.

以下、本発明を実施するための好適な実施形態について、図面を用いて説明する。なお、以下の実施形態は、各請求項に係る発明を限定するものではなく、また、実施形態の中で説明されている特徴の組み合わせの全てが発明の解決手段に必須であるとは限らない。   DESCRIPTION OF EXEMPLARY EMBODIMENTS Hereinafter, preferred embodiments for carrying out the invention will be described with reference to the drawings. The following embodiments do not limit the invention according to each claim, and all combinations of features described in the embodiments are not necessarily essential to the solution means of the invention. .

図1は、本実施形態に係る車内騒音評価システムを備えた車両の概要図であり、図2は、本実施形態に係る車内騒音評価システムの概要図であり、図3は、本実施形態に係る車内騒音評価システムのデータ処理のフロー図である。   FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of a vehicle provided with a vehicle interior noise evaluation system according to the present embodiment, FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of the vehicle interior noise evaluation system according to the present embodiment, and FIG. It is a flowchart of the data processing of the in-vehicle noise evaluation system which concerns.

図1および2に示すように、本実施形態に係る車内騒音評価システム10は、車両1の床面8に載置されたセンサ部14と、車両1の内部空間に設置された第2の計測手段15を備えている。なお、車両1は、空気バネ7を介して車両1を支持する台車枠5と、軸バネ6を介して台車枠5に回転自在に取り付けられた輪軸を備えており、輪軸の左右に回転を固定された状態で車輪4が取り付けられている。車輪4は、軌道面2に敷設されたレール3上を走行する。なお、レール波状摩耗とは、繰り返しレール3上を走行する車両1からの作用によってレール3が周期的に摩耗又は損傷してレール3の車輪4の転走面に周期的かつ微細な凹凸が形成される現象のことをいう。   As shown in FIGS. 1 and 2, the vehicle interior noise evaluation system 10 according to this embodiment includes a sensor unit 14 placed on the floor surface 8 of the vehicle 1 and a second measurement installed in the internal space of the vehicle 1. Means 15 are provided. The vehicle 1 includes a bogie frame 5 that supports the vehicle 1 via an air spring 7 and a wheel shaft that is rotatably attached to the bogie frame 5 via a shaft spring 6, and rotates to the left and right of the wheel shaft. The wheel 4 is attached in a fixed state. The wheel 4 travels on the rail 3 laid on the raceway surface 2. The rail wavy wear means that the rail 3 is periodically worn or damaged by the action of the vehicle 1 that repeatedly travels on the rail 3 to form periodic and fine irregularities on the rolling surface of the wheel 4 of the rail 3. The phenomenon that is done.

センサ部14は、第1の計測手段11及び加速度センサ/ジャイロセンサ13を備えており、第1の計測手段11は、下面のみに開口している収納箱12に収納されている。第1の計測手段11及び第2の計測手段15は、それぞれマイクロホンが好適に用いられ、例えば普通騒音計、精密騒音計及びその他のコンデンサ型マイクロホン等を用いることができる。   The sensor unit 14 includes a first measuring unit 11 and an acceleration sensor / gyro sensor 13, and the first measuring unit 11 is stored in a storage box 12 that is open only on the lower surface. For the first measuring means 11 and the second measuring means 15, microphones are preferably used, and for example, a normal sound level meter, a precision sound level meter and other condenser type microphones can be used.

なお、第1の計測手段11は、車両1の床面8に設置されているので、レール3と車輪4との接触に起因する床面騒音N1を測定する。また、第1の計測手段11は、下面のみに開口している収納箱12に収納されているので、車内騒音N2による影響を排除して床面騒音N1を効率的に測定できるように構成されている。   In addition, since the 1st measurement means 11 is installed in the floor surface 8 of the vehicle 1, the floor surface noise N1 resulting from the contact with the rail 3 and the wheel 4 is measured. Further, since the first measuring means 11 is stored in the storage box 12 that is open only on the lower surface, the first measuring means 11 is configured to efficiently measure the floor noise N1 while eliminating the influence of the vehicle interior noise N2. ing.

収納箱12は、車内騒音N2による影響を防止することができればどのような構成でも構わないが、例えばアルミニウムやジュラルミンなどの金属や合成樹脂又は木材からなる箱の内面に吸音材を貼付して構成すると好適である。これに対し、第2の計測手段15は、車両1の車内にむき出しに配置されているので、適切に車内騒音N2を測定することができるように構成されている。   The storage box 12 may have any configuration as long as it can prevent the influence of the vehicle interior noise N2. For example, the storage box 12 is configured by attaching a sound absorbing material to the inner surface of a box made of metal such as aluminum or duralumin, synthetic resin, or wood. It is preferable. On the other hand, since the 2nd measurement means 15 is arrange | positioned in the inside of the vehicle 1 of the vehicle 1, it is comprised so that the vehicle interior noise N2 can be measured appropriately.

加速度センサ/ジャイロセンサ13は、車両1の動揺管理や曲線検知に用いられ、加速度センサは、例えば抵抗線式、サーボ式、圧電式、及びMEMS式等が用いられ、ジャイロセンサは、例えば機械式、流体式、光学式、量子式、及びMEMS式等が好適に用いられる。   The acceleration sensor / gyro sensor 13 is used for vibration management and curve detection of the vehicle 1, and the acceleration sensor is, for example, a resistance wire type, a servo type, a piezoelectric type, and a MEMS type, and the gyro sensor is, for example, a mechanical type Fluid type, optical type, quantum type, MEMS type and the like are preferably used.

また、本実施形態に係る車内騒音評価システム10は、上述したセンサ部14及び第2の計測手段15の他に、速度検知手段としてのGPSレシーバ16、速度検知の補助手段及び位置検知手段としてのマーカスイッチ17及びデータ収録・処理部18を備えている。GPSレシーバ16は、車両1の走行速度を検出するために用いられ、マーカスイッチ17は、車両1の現在の位置を特定するために用いられる。さらに、情報処理手段を構成するデータ収録・処理部18は、計測データを収録するための記録装置、収録データの処理プログラムを実行するCPU(Central Processing Unit)と、処理プログラムを格納するROM(Read Only Memory)と、CPUの処理に必要なデータを一時的に記憶するRAM(Random Access Memory)とを備えている。なお、速度検知手段は、GPSレシーバの他、速度発電機パルスを速度データに変換する装置や速度発電機パルスそのものを入力して、後処理で速度データを演算するように構成することも可能である。また、速度検知の補助手段は、マーカスイッチの他、線路に建植されている100m間隔のキロ程標識で定期的にマーカ入力をすれば、その間の平均速度を求めることができ、これによって位置検出を行っても構わないし、位置検出手段は、ジャイロによる曲線検知を用いても構わない。   In addition, the vehicle interior noise evaluation system 10 according to the present embodiment includes a GPS receiver 16 as a speed detection unit, a speed detection auxiliary unit, and a position detection unit in addition to the sensor unit 14 and the second measurement unit 15 described above. A marker switch 17 and a data recording / processing unit 18 are provided. The GPS receiver 16 is used to detect the traveling speed of the vehicle 1, and the marker switch 17 is used to specify the current position of the vehicle 1. Further, the data recording / processing unit 18 constituting the information processing means includes a recording device for recording measurement data, a CPU (Central Processing Unit) for executing a processing program for the recorded data, and a ROM (Read) for storing the processing program. And an RAM (Random Access Memory) that temporarily stores data necessary for CPU processing. The speed detecting means can be configured to calculate the speed data in post-processing by inputting a speed generator pulse or a device for converting the speed generator pulse into speed data or the speed generator pulse itself in addition to the GPS receiver. is there. In addition to the marker switch, the auxiliary means for speed detection can obtain the average speed during the period if the marker is periodically input with a 100 m-distance marker built on the track. Detection may be performed, and the position detection means may use curve detection by a gyro.

次に、本実施形態に係る車内騒音評価方法を実行するための車内騒音評価システム10の動作について説明を行う。図3に示すように、第1の計測手段11によって計測された床面騒音N1の測定結果から床面騒音データを生成する(S101)。ここで測定された床面騒音データは、時間サンプリングされた時間軸上のデータであるので、これを距離サンプリングの空間軸データに変換する(S102)。次に地上との位置補正を行う(S103)。具体的にはマーカスイッチ17によって約1km間隔で地上に設置されているキロ程標識をマーキングすることによって、空間軸上のデータに保線作業で用いられるキロ程を付与する。次に、波状摩耗検出フィルタ(S104)によって空間軸データを空間周波数軸上でバンドパスフィルタ処理して波状摩耗に起因する周波数成分のみを抽出する(S104)。次いで、レール波状摩耗データを標準偏差に代表される区間統計量で評価することで波状摩耗の評価(S105)を行い、レール波状摩耗の発生区間を決定する。なお、波状摩耗の評価方法は周知技術を適用することができるため、ここでは詳細な説明は省略する。   Next, the operation of the vehicle interior noise evaluation system 10 for executing the vehicle interior noise evaluation method according to the present embodiment will be described. As shown in FIG. 3, floor noise data is generated from the measurement result of the floor noise N1 measured by the first measuring means 11 (S101). Since the floor noise data measured here is time-sampled data on the time axis, it is converted into spatial sampling data of distance sampling (S102). Next, position correction with respect to the ground is performed (S103). More specifically, the marker switch 17 marks the kilometer mark installed on the ground at intervals of about 1 km, thereby giving the kilometer data used in the track maintenance work to the data on the space axis. Next, the spatial axis data is subjected to bandpass filter processing on the spatial frequency axis by the wavy wear detection filter (S104), and only the frequency component resulting from the wavy wear is extracted (S104). Next, the corrugated wear is evaluated by evaluating the rail corrugated wear data with the section statistics represented by the standard deviation (S105), and the section in which the rail corrugated wear occurs is determined. In addition, since a well-known technique can be applied to the evaluation method of wavy wear, detailed description is omitted here.

次いで、車内快適性の評価を行う。本実施形態に係る車内騒音評価システム10では、車内快適性と相関が高い車内騒音N2を用いて車内快適性の評価を行う。具体的には、第2の計測手段15によって計測された車内騒音N2の測定結果から車内騒音データを生成する(S106)。この車内騒音データに基づいて車内快適性の評価を行う(S107)。車内快適性の評価は、種々の評価方法を採用することができ、例えば車内騒音に対する乗客の不快感を示す不快度を用いて評価すると好適である。また、通常の騒音レベルを用いて車内快適性を評価しても構わない。その後、床面騒音N1の場合と同様に、時間軸から空間軸へ変換し(S108)、地上との位置補正を行って(S109)、キロ程を付与する。   Next, the interior comfort is evaluated. In the vehicle interior noise evaluation system 10 according to the present embodiment, vehicle interior comfort is evaluated using vehicle interior noise N2 having a high correlation with vehicle interior comfort. Specifically, in-vehicle noise data is generated from the measurement result of the in-vehicle noise N2 measured by the second measuring means 15 (S106). In-vehicle comfort is evaluated based on the in-vehicle noise data (S107). Various evaluation methods can be adopted for the evaluation of the in-vehicle comfort. For example, it is preferable to evaluate the in-vehicle comfort using an unpleasant degree indicating passenger discomfort with respect to in-vehicle noise. Moreover, you may evaluate vehicle interior comfort using a normal noise level. After that, as in the case of the floor noise N1, the time axis is converted to the space axis (S108), the position is corrected with respect to the ground (S109), and about a kilometer is given.

不快度は、車内騒音の音質の指標であるラウドネス(dB)、シャープネス(acum)、トーナリティ(tu)、ラフネス(asper)及び変動強度(vacil)の5変数に基づいて算出することができ、例えばこれらの変数を含む回帰式として、不快度=A×ラウドネス+B×シャープネス+C×トーナリティ+D×ラフネス+E×変動強度+F(変数)を用いて算出される。この回帰式で算出された不快度が所定の閾値を超えた場合には、車内快適性が低下していると判断される。また、レールの保守作業後の測定結果と比較することで、車内快適性の向上効果を確認することも可能となる。   The discomfort level can be calculated based on five variables, which are indicators of sound quality of in-vehicle noise, such as loudness (dB), sharpness (acum), tonality (tu), roughness (asper), and fluctuation intensity (vacil). As a regression equation including these variables, the degree of discomfort = A × loudness + B × sharpness + C × tourality + D × roughness + E × variation intensity + F (variable). When the discomfort level calculated by this regression equation exceeds a predetermined threshold value, it is determined that the in-vehicle comfort is reduced. Moreover, it becomes possible to confirm the improvement effect of in-vehicle comfort by comparing with the measurement result after the rail maintenance work.

また、本実施形態に係る車内騒音評価システム10は、ジャイロセンサを備えているので、曲線を検知することで、地上の絶対位置との照合を行い、位置を補正することが可能となる。   In addition, since the vehicle interior noise evaluation system 10 according to the present embodiment includes a gyro sensor, it is possible to check the curve and perform matching with the absolute position on the ground and correct the position.

さらに、本実施形態に係る車内騒音評価システム10に基づいて判定された指標を用いると、車内騒音に影響を与えるレール波状摩耗を特定することができるので、レール波状摩耗の整備を行うことで、レールの保守作業の際に、車内快適性の向上効果が高い区間を選定したり、車内快適性そのものを評価指標として施工することが可能となる。   Furthermore, if the index determined based on the vehicle interior noise evaluation system 10 according to the present embodiment is used, rail corrugated wear that affects vehicle interior noise can be identified. During rail maintenance work, it is possible to select a section that has a high effect of improving in-vehicle comfort, or to construct the in-vehicle comfort itself as an evaluation index.

また、図3では、床面騒音データの生成と車内騒音データの生成を直列に評価した場合について説明を行ったが、床面騒音データの生成と車内騒音データの生成は、互いに並列に評価しても構わない。   In FIG. 3, the generation of floor noise data and the generation of in-vehicle noise data have been described in series. However, the generation of floor noise data and the generation of in-vehicle noise data are evaluated in parallel with each other. It doesn't matter.

なお、本発明は、上述した実施形態に限定されず、上述した実施形態は発明の趣旨を変更しない範囲で変更又は改良を加えることも可能であることが特許請求の範囲の記載から明らかである。   It should be noted that the present invention is not limited to the above-described embodiment, and it is apparent from the description of the claims that the above-described embodiment can be changed or improved without departing from the spirit of the invention. .

1 車両
2 軌道面
3 レール
4 車輪
5 台車枠
6 軸バネ
7 空気バネ
8 床面
10 車内騒音評価システム
11 第1の計測手段
12 収納箱
13 加速度センサ/ジャイロセンサ
14 センサ部
15 第2の計測手段
16 GPSレシーバ
17 マーカスイッチ
18 データ収録・処理部
N1 床面騒音
N2 車内騒音
DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 1 Vehicle 2 Track surface 3 Rail 4 Wheel 5 Bogie frame 6 Axle spring 7 Air spring 8 Floor surface 10 Car interior noise evaluation system 11 First measurement means 12 Storage box 13 Acceleration sensor / gyro sensor 14 Sensor part 15 Second measurement means 16 GPS receiver 17 Marker switch 18 Data recording / processing section N1 Floor noise N2 Car interior noise

Claims (7)

軌道上を走行する車両の車内騒音評価方法であって、
前記車両の車内の床面に設置した第1の計測手段によって前記車内の床面における床面騒音データを生成し、
前記車両の車内に設置した第2の計測手段によって前記車内の車内騒音データを生成し、
前記床面騒音データを用いて前記軌道のレール波状摩耗の発生区間を決定し、
前記車内騒音データを用いて前記レール波状摩耗に伴う車内快適性の評価を行うことを特徴とする車内騒音評価方法。
A vehicle interior noise evaluation method for a vehicle traveling on a track,
Generating floor noise data on the floor surface of the vehicle by first measuring means installed on the floor surface of the vehicle;
Generating in-vehicle noise data in the vehicle by a second measuring means installed in the vehicle;
Using the floor noise data to determine the occurrence section of the rail wavy wear of the track,
A vehicle interior noise evaluation method, wherein the vehicle interior noise data is used to evaluate vehicle interior comfort associated with the rail corrugated wear.
請求項1に記載の車内騒音評価方法において、
前記第1の計測手段は、収納箱に収納されていることを特徴とする車内騒音評価方法。
The vehicle interior noise evaluation method according to claim 1,
The vehicle interior noise evaluation method, wherein the first measuring means is stored in a storage box.
請求項2に記載の車内騒音評価方法において、
前記収納箱は、下面のみに開口していることを特徴とする車内騒音評価方法。
The vehicle interior noise evaluation method according to claim 2,
The vehicle interior noise evaluation method, wherein the storage box is opened only on a lower surface.
軌道上を走行する車両の車内騒音評価システムであって、
前記車内の床面における床面騒音データを生成する第1の計測手段と、
前記車内の車内騒音データを生成する第2の計測手段と、
前記床面騒音データ及び前記車内騒音データを用いて前記軌道のレール波状摩耗の発生区間の決定及び車内快適性の評価を行う情報処理手段とを備えることを特徴とする車内騒音評価システム。
A vehicle interior noise evaluation system for a vehicle traveling on a track,
First measurement means for generating floor noise data on the floor surface in the vehicle;
Second measuring means for generating in-vehicle noise data in the vehicle;
An in-vehicle noise evaluation system comprising: information processing means for determining an occurrence section of rail corrugated wear on the track and evaluating in-vehicle comfort using the floor noise data and the in-vehicle noise data.
請求項4に記載の車内騒音評価システムにおいて、
前記第1の計測手段は、収納箱に収納され、
前記収納箱は、前記床面に載置されることを特徴とする車内騒音評価システム。
In the vehicle interior noise evaluation system according to claim 4,
The first measuring means is stored in a storage box,
The vehicle interior noise evaluation system, wherein the storage box is placed on the floor surface.
請求項4又は5に記載の車内騒音評価システムにおいて、
前記第2の計測手段は、前記車内に設置されることを特徴とする車内騒音評価システム。
In the vehicle interior noise evaluation system according to claim 4 or 5,
The vehicle interior noise evaluation system, wherein the second measuring means is installed in the vehicle.
請求項4から6のいずれか1項に記載の車内騒音評価システムを用いて判定された指標に基づき、レール波状摩耗を整備することを特徴とするレールの保守方法。   A rail maintenance method, comprising: maintaining rail wavy wear based on an index determined using the in-vehicle noise evaluation system according to any one of claims 4 to 6.
JP2017163119A 2017-08-28 2017-08-28 Evaluation method of in-car noise due to rail wavy abrasion, in-car noise evaluation system, and rail maintenance method using the same Pending JP2019039857A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2017163119A JP2019039857A (en) 2017-08-28 2017-08-28 Evaluation method of in-car noise due to rail wavy abrasion, in-car noise evaluation system, and rail maintenance method using the same

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2017163119A JP2019039857A (en) 2017-08-28 2017-08-28 Evaluation method of in-car noise due to rail wavy abrasion, in-car noise evaluation system, and rail maintenance method using the same

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2019039857A true JP2019039857A (en) 2019-03-14

Family

ID=65725562

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2017163119A Pending JP2019039857A (en) 2017-08-28 2017-08-28 Evaluation method of in-car noise due to rail wavy abrasion, in-car noise evaluation system, and rail maintenance method using the same

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP2019039857A (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN112345063A (en) * 2020-10-14 2021-02-09 合肥工业大学 Testing method for floor vibration comfort level
JP2021025210A (en) * 2019-07-31 2021-02-22 近畿車輌株式会社 Rail maintenance system and railway vehicle

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2008081102A (en) * 2006-08-31 2008-04-10 Hokkaido Railway Co Vehicle travelling swing/noise analyzing system, vehicle travelling swing/noise analyzing method, vehicle travelling noise analyzing system, and vehicle travelling noise analyzing method
JP2012021790A (en) * 2010-07-12 2012-02-02 Railway Technical Research Institute Rail wavy abrasion detection method and rail wavy abrasion detection system
JP2012047483A (en) * 2010-08-24 2012-03-08 Railway Technical Research Institute Evaluation method for noise in railway vehicle
CN102706439A (en) * 2012-05-22 2012-10-03 西南交通大学 Portable interior noise comfort tester
CN106679999A (en) * 2016-12-26 2017-05-17 合肥工大高科信息科技股份有限公司 Built-in-compartment high-speed train running part online fault detection device

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2008081102A (en) * 2006-08-31 2008-04-10 Hokkaido Railway Co Vehicle travelling swing/noise analyzing system, vehicle travelling swing/noise analyzing method, vehicle travelling noise analyzing system, and vehicle travelling noise analyzing method
JP2012021790A (en) * 2010-07-12 2012-02-02 Railway Technical Research Institute Rail wavy abrasion detection method and rail wavy abrasion detection system
JP2012047483A (en) * 2010-08-24 2012-03-08 Railway Technical Research Institute Evaluation method for noise in railway vehicle
CN102706439A (en) * 2012-05-22 2012-10-03 西南交通大学 Portable interior noise comfort tester
CN106679999A (en) * 2016-12-26 2017-05-17 合肥工大高科信息科技股份有限公司 Built-in-compartment high-speed train running part online fault detection device

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2021025210A (en) * 2019-07-31 2021-02-22 近畿車輌株式会社 Rail maintenance system and railway vehicle
JP7025382B2 (en) 2019-07-31 2022-02-24 近畿車輌株式会社 Rail maintenance system and rail vehicle
CN112345063A (en) * 2020-10-14 2021-02-09 合肥工业大学 Testing method for floor vibration comfort level
CN112345063B (en) * 2020-10-14 2022-08-02 合肥工业大学 Testing method for floor vibration comfort level

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Bosso et al. Wheel flat detection algorithm for onboard diagnostic
Chudzikiewicz et al. Condition monitoring of railway track systems by using acceleration signals on wheelset axle-boxes
US9628762B2 (en) System for imaging and measuring rail deflection
JP5433516B2 (en) Rail wavy wear detection method and rail wavy wear detection system
JP4298433B2 (en) Railway vehicle abnormality detection device
CN113276905B (en) Identification method and measurement method for distinguishing track corrugation and wheel polygon abrasion
Tsunashima et al. Japanese railway condition monitoring of tracks using in-service vehicle
JP2021070463A (en) Progress detection method and progress detection system of rail wavy abrasion
JP2019039857A (en) Evaluation method of in-car noise due to rail wavy abrasion, in-car noise evaluation system, and rail maintenance method using the same
JP6838176B2 (en) Railroad vehicle anomaly detectors and methods
Boronakhin et al. Inertial method of railway track diagnostics incorporating the condition of rolling surfaces of the railcar’s wheels
Wei et al. Carriage interior noise-based inspection for rail corrugation on high-speed railway track
JP6245466B2 (en) Wheel uneven wear degree determination system, wheel uneven wear degree determination method and program
RU89053U1 (en) THE SYSTEM OF EARLY DIAGNOSTICS OF BEARING BEARINGS BEARING UNITS OF WHEEL PAIRS OF MOVING TRAIN "ACOUSTIC SYSTEM PACK"
Alten et al. Detecting and classifying rail corrugation based on axle bearing vibration
JP4298635B2 (en) Axle bearing monitoring method for rolling stock by measuring axle box sound
RU2466047C2 (en) Method of diagnosing roll surfaces of railway and metro rolling stock axle boxes
JP7056428B2 (en) Orbital condition evaluation method and evaluation device
Ng et al. Managing rail corrugation through modelling, simulation, and instrumentation technologies
KR101303566B1 (en) Method for inducing noise characteristics of certain point of train
Staśkiewicz et al. Out-of-round tram wheels–current state and measurements
JP6770414B2 (en) Ride comfort measurement method and equipment
Dadié et al. Track geometry monitoring using smartphones on board commercial trains
Jeong et al. Measuring technique for acoustic roughness of rail surface with homogeneous displacement sensors
JP5769408B2 (en) Track measurement data analysis system

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20190909

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20200722

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20200804

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20200910

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20201208

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20210127

A02 Decision of refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A02

Effective date: 20210622

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20210825

C60 Trial request (containing other claim documents, opposition documents)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: C60

Effective date: 20210825

A911 Transfer to examiner for re-examination before appeal (zenchi)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A911

Effective date: 20210906

C21 Notice of transfer of a case for reconsideration by examiners before appeal proceedings

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: C21

Effective date: 20210908

A912 Re-examination (zenchi) completed and case transferred to appeal board

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A912

Effective date: 20211015

C211 Notice of termination of reconsideration by examiners before appeal proceedings

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: C211

Effective date: 20211019

C22 Notice of designation (change) of administrative judge

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: C22

Effective date: 20211102

C23 Notice of termination of proceedings

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: C23

Effective date: 20211221

C03 Trial/appeal decision taken

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: C03

Effective date: 20220125

C30A Notification sent

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: C3012

Effective date: 20220125