JP2016177330A - Paper sheet information processing system and paper sheet information processing method - Google Patents

Abstract

PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide a paper sheet information processing system capable of quantitatively determining whether an authenticity determination element provided to paper sheets is effective for forgery prevention and a paper sheet information processing method.SOLUTION: An information processing system 1 for processing information on bank bills is structured through connecting a device in a branch office 2 to a device in the head office 3 via a network 4. A determination part of a bank bill processor 10 determines the authenticity of a plurality of authenticity determination elements read from a bank bill. A database of a server 30 stores an authenticity determination result for each authenticity determination element determined by the determination part for each bank bill. A statistical processing part of a statistical processor 40 generates an effectiveness for forgery of each authenticity determination element of a bank bill as numerical index information through statistically processing the authenticity determination results stored in the database. A display part 42 displays the index information generated by the statistical processing part.SELECTED DRAWING: Figure 1

Description

  The present invention relates to a paper sheet information processing system that displays an index for determining whether or not a forgery prevention element applied to a paper sheet for determining the authenticity of the paper sheet is effective for the authenticity determination. And a paper sheet information processing method.

  Currently, paper sheets such as banknotes are subjected to authenticity determination elements from various viewpoints such as print patterns and magnetic bands in order to detect counterfeit tickets. The apparatus for processing paper sheets is provided with detection means corresponding to the authenticity determination element, and the authenticity of the paper sheet to be processed is determined based on the detection result from the detection means.

  In Patent Document 1 below, every time a rejection ticket is detected by the main controller, all exclusion factors related to the rejection ticket are transmitted to the operation / maintenance terminal, and the exclusion factors are displayed in real time on the operation / maintenance terminal. The structure to be described is described. According to this configuration, when a paper sheet is removed, it is possible to confirm an exclusion factor related to the paper sheet, and thereby it is possible to confirm an exclusion factor of each paper sheet.

JP 2002-197505 A

  However, in Patent Document 1, although the exclusion factor can be confirmed for each paper sheet, it is immediately determined from the display contents whether the authenticity determination element applied to the paper sheet is effective in preventing forgery. It was difficult to do.

  In view of such problems, the present invention provides a paper sheet information processing system and a paper sheet that can quantitatively determine whether or not the authenticity determination element applied to the paper sheet is effective in preventing counterfeiting. An object is to provide an information processing method.

  A first aspect of the present invention relates to a paper sheet information processing system that processes information related to paper sheets. The paper sheet information processing system according to this aspect includes a determination unit that determines the authenticity of a plurality of true / false determination elements read from a paper sheet, and a determination result of authenticity for each of the authenticity determination elements by the determination unit A database unit for storing each paper sheet, and the statistical processing of the authenticity determination result stored in the database unit, thereby improving the effectiveness of each authenticity determination element of the paper sheet against forgery. A statistical processing unit that is generated as digitized index information, and a display unit that displays the index information generated by the statistical processing unit.

  A second aspect of the present invention relates to a paper sheet information processing method for processing information related to paper sheets. The paper sheet information processing method according to this aspect determines the authenticity of a plurality of authenticity determination elements read from the paper sheet, and determines the authenticity determination result for each authenticity determination element for each of the paper sheets. Storing and statistically processing the stored true / false determination result, thereby generating the effectiveness against counterfeiting of each authenticity determination element of the paper sheet as digitized index information, Display index information.

  According to the present invention, since the effectiveness against forgery of the authenticity determination element applied to the paper sheet is displayed as digitized index information, the user can refer to the index information by referring to the index information. It is possible to quantitatively determine whether or not the authenticity determination element applied to the leaves is effective for preventing forgery. Therefore, according to the present invention, it is possible to provide a paper sheet information processing system and a paper sheet information processing method capable of quantitatively determining the validity of the authenticity determination element applied to the paper sheet. it can.

  The effects and significance of the present invention will become more apparent from the following description of embodiments. However, the embodiment described below is merely an example when the present invention is implemented, and the present invention is not limited to what is described in the following embodiment.

FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram illustrating an overall configuration of an information processing system according to an embodiment. Fig.2 (a)-(d) is a block diagram which respectively shows the structure of the banknote processing apparatus which concerns on embodiment, information processing apparatus, a server, and a statistics processing apparatus. Fig.3 (a)-(c) is a schematic diagram which shows the authenticity determination element currently applied to the genuine note of the banknote which concerns on embodiment, FIG.3 (d)-(f) is embodiment. It is a schematic diagram which shows the type of the forged ticket of the banknote which concerns on. FIGS. 4A and 4B are conceptual diagrams showing a database according to the embodiment. FIG. 5 is a flowchart showing a process for registering registration data in the database in the forged ticket registration mode according to the embodiment. FIGS. 6A and 6B are diagrams showing configurations of a counterfeit ticket registration screen and a serial number correction screen according to the embodiment, respectively. FIGS. 7A and 7B are diagrams showing the configurations of a search setting screen and a search result screen according to the embodiment, respectively. FIG. 8 is a diagram illustrating a configuration of a registration data screen according to the embodiment. FIG. 9 is a flowchart showing a process for displaying information aggregated based on the database according to the embodiment. FIGS. 10A to 10C are diagrams showing configurations of the aggregation setting screen, the combination list screen, and the element list screen, respectively, according to the embodiment. FIG. 11 is a diagram illustrating a transition screen according to the embodiment. FIGS. 12A and 12B are diagrams illustrating the configuration of a search result screen according to the embodiment. FIG. 13 is a diagram for explaining the effect of the tabulation result list on the combination list screen according to the embodiment.

  In the following embodiment, an example in which the present invention is applied to an information processing system that processes information related to banknotes is shown.

  In the present embodiment, the information processing system 1 corresponds to the “paper sheet information processing system” recited in the claims. The database 32a corresponds to a “database unit” recited in the claims.

<System configuration>
FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram illustrating an overall configuration of an information processing system 1 according to an embodiment. As shown in FIG. 1, the central bank has a plurality of branches 2 and a head office 3 that supervises the branches 2 in various places. The information processing system 1 is configured by connecting devices in the branch 2 and devices in the main store 3 via a network 4 such as the Internet. The information processing system 1 processes various information necessary for handling money in addition to information on banknotes. For convenience, only one branch 2 is shown in FIG. 1, but in reality, there are many branches 2 in various places.

  In the branch 2, a banknote processing apparatus 10 and an information processing apparatus 20 provided along with the banknote processing apparatus 10 are installed. The banknote handling apparatus 10 includes a display unit 11, an input unit 12, an input unit 13, a plurality of stacking units 14, and a discharge unit 15. The display unit 11 includes a liquid crystal panel, and the input unit 12 includes buttons. The banknote processing apparatus 10 processes the banknotes inserted into the input unit 13, divides the genuine bills into denominations and the like, accumulates them in the accumulation unit 14, and discharges counterfeit tickets and the like to the discharge unit 15. Moreover, the banknote processing apparatus 10 processes the forged ticket inserted into the insertion part 13, and acquires the information of a forged ticket so that it may mention later.

  The information processing apparatus 20 is a personal computer or the like, and includes a main body 21, a display unit 22, and an input unit 23. The main body 21 is communicably connected to the banknote processing apparatus 10 in the same store. The main body 21 is communicably connected to the network 4. The display unit 22 is a display, and the input unit 23 is a mouse or a keyboard. The information processing apparatus 20 transmits an instruction input by the user via the input unit 23 to the banknote processing apparatus 10, and transmits information on the counterfeit ticket received from the banknote processing apparatus 10 to the server 30 of the head office 3. .

  In the main store 3, as in the branch 2, a banknote processing device 10 and an information processing device 20 provided in the banknote processing device 10 are installed. The main store 3 is provided with a server 30, a statistical processing device 40, and a HUB 50 including a switching hub. The main body 21, the server 30, and the statistical processing device 40 of the information processing apparatus 20 of the head office 3 are connected to the HUB 50 so as to be communicable, and the HUB 50 is connected to the network 4 so as to be communicable.

  The server 30 stores information on counterfeit tickets transmitted from the information processing device 20 at the branch 2 and the information processing device 20 at the head office 3. Similar to the information processing apparatus 20, the statistical processing apparatus 40 is a personal computer or the like, and includes a main body 41, a display unit 42, and an input unit 43. The statistical processing device 40 is used when a user browses information on a forged ticket stored in the server 30.

<Flow of registration and browsing>
Next, an outline of a flow of registering counterfeit ticket information in the server 30 and a flow of browsing the counterfeit ticket information by the user will be described.

  Banknotes in general circulation are collected at the branch 2 of the central bank at a predetermined timing. The banknotes collected at the branch 2 are processed by the banknote processing apparatus 10. Specifically, the user of the branch 2 operates the input unit 23 of the information processing device 20 to set the operation mode of the banknote processing device 10 to “normal mode”, and then enters the input unit 13 of the banknote processing device 10. A bill is inserted and the input unit 12 is operated to start feeding the bill. Thereby, the banknote processing apparatus 10 pays out the banknotes of the insertion unit 13 one by one, and performs denomination identification, authenticity determination, and correctness determination for each banknote. When the banknote is a genuine note, the banknote handling apparatus 10 stacks the banknote on the stacking unit 14 according to the denomination. Moreover, the banknote processing apparatus 10 discharges | emits this banknote to the discharge part 15, when a banknote is a forged ticket. Note that a non-use ticket is also discharged to the discharge unit 15.

  The authenticity determination process is not changed between the normal mode and the forged ticket registration mode described later, and the same authenticity determination process is executed in both modes.

  Subsequently, the user of the branch 2 operates the input unit 23 of the information processing apparatus 20 to set the operation mode of the banknote processing apparatus 10 to “counterfeit ticket registration mode”, and then only the counterfeit tickets collected so far are collected. It is inserted into the insertion unit 13 and the input unit 12 is operated to start feeding out bills. The banknote handling apparatus 10 feeds out the counterfeit tickets of the insertion unit 13 one by one, and performs denomination identification and authenticity determination for each counterfeit ticket.

  Here, in order to prevent counterfeiting, a plurality of authenticity determination elements (hereinafter simply referred to as “elements”) characterized from different viewpoints are applied to the banknote. The banknote processing apparatus 10 of this Embodiment can determine the authenticity of a banknote by performing authenticity determination about each of the seven elements applied to the banknote. Hereinafter, the seven elements that the banknote processing apparatus 10 of the present embodiment can determine authenticity are referred to as elements 1 to 7.

  Element 1 is, for example, an element characterized from the viewpoint of infrared light. Element 2 is an element characterized from a magnetic point of view, for example. Element 3 is, for example, an element characterized from the viewpoint of fluorescence. The element 4 is an element characterized from the viewpoint of phosphorescence, for example. The element 5 is an element characterized from the viewpoint of conductivity, for example. Elements 6 and 7 are each characterized from the other two viewpoints.

  In the forged ticket registration mode, the banknote processing apparatus 10 acquires an image for acquiring the denomination and serial number from one counterfeit ticket, and acquires the denomination and serial number based on the acquired image. Moreover, the banknote processing apparatus 10 acquires the data used for the authenticity determination of the elements 1-7 from one forged ticket using the sensor provided in order to detect each element, Based on the acquired data A true / false determination is performed on elements 1-7. Then, the banknote processing apparatus 10 images each data acquired at the time of element detection.

  And the banknote processing apparatus 10 WHEREIN: The image used in the acquisition of a money type and a serial number, the image acquired in the case of the authenticity determination of the elements 1-7, the authenticity determination result with respect to the elements 1-7, and others Is stored in the storage unit 17 (see FIG. 2A) as information on one counterfeit ticket (hereinafter referred to as “acquired data”). Other additional information identifies the denomination of the counterfeit ticket, the serial number of the counterfeit ticket, the combination number indicating the combination of the authenticity determination results for the elements 1 to 7, and the banknote processing apparatus 10 that has performed the processing. Device information.

  When the storage of the acquisition data for all the counterfeit tickets in the insertion unit 13 is completed, the banknote processing device 10 transmits all the stored acquisition data to the information processing device 20 provided therewith. The information processing apparatus 20 transmits the received acquisition data to the server 30 of the head office 3 via the network 4. The server 30 registers information (hereinafter referred to as “registration data”) in which the registration number and the registration date are added to the received acquisition data in the database 32a (see FIG. 2C).

  Note that generally distributed banknotes are also collected at a predetermined timing in the central bank's main store 3, and the banknotes collected in the main store 3 are processed in the same manner as the branch 2. That is, the banknote processing apparatus 10 of the head office 3 transmits the acquired data for each counterfeit ticket to the information processing apparatus 20 provided therewith. The information processing apparatus 20 of the head office 3 transmits the received acquisition data to the server 30 via the HUB 50. The server 30 registers registration data based on the received acquired data in the database 32a (see FIG. 2C).

  The user of the head office 3 can browse the registered data by using the statistical processing device 40. Specifically, the user of the head office 3 can set the search condition by operating the input unit 43, and can display the registration data that matches the search condition among the registration data in the database 32a on the display unit 42. Further, the user of the head office 3 can set the aggregation condition by operating the input unit 43, and can display the information aggregated according to the aggregation condition from the registered data in the database 32a on the display unit 42. The display of the search result will be described later with reference to FIGS. 7A to 8, and the display of the aggregated information will be described later with reference to FIGS. 9 to 11.

<Configuration of each device>
2A to 2D are block diagrams illustrating configurations of the banknote processing device 10, the information processing device 20, the server 30, and the statistical processing device 40, respectively.

  As illustrated in FIG. 2A, the banknote processing apparatus 10 includes a display unit 11, an input unit 12, a control unit 16, a storage unit 17, a communication unit 18, and a detection unit 19. In addition, the banknote processing apparatus 10 includes a mechanism for transporting banknotes, the input unit 13 and the discharge unit 15 shown in FIG. The control unit 16 controls each unit of the banknote processing apparatus 10 and performs various processes using a program stored in the storage unit 17. Further, the functions of the identification unit 16 a and the determination unit 16 b are given to the control unit 16 by a program stored in the storage unit 17. Note that in the banknote handling apparatus 10, the identification unit 16a normally performs denomination identification, authenticity determination, and damage determination of the banknote, and the determination unit 16b does not exist individually, but here, the present invention is understood. For the sake of simplicity, the identification unit 16a and the determination unit 16b are described separately. Of course, these may be configured by one identification unit 16a. The communication unit 18 is connected to the communication unit 26 of the information processing apparatus 20 provided side by side.

  The detection unit 19 has a configuration for detecting information used for authenticity determination for the elements 1 to 7, acquisition of denominations, and acquisition of serial numbers. Specifically, the detection unit 19 is configured to irradiate the bill with visible light, infrared light, and ultraviolet light. Moreover, the detection part 19 detects the visible ink reflected by the banknote, the infrared light, the visible light which permeate | transmitted the banknote, the sensor which detects infrared light, and the magnetic ink printed on the banknote. A sensor, a sensor for detecting fluorescence generated by irradiating the banknote with ultraviolet light, a sensor for detecting phosphorescence generated by irradiating the banknote with ultraviolet light, a sensor for detecting conductivity of the banknote, and a banknote And a sensor for detecting the element 7 applied to the banknote.

  The control unit 16 includes a sensor that detects infrared light, a sensor that detects magnetic ink, a sensor that detects fluorescence, a sensor that detects phosphorescence, a sensor that detects conductivity, a sensor that detects element 6, and an element 7. Based on the detection signals of the sensors to be detected, images corresponding to the detection signals of the sensors (hereinafter referred to as “element images 1 to 7”) are generated. In addition, the control unit 16 generates an image (hereinafter referred to as “visible light image”) for acquiring a denomination, a serial number, and the like based on a detection signal of a sensor that detects visible light.

  With reference to FIG. 2B, the information processing apparatus 20 includes a display unit 22, an input unit 23, a control unit 24, a storage unit 25, and a communication unit 26. The components other than the display unit 22 and the input unit 23 are accommodated in the main body 21 shown in FIG. The control unit 24 controls each unit of the information processing apparatus 20 and performs various processes using a program stored in the storage unit 25. The communication unit 26 is connected to the communication unit 18 of the banknote processing apparatus 10 provided side by side and the network 4 shown in FIG.

  With reference to FIG. 2C, the server 30 includes a control unit 31, a storage unit 32, and a communication unit 33. The control unit 31 controls each unit of the server 30 and performs various processes by the program stored in the storage unit 32. In the storage unit 32, a database 32a for storing registration data is constructed. The detailed configuration of the database 32a will be described later with reference to FIGS. 4 (a) and 4 (b). The communication unit 33 is connected to the HUB 50 shown in FIG.

  With reference to FIG. 2 (d), the statistical processing device 40 includes a display unit 42, an input unit 43, a control unit 44, a storage unit 45, and a communication unit 46. The configuration other than the display unit 42 and the input unit 43 is accommodated in the main body 41 shown in FIG. The control unit 44 controls each unit of the statistical processing device 40 and performs various processes by the program stored in the storage unit 45. In addition, the function of the statistical processing unit 44 a is given to the control unit 44 by a program stored in the storage unit 45. The communication unit 46 is connected to the HUB 50 shown in FIG.

<Outline of authenticity judgment>
Next, an outline of the authenticity determination will be described with reference to FIGS.

  Drawing 3 (a)-(c) is a mimetic diagram showing the element currently applied to the genuine note of bills AC which differ, respectively. Here, the elements 1 to 5 are applied to the genuine note of the banknote A, the elements 1 to 4 and 6 are applied to the genuine note of the banknote B, and the elements 1 to 4 and 7 are applied to the genuine note of the banknote C. . In addition, even if the element applied to a banknote is the same number (element of the same kind), it may have a mutually different structure. For example, the element 2 is arranged in the lower left in the case of the banknote A, is arranged in two places in the case of the banknote B, and is arranged in the lower right in the case of the banknote C.

  3D to 3F are schematic diagrams illustrating types T1 to T3 that are examples of counterfeit bills of the banknote A, respectively. 3D to 3F, the solid line indicates that the corresponding element is included in the counterfeit ticket, and that the element is determined to be true by the banknote handling apparatus 10. A broken line indicates that the corresponding element is included in the counterfeit ticket, and that the element is determined to be false by the banknote handling apparatus 10. When the corresponding element is not included in the counterfeit ticket, the element is not shown as shown in FIGS. 3E and 3F, and the area of the element is blank.

  In the case of type T1, elements 1 to 3 are determined to be the same as genuine bills, and elements 4 and 5 are insufficient to be determined to be the same as genuine bills. In this case, the banknote handling apparatus 10 determines “true” for the elements 1 to 3 and “1” for each determination result of the elements 1 to 3. Moreover, the banknote processing apparatus 10 determines that the elements 4 and 5 are “false”, and sets each determination result of the elements 4 and 5 to “0”. Thus, since the banknote processing apparatus 10 determined “false” for one or more of the elements 1 to 5 to be applied to the banknote A, in other words, the determination result is 0 for the elements 1 to 5. Since the element exists, this banknote is determined to be a forged ticket. In addition, when the banknote processing apparatus 10 determines "true" for all the elements 1 to 5, in other words, when all the determination results of the elements 1 to 5 are 1, this banknote is regarded as a genuine note. judge.

  In the case of type T2, the elements 1 to 3 are determined to be genuine bills as in the case of type T1, and the elements 4 and 5 are not included in the bill. In this case, the banknote handling apparatus 10 determines “true” for the elements 1 to 3 and sets each determination result of the elements 1 to 3 to “1”. Moreover, the banknote processing apparatus 10 determines that the elements 4 and 5 are “false”, and sets each determination result of the elements 4 and 5 to “0”. Thus, the banknote handling apparatus 10 determines that the banknote is a forged ticket.

  In the case of type T3, the elements 1 to 3 are insufficient to determine that they are the same as the genuine note, and the elements 4 and 5 are not included in the banknote. In this case, the banknote processing apparatus 10 determines “false” for the elements 1 to 5 and sets each determination result of the elements 1 to 5 to “0”. Thus, the banknote handling apparatus 10 determines that the banknote is a forged ticket.

<Database configuration>
4A and 4B are conceptual diagrams showing the database 32a. For convenience, the database 32a is divided into two by associating with registration numbers as shown in FIGS. 4 (a) and 4 (b), but the configuration shown in FIGS. 4 (a) and 4 (b) is used. You may be comprised so that it may be united.

  As shown in FIG. 4A, the database 32a includes, as items, a “registration number” for identifying registration data, a “registration date” indicating the date when the registration data was registered in the database 32a, and a forged ticket. "Denomination", "number" of counterfeit ticket, "elements 1-7" indicating the determination results of elements 1-7, "combination number" indicating the combination of the determination results of elements 1-7, “Apparatus information” indicating the apparatus for which the authenticity determination is performed. 4B, the database 32a includes, as items, “element images 1 to 7” indicating the file names of the element images 1 to 7 and “visible light image” indicating the file name of the visible light image. ". In the database 32a, one registration data corresponds to one counterfeit ticket.

  The combination number is a number that can individually identify the combination of the determination results (1 or 0) of the elements 1 to 7. The file bodies of the element images 1 to 7 and the visible light image are stored in the storage unit 32. The element images 1, 3 and 4 and the visible light image each have two files corresponding to both sides of the bill.

  In the present embodiment, for each denomination, a group of registered data having the configuration shown in FIGS. 4A and 4B is stored in the database 32a. The example shown in FIG. 4A shows denomination registration data to which only elements 1 to 5 are applied. Since elements 6 and 7 are not applied to the banknote of this denomination, “***” is stored in the determination results of elements 6 and 7.

  In the present embodiment, as described later, the process of storing “***” in the determination result is performed not on the server 30 but on the banknote processing apparatus 10 side. Instead, the process of storing “***” in the determination result may be performed on the server 30 side.

<Register to database>
Next, a procedure for registering registration data in the database 32a in the forged ticket registration mode will be described with reference to FIGS. 5 and 6A and 6B.

  With reference to FIG. 5, when the user sets the forged ticket registration mode by operating the input unit 23 of the information processing device 20 (S11), the control unit 24 of the information processing device 20 sets the forged ticket registration mode. An instruction is transmitted to the banknote handling apparatus 10. When receiving the instruction to set the forged ticket registration mode (S21: YES), the control unit 16 of the banknote handling apparatus 10 waits for a start instruction input by the user via the input unit 12 (S22). When the start instruction is input (S22: YES), the control unit 16 pays out the inserted counterfeit tickets one by one, and performs identification processing by the identification unit 16a and determination processing by the determination unit 16b for each forged ticket. (S23).

  Here, the identification unit 16a identifies the denomination and acquires the serial number based on the visible light image. The determination unit 16 b performs authenticity determination on each element based on the denomination obtained by the identification unit 16 a and the detection signal read from the banknote by the sensor of the detection unit 19. As described above, the determination unit 16b performs true / false determination on all elements (elements 1 to 7) as well as elements applied to the banknote. Thereafter, when storing the acquired data in the storage unit 17, the control unit 16 sets “***” as a determination result for an element not set as the target denomination.

  When the processing for all counterfeit tickets is completed, the control unit 16 transmits all the acquired data stored in the storage unit 17 to the information processing apparatus 20 (S24). When the control unit 24 of the information processing device 20 receives the acquisition data from the banknote processing device 10 provided (S12: YES), the control unit 24 stores the received acquisition data in the storage unit 25 and accepts the registration for registering the acquisition data. Perform (S13). In this reception, the user can appropriately correct the serial number for each counterfeit ticket as will be described later.

  When the user performs a registration operation after correcting the serial number (S14: YES), the control unit 24 transmits the acquired data stored in the storage unit 25 to the server 30 (S15). When receiving the acquisition data (S31: YES), the control unit 31 of the server 30 distributes the registration data in which the registration number and the registration date are assigned to the received acquisition data for each denomination and registers them in the database 32a (S32). ).

  FIGS. 6A and 6B are diagrams showing configurations of the forged ticket registration screen 110 and the serial number correction screen 120 displayed in S13 of FIG. 5, respectively. In S13, first, the forged ticket registration screen 110 shown in FIG. 6A is displayed.

  With reference to FIG. 6A, the forged ticket registration screen 110 includes a forged ticket list 111, an image area 112, and a registration button 113. The forged ticket list 111 displays the denominations and serial numbers included in the acquired data in a list format for each forged ticket. The image area 112 displays a visible light image included in the acquired data. When confirming the visible light image, the user clicks the forged ticket item that is the target of the forged ticket list 111. As a result, as shown in FIG. 6A, the item of the forged ticket as a target is highlighted and a visible light image of each surface of the forged ticket as a target is displayed in the image area 112. Furthermore, when correcting the serial number, the user double-clicks a forged ticket item that is a target of the forged ticket list 111. Thereby, the serial number correction screen 120 of FIG. 6B is displayed.

  With reference to FIG. 6B, the serial number correction screen 120 includes an image region 121, a text box 122, a correction button 123, and a close button 124. The image area 121 displays a visible light image of each surface of the counterfeit ticket double-clicked in the counterfeit ticket list 111 of FIG. The user confirms the serial number from the visible light image in the image area 121, inputs the corrected serial number in the text box 122, and clicks the correction button 123. Thereby, the serial number after correction is overwritten on the serial number of the target acquired data. Thereafter, the user clicks the close button 124 to close the serial number correction screen 120. Thereby, the forged ticket registration screen 110 of FIG. 6A is displayed again. Thereafter, the user appropriately performs the same operation to correct the serial number of the forged ticket. Thus, after correcting the serial number for all counterfeit tickets that need correction, the user performs a registration operation by clicking the registration button 113 on the counterfeit ticket registration screen 110 (S14 in FIG. 5). YES) Thereby, S15 of FIG. 5 is executed and the registration of the acquired data is completed.

  Thus, in this Embodiment, since the serial number of acquisition data can be corrected according to a visible light image, an exact serial number can be registered into the database 32a. Thereby, when referring to the registration data of the database 32a, a serial number can be used as useful information regarding forgery.

  Note that the control unit 24 of the information processing device 20 does not perform the processing of S13 and S14 when receiving the acquisition data from the banknote processing device 10 provided (S12: YES), and acquires the acquisition data at a predetermined timing. A process of transmitting to the server 30 (S15) may be performed.

<Search database>
Next, with reference to FIG. 7A to FIG. 8, a procedure in which the user of the main store 3 searches the database 32a using the statistical processing device 40 will be described.

  When searching the database 32a, first, the search setting screen 130 of FIG. 7A is displayed on the display unit 42 of the statistical processing device 40. The user inputs search conditions via the search setting screen 130.

  With reference to FIG. 7A, the search setting screen 130 includes a registration date area 131, an element area 132, an other area 133, and a search button 134. The user inputs a registration date range of registration data to be extracted from the database 32 a in the text box of the registration date area 131. In addition, the user inputs the determination result or combination number for the elements 1 to 7 of the registration data to be extracted from the database 32 a in the text box of the element area 132. In addition, the user inputs any or all of the registration number, denomination, serial number, and device information of the registration data to be extracted from the database 32a in the text box of the other area 133.

  In the example shown in FIG. 7A, “2015/01/28” and “2015/02/01” are entered in the text boxes for the start date and the end date, respectively, and the predetermined money is entered in the denomination text box. The seed has been entered. In addition, “1” is input in the text boxes of the elements 2 and 3, and “12” is input in the text box of the combination number. In this denomination, the combination number in which only the determination results of the elements 2 and 3 are “1” is “12”.

  Note that the search setting screen 130 may be configured such that when a value is input to the text box of the elements 1 to 7, a value is automatically input to the combination number text box. For example, when the user inputs “1” into the text boxes of the elements 2 and 3, the corresponding combination number “12” is automatically input into the combination number text box. Similarly, the search setting screen 130 may be configured such that when a value is input to the combination number text box, the value is automatically input to the text boxes of elements 1 to 7.

  When the user finishes inputting the search conditions, the user clicks the search button 134 to start the search. As a result, the search condition is transmitted from the statistical processing device 40 to the server 30.

  The control unit 31 of the server 30 performs a search on the registration data stored in the database 32a based on the received search condition, and transmits the search result to the statistical processing device 40. The search result transmitted here does not include the image of the counterfeit ticket, but includes registration data other than the image. Based on the search result transmitted in this manner, the search result screen 140 of FIG. 7B is displayed on the display unit 42 of the statistical processing device 40.

  With reference to FIG. 7B, the search result screen 140 includes a search condition area 141 and a search result list 142. The search condition area 141 displays search conditions set on the search setting screen 130. The search result list 142 displays the search results received from the server 30 in a list format for each counterfeit ticket (for each registration number). FIG. 7B shows a search result screen 140 that is displayed when the search condition is set as shown in FIG. 7A and the search button 134 is clicked. Referring to FIG. 7B, it can be confirmed that among the counterfeit tickets narrowed down by denomination and registration date, a counterfeit ticket whose determination result of elements 2 and 3 is “1” is displayed. It can also be confirmed that the combination number is “12” when the determination result of the elements 2 and 3 is “1”.

  When the user wants to display an image of a counterfeit ticket, the user double-clicks the item of the counterfeit ticket that is the target of the search result list 142. Thereby, the transmission request for the image of the counterfeit ticket is transmitted from the statistical processing device 40 to the server 30. In response to the received transmission request, the server 30 extracts the image of the counterfeit ticket from the database 32a and transmits the extracted image to the statistical processing device 40. Thereby, the registration data screen 150 shown in FIG. 8 is displayed.

  Referring to FIG. 8, registration data screen 150 includes a data list 151 and image areas 152a to 152h. The data list 151 displays information on counterfeit tickets double-clicked on the search result screen 140 in FIG. 7B. The image areas 152a to 152h display a visible light image and element images 1 to 7, respectively. In the image areas 152a to 152e, a visible light image and element images 1 to 4 acquired from a genuine note are displayed as reference images, respectively. FIG. 8 shows a registration data screen 150 displayed when the counterfeit ticket item with registration number 3 in FIG. 7B is double-clicked.

<Display of index information>
Next, with reference to FIGS. 9-11, the procedure in which the user of the head office 3 browses the information totaled based on the database 32a using the statistical processing apparatus 40 is demonstrated.

  First, the processing procedure will be described with reference to FIG. The control unit 44 of the statistical processing device 40 displays a tabulation setting screen 160, which will be described later, on the display unit 42, and accepts setting of tabulation conditions (S101). When the setting of the total condition is completed, the control unit 44 transmits the total condition to the server 30 (S102).

  When receiving the counting condition from the statistical processing device 40 (S111: YES), the control unit 31 of the server 30 extracts the registration data stored in the database 32a based on the denomination and the registration date included in the received counting condition. Then, the extraction result is transmitted to the statistical processing device 40 (S113).

  When the control unit 44 of the statistical processing device 40 receives the extraction result from the server 30 (S103: YES), the statistical processing unit 44a of the control unit 44 outputs a true / false determination result for the element based on the received extraction result. By performing the statistical processing, the effectiveness against counterfeiting of each element applied to the banknote is generated as digitized index information (S104). Then, the control unit 44 displays the index information generated by the statistical processing unit 44a on the display unit 42 (S105).

  Next, details of the browsing procedure will be described with reference to FIGS.

  FIG. 10A is a diagram showing the configuration of the tabulation setting screen 160 displayed in S101 of FIG. The tabulation setting screen 160 includes selection buttons 161 to 163, a setting period area 164, a text box 165, a registration date area 166, and a display button 167. Any one of the selection buttons 161 to 163 can be selected. The setting period area 164 is valid when the selection button 163 is selected.

  The user selects one of the selection buttons 161 to 163 according to the total content. When the selection button 163 is selected, the user further selects one of the three selection buttons in the setting period area 164. In addition, the user inputs the denominations to be aggregated in the text box 165, and enters the registration date range of the registration data to be aggregated in the text box of the registration date area 166.

  In the example shown in FIG. 10A, the selection button 161 is selected. Also, a predetermined denomination is entered in the text box 165, and “2006/01/01” and “2014/12/31” are entered in the text boxes for the start date and the end date, respectively.

  When the user finishes inputting the totaling conditions, the user clicks the display button 167 to start totaling. As a result, the aggregation condition is transmitted to the server 30. Based on the denomination included in the totaling condition and the registration date range included in the totaling condition, the control unit 31 of the server 30 extracts registration data that matches this from the database 32a and extracts the result (registration data). Is transmitted to the statistical processing device 40. Then, the statistical processing unit 44a of the statistical processing device 40 performs statistical processing on the item selected from the selection buttons 161 to 163 in FIG. 10A based on the extracted registration data.

  When the selected item is “number of registrations for each combination” (selection button 161), the statistical processing unit 44a adds up the number of registrations and the registration ratio for each combination. Specifically, the statistical processing unit 44a counts the extracted registration data for each combination number, and acquires the number of registrations for each combination. Further, the statistical processing unit 44a acquires the total number (total number of registrations) of the extracted registration data. Subsequently, the statistical processing unit 44a calculates the ratio of the number of registrations for each combination to the total number of registrations, and acquires the registration ratio (the ratio to the total number of registrations) for each combination.

  When the selected item is “number of registrations for each element” (selection button 162), the statistical processing unit 44a adds up the number of registrations and the registration ratio for each element. Specifically, the statistical processing unit 44a obtains the number of registrations for each element by counting the number of elements whose determination results are 1 for each of the elements 1 to 7 in the extracted registration data. . Further, the statistical processing unit 44a acquires the total number (total number of registrations) of the extracted registration data. Subsequently, the statistical processing unit 44a calculates the ratio of the number of registrations for each element to the total number of registrations, and acquires the registration ratio for each element (ratio to the total number of registrations).

  When the selected item is “transition of the effective rate for each element” (selection button 163), the statistical processing unit 44a adds up the effective rates for each element. Specifically, the statistical processing unit 44a first sets the registration date range (registration date area 166) included in the aggregation condition to the set period (year, month, or day of the setting period area 164) included in the aggregation condition. The registration data is divided according to the divided setting periods, and the extracted registration data is divided into groups.

  Subsequently, the statistical processing unit 44a counts the number of registered data of each group for which the determination result is 1, for each of the elements 1 to 7, thereby registering the number of registrations for each element in each setting period (the relevant Get the number of registered elements). The statistical processing unit 44a obtains the total number of registration data (the total number of registrations) in each setting period by counting the registration data of each group. Subsequently, the statistical processing unit 44a calculates an effective rate by the following formula (1) for each element in each setting period.

  Effective rate = 100 − {(number of registered elements) / (total number of registered)} × 100 (1)

  Next, after performing the statistical processing as described above, the statistical processing unit 44a is effective for counterfeiting each element of the banknote as described below according to the contents of the item selected by the selection buttons 161 to 163. Property is generated as digitized index information. Then, the control unit 44 displays the generated index information.

  When the selected item is “number of registrations for each combination” (selection button 161), the statistical processing unit 44a generates the combination list screen 170 as index information, and the control unit 44 displays the combination list screen 170 as a display unit. 42.

  With reference to FIG. 10B, the combination list screen 170 includes a totaling condition area 171 and a totaling result list 172. The aggregation condition area 171 displays the aggregation conditions set on the aggregation setting screen 160. The tabulation result list 172 displays the number of registrations and the registration ratio for each combination acquired by statistical processing in a list format. The display contents of the total result list 172 are arranged from top to bottom in the order of the number of registrations and the ratio of the total number of registrations.

  When the selected item is “number of registrations per element” (selection button 162)), the statistical processing unit 44a generates the element list screen 180 as index information, and the control unit 44 displays the element list screen 180. Displayed on the unit 42.

  Referring to FIG. 10C, the element list screen 180 includes a totaling condition area 181 and a totaling result list 182. The aggregation condition area 181 displays the aggregation conditions set on the aggregation setting screen 160. The tabulation result list 182 displays the number of registrations and the registration ratio for each element acquired by statistical processing in a list format. The display contents of the total result list 182 are arranged from top to bottom in the order of the number of registrations and the ratio of the total number of registrations.

  When the selected item is “Transition of effective rate for each element” (selection button 163), the statistical processing unit 44a generates a transition screen 190 regarding the transition of the effective rate for each element as index information, and the control unit 44 displays the transition screen 190 on the display unit 42.

  Referring to FIG. 11, transition screen 190 includes a totaling condition area 191 and a graph area 192. The aggregation condition area 191 displays the aggregation conditions set on the aggregation setting screen 160. The graph area 192 displays a graph indicating the effective rate for each element in each setting period acquired by the statistical processing. The vertical axis of the graph indicates the effective rate of the element, and the horizontal axis of the graph indicates the registration date range set in the registration date area 166 of FIG. 10A in time series. The scale interval on the horizontal axis of the graph corresponds to the set period (year, month, or day of the set period area 164) set in the set period area 164 of FIG. In FIG. 11, a screen is displayed when the scale interval on the horizontal axis is set to one year by selecting “year” in the set period area 164.

  When the user double-clicks the combination number item in the totalization result list 172 on the combination list screen 170 in FIG. 10B, a list of registered data narrowed down by the double-clicked combination number is displayed. Specifically, the statistical processing device 40 sets a new search condition including the total condition of the total condition area 171 and the selected combination number. Then, the statistical processing device 40 narrows down the registration data received from the server 30 at the time of generating the combination list screen 170 based on the new search condition, and on the display unit 42 based on the narrowed-down result, FIG. The search result screen 140 shown in FIG. FIG. 12A shows the search result screen 140 when the item with the combination number 6 is double-clicked in the tabulation result list 172 of FIG. 10B.

  In addition, on the element list screen 180 in FIG. 10C, when the user double-clicks an element item in the total result list 182, a list of registered data narrowed down by the double-clicked element is displayed. Specifically, the statistical processing device 40 sets a new search condition including the total condition of the total condition area 181 and the selected element. Then, the statistical processing device 40 narrows down the registration data received from the server 30 at the time of generating the element list screen 180 based on the new search condition, and on the display unit 42 based on the narrowed result, FIG. The search result screen 140 shown in FIG. FIG. 12B shows the search result screen 140 when the item whose element is 4 is double-clicked in the tabulation result list 182 of FIG.

  In this way, if the combination list screen 170 and the element list screen 180 can be narrowed down, the registration data related to the information displayed on the combination list screen 170 and the element list screen 180 can be easily confirmed with a small number of procedures. be able to.

<Effect of embodiment>
According to this Embodiment, the effectiveness with respect to the forgery of the element for the authenticity determination applied to the banknote is displayed as digitized index information. Specifically, a combination list screen 170, an element list screen 180, and a transition screen 190 are displayed as index information. These screens show the effectiveness against counterfeiting of each element of the banknote as described below. For this reason, the user can determine quantitatively whether the element given to the bill is effective for preventing counterfeiting by referring to the index information.

  For example, in the present embodiment, the tabulation result list 182 shown in FIG. 10C is displayed on the display unit 42 of the statistical processing device 40 as index information. Here, the tabulation result list 182 indicates the number of registrations and the registration ratio for each element, and each element is ranked in order of the number of registrations and the size of the registration ratio. They are arranged from top to bottom.

  Therefore, in the total result list 182, elements that are relatively likely to have a determination result of 1, that is, elements that are relatively higher in the determination result, that is, elements that are not effective for true / false determination, are relatively higher. Elements that are more effective for determination are positioned below. In addition, it is possible to evaluate the relative effectiveness against counterfeiting of each element (comparison of effectiveness between elements) from the registration ratio of each element, and the absolute effectiveness of each element from the number of registrations of each element ( The effectiveness of the element can be evaluated. Therefore, the user can grasp the effectiveness of each forgery prevention element with respect to the authenticity determination by referring to the tabulation result list 182.

  Further, according to the present embodiment, a graph indicating the transition of the effective rate of each element is displayed as index information in the graph area 192 illustrated in FIG. The graph of each element displayed in the graph area 192 has an effectiveness of 0% as the determination result of the element is likely to be 1 by the calculation of the above formula (1), that is, as the element is not effective for true / false determination. Get closer. Therefore, from the graph of the effectiveness of each element displayed in the graph area 192, the user is in a state of effectiveness with respect to the authenticity determination of each element, that is, whether the current effectiveness or effectiveness is drastically decreased. Whether or not can be grasped.

  Further, according to the present embodiment, the tabulation result list 172 shown in FIG. 10B is displayed on the display unit 42 of the statistical processing device 40 as index information. Here, the aggregation result list 172 shows the number of registrations and the registration ratio for each combination number, and each combination number is ranked in order of the number of registrations and the size of the registration ratio. Combination numbers are arranged from top to bottom.

  Here, in the total result list 172, the number of registrations for the combination of determination results of each element corresponding to the combination number decreases as it goes down. For example, in the example of FIG. 13, the combination number 28 is 1, 1, 1, 0, 0 as the result of authenticity determination of the elements 1 to 5 as shown in the right table of FIG. Only five counterfeit tickets for which the authenticity determination is made in (1, 1, 1, 0, 0) are registered in the database 32a in the tabulation result list 172 of FIG. The fact that the number of registered counterfeit tickets is small in this way means that counterfeit tickets based on the combination are not available, and it can be evaluated that the security capability against counterfeiting is enhanced by the combination. Therefore, in the total result list 172, the lower combination number is considered to have higher security capability.

  In this case, it can be evaluated that the security capability is secured by an element having a determination result of 0 among the combined authenticity determination results, that is, an element effective for authenticity determination. For example, in the example of FIG. 13, the combination number 28 is positioned below because of the elements 4 and 5 whose determination result is 0. These elements 4 and 5 are particularly effective for true / false determination, It can be evaluated that the security capability against forgery is secured by these elements 4 and 5.

  Here, in general, an element whose determination result is 0 in the lower combination number is considered to be highly effective for authenticity determination even by itself. For example, in the example of FIG. 13, the elements 4 and 5 whose determination result is 0 with the combination number 28 are highly effective for true / false determination as shown in FIG. 10C. However, although the effectiveness of an element alone is not high, there may be an element that increases synergistically when combined with other elements.

  For example, in the example of FIG. 13, the combination number 21 is positioned one above the combination number 28 and has high security capability against forgery. In this case, in the combination number 21, the determination result is 0 for the elements 2 and 4. However, as shown in FIG. 10C, the element 2 alone has low effectiveness for the authenticity determination. However, when the element 4 is combined with the element 2, the security capability against forgery is high as shown in FIG. Thus, the total result list 172 can be used as index information when evaluating whether or not the security capability against forgery is enhanced by the combination of each element.

  For example, when the elements 4 and 5 are adopted at the time of banknote revision, the cost increases when the elements 2 and 4 are adopted. A combination of the elements 2 and 4 for which the ability can be secured can be considered as an entrance candidate for the ticket gate.

  Further, according to the present embodiment, as shown in FIG. 4B, the registration data of the database 32a includes the element images 1 to 7 and the file name of the visible light image. When the user double-clicks the counterfeit ticket item on the search result screen 140, a registration data screen 150 including these images is displayed on the display unit 42. Thereby, the user can confirm the element images 1 to 7 respectively used for authenticity determination for the elements 1 to 7. Moreover, the user can confirm the visible light image corresponding to a forged ticket.

<Example of change>
In the above embodiment, as shown in FIG. 4A, in the registration data of the database 32a, “***” is stored in the determination result for the element not applied to the denomination. In addition, determination results for elements not applied to denominations may also be stored in the database 32a. In this case, in FIG. 10C and FIG. 11, elements not applied to the denomination are included in the display, and the number of combination numbers in FIG. 10B increases compared to the embodiment.

For example, in the above embodiment, as shown in FIG. 4A, the elements 6 and 7 are masked, and a combination of true / false determination results for the elements 1 to 5 is set. For this reason, the total number of combination numbers that can occur in the embodiment is 2 ⁵ −1 = 31. On the other hand, when the determination result is given to the masked elements 6 and 7, the total number of possible combination numbers is 2 ⁷ −1 = 127.

  In this modified example, the determination result of the element not applied to the denomination is also displayed, but the screen for setting whether to display the determination result of the element not applied to the denomination May be provided separately. In this way, the user can display the determination result of the element depending on whether or not the element not applied to the denomination is to be evaluated.

  Moreover, in the said embodiment, when the selection button 162 of Fig.10 (a) is selected, the number by which the determination result is 1 was counted for every element, and the registration number for every element was acquired. . However, the present invention is not limited to this, and the number of registrations for each element may be acquired by counting the number of determination results of 0 for each element. In this case, the elements arranged in the tabulation result list 182 are arranged in the opposite direction to the above embodiment.

  In the above embodiment, when the selection button 163 in FIG. 10A is selected, the number of determination results of 1 is counted for each element, and the number of registrations for each element in each setting period. Was acquired. However, the present invention is not limited to this, and the number of registrations for each element in each setting period may be acquired by counting the number of determination results of 0 for each element. In this case, the value calculated by the above equation (1) is not the effective rate but the “invalid rate”, and the transition of the graph of FIG. 11 is inverted from the above embodiment in the vertical direction.

  Further, in the above embodiment, when the selection button 163 in FIG. 10A is selected, the number of determination results of 1 is counted for each element, and the effective rate is calculated by the above equation (1). However, instead of this, the number of determination results of 1 may be counted for each element, and the “invalidity rate” may be calculated by the following equation (2). In this case, the transition of the graph in FIG. 11 is inverted in the vertical direction from the above embodiment.

  Inefficiency = {(Number of registered elements) / (Total number of registered)} × 100 (2)

  In the above embodiment, the transition screen 190 in FIG. 11 displays the graph showing the effective rate for each element in each setting period in time series. However, the present invention is not limited to this, and for each element in each setting period, A graph showing the number of registrations and the registration ratio in time series may be displayed. In addition, the transition screen 190 may display a list of effective rates for each element in each setting period as a numerical value in time series.

  In the above embodiment, the number of registrations and the registration ratio for each combination are displayed in a list format on the combination list screen 170 in FIG. 10B. However, the present invention is not limited to this, and the number of registrations and registration for each combination are displayed. A graph showing the transition of the ratio in time series may be displayed. In addition, on the element list screen 180 in FIG. 10C, the number of registrations and registration ratios for each element are displayed in a list format. May be displayed. In these cases, the setting period area 164 of FIG. 10A is also effective when the selection buttons 161 and 162 are selected, and the setting period of the graph displayed on the combination list screen 170 and the element list screen 180 is set. Is done.

  In the above embodiment, the combination list screen 170 displays the number of registrations and the registration ratio for each combination. However, the present invention is not limited to this, and the effective rate for each combination is calculated. A graph showing the efficiency in time series may be displayed. The effective rate for each combination is calculated by, for example, the following equation (3) in each setting period.

  Effective rate = 100 − {(number of registrations of the combination) / (total number of registrations)} × 100 (3)

  In the above embodiment, any one of the combination list screen 170, the element list screen 180, and the transition screen 190 is selected by selecting any one of the selection buttons 161 to 163 shown in FIG. Displayed. However, the present invention is not limited to this, and a plurality of selection buttons among the selection buttons 161 to 163 may be selectable. When a plurality of selection buttons are selected, a screen including a plurality of total results corresponding to the selected buttons is displayed on the display unit 42. Further, the selection buttons 161 to 163 may be omitted. In this case, when the display button 167 is clicked, a screen including all the counting results corresponding to the selection buttons 161 to 163 is displayed on the display unit 42.

  Further, in the above embodiment, one denomination is selected on the aggregation setting screen 160, and the aggregation results performed on the selected one denomination are the combination list screen 170, the element list screen 180, and the transition screen. 190. However, the present invention is not limited to this, and by selecting a plurality or all of the denominations on the tabulation setting screen 160, a totaling result that is collectively performed on the selected plurality or all of the denominations may be displayed.

  Moreover, in the said embodiment, although the group of registration data was stored in the database 32a for every denomination, not only this but all the denominations may be stored in the one database 32a.

  Moreover, in the said embodiment, although the statistical processing apparatus 40 was installed only in the head office 3, you may install in the branch 2. In this case, the statistical processing device 40 is communicably connected to the HUB 50 installed in the branch 2. Thereby, the user of the branch 2 can browse the search result and the totaled information by communicating with the server 30 by using the statistical processing device 40 installed in the branch 2.

  Moreover, in the said embodiment, although the banknote processing apparatus 10 transmitted the acquisition data regarding a forged ticket to the information processing apparatus 20, only when the operation mode was a forged ticket registration mode, not only this but operation mode is normal. Even in the mode, the acquisition data may be generated by acquiring the data related to the counterfeit ticket, and the generated acquisition data may be transmitted to the information processing apparatus 20. In this way, even when the operation mode is the normal mode, registration data can be registered in the database 32a as in the above embodiment.

  Moreover, in the said embodiment, the server 30 extracts registration data based on the money type and registration date which are included in a count condition, and the statistical processing part 44a of the statistical processing apparatus 40 performs statistical processing based on an extraction result. Go to generate index information. However, the present invention is not limited to this, and the server 30 may perform statistical processing and index information generation in addition to extraction of registered data.

  Moreover, in the said embodiment, although index information was displayed on the display part 42 of the statistical processing apparatus 40, it may not be limited to this but may be displayed on the display part of another apparatus. For example, it may be displayed on a display unit provided in the server 30.

  Moreover, in the said embodiment, although the server 30 and the statistical processing apparatus 40 were comprised as a separate apparatus, you may be comprised as one apparatus. Moreover, although the banknote processing apparatus 10 and the information processing apparatus 20 were comprised as a separate apparatus, you may be comprised as one apparatus. Moreover, the banknote processing apparatus 10, the information processing apparatus 20, the server 30, and the statistical processing apparatus 40 may be configured as one apparatus.

  Moreover, in the said embodiment, although the information processing system 1 processed the information regarding a banknote, it is not restricted to this, Information regarding paper sheets (cash vouchers) other than a banknote, such as a gift certificate, a check, and a coupon. It may be processed.

  Although the embodiment and modification examples of the present invention have been described above, the present invention is not limited to the above embodiment, and the embodiment of the present invention can be variously modified in addition to the above. is there.

1 ... Information processing system (paper sheet information processing system)
16b ... determination part 32a ... database (database part)
42 ... Display unit 44a ... Statistical processing unit

Claims (11)

A paper sheet information processing system for processing information about paper sheets,
A determination unit for determining the authenticity of a plurality of authenticity determination elements read from paper sheets;
A database unit for storing the determination result of each authenticity by the determination unit for each of the paper sheets;
A statistical processing unit that generates, as a quantified index information, the effectiveness against forgery of each authenticity determination element of the paper sheet by statistically processing the authenticity determination result stored in the database unit When,
A display unit for displaying the index information generated by the statistical processing unit;
A paper sheet information processing system characterized by comprising: The statistical processing unit aggregates the true / false determination results for each of the authenticity determination elements, ranks the aggregated values, and generates the index information.
The paper sheet information processing system according to claim 1. The statistical processing unit ranks the number of registrations on the database determined to be true or false for each authenticity determination element, and generates the index information.
The paper sheet information processing system according to claim 2. The statistical processing unit ranks the ratio of the number of registrations on the database determined to be true or false for each authenticity determination element, and generates the index information.
The paper sheet information processing system according to claim 2 or 3. The statistical processing unit aggregates the number of counterfeit tickets for each combination of the authenticity determination elements, ranks the aggregated values, and generates the index information.
The paper sheet information processing system according to any one of claims 1 to 4, wherein the information processing system is a paper sheet information processing system. The statistical processing unit aggregates the number of registered counterfeit tickets on the database for each authenticity combination of the authenticity determination elements, ranks the aggregated values, and generates the index information.
The paper sheet information processing system according to claim 5. The statistical processing unit calculates a ratio of the number of registered counterfeit tickets on the database for each authenticity combination of the authenticity determination elements, ranks the calculated ratios, and generates the index information. ,
The paper sheet information processing system according to claim 5 or 6. The statistical processing unit generates, as the index information, a transition of a value obtained by quantifying the effectiveness against forgery of the authenticity determination element.
The paper sheet information processing system according to any one of claims 1 to 7. The statistical processing unit calculates a ratio of the number of registrations on the database determined to be true or false for each authenticity determination element every predetermined period, and generates a graph based on the calculated ratio as the index information To
The paper sheet information processing system according to claim 8. The database stores information about an image corresponding to the authenticity determination element for each forged ticket,
For the counterfeit ticket specified by the instruction input, an image corresponding to the authenticity determination element is displayed on the display unit.
The paper sheet information processing system according to any one of claims 1 to 9. A paper sheet information processing method for processing information about paper sheets,
Judgment of authenticity of multiple authenticity judgment elements read from paper sheets,
Stores the authenticity determination result for each authenticity determination element for each paper sheet,
By statistically processing the stored true / false determination result, the effectiveness of the paper sheets against the forgery of each authenticity determination element is generated as digitized index information,
Display the generated indicator information;
Paper sheet information processing method characterized by the above.

Images