JP2013005681A - Bird injury prevention device for overhead wire - Google Patents

Bird injury prevention device for overhead wire Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP2013005681A
JP2013005681A JP2011137353A JP2011137353A JP2013005681A JP 2013005681 A JP2013005681 A JP 2013005681A JP 2011137353 A JP2011137353 A JP 2011137353A JP 2011137353 A JP2011137353 A JP 2011137353A JP 2013005681 A JP2013005681 A JP 2013005681A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
wire
overhead
tubular
damage prevention
electric wire
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
JP2011137353A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Inventor
Yasuhiro Komichi
泰弘 小路
Tetsuji Nishimura
哲治 西村
Masahito Watabe
雅人 渡部
Hideto Ito
英人 伊藤
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Kansai Electric Power Co Inc
J Power Systems Corp
Original Assignee
Kansai Electric Power Co Inc
J Power Systems Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Kansai Electric Power Co Inc, J Power Systems Corp filed Critical Kansai Electric Power Co Inc
Priority to JP2011137353A priority Critical patent/JP2013005681A/en
Publication of JP2013005681A publication Critical patent/JP2013005681A/en
Withdrawn legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Landscapes

  • Suspension Of Electric Lines Or Cables (AREA)

Abstract

PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide a bird injury prevention device for an overhead wire capable of preventing corrosion of an overhead wire at an attachment part of a jumper device.SOLUTION: The bird injury prevention device for the overhead wire 10 includes a silicone rubber-made tubular insulator 11 of a tubular part having a plurality of projections 111 in an inner face thereof to form a gap with the overhead wire 1 attached in a peripheral of the overhead wire 1, such as a steel core aluminum twisted wire(ACSR), aluminum covered steel core aluminum twisted wire(ACSR/AC), and at least one silicone rubber-made drain tube 12 for discharging water staying inside the tubular insulator 11.

Description

本発明は、架空電線用鳥害防止装置(鳥害防止装置)に関し、特に、ジャンパ装置などの装着部における架空電線の腐食防止を可能とした鳥害防止装置に関するものである。   The present invention relates to a bird damage prevention apparatus (bird damage prevention apparatus) for an overhead electric wire, and more particularly to a bird damage prevention apparatus capable of preventing corrosion of an overhead electric wire in a mounting portion such as a jumper device.

ジャンパ装置の構成部材である架空裸電線(架空電線、ジャンパ線)は、支持物である鉄塔と近接して設置されているため、鳥獣類やその鳥獣類の営巣部材を介して支持物との間で地絡事故が発生する場合がある。   An overhead bare wire (an overhead wire, a jumper wire), which is a component of the jumper device, is installed in close proximity to a supporting steel tower. A ground fault may occur between the two.

この地絡事故を防止する従来の方法として、図4の正面図及び図5の断面図、または図6の断面図に示すようなジャンパ線に絶縁材料を被覆する方法が多数提案されている。亜鉛めっき鋼線もしくはアルミニウム被覆鋼線の鋼心部2の周囲に複数本のアルミニウム素線もしくはアルミニウム合金素線の導体部3を配置した構造の架空電線1の外周に対して、図5の管状の絶縁性カバー21(架空電線用鳥害防止装置)を装着すること、あるいは図6の絶縁性テープを重ね巻きした絶縁テープ層31(架空電線用鳥害防止装置)を装着することなどにより、架空電線1の部分的な絶縁化が図られ、鳥獣類やその鳥獣類の営巣部材に起因した架空電線の地絡事故が防止される。   As a conventional method for preventing this ground fault, many methods have been proposed in which a jumper wire is coated with an insulating material as shown in the front view of FIG. 4 and the cross-sectional view of FIG. 5 or the cross-sectional view of FIG. FIG. 5 shows the tubular structure shown in FIG. By attaching the insulating cover 21 (bird damage prevention apparatus for overhead electric wires) or by attaching the insulating tape layer 31 (overhead wire bird damage prevention apparatus) in which the insulating tape of FIG. The insulation of the overhead electric wire 1 is achieved, and ground faults of the overhead electric wire due to the birds and animals and the nesting members of the birds and animals are prevented.

特許文献1には、架空電線(ジャンパ線)の地絡事故防止と、鳥害防止装置を装着したジャンパ線がその装着部において腐食を防止するため、長手方向で両面に鋸歯状突状を設けた絶縁シートをジャンパ線にロール巻きし、この絶縁シートとジャンパ線の中間部分を懸垂碍子連で上方に吊り上げることで、絶縁シートとジャンパ線との間に雨水が滞留することを防止した鳥害防止ジャンパ装置が開示されている。   In Patent Document 1, in order to prevent grounding accidents of overhead electric wires (jumper wires) and jumper wires equipped with bird harm prevention devices to prevent corrosion at the mounting portion, serrated projections are provided on both sides in the longitudinal direction. Bird damage that prevents rainwater from staying between the insulation sheet and the jumper wire by rolling the insulation sheet around the jumper wire and lifting the middle part of the insulation sheet and the jumper wire upward with a suspended insulator chain A prevention jumper device is disclosed.

特許文献2には、筒状絶縁体の肉厚方向の絶縁破壊が生じても地絡事故防止効果を維持するため、筒状絶縁体の内面と架空電線の外面との間に絶縁空間を形成した鳥害防止絶縁カバーが開示されている。   In Patent Document 2, an insulation space is formed between the inner surface of the tubular insulator and the outer surface of the overhead electric wire in order to maintain the effect of preventing a ground fault even if the insulation breakdown in the thickness direction of the tubular insulator occurs. An avian damage prevention insulation cover is disclosed.

特許文献3には、架空線の外周長手方向に巻き付けられた光ケーブルの損傷を防ぐため、その架空線の外周に取り付けられた複数個のリング状固定体と、リング状固定体の外周に係合して回転自在に取り付けられた筒状の回転体とを備えた鳥害防止装置が開示されている。   In Patent Document 3, in order to prevent damage to the optical cable wound in the longitudinal direction of the outer periphery of the overhead wire, a plurality of ring-shaped fixing members attached to the outer periphery of the overhead wire and the outer periphery of the ring-shaped fixing member are engaged. In addition, a bird damage prevention apparatus including a cylindrical rotating body attached rotatably is disclosed.

特許文献4には、電線への装着被覆作業を容易にするため、シリコーンゴムの押出成形品を被覆すべき電線の外周に少なくとも2重に捲回可能な幅を有した電線保護カバーが開示されている。   Patent Document 4 discloses an electric wire protective cover having a width that can be wound at least twice around the outer periphery of an electric wire to be covered with an extrusion-molded product of silicone rubber in order to facilitate the covering and covering operation on the electric wire. ing.

特許文献5には、裸電線の放熱特性及び耐食性を向上させるため、絶縁シートと裸電線との間に雨水排水用の間隙を形成した鳥害防止絶縁装置が開示されている。   Patent Document 5 discloses a bird harm prevention insulating device in which a gap for drainage of rainwater is formed between an insulating sheet and a bare wire in order to improve heat dissipation characteristics and corrosion resistance of the bare wire.

特開平5−260633号公報Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 5-260633 特開2000−92672号公報JP 2000-92672 A 特開2003−284227号公報JP 2003-284227 A 特開2004−72809号公報JP 2004-72809 A 実開平5−74131号公報Japanese Utility Model Publication No. 5-74131

そして、上記のような従来の架空電線が海岸近接地帯や工業地帯などに布設されると、周辺環境に存在する海塩粒子、SOx系ガス、NOx系ガス等に起因して腐食が発生、進展する場合がある。   And when the conventional overhead wires as described above are laid in the coastal zone or industrial zone, corrosion occurs due to sea salt particles, SOx gas, NOx gas, etc. existing in the surrounding environment. There is a case.

また、近年では、上記以外の地域においても、地球環境の変化による酸性雨などの影響によって腐食が進展することも指摘されている。そして、前述したとおり架空電線の布設場所や布設後の気象条件などの布設環境により、従来の鳥害防止装置と架空電線との隙間に腐食性物質を含んだ水分が浸入し、それが鳥害防止装置と架空電線との間で滞留することがある。   In recent years, it has also been pointed out that corrosion also develops in other regions than the above due to the influence of acid rain due to changes in the global environment. As described above, moisture containing corrosive substances invades the gap between the conventional bird damage prevention device and the overhead wire due to the installation environment of the overhead wire and the weather conditions such as the post-laying weather conditions. It may stay between the prevention device and the overhead wire.

図7は、図5に示す架空電線用鳥害防止装置内に水が滞留した状態であるが、架空電線用鳥害防止装置5と架空電線1との間に形成された隙間は、鳥害防止装置5と架空電線1の最外層の導体部3とが常に当接している状態であることから極めて小さい隙間となるため、架空電線1と腐食性物質を含んだ水分4とは長期間接触し続けることになる。結果として、鳥害防止装置5が装着された装着部の架空電線1は、装着部以外の架空電線1に比べて腐食進展速度が加速されるという問題がある。また、架空電線が腐食することにより、その機械的特性・電気的特性が低下し、安定して電力を供給することが困難となる。さらに腐食が進展すると、架空電線が破断し、送電が不可能になる場合もある。   FIG. 7 shows a state in which water has accumulated in the overhead wire electric bird damage prevention apparatus shown in FIG. 5, but the gap formed between the overhead electric wire bird damage prevention device 5 and the overhead electric wire 1 is not bird damage. Since the prevention device 5 and the conductor 3 of the outermost layer of the overhead wire 1 are always in contact with each other, the gap is extremely small, and the overhead wire 1 and the moisture 4 containing a corrosive substance are in contact for a long time. Will continue to do. As a result, the overhead wire 1 of the mounting portion to which the bird damage prevention device 5 is attached has a problem that the corrosion progress rate is accelerated as compared to the overhead wire 1 other than the mounting portion. Moreover, when an overhead electric wire corrodes, the mechanical characteristic and electrical characteristic will fall, and it will become difficult to supply electric power stably. If corrosion further develops, the overhead electric wire may break and power transmission may become impossible.

したがって、本発明の目的は、ジャンパ装置などの装着部に装着される架空電線の腐食を防止し、かつ装着部での鳥獣類による地絡事故防止を可能とした架空電線用鳥害防止装置を提供することにある。   Accordingly, an object of the present invention is to provide a bird damage prevention device for an overhead wire that prevents corrosion of an overhead wire attached to a mounting part such as a jumper device and prevents ground faults caused by birds and beasts at the attachment part. It is to provide.

架空電線の鳥害防止装置の装着部における腐食を防止するために、本発明者らは、実環境での腐食実態を詳細に調査・解析し、それらを踏まえて、架空電線用鳥害防止装置について絶縁材料、厚さ、架空電線との間隔(隙間)等を規定した本発明に至ったものである。   In order to prevent corrosion at the mounting part of the bird damage prevention device for the overhead electric wire, the present inventors have investigated and analyzed the actual corrosion situation in the real environment in detail, and based on these, the bird damage prevention device for the overhead wire This leads to the present invention in which the insulating material, the thickness, the distance (gap) from the overhead electric wire, etc. are defined.

本発明は、上記目的を達成するため、亜鉛めっき鋼線もしくはアルミニウム被覆鋼線の鋼心部と、その鋼心部の外周に複数本のアルミニウム素線もしくはアルミニウム合金素線を撚り合せた導体部とから構成された架空電線の周囲に装着される架空電線用鳥害防止装置において、内面に複数の突起部を有して前記架空電線との間に空隙を形成するシリコーンゴムからなる管状部の管状絶縁体と、前記管状絶縁体の内部に滞留した水分を排出するシリコーンゴムからなる少なくとも1つの水抜管とを備えることを特徴とする架空電線用鳥害防止装置を提供する。   In order to achieve the above object, the present invention provides a steel core portion of a galvanized steel wire or an aluminum-coated steel wire, and a conductor portion in which a plurality of aluminum wires or aluminum alloy wires are twisted around the outer periphery of the steel core portion. In the bird's damage prevention apparatus for an overhead electric wire mounted around the overhead electric wire composed of the above, a tubular portion made of silicone rubber having a plurality of protrusions on the inner surface and forming a gap with the overhead electric wire There is provided a bird injury prevention apparatus for an overhead electric wire, comprising: a tubular insulator; and at least one drainage pipe made of silicone rubber that discharges moisture accumulated in the tubular insulator.

前記管状絶縁体の前記管状部の厚さは、1mm以上8mm以下が好ましい。   The thickness of the tubular portion of the tubular insulator is preferably 1 mm or more and 8 mm or less.

前記管状絶縁体の前記突起部によって前記管状部と前記架空電線との間に形成される空隙の長さは、3mm以上20mm以下が好ましい。   The length of the gap formed between the tubular portion and the overhead electric wire by the protrusion of the tubular insulator is preferably 3 mm or more and 20 mm or less.

上記構成によれば、管状絶縁体の突起部によって管状部の内面と架空電線との間に空隙が形成されるため、管状絶縁体の内側に浸入した水分、または内部に滞留した水分と架空電線とが接触し難くなるとともに、水抜管を設けることで、装置部における架空電線の排水性、通気性をさらに向上させることにより腐食を防止できる。また装着部での鳥獣類による地絡事故を防止できる。さらに本装置全体が可撓性を有するシリコーンゴムの絶縁材料としたことにより、架空電線の布設状況に応じて柔軟に追随することができ、常に突起部を架空電線に当接した状態を保持できる。また、透明性のあるシリコーンゴムを用いれば、排水状況や滞留状況などを外部から容易に観察することができる。   According to the above configuration, since the gap is formed between the inner surface of the tubular portion and the overhead electric wire by the protruding portion of the tubular insulator, the moisture that has entered the inside of the tubular insulator or the moisture that has accumulated inside and the overhead electric wire And the provision of a water drain tube can prevent corrosion by further improving the drainage and air permeability of the overhead electric wire in the device section. In addition, it is possible to prevent a ground fault caused by birds and beasts at the wearing part. Furthermore, since the entire device is made of a flexible silicone rubber insulating material, it can follow flexibly according to the installation status of the overhead wire, and can always maintain the state in which the protrusion is in contact with the overhead wire. . In addition, if transparent silicone rubber is used, it is possible to easily observe the state of drainage and the state of residence from the outside.

本発明によれば、ジャンパ装置などの装着部に装着される架空電線の腐食防止が可能であるとともに、装着部での鳥獣類による地絡事故防止が可能である。   ADVANTAGE OF THE INVENTION According to this invention, while preventing the corrosion of the overhead electric wire with which mounting parts, such as a jumper apparatus, are prevented, the ground fault accident by the birds and beasts in a mounting part is possible.

図1は、本発明の実施の形態に係る架空電線用鳥害防止装置の外観の一例を示す正面図である。FIG. 1 is a front view showing an example of the appearance of an overhead wire electric bird damage prevention apparatus according to an embodiment of the present invention. 図2は、図1に示す架空電線用鳥害防止装置の断面構造を模式的に示し、図2(a)は、図1におけるA−A線断面図、図2(b)は、図1におけるB−B線断面図である。2 schematically shows a cross-sectional structure of the bird's damage prevention apparatus for overhead wires shown in FIG. 1, FIG. 2 (a) is a cross-sectional view taken along line AA in FIG. 1, and FIG. 2 (b) is FIG. It is BB sectional drawing in FIG. 図3は、図1に示す架空電線用鳥害防止装置と架空電線との間に水が浸入した状態を示し、図3(a)は、図1におけるA−A線断面図、図3(b)は、図1におけるB−B線断面図である。FIG. 3 shows a state where water has entered between the overhead wire electrical damage control apparatus shown in FIG. 1 and the overhead wire, and FIG. 3A is a cross-sectional view taken along line AA in FIG. b) is a sectional view taken along line BB in FIG. 図4は、従来の架空電線用鳥害防止装置の外観を示す正面図である。FIG. 4 is a front view showing an appearance of a conventional bird damage prevention apparatus for overhead electric wires. 図5は、図4に示す架空電線用鳥害防止装置の断面図である。FIG. 5 is a cross-sectional view of the bird damage prevention apparatus for overhead electric wires shown in FIG. 図6は、従来の架空電線用鳥害防止装置の他の例の断面図である。FIG. 6 is a cross-sectional view of another example of a conventional bird damage prevention apparatus for an overhead electric wire. 図7は、図5に示す架空電線用鳥害防止装置内に水が滞留した状態を示す断面図である。FIG. 7 is a cross-sectional view showing a state where water is retained in the overhead wire electric bird damage prevention apparatus shown in FIG. 5.

以下、本発明の実施の形態について図面を参照して説明する。なお、各図中、実質的に同一の機能を有する構成要素については、同一の符号を付しその重複した説明を省略する。   Hereinafter, embodiments of the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings. In addition, in each figure, about the component which has the substantially same function, the same code | symbol is attached | subjected and the duplicate description is abbreviate | omitted.

図1は、本発明の実施の形態に係る架空電線用鳥害防止装置の外観の一例を示す正面図である。図2は、図1に示す架空電線用鳥害防止装置の断面構造を模式的に示し、図2(a)は、図1におけるA−A線断面図、図2(b)は、図1におけるB−B線断面図である。   FIG. 1 is a front view showing an example of the appearance of an overhead wire electric bird damage prevention apparatus according to an embodiment of the present invention. 2 schematically shows a cross-sectional structure of the bird's damage prevention apparatus for overhead wires shown in FIG. 1, FIG. 2 (a) is a cross-sectional view taken along line AA in FIG. 1, and FIG. 2 (b) is FIG. It is BB sectional drawing in FIG.

この架空電線用鳥害防止装置10は、図1に示すように、架空電線1に周囲に装着される管状絶縁体11と、管状絶縁体11に設けられその管状絶縁体11内の水分を排出するための水抜管12とを備える。管状絶縁体11は可撓性を有するシリコーンゴムの絶縁材料からなる。また、透明性を有するものでもよい。   As shown in FIG. 1, this overhead wire bird damage prevention apparatus 10 is provided with a tubular insulator 11 attached to the periphery of the overhead wire 1, and discharges moisture in the tubular insulator 11 provided on the tubular insulator 11. And a water drain pipe 12 for the purpose. The tubular insulator 11 is made of a flexible silicone rubber insulating material. Further, it may be transparent.

水抜管12は、水分が滞留する箇所に設けられる。本実施の形態は、水抜管12を1箇所に設けたが、架空電線(ジャンパ線)1の布設状況に応じて水分の滞留し易い複数の箇所に設けてもよい。水抜管12は、管状部110から突出するような長さを有する。また、水抜管12は、管状絶縁体11と同じ可撓性を有するシリコーンゴムの絶縁材料からなる。透明性を有するものであってもよい。管状絶縁体11と水抜管12とは、例えば常温硬化型シリコーン樹脂の接着剤によりに強固に接着されている。管状絶縁体11と水抜管12とは本実施の形態においては分割構造であるが、一体成型構造でもよい。   The drain pipe 12 is provided at a location where moisture stays. In the present embodiment, the drain pipe 12 is provided at one place, but it may be provided at a plurality of places where moisture tends to stay depending on the installation situation of the overhead electric wire (jumper wire) 1. The drain pipe 12 has a length that protrudes from the tubular portion 110. The drain pipe 12 is made of a silicone rubber insulating material having the same flexibility as the tubular insulator 11. It may have transparency. The tubular insulator 11 and the water drain tube 12 are firmly bonded with, for example, a normal temperature curable silicone resin adhesive. The tubular insulator 11 and the drain pipe 12 are divided structures in the present embodiment, but may be integrally formed.

架空電線1は、図2に示すように、例えば、中心部にテンションメンバーとして機能する複数本の亜鉛めっき鋼線もしくはアルミニウム被覆鋼線を撚り合わせてなる鋼心部2と、この鋼心部2の外周に複数本のアルミニウム素線もしくはアルミニウム合金素線を撚り合せた導体部3とが配置されたものである。   As shown in FIG. 2, the overhead electric wire 1 includes, for example, a steel core portion 2 formed by twisting a plurality of galvanized steel wires or aluminum-coated steel wires functioning as tension members at the center portion, and the steel core portion 2. A conductor portion 3 in which a plurality of aluminum strands or aluminum alloy strands are twisted is arranged on the outer periphery of the wire.

管状絶縁体11は、図2に示すように、管状部110と、管状部110の内面に中心に向かうように設けられた複数の突起部111とを備える。この突起部111によって管状絶縁体11と架空電線1との間に空隙13が形成される。突起部111の形状は、本実施の形態では幅が一定の矩形状であるが、半円形状等の他の形状でもよい。突起部111の数については特に規定はなく、鳥害防止装置10の製造性や架空電線1の腐食防止効果などを踏まえて適正な数に設定すればよい。また、管状部110と突起部111とは一体成型されているが、分割成型でもよい。   As shown in FIG. 2, the tubular insulator 11 includes a tubular portion 110 and a plurality of protrusions 111 provided on the inner surface of the tubular portion 110 so as to be directed toward the center. The protrusion 111 forms a gap 13 between the tubular insulator 11 and the overhead electric wire 1. The shape of the protrusion 111 is a rectangular shape having a constant width in the present embodiment, but may be another shape such as a semicircular shape. The number of the protrusions 111 is not particularly specified, and may be set to an appropriate number based on the manufacturability of the bird harm prevention apparatus 10 and the corrosion prevention effect of the overhead electric wire 1. Moreover, although the tubular part 110 and the projection part 111 are integrally molded, division | segmentation molding may be sufficient.

管状絶縁体11の管状部110の厚さは、1mm以上8mm以下が好ましい。管状部110の厚さが1mm未満であると、絶縁特性が不十分であり、所望の鳥害防止効果(地絡事故防止効果)が得られ難い。また、管状部110の厚さが8mmを超えると、重量増や製品コスト増の点で問題となる。したがって、管状部110の厚さは、1mm以上8mm以下であることが好ましい。   The thickness of the tubular portion 110 of the tubular insulator 11 is preferably 1 mm or more and 8 mm or less. If the thickness of the tubular portion 110 is less than 1 mm, the insulation characteristics are insufficient, and it is difficult to obtain a desired bird damage prevention effect (ground fault accident prevention effect). Moreover, when the thickness of the tubular part 110 exceeds 8 mm, it will become a problem in the point of a weight increase and a product cost increase. Therefore, the thickness of the tubular portion 110 is preferably 1 mm or more and 8 mm or less.

突起部111によって管状部110と架空電線1との間に形成される空隙13の長さ、すなわち突起部111の高さは、3mm以上20mm以下が好ましい。空隙13の長さ、すなわち突起部111の高さが3mm未満であると、鳥害防止装置10の内部に浸入した水分と架空電線1との接触抑制効果、鳥害防止装置10と架空電線1との間の排水性、通気性が十分でなく、所望の腐食抑制効果が得られ難い。また、空隙13の長さ、すなわち
突起部111の高さが20mmを超えても、腐食抑制効果はほぼ一定に留まる。しかし、無用に空隙13の長さを大きくすると、風圧特性上好ましくない。したがって、突起部111によって管状部110と架空電線1との間に形成される空隙13の長さは、3mm以上20mm以下であることが好ましい。
The length of the gap 13 formed between the tubular portion 110 and the overhead electric wire 1 by the projection 111, that is, the height of the projection 111 is preferably 3 mm or more and 20 mm or less. If the length of the gap 13, that is, the height of the protrusion 111 is less than 3 mm, the effect of suppressing the contact between the moisture that has entered the bird damage prevention apparatus 10 and the overhead wire 1, the bird damage prevention apparatus 10 and the overhead wire 1. The water drainage and air permeability between the two are not sufficient, and it is difficult to obtain the desired effect of inhibiting corrosion. Moreover, even if the length of the gap 13, that is, the height of the protrusion 111 exceeds 20 mm, the corrosion inhibiting effect remains almost constant. However, unnecessarily increasing the length of the gap 13 is not preferable in terms of wind pressure characteristics. Therefore, the length of the gap 13 formed between the tubular portion 110 and the overhead electric wire 1 by the protrusion 111 is preferably 3 mm or more and 20 mm or less.

上記のように構成された管状絶縁体11は、例えば押出成形によって形成することができる。また、管状絶縁体11は、架空電線1に巻き付けたときに材料が有する弾性により閉じて管状となるように構成されていてもよい。この場合、管状絶縁体11を架空電線1に正面から装着した後、端面の突合せ部(図示せず)同士を接着剤、例えば常温硬化型シリコーン樹脂で接合して架空電線1に取り付ける。なお、管状絶縁体11は、2つ割り構造でもよく、それらの間の接合は接着剤を用いてもよく、ねじを用いてもよい。   The tubular insulator 11 configured as described above can be formed by, for example, extrusion molding. Moreover, the tubular insulator 11 may be configured so as to be closed by the elasticity of the material when wound around the overhead electric wire 1 to be tubular. In this case, after attaching the tubular insulator 11 to the overhead electric wire 1 from the front, the butted portions (not shown) of the end faces are joined to each other with an adhesive, for example, a room temperature curable silicone resin, and attached to the overhead electric wire 1. The tubular insulator 11 may have a split structure, and an adhesive may be used for bonding between them, or a screw may be used.

図3は、図1に示す架空電線用鳥害防止装置と架空電線との間に水が浸入した状態を示し、図3(a)は、図1におけるA−A線断面図、図3(b)は、図1におけるB−B線断面図である。   FIG. 3 shows a state where water has entered between the overhead wire electrical damage control apparatus shown in FIG. 1 and the overhead wire, and FIG. 3A is a cross-sectional view taken along line AA in FIG. b) is a sectional view taken along line BB in FIG.

突起部111によって管状絶縁体11と架空電線1との間には空隙13が形成されるため、管状絶縁体11の内部に浸入した水分4は架空電線1との接触が抑えられるとともに、水抜管12から滞留した水分4、または滞留しようとする水分4を外部へ排出される構造となっている。   Since the gap 111 is formed between the tubular insulator 11 and the overhead electric wire 1 by the protrusion 111, the moisture 4 that has entered the inside of the tubular insulator 11 is prevented from contacting the overhead electric wire 1 and drained. In this structure, the moisture 4 remaining from 12 or the moisture 4 to be retained is discharged to the outside.

(本実施の形態の効果)
本実施の形態の架空電線用鳥害防止装置によれば、以下の効果を奏する。
(1)管状絶縁体11の突起部111によって管状部110の内面と架空電線1との間に空隙13が形成されるため、管状絶縁体11の内部に浸入した水分4と架空電線1とが接触し難くなる。
(2)また、水抜管12を設けることで、装置部における架空電線1の排水性、通気性が高まる。この結果、従来と比較して鳥害防止装置装着部における架空電線の腐食を大幅に抑制することができ、架空電線の寿命を格段に延伸化することが可能となる。
(3)さらに、本装置10の装着部における鳥獣類やその営巣部材に起因した架空電線の地絡事故を防止することが可能となる。
(4)本装置10全体が可撓性を有するシリコーンゴムの絶縁材料としたことにより、架空電線1の布設状況に応じて柔軟に追随することができ、常に突起部を架空電線に当接した状態を保持できる。
(5)本装置10を透明性のあるシリコーンゴムを用いれば、排水状況や滞留状況などを外部から容易に観察することができる。
(Effect of this embodiment)
According to the bird damage prevention apparatus for an overhead electric wire of the present embodiment, the following effects can be obtained.
(1) Since the gap 13 is formed between the inner surface of the tubular portion 110 and the overhead wire 1 by the projection 111 of the tubular insulator 11, the moisture 4 and the overhead wire 1 that have entered the inside of the tubular insulator 11 are formed. It becomes difficult to touch.
(2) Moreover, by providing the drain pipe 12, the drainage property and the air permeability of the overhead electric wire 1 in the device section are enhanced. As a result, it is possible to significantly suppress the corrosion of the overhead electric wire in the bird damage prevention device mounting portion as compared with the conventional case, and it is possible to extend the life of the overhead electric wire significantly.
(3) Further, it is possible to prevent a ground fault of an overhead electric wire due to the birds and beasts and the nesting members in the mounting portion of the apparatus 10.
(4) Since the entire device 10 is made of a flexible silicone rubber insulating material, it can flexibly follow the installation condition of the overhead electric wire 1 and the projection is always in contact with the overhead electric wire. Can hold state.
(5) If transparent silicone rubber is used for the device 10, the drainage state, the staying state, etc. can be easily observed from the outside.

以下、本発明の架空電線用鳥害防止装置の一実施例を説明する。   Hereinafter, an embodiment of the bird harm prevention apparatus for overhead electric wires according to the present invention will be described.

(実施例1)
実施例1は、体積固有抵抗5×1016Ω・cmのシリコーンゴムからなり、管状部110の厚さを1.0mm、突起部111の高さを3.0mmとする管状絶縁体11、および水抜管12からなる全体長さ4mの架空電線用鳥害防止装置10としての管状カバー10を作製した。この管状カバー10を長さ5mの架空電線1としての導体有効断面積410mmの導電部が内外層の2層からなる鋼心アルミニウム撚線(ACSR)に隙間を設けるように覆った後、管状カバー10内の水分が滞留するカバー長手方向の中央部の1箇所に管状カバーと同材質のシリコーンゴムからなる内径10mmの水抜管12を設ける。次に、管状カバー10と鋼心アルミニウム撚線1との間の空隙13の長さ(突起部111の高さ)が3.0mmとなるようその管状カバーの両突合せ部を常温硬化型シリコーン樹脂で接合することにより、その架空電線1に架空電線用鳥害防止装置10を装着した。
Example 1
Example 1 is made of silicone rubber having a volume resistivity of 5 × 10 16 Ω · cm, a tubular insulator 11 having a thickness of the tubular portion 110 of 1.0 mm and a height of the protruding portion 111 of 3.0 mm, and A tubular cover 10 was produced as a bird damage prevention apparatus 10 for an overhead electric wire having a total length of 4 m comprising a drain pipe 12. After covering this tubular cover 10 so that a conductive portion having a conductor effective cross-sectional area of 410 mm 2 as an overhead electric wire 1 having a length of 5 m is provided in a steel core aluminum stranded wire (ACSR) composed of two layers of inner and outer layers, a tubular portion is formed. A drain pipe 12 having an inner diameter of 10 mm made of silicone rubber made of the same material as that of the tubular cover is provided at one central portion in the cover longitudinal direction where moisture in the cover 10 stays. Next, both butt portions of the tubular cover are set to room temperature curable silicone resin so that the length of the gap 13 between the tubular cover 10 and the steel core aluminum stranded wire 1 (height of the protruding portion 111) is 3.0 mm. The bird's damage prevention apparatus 10 for overhead wires was attached to the overhead wire 1 by joining with the above.

(実施例2〜4)
実施例2〜4は、実施例1に対して管状部110の厚さを異ならせたものであり、他は実施例1と同様に構成されている。管状部110の厚さは、実施例2は3.5mm、実施例3は5.5mm、実施例4は8.0mmとした。
(Examples 2 to 4)
In Examples 2 to 4, the thickness of the tubular portion 110 is different from that in Example 1, and the other configurations are the same as those in Example 1. The thickness of the tubular portion 110 was 3.5 mm in Example 2, 5.5 mm in Example 3, and 8.0 mm in Example 4.

(実施例5)
実施例5は、突起部111の高さ(空隙13の長さ)を実施例1よりも高い12.0mmとしたものであり、他は実施例1と同様に構成されている。
(Example 5)
In the fifth embodiment, the height of the protrusion 111 (the length of the gap 13) is 12.0 mm, which is higher than that of the first embodiment, and the other configuration is the same as that of the first embodiment.

(実施例6〜8)
実施例6〜8は、実施例5に対して管状部110の厚さを異ならせたものであり、他は実施例5と同様に構成されている。管状部110の厚さは、実施例6は4.0mm、実施例7は6.5mm、実施例8は8.0mmとした。
(Examples 6 to 8)
In Examples 6-8, the thickness of the tubular portion 110 is different from that in Example 5, and the other configurations are the same as those in Example 5. The thickness of the tubular portion 110 was 4.0 mm in Example 6, 6.5 mm in Example 7, and 8.0 mm in Example 8.

(実施例9)
実施例9は、突起部111の高さ(空隙13の長さ)を実施例1よりも高い20.0mmとしたものであり、他は実施例1と同様に構成されている。
Example 9
In the ninth embodiment, the height of the protrusion 111 (the length of the gap 13) is 20.0 mm, which is higher than that of the first embodiment, and the other configuration is the same as that of the first embodiment.

(実施例10〜12)
実施例10〜12は、実施例9に対して管状部110の厚さを異ならせたものであり、他は実施例5と同様に構成されている。管状部110の厚さは、実施例10は4.5mm、実施例11は6.0mm、実施例12は8.0mmとした。
(Examples 10 to 12)
In Examples 10 to 12, the thickness of the tubular portion 110 is different from that in Example 9, and the other configurations are the same as those in Example 5. The thickness of the tubular portion 110 was 4.5 mm in Example 10, 6.0 mm in Example 11, and 8.0 mm in Example 12.

(比較例1)
比較例1は、管状部110の厚さを実施例1〜12よりも薄い0.7mmとし、突起部111の高さ(空隙13の長さ)を実施例1〜12よりも低い0.5mmとしたものであり、他は実施例1〜12と同様に構成されている。
(Comparative Example 1)
In Comparative Example 1, the thickness of the tubular portion 110 is 0.7 mm thinner than those of Examples 1 to 12, and the height of the protrusion 111 (the length of the gap 13) is 0.5 mm lower than those of Examples 1 to 12. The others are configured in the same manner as in Examples 1-12.

(比較例2)
比較例2は、突起部111の高さ(空隙13の長さ)を実施例1〜12よりも低い1.0mmとし、管状部110の厚さを4.0mmとしたものであり、他は実施例1〜12と同様に構成されている。
(Comparative Example 2)
In Comparative Example 2, the height of the protruding portion 111 (the length of the gap 13) is 1.0 mm, which is lower than those of Examples 1 to 12, and the thickness of the tubular portion 110 is 4.0 mm. It is comprised similarly to Examples 1-12.

(比較例3)
比較例3は、突起部111の高さ(空隙13の長さ)を実施例1〜12よりも低い2.0mmとし、管状部110の厚さを7.0mmとしたものであり、他は実施例1〜12と同様に構成されている。
(Comparative Example 3)
In Comparative Example 3, the height of the protruding portion 111 (the length of the gap 13) is set to 2.0 mm, which is lower than those of Examples 1 to 12, and the thickness of the tubular portion 110 is set to 7.0 mm. It is comprised similarly to Examples 1-12.

(比較例4)
比較例4は、突起部111の高さ(空隙13の長さ)を実施例1〜12よりも低い2.5mmとし、管状部110の厚さを9.5mmとしたものであり、他は実施例1〜12と同様に構成されている。
(Comparative Example 4)
In Comparative Example 4, the height of the protruding portion 111 (the length of the gap 13) is 2.5 mm, which is lower than those of Examples 1 to 12, and the thickness of the tubular portion 110 is 9.5 mm. It is comprised similarly to Examples 1-12.

(比較例5)
比較例5は、管状部110の厚さを実施例1〜12よりも薄い0.5mmとし、突起部111の高さ(空隙13の長さ)を4.0mmとしたものであり、他は実施例1〜12と同様に構成されている。
(Comparative Example 5)
In Comparative Example 5, the thickness of the tubular portion 110 is 0.5 mm, which is thinner than those of Examples 1 to 12, and the height of the protrusion 111 (the length of the gap 13) is 4.0 mm. It is comprised similarly to Examples 1-12.

(比較例6)
比較例6は、管状部110の厚さを実施例1〜12よりも厚い8.5mmとし、突起部111の高さ(空隙13の長さ)を8.0mmとしたものであり、他は実施例1〜12と同様に構成されている。
(Comparative Example 6)
In Comparative Example 6, the thickness of the tubular portion 110 is 8.5 mm, which is thicker than those of Examples 1 to 12, and the height of the protruding portion 111 (the length of the gap 13) is 8.0 mm. It is comprised similarly to Examples 1-12.

(比較例7)
比較例7は、管状部110の厚さを実施例1〜12よりも薄い0.8mmとし、突起部111の高さ(空隙13の長さ)を14.0mmとしたものであり、他は実施例1〜12と同様に構成されている。
(Comparative Example 7)
In Comparative Example 7, the thickness of the tubular portion 110 is 0.8 mm, which is thinner than those of Examples 1 to 12, and the height of the protruding portion 111 (the length of the gap 13) is 14.0 mm. It is comprised similarly to Examples 1-12.

(比較例8)
比較例8は、管状部110の厚さを実施例1〜12よりも厚い9.0mmとし、突起部111の高さ(空隙13の長さ)を16.0mmとしたものであり、他は実施例1〜12と同様に構成されている。
(Comparative Example 8)
In Comparative Example 8, the thickness of the tubular portion 110 is set to 9.0 mm, which is thicker than those of Examples 1 to 12, and the height of the protruding portion 111 (the length of the gap 13) is set to 16.0 mm. It is comprised similarly to Examples 1-12.

(比較例9)
比較例9は、管状部110の厚さを実施例1〜12よりも薄い0.7mmとし、突起部111の高さ(空隙13の長さ)を実施例1〜12よりも高い22.0mmとしたものであり、他は実施例1〜12と同様に構成されている。
(Comparative Example 9)
In Comparative Example 9, the thickness of the tubular portion 110 is 0.7 mm, which is thinner than those of Examples 1 to 12, and the height of the protrusion 111 (the length of the gap 13) is 22.0 mm, which is higher than those of Examples 1 to 12. The others are configured in the same manner as in Examples 1-12.

(比較例10)
比較例10は、突起部111の高さ(空隙13の長さ)を実施例1〜12よりも高い24.0mmとし、管状部110の厚さを3.5mmとしたものであり、他は実施例1と同様に構成されている。
(Comparative Example 10)
In Comparative Example 10, the height of the protruding portion 111 (the length of the gap 13) is 24.0 mm, which is higher than those of Examples 1 to 12, and the thickness of the tubular portion 110 is 3.5 mm. The configuration is the same as in the first embodiment.

(比較例11)
比較例11は、突起部111の高さ(空隙13の長さ)を実施例1〜12よりも高い21.0mmとし、管状部110の厚さを5.5mmとしたものであり、他は実施例1〜12と同様に構成されている。
(Comparative Example 11)
In Comparative Example 11, the height of the protrusion 111 (the length of the gap 13) is 21.0 mm, which is higher than those in Examples 1 to 12, and the thickness of the tubular portion 110 is 5.5 mm. It is comprised similarly to Examples 1-12.

(比較例12)
比較例12は、突起部111の高さ(空隙13の長さ)を実施例1〜12よりも高い20.5mmとし、管状部110の厚さを8.5mmとしたものであり、他は実施例1〜12と同様に構成されている。
(Comparative Example 12)
In Comparative Example 12, the height of the protrusion 111 (the length of the gap 13) is 20.5 mm, which is higher than those of Examples 1 to 12, and the thickness of the tubular portion 110 is 8.5 mm. It is comprised similarly to Examples 1-12.

(従来例1)
従来例1は、体積固有抵抗5×1016Ω・cmのシリコーンゴムからなり、管状部110の厚さを4.0mm、突起部111のない、管状絶縁体11、および水抜管12のない全体長さ4mの管状カバー10を作製した。この管状カバー10を長さ5mの架空電線1としての導体有効断面積410mmの導電部が内外層の2層からなる鋼心アルミニウム撚線(ACSR)に緊密に覆った後、その切れ目同士を常温硬化型シリコーン樹脂で接合することにより、その架空電線1に管状カバー(架空電線用鳥害防止装置10)を装着した。
(Conventional example 1)
Conventional Example 1 is made of silicone rubber having a volume resistivity of 5 × 10 16 Ω · cm, the thickness of the tubular portion 110 is 4.0 mm, the tubular insulator 11 without the projection 111, and the whole without the drain tube 12. A tubular cover 10 having a length of 4 m was produced. After the tubular cover 10 is tightly covered with a steel core aluminum stranded wire (ACSR) composed of two layers of inner and outer layers, a conductive portion having a conductor effective cross-sectional area of 410 mm 2 as an overhead electric wire 1 having a length of 5 m, A tubular cover (bird damage prevention device 10 for overhead wires) was attached to the overhead wire 1 by bonding with a room temperature curable silicone resin.

(従来例2)
従来例2は、体積固有抵抗2.5×1016Ω・cmのエチレンプロピレン製テープを螺旋状に厚さ4.0mmとしたテープカバーで長さ5mの架空電線1としての導体有効断面積410mmの導電部が内外層の2層からなる鋼心アルミニウム撚線(ACSR)に緊密に覆い、その架空電線1に(テープカバー)架空電線用鳥害防止装置を装着した。
(Conventional example 2)
Conventional Example 2 is a tape cover made of an ethylene propylene tape having a volume resistivity of 2.5 × 10 16 Ω · cm spirally having a thickness of 4.0 mm, and an effective conductor sectional area of 410 mm as an overhead electric wire 1 having a length of 5 m. Two conductive parts were tightly covered with a steel core aluminum stranded wire (ACSR) composed of two layers of inner and outer layers, and the overhead wire 1 (tape cover) was equipped with a bird damage prevention device for the overhead wire.

上記の実施例、比較例及び従来例のそれぞれの架空電線用鳥害防止装置を装着した架空電線について、各種特性評価を実施した。   Various characteristics evaluation was implemented about the overhead electric wire equipped with the bird damage prevention apparatus for each overhead electric wire of said Example, a comparative example, and a prior art example.

(絶縁特性の評価方法)
はじめに、絶縁特性として、それぞれの絶縁破壊電圧値を測定した。架空電線用鳥害防止装置を装着した電線サンプルを水平に設置し、電線本体を高電圧電極、鳥害防止装置にアルミ箔を取付け、これを接地電極とした。表面無汚損・乾燥条件下においてこの電線と鳥害防止装置間に交流電圧を印加し、鳥害防止装置が絶縁破壊し、回路中に電流が流れた時の電圧値を絶縁破壊電圧値として測定した。絶縁特性は、77kV送電線路の対地電圧(44.5kV)を超えたものを「○」、対地電圧到達前に絶縁破壊に至ったものを「×」で評価した。
(Insulation characteristics evaluation method)
First, each insulation breakdown voltage value was measured as an insulation characteristic. An electric wire sample equipped with an aerial wire bird damage prevention device was installed horizontally, the wire body was attached with a high voltage electrode, and an aluminum foil was attached to the bird damage prevention device, which was used as a ground electrode. An AC voltage is applied between the electric wire and the bird protection device under non-staining and dry conditions on the surface, the bird protection device breaks down, and the voltage value when current flows through the circuit is measured as the breakdown voltage value. did. The insulation characteristics were evaluated as “◯” when the ground voltage of the 77 kV transmission line exceeded the ground voltage (44.5 kV), and “x” when the dielectric breakdown occurred before reaching the ground voltage.

(耐食特性の評価方法)
次に、腐食加速実験により架空電線用鳥害防止装置の装着部における電線の耐食特性を評価した。腐食加速実験は各種鳥害防止装置を装着した電線を支持点間3mで1.5m程度の弛度を設け、鳥害防止装置に取付けた水抜管が最下点に位置する状態で設置し、電線温度90℃になるようトランスで通電した状態の下、5重量%の塩化ナトリウム水溶液に硫酸を添加しpH4に調整した電解質溶液を噴霧30min、大気放置60minを1サイクルとして、これを2400サイクルまで繰り返すことで実施した。耐食特性は、鳥害防止装置の装着部における電線の最外層アルミ線の腐食進展状況を相対的に「○(鳥害防止装置の非装着部と同等)」、「×(鳥害防止装置の非装着部よりも腐食進展)」、「××(鳥害防止装置の非装着部よりも激しく腐食進展)」で評価した。
(Evaluation method for corrosion resistance)
Next, the corrosion resistance characteristic of the electric wire in the attachment part of the bird damage prevention apparatus for an overhead electric wire was evaluated by the corrosion acceleration experiment. In the corrosion acceleration experiment, the wires equipped with various bird harm prevention devices were installed with the slackness of about 1.5 m between the support points 3 m and the drainage pipe attached to the bird harm prevention device located at the lowest point, Under the condition that current is passed through a transformer so that the wire temperature is 90 ° C., an electrolyte solution adjusted to pH 4 by adding sulfuric acid to a 5% by weight sodium chloride aqueous solution is sprayed for 30 minutes and left in the atmosphere for 60 minutes, and this is up to 2400 cycles. It was carried out by repeating. Corrosion resistance characteristics are relative to the progress of corrosion of the outermost aluminum wire of the wire at the attachment part of the bird damage prevention device, relative to “○ (equivalent to the non-attachment part of the bird damage prevention device)”, “× (of bird damage prevention device Corrosion progressed more than the non-attached part) ”and“ XX (corrosion progressed more intensely than the non-attached part of the bird harm prevention apparatus) ”.

(風圧特性の評価方法)
また、風洞実験設備により架空電線用鳥害防止装置の装着部の風圧特性を評価した。鳥害防止装置を装着した電線を水平に設置し、それぞれ風速40m/sまでパラメータとした際の風圧荷重を測定した。風圧特性は、許容レベルにあるものを「○」、許容できないレベルを「×」で評価した。
(Evaluation method of wind pressure characteristics)
Moreover, the wind pressure characteristics of the installation part of the bird damage prevention device for overhead electric wires were evaluated by the wind tunnel experimental equipment. The electric wire equipped with the bird damage prevention apparatus was installed horizontally, and the wind pressure load was measured using each parameter up to a wind speed of 40 m / s. The wind pressure characteristics were evaluated as “◯” when the level was at an allowable level, and “X” when the level was unacceptable.

(施工特性の評価方向)
そして、各種架空電線用鳥害防止装置の施工特性も評価した。施工特性は、電線に鳥害防止装置を装着する際の所要時間を測定するとともに、その容易さを調査し、現地作業において問題ないレベルを「○」、問題が生じるレベルを「×」で評価した。
(Evaluation direction of construction characteristics)
And the construction characteristic of the bird damage prevention apparatus for various overhead electric wires was also evaluated. As for the construction characteristics, while measuring the time required to attach the bird damage prevention device to the electric wire, we investigated its ease and evaluated the level where there is no problem in the field work as "○" and the level where the problem occurred as "X". did.

各種架空電線用鳥害防止装置の絶縁特性評価結果、鳥害防止装置の装着部における電線の耐食特性評価結果、鳥害防止装置の装着部の風圧特性測定結果、及び鳥害防止装置の施工特性評価結果を表1に示す。   Insulation characteristics evaluation results of bird damage prevention devices for various overhead power lines, corrosion resistance evaluation results of electric wires in the attachment parts of the bird damage prevention devices, wind pressure characteristic measurement results of the attachment parts of the bird damage prevention devices, and construction characteristics of the bird damage prevention devices The evaluation results are shown in Table 1.

(絶縁特性の評価結果)
はじめに、絶縁特性についてみると、実施例1〜12の絶縁破壊電圧値はすべて規定の値を上回っており、本鳥害防止装置10の絶縁特性は問題ない結果となった。また、鳥害防止装置の管状絶縁体の厚さが1mm以上である比較例2〜4、6、8、10〜12についても、絶縁破壊電圧値は規定値を満足していた。これに対して、管状絶縁体の厚さが1mm未満である比較例1、5、7、9では、絶縁破壊電圧値が規定値未満であり、絶縁特性が不十分であった。このように、鳥害防止装置における管状絶縁体の厚さを1mm以上に設定することで、優れた絶縁特性が得られることが分かった。
(Insulation characteristics evaluation results)
First, regarding the insulation characteristics, the dielectric breakdown voltage values of Examples 1 to 12 all exceeded the specified values, and the insulation characteristics of the bird harm prevention apparatus 10 were satisfactory. Moreover, the dielectric breakdown voltage value also satisfied the specified value for Comparative Examples 2 to 4, 6, 8, and 10 to 12 in which the thickness of the tubular insulator of the bird damage prevention apparatus was 1 mm or more. On the other hand, in Comparative Examples 1, 5, 7, and 9 in which the thickness of the tubular insulator is less than 1 mm, the dielectric breakdown voltage value is less than the specified value, and the insulation characteristics are insufficient. Thus, it turned out that the outstanding insulation characteristic is acquired by setting the thickness of the tubular insulator in a bird damage prevention apparatus to 1 mm or more.

(耐食特性の評価結果)
次に、耐食特性についてみると、実施例1〜12における最外層アルミ線の腐食進展程度は鳥害防止装置の非装着部のそれと同等レベルにあり、これらの耐食特性は問題ないことが明らかとなった。また、鳥害防止装置(管状絶縁体)と電線との空隙長さが3mm以上である比較例5〜12においても、耐食特性は良好であった。これに対して、管状絶縁体と電線との空隙長さが3mm未満である比較例1〜4、及び従来例1、2では鳥害防止装置の装着部における架空電線の腐食が鳥害防止装置の非装着部のそれよりも進展しており、特に、従来例1、2ではそれが著しく大きかった。このように、鳥害防止装置(管状絶縁体)と電線との空隙長さを3mm以上に設定することで、鳥害防止装置の内部における電線と浸入水分との接触が抑制されるとともに、鳥害防止装置と電線との間の排水性、通気性が図られ、良好な腐食抑制効果が得られることが分かった。
(Evaluation results of corrosion resistance)
Next, regarding the corrosion resistance characteristics, it is clear that the degree of corrosion progression of the outermost aluminum wires in Examples 1 to 12 is at the same level as that of the non-attached portion of the bird harm prevention apparatus, and these corrosion resistance characteristics are clear. became. Moreover, also in Comparative Examples 5 to 12 in which the gap length between the bird harm prevention apparatus (tubular insulator) and the electric wire was 3 mm or more, the corrosion resistance was good. On the other hand, in Comparative Examples 1 to 4 in which the gap length between the tubular insulator and the electric wire is less than 3 mm, and in the conventional examples 1 and 2, the corrosion of the overhead electric wire in the mounting portion of the bird damage prevention device is the bird damage prevention device. It has progressed more than that of the non-attached part, and in particular, in the conventional examples 1 and 2, it was significantly larger. Thus, by setting the gap length between the bird harm prevention apparatus (tubular insulator) and the electric wire to 3 mm or more, contact between the electric wire and the intrusion moisture inside the bird harm prevention apparatus is suppressed, and the bird It was found that drainage and air permeability between the harm prevention device and the electric wire were achieved, and a good corrosion inhibiting effect was obtained.

(風圧特性の評価結果)
そして、風圧特性についてみると、実施例1〜12における鳥害防止装置の風圧荷重は、すべて許容されるレベルにあった。また、鳥害防止装置(管状絶縁体)と電線との空隙長さが20mm以下である比較例1〜8においても、風圧特性は許容範囲であった。これに対して、鳥害防止装置(管状絶縁体)と電線との空隙長さが20mmを超える比較例9〜12では、本鳥害防止装置の装着によって風圧荷重が増大し、風圧特性上、適用箇所が制限される結果となった。このように、鳥害防止装置(管状絶縁体)と電線との空隙長さを20mm以下に設定することで、本鳥害防止装置の装着部の風圧特性を許容範囲内に留められることが分かった。
(Evaluation results of wind pressure characteristics)
And when it looked at the wind pressure characteristic, all the wind pressure loads of the bird harm prevention apparatus in Examples 1-12 were in the allowable level. Moreover, also in Comparative Examples 1 to 8 in which the gap length between the bird harm prevention apparatus (tubular insulator) and the electric wire is 20 mm or less, the wind pressure characteristics were within an allowable range. On the other hand, in Comparative Examples 9 to 12 in which the gap length between the bird damage prevention device (tubular insulator) and the electric wire exceeds 20 mm, the wind pressure load increases due to the mounting of the bird damage prevention device. As a result, the application location was limited. Thus, it turns out that the wind pressure characteristic of the mounting part of this bird damage prevention apparatus can be kept within an allowable range by setting the gap length between the bird damage prevention apparatus (tubular insulator) and the electric wire to 20 mm or less. It was.

(施工特性の評価結果)
最後に、施工特性についてみると、実施例1〜12における鳥害防止装置の架空電線への装着は短時間で行うことができ、作業上問題となる点も特段見当たらなかった。
(Evaluation results of construction characteristics)
Finally, regarding the construction characteristics, the bird harm prevention apparatus in Examples 1 to 12 could be attached to the overhead electric wire in a short time, and there was no particular problem in terms of work.

また、比較例1〜3、5、7の施工特性も問題ないレベルであった。これに対して、鳥害防止装置における管状絶縁体の厚さが8mmを超える比較例4、6、8、12、ならびに、管状絶縁体内面の突起部111の高さが20mmを超える比較例9〜11では鳥害防止装置の装着性、取扱性が劣り、特に、管状絶縁体の厚さが8mmを超え、かつ、突起部111の高さが20mmを超える比較例12では作業に極めて長い時間を要した。   Moreover, the construction characteristics of Comparative Examples 1 to 3, 5, and 7 were at a level with no problem. In contrast, Comparative Examples 4, 6, 8, and 12 in which the thickness of the tubular insulator in the bird damage prevention apparatus exceeds 8 mm, and Comparative Example 9 in which the height of the protrusion 111 on the inner surface of the tubular insulator exceeds 20 mm -11 is inferior in mountability and handleability of the bird damage prevention device, and in particular, in Comparative Example 12, in which the thickness of the tubular insulator exceeds 8 mm and the height of the protrusion 111 exceeds 20 mm, the work takes a very long time. Cost.

このように、鳥害防止装置10における管状絶縁体11の管状部110の厚さを8mm以下、突起部111の高さを20mm以下に設定することで、問題のない施工特性が得られることが分かった。   As described above, by setting the thickness of the tubular portion 110 of the tubular insulator 11 in the bird damage prevention apparatus 10 to 8 mm or less and the height of the protruding portion 111 to 20 mm or less, it is possible to obtain trouble-free construction characteristics. I understood.

(総合評価結果)
以上により、亜鉛めっき鋼線の鋼心部と、その鋼心部の外周に複数本のアルミニウム素線を撚り合せた導体部とから構成された架空電線の周囲に装着される架空電線用鳥害防止装置10において、可撓性を有する厚さ1mm以上8mm以下のシリコーンゴムからなる管状絶縁体11の内面に複数の突起部111を設けた管状部の管状絶縁体11と、その突起部111によって管状部110と架空電線1との間に3mm以上20mm以下の空隙13を形成し、かつ、管状絶縁体11の内部に滞留した水分を排出するためのシリコーンゴムからなる少なくとも1つの水抜管12を備えた架空電線用鳥害防止装置10では、規定の絶縁特性を確保しつつ、鳥害防止装置の装着部における架空電線の耐食性が従来の鳥害防止装置の装着部のそれと比較して著しく優れることが判明した。本鳥害防止装置により、電線の腐食進展を確実に、かつ経済的に防止することができ、架空電線の機械的性能・電気的性能の確保、重大事故の防止、安定した電力の供給等が可能となる。
(Comprehensive evaluation result)
As described above, bird damage for overhead electric wires installed around an overhead electric wire composed of a steel core portion of a galvanized steel wire and a conductor portion in which a plurality of aluminum strands are twisted around the outer periphery of the steel core portion. In the prevention device 10, a tubular insulator 11 having a plurality of protrusions 111 provided on the inner surface of a tubular insulator 11 made of silicone rubber having a thickness of 1 mm or more and 8 mm or less having flexibility, and the protrusions 111 At least one drain pipe 12 made of silicone rubber for forming a gap 13 of 3 mm or more and 20 mm or less between the tubular portion 110 and the overhead electric wire 1 and for discharging moisture accumulated in the tubular insulator 11 is provided. The aerial cable bird damage prevention apparatus 10 provided has a corrosion resistance of the overhead wire in the attachment part of the bird damage prevention apparatus compared with that of the attachment part of the conventional bird damage prevention apparatus while ensuring the prescribed insulation characteristics. That Te excellent remarkably has been found. This bird harm prevention device can reliably and economically prevent the corrosion of wires, ensuring the mechanical and electrical performance of overhead wires, preventing serious accidents, supplying stable power, etc. It becomes possible.

なお、本発明は、上記実施の形態及び上記実施例に限定されず、発明の要旨を変更しない範囲内で種々に変形実施が可能である。   In addition, this invention is not limited to the said embodiment and said Example, A various deformation | transformation implementation is possible within the range which does not change the summary of invention.

Figure 2013005681
Figure 2013005681

1 架空電線
2 鋼心部
3 導体部
4 水分
5 架空電線用鳥害防止装置
10 架空電線用鳥害防止装置
11 管状絶縁体
12 水抜管
13 空隙
21 絶縁性樹脂製カバー(架空電線用鳥害防止装置)
31 絶縁テープ層(架空電線用鳥害防止装置)
110 管状部
111 突起部
DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 1 Overhead electric wire 2 Steel core part 3 Conductor part 4 Moisture 5 Overhead electric wire bird damage prevention apparatus 10 Overhead electric wire bird damage prevention apparatus 11 Tubular insulator 12 Drain pipe 13 Air gap 21 Insulating resin cover (Infestation resin bird damage prevention apparatus)
31 Insulating tape layer (bird damage prevention device for overhead wires)
110 Tubular part 111 Protrusion part

Claims (3)

亜鉛めっき鋼線もしくはアルミニウム被覆鋼線の鋼心部と、その鋼心部の外周に複数本のアルミニウム素線もしくはアルミニウム合金素線を撚り合せた導体部とから構成された架空電線の周囲に装着される架空電線用鳥害防止装置において、内面に複数の突起部を有して前記架空電線との間に空隙を形成するシリコーンゴムからなる管状部の管状絶縁体と、前記管状絶縁体の内部に滞留した水分を排出するシリコーンゴムからなる少なくとも1つの水抜管とを備えることを特徴とする架空電線用鳥害防止装置。   Attached around an overhead electric wire composed of a galvanized steel wire or aluminum-coated steel wire core and a conductor that is twisted with multiple aluminum or aluminum alloy wires on the outer periphery of the steel core In the bird's damage prevention apparatus for an overhead electric wire, a tubular insulator made of silicone rubber having a plurality of protrusions on the inner surface and forming a gap between the overhead wire and the inside of the tubular insulator An aerial wire bird damage prevention apparatus comprising: at least one drainage pipe made of silicone rubber that discharges water accumulated in the water. 前記管状絶縁体の前記管状部の厚さは、1mm以上8mm以下であることを特徴とする請求項1記載の架空電線用鳥害防止装置。   The bird damage prevention apparatus for overhead electric wires according to claim 1, wherein the tubular portion of the tubular insulator has a thickness of 1 mm or more and 8 mm or less. 前記管状絶縁体の前記突起部によって前記管状部と前記架空電線との間に形成される空隙の長さは、3mm以上20mm以下であることを特徴とする請求項1又は2記載の架空電線用鳥害防止装置。   The length of the space | gap formed between the said tubular part and the said overhead wire by the said projection part of the said tubular insulator is 3 mm or more and 20 mm or less, The overhead wire for Claim 1 or 2 characterized by the above-mentioned. Bird damage prevention device.
JP2011137353A 2011-06-21 2011-06-21 Bird injury prevention device for overhead wire Withdrawn JP2013005681A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2011137353A JP2013005681A (en) 2011-06-21 2011-06-21 Bird injury prevention device for overhead wire

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2011137353A JP2013005681A (en) 2011-06-21 2011-06-21 Bird injury prevention device for overhead wire

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2013005681A true JP2013005681A (en) 2013-01-07

Family

ID=47673640

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2011137353A Withdrawn JP2013005681A (en) 2011-06-21 2011-06-21 Bird injury prevention device for overhead wire

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP2013005681A (en)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2016062848A (en) * 2014-09-19 2016-04-25 近藤化学工業株式会社 Insulation cover
JP2017011909A (en) * 2015-06-24 2017-01-12 東日本旅客鉄道株式会社 Ground fault prevention insulation cover
CN108565807A (en) * 2018-05-29 2018-09-21 国网四川阿坝州电力有限责任公司 A kind of plateau type 10kV high-tension distributing line composite material tubes

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2016062848A (en) * 2014-09-19 2016-04-25 近藤化学工業株式会社 Insulation cover
JP2017011909A (en) * 2015-06-24 2017-01-12 東日本旅客鉄道株式会社 Ground fault prevention insulation cover
CN108565807A (en) * 2018-05-29 2018-09-21 国网四川阿坝州电力有限责任公司 A kind of plateau type 10kV high-tension distributing line composite material tubes

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN111755154B (en) Fixed point reinforcing type cable capable of automatically restraining bending angle
CN205487486U (en) High tension cable metallic sheath ground structure
JP2013005681A (en) Bird injury prevention device for overhead wire
KR20130060931A (en) Dual insulated cable
CN102982875A (en) Cable
CN201725616U (en) Self-supporting overhead insulated cable
CN206460795U (en) A kind of seismic-resistant electrical cable
CN203562236U (en) Medium-voltage lead sheath cable
CN103985469A (en) Embedded type optical fiber composite overhead ground wire capable of melting ice
JP6593052B2 (en) Mounting structure for polymer connection for power cable
JP6428224B2 (en) Polymer connections for power cables and rail vehicles
KR101977966B1 (en) Mylar tape of high voltage cable for underground
CN205230628U (en) Track traffic 1500V and following DC traction anticorrosion power cable
RU106981U1 (en) FLEXIBLE MOUNTING CABLE
UA115961U (en) Elongate anode grounding electrode
CN212209025U (en) Dedicated corrosion-resistant dampproofing power cable of large-scale construction machinery
RU68758U1 (en) STEEL ALUMINUM WIRE
CN213635499U (en) Novel corrosion-resistant termite-proof high-voltage cable
JP5412564B1 (en) Bird damage control device for overhead electric wires
CN209571273U (en) One kind blocks water anticorrosive wear-resistant rat-and-ant proof medium-pressure power cable
CN105321610A (en) 0.6kV and 1kV environment-friendly-type ratproof and ant-prevention power cable
CN203858907U (en) Embedded ice-meltable optical fiber composite overhead ground wire
JP6083100B1 (en) Lightning suppression type lightning arrester
RU150540U1 (en) Self-supporting insulated wire
CN203721348U (en) Water-blocking shielding layer for power cable

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A300 Withdrawal of application because of no request for examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A300

Effective date: 20140902