JP2017175659A - Radio communication device and radio communication channel selection method - Google Patents

Abstract

PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide a channel selection method capable of channel selection according to easiness to be influenced by radio wave interference.SOLUTION: A radio communication device includes: an interference degree acquisition unit which acquires a present interference degree of an available channel; a determination unit which determines, on radio communication of an execution target, easiness to be influenced by radio wave interference; and a channel selection unit which, when executing communication determined in the determination unit to be easy to be influenced by the radio wave interference, selects a channel to be used for the radio communication of the execution target, from among available channels, on the basis of the result of acquisition by the interference degree acquisition unit.SELECTED DRAWING: Figure 2

Description

  The present invention relates to wireless communication.

  A wireless communication device (for example, an access point) used for wireless communication can only collect fragment information in a time series for channels other than the communication channel used for communication, and cannot confirm the continuous usage status. there were. In view of this, there is known a technique that takes into account the availability of adjacent channels when selecting a channel based on carrier sense (for example, Patent Document 1).

JP 2008-148215 A

  In the case of the above method, since the wireless communication device can only monitor the channel used for communication and the channel adjacent to this channel, even if there is a wireless communication channel that is not easily affected by radio wave interference, the channel It was difficult to discover and use. In order to discover such a channel for wireless communication, when managing a usable channel in a wide frequency band by introducing a management device such as a wireless switch, it is a cause of complicated network construction and high cost. .

  In view of the above, the problem to be solved by the present invention is that it is not possible to select a channel according to the susceptibility to the influence of radio wave interference while avoiding significant complication of network construction and high cost. In addition, it has been desired to reduce the size of the device, save resources, facilitate manufacturing, improve usability, and the like.

  SUMMARY An advantage of some aspects of the invention is to solve at least a part of the problems described above, and the invention can be implemented as the following forms.

(1) According to one aspect of the present invention, a wireless communication apparatus is provided. The wireless communication apparatus includes: an interference level acquisition unit that acquires a current interference level of a usable channel; a determination unit that determines whether the wireless communication to be executed is easily affected by radio wave interference; and radio wave interference. When performing communication determined by the determination unit as being easily affected by the channel, a channel to be used for the wireless communication to be executed is selected from available channels based on an acquisition result by the interference level acquisition unit A selection unit. According to this aspect, when performing communication determined to be easily affected by radio wave interference (hereinafter also referred to as “specific communication”), the channel used for the specific communication is selected, so that it is easily affected by radio wave interference. The channel can be selected accordingly. In addition, since the above features are realized by a wireless communication device, it is possible to avoid a significant complication and cost increase in network construction.

(2) In the wireless communication device of the above aspect, the determination unit determines that the communication for streaming is susceptible to the influence of radio wave interference. According to this aspect, since the communication for streaming is determined as the specific communication, reproduction by streaming becomes smoother. Streaming in the present application refers to all technologies for reproducing files while downloading, and means a broad concept including technologies generally distinguished from streaming, such as progressive download.

(3) The radio communication apparatus according to the above aspect includes an interference prediction unit that excludes a channel whose interference is predicted based on an acquisition history by the interference degree acquisition unit from candidates selected by the channel selection unit. According to this aspect, since a channel in which interference is predicted based on the interference degree acquisition history is not selected, a channel can be selected in consideration of not only the current interference level but also prediction based on the past history.

(4) The wireless communication apparatus of the above aspect includes a channel maintaining unit that does not cause the channel selection unit to switch channels when the interference of the channel being used is less than a reference value. According to this aspect, when the interference level of the channel in use is less than the reference value, the channel is not switched, so that unnecessary channel switching can be prevented.

(5) In the radio communication apparatus of the above aspect, the channel selection unit excludes a channel in which a radar wave is detected within a predetermined period from available channels. According to this aspect, since the channel in which the radar wave is detected within the predetermined period is excluded from the usable channels, the use of the channel in which the radar wave is detected within the predetermined period can be avoided.

(6) In the radio communication apparatus according to the above aspect, the interference level acquisition unit acquires the interference level of each channel by using FFT for each available channel band. According to this aspect, since the interference level of each channel is acquired using FFT, the interference level of each channel can be acquired in parallel.

  The plurality of constituent elements of each of the embodiments of the present invention described above are not necessarily essential, but to solve part or all of the above-described problems or a part of the effects described in the present specification. Or, in order to achieve all of them, it is possible to change, delete, replace with other new components, or delete some of the limited contents of some components of the plurality of components as appropriate. is there. Further, in order to solve part or all of the above-described problems or to achieve part or all of the effects described in the present specification, technical features included in one embodiment of the present invention described above. A part or all of the technical features included in the other aspects of the present invention described above may be combined to form an independent form of the present invention.

  For example, one embodiment of the present invention can be realized as an apparatus including some or all of the three elements of the interference degree acquisition unit, the determination unit, and the channel selection unit. That is, this apparatus may or may not have an interference degree acquisition unit. Moreover, you may have the determination part and it does not need to have it. The device may or may not have a channel selection unit. For example, the interference degree acquisition unit may acquire the current interference degree of a usable channel when performing communication determined by the determination unit that the influence of radio wave interference is large. For example, the determination unit may determine how easily the wireless communication to be executed is easily affected by radio wave interference. For example, when performing communication determined by the determination unit to be easily affected by radio wave interference, the channel selection unit selects a channel used for the execution target wireless communication from the available channels. You may select based on the acquisition result by an acquisition part. Such a device can be realized as a wireless communication device, for example, but can also be realized as a device other than the wireless communication device. According to such an embodiment, it is possible to solve at least one of various problems such as downsizing of the apparatus, cost reduction, resource saving, easy manufacture, and improvement in usability. Any or all of the technical features of each form of the wireless communication device described above can be applied to this device.

  The present invention can be realized in various forms other than the above. For example, the present invention can be realized in the form of a method for selecting a channel used for wireless communication, a program for realizing the method, a non-temporary storage medium storing the program, and the like.

Outline of network system. The block diagram which shows the outline of an internal structure of a radio | wireless communication apparatus. The flowchart which shows log | history acquisition processing. A bar graph illustrating history information. The flowchart which shows a channel selection process. The flowchart which shows a switching necessity determination process. The flowchart which shows a channel determination process.

  FIG. 1 illustrates an outline of a network system 100 in the present embodiment. The illustrated network system 100 includes a wireless communication device 200 and three client devices 300, 400, and 500.

  The wireless communication device 200 is a wireless LAN access point compliant with IEEE 802.11, and is connected to the Internet INT via a wired cable. The wireless communication apparatus 200 also functions as a third layer router in the OSI reference model, and relays wireless communication and wired communication with the client apparatuses 300, 400, and 500.

  The client device 300 is a personal computer that includes a wired communication interface that conforms to IEEE802.3. The client device 400 is a personal computer provided with a wireless communication interface conforming to IEEE 802.11. The client device 500 is a portable terminal that includes a wireless communication interface compliant with IEEE 802.11. In the example illustrated in FIG. 1, the client device 300 is connected to the wireless communication device 200 by wire, and the client devices 400 and 500 are connected to the wireless communication device 200 wirelessly.

  FIG. 2 is a block diagram illustrating an outline of the internal configuration of the wireless communication apparatus 200. The wireless communication device 200 includes a CPU 210, a RAM 220, a flash ROM 230, a wireless communication unit 240, and a wired communication unit 250. Each component is connected to each other by a bus.

  The CPU 210 functions as a determination unit 211, a channel maintenance unit 213, an interference prediction unit 215, an interference degree acquisition unit 217, and a channel selection unit 219 by executing a program to be described later. The flash ROM 230 stores various programs such as a history acquisition process and a channel selection process described later. The RAM 220 is used when the CPU 210 executes a program.

  The wireless communication unit 240 performs demodulation and generation of data received via the antenna, and generation and modulation of radio waves transmitted via the antenna. The wireless communication unit 240 can execute communication using a 2.4 GHz band channel and communication using a 5 GHz band channel. The wireless communication unit 240 is applied with MIMO and can transmit and receive radio waves using two antennas.

  The wireless communication unit 240 includes an FFT unit 241. The FFT unit 241 analyzes signals received from the two antennas by FFT (Fast Fourier Transform). This analysis is performed to calculate RSSI (Received Signal Strength) for each subcarrier. The RSSI here is the received intensity including the transmission radio wave and noise of other communication terminals, excluding the transmission radio wave of the own terminal. The subcarriers to be analyzed are all subcarriers included in all channels that can be used for communication. For example, in the case of the 5 GHz band, the W52 band (5.17 to 5.25 GHz), the W53 band (5.25 to 5.33 GHz), and the W56 band (5.49 to 5.71 GHz) are targeted. , RSSI every 312.5 kHz is calculated.

  The CPU 210 always performs ISM (In Service Monitoring) for the used channels, and monitors the presence or absence of radar wave detection for each unused channel. The channels to be monitored for radar wave detection are all channels including channels belonging to W53 and channels belonging to W56. Radar wave detection is performed based on the analysis result acquired from the FFT unit 241. This radar wave monitoring can be interpreted as CAC (Channel Availability Check) for non-used channels, and CAC for all channels when power is turned on, and continuous for all channels. It can also be interpreted as an ISM implementation. In any interpretation, radar wave monitoring is performed on all the corresponding channels. Therefore, it is not necessary to perform CAC in accordance with the channel change.

  Radars to be detected target both fixed and mobile radars and have a specific waveform pattern. The fixed radar is, for example, a weather radar, an airport radar, or the like. The mobile radar is, for example, a military radar, a marine radar, or the like. The CPU 210 performs DFS (Dynamic Frequency Selection) so as to satisfy the legal requirements by executing a channel selection process described later.

  The wired communication unit 250 executes processing for adjusting the waveform of the received signal, processing for extracting a MAC frame from the received signal, and the like. The wired communication unit 250 includes a WAN side interface 251 and a LAN side interface 253. The WAN side interface 251 is connected to a line on the Internet INT side. The LAN side interface 253 is connected to the client device 300.

  FIG. 3 is a flowchart showing the history acquisition process. The history acquisition process is always executed by the CPU 210. When the history acquisition process is started, the interference degree acquisition unit 217 of the CPU 210 acquires the RSSI of all subcarriers from the FFT unit 241 (step S310). Subsequently, based on the current time and the acquired RSSI, the CPU 210 updates the RSSI history value and the number of radar wave detections (hereinafter, these two pieces of information are collectively referred to as “history information”) for each channel (step S320). ), The process returns to step S310. However, channels belonging to other than W53 and W56 are not subject to radar wave detection, and therefore are not subject to radar wave detection counting.

  FIG. 4 is a bar graph illustrating history information. The history information shown in FIG. 4 is organized for a certain day of the week for a certain channel. The horizontal axis of the graph indicates the time zone. The history information is calculated based on data acquired during a predetermined period (for example, the latest 10 weeks).

  In the present embodiment, the history information is organized by day of the week and time zone based on the prediction that the history information has some regularity regarding the day of the week and the time zone. In the present embodiment, the time zone classification is not equal, but is determined according to how finely it is preferable to acquire data.

  The RSSI history value is an average of RSSI acquired in a predetermined period. A standard deviation is associated with the history value of RSSI. FIG. 4 shows the standard deviation by error bars. The number of radar wave detections indicates the number of times a radar wave is detected in each time zone in a predetermined period. For example, if the predetermined period is 10 weeks, Mondays from 12:00 to 13:00 are visited 10 times in the predetermined period. The number of radar waves detected during this period is the number of radar wave detections from 12:00 to 13:00 on Monday.

  In FIG. 4, a reference value determined in advance for the history value of RSSI is shown. The reference value of RSSI is used in channel selection processing described later. Since the reference value for the number of radar wave detections is zero in this embodiment, it is not shown in FIG.

  FIG. 5 is a flowchart showing channel selection processing. The channel selection process is executed by the CPU 210 while wireless communication is being executed. When the channel selection process is started, the CPU 210 repeatedly executes a switching necessity selection process (step S400) and a channel determination process (step S500).

  FIG. 6 is a flowchart showing a switching necessity determination process. First, the CPU 210 determines whether a radar wave has been detected in a channel currently used for wireless communication (hereinafter referred to as “current channel”) (step S410). When a radar wave is detected in the current channel (step S410, YES), the switching necessity determination process ends. When the CPU 210 finishes the switching necessity determination process, the CPU 210 executes the channel determination process (step S500) as described above. The channel determination process will be described later with reference to FIG.

  If the radar wave is not detected (step S410, NO), it is determined whether preparation for streaming has started (step S415). Specifically, the CPU 210 determines that “preparation for streaming has started” in step S415 to be executed first after accessing a specific port number. In other cases, the CPU 210 starts “preparation for streaming”. Is not determined. When the preparation for streaming is started (step S415, YES), the switching necessity determination process ends. When preparation for streaming has not been started (step S415, NO), the determination unit 211 of the CPU 210 determines whether streaming is being executed (step S420). If streaming is not being executed (step S420, NO), the process returns to step S410.

  When streaming is being executed (step S420, YES), the channel maintaining unit 213 of the CPU 210 determines whether the current RSSI of the current channel is greater than or equal to a reference value (step S430). The reference value used in step S430 does not have to be the same value as the reference value determined for the history information. Hereinafter, the reference value used in step S430 is referred to as “current reference value”, and the reference value defined in the history information is referred to as “history reference value”.

  If the current RSSI of the current channel is less than the current reference value (step S430, NO), the CPU 210 determines whether the RSSI history value in the current channel is equal to or greater than the history reference value during the execution of streaming (step S440). ). This determination is based on whether the RSSI history value of interest is greater than or equal to the history reference value. The RSSI history value of interest is the RSSI history value corresponding to the day of the week and the time zone to which the period from the current time to the expected end time of the streaming in progress (hereinafter referred to as “streaming period”) belongs. The streaming period may straddle a plurality of time zone classifications shown in FIG. In this case, when the RSSI history value is greater than or equal to the reference value in at least one section, YES is determined in step S440.

  If the history value of RSSI in the current channel does not exceed the history reference value during execution of streaming (step S440, NO), the process returns to step S410. When the RSSI of the current channel becomes equal to or higher than the history reference value during the execution of streaming (step S440, YES), the switching necessity determination process ends. On the other hand, also when the current RSSI of the current channel is greater than or equal to the current reference value (step S430, YES), the switching necessity determination process ends.

  FIG. 7 is a flowchart showing channel determination processing. First, the interference degree acquisition unit 217 of the CPU 210 excludes channels within 30 minutes from detection of radar waves from channels belonging to any of W53 and W56 from the selection candidate channels (step S510). The selection candidate channel is a channel that becomes a migration destination candidate, and by default, all channels including the current channel are applicable.

  Next, for the channel in the 5 GHz band, the CPU 210 selects a selection candidate channel (hereinafter referred to as “good channel”) in which the number of radar wave detections is equal to or less than a reference value and the RSSI history value is less than the history reference value in a streaming period. It is determined whether or not there is (step S520). The “selection candidate channel whose RSSI history value is less than the history reference value” in this determination includes “selection candidate channel whose RSSI history value is greater than or equal to the history reference value and has a large standard deviation”. This is because in the present embodiment, when the standard deviation is large, even if the RSSI history value is large, it is regarded as unreliable as information for exclusion from the selection candidate channel. The case where the standard deviation is large is, for example, the case of 19:00 to 21:00 shown in FIG. 4, and the standard deviation is a predetermined ratio (for example, 30%) or more of the average value.

  If a good channel in the 5 GHz band remains as a selection candidate channel (step S520, YES), the interference prediction unit 215 of the CPU 210 excludes channels other than the good channel in the 5 GHz band from the selection candidate channels (step S530). . In step S530, a good channel in the 5 GHz band is set as a selection candidate channel.

  If a good channel in the 5 GHz band is not left as a selection candidate channel (step S520, NO), the CPU 210 determines whether a good channel in the 2.4 GHz band is left as a selection candidate channel (step S540). When a good channel in the 2.4 GHz band remains as a selection candidate channel (step S540, YES), the interference prediction unit 215 of the CPU 210 excludes channels other than the good channel in the 2.4 GHz band from the selection candidate channels. (Step S550). In step S550, a good channel in the 2.4 GHz band is set as a selection candidate channel.

  If a good channel in the 2.4 GHz band is not left as a selection candidate channel (step S540, NO), step S560 described below is executed without excluding channels other than the good channel from the selection candidate channels.

  After NO in step S540 or after step S530 or step S550, the interference degree acquisition unit 217 of the CPU 210 acquires the current RSSI of each of the selection candidate channels (step S560). Next, the channel selection unit 219 of the CPU 210 determines a channel having the lowest RSSI among the selection candidate channels as a switching destination channel and starts wireless communication using the switching destination channel (step S570). Finish the decision process.

  In step S570, when a channel belonging to W53 or W56 is selected, wireless communication using the selected channel is started without performing one minute CAC again. This is because, as described above, radar wave monitoring is always performed even if one-minute CAC is not performed again, and it is considered that the regulations are substantially satisfied.

  According to this embodiment, at least the following effects can be obtained. (A) When streaming is not being executed (for example, when browsing a website), channel determination processing is not performed, so that it is not necessary to switch channels more than necessary. (B) Since the determination as to whether or not to switch channels is performed based not only on the current RSSI and radar wave detection results but also on historical information, the possibility of wireless communication being interrupted during streaming is reduced. The (C) Since the switching destination channel is not selected at random, but is selected based on the history of RSSI and radar, the possibility of being forced to switch again in a short time after switching is reduced. (D) Since the history is always acquired for all channels by using FFT, the accuracy of interference prediction using the history information is improved. (E) By always performing CAC, it is possible to avoid a one-minute communication disruption associated with normal CAC. (F) The above effect is obtained by the configuration of the wireless communication device 200 and does not require another management device or the like. Therefore, the network configuration is not greatly complicated and the cost is not significantly increased.

As another embodiment, for example, the following can be considered.
Communication other than streaming may be taken into consideration for the necessity of channel switching. For example, a case of downloading a large file or communication associated with an online game can be cited.
The steps relating to the radar wave in the embodiment are determined in consideration of Japanese regulations at the time of filing, and may be changed according to the regulations at the place of implementation and at the time of implementation.
The wireless communication apparatus to which the present invention is applied may be other than a wireless LAN access point. For example, the present invention may be applied to a mobile router or a smartphone having a tethering function.
The method of organizing the history information may not be the day of the week and the time zone. For example, it may be organized only by the time zone regardless of the day of the week.
The period for which history information is targeted may be longer or shorter than the last 10 weeks.
In the embodiment, the function realized by software may be realized by hardware, and the function realized by hardware may be realized by software.

  The present invention is not limited to the embodiments, examples, and modifications of the present specification, and can be implemented with various configurations without departing from the spirit of the present invention. For example, the technical features in the embodiments, examples, and modifications corresponding to the technical features in the embodiments described in the summary section of the invention are to solve some or all of the above-described problems, or In order to achieve part or all of the effects described above, replacement or combination can be performed as appropriate. If the technical feature is not described as essential in this specification, it can be deleted as appropriate.

DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 100 ... Network system 200 ... Wireless communication apparatus 210 ... CPU
211 ... Determination unit 213 ... Channel maintenance unit 215 ... Interference prediction unit 217 ... Interference degree acquisition unit 219 ... Channel selection unit 220 ... RAM
230 ... Flash ROM
DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 240 ... Wireless communication part 241 ... FFT part 250 ... Wired communication part 251 ... WAN side interface 253 ... LAN side interface 300 ... Client apparatus 400 ... Client apparatus 500 ... Client apparatus INT ... Internet

Claims (7)

An interference level acquisition unit for acquiring the current interference level of the available channels;
A determination unit that determines the susceptibility to influence of radio wave interference on wireless communication to be executed,
When executing communication determined by the determination unit as being easily affected by radio wave interference, a channel used for the execution target wireless communication is selected from available channels based on an acquisition result by the interference degree acquisition unit. A wireless communication device comprising: a channel selection unit to select. The wireless communication apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the determination unit determines that the communication for streaming is communication that is easily affected by radio wave interference. The wireless communication apparatus according to claim 1, further comprising: an interference prediction unit that excludes a channel whose interference is predicted based on an acquisition history by the interference degree acquisition unit, from candidates selected by the channel selection unit. The wireless communication apparatus according to any one of claims 1 to 3, further comprising: a channel maintaining unit that prevents the channel selection unit from switching a channel when an interference level of a channel in use is less than a reference value. The radio communication apparatus according to any one of claims 1 to 4, wherein the channel selection unit excludes a channel in which a radar wave is detected within a predetermined period from usable channels. The wireless communication apparatus according to any one of claims 1 to 5, wherein the interference level acquisition unit acquires an interference level of each channel by using an FFT targeting a band of each usable channel. . A channel selection method for wireless communication that selects a channel to be used for wireless communication based on the degree of interference acquired for a usable channel when it is determined that the wireless communication to be executed is easily affected by radio wave interference.

Images