JP2014197247A - Pedestrian safety device for vehicle - Google Patents

Abstract

PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide a pedestrian safety device for a vehicle for allowing a driver to be appropriately supported in safety confirmation in accordance with traffic situations in the periphery of an own vehicle.SOLUTION: A pedestrian safety device for a vehicle includes: a traffic situation detection part 10 for detecting traffic situations in the periphery of an own vehicle including the presence/absence of a collision risk object such as a pedestrian during the stop of the own vehicle; a safety confirmation detection part 12 for, when the collision risk object is detected, detecting the duration time of the safety confirmation action of a driver; a determination part 14 for comparing the duration time of the safety confirmation action with a threshold, and for, when the duration time is less than the threshold, determining that the safety confirmation action is insufficient; a vehicle start detection part 16 for detecting the start action of the own vehicle; a notification part 18 for, when it is determined that the safety confirmation action is insufficient, and the start action is detected, issuing a warning; and a threshold changing part 20 for, when performing the second comparison of the duration time of the safety confirmation action with the threshold after the operation of the notification part 18, changing the second threshold from the first threshold in accordance with the traffic situations.

Description

  The present invention relates to a vehicle pedestrian safety device, and more particularly, to a vehicle pedestrian safety device that can appropriately support safety confirmation by a driver according to surrounding traffic conditions.

  Conventionally, many traffic accidents between vehicles and pedestrians have occurred near intersections. For this reason, the driver of the vehicle entering the intersection needs to check the pedestrians near the intersection and perform sufficient safety confirmation.

  In Patent Document 1 below, when a vehicle that has automatically stopped the engine by so-called idling stop while waiting for a signal at an intersection restarts the engine, the driver neglects safety confirmation in the vehicle traveling direction. There is described a vehicle control device that gives a warning to a driver and prevents the vehicle from starting.

JP 2010-77994 A

  By the way, just giving a warning to the driver once may cause the driver to start the vehicle without performing sufficient safety confirmation. Also, when a pedestrian is approaching the vehicle from two directions at the intersection, the driver misrecognizes that the warning is only alerting one pedestrian, and the other pedestrian does not notice There is also a risk of starting the vehicle.

  Therefore, it is possible to realize higher safety from the viewpoint of traffic safety for pedestrians etc. by repeatedly giving warnings to the driver as many times as necessary until the driver performs sufficient safety confirmation and prohibiting the start of the vehicle. I can expect.

  However, if a warning is repeatedly given to the driver, a useless warning may be repeatedly given even though the driver has already fully recognized a pedestrian or the like. In that case, the reliability of the warning system is impaired. In addition, if the vehicle cannot start forever at the intersection, the subsequent vehicle cannot start, and smooth traffic may be hindered.

  Therefore, an object of the present invention is to provide a pedestrian safety device for a vehicle that can appropriately support safety confirmation by a driver according to surrounding traffic conditions.

  In order to achieve the above object, the vehicle pedestrian safety device according to the present invention includes a vehicle surrounding area including the presence or absence of a collision risk object that may collide with the host vehicle after starting while the host vehicle is stopped. A traffic condition detecting means for detecting a traffic condition of the vehicle, a safety confirmation action detecting means for detecting a duration of a driver's safety confirmation action when the collision risk object is detected, and a duration of the safety confirmation action And a threshold value, and when the duration time is less than the threshold value, a determination unit that determines that safety confirmation behavior is insufficient, and a starting movement detection that detects a starting movement of the host vehicle by the driver And a warning means for operating and issuing a warning to the driver when a starting movement is detected by the starting movement detection means when the determination unit determines that the safety confirmation action is insufficient. The police After the operation of the means, when the determination means performs a second comparison between the duration of the safety confirmation action and a threshold value, the second comparison is performed according to the traffic situation detected by the traffic situation detection means. And a threshold value changing means for changing the threshold value from the threshold value in the first comparison.

  According to the present invention configured as described above, when the second comparison between the duration of the safety confirmation action and the threshold value is performed, the threshold value in the second comparison is set according to the surrounding traffic situation. It is changed from the threshold value in the comparison. Thereby, according to the pedestrian safety device for vehicles of the present invention, it is possible to appropriately support the safety confirmation by the driver according to the surrounding traffic situation.

In the present invention, it is preferable that the threshold value changing unit changes the threshold value in the second comparison to a value smaller than the threshold value in the first comparison.
Thus, if the threshold value in the second comparison is changed to a smaller value, the duration required for the second safety confirmation action can be shortened. As a result, it is possible to shorten the start delay time due to the warning. Thereby, smoothness of traffic can be aimed at, aiming at traffic safety by a driver's safety confirmation action.

  As a surrounding traffic situation, for example, when a subsequent vehicle is detected, it is desirable to change the threshold value in the second comparison to a smaller value. Further, as the surrounding traffic situation, for example, when the number of detected dangerous objects is equal to or less than a predetermined reference value (for example, one), the threshold value in the second comparison may be changed to a smaller value. . Further, as a surrounding traffic situation, for example, when the distance between the detected dangerous object and the own vehicle is equal to or greater than a predetermined reference value, the threshold value in the second comparison may be changed to a smaller value. Good.

In the present invention, it is preferable that the threshold value changing unit changes the threshold value in the second comparison to a value larger than the threshold value in the first comparison.
As described above, if the threshold value in the second comparison is changed to a larger value, the duration required for the second safety confirmation action becomes longer, but the safety confirmation can be performed more reliably. As a result, it is possible to reduce the possibility of collision between the pedestrian and the own vehicle and improve the safety of the pedestrian or the like.

  As a surrounding traffic situation, for example, when a subsequent vehicle is not detected, it is desirable to change the threshold value in the second comparison to a larger value. Further, as the surrounding traffic situation, for example, when the number of detected dangerous objects is equal to or larger than a predetermined reference value (for example, when the number is two or more), the threshold value in the second comparison is changed to a larger value. Also good. Further, as a surrounding traffic situation, for example, when the distance between the detected dangerous object and the host vehicle is equal to or less than a predetermined reference value, the threshold value in the second comparison may be changed to a larger value. Good.

In the present invention, it is preferable that the safety confirmation action detecting unit includes a duration time for the driver to move his / her line of sight as a duration of the safety confirmation action and a duration for the driver to move his / her head to the left / right. Detect the duration of at least one of
Thus, safety confirmation behavior can be detected objectively by detecting the movement of the driver's line of sight and the movement of the head.
It is desirable that the direction of the dangerous object viewed from the driver is included in the range of the driver's line of sight and the head's face.

In the present invention, it is preferable that the engine control unit further automatically stops the engine while the vehicle is stopped, and the engine control unit determines that the safety confirmation action is insufficient by the determination unit. The engine restart is prohibited when the starting / moving motion is detected by the starting / moving motion detecting means.
As described above, when the safety confirmation action is insufficient, if the restart of the engine that performs the so-called idling stop is prohibited, the vehicle does not start. For this reason, safety can be ensured.

In the present invention, it is preferable to further include a release switch for canceling the engine restart prohibition control by the engine control unit.
As described above, if the release switch is provided, the vehicle can be started by releasing the engine restart prohibition control by manually operating the release switch in an emergency. As an emergency, for example, there is a case where it is necessary to move the host vehicle in order to pass the emergency vehicle.

  According to the vehicle pedestrian safety device of the present invention, it is possible to notify the obstacle that the driver of the vehicle recognizes the obstacle.

It is a block diagram which shows the structure of the pedestrian safety device for vehicles by embodiment of this invention. It is explanatory drawing of the traffic condition around the own vehicle in an intersection. It is a graph which shows the relationship between the surrounding traffic condition and the safety confirmation required time calculated | required by the driver. It is a flowchart explaining operation | movement of the pedestrian safety apparatus for vehicles by embodiment of this invention.

Hereinafter, an embodiment of a pedestrian safety device for a vehicle according to the present invention will be described with reference to the accompanying drawings.
First, with reference to FIG. 1, the structure of the pedestrian safety device for vehicles by embodiment of this invention is demonstrated. FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrating a configuration of a vehicle pedestrian safety device according to an embodiment.

  As shown in FIG. 1, the pedestrian safety device for a vehicle according to the embodiment includes the presence or absence of a collision risk object that may collide with the host vehicle after starting while the host vehicle is stopped. A traffic condition detection unit 10 that detects a traffic condition, a safety confirmation detection unit 12 that detects a duration of a driver's safety confirmation action when a collision risk object is detected, a duration and a threshold value of the safety confirmation action When the duration is less than the threshold, the determination unit 14 determines that the safety confirmation action is insufficient, the vehicle start detection unit 16 that detects the start and movement of the host vehicle by the driver, When it is determined that the safety confirmation action is insufficient, the notification unit 18 that issues a warning to the driver when the start-up movement is detected, and after the operation of the notification unit 18, the determination unit 14 performs the safety confirmation action. Make a second comparison between duration and threshold The case, depending on the traffic situation around the vehicle, and a threshold value changing portion 20 for changing the threshold value the threshold value of the second comparison in the first comparison. Further, the vehicle pedestrian safety apparatus shown in FIG. 1 includes an engine ECU 22 and a brake lamp 24.

  The processing functions of the traffic condition detection unit 10, the safety confirmation detection 16, the determination unit 14, and the threshold value changing unit 20 are performed by executing a predetermined program in a computer such as an ECU (electric control unit). Realized.

  First, the traffic condition detection unit 10 will be described. The traffic situation detection unit 10 detects the surrounding traffic situation based on the information detected by the vehicle outside situation detection unit 26. The out-of-vehicle condition detection unit 26 includes, for example, a camera that captures an image around the vehicle and a radar that detects a distance to a target around the vehicle. By recognizing the image captured by the camera, pedestrians and bicycles in the image are extracted. Further, the distance and direction from the own vehicle to the pedestrian or the bicycle are detected by the radar. Further, the moving direction and moving speed of the pedestrian and the like are obtained from a series of positions of the pedestrian and the like detected every time the radar sweeps. Then, the position of a pedestrian or the like after a predetermined time is predicted.

  The traffic situation detection unit 10 determines that the position of a predicted pedestrian or the like after a predetermined time is included in an area of a predetermined range including the predicted position of the host vehicle after the start after a predetermined time. Etc. are judged as collision risk objects. For example, when the predicted position of the host vehicle several seconds later and the predicted position of a pedestrian or the like overlap or are close to each other within several meters, the pedestrian or the like is determined as a collision risk object.

  In addition, the vehicle course after the start may be set based on whether or not the direction indicator (blinker) is operated. For example, when the turn signal is not operating, it is preferable to set the course of the vehicle on the assumption that the vehicle after starting travels straight through an intersection. In addition, when the right turn signal is operating, it is preferable to set the course of the vehicle on the assumption that the vehicle after starting turns right at the intersection. Furthermore, when the left turn signal is operating, it is preferable to set the course of the vehicle on the assumption that the vehicle after starting turns left at the intersection.

Here, with reference to FIG. 2, the example of a detection of a collision danger target object is demonstrated. FIG. 2 is an explanatory diagram schematically showing the traffic situation around the host vehicle at an intersection where there is no signal. The host vehicle C operates the right turn signal and stops to turn right at the intersection. There is a child pedestrian a on the pedestrian crossing P of the road on which the own vehicle C is going to turn right, and pedestrians b, c and d and a pedestrian f are respectively connected to both ends of the pedestrian crossing P. There is. The child pedestrian a stops on the pedestrian pavement P, and the pedestrians b, c, and f are walking toward the pedestrian crossing P. On the other hand, the pedestrian d is walking in the direction opposite to the pedestrian crossing P.

In this case, the predicted positions of the pedestrians a, b, c, and f among the pedestrians a to f at the time when the host vehicle C starts crossing the pedestrian crossing P after 1 second is 1 second later. It is estimated that it is included in the area A including the host vehicle C. For this reason, pedestrians a, b, c, and f are determined to be collision risk objects.
The area A is an ellipse that is wide in front of the host vehicle C and narrow in the rear of the host vehicle C.

  On the other hand, if neither a pedestrian nor a bicycle is located near the intersection, and if neither a pedestrian nor a bicycle predicted after a predetermined time is located within the area A after a predetermined time, the collision risk object is Not detected.

  Further, the vehicle traffic condition detection unit 10 can also detect the presence or absence of a succeeding vehicle located behind the vehicle by the camera of the vehicle exterior condition detection unit 26 as the surrounding traffic condition. Moreover, the vehicle traffic condition detection part 10 can also detect the presence or absence of the emergency vehicle approaching from the vehicle back.

  Next, the safety confirmation detection unit 12 will be described. The safety confirmation detection unit 12 detects the duration of the driver's safety confirmation action based on the information from the driver state detection unit 28 when a collision risk object is detected. The driver state detection unit 28 includes, for example, a face direction sensor that detects the face direction of the driver and a line-of-sight sensor that detects the direction of the driver's line of sight. Then, the safety confirmation detection unit 12 detects the duration of the driver's safety confirmation behavior as the duration of at least one of the duration for the driver to move his / her line of sight and the duration for the driver to move the head to the left / right. To do.

  For example, when the driver visually recognizes only the pedestrian a, since the viewing angle including the pedestrian a viewed from the driver is narrow, the duration of the safety confirmation action for moving the visual field and the head from side to side is shortened. On the other hand, when the driver visually recognizes all of the pedestrians a to f, since the viewing angle including the pedestrian d and the pedestrian f at both ends viewed from the driver is wide, the field of view and the head are left and right. The duration of the safety confirmation action to move becomes longer.

  Next, the determination unit 14 will be described. The determination unit 14 compares the duration of the safety confirmation action detected by the safety confirmation detection unit 12 with a threshold value. The threshold is a time required for safety confirmation required by the driver (driver).

  Here, with reference to the graph of FIG. 3, the relationship between the traffic condition around the own vehicle and the required time for safety confirmation required by the driver will be described. The horizontal axis of the graph in FIG. 3 shows the number of types of dangerous objects / attributes, the amount of change per unit time of dangerous objects, and the amount of change per unit time of the dangerous objects, Illustrate the distance. In addition, the vertical axis of the graph represents the safety confirmation required time required for the driver. A curve I in the graph schematically represents the required safety confirmation time required for the driver.

  The case where the number of dangerous objects is small is, for example, a case where the pedestrian a is the only collision dangerous object that may collide with the host vehicle after starting in the surrounding situation shown in FIG. When the driver visually recognizes only the pedestrian a, since the viewing angle including the pedestrian a viewed from the driver is narrow, the time required for safety confirmation can be short. On the other hand, when the number of dangerous objects is large, for example, in the surrounding situation shown in FIG. 2, the collision dangerous objects that have a risk of colliding with the host vehicle after starting are pedestrians a, b, c, and f. And many cases. When the driver visually recognizes all of the pedestrians a, b, and f, since the viewing angle including the pedestrian c to the pedestrian f at both ends viewed from the driver is wide, the time required for safety confirmation Becomes longer.

  Moreover, the case where the types of the attributes of the dangerous object are small is, for example, a case where the dangerous object is only a pedestrian. On the other hand, the case where there are many types of attributes of the dangerous object is, for example, a case where a pedestrian and a bicycle are mixed in the dangerous object. Since pedestrians and bicycles have different movement speeds, the time required for safety confirmation becomes longer.

  Moreover, the case where the amount of change per unit time of the dangerous object is large is, for example, a case where the moving speed of a pedestrian or the like is high. In such a case, in order to prevent a traffic accident caused by a pedestrian or the like jumping out, the time required for safety confirmation becomes longer.

  In addition, the shorter the distance between the dangerous object and the own vehicle, the higher the possibility of collision with the own vehicle, and the less time remaining until the collision with the own vehicle (TTC: time to collision). The time required for confirmation becomes longer.

  In addition, as shown in the area | region a on the curve I in a graph, the time required for safety confirmation does not become zero at the shortest. Moreover, as shown in the area | region c on the curve I, an upper limit is good for the time required for safety confirmation for smooth traffic. Then, in the first comparison with the detected duration of the safety confirmation action, for example, the time of the region b in the center of the curve I may be set as the threshold value.

  And the determination part 14 determines with safety confirmation action being inadequate when the duration of the detected safety confirmation action is less than a threshold value.

  Next, the vehicle start detection unit 16 will be described. The vehicle start detection unit 16 detects the start and advance movement of the host vehicle by the driver based on information from the vehicle detection unit 30. The vehicle detection unit 30 includes, for example, a brake sensor that detects the depression amount of the brake pedal, an accelerator sensor that detects the depression amount of the accelerator pedal, and a steering sensor that detects the steering angle of the steering. The vehicle start detection unit 16 may detect the start and advance movement by the driver when the driver removes his / her foot from the brake pedal and the amount of depression of the brake pedal decreases. In addition, the vehicle start detection unit 16 may detect the start and advance movement by the driver when the driver depresses the accelerator pedal and the amount of depression of the accelerator pedal increases. Further, the vehicle start detection unit 16 may detect the start and advance movement by the driver when the driver operates the steering and the steering angle of the steering changes.

  Next, the notification unit 18 will be described. When the determination unit 19 determines that the safety confirmation action is insufficient, the notification unit 18 issues an alarm to the driver when the vehicle start detection unit 16 detects the start-up movement. The alerting | reporting part 18 may display a warning visually, may sound audibly to a driver | operator, and may convey tactilely. For example, the notification unit 18 may display a warning on a display provided on the instrument panel. Moreover, the alerting | reporting part 18 may sound a buzzer sound with a speaker provided in the vehicle interior, or may issue a warning by voice. Further, the notification unit 18 may transmit a warning to a driver who is gripping the steering wheel by vibrating a vibrator provided inside the steering wheel.

  Next, the threshold value conversion unit 20 will be described. When the determination unit 14 performs the second comparison between the duration of the safety confirmation action and the threshold after the operation of the notification unit 18, the threshold conversion unit 20 performs the second conversion according to the traffic situation around the host vehicle. The threshold value in the comparison is changed from the threshold value in the first comparison.

  When the number of dangerous objects is small, when the moving speed of the dangerous objects is slow, or when the dangerous objects are away from the host vehicle, the threshold value in the second comparison is smaller than the threshold value in the first comparison. Change it to a value. Specifically, when there is one pedestrian detected as a dangerous object, when a pedestrian detected as a dangerous object is stopped, or when a pedestrian detected as a dangerous object is When the distance is more than a predetermined distance, the second threshold may be reduced. Further, even when a subsequent vehicle is detected as a surrounding traffic situation, the threshold value in the second comparison may be changed to a smaller value. When the first threshold is 1 second, for example, the second threshold may be shortened to 0.8 seconds, for example.

  Thus, if the threshold value in the second comparison is changed to a value smaller than the first threshold value, the duration required for the second safety confirmation action can be shortened. As a result, it is possible to shorten the start delay time due to the warning. As a result, traffic smoothness is achieved while ensuring traffic safety by the driver's safety confirmation behavior. Therefore, safety confirmation by the driver can be appropriately supported according to the surrounding traffic conditions.

  On the other hand, when the number of dangerous objects is large, when the moving speed of the dangerous objects is high, or when the dangerous objects are close to the host vehicle, the threshold value in the second comparison is larger than the threshold value in the first comparison. Change it to a value. Specifically, when there are two or more pedestrians detected as dangerous objects, when pedestrians detected as dangerous objects are running, or when pedestrians detected as dangerous objects are When the vehicle is near a predetermined distance or less from the host vehicle, the second threshold value may be increased. Further, even when the following vehicle is not detected as the surrounding traffic situation, the threshold value in the second comparison may be changed to a larger value. If the first threshold is, for example, 1 second, the second threshold may be extended to, for example, 2 seconds.

  As described above, if the threshold value in the second comparison is changed to a larger value, the duration required for the second safety confirmation action becomes longer, but the safety confirmation can be performed more reliably. As a result, it is possible to reduce the possibility of collision between the pedestrian and the own vehicle and improve the safety of the pedestrian or the like. Thereby, it is possible to appropriately support the safety confirmation by the driver according to the surrounding traffic conditions.

  Next, the engine ECU 22 will be described. The engine ECU 22 automatically stops the engine by idling stop while the vehicle is stopped. When the determination unit 14 determines that the safety confirmation action is insufficient, the engine ECU 22 prohibits restarting of the engine when the vehicle start detection unit 16 detects the starting movement. As described above, when the safety confirmation action is insufficient, if the restart of the engine that has stopped idling is prohibited, the vehicle does not start, and thus safety can be ensured.

  Furthermore, the vehicle pedestrian safety apparatus of the present embodiment is provided with a release switch (not shown) for releasing the engine restart prohibition control by the engine ECU 22 in the vehicle interior. If such a release switch is provided, for example, in an emergency where it is necessary to move the host vehicle to pass the emergency vehicle, the release switch is manually controlled to release the engine restart prohibition control and You can start.

  Further, the brake lamp 24 is used when the driver takes a starting and advancing action from the brake pedal and when the warning is notified or the engine restart is prohibited because the safety confirmation is insufficient. Lights even when the brake pedal is not depressed. When the notification unit 18 is activated to issue a warning, the host vehicle does not start even though the brake lamp is not lit. For this reason, there is a possibility that the driver of the succeeding vehicle who sees that the brake lamp of the own vehicle has turned off starts the succeeding vehicle and collides with the own vehicle. Therefore, if the brake lamp is automatically turned on when the notification unit 18 is activated, it is possible to prevent a rear-end collision by the following vehicle.

Next, with reference to the flowchart of FIG. 4, the operation example of the vehicle pedestrian safety device according to the present embodiment will be described.
First, the engine ECU 22 automatically stops the engine by idling stop while the vehicle is stopped (S1).

  Subsequently, the traffic condition detection unit 10 detects a collision risk object that has a risk of colliding with the host vehicle after starting (S2). When a dangerous object is detected (“Yes” in step S2), the determination unit 14 performs a first comparison between the duration of the driver's safety confirmation action and the threshold value. The threshold value in the first comparison may be set to, for example, a required time of the middle b portion on the curve I in the graph of FIG. 3, for example, 1 second.

  Then, when the duration of the safety confirmation action is shorter than the first threshold (in the case of “No” in step S3), and when the vehicle start detection unit 16 detects the starting movement (in step S4, “ In the case of “Yes”), the notification unit 18 operates to issue a warning to the driver (S5). At the same time, the engine ECU 22 performs engine restart prohibition control. The driver who receives the warning takes safety confirmation action again.

  Subsequently, the determination unit 14 performs a second comparison between the duration of the safety confirmation action of the driver again and the threshold (S6). The threshold value in the second comparison is changed by the threshold value changing unit 20 from the threshold value in the first comparison according to the traffic situation around the host vehicle.

  When the number of pedestrians detected as a dangerous object is one, or when a subsequent vehicle is detected as the surrounding traffic situation, the threshold value in the second comparison may be changed to a smaller value. When the first threshold is 1 second, for example, the second threshold may be shortened to 0.8 seconds, for example. Thereby, smoothness of traffic can be aimed at, aiming at safety.

  On the other hand, when there are two or more pedestrians detected as dangerous objects, or when no subsequent vehicle is detected as the surrounding traffic situation, the threshold value in the second comparison is changed to a larger value. Good. If the first threshold is, for example, 1 second, the second threshold may be extended to, for example, 2 seconds. Thereby, safety can be improved according to surrounding traffic conditions.

  Then, when the duration of the safety confirmation action again is shorter than the second threshold (in the case of “No” in step S6), and when the vehicle start detection unit 16 detects the starting action again ( In the case of “Yes” in step S <b> 7), the notification unit 18 operates again and issues a warning to the driver (S <b> 8). At the same time, the engine ECU 22 also performs engine restart prohibition control. Then, the process returns to step S6.

  On the other hand, when the duration of the safety confirmation action by the driver is greater than or equal to the first threshold (in the case of “Yes” in step S3), or the duration of the safety confirmation action by the driver again is greater than or equal to the second threshold. In this case (in the case of “Yes” in step S6), the notification unit 18 does not operate, and the engine ECU starts the engine by the forward movement (S9).

  In the above-mentioned embodiment, although the example which comprised this invention on the specific conditions was demonstrated, this invention can perform a various change and combination, and is not limited to this.

DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 10 Traffic condition detection part 12 Safety confirmation detection part 14 Judgment part 16 Vehicle start detection part 18 Notification part 20 Threshold change part 22 Engine ECU
24 Brake lamp 26 Outside vehicle state detection unit 28 Driver state detection unit 30 Vehicle state detection unit

Claims (6)

A traffic condition detection means for detecting a traffic condition around the own vehicle including the presence or absence of a collision risk object that may collide with the host vehicle after starting, while the host vehicle is stopped;
Safety confirmation action detecting means for detecting the duration of the driver's safety confirmation action when the collision danger object is detected;
A determination unit that compares the duration of the safety confirmation action with a threshold and determines that the safety confirmation action is insufficient when the duration is less than the threshold;
A departure and movement detection means for detecting the departure and movement of the host vehicle by the driver;
In the case where it is determined that the safety confirmation action is insufficient by the determination unit, an alarm unit that operates and issues an alarm to the driver when the starting and moving operation is detected by the starting and moving detection unit;
After the operation of the warning means, when the determination means performs a second comparison between the duration of the safety confirmation action and a threshold value, the second time is determined according to the traffic situation detected by the traffic situation detection means. A vehicle pedestrian safety device, comprising: a threshold value changing unit that changes a threshold value in the comparison of the threshold value from the threshold value in the first comparison. 2. The vehicle pedestrian safety device according to claim 1, wherein the threshold value changing unit changes the threshold value in the second comparison to a value smaller than the threshold value in the first comparison. 2. The vehicle pedestrian safety device according to claim 1, wherein the threshold value changing unit changes the threshold value in the second comparison to a value larger than the threshold value in the first comparison. The safety confirmation action detecting means detects, as the duration of the safety confirmation action, a duration of at least one of a duration for the driver to move his / her line of sight and a duration for the driver to move his / her head to the left / right. The pedestrian safety device for a vehicle according to any one of claims 1 to 3, wherein: An engine control unit for automatically stopping the engine while the vehicle is stopped;
The engine control unit prohibits restarting of the engine when a starting movement is detected by the starting movement detection unit when the determination unit determines that safety confirmation behavior is insufficient. The pedestrian safety device for vehicles according to any one of claims 1 to 4. 6. The vehicle pedestrian safety device according to claim 5, further comprising a release switch for releasing engine restart prohibition control by the engine control unit.

Images