JP2012253093A - Lithography apparatus and manufacturing method of article - Google Patents

Abstract

PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide a lithography apparatus which is advantageous to achieve uniformity in characteristic between a plurality of charged particle beams, even when the lithography apparatus is provided with an irradiation optical system having a nonuniform irradiation angle.SOLUTION: A lithography apparatus comprises: an irradiation system (140) including a collimator lens; an aperture array (117) for dividing a charged particle beam emitted from the irradiation system into a plurality of charged particle beams; a convergence lens array (119) for forming a plurality of crossovers from the plurality of charged particle beams emitted from the aperture array; and a projection system (160) including a component (122) having a plurality of apertures corresponding to the plurality of crossovers and a plurality of projection units. In this lithography apparatus, the convergence lens array includes convergence lenses each decentering with respect to a corresponding aperture in the component, and the irradiation system includes adjustment means for adjusting an aberration so that each of positions of the plurality of crossovers formed by the convergence lens array while entering to the aperture array with an incident angle depending on the aberration is matched with a corresponding aperture in the component.

Description

  The present invention relates to a drawing apparatus that performs drawing on a substrate with a plurality of charged particle beams.

  As the drawing apparatus, a so-called multi-column drawing apparatus having a projection unit for each charged particle beam is known (Patent Document 1). Such a drawing apparatus does not have a crossover in which a plurality of charged particle beams are converged because the projection units are individually present. Therefore, since the influence of the space charge effect (Coulomb effect) is small, it can be said that it is advantageous for increasing the number of charged particle beams.

JP 09-007538 A

  However, in order to increase the number of charged particle beams in a multi-column drawing apparatus, in general, the divergence angle (divergence half angle) of charged particle beams from the charged particle source in the irradiation optical system on the front side of a plurality of projection units is set. It needs to be bigger. When the divergence angle of a charged particle beam from a charged particle source increases, it is difficult to make the charged particle beam irradiated to multiple projection units sufficiently parallel due to the aberration of the irradiation optical system, so the irradiation angle (incident angle) Becomes non-uniform. This non-uniformity of the irradiation angle results in non-uniformity of characteristics among the plurality of charged particle beams. Conventionally, a problem related to the aberration of the projection optical system and a configuration for compensating the aberration are known, but the inventor has independently recognized the problem related to the aberration of the irradiation optical system as described above. Is.

  An object of the present invention is to provide a drawing apparatus that includes an irradiation optical system with nonuniform irradiation angles but is advantageous in terms of uniformity of characteristics among a plurality of charged particle beams.

One aspect of the present invention is a drawing apparatus for drawing on a substrate with a plurality of charged particle beams,
An irradiation system including a collimator lens on which a diverging charged particle beam is incident;
An aperture array for dividing the charged particle beam emitted from the irradiation system into a plurality of charged particle beams;
A focusing lens array that forms a plurality of crossovers from a plurality of charged particle beams emitted from the aperture array, and
An element having a plurality of openings corresponding respectively to the plurality of crossovers; and a plurality of projection units provided respectively for the plurality of openings and projecting a plurality of charged particle beams onto the substrate. A projection system,
The focusing lens array includes a focusing lens that is decentered with respect to a corresponding aperture in the element;
The irradiation system is incident on the aperture array at an incident angle depending on the aberration of the irradiation optical system, and each position of the plurality of crossovers formed by the focusing lens array is aligned with a corresponding opening in the element. Thus, the drawing apparatus includes an adjusting means for adjusting the aberration.

  According to the present invention, for example, it is possible to provide a drawing apparatus that has an irradiation optical system with nonuniform irradiation angles but is advantageous in terms of uniformity of characteristics among a plurality of charged particle beams.

1 is a diagram illustrating a configuration of a drawing apparatus according to a first embodiment. The figure which shows the charged particle beam which passes an aperture array and a focusing lens array (when this invention is not applied). The figure which shows the aperture arrangement | sequence of an aperture array and a focusing lens array, and the charged particle beam arrangement | sequence in an imaging surface (in the case of the structure of FIG. 2). The figure which shows the charged particle beam which passes an aperture array and a focusing lens array (in the case of Embodiment 1). The figure which shows the aperture arrangement | sequence of an aperture array and a focusing lens array, and the charged particle beam arrangement | sequence in an imaging surface (in the case of the structure of FIG. 4). The figure which shows the difference in the aperture arrangement | sequence of an aperture array and a condensing lens array by the presence or absence of the defocus of an irradiation optical system. The figure which shows the charged particle beam which passes along the aperture array and focusing lens array of Embodiment 2. The figure which shows the aperture arrangement | sequence of an aperture array and a focusing lens array, and the charged particle beam arrangement | sequence in an imaging surface. The figure which shows the charged particle beam which reaches | attains each part in a beam spot. The figure which shows the light ray in case there exists an error in the estimation of the angle of a charged particle beam. FIG. 4 is a diagram illustrating a configuration of a drawing apparatus according to a third embodiment. The figure which shows the aperture arrangement | sequence of an aperture array and a focusing lens array, and the charged particle beam arrangement | sequence in an imaging surface. FIG. 6 is a diagram illustrating a configuration of a drawing apparatus according to a fourth embodiment. The figure which shows the charged particle beam which passes an aperture array and a focusing lens array, the aperture arrangement | sequence of an aperture array and a focusing lens array, and the charged particle beam arrangement | sequence in an imaging surface (when this invention is not applied). The figure which shows the charged particle beam which passes an aperture array and a focusing lens array, the aperture arrangement | sequence of an aperture array and a focusing lens array, and the charged particle beam arrangement | sequence in an imaging surface (in the case of Embodiment 4). FIG. 10 is a diagram illustrating a configuration of a drawing apparatus according to a fifth embodiment. The figure which shows the structure and function of a collimator lens. FIG. 10 is a diagram illustrating a configuration of a drawing apparatus according to a sixth embodiment. The figure explaining the position adjustment of the crossover in the front side of a collimator lens.

  Embodiments of the present invention will be described below with reference to the accompanying drawings. Note that, in principle, the same members are denoted by the same reference symbols throughout the drawings, and repeated description thereof is omitted.

[Embodiment 1]
FIG. 1 is a diagram illustrating a configuration of a drawing apparatus (a drawing apparatus that performs drawing on a substrate with a plurality of charged particle beams) according to the first embodiment. The drawing apparatus of the present embodiment is a so-called multi-column drawing apparatus provided with a projection unit for each charged particle beam. An example in which an electron beam (electron beam) is used as a charged particle beam will be described. However, the present invention is not limited to this, and other charged particle beams such as an ion beam may be used. In FIG. 1, an electron beam extracted by an anode electrode 110 from an electron source 108 through adjustment by a Wehnelt electrode 109 passes through a crossover 112 (irradiation system) through a crossover adjustment optical system 111 (crossover adjustment system). Crossover). Here, the electron source 108 may be a so-called thermoelectron type electron source including LaB ₆ or BaO / W (dispenser cathode) or the like in the electron emission portion. The crossover adjustment optical system 111 is composed of two-stage electrostatic lenses, each electrostatic lens is composed of three electrodes, a negative potential is applied to the intermediate electrode, and the upper and lower electrodes are grounded. It can be an Einzel type electrostatic lens. The electron beam emitted from the crossover 112 with a wide angle becomes a parallel beam by the collimator lens 115 and irradiates the aperture array 117.

  The parallel beam irradiated on the aperture array 117 is divided by the aperture array 117 to become a multi-electron beam 118 (a plurality of electron beams). The multi-electron beams 118 are respectively focused by the (first) focusing lens array 119 and imaged on the blanker array 122. Here, the converging lens array 119 can be an Einzel-type electrostatic lens array that includes three porous electrodes, applies a negative potential to an intermediate electrode among the three electrodes, and grounds the upper and lower electrodes. . The aperture array 117 also has a role of defining the region of the electron beam that passes through the pupil plane of the focusing lens array 119. Therefore, the position of the pupil plane of the focusing lens array 119 (the position of the front focal plane of the focusing lens array 119). ).

  The blanker array 122 is a device that includes individually controllable deflection electrodes (more precisely, deflection electrode pairs). The blanker array 122 performs blanking by individually deflecting the multi-electron beam 118 based on the blanking signal generated by the drawing pattern generation circuit 102, the bitmap conversion circuit 103, and the blanking command circuit 107. When the electron beam is not blanked, no voltage is applied to the deflection electrode of the blanker array 122, and when the electron beam is blanked, a voltage is applied to the deflection electrode of the blanker array 122. Here, the electron beam deflected by the blanker array 122 is blocked by the stop aperture array 123 on the rear side to be in a blanking state. In the present embodiment, the blanker array / stop aperture array has two stages. That is, the (second) blanker array 127 and the (second) stop aperture array 128 having the same structure as the (first) blanker array 122 and the (first) stop aperture array 123 are arranged on the rear side.

  The multi-electron beam 118 passing through the blanker array 122 is imaged on the second blanker array 127 by the second focusing lens array 126. Further, the multi-electron beam 118 is focused by the third focusing lens 130 and the fourth focusing lens 132 and forms an image on the wafer 133 (substrate). Here, like the first focusing lens array 119, the second focusing lens array 126, the third focusing lens array 130, and the fourth focusing lens array 132 can be Einzel type electrostatic lens arrays.

  Here, the fourth focusing lens array 132 is an objective lens array, and the projection magnification is set to about 1/100, for example. As a result, the spot diameter (FWHM (full width at half maximum) of 2 μm) of the electron beam 121 on the intermediate imaging plane on the blanker array 122 is reduced to about 1/100 on the wafer 133, and the spot diameter of about 20 nm on the FWHM. It becomes the diameter.

  Scanning of the multi-electron beam 118 on the wafer 133 can be performed by the deflector 131. The deflector 131 is formed by opposing electrode pairs. For example, in order to perform two-stage deflection in each of the x and y directions, the deflector 131 can be configured by four counter electrode pairs (in the drawing, for simplicity, two stages Is shown as one unit). The deflector 131 is driven in accordance with a signal from the deflection signal generation circuit 104.

  During drawing of the pattern, the stage 134 holding the wafer 133 is continuously moved in the X direction. In parallel with this, the electron beam 135 on the wafer is deflected in the Y direction by the deflector 131 based on the position measurement result of the stage 134 in real time by a position measuring device (for example, using a laser length measuring device). . Further, in parallel with these, the first blanker array 122 and the second blanker array 127 perform blanking of the electron beam according to the drawing pattern. With such an operation, a pattern can be drawn on the wafer 133 at high speed.

  The electron (charged particle) optical system described above can be roughly divided into the following three parts. The first is an irradiation optical system 140 (also referred to as an irradiation system) including elements from the electron source 108 to the collimator lens 115. Second, a multi-beam forming optical system including an aperture array 117 that divides the electron beam emitted from the irradiation optical system 140 into a multi-electron beam and a focusing lens array 119 that forms a plurality of crossovers from the multi-electron beam. 150. The multi-beam forming optical system 150 is also simply referred to as a multi-beam forming system. The third one is an element having a plurality of openings corresponding to the plurality of crossovers, and a plurality of elements each provided for the plurality of openings to project an electron beam (crossover) onto the wafer (on the substrate). Projection optical system 160 including the projection optical unit. Here, the element is, for example, the blanker array 122. The projection optical unit is also simply referred to as a projection unit, and the projection optical system is also simply referred to as a projection system. This embodiment is characterized by the configuration of the multi-beam forming optical system 150.

  FIG. 2 is a diagram showing an electron beam passing through the aperture array and the focusing lens array when the present invention is not applied. FIG. 2 illustrates a portion including the multi-beam forming optical system 150 in FIG. In FIG. 2, the electron beam emitted from the crossover 112 at a wide angle enters the collimator lens 115 and is collimated (substantially parallelized) by the collimator lens 115. However, when the divergence angle (divergence half angle) of the electron beam is large, the electron beam is not completely collimated due to the aberration of the irradiation optical system 140, and the irradiation angle (incident angle) varies depending on the position in the irradiated surface. Inhomogeneity will occur. Here, the aberration of the irradiation optical system corresponds to the spherical aberration of the crossover adjusting optical system 111, the spherical aberration of the collimator lens 115, and the aberration due to the space charge effect from the electron source to the aperture array 117 (corresponding to the spherical aberration of the concave lens). )including. For example, when the spherical aberration of the collimator lens 115 is dominant among the aberrations of the irradiation optical system 140, the electron beam 204 incident on the aperture array 117 due to the spherical aberration of the convex lens (positive spherical aberration) The more the outer side is, the more the inner side is inclined. Accordingly, the principal ray 205 of the multi-electron beam that has passed through the aperture array is also more inclined to the inside as the outer one is further out.

  As a result, the electron beam that has passed through the focusing lens array 119 shifts further inward from the desired position on the blanker array 122 as it goes further outward. In this way, the beam arrangement of the multi-electron beam becomes non-uniform, and the outer electron beam does not pass through the center of the opening 203 of the blanker array 122. As a result, the deflection characteristics of the blanker array 122 become non-uniform.

  On the other hand, when the influence of the aberration due to the space charge effect becomes dominant, the electron beam 204 incident on the aperture array 117 is conversely more outward because of the spherical aberration (negative spherical aberration) of the concave lens. The more it becomes, the more it will tilt outward. Therefore, the sum of the spherical aberration of the convex lens (positive spherical aberration) by the crossover adjusting optical system 111 and the collimator lens 115 and the aberration due to the space charge effect (corresponding to the concave lens (ie, negative) spherical aberration) is the sum of the electron beam. Determine the angular distribution. That is, the sum determines whether the outer electron beam is inclined more inward or outward. In the embodiment of the present specification, as in FIG. 2, the spherical aberration of the collimator lens 115 is dominant for the aberration of the irradiation optical system, and the electron beam incident on the aperture array becomes more inner as the electron beam becomes more outer. An example in which there is a non-uniformity incline will be described.

  FIG. 3 is a diagram showing the aperture arrangement of the aperture array and the focusing lens array and the arrangement of electron beams on the imaging plane in the configuration of FIG. The aperture array 201 of the aperture array and the aperture array 202 of the focusing lens array in FIG. 3A are made to coincide with the aperture array 203 of the blanker array in FIG. Here, as an example, the arrangement of the openings 203 of the blanker array is a square lattice array, but is not limited thereto, and may be another array having regularity such as a staggered lattice array. As shown in FIG. 3B, due to the aberration of the irradiation optical system, the position of the electron beam 121 on the imaging plane (or blanker array) is relative to the position of the opening 203 of the blanker array, as described above. The more the electron beam is on the outside, the more on the inside. That is, the beam arrangement 121 on the blanker array (imaging plane) is shifted from the arrangement of the openings 203 in the blanker array due to the aberration of the irradiation optical system. Therefore, it is not preferable to match the arrangement of the apertures 201 of the aperture array and the arrangement of the apertures 202 of the focusing lens array with the arrangement of the openings 203 of the blanker array, assuming the aberration of the irradiation optical system.

  On the other hand, FIG. 4 is a diagram showing an electron beam passing through the aperture array and the focusing lens array in the first embodiment. In FIG. 4, the positions of the apertures of the aperture array 117 and the focusing lens array 119 are the same amount with respect to the corresponding position of the aperture (the position of the desired electron beam) on the blanker array 122 (or the imaging plane). I just try to shift it. Here, the same amount is not only when the amounts are completely the same, but also when the amounts are inconsistent within an allowable range set by the accuracy required for the drawing apparatus due to manufacturing errors, placement errors, etc. Including. The displacement amount (decentration amount) of the opening position may be set based on the incident angle of the electron beam corresponding to the aberration of the irradiation optical system. The incident angle can be set by a function of a distance from a blanker center (center of the blanker array 122) at a position on the blanker array 122, for example, a cubic polynomial (described later).

  As described above, the trajectory 401 of the multi-electron beam when the aperture positions of the aperture array 117 and the focusing lens array 119 are shifted in consideration of the incident angle of the electron beam is as shown in FIG. That is, the trajectory is such that the electron beam array 121 on the blanker array 122 (or the imaging plane) matches the array at the center of the opening 203 of the blanker array. By compensating for the non-uniformity of the beam arrangement of the multi-electron beam in this way, the outer electron beam also passes through the center of the opening 203 of the blanker array, and the deflection characteristics of the blanker array 122 are improved. For comparison, FIG. 4 shows a multi-electron beam trajectory 402 in the configuration of FIG. 2 by dotted lines.

  FIG. 5 is a diagram illustrating the aperture array of the aperture array and the focusing lens array and the electron beam array on the imaging plane (or on the blanker array 122) in the first embodiment. FIG. 5A shows an aperture array in which the position of each aperture 201 of the aperture array and the position of each aperture 202 of the focusing lens array are both displaced by the same amount with respect to the position of the corresponding aperture 203 of the blanker array. The aperture arrangement of the focusing lens array is shown. FIG. 5B shows an electron beam array on the imaging plane, and the electron beam array is aligned with a desired electron beam array as a result of compensation. Here, the alignment means that the deviation of the position of each electron beam from the target position is within tolerance.

  Here, the aperture array 117 is preferably placed on the pupil plane (front focal plane) of the focusing lens array 119. In the state where the aperture array 117 is placed on the pupil plane of the focusing lens array 119, when the aperture array 201 of the aperture array and the aperture array 202 of the focusing lens array are shifted by the same amount, they pass through the pupil plane of the focusing lens array 119. The region of the electron beam does not change. Therefore, even if the aperture positions of the aperture array and the focusing lens array are kept on the same axis and the aperture position is displaced by the same amount, the angles of the principal rays of the multi-electron beam incident on the imaging plane can be kept uniform. Can do. That is, by arranging the aperture array 117 on the front focal plane of the focusing lens array 119 and performing the above-described compensation, not only the non-uniformity of the beam arrangement of the multi-electron beam on the imaging plane can be compensated, but also the imaging plane. Uniformity of the incident angle to can also be maintained.

  If there is parallel decentering between the aperture array 117 and the focusing lens array 119, the region of the electron beam passing through the pupil plane of the focusing lens array 119 changes uniformly over the entire multi-electron beam, and the imaging plane Above, the entire multi-electron beam is uniformly tilted. Such uniform inclination can be easily corrected at once by the aligner deflector 120. The problem is the non-uniformity caused by the individual tilts of the multi-electron beam, and the object of the present invention is to reduce the non-uniformity caused by the aberrations of the illumination optics.

  In the first embodiment, the amount of shifting the aperture array 201 of the aperture array and the aperture array of the focusing lens array 202 is specifically determined in addition to the distance (image height) Y from the center of the blanker array of the electron beam on the blanker array, It can be determined by three parameters. The three parameters are the spherical aberration coefficient Cs of the irradiation optical system, the focal length f of the collimator lens, and the defocus adjustment amount Δf. Here, the defocus adjustment amount Δf can be adjusted by the crossover adjustment optical system 111, but is not limited thereto, and may be adjusted by changing the power of the collimator lens, for example.

  Here, the spherical aberration coefficient Cs of the irradiation optical system can be expressed by a mathematical formula of Cs = Cs (CO_adjust) + Cs (CL) + Cs (Coulomb). Cs (CO_adjust) is the spherical aberration coefficient of the crossover adjusting optical system, Cs (CL) is the spherical aberration coefficient of the collimator lens, and Cs (Coulomb) is the spherical aberration coefficient due to the space charge effect (the spherical aberration coefficient of the specific concave lens). Equivalent).

The angle deviation amount Δθ of the electron beam due to the aberration of the irradiation optical system can be approximately expressed as Δθ = Cs (Y / f) ³ + Δf (Y / f) using the above parameters. This equation is a cubic polynomial with respect to the distance Y.

  FIG. 6 is a diagram illustrating a difference in aperture arrangement between the aperture array and the focusing lens array according to the first embodiment depending on whether or not the irradiation optical system is defocused. FIG. 6A shows the aperture array 201 of the aperture array and the aperture array 202 of the focusing lens array when the defocus adjustment amount Δf is 0 (the defocus amount is zero). FIG. 6B shows an aperture array 201 of the aperture array and an aperture array 202 of the focusing lens array when defocus adjustment is performed (defocused). 6C, the distance (image height) Y is represented on the horizontal axis, and the angle deviation amount of the electron beam due to the aberration of the irradiation optical system (positive when the electron beam is tilted inward) is represented on the vertical axis. It is a graph (shows the case of Cs = 5000 mm, f = 500 mm, Δf = 1.5 mm).

  In FIG. 6C, the amount of angular deviation of the electron beam when there is no defocus adjustment is proportional to the cube of the distance Y. For this reason, the aperture arrays of the aperture array and the focusing lens array are also compensated by using an aperture array having a shift amount proportional to the cube of the distance Y as shown in FIG.

  On the other hand, in FIG. 6C, the amount of angular deviation of the electron beam when the defocus adjustment is performed adds a defocus term proportional to the distance Y in addition to a term proportional to the cube of the distance Y. Therefore, as can be seen from FIG. 6C, the electron beam when the defocus adjustment is performed is inclined outward in the region where the distance Y is small, and inward in the region where the distance Y is large. Will tilt. Considering this, the aperture array of the aperture array and the focusing lens array is arranged such that the aperture 601 in a region having a small distance Y is inward with respect to the desired beam array on the imaging plane, as shown in FIG. The opening 602 in the region where the distance Y is large is shifted outward to perform compensation.

  As described above, when the defocus adjustment is performed, the aperture arrangement pattern is somewhat complicated. However, as is apparent from the graph of FIG. 6C, the absolute value range of the angular deviation amount is smaller when the defocus adjustment is performed. Therefore, the defocus adjustment has an advantage that the amount of shifting the aperture array of the aperture array and the focusing lens array can be reduced. This can be clearly seen by comparing FIG. 6 (A) and FIG. 6 (B).

  As described above, the presence or absence of defocus adjustment has advantages and disadvantages. In all the embodiments of the present invention, the pattern of the aperture array of the aperture array and the focusing lens array can be changed by the defocus adjustment. Moreover, the arrangement pattern of the apertures shown in the embodiments is merely an example, and as long as the arrangement pattern compensates for the nonuniformity of the angle of the electron beam caused by the aberration of the irradiation optical system, it is within the scope of the present invention. is there.

[Embodiment 2]
FIG. 7 is a diagram showing an electron beam passing through the aperture array 117 and the focusing lens array 19 in the second embodiment. FIG. 7 is a portion corresponding to the multi-beam forming optical system 150 of FIG. 1, and other components of the present embodiment are the same as those of the first embodiment.

  In the same figure, the aperture position 202 of the focusing lens array is similar to the first embodiment in order to compensate for the non-uniformity of the electron beam arrangement on the imaging surface due to the aberration of the irradiation optical system. Are shifted according to a cubic polynomial. In addition, the position of the aperture array 117 is arranged at a position shifted from the front focal plane 701 of the focusing lens array 119. Ideally, the position of the aperture array 117 is preferably placed on the front focal plane 701 of the focusing lens array 119. However, there may be cases where an ideal arrangement cannot be achieved, such as when the mounting space cannot be secured or when the focal length of the focusing lens array 119 is very long.

  Even in such a case, as long as the angle deviation of the electron beam due to the aberration of the irradiation optical system can be accurately grasped, as in the case of the first embodiment, the main main component is uniform with respect to the blanker array 122 (or the imaging plane). Multiple electron beams can be incident at the angle of the light beam. For this purpose, in FIG. 7, it is necessary to determine the aperture arrangement of the aperture array 117 so that the convergence angle distribution of the electron beam by the focusing lens array 119 is uniform over the entire multi-electron beam.

  That is, the convergence angle distribution of the multi electron beam is determined by the distribution of the electron beam passing through the front focal plane 701 of the focusing lens array. Therefore, when the angle deviation (angle distribution) of the electron beam due to the aberration of the irradiation optical system can be accurately grasped, the distribution of the electron beam passing through the front focal plane 701 can be defined.

  Specifically, as shown in FIG. That is, as in the first embodiment, the aperture position of the aperture array 117 is set so that the center of the (virtual) electron beam distribution 703 on the front focal plane 701 of the focusing lens array is on the optical axis 704 of the focusing lens array. Just decide.

  For example, in FIG. 7, the position of the aperture array 117 is arranged approximately at the center between the focusing lens array 119 and the front focal plane 701 of the focusing lens array. In this case, the amount by which the aperture 201 of the aperture array is displaced is approximately half of the amount by which the aperture 202 of the focusing lens array is displaced. By doing so, the center of the (virtual) electron beam distribution 703 in the front focal plane 701 of the focusing lens array is positioned on the optical axis 704 of the focusing lens array. More generally, the amount by which the aperture 201 of the aperture array is displaced may be proportional to the distance 710 between the front focal plane of the focusing lens array and the aperture array.

  FIG. 8 is a diagram illustrating the aperture array of the aperture array and the focusing lens array and the electron beam array on the imaging plane in the second embodiment. 8A shows the arrangement of the apertures 202 of the focusing lens array, FIG. 8B shows the arrangement of the apertures 201 of the aperture array, and FIG. 8C shows the arrangement of electron beams on the imaging plane. Show. The round dotted lines in FIGS. 8A and 8B indicate the opening 203 of the blanker array. In FIG. 8B, the amount by which the aperture of the aperture array is shifted is approximately half the amount by which the aperture of the focusing lens array is shifted so as to define the electron beam distribution 703 at the front focal plane 701 of the focusing lens array as described above. Is set to As described above, even when the aperture array 117 is not disposed on the front focal plane 701 of the focusing lens array, the same effect as that of the first embodiment can be obtained by configuring the present embodiment.

  However, as will be described with reference to FIGS. 9 and 10, the aperture array 117 is preferably disposed on the front focal plane 701 of the focusing lens array as much as possible in the first embodiment. FIG. 9 is a diagram showing an electron beam reaching each part in the spot beam. FIG. 9A shows an electron beam that reaches each part in the spot beam according to the first embodiment. The aperture array 117 is placed on the front focal plane 701 of the focusing lens array. For this reason, on-axis and off-axis principal rays including the principal ray 901 of the off-axis beam toward the outer portion of the spot beam image are parallel to the optical axis.

  FIG. 9B shows an electron beam that reaches each part in the spot beam according to the second embodiment, and the aperture array 117 is not placed on the front focal plane 701. In this case, as can be seen from the figure, on the front focal plane 701 of the focusing lens array, the angular distribution of the off-axis electron beam is different from that on the axis. That is, the principal ray 901 of the off-axis beam toward the outer portion of the spot beam image is tilted without being parallel to the optical axis. As a result, when the focus shifts, the beam spot is easily blurred. That is, in the configuration of the second embodiment, both the on-axis and off-axis principal rays cannot be made parallel to the optical axis. However, this effect is also small when the beam spot diameter on the imaging surface is small. Therefore, in the configuration of the second embodiment, it is preferable to reduce the beam spot diameter on the imaging surface to such an extent that the influence of the off-axis light beam can be tolerated.

  Next, FIG. 10 is a diagram illustrating an electron beam when there is an error in the estimation of the angular deviation of the electron beam. FIG. 10A shows the actual electron beam with a solid line and the estimated electron beam with a dotted line when there is an error in the estimation of the angular deviation of the electron beam in the first embodiment. Since there is an estimation error, the electron beam imaging position 121 is shifted from the estimated imaging position 1002, but the principal ray 205 of the electron beam is parallel to the optical axis. This is because the aperture 201 of the aperture array is on the front focal plane of the focusing lens array even when there is an estimation error.

  FIG. 10B shows the actual electron beam with a solid line and the estimated electron beam with a dotted line when there is an error in the estimation of the angular deviation of the electron beam in the second embodiment. Due to the estimation error, the electron beam imaging position 121 is shifted with respect to the estimated imaging position 1002, and in the case of the second embodiment, the angle of the principal ray 205 of the electron beam is also shifted. End up. This is because the aperture array 117 is not on the front focal plane 701 of the focusing lens array, and as can be seen from the figure, the electron beam distribution on the front focal plane 701 of the focusing lens array is further deviated from the estimate. Because. That is, in the configuration of the second embodiment, when there is an error in the estimation of the angle deviation of the electron beam, it should be noted that not only the imaging position 121 of the multi-electron beam but also the angle of the principal ray 205 is displaced. .

  As described above, in the case of adopting the configuration of the second embodiment, the beam spot diameter on the imaging surface is made small enough to allow the influence of the off-axis beam tilt, or the estimation error of the angle deviation of the electron beam. You should be careful about the influence which has on the chief ray angle.

[Embodiment 3]
FIG. 11 is a diagram illustrating a configuration of a drawing apparatus according to the third embodiment. Only the irradiation optical system 140 and the multi-beam forming optical system 150 different from the configuration of FIG. 1 will be described.

  The electron source array 1110 includes a plurality of thermal field emission (TFE) type electron sources. The thermal field emission type electron source can be composed of a thermal field emission type emitter 1101, a suppressor electrode 1102, a first anode electrode 1103, and a second anode electrode 1104. The thermal field emission type emitter 1101 corresponds to a cathode. The suppressor electrode 1102 has a function of restricting electron emission from other than the cathode tip. The first anode electrode 1103 and the second anode electrode 1104 form an electric field for emitting electrons from the thermal field emission emitter 1101. The thermal field emission type emitter 1101 emits electrons by a combination of thermionic emission action by heating and the Schottky effect under a strong electric field by the anode electrode. A group of electron beams emitted from the thermal field emission type emitters 1101 arranged in an array is crossed over in the form of an array (irradiation optical system) by a crossover adjusting optical system 111 arranged in an array. 112 is formed. Here, for the thermal field emission type emitter 1101, for example, a thermal field emission type cathode material such as ZrO / W is used.

  The electron beams 114 emitted from the crossovers 112 arranged in an array are collimated by the collimator lens array 1105 to form a plurality of electron beams that do not overlap each other. Each of the plurality of electron beams irradiates a plurality of subarray regions (each including a plurality of openings) on the aperture array 117.

  As can be seen from FIG. 11, when attention is paid to one of the plurality of electron source arrays 1110, the configuration of the optical system is equivalent to that of FIG. Therefore, the configuration of the above-described embodiment can be applied in parallel to the optical system corresponding to each electron source (each subarray region).

  FIG. 12 is a diagram illustrating the aperture array of the aperture array and the focusing lens array and the electron beam array on the imaging plane in the third embodiment. 12A shows the aperture arrangement of the aperture array and the focusing lens array in the 3 × 3 sub-array region, and FIG. 12B shows the imaging plane in the 3 × 3 sub-array region in this embodiment. It is a figure which shows the electron beam arrangement | sequence 121 of.

  As shown in FIG. 12A, in each sub-array region, the aperture 201 of the aperture array and the aperture 202 of the focusing lens array are set so as to compensate for the non-uniformity of the angle of the electron beam due to the aberration of the irradiation optical system. It is shifted with respect to the opening 203 of the blanker array. Since a plurality of irradiation optical systems having the same configuration are provided in parallel, the aperture array and the focusing lens array have the same aperture arrangement in any sub-array. In FIG. 12A, the aperture array 117 is placed on the front focal plane 701 of the focusing lens array, and the aperture 201 of the aperture array and the opening 202 of the focusing lens array are shifted by the same amount.

  By applying the configuration of the first embodiment for each sub-array as shown in FIG. 12A, multi-beam nonuniformity is corrected as shown in FIG. Thus, if the irradiation optical system is provided in parallel, the present invention may be applied in parallel to a plurality of irradiation optical systems. Therefore, even when the defocus adjustment of the irradiation optical system described above is performed, the arrangement shown in FIG. 6 may be applied to each of the irradiation optical systems (subarrays) as the aperture arrangement of the aperture array / focusing lens array. . Further, even when the aperture array 117 is arranged so as to be shifted from the front focal plane 701 of the focusing lens array, the aperture array / focusing lens array has an aperture arrangement shown in FIG. 8 for each irradiation optical system (subarray). It is clear that it should be applied to.

[Embodiment 4]
FIG. 13 is a diagram illustrating a configuration of a drawing apparatus that is a premise of the fourth embodiment. In the figure, the configuration from the upper electron source 108 to the aperture array 117 is the same as that in FIG. 1, and therefore, repetitive description is omitted, and components on the rear side of the aperture array 117 will be described.

  The multi-electron beam formed by the aperture array 117 is focused by the focusing lens array 119. In the fourth embodiment, the power of each lens of the focusing lens array 119 is set so that the multi-electron beam is focused on the stop aperture array 1303 on the rear side. The multi electron beam passes through the focusing lens array 119 and is further divided into sub multi electron beams by the projection aperture array 1301. In the drawing, one of the multi-electron beams is divided into 3 × 3 sub-multi-electron beams.

  Since the power of each lens of the focusing lens array 119 is set as described above, the sub-multi electron beam is focused on the stop aperture array 1303. Here, the stop aperture array 1303 is provided with one opening for the sub-multi electron beam. The arrangement of the apertures 1304 of the stop aperture array is configured to match the arrangement of the openings at the center of the 3 × 3 sub-aperture array of the projection aperture array 1301.

  A blanker array 122 is provided immediately below the projection aperture array 1301, and the blanking operation of each electron beam can be performed by individual deflection as in the configuration of FIG. 1. When it is desired to blank the electron beam, if a voltage is applied to the corresponding electrode pair of the blanker array 122, the electron beam is blocked by the stop aperture array 1303. FIG. 13 shows the electron beam 125 deflected (blanked) by the blanker array.

  The sub-multi electron beam that has passed through the stop aperture array 1303 is focused by the second focusing lens array 132 and forms an image on the surface of the wafer 133. A projection aperture array 1301 is disposed on the object plane of the second focusing lens array, and the 3 × 3 aperture pattern of the projection aperture array 1301 is reduced and projected onto the surface of the wafer 133 by each lens of the second focusing lens array. . For example, the aperture diameter of the projection aperture array 1301 is 2.5 μm, and the projection magnification of the second focusing lens array 132 is set to 1/100 times. As a result, an image having a diameter of 25 nm is formed on the surface of the wafer 133. The Note that the stop aperture array 1303 is disposed on the front focal plane of the second focusing lens array 132 and defines an electron beam region passing through the pupil plane of the second focusing lens array 132.

  A deflector array 1302 is disposed in the vicinity of the stop aperture array 1303, and sub-multi electron beam deflection (scanning) can be performed as in the configuration of FIG. More simply, the deflector array 1302 is driven by a common applied voltage, and the electrode structure may be composed of comb-like counter electrodes.

  FIG. 14 is a diagram showing an electron beam passing through the aperture array and the focusing lens array and an electron beam arrangement on the stop aperture array in the configuration of FIG. 13 (when the present invention is not applied).

  When the angular distribution of the electron beam becomes non-uniform due to the aberration of the irradiation optical system, as described above, the arrangement of the electron beam (crossover) formed on the stop aperture array 1303 by the focusing lens array 119 becomes non-uniform. End up. That is, the sub-multi electron beam spot arrangement on the stop aperture array 1303 becomes non-uniform due to the aberration of the irradiation optical system. FIG. 14B shows the arrangement, and as shown in FIG. 3B, the desired position (opening of the stop aperture array) is increased as the electron beam is more outward (the image height is higher). A non-uniformity that converges more inward with respect to the position 1304 occurs.

  In the present embodiment, since the multi-electron beam is further divided into sub-multi-electron beams by the projection aperture array 1301, it is necessary to newly consider the effect of shifting the electron beam applied to the projection aperture array 1301. . As can be seen from FIG. 14, the electron beam applied to the projection aperture array 1301 shifts inward as the electron beam goes outward due to the aberration of the irradiation optical system. As a result, each chief ray of the sub-multi electron beam is inclined more inward as the chief ray goes outward due to the aberration of the irradiation optical system (the central electron beam group and the left and right electron beam groups in FIG. 14). To see). In this way, the angular distribution of the electron beam defined by the stop aperture array 1303 differs depending on the subarray. As a result, non-uniformity in the arrangement and intensity (current intensity) of electron beams on the wafer 133 surface is caused.

  FIG. 15 is a diagram showing an electron beam passing through the aperture array and the focusing lens array and an electron beam arrangement on the stop aperture array when the present invention is applied to the configuration of FIG. In this embodiment, as in the first embodiment, the aperture 201 of the aperture array and the aperture 202 of the focusing lens array are shifted according to a third-order polynomial with respect to the distance (image height) Y as shown in FIG. , Compensation for the non-uniformity is performed. Any of the configurations used in the first and second embodiments can be applied to the present embodiment, and these are also embodiments within the scope of the present invention.

  According to the present embodiment as shown in FIG. 15, compensation can be performed so that each principal ray of the sub-multi electron beam is not tilted by the aberration of the irradiation optical system and is focused on the center of the aperture 1304 of the stop aperture array. it can.

[Embodiment 5]
In the above embodiment, the arrangement of the aperture 201 of the aperture array and the aperture 202 of the focusing lens array is determined according to the spherical aberration of the irradiation optical system. Here, the spherical aberration of the irradiation optical system is actually estimated in advance by simulation or actual measurement, but this estimation may include an error. Therefore, when the estimation error exceeds the allowable value, the correction by the arrangement of the aperture 201 of the aperture array and the aperture 202 of the focusing lens array obtained by the estimation has an unacceptable correction residual (error). In such a case, it is not preferable in terms of manufacturing cost to manufacture the aperture array and the focusing lens array again. In view of this point, the following embodiments including this embodiment relate to a configuration that is advantageous when a correction residual is generated due to an estimation error of spherical aberration of an irradiation optical system. The said structure contains the adjustment means to adjust the aberration of an irradiation optical system. The adjusting means adjusts the aberration so that each position of a plurality of crossovers formed by the focusing lens array is incident on the aperture array at an incident angle depending on the aberration and is aligned with the corresponding opening. is there. Here, the corresponding opening is a corresponding opening in an element such as a blanker array or a stop aperture array as described above.

  FIG. 16 is a diagram illustrating a configuration of a drawing apparatus according to the fifth embodiment. Since the configuration of the present embodiment is characterized by the configuration of the collimator lens 115, the configuration will be described. In this embodiment, the collimator lens 115 is constituted by a three-stage lens (charged particle lens), and diverges by an intermediate main collimator lens 1701, an upper first adjustment lens 1702, and a lower second adjustment lens 1703. Collimate a charged particle beam. As described above, the multi-stage configuration of the collimator lens (a configuration including a plurality of charged particle lenses) can adjust the spherical aberration of the irradiation optical system while keeping the focal length of the collimator lens constant. Here, the focal length of the collimator lens means a focal length (synthetic focal length) when a multi-stage collimator lens is regarded as one lens.

  The spherical aberration is adjusted by, for example, individually controlling (adjusting) the powers of the first adjustment lens 1702, the main collimator lens 1701, and the second adjustment lens 1703, so that the front focal position (object-side focal position) It can be performed while maintaining the front side (object side main surface position). Here, the front focal position and the front main surface position mean the front focal position and the front main surface position when the multi-stage collimator lens is regarded as one lens. Reference numeral 1706 denotes an electron beam when the collimator lens is composed of only one stage of electron lens. The spherical aberration can also be adjusted by moving each lens in the multistage collimator lens. In this case, for example, the main collimator lens 1701, the first adjustment lens 1702, and the second adjustment lens 1703 are each used as a unit related to movement (that is, three electrodes constituting each lens as one unit), and in units. A mechanism for driving may be provided. Further, the spherical aberration may be adjusted by a combination of power adjustment and position adjustment of each electron lens. Although a collimator lens including a three-stage electron lens is illustrated, the configuration of the collimator lens is not limited to that including a three-stage electron lens, and includes a two-stage or four-stage or more electron lens. May be.

  Such an adjustment changes the spherical aberration of the irradiation optical system by changing the electron beam path while fixing the front focal position and the front principal surface position. In short, two types of optical characteristics are fixed. However, one kind of optical characteristic is made variable. Therefore, such adjustment is possible in principle (mathematical) if there are three or more control parameters. For example, in the above configuration example, the number of control parameters is set to 3 by changing the potential applied to each of the three-stage electron lenses. For example, in the case of two-stage electron lenses, the number of control parameters can be set to 3 or more by adjusting (moving) the position of at least one of the electron lenses to adjust the potential applied to each. it can. Even in the case where four or more stages of electron lenses are included, the above-described adjustment can be performed by configuring the control lens to have three or more control parameters.

  The adjustment as described above can be performed based on the estimated error amount of the spherical aberration of the irradiation optical system. The estimated error amount can be obtained, for example, through measurement of the positional deviation of the electron beam on the wafer 133. More specifically, for example, the position of the electron beam is measured with respect to a plurality of different image heights, and the positional deviation amount (deviation amount from the target position) of the electron beam is represented by the above cubic function relating to the image height. It is sufficient to check whether there is a correlation. If there is a correlation, the above adjustment can be performed using the coefficient of the cubic function as an estimation error.

  By using multiple collimator lenses as in this embodiment, aberration (spherical aberration) can be adjusted while maintaining optical characteristics other than aberration (spherical aberration). Thereby, the above-mentioned problem of the correction residual can be solved. This point will be described with reference to FIG. FIG. 17 is a diagram illustrating the configuration and functions of a multi-stage collimator lens. FIG. 17A is a graph illustrating the relationship between the change in spherical aberration of the collimator lens having a multi-stage configuration and the change in the deviation amount of the irradiation angle. FIG. 17B is a diagram showing an arrangement of apertures 201 of the aperture array and apertures 202 of the focusing lens array, which are determined in advance according to the estimated spherical aberration of the irradiation optical system. As shown in FIG. 17A, the deviation of the irradiation angle of the electron beam by the irradiation optical system can be adjusted by adjusting the spherical aberration by the multi-stage collimator lens. Therefore, even if the estimated spherical aberration of the illumination optical system has an error with respect to the actual spherical aberration, the correction residual caused by the estimation error of the spherical aberration can be obtained by adjusting the spherical aberration of the illumination optical system. The difference can be reduced (compensated). Here, since the opening pattern of FIG. 17B is formed according to the spherical aberration value estimated in advance, the correction residual is usually small. Therefore, such a correction residual can be normally compensated by finely adjusting the spherical aberration of the irradiation optical system.

  FIGS. 17C and 17D show examples of spherical aberration adjustment using a multistage collimator lens. 17 (C) and 17 (D), the positions of the (synthetic) front focal plane 1704 and the (synthetic) front main surface 1705 are constant when the three-stage collimator lens is regarded as one lens. You can see that it is kept. Accordingly, optical characteristics other than the aberration (spherical aberration) of the irradiation optical system, for example, the parallelism and irradiation angle of the electron beam in the paraxial are maintained. In this way, it is possible to adjust the aberration (spherical aberration) of the irradiation optical system while maintaining optical characteristics other than the aberration (spherical aberration), as illustrated in FIGS. 17C and 17D.

[Embodiment 6]
Reducing the residual in the compensation (correction) of the irradiation angle deviation by changing the aperture array of the aperture array and the focusing lens array by adjusting the spherical aberration of the irradiation optical system using a multistage collimator lens is limited to the configuration of the fifth embodiment. It is possible. In the present embodiment, a configuration example in which a multistage collimator lens is applied to the configuration of the fourth embodiment will be described.

  FIG. 18 is a diagram illustrating a configuration of a drawing apparatus according to the sixth embodiment. In the present embodiment, the collimator lens 115 of the fourth embodiment is replaced with a multistage collimator lens 115 similar to that of the fifth embodiment, and the spherical aberration of the irradiation optical system is made variable. Therefore, the difference of the present embodiment from the fourth embodiment is the configuration of the collimator lens 115. Here, the configuration and functions of the multi-stage collimator lens 115 are the same as those of the fifth embodiment. That is, by adjusting the aberration (spherical aberration) while maintaining optical characteristics other than aberration (spherical aberration) using multiple collimator lenses, the correction residual caused by the estimation error of the aberration (spherical aberration) of the irradiation optical system can be reduced. It can be reduced (compensated).

  In the present embodiment, the estimation error of the spherical aberration of the irradiation optical system appears as a positional deviation of the electron beam on the stop aperture array 1303. Therefore, the amount of the estimation error can be obtained, for example, by measuring the amount of electron beam positional deviation (deviation from the target position) on the stop aperture array 1303 with respect to a plurality of different image heights. More specifically, for example, a sensor that detects an electron beam (incident current) disposed on the stage 134 may be used. That is, the positional deviation can be measured by scanning the electron beam on the stop aperture array using the aligner 120 and detecting the electron beam that has passed through the opening of the stop aperture array with the sensor. If this measurement is performed on a plurality of electron beams respectively corresponding to a plurality of different image heights, it is possible to check whether or not there is a correlation of the above-mentioned cubic function related to the image height in the positional deviation amount of the electron beams.

[Embodiment 7]
In the fifth and sixth embodiments, the collimator lens is composed of multistage lenses, and the spherical aberration of the irradiation optical system is adjusted without changing other optical characteristics. In the present embodiment, the amount of change in other optical characteristics is larger than in the configurations of the fifth and sixth embodiments, but the spherical aberration of the irradiation optical system can be adjusted while keeping it within an allowable range. The configuration of this embodiment is the same as that of any of the first, third, and fourth embodiments except for the points described below.

The feature of the present embodiment is that the irradiation distance is adjusted by adjusting the focal length (or power) of the collimator lens 115 and adjusting the position of the crossover 112 formed on the front side of the collimator lens 115 so as to be matched therewith. The spherical aberration of the system is adjusted. Here, by adjusting the power of the collimator lens 115, the dependency of the irradiation optical system on the image height of the spherical aberration can be adjusted. This can be understood from the above-described cubic function representing Δθ. As described above, the angle deviation amount Δθ of the electron beam due to the spherical aberration of the irradiation optical system can be approximately represented by a cubic function of Δθ = Cs (Y / f) ³ + Δf (Y / f). Therefore, the dependence of Δθ on the image height Y can be adjusted by adjusting the focal length f (or power) of the collimator lens 115.

  For example, depending on the configuration of the electron source, such as when the electron emission surface of the cathode is a flat surface, the front side of the collimator lens 115 does not have a crossover (actual crossover) in which electrons are actually focused / diverged, and the virtual Or an imaginary crossover (imaginary crossover) may be formed. In that case, the electrons on the rear side of the collimator lens take a trajectory as if they diverged from the imaginary crossover and were collimated by the collimator lens. Therefore, an optical system behind the collimator lens can be configured with the imaginary crossover as the imaginary object point. Therefore, in such a system that does not have an actual crossover on the front side of the collimator lens 115, the position of the imaginary crossover can be adopted as the position of the crossover 112 in the above adjustment. Here, the crossover (irradiation system crossover) formed by the irradiation optical system at the front side of the collimator lens refers to both the above-described real crossover and imaginary crossover.

  Examples of the adjusting means for adjusting the position of the crossover 112 include a driving means for moving a portion (also referred to as a charged particle source) extending from the cathode electrode to the crossover adjusting optical system, and the potential of the electrodes constituting the crossover adjusting optical system. An adjusting means for adjusting can be employed. FIG. 19 is a diagram for explaining these two means. FIG. 19A shows a state before adjustment. FIG. 19B shows a state in which the position of the crossover is adjusted by the driving means for moving the electron source portion (portion surrounded by a dotted line in the figure). FIG. 19C shows a state in which the position of the crossover is adjusted by adjusting means for adjusting the potential of the electrodes constituting the crossover adjusting optical system. From FIG. 19, it can be seen that the crossover position can be adjusted to the target position (on the target crossover surface 1901) by either the driving means or the adjusting means. Here, as a matter of course, the position of the crossover 112 may be adjusted by combining these two means.

  When the configuration of this embodiment is adopted, it is necessary to consider the influence on the optical system at the subsequent stage. As the influence, for example, the magnification of the rear optical system changes due to the change in the focal length of the collimator lens. The ratio of the magnification change is expressed by f ′ / f using the focal length f before the change and the focal length f ′ after the change. Therefore, when adopting the configuration of the present embodiment, it is provided with a means for compensating for the magnification change of the rear optical system, or the above adjustment is performed in a range in which the magnification change of the rear optical system is allowable, It is preferable to use either of these. Here, as means for compensating for the change in magnification, for example, there is a method by adjusting the diameter of the crossover using a crossover adjusting optical system. However, when the adjustment with the crossover adjustment optical system is performed, the spherical aberration of the crossover adjustment optical system may change. Therefore, the adjustment needs to be performed in consideration of the change. In addition, if the charged particle source employs a configuration that does not include a crossover adjustment optical system, naturally, the magnification change cannot be compensated for by the crossover adjustment optical system. A configuration that does not include a crossover adjusting optical system can be employed to avoid this influence because the Coulomb effect is large in a crossover in a region where the current density is high. In that case, for example, the above-described adjustment may be performed within a range in which a change in magnification of the rear optical system is allowable.

[Embodiment 8]
The method for manufacturing an article according to an embodiment of the present invention is suitable for manufacturing an article such as a microdevice such as a semiconductor device or an element having a fine structure. The manufacturing method includes a step of forming a latent image pattern on the photosensitive agent on the substrate coated with the photosensitive agent using the above drawing apparatus (a step of drawing on the substrate), and the latent image pattern is formed in the step. Developing the substrate. Further, the manufacturing method may include other well-known steps (oxidation, film formation, vapor deposition, doping, planarization, etching, resist stripping, dicing, bonding, packaging, and the like). The method for manufacturing an article according to the present embodiment is advantageous in at least one of the performance, quality, productivity, and production cost of the article as compared with the conventional method.

  As mentioned above, although embodiment of this invention was described, this invention is not limited to these embodiment, A various deformation | transformation and change are possible within the range of the summary. For example, by shifting the aperture of the focusing lens array without shifting the aperture of the aperture array, the position of the crossover formed by the focusing lens array is moved to the aperture (center) of the rear element such as a blanker array or a stop aperture array. You may comprise so that it may match. However, this configuration requires attention because the principal ray of the electron beam incident on the aperture of the element is not parallel to the optical axis. This configuration can be used when, for example, such an angle deviation of the principal ray is allowable or when an optical element that compensates for the angle deviation is added separately.

115 Collimator lens 140 Irradiation optical system (irradiation system)
117 Aperture array 119 Focusing lens array 160 Projection optical system (projection system)

Claims (14)

A drawing apparatus for drawing on a substrate with a plurality of charged particle beams,
An irradiation system including a collimator lens on which a diverging charged particle beam is incident;
An aperture array for dividing the charged particle beam emitted from the irradiation system into a plurality of charged particle beams;
A focusing lens array that forms a plurality of crossovers from a plurality of charged particle beams emitted from the aperture array, and
An element having a plurality of openings corresponding respectively to the plurality of crossovers; and a plurality of projection units provided respectively for the plurality of openings and projecting a plurality of charged particle beams onto the substrate. A projection system,
The focusing lens array includes a focusing lens that is decentered with respect to a corresponding aperture in the element;
The irradiation system is incident on the aperture array at an incident angle depending on the aberration of the irradiation optical system, and each position of the plurality of crossovers formed by the focusing lens array is aligned with a corresponding opening in the element. As described above, the drawing apparatus includes an adjusting means for adjusting the aberration. The collimator lens includes a plurality of charged particle lenses,
The adjusting means adjusts at least one of the power and position of each of the plurality of charged particle lenses so as to change the aberration while maintaining the front focal position and the front principal surface position of the collimator lens. The drawing apparatus according to claim 1. The irradiation system forms a crossover (irradiation system crossover) at a position on the front side of the collimator lens,
The adjusting means adjusts the aberration by adjusting the focal length of the collimator lens, and adjusts the position of the irradiation system crossover so as to match the adjusted focal length. The drawing apparatus according to claim 1. The irradiation system includes a charged particle source,
The drawing apparatus according to claim 3, wherein the adjusting unit adjusts the position of the irradiation system crossover by moving the charged particle source. The irradiation system includes a crossover adjustment system provided on the front side of the irradiation system crossover,
The drawing apparatus according to claim 3, wherein the adjusting unit adjusts a position of the irradiation system crossover by adjusting a power of the crossover adjusting system.   The drawing apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the decentered focusing lens is decentered so as to compensate for the aberration of the irradiation system.   2. The collimator lens according to claim 1, wherein a charged particle beam emanating from a crossover of charged particle beams is incident on the collimator lens, and the crossover is at a position shifted from a front focal point of the collimator lens. The drawing apparatus according to any one of 6.   8. The aperture array according to claim 1, wherein the aperture array includes an aperture that is eccentric with respect to a corresponding aperture in the element along with a corresponding focusing lens in the focusing lens array. 9. Drawing device.   The aperture array includes an aperture disposed at a front focal point of the focusing lens array and decentered with respect to a corresponding aperture in the element by the same amount as a corresponding focusing lens in the focusing lens array. The drawing apparatus according to claim 1.   The aperture array includes an aperture disposed at a position deviated from a front focal point of the focusing lens array and decentered with respect to a corresponding aperture in the element by an amount different from a corresponding focusing lens in the focusing lens array; 9. The drawing apparatus according to claim 1, wherein   11. The drawing apparatus according to claim 1, wherein a plurality of sets including the irradiation optical system, the aperture array, the focusing lens array, and the projection system are provided in parallel.   The drawing device according to claim 1, wherein the element is a blanker array.   The drawing device according to claim 1, wherein the element is a stop aperture array. A step of drawing on a substrate using the drawing apparatus according to any one of claims 1 to 13,
Developing the substrate on which the drawing has been performed in the step;
A method for producing an article comprising:

Images