JP2013117475A - Obstacle detector - Google Patents

Abstract

PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide an obstacle detector capable of reliably fusion-detecting obstacles while decelerating a vehicle.SOLUTION: A vehicle-mounted obstacle detector for detecting obstacles around a vehicle includes: a stereo camera and a camera ECU which captures images of the surrounding of a vehicle to detect image data of obstacles; a millimeter wave sensor which emits electromagnetic wave and receives reflected waves thereof to detect positional information of the obstacles; a fusion detector which fusion-detects the obstacles in the surrounding using the image data of the obstacles detected by the camera ECU and the positional information thereof detected by the millimeter wave sensor; and a detection range setting unit which sets the detection range of the fusion detector to a first range when deceleration rate of the vehicle is less than a threshold value B, and sets the detection range to a second range, which is greater than the first range, when the deceleration rate is equal to or greater than the threshold value B.

Description

  The present invention relates to an obstacle detection apparatus that detects an obstacle.

  Conventionally, a safety system such as a PCS (Pre-crashsafety system) that performs collision avoidance control is known. The PCS automatically detects whether there is an obstacle ahead and automatically notifies the driver of an emergency by a warning, etc., or even if the driver continues driving without noticing the obstacle ahead. This is a technique for avoiding a collision by automatically stopping the vehicle. In such a safety system, since it is necessary to accurately detect the presence or absence of an obstacle in front of the vehicle, fusion is performed between radar target information acquired by a radar and image target information acquired by a camera. Obstacle detection devices that detect obstacles are used.

  For example, in Patent Document 1 (Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 2011-053139), a lateral distance between a radar target and an image target recognized by a monocular camera is set according to the intensity of the received wave of the radar. There is disclosed an obstacle detection device that performs fusion without using image target information corresponding to the exceeded value. In this obstacle detection device, the image target information from which unreliable parts are removed is fused with the radar target information, so that it is possible to suppress false detection of the width of the target and improve the detection accuracy of the obstacle. It is possible to make it.

JP 2011-053139 A

  By the way, in a vehicle equipped with the obstacle detection device as described above, when the vehicle decelerates due to operation of the PCS or the like, an event called pitching or nose dive in which the vehicle swings up and down may occur. When these events occur, the radar also swings up and down, so that the obstacle cannot be captured and the reliability of the radar target information decreases. Further, in the conventional obstacle detection device, when the reliability of the radar target information is low, extrapolation processing for estimating the target information from the past history is performed, so that it is difficult to detect fusion with the image target information. There is a problem that the performance of collision determination is reduced.

  An object of the present invention is to provide an obstacle detection device capable of reliably performing fusion detection when a vehicle is decelerated.

  That is, according to the obstacle detection device according to the present invention, the obstacle detection device is mounted on a vehicle and detects obstacles around the vehicle, and detects an image data of the obstacle by imaging the surroundings. A detection means, a radar detection means for receiving a reflected wave of the emitted electromagnetic wave and acquiring a detection point on the obstacle, an image data of the obstacle detected by the image detection means, and a detection point acquired by the radar detection means; And a detection range setting unit for setting a detection range by the fusion detection unit according to the deceleration of the vehicle.

  According to this invention, the detection range setting means sets the detection range for fusion detection according to the deceleration of the vehicle. Therefore, even if an event such as pitching occurs due to deceleration of the vehicle and the reliability of the radar target information decreases, the detection range for fusion detection is set according to the deceleration. Fusion detection with mark information can be performed.

  In the obstacle detection device according to the present invention, the detection range setting means preferably sets the detection range wider as the deceleration of the vehicle is larger. According to the present invention, since the detection range is set wider as the deceleration is larger, the detection range can be set according to the size of pitching, and even when pitching or the like occurs, it is possible to reliably detect fusion. It can be performed.

  In the obstacle detection device according to the present invention, the detection range setting means sets the detection range by the fusion detection means to the first range when the vehicle deceleration is less than a predetermined value, and the vehicle deceleration is predetermined. When the value is equal to or greater than the value, it is preferable to set the detection range by the fusion detection means to a second range wider than the first range. According to this invention, when the deceleration of the vehicle is equal to or greater than a predetermined value, the detection range for fusion detection is set to a wider second range. Therefore, even if an event such as pitching occurs due to vehicle deceleration and the reliability of radar target information is reduced, the detection range of fusion detection is expanded, so fusion detection with image target information can be performed more reliably. It can be performed.

  The obstacle detection device according to the present invention further includes a deceleration control unit that performs deceleration control for automatically decelerating the vehicle, and the detection range setting unit detects the range when the deceleration control unit performs the deceleration control. Is preferably set to the second range. According to the present invention, when a safety system such as a PCS is installed, the detection range is set wide during deceleration control, so that fusion detection can be performed more reliably.

  The obstacle detection device according to the present invention is an obstacle detection device that is mounted on a vehicle and detects obstacles around the vehicle, and images the surroundings and detects image data of the obstacles. A detection means, a radar detection means for receiving a reflected wave of the emitted electromagnetic wave and acquiring a detection point on the obstacle, an image data of the obstacle detected by the image detection means, and a detection point acquired by the radar detection means; A fusion detection means for detecting surrounding obstacles using the sensor, and a detection range setting by the fusion detection means, and a detection range setting for setting a wider detection range when the vehicle brake is operated than when the brake is not operated Means.

  According to the present invention, the detection range setting means sets a wider detection range when the vehicle brake is operated. Therefore, even if an event such as pitching occurs when the brake is operated and the reliability of the radar target information is lowered, the detection range of the fusion detection is widened when the brake is operated, so that the fusion detection can be reliably performed. .

  In the obstacle detection device according to the present invention, the brake may be automatically operated by the vehicle. According to the present invention, even if the brake is automatically operated, the detection range is expanded by the detection range setting means when the brake is operated, so that the fusion detection can be reliably performed.

  According to the present invention, fusion detection can be reliably performed when the vehicle is decelerated.

1 is a schematic configuration diagram of an obstacle detection device according to an embodiment of the present invention. It is a flowchart which shows the fusion detection process in the obstruction detection apparatus of FIG. It is a figure for demonstrating the problem of the fusion detection process in the conventional obstacle detection apparatus.

  Hereinafter, embodiments of the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the drawings. In addition, the same code | symbol is used for the same element or the same equivalent element, and the overlapping description is abbreviate | omitted. FIG. 1 is a schematic configuration diagram of an obstacle detection apparatus 1 according to the first embodiment of the present invention.

  An obstacle detection apparatus 1 shown in FIG. 1 is an apparatus that is mounted on a vehicle 100 and detects obstacles around the vehicle 100. The obstacle detection device 1 includes a millimeter wave sensor 2, a stereo camera 3, a camera ECU (Electronic Control Unit) 4, a PCSECU (Electronic Control Unit) 5, and a vehicle speed sensor 6. The obstacle detection device 1 has a function of detecting obstacles and pedestrians around the vehicle 100 from information acquired by the millimeter wave sensor 2 and the stereo camera 3. The obstacle detection device 1 determines the possibility of collision with these obstacles and the like, and when it is determined that the possibility of collision is high, outputs an alarm to the driver of the vehicle 100 and executes collision prevention control. . Here, examples of the collision prevention control include deceleration of the vehicle 100 by pre-crash braking, winding of a seat belt, and the like.

  The millimeter wave sensor 2 functions as a radar detection unit that receives a reflected wave of an emitted electromagnetic wave and acquires a detection point on an obstacle. The millimeter wave sensor 2 is attached to the front of the vehicle 100, for example, scans the front of the vehicle 100 with millimeter wave band electromagnetic waves, and receives the electromagnetic waves reflected by the surface of an object existing around the vehicle 100. Thereby, the millimeter wave sensor 2 recognizes the target as an electromagnetic wave reflection point. The millimeter wave sensor 2 also acquires target information (radar target information) from millimeter wave transmission / reception data. The radar target information is, for example, the lateral position of the target, the distance between the vehicle 100 and the target, and the relative speed between the vehicle 100 and the target. Radar target information acquired by the millimeter wave sensor 2 is input to the camera ECU 4 and the PCSECU 5.

  The stereo camera 3 and the camera ECU 4 function as an image detection unit that images the surroundings and detects image data of an obstacle. The stereo camera 3 is attached in front of the vehicle 100, for example, and images the front of the vehicle 100. Thereby, the stereo camera 3 recognizes the target as an image. An image photographed by the stereo camera 3 is input to the camera ECU 4 as an image signal. The stereo camera 3 outputs image information around the vehicle 100 to the camera ECU 4 every predetermined time. Instead of the stereo camera 3, another imaging means such as a CCD camera or a monocular camera may be used.

  The camera ECU 4 is connected to the millimeter wave sensor 2 and the stereo camera 3, and receives radar target information from the millimeter wave sensor 2 and image information from the stereo camera 3. When an object is detected by the millimeter wave sensor 2, the camera ECU 4 sets an image processing area including an obstacle from image information based on detection point data regarding the detected object, and performs image processing (for example, , Edge analysis processing, luminance analysis processing, or optical flow processing) is performed to detect an obstacle as image target information. The image target information here is the horizontal position of the target, the size and height of the target. The camera ECU 4 outputs the acquired image target information to the PCSECU 5. In addition, as an image processing method for camera ECU4 to detect the image target information of an obstruction, not only the above but various methods are employable.

  The vehicle speed sensor 6 is provided, for example, in a wheel portion of the vehicle 100, detects the rotation speed of the wheel, and calculates the vehicle speed of the vehicle 100 from the detected rotation speed of the wheel. The vehicle speed sensor 6 transmits vehicle speed information based on the calculated vehicle speed to the PCSECU 5.

  The PCSECU 5 makes contact between the vehicle 100 and the obstacle detected when the vehicle 100 moves forward and backward based on information detected by the vehicle speed sensor 6, shift sensor, brake pedal sensor, accelerator pedal sensor, tilt sensor, and the like. The engine ECU and the brake ECU are operated so as to prevent the vehicle 100 from traveling. Further, the PCSECU 5 has a function of causing the driver of the vehicle 100 to recognize the detected obstacle information by an alarm or the like via a display device or the like.

  The PCSECU 5 is connected to the millimeter wave sensor 2 and the camera ECU 4, acquires obstacle detection point data from the millimeter wave sensor 2, acquires obstacle image data from the camera ECU 4, and detects detection point data and image data. It has a function of performing sensing by calculating information such as the position of the obstacle and the width in the horizontal direction using the fusion data obtained by fusion.

  The PCSECU 5 detects an obstacle by determining whether the radar target at the detection point by the millimeter wave sensor 2 and the image target of the image data by the camera ECU 4 are the same object. Specifically, for example, when the distance between the position of the radar target and the position of the image target is less than a predetermined threshold, the PCSECU 5 determines that these targets are due to the same object, and the obstacle Detect as. Hereinafter, the obstacle detection by the PCSECU 5 is referred to as fusion detection, and the predetermined threshold value that is a criterion for determining whether or not the object is the same object is referred to as a fusion detection range.

  Here, the problem of the obstacle detection apparatus provided with the conventional PCSECU will be described. For example, as shown in FIG. 3, it is assumed that a preceding vehicle 200 exists in front of a vehicle 300 having a conventional PCSECU and the vehicle 300 travels following the preceding vehicle 200. Here, as shown in the upper part of FIG. 3A, when the vehicle 300 is traveling behind the preceding vehicle 200 at a substantially constant speed, the reception intensity of the radar L of the millimeter wave sensor 2 is sufficient. The reliability of millimeter waves is high, and fusion detection by the PCSECU 5 can be performed reliably.

  However, for example, as shown in the lower part of FIG. 3 (a), when the preceding vehicle 200 stops suddenly and the PCSECU of the vehicle 300 controls the vehicle 300 to decelerate accordingly, an event called pitching or nose dive occurs. Sometimes. When these events occur, the radar L swings downward, so that the preceding vehicle 200 cannot be captured, and the reliability of the radar target information of the millimeter wave sensor 2 decreases. At this time, in the conventional obstacle detection device, extrapolation processing estimated from the history so far is performed to calculate the target information, and the detection range of the fusion detection by the PCSECU 5 is shown in part (c) of FIG. Set to narrow. Therefore, the fusion detection with the image target information cannot be performed when the vehicle 300 decelerates, and there arises a problem that the performance of the collision determination is deteriorated.

  Therefore, in the obstacle detection device 1 of the present embodiment, as shown in FIG. 1, the PCSECU 5 has a detection range setting unit 54 and can set a detection range for fusion detection according to the state of the vehicle 100. . The detection range setting unit 54 sets the fusion detection range (the length of the horizontal arrow in the figure) of the PCSECU 5 widely when the vehicle 100 is decelerated, for example, as shown in FIG. The above-mentioned problem is solved by surely performing fusion detection according to the above. Specifically, the detection range setting unit 54 determines that these targets are due to the same object even if the distance between the radar target and the image target is long by setting a wide fusion detection range. This makes it easier to detect obstacles. In addition to the detection range setting unit 54, the PCSECU 5 of the present embodiment includes a collision determination unit 51, a deceleration control unit 52, and a fusion detection unit 53.

  Based on the detection result of the fusion detection unit 53, the collision determination unit 51 determines the horizontal position of the target, the horizontal width of the target, the height of the target, the distance between the vehicle 100 and the target, and the vehicle 100 and the target. Has a function of calculating the relative speed of the vehicle 100 and determining the possibility of collision between the vehicle 100 and the target. The collision determination unit 51 outputs a determination result of the possibility of collision to the deceleration control unit 52.

  The deceleration control unit 52 has a function as deceleration control means for performing deceleration control that automatically decelerates the vehicle 100 in order to prevent a collision with an obstacle. The deceleration control unit 52 receives the determination result about the possibility of collision with the target from the collision determination unit 51, and when the collision determination unit 51 determines that the possibility of collision with the target is high, Deceleration control for decelerating the vehicle 100 by operating is performed, and the vehicle 100 is stopped.

  The fusion detection unit 53 functions as a fusion detection unit that performs fusion detection that detects surrounding obstacles using the image data of the obstacle detected by the camera ECU 4 and the detection points acquired by the millimeter wave sensor 2. The fusion detection unit 53 is connected to the millimeter wave sensor 2 and the camera ECU 4, receives radar target information from the millimeter wave sensor 2, receives image target information from the camera ECU 4, and detects radar target information and an image. An obstacle is detected by fusing the target information.

  The detection range setting unit 54 has a function as detection range setting means for setting a detection range of fusion detection by the fusion detection unit 53. The detection range setting unit 54 has a function of detecting the deceleration of the vehicle 100 by receiving the deceleration from the vehicle speed sensor 6, for example. Note that deceleration may be received from a deceleration sensor such as a brake sensor instead of the vehicle speed sensor 6, and the deceleration reception processing of the detection range setting unit 54 is not limited to the above.

  The detection range setting unit 54 sets the detection range by the fusion detection unit 53 to a narrow first range when the deceleration of the vehicle 100 is less than a predetermined value when the radar reception intensity of the millimeter wave sensor 2 is smaller than the predetermined intensity. When the deceleration of the vehicle 100 is equal to or greater than the predetermined value, the detection range by the fusion detection unit 53 is set to a second range wider than the first range. The values of the first range and the second range can be appropriately changed and are not particularly limited. For example, the first range can be about 2 m in the left-right width and the second range can be about 4 m in the left-right width.

  Next, an example of the operation of the obstacle detection apparatus 1 according to the present embodiment will be described with reference to FIG. FIG. 2 is a flowchart showing a detection range setting process of the fusion detection unit 53 by the PCSECU 5 of the obstacle detection apparatus 1. The processing shown in FIG. 2 is repeatedly executed at regular intervals while the vehicle 100 is traveling.

  First, in step S10 (hereinafter referred to as “S10”, the same applies to other steps), the PCSECU 5 performs processing of reading radar target information by the millimeter wave sensor 2 and image target information by the camera ECU 4. Executed. At this time, the PCSECU 5 also receives information related to the radar reception intensity of the millimeter wave sensor 2, and the reliability of the radar target information by the millimeter wave sensor 2 is determined in accordance with this reception intensity. That is, the reliability of the radar target information here is a value corresponding to the received intensity of the radar. The higher the received intensity, the higher the reliability, and the lower the received intensity, the lower the reliability.

  And it transfers to S12 and it is determined by PCSECU5 whether the reliability determined in S10 is more than the threshold value A. In FIG. If it is determined that the reliability is greater than or equal to the threshold value A, the process proceeds to S20, where the detection range setting unit 54 sets the detection range of the fusion detection unit 53 to a wide second range, and fusion detection is performed in S22. After the fusion detection is performed by the unit 53, a series of processing ends. On the other hand, if it is determined in S12 that the reliability is not equal to or higher than the threshold A, the process proceeds to S14.

  In S14, the PCSECU 5 determines whether the deceleration control unit 52 is performing deceleration control. That is, it is determined by the collision determination unit 51 whether or not the possibility of collision with a target in front of the vehicle 100 is high. If it is determined in S14 that the deceleration control unit 52 is performing deceleration control, the process proceeds to S20, where the detection range of the fusion detection unit 53 is set to the second range, and in S22, the fusion detection unit 53 After fusion detection is performed, a series of processing ends. On the other hand, if it is determined in S14 that the deceleration control unit 52 is not performing deceleration control, the process proceeds to S16. In S14, instead of determining whether or not the deceleration control unit 52 is performing deceleration control, it may be determined whether or not the foot brake of the vehicle 100 is activated.

  In S <b> 16, the detection range setting unit 54 determines whether the deceleration of the vehicle 100 is greater than or equal to the threshold value B. If it is determined in S16 that the deceleration of the vehicle 100 is not greater than or equal to the threshold value B, the process proceeds to S18, where the detection range of the fusion detection unit 53 is narrower than the second range by the detection range setting unit 54. After the fusion detection is performed by the fusion detection unit 53 in S22, a series of processing ends.

  On the other hand, if it is determined in S16 that the deceleration of the vehicle 100 is equal to or greater than the threshold value B, the process proceeds to S20, and the detection range of the fusion detection unit 53 is set to the second range by the detection range setting unit 54. After fusion detection is performed by the fusion detection unit 53 in S22, a series of processing ends. In addition, although the value of said threshold value A and B can be changed suitably and is not specifically limited, For example, threshold value B can be 0.3 [G]. Further, the value of the threshold value B may be determined as appropriate from the relationship between the deceleration of the vehicle 100, the pitching angle, and the vertical angle of the millimeter wave.

  As described above, the obstacle detection device according to the present embodiment is the obstacle detection device 1 that is mounted on the vehicle 100 and detects obstacles around the vehicle 100, and images the surroundings to obtain image data of the obstacles. Stereo camera 3 and camera ECU 4 to detect, millimeter wave sensor 2 that receives a reflected wave of the emitted electromagnetic wave and obtains a detection point on the obstacle, image data of the obstacle detected by camera ECU 4 and millimeter wave sensor 2 And a detection range setting unit 54 for setting a detection range by the fusion detection unit 53 in accordance with the deceleration of the vehicle 100.

  As described above, the detection range setting unit 54 sets the detection range for fusion detection according to the deceleration of the vehicle 100. Therefore, even if an event such as pitching occurs due to deceleration of the vehicle 100 and the reliability of the millimeter wave sensor 2 is lowered, the detection range of fusion detection is set according to the deceleration, so that the image is surely displayed. Fusion detection with target information can be performed.

  Further, according to the obstacle detection device 1 according to the present embodiment, the detection range setting unit 54 sets the detection range wider as the deceleration of the vehicle 100 is larger. Therefore, the larger the vehicle deceleration, the wider the detection range. Therefore, it is possible to set the detection range according to the pitching size, so that fusion detection is ensured even when pitching occurs. It can be carried out.

  Moreover, according to the obstacle detection device 1 according to the present embodiment, when the deceleration of the vehicle 100 is less than the threshold value B, the detection range by the fusion detection unit 53 is set to the first range, and the deceleration of the vehicle 100 is When the value is equal to or greater than the threshold value B, the detection range by the fusion detection unit 53 is set to a second range wider than the first range. Therefore, the detection range setting unit 54 sets the detection range for fusion detection to a second range that is wider when the reliability of the electromagnetic wave is smaller than the threshold value A and the deceleration of the vehicle 100 is greater than or equal to the threshold value B. Therefore, even when an event such as pitching occurs due to deceleration of the vehicle 100 and the reliability of the radar target information is lowered, the detection range of the fusion detection is expanded, so that the fusion with the image target information is more reliably performed. Detection can be performed.

  Further, the obstacle detection device 1 according to the present embodiment includes the deceleration control unit 52 that performs deceleration control for automatically decelerating the vehicle 100, and the detection range setting unit 54 includes the deceleration control unit 52 that performs deceleration control. When performing, the detection range is set to the second range. Therefore, when a safety system such as PCS is installed, the detection range is set wide during deceleration control, so that fusion detection can be performed more reliably.

  Furthermore, in the obstacle detection device 1 of the present embodiment, the detection range setting unit 54 sets a second range that is wider when the brake of the vehicle 100 is operated than when the brake is not operated. Therefore, even when an event such as pitching occurs when the brake is operated and the reliability of the radar target information is lowered, the detection range of the fusion detection is widened when the brake is operated, so that the fusion detection can be reliably performed. .

  Further, according to the obstacle detection device 1 according to the present embodiment, the brake is automatically operated by the vehicle 100 because the deceleration control unit 52 performs the deceleration control. As described above, even if the brake is automatically operated, the detection range is expanded by the detection range setting unit 54 when the brake is operated, so that the fusion detection can be performed reliably.

  In addition, embodiment mentioned above demonstrated embodiment of the obstacle detection apparatus which concerns on this invention, and the obstacle detection apparatus which concerns on this invention is not limited to what was described in this embodiment. The obstacle detection apparatus according to the present invention may be a modification of the obstacle detection apparatus according to the present embodiment, or may be applied to other objects without changing the gist described in each claim.

  For example, in the above-described embodiment, as shown in S12, S14, and S16 of FIG. 2, it is determined whether the millimeter wave reliability is equal to or higher than the threshold A, and whether the deceleration control unit 52 is performing deceleration control. Although the example which performs three determinations of determination about whether or not the deceleration of the vehicle 100 is greater than or equal to the threshold value B has been described, at least one of these determinations is executed. You may do it.

  In the above embodiment, the example in which the detection range setting unit 54 sets the detection range of the fusion detection unit 53 to either the first range or the second range has been described. It is not limited to this. For example, the detection range setting unit 54 may calculate the range each time and dynamically set the range based on at least one of the reliability of the radar target information and the deceleration of the vehicle 100. In this way, more precise range setting by the detection range setting unit 54 becomes possible.

  In the above embodiment, the example in which the detection range setting unit 54 sets the range based on the reliability of the millimeter wave sensor 2, the operating state of the deceleration control unit 52, and the deceleration of the vehicle 100 has been described. The parameter on which the setting is based is not limited to the above. For example, the detection range setting unit 54 may set the range based on the pitching angle of the vehicle 100 instead of the deceleration of the vehicle 100.

  Moreover, although the said embodiment demonstrated the example using the millimeter wave sensor 2 which irradiates electromagnetic waves ahead, you may use combining the sensor which irradiates electromagnetic waves ahead, and the sensor which irradiates electromagnetic waves to a side. . Further, instead of the millimeter wave sensor 2, sensors of different wavelength bands such as a sensor using a microwave or a submillimeter wave may be used. Further, any sensor can be used as a substitute for the millimeter wave sensor 2 as long as it can identify the object by measuring the distance to the object by transmitting and receiving electromagnetic waves.

  DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 1 ... Obstacle detection apparatus, 2 ... Millimeter wave sensor, 3 ... Stereo camera, 4 ... Camera ECU, 5 ... PCSECU, 51 ... Collision determination part, 52 ... Deceleration control part, 53 ... Fusion detection part, 54 ... Detection range setting Part, 100 ... vehicle, A, B ... threshold.

Claims (6)

An obstacle detection device mounted on a vehicle for detecting obstacles around the vehicle,
Image detecting means for detecting the image data of the obstacle by imaging the surroundings;
Radar detection means for receiving a reflected wave of the emitted electromagnetic wave and acquiring a detection point in the obstacle;
A fusion detection means for detecting surrounding obstacles using the image data of the obstacle detected by the image detection means and the detection point acquired by the radar detection means;
Detection range setting means for setting a detection range by the fusion detection means in accordance with the deceleration of the vehicle;
An obstacle detection device comprising: The detection range setting means sets the detection range wider as the deceleration of the vehicle is larger.
The obstacle detection apparatus according to claim 1. The detection range setting means sets the detection range by the fusion detection means to a first range when the deceleration of the vehicle is less than a predetermined value, and the detection range setting means when the deceleration of the vehicle is equal to or greater than the predetermined value. Setting the detection range by the fusion detection means to a second range wider than the first range;
The obstacle detection apparatus according to claim 1 or 2. A deceleration control means for performing deceleration control for automatically decelerating the vehicle;
The detection range setting means sets the detection range to the second range when the deceleration control means is performing deceleration control.
The obstacle detection device according to claim 3. An obstacle detection device mounted on a vehicle for detecting obstacles around the vehicle,
Image detecting means for detecting the image data of the obstacle by imaging the surroundings;
Radar detection means for receiving a reflected wave of the emitted electromagnetic wave and acquiring a detection point in the obstacle;
A fusion detection means for detecting surrounding obstacles using the image data of the obstacle detected by the image detection means and the detection point acquired by the radar detection means;
A detection range setting means for setting a detection range by the fusion detection means, wherein the detection range setting means sets a wider detection range when the brake of the vehicle is operated than when the brake is not operated;
An obstacle detection device comprising: The brake is automatically actuated by the vehicle;
The obstacle detection device according to claim 5.

Images