JP2015070631A - Power system facility planning support device and power system facility arrangement determination method - Google Patents

Abstract

PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To determine the arrangement places of monitoring apparatuses and the base stations so that the number of the monitoring apparatuses performing supervisory control of the power system is minimized and the number of the base stations for relaying communication with respective monitoring apparatus is minimized.SOLUTION: A monitoring apparatus candidate determination unit 16 determines a candidate of the arrangement place of a monitoring apparatus based on the configuration of the power system. A base station determination unit 17 determines the arrangement place of a base station from the candidate of monitoring apparatus, and the communication area data indicating the range communicable from the base station. Determination is made so that communication with any one arrangement place monitoring apparatus candidate of all monitoring apparatuses is possible in a base station to be arranged, and the total number of base stations to be arranged is minimized. A monitoring apparatus determination unit 18 determines the arrangement place of a monitoring apparatus from the candidate of arrangement place of a monitoring apparatus, the arrangement place of a base station, and the communication area data.

Description

  The present invention relates to a power system facility plan support apparatus and a power system facility arrangement determination method for optimally arranging power system facilities.

  In recent years, small-scale distributed power sources that use renewable energy such as sunlight and wind power have become widespread. These distributed power sources are arranged in a distributed manner on the electric power system, and the amount of power generation changes according to external factors such as changes in weather. As described above, in a power system interconnected with a distributed power source using renewable energy, a local voltage rise or voltage drop occurs depending on external factors, and the power state is likely to become unstable. As a result, there is a risk that the power quality to be supplied is reduced. In order to stabilize the power state, it is necessary to measure the power state with a measuring device installed at each point of the power system and to control the power system so that the power quality does not deteriorate.

  For example, Patent Document 1 discloses a configuration having measuring instrument installation position determining means in an electric power system in order to determine an installation position of a measuring instrument with a small number of measuring instruments and a minimum calculation error. The determining means temporarily sets the positions of a plurality of measuring instruments installed in the power system, calculates the system state from the data obtained by the target power system voltage / tidal current distribution state determining means, The installation location is selected.

  Moreover, the measured value acquired by each measuring device is transmitted to the management center etc. which control an electric power system via a relay station by the communication function with which the measuring device was equipped. In that case, it is necessary to efficiently select the location of the relay station. In relation to this, Patent Document 2 discloses a technique for estimating a radio wave propagation characteristic between a transmission point and a reception point.

JP 2008-72791 A JP 2004-304400 A

  As a measuring device for measuring the power system state, there are a device for measuring an electric quantity such as a voltage sensor and a device for controlling the power system such as an automatic voltage regulator (SVR = Step Voltage Regulator) Is called monitoring equipment). For example, when the method described in Patent Document 1 is used for these monitoring devices, the arrangement location can be determined so that the number of monitoring devices is small and the calculation error is minimized. On the other hand, regarding the installation of a relay station (hereinafter also referred to as a base station) for communicating measurement values and the like from a monitoring device, for example, an area in which communication is possible using the technique described in Patent Document 2 is obtained, and the number of base stations is It is possible to determine an arrangement location that is minimized.

  However, in these procedures, after determining the location of the monitoring device, the location of the base station is determined in accordance with this, and the location of the monitoring device is determined. However, since the measurement conditions (for example, voltage values) required for the monitoring device have an allowable width, the place where the power system can be arranged is not a single point but a certain width (degree of freedom). Therefore, if the location of the base station is determined in consideration of the degree of freedom of the location of the monitoring device, the total number of base stations may be further reduced. In the prior art including the above-mentioned patent documents and the like, there is room for improvement because the degree of freedom of the location of the monitoring device is not taken into consideration.

  The purpose of the present invention is to determine the location of monitoring devices and base stations so as to minimize the number of monitoring devices that perform monitoring control of the power system and minimize the number of base stations that relay communication with each monitoring device. An object of the present invention is to provide a power system facility planning support apparatus and a power system facility arrangement determination method.

In order to solve the above problems, for example, the configuration described in the claims is adopted.
The present invention relates to a monitoring device that monitors a power system and a power system facility planning support apparatus that determines the arrangement of a base station that communicates with the monitoring device. Based on the configuration of the power system, a candidate for the location of the monitoring device is determined. A monitoring device candidate determination unit that performs determination, a base station determination unit that determines a location of the base station from communication area data indicating a range that can be communicated from the base station, and a monitoring device The base station determination unit is a base station to be arranged, the base station determination unit includes a monitoring device determination unit that determines the placement location of the monitoring device from the communication base data, the placement location of the determined base station, and the communication area data. The location of the base station is determined so that it can communicate with any of the placement location candidates of all the monitoring devices and the total number of base stations to be placed is minimized.

  Further, the present invention provides a monitoring device for monitoring a power system and a power system facility layout determination method for determining a layout of a base station that communicates with the monitoring device. A monitoring device candidate determining step for determining, a base station determining step for determining a location of the base station from the determined monitoring device location candidate, and communication area data indicating a communicable range from the base station, and monitoring A device placement location candidate, a determined base station placement location, and a monitoring device determination step for determining a placement location of the monitoring device from the communication area data, wherein the base station determination step includes: The base station placement location is determined so that it can communicate with any placement location candidate of all the monitoring devices and the total number of base stations to be placed is minimized.

  According to the present invention, the location of the monitoring device and the base station is determined so as to minimize the number of monitoring devices that perform monitoring control of the power system and minimize the number of base stations that relay communication with each monitoring device. It is possible to reduce the cost of the power system monitoring and control system.

1 is a logical configuration diagram of a power system facility plan support apparatus in Embodiment 1. FIG. The physical block diagram of an electric power system equipment plan assistance apparatus. The figure which shows the structure of an electric power grid | system, and the example of arrangement | positioning of a monitoring apparatus candidate. The figure which shows the example of base station arrangement | positioning according to monitoring apparatus arrangement | positioning. The figure which shows the example of the monitoring apparatus candidate determination rule 135. FIG. Explanatory drawing which determines the arrangement | positioning candidate of a monitoring apparatus (voltage sensor). The figure which shows the example of the monitoring apparatus candidate data 136. FIG. The figure which shows the example of the base station arrangement | positioning data 137. FIG. The figure which shows the example of the monitoring apparatus arrangement | positioning data 138. FIG. The figure which shows the example of the radio | wireless coverage area data 139. The figure which shows the example of the electric power grid structure data. The figure which shows the example of load amount and PV electric power generation amount data 141. FIG. The figure which shows the example of the voltage calculation value data 142. FIG. The figure which shows the example of the communicable monitoring apparatus data 143. FIG. The flowchart which shows the monitoring apparatus candidate determination process. The flowchart which shows a base station determination process. The flowchart which shows the monitoring apparatus determination process. The figure which shows the example of the monitoring apparatus candidate determination rule 135 'in Example 2. FIG. Explanatory drawing which determines the arrangement | positioning candidate of a monitoring apparatus (SVR). The figure which shows the example of monitoring apparatus candidate data 136 '. The figure which shows the example of the monitoring apparatus candidate decision rule 135 "in Example 3. FIG. The figure which shows the example of monitoring apparatus candidate data 136 ". The figure which shows the example of the communication condition data 144. FIG. 10 is a flowchart illustrating a base station determination process according to the third embodiment. The block diagram which connected the assistance apparatus 1 and the user terminal 10 by the communication channel 500. FIG.

  Equipment for monitoring the electric power system includes a voltage sensor with a communication function, a device for measuring an electric quantity such as a sensor-equipped switch, and a device for controlling the electric power system such as an SVR. And called monitoring equipment. Information from each monitoring device is once transmitted to a communication facility such as a radio base station (hereinafter simply referred to as a base station), and transmitted from each communication facility to a management center that manages a power system. Several embodiments of the present invention will be described below with reference to the drawings.

  FIG. 1 is a logical configuration diagram of a power system facility plan support apparatus according to the first embodiment. The power system facility plan support device 1 (hereinafter simply referred to as a support device) has input data 21 that includes the configuration of the power system, terrain information, base station candidates, load / solar power (PV = PhotoVoltaics) power generation, communication conditions, and the like. As described above, the arrangement of the monitoring equipment and the arrangement of the base stations are used as the output data 22. (Note that the communication conditions of the input data 21 are used in the third embodiment). The configuration of the support apparatus 1 includes a monitoring device candidate determination unit 16, a base station determination unit 17, a monitoring device determination unit 18, a wireless coverage area creation unit 19, a monitoring device candidate determination rule 135, and monitoring device candidate data 136. And base station arrangement data 137, monitoring equipment arrangement data 138, and wireless coverage area data 139.

  The monitoring device candidate determination unit 16 inputs the configuration of the power system and the load amount / PV power generation amount, and determines a plurality of candidates (hereinafter referred to as arrangement candidates) where the monitoring devices are to be arranged. In the candidate determination, the monitoring device candidate determination rule 135 is referred to, and a specific arrangement location is selected from the power pole number of the power system. The determined monitoring device arrangement candidate list is stored in the monitoring device candidate data 136 and information on the arrangement candidates is notified to the base station determination unit 17. The processing of the monitoring device candidate determination unit 16 will be described in detail with reference to FIG. The monitoring device candidate determination rule 135 is a rule used when determining the placement candidate of the monitoring device, and an example thereof will be described with reference to FIG. An example of the determined monitoring device candidate data 136 is shown in FIG.

  The wireless reachable area creating unit 19 receives the configuration of the power system, the terrain information, and the base station candidates, obtains the area where the radio reaches for each base station candidate, and creates a list of utility pole numbers existing in the area. Here, as the base station candidates, a plurality of points where the base station can be arranged are assumed in consideration of the configuration of the power system and the terrain information. The base station candidates may be given from, for example, mesh points with a predetermined interval drawn on a map. In the wireless reachable area creation process, for example, an area where the wireless reaches from the base station can be obtained by the method described in Patent Document 2. The created list is stored in the wireless coverage area data 139. An example of the wireless coverage area data 139 will be described with reference to FIG.

  The base station determination unit 17 actually selects a base station based on the monitoring device placement candidate notified from the monitoring device candidate determination unit 16 and the wireless arrival area for each base station candidate stored in the wireless arrival area data 139. Decide where to place. In this process, the base station arrangement is determined so that communication with all monitoring devices is possible and the number of base stations is minimized. Information on the determined base station arrangement is stored in the base station arrangement data 137 and notified to the monitoring device determination unit 18. The processing of the base station determination unit 17 will be described in detail with reference to FIG. An example of the base station arrangement data 137 will be described with reference to FIG.

  Based on the base station arrangement notified from the base station determination section 17 and the monitoring equipment arrangement candidate list stored in the monitoring equipment candidate data 136, the monitoring equipment determination section 18 (location number of telephone poles) ). In this process, one arrangement capable of communicating with the base station is selected from the monitoring apparatus arrangement candidates. Information on the determined monitoring device arrangement is stored in the monitoring device arrangement data 138. The processing of the monitoring device determination unit 18 will be described in detail with reference to FIG. An example of the monitoring device arrangement data 138 will be described with reference to FIG.

FIG. 2 shows a physical configuration diagram of the power system facility plan support apparatus. The configuration of the support device 1 includes a CPU 11, a memory 12, a storage device 13, an output device 14, and an input device 15.
The input device 15 is a keyboard or a mouse, for example, and can input input data (configuration of power system, topographic information, load amount / PV power generation amount, communication condition). The output device 14 is, for example, a display device or a display light, and displays information input from the input device 15, output information of each program, and data of each database. For example, the output device 14 can display the content of the monitoring device candidate data 136 to indicate to the user the utility pole number listed as a candidate for the arrangement of the monitoring device.

  The storage device 13 is, for example, a hard disk or a flash memory, and stores information such as programs and data. The programs stored here include a monitoring device candidate determination program 131, a base station determination program 132, a monitoring device determination program 133, and a wireless coverage area creation program 134. As a database to be stored, the monitoring device candidate determination rule 135, the monitoring device candidate data 136, the base station arrangement data 137, the monitoring device arrangement data 138, the wireless coverage area data 139, the power system configuration data 140, the load Amount / PV power generation amount data 141, voltage calculation value data 142, communicable monitoring device data 143, and communication condition data 144 are included. (The communication condition data 144 is used in the third embodiment).

The monitoring device candidate determination program 131 is read into the memory 12 and executed by the CPU 11 to implement the monitoring device candidate determination unit 16 (see FIG. 1). Similarly, by executing the base station determination program 132, the monitoring device determination program 133, and the wireless coverage area data creation program 134, the base station determination unit 17, the monitoring device determination unit 18, and the wireless coverage area creation unit 19 are realized. Is done.
As a result of the above processing, the arrangement of the monitoring device and the arrangement of the base station are determined and output as output data 22.

  First, an overview of a method for arranging monitoring devices and base stations in the present embodiment will be described with reference to FIGS.

FIG. 3 is a diagram illustrating a configuration of a power system and an example of arrangement of monitoring device candidates.
The power system includes a distribution substation 2, a distribution line 3 laid from now on, a number of utility poles 4 provided at predetermined intervals on the line, loads (not shown) connected to the line 3, PV power generation, etc. Consists of The distribution substation 2 converts the voltage of the upper system (not shown) into the voltage of the power system, and supplies power to the load (not shown) via the line 3. Electric power is also supplied from PV power generation (not shown). Telephone poles 4 (indicated by □) supporting the line 3 are assigned telephone pole numbers #n for identifying each, and the positions can be specified by the telephone pole numbers.

  In this embodiment, the monitoring device is attached to one of the power poles 4 and monitors the power state on the line. However, since the monitoring device only needs to detect a line voltage value within a certain range, for example, there is a degree of freedom as to which power pole is attached. Therefore, a plurality of utility pole numbers are determined as utility pole candidates to which a certain monitoring device is attached. For example, there are three degrees of freedom (electric pole numbers # 50 to # 52) as the arrangement candidate group 4a for the monitoring apparatus a, and two degrees of freedom (electric pole numbers # 40, # 52) as the arrangement candidate group 4b for the monitoring apparatus b. 41) exists. In this example, five monitoring devices a to e are necessary, and the arrangement candidate groups 4 a to 4 e are shown.

FIG. 4 is a diagram illustrating an example of base station arrangement according to the monitoring equipment arrangement.
In the power system monitoring system, information collected by each monitoring device is transmitted to a management center (such as a power company sales office) via a base station. Conversely, control information from the management center is transmitted to each monitoring device via the base station. In this embodiment, first, a plurality of base station candidates 5 (indicated by ◯ and ◎) are assumed as base station arrangement candidates. Of course, the position along the track 3 (electric pole 4) is preferable for the arrangement candidate of the base station. Then, a wireless reachable area is obtained from each base station candidate. For example, the radio coverage area from the base station candidate #a (marked by ◎) is a range indicated by 6a, and the radio coverage area from the base station candidate #b is a range indicated by 6b. And the arrangement | positioning candidate of the monitoring apparatus contained in this area is extracted. For example, the radio coverage area 6a of the base station candidate #a includes utility pole numbers # 50, 51 that are candidates for placement of the monitoring device a, and utility pole numbers # 40,... That are placement candidates of the monitoring device b. . In this case, if at least one placement candidate for the monitoring device is included in the wireless coverage area, communication is possible by placing the monitoring device at the candidate location.

  Next, the actual base station arrangement is determined on the condition that communication with all monitoring devices is possible and the total number of base stations is minimized. In this example, if the base station is arranged at the position #a, it is possible to communicate with all the monitoring devices a to e, and the number of base stations is one. On the other hand, if the base station is arranged at the position #b, communication with the monitoring devices a and b is impossible. Therefore, another base station must be added to compensate for this, and the number of base stations is two, or More than that. Therefore, in order to minimize the number of base stations, the base stations may be arranged at position #a.

  Finally, the actual arrangement of the monitoring device is determined from the arrangement candidates that can be communicated. Specifically, it is preferable to select a candidate at the shortest distance from the base station in consideration of communication performance. According to this, it is determined that the monitoring device a is arranged at the utility pole number # 50 and the monitoring device b is arranged at the utility pole number # 40. In this way, it is possible to optimally arrange the monitoring devices and the base stations so that not only the number of monitoring devices actually arranged is minimized but also the number of base stations is minimized.

Next, the contents of each database stored in the storage device 13 will be described.
FIG. 5 is a diagram illustrating an example of the monitoring device candidate determination rule 135. The monitoring device candidate determination rule 135 defines a rule that is used when the monitoring device candidate determination unit 16 determines an arrangement candidate (specifically, a utility pole number) of the monitoring device, that is, a monitoring target specification. Since the decision rule is configured as a database, it can be flexibly modified as compared with the case where the determination rule is incorporated in the program. In this example, a voltage sensor that measures a voltage is used as a monitoring device. Since the voltage sensor detects whether or not the line voltage is a specified value, the specified value of the detected line voltage is defined as a specification value.

  The monitoring device candidate determination rule 135 includes items of a voltage upper limit prescribed value 135a, a voltage lower limit prescribed value 135b, and a margin 135c as record fields. The voltage upper limit specified value 135a is an upper limit specified value for voltage management, and the voltage lower limit specified value 135b is a lower limit specified value for voltage management. The margin 135c is a margin (allowable amount) for voltage fluctuations from the upper limit specified value and the lower limit specified value.

  FIG. 6 is an explanatory diagram for determining monitoring device placement candidates in accordance with the monitoring device candidate determination rule 135 of FIG. The voltage value in each utility pole position 4 used as the candidate which attaches monitoring equipment (voltage sensor) is shown. According to the rule 135, the range 7a of the margin amount 135c below the upper limit prescribed value 135a and the range 7b of the margin amount 135c above the lower limit prescribed value 135b are the specification ranges in accordance with the rule 135. The number is a candidate for arrangement of the monitoring device in this case.

  FIG. 7 is a diagram illustrating an example of the monitoring device candidate data 136. The monitoring device candidate data 136 stores monitoring device placement candidate data determined by the monitoring device candidate determination unit 16.

  The monitoring device candidate data 136 includes items of a device number 136a, a device type 136b, and an arrangement candidate 136c of the monitoring device as record fields. The device number 136a is a number that uniquely identifies each monitoring device. The device type 136b is a type of monitoring device, and here is a case of a voltage sensor. The placement candidate 136c describes a pole number that is a placement candidate for the monitoring device. For example, for the device number 001, utility pole numbers # 10 to 14 (record numbers 13600 to 13604) are listed as candidates.

  FIG. 8 is a diagram illustrating an example of the base station arrangement data 137. The base station arrangement data 137 stores base station arrangement data determined by the base station determination unit 17.

  Base station arrangement data 137 includes an item of base station number 137a as a record field. Since the base stations have the same specifications, only a number for identifying the position of the base station is sufficient. In this example, the arrangement of base stations is determined as #a and #c.

  FIG. 9 is a diagram illustrating an example of the monitoring device arrangement data 138. The monitoring device arrangement data 138 stores data on the arrangement location of the monitoring device determined by the monitoring device determination unit 18.

  The monitoring device arrangement data 138 includes items of a monitoring device device number 138a, a device type 138b, an arrangement location 138c, and a connection destination base station 138d as record fields. The monitoring device number 138a is a number that uniquely identifies each monitoring device, and the device type 138b is the type of the monitoring device. The placement location 138c describes the pole number where the monitoring device is actually placed. The connected base station 138d describes the number of the base station with which the monitoring device communicates. In this example, the voltage sensor with the device number 001 is arranged at the utility pole number # 14, and the voltage sensor with the device number 002 is arranged at the utility pole number # 22.

Next, a database that is referred to for determining the arrangement of monitoring devices and base stations will be described.
FIG. 10 is a diagram illustrating an example of the wireless coverage area data 139. The wireless reachable area data 139 is created by the wireless reachable area creating unit 19 that creates a list of utility poles that exist in the area where the radio reaches for each base station candidate. This data is referenced by the base station determination unit 17 in order to determine the actual location of the base station.

  The wireless coverage area data 139 includes items of a base station number 139a and a wireless coverage area 139b as record fields. The base station number 139a is a number for identifying the arrangement position of the base station (candidate). The wireless reachable area 139b describes utility pole numbers that exist in an area where radio transmitted from the base station can reach and communicate.

  FIG. 11 is a diagram illustrating an example of the power system configuration data 140. The power system configuration data 140 is data indicating the configuration of the power system, and the information is input by the user via the input device 15. In this example, power system lines are divided by adjacent power poles, and data of each divided line is stored.

  The power system configuration data 140 includes items of a main utility pole number 140a, a slave utility pole number 140b, a line resistance 140c, and a line inductance 140d as record fields. The parent utility pole number 140a indicates the utility pole number on the upstream side (distribution substation 2 side), and the slave utility pole number 140b indicates the utility pole number on the downstream side (opposite side of the distribution substation 2). The line resistance 140c is the resistance value of the segmented line (electric wire), and the line inductance 140d is the inductance value of the segmented line.

  FIG. 12 is a diagram illustrating an example of the load amount / PV power generation amount data 141. The load amount / PV power generation amount data 141 is data indicating the load amount of each power consumer connected to the power system of FIG. 11 and the power generation amount of each PV generator, and the information is input by the user via the input device 15. Is entered.

  The load amount / PV power generation amount data 141 includes items of a utility pole number 141a, an active power amount 141b, and a reactive power amount 141c as record fields. The utility pole number 141a is a number for identifying the utility pole. The active power amount 141b indicates the active power amount among the total value of the load amount of the consumer connected to the utility pole number 141a and the PV power generation amount, and the reactive power amount 141c indicates the reactive power amount among the total value. Note that the sign (positive or negative) of the total value is determined depending on which of the load amount and the power generation amount is large.

  FIG. 13 is a diagram illustrating an example of the voltage calculation value data 142. The voltage calculation value data 142 indicates the voltage value of each utility pole calculated by the monitoring device candidate determination unit 16 by the power flow calculation. The calculated voltage data 142 includes items of a telephone pole number 142a and a voltage 142b as record fields. The utility pole number 142a is a number for identifying the utility pole, and the voltage 142b indicates the voltage value of the utility pole of each utility pole number 142a. In this example, voltage values of utility pole numbers # 10 to 14 are described as record numbers 14200 to 14204.

  FIG. 14 is a diagram illustrating an example of the communicable monitoring device data 143. The communicable monitoring device data 143 is a list in which the base station determination unit 17 extracts monitoring devices that can communicate with each base station candidate.

  The communicable monitoring device data 143 includes items of a base station number 143a and a monitoring device number 143b as record fields. The base station number 143a is a number for identifying a base station (candidate). The monitoring device number 143b describes whether or not the radio transmitted from the base station number 143a arrives. At this time, “o” is described if at least one candidate for the monitoring device can communicate with the base station, and “x” is described if all candidates cannot communicate.

  Next, a procedure for determining the arrangement of the monitoring device and the base station will be described. For this determination process, the flowcharts shown in FIGS.

  FIG. 15 is a flowchart illustrating monitoring device candidate determination processing. The following flow is executed by the monitoring device candidate determination unit 16, and this function is realized by the CPU 11 executing the monitoring device candidate determination program 131.

In step S1600, an instruction to start processing is received.
In step S1601, the monitoring device candidate determination unit 16 reads the configuration of the power system from the power system configuration data 140 (FIG. 11) and the load amount / PV power generation amount from the load amount / PV power generation amount data 141 (FIG. 12). By performing the tidal current calculation, the voltage value in each power pole 4 of the power system is calculated.
In step S1602, the voltage value calculated in step S1601 is written in the voltage calculation value data 142 (FIG. 13).

  In step S1603, according to the monitoring device candidate determination rule 135 (FIG. 5) from the voltage calculation value data 142 (FIG. 13), the arrangement candidate of the monitoring device that satisfies this is determined. Specifically, as shown in FIG. 6, the utility pole 4 whose voltage value is included in the range 7a of the voltage upper limit prescribed value 135a−the margin amount 135c or the voltage lower limit prescribed value 135b + the margin amount 135c is extracted. For example, according to the rule 135 of FIG. 5, the voltage value conditions are 6800 to 6750 V and 6450 to 6400 V. From the voltage calculation value data 142 of FIG. 14200-14204).

In step S1604, the arrangement candidate of the monitoring device determined in step S1603 is registered in the monitoring device candidate data 136 (FIG. 7). For example, utility pole numbers # 10 to 14 extracted from FIG. 13 become placement candidates, and are registered as record numbers 13600 to 13604 for the device number 001 in FIG. Similarly, telephone pole numbers # 20 to 22 (record numbers 13605 to 13607) are registered as arrangement candidates for the device number 002.
In step S <b> 1605, the monitoring device placement candidate (device number, device type, placement candidate) determined in step S <b> 1603 is transmitted to the base station determination unit 17.

  FIG. 16 is a flowchart showing the base station determination process. The following flow follows step S1605 in FIG. 15 and is executed by the base station determination unit 17. This function is realized by the CPU 11 executing the base station determination program 132.

In step S1700, the base station determination unit 17 receives information (device number, device type, location candidate) (FIG. 7) of the monitoring device placement candidates from the monitoring device candidate decision unit 16.
In step S1701, attention is focused on one base station candidate (for example, #a) in the wireless coverage area data 139 (FIG. 10).

  In step S1702, the wireless coverage area data 139 (FIG. 10) is referred to, and whether or not the placement candidate 136c of each monitoring device in FIG. 7 exists within the wireless coverage area of the base station candidate focused in step S1701 (communication) Whether it is possible). For example, it is determined whether each placement candidate # 10-14, 20-22,... In FIG. 7 is included in the wireless coverage area of the base station number #a in FIG. In this case, candidates # 13, 14, 22,... Are included, but other candidates # 10, 11, 12, 20, and 21 are not included.

  In step S1703, the result determined in step S1702 is registered in the communicable monitoring device data 143 (FIG. 14). This registration is described for each monitoring device (device number), not for each monitoring device candidate. That is, when at least one candidate among a plurality of candidates for a certain monitoring device is included in the wireless coverage area of the base station to which attention is paid, the monitoring device is determined to be communicable (marked with a circle), and all of the plurality of candidates are If it is not included in the wireless coverage area of the base station, the monitoring device determines that communication is not possible (x mark). For example, in the case of FIG. 14, all the monitoring device numbers 001 to 005 can communicate with the base station number #a, and the monitoring device numbers 001 to 003 can communicate with the base station number #b. Show.

  In step S1704, it is determined whether or not all the base station candidates registered in the wireless coverage area data 139 (FIG. 10) have been completed. If there is an unexecuted base station candidate (for example, #b), the process returns to S1701, and the above processing is performed focusing on the base station candidate #b. When all the base station candidates are completed, the process proceeds to step S1705.

  In step S1705, the optimal arrangement of the base stations is determined with reference to the communicable monitoring device data 143 (FIG. 14). The determination condition is that the base station to be arranged can communicate with all the monitoring devices (any of the placement candidates), and the total number of base stations to be arranged is minimized. For this purpose, a total search is performed for combinations of base station numbers 143a in the communicable monitoring device data 143 (the number of base stations is searched in the order of 1, 2,...), And all the monitoring device numbers 143b can communicate (circles). And the one with the smallest total number of base stations is selected.

  For example, in FIG. 14, there are three combinations of the base station number 143a: “#a alone”, “#b alone”, and “# a + # b combination”. Among them, when all the monitoring device numbers 143b are communicable (circles), there are two ways of “#a” and “# a + # b”. Furthermore, “#a” is selected because the total number of base stations is the smallest because “#a” (number of base stations = 1). The example of FIG. 14 is a simple case that can be handled by one base station. However, since a large number of monitoring devices are actually arranged, a plurality of base stations are optimally combined.

In step S1706, the base station arrangement determined in step S1705 is registered in the base station arrangement data 137 (FIG. 8). For example, in FIG. 8, base station numbers #a and #c are registered.
In step S1707, the base station arrangement information (base station number) determined in step S1705 is transmitted to the monitoring device determination unit 18.

  FIG. 17 is a flowchart showing monitoring device determination processing. The following flow follows step S1707 in FIG. 16 and is executed by the monitoring device determination unit 18. This function is realized by the CPU 11 executing the monitoring device determination program 133.

In step S1800, the monitoring device determination unit 18 receives base station arrangement information (base station number) (FIG. 8) from the base station determination unit 17.
In step S1801, monitoring device placement candidates are read from the monitoring device candidate data 136 (FIG. 7).

In step S1802, the placement location of the monitoring device is determined from the base station number obtained in step S1800, the placement candidate of the monitoring device obtained in step S1801, and the wireless coverage area data 139 (FIG. 10).
Specifically, out of the monitoring device arrangement candidates (electric pole numbers) 136c, those existing in the wireless coverage area 139b are extracted from the base station number 137a for which the arrangement has been determined. When there are a plurality of extracted candidates, the telephone pole number existing at the position closest to the base station is selected. The above process is repeated for each monitoring device number 136a.

  For example, when the base station number in FIG. 8 is #a and the monitoring device placement candidates in FIG. 7 are records 13600 to 13607, the wireless device area 139b in FIG. The utility pole numbers # 13 and 14 are extracted, and for the monitoring device number 002, the utility pole number # 22 is extracted. Among them, for the monitoring device number 001 in which a plurality of candidates exist, # 14 close to the base station #a is selected as an arrangement location (see FIG. 4).

In step S1803, the monitoring device placement information (device number, device type, placement location, connected base station) determined in step S1802 is registered in the monitoring device placement data 138 (FIG. 9).
In step S1804, the arrangement determination process between the monitoring device and the base station ends.

  Thus, in the determination process of the present embodiment, focusing on the fact that the place where the monitoring device (voltage sensor) to be placed in the power system can be placed has a degree of freedom, first, the candidate placement location of the monitoring device is determined. To do. Next, the arrangement of base stations that can communicate with the candidate location of the monitoring device is determined. At that time, it is a condition that the base station to be arranged can communicate with all the monitoring devices (any of the arrangement candidates) and the total number of base stations to be arranged is minimized. Finally, the arrangement of the monitoring devices that can communicate with the determined base station is determined from among the arrangement candidate locations. As a result, the location of the monitoring device and the base station can be determined so as to minimize the number of monitoring devices that perform monitoring control of the power system and to minimize the number of base stations that relay communication with each monitoring device. it can.

  In the first embodiment, a voltage sensor is targeted as a type of monitoring device. On the other hand, in the second embodiment, a case where an automatic voltage regulator (SVR) is targeted as a type of monitoring device is taken as an example. Since the voltage drop increases far from the distribution substation, the SVR is inserted in the line to compensate for this. Accordingly, the specifications of the monitoring device candidate decision rule 135 are changed.

  FIG. 18 is a diagram illustrating an example of the monitoring device candidate determination rule 135 ′ according to the second embodiment. The monitoring device candidate determination rule 135 'includes items of a voltage drop amount minimum 135d and a voltage drop amount maximum 135e as fields of the record. The minimum voltage drop amount 135d indicates the minimum amount of the voltage drop amount from the distribution substation 2, and the maximum voltage drop amount 135e indicates the maximum amount of the voltage drop amount from the distribution substation 2. As described above, in the specification of SVR, the voltage value is arranged at a place where the voltage value drops from the distribution substation 2 by a certain amount.

  FIG. 19 is an explanatory diagram for determining the placement candidate of the monitoring device (SVR) according to the monitoring device candidate determination rule 135 ′ of FIG. 18. In this example, the utility pole 4 existing in the region 7a sandwiched between the minimum descent amount 135d and the maximum descent amount 135e is an arrangement candidate. In this case, as the voltage of the distribution substation 2, the voltage value of the utility pole 4s existing next to the distribution substation 2 may be used as a reference. For example, if the voltage value of the utility pole 4s adjacent to the distribution substation 2 is 6700V, it is extracted from the voltage range 6500V to 6460V determined by the minimum drop amount (200V) and maximum drop amount (240V) defined in FIG. . When a plurality of SVRs are installed in series, the next SVR is arranged at a place where a certain amount of voltage has dropped from the SVR existing on the distribution substation 2 side.

  The monitoring device candidate determination process in the second embodiment is almost the same as the flowchart in the first embodiment (FIG. 15). Among these, in step S1603, the monitoring device arrangement candidate is determined from the voltage value of each utility pole calculated in step S1601 according to the method described in FIG.

FIG. 20 is a diagram illustrating an example of the monitoring device candidate data 136 ′ according to the second embodiment. Although it is the same as the format of Example 1 (FIG. 7), it replaces with a voltage sensor and is described in the field of the apparatus classification 136b.
Subsequent determination processing of the location of the base station and the monitoring device (SVR) is the same as in the first embodiment.

  In Example 1, the configuration of the power system, topographic information, load amount / PV power generation amount, base station candidates were input, and the location of the monitoring device and the base station was output. On the other hand, in the third embodiment, communication conditions (communication speed, communication cycle, delay time) are added to the input data. Thereby, the optimum arrangement of the monitoring device and the base station is determined in consideration of the communication capability of the arranged base station (the number of monitoring devices that can communicate).

  The support device of the third embodiment has the same configuration as that of the first embodiment, but uses the “communication condition” in the input data 21 in the logical configuration diagram (FIG. 1) and the physical configuration diagram (FIG. 2). It is characterized in that “communication condition data 144” in the storage device 13 is used.

  FIG. 21 is a diagram illustrating an example of the monitoring device candidate determination rule 135 ″ according to the third embodiment. The monitoring device candidate determination rule 135 ″ is included in the item of the data size 135d in addition to the voltage regulation value as a record field. It is out. The data size 135d stores the size of data communicated by the monitoring device. In this example, the data size transmitted from the monitoring device (for example, a voltage sensor) is 156 bits.

  FIG. 22 is a diagram illustrating an example of the monitoring device candidate data 136 ″ according to the third embodiment. The monitoring device candidate data 136 ″ includes an item of the data size 136d as a record field in addition to the monitoring device arrangement candidate. Including. The data size 136d stores the size of data communicated by the monitoring device.

  FIG. 23 is a diagram illustrating an example of the communication condition data 144. The communication condition data 144 is a database in which communication conditions between the monitoring device and the management center (computer), that is, the communication performance of the base station is defined. This communication condition is based on information input by the user via the input device 15.

  The communication condition data 144 includes items of a communication speed 144a, a delay time 144b, and a communication cycle 144c as record fields. The communication speed 144a indicates the communication speed between the monitoring device and the management center. The delay time 144b indicates a delay time that occurs during communication between the monitoring device and the management center. The communication cycle 144c indicates a cycle for communication between the monitoring device and the management center. In this example, communication speed = 100 kbps, delay time = 3 sec, and communication cycle = 60 sec.

Next, a procedure for determining the arrangement of monitoring devices and base stations in the third embodiment will be described.
First, the monitoring device candidate determination process is the same as that in the first embodiment (FIG. 15). Among these, in step S1603, the monitoring device candidate candidate is determined according to the monitoring device candidate determination rule 135 ″ (FIG. 21). In step S1604, the data size is added to the determined monitoring device placement candidate, and monitoring is performed. It registers in the device candidate data 136 ″ (FIG. 22). In step S 1605, the determined combination of the monitoring device arrangement candidate and the data size is transmitted to the base station determination unit 17.

  FIG. 24 is a flowchart illustrating the base station determination process according to the third embodiment. Here, the base station is arranged in consideration of the communication capability of the base station. The same steps as those in the corresponding first embodiment (FIG. 16) are denoted by the same reference numerals, and the processing steps are different.

  In step S <b> 1700, the base station determination unit 17 receives a combination of the monitoring device placement candidate and the data size from the monitoring device candidate determination unit 16.

In step S1710 (newly added), the maximum number of monitoring devices that can communicate with each base station 5 (the number of communicable devices) is calculated from the received data size and communication conditions 144. Here, on the premise that data is acquired by the polling method, the following calculation formula is used. For example, in the example shown in FIGS. 22 and 23, the number of communicable units is 19.
Number of communicable units = (communication cycle) / ((data size) / (communication speed) + (delay time))
= 60 ÷ (156 ÷ 100,000 + 3) = 19.9

In step S1705, the optimal arrangement of the base stations is determined with reference to the communicable monitoring device data 143. This determination condition is that the arranged base station can communicate with all the monitoring devices (any of arrangement candidates), the number of monitoring devices to be connected is within the communicable number of each base station, and the total number of arranged base stations is Let it be the minimum.
Other steps are the same as those in the first embodiment (FIG. 16). Subsequent monitoring device determination processing is the same as that in the first embodiment (FIG. 17).

  As described above, according to the third embodiment, it is possible to determine the optimal arrangement of the monitoring device and the base station while further considering the communication capability of the base station (the number of monitoring devices that can communicate).

The embodiment of the present invention has been specifically described above, but the present invention is not limited to this, and the following modifications can be made without departing from the scope of the invention.
For example, in the base station determination process of FIG. 16, in step S1705, the restriction condition is that each monitoring device can communicate with any one of the base stations 5, but a plurality of (two or more) base stations 5 and The restriction may be that communication is possible. This corresponds to a monitoring device that does not allow communication interruption and needs to form a duplex communication system.

  In step S1705, the determination condition is that the total number of base stations 5 is minimized. Instead, the installation cost for each base station number 139a may be estimated in the wireless coverage area data 139 of FIG. 10, and the total cost for installing the base station may be a minimum condition.

  For example, in the monitoring device candidate determination process in FIG. 15, priority may be set for the monitoring device placement candidates determined in step S1603. Accordingly, in the monitoring device determination process of FIG. 17, when determining the placement of the monitoring device in step S1802, it is possible to efficiently monitor by selecting a placement candidate having a high priority when there are a plurality of candidates.

  Further, in the monitoring device candidate determination rule 135 of FIG. 5, the priority of the contents to be monitored, that is, the communication priority may be set for each corresponding monitoring device. Accordingly, in the base station determination process of FIG. 16, when all the monitoring devices cannot communicate with the base station in step S1705, it is possible to select a high-priority monitoring device and efficiently communicate with it.

  In each embodiment, the communication between the monitoring device and the management center via the base station is a method using wireless communication, but a method using wired communication is also possible. In that case, the base station arrangement may be determined so that the installation cost of the communication cable is minimized.

Furthermore, in each embodiment, the support apparatus operates stand-alone, but may be configured to be connected to a user terminal.
FIG. 25 is a configuration diagram in which the support apparatus 1 and the user terminal 10 are connected through a communication path 500. The user terminal 10 includes a CPU 101, a memory 102, an output device 103, an input device 104, and a communication interface 105. As a result, the user can transmit information from the communication interface 105 of the user terminal 10 to the communication interface 16 of the support apparatus 1 via the network 500. Or conversely, the information generated by the support apparatus 1 can be used by the user via the network 500.

1: Power system facility plan support device (support device),
16: Monitoring device candidate determination unit,
17: Base station determination unit,
18: Monitoring device determination unit,
19: Radio coverage area creation unit,
135: Monitoring device candidate decision rule,
136: Monitoring device candidate data,
137: Base station arrangement data,
138: Monitoring device arrangement data,
139: Wireless coverage area data,
144: Communication condition data.

Claims (8)

In the monitoring device for monitoring the power system, and the power system facility plan support device for determining the arrangement of the base stations that communicate with the monitoring device,
Based on the configuration of the power system, a monitoring device candidate determination unit that determines candidates for the location of the monitoring device;
A base station determination unit that determines the location of the base station from communication area data indicating a range in which communication can be performed from the base station, and the candidate location of the determined monitoring device,
A candidate for a location of the monitoring device, a location of the determined base station, and a monitoring device determination unit for determining a location of the monitoring device from the communication area data,
The base station determination unit determines the location of the base station so that the base station to be arranged can communicate with any of the placement location candidates of all the monitoring devices, and the total number of base stations to be arranged is minimized. A power system facility planning support apparatus characterized by that. In the electric power system equipment plan assistance apparatus of Claim 1,
The monitoring device candidate determination unit calculates a voltage value in each power pole of the power system by power flow calculation from the configuration of the power system and the load amount / photovoltaic power generation amount, and the monitoring device candidate that defines the specifications of the monitoring device According to a decision rule, a power system facility plan support apparatus characterized in that a candidate for an arrangement location of the monitoring device that satisfies the decision rule is decided. In the electric power system equipment plan assistance apparatus of Claim 1,
The monitoring device determination unit selects an arrangement location that is closest to the determined location of the base station from among the candidates for the location of the monitoring device. In the electric power system equipment plan assistance apparatus of Claim 1,
The base station determination unit further calculates a maximum number of monitoring devices communicable in the base station from a data size communicated by the monitoring device and communication performance data of the base station, and monitors to connect to the base station A power system facility planning support apparatus, characterized in that the location of base stations is determined so that the number of devices is within the maximum number communicable with the base station. In a monitoring device for monitoring a power system, and a power system facility layout determination method for determining the layout of a base station that communicates with the monitoring device,
Based on the configuration of the power system, a monitoring device candidate determination step for determining candidates for the location of the monitoring device;
A base station determination step for determining the location of the base station from communication area data indicating a range in which communication can be performed from the base station, and the candidate location of the determined monitoring device;
A monitoring device determination step of determining a location of the monitoring device from the candidate location of the monitoring device, the determined location of the base station, and the communication area data;
The base station determination step determines the location of the base station so that the base station to be arranged can communicate with any of the placement location candidates of all the monitoring devices, and the total number of base stations to be arranged is minimized. A power system facility arrangement determination method characterized by the above. In the electric power system equipment arrangement | positioning determination method of Claim 5,
The monitoring device candidate determination step includes:
From the configuration of the power system and the load amount / photovoltaic power generation amount, calculating a voltage value at each power pole of the power system by power flow calculation,
And determining a candidate for a location of the monitoring device that satisfies the monitoring device candidate determination rule that defines the specification of the monitoring device. In the electric power system equipment arrangement | positioning determination method of Claim 5,
In the monitoring device determination step, an arrangement location that is closest to the determined location of the base station is selected from the candidates for the location of the monitoring device. In the electric power system equipment arrangement | positioning determination method of Claim 5,
The base station determination step further includes:
Calculating the maximum number of monitoring devices that can communicate with the base station from the data size of the monitoring device to communicate and the communication performance data of the base station;
A method of determining an arrangement of power system equipment, comprising the step of determining an arrangement location of a base station so that a number of monitoring devices connected to the base station is within a maximum number communicable with the base station.

Images