JP2018124953A - Inventive ability evaluation system and inventive ability evaluation method, and network system for person of inventive ability using them, idea information market system, client communication system, idea note management system, and data stream of idea sheet therefor - Google Patents

Abstract

PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide an inventive ability evaluation method that is usable as a management index for appropriately reinforcing and promoting inventive ability and selecting a person having a high inventive ability and artificial intelligence, and to provide a network system for a person of inventive ability using the same.SOLUTION: An inventive ability evaluation system includes: starting point information providing means for providing starting point information as information that becomes a starting point of an inventive idea to a subject of inventive ability evaluation; idea information reception means for receiving idea information that the subject creates by the starting point information; idea information evaluation means for evaluating information received by the idea information reception means by a predetermined evaluation method and generating an evaluation value; and evaluation value calculation means for calculating an evaluation value of inventive ability by an evaluation value generated by the idea information evaluation means and the starting point information.SELECTED DRAWING: Figure 8

Description

The present invention relates to the evaluation of the invention ability of an individual natural person, individual artificial intelligence, an individual group of natural persons, an individual group of artificial intelligence, or an individual group having natural persons and artificial intelligence as members, and an application system thereof.

With the progress of the fourth industrial revolution, IoT (Internet of Things), artificial intelligence, robots and 3D printers are going to penetrate into various fields of society. The governments of Japan and the United States, as well as the governments of the United States, are trying to develop their own industries by actively developing the Fourth Industrial Revolution.

These movements will inevitably transfer much of the intellectual labor that humans have to artificial intelligence and robots.
In addition, as shown in Maslow's 5-level theory of desire, human beings have the desire for self-realization and creation as the highest level of desire.

As a result of the progress of the Fourth Industrial Revolution and the improvement of the human desire stage, the labor that humans should carry will shift to those that require greater creativity. Fields that require greater creativity include the fields of research and development of science and technology and products and services, the field of art, the field of interpersonal communication, and the field of strategic planning in management, administration, military and politics.

This trend is based on the necessity of strengthening and fostering the ability to execute the invention (invention ability), which is the center of creation in the field of research and development of science / technology and products / services, as well as human and artificial Increases the need for intelligence selection.

In order to strengthen and nurture the invention ability, and to select people with high invention ability and artificial intelligence appropriately, use the evaluation value obtained by objective invention ability evaluation as a management index, It is necessary to appropriately manage the training process and the process of selecting highly skilled people and artificial intelligence.

In order to actually perform the invention ability evaluation for such management, it is necessary to satisfy all of the following conditions 1 to 3 at the same time.
Condition 1: Inventive ability evaluation within a reasonable time period compared to the time of one execution of an activity (for example, activities for strengthening and fostering inventive ability, inventive activity) performed using the results of the inventive ability evaluation What can be done.
Condition 2: Inventive ability evaluation costs are within a reasonable range compared to the cost of an activity that is performed using the results of the inventive ability evaluation (eg, activities for strengthening and fostering inventive ability, invention activities). There is.
Condition 3: The stage before the invention can be expressed as a claim (eg, extraction of problems in the prior art, understanding of the causes of problems, setting of problems to be solved based on the causes, and means for solving problems) The ability of invention can be evaluated even if it has only reached the stage of creation of the essential action of

That is, an invention ability evaluation that provides a management index that can be practically used will be required in the future.
Examples of conventional techniques that may be used as a reference for the invention ability evaluation method are as follows.

● About Non-Patent Document 1:
Non-Patent Document 1 is a systematic book representing Japan regarding creation in invention and technology development, and is mainly composed of equivalent transformation creation theory. In particular, in the first chapter, the sections “Human brain characteristics suitable for creative activities” and “Human conditions that development engineers should have” are important from the viewpoint of invention ability evaluation.
In the section “Characteristics of the human brain suitable for creative activities”, pages 29 to 30 classify the way of recalling stored information in the human brain into the following three patterns. It becomes reference of the method of.
In the first pattern, all the information that has been incorporated into the memory is recorded in a mechanically unprocessed manner according to the time sequence, and this is triggered by some accidental information stimulation. This is a pattern in which the stored memory is reproduced according to the time order.
In the second pattern, each piece of information taken is not recorded in the brain as it is, but is processed into general information with a higher level of abstraction by a so-called conceptualization method. And this is a way to build it up step by step in a pyramid shape. When the existing intellectual system is recalled or applied within the framework, high performance that does not allow comparisons appears. However, in general, information with creative content is not available.
In the third pattern, as seen in the second pattern, the information taken from outside forms a generally pyramid type hierarchical structure. However, the upper stage of the pyramid system abstracted from the incorporated information is not only meaningful for the search route in the vertical direction, as seen in the second pattern, but also content constraints and individual information. There is now another information search route that can overcome the special characteristics of, and move laterally between each upper stage. A new thought route with equivalency that makes it possible for both categories to freely move back and forth between any thoughts that are unlikely to have any relevance from the categories of previous classifications. It is a pattern with This pattern has the potential to produce free ideas (information processing activities) that overcome the principles and restrictions of intellectual experience that have already been incorporated.

Furthermore, in “Human conditions that the development engineer should have”, the outline of the creative person is listed in the following nine items, which can be used as a reference for the invention ability evaluation method.
(1) High voluntary work. (Establishment of independence)
(2) See things from a new perspective. (Change in perspective or freedom of perspective)
(3) Grasp the root of each object, not the end. (Understanding the essence)
(4) Look at the long scale. (Overall perspective)
(5) Sensitivity to the flow of the times. (Excellent sense of the times)
(6) A spirit that is unaffected by the current situation. (Creative Romanticism)
(7) Don't stick to authority. (Non-authoritarianism)
(8) Longing for newness. (Strong curiosity)
(9) Thermal neutrality and sustainability for work. (So-called nature)

Also, in the section of “The Path to Equivalent Transformation Theory as a Creative Engineering Theory” in Chapter 1, “Conversely, no abstract work is done from this certain point of view, or insufficient disposal. In the process of creating a clue as an idea, it falls into an analogy as a typical imitation thought, and this is a home that is peculiar to the information processing work that is vaguely called analogy. "There is lurking," explains the shortcomings of analogy thinking as an inventive idea and the superiority of equivalent transformation theory overcoming it.
And in “Chapter 4“ Ethinking Flow Chart ”(hereinafter referred to as“ E / T diagram ”for short), the following thought procedure is the mainstream and its surroundings. The procedure of branching and feedback is arranged in
(1) ': Experience or object that created the problem (1): Raising the problem (setting the goal)
(2): Establishing viewpoints by extracting essential aspects for realizing goals (3): Essential functions of extracted problem solving (4): Group of starting systems with the essential functions of extracted problem solving in mind The event that seems to perform well is selected from the global viewpoint.
(5): Selected starting system (6): Detailed analysis of the selected starting system to confirm general limiting conditions (7): Set of essential functions and limiting conditions for problem solving (8): Combining the special condition group of the selected system from various angles for the combination of the problem solving essential function and the limiting condition (9): Test the degree of coincidence with the target (10): Set the target Creating a satisfying attainment system

● About Non-Patent Document 2:
Non-Patent Document 2 describes in detail the whole of Triz (Inventive Problem Solving Theory) and systematically describes creative thinking methods. In Chapter 2, the systematic creativity process consists of (1) defining a problem, (2) selecting a tool, (3) generating a solution, and (4) evaluating the solution. It consists of two steps. In Chapter 3, the systematic creativity process provided by Triz transforms a "specific problem" into a "TRIZ generalized problem" and generates a "TRIZ generalized solution" that solves that problem. , “TRIZ generalized solution” is converted to “specific solution”. However, since it is difficult to convert “a generalized solution of TRIZ” to “a specific solution” by a general method, for each type of problem / opportunity situation, there are various types suitable for the situation. Provides problem-solving tools. Table 9.1 in Chapter 9 shows a tool selection summary table.
In Non-Patent Document 2, there is no direct description of the method for evaluating the inventive ability, but there seems to be a premise that the inventive ability is improved by learning and practicing Triz.

● About Non-Patent Document 3:
Non-Patent Document 3 states that Atsushi, the boy of the main character, has improved his invention ability in the process of becoming a junior high school student, a high school student, and a university student from the third grade of elementary school. A specific description of training to improve the invention ability is described. Furthermore, the inventive idea technique is described in detail in a systematic manner. However, there is no specific description of the inventive ability evaluation method.

In Non-Patent Document 4, a claim is simply analyzed and decomposed into constituent elements, and information such as a coupling relationship between the constituent elements and an evaluation value of the claims are provided. Furthermore, in this non-patent document 4, when “display page source” is performed, source code in a programming language called JavaScript (registered trademark) is displayed. In this technique, a character string of one claim is analyzed and decomposed into constituent elements, and a connection relationship between constituent elements and an evaluation value of the claims are also detected.

● In Non-Patent Document 5, the claim is automatically decomposed into component elements by character string analysis of the claims in the independent claim format, and the evaluation of the claims is performed using the result of analyzing the input / output relationship between the components. An algorithm for calculating the value is shown. The feature amount used for calculation of the evaluation value and the algorithm are as follows.
p1: Number of components
p2: Character string length in the component with the maximum character string length
p3: Number of isolated elements
p4: Number of terminal elements
p5: Number of connected subgraphs
p6: Number of intermediate elements

Calculate the deductions using these features.

mscore1 = max (p1-5,0) * 2; // The number of components that exceeds 5 is the deduction target.
mscore2 = max (p2-50,0) * 0.2; // The existence of a component that exceeds 50 characters will be deducted.
mscore3 = p3 * 10; // Decrease in proportion to the number of isolated elements.
mscore3 = mscore3 + max (p4-1,0) * 20; // Add deductions due to two or more terminal elements.
mscore3 = mscore3 + max (p5-1,0) * 20 + max (p6-3,0) * 5; // Add deduction points by 2 or more connected subgraphs and 4 or more intermediate elements.

Calculate the overall evaluation value by surface analysis.
totalscore = max (100-mscore1-mscore2-mscore3,0); // Subtract deductions from 100 points, but the lowest point is 0 points.

● Regarding Patent Document 1:
Patent Document 1 describes, in column 0078, a specific method for evaluating the inventive ability of each inventor using an evaluation value of a patent right.
Column 0078: The inventor evaluation unit 136 calculates an inventor evaluation value by an inventor evaluation function (IF) using the accumulated technical evaluation value as a variable. Since the accumulated technical evaluation value is calculated based on the technical evaluation value, the inventor evaluation function (IF) can be said to be a function having the technical evaluation value as a variable. In the case of the inventor (ID: 1), the inventor evaluation value (= 74) of the inventor (ID: 1) is calculated based on the technical evaluation accumulated value group (147, 202, 180, ..., 37). The
In the column 0075, there is also an explanation that “the technical evaluation cumulative value is a cumulative value of the technical evaluation value calculated from the inventor's past patent rights, etc.”.

● Regarding Patent Document 2:
Patent Document 2 describes a mechanism of artificial intelligence that creates an invention. The mechanism is based on the hypothesis (invention principle) that the invention will be carried out in the next step. However, there is no description about the method for evaluating the inventive ability.
First step Assuming the devices with the new functions should be, in other words, the required inputs and outputs.
By intensively thinking about the input and output that should be the second step, a place for executing a simulation of the relationship between the input and output is temporarily self-organized in the human right brain. This field is called a Kansei field, and the Kansei field is a spatial distribution of synaptic connection strength coefficients (synaptic loads), which are connections between neurons in the right brain, and expresses information processing functions.
Third step Pattern recognition is performed using the sensitivity field as a pattern to be recognized for portions other than the sensitivity field in the right brain.
4th step The local part of the sensitivity field is forced by applying the pattern of the known basic function block that is most similar to the distribution of the known basic function blocks to the local part pattern of the sensitivity field. Replace the pattern with the pattern of its similar basic functional block. Then, returning to the second step, self-organization is executed again. As a result, if the sensitivity field is expressed by a combination of known basic functional blocks, creation of a new functional device is completed.

Patent Document 1 evaluates the inventor's ability of an invention using the result of evaluating a registered patent after the invention is registered as a patent right. This method does not satisfy the above-mentioned condition 1 because at least the time required for obtaining an examination result at the JPO is required. Considering application costs, examination request costs, and intermediate processing costs, it is highly possible that Condition 2 described above is not satisfied in some cases.

Non-Patent Literature 1, Non-Patent Literature 2, Non-Patent Literature 3, and Patent Literature 2 have descriptions of the thinking procedure of the invention idea and the mechanism of the system capable of making the invention idea. There is no description.
Non-Patent Document 4 and Non-Patent Document 5 show techniques for claim structure analysis and claim evaluation value calculation, but there is no description of a method for evaluating invention ability.

Japanese Patent Laying-Open No. 2015-187883 Japanese Patent No. 3275311

Kamehisa Ichikawa, “Creative Engineering: Introduction of Equivalent Transformation Creation Theory into Technology Development Field and its Results”, published by Lattice Co., Ltd., December 25, 1977 (Creative Engineering (on-demand version) Michiko Ichikawa, November 25, 2005 (From day issue) Original author: Darrell Mann, supervisor: Toru Nakagawa, translation: Knowledge Creation Research Group, "Triz Practice and Utility (1) Systematic Technological Innovation", published on June 30, 2004, Publisher: Masatoshi Hotta, Publisher: Creative Development Initiative Inc. Kuno Junji "Invention Boy Z -Invention Ability Training Method Using Idea Notes-" Published by Parade, Inc., December 1, 2016 Junji Kuno, PCML Open Editor Ver 0.21 [online], December 3, 2007, Junji Kuno, [Search January 30, 2017], Internet <URL: http://www.patentisland.com/pcml_open_editor. html> Kuji Kuno, Help file on how to use PCML Open Editor, [online], January 18, 2008, Koji Kuno, [Search January 30, 2017], Internet <URL: http://www.patentisland.com /pcml_open_editor_help.html>

In the prior art, an invention ability evaluation value that can be used as a management index for appropriately strengthening / nurturing an invention ability and selecting a person with high invention ability or artificial intelligence cannot be created.

The problem to be solved by the present invention is to provide a means for objective invention ability evaluation that satisfies all of the following conditions 1 to 3 simultaneously.
Condition 1: Inventive ability evaluation within a reasonable time period compared to the time of one execution of an activity (for example, activities for strengthening and fostering inventive ability, inventive activity) performed using the results of the inventive ability evaluation What can be done.
Condition 2: Inventive ability evaluation costs are within a reasonable range compared to the cost of an activity that is performed using the results of the inventive ability evaluation (eg, activities for strengthening and fostering inventive ability, invention activities). There is.
Condition 3: The stage before the invention can be expressed as a claim (eg, extraction of problems in the prior art, understanding of the cause of problems, setting of problems to be solved based on the causes, and means for solving problems) The ability of invention can be evaluated even if it has only reached the stage of creation of the essential action of

Before describing the means for evaluating the invention ability as a means for solving the problems of the present invention, the ability evaluation means will be examined as a general theory.

● General examination of ability evaluation There are four types of ability evaluation means E1 to E4 shown below.
E1: Use the evaluation value of the product of ability display to evaluate the ability display subject.
E2: Using the evaluation values of the internal mechanism of the ability exhibitor and the mechanism of cooperation with the outside, the ability exhibitor is evaluated.
(Note) “Mechanism” means both the connection relationship of objects and the execution order of processes. That is, it means a combined structure in the space-time of function.
E3: Within the scope of the assumption that the product of ability display is above a certain level, input given to the ability exhibitor from outside (for example, time, information, energy) , Effort) based on the type and amount of labor).
E4: The greater the range in which knowledge describing the method of demonstrating ability is stored, the higher the evaluation value of the ability executor.

If the time and cost required for the ability evaluation by E1 are at a reasonable level, the ability evaluation by E1 is considered the best.
Since the ability evaluation by E2 is performed based on the degree of matching with the best mechanism recognized by the evaluator side, it is different from the mechanism recognized by the evaluator side and is valuable. It will not be possible to properly evaluate the mechanism that provides the deliverables.
Moreover, it is generally very difficult for the evaluator to know the internal mechanism of the entity that exhibits ability. In particular, there is no real way to know the mechanism in the brain other than by self-reporting by the ability-playing subject. The use of self-declaration on the side of ability evaluation for ability evaluation is also a problem of reliability, and can be used for the purpose of subjective self-evaluation of ability, but is difficult to use for objective evaluation.
The ability evaluation by E3 is a derivative form of E1. If the result of performance is roughly evaluated by the method of E1 within the range of use of time and cost below the reasonable level, and the evaluation value of the product is above a certain level, the ability exhibitor is externally applied. Based on the type and amount of input (eg, time, information, energy, labor) given, the ability exhibitor is evaluated. Since the type and amount of input given from the outside can be specified objectively, it can be said that it is easy to make an evaluation with reliability and objectiveness at low cost and in a short time.
The ability evaluation by E4 has a problem that even if there is knowledge of a method of demonstrating ability, if the knowledge is not used, the fact that ability is low cannot be overcome.

● Examination of invention ability evaluation In the invention ability evaluation, Patent Document 1 corresponds to the above-mentioned E1, but the above-mentioned conditions 1 and 2 which are necessary conditions for the invention ability evaluation are not satisfied. I can not use it.
In the invention ability evaluation, patent document 2, non-patent document 1, non-patent document 2 and non-patent document 3 correspond to E2 described above, and these are for the purpose of self-discipline by subjective self-evaluation of the invention ability Can be used, but it is difficult to use for objective evaluation, and cannot be used to solve the problem to be solved by the present invention. The techniques according to Non-Patent Document 4 and Non-Patent Document 5 perform surface-like evaluation of the invention shown in the claims, but do not indicate the technique of evaluating the invention ability and do not satisfy the above-mentioned Condition 3. Inventive ability evaluation by E4 may lead to an unreasonable result of evaluating a person who has knowledge but never invented higher than a person who has many inventions but does not have knowledge. Because there is, it cannot be used.
Patent applications are examined for the inventions described in the claims.
This is because the technical scope of the patented invention must be determined based on the description of the scope of claims attached to the application.
However, the invention ability is not exhibited only at the stage of creation of the invention to be described in the claims.
For example, “Social movements that bring new values”, “Values”, “Ideal state based on values”, “Conventional technology”, “Problems of conventional technology from the ideal state”, “ Activities at each stage to create the types of information such as “Cause”, “Problem to be solved based on cause”, “Viewpoint of finding solution”, “Essential action of solution obtained from viewpoint” It is an activity that demonstrates invention ability.
These pieces of information are “invention intermediate information” that is often created as a pre-stage of creation of invention information expressed as claims. Even if the invention has reached only the stage of creation of the intermediate information, it is necessary to be able to evaluate the creator's invention ability.
Therefore, the invention ability is evaluated by the following solution based on E3.

Means to solve the problem are:
Starting point information providing means for providing starting point information, which is information that should be the starting point of the invention idea, for the subject of the invention ability evaluation;
An idea information receiving means for receiving the idea information created by the subject using the starting point information;
An idea information evaluation means for generating an evaluation value by evaluating the information received by the idea information receiving means by a predetermined evaluation method;
An invention ability evaluation system comprising an evaluation value calculation means for calculating an evaluation value of invention ability using the evaluation value generated by the idea information evaluation means and the starting point information.

According to this configuration, if the subject of the invention ability evaluation demonstrates the ability of the invention based on the given starting point information and provides the idea information, the evaluation value of the invention ability is generated. An invention ability evaluation value can be easily obtained.
In addition, for the inventor ability evaluation side, the starting point information provided to the target person and utilized for the display of the inventor ability is not only evaluated based on the idea information received from the subject person of the invention ability evaluation. Since the evaluation value of the invention ability is calculated using the objective information, the following effects can be obtained.

1: Inventive ability evaluation is performed within a reasonable time period compared to the execution time of an activity that is performed using the results of inventive ability evaluation (eg, activities for strengthening and fostering inventive ability, invention activity) What you can do.
2: The cost of the invention ability evaluation is within a reasonable range compared to the cost of an activity that is performed using the result of the invention ability evaluation (for example, the activity for strengthening / developing the invention ability, the invention activity). about.
3: The stage before the invention can be expressed as a claim (extracting problems of the prior art, grasping the cause of the problem, setting the problem to be solved based on the cause, and the essential action of the problem solving means It is possible to evaluate the invention ability even if it has only reached the stage of creation).

In the present invention, since the invention ability evaluation is performed using the evaluation value of the idea information and the starting point information used for creating the idea information, all of the above conditions 1 to 3 can be satisfied. As a result, it is possible to appropriately manage the process of strengthening / nurturing the invention ability and the process of selecting people with high invention ability and artificial intelligence using the invention ability evaluation value.

Inventive ability evaluation system (hereinafter referred to as ERISA for the sake of simplicity) Overall system configuration Internal configuration diagram of the ERISA function of the ERISA terminal Idea Sheet format Internal structure of idea sheet analysis unit Internal structure of the invention capability evaluation unit Functional structure diagram of idea information market Functional configuration diagram of customer communication system in portals such as stores Second form of the invention ability evaluation system The third form of the invention ability evaluation system Inventive ability comprehensive evaluation system that performs comprehensive evaluation of inventive ability using evaluation values obtained by evaluating inventive ability under various conditions Invention comprehensive support system for invention idea support, invention ability evaluation and idea note management Idea sheet format used to develop ideas step by step according to the invention creation model Example of an idea sheet Evaluation table when comprehensive evaluation of invention ability is performed by the second form of the invention evaluation system for the subject of invention ability evaluation who has been given invention information and created invention information Evaluation table when comprehensive evaluation of invention ability is performed by the third form of the invention evaluation system for the subject of invention ability evaluation who has given invention information and created invention information For the invention ability evaluation, the starting point information presented to the subject is “the problem of the prior art viewed from the ideal state” and the idea sheet which is all the starting point information above it Idea sheet when the starting point information presented to the target person for the invention ability evaluation is the “point of finding a solution” and all starting point information above it (A) is an idea sheet that describes starting point information that describes only the content of “essential action of the solution means obtained from the viewpoint”, and (b) is the starting point information described in the idea sheet of (a). Based on the idea sheet, the origin information is created at the top and the invention is created and described as invention information. (C), (d) are the idea sheets of the invention created using the starting point information higher than the “cause of the problem” in the idea sheet of FIG. 18B as starting point information. The invention of FIG. 18 (b) created based on the starting point information of FIG. 18 (a) and the starting point information higher than the “cause of the problem” described in the idea sheet of FIG. 18 (b). Evaluation table in the case of performing a comprehensive evaluation of the invention ability based on the invention actions of the invention of FIG. 19 (c) and the invention of FIG. 19 (d)

As described in the section for solving the problems, the mode for carrying out the invention is as follows.
Starting point information providing means for providing starting point information, which is information that should be the starting point of the invention idea, for the subject of the invention ability evaluation;
An idea information receiving means for receiving the idea information created by the subject using the starting point information;
An idea information evaluation means for generating an evaluation value by evaluating the information received by the idea information receiving means by a predetermined evaluation method;
Evaluation value calculation means for calculating an evaluation value of invention ability using the evaluation value generated by the idea information evaluation means and the starting point information.

Regarding the components of the invention ability evaluation system, the structure of the invention ability evaluation system based on the coupling and cooperation between the components, the action of the invention ability evaluation system that is the dynamic behavior of the structure, and the effects of the action, Matters that are not limited to specific embodiments will be explained as clearly as possible by using a superordinate concept.

● First, define and explain terms.
The “invention” is a technical idea created as a solution to some problem, and does not have to satisfy the patent requirements.
“Starting point information” is information that should be the starting point of the inventive idea, and includes “type of starting point information” and “content of starting point information”. As the type of starting information, for example, according to the invention creation model 1 to be described later, “social movement bringing new values”, “values”, “ideal state based on values”, “conventional technology” , “Problems of the prior art viewed from the ideal state”, “Cause of the problem”, “Problem to be solved based on the cause”, “Viewpoint of finding the solution”, “Solution obtained from the viewpoint” "Essential action of" corresponds to this. The “type of origin information” may be explicitly described, or may be expressed by determining the “type of origin information” in advance for each position or order of the description of “content of origin information”. .
“Invention ability” is the ability to create an invention, and if an invention can be made from information that is difficult to set as the starting point of an inventive idea (eg, high-level starting point information in the invention creation model), it can be said that the invention ability is high. It can be said that if a large number of inventions can be made within a certain period of time, the invention ability is high, and if an invention including various application forms, embodiments and various evolution forms is made, the invention ability is high.
“Person of invention ability assessment” is a person who is subject to the assessment of the presence, level, or type of invention ability, and is an individual natural person, individual artificial intelligence, an individual group of natural persons, an individual group of artificial intelligence, or a natural person. And an individual group with artificial intelligence as members.
“Invention information” is information that expresses an invention and can be expressed in the form of a claim, or in the form of a functional block diagram, a flowchart, or a molecular formula, but detailed enough to implement the invention. The specific design information may not be included.
“Invention intermediate information” is information created in a creative thinking process in an intermediate stage before invention information is created. If this invention intermediate information becomes the starting point of the creation of the next stage of invention intermediate information or invention information, it is used as starting point information.
“Idea information” is intermediate invention information or invention information.
“Hint information” is supplementary information that supplements starting point information and starting point information.
“Evaluation value of invention ability” is a value obtained by evaluating invention ability based on some evaluation method (eg, evaluation function, evaluation system, computer program for evaluation, case study for evaluation). In some cases, it may be expressed by a numerical value that can be expressed, and in other cases, it may be expressed by a code indicating a superiority or inferiority order.
The “invention creation model” refers to the information required as input for the first stage thinking in the multi-stage thinking process until the invention information is created, and the next stage thinking This is a model that expresses information that is input information for and the invention information that is the final product as a series in the order of thought stages. Various invention creation models can be considered, and two examples are shown below. (In the present specification, in the description of the invention creation model, Example 1 of the invention creation model is mainly used.)

Invention creation model example 1: The starting point information is arranged in order from the top to the bottom, and is as follows.
"Social movements that bring new values" ⇒ "Values" ⇒ "Ideal state based on values" ⇒ "Conventional technology" ⇒ "Problems of conventional technology from an ideal state" ⇒ "Cause of problems" ⇒ "Problem to be solved based on cause" ⇒ "Viewpoint of finding solution" ⇒ "Essential action of the solution obtained from the viewpoint" ⇒ "Invention information (invention information) that is a solution including the intrinsic action" May be written only) ”

Example 2 of invention creation model: Starting point information is arranged in order from the top to the bottom, as follows.
"(1) ': Experience or object that created the problem" ⇒ "(1): Problem or goal" ⇒ "(2): Perspective by extracting essential aspects for realizing the goal" ⇒ "(3): Extraction" The essential functions of problem solving ”⇒” (4): Events that seem to have good performance selected from the group of starting systems from the group of starting systems with the extracted essential functions of problem solving ”⇒” (5 ): Selected starting system ”⇒“ (6): General limiting conditions confirmed by detailed analysis of the selected starting system ”⇒“ (7): Set of problem solving essential functions and limiting conditions "⇒" (8): Inventive information candidate obtained by combining special condition groups of the selected system from various angles with respect to the combination of the essential function of problem solving and limiting conditions "⇒" (9 ): Invention information that is a reaching system that satisfies the goal created by examining the degree of agreement with the goal.

● Next, the components of the invention ability evaluation system will be described.

The “starting point information providing means” provides starting point information, which is information that should be the starting point of the inventive conception, for the subject of invention ability evaluation or invention ability development. There are two methods for providing starting point information: a method in which an evaluation subject selects from a plurality of pieces of starting point information stored in advance, and a method determined by a predetermined method among a plurality of pieces of starting point information stored in advance. There are a method of giving one starting point information to the evaluation subject and a method of combining the starting point information by some information processing and giving it to the evaluation subject.
Since the starting point information is provided together with all starting point information positioned in the previous stage of the starting point information in the invention creation model, it becomes easy to use as the starting point of the inventive idea. It is desirable to provide such starting point information. More specifically, when providing the origin information of “cause of the problem”, the “social movement that brings new values”, “values”, “ It also provides "ideal state based on values", "conventional technology", and "problems of conventional technology from the viewpoint of ideal state".
However, for the purpose of invention ability evaluation or invention ability strengthening of intermediate level or higher of the inventive idea, the starting point information positioned before the relevant starting point information in the invention creation model is not given at all, and the starting point information is estimated by itself. Or it is desirable to create.
In other words, when providing the origin information of “cause of problem”, “societal movements that bring new values” and “values” positioned in the previous stage in the invention creation model. , “Ideal state based on values”, “conventional technology”, and “problems of conventional technology viewed from ideal state” are not provided at all.

The “invention information receiving means” receives the invention information expressing the invention created by the subject using the starting point information. Invention information may be received as character string information inputted from the keyboard by the evaluation subject, or may be received as character string information obtained by voice recognition of information inputted by the subject, or graphic information. It may be received as information of a functional block diagram or flowchart drawn by the inventor using a terminal, or may be received as data stored in some storage medium.

The “pass / fail determination means” determines pass / fail according to whether the invention information received by the invention information receiving means satisfies a predetermined evaluation standard. The “evaluation criteria” mentioned here are, for example, an evaluation function, an evaluation system, and a collection of cases for evaluation. There are various ways of setting evaluation criteria. For example, (1) a combination structure of a plurality of technical means expressed by the invention information satisfies a predetermined condition, and if it is not satisfied, the combination is rejected. If it does not contain non-technical terms, it will be accepted, and if it is contained, it will be rejected. (3) A publicly known statement that contains a description substantially the same as the combined structure of technical means expressed by the invention information Some documents are rejected if they are detected, and others are accepted if not detected. (4) There is also what determines pass / fail by the combination of (1) to (3).

The “evaluation value generation means” outputs the evaluation value of the inventive ability according to the type of the starting point information used as the starting point of the inventive idea by the subject of the inventive ability evaluation when the pass / fail determination means determines that it is acceptable. For example, if the invention creation model 1 is used as the type of starting information, “society movements that bring new values”, “values”, “ideal state based on values”, “conventional technology”, “ideal” "Problems of the prior art viewed from the state", "Cause of the problem", "Problem to be solved based on the cause", "Viewpoint of finding the solution", "Essential action of the solution obtained from the viewpoint "," Invention which is a solution means including essential action ". If invention creation model 2 is used, it can also be set as the starting point information of another system.
In setting the evaluation value of the inventive ability according to the type of the starting point information, for example, the points are distributed as follows.
“Social movements that bring new values: 9 points”, “Values: 8 points”, “Ideal state based on values: 7 points”, “Prior art: 6 points”, “Conventional view from the ideal state” Technical problems: 5 points, “Causes of problem points: 4 points”, “Problems to be solved based on cause: 3 points”
, “Viewpoint to find problem solving means: 2 points”, “Essential action of solution means based on viewpoint: 1 point”

In the setting of such evaluation values, when starting point information at a certain stage is provided, the starting point information that is closer to invention creation is created by the thought inspired by the starting point information, and the thinking gradually becomes It is based on an invention creation model that approaches the creation of invention information.

That is, among the starting information of individual invention creation in the invention creation model, the farther the starting information is from the individual invention information, the more common the starting information for the creation of the invention. There are many difficulties in reaching from such starting point information to more specific starting point information. Therefore, it is based on the idea that the ability to invent an invention using such starting information that is highly valuable and difficult to use for invention creation can be evaluated as having high inventive ability. More specifically, the ability to invent the invention by providing “social movements that bring new values” as the starting point information is provided by using “the essential action of the solution obtained from the viewpoint” as the starting point information. It is rated as a much higher invention ability than the ability to invent.

This is because, as can be seen from the invention creation model, the path from “society movements that bring about new values” to “inventions that are solutions that include essential effects” has a “value” to “point of view”. Although there is a large distance of 9 stages after going through 8 stages to "essential action of solution means obtained based on", the invention which is a solution means including "essential action" from "essential action of solution means obtained based on viewpoint" This is because there is only a small distance of “1 step”.

The “invention information evaluation unit” generates an evaluation value based on a predetermined evaluation standard of the invention information received by the invention information reception unit. As described in Non-Patent Document 4 and Non-Patent Document 5, a claim which is a kind of invention information is analyzed, and after being decomposed into constituent elements, the connection relationship between the constituent elements is grasped. It is also possible to calculate the evaluation value by evaluating the coupling relationship between various components.

The “evaluation value calculation means” calculates the evaluation value of the invention ability using the evaluation value generated by the invention information evaluation means and the type of the starting point information. The higher the evaluation value generated by the invention information evaluation means, the higher the invention ability evaluation value calculated by the evaluation value calculation means as the type of starting point information is farther from the invention information as seen from the invention creation model. .

The evaluation performed when the person to be evaluated creates one piece of invention information based on the starting point information is the minimum unit of the invention ability evaluation. Rather than just assessing the invention ability of a subject by creating one invention information, rather than assessing the invention ability of the person being evaluated, the invention ability assessment of each invention creation when multiple inventions were made under "various conditions" When the evaluation values are aggregated and the invention ability evaluation is comprehensively performed, the convincing property of the evaluation value of the person to be evaluated becomes higher.
As the “various conditions” referred to herein, for example, conditions that can be realized as combinations of various selections for the following items (1) to (5) are conceivable.

(1) Variety of types of origin information,
(2) Diversity in the field of invention,
(3) Diversity of the length of time available to invent,
(4) Diversity of the range of information available for making an invention;
(5) Variety of expression format of invention information

The invention ability is calculated by collecting the evaluation values of the invention ability evaluation at each time when the invention ability evaluation is performed multiple times by analyzing the creation process of the invention information starting from the origin information under various conditions. As a method of calculating the comprehensive evaluation value for the person to be evaluated for the invention ability, there may be the following forms.

(1) Total the evaluation values of the invention ability evaluation in each time, and divide the total value by the number of times of the invention ability evaluation.
(2) The remaining evaluation values excluding the highest value and the lowest value among the evaluation values of the invention ability evaluation at each time are totaled and divided by the number of evaluation values used for the total.
(3) Diversify “various conditions” into conditions common to all persons subject to invention capacity evaluation (hereinafter referred to as prescribed conditions) and conditions selected by the subject (hereinafter referred to as free conditions). Inventive ability evaluation in (1) or (2) and the evaluation value (hereinafter referred to as the prescribed item score) obtained in the above (1) or (2) A total score obtained by summing up the obtained evaluation values (hereinafter referred to as free item scores) is calculated, and the total score is set as a total evaluation value of the subject of the invention ability evaluation.

First, the first embodiment will be described.
From here on, for simplicity of explanation, “ELISA” is used as a simplified notation of the invention ability evaluation system. ELISA is an abbreviation for “EvaLuation System of Inventing Ability”.

A configuration diagram of the entire ELISA system shown in FIG. 1 will be described.
The entire ERISA system is a system in which one or more ELIA terminals 2 are coupled to the ERISA server 1 via the Internet.
The ERISA server 1 is an HTML file (including a program written in a programming language called JavaScript (registered trademark)) that is downloaded to a terminal and executed. 1 folder.
Also, the ERISA server 1 is an HTML file (including a program written in a programming language called JavaScript (registered trademark)) that is also downloaded to the terminal and executed. In this embodiment, PCML_OPEN_EDITOR software is used. 1-1.
In the present embodiment, the terminal in which the ERISA software is downloaded and incorporated in the terminal is referred to as an ERISA terminal.
The ERISA server 1 has a user information management table 1-2. The user information management table 1-2 includes a user ID and a password required for user authentication in the access management unit 1-5 when the ERISA terminal 2 used by the user accesses the ERISA server 1. Personal information such as the user's name, contact address, and e-mail address is stored.
The user information management table 1-2 may also record the invention ability evaluation report 1-4 of the user and the invention ability evaluation data from the outside.
The ERISA server 1 stores one or more idea sheets 1-3, which are downloaded to the ERISA terminal 2 and used. The idea sheet 1-3 may be added from the external ERISA terminal 2 via the acceptance processing unit 1-6.
The ERISA server 1 can store the invention capability evaluation report 1-4 obtained from the ERISA terminal 2 via the Internet using the acceptance processing unit 1-6. The invention ability evaluation report 1-4 is stored in correspondence with the user who is the object of the invention ability evaluation using the user information management table 1-2.
In the ERISA server 1, an invention ability certificate issuing unit 1-7 can also be provided.
Upon receiving an “invention ability certificate issuance request” from a user who has registered as a user, the invention ability proof issuing unit 1-7 obtains information on the user by referring to the user information management table 1-2. Using the content of the user's invention ability evaluation report and external invention ability evaluation data obtained in this way, the invention ability possessed by the user is determined according to a predetermined standard and processing procedure. "Is expressed in combination. For example, a display of “A field, first grade” displayed on an invention capability certificate (which may be a paper medium or digital information) together with information such as a name identifying the user is issued. When the invention capability certificate is a paper medium, the issuer's signature is entered, and when it is digital information, a digital signature is entered to prevent duplication and tampering. Via the external invention capability evaluation data receiving unit 1-8, the user's invention capability evaluation document registered as a user in the ERISA server 1 is received from an external organization and is received as a user information management table 1-2. It can also be stored in

The internal configuration and operation of the ELISA terminal 2 shown in FIG. 1 will be described.
A person who has registered as a user in the ERISA server 1 performs an authentication act such as inputting a user ID and a password, and downloads the ERISA software or the like from the ERAIA server 1 to the terminal operated by the ERIA server 1. If the ERISA software has been downloaded and the terminal can access the ERISA server 1, it can be said to be an ELIA terminal 2.
In this embodiment, the ERISA software operates using the function of the Web browser 2-2 that operates on the operating system 2-3, and is denoted by 2-1 in FIG.
The ELISA software uses the input device group and the output device group 2-6 through the web browser 2-2 and the operating system 2-3, and also uses the communication device group 2-7 to communicate with the user. However, the IDE Sheet 1-3 is downloaded from the ERISA server 1 and is used to execute the invention ability evaluation of the user, and the execution result is created as an invention ability evaluation report and stored as a local file in the ERISA terminal. Can be stored. Furthermore, it is also possible to create Idea sheet 2-5 that becomes starting point information of a new invention and store it in a local file.
The ERISA terminal 2 can also send an idea sheet 2-5 and an invention capability evaluation report to the ERISA server 1 as an attached file attached to an e-mail or by an upload operation by a user operation.

A large number of ELIA terminals 2 are connected to the ERISA server 1 via the Internet, and various operations can be performed. For example, an idea sheet sent from one ERISA terminal 2 to the ERISA server 1 is accepted by the ERISA server 1 and then stored in the ERISA server 1 so that another ERISA terminal 2 can access it. . As a result, the idea information can be distributed among a large number of users in the form of an idea sheet. The function that the ERISA server 1 issues an invention ability certificate that proves the user's invention ability helps the user's activities when the user participates in various activities that demonstrate the invention ability.
An inventor with an invention ability evaluation value having a value of a predetermined level (e.g., the first level, the first level when the invention ability evaluation level is set in three stages of first, second, third) It is also possible to distribute the idea sheet to an inventor network that can communicate with each other via the network. Specifically, the acceptance processing unit 1-6 of the ERISA server 1 controls the invention sheet so that the invention ability is accepted only from a first-class user, and is stored in the ERISA server 1 as such. The idea sheet controls the access management 1-5 so that the invention ability can be accessed only by a first-class user. By doing so, it is possible to form and operate a network of inventor with very high inventive ability centering on the ERISA server 1. If starting point information such as a problem that needs to be solved is input to this network, it is very likely that an innovative solution will be created as invention information in a short time. The value is extremely high.

Next, based on FIG. 2, the internal configuration and operation of the ERISA function of the ERISA terminal 2 will be described.
The HTML file of ERISA downloaded from the ERISA server 1 operates on the Web browser of the ERISA terminal 2 by forming an ERISA Window 2-1-A. The window operates as a window object in a program described in JavaScript (registered trademark) described in the HTML file (hereinafter referred to as an ERISA program).
In the present embodiment, each window shown in FIG. 2 is realized by a large number of functional elements realized by programs in ELIA that are linked with various input / output elements described in HTML.
In order to access the ERISA server 1, it is necessary to first enter the user ID and password to obtain authentication of the ERISA server 1. If authentication is obtained, access is permitted.
First, the on-server idea sheet selection unit 2-1-1 determines the file name of the idea sheet to be read from the ERISA server 1 based on the user's operation content.
The user information acquisition unit 2-1-3 acquires information for identifying the user such as the user's name and ID number. Normally, the user enters the information using a keyboard or voice input. However, the information may be acquired using a face or fingerprint recognition function, or from an ID information providing device such as an RFID held by the user. Those information may be acquired.
The hint information level setting unit 2-1-4 sets the level of hint information that the user wants to receive in order to conceive idea information. The hint information that is presented is closer to the invention information in the invention creation model, and the level of the hint information is lower. The lower the level of hint information, the lower the inventive ability evaluation value of the creator of the idea information, even if the idea information can be created starting from the hint information.
If the idea sheet file name to be read from the ERISA server 1 has been determined, the user information has been acquired, and the setting of the hint information level has been completed, the idea entry sheet window generation unit responds to the user's operation. Operate 2-1-5.
The idea entry sheet window generation unit 2-1-5 generates the IDEA Window 2-1-B. The IDEA Window 2-1-B displays an idea entry sheet. For example, when the hint information level setting unit 2-1-4 sets the hint information level to level 6, the number of items of idea information that the user must fill in the idea entry sheet in order to complete the invention information Are 6 items including invention information.
The idea entry sheet will be described using the Idea Sheet shown in FIG.
Assume that the identification code of the user of the ERISA terminal 2 is B002, and the identification code of the creator of the file selected by this user as the Idea Sheet to be downloaded from the ERISA server 1 is A001.
The user A001 entered the idea information he created in the four lines above Idea Sheet. That is, “Social movement bringing new values”, “Values”, “Ideal state based on values”, and “Conventional technology”. When the four lines have been entered, the user A001 has finished creating the Idea Sheet. The end time was 12:00 on May 23, 2016. Then, “IDEA20146052300001356” was assigned to the Idea Sheet as the Idea sheet number.
Since the user A001 has sent the Idea Sheet in which the lines up to the prior art have been entered to the ERISA server 1, the Idea Sheet is stored in the ERISA server.
Thereafter, a user having an identification code of B002 selects the Idea Sheet number IDEA201605230000000156 stored in the ERISA server 1, imports it into his / her ERISA terminal 2, reads it, and further himself The idea was added and stored in the ERISA server 1 again.
Next, the user having the identification code of B003 also selects the Idea Sheet of IDEA Sheet number: IDEA 16605230000000156 from the ERISA server 1, imports it into his / her ERISA terminal 2, reads it, and further his / her idea In addition, it was stored in the ERISA server 1 again. The date and time was 14:26 on February 1, 2017.
Finally, a user having an identification code of B004 selects the Idea Sheet of IDEA 201602300000001506, imports it into his / her ERISA terminal 2, and adds invention information. The date and time was 17:01 on February 22, 2017.
As described above, the ERISA user can use the EAIA terminal 2 to use various contents stored in the ERISA server 1 and the idea sheet at the entry stage.
In other words, “Social movements that bring new values”, “Values”, “Ideal state based on values”, “Conventional technology”, “Problems of conventional technology from an ideal state”, “ “Cause”, “Problem to be solved based on cause”, “Viewpoint of finding solution”, “Essential action of solution obtained from viewpoint”, “Invention information that is solution means including essential action ( In some cases, only a part of the idea sheet in which the idea information is already written is displayed as hint information to the user. That is, only items corresponding to the level of hint information set by the user using the hint information level setting unit 2-1-4 are presented to the user, and other items are considered by the user and input their own thoughts. Is. Thereby, the invention ability of the user can be evaluated. The idea of seeing the sheet in FIG. 3 is another way.
In other words, each of the items of “social movement bringing about new values”, “values”, “ideal state based on values”, and “conventional technology”, which are the idea information input by the user of the identification code A001 The content became starting point information for the inventive idea of the user with the identification code B002. The contents of each item of “the problem of the prior art viewed from the ideal state”, “the cause of the problem”, and “the problem to be solved based on the cause”, which are the information input by the user of the identification code B002, This is the starting point information for the inventive idea of the user with the identification code B003. Furthermore, the contents of each item of “the viewpoint of finding the problem solving means” and “the essential action of the solving means obtained from the viewpoint” which are the information input by the user of the identification code B003 are as follows. This is the starting point information for inputting the invention information into the idea sheet.

In this situation, among the users who use the ERISA terminal 2, idea sheets are distributed to the idea information of various contents at various stages while being distributed one after another through the ERISA server 1, and various invention information It means that it is something that realizes creation.

When the user completes the entry of idea information on the idea entry sheet in IDEA Window 2-1 -B, the user operates the ERISA Window 2-1 -A idea sheet analysis unit 2-1-6. . The user's operation for activation can be realized as being performed on the IDEA Window 2-1-B, or can be realized as being performed on the ERISA Window 2-1-A.
The idea sheet analysis unit 2-1-6 obtains and analyzes the data of the idea sheet entered in the idea entry sheet in the IDEA Window 2-1-B.
The idea sheet analysis unit 2-1-6 generates PCML_OPEN_EDITOR Window 2-1-C as a new window if the invention information is described in the claim and exists in the data of the idea sheet. Then, the idea sheet analysis unit 2-1-6 transmits a claim to the generated PCML_OPEN_EDITOR Window 2-1-C. The claim evaluation value calculation unit in the PCML_OPEN_EDITOR Window2-1-C that has received the claim calculates the evaluation value of the claim. Then, PCML_OPEN_EDITOR Window2-1-C provides the evaluation value of the claims to the invention ability evaluation unit 2-1-8.
The idea sheet analysis unit 2-1-6 analyzes the idea information described in the idea sheet provided from the IDEA Window 2-1-B for each item. As a result of the analysis, an evaluation value of the intermediate invention information and an illegal flag are generated, and these are given to the invention ability evaluation unit 2-1-8.

The invention completion time measurement unit 2-1-7 receives start time information from the idea entry sheet window generation unit 2-1-5 and receives end time information from the idea sheet analysis unit 2-1-6. The invention completion time is calculated as the difference between the end time and the start time, and is given to the invention ability evaluation unit 2-1-8. The start time is the time when the idea entry sheet window generation unit 2-1-5 created the IDEA Window 2-1-B. The invention completion time measurement unit 2-1-7 uses, as an end time, the time of the timing at which the idea sheet analysis unit 2-1-6 has received the data of the idea sheet in which the idea has been entered from the IDEA Window 2-1-B. Received from the idea sheet analysis unit 2-1-6.

The invention capability evaluation unit 2-1-8 receives the input of the completion time of the invention, the evaluation value of the intermediate information of the invention, the fraud flag, the hint information level, the evaluation value of the claim, the data of the idea sheet, and the idea sheet identifier. Then, an individual invention ability evaluation report for the user of the ERISA terminal 2 is created and stored as a local file. The invention ability evaluation unit 2-1-8 reads a plurality of individual invention ability evaluation reports from the past, stored as local files of the ELIA terminal 2, and performs statistical processing, etc., and the invention ability comprehensive evaluation report Is created and stored as a local file of the ERISA terminal 2.
For example, an example of the invention ability evaluation value and the basis for calculating the evaluation value in the invention ability evaluation report is as follows.

The grounds for Taro Inventor's invention ability evaluation (out of 600) are as follows.
Add 10 points according to the setting of “Prior art”.
Add 100 points by setting “Problem”.
Add 30 points depending on the “Cause” setting.
81 points are added according to the evaluation value of the claim set as the invention information.
Additional points for processing time are 100 points.
The total score is 321 points.

In order to perform the invention ability evaluation as accurately and stably as possible, it is effective to make the evaluation target user as active as possible in the invention. Therefore, in order to encourage the user to practice the inventive ability after receiving the evaluation of the inventive ability, or to encourage the creation of the invention, for example, the following sentence is launched in ERISA Window2-1-A: I think it is good that the software in this window reads out by speech synthesis every time the user recognizes the significance of the invention.

The invention is a mechanism for creating the desired good state.
In order to create the desired good state, it is necessary to give an appropriate action to the object for which the good state is to be realized.
The appropriateness of the action depends on the causal relationship brought about by the internal structure of the object and the connection with the outside.
By abstracting the causal relationship between the internal structure of the target and the outside, it is often possible to find a mechanism that can make the target in a good state among the mechanisms of existing organisms and machines.
This is an equivalent relationship between different things and events.
You can consciously combine and replace knowledge based on equivalence, create and evaluate various combinations, and build various ideas.
Even if your idea is fragmented, you should record it in an idea note.
The idea grows into an invention when the idea note is read over and over again, the consciousness is concentrated on the subject, and the idea is recorded in the idea note.
If you keep thinking and focusing on the challenges of creating a good state of interest using idea notes, fragmentary ideas and knowledge create a spiral of information in your brain.
When the swirl becomes large enough, your subconsciousness will be activated and you will automatically form and evaluate a huge idea automatically when you are sleeping or walking.
And then it's time for the subconscious to report great ideas to your consciousness.
This is the same as how some fish jump out of the large swarm of fish that swirl in the sea, jump on the sea, and shine.
The phenomenon that a groundbreaking invention jumps out of the sea of subconsciousness is written as fish shining and named Umitsu.
Start by recording your thoughts in an idea note. You will experience Umitsu and make a groundbreaking invention.
You can be part of the creator of civilization.

The internal configuration and operation of the idea sheet analysis unit will be described with reference to FIG.
The idea sheet data is subjected to a simple acceptance process in the idea sheet acceptance processing unit 2-1-6-1. The contents of the acceptance process are as follows. First, the time when the idea sheet is received is output to the outside as the end time. If the claim is described as invention information in the idea sheet, PCML_OPEN_EDITOR is activated and the claim is given to PCML_OPEN_EDITOR. The type, content, and score of the starting point information described in the idea sheet (invention intermediate information is also referred to as starting point information since it is also the starting point of creation of the invention information) are the parsing processing unit 2-1 for each type of starting point information. Give to 6-2.
The idea sheet acceptance processing unit 2-1-6-1 also provides the content of the starting point information to the fraud response detection processing unit 2-1-6-3.
The parsing processing unit 2-1-6-2 for each type of starting point information checks whether the content of the starting point information has a syntax that matches the type of starting point information. One method of checking this syntax is to register one or more appropriate syntaxes for each type of origin information as a pass pattern using a regular expression, and match the content of the origin information with one of those pass patterns. If it passes, the value of the stipulation given to the type of the starting point information is output as an evaluation value for each type of starting point information.
In the illegal answer detection processing unit 2-1-6-3, the content of the given starting point information is illegal answer pattern data 2-1-6-4 (for example, any of the illegal answer patterns described in regular expressions). If it matches, the illegal flag is set as invalid and output.
Artificial intelligence can be generated by supervised learning with a human being as a teacher for both the acceptance pattern and the fraud response pattern used in the idea sheet analysis unit 2-1-6. The ERISA server 1 collects many diverse acceptance patterns and fraudulent answer patterns from a large number of ELISA terminals 2, sorts them by processing such as statistical processing, and creates an appropriate pattern by integrating the sorting results. Can also distribute the patterns from the ERISA server 1 to the ERISA terminals 2 to update the patterns used by the ERISA terminals 2 in the idea sheet analysis unit 2-1-6 to appropriate ones.

The internal configuration and operation of the invention ability evaluation unit 2-1-8 will be described with reference to FIG. The individual evaluation value of the invention ability and the creation reason explanation explanation unit 2-1-8-1 include the level of hint information, the time of completion of the invention, the evaluation value of each intermediate information of the invention, the evaluation value of the claims, An idea sheet identifier is input. There are various methods for calculating the individual evaluation value of the invention ability, but one implementation form is (1) a score corresponding to the level of hint information, (2) a score corresponding to the completion time of the invention, (3) The score corresponding to the evaluation value of each invention intermediate information, (4) The total of the score corresponding to the evaluation value of the claim is used as the individual evaluation value of the invention ability, and the calculation of (1) to (4) above The logic is generated in the sentence as the explanation of the reason for evaluation.
The individual evaluation value of the inventive ability thus generated and the explanation of the reason for evaluation are paired with the idea sheet identifier, so that the individual evaluation value and the reason for correction explanation correction unit 2-1-8-2 (hereinafter referred to as the correction unit). Output for.
For the correction unit, not only an individual evaluation value and an explanation of the reason for evaluation, but also an illegal flag is input. If the fraud flag indicates fraud, the correction unit sets a deduction value based on the fraud and subtracts the deduction value from the individual evaluation value. In addition, an explanation of the reason for deduction is added to the explanation of the reason for evaluation. Then, the corrected individual evaluation value and the corrected evaluation reason explanation are output as a file as an invention ability individual evaluation report. If the fraud flag does not indicate that the fraud flag is fraudulent, the correction unit outputs the input explanation of the evaluation reason as an invention capability individual evaluation report without correcting the input individual evaluation value and the explanation of the evaluation reason.
The invention ability comprehensive evaluation creating unit 2-1-8-3 reads a plurality of invention ability individual evaluation reports, performs statistical processing, etc., and creates and outputs an invention ability comprehensive evaluation report.

The idea information market will be described with reference to FIG.
The user registered in the ERISA server 1 has a problem to be solved, has a hint information provider who wants to provide hint information and obtain idea information of a problem solution, and an invention ability to solve the problem. It consists of two types of solution idea providers.
The idea information market server 3 performs matching between these two types of users.
Therefore, the user of the idea information market server 3 needs to register as a user in the ERISA server 1 as well.

(1) The hint information provider group transmits a hint information sheet to the database management unit 3-2 of the idea information market server 3. They are stored in the hint information sheet DB 3-4.
(2) The hint information sheet is labeled with the technical field and required invention ability. Based on the labeling information, matching with the solution idea provider group is performed by the matching unit 3-1. (In FIG. 6, Mr. Y03 matched and Hint information sheet No. 3 was transmitted from Mr. Y03 to the idea information market server 3)
(3) When an idea provider inputs idea information into the hint information sheet obtained by matching using the ERISA terminal 2, the ERISA terminal 2 automatically performs an invention ability evaluation, and the evaluation result is sent to the hint information provider. An invention capability individual evaluation report including an idea sheet is sent. (In FIG. 6, the invention capability individual evaluation report including idea information created by Mr. Y03 who is an idea provider is sent to Mr. X02.)
The idea information transaction record and consideration payment unit 3-3 stores these activities as a transaction record and performs a process of paying consideration to Mr. Y03 who provided the idea information.
(4) The idea information gathered under the hint information provider in (3) cannot be viewed by other users.
(5) The information of (3) can be evaluated not only by the ERISA terminal 2 but also by the hint information provider itself (Mr. X02 in FIG. 6). The evaluation by the hint information provider is sent to the ERISA server 1.
(6) The idea sheet that is evaluated well by the hint information provider is given points to the idea provider.
(7) In addition to points, the number of times of providing ideas is also accumulated. Idea providers increase their ability and trust by accumulating the number of times and points.
(8) An idea sheet that is badly evaluated by the hint information provider is given zero points or minus points to the idea provider. (To prevent ridiculous idea provision)
(9) An idea sheet that is badly evaluated by the hint information provider can be set so as to be disclosed to all users. (Since it is a good idea, but it is not evaluated as bad)
(10) The idea sheet published in (9) can be viewed and evaluated by other users. Points are also given by other users' ratings.
(11) When the points and the number of ideas provided reach a certain amount, the idea provider can obtain an invention ability certificate.
(13) Once you have an invention certificate, you can sell your ideas.
The idea information transaction between the holder of the invention capability certificate and the hint information provider is recorded in the idea information market server 3.
(14) Anyone can participate in the evaluation of the published idea sheet, but the holder of the invention ability certificate has a higher point that can be given to the idea sheet than the general idea provider.

Method of buying and selling ideas 1: When the hint information provider pays a certain amount to the operator of the idea information market server 3, the number of providing hint information sheets and the number of browsing idea sheets are unlimited.

Method 2: The idea information market server 3 assigns a price to each idea sheet provided by a premium member who is an idea provider having a high-ranked invention ability certificate. The hint information provider pays an amount corresponding to the idea sheet to be viewed.

Based on FIG. 7, the configuration and operation of a customer communication system in a portal such as a store will be described.
In the store, the ERISA terminal 2 is provided at the position of the portal P.
The store registers in advance with the ERISA server 1 and makes a contract necessary for using ERISA.
A or a group of Mr. A, Mr. B and Mr. C who has an invention ability certificate (D field, first grade, name: Mr. A) issued by the ERISA server 1 comes to the portal P to invent.
The ERISA terminal 2 notifies the idea providing server 3 of the portal position P.
Then, the portal server-related hint information sheet Ip at the position P is transmitted from the idea providing server 3 to the portable terminal of the person near the ERISA terminal 2 or the portal position P.
A customer who comes to the store answers the questionnaire included in the Ip using the ERISA terminal 2 installed in the store or his / her mobile terminal, and the customer gets points from the store, and when the points are accumulated, they are exchanged for cash it can.
In some cases, Ip may include information on a problem that the store wants to solve.
Mr. A, Mr. B, and Mr. C who came to the store talked while eating and drinking in the store, and the representative A was given the idea information Sp describing the solution to the problem included in the Ip. Or, it is transmitted to the idea information providing server using its own mobile terminal.
Mr. A includes in the idea information Sp a description that Mr. B and Mr. C are also joint idea providers, and the point distribution ratio between Mr. A, Mr. B and Mr. C.
The idea providing server 3 can also raise the consideration point for providing an idea for a group including a person having an invention ability certificate or a group including a person having an invention ability certificate.
In the case where the idea providing server 3 does not make the requirement for providing an idea that the invention providing certificate is present, both Mr. B and Mr. C can provide the idea providing server 3 with an idea alone. In that case, Mr. B and Mr. C are evaluated for inventive ability by the ERISA function shown in FIG. And an invention capability individual evaluation report can also be received.
At the store where the portal P is installed, at least one item can be ordered as a condition for the customer to use ERISA, or an ERISA point card can be issued to give the customer points for providing ideas. Can be recorded on the point card.
In stores where such ERISA terminals are installed, products are sold, stores are promoted, and the region where the stores are located is activated. In addition, for store customers, they will have the ability to think and create inventions. As a result, the world becomes more sophisticated and the world is improved.

A second embodiment will be described.
Since FIG. 11 shows the “invention comprehensive support system” which is the overall configuration of the present embodiment, the explanation starts with the explanation regarding FIG. 11 and proceeds to the detailed explanation.
The invention comprehensive support system shown in FIG. 11 includes the “invention ability comprehensive evaluation system” shown in FIG. 10 and the “idea note management system” whose internal structure is not shown. The invention comprehensive support system has two modes, an invention idea support mode and an invention ability evaluation mode.

The invention comprehensive support system has a man-machine interface, an information storage function, and an information processing function when the target person is a natural person or a group of natural persons, whether in the invention idea support mode or the invention ability evaluation mode. Realize using devices. When the subject of invention ability evaluation is artificial intelligence, a man-machine interface is not necessary, and a communication function for simply exchanging information is sufficient. Here, a description will be given on the premise of a device intended for a natural person. Examples of such a device include a personal computer, a smartphone, a tablet PC, and a computer integrated with a head mounted display. In the future, as the technology advances, body-worn terminals with a man-machine interface, implantable terminals, and the like will be used as devices here.
Here, for simplicity of explanation, an embodiment will be described as one of application software that operates on a smartphone, which is the most popular device at present.
Naturally, such application software runs on the cloud outside the smartphone, and it is easy to exchange information with the target person via the man-machine interface software on the smartphone via the Internet. Omitted.

Invention Invention Support Mode In the invention idea support mode, the subject is provided with an idea sheet in the format shown in FIG. 12 from the idea note management system. Depending on the selection of the target person, an idea sheet may be used in which nothing other than the item name is entered as shown in FIG. 12, or the starting point information is provided in advance as shown in FIG. 16 or FIG. Sometimes it is done. In addition, an idea sheet that has already been created can be read out from an idea note and edited or viewed. When the target person selects to record the idea sheet in the idea note by means such as menu selection, the start date of work is automatically added to the idea sheet by the idea note management system in the case of a new idea sheet. It is filled in and the idea number is automatically assigned and taken as an idea sheet in the idea note associated with the target person. Monthly date and time and idea sheet reduction icons are automatically displayed. When the target person records the idea sheet in the idea note, the year, month, date, and time of the input confirmation for each line is automatically recorded in each line of the idea sheet. Input confirmation is performed by operating a confirmation button provided as a man-machine interface on the device. If the subject assigns the attribute value “determined” using the idea note management system for the contents of the description in the invention information line of the idea sheet using the confirm button as described above, the idea sheet Can be input to the invention ability evaluation system for invention ability evaluation. FIG. 13 is a hypothetical example of an idea sheet that has been completed up to the invention information and completed as a whole.

As an assumption example of the process until the completion of the idea sheet in FIG. 13, the operation in the invention idea support mode will be described more specifically.
The subject of invention idea support can access through the idea note management system because it is an idea note stored in a storage device in his device or an idea note published via the network or a specific relationship By accessing another person's idea note, an idea sheet in which starting point information is described and invention information is not filled in is obtained. From one or more idea sheets obtained in this way, one idea sheet to be the subject of the inventive idea is selected and made the subject of the inventive idea activity. Then, in the selected idea sheet, in the case of FIG. 13, only the line with a ◯ mark at the beginning of the creation date is displayed. In the case of an idea sheet created by a person other than the target person, for each row that has a description in the content column, the year, month, day and time of the moment that the target person has selected as the subject of the invention activity is marked with a 〇 mark at the beginning. ,Is displayed.
Each row marked with a circle at the beginning of the date of creation date is registered in the idea sheet as starting point information of the inventive idea performed by the subject. In the case of the idea sheet in FIG. 15, the subject of invention idea support made this idea sheet the subject of the invention idea activity at 12:00 on May 25, 1989, the starting point described from the beginning. The information was “prior art” and everything before it. The subject of the invention idea support then entered the contents of “Problems of the prior art viewed from the ideal state” at 12:10 on May 25, 1989. Since the target person entered the starting point information in the subsequent direction, a asterisk (*) is displayed before the date of entry. It can be seen that the creation date of the invention information is 17:01 on June 22, 1989. Since the start of the inventive idea activity was 12:00 on May 25, 1989, it can be seen that it took about one month to complete the creation of the invention information.
The length of time from the registration of the starting point information to the idea sheet to the completion of the creation of the invention information can also be used for the invention ability evaluation.

Inventive ability evaluation mode The subject of invention ability evaluation is an idea sheet (for example, FIG. 16 or FIG. 16) in which the starting point information of the invention idea is described from the invention ability comprehensive evaluation system which is a partial system of the invention comprehensive support system of FIG. 17 ideas sheets) and "providing other information necessary for invention creation" to create inventions in stages and fill in the created information on each idea sheet. In the idea note management system, record the idea sheet to your idea note. The format of the idea sheet has the structure shown in FIG.
The format of FIG. 12 is configured such that invention information can be naturally created by describing in order from any line in the downward direction. For example, when necessary information is described in the prior art line as the starting point information and provided to the target person, the description of each line in order downward from the prior art line is appropriate to the line of the invention information. The invention can be created by describing the above. By describing each line in order upward from the conventional technology, the values and social movements that serve as the basis for evaluating the conventional technology can be recognized, and the conventional technology can be grasped from a wider perspective and applied in various ways. A wide range of invention ideas can be made.
The subject of the invention ability evaluation creates the invention while recording the contents obtained by creating the idea based on the starting point information on the idea sheet. The idea sheet is recorded in each idea note through an idea note management system, and access management and progress management are performed. An example of an idea sheet when the evaluation subject completes the invention in this way is shown in FIG.
Here, a method of obtaining “providing other information necessary for invention creation” as a number of published patent publications from the patent information platform (J-PlatPat) is also conceivable.
After receiving the idea sheet with the starting point information as shown in FIG. 16 from the invention ability comprehensive evaluation system, the subject of the invention ability evaluation makes an invention idea and adds his / her idea to the idea sheet. , “Social movements that bring new values”, “Values”, “Ideal state based on values”, “Conventional technology”, “Problems of conventional technology from the viewpoint of ideal state”, “Cause of problems ”,“ Problem to be solved based on cause ”,“ Viewpoint of finding solution ”,“ Essential action of solution obtained from viewpoint ”,“ Invention information ” To complete the invention information. Depending on the desire of the subject or the judgment of the invention ability comprehensive evaluation system, the idea sheet given to the subject may be as shown in FIG. For example, if the invention information cannot be created simply by receiving the idea sheet shown in FIG. 16 or if the invention information can be created but cannot be passed, the starting point information (starting point information that easily reaches the invention information) from the subject ) Is requested to provide an idea sheet provided to the evaluation subject, for example, as shown in FIG.

When the comprehensive evaluation system of the invention ability calculates the overall evaluation value of the inventor's invention ability, the invention creation activity of the subject of the invention ability evaluation is determined from the invention field, invention time, It is performed in accordance with a command relating to all or part of the expression format of invention information, starting point information, and the like. The subject of evaluation performs the invention activity at least once according to these directives, accesses the idea notes through the idea note management system, receives the idea sheet recorded in the idea notes, and uses the invention information while using it To complete. That is, as shown in FIG. 16 and FIG. 17, an idea sheet including starting point information that has already been described up to a certain level is received, and based on that, the invention is completed and the idea sheet is obtained as invention information. I will add. When the invention information row is completed and the confirm button is selected as shown in FIG. 13, the invention ability comprehensive evaluation system calculates the evaluation value of the invention ability for the invention act.
A directive (all or part of the invention field, invention time, expression format of invention information, starting information, etc.) that allows the subject of invention ability evaluation to invent invention under “various conditions” Is given to the subject one or more times. As items constituting “various conditions”, for example, the following items (1) to (5) are conceivable.
(1) Variety of types of origin information,
(2) Diversity in the field of invention,
(3) Diversity of the length of time available to invent,
(4) Diversity of the range of information available for making an invention;
(5) Variety of expression format of invention information

FIG. 14 and FIG. 15 show the invention ability comprehensive evaluation when the subject of the invention ability evaluation performs the invention creation activity three times under such various conditions and completes the line of the invention information in the three idea sheets. It is the table | surface which put together the calculation process of the comprehensive evaluation value by a system. In other words, it can be said that it is the subject's gradebook. 14 and 15 differ in the inventive ability evaluation method.

FIG. 14 shows a case where the inventive ability evaluation is performed by the method of the second form of the inventive ability evaluation system shown in FIG. 9, and FIG. 15 shows the inventive ability evaluation by the method of the second form of the inventive ability evaluation system shown in FIG. This is the case.
In FIG. 15, it can be seen that three pieces of invention information have been created by three invention activities. However, two of the three pieces of invention information have passed, and one has failed. In the two invention information passed, the starting point information used is “Societal movements that bring new values: 9 points”, “Values: 8 points”, and “Ideal state based on values: 7 points” In the case of three, seven points, which is the minimum number of points in the three starting point information, were given as evaluation values of the inventive ability. On the other side of the two invention information that passed, the starting point information used was seven from "Social movement bringing new values: 9 points" to "Problems to be solved based on the cause: 3 points" It was starting point information. Therefore, three points, which is the minimum number of points among these seven starting point information, were given as evaluation values of the invention ability.
The evaluation value of the invention ability based on the idea sheet in which the invention information is rejected is 0 point.
As a result, based on the result of completing three idea sheets, the overall evaluation value of the subject's invention ability was 3.3 points, which is an average of 7 points, 3 points, and 0 points.
In FIG. 16, the invention information of 3 cases has been created by the invention activity of 3 times. The evaluation values of the invention information are 2, 4, and 1 from the left. For the evaluation of the invention information, for example, the technique described in Non-Patent Document 4 and Non-Patent Document 5 for executing the claim evaluation algorithm described in Non-Patent Document 5 is divided by 10 from the scoring result with 100 points. Thus, it can be used as an evaluation value with a maximum score of 10.
The starting point information used in the field 1 of the invention was 7 points with high difficulty, but since the evaluation value of the created invention information was 2, the invention ability shown in this invention creation activity was 7 points + 2 Points = 9 points.
The starting point information used in the invention field 2 has a difficulty level of three points, but the invention information created using the starting point information has an evaluation value of four points. 3 points + 4 points = 7 points.
Since the starting point information used in the invention field 3 has a difficulty level of 6 points, and the evaluation value of the invention information created from that is 1 point, the invention ability shown in this invention creation activity is 6 points + 1 point = 7 points It became.
The overall evaluation value of the inventive ability obtained as an average value of the evaluation values in these three invention activities was 7.7 points.

The invention capability comprehensive evaluation system of FIG. 10 will be described.
The invention ability comprehensive evaluation system includes (1) an invention idea support mode that provides “starting information” of an invention idea and “providing other information necessary for invention creation”, and (2) an invention time and an expression format of the invention information. In the comprehensive evaluation mode, after setting some or all of the conditions, give the evaluation subject a predetermined starting point information and let the evaluation subject perform one or more invention activities, and comprehensively evaluate the created invention information There are two modes of operation.

The invention ability comprehensive evaluation system is composed of an “invention ability evaluation system” and a “means for calculating a comprehensive evaluation value of invention ability”.
As described above, the invention ability evaluation system has the form shown in FIG. 8 and the form shown in FIG.
In either form, the invention ability evaluation system receives an input of “starting point information setting command” and “invention field” and prepares an idea sheet in which “starting point information” of the condition matching the input is described. Received from outside the idea sheet filled with "invention information" created by the subject based on the starting point information described in the idea sheet, obtained from the outside, given to the subject, invention information, starting point information and invention Based on the time and the like, the inventor's ability to invent is evaluated, and an “invention ability evaluation value” is output.

"Calculation means for comprehensive evaluation value of invention ability" is an evaluation of an idea sheet in which invention information is added to the subject of invention ability evaluation under various conditions and one or more invention activities. The obtained invention ability evaluation values are counted once or more, and a comprehensive evaluation value of the invention ability is calculated and output. Further, in order to provide the inventive ability evaluation system with an idea sheet including starting point information to be given to the subject of invention ability evaluation, information on “invention field” and “starting point information” used for selecting such an idea sheet. Is given to the invention ability evaluation system.
Here, the “invention field” may be designated by an international patent classification code (IPC), or may be designated by a designation code for a technical field or an industrial field based on another system. The “starting point information setting command” is a command for designating a description format of starting point information to be presented to the target person. There are the following starting point setting commands.
Type A setting command: Only the starting point information that specifies the description is described in the idea sheet.
Type B setting command: The starting point information specifying the description and all starting point information in the preceding stage are described in the idea sheet.
Type C setting command: Do not describe any starting point information in the idea sheet.

The “means for calculating the total evaluation value of the inventive ability” also manages the provision of “other information necessary for invention creation” provided to the subject of the inventive ability evaluation. For example, when the information source of “other information necessary for invention creation” is a patent information platform (J-PlatPat), information that can be accessed by the subject is changed from D1 that is a specific date to another specific date. It is possible to limit to a published patent publication in which a published publication is issued during D2, which is the date of the date, and further, it is possible to add a limiting condition that the claims are limited to those containing a specific keyword. Furthermore, it can be limited to the front page of each published patent publication.

The “means for calculating the total evaluation value of the inventing ability” can limit the time used for the invention for the subject of the inventing ability evaluation and can also specify the expression format of the invention information. As a form of restriction of time used in the invention, there is a form in which the start time and end time are specified, and there is a form in which only the end time is specified. There is also a form of restriction that must be completed within the time limit.
As the expression format of the invention information, a claim format, a functional block diagram format, and a flowchart format are conceivable.

Next, the inventive ability evaluation method for the subject having the inventive ability of the intermediate level or higher will be described in detail with reference to FIG. 18, FIG. 19, FIG. 20, and FIG.
In the invention ability comprehensive evaluation system of FIG. 10, the “starting information setting command” given to the invention ability evaluation system by the “means for calculating the overall evaluation value of the invention ability” is “type A setting command” Only “vibrating the bed mat at a specified time” corresponding to “essential action of the means” is used. The designation of “invention field” given to the invention ability evaluation system by the “inventive ability comprehensive evaluation value calculation means” is “None” indicating that no designation is made. If the designation of the invention field is not None, the code of the designated field is described as the contents of the prior art line of the idea sheet.

As described above, the invention ability evaluation system, which receives the designation of “starting point information setting instruction” and “invention field” of the type A setting instruction from the “means for calculating the overall evaluation value of the invention ability”, The information shown in FIG. 18A, which is an idea sheet describing starting point information that matches those designations, is acquired. The invention ability evaluation system gives the obtained idea sheet to the subject of invention ability evaluation as starting point information. The given year / month / day / hour / day / day / hour / day are provided when the subject is provided in the entry area for the month / date / time of creation in the row of “Essential Action of Solution Means Obtained from Viewpoint” in the idea sheet of FIG. Is written.

The “means for calculating the overall evaluation value of the invention ability” gives the subject a command of “invention time: 5 hours” and “expression format of the invention information: claim format”. It is expected that the invention creation activity will be performed so that the invention information part of the idea sheet shown in FIG.

The subject of the invention ability evaluation proceeds with the invention idea using the idea sheet of FIG. 18A and "other information necessary for invention creation" provided by the "means for calculating the overall evaluation value of the invention ability". And create an idea sheet. In this idea sheet, the starting point information from “point of finding problem solving means” to “value” is entered by the subject of invention ability evaluation by himself / herself. After that, the “invention information” line of the idea sheet is entered. As a result, the idea sheet of FIG. 18B is completed. Next, in order to create an idea sheet of the related invention, the same target person has the same starting point information from the “value” line to the “cause of problem” line as in the idea sheet of FIG. Create two idea sheets. In one of the two idea sheets, the content of the line “Problem to be solved based on cause” is “sound wave is transmitted only to the person and the sound wave is not transmitted to other persons”. After the description, starting point information is sequentially added from there, and the contents of the invention information are filled in, and the idea sheet of FIG. 19C is created. Next, in another idea sheet, as the content of the “problem to be solved based on the cause” line, it is described that “the transmitted sound wave gives a large stimulus to the ear only for the person himself / herself”. From there, the starting point information is sequentially added, and the contents of the invention information are entered to create the idea sheet shown in FIG.

FIG. 20 shows the “starting information shown in the idea sheet shown in FIG. 18A”, which is “the essential action of the solving means obtained from the viewpoint”, which is the starting point information. 18 (b) is created on the basis of “.” And the idea sheets of FIG. 19 (c) and FIG. 19 (d) are created based on the idea sheet of FIG. 18 (b). Thus, based on the connected thought process of creating a total of three pieces of invention information, it is an evaluation table in which a comprehensive evaluation value of the subject's invention ability is calculated.

According to the evaluation table of FIG. 20, the inventive ability evaluation value in the idea sheet of FIG. 18B is 38 points, and the inventive ability evaluation value in the idea sheet of FIG. 19C is 7 points. The invention ability evaluation value in the idea sheet of (d) is 7 points, and the overall evaluation value of the invention ability is 52 points = 38 points + 7 points + 7 points.
Here, three pieces of invention information were created, but based on one piece of starting information, three pieces of invention information were connected by the same subject without providing additional starting point information from the outside. Since it was created in the process of thinking, it was determined that it was an invention act of one time, and 52 points were not divided by 3, but were divided by 1, and 52 points were obtained as a comprehensive evaluation value.

According to the evaluation table of FIG. 20, the evaluation value of the invention information in the column of FIG. 18B is two points. The display of the mark “◯” shown in the column of FIG. 18B indicates that the content of the row of “essential action of the solution means obtained from the viewpoint” which is the starting point information is received from the outside. Show. The minimum value of the scoring points in all the rows where “◯” is displayed is used as a point of the invention ability regarding the creation of the invention information by receiving the provision from the outside. That is, in this case, it is 1 point.
According to the evaluation table of FIG. 20, the display of “☆” mark shown in the column of FIG. 21 (b) indicates that the starting point information is higher in the upward direction than the starting point information having the above “◯” mark. This indicates that the person to be evaluated added the idea sheet. Appending the starting point information in the upper direction requires a wide range of knowledge, visual field, flexible thinking and reasoning, and is highly appreciated. Therefore, the points assigned to the starting point information corresponding to the “☆” mark are totaled and added to the evaluation value in the invention ability evaluation. That is, (2 points + 3 points + 4 points + 5 points + 6 points + 7 points + 8 points) was added to 2 points which are the evaluation values of the invention information and 1 point corresponding to the “◯” mark. As a result, the inventive ability evaluation score for the column of FIG. 18B in the evaluation table of FIG. 20 was 38 points.

The evaluation value of the invention information in the column of FIG. 12C of the evaluation table of FIG. 20 is three points, and the starting point information received from the outside is of the type “cause of the problem” and “value” This is all of the high-order origin information up to the type of origin information. Since it was provided from the outside, the line corresponding to them is marked with “◯”. Therefore, 4 points which are the minimum value of the points assigned to the starting point information marked with “◯” are added to 3 points which are the evaluation values of the invention information to obtain 7 points as the invention ability evaluation value.

The evaluation value of the invention information in the column of FIG. 19D of the evaluation table of FIG. 20 is 3 points, and the minimum value of the scoring based on the starting point information received from the outside is 4 points. Therefore, 7 points were obtained as invention ability evaluation values in the column of FIG.

INDUSTRIAL APPLICABILITY The present invention can be used in many fields, such as the field of invention ability education, the field of selecting talented human resources and artificial intelligence and their teams, and the field of invention idea support.

1: Inventive ability evaluation system second form 2: Inventive ability evaluation system third form 3: Inventive ability comprehensive evaluation system

Claims (7)

Starting point information providing means for providing starting point information, which is information that should be the starting point of the invention idea, for the subject of the invention ability evaluation;
An idea information receiving means for receiving the idea information created by the subject using the starting point information;
An idea information evaluation means for generating an evaluation value by evaluating the information received by the idea information receiving means by a predetermined evaluation method;
An invention ability evaluation system comprising evaluation value calculation means for calculating an evaluation value of invention ability using the evaluation value generated by the idea information evaluation means and the starting point information. Providing starting point information, which is information that should be the starting point of the invention idea, to the subject of the invention ability evaluation,
Receive the idea information created by the subject using the starting point information,
The received idea information is evaluated by a predetermined evaluation method to generate an evaluation value,
An invention ability evaluation method for calculating an evaluation value of invention ability using an evaluation value of generated idea information and the starting point information. Starting point information providing means for providing starting point information, which is information that should be the starting point of the invention idea, for the subject of the invention ability evaluation;
An idea information receiving means for receiving the idea information created by the subject using the starting point information;
An idea information evaluation means for generating an evaluation value by evaluating the information received by the idea information receiving means by a predetermined evaluation method;
An evaluation value calculating means for calculating an evaluation value of the inventive ability using the evaluation value generated by the idea information evaluation means and the starting point information;
The inventor who has an invention ability evaluation value having a predetermined level by the evaluation value calculation means distributes the idea sheet to an inventor network that can communicate with each other via a communication network, so that the starting point information in the idea sheet And control means for controlling the inventor network so as to collect idea information and create invention information;
An inventor network system comprising: Starting point information providing means for providing starting point information, which is information that should be the starting point of the invention idea, for the subject of the invention ability evaluation;
An idea information receiving means for receiving the idea information created by the subject using the starting point information;
An idea information evaluation means for generating an evaluation value by evaluating the information received by the idea information receiving means by a predetermined evaluation method;
An evaluation value calculating means for calculating an invention ability evaluation value using the evaluation value generated by the idea information evaluation means and the starting point information;
The starting point information and the level of the invention ability evaluation value that the subject person who should provide the idea information based on the starting point information should have the desired condition for the value calculated by the evaluation value calculating means. An accepting means for accepting an idea providing request from a requester;
The starting point information is given to the inventor who meets the conditions described in the idea providing request received by the receiving means, and the inventor is provided with the idea information based on the starting point information. Invention request means to request,
An idea information market system comprising idea information providing means for providing idea information to a requester of the idea providing request when the idea information is provided in response to a request by the invention requesting means. Starting information that receives information specifying the location, acquires starting information related to the location, and provides the customer with starting information that is information that should be the starting point of the invention idea from the device at the location Providing means;
An idea information receiving means for receiving idea information created using the starting point information;
An idea information evaluation means for generating an evaluation value by evaluating the information received by the idea information receiving means by a predetermined evaluation method;
An evaluation value calculating means for calculating an invention ability evaluation value using the evaluation value generated by the idea information evaluation means and the starting point information;
Provide customer communication system. An idea note management system for managing an idea note readable by an invention ability evaluation system that outputs an invention ability evaluation value,
A managed idea note consists of one or more idea sheets,
Each idea sheet includes starting point information given as information that should be the starting point of an invention idea that enables the creator of the idea information to perform an invention ability evaluation,
Idea information created based on the starting point information,
An idea note management system comprising a creator of the idea information and information capable of specifying a time required for the creation. A data stream that can be read by an invention ability evaluation system that outputs an invention ability evaluation value,
Starting point information given to the subject of the invention ability evaluation as information to be the starting point of the invention idea,
Idea information created by the subject based on the starting point information;
A data stream of an idea sheet, which is information including a creator of the idea information and information describing a time required for the creation.

Images