JP2015530663A5 - - Google Patents

Description

Methods for aggregating and servicing intellectual property in transactions

(Related application)
This application claims priority from US patent application Ser. No. 13 / 595,745, filed Aug. 27, 2013.

(Technical field)
The present invention is a method for generating a service exchange of a type that can operate alone or can be integrated into a trade in intellectual property rights from a pool of intellectual property rights. About. Service providers can aggregate their services into service transactions, so that intellectual property owners can use the services. The owner of the intellectual property can pay for the service transaction for the service received, and the service provider can receive a dividend of the aggregate value of the service transaction. The invention further relates to a method of generating a financial transaction of a type that trades intellectual property rights from a pool of intellectual property rights and trades equity interests in the transaction. Is based on the aggregated value of the pooled intellectual property, and the value of the share has a value based on at least a portion of the aggregated value.

The role of intellectual property in the global economy has grown significantly over the past few decades. In many of the most prominent companies in the United States, intellectual property value accounts for more than 70% of each company's market value. Despite the economic importance of intellectual property, the true intellectual property-based economy has not yet developed. One factor that hinders such economic development is that the value of intellectual property is contextual. The value of a specific intellectual property right varies depending on the value recognized by the person who acquired the intellectual property right. For example, the value of which the transferred (Transferred) intellectual property in a given transaction form, if Kaware the need and intended use of the acquirer will vary. Also, the value of the transferred intellectual property can change if the profit margin achievable through the use of the intellectual property changes.

Many attempts have been made to generate a comprehensive process for intellectual property transactions, but none of these attempts has answered the question of context-dependent values. For example, each company takes form by acquiring intellectual property rights from individual intellectual property rights holders. These companies then license or sell the bundles of intellectual property rights to the licensee. In general, the original intellectual property rights holders tend to conduct such transactions due to economic needs and minimize the value paid to the original intellectual property rights holders. is there. One reason for such value minimization is that the original intellectual property owner does not have extensive access to the intellectual property market. With this limited access, the number of intellectual property buyers is limited. Thus, with a limited number of buyers, intellectual property rights will never fully realize their true market value in such transactions. On the other hand, companies that have acquired such individual intellectual property rights have broad access to the market. Therefore, for companies, the value of intellectual property rights tends to be maximized. This large difference in value for one intellectual property is due to the different circumstances in which the intellectual property rights are transferred.

  One result derived from such differences in value is the minimization of incentives for innovation. Small businesses and independent innovators will find it difficult to balance innovation costs against intellectual property values when access to their markets is restricted.

  Therefore, to seek to maximize incentives for innovation, and to trade intellectual property rights that mitigate the breadth and differences in economic valuation of one intellectual property right A process is needed.

  There is also a need for a method of aggregating intellectual property rights from multiple intellectual property rights holders and providing one value to those intellectual property rights holders based on the aggregated value.

  There is also a need for a method for evaluating intellectual property that eases the breadth of economic evaluation for intellectual property realized using this method and adds value to intellectual property. .

  Small businesses and independent innovators also find it difficult to obtain specific services such as marketing, investment, accounting, manufacturing and technical advice from professionals due to the cost of receiving such services. Will. In general, if an innovator has access to such services, the value of these innovations can be high because receiving these services can better manage these innovations. Therefore, it would be advantageous to provide a way to aggregate each intellectual property from multiple intellectual property owners and provide a service to add value to the value of the aggregated intellectual property. . Therefore, what is further needed is a way to provide services to innovators, which can increase the value of innovators' intellectual property and add value to the resulting aggregated intellectual property value. it can.

  The present invention provides a computer-implemented method that promotes open source collaboration, maximizes innovation and at the same time minimizes differences in economic value due to the situation where intellectual property rights are transferred To do. The present invention provides a process by which services can be provided to innovators as one means of increasing the value of innovation.

In one embodiment, the method of the present invention provides a means for operating a trade based on intellectual property rights (exchange) , the method further comprising providing services to innovators participating in the trade. Including. In the method of the present invention, the transaction, the holder of a plurality of intellectual property rights to obtain the rights of intellectual property, it is produced by the intellectual property rights of aggregator (aggregator). The aggregator obtains such intellectual property rights either through licensing or acquisition from the original intellectual property rights holder. The right to the aggregated intellectual property is then given in the transaction. The value of intellectual property rights is not only determined based on the rights themselves, but rather the aggregated intellectual property rights are evaluated. In addition, the aggregator provides services to intellectual property rights holders via transactions as a means to increase the value of intellectual property and thus the value of aggregated intellectual property rights. In one embodiment, the present invention provides a method that combines the estimation of the value of an intellectual property right and the assessment of the influence of the intellectual property right held by the transaction on the aggregated value of the intellectual property. In addition, the estimated value includes the value added by the provision of services through transactions.

In some embodiments, the present invention is a method for generating publicly traded security at an intellectual property aggregator that manages intellectual property transactions, comprising:
Transferring multiple intellectual property rights from multiple intellectual property rights holders to an intellectual property aggregator;
Providing a service to at least one of the plurality of intellectual property rights holders, wherein providing the service adds value to at least one of the plurality of assigned intellectual property rights The stage,
Calculating the value of the aggregated intellectual property of multiple assigned intellectual property rights;
For each of a plurality of intellectual property rights, a step of estimating the value of intellectual property in a transaction, the value of intellectual property in the transaction, within each of the plurality of intellectual property rights, aggregated knowledge Estimated by assigning the value of intellectual property, and
Transferring a portion of a plurality of intellectual property rights to one or more acquirers of intellectual property rights;
Receiving payments from each acquirer of the intellectual property rights, wherein the payment is comparable to the intellectual property value in the transaction for each of the intellectual property rights transferred to each acquirer;
In order to clarify the each payment received (account for), it has been updated, and calculating the value of the aggregated intellectual property,
Comprising the steps of issuing the benefit of multiple securities (security interest), the benefits of each of the securities are available at a certain price, the price indicates updated, the value of the aggregated intellectual property , Stage and
including.

In some embodiments, the present invention provides a method for managing rights-based transactions in intellectual property implemented by a computer-based system, the method comprising:
In the first transfer, by transferring the intellectual property rights to the intellectual property aggregator, the intellectual property aggregator aggregates the intellectual property rights from a plurality of intellectual property right holders; ,
Comprising the steps of providing a plurality of holders at least one holder in the service of intellectual property rights, such step of providing a service, to add value to at least one of the plurality of the transferred IPR And the stage
In the first database, the method comprising: storing information of the first set to describe each of the holders of a plurality of intellectual property rights,
In the second database, the method comprising: storing information of the second set describing each of the plurality of intellectual property rights, information of the second set of a plurality of value added by the provision of services A stage including the value of the intellectual property for each of the intellectual property rights of
In a third database, the method comprising: storing information of a third set of writing multiple acquirer of a portion of the plurality of intellectual property rights, information of the third set, the intellectual property rights Including, for a second transfer to the acquirer, payment information for each acquirer for each payment made to the intellectual property aggregator;
In a fourth database, comprising the steps of storing information of the fourth set to describe a plurality of investors, each investor is an purchaser stake (equity interest) in the aggregator Intellectual Property The fourth set of information includes investor information for each investor for investments made to the intellectual property aggregator; and
Inputting information selected from the group consisting of information of the first set, information of the second set, information of the third set, and information of the fourth set into the evaluation module;
Calculating the value of the aggregated intellectual property rights in the evaluation module to reveal the information;
Determining the value of the intellectual property in the transaction for each of the plurality of intellectual property rights, wherein the value of the intellectual property in the transaction is the aggregated intellectual property in each of the plurality of intellectual property rights; Estimated by assigning the value of intellectual property, and
To clarify the payment of the received respectively, it has been updated, and calculating the value of the aggregated intellectual property,
Entering the value of payment for each payment received for transfer of intellectual property rights into the third database;
And the payment received for the intellectual property right is comparable to the value of the intellectual property in the transaction for the intellectual property right.

FIG. 3 is a process flow diagram illustrating an embodiment of the method for trading intellectual property of the present invention. FIG. 4 is a process flow diagram illustrating an embodiment of a computer-implemented method for intellectual property trading of the present invention. FIG. 2 is a process flow diagram illustrating another embodiment of the method for trading intellectual property of the present invention shown in FIG. 1, wherein the transferred intellectual property is subject to additional research and development before being accepted for transfer to the acquirer. Need. FIG. 2 is a process flow diagram illustrating another embodiment of the intellectual property trading method of the present invention shown in FIG. 1, wherein an IP aggregator identifies additional markets for existing intellectual property. FIG. 4 is a process flow diagram of a computer-implemented method of service transaction of the present invention.

  In the method of the present invention, a transaction is generated by an intellectual property aggregator that obtains intellectual property rights from a plurality of intellectual property rights holders. The aggregator obtains such intellectual property rights either through licensing or acquisition from the original intellectual property rights holder.

Transaction 1 according to the present invention is shown in FIG. Transaction 1 includes IP owner 10, IP aggregator 20, acquirer 30, other licensees / buyers 40, investors 50, investment research 60, and technical expertise 70. In one embodiment, IP aggregator 20 may be a company. In another embodiment, IP aggregator 20 may be a joint venture with investors. In yet another embodiment, the IP aggregator 20 may be a limited liability company or a legal entity such as a joint management. Transaction 1 determines the value of intellectual property rights, assigns intellectual property rights from the intellectual property rights holders, aggregates the intellectual property rights assigned at the central facility, Provide a means to further transfer a portion of the property rights. Described further below, each of these elements of transaction 1. As used herein, the term “IP owner 10” includes other intellectual property rights holders, such as licensees, who generally have the necessary rights with respect to intellectual property in order to conduct transactions based on intellectual property. .

In transaction 1, the IP owner 10 assigns the intellectual property right to the IP aggregator 20 as indicated by the flow path “a”. The IP owner 10 may be a single owner of intellectual property rights, and the IP owner 10 may be a plurality of owners of intellectual property rights. The intellectual property rights may be assigned by licensing between the IP owner 10 and the IP aggregator 20, or the rights may be assigned by selling rights from the IP owner 10 to the IP aggregator 20. . The flow path “a” in FIG. 1 indicates the sale or licensing of intellectual property rights from the IP owner 10 to the IP aggregator 20. The flow path “a” is referred to herein as “ sales / licensing“ a ”. The licensing of intellectual property from the IP owner 10 to the IP aggregator 20 is an exclusive license (licensing rights). ) Or non-exclusive license (license) In one embodiment, the IP aggregator 20 may be a plurality of IP aggregators 20, where each aggregator 20 is a different technical category or Acquire rights for intellectual property in the class, where the IP aggregator 20 is the owner of the intellectual property right pool, and the intellectual property right pool is acquired by the IP aggregator 20 from the IP owner 10. including.

  In yet another embodiment, each of the plurality of IP aggregators 20 may have a different investment target. Examples of different investments include, for example, a collection of families of intellectual property rights concentrated in a single technology or technology area, a collection of families of intellectual property rights concentrated in a specific industry, Intellectual property from multiple principles or technologies that can create new products and / or processes when combined or combined with intellectual property rights that further require research and development efforts to make intellectual property viable A collection of property rights.

Consideration for selling / licensing “a” may include any known form of consideration used in selling or licensing intellectual property. The IP owner 10 pays the IP aggregator 20 for payment of intellectual property rights or sales of money, shares (equity), or other equity interests of the IP aggregator 20, Alternatively, one can choose to receive monetary payments and some combination of stocks. The payment of money may be a royalty payment or a lump sum payment. Payment for the sale / license “a” is indicated by the flow path “b” in FIG. The flow path “b” is hereinafter referred to as “out-payment“ b ””.

The intellectual property of the present invention and the intellectual property right accompanying it include patents, copyrights, trade secrets, know-how, and confidential information. Intellectual property rights in patents, copyrights, and trade secrets are generated under laws legislated by administrative bodies that have authority over such rights. In the United States, it occurs under Article 1 of the US Patent Law. Similarly, in countries other than the United States, patent rights arise under the country's national laws. Copyright also occurs under the national laws of countries that provide copyright protection. Trade secret rights in the United States arise under the laws enacted by individual states, or under state customary laws (common law) that have not generated laws protecting trade secret rights. In countries other than the United States, trade secret rights usually arise under the country's national laws. Know-how and top-secret information can be intellectual property rights that are defined and protected under contract, even though they cannot be legally defined as trade secrets. Accordingly, intellectual property and associated intellectual property rights are to be described above when these terms are used in connection with the present invention.

Out-Payment “b” is based on an assessment of the intellectual property rights assigned in sales / licensing “a”. The value assigned to Out-Payment “b” is determined from the determination of the value of the intellectual property right itself (“IPV”) and the value of the aggregated intellectual property right (“AIPV”) . After starting transaction 1, the value assigned to Out-Payment “b” is the intellectual property value (“EIPV”) from the transaction. The IPV can be determined using any known method for valuing intellectual property rights. Examples of these known valuation methods include “cost approach”, “market approach”, and “revenue approach”.

When the transaction 1 is started, the IP aggregator 20 first acquires an intellectual property right from the IP owner 10. At the start, the AIPV is comparable to the IPV obtained by subtracting the out- payment “b” made by the IP aggregator 20 to the IP owner 10 from the intellectual property right initially acquired. At the beginning of transaction 1, the intellectual property rights can include a single intellectual property right or multiple intellectual property rights.

  In the “cost approach”, the value of the intellectual property is set to be the same as the cost for copying / reproducing or replacing / replacing the intellectual property. The cost for duplicating and commercializing intellectual property is the cost for duplicating and commercializing the same intellectual property to be valued. Therefore, examples of cost estimation for reproduction and commercialization include the estimation of research and development costs, the cost of testing and improving intellectual property, and the realization of intellectual property that can be used for commercialization. A cost component that is an estimate of the cost of The replacement / replenishment cost is an estimate of the cost of producing an intellectual property that has utility similar to the intellectual property being valued. Therefore, examples of replacement / replenishment costs include R & D cost estimates, costs for testing and improving intellectual property, and costs for realizing intellectual property that can be used for commercialization. An element of cost that is an estimate of can be included. In general, under the “cost approach”, the evaluation measures the cost at the time when the evaluation is made, and does not depend on the cost information in the previous history.

In the “market approach”, value estimation is based on the cost of similar intellectual property. The “market approach” requires knowledge of the existence of a market for comparable intellectual property and the terms of sale or licensing of comparable intellectual property.

  In the “revenue approach”, estimate the current discounted value of future revenue sources. Future revenue sources typically include intellectual property benefits over other possible products or processes, the size of the market where commercial sales will be based on intellectual property, manufacturing and / or commercialization related Or estimated based on a number of factors, including supply factors and estimated demand for commercialized products or processes.

  AIPV is estimated as the overall value of the intellectual property rights held in the IP aggregator 20. The value of the AIPV is the sum of the individual IPV for each intellectual property right held by the IP aggregator 20 and the value that the investor 50, acquirer 30, and other licensees / buyers 40 will have to the IP aggregator 20 It is.

Investor 50 purchases the share (share) of IP aggregator 20 indicated by flow path “g” in FIG. 1 by paying cash to IP aggregator 20 indicated by flow path “h” in FIG. 1. . Hereinafter, in the present specification, the flow path "h" is referred to as the "stock payment (Stock Payment)" h "," flow path "g" is referred to as a "stock purchase (Stock Purchase)" g "".

A licensee or purchaser (individually or collectively) may obtain some rights of the aggregated intellectual property from the IP aggregator 20. The IP aggregator 20 assigns the intellectual property right to the acquirer 30 as indicated by the flow path “c”. The acquirer 30 may be a single acquirer of one intellectual property right, or the acquirer 30 may be a plurality of acquirers of a plurality of intellectual property rights. The transfer of intellectual property rights may be by a license agreement between the IP aggregator 20 and the acquirer 30, or the transfer of rights may be by sale of rights from the IP aggregator 20 to the acquirer 30. Thus, the flow path “c” in FIG. 1 indicates the sale or licensing of intellectual property rights from the IP aggregator 20 to the acquirer 30. Hereinafter, the flow path “c” is referred to as “transfer out “ c ”” in the present specification. Consideration for “ Transfer Out “ c ”” can include any known form of consideration used in selling or licensing intellectual property. For example, the IP aggregator 20 pays for a lump sum payment or royalty payment for the sale or licensing of intellectual property, or pays the acquirer 30 for one of several payment types as a consideration for licensing or selling intellectual property rights. You may choose to receive a combination of parts. Payment for the transfer “c” is indicated by the flow path “d” in FIG. Hereinafter, the flow path “d” is referred to as “in-payment“ d ”” in the present specification. The "Payment (In-Payment)" d "", in one embodiment of the present invention, a payment negotiated an agreement has been obtained by the Acquirer 30 and IP Aggregator 20.

Other licensees / buyers 40 may obtain some rights of the aggregated intellectual property from the IP aggregator 20. The IP aggregator 20 assigns the intellectual property rights to another licensee / buyer 40 as indicated by the flow path “e”. Other licensees / buyers 40 may be a single acquirer of one intellectual property right, or other licensees / buyers 40 may be multiple acquirers of multiple intellectual property rights Good. The transfer of intellectual property rights may be by a license agreement between the IP aggregator 20 and another licensee / buyer 40, or the transfer of rights may be a sale of the rights from the IP aggregator 20 to another licensee / buyer 40. It may be. The flow path “e” in FIG. 1 indicates the sale or licensing of intellectual property from the IP aggregator 20 to another licensee / buyer 40. The flow path “e” is hereinafter referred to as “Other Transfer Out“ e ”” in the present specification. Other Transfer Out “e” consideration may include any known form of consideration used in selling or licensing intellectual property. For example, the IP aggregator 20 may pay multiple payment types as payments for lump sum payments or royalties for intellectual property sales or licensing, licensing or sales of intellectual property rights to other licensees / buyers 40. You can choose to receive several combinations. The payment for the other transfer “e” is indicated by the flow path “f” in FIG. The flow path “f” is hereinafter referred to as “ Other In-Payment “ T ”” in this specification. Other In-Payment “f” is a negotiated payment that is agreed between the other licensee / buyer 40 and the IP aggregator 20 in one embodiment herein.

In some embodiments of the present invention, AIPV can be represented by Equation 1 below.
(Formula 1)
AIPV = Σ {Σ [IPV] i + Σ [ Payment (In-Payment) "d" ] i + Σ [ other payment (Other In-Payment) "f "] i + Σ [ shares Payment (Stock Payment) "h" _I }-{Σ [Out-Payment “b”] _i }

Σ [IPV] _i represents the sum of all IPVs estimated for the intellectual property held by the IP aggregator 20. For the transaction between the IP aggregator 20 and the acquirer 30, there is a monetary value accumulated by the IP aggregator 20 from the payment made by the acquirer 30, and this accumulated monetary value is Σ [payment (In-Payment) “d”] _i . Similarly, for transactions between the IP aggregator 20 and other licensees / buyers 40, there is a monetary value accumulated by the IP aggregator 20 from payments made by other licensees / buyers 40 and this accumulated. The monetary value is represented by Σ [ Other In-Payment “f”] _i . An investor 50 who purchases stock of the IP aggregator 20 pays the purchase price of this stock, and this monetary value also accumulates at the IP aggregator 20. The sum of payments made for stock purchases is represented by Σ [ Other In-Payment “f”] _i . Acquisition of intellectual property rights from the IP owner 10 by the IP aggregator 20 requires some form of payment from the IP aggregator 20 to the IP owner 10. As noted above, such payments can be cash, IP aggregator 20 shares, or a combination of these payment types. The sum of all payments made by the IP aggregator 20 to the IP owner 10 is represented by Σ [Out-Payment “b”] _i .

In addition to Σ [Out-Payment “b”] _i , the IP aggregator may have additional funding that can be appropriately included in the AIPV. For example, if dividends are paid to stockholders or other equity interests in IP aggregator 20, it may be appropriate to subtract the total dividend payment made from AIPV. Also, it may be appropriate to deduct a specific type of business expenses other than the payment (Out-Payment) “b” from the AIPV. Equation 1 can be modified to so clarify such additional deductions.

  In some embodiments, the AIPV is determined by the administrator of the IP aggregator 20. Administrators can use any known or later developed accounting and / or economic method to value intellectual property. In the present invention, AIPV is an estimate of the value of all intellectual property rights held by the IP aggregator 20, and in some embodiments, includes the results of other value measurements described herein.

If the IP aggregator 20 acquires additional intellectual property rights from the IP owner 10, the AIPV has been considered by the newly acquired IPV, the payment received and received by the IP aggregator 20, and the administrator of the IP aggregator 20. Can be updated to reveal other value measurements.

AIPV is can be represented by the stock price is the price per share (share) for shares in the IP Aggregator 20, all overall value of shares issued would not necessarily equal to AIPV . The stock price can be set based on any known market process, such as an auction process or negotiation. In one embodiment of the present invention, it shares the aggregator 20 may be one or more known securities (security) or more securities form. As used herein, the term "stock, stock (stock") is referred to as the capital of the IP Aggregator 20, assets, property or securities (securities), which represents the revenue in profit,. These types of securities, common stock equity or preferred stock equity (common or preferred shares of stock) shares securities (equity securities) such as, debt including bonds (bonds) and debt instruments (debentures) Securities ( debt sectors) , as well as mutual fund investments that allow investors to pool investments with many other investors. The process of buying and selling stocks can include public trading of the stock . Stock purchases and sales may be further facilitated by web-based methods developed for stock trading, known as any known or electronic commerce. Such a web method can be made accessible to the investor 50 via the internet, and the value per share price can be posted on an e-commerce website, investors 50, will be able to buy the shares of equity (shares) through the Internet.

Transaction 1 of the present invention, as an input to the transaction 1, it is possible to further use of the investment research (Investment Research) 60 and technical expertise (experts) (Technical Expertise) 70. The investment survey 60 can include, for example, market research to determine IPV of intellectual property. Investment survey 60 may also include an industrial survey to identify IP owner 10, acquirer 30, or other licensee / buyer 40. Investment survey 60 assists in the determination of IPV and AIPV in transaction 1.

The technical expertise 70 similarly supports the operation of transaction 1. Further, the technical expertise 70 can include expertise for setting the value of the stock price. Technical expertise 70 may include economic expertise that determines AIPV. The technical expertise 70 may include expertise to use intellectual property sold or licensed in a transfer out “c” and / or other transfer out “e”. In one embodiment of the present invention, the technical expertise 70 is a subsidiary company to the IP aggregator 20. Employees with technical expertise 70 are required to take advantage of intellectual property material sold or licensed to Transfer Out “c” and / or Other Transfer Out “e” Have knowledge. In one embodiment of the present invention, acquirer 30 will receive the benefits of technical expertise 70 in addition to the intellectual property rights sold or licensed. In this embodiment, or in another embodiment, other licensees / buyers 40 will receive the benefits of technical expertise 70 in addition to the intellectual property rights sold or licensed. Benefits received from technical expertise 70 may include know-how on how to utilize materials such as intellectual property products or processes sold or licensed by IP aggregator 20, for example.

In one embodiment, the technical expertise 70 provides an assessment of the intellectual property that the IP aggregator 20 is interested in purchasing or licensing, and based on the assessment, IP for such transactions. Guidance is provided to the aggregator 20. As guidance, the IP aggregator 20 seeks to purchase or license the intellectual property that it is interested in and the IP aggregator 20 to acquire the rights, and the IP aggregator 20 should have other rights or intellectual property. Instructions that link intellectual property can be included. Guidance can include instructions for combining intellectual property, thereby creating a patent network of intellectual property that covers a new product or process. Guidance can further include identifying areas of innovation to be developed to generate new intellectual property. Technical expertise 70 also facilitates joint research and development between the IP aggregator 20 and the IP owner 10, between two or more IP owners 10, and between one or more IP owners 10 and third parties. Can play a role. Joint research and development can include research funded by third parties. A third party related to the present invention is a person or entity other than the IP aggregator 20 and the IP aggregator 10.

The technical expertise 70 increases the in - payment “d” paid by the acquirer 30 for the benefit of the technical expertise 70 in addition to the rights of the intellectual property sold or licensed. It can affect AIPV. Similarly, in addition to intellectual property rights sold or licensed, technical expertise 70 may be used for other payments (Other In-) paid by other licensees / buyers 40 for the benefit of technical expertise 70. (Payment) “f” can be increased. In some embodiments of the present invention, the technical expertise 70 can generate know-how about the use or use of sold or licensed intellectual property. In such embodiments, the acquirer 30 or other licensee / buyer 40 may agree to make a higher payment if the know-how generated by the technical expertise 70 is included in the transfer of rights. Further, the technical expertise 70 is a patent network that covers the new product or process by increasing the AIPV as a result of the acquisition of the intellectual property by the instruction of the technical expertise 70 and combining the intellectual property. As well as joint research and development, and as a result of the cooperation, the IP aggregator can be made a new intellectual property.

The EIPV is determined by distributing the AIPV in the intellectual property rights held by the IP aggregator 20. This distribution is based on the determination of a plurality of weighting factors, as these factors in some embodiments, the scope of exclusive rights of intellectual property rights (exclusivity), the estimated duration of the exclusivity, IP Aggregator 20 Closeness of competing intellectual property not owned by the company, the scope of trade secrets, know-how and / or confidential information transferred from the IP owner 10 to the IP aggregator 20, and the geographical scope of the exclusive rights (for example, the IP owner 10 The range of foreign intellectual property rights included in the intellectual property rights transferred to the IP aggregator 20), the possibility of exercising the rights related to the intellectual property rights transferred to the IP aggregator 20, and the acquirer 30. And / or licenses of intellectual property held by IP aggregators to other licensees / buyers 40. Includes a range of opportunities on is available for sale commercially. In one embodiment, the EIPV determination is shown in Equation 2.

(Formula 2)
EIPVi = [AIPV / Σi] x [1 + α + β + γ + δ + ε + ζ + η + θ + λ + μ + π + σ + φ + ω]
Here, α, β, γ, δ, ε, ζ, and η are weighting factors representing the following matters.
α: Range of monopoly rights of intellectual property rights,
β: Estimated period of exclusivity,
γ: proximity of competing intellectual property not owned by IP aggregator 20,
δ: scope of trade secret, know-how and / or confidential information transferred from IP owner 10 to IP aggregator 20
ε: Geographic range of exclusive rights (for example, the range of foreign intellectual property rights included in the intellectual property rights transferred by IP owner 10 to IP aggregator 20),
ζ: Possibility of exercising relevant rights of intellectual property rights assigned to IP aggregator 20,
η: the range of commercial opportunities available to the acquirer 30 and / or other licensees / buyers 40 for licensing or selling intellectual property held by the IP aggregator,
θ: Estimated value of the number of sublicenses recognized for intellectual property rights,
λ: the need for third party licensing in order to take advantage of intellectual property rights and / or so that such third party licenses can be acquired or acquired,
μ: Estimated value of the value of bundling intellectual property rights with other intellectual property rights π: Whether the right is included in the rights acquired by the IP aggregator 20 for the purpose of improving the value of the intellectual property right,
σ: whether further enhancement of the subject matter of the intellectual property right is necessary prior to commercialization and / or whether value enhancement has been made or can be done,
φ: whether financing is required to further improve intellectual property rights prior to commercialization and / or whether such financing has been acquired or can be acquired,
ω: whether “other services” are required to prepare intellectual property rights for sublicenses and / or whether such “other services” have been acquired or can be acquired,
Σi is equal to the number of intellectual property rights valued separately by the IP aggregator 20.

  “Other services” includes providing marketing, investment, accounting, manufacturing, and other advice, and providing tangible work products based on such advice.

Since these weighting factors can be positive or negative, any individual EIPV may be greater than or less than the average AIPV, where AIPV / Σi is the average AIPV. Other weighting factors can be applied in the determination of EIPV _i , for example in the IP aggregator 20. These weighting factors can also change over time, for example, for age of the intellectual property rights , scientific advancements, valued intellectual property Any one or more weightings that occur due to technology or business, or acquisition of other intellectual property rights by IP aggregator 20 (which affects the value of the valued intellectual property rights), etc. Represents changes in factors. Alternatively, EIPV _i can be determined by currently known or later developed accounting and / or economic methods for determining the value of intellectual property rights. Such other methods include the estimation of the value that the relevant market will generate, the consideration of the value set for similar intellectual property rights in transactions and / or litigation, the provisions relating to intellectual property rights Potential profits available from transactions, or negotiations with prospective acquirers 30 or other licensees / buyers 40, etc.

Services such as marketing, investment, accounting, manufacturing, and technology, or tangible work products in these categories, provided to intellectual property rights holders can increase the value of ElPV _i . In general, when innovators have access to such services, the value of these innovations can be high because the acquisition of services provides a better way to manage the innovation and commercialize it. It is because it can prepare well. As a result, by incorporating the factors σ, φ, and ω into the estimation of EiPV _i , a means for explaining the action of providing each service to the value of the intellectual property right is realized.

As provided herein, when transaction 1 is initiated, the IP aggregator 20 first acquires an intellectual property right from the IP owner 10. At the start, the AIPV is comparable to the IPV obtained by subtracting the out-payment “b” made by the IP aggregator 20 to the IP owner 10 from the initially acquired intellectual property right. The starting values for EIPV, AIPV and Out-Payment “b” are given by Equation 3 and Equation 4.

(Formula 3)
EIPV ₀ = payment (Out-Payment) “b” ₀ = IPV ₀
(Formula 4)
AIPV ₀ = ΣEIPV ₀

  In Equation 3 and Equation 4, the subscript 0 indicates the start condition. As provided above in this specification, at the beginning of transaction 1, the intellectual property rights may include a single intellectual property right or multiple intellectual property rights.

Each EIPV _i can be recalculated as the AIPV is updated. As provided above in this specification, when the IP aggregator 20 acquires additional intellectual property rights from the IP owner 10, the AIPV is the newly acquired IPV, the payment made and received by the IP aggregator 20. , And other value measurements envisioned by the administrator of the IP aggregator 20 can be updated. The AIPV can also be updated to reflect arbitrarily added value generated by the technical expertise 70. Alternatively, each EIPV _i can be recalculated at the discretion of the administrator of the IP Aggregator 20 (discretion). In the preferred embodiment of the invention, each EIPV _i is recalculated when the AIPV changes by a significant amount. This substantial amount can be related to the rate of change of AIPV, for example. In some embodiments of the invention, each EIPV _i is recalculated as market conditions change, such as demand for intellectual property rights by the acquirer 30 or other licensee / buyer 40, for example.

  FIG. 2 illustrates one embodiment of the computer-implemented method of Transaction 1 of the present invention. The computer-implemented method shown in FIG. 2 uses patents as exemplary intellectual property rights. However, the intellectual property rights of the method may include copyright, trade secrets, know-how, and top secret information each alone or in combination. In the database 80, the data of the IP owner 10 is accumulated and held. The data stored in the database 80 includes information on each IP owner 10, for example, an address, a contact information for each IP owner 10, an intellectual property ID of each IP owner 10, and the IP owner 10 and the IP aggregator 20. Other information related to the business relationship between can be included. In the database 90, descriptions of each patent right assigned from the IP owner 10 to the IP aggregator 20 are stored and held. Each description of the patent in the database 90 includes the ID of the corresponding IP owner 10, title information about the patent ownership, the expiry date of the patent, the presence of the corresponding application filed in the United States, the corresponding application in the foreign country and / or Or the existence of a patent, as well as other factors and in some embodiments that may be relevant to the claims, the closeness of competing intellectual property, and the value of the patent or transaction containing that patent, as appropriate Other factors including weighting factors as described herein above are included. Databases 80 and 90 are maintained and maintained by IP aggregator 20, or by a third party provider of database services, or by contractual agreement. Databases 80 and 90 may be maintained and maintained as separate databases, or databases 80 and 90 may include different data regions in a single database.

The IP aggregator 20 can determine which patents are associated with the transfer of rights to the acquirer 30 or other licensee / buyer 40 by accessing the databases 80 and 90. Data regarding the acquirer 30 is maintained and maintained in the database 130, such as the name of the acquirer 30, the contact information of the acquirer 30, and the patent or patents from the database associated with the acquirer 30. Including patents. The database may also include the type and price of the transfer out “c” and the payment (In-Payment) “d”. The database 130 may further include information about interests that the acquirer 30 has in different technical or business areas, or specific intellectual property rights. Data about other licensees / buyers 40 is maintained and maintained in the database 140, such data includes the names of other licensees / buyers 40, contacts about other licensees / buyers 40, and others Patent or patents from the database 90 associated with the licensee / buyer 40 of the company. The database 140 is transferred (Transfer Out) "e", and may include types (nature) and price paid (Other In-Payment) "f ". The database 140 may further include information about interests that the licensee / buyer 40 has in different technical or business areas, or specific intellectual property rights. Databases 130 and 140 are maintained and maintained by IP aggregator 20, or by a third party provider of database services, or by contractual agreement. Databases 130 and 140 may be maintained and maintained as separate databases, or databases 130 and 140 may include different data regions in a single database. Databases 130 and 140 may also include different data regions in databases 80 and 90, either separately or as part of a single database that combines all of databases 80, 90, 130, and 140.

Database 150 includes information about the investors 50, such data, the name of the investor 50, contact information for the investors 50, the number of shares of shares held by investors 50 (shares) or including the value of other securities, and shares payment (Stock payment) "h". The database 150 may include such further information U.S. Securities Exchange Act or IP Aggregator 20 appropriately by jurisdictions is active, associated with the required stock purchased (Stock Purchase) "g" . Also, the databases 130, 140, and 150 are different data in the databases 80 and 90, either separately or as part of a single database that combines all of the data in the databases 80, 90, 130, 140, and 150. An area can be included. In some embodiments, the information contained in the databases 80, 90, 130, 140, and 150 is a different data set stored in one or more computers or computer systems.

Evaluation module 100 receives data from databases 80, 90, 130, 140, and 150. Included in the data is the values of the other payment (Other In-Payment) "f ", the value of payments (In-Payment) "d" , and shares payment (Stock Payment) "h". Within the evaluation module 100, individual IPV _i are determined using any of the methods described hereinabove. Accordingly, the external input unit 160 includes a database of information, and provides related cost or market data to the evaluation module 100. The database of the external input unit 160 includes a cost approach, a market approach, a revenue approach, or other intellectual property valuation methods known to those skilled in the art that value intellectual property. Illustratively, data of the external input unit 160 may include the cost elements for calculating the cost of replication for patent (Reproduction) or exchange (replacement). The data of the external input unit 160 includes market data regarding the cost of comparable patents, similarly or alternatively. The data in the external input 160 can, similarly or alternatively, include estimates of future income streams and discounted cash flows.

According to Equation 1, in one embodiment, an AIPV is determined within the evaluation module 100. Other methods for calculating ATPV are known or can be developed as appropriate within the scope of the present invention. For example, AIPV of the present invention, the payment (In-Payment) "d" , other payment (Other In-Payment) "f ", shares payment (Stock Payment) "h", and the payment (Out-Payment) " It can be determined using data different from or in addition to b ″. The AIPV is maintained and maintained in a database associated with the evaluation module 100. Since the variable of Formula 1 changes, for example, as appropriate, the AIPV related to the IP aggregator 20 is updated. The AIPV can be updated periodically or as needed. The most recently updated AIPV is referred to herein as the latest AIPV 170.

  The latest AIPV 170 is an input from the evaluation module 100 to the assignment module 115. Also, the evaluation module 100 counts and stores the number of individual intellectual property valued in the evaluation module 100 and identified as Σi in Equation 2. Σi is an input from the evaluation module 100 to the assignment module 115. In some embodiments, the assignment factor 180 is a database that includes the weighting factor used to adjust the average AIPV in Equation 2 and other factors of the values used by the administrator of the IP aggregator 20. Database 90 is valid for patents, existence of corresponding applications filed in the United States, presence of corresponding applications and / or patents in foreign countries, and claims, competing intellectual property approximations, and As appropriate for the value of the patent or transaction including that patent. For patents that contain information about other factors that may be relevant, such data is input from database 90 to assigned factor 180. Further, the assignment factor 180 may be a weighting factor that is not included in the database 90, such as trade secrets, know-how, and / or confidential information transferred from the IP owner 10 to the IP aggregator 20 in the embodiment presented herein. , And a weighting factor indicating the associated exercising potential of the intellectual property rights transferred to the IP aggregator 20.

  The weighting factor retained and maintained in the assignment factor 180 may be assigned as a relative value on any scale. For example, ζ, which is a weighting factor indicating the related executability of an intellectual property right, can be indicated by a value from 0 to 0.1, where 0 is a patent having a very limited executability. 0.1 indicates the patent with the highest level of enforceability. Similar arbitrary scales can be set for other weighting factors.

The output from the assignment module 115 is an individual EIPVi's that sets an out-payment “b” for each IP owner 10 that assigns a patent right to the IP aggregator 20 by licensing or sales. .

FIG. 3 illustrates the method of the present invention in some embodiments, where technical expertise 70 is aggregated by IP aggregator 20 via flow path j ′, Augmented Innovation 200. Expand. In the present embodiment, the IP aggregator 20 receives the transfer of intellectual property rights from the IP owner 10 by either sales or licensing. The transferred intellectual property right requires further research and development efforts to be suitable for transfer to the acquirer 30. The reason that further research and development efforts may be required is that even if the intellectual property rights transferred to the IP aggregator 20 are suitable for use in one market, those intellectual property rights are for use in the market for the acquirer 30. This is because it may not be appropriate. Accordingly, the technical expertise 70 receives information or data about the intellectual property rights transferred to the IP aggregator 20 along the flow path j. The technical expertise 70 then provides further research and development needed to produce an enhanced innovation 200. The enhanced innovation 200 is aggregated using IP rights acquired by the IP aggregator 20 from the IP owner 10 for transfer to the acquirer 30 in line with Transfer Path “c”. Itself protected by the intellectual property rights granted. The IP aggregator receives payment for Transfer Out “c” via In-Payment “d” as described herein above.

FIG. 4 illustrates the method of the present invention in some embodiments, where technical expertise 70 is an IP aggregator to identify new markets for existing intellectual property rights held by the IP aggregator 20. Support 20 In this embodiment, the intellectual property rights that are owned by the IP Aggregator 20, can be used in the market "A", it could also be used in different markets "B". The technical expertise 70 receives information or data about the intellectual property rights held by the IP aggregator 20 along the flow path j, enables utilization of the intellectual property rights in the market “B”, and enters the flow path j ′. Along with this, information or data is provided to the IP aggregator 20. IP Aggregator 20, then another transfer of the flow path through the (Other Transfer Out) "e" , the transfer of the intellectual property rights to another licensee / buyer 40. The IP aggregator 20 receives payment of the intellectual property right transferred through another payment ( Other In-Payment) “f”.

Referring to FIG. 5, the embodiment of the present invention relates to a service transaction 200, and a plurality of service providers 210 subscribe to the service transaction 200 by subscribing to the service transaction 200. In another embodiment, the registration step 220 includes paying a purchase fee for the service transaction 200 by one or more of the plurality of service providers 210. The IP owner 10 can purchase the service of one or more service providers 210 by paying the service transaction 240 to the service transaction 200. In another embodiment, services 230 of multiple service providers 210 include technical advice such as marketing advice, investment advice, engineering or scientific advice, research / development support, commercialization advice, manufacturing advice, and accounting advice. be able to. Service provider 210 receives payment 250 for service 230 provided from service transaction 200. In one embodiment, the service provider may receive a payment 250 in the form of a dividend from the service transaction 200 in return for the purchase payment paid in the registration step 220. Accordingly, the IP owner 10 receives one or more services 230 from one or more of the plurality of service providers 210 by paying the service transaction 240 to the service transaction 200.

Service transaction 200 can operate in conjunction with transaction 1 or as an integrated service of transaction 1, regardless of transaction 1 of the present invention. Accordingly, an IP owner 10 that needs one or more of the services 230 can obtain these services via the service transaction 200. When operating in conjunction with or as a service for transaction 1, service transaction 200 can then provide a process, which increases AIPV thanks to the provision of service 230 to IP owner 10. For example, such services also have the potential to increase the value of the intellectual property being traded by increasing the value of IPV _i and including the factors σ, φ, and ω in the EIPV estimate. Accordingly, the aggregated intellectual property value itself is known to increase the value of the services described herein and the intellectual property of the IP owner 10, or can be determined as such. Can be enhanced by providing services.

With reference to FIGS. 1, 2, and 5, in one embodiment, IP owner 10 obtains service 230 for service cost 240 below the market cost for such service. Transaction 1 maintains a high rate of revenue that should receive the cost difference between service costs 240 and the market cost of such services from the intellectual property owner's license out of the intellectual property rights. Can be recovered. The service provider 210 can benefit from the economies of scale realized through the aggregation of services 230, for example, because the service provider 210 can provide a “product” service to the IP owner 10 through the service transaction 200. Such “ productized ” services can include, for example, services whose scope and content have been determined so that the amount of development work required to provide the services is minimized or reduced. .

With reference to FIGS. 1, 2 and 5, in another embodiment, the service provider 210 may have an existing tenant due to participation in the transaction 1 that may integrate or integrate the method of the service transaction 200 of the owner 10. Should benefit from the number of customers. Accordingly, the IP owner 10 participating in the transaction 1 can access the service via the service transaction 200, thereby increasing the value of IPV _i , EIPV _i , and finally APV. Service provider 210 can have an efficient process available, which can identify clients that are intellectual property rights holders participating in transaction 1.

With reference to FIGS. 1, 2, and 5, in yet another embodiment, service provider 210 may result from participation in a service transaction 200, which is a centralized transaction (centralized exchange) of an intellectual property rights holder. And should benefit from the number of existing customers. Accordingly, the IP owner 10 participating in the transaction 1 can access the service, thereby increasing the value of the intellectual property of the intellectual property right holder. The service provider 210 can have an efficient process available, which can identify clients that are intellectual property rights holders participating in the service transaction 200.

Accordingly, in one embodiment, a method is provided for aggregating services and providing them to the IP owner 10 from the centralized service transaction 200, which includes subscribing a plurality of service providers 210 to the service transaction 200. When, and providing access to the service transaction 200 to a plurality of IP owners 10, the steps at least one owner to acquire from at least one service 230 of the plurality of service providers 210 of the IP owners 10 at least one owner of the IP owner 10, the steps to pay service fees or the first payment 240 to the service transaction 200 to the service 230, a plurality of service providers 210 that service transaction 200 provides services 230 Our little Includes a step of performing a second payment 250 against Kutomo one of at least two of the service provider 210 provides a service 230 heterogeneous.

  Referring to FIGS. 1, 2 and 5, in yet another embodiment, a method is provided for aggregating services and providing them from a centralized service transaction 200 to an IP owner 10, where the service transaction 200 is operated by transaction 1, Transaction 1 aggregates a plurality of intellectual property rights from a plurality of IP owners 10 in the intellectual property aggregator 20 by transferring a plurality of intellectual property rights to the intellectual property aggregator 20.

Referring to FIG. 5, in yet another embodiment, a method for aggregating services and providing an IP owner 10 from a centralized service transaction 200 is provided, with service costs 240 being assisted by an intellectual property aggregator. The method of aggregating and providing services from the service transaction 200 to the IP owner 10 may further include payment to the service transaction 200 by multiple service providers to subscribe to the service transaction 200. The method of aggregating services and providing them to the IP owner 10 from the service transaction 200 was selected from the group consisting of marketing services, investment services, technical services, research support, development support, commercialization services, manufacturing services, and accounting services. A service 230 may further be included. The method of providing services from the service transaction 100 to the IP owner 10 by aggregating services includes setting the service cost 240 to be less than the market price.

Referring to FIGS. 1, 2, and 5, the operation of service transaction 200 according to one embodiment of the present invention is a computer-implemented method for operating a transaction based on intellectual property rights, In the method, the intellectual property aggregator 20 aggregates a plurality of intellectual property rights by a first transfer from a plurality of IP owners 10, and the intellectual property aggregator 20 performs a plurality in exchange for a plurality of first acquisition costs. The stage of acquiring intellectual property rights,
Electronically transferring the value of the intellectual property selected from the group consisting of the first acquisition cost and the value acquired using the intellectual property evaluation method for each of the plurality of intellectual property rights to the first database. And the stage of
Electronically transferring a plurality of payments made to the intellectual property aggregator 20 by a plurality of acquirers 30 of some of the plurality of intellectual property rights to a second database;
Electronically transferring a plurality of investment prices paid by a plurality of investors 50 for each purchase of an equity aggregator 20's equity interest to a third database;
In the microprocessor, for each of the purchased intellectual property rights, calculating the aggregated intellectual property value based on the intellectual property value in the first data, wherein the payment is The investment price is paid in a third database for each of the payments made to the intellectual property aggregator made in the second database for each of the transferred intellectual property rights When,
Processing a plurality of weighting factors for each of the intellectual property rights in the microprocessor;
In a microprocessor, the stage of processing the value of the traded intellectual property for a plurality of intellectual property rights, wherein the value of the traded intellectual property uses a weighting factor for each of the intellectual property rights Estimated by assigning the value of each aggregated intellectual property of the plurality of intellectual property rights, and
including. In this embodiment, the provision of the service 230 can be further incorporated as described above.

It will be appreciated by persons skilled in the art that the present invention is not limited by what has been particularly shown and described herein. Rather, the scope of the present invention is defined only by the following claims.

10 IP owner 20 IP aggregator 200 Enhanced innovation 30 New product / process acquirer 70 Technical expertise

Claims (21)

In an intellectual property aggregator that manages intellectual property transactions, a computer-implemented method for generating public securities,
From a plurality of intellectual property rights holders to the aggregator of the intellectual property, and to transfer multiple of intellectual property rights (transferring-in) stage,
Comprising the steps of providing a service to at least holders of the holders of the plurality of intellectual property rights, the step of providing the service, at least one value to the plurality of the transferred IPR And the stage that began to add,
Calculating the aggregated intellectual property value of the plurality of assigned intellectual property rights;
Estimating the value of intellectual property in a transaction for each of the plurality of intellectual property rights, wherein the value of intellectual property in the transaction is A stage estimated by assigning aggregated intellectual property values;
A portion of the plurality of intellectual property rights, and transfer to one or more of the acquirer of intellectual property rights (transferring-out) step,
Receiving payment from each acquirer of intellectual property rights, wherein said payment is comparable to the intellectual property value in said transaction for each of said intellectual property rights transferred to each acquirer; ,
Calculating the value of the updated aggregated intellectual property to account for each payment received;
Comprising the steps of issuing the benefit of multiple securities (security interests), the benefits of each of the securities are available at a certain price, the price indicates updated, the value of the aggregated intellectual property , The stage,
A method for generating public securities, including: The transfer-in of at least one of the plurality of intellectual property rights is by selling the intellectual property rights from a holder of the intellectual property rights to an aggregator of the intellectual property. A method for generating public securities in an intellectual property aggregator that manages an intellectual property transaction according to 1. Be transferred at least one of the plurality of intellectual property rights (transfer-in) is due to licensing from holders of the intellectual property rights to the aggregator of the intellectual property, knowledge of claim 1 A method for generating public securities in an intellectual property aggregator that manages public property transactions.   The intellectual property of claim 1, wherein the service provided is selected from the group consisting of market advice, investment advice, technical advice, research support, development support, commercialization advice, manufacturing advice, and accounting advice. A method for generating public securities in an intellectual property aggregator that manages transactions. A method for managing transactions based on intellectual property rights by means of a computer-based system, comprising:
In the first transfer, the intellectual property rights are transferred to an intellectual property aggregator, whereby a plurality of intellectual property rights are aggregated from a plurality of intellectual property rights holders in the intellectual property aggregator. When,
Comprising the steps of providing a service to at least one holder of the holders of the plurality of intellectual property rights, the step of providing the service, to at least one of the plurality of the transferred IPR The stage where value was added,
In the first database, the method comprising: storing information of the first set to describe each of the holders of the plurality of intellectual property rights,
Storing a second set of information describing each of the plurality of intellectual property rights in a second database, wherein the second set of information is a value added by provision of the service. Including the value of intellectual property for each of the plurality of intellectual property rights having:
Storing a third set of information describing a plurality of acquirers of a portion of the plurality of intellectual property rights in a third database, wherein the third set of information is stored in the intellectual database Including, for a second assignment of property rights to the acquirer, payment information for each acquirer for each payment made to the intellectual property aggregator;
Storing a fourth set of information describing a plurality of investors in a fourth database, wherein each investor is a purchaser of equity interest in the intellectual property aggregator; And wherein the fourth set of information includes investor information for each investor for an investment made to the intellectual property aggregator;
Inputting information selected from the group consisting of the information of the first set, the information of the second set, the information of the third set, and the information of the fourth set into the evaluation module;
Calculating the value of the aggregated intellectual property rights in the evaluation module to reveal the information;
Determining the value of intellectual property in a transaction for each of the plurality of intellectual property rights, wherein the value of the intellectual property in the transaction is aggregated in each of the plurality of intellectual property rights Estimated by assigning the value of the rendered intellectual property, and
To clarify the payment of the received respectively, it has been updated, and calculating the value of the aggregated intellectual property,
Entering the value of payment for each payment received for transfer of intellectual property rights into the third database;
And the payment received for the intellectual property right manages a transaction based on the intellectual property right by a computer-based system that is comparable to the value of the intellectual property in the transaction for the intellectual property right. Way for. At least one of said transfer of said plurality of intellectual property rights (transfer-in), the depending from the intellectual property rights holders to the intellectual property rights sale to aggregator of the intellectual property, in claim 5 A method for managing transactions based on intellectual property rights by means of the described computer-based system. 6. The computer-based system of claim 5, wherein the transfer-in of at least one of the plurality of intellectual property rights is by licensing from a holder of the intellectual property rights to an aggregator of the intellectual property. A method for operating transactions based on intellectual property rights.   6. The computer-based system of claim 5, wherein the service provided is selected from the group consisting of market advice, investment advice, technical advice, research support, development support, commercialization advice, manufacturing advice, and accounting advice. A method for managing transactions based on intellectual property rights. A computer-implemented method that aggregates services and provides them to an intellectual property rights holder from a centralized transaction (centralized exchange) ,
Registering multiple service providers in a service transaction (service exchange) ;
Providing access to service transactions (service exchanges) to multiple intellectual property rights holders;
A step of obtaining a service from at least one of the at least one holder has multiple service providers of the holders of the intellectual property rights,
At least one holder of the holder of the intellectual property rights, and performing a first payment service transaction (service exchanges) to the service,
Comprises the steps of performing a second payment for at least one of the plurality of service providers said service transactions (International Exchange) to provide the service,
At least two of the service providers offer disparate services, a method of consolidating services and providing them from a centralized transaction to intellectual property rights holders. The service transaction (service Exchange) is operated by intellectual property transactions (Intellectual Property Exchange), the intellectual property transactions (Intellectual Property Exchange), the intellectual property a multiple of intellectual property rights 10. Aggregating a plurality of intellectual property rights from a plurality of intellectual property right holders in an intellectual property aggregator by transferring in to an aggregator A method of providing intellectual property rights holders from type trading (centralized exchanges) . 11. The method of aggregating services according to claim 10 , wherein said first payment is assisted by said intellectual property aggregator and provided from a centralized transaction (centralized exchange) to an intellectual property rights holder. . Each of the plurality of service providers is registered in the service transaction the service transaction paid cost (Service Exchange) (International Exchange), centralized transaction (concentrated by aggregating services according to claim 9 Type exchange) to provide intellectual property rights holders. 10. The service of claim 9, wherein the services provided are selected from the group consisting of market advice, investment advice, technical advice, research support, development support, commercialization advice, manufacturing advice, and accounting advice. To provide intellectual property rights holders from a centralized transaction (centralized exchange) . The method according to claim 9, wherein the second payment is lower than a market price and is provided from a centralized transaction (centralized exchange) to a holder of intellectual property rights. A computer-implemented method for operating a transaction (exchange) based on intellectual property rights,
In the intellectual property aggregator, a step of aggregating a plurality of intellectual property rights from a plurality of intellectual property right holders by a first transfer, wherein the intellectual property aggregator obtains a plurality of first acquisitions. Obtaining the plurality of intellectual property rights in exchange for costs;
Comprising the steps of providing a service to at least holders of the holders of a plurality of intellectual property rights, the step of providing the service, the value to at least one of the plurality of the transferred IPR Grant, stage,
Electronically transferring the value of the intellectual property relating to each of the plurality of intellectual property rights to the first database, wherein the value of the intellectual property is determined by a first acquisition cost and an intellectual property evaluation; A stage comparable to a value selected from the group of values obtained using the method;
Electronically transferring a plurality of payments made to the intellectual property aggregator by a plurality of acquirers of a portion of the plurality of intellectual property rights to a second database;
The third database, in aggregator of the intellectual property, and transmitting the more multiple investment price paid electronically to a plurality of investor for each purchase of stake (equity interest),
In the microprocessor, for each of the intellectual property rights purchased, based on the value of the intellectual property in the first data base, comprising the steps of calculating the value of the aggregated intellectual property, The payment is made in the second database for each of the intellectual property rights assigned in the second assignment, and the investment price is for each of the payments made to the intellectual property aggregator, Paid in said third database; and
For each intellectual property right, a numerical value corresponding to the range of exclusive rights that can be assigned to each intellectual property right, a numerical value corresponding to the period of exclusive rights that can be assigned to each intellectual property right, and intellectual property rights Corresponding to the range of trade secrets that comprise each of these, the number corresponding to the relative number of commercial opportunities associated with each of the intellectual property rights, and the value added at the stage of providing the service Processing a plurality of weighting factors selected from the group consisting of numerical values with the microprocessor;
Processing the intellectual property value in the transaction for the plurality of intellectual property rights by the microprocessor, wherein the intellectual property value in the transaction is a weighting factor for each of the intellectual property rights; Estimated using assigning the value of each aggregated intellectual property of the plurality of intellectual property rights,
For managing transactions (exchanges) including 16. The first transfer of at least one of the plurality of intellectual property rights is by selling the intellectual property rights from a holder of the intellectual property to an aggregator of the intellectual property. A method for operating a transaction (exchange) . 16. The first assignment of at least one of the plurality of intellectual property rights is by licensing of the intellectual property rights from a holder of the intellectual property to an aggregator of the intellectual property. To manage the trading (exchange) of The method for operating the transaction (exchange) according to claim 15, wherein the second assignment to the acquirer of the intellectual property right is by selling the intellectual property right. 16. The method for operating a transaction (exchange) according to claim 15, wherein the second assignment to the acquirer of the intellectual property right is by licensing the intellectual property right. The method for managing a transaction (exchange) according to claim 15, wherein at least one of the plurality of intellectual property rights is a patent. The method for operating a transaction (exchange) according to claim 15, wherein at least one of the plurality of intellectual property rights is a trade secret.