JP2013096854A - Motorcycle shift simulation system and method for predicting shift feeling of motorcycle - Google Patents

Abstract

PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide a motorcycle shift simulation system which is capable of quantifying shift feeling as general feeling.SOLUTION: A system 100 includes a testing device 102 simulating a motorcycle, a system control device for controlling the testing device 102, and an input/output device attached to the testing device 102. The testing device 102 includes a shift pedal 110 and a motor 112 having a motor shaft 114 connected to a revolving shaft of the shift pedal 110, and the system control device includes a storage unit 140 in which a plurality of torque patterns for gear change are stored, and a control unit 138 which generates a plurality of sets of a pair of torque patterns for gear change out of the plurality of torque patterns for gear change, and the input/output device includes a display part and an operation part capable of instructing switching to a torque pattern for gear change, which pairs with a current torque pattern for gear change, and capable of scoring torque patterns for gear change with respect to various evaluation items.

Description

  The present invention relates to a motorcycle shift simulation system and a motorcycle shift feeling prediction method.

  Sensory evaluation tests have been performed to evaluate the shift feeling (operating feeling during shifting) of a motorcycle. Conventionally, in the sensory evaluation test, a plurality of types of motorcycles are prepared, and subjects (test riders and users) are given a score for predetermined evaluation items (for example, weight, feeling of moderation, etc.).

  On the other hand, there is a demand for quantification of shift feeling in recent years. Quantification is performed for each evaluation item using a statistical method such as multiple regression analysis. However, it is difficult to uniformly quantify the shift feeling because it depends on how the subject feels. This is because even if the same subject evaluates the same actual machine, the score often changes due to minor condition changes and feelings such as the physical condition, riding posture, and weather of the subject.

  Shift feeling, on the other hand, is directly linked to the sales of motorcycles with annual shipments of 30,000 to 60,000 units in Japan alone. Of course, the user selects a vehicle that is easy to drive when selecting the purchase vehicle. Accordingly, the quantification of shift feeling (quantification that does not conform to the general sense) and the design of the vehicle based on the failed quantification may impair the merchantability of the vehicle and have a huge impact. For this reason, the shift feeling must be quantified very carefully in a general sense.

  Therefore, the inventor invented a motorcycle shift simulator and filed a patent application on October 28, 2008 (Patent Document 1). In such a motorcycle shift simulator, a motor shaft of a direct drive motor is directly connected to a rotating shaft of a motorcycle shift pedal, and the servo drive of the direct drive motor is servo controlled. As a result, it is possible to score a plurality of shift torque patterns (for example, a reproduction of an actual machine) in the same riding posture without changing the subject, and it is possible to score shift feeling under relatively the same conditions. .

JP 2010-108209 A

  As described above, the quantification of the shift feeling must be carried out very carefully in accordance with the general sense, since the effect directly affects the sales of the vehicle itself. Although the technique of Patent Document 1 enables scores under relatively the same conditions, there is still room for further measures to realize quantification according to a general sense.

  The present invention has been made in view of the above-described problems. A motorcycle shift simulation system capable of quantifying shift feeling in accordance with a general sense, and a motorcycle shift fee using the same. An object is to provide a ring prediction method.

  In order to solve the above problems, a representative configuration of the present invention is a motorcycle shift simulation system in which a test apparatus that simulates a motorcycle, a system control apparatus that controls the test apparatus, and an input / output that is attached to the test apparatus. The test device has a shift pedal and a motor having a motor shaft coupled to the rotation shaft of the shift pedal, and the system control device stores a plurality of shift torque patterns applied to the shift pedal. And a control unit that creates a plurality of pairs of combinations among a plurality of shift torque patterns and controls the shift pedal to move with one of the pair of shift torque patterns. The output device includes a display and another shift torque torque that is a combination of the current shift torque pattern. Is capable instructs the switch to over emissions, and characterized by having a score possible operations unit to various evaluation items for shifting time torque pattern.

  According to the above configuration, a plurality of pairs of combinations are created from a plurality of shift load patterns, and a sensory evaluation test is performed. In other words, a so-called “pair comparison method” is used to score various evaluation items for the load pattern during shifting. When evaluating shift feeling, which is a human sense, according to the “pair comparison method,” one of a pair of combinations plays a monosasic role of measuring subjective judgment (the role of evaluation criteria). A grade with high accuracy can be given. Furthermore, since a plurality of sets are continuously evaluated here, a score under the same conditions can be obtained for the subject's riding posture and the like. This makes it possible to quantify the shift feeling according to the general sense.

  The control unit of the system control device may create a plurality of sets such that one shift torque pattern appears multiple times in separate sets. Thereby, an accurate (accurate) score can be obtained.

  The control unit of the system control device uses the operation unit of the input / output device to allow the subject to change to the other shift torque pattern that is a paired combination with one of the current set of shift torque patterns. On the other hand, it is recommended to move to the next set when the score is completed. Thereby, an accurate (accurate) score can be obtained.

  After all evaluations are completed, the control unit of the system controller performs multiple regression analysis using various parameters of the respective torque patterns at the time of shifting and the scores for the torque patterns at the time of shifting, and predicts shift feeling for each evaluation item. Can be calculated. As a result, the shift feeling is quantified according to a general sense.

  The various parameters of the torque pattern during shifting include any of peak torque Pmax, peak phase a, torque difference ΔP, and stroke phase st, and the control unit of the system controller sets the various parameters of the shifting torque pattern as independent variables. The multiple regression analysis may be performed using the score for the shift torque pattern as a dependent variable. Thereby, a suitable shift feeling prediction formula can be calculated.

  According to another aspect of the present invention, a motorcycle that predicts the shift feeling by introducing a predetermined parameter of the shift mechanism to be predicted into the shift feeling prediction formula calculated by the shift simulation system of the motorcycle. A shift feeling prediction method is provided. Thereby, the shift feeling of the shift mechanism to be predicted can be accurately predicted.

  ADVANTAGE OF THE INVENTION According to this invention, the shift simulation system of the motorcycle which can implement | achieve quantification of the shift feeling along a general sense, and the shift feeling prediction method of a motorcycle using the same can be provided.

It is a figure which shows the outline of the design of the shift mechanism using the shift simulation system of the motorcycle concerning this embodiment. It is a figure which illustrates about a torque pattern at the time of gear shifting. 1 is an external view of a motorcycle shift simulation system according to an embodiment. FIG. It is AA sectional drawing of FIG. FIG. 4 is a block diagram showing a schematic configuration of the motorcycle shift simulation system of FIG. 3. It is a block diagram which shows the other structure of FIG. FIG. 4 is a diagram showing an application example of torque patterns during shifting in a sensory evaluation test using the motorcycle shift simulation system of FIG. 3. FIG. 4 is a diagram showing a flow of a sensory evaluation test using the motorcycle shift simulation system of FIG. 3. It is a figure which illustrates the display screen of the touchscreen display of FIG. It is a figure explaining the internal process of the real-time controller of FIG. FIG. 4 is a diagram illustrating an evaluation result of each torque pattern at the time of a sensory evaluation test using the motorcycle shift simulation system of FIG. 3. It is a figure which shows the relationship between the evaluation result of FIG. 11, ie, an actual value, and the predicted value by the shift feeling prediction formula computed from the evaluation result using multiple regression analysis.

  Hereinafter, preferred embodiments of the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings. The dimensions, materials, and other specific numerical values shown in the embodiments are merely examples for facilitating understanding of the invention, and do not limit the present invention unless otherwise specified. In the present specification and drawings, elements having substantially the same function and configuration are denoted by the same reference numerals, and redundant description is omitted, and elements not directly related to the present invention are not illustrated. To do.

  FIG. 1 is a diagram showing an outline of a design of a shift mechanism using a motorcycle shift simulation system (hereinafter referred to as “system 100”) according to the present embodiment. In the present embodiment, the shift feeling is predicted from the component specifications 204 of various components (for example, a shift cam, a stopper spring, and a return spring) constituting the shift mechanism of the motorcycle without producing a prototype.

  Specifically, as shown in FIG. 1, a sensory evaluation test is performed to obtain an evaluation result 200. The obtained evaluation result 200 is subjected to multiple regression analysis using multiple regression analysis software (hereinafter referred to as “analysis software 144”) to calculate a shift feeling prediction formula 202.

  Next, the parts specification 204 of the shift mechanism of the motorcycle to be predicted is input, and the torque pattern calculation software (hereinafter referred to as “calculation software 146”) at the time of the shift mechanism during the shift pedal operation at the time of the shift mechanism is input. A predetermined parameter of the shifting torque pattern 206 representing the relationship between the angle (stroke) and the torque is calculated.

  FIG. 2 is a diagram illustrating the torque pattern 206 during shifting. As illustrated in FIG. 2, the shifting torque pattern 206 includes various parameters such as peak torque Pmax, peak phase a, torque difference ΔP, and stroke phase st. A predetermined parameter of the required shift torque pattern 206 is introduced into the shift feeling prediction formula 202 to obtain a shift feeling prediction result 208 of the shift mechanism.

  The system 100 according to the present embodiment performs the above-described series of processes. The system 100 performs a sensory evaluation test to calculate the shift feeling prediction formula 202, and the shift of the prediction target using the shift feeling prediction formula 202. You may make it different from what calculates the prediction result of the shift feeling of a mechanism, respectively.

  Hereinafter, the system 100 will be described in detail. FIG. 3 is an external view of the system 100. 4 is a cross-sectional view taken along line AA in FIG. FIG. 5 is a block diagram illustrating a schematic configuration of the system 100. FIG. 6 is a block diagram showing another configuration of FIG.

  As shown in FIG. 3, the system 100 includes a test apparatus 102 that simulates a motorcycle, a computer 104 and a real-time controller 106 as a system control apparatus, and a touch panel display 108 as an input / output apparatus.

  The test apparatus 102 is an apparatus on which a subject is boarded during a sensory evaluation test, and is obtained by modifying a part of an actual motorcycle. In the present embodiment, the test apparatus 102 has the same parts as the actual machine, such as the handle, seat, fuel tank, and footrest, but the shift mechanism is not the same as the actual machine.

  As shown in FIG. 4, in the test apparatus 102, the motor shaft 114 of the motor 112 is directly connected to the rotation shaft of the shift pedal 110. When a current is applied to the motor 112, the motor shaft 114 rotates together with the rotor 116 due to the interaction between the stator 118 (stator) and the rotor 116 (rotor). A torque sensor 122 that measures the torque (operation torque τ) of the motor shaft 114 is attached to the motor shaft 114. Further, an encoder 126 for measuring the rotation angle θ is attached to the motor shaft 114 via a coupling 124 (shaft joint). In this embodiment, the shift pedal 110 is caused to reproduce an arbitrary shift torque pattern by controlling the current applied to the motor 112 by the computer 104 and the real-time controller 106.

  As shown in FIG. 5, the real-time controller 106 includes a control unit 128 configured with a CPU and the like, and a storage unit 130 configured with a ROM, a RAM, a flash memory, and the like. The storage unit 130 stores control software 156 for calculating the control torque u. The control unit 128 executes the control software 156, acquires the operation torque τ via the A / D board 132, acquires the rotation angle θ via the counter board 134, and calculates the control torque u in real time. The control torque u is a torque for realizing impedance control (accurately reproducing the shift torque pattern currently being applied to the shift pedal 110), and the equation (1) representing the actual dynamic characteristics of the motor 112 and the target From equation (2) representing the dynamic characteristics, it can be obtained by equation (3). The target moment of inertia Jd and the target viscous resistance coefficient Dd are set in advance with reference to the specifications of the parts of the actual machine. The moment of inertia J and the viscous resistance coefficient D of the rotor 116 and the motor shaft 114 are determined by the properties of the motor 112. The reproduction torque pattern reproduction torque Kd (θ) is a torque at the rotation angle θ of the transmission time torque pattern currently applied to the shift pedal 110.

  In the actual machine, the shift torque pattern of the shift pedal 110 changes according to the operation of the throttle grip 148 and the clutch lever 150 as well as the component specifications of the shift mechanism. Therefore, as shown in FIGS. 6A and 6B, the operation amounts of the throttle grip 148 and the clutch lever 150 are acquired by the potentiometers 166 and 168 and transmitted to the real-time controller 106 (A / D board 132). Good. In this case, the control unit 128 of the real-time controller 106 calculates the control torque u in consideration of these.

  Further, in the actual device, a gear dog meshing sound is generated, so that a speaker 152 may be attached to the test apparatus 102 and this meshing sound may be generated from the speaker 152 based on the rotation angle θ. As shown in FIG. 6C, for example, a command to the speaker 152 can be issued to the computer 104. By generating the sound corresponding to the actual machine from the speaker 152, the sensory evaluation test can be performed under the same conditions as the actual machine, and the influence on the shift feeling due to the presence or absence of sound can be eliminated.

  Furthermore, since vibration is generated in connection with the clutch plate in the actual machine, the vibration generator 154 may be attached to the test apparatus 102 and vibration may be generated by the vibration generator 154 based on the rotation angle θ. As shown in FIG. 6D, for example, a command to the vibration generator 154 can be transmitted via the D / A board 136 of the real-time controller 106. By generating such vibration, the sensory evaluation test can be carried out under the same conditions as the actual machine, and the influence on the shift feeling due to the presence or absence of vibration can be eliminated.

  As shown in FIG. 5, the calculated control torque u is transmitted to the servo driver 120 via the D / A board 136 in the form of a current command value for realizing the control torque u. The servo driver 120 causes the current applied to the motor 112 to follow this current command value. As a result, an arbitrary shift torque pattern can be accurately reproduced.

  The above-described real-time controller 106 executes a process that requires real-time property in the sensory evaluation test, while the computer 104 executes a process that does not require real-time property in the sensory evaluation test. The computer 104 includes a control unit 138 configured with a CPU and the like, and a storage unit 140 configured with a ROM, a RAM, a flash memory, and the like. The storage unit 140 stores sensory evaluation test software (hereinafter referred to as “test software 142”) that executes processing that does not require real-time performance in the sensory evaluation test. The test software 142 has a function of performing input / output management of a torque pattern during shifting applied to the shift pedal 110. The storage unit 140 stores the analysis software 144 and the calculation software 146 described above. Furthermore, the storage unit 140 stores a plurality of shift torque patterns to be applied to the shift pedal 110 in the sensory evaluation test.

  The control unit 138 of the computer 104 executes the test software 142 in the sensory evaluation test, and creates a plurality of sets of a pair of combinations from the plurality of shifting torque patterns stored in the storage unit 140. In particular, the control unit 138 of the computer creates a plurality of sets such that one shift torque pattern appears a plurality of times in different sets. The created paired combination plural sets of data are output to the real-time controller 106.

  FIG. 7 is a diagram illustrating an application example of each torque pattern at the time of shifting in the sensory evaluation test using the system 100. As illustrated in FIGS. 7A and 7B, here, four shift torque patterns (“Pattern 1”, “Pattern 2”, The case of creating a pair of combination data from “pattern 3” and “pattern 4” will be described. As illustrated in FIG. 7C, each shift torque pattern is allocated to a plurality of sets. In the present embodiment, one of the pair of combinations is referred to as a pattern A and the other is referred to as a pattern B.

  FIG. 8 is a diagram showing the flow of a sensory evaluation test using the system 100. FIG. 9 is a diagram illustrating a display screen of the touch panel display 108. FIG. 10 is a diagram for explaining internal processing of the real-time controller 106. As shown in FIG. 8, in the sensory evaluation test using the system 100, a pair of combined multiple sets of torque patterns during shifting are presented to the subject. The shift-time torque pattern of pattern A of set 1 is applied to the shift pedal 110 at the start of the sensory evaluation test. In addition, in order to improve the test accuracy, as a function of the test software 142, the subject can experience the torque pattern at the time of the shift with the largest difference (for example, the difference in the peak torque Pmax) before the sensory evaluation test starts. It may be.

  The touch panel display 108 is attached to the test apparatus 102 and functions as a display unit that displays an image to the subject and an operation unit that receives an input operation from the subject. As illustrated in FIG. 8, the touch panel display 108 is set with a scoring area 158 that can be scored by touching various evaluation items (weight, stroke, moderation, etc.) with respect to the torque pattern during shifting. . Next to the score area 158, a temporary selection area 160 for displaying the selected score is set. Even if the selected grade is displayed in the temporary selection area 160, it can be overwritten by reselecting the score in the grade area 158 until the next set is transferred. A mode setting area 164 is set above the temporary selection area 160, and the “sensory evaluation test mode” and “training mode” can be selected by touching the subject. In the “sensory evaluation test mode”, the mode setting area 164 displays how many sets are present. “Training mode” will be described later.

  Above the rating area 158, a pattern switching area 162 that can instruct switching to the other shifting torque pattern (switching from pattern A to pattern B) that is a pair with the current shifting torque pattern. Is set. In this embodiment, when the subject touches “A” in the pattern switching area 162, switching to the pattern A is instructed, and when “B” is touched, switching to the pattern B is instructed. As shown in FIG. 10, when pattern switching is instructed from the touch panel display 108, pattern switching (set number and pattern AorB) is input to the real-time controller 106 via the computer 104. The control torque u is calculated in real time based on the hour torque pattern.

  Please refer to FIG. In this embodiment, the subject compares both pattern A and pattern B (steps S308 and S310), and inputs a score for pattern A of pattern B for each of various evaluation items (weight, stroke, moderation, etc.). The score is completed (step S300). That is, the pattern A is a reference here, and the score input to the pattern A is not performed. When the score is completed for the current set, the score data being displayed in the temporary selection area 160 is stored in the storage unit 140 of the computer 104 (step S302), and the process proceeds to the next set (step S304). These processes are repeated until a plurality of sets created by the control unit 138 are completed (step S306). In this embodiment, the pattern B is scored on the basis of the pattern A. However, the present invention is not limited to this, and the pattern A and the pattern B may be scored separately.

  According to the configuration described above, the sensory evaluation test is performed using a so-called “pair comparison method”. When evaluating shift feeling, which is a human sense, according to the “pair comparison method,” one of a pair of combinations plays a monosasic role of measuring subjective judgment (the role of evaluation criteria). A grade with high accuracy can be given. Further, regarding the point that the switching between the pattern A and the pattern B can be performed at any time through the touch panel display 108, the test subject can input the score while confirming both, which contributes to the improvement of accuracy. Furthermore, since a plurality of sets are continuously evaluated here, a score under the same conditions can be obtained for the subject's riding posture and the like. This makes it possible to quantify the shift feeling according to the general sense.

  In particular, in the present embodiment, the control unit of the computer 104 creates a plurality of sets such that one shift torque pattern appears multiple times in separate sets. This makes it easier for the test subject to establish a standard and gives an accurate (accurate) score throughout. In addition, by making one shift torque pattern appear multiple times in this way, it is possible to obtain an average score for the shift torque pattern as shown in FIG. 11 described later (the scores can be averaged). The average score can be used for multiple regression analysis to ensure its reliability.

  After all the evaluations are completed (after obtaining the evaluation result 200), the control unit 138 of the computer 104 executes the analysis software 144 and performs multiple regression analysis using various parameters of the respective torque patterns at the time of shifting and the scores for the torque patterns at the time of shifting. The shift feeling prediction formula 202 for each evaluation item is calculated. Here, after all evaluations are completed, when there are a plurality of subjects, all the subjects have completed a plurality of sets of scores (evaluation results 200 of all subjects are stored in the storage unit 140). It is.

FIG. 11 is a diagram illustrating an evaluation result 200 of each shift time torque pattern of the sensory evaluation test using the system 100. With respect to the evaluation results illustrated in FIG. 11, the analysis software 144 sets various parameters of the torque pattern during shifting such as peak torque Pmax, peak phase a, torque difference ΔP, stroke phase st, etc. Multiple regression analysis is performed for each evaluation item (weight, stroke, sense of moderation) using the score as a dependent variable. In the multiple regression analysis, the shift feeling prediction formula 202 is calculated while removing variables in which collinearity is found and unnecessary variables. By the multiple regression analysis from the evaluation result of FIG. 11, the shift feeling prediction formula 202 of the evaluation item “weight” is expressed by the equation (4), the shift feeling prediction equation 202 of the evaluation item “stroke” is expressed by the equation (5), and the evaluation item The shift feeling prediction formula 202 of “moderate feeling” can be calculated as in formula (6). The calculated shift feeling prediction formula 202 is stored in the storage unit 140.
Predicted value of “weight” = 1.07 × Pmax + 0.126 × a + 0.683 × ΔP−8.15 (4)
Expected value of “Stroke” = − 0.442 × Pmax−0.0933 × a + 0.735 × st−7.53
... (5)
Predicted value of “moderate feeling” = 0.196 × a + 1.28 × ΔP−4.99 (6)

  FIG. 12 is a diagram showing the relationship between the evaluation result of FIG. 11, that is, the actual measurement value, and the predicted value based on the shift feeling prediction formula 202 calculated from the evaluation result using multiple regression analysis. As illustrated in FIG. 12, although the predicted value tends to be weaker and weaker than the actually measured value, in any of the shift feeling prediction formulas 202 of the evaluation items “weight”, “stroke”, and “moderate feeling”, Shift feeling can be predicted with high accuracy.

  In the sensory evaluation test, identification information such as age, sex, race, and preference (standard type, American type) of the subject is stored in the storage unit 140 in association with the evaluation result 200 of the subject, and shift feeling prediction is performed. Only the evaluation result 200 of a specific subject may be used when calculating the expression 202. For example, when it is necessary to predict the shift feeling in order to select and design various parts of the shift mechanism of an American type motorcycle, only the evaluation result 200 of the subject who likes the American type may be extracted. Thereby, shift feeling can be predicted with higher accuracy.

  As described above, when the shift feeling prediction formula 202 is calculated and the shift feeling is quantified, the system 100 can also make the test rider remember the quantified evaluation criteria by the “training mode”. . Specifically, in the “training mode”, the shift torque pattern to be presented to the test rider or the like is displayed on the touch panel display 108 according to the calculated shift feeling prediction formula 202 to be remembered. This makes it possible to unify the evaluation criteria between test riders. In the “training mode”, what can be shipped at the factory and what cannot be shipped may be presented continuously so that the test rider or the like can learn the criteria for shipping.

  As mentioned above, although preferred embodiment of this invention was described referring an accompanying drawing, it cannot be overemphasized that this invention is not limited to this example. It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various changes and modifications can be made within the scope of the claims, and these are naturally within the technical scope of the present invention. Understood.

  For example, the system 100 can be applied as a device for setting a torque pattern of a shift mechanism such as shift-by-wire that does not mechanically shift. The system 100 is applicable not only to motorcycles but also to shift feeling systems such as four-wheel MT, four-wheel AT, ATV, and outboard motor.

  The present invention can be used as a shift simulation system for a motorcycle and a shift feeling prediction method for a motorcycle.

DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 100 ... System, 102 ... Test apparatus, 104 ... Computer, 106 ... Real time controller, 108 ... Touch panel display, 110 ... Shift pedal, 112 ... Motor, 114 ... Motor shaft, 116 ... Rotor, 118 ... Stator, 120 ... Servo Driver, 122 ... Torque sensor, 124 ... Coupling, 126 ... Encoder, 128 ... Control unit, 130 ... Storage unit, 132 ... A / D board, 134 ... Counter board, 136 ... D / A board, 138 ... Control unit, 140: Storage unit, 142: Test software, 144: Analysis software, 146: Calculation software, 148: Throttle grip, 150 ... Clutch lever, 152 ... Speaker, 154 ... Vibration generator, 156 ... Control software, 158 ... Rating area, 160 ... Temporary selection area, 162 ... Pattern Down switch region, 164 ... mode setting area, 166, 168 ... potentiometer, 200 ... evaluation result, 202 ... shift feeling prediction formula, 204 ... part feature, 206 ... gear shifting torque pattern, 208 ... prediction result

Claims (6)

In a motorcycle shift simulation system,
A test device simulating a motorcycle,
A system controller for controlling the test apparatus;
An input / output device attached to the test device,
The test apparatus comprises:
A shift pedal,
A motor having a motor shaft coupled to the rotation shaft of the shift pedal;
The system controller is
A storage unit that stores a plurality of shift torque patterns applied to the shift pedal;
A plurality of sets of a pair of combinations among the plurality of shift torque patterns, and a control unit that controls the shift pedal to move according to one of the pair of combinations of the shift torque patterns;
The input / output device is
A display unit;
An operation unit capable of instructing switching to the other shift torque pattern that is a paired combination with the current shift torque pattern and capable of scoring various evaluation items with respect to the shift torque pattern; A motorcycle shift simulation system characterized by comprising:   2. The shift simulation system for a motorcycle according to claim 1, wherein the control unit of the system control device creates the plurality of sets so that one shift torque pattern appears multiple times in separate sets. .   The control unit of the system control device is configured so that the subject can perform a pair of combinations with the reference set on the basis of one of the shift torque patterns of the current set via the operation unit of the input / output device. The shift simulation system for a motorcycle according to claim 1 or 2, wherein when a score is completed for a torque pattern, the process shifts to the next set.   The control unit of the system control device performs a multiple regression analysis using various parameters of the respective torque patterns at the time of shifting and the scores for the torque patterns at the time of shifting after completing all the evaluations, and shifts the individual evaluation items. The shift simulation system for a motorcycle according to any one of claims 1 to 3, wherein a feeling prediction formula can be calculated. Various parameters of the torque pattern at the time of shifting include any of peak torque Pmax, peak phase a, torque difference ΔP, stroke phase st,
The motorcycle according to claim 4, wherein the control unit of the system control device performs a multiple regression analysis using various parameters of the shift torque pattern as independent variables and a score for the shift torque pattern as a dependent variable. Shift simulation system.   A shift feeling of a motorcycle for predicting the shift feeling by introducing a predetermined parameter of a shift mechanism to be predicted into the shift feeling prediction formula calculated by the shift simulation system for a motorcycle according to claim 4 or 5. Prediction method.

Images