JP2016177402A - Fall detection terminal and program - Google Patents

Abstract

PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide a fall detection terminal capable of highly accurately determining a fall possibility of a user.SOLUTION: A fall detection terminal comprises: an acceleration sensor 2 that detects an acceleration generated by the movement of the fall detection terminal to output acceleration data; an impact detection part 16 that detects, from the acceleration data, a peak value P of acceleration exceeding a predetermined reference value to calculate a total amount h of changes in acceleration in a predetermined period; and a fall determination part 18 that determines a fall possibility of a user, on the basis of the total amount h (change amount peak ratio r) of changes in a predetermined period corresponding to the detection time of the peak value P with respect to the peak value P.SELECTED DRAWING: Figure 1

Description

  The present invention relates to a fall detection terminal having a function of detecting a fall of a user (carrier).

  Conventionally, methods for detecting a person's fall have been proposed. For example, in the method of Patent Document 1, the absolute value of the acceleration digital signal value (acceleration absolute value) obtained from an acceleration sensor attached to a human trunk is greater than or equal to a threshold value, that is, in normal operation such as walking. A person's fall is detected based on whether a large acceleration that is rarely detected is detected.

JP 2009-163538 A

  However, there are a wide variety of fall modes, and it is often difficult to detect with the conventional fall detection methods. For example, when a strong arm is shaken, a large change in acceleration occurs even in a motion that does not involve a collision (impact). Therefore, simply observing only the absolute value (peak value) of acceleration distinguishes a fall from a daily action. There was a problem that it was difficult to do.

  The present invention has been made in view of the above problems, and an object of the present invention is to provide a fall detection terminal capable of determining a user's fall possibility with high accuracy.

  The fall detection terminal of the present invention is a fall detection terminal that is carried by a user and detects the fall of the user, an acceleration sensor that detects acceleration caused by the movement of the fall detection terminal and outputs acceleration data; and Peak detecting means for detecting a peak value of acceleration exceeding a predetermined reference value from acceleration data, total change calculating means for calculating the total change amount of the acceleration during a predetermined period, and a predetermined period corresponding to the detection of the peak value A fall determination means for judging the possibility of the user to fall based on the magnitude of the total change amount with respect to the peak value.

  With this configuration, the peak value of acceleration and the total change amount of acceleration during a predetermined period are calculated, and the user can fall over based on the magnitude of the total change amount during the predetermined period corresponding to the peak detection for that peak value Sex is determined. For example, the maximum value of the total change amount in the vicinity at the time of peak detection is used as a comparison target with the peak value. Even in daily operations, a peak (acceleration peak value) similar to that at the time of falling may be detected. However, since the change in acceleration becomes severe when an impact is applied, the total amount of change becomes large. Further, the greater the acceleration that forms the peak, the greater the total change amount. Therefore, by using the magnitude of the total amount of change with respect to the peak value, it is possible to distinguish a daily motion that causes a large acceleration peak from a fall. Thereby, compared with the case where it determines only from a peak value, or the case where it determines only from the variation | change_quantity, a user's fall possibility can be determined with high precision.

  In the fall detection terminal of the present invention, the fall determination means may determine that the user is more likely to fall as the ratio of the total change amount to the peak value is larger.

  With this configuration, it is determined that the possibility of the user falling is higher as the ratio of the total change amount to the peak value is larger. In this way, the possibility of the user falling can be determined with high accuracy.

  In the fall detection terminal of the present invention, the peak detection means calculates a first evaluation value indicating the possibility of the user to fall based on a ratio of the total change amount to the peak value, and the fall determination means May determine whether or not the user has fallen based on the first evaluation value and a comprehensive evaluation value obtained by comprehensively evaluating a second evaluation value different from the first evaluation value.

  With this configuration, the first evaluation value indicating the possibility of the user falling is calculated based on the ratio of the total change amount to the peak value. Then, based on the comprehensive evaluation value that comprehensively evaluates the first evaluation value and the second evaluation value (second evaluation value different from the first evaluation value), it is determined whether the user has fallen (falling determination). Is done. Thereby, compared with the case where it determines from only one evaluation value (for example, peak value of acceleration), a highly accurate fall determination can be performed.

  In the fall detection terminal of the present invention, the fall detection terminal further detects a fall characteristic that appears when the fall detection terminal falls freely from the acceleration data, and indicates a fall possibility based on the fall characteristic. A fall detection means for calculating an evaluation value is provided, and the fall determination means uses the fall evaluation value as the second evaluation value, and adds the first evaluation value and the second evaluation value to obtain the total evaluation value. You may ask for it.

  With this configuration, the fall possibility (fall evaluation value) based on the drop characteristic is obtained from the drop characteristic that appears when the fall detection terminal falls freely. The fall evaluation value is used as the second evaluation value, and the first evaluation value and A total evaluation value is obtained by adding the second evaluation values. And based on the comprehensive evaluation value calculated | required in this way, the determination (falling determination) of whether the user fell is performed. As a result, it is possible to perform the fall determination with higher accuracy than in the case where the determination is made based solely on the peak value of the acceleration or simply based on the drop characteristic.

  The program of the present invention is a program executed by a fall detection terminal that detects a fall of a user, and detects acceleration generated by the movement of the fall detection terminal and outputs acceleration data to the fall detection terminal. An acceleration sensor is provided, and the program causes the computer to detect a peak value of acceleration exceeding a predetermined reference value from the acceleration data, to calculate a total change amount of the acceleration in a predetermined period, And a process of determining the possibility of the user falling based on the magnitude of the total change amount with respect to the peak value during a predetermined period corresponding to the detection of the peak value.

  Also with this program, the peak value of acceleration is compared with the total change amount of acceleration in a predetermined period corresponding to the detection of the peak value, as in the above terminal, and based on the magnitude of the total change amount with respect to the peak value, The possibility of the user falling is determined. Even in daily activities, a peak (acceleration peak value) similar to that at the time of a fall may be detected, but by using the total amount of change with respect to the peak value, it is possible to distinguish such an everyday action from a fall. it can. Thereby, compared with the case where it determines only from a peak value, or the case where it determines only from the variation | change_quantity, a user's fall possibility can be determined with high precision.

  According to the present invention, it is possible to determine a user's possibility of falling with high accuracy based on the magnitude of the total change amount with respect to the peak value.

It is a block diagram of a fall detection terminal in an embodiment of the present invention. (A) It is a figure which shows an example of the acceleration data of a fall. (B) It is a figure which shows an example of the acceleration data of non-falling (when a hand is collided with a wall). (A) It is a figure which shows an example of the acceleration data of the fall at the time of rest. (B) It is a figure which shows an example of the acceleration data of the fall during walking. (C) It is a figure which shows an example of the acceleration data of the fall during driving | running | working. It is a figure which shows an example of the acceleration data for demonstrating the calculation method of an acceleration change amount. (A) It is a figure which shows an example of the data of the acceleration at the time of a fall, and an acceleration change amount. (B) It is a figure which shows an example of the data of the acceleration at the time of an exercise | movement (non-falling) and an acceleration change amount. It is a flowchart for operation | movement description of the fall detection terminal in embodiment of this invention.

  Hereinafter, a fall detection terminal according to an embodiment of the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings. In the present embodiment, a case of a fall detection terminal used in a monitoring system or the like that detects the fall of an elderly person is exemplified. The function of the fall detection terminal (fall detection function) can be realized by a program stored in a memory or the like of the terminal.

  The fall detection terminal is a terminal device carried by a user (such as an elderly person). For example, the fall detection terminal is composed of a wristband type (watch type) wearable terminal, and a user (such as an elderly person) is worn on the wrist or arm. The fall detection terminal may be a pendant type that hangs from the neck, a head-mounted type that is attached to the head or ear, or a waist-mounted type such as a belt type.

  First, the configuration of the fall detection terminal of the present embodiment will be described with reference to the drawings. FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing the configuration of the fall detection terminal of the present embodiment. As shown in FIG. 1, the fall detection terminal 1 includes an acceleration sensor 2, a mounting sensor 3, an altitude sensor 4, and an emergency button 5. The fall detection terminal 1 includes an operation display unit 6, a vibration unit 7, a power supply unit 8, a wireless communication unit 9, and a monitoring control unit 10.

  The acceleration sensor 2 is a sensor having a function of detecting a user's movement and outputting movement data (acceleration data) indicating the movement of the user, and is composed of, for example, a three-axis acceleration sensor. The acceleration sensor 2 outputs acceleration data detected at a predetermined sampling period. The mounting sensor 3 is a sensor having a function of detecting a mounting state (whether or not it is mounted) on a human body (arm). For example, a capacitive sensor or the like can be used to electrically detect contact and proximity of a human body mounting site. It consists of sensors that can be detected automatically. The altitude sensor 4 is a sensor having a function of detecting a change in the height of the terminal using a change in atmospheric pressure or the like, and is composed of, for example, an atmospheric pressure sensor. The emergency button 5 is an operation unit (emergency operation unit) for a user to make an emergency report in an emergency.

  The operation display unit 6 includes, for example, a touch panel display, and includes a function for displaying various information such as abnormality notification (information display function) and a function for performing various input operations such as a cancel operation (input operation function). Yes. The vibration unit 7 is composed of a vibration device or the like, and has a function of notifying a user of an abnormality or operation acceptance by a stimulus by vibration. The power supply unit 8 includes a battery such as a battery. The wireless communication unit 9 has a function of performing wireless communication with a security terminal 12 installed in a remote monitoring center 11 via, for example, a mobile communication network. In addition, the wireless communication unit 9 has a function of performing wireless communication with a security terminal (not shown) installed in the house by Bluetooth (registered trademark) or specific low power wireless.

  The monitoring control unit 10 is an emergency monitor having a function of performing emergency monitoring based on input from each sensor (acceleration sensor 2, wearing sensor 3, altitude sensor 4) and operation unit (emergency button 5, operation display unit 6). A life monitoring unit 14 having a function of performing life monitoring, and a fall monitoring unit 15 having a function of performing fall monitoring. In addition, the monitoring control unit 10 has a function of controlling each unit of the fall detection terminal 1.

  The emergency monitoring unit 13 has a function of making an emergency report to the monitoring center 11 when the user operates the emergency button 5 in response to an emergency response. For example, if the emergency button 5 is kept pressed for 2 seconds, it is determined that the emergency is abnormal, the emergency abnormality is notified to the monitoring center 11, and the fact that the abnormality is confirmed is notified to the surroundings by vibration, screen, sound, light, or the like. Since the emergency abnormality is an abnormality caused by conscious operation, the cancel operation is not accepted. In addition, even if a life abnormality or a fall abnormality (described later) occurs, if an emergency abnormality occurs, the emergency abnormality takes priority.

  Based on the output of the acceleration sensor 2, the life monitoring unit 14 monitors whether the user (carrier or wearer) is moving to an extent that occurs in daily life, and confirms that the state where the user cannot move due to sudden illness or the like continues. It has a function to report. The life monitoring unit 14 performs life monitoring when in the wearing state (mounted state). For example, a user's movement (body movement) is detected from the output of the acceleration sensor 2, and it is determined that there is a life abnormality if body movement at the daily life level does not occur continuously for a certain period (for example, 1 hour). If it is determined that the life is abnormal, the user is notified by vibration, screen, sound, light, or the like. The life monitoring unit 14 cancels the life abnormality when the body movement is detected during a predetermined cancel time (for example, 10 seconds) or a cancel operation is input after determining / notifying the life abnormality ( Do not report errors). The body movement detection process is the same as the process in the fall monitoring (described later).

  The fall monitoring unit 15 has a function of automatically detecting the fall of a user (carried person, wearer) based on the output of the acceleration sensor 2 and reporting the occurrence of a fall accident. The fall monitoring unit 15 performs fall monitoring when in the mounted state (mounted state). In this case, “impact” and “free fall characteristics” are detected from the output of the acceleration sensor 2, and the detection result is evaluated to detect a fall. Then, after detecting a fall, if a body movement such as standing up and walking cannot be detected for a predetermined time (for example, 15 seconds), it is determined that the fall is abnormal. This predetermined time does not include several seconds (for example, 5 seconds) immediately after the fall detection. If it is determined that the fall is abnormal, the user is notified of this by vibration, screen, sound, light, or the like. The fall monitoring unit 15 performs a process of canceling the fall abnormality (not reporting an abnormality) when a cancel operation is input during a predetermined cancel time (for example, 20 seconds) after determining and notifying that the fall is abnormal.

  Here, the basic logic of the fall detection will be described with reference to FIG. The fall monitoring unit 15 evaluates the impact applied to the terminal during the fall and the drop characteristics generated in the process of the fall, and detects the fall. In particular, in the present invention, the final fall determination is performed by comprehensively evaluating the fallability based on the impact and the fallability based on the drop characteristic. As a configuration for this, the fall monitoring unit 15 includes an impact detection unit 16, a fall detection unit 17, and a fall determination unit 18.

  The impact detection unit 16 has a function of detecting an impact generated in the fall detection terminal 1 from the acceleration data and calculating an impact evaluation value indicating the possibility of the fall based on the impact. Since the fall involves a body collision with the ground or the like, the acceleration changes greatly due to an impact applied to the fall detection terminal 1. Therefore, the impact detection unit 16 is configured to detect an impact applied to the terminal at the time of falling based on the peak value of acceleration.

2 and 3 are diagrams showing examples of acceleration data. In this case, as preprocessing, acceleration data output for each of the three axes (X axis, Y axis, Z axis) is scalarized and subjected to moving average processing (low-pass filter). The impact detection unit 16 detects an acceleration peak (time T1) equal to or greater than a predetermined threshold (for example, 30 m / sec ² ), and obtains the peak value P. And the impact detection part 16 calculates | requires the impact evaluation value Es based on the peak value P by using the following formula | equation 1, for example. Here, c is an adjustment coefficient for comprehensive evaluation.
Es = P × c (Formula 1)

The fall detection unit 17 has a function of detecting a fall characteristic that appears when the fall detection terminal 1 freely falls from the acceleration data, and calculating a fall evaluation value that indicates a fall possibility based on the fall characteristic. Since the fall is a phenomenon that causes a fall toward the ground, the acceleration during the fall is smaller than the gravitational acceleration (9.8 m / sec ² ). Therefore, the fall detection unit 17 goes back from the acceleration peak (time T1), finds the intersection with the gravitational acceleration (time T2), and calculates the average acceleration value A from that point to a certain period before (time T3). To do. A period from time T3 to time T2 (for example, 500 msec) can be called a fall determination period. And the fall detection part 17 calculates | requires the fall evaluation value Ef based on the acceleration average value A by using the following formula | equation 2, for example. Here, a is a drop standard constant, and b is an adjustment coefficient for comprehensive evaluation.
Ef = (a−A) × b (Formula 2)

The constant a is an acceleration serving as a reference point for discriminating whether or not there is a drop characteristic, and for example, 8 m / sec ² or gravity acceleration 9.8 m / sec ² is used. If the acceleration average value A is smaller than the constant a, the drop evaluation value Ef takes a positive value.

The fall determination unit 18 has a function of determining whether or not the user has fallen based on a comprehensive evaluation value obtained by comprehensively evaluating the impact evaluation value and the drop evaluation value. There are various modes of falling, and there are cases where the impact is large and the drop characteristics are remarkable, but there are cases where the impact is small and the drop characteristics are noticeable. Therefore, the fall determination unit 18 obtains the overall evaluation value Et by adding the impact evaluation value and the drop evaluation value by using the following expression 3, and when the overall evaluation value is equal to or more than the reference value Th for the fall determination, To detect a person's fall.
Et = Es + Ef (Formula 3)

  In this fall determination part 18, the automatic cancellation determination by a body movement detection is performed. Even if a fall is detected, it is considered that the user is not in a dangerous state if body movement is detected thereafter, so the fall determination unit 18 automatically cancels the fall detection. In this body movement detection (automatic cancellation determination), body movement at a predetermined delay time (for example, 5 seconds) from the peak time point (T1) when the fall determination is made is ignored, and subsequent body movement determination time (for example, 15 seconds). ) To determine whether there is any body movement. The presence or absence of body movement is determined by observing the peak value of acceleration or the amount of change. For example, body movement is detected when a peak value equal to or greater than a predetermined threshold is detected a predetermined number of times, or when the sum of the peak values exceeds a certain value. Alternatively, when the total amount of change in acceleration over a certain period (eg, several seconds) or body movement determination time exceeds a certain value, or when the amount of change in acceleration per unit time exceeds a certain value, Is detected. If no body movement is detected after the automatic cancellation determination, that is, by the time when the body movement determination time elapses, the fall determination unit 18 determines the fall abnormality.

  Further, the fall determination unit 18 performs fall determination in consideration of the user's activity status (activity amount). The impact and drop characteristics obtained differ depending on the manner of falling, such as whether or not there is consciousness or whether or not it is moving violently. Therefore, the fall determination unit 18 calculates the activity amount of the user from the acceleration data, and weights the impact evaluation value and the fall evaluation value according to the activity amount of the user in a predetermined period with respect to the time of occurrence of the impact. In addition, a comprehensive evaluation value is obtained.

  That is, the fall determination unit 18 does not simply obtain the overall evaluation value as “Et = Es + Ef”, but weights each evaluation value (Es, Ef) according to the user's activity status (activity amount) at the time of the fall. Are added together to obtain a comprehensive evaluation value Et. In this case, the activity state (activity amount) of the user is analyzed by analyzing the movement in a certain period (activity determination period) before a fall (impact) is detected, and the acceleration data (for example, 3 seconds) ( (Peak and change amount). Note that the above-described fall determination period (for example, the period from time T3 to time T2) includes the movement during the fall, so this activity determination period (for example, the period from time T4 to time T3). The period after the fall determination period (for example, the period from time T3 to time T1) is not included, and the period before the fall determination period is set (see FIG. 3).

Specifically, the fall determination unit 18 obtains an amount of exercise W that is a total amount of change in acceleration during the activity determination period, and determines an activity status (motion intensity) by comparing the amount of exercise W with an activity reference value. . The amount of exercise W is obtained by, for example, integrating the differences of acceleration data (scalarized acceleration data a1, a2,..., An−1, an) in the activity determination period by using the following expression 4. Can do. This momentum W may be calculated for each of the three axes (X axis, Y axis, Z axis), or may be calculated as the sum or average of the three axes.
W = | a1-a2 | + | a2-a3 | +... || an-1-an | (Formula 4)

  The amount of exercise W can also be obtained based on the magnitude of the peak value and the number of detections. For example, the amount of exercise W may be the number of times a peak value above a certain level is detected, the sum of the peak values, or the number of times weighted by the maximum or average of the peak values.

  In the present embodiment, the fall determination unit 18 determines that the user is in a resting state when the exercise amount W of the user in the activity determination period is smaller than the first reference activity amount Th1, and the exercise amount W of the user is the first reference amount. When the activity amount Th1 is equal to or greater than the second reference activity amount Th2, it is determined to be in the normal state, and when the user's exercise amount W is equal to or greater than the second reference activity amount Th2, it is determined to be the exercise state. To do. And in the resting state, compared to the normal state, the fall evaluation value is weighted higher than the impact evaluation value to obtain a comprehensive evaluation value, and in the exercise state, compared with the normal state Then, the impact evaluation value is weighted higher than the drop evaluation value to obtain a comprehensive evaluation value.

  In the present embodiment, the impact detection unit 16 detects a peak value of acceleration exceeding a predetermined reference value from the acceleration data, and calculates a total change amount of acceleration during a predetermined period corresponding to the detection of the peak value. And the fall determination part 18 determines the possibility of the said user's fall based on the magnitude | size of the total variation | change_quantity with respect to a peak value. Specifically, it is determined that the possibility of the user falling is higher as the ratio of the total change amount to the peak value is larger. In this case, the impact detection unit 16 calculates an evaluation value (impact evaluation value) indicating the possibility of the user falling based on the ratio of the total change amount to the peak value.

When an impact occurs like a fall, the sensor is strongly shaken, so that the output of each axis of the three-axis acceleration sensor 2 changes more rapidly than the acceleration generated in daily life. That is, the acceleration change amount h increases. Therefore, the acceleration change amount h is calculated by integrating the acceleration change amount in a certain period in the scalarized acceleration data. For example, by using the following formula 5, the absolute value of the difference from the immediately preceding acceleration is obtained for acceleration data (a1, a2,..., A5) within a predetermined period (for example, 100 msec) and integrated over this period. (See FIG. 4). The impact detection unit 16 obtains an acceleration change amount h for a predetermined period before and after the acceleration data obtained sequentially, or obtains an acceleration change amount h for each predetermined period with the predetermined period (for example, 100 msec) as one cycle. Here, the acceleration change amount h may be calculated for each of the three axes (X axis, Y axis, and Z axis), and may be calculated as the sum or average of the three axes.
h = | a1-a2 | + | a2-a3 | +... + | a4-a5 | (Formula 5)

  FIG. 5 is a diagram showing an example of data of acceleration and acceleration change amount, (a) is data at the time of falling with impact, and (b) is data at the time of exercise without impact (strongly swinging the arm). is there. In FIG. 5, the acceleration is illustrated by a solid line, and the acceleration change amount is illustrated by hatching. As described above, when comparing an acceleration change accompanied by an impact with an acceleration change that occurs in daily life, the magnitude of the acceleration peak (peak value P) can occur at an equivalent level or more, but the magnitude of the acceleration peak is equivalent. If so, the acceleration change amount h increases with an impact. For this reason, the ratio r of the acceleration change amount h with respect to the acceleration peak (peak value P) increases in the acceleration change accompanied by the impact. Therefore, the fall determination unit 18 determines the possibility of fall based on the ratio r. In this case, the fall determination unit 18 may not use another fall determination index such as a drop characteristic in combination.

Specifically, the impact detection unit 16 has a plurality of accelerations calculated for a certain period of time (for example, 100 msec, 50 msec before and after) for a peak of acceleration equal to or greater than a predetermined threshold (for example, 30 m / sec ² ). The ratio r with the peak value P is calculated by using the maximum value hx of the amount of change h and using Equation 6 below. Although the acceleration change amount h calculated at the peak time (targeting acceleration data for a predetermined period before and after the peak time) may be used as it is, the timing at which the maximum value of the acceleration change amount h is obtained is different from the peak appearance time. Therefore, it is preferable to use the maximum value of the acceleration change amount in the vicinity of the peak appearance (a certain period including the peak time).
r = hx / P (Formula 6)

Further, the impact detection unit 16 obtains the impact evaluation value Es based on the ratio r using the following Expression 7. Here, c is an adjustment coefficient for comprehensive evaluation, and Th is an impact reference value (for example, 0.28). In this case, the impact evaluation value is calculated such that Es increases as the ratio r increases. A value obtained by multiplying the ratio r by the adjustment coefficient c may be used as the impact evaluation value Es.
Es = (r−Th) × c (Formula 7)

  Using the impact evaluation value Es obtained in this manner, the fall determination unit 18 detects the fall of the user. That is, the fall determination unit 18 determines that the possibility of falling is higher as the ratio r is larger. In the case of the above (formula 7), when the ratio r is equal to or greater than the predetermined impact reference value Th, it is determined that there is a possibility of falling.

  Next, with respect to the fall detection terminal 1 of the present embodiment, an operation in a case where the fall determination is performed by impact evaluation without using drop evaluation will be described with reference to the flowchart of FIG. In the fall detection terminal 1 of the present embodiment, first, the peak value P is detected from the acceleration data (S1), and the total change amount h of acceleration in a predetermined period (for example, 100 msec, 50 msec before and after) when the peak is detected. Is calculated (S2). And based on the magnitude | size (change amount peak ratio r) of the total change amount h with respect to the peak value P, a user's fall possibility is determined (S3). When the possibility of falling (impact evaluation value) is higher than the reference, it is determined that the vehicle falls.

  If it is determined to fall, the fall flag is turned ON (S4). Thereafter, body motion detection (automatic cancellation determination) is performed. If body movement is detected (S5), the fall flag is turned off (S6). On the other hand, if no body movement is detected (S5), after a predetermined cancellation time has elapsed (S7), a fall abnormality is determined (S8).

  According to such a fall detection terminal 1 of the present embodiment, the acceleration peak value P and the acceleration total change amount h in a predetermined period with respect to the time of detection of the peak value P are calculated, and the peak value P Based on the magnitude of the total change amount h relative to (change amount peak ratio r), the possibility of the user falling is determined. Even in daily operations, a peak (acceleration peak value P) similar to that at the time of falling may be detected, but according to the present embodiment, the magnitude of the total change amount h with respect to the peak value P is used. Thus, it is possible to distinguish between such daily activities and falls. Thereby, compared with the case where it determines only from a peak value, or the case where it determines only from the variation | change_quantity, a user's fall possibility can be determined with high precision.

  Specifically, it is determined that the possibility of the user falling is higher as the ratio r of the total change amount h to the peak value P is larger. In this way, the possibility of the user falling can be determined with high accuracy.

  In the present embodiment, the first evaluation value (impact evaluation value Es) indicating the possibility of the user falling is calculated based on the ratio r of the total change amount h to the peak value P. Then, based on the comprehensive evaluation value Et obtained by comprehensively evaluating the first evaluation value Es and the separately obtained second evaluation value Ef, it is determined whether or not the user has fallen (falling determination). Thereby, compared with the case where it determines from only one evaluation value (for example, peak value of acceleration), a highly accurate fall determination can be performed.

  In this case, a fall possibility (drop evaluation value Ef) based on the drop characteristic is obtained from the drop characteristic that appears when the fall detection terminal 1 freely falls, and the first evaluation is performed with the drop evaluation value Ef as the second evaluation value. The overall evaluation value Et is obtained by adding the value Es and the second evaluation value Ef. Then, based on the comprehensive evaluation value Et obtained in this way, a determination is made as to whether or not the user has fallen (falling determination). As a result, it is possible to perform the fall determination with higher accuracy than in the case where the determination is made based solely on the peak value of the acceleration or simply based on the drop characteristic.

  In the present embodiment, the fall detection unit 18 is configured to obtain the drop evaluation value Ef based on the average acceleration value A during the fall determination period, but instead of the acceleration average value A, the fall detection period 18 A configuration may be adopted in which a drop is detected based on a continuous time or an accumulated time in which an acceleration lower than a minimum acceleration or a reference acceleration (the above constant a) is detected.

  The embodiments of the present invention have been described above by way of example, but the scope of the present invention is not limited to these embodiments, and can be changed or modified according to the purpose within the scope of the claims. is there.

  As described above, the fall detection terminal according to the present invention has the effect of being able to determine the possibility of a user's fall with high accuracy, and is useful for a monitoring system that detects the fall of an elderly person. It is.

DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 1 Fall detection terminal 2 Acceleration sensor 3 Wear sensor 4 Altitude sensor 5 Emergency button 6 Operation display part 7 Vibration part 8 Power supply part 9 Wireless communication part 10 Monitoring control part 11 Monitoring center 12 Security terminal 13 Emergency monitoring part 14 Life monitoring part 15 Fall Monitoring unit 16 Impact detection unit (peak detection means, total change amount calculation means)
17 Fall detection unit (fall detection means)
18 Fall determination unit (fall determination means)

Claims (5)

In a fall detection terminal that is carried by a user and detects the fall of the user,
An acceleration sensor that detects acceleration caused by the movement of the fall detection terminal and outputs acceleration data;
Peak detection means for detecting a peak value of acceleration exceeding a predetermined reference value from the acceleration data;
A total change amount calculating means for calculating a total change amount of the acceleration in a predetermined period;
A fall judging means for judging the possibility of the user to fall based on the magnitude of the total change amount in the predetermined period corresponding to the detection of the peak value with respect to the peak value;
A fall detection terminal comprising:   2. The fall detection terminal according to claim 1, wherein the fall determination unit determines that the user is more likely to fall as the ratio of the total change amount to the peak value is larger. The peak detection means calculates a first evaluation value indicating a fall possibility of the user based on a ratio of the total change amount to the peak value,
The fall determination means determines whether the user has fallen based on a comprehensive evaluation value obtained by comprehensively evaluating the first evaluation value and a second evaluation value different from the first evaluation value. The fall detection terminal according to Item 2. The fall detection terminal is
Furthermore, it comprises a drop detection means for detecting a fall characteristic that appears when the fall detection terminal falls freely from the acceleration data, and calculating a fall evaluation value indicating a fall possibility based on the fall characteristic,
The fall detection terminal according to claim 3, wherein the fall determination means obtains the comprehensive evaluation value by adding the first evaluation value and the second evaluation value, with the fall evaluation value as the second evaluation value. . A program executed on a fall detection terminal that detects a user's fall,
The fall detection terminal includes an acceleration sensor that detects acceleration caused by the movement of the fall detection terminal and outputs acceleration data.
The program detects a peak value of acceleration exceeding a predetermined reference value from the acceleration data in a computer;
A process of calculating a total change amount of the acceleration in a predetermined period;
A process of determining the possibility of the user falling based on the magnitude of the total change amount with respect to the peak value in a predetermined period corresponding to the detection of the peak value;
A program characterized by having executed.

Images