JP2017196702A - Full hard vanadium-based composite coated tool - Google Patents

Abstract

PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide a full hard vanadium-based composite coated tool excellent in durability, and capable of elongating a limit life.SOLUTION: A first layer of a VN film, a second layer of a VCN film, a third layer of a VC film, and a coating of a fourth layer are formed successively on a base metal surface by a PVD method. When the atomic composition ratio of the second layer is expressed as Va(CbN(1-a-b)), 0.5≤a≤0.7, 0.1≤b≤0.3 are satisfied, and the atomic composition ratio Y of element C in the third layer satisfies 0.2≤Y≤0.4, and the atomic composition ratio X of element C in the fourth layer satisfies 0.4≤X≤0.6.SELECTED DRAWING: Figure 1

Description

The present invention relates to a hard vanadium-based composite coated jig / tool, and more particularly to a jig / tool suitable for a die used in cold working, a cutting tool used in a wet environment, and the like.

Jigs and tools such as molding dies and cutting tools are required to have high wear resistance. As surface modification technologies, carburizing, nitriding, thermal reactive deposition and diffusion (TRD method), chemical reaction A vapor deposition method (CVD method: Chemical Vapor Deposition), a physical vapor deposition method (PVD method: Physical Vapor Deposition), or the like is employed. As a result, the hardness of the base metal surface has been improved, so that the wear resistance has been improved and the tool life has been extended.

Cold working molds are made of cold tool steel, hot tool steel, high speed steel, cemented carbide, etc., but since high dimensional accuracy is required compared to hot working, the TRD method, A high temperature treatment close to 1000 ° C. such as a CVD method is not preferable. At present, the demand for dimensional accuracy for cold working is becoming stricter.

On the other hand, the PVD method, which can be processed at a low temperature of about 500 ° C, is advantageous in terms of dimensional accuracy, and in particular, the ion plating method therein produces a hard coating on the base material surface while ensuring adhesion. It has now become mainstream.

As the hard coating produced by the ion plating method, titanium nitride (TiN), chromium nitride (CrN), or a nitride or carbonitride-based coating obtained by adding an additional element based on these is common. However, vanadium carbide used in the TRD method is also formed by the PVD method.

In the vanadium-based film forming method disclosed in Patent Document 1, from the base material (base material) side toward the outermost surface layer of the film by an ion plating method in which nitrogen gas and hydrocarbon gas are injected using vanadium as an evaporation source. Vanadium nitride (VN), vanadium carbonitride (VCN), and vanadium carbide (VC) are sequentially stacked, and the amount of injected gas and the gas pressure are adjusted depending on the film type of each layer.
However, the laminated structure produced by this film forming method does not maintain the low coefficient of friction that is characteristic of the VC film when the film hardness is increased, and the coefficient of friction increases, so that the work is performed in a molding die or a cutting tool. Adhesion and galling of the material sometimes occurred.
As a result of the inventors' investigation, it has become apparent that the laminated composite coating of the VN film, the VCN film, and the VC film cannot exhibit sufficient molding performance in the mold and sufficient cutting performance in the cutting tool.
That is, the vanadium-based film forming method disclosed in Patent Document 1 cannot sufficiently enhance the durability.

Japanese Patent No. 3909658

  The present invention was devised to solve such a conventional problem. By forming a vanadium-based composite coating excellent in durability by an ion plating method, the critical life of a hard vanadium-based composite coated jig is extended. For the purpose.

とするとき、ａ、ｂの原子比が

である第１層と、前記第２層上に、ＰＶＤ法により形成された、炭化バナジウム膜の第３層であって、元素Ｃの原子組成比をＹとするとき、

である第３層と、前記第３層上に、ＰＶＤ法により形成された、炭化バナジウム膜の第４層であって、元素Ｃの原子組成比をＸとするとき、

である第４層とを備えた硬質バナジウム系複合被膜が被覆される。 To achieve the above purpose,
The hard vanadium-based composite coated jig according to claim 1 is formed on a base material surface by a PVD method, and on the first layer of a vanadium nitride film and on the first layer by a PVD method. The second layer of the vanadium carbonitride film, the composition of the elements V, C, N,

When the atomic ratio of a and b is

And the third layer of the vanadium carbide film formed by the PVD method on the first layer and the second layer, where the atomic composition ratio of element C is Y,

And the fourth layer of the vanadium carbide film formed by the PVD method on the third layer, and when the atomic composition ratio of the element C is X,

And a hard vanadium-based composite coating provided with a fourth layer.

  The hard vanadium-based composite coated jig according to claim 2 has a Vickers equivalent value of 1500 to 2000 based on the nanoindenter hardness of the first layer, and a Vickers equivalent value of 2500 to 2000 based on the nanoindenter hardness of the second layer. 3000, the Vickers conversion value by the nanoindenter hardness of the said 3rd layer and the 4th layer is 1900-2400, and it is lower hardness than a 2nd layer.

または

の少なくとも一方に起因する六方晶に配向し、前記第３層は、

に起因する六方晶に配向している。 The hard vanadium-based composite coated jig according to claim 3, wherein the second layer is

Or

Oriented in a hexagonal crystal resulting from at least one of the following:

Oriented to hexagonal crystals due to

According to the present invention, it is possible to extend the limit life of a jig / tool by applying the vanadium-based composite coating to the jig / tool.

It is Table 1 which shows the structure of the hard vanadium type composite coating in the Example of the hard vanadium type composite coating jig / tool which concerns on this invention. It is Table 2 which shows the formation conditions of the 1st layer in the hard vanadium type composite film of Table 1. It is Table 3 which shows the formation conditions of the 2nd layer in the hard vanadium type composite film of Table 1. 5 is a table 4 showing conditions for forming the third layer and the fourth layer in the hard vanadium-based composite coating of Table 1. It is Table 5 for determining the structure of the hard vanadium type composite film of Table 1. It is a graph which shows the test result which performed the deep drawing process of the cold rolled steel plate by the Example of Table 1, and a comparative example. It is a graph which shows the test result which performed the deep drawing process of the SUS304 by the Example of Table 1, and a comparative example. It is Table 6 and the graph which show the result of having done the drill cutting test by the Example of Table 1, and a comparative example. It is a front view which shows the apparatus for the test of the deep drawing process of FIG. 6, FIG. It is a top view which shows the dice | dies used for the apparatus of FIG. It is a longitudinal cross-sectional view which shows the dice | dies of FIG. It is the elements on larger scale of FIG.

  Next, a preferred embodiment of the hard vanadium composite coated jig according to the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings.

The hard vanadium-based composite coated jig / tool is obtained by forming a hard vanadium-based composite coating on the surface of the base material by the PVD method, and the vanadium-based composite coating is formed by VN (nitridation) from the base material surface toward the outermost surface layer. A vanadium) film, a second-layer VCN (vanadium carbonitride) film, a third-layer and a fourth-layer VC (vanadium carbide) film, and the specifications of each layer are as shown in Table 1 of FIG.

Table 1 shows the Vickers conversion values (hereinafter simply referred to as “hardness”) of the atomic composition ratio, crystallinity, and nanoindata hardness of each layer.
The first layer (VN film) of the hard vanadium-based composite coating has a Vickers conversion value of the nanoindata hardness of 1500 to 2000.
The second layer (VCN film) has an atomic composition ratio of V: 0.5 to 0.7, C: 0.1 to 0.3, N: balance, crystallinity is hexagonal, and has a hardness of 2500 to 3000. is there.
The third layer (VC film) has an atomic composition ratio of C: 0.2 to 0.4, N: balance, crystallinity of hexagonal crystal, and hardness of 1900 to 2400.
The third layer (VC film) has an atomic composition ratio of C: 0.4 to 0.6, N: balance, crystallinity of hexagonal crystal, and hardness of 1900 to 2400.

The first to fourth layers and comparative examples thereof were formed on a cemented carbide test piece by the PVD method using a melt evaporation type ion plating apparatus. And the result which evaluated the Vickers conversion value by the nanoindenter hardness of the adhesiveness and film which used the Rockwell hardness meter for the hardness and adhesiveness (it evaluates and evaluates the crack which arises in the case of a hardness test). It is. This nanoindenter hardness is measured by the nanoindentation method. Specifically, a product name Nano Hard Tester manufactured by CSM Instrument (Switzerland) was used as a measuring apparatus, and the measurement conditions were adjusted to a load of 5 mN.

Table 2 in FIG. 2 shows representative data of test results for determining the conditions for forming the first layer of the hard vanadium-based composite coating. Table 2 shows the bias voltage, adhesion, and hardness of the PVD method for the tested VN films VN-1 to VN-5.
The hardness of the VN film increases as the bias voltage increases. When the bias voltage is increased to 15V, 30V, 50V, 70V, and 150V with respect to VN-1 to VN-5, the hardness is 1233, 1558, 1759, 1996. , 2522, and VN-1 to VN-3 did not crack, but a slight crack occurred in VN-4 and a crack occurred in VN-5. As a result of evaluating the above data and other test results, the hardness range shown in Table 1 was set.
It has been found that, as the hardness increases, the adhesion and toughness with respect to the base material decrease, and when the hardness exceeds 2000, cracks occur due to the decrease in adhesion and toughness. Also, if the hardness gap with the second layer (VCN film) located immediately above is large, there is a high possibility of delamination, so VN-1 with a hardness of 1233 should be excluded.
From the above, it can be determined that the bias voltage is preferably 30 to 70 V, and particularly 50 V is desirable.
A 1st layer is a layer which influences adhesiveness and durability largely in a composite film, and the adhesiveness and durability depend on the hardness.

Table 3 in FIG. 3 shows the results of testing by forming a VCN single-layer film having the same composition as the second layer without being stacked on the first layer by an ion plating apparatus similar to the first layer. . Table 3 shows the bias voltage, atomic composition ratio, crystallinity, adhesion, and hardness of the PVD method for the tested VCN films VCN-1 to VCN-8.
In addition, about crystallinity, the film composition evaluation by EPMA (electron probe microanalyzer) and the evaluation by XRD (X-ray diffraction) were performed. The hardness was evaluated with a nanohard tester, and the adhesion was evaluated with a Rockwell hardness meter.

および

に起因した六結晶に配向していることが判明した。一方、ＶＣＮ−１は

に起因した立方晶、ＶＣＮ−２は

のみに起因した六方晶、
ＶＣＮ−７、ＶＣＮ−８はＶＮに起因した立方晶に配向している。ＶＣＮ−７、ＶＣＮ−８は、バイアス電圧１００に対して、組成比をＶ＞０．７、Ｖ＜０．５に変化させたとき、硬度上昇によるクラックが生じた例である。 VCN-3 to VCN-5 in which no cracks occurred in the second layer had atomic composition ratios of V: 0.60 to 0.64 and C: 0.12 to 0.25, and other test results were taken into account. As a result of evaluation, V: 0.5 to 0.7 and C: 0.1 to 0.3 are acceptable. At this time, the bias voltage was 80 V to 120 V, and the corresponding hardness was 2864, 2649, 2915. That is, when the bias voltage is 100, the hardness is minimum and the adhesion and toughness are increased. And as a result of evaluating by considering other test results, the allowable range of hardness is 2500 to 3000. When the crystallinity of VCN-3 to VCN-5 was evaluated by EPMA and XRD,

and

It was found that the crystals were oriented to six crystals due to the above. On the other hand, VCN-1

The cubic crystal, VCN-2, due to

Hexagonal crystals, caused only by
VCN-7 and VCN-8 are oriented in a cubic crystal due to VN. VCN-7 and VCN-8 are examples in which cracks due to an increase in hardness occurred when the composition ratio was changed to V> 0.7 and V <0.5 with respect to the bias voltage 100.

とするとき、ａ、ｂの原子比が

のとき、

または

の少なくとも一方に起因した六方晶に配向し、バイアス電圧１００Ｖのときに、最低硬度の最適条件となる。 From the above results, the VCN film has the composition of the elements V, C, and N,

When the atomic ratio of a and b is

When,

Or

When the bias voltage is 100 V, the optimum condition for the minimum hardness is obtained.

VC 3-1 to VC 3-7 in Table 4 of FIG. 4 are VC films having the same composition as the third layer without being stacked on the second layer by the same ion plating apparatus as the first layer and the second layer. The result of forming and testing a single layer film is shown. Similarly to the second layer, the formed VC film monolayer film was subjected to coating composition evaluation by EPMA, crystallinity evaluation by XRD, hardness evaluation by nanohard tester, and adhesion evaluation by Rockwell hardness meter.

に起因した六方晶に配向していることが判明した。一方、ＶＣ３−１は、ＶＣに起因した立方晶、ＶＣ３−５〜ＶＣ３−７は、ＶＣに起因した立方晶に配向している。ＶＣ３−５は、バイアス電圧１５０Ｖで硬度が２６６４と高く、ＶＣ３−６、ＶＣ３−７は、バイアス電圧１００Ｖでありながら組成をＣ：０．８２、０．５８と変化させ、硬度が２８９０、２３７１に増大したものである。ＶＣ３−５、ＶＣ３−６、ＶＣ３−７はＶＣに起因した立方晶に配向している。 VC3-2 to VC3-4 in which cracks did not occur in the third layer had an atomic composition ratio of C: 0.25 to 0.40, and were evaluated in consideration of other test results. 2 to 0.4 is an allowable range. At this time, the bias voltage is 80 V to 120 V, and the corresponding hardness is 1905, 1995, 2319. As a result of evaluation with other test results taken into account, the hardness of 1900 to 2400 is within the allowable range.
When the crystallinity of VC3-2 to VC3-4 was evaluated by EPMA and CRD,

It was found that the film was oriented in a hexagonal crystal due to. On the other hand, VC3-1 is oriented to a cubic crystal due to VC, and VC3-5 to VC3-7 are oriented to a cubic crystal due to VC. VC3-5 has a high hardness of 2664 at a bias voltage of 150 V, and VC3-6 and VC3-7 have a bias voltage of 100 V, but the composition is changed to C: 0.82, 0.58, and the hardness is 2890, 2371. It has been increased. VC3-5, VC3-6, and VC3-7 are oriented in a cubic crystal due to VC.

または

に起因した六方晶に配向した炭窒化バナジウムの第２層の上に、

に起因した六方晶に配向している第３層の炭化バナジウム膜を介在させることによって、外部からの負荷を緩衝することができ、硬質バナジウム系複合被膜の耐久性を向上させる。 in this way,

Or

On the second layer of vanadium carbonitride oriented hexagonal due to

By interposing a third-layer vanadium carbide film oriented in a hexagonal crystal resulting from the above, an external load can be buffered, and the durability of the hard vanadium-based composite coating is improved.

VC4-1 to VC4-7 in Table 4 of FIG. 4 are VC films having the same composition as the fourth layer without being stacked on the third layer by the same ion plating apparatus as the first layer and the second layer. The result of forming and testing a single layer film is shown. Similarly to the second layer, the formed VC film monolayer film was subjected to coating composition evaluation by EPMA, crystallinity evaluation by XRD, hardness evaluation by nanohard tester, and adhesion evaluation by Rockwell hardness meter.

VC4-2 to VC4-4 in which cracks did not occur in the fourth layer had an atomic composition ratio of C: 0.43 to 0.59, and were evaluated with consideration of other test results. 4 to 0.6 is an allowable range. At this time, the bias voltage is 30 V to 70 V, and the corresponding hardness is 2133, 2319, 2391. As a result of evaluation with consideration of other test results, the hardness of 1900 to 2400 is within the allowable range.
When the crystallinity of VC3-2 to VC3-4 was evaluated by EPMA and CRD, it was found that the crystals were oriented to cubic crystals due to VC.
On the other hand, VC4-1 has a low bias voltage of 15 V, C: 0.62, hardness 1890, and VC4-5 has a high bias voltage of 150 V, C: 0.39, hardness 2751, and cracks occurred. VC-6 and VC-7 whose composition was changed at a median value of 50 V of the appropriate bias voltage are VC-6, C: 0.39, hardness 2751, VC4-6, C: 0.29, hardness 2413 , Caused a big crack.

第４層のＶＣ膜は、

以上の適正な成膜条件で形成された第１層〜第４層よりなる硬質バナジウム系複合被覆は、耐久性に優れるばかりでなく、摩擦係数も低く抑えられる。
特に、硬質バナジウム系複合被膜を、溶融蒸発型イオンプレーティング装置で形成したときは、ドロップレットが生成されず、極めて滑らかに仕上がるため、第４層ＶＣ膜の低摩擦係数を効果的に機能させて潤滑性を付与することが可能となる。
同じＰＶＤ法であっても、アークイオンプレーティング装置を使用すると、未蒸発、未反応の金属ドロップレットが生成され表面が粗くなりやすい。 The film composition ratio of each layer and the bias voltage, which is the film formation condition, are 30 to 70 V for the first VN film, 80 to 120 V for the second VCN film, and 80 to 120 V for the third VC film. The fourth layer of the VC film was optimally formed when the voltage was 30 to 70V.
The VC film of the third layer is

The fourth layer VC film is

The hard vanadium-based composite coating composed of the first layer to the fourth layer formed under the above appropriate film forming conditions not only has excellent durability, but also has a low coefficient of friction.
In particular, when a hard vanadium-based composite coating is formed with a melt evaporation type ion plating apparatus, droplets are not generated and the finish is extremely smooth, so that the low friction coefficient of the fourth layer VC film is effectively functioned. Thus, lubricity can be imparted.
Even in the same PVD method, when an arc ion plating apparatus is used, unvaporized and unreacted metal droplets are generated and the surface tends to become rough.

Hard vanadium based composite coating on cemented carbide test piece, cold tool steel SKD11 drawing die, high speed steel (SKH51) diameter 6mm straight drill using the melt evaporation type ion plating apparatus by the film formation method described above. Table 5 in FIG. 5, FIG. 6, and FIG. 7 show the results of evaluating the friction coefficient, deep drawing performance, and cutting performance in the ball-on-disk test, respectively.

Specifically, the ball-on-disk test uses a “tribometer” manufactured by CSM Instrument (Switzerland) as a measuring device, a load of 5 N, a rotation speed of 10 cm / sec, a rotation radius of 3 mm using a SUJ2 ball, traveling Evaluation was performed at a distance of 1000 m in a dry environment.

  Table 5 in FIG. 5 shows each layer of the hard vanadium-based composite coating (VN-3, VCN-4, VC3-3, VC4-3), (VN-2, VCN-3, VC3-3, VC4-3). , (VN-3, VCN-5, VC3-2, VC4-4), (VN-2, VCN-4, VC3-4, VC4-2) (Examples of the invention, 2, 4, 4) and 4 layers (VN-1, VCN-4, VC3-3, VC4-3), (VN-3, VCN-2, VC3-3, VC4-3) , (VN-3, VCN-4, VC3-6, VC4-3), (VN-3, VCN-4, VC3-3, VC4-6) Comparative Examples 1 to 4 and 3 layers as (VN -3, VC3-3, VC4-3), (VN-3, VCN-4, VC4-3) Comparative Examples 5, 6, and 2 layers, each layer being (VC3-3 And Comparative Example 7 in which the VC4-3), friction coefficient, are compared for durability (limit life).

  The friction coefficients were 0.28 to 0.34 in Invention Examples 1 to 4, and 0.44 to 0.68 in Comparative Examples 1 to 7. That is, the inventive examples 1 to 4 are stable with less friction compared to the comparative examples 1 to 7. In Comparative Examples 1, 3, and 4, the coating film peeled off between the layers at the beginning of running, and the friction coefficient increased. For this reason, it was judged that Comparative Examples 1, 3, and 4 were extremely lacking in durability, and evaluation of deep drawing performance and cutting performance was stopped. In Comparative Example 2, the film peeling between the layers did not occur, but the friction coefficient exceeded 0.5. In Comparative Examples 5 and 7, the friction coefficient was relatively low. Comparative Example 6 showed frictional behavior that gnawed from the beginning, but traveled 1000 m without peeling.

  In Comparative Example 1, VN-1 was very hard, so the load could not be buffered, and peeling was induced. In Comparative Example 3, since VC3-6 did not follow the crystallinity of the layer immediately above and below it, peeling occurred between the layers starting from VC3-6. Inventive Example 4 had a high hardness of VC4-6 exceeding 3000, so that the shear stress increased, the friction coefficient increased, and peeling occurred.

  The low coefficient of friction in Comparative Examples 5 and 7 is the result of the effective operation of VC3-3 and VC4-3, and Comparative Example 6 has a configuration in which the third layer (VC film) is not interposed. When the layer VC4-3 was worn away, the second layer (VCN film) was exposed, resulting in an increased coefficient of friction.

  From the above results, in the laminated composite coating of this example, the outermost layers VC4-2, VC4-3, and VC4-4 exhibit the low friction performance. 3. It was confirmed that VCN-3, VCN-4, and VCN-5 in the second layer and VC3-2, VC3-3, and VC3-4 in the third layer are essential.

Examples of evaluation of the deep drawing press test shown in FIGS.

A cold rolled steel plate (SPCC) and stainless steel (SUS304) blank 140 having a hard vanadium-based composite film formed on a drawing die made of cold tool steel SKD11 by a film forming method using a melt evaporation type ion plating apparatus. Then, a deep drawing test was performed in a completely degreased state. In the figure, 100 is a punch, 120 is a blank holder, 160 is a die holder, 162 is a die, C4 is an R portion of the die, and d is a gradient of the inner diameter of the die.

The drawability was evaluated from the behavior of the processing force applied to the punch 100 when processing 100 shot constants for each material. In addition to Invention Examples 1 to 4 in Table 5, five types of Comparative Examples 2, 5, 6, and 7 were evaluated. The average value of the processing force is shown in Table 5, and the behavior of the processing force is shown in FIGS. .

6 and 7, Invention Example 1 has a low processing force and is stable. Since the cold rolled steel sheet frictionally adhered to the R part C4 of the die 162 at an early stage, the test was forced to be interrupted with 3 shots in Comparative Example 6 and 21 shots in Comparative Example 2. In Comparative Example 7, although constant machining could be performed up to 100 shots, the machining force greatly fluctuated up and down, and it can be seen that adhesion and detachment of the adherend occurred repeatedly. Comparative Example 1 shows a relatively low processing force, but in some places, the influence of the adherent appears in the behavior.

6 and 7 that the present invention has a very low processing force. On the other hand, because the stainless steel was friction-adhered to the R part C4 of the die at an early stage, Comparative Example 2 and Comparative Example 6 had to be interrupted with 6 shots each. Although Comparative Example 5 and Comparative Example 7 were able to process up to 100 shots, it was confirmed that the overall processing force was high and the processing force was up and down.

From the above results, it can be inferred that the vanadium-based composite coating according to the present invention can be narrowed down with a low processing force with respect to any material of SPCC and SUS304, and as a result, the work material is less likely to adhere. it can.

A vanadium-based composite coating is formed on a 6 mm diameter straight drill made of high-speed steel (SKH51) using the melt evaporation type ion plating apparatus as described above, and cutting is performed at the limit life when drilling cannot be performed. The results of evaluating the performance are shown in the graph of FIG. 8 and Table 6 of FIG.

Drill cutting conditions are: work material SCM440C (hardness 28HRC), peripheral speed 40.7m / min, feed rate: 200m / min, feed 0.09mm / rev, blind hole 15mm in an environment using water-soluble cutting fluid After dawn processing.

From FIG. 8, the present invention had no abnormal noise at the initial stage of machining, and was able to increase the number of drilling processes most. In Comparative Example 2, the processing was completed with 15 holes seized early. In Comparative Example 5, Comparative Example 6, and Comparative Example 7, the noise when cutting from the processing initialization was loud, and processing was impossible at an early stage.

Comparative Example 2 has a very high hardness gap with VN-3 due to the presence of extremely high hardness VCN-1, and as a result, the load during cutting cannot be buffered, resulting in delamination and an early life. Greeted. Since VC3-3 was not interposed in Comparative Example 2, interfacial delamination between VCN-3 and VC3-3 occurred. Since the comparative example 3 was not provided with a strong underlayer such as VN-3 and VCN-3, the characteristics of the coating film showing the low friction coefficient of VC3-3 and VC4-3 could not be sufficiently exhibited.

From the above results, it was confirmed that the hard vanadium-based composite coating of the present invention has a favorable influence on the cutting performance due to the intervention of coatings such as VN-3 and VCN-3 which are optimized.

  In the above embodiment, the hard vanadium composite coating is formed on the tool, but the hard vanadium composite coating according to the present invention is applied to machine parts that require wear resistance, such as bearings and other sliding machine parts. Needless to say, it can be applied.

100 Punch 120 Blank holder 140 Blank material 160 Die holder 162 Die C4 R part of the die d Gradient of the inside diameter of the die

Claims (3)

A first layer of a vanadium nitride film formed on the surface of the base material by a PVD method;
A second layer of a vanadium carbonitride film formed on the first layer by a PVD method, wherein the atomic composition ratio of the elements VC and N is

When the atomic ratio of a and b is

A second layer,
When the third layer of the vanadium carbide film formed on the second layer by the PVD method and the atomic composition ratio of the element C is Y,

A third layer,
When the fourth layer of the vanadium carbide film formed on the third layer by the PVD method and the atomic composition ratio of the element C is X,

A fourth layer,
A hard vanadium-based composite coating tool characterized by being coated with a hard vanadium-based composite coating.   The Vickers conversion value by the nano indenter hardness of the first layer is 1500 to 2000, the Vickers conversion value by the nano indenter hardness of the second layer is 2500 to 3000, the nano indenters of the third layer and the fourth layer The hard vanadium-based composite coated jig according to claim 1, wherein a Vickers equivalent value by hardness is 1900 to 2400 and has a lower hardness than the second layer. The second layer is

Or

Oriented in a hexagonal crystal resulting from at least one of the following:

A hard vanadium-based composite coated jig characterized by being oriented in hexagonal crystals caused by

Images