JP2017225583A - Evaluation method of skin condition - Google Patents

Evaluation method of skin condition Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP2017225583A
JP2017225583A JP2016122999A JP2016122999A JP2017225583A JP 2017225583 A JP2017225583 A JP 2017225583A JP 2016122999 A JP2016122999 A JP 2016122999A JP 2016122999 A JP2016122999 A JP 2016122999A JP 2017225583 A JP2017225583 A JP 2017225583A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
skin
surface roughness
flat plate
friction
friction coefficient
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
JP2016122999A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP6730860B2 (en
Inventor
敦 山岸
Atsushi Yamagishi
敦 山岸
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Kao Corp
Original Assignee
Kao Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Kao Corp filed Critical Kao Corp
Priority to JP2016122999A priority Critical patent/JP6730860B2/en
Publication of JP2017225583A publication Critical patent/JP2017225583A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP6730860B2 publication Critical patent/JP6730860B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Landscapes

  • Measurement Of The Respiration, Hearing Ability, Form, And Blood Characteristics Of Living Organisms (AREA)
  • Measuring And Recording Apparatus For Diagnosis (AREA)
  • Investigating Or Analysing Biological Materials (AREA)

Abstract

PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide means for evaluating easily a skin condition of each individual.SOLUTION: In an evaluation method of a skin condition, each friction coefficient is measured respectively, which is obtained when a skin is brought into contact with a plurality of plates having each different surface roughness, and moved in parallel to each plate surface, and a mutual relation between a plurality of measured friction coefficients is used as an index.SELECTED DRAWING: None

Description

本発明は、乾燥状態等の皮膚の状態を評価する方法に関する。   The present invention relates to a method for evaluating a skin condition such as a dry condition.

皮膚の乾燥状態等を測定する方法としては、角層の水分量を測定する方法、皮脂量を測定する方法が知られている。水分量の測定法としては、肌の電気伝導度や電気容量を測定する方法等が知られている(特許文献1)。また、皮脂量の測定法としては、反射光の屈折率で油分の割合を推定する方法等が知られている(特許文献2)。
一方、環境の肌に与える影響を観察するために、皮膚表面の平板に対する摩擦係数を測定することが試みられている(非特許文献1)
Known methods for measuring the dry state of the skin include a method for measuring the moisture content of the stratum corneum and a method for measuring the sebum amount. As a method for measuring the amount of moisture, a method for measuring the electrical conductivity and capacitance of the skin is known (Patent Document 1). Further, as a method for measuring the amount of sebum, a method of estimating the ratio of oil by the refractive index of reflected light is known (Patent Document 2).
On the other hand, in order to observe the influence of the environment on the skin, attempts have been made to measure the friction coefficient of the skin surface against a flat plate (Non-Patent Document 1).

特開平11−19060号公報Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 11-19060 特開2002−85356号公報JP 2002-85356 A

C.P.Hendriks・S.E.Franklin(2009Tribol Left)C. P. Hendriks S. E. Franklin (2009 Tribol Left)

しかしながら、前記の角層の水分量の測定法や皮脂の測定法は、原理が複雑なので高価な機器が必要になる、発汗や乾燥など経時的に変化する皮膚の状態を正確に評価できない等の問題がある。
一方、環境の肌に対する影響を板などとの摩擦力を計測することで観察することは試みられているが、その場合、各人の肌の違いは平均値として取り扱われており、個人差を調べる検討は行われていない。
本発明は、各個人の肌の状態を、簡便に評価する手段を提供することを課題とする。
However, the water content measurement method and sebum measurement method of the stratum corneum are complicated in principle and require expensive equipment, and it is impossible to accurately evaluate skin conditions that change over time such as sweating and drying. There's a problem.
On the other hand, it has been attempted to observe the influence of the environment on the skin by measuring the frictional force with a board, but in that case, the difference in the skin of each person is treated as an average value, There are no studies to investigate.
An object of the present invention is to provide a means for simply evaluating the skin condition of each individual.

本発明者は、皮膚の状態と平板上での摩擦との関係を検討してきたところ、全く意外にも、特定の平板上における皮膚の摩擦だけで皮膚状態を評価するのではなく、表面粗さの異なる複数の平板を用意して、それらの平板上における皮膚の摩擦係数をそれぞれ測定し、測定された複数の摩擦係数相互の関係を指標とすることにより、皮膚の乾燥状態等を簡便かつ正確に評価できることを見出した。
より詳細には、以下のとおりである。すなわち、皮膚の評価に好適な平板がどのようなものであるかの探索を行っていく中で、表面粗さの違いによる摩擦係数の測定を行っていたところ、柔らかな肌では表面粗さが小さくなるにしたがって、摩擦係数が大きくなるのに対し、固い、あるいは潤いのない肌ではそのようなことはなく、表面粗さに依らず摩擦係数がほぼ一定であるということを見出した(図1)。本発明者は、この表面粗さと摩擦係数の関係を用いれば、皮膚の状態を評価できるのではとの着想に至り、本発明を完成した。
The present inventor has studied the relationship between the skin condition and the friction on the flat plate. Surprisingly, the present inventors do not evaluate the skin condition only by the friction of the skin on the specific flat plate, but the surface roughness. By preparing multiple flat plates with different thicknesses, measuring the friction coefficient of the skin on each of these flat plates, and using the relationship between the measured multiple friction coefficients as an index, the skin dryness etc. can be easily and accurately measured. It was found that it can be evaluated.
In more detail, it is as follows. In other words, while searching for a suitable flat plate for skin evaluation, the friction coefficient due to the difference in surface roughness was measured. It was found that the coefficient of friction increases as it becomes smaller, whereas this is not the case with firm or non-moisturized skin, and the coefficient of friction is almost constant regardless of the surface roughness (FIG. 1). ). The inventor has arrived at the idea that the skin condition can be evaluated by using the relationship between the surface roughness and the friction coefficient, and the present invention has been completed.

すなわち、本発明は、表面粗さが相違する複数の平板上に皮膚を接触させて平板表面に対して平行に動かしたときの摩擦係数をそれぞれ測定し、測定された摩擦係数相互の関係を皮膚状態の指標とすることを特徴とする皮膚状態の評価方法を提供するものである。
また、本発明は、肌に適用される剤を、肌に適用する前と適用した後との各々において評価した皮膚状態により、肌に適用される剤が肌に与える効果を評価する方法であって、前記の皮膚状態の評価方法により皮膚状態の評価を行う、肌に適用される剤が肌に与える効果を評価する方法を提供するものである。
That is, the present invention measures the friction coefficient when the skin is brought into contact with a plurality of flat plates having different surface roughnesses and moved parallel to the flat plate surface, and the relationship between the measured friction coefficients is determined. The present invention provides a method for evaluating a skin condition characterized by being used as an index of the condition.
Further, the present invention is a method for evaluating the effect of an agent applied to the skin on the skin condition evaluated before and after applying the agent applied to the skin. Thus, the present invention provides a method for evaluating the effect of an agent applied to the skin, which evaluates the skin state by the above-described skin condition evaluation method.

指等を、表面粗さが相違する複数の平板上を擦過させるだけで、簡便かつ正確に、皮膚がどの程度乾燥しているか、しっとりしているか、皮脂が過剰に分泌されているか等の皮膚の状態が評価できる。   By simply rubbing a finger or the like on a plurality of flat plates with different surface roughnesses, the skin such as how dry the skin is, how moist, or excessive sebum is secreted easily and accurately. Can be evaluated.

皮膚の性状(柔軟性)の評価例を示す。An evaluation example of skin properties (flexibility) is shown. 化粧品の効果(潤い、柔軟化)の評価例を示す。The evaluation example of the effect (moisturization, softening) of cosmetics is shown. 油性感の評価例(摩擦係数と繰り返し回数との関係)を示す。An example of evaluation of oiliness (relation between friction coefficient and number of repetitions) is shown. 汗のかきやすさの評価例(摩擦係数と繰り返し回数との関係)を示す。An example of evaluating the ease of sweating (relationship between the coefficient of friction and the number of repetitions) is shown. 被験者5名の摩擦係数の違いを示す。The difference of the friction coefficient of five test subjects is shown. 摩擦係数測定装置のSUS板の配置を示す。The arrangement of the SUS plate of the friction coefficient measuring device is shown. 未加工SUS板との摩擦係数を示す。The friction coefficient with an unprocessed SUS board is shown. ブラスト処理板との摩擦係数を示す。The coefficient of friction with the blasted plate is shown.

本発明の皮膚状態の評価方法は、表面粗さが相違する複数の平板上に皮膚を接触させて平板表面に対して平行に動かしたときの摩擦係数をそれぞれ測定し、測定された複数の摩擦係数相互の関係を指標とすることを特徴とする。   The skin condition evaluation method of the present invention measures the friction coefficient when the skin is brought into contact with a plurality of flat plates having different surface roughnesses and moved parallel to the flat plate surface. It is characterized by using the relationship between coefficients as an index.

本発明方法に用いる平板は、表面粗さが相違する複数の平板である。複数の平板の素材は、金属板、樹脂板、木板、石板、紙板等のいずれでもよいが、同一であるのが好ましい。また、平板の大きさは、指、手のひら、手の甲、顔などの皮膚の一部を接触させて動かすことができる大きさであれば、特に限定されない。表面粗さは、市販の表面粗さ計、例えば(株)東京精密SURFCOM FLEX-50Aにより測定できる。   The flat plates used in the method of the present invention are a plurality of flat plates having different surface roughness. The material of the plurality of flat plates may be any of a metal plate, a resin plate, a wood plate, a stone plate, a paper plate, etc., but is preferably the same. Further, the size of the flat plate is not particularly limited as long as it is a size capable of moving by bringing a part of skin such as a finger, palm, back of the hand, and face into contact with each other. The surface roughness can be measured with a commercially available surface roughness meter, for example, Tokyo Seimitsu SURFCOM FLEX-50A.

本発明で用いる複数の平板の表面粗さは、相互に相違しており、Ra=0.001〜5μmの範囲であるのが、皮膚状態の評価性能の点から好ましい。さらに、Ra=0.001〜0.10μmの範囲から選択される1種以上の平板と、Ra=0.10〜3μmの範囲から選択される1種以上の平板とを組み合わせて用いるのがより好ましい。表面粗さが相違する平板の数は2以上であればよく、2〜10が好ましく、3〜6がより好ましい。なお、平板は水平に設置されていてもよいが、垂直や斜めに設置されていてもよい。また、平板は、固定して設置されておらず、摩擦力を検出するための力覚センサと一体となって例えば把持具に取り付けられその全体が動かせるものでもあってもよい。
また、複数の平板の材質は同一であることが好ましい。すなわち、材質を一定とし、表面粗さのみ相互に異った複数の平板を用いるのが好ましい。
The surface roughness of the plurality of flat plates used in the present invention is different from each other, and is preferably in the range of Ra = 0.001 to 5 μm from the viewpoint of the evaluation performance of the skin condition. Furthermore, it is more preferable to use a combination of one or more types of flat plates selected from the range of Ra = 0.001 to 0.10 μm and one or more types of flat plates selected from the range of Ra = 0.10 to 3 μm. preferable. The number of flat plates with different surface roughness may be 2 or more, preferably 2 to 10, and more preferably 3 to 6. In addition, although the flat plate may be installed horizontally, you may install vertically or diagonally. Further, the flat plate may not be fixedly installed, and may be a unit that is attached to, for example, a gripping tool and is movable together with a force sensor for detecting a frictional force.
Moreover, it is preferable that the material of several flat plates is the same. That is, it is preferable to use a plurality of flat plates having a constant material and different only in surface roughness.

前記複数の平板上に皮膚を接触させて皮膚表面と平板表面とが平行な状態を維持して皮膚(体)もしくは平板を動かしたときの摩擦係数をそれぞれ測定する。すなわち、複数の平板の表面で皮膚を擦過させて摩擦係数を測定する。この際の垂直応力は、一定とするのが好ましく、例えば0.1〜5Nの範囲内で所定の垂直応力とするのが好ましい。皮膚もしくは平板を動かす速度は、0.1〜20cm/secが好ましい。皮膚を動かす場合は、垂直応力を一定とする、すなわち加える力を加減するために、力覚センサによって検出される力をリアルタイムでモニタするのが好ましい。固定して設置されていない平板を用いる場合も、同様にリアルタイムでモニタするのが好ましい。あるいは、例えばばねを用いて押しつけ力を一定にするなど、周知の手段を用いて、平板に加わる垂直応力を一定に維持することができる。   The skin is brought into contact with the plurality of flat plates, and the friction coefficient is measured when the skin (body) or the flat plate is moved while maintaining the parallel state of the skin surface and the flat plate surface. That is, the friction coefficient is measured by rubbing the skin with the surfaces of a plurality of flat plates. The normal stress at this time is preferably constant, and is preferably set to a predetermined normal stress within a range of 0.1 to 5N, for example. The moving speed of the skin or flat plate is preferably 0.1 to 20 cm / sec. When moving the skin, it is preferable to monitor the force detected by the force sensor in real time in order to make the normal stress constant, that is, to adjust the applied force. Similarly, when using a flat plate that is not fixedly installed, it is preferable to monitor in real time. Alternatively, the vertical stress applied to the flat plate can be kept constant by using a well-known means such as making the pressing force constant using a spring, for example.

摩擦係数は、前記平板に設けられた垂直応力と水平応力の計測が可能な周知の力覚センサを用いて測定することができる。   The coefficient of friction can be measured using a well-known force sensor capable of measuring vertical stress and horizontal stress provided on the flat plate.

得られる複数の摩擦係数相互の関係、すなわち変化の向きや大小を皮膚状態の指標とすれば、皮膚状態が評価できる。例えば、乾燥状態にある皮膚においては、表面粗さの小さい平板の摩擦係数が低く、表面粗さの大きい平板においても摩擦係数が低いままである。一方、しっとり、柔らかい皮膚においては、表面粗さの小さい平板での摩擦係数が高く、表面粗さの大きい平板での摩擦係数が低くなる(図1)。これは、化粧料が潤いや柔軟性を肌に与える性能の評価に用いることができる。すなわち、潤いや柔軟性を肌に与える性能が高い化粧料を皮膚に塗布すると表面粗さの小さい平板での摩擦係数が高く、表面粗さの大きい平板での摩擦係数が低くなることを利用して、表面粗さの小さい平板での摩擦係数と表面粗さの大きい平板での摩擦係数の差を、潤いや柔軟性を肌に与える性能の指標とすることができる(図2)。   The skin condition can be evaluated by using the relationship among the plurality of obtained friction coefficients, that is, the direction and magnitude of the change as an index of the skin condition. For example, in a skin in a dry state, the friction coefficient of a flat plate having a small surface roughness is low, and the friction coefficient remains low even in a flat plate having a large surface roughness. On the other hand, in moist and soft skin, the friction coefficient of a flat plate having a small surface roughness is high, and the friction coefficient of a flat plate having a large surface roughness is low (FIG. 1). This can be used to evaluate the performance of cosmetics to moisturize and give skin flexibility. In other words, when applying cosmetics with high performance to moisturize and soften skin, the coefficient of friction on a flat plate with a small surface roughness is high, and the coefficient of friction on a flat plate with a large surface roughness is low. Thus, the difference between the friction coefficient of a flat plate having a small surface roughness and the friction coefficient of a flat plate having a large surface roughness can be used as an index of performance for imparting moisture and flexibility to the skin (FIG. 2).

このような評価は、化粧料に限られるものではなく、他にも医薬品外用剤などについても行うことができる。すなわち、化粧料や医薬品外用剤などの肌に適用(塗布のみならずパップ剤などによる場合も含む)する剤を、肌に適用する前と適用した後との各々において、表面粗さが相違する複数の平板上に皮膚を接触させて平板表面に対して平行に動かしたときの摩擦係数をそれぞれ測定し、測定された複数の摩擦係数相互の関係の変化から化粧料や医薬品が肌に与える効果を評価することができる。   Such evaluation is not limited to cosmetics, but can also be performed for pharmaceutical preparations for external use. That is, the surface roughness is different between before and after applying an agent to be applied to the skin such as cosmetics and pharmaceutical external preparations (including not only applying but also using a poultice). The effect of cosmetics and pharmaceuticals on the skin is measured by measuring the friction coefficient when the skin is brought into contact with multiple flat plates and moved parallel to the flat plate surface. Can be evaluated.

また、油性感のある皮膚においては、表面粗さの小さい平板の測定1回目の摩擦係数が低いものの、皮膚の同じ位置を同一の表面粗さの平板で繰り返し測定すると徐々に摩擦係数が上昇する(図3)。これは表面にある油性成分が除去されるためであり、摩擦係数が一定になったところが肌本来の性質となる。摩擦係数が一定になった後で表面粗さの異なる平板で計測すると肌本来の状態を評価できる。濡れた状態や、クリームなどの剤が付着した皮膚も、同様に皮膚の同じ位置を常に同一の表面粗さの平板で繰り返し測定すると、当初は変動している摩擦係数が一定になるので、そのあとで、表面粗さの異なる平板で計測することで、肌本来の状態を評価できる。
このように、平板の表面粗さと摩擦係数の変化との相関関係から、皮膚状態を評価することができる。
In skin with oily feeling, the coefficient of friction for the first measurement of the flat plate with small surface roughness is low, but the coefficient of friction gradually increases when the same position on the skin is repeatedly measured with the flat plate of the same surface roughness. (Figure 3). This is because the oily component on the surface is removed, and the place where the coefficient of friction becomes constant becomes the original property of the skin. The original skin condition can be evaluated by measuring on a flat plate having a different surface roughness after the coefficient of friction becomes constant. Similarly, when the skin is wet or the skin is covered with an agent such as cream, if the same position of the skin is always measured repeatedly on a flat plate with the same surface roughness, the initially changing coefficient of friction will be constant. Later, the original state of the skin can be evaluated by measuring with flat plates having different surface roughness.
Thus, the skin condition can be evaluated from the correlation between the surface roughness of the flat plate and the change in the friction coefficient.

表面粗さの相違する平板を2枚だけでなく、3枚〜8枚と増加させることにより、さらに詳細な皮膚状態を評価することができる。例えば、Ra=0.01〜0.1(0.025)の平板を基準とし、Ra=0.1〜0.3(0.254)の平板、Ra=0.3〜0.5(0.341)の平板、Ra=0.5〜0.6(0.56)の平板、Ra=0.6〜0.7(0.645)の平板、Ra=0.7〜0.8(0.738)の平板、及びRa=0.8〜1.0(0.817)の平板を用いて、摩擦係数の変化を測定すれば、乾燥状態の度合、しっとり感の度合、油性感の度合も含めた多段階の皮膚状態が評価できる。   A more detailed skin condition can be evaluated by increasing the number of flat plates having different surface roughnesses from two to three instead of two. For example, on the basis of a flat plate of Ra = 0.01 to 0.1 (0.025), a flat plate of Ra = 0.1 to 0.3 (0.254), Ra = 0.3 to 0.5 (0 .341), Ra = 0.5 to 0.6 (0.56), Ra = 0.6 to 0.7 (0.645), Ra = 0.7 to 0.8 ( 0.738) flat plate and Ra = 0.8 to 1.0 (0.817) flat plate, if the change in friction coefficient is measured, the degree of dryness, the degree of moist feeling, the oily feeling Multi-stage skin condition including degree can be evaluated.

また、上述したように、一般的な皮膚では、表面粗さの小さい平板での摩擦係数と表面粗さの大きい平板での摩擦係数の差を、潤いあるいは柔らかさの指標とすることができるが、3枚あるいはそれ以上の平板を用いると、皮膚の発汗の有無を容易に観察できる。すなわち、発汗状態の皮膚では、水分が供給されることで、摩擦係数が不安定となり、表面粗さの小さい平板での摩擦係数と表面粗さの大きい平板での摩擦係数の大小関係が逆転する。このことを利用して、測定した皮膚の発汗状態若しくは被験者の肌が発汗しやすいか否かを判定することができる(図4)。発汗のしやすさは摩擦係数の変動により判定できるが、その際の皮膚の柔軟性も同時に判別することができる。この判定は、測定を繰り返し行えば2枚の平板で行うことも可能だが、3枚以上が好ましく、5枚以上用いることが更に好ましい。測定の煩雑さを考えると10枚以下が好ましい。   Further, as described above, in general skin, the difference between the friction coefficient of a flat plate having a small surface roughness and the friction coefficient of a flat plate having a large surface roughness can be used as an indicator of moisture or softness. When three or more flat plates are used, the presence or absence of sweating of the skin can be easily observed. That is, in the sweating skin, when moisture is supplied, the friction coefficient becomes unstable, and the magnitude relationship between the friction coefficient of the flat plate having a small surface roughness and the friction coefficient of the flat plate having a large surface roughness is reversed. . Using this fact, it is possible to determine whether the measured skin perspiration state or the subject's skin is likely to perspire (FIG. 4). The ease of sweating can be determined by the change in the coefficient of friction, but the skin flexibility at that time can also be determined simultaneously. This determination can be made with two flat plates if the measurement is repeated, but three or more are preferable, and five or more are more preferable. Considering the complexity of measurement, 10 or less is preferable.

次に実施例を挙げて本発明を更に詳細に説明する。   EXAMPLES Next, an Example is given and this invention is demonstrated still in detail.

実施例1
高密度ポリエチレン板(HDPE)(表面粗さRa=0.08)と同(表面粗さRa=2.5)の平板の下部に摩擦係数測定装置を設置した。これらの平板上を垂直応力約0.5Nの力で手指の腹を擦過し、摩擦係数を測定した。
Example 1
A friction coefficient measuring device was installed at the lower part of a flat plate having the same density (surface roughness Ra = 2.5) as that of the high-density polyethylene plate (HDPE) (surface roughness Ra = 0.08). The flat surfaces of the fingers were scratched on these flat plates with a vertical stress of about 0.5 N, and the friction coefficient was measured.

それぞれ指の乾燥状態の異なる被験者5名(A、B、C、D、E)の摩擦係数を図5に示す。
図5中、被験者Dは、指が乾燥しており、カサカサして硬い状態であった。この被験者Dは、表面粗さの小さいHDPE板では摩擦係数が低く、一方表面粗さの大きい板でも摩擦係数は低かった。この結果から、乾燥状態の皮膚は、表面粗さの小さい平板では摩擦係数が低く、表面粗さの大きい平板も低いままであることがわかる。
FIG. 5 shows the friction coefficients of five subjects (A, B, C, D, E) having different dry states of their fingers.
In FIG. 5, the subject D had a dry finger and was crisp and hard. This subject D had a low coefficient of friction with an HDPE plate having a small surface roughness, while the coefficient of friction was also low with a plate having a large surface roughness. From this result, it can be seen that the dry skin has a low coefficient of friction for a flat plate with a small surface roughness and a low flat plate with a high surface roughness.

一方、図5中、被験者Cは、指がしっとり、柔らかい状態であった。この被験者Cは、表面粗さの小さいHDPE板では摩擦係数が高く、一方表面粗さの大きい板では摩擦係数が低くなった。この結果から、しっとりした状態の皮膚は、表面粗さの小さい平板では摩擦係数が高く、表面粗さの大きい平板では摩擦係数が低くなることがわかる。   On the other hand, in FIG. 5, the subject C was soft and soft. This subject C had a high coefficient of friction in the HDPE plate having a small surface roughness, while the coefficient of friction was low in the plate having a large surface roughness. From this result, it can be seen that moist skin has a high friction coefficient on a flat plate with a small surface roughness and a low friction coefficient on a flat plate with a large surface roughness.

これらの結果に基づき、表面粗さと摩擦係数の変化と皮膚状態との相関性を予め求めておけば、皮膚状態の評価が可能になる。   Based on these results, if the correlation between the surface roughness, the change in the friction coefficient, and the skin state is obtained in advance, the skin state can be evaluated.

実施例2
図6のような表面粗さを相互に異ならせたSUS板を7板配置した摩擦係数測定装置を作製した。図6中、中心は未加工SUS板(Ra=0.025)であり、その周囲には、ブラスト処理により表面粗さを変化させた(Ra=0.2〜0.9)SUS板を配置した。
被験者11名が、指で未加工板を擦過(0.5N)したときの摩擦係数を図7に示す。実施例1の場合と同様に、皮膚の状態により摩擦係数は大きく変化した。なお、回数の変化により摩擦係数が変化するのは、発汗などにより皮膚状態が変化するからである。
Example 2
A friction coefficient measuring device in which seven SUS plates having different surface roughness as shown in FIG. 6 were arranged was produced. In FIG. 6, the center is an unprocessed SUS plate (Ra = 0.025), and a SUS plate having a surface roughness changed by blasting (Ra = 0.2 to 0.9) is disposed around the center. did.
FIG. 7 shows the coefficient of friction when 11 test subjects rub the unprocessed plate with their fingers (0.5 N). Similar to the case of Example 1, the friction coefficient changed greatly depending on the skin condition. Note that the friction coefficient changes due to the change in the number of times because the skin condition changes due to sweating or the like.

被験者11名が、指でブラスト処理板を擦過(0.5N)したときの摩擦係数の変化を図8に示す。図8より、表面粗さが小さい場合は個人差が大きく、表面粗さが大きくなると個人差が縮小し、実施例1と同じ傾向があった。   FIG. 8 shows changes in the coefficient of friction when 11 subjects rub the blasted plate with their fingers (0.5 N). As shown in FIG. 8, the individual difference is large when the surface roughness is small, and the individual difference is reduced when the surface roughness is large.

Claims (7)

表面粗さが相違する複数の平板上に皮膚を接触させて平板表面に対して平行に動かしたときの摩擦係数をそれぞれ測定し、測定された複数の摩擦係数相互の関係を指標とすることを特徴とする皮膚状態の評価方法。   Measure the friction coefficient when the skin is brought into contact with a plurality of flat plates with different surface roughness and moved parallel to the flat plate surface, and the relationship between the measured friction coefficients is used as an index. A method for evaluating a characteristic skin condition. 評価する皮膚状態が、皮膚の乾燥状態、しっとり感、柔軟性、油性感及び汗のかきやすさから選ばれる状態である請求項1記載の皮膚状態の評価方法。   The skin condition evaluation method according to claim 1, wherein the skin condition to be evaluated is a condition selected from the dry state of the skin, moist feeling, flexibility, oily feeling and ease of sweating. 表面粗さと摩擦係数の変化との相関関係に基づいて皮膚状態を評価する請求項1又は2記載の皮膚状態の評価方法。   The skin condition evaluation method according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the skin condition is evaluated based on a correlation between the surface roughness and the change in friction coefficient. 前記平板の表面粗さが、Ra=0.001〜5μmの範囲から選ばれる相互に相違する2種以上である請求項1〜3のいずれか1項記載の皮膚状態の評価方法。   The method for evaluating a skin condition according to any one of claims 1 to 3, wherein the surface roughness of the flat plate is two or more different from each other selected from the range of Ra = 0.001 to 5 µm. 平板上に皮膚を接触させて平行に動かす際の垂直応力が0.1〜5Nの範囲である請求項1〜4のいずれか1項記載の皮膚状態の評価方法。   The method for evaluating a skin condition according to any one of claims 1 to 4, wherein the normal stress when the skin is brought into contact with a flat plate and moved in parallel is in the range of 0.1 to 5N. 同一粗さの平板で複数回の計測を行い、摩擦係数が安定した後、これとは異なる粗さの1種以上の平板で計測を行う、請求項1〜5のいずれか1項記載の皮膚状態の評価方法。   The skin according to any one of claims 1 to 5, wherein the measurement is performed a plurality of times on a flat plate having the same roughness and the friction coefficient is stabilized, and then the measurement is performed on one or more types of flat plates having a different roughness. State evaluation method. 肌に適用される剤を、肌に適用する前と適用した後との各々において評価した皮膚状態により、肌に適用される剤が肌に与える効果を評価する方法であって、請求項1〜6のいずれか1項記載の皮膚状態の評価方法により皮膚状態の評価を行う、肌に適用される剤が肌に与える効果を評価する方法。   A method for evaluating the effect of an agent applied to the skin on the skin according to the state of the skin evaluated before and after applying the agent applied to the skin. A method for evaluating the effect of an agent applied to the skin, which evaluates the skin state by the method for evaluating a skin state according to any one of 6 above.
JP2016122999A 2016-06-21 2016-06-21 Evaluation method of skin condition Active JP6730860B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2016122999A JP6730860B2 (en) 2016-06-21 2016-06-21 Evaluation method of skin condition

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2016122999A JP6730860B2 (en) 2016-06-21 2016-06-21 Evaluation method of skin condition

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2017225583A true JP2017225583A (en) 2017-12-28
JP6730860B2 JP6730860B2 (en) 2020-07-29

Family

ID=60889480

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2016122999A Active JP6730860B2 (en) 2016-06-21 2016-06-21 Evaluation method of skin condition

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP6730860B2 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN112839570A (en) * 2018-10-16 2021-05-25 株式会社资生堂 Skin evaluation method and skin evaluation device

Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2000271094A (en) * 1999-03-11 2000-10-03 Centre Technique Des Ind Mecaniques Device and method for grasping characteristic of skin by measuring friction
JP2002191564A (en) * 2000-12-26 2002-07-09 Shiseido Co Ltd Cosmetics selecting method, its using method, its manufacturing method and its selecting information map
JP2003024282A (en) * 2001-07-11 2003-01-28 Shiseido Co Ltd Method for evaluating skin state
JP2012093144A (en) * 2010-10-25 2012-05-17 Kao Corp Physical property measuring method for horny layer cell
KR20130024473A (en) * 2011-08-31 2013-03-08 한국 한의학 연구원 Apparatus to measure friction coefficient of skin and method to measure thereof
US20150051513A1 (en) * 2009-09-01 2015-02-19 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Nonlinear System Identification Techniques and Devices For Discovering Dynamic And Static Tissue Properties

Patent Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2000271094A (en) * 1999-03-11 2000-10-03 Centre Technique Des Ind Mecaniques Device and method for grasping characteristic of skin by measuring friction
US6309363B1 (en) * 1999-03-11 2001-10-30 Centre Technique Des Industries Mecaniques Device and method for characterization of the skin by tribometry
JP2002191564A (en) * 2000-12-26 2002-07-09 Shiseido Co Ltd Cosmetics selecting method, its using method, its manufacturing method and its selecting information map
JP2003024282A (en) * 2001-07-11 2003-01-28 Shiseido Co Ltd Method for evaluating skin state
US20150051513A1 (en) * 2009-09-01 2015-02-19 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Nonlinear System Identification Techniques and Devices For Discovering Dynamic And Static Tissue Properties
JP2012093144A (en) * 2010-10-25 2012-05-17 Kao Corp Physical property measuring method for horny layer cell
KR20130024473A (en) * 2011-08-31 2013-03-08 한국 한의학 연구원 Apparatus to measure friction coefficient of skin and method to measure thereof

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN112839570A (en) * 2018-10-16 2021-05-25 株式会社资生堂 Skin evaluation method and skin evaluation device

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP6730860B2 (en) 2020-07-29

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Sandford et al. Capturing skin properties from dynamic mechanical analyses
Ding et al. Tactile perception of skin and skin cream by friction induced vibrations
Bochereau et al. Characterizing and imaging gross and real finger contacts under dynamic loading
Tang et al. Tactile perception of skin and skin cream
Zhang et al. Finger pad friction and tactile perception of laser treated, stamped and cold rolled micro-structured stainless steel sheet surfaces
Tang et al. Characterization of tactile perception and optimal exploration movement
Zhou et al. Effect of finger sliding direction on tactile perception, friction and dynamics
Tanaka et al. Measurement and evaluation of tactile sensations using a PVDF sensor
Lewis et al. Skin friction at the interface between hands and sports equipment
Peyre et al. Tactile perception of textile surfaces from an artificial finger instrumented by a polymeric optical fibre
JP2017225583A (en) Evaluation method of skin condition
JP2018057691A (en) Tissue paper
JP6750932B2 (en) Skin tactile measurement method and cosmetic performance evaluation method
Shao et al. A novel tactile sensation measurement system for qualifying touch perception
Jachowicz et al. Alteration of skin mechanics by thin polymer films
JP2019095263A (en) Evaluation method of human skin or cosmetics
Mao et al. Characteristics of dummy skin contact mechanics during developing process of skin abrasion trauma
JP2018109599A (en) Touch feel evaluation device
Harris et al. A sticky situation or rough going? influencing haptic perception of wood coatings through frictional and topographical design
JP2005134344A (en) Sample for evaluating bending characteristic of hair
WO2020080137A1 (en) Skin evaluation method and skin evaluation device
Maidhof et al. Technical approaches to select high‐performance instant skin smoothing formulations: Correlation of in vitro and in vivo assessment methods
Kawazoe et al. Tactile samples with variable surface textures to investigate tactile perception characteristic
JP2017053791A (en) Method of evaluating viscous cosmetics
Brown et al. Investigation of surface topography differences in native and exotic invertebrates in the St. Lawrence River

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20190305

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20191213

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20200114

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20200303

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20200519

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20200618

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20200630

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20200703

R151 Written notification of patent or utility model registration

Ref document number: 6730860

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R151

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250