JP2018034379A - Sheet with answer for instructor - Google Patents

Abstract

PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide a sheet with answers for an instructor, which enables efficient execution of test rating and counting work.SOLUTION: A sheet with answers for an instructor is used for rating of a test for children. The same questions as questions described in the test for the children, and answers about them are described, and a score summing-up column 25, in which scores of the plurality of children taking the test for the children are entered for each children, is also described.SELECTED DRAWING: Figure 2

Description

  The present invention relates to a sheet with answers for instructors used for scoring a test for children.

  In an elementary school or the like, a test may be carried out for each learning unit in order to check the degree of achievement of learning, such as how much the student has acquired the learning content in the class. The instructor confirms the achievement level of each child at the end of the learning unit by a test in which the items to be learned in the learning unit are described as questions when one learning unit is completed.

  Moreover, the learning content of the child is determined in each semester as a learning unit to be acquired, and a plurality of learning units are learned in one semester. Therefore, a test for each learning unit will be conducted multiple times during one semester.

  These tests are conducted for each learning unit. The scores for each question in each test and their total points are counted at the end of the semester, and each student understands the learning unit that should be acquired during the semester. It is used as a material for grasping and evaluating whether or not you have mastered. At the elementary school teaching site, the total points of the tests conducted for each learning unit are counted at the end of the semester. At this time, the scores and totals for each question in all the learning unit tests during the semester The point is written in the “score summary table”. The “Score Counting Table” is configured so that the scores and total scores of all tests during the semester can be written for each child. The writing operation can be carried out by input or by transfer to a “score totaling sheet” printed on paper. Based on these “score summary tables,” the information obtained from the tests of each learning unit conducted during the semester is compared for each child to accurately grasp the tendency of each child's strengths and weaknesses. It is possible to accurately grasp the situation of achievement.

  Traditionally, the instructor must perform such tests such as scoring and counting other than the time that the child is in school, such as preparation time for class, class time, rest time, or staff time, etc. In some cases, it was difficult to secure sufficient time. Therefore, there is a need for efficient work such as scoring and counting.

  Patent Document 1 describes that a teacher's test answer material is set to about half the size of a test paper for children in order to efficiently perform test scoring. The teacher's test answer material (instructor answer sheet) is printed with the same questions as the child's test sheet, and the correct answer, examples of wrong answers, scoring standards, etc. are written in red in the answer column. It is common to score a test for a child while checking the answer column in the teacher's test answer material.

Japanese Unexamined Patent Publication No. 2016-32877

  The teacher's test answer material described in Patent Document 1 is a booklet of the same shape and about half the size of the child's test paper, and the child's test paper is placed on one side of the double-page spread. The other side is printed with the back side of the child's test paper. As a result, the teacher's test answer material does not take up space even on a small desk, making it easier to compare and compare the child's test paper and the teacher's test answer material, making it easier to use when scoring. It becomes good. Further, when scoring the back side of the test sheet, it is not necessary to turn over the teacher's test answer material, and the test can be scored efficiently.

  By using such a test answer material for teachers, the scoring work for each test sheet becomes easy, and the scoring work can be performed efficiently. However, on the other hand, the work of counting the scores of each test sheet after scoring needs to be done in the same way as before, and there is still room for improvement from the viewpoint of scoring the children's test and improving the efficiency of the work. It was a thing.

  The present invention has been made to solve these conventional problems, and an object of the present invention is to provide a sheet with answers for instructors that can efficiently perform test scoring and tabulation.

  In order to solve the above-mentioned problems, the present invention is a paper with an answer for a leader used for scoring a test for a child, the same question as the question described in the test for a child and its answer are described, and There is also a score summary column where you can enter the score of each student who took the test.

  According to said structure, the score totalization column which fills in the score for every child who received the test for children is described in the paper with an answer for leaders. For example, if the instructor enters the score for each test for a child in a study unit in the score summary column on the answer sheet for the instructor, the instructor will provide a score table for each child in the test for a child in one study unit. Can be completed. For this reason, it is easy to grasp the achievement level of learning for each child in one learning unit by looking at the score totaling column of the answer sheet for instructors.

  During the semester, multiple tests for children will be conducted. When scoring the results of a test for a child for each learning unit in the “Score Summary Table” and evaluating each student's learning achievement level, each child ’s test score is displayed on the paper with an answer sheet for each teacher. The work efficiency when writing and summing up the score in the “score summary table” is improved. Note that the “score summary table” is a concept that includes both “score summary software” as PC software that can be used to write test scores for children and “score summary paper” printed on paper. And

  In order to solve the above-mentioned problems, the present invention is a paper with answers for instructors used for scoring a test for children whose questions are written on the front and back, the same questions as the questions described in the tests for children and the Answers are written on the front and back, and on the first side of the instructor's answer sheet, there is a first score totaling column for each student to fill in the score of the question written on the first side. The second side of the answer sheet for the person is provided with a second score totaling column for entering the score of the question described in the second side for each child, and the first score totaling column and the above-mentioned The second score totaling section is configured such that the portion including the first score totaling field of the first surface is turned back toward the second score totaling field of the second surface, whereby the first score totaling is performed. The column and the second score totaling column are provided at positions where they can be visually recognized.

  According to the above configuration, when scoring the surface of the test for children with questions written on the front and back, the scoring results are scored while looking at the first surface of the instructor-equipped answer sheet. You can fill in the first score tab for each child. In addition, when scoring the back side of the test for children, scoring while looking at the second side of the answer sheet for the instructor, and the scoring results in the second scoring column on the same second side, for each child You can fill in. For this reason, the work efficiency for scoring the test for children and entering the scoring result is improved.

  Further, the first score totaling column and the second score totaling column are obtained by folding back the portion including the first score totaling column of the first surface toward the second score totaling column of the second surface. The first score totaling column and the second score totaling column are provided at positions where they can be visually recognized. For this reason, the score of the front and back of the test for children can be easily grasped for each child by folding the first surface. And the work efficiency at the time of writing the score for every test in the "score totaling table" and totaling it improves.

  In the above invention, the instructor answer sheet is preferably provided with a mark for turning back so that the first score totaling column and the second score totaling column are visible.

  In the above invention, the mark is folded at a position of the mark toward the second score totaling column of the second surface at a portion including the first score totaling column of the first surface. It is preferable that the first score totaling column and the second score totaling column are provided at positions where they can be viewed in parallel.

  The instructor answer sheet of the present invention can efficiently perform test scoring and tabulation.

The figure which shows the surface of a test for children. The figure which shows the surface of the paper with an answer for leaders of this embodiment. The figure which shows the back surface of the paper with an answer for leaders of this embodiment. The figure which shows the state which turned up the paper with an answer for leaders of this embodiment. The figure which shows the score totalization table according to learning unit. The figure which shows the score totaling table according to evaluation viewpoint. The figure which shows the score totaling software. The figure which shows the example of a change of the score column of the paper with an answer for leaders. (A) is a figure which shows the surface of the example of a change of the paper with an answer for leaders. (B) is the figure which shows the state which turned up the back surface of the example of a change of the paper with an answer for leaders. The figure which shows the example of a change of the score column of the paper with an answer for leaders. (A) is a figure which shows the surface of the example of a change of the paper with an answer for leaders. (B) is a figure which shows the back surface of the example of a change of the paper with an answer for leaders. The figure which shows the example of a change of the score column of the paper with an answer for leaders. (A) is a figure which shows the surface of the example of a change of the paper with an answer for leaders. (B) is a figure which shows the back surface of the example of a change of the paper with an answer for leaders. The figure which shows the example of a change of the score column of the paper with an answer for leaders. (A) is a figure which shows the surface of the example of a change of the paper with an answer for leaders. (B) is a figure which shows the back surface of the example of a change of the paper with an answer for leaders.

  Hereinafter, an embodiment of a sheet with answers for a leader embodying the present invention will be described with reference to FIGS. In the present embodiment, a mathematics learned in the first semester of second graders is taken as an example, and a paper with answers for leaders used for scoring a test for children conducted there will be described.

  As shown in FIG. 5, the arithmetic lesson for the first semester of the second grader of elementary school is composed of seven learning units. As described in the column of “Unit Name” 51 in the “Score Summary Table for Evaluation of Learning Status by Unit” 5 shown in FIG. , "Subtraction of subtraction", "Tangai of length", "Number of 3 digits", "Tangai of water" and "Time and time" are composed of seven learning units. Each time these learning units are completed, the instructor performs a test for children (hereinafter sometimes simply referred to as a test) for grasping the achievement of learning of the children. In addition, at the end of the semester, a semester test will be conducted in order to comprehensively understand the achievement of all units learned during the semester. This corresponds to a portion described as “Let's see” in the column of “Unit name” 51 in “Score totaling table for evaluation of learning status by unit” 5.

  In such a test, the content to be learned in each learning unit is described as a question, and each question is set for each “evaluation viewpoint” for grasping the degree of learning in each learning unit. Here, the “evaluation viewpoint” includes “mathematical thinking”, “score” as described in the column of “viewpoint” 61 in the “score totaling table for evaluation of learning status by viewpoint” 6 shown in FIG. It consists of “skills about quantity and figure” and “knowledge / understanding about quantity and figure”.

  FIG. 1 shows, as an example, a test for a child for confirming the achievement of learning in the learning unit “length study”. The test consists of a sheet of approximately A3 size with a plurality of questions written on the front and back sides. As shown in FIG. 1, on the test surface 1, a learning unit name 11, a name entry column 12, and a score column 13 are arranged in a line above the page. A question column 14 consisting of a plurality of questions is described at the center of the page. The question column 14 is divided into two columns of question columns 14a and 14b for each evaluation unit to be evaluated for each learning unit. In this example, the question column 14a on the left side describes four questions from the viewpoint of “knowledge / understanding about quantities and figures”, and the question column 14b on the right side shows “skills about quantities and figures”. Three questions from the viewpoint of evaluation are described. And in the upper part of each question column 14a, 14b, the correspondence 14c, 14d for every corresponding evaluation viewpoint is described concretely. Each question has an answer column 14e and a score 14f.

  The score column 13 is divided so that the score for each evaluation viewpoint to be evaluated for each learning unit can be entered. Specifically, a score column 13a for entering the score of the question column 14a from the evaluation viewpoint of "knowledge / understanding about quantities and figures" and a question column from the evaluation viewpoint of "skills about quantities and figures" It is divided into a score column 13b for entering the score of 14b and a score column 13c for entering the total score of the score columns 13a and 13b.

  Although not shown, the rear surface of the child test has the same configuration as that of the front surface 1 and includes a learning unit name, a name entry column, a score column, a question column, and the like. In the question column on the back side, two questions from the viewpoint of evaluation of “mathematical thinking” are described.

  FIG. 2 and FIG. 3 show the answer sheet for instructors of this embodiment used for scoring the test for children. The answer sheet for instructors consists of a sheet of approximately A4 size, about half the size of the test for children, from the viewpoint that the instructor can easily score, and the same questions as the test for children shown in Fig. 1 are in the same format. It is written on the front and back.

  As shown in FIG. 2, among the matters described on the front surface 2 of the answer sheet for instructors, the same matters as those on the front surface 1 of the child test are shown as numbers obtained by adding 10 to the member number in the child test. ing. Specifically, a learning unit name 21, a name entry field 22, a score field 23 (23a, 23b, 23c) described above the page, and a question field 24 (24a consisting of a plurality of questions described in the center of the page) 24b), contacts 24c and 24d, answer column 24e, and scoring points 24f.

  On the other hand, the allocation area and position of the question column 14 and the like on the paper are different from the surface 1 of the test for children. On the surface 1 of the test for children, the learning unit name 11, the name entry column 12, the score column 13, and the question column 14 are assigned to the entire surface of the surface, whereas on the surface 2 of the paper with answers for the instructor , They are allocated in positions that are reduced with respect to the area of the surface 2 and that are biased in the upper left direction.

  In addition to the above items, a score totaling column 25 is written on the right side of the page, and a memo column 26 is written below the page on the surface 2 of the instructor answer sheet. Yes. Various information is written in red in the name entry field 22, the score field 23, and the answer field 24e so that the instructor can score smoothly.

In the name entry column 22, the standard answer time for the questions on the surface 1 of the child test and the standard answer times for the questions for the whole child test including the front and back are written in red.
Of the scoring column 23, the scoring column 23a describes the achievement score for the question described in the question column 24a from the evaluation viewpoint of “knowledge / understanding of quantity and figure” in red, and the scoring column 23b includes “ The achievement score for the question described in the question column 24b from the viewpoint of evaluation of “skills regarding quantity and figure” is written in red. In the score column 23c, the achievement scores for all questions written on the surface 1 of the test for children are written in red.

In the answer column 24e, correct answers, allowable answers, examples of incorrect answers, scoring standards, etc. are written in red.
The score totaling column 25 is described as a table surrounded by a rectangular frame extending in the vertical direction on the right side of the page. In this example, the table is composed of 42 rows in the vertical direction and 3 columns in the horizontal direction, and the serial number 25a is described in the left column. This serial number 25a can be used, for example, corresponding to the attendance number of the children in the class. Above the center column and the right column, evaluation viewpoints evaluated in the question columns 24a and 24b are described as evaluation viewpoint names 25b and 25c. Here, in the evaluation viewpoint name 25b, “knowledge / understanding” is written in the column so that the score from the evaluation viewpoint of “knowledge / understanding about quantity and figure” can be entered, and in the evaluation viewpoint name 25c, , “Skill” is written in the column so that the score from the evaluation viewpoint of “Skill for quantity and figure” can be entered. The ruled lines in the table constituting the score totaling column 25 are bold lines every 5 rows.

The memo field 26 is surrounded by a substantially rectangular frame extending in the left-right direction below the page. A guide line 27 extending in the up-down direction is described to the right of the center of the memo field 26.
FIG. 3 shows the back surface 3 of the instructor answer sheet. Among the matters described on the back surface 3 of the answer sheet for leaders, the same matters as those on the front surface 2 of the answer sheet for leaders are the numbers obtained by adding 10 to the member numbers on the front surface 2 of the answer sheet for leaders. As shown. Specifically, the learning unit name 31, the name entry field 32, the score field 33, the question field 34 (34a, 34b) consisting of a plurality of questions written in the center of the page, and the address 34c are described above the page. , Answer column 34e, scoring 34f, score totaling column 35, and memo column 36.

  On the back surface 3, the question column 34 is divided into two columns of question columns 34a and 34b on the left and right sides, and one question is described for each. In this example, both the left and right question fields 34a and 34b are questions from the evaluation viewpoint of the “mathematical way of thinking”, so the score field 33 is composed of one frame.

  The score totaling column 35 is a table having 42 rows in the vertical direction and 2 columns in the horizontal direction. A serial number 35a is described in the left column, and an evaluation viewpoint name 35b is described above the right column. In the present embodiment, since the questions described on the back surface 3 are only questions from the evaluation viewpoint of “mathematical thinking”, the column in which the evaluation viewpoint name 35b is described is only one column on the right side. It has become. In the evaluation viewpoint name 35b, “concept” is written in the column so that the total score of the question columns 34a and 34b from the evaluation viewpoint of “mathematical idea” can be entered for each child.

Further, below the question column 34 and above the memo column 36, there are described utilization problems 38 that can be solved by utilizing the items learned in the learning unit.
As with the front surface 2, the correct answer, the acceptable answer, an example of an incorrect answer, a scoring standard, etc. are written in red on the back face 3 of the instructor answer sheet. The achievement score for the question described in the question columns 34a and 34b from the viewpoint of evaluation of “the mathematical idea” is written in red.

  Regarding the test for children, only the items on the front side 1 were explained, but the relationship between the items on the back side of the test for children and the items on the back side 3 of the answer sheet for the instructor This is the same as the relationship between the description of the surface 1 and the surface 2 of the answer sheet for the instructor. Specifically, on the back side of the test for children, there are a learning unit name 31, a name entry column 32, a score column 33, a question column 34 (34a, 34b), a balance 34c, an answer column 34e, a scoring 34f, and a utilization question 38. Similar items are assigned to the entire back of the child test.

Next, how to use the answer sheet for the instructor will be described.
First, the case of scoring the surface 1 of the child test will be described. For example, when scoring a test for 40 people per class, the tests for 40 people are overlapped in order of attendance number. The answer sheet for the leader is placed next to the test for the child answered by the student with attendance number 1, and the correct answer written in red on the surface 2 of the answer sheet for the leader, the acceptable answer, and an example of the wrong answer The answers described in the answer column 14e on the surface 1 of the child test are scored with reference to the scoring standards and the like.

  After scoring, the score for each question is calculated based on the score 24f described in the question fields 24a and 24b of the answer sheet for the leader, and the score for each question is totaled for each evaluation viewpoint. In the present embodiment, the question field 14 on the surface 1 of the test includes a question field 14a from an evaluation viewpoint of “knowledge / understanding about quantities and figures” and a question field from an evaluation viewpoint of “skills about quantities and figures”. 14b, the total score for the four questions described in the question column 14a and the total score for the three questions described in the question column 14b are totaled. Then, the score for the question from the evaluation viewpoint of "knowledge / understanding about quantity and figure" is entered in the score column 13a of the test for children, and the score for the question from the evaluation viewpoint of "skill about quantity and figure" is tested for the child In the score field 13b. Also, the total score of the score columns 13a and 13b is entered in the score column 13c.

  When the score of surface 1 of the test answered by the child with attendance number 1 can be counted, the score number column 25 on the surface 2 of the answer sheet for the instructor will display the line where serial number 25a is displayed as “1”. Enter the scores in the score columns 13a and 13b. Specifically, the score for the question column 14a of the evaluation viewpoint of “knowledge / understanding about quantity and figure” is entered in the column of the evaluation viewpoint name 25b in the row where the serial number 25a is displayed as “1”. The score for the question column 14b of the evaluation viewpoint of “skills for and graphics” is entered in the column of the evaluation viewpoint name 25c in the row where the serial number 25a is displayed as “1”.

  Subsequently, the answer written in the answer column on the front surface 1 of the child test of the attendance number 2 is scored in the same manner as the attendance number 1. After scoring, the score of the child with attendance number 2 is totaled and entered in the same manner as before in the line where the serial number 25a of the score totaling column 25 on the front surface 2 of the answer sheet for instructors is displayed as “2”.

In this way, the surface 1 of the test for children is scored up to the child whose attendance number is 40, and the score is entered in the score totaling column 25 on the surface 2 of the answer sheet for instructors.
Next, the back side of the test for children is scored. In this case as well, the test for children of 40 students in one class is placed in order of attendance number with the back side facing up. Place the answer sheet for the instructor next to the child's test for the attendance number 1 with the back side up and the correct answer written in red on the back side 3 of the answer sheet for the instructor. Scoring the answers listed in the answer column on the back of the test for children, referring to the answers, examples of wrong answers, and scoring standards.

  After scoring, the score for each question is calculated and the score for each question is totaled based on the score 34f described in the question fields 34a and 34b of the paper with answers for the leader, as in the case of the front surface 2. In the present embodiment, since the question column 34 on the back surface 3 is composed only of questions from the evaluation viewpoint of “mathematical thinking”, the total score for the two questions described in the question columns 34a and 34b is totalized. Enter the total score in the score column on the back of the child test.

  When the score of the child with attendance number 1 has been counted, the back of the back of the paper with the answer for the instructor on the back surface 3 of the scoring column 35 where the serial number 35a is displayed as “1”, Enter the score.

  In the same way, the children's tests for attendance numbers 2 to 40 are scored in the same way, and the total points are counted and listed in the score column, and the score is counted in the score summary column 35 on the back 3 of the answer sheet for the instructor. Enter the score for each.

  In this way, by scoring the front and back of the test for all 40 children in one class and filling in the score totaling fields 25 and 35 of the answer sheet for the instructor, the score for each question according to the evaluation viewpoint for each child The list filled in is completed on the front surface 2 and the back surface 3 of the instructor-equipped answer sheet.

Next, a description will be given of an operation of writing the scoring results of the test of the learning unit “length test” into the “score totaling table” that can display the scoring results of all tests performed during the semester.
Examples of the “score totaling table” include score totaling software 7 as personal computer software as shown in FIG. By inputting the test scoring results into the score totaling software 7 for each child, the score totaling table for each learning unit test or the “score totaling table for evaluation of learning status by unit” 5 and 6 shown in FIG. It is possible to automatically create a score summary table for all tests performed during the semester, such as “Score Summary Table for Evaluation of Learning Situation by Perspective” 6 shown in FIG.

  As shown in FIG. 7, on the screen of the score totaling software 7, there are a name field 71 for selecting an attendance number and a child name on the right side, and a score input field 72 for inputting a child's score for each evaluation viewpoint. It is displayed. Also, on the left side of the score totaling software 7 screen, there are a totaling field 73 for displaying the score input in the score input field 72 for each child, a semester selection field 74 for selecting a semester, and a learning unit. A learning unit column 75 for selection is displayed.

  First, prior to the operation of inputting the score result of each child to the score totaling software 7, the score totaling fields 25 and 35 of the answer sheet for the instructor are matched with the format of the score input field 72 of the score totaling software 7. Do work.

  As shown in FIG. 2, a substantially rectangular memo field 26 extending in the left-right direction below the paper surface is described on the front surface 2 of the instructor answer sheet. A guide line 27 extending in the direction is described. First, the surface 2 is folded in a direction along the guide line 27. As shown in FIGS. 2 and 3, the score totaling column 25 on the front surface 2 is described as a table surrounded by a rectangular frame extending in the vertical direction on the right side of the front surface 2. Since it is described as a table surrounded by a rectangular frame extending in the vertical direction on the right side of the back surface 3, the score totaling column 25 on the front surface 2 is It will be returned to the score totaling column 35.

  As shown in FIG. 4, when the score totaling column 25 on the front surface 2 is turned back toward the score totaling column 35 on the back surface 3 along the guide line 27, the score on the score totaling column 25 on the front surface 2 and the score on the back surface 3. The tabulation column 35 can be viewed in parallel. At this time, the score totaling column 25 and the score totaling column 35 are in a state in which the respective lines are aligned in the left-right direction and are lined up substantially without any gap in the left-right direction. That is, the guide line 27 is provided at a position where the score totaling column 25 and the score totaling column 35 are folded back so that they can be visually recognized as one table, which is, in other words, a mark for forming an integrated table. is there.

  As shown in FIG. 4, when the score totaling columns 25 and 35 are in a parallel state, the rows of the score totaling columns 25 and 35 are arranged in the left-right direction. The scores from the attendance numbers 1 to 40 are the scores for the question column 14a from the evaluation viewpoint of "knowledge / understanding about quantities and figures" and "skills about quantities and figures" from the left, respectively. Each column is arranged in the order of the score for the question column 14b from the evaluation point of view and the score for the question column from the evaluation point of view of "mathematical thinking".

  On the other hand, as shown in FIG. 7, the score input field 72 of the score totaling software 7 is divided into three score input fields 72a, 72b, 72c. The score input field 72a on the left side is used to enter a score for the question field 14a from the evaluation viewpoint of "knowledge / understanding about quantities and figures". The score input column 72b in the center is for entering a score for the question column 14b from the viewpoint of evaluation of “skills regarding quantities and figures”. Further, the score input column 72c on the right side is for entering a score for the question column from the evaluation viewpoint of the “mathematical idea”. That is, the score input field 72 of the score totaling software 7 is the same as the order of scores of each child when the score totaling fields 25 and 35 of the instructor answer sheet are placed in a parallel state.

Next, an operation for inputting the score of each child in the score input field 72 of the score totaling software 7 will be described.
First, select “1 semester” in the semester selection field 74 on the left side of the score totaling software 7, select “Length” in the learning unit field 75, and the attendance number 1 in the name field 71 on the right side. Select a child. Then, from the table in which the score totaling columns 25 and 35 shown in FIG. 4 are in a parallel state, each score entered in the row of the attendance number 1 is input to the score input column 72 of the score totaling software 7. At this time, since the arrangement order of the score input field 72 of the score aggregation software 7 and the arrangement order of the columns in which the score aggregation fields 25 and 35 are in parallel state are the same, the score aggregation fields 25 and 35 are parallel. The score entered in the state table may be input to the score input fields 72a, 72b, 72c of the score totaling software 7 as it is as a numeric string.

  When each score of the child of attendance number 1 is entered in the score entry fields 72a, 72b, 72c of the score counting software 7, each score entered in the line of attendance number 1 in the counting field 73 of the score counting software 7 Is displayed, and the score input fields 72a, 72b, 72c become blank and the initial state is restored. At this time, the name field 71 displays the child of attendance number 2.

Subsequently, the score is input in the same manner for the child of attendance number 2 and the score is displayed in the totaling column 73. The same applies for the scores of the attendance numbers 3 to 40.
In this way, by inputting the scores of the test for all 40 students in one class, the scores of all the students for each evaluation point in the learning unit “Length Tan” are displayed in the totaling column of the score totaling software 7 73 will be completed as a list.

  By performing such work for each test of the learning unit learned during one semester, it is possible to easily create a score list of all children from each evaluation viewpoint for each learning unit test during the semester.

  Moreover, the score totaling software 7 displays the score of each student for each learning unit test as shown in FIG. The “table” 5 and the “score totaling table for evaluation of learning status by viewpoint” 6 for displaying the score of each child for each evaluation viewpoint as shown in FIG. 6 can be easily created. Based on “Score summary table for evaluation of learning status by unit” 5 and “Score summary table for evaluation of learning status by viewpoint” 6, which learning unit should be acquired by each child during the semester? Can understand and evaluate to the extent that they understand and acquire.

  As described above, in the paper with answers for instructors of the present embodiment, the scores on the front and back sides of the test for children can be visually recognized as a list by folding back on the guide line 27, so in one learning unit test Work efficiency of score totaling work improves. Moreover, the score totaling work in the test for each learning unit that the child learns during the semester can be simplified, and the efficiency of the totaling work can be improved. Work efficiency is improved in the work of understanding and evaluating the learning unit to be learned during the semester.

  It should be noted that, instead of being input to the score totaling software 7 as a “score totaling table”, it may be transferred to a score totaling sheet printed on paper. For the case where a score totaling sheet printed on paper is used as the “score totaling table”, FIG. 5 “Score totaling table for unit-based learning status evaluation” 5 and FIG. In the following description, it is assumed that the score totaling table 6 is a score totaling sheet.

  In the “score totaling table for evaluation of learning status by unit” 5 as shown in FIG. 5, a learning unit name 51 and an evaluation viewpoint name 52 are displayed in each column, and an attendance number and a child name are displayed. A plurality of columns 53 are provided so that the score for each learning unit and each evaluation viewpoint can be displayed for each child. Further, in the “score totaling table for evaluation of learning status by viewpoint” 6 as shown in FIG. 6, each learning unit name 62 is displayed in each column for each evaluation viewpoint name 61, and the attendance number and A plurality of columns 63 for describing child names are provided, and the score from each evaluation viewpoint can be displayed for each child.

  As shown in FIG. 4 and FIG. 5, first, from the table in which the score totaling columns 25 and 35 are in a parallel state, each score entered in the row of the attendance number 1 is “for learning status evaluation by unit”. It is transferred to the row of the attendance number 1 in the column of the learning unit “length of length” in the score totaling table 5. Similarly, each score entered in the rows after attendance number 2 in the score totaling columns 25 and 35 is transferred to the corresponding row in “Score totaling table for evaluation of learning status by unit” 5.

  In this way, from the table in which the score totaling columns 25 and 35 are placed in a parallel state in the column 53 describing the attendance number and the name of the child in the “score totaling table for evaluation of learning status by unit” 5, the numbers are unchanged. By posting the column, it is possible to create a score totaling table for each child in the “Summary of length” in “Score totaling table for evaluation of learning status by unit” 5.

By performing such work for each test of each learning unit, it is possible to easily create a score totaling table from each evaluation viewpoint in the test learned during the semester.
Further, as shown in FIG. 6, the “score totaling table for viewpoint-based learning status evaluation” 6 is also obtained from the table in which the score totaling columns 25 and 35 are in a parallel state. The score of each child can be transcribed in the same manner as in “Score Summary Table” 5. When describing the test result of the learning unit name “length of length” described in the present embodiment, from the table in which the score totaling columns 25 and 35 are in a parallel state, “score counting for viewpoint-based learning status evaluation” The score for each child may be transcribed in the column of “Evaluation viewpoint 61” in the column 63 describing the attendance number and the name of the child in “Table 6”.

Next, the effect of the instructor answer sheet of this embodiment will be described.
(1) The score-added fields 25 and 35 for entering scores of a plurality of children are described on the sheet with answers for the leader of the present embodiment. For this reason, it is possible to centrally manage the results of the test.

  (2) The score totaling columns 25 and 35 can be made visible in a parallel state by folding the score totaling column 25 on the front surface 2 of the paper with answers for the instructor toward the score totaling column 35 on the back surface 3. . For this reason, the result of the test described over the front and back can be managed centrally by one table | surface.

  (3) When the score totaling columns 25 and 35 are in a parallel state, the score for each evaluation viewpoint in the learning unit test can be visually recognized as a single table describing each child. By making the score line for each evaluation viewpoint the same line as the score input field 72 of the score totaling software 7, the efficiency of the work to input to the score input field 72 of the score totaling software 7 is improved. Scores can be calculated efficiently for each learning unit test required at the end of the semester.

  (4) Since the score for each evaluation point in the learning unit test can be visually recognized as a single table describing each child, the “Score Summary Table for Evaluation of Learning Status by Unit” 5 shown in FIG. Even if the “score totaling table for viewpoint-based learning status evaluation” 6 shown in FIG. 6 is configured as a score totaling sheet printed on paper, the posting work can be efficiently performed. . Improves the efficiency of score calculation for each learning unit test required at the end of the semester.

  (5) When the score totaling columns 25 and 35 are in a parallel state, no gap is created between the score totaling column 25 and the score totaling column 35. For this reason, it is easy to grasp the score of each child. In addition, the work efficiency when writing in the “score summary table” is improved.

  (6) On the front surface 2 of the answer sheet for the leader, a guide line 27 for returning the score totaling column 25 toward the score totaling column 35 is described. For this reason, the score totaling columns 25 and 35 can be easily and accurately aligned.

  (7) The ruled lines of the tables constituting the score totaling columns 25 and 35 are thick lines every five rows. Therefore, it is easy to align the score totaling column 25 and the score totaling column 35. Moreover, it can suppress making a mistake in a line when filling in the score totaling columns 25 and 35.

  (8) The answer sheet for instructors of this embodiment includes a question field, an answer field, etc. in the same format as the question field, the answer field, etc. described in the test for children. Acceptable answers, examples of incorrect answers, scoring standards, etc. are written in red. This improves the work efficiency of test scoring.

  (9) The test for children of this embodiment is approximately A3, while the instructor-equipped answer sheet is approximately half the size of A4. For this reason, the problem that the work space is narrowed by placing the paper with answers for instructors is less likely to occur. Work efficiency of test scoring is improved.

The above embodiment may be modified as follows, and these modified examples may be applied in appropriate combination.
In the present embodiment, the instructor answer sheet is described as one sheet, but the instructor answer sheet may be configured as a booklet in which a plurality of pages are bound. In this case, if the scoring and totaling work of the test has already been completed, if the score totaling column 25 is kept folded toward the score totaling column 35, the folded page becomes a mark, and the next time You can immediately open the page to be implemented.

  ・ In this embodiment, we explained the test for children with questions etc. on both sides, and the answer sheet for instructors with questions and correct answers on both sides, but there are questions only on one side of the page. It is good also as a paper with the answer for leaders in which the test for children described and the question, the correct answer, etc. were written only on one side of the paper.

  In the present embodiment, the score totaling column 25 is described on the right side of the front surface 2 of the leader answer sheet, and the score totaling column 35 is described on the right side of the back surface 3 of the leader answer sheet. For example, as shown in FIG. 8A, the score totaling column 25 may be described on the left side of the front surface 2 and the score totaling column 35 may be described on the left side of the back surface 3. In this case, as shown in FIG. 8B, if the mountain is folded along the guide line 37 written on the back surface 3, the score totaling column 35 on the back surface 3 is folded back toward the score totaling column 25 on the front surface 2. The score totaling columns 25 and 35 are in a parallel state and can be visually recognized as one table. In FIG. 8 and FIGS. 9 to 11 described below, only the score totaling columns 25 and 35 are schematically described, and other description items are omitted.

  In the present embodiment, only the scores of the score fields 13a and 13b of the surface 1 of the child test are entered in the score totaling field 25 of the surface 2 of the answer sheet for instructors. However, the present invention is not limited to this. . As shown in FIG. 9A, not only the scores in the score columns 13a and 13b on the front surface 1 of the child test but also the scores in the score column on the back surface may be entered. In this case, for example, as shown in FIG. 9 (a), a score totaling column 25 in which scores for all evaluation viewpoints of questions on both the front and back sides can be entered is written on the right side of the front surface 2 of the answer sheet for instructors. On the other hand, as shown in FIG. 9 (b), for example, a score totaling column 35 in which the score of each child can be entered for a question to see the evaluation viewpoint “mathematical way of thinking” described on the back surface 3 is provided with an answer for the leader It is written on the left side of the back side 3 of the paper. Then, the score totaling columns 35 on the back surface 3 are turned back toward the score totaling column 25 on the front surface 2 so that the score totaling columns 25 and 35 are in a parallel state. In this state, the score in the “Mathematical Concept” column of the score totaling column 35 may be transferred to the “Mathematical Concept” column of the score totaling column 25. In this way, when writing in the “score summary table”, it is not necessary to wrap the paper with answers for the instructor.

  As shown in FIG. 10 (a), the score totaling column 25 is described on the right side of the front surface 2 of the answer sheet for the instructor, and as shown in FIG. 10 (b), the score totaling column 35 is indicated to the instructor. It may be described on the left side of the back surface 3 of the answer-added paper, and the score totaling columns 25 and 35 may be configured to be cut by a cut line. By doing so, when writing in the “score summary table”, the work can be performed after the score summary fields 25 and 35 are cut off. Compared to the paper with answers for instructors, it can be done in a smaller work space, improving work efficiency. Further, since the score in the test is personal information, it is easy to discard the score totaling columns 25 and 35 after counting, which is preferable from the viewpoint of protecting personal information.

  As shown in FIG. 11 (a), the score totaling column 25 is described on the right side of the front surface 2 of the paper with answers for the instructor, and the size of the score totaling column 35 is on the right side of the score totaling column 25. The frame may be indicated by a dotted line, and as shown in FIG. 11B, the score totaling column 35 on the back surface 3 of the sheet with answers for the leader may be a seal. By removing the score totaling column 35 from the back surface 3 and pasting it within the dotted line frame on the right side of the score totaling column 25 on the front surface 2, an integrated table can be obtained.

  In the present embodiment, the score totaling columns 25 and 35 are configured to enter the score for each evaluation viewpoint, but the present invention is not limited to this. The score for each question may be entered, or the evaluation viewpoint names 25b, 25c, and 35b may be left blank so that the score can be totaled from a free viewpoint.

  In the present embodiment, the score totaling columns 25 and 35 are configured so that only the score for each evaluation viewpoint is entered, but the total score for each child may be entered. In this case, the total score for the front surface 1 of the child test, the total score for the back surface, and the total score for both the front and back surfaces may be entered, or only the total score for the back and front surfaces may be entered.

  -In this embodiment, about the example of a mountain fold along the guide line 27 of the back surface 3 of the paper with an answer for leaders, and the example of a change folded along the guide line 37 of the paper with an answer for leaders As described above, the guide lines 27 and 37 may be described not on the paper surface on the mountain folding side but on the paper surface on the valley folding side. Or you may describe on both surfaces.

  In the present embodiment, the guide wire 27 is used for folding, but the mark for folding may not be linear. A figure such as a circle mark or a triangle mark may be provided at a predetermined position as a mark for folding. Further, the mark for folding may be written at any position on the paper. It may be described above the paper surface, and a linear mark may be described over the entire paper surface.

  In the score totaling columns 25 and 35 of the present embodiment, the ruled lines in the table are thick lines every five lines. Not only this but it is good also as a thick line for every predetermined number of lines. For example, it may be a thick line every two lines or a thick line every ten lines. Further, each column may be shaded or colored every predetermined number of rows. By doing so, it is easy to align the score totaling column 25 and the score totaling column 35, and errors in entering the score totaling columns 25 and 35 are suppressed.

  In the present embodiment, a case has been described in which the answer on the back surface is scored after the answer on the front surface 1 of the test for children of all the classes is first scored. For example, after scoring the front and back of the child test for the child with attendance number 1, the front and back of the child test for the child with attendance number 2 may be scored.

  -In this embodiment, after scoring the surface 1 of the test for the child with the attendance number 1, the score is entered in the score totaling column 25 of the answer sheet for the instructor, and then the child with the attendance number 2 After scoring the surface 1 of the test, the score was entered in the score totaling column 25 of the answer sheet for the instructor. However, it is not limited to the case where the score totaling column 25 is filled in each time the surface 1 of the test for each child is scored. After scoring all children's test surface 1, all children's scores may be entered in the score summary section 25 of the instructor's answer sheet, or a certain number of child's test surfaces 1 After scoring, the score may be entered in the score totaling column 25, and then a certain number of child test surfaces 1 may be scored. The scoring method, order, etc. are not particularly limited.

  -Although this embodiment demonstrated the case where the test for children of all the classes was arranged after ordering by attendance number, and graded, it is not restricted to this. You may score in a random order. The order of scoring is not particularly limited as long as the scores are entered so that the serial numbers in the score totaling column correspond one-to-one and the serial numbers in the various “score totaling tables” correspond to one-to-one.

  11, 21, 31 ... Learning unit name, 12, 22, 32 ... Name entry column, 13, 23, 33 ... Score column, 14a, 14b, 24a, 24b, 34a, 34b ... Question column, 14e, 24e, 34e ... Answer column, 25, 35 ... Score total column.

Claims (4)

An instructor with answers for instructors used for scoring child tests,
The same questions and answers as those listed in the child test are listed,
A sheet with answers for leaders, which further includes a score totaling column for entering the scores of multiple children who have taken the test for each child. A paper with answers for instructors used for scoring children's tests with questions on both sides,
The same questions and answers as those listed in the test for children are listed on the front and back,
The first side of the answer sheet for instructors is provided with a first score totaling column in which the score of the question described on the first side is entered for each child. On the second side, there is provided a second score totaling column for entering the score of the question described in the second side for each child,
In the first score totaling column and the second score totaling column, a portion including the first score totaling column of the first surface is folded back toward the second score totaling column of the second surface. Thus, the answer-added sheet for instructors is provided at a position where the first score totaling column and the second score totaling column are visible.   The instructor's answer sheet according to claim 2, wherein the instructor's answer sheet is provided with a mark for turning back so that the first score totaling column and the second score totaling column are visible. Paper with answers.   The mark is folded at a position including the first score totaling column of the first surface toward the second score totaling column of the second surface at the position of the mark. 4. The instructor-equipped answer sheet according to claim 3, wherein the score totaling column and the second score totaling column are provided at positions where they can be viewed in parallel.

Images