JP2017223785A - Information processing terminal - Google Patents

Abstract

PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide a preventive measure to dementia by means of brain stimulation in composite combination with other preventive measures.SOLUTION: An information terminal device includes: an acquisition unit 10 for acquiring activity information based on user's activity in association with a time at which the activity was performed; application software 21 to 23 having at least one game which increments a game score by making correct answer determination on the basis of an input from a display screen; a measurement unit 31 for measuring an execution time of a game; a comparison unit 32 for comparing an activity time at which an activity associated with the activity information was performed with the measured execution time of the game and determining whether an interval between the activity time and the execution time is within a predetermined time, and an evaluation unit 33 for adding an evaluation score when the interval between the activity time and the execution time is determined to be within the predetermined time.SELECTED DRAWING: Figure 1

Description

  The present invention relates to an information processing terminal for use in activation of a user's brain.

  In Japan, the elderly population is increasing, and the number of people with dementia is expected to increase accordingly. It is becoming necessary to activate the brain as a precautionary measure against dementia. Therefore, a method of activating the brain via game software has come out. Game software has usually been sold to young people by children, but with this background, demand is gradually increasing for elderly people. As such a brain activation game, it is common to have the elderly solve the problem. For example, Patent Document 1 discloses a dementia prevention system that presents a problem to be used for training for preventing dementia.

  On the other hand, the causes of dementia are diverse, not just the lack of stimulation to the brain, but also the degree of stress and social participation, as well as whether exercise and diet are being done properly, It is thought that dementia is caused by a combination of many factors.

Japanese Patent Laying-Open No. 2015-45143

  Conventional prevention and countermeasures for dementia have only provided countermeasures for various factors of dementia. For example, in the example of Patent Document 1, it is a coping method that a stimulus to the brain is given to a factor of a decrease in the stimulus to the brain. As other measures against dementia, most of them responded individually, such as improving eating habits and exercising. For example, things related to general health improvement measures such as food and exercise are often provided as a combination improvement measure. However, for many factors that cause dementia, we have not provided preventive measures such as stimulation to the brain in combination with other preventive measures or motivated to take these preventive measures.

  An object of the present invention is to provide preventive measures for dementia caused by brain stimulation in combination with other preventive measures.

  An information processing terminal according to the present invention is an acquisition unit that acquires activity information based on a user's activity in association with the time when the activity was performed, and indicates a predetermined position from the display screen or is at a predetermined position on the display screen Application software having at least one game that accepts an input of an answer or operation by a moving operation of the target, adds a game score by determining a correct answer based on the input, and a game execution time by the application software is measured The time between the activity time and the execution time is determined in advance by comparing the activity time of the activity associated with the activity information and the game execution time measured by the measuring side unit. A comparison unit for determining whether or not the time is within the time, and the comparison unit determines a time between the activity time and the execution time. If it is determined that the in time, and a evaluation unit for adding the evaluation score.

  According to the present invention, when providing a game that can achieve the effect of brain activation, motivate the user to take other preventive measures such as the exercise situation and the meal situation in combination. As a result, it is possible to encourage not only a single activation effect due to brain stimulation but also a combined effort to maximize the brain activation effect by games, so that the user's brain activation effect can be improved. It can be further increased.

FIG. 2 is a block diagram illustrating a functional configuration of an information processing terminal of this embodiment. It is a display screen which shows a step count screen. It is a display screen which shows a meal item. It is a display screen which shows the addition screen of an evaluation score. It is a flowchart explaining the activity evaluation process of this Embodiment. It is a flowchart explaining the evaluation process with respect to exercise information. It is a flowchart explaining the evaluation process with respect to meal information.

  Embodiments of the present invention will be described below with reference to the drawings. However, the embodiment described below is merely an example, and there is no intention to exclude various modifications and technical applications that are not explicitly described below. That is, the present invention can be implemented with various modifications without departing from the spirit of the present invention. In the following description of the drawings, the same or similar parts are denoted by the same or similar reference numerals. The drawings are schematic and do not necessarily match actual dimensions and ratios. In some cases, the dimensional relationships and ratios may be different between the drawings.

  This embodiment is realized in an information processing terminal such as a mobile phone, a smart phone, and a tablet terminal. The present invention is not limited to the above, and can be applied to general information processing apparatuses having various computer functions. However, description will be made assuming that the present invention is applied to the above-described small information processing terminal.

  Although not shown, the information processing terminal according to the present embodiment includes a CPU (Central Processing Unit), a ROM (Read Only Memory), a RAM (Random Access Memory), an image processing unit, and a memory. The CPU, ROM, RAM, image processing unit, and memory are connected to each other via a bus.

  The CPU executes various processes according to a program recorded in the ROM or a program loaded from the memory to the RAM. The RAM appropriately stores data necessary for the CPU to execute various processes.

  The image processing unit includes a DSP (Digital Signal Processor), a VRAM (Video Random Access Memory), and the like, and performs various image processing on image data in cooperation with the CPU.

  The memory may be any storage medium such as a DRAM, a cache memory, a magnetic disk, an optical disk, a magneto-optical disk, or a semiconductor memory. The memory includes not only memory connected by a bus but also memory read / written via a drive. The data stored in the present embodiment will be described as being temporarily stored in this memory, both for temporary storage and for long-term storage using a nonvolatile memory.

  An input / output interface is connected to the information processing terminal. An imaging unit, an input unit, and a communication unit are connected via an input / output interface. The input unit includes various buttons and accepts user instruction operations. The communication unit controls communication performed with other devices via a network including the Internet. The information processing terminal is configured to incorporate an acceleration sensor and a gyro (angular velocity) sensor, so that an output is given to the above various configurations.

  The information processing terminal includes each of the above-described configurations, and the functional configuration will be described later. Each functional configuration is functionally realized by the cooperative operation of the CPU, ROM, RAM, image processing unit, and memory. The function of each of these units is a module configuration provided by an electronic circuit or a program. The program is stored in the ROM and executed by cooperating with each unit while being appropriately read out by the CPU. Each functional configuration shown in FIG. 1 will be described with reference to FIGS.

  FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrating a functional configuration of the information processing terminal according to the present embodiment. The information processing terminal according to the present embodiment includes an application storage unit 10, an acquisition unit 20, a control unit 30, and a display unit 40. The functional configurations of the application storage unit 10, the acquisition unit 20, the control unit 30, and the display unit 40 are functional configurations realized by the above-described hardware configuration. The display unit 40 has a display screen 41.

(About the acquisition unit 10 and user activity information)
The acquisition unit 10 acquires activity information based on the activity of the user in association with the time when the activity was performed. User activities mainly include various activities that are useful in preventing dementia. These include meals, exercise, stress relief, and social participation that help dementia. The activity information is information that can quantify or identify the activities of these users. As for user activities, explanation will be given mainly on user exercise and meals. Specific types of diet and exercise include activities that themselves help prevent dementia.

  There are many types of exercise for users, but the types of exercise that can actually be performed are limited as they get older. There are even fewer items that can be started more easily. As an exercise that can be easily performed, walking, walking, jogging, and jogging can be considered, and the number of steps can be measured in the case of walking, and the heart rate can be measured in the case of fast walking and jogging. In all cases, exercise time is an important factor.

  While the act of walking is a simple exercise, it is often easier to produce results when walking rather than simply thinking and studying at the desk. It has been confirmed that walking has a positive effect on the brain. Compared with strenuous exercise, how much walking will have an effect on health has the advantage that it is relatively easy to manage the effect, especially for users who do not exercise regularly.

  When the user's exercise is walking, the acquisition unit 10 may be a pedometer. In this case, the acquisition unit 10 acquires user step count information as activity information. The acquisition unit 10 combines the step count information, which is output from the pedometer, with the walking time, and the step count information and the count end time of the acquired step count information are used as the step count information as the time of the activity. Obtain by associating.

  FIG. 2 is a display screen showing a step count screen. A display screen 41 when the acquisition unit 10 is a pedometer is shown in FIG. The display screen 41 of FIG. 2 can be displayed by the user's operation. When the automatic walking determination function is used, the acquisition unit 10 displays the screen of FIG. 2 on the display screen 41 according to an instruction to the display unit 40 when it is determined that the user has started walking.

  During walking, the number of steps while walking is displayed as shown in FIG. The display unit 40 may display the number of steps during the walking period, but in FIG. 2, the number of steps accumulated on the day of walking is displayed. In addition to this, it is also possible to display the number of steps targeted by the user, the fraction to the target, the number of steps accumulated from past walking, and the like. Furthermore, various menu items are displayed below the display screen 41, and it is possible to return to other menus during display.

  The start and end of walking are set by the user inputting to the information processing terminal. On the other hand, it can also be set as the structure which determines the start and completion | finish of a walk automatically. By configuring the information processing terminal to include, for example, an acceleration sensor and a gyro (angular velocity) sensor, information regarding whether or not the user has walked can be acquired from the output. By determining whether or not the walking has continued, the start and end of the time during which the walking has continued is acquired as the walking time and the time during which the activity was performed.

  By adopting a configuration for automatically determining the start and end of walking in this way, it is possible not only to input user activity information without the user himself / herself, but also to input arbitrary or inaccurate walking information. Can be prevented. By accurately grasping the user's exercise state, it is possible to accurately assign an evaluation score during a training game, which will be described later. It is possible to avoid an inaccurate operation of simply inputting “exercise”, and to appropriately promote the interlocking operation of the exercise and the training game. You can get it properly.

  Further, the acquisition unit 10 may determine that exercise has been performed when the number of steps has increased beyond a predetermined number in a certain period. In this case, the acquisition unit 10 sets a reference number of steps in advance, and when the number of steps set is equal to or more than the set number of reference steps, the acquisition unit 10 sets the start of walking as the start of exercise. For example, if the user walks for 50 steps and walks, the time of the first step can be set as the start of walking. If the walk is not counted for 3 minutes or more, it is determined that the walk is finished with the time of the last walk.

  Simply taking a few steps is natural in daily life, and with the above-described configuration, it can be determined that the user has walked and exercised with a certain number of steps. In particular, when the start and end of walking are automatically determined as described above, it means that you have moved around the house with a little movement and will contain noise. Can do.

(About meals as activity information)
Explaining exercise as a user activity, especially walking, diet management is also important in terms of preventing dementia. FIG. 3 is a display screen showing meal items. As shown in FIG. 3, meals eaten on the day are classified by item and displayed on the display unit 40 as icon items. For example, specific items such as “beans”, “sesame seeds”, “eggs”, “cheese”, “wakame”, “vegetables”, “fish”, “shiitake”, and “mochi” are displayed on the screen as icons. When a meal is taken, the contents of the actual meal are input by an operation of selecting an icon together with the meal time zone. Thus, the acquisition part 10 receives the element which comprises a user's meal by selection input, and links | relates and acquires with respect to the information regarding a user's meal time. As an element constituting the user's meal, information related to the type of the user's meal is selected and input by displaying a plurality of items on the display screen 41 according to the type and receiving an instruction input on the display screen 41. The

  And the acquisition part 10 determines with having performed activity, when the element received by selection input satisfy | fills a reference | standard, and acquires the information regarding a user's meal time as the time which performed the said activity. Specifically, it can be assumed that the criterion is satisfied when five of the nine items shown in FIG. 3 are satisfied. Or, if you take “fish” and “vegetable”, if you take “sesame” and “vegetable”, if you take “egg” and “beans”, if you take “salmon” and “beans”, etc. The standard can be determined based on whether or not a predetermined combination of a plurality of items is satisfied.

(About application storage unit 20 and training game)
The application storage unit 20 stores a plurality of application software, and particularly stores the games 21 to 23. For illustration, the games 21 to 23 and three are shown as examples, but the number may be more or less. Further, application software that is not game software may be stored. Hereinafter, the games 21 to 23 and other software will be collectively referred to as application software.

  The games 21 to 23 are prepared in advance from training games that stimulate the brain and are useful for preventing dementia. Training games include a calculation game, a quiz game, and a mistake search. Furthermore, from the aspect of recognizing social participation for the prevention of dementia, it is possible to further increase the effect by making it a battle game. As the training games of the games 21 to 23, games that have been confirmed to have a certain effect on the demand for dementia are selected.

  As for the training game, it has been confirmed that what can be confirmed whether a correct answer exists and has reached the correct answer is more effective in preventing dementia (Higher Brain Function Research 34 (3 ): 335-341, 2014, "Can a brain training (registered trademark) game improve cognitive function?"). Rather than just using the head by playing a game, the game is effective in preventing dementia and is regularly performed at an appropriate timing in relation to exercise and meals. The effect of combining with can be further enhanced.

  Specific examples of the games 21 to 23 include a question and answer game and a quiz game that display question and answer options and make a correct answer determination based on an answer input from the user. Further, when a plurality of objects displayed on the display screen 41 are operated by input, and in some cases, the objects are moved on the display screen 41, and the arrangement of the plurality of objects satisfies the requirements as a result of the operation. For example, there is a puzzle game in which the correct answer state is obtained when the arrangement of the moved object matches the requirement. In addition, there is a calculation game in which a calculation formula is displayed on the display screen 41 and a numeric input is received, so that the calculation result of the calculation formula and the input number match each other and the correct answer state is obtained.

  As described above, the games 21 to 23 stored in the application storage unit 20 accept an indication of a predetermined position from the display screen 41 or an input of an answer or an operation by a moving operation of a target at a predetermined position on the display screen. There is at least one game in which the game score is added by determining the correct answer based on the determination.

  It is considered that the training game is effective in preventing dementia by making a game with a correct answer in this way. Cognitive function is expected to improve by repeating correct work and answers. For games that do work without correct answers, the game progresses without confirmation of correctness, so no feedback is given to cognition.

  Research is ongoing on games that can help improve cognitive function. For example, according to Higher Brain Function Research 34 (3): 335-341, 2014, "Can a brain training (registered trademark) game improve cognitive function?" It has been confirmed that there is an effect of improving the cognitive function for games that work correctly.

  In the case of a normal game, even if the score is increased or an effect on the screen is generated by an operation, there is not necessarily a correct answer. It is considered that the ability to reflect and judge appropriately is displayed without correct answers. Although it may improve reflexes, no studies are currently being conducted to improve its cognitive ability and, consequently, its effectiveness in preventing dementia.

  In this way, it is important that the user derives an answer to a correct answer, and as an input method for that purpose, the user can point out a predetermined position from the display screen 41 or a target at a predetermined position on the display screen. Enter the answer or operation by the moving action of. In this embodiment, dementia is prevented by repeating the feedback of the correctness determination as a result.

(About the control unit 30)
The control unit 30 includes a measurement unit 31, a comparison unit 32, and an evaluation unit 33 as functional configurations. The control unit 30 includes information processing including control processing based on activity information acquired from the acquisition unit 10, execution control of the games 21 to 23 stored in the application storage unit 20, data management, display control, and network control processing. It is a processing unit that performs overall control of the terminal.

  The measuring unit 31 measures the game execution time by the application software. The game execution time can be from the start time to the end time of the game. For example, the time from when the user inputs the game start button to when the user inputs the end button can be used. However, since some recent application software continues to operate in the background, the time from when the screen is displayed on the display screen 41 on the information processing terminal until the screen is erased may be the game execution time. . The execution time is the start / end information based on the date of year / month / day and the time of hour / minute / second. Furthermore, the duration of game execution is included.

  The comparison unit 32 compares the activity time of the activity associated with the activity information with the game execution time measured by the measuring side unit, and the time between the activity time and the execution time is within a predetermined time. It is determined whether or not. For example, it is assumed that exercise such as walking is performed from 2 pm to 2:30 on June 1 as an activity time. On the other hand, for example, it is assumed that the game 21 is played from 5 pm to 5:30 on June 1. Since the end time of the exercise is 2:30 pm and the start time of the game 21 is 5:00 pm on June 1, the time between the activity time and the execution time is 2 hours 30 minutes.

  On the other hand, in the comparison unit 32, a set time to be compared is set in advance. The set time can be set to 3 hours, for example. Since the time between the activity time and the execution time is 2 hours 30 minutes and within 3 hours this time, the comparison unit 32 determines that the time is within a predetermined time. If the set time here is 1 hour, 2 hours and 30 minutes between the activity time and the execution time exceeds 1 hour, so the comparison unit 32 does not exceed the predetermined time. Judge that there is no.

  The evaluation unit 33 adds an evaluation score when the comparison unit 32 determines that the interval between the activity time and the execution time is within a predetermined time. The evaluation score may be a score specifically set for the application software, or a score used in other software may be used as it is.

  Or, the evaluation score is not limited to a simple score, but can be used by making it an economical point such as a point for purchase that can be redeemed in monetary terms, or a certain privilege when a certain point is accumulated. The incentive for the person may be further increased.

  FIG. 4 is a display screen showing an evaluation score addition screen. FIG. 4 shows an example of a display screen 41 that adopts “brain health maintenance activity star bonus” as an evaluation score and shows that this evaluation score has been added. By displaying this display screen 41 when the training game is finished, it is possible to provide an incentive for the user.

  Through the above incentives, the user is motivated to execute the training game within a predetermined time. Since the user originally owns the training game and plays the training game at a certain frequency, the user is more likely to execute the training game at the timing motivated by the incentive. For example, it is expected to bring about a particularly high effect by motivating the time zone in which the user walks and the time zone of the training game to be performed at a close time.

  The evaluation unit 33 may add a uniform value as an evaluation score when they match, for example, not only whether the walking time zone is close to the training game time zone, You may set whether a score is added.

  On the other hand, when the comparison unit 32 determines that the interval between the activity time and the execution time is not within the predetermined time, the evaluation unit 33 notifies the user that it is out of time. For example, the display unit 40 displays a warning. A warning sound may be emitted from the information processing terminal. By making it possible for the user to check at any time whether the time is within or outside of the time, the user can be encouraged to use the application software at a time determined by the user.

  As one function, the comparison unit 32 may compare the activity time and the execution time to determine whether or not there is an overlap. Specifically, it is a case where a game is started while walking. It is extremely dangerous to execute application software such as games 21 to 23 while moving. Therefore, when the execution of the application software is operated during the movement, the control unit 30 can stop the execution of the application software. Alternatively, forcible termination by interruption or a warning screen can be displayed by the display unit 40. With this configuration, it is possible to avoid a dangerous state of being heated by a game while walking.

(Effects of this embodiment)
As described above, when a user plays a training game, with reference to the exercise data, if it is within a certain period such as within one hour from the time of exercise, the evaluation points are added. , The incentive to play the training game within the predetermined time is increased.

  Also, if you enter the meal time and the contents of the meal, and the meal that satisfies the requirement is within the set time, the evaluation points will also be added, so the training game will be done within the set time. Is motivated to do. Also, those who play games are motivated to have a regular diet.

  As described above, it is expected that a training game is motivated to be performed within a predetermined time from meals and exercises, and that it is performed at an appropriate timing, so that a combined effect on dementia prevention is expected to increase. Although the effect of preventing dementia by each action is not necessarily high at present, a synergistic effect is exhibited by motivating them to be performed in combination.

  In addition, research on prevention of dementia has just begun, and the effects of individual actions that have not been confirmed have been confirmed, but those that have been confirmed to be effective when combined are adopted as measures to prevent dementia. It is also possible. In particular, the actions taken for the prevention of dementia are lifestyle-related, and it is thought that there are many things that will produce results only when repeated. Although it is one method to force it to be performed by the management of a doctor or the like, it is reasonable to combine it with a training game habitually by motivation even considering the cost.

  Also, lifestyle-related improvement measures through repetition tend to be motivated for the person who has a visible effect at an early stage. By being motivated to perform multiple actions in combination without difficulty, it is expected that multiple actions will be effective quickly. It is expected that the effect will be a motivation for users, and as a result, a good cycle will be created.

  Even if you know that eating a healthy meal, doing appropriate exercise, and getting the right stimulus to your brain regularly is important, there is an opportunity to motivate that combination. If you don't get it, you're more likely to drop out. In addition, it can be considered that it will be stressed by being given forcible power, and the person's motivation will be returned and removed. Even though it is a game that can be enjoyed easily, it is also possible to hold off.

  In this example, it is only added to the evaluation score, so it is not necessary to play the game forcibly despite being busy. It is thought that it is hard to fall. On the other hand, since it is confirmed that the score is difficult to increase when the game is not played within a predetermined time, it is predicted that if it is not this, it will be motivated later. As a result, it is expected that results will be easier to produce.

(flowchart)
Regarding the configuration described above, the flow of processing will be described with reference to a flowchart. In the present embodiment, the flow of processing will be described along the flowchart, but the order is not limited to the order shown in each figure, and the processing may be performed before and after the processing without causing any trouble in performing the corresponding processing. Good.

  FIG. 5 is a flowchart for explaining the activity evaluation process of the present embodiment. First, the evaluation unit 33 performs initialization and evaluation data acquisition processing (step 100). Here, variable data initialization and star data acquisition processing as evaluation data are performed. The evaluation data is added to the already accumulated data.

  Next, the measurement unit 31 acquires training data from the application storage unit 20 (step 110). That is, since the application storage unit 20 stores the games 21 to 23, the game score as an execution result thereof, and data of the date and time when the application software is executed, the training data is acquired.

  And the measurement part 31 determines whether training data were able to be acquired (step 120). If there is no training data, the evaluation score is not added, so the process related to the addition of the evaluation score is omitted, and the process proceeds to step 160 to shift to another output process.

  If there is training data, the acquisition unit 10 acquires activity data within 24 hours from the date and time indicated in the training data (step 130). Steps 130 to 150 are described as a process flow for only a single activity information. As described above, the activity information includes a wide variety of information such as exercise information, walking information, and meal information. Is included. Therefore, in steps 130 to 150, processing is looped for each type of activity information. For example, it can be set as the structure which performs the evaluation process (steps 130-150) regarding a walk first, and performs the evaluation process regarding an exercise | movement and the evaluation process regarding a meal similarly after that. After these processes are completed, the process proceeds to step 160 to shift to another output process.

  Next, the acquisition unit 10 determines whether or not activity information has been acquired (step 140). If the activity information cannot be acquired, the processing related to the activity is terminated. If the activity information has been acquired, the process proceeds to activity evaluation processing (step 150). The activity evaluation process will be described with reference to the flowcharts of FIGS.

  When the evaluation score is acquired in the activity evaluation process of step 150 or when the process related to the evaluation score is not executed, the evaluation unit 33 executes an output process of the evaluation score and advice (step 160). The display process of the evaluation score is shown in FIG.

  FIG. 6 is a flowchart illustrating an evaluation process for exercise information. Of the activity evaluation processing in step 150 in FIG. 5, the exercise information evaluation processing will be described. First, an evaluation process related to walking is executed. First, the acquisition unit 10 acquires step count data one hour before the start of the game (step 200). And the acquisition part 10 determines whether the walk about the acquired step count data is what continued for 30 minutes or more (step 210).

  In the case where the exercise is continued for 30 minutes or more, the evaluation unit 33 adds +2 to the evaluation score as the exercise to be the evaluation score (step 220). If the exercise is not continued for 30 minutes or more, it is not an exercise that is the subject of the evaluation score, so a message recommending an activity is displayed on the display unit 40 (step 225).

  Since the evaluation process related to walking is executed, the evaluation process related to fast walking is executed next. The acquisition unit 10 acquires fast walking time data 24 hours before the start of the game (step 230). And the acquisition part 10 determines whether the walk about the acquired rapid walk time data is what continued for 30 minutes or more (step 240).

  In the case where the exercise is continued for 30 minutes or more, the evaluation unit 33 adds +2 to the evaluation score as the exercise to be the target of the evaluation score (step 250). If the exercise is not continued for 30 minutes or more, it is not an exercise targeted for the evaluation score, and a message recommending an activity is displayed on the display unit 40 (step 255). Thus, the evaluation process for exercise information ends.

  FIG. 7 is a flowchart illustrating an evaluation process for meal information. First, the acquisition unit 10 determines whether fish and vegetables have been selected via the display screen 41 (step 310). If selected, the evaluation score is incremented by +2 (step 320). If not selected, the display unit 40 displays a message recommending the activity (step 325). Thus, the evaluation process for exercise information ends.

  Next, the acquisition unit 10 determines whether sesame and vegetables have been selected via the display screen 41 (step 330). If selected, the evaluation score is incremented by +2 (step 340). If not selected, a message recommending the activity is displayed on the display unit 40 (step 345). Thus, the evaluation process for exercise information ends.

  Similarly, the acquisition unit 10 determines whether an egg and a bean are selected via the display screen 41 (step 350). If selected, the evaluation score is incremented by +2 (step 360). If it is not selected, a message recommending the activity is displayed on the display unit 40 (step 365). Thus, the evaluation process for exercise information ends.

  Similarly, the acquisition unit 10 determines whether or not candy and beans have been selected via the display screen 41 (step 370). If selected, the evaluation score is incremented by +2 (step 380). If not selected, a message recommending the activity is displayed on the display unit 40 (step 385). Thus, the evaluation process for exercise information ends.

  As mentioned above, although this invention was demonstrated using the Example, the technical scope of this invention is not limited to the range as described in the said Example. It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications or improvements can be made to the above-described embodiments. It is apparent from the description of the scope of claims that embodiments with such changes or improvements can be included in the technical scope of the present invention.

Application storage unit 10, acquisition unit 20, control unit 30, measurement unit 31, comparison unit 32, evaluation unit 33, display unit 40, display screen 41

Claims (6)

An acquisition unit that acquires activity information based on the user's activity in association with the time of the activity;
At least one game that accepts an input of an answer or an operation by pointing out a predetermined position from the display screen or moving an object at a predetermined position on the display screen, and adding a game score by determining a correct answer based on the input Application software,
A measurement unit for measuring the execution time of the game by the application software;
The activity time in which the activity associated with the activity information is performed is compared with the game execution time measured by the measuring side, and the interval between the activity time and the execution time is within a predetermined time. A comparison unit for determining whether or not
An evaluation unit that adds an evaluation score when the comparison unit determines that the interval between the activity time and the execution time is within a predetermined time; and
An information processing terminal comprising: The acquisition unit acquires step count information of the user as the activity information, and associates the step count start time to the count end time of the acquired step count information with the step count information as the time when the activity was performed. To get
The information processing terminal according to claim 1. The acquisition unit receives an element constituting the user's meal by a selection input, acquires the element in association with information on a timing of the user's meal, and the element received by the selection input satisfies the criteria, It is determined that the activity has been performed, and information on the timing of the user's meal is acquired as the time at which the activity was performed.
The information processing terminal according to claim 1. The elements constituting the user's meal are selected by displaying information related to the type of ingredients of the user's meal by displaying a plurality of items for each type on the display screen and receiving an instruction input on the display screen Entered,
The reference is whether or not a predetermined combination of the plurality of items is satisfied.
The information processing terminal according to claim 3. The application software has a plurality of the games, and the plurality of games include
A question and answer game consisting of a plurality of combinations of questions and answers that display question and answer options and make a correct answer determination based on the answer input from the user;
A puzzle game in which a plurality of objects displayed on the display screen are operated by input, and a correct answer state is obtained when arrangement of the plurality of objects satisfies a requirement as a result of the operation;
A calculation game that displays a calculation formula on the display screen and accepts an input of a number so that the calculation result of the calculation formula matches the input number and matches the input number,
The information processing terminal according to any one of claims 1 to 4, comprising at least any of the above. When the comparison unit determines that the interval between the activity time and the execution time is not within the predetermined time, the evaluation unit notifies the user that it is out of time.
The information processing terminal according to claim 1.