JP2012211844A - Terminal position determination device and terminal position determination system - Google Patents

Terminal position determination device and terminal position determination system Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP2012211844A
JP2012211844A JP2011077958A JP2011077958A JP2012211844A JP 2012211844 A JP2012211844 A JP 2012211844A JP 2011077958 A JP2011077958 A JP 2011077958A JP 2011077958 A JP2011077958 A JP 2011077958A JP 2012211844 A JP2012211844 A JP 2012211844A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
terminal
reliability
information
vehicle
received
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
JP2011077958A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Inventor
Toshio Ito
敏夫 伊東
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Daihatsu Motor Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Daihatsu Motor Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Daihatsu Motor Co Ltd filed Critical Daihatsu Motor Co Ltd
Priority to JP2011077958A priority Critical patent/JP2012211844A/en
Publication of JP2012211844A publication Critical patent/JP2012211844A/en
Withdrawn legal-status Critical Current

Links

Abstract

PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide a configuration for determining the reliability of positional information using a satellite such as GPS positional information exchanged between terminals via inter-vehicle communication and pedestrian-vehicle communication.SOLUTION: Based on GPS positional information of another terminal received by an inter-vehicle communication part 32 and on the moving speed and travelling direction of the other terminal obtained by an obtainment part 33, an estimation part 34 estimates the existing position of the other terminal at a next clock-time by establishing the existing position of the other terminal on the basis of the GPS positional information as reference; a determination part 35 determines the reliability of the GPS positional information received from the other terminal on the basis of a degree of matching between the estimated position of the other terminal at the next clock-time estimated by the estimation part 34 and that of the other terminal based on GPS positional information received by the inter-vehicle communication part 32 at the next clock-time.

Description

この発明は、車車間通信や歩車間通信で車両や歩行者の端末がやり取りする、衛星を用いた他の端末の存在位置の情報の信頼度を判定する端末位置判定装置および、各端末で構成される端末システム全体の前記存在位置の情報の信頼度を判定する端末位置判定システムに関し、詳しくは、判定精度が向上する新規な構成に関する。   The present invention includes a terminal position determination device that determines the reliability of information on the position of other terminals using satellites, which are exchanged between vehicles and pedestrian terminals in inter-vehicle communication and inter-vehicle communication, and each terminal. The present invention relates to a terminal position determination system that determines the reliability of information on the presence position of the entire terminal system, and more particularly to a novel configuration that improves the determination accuracy.

従来、例えば異なる道路から交差点に進入する車両やその周辺の車両等の一群の車両間において、各車両の車車間通信の端末が、衛星を用いた測位システム、例えば、代表的なGPS(Global Positioning System)の受信位置情報(以下、GPS位置情報という)および走行方向等の情報を端末間でやり取りして互いの車両(他の車両)の挙動を監視し、出会い頭事故の防止等を図る際、各車両の端末において、他の車両の端末から受信したGPS位置情報の信頼度が低く誤った情報であれば、その情報の使用を禁止して各端末が受信する情報の信頼度やシステム全体の信頼度を向上することが提案されている(例えば、特許文献1(段落[0001]−[0005]、[0077]−[0078]、図1、図2、図6、図7等)参照)。   Conventionally, between a group of vehicles such as vehicles entering an intersection from different roads and the surrounding vehicles, a terminal for inter-vehicle communication of each vehicle has been used as a positioning system using a satellite, such as a representative GPS (Global Positioning). (System) received position information (hereinafter referred to as GPS position information) and information such as the direction of travel are exchanged between terminals to monitor the behavior of each other's vehicles (other vehicles), and to prevent encounter accidents, etc. If the reliability of GPS position information received from another vehicle terminal is low and incorrect information at each vehicle terminal, the use of that information is prohibited and the reliability of the information received by each terminal and the overall system It has been proposed to improve the reliability (for example, Patent Document 1 (paragraphs [0001]-[0005], [0077]-[0078], FIG. 1, FIG. 2, 6, 7, etc.) refer).

特開2010−182007号公報JP 2010-182007 A

特許文献1に記載の信頼性判定では、自車両の端末のGPS位置情報の位置と受信した他の車両のGPS位置情報の位置を結んだ直線と、前記他の車両のGPS位置情報の信号(送信フレーム)が到来する方向とのなす角度が、設定値よりも大きく一定以上ずれてると、その位置情報が誤っていると判定しているが、一般に、GPS位置情報自体が比較的大きな位置の誤差を含むため、この誤差を考慮しなければ、判定を誤り、位置情報の信頼度やシステムの信頼度が低下する。   In the reliability determination described in Patent Document 1, a straight line connecting the position of the GPS position information of the terminal of the own vehicle and the position of the received GPS position information of the other vehicle, and a signal of the GPS position information of the other vehicle ( If the angle formed with the direction in which the transmission frame arrives is larger than the set value by a certain amount or more, it is determined that the position information is incorrect, but generally, the GPS position information itself has a relatively large position. Since the error is included, if this error is not taken into consideration, the determination is wrong, and the reliability of the position information and the reliability of the system are lowered.

図10は交差点に異なる方向の道路から進入する2台の車両100、200および、筋違いの道路を走行する車両300の3台が車車間通信可能な範囲に近づき、車両100、200、300の端末間の車車間通信で、それぞれのGPS位置情報をやり取りする場合を示し、この場合、例えば車両100の端末は、他の車両200、300の端末のGPS位置情報を受信するが、その際、例えば他の車両300の端末のGPS位置情報の誤差により、実線の車両300が破線の位置に存在すると誤認識する事態が容易に発生する。なお、他の車両200のGPS位置情報の誤差により、車両200についても、同様に存在位置を誤認識する事態が容易に発生する。また、車両200、300の端末においても、それぞれからみて他の車両100、300(または車両100、200)の端末のGPS位置情報が誤差を含むため、同様に、他の車両の存在位置を誤認する事態が生じる。   FIG. 10 shows that the two vehicles 100 and 200 that enter the intersection from roads in different directions and the vehicle 300 that travels on a different road approach the range where inter-vehicle communication is possible, and the terminals of the vehicles 100, 200, and 300 In this case, the GPS position information is exchanged in the inter-vehicle communication. In this case, for example, the terminal of the vehicle 100 receives the GPS position information of the terminals of the other vehicles 200 and 300. Due to an error in the GPS position information of the terminal of another vehicle 300, a situation in which it is erroneously recognized that the solid vehicle 300 exists at the position of the broken line easily occurs. In addition, due to the error in the GPS position information of the other vehicle 200, a situation in which the existence position of the vehicle 200 is erroneously recognized similarly occurs easily. In addition, in the terminals of the vehicles 200 and 300, the GPS position information of the terminals of the other vehicles 100 and 300 (or the vehicles 100 and 200) includes an error when viewed from the respective terminals. Will happen.

なお、図10の各道路が高層ビル群で囲まれているような場合には、マルチパスが発生し易く、マルチパスが発生すると、各端末のGPS位置情報は急激に異なる誤差(バラツキ)を生じさせることがあり、そのため、他の車両の存在位置を一層誤認し易くなる。   In addition, when each road of FIG. 10 is surrounded by a high-rise building group, multipath is likely to occur, and when a multipath occurs, the GPS position information of each terminal has a different error (variation). For this reason, it is easier to misidentify the location of another vehicle.

これらの場合、GPS位置情報の補正には統計的な手法は適用しにくく、参照信号で補正する周知のDGPS(Differential GPS)や、ナビゲーションシステムのように道路地図データと照合して位置情報を補正するマップマッチング等によりGPS位置情報の位置精度を向上することが考えられるが、全ての車両の端末でDGPSやマップマッチングによって位置情報を補正することは現実的ではなく、車車間通信での端末間の情報のやり取りに適した何らかの情報補正方法が望まれる。また、車車間通信でやり取りされるGPS位置情報がどの程度信頼できるかを判定し、さらには、通信し合っている一群の車両の互いに車車間通信する複数の端末の端末システム全体におけるネットワーク品質を評価するような手法も必要になるものと考えられるが、いずれについても具体的な構成等は何ら発明されていない。   In these cases, it is difficult to apply a statistical method to the correction of the GPS position information, and the position information is corrected by comparing with the well-known DGPS (Differential GPS) that is corrected by a reference signal or road map data like a navigation system. Although it is conceivable to improve the position accuracy of GPS position information by map matching, etc., it is not realistic to correct position information by DGPS or map matching in all vehicle terminals, and between terminals in inter-vehicle communication Any information correction method suitable for the exchange of information is desired. Further, it is determined how reliable the GPS position information exchanged by inter-vehicle communication is, and furthermore, the network quality of the entire terminal system of a plurality of terminals that communicate with each other among a group of vehicles communicating with each other. Although it is considered that a technique for evaluation is necessary, no specific configuration has been invented for any of them.

本発明は、車車間通信や歩車間通信によって端末間でやり取りされるGPS位置情報のような衛星を用いた位置情報の信頼度を判定する構成を提供することを目的とし、さらには、そのような端末システムの各端末および全体の信頼度を判定する構成を提供することも目的とする。   An object of the present invention is to provide a configuration for determining reliability of position information using a satellite such as GPS position information exchanged between terminals by inter-vehicle communication or inter-vehicle communication, and further, Another object of the present invention is to provide a configuration for determining the reliability of each terminal and the entire terminal system.

上記した目的を達成するために、本発明の端末位置判定装置は、衛星を用いて他の端末が検出して送信する前記他の端末の存在位置の情報を受信する受信手段と、前記受信手段が受信した前記他の端末の存在位置の情報の信頼度を判定する判定手段とを備えた端末位置判定装置であって、少なくとも前記他の端末の移動速度および進行方向の情報を取得する取得手段と、前記受信手段が受信した前記他の端末の存在位置を基準にして、前記取得手段が取得した前記他の端末の移動速度および進行方向からつぎの時刻における前記他の端末の存在位置を推定する推定手段とを備え、前記判定手殴は、前記推定手段の前記他の端末の推定位置と、前記受信手段が前記つぎの時刻に受信した前記他の端末の存在位置との一致度に基づき、前記他の端末から前記受信手段が受信する前記他の端末の存在位置の情報の信頼度を判定することを特徴としている(請求項1)。   In order to achieve the above-described object, the terminal position determination apparatus of the present invention includes a receiving unit that receives information on the location of the other terminal that is detected and transmitted by another terminal using a satellite, and the receiving unit. A terminal position determination apparatus including a determination means for determining reliability of the information on the location of the other terminal received by the acquisition means for acquiring at least information on a moving speed and a traveling direction of the other terminal. And the presence position of the other terminal at the next time is estimated from the moving speed and the traveling direction of the other terminal acquired by the acquisition means on the basis of the presence position of the other terminal received by the reception means. And the determining means is based on a degree of coincidence between the estimated position of the other terminal of the estimating means and the existing position of the other terminal received by the receiving means at the next time. The other end Is characterized by determining the reliability of the information locations of said other terminals receiving said receiving means from (claim 1).

また、本発明の端末位置判定装置は、前記つぎの時刻における前記他の端末の推定位置と、前記つぎの時刻に受信した前記他の端末の存在位置とは、それぞれ所定の誤差範囲を有し、前記判定手段は、前記推定位置と前記つぎの時刻に受信した前記他の端末の存在位置との前記誤差範囲の重なり度合いから、前記他の端末の存在位置の情報の信頼度を判定することを特徴としている(請求項2)。   In the terminal position determination apparatus of the present invention, the estimated position of the other terminal at the next time and the presence position of the other terminal received at the next time each have a predetermined error range. The determination means determines the reliability of the information on the location of the other terminal from the degree of overlap of the error range between the estimated location and the location of the other terminal received at the next time. (Claim 2).

さらに、本発明の端末位置判定システムは、端末システムの複数の端末それぞれが、衛星を用いて他の端末が検出して送信する前記他の端末の存在位置の情報を受信する受信手段と、少なくとも前記他の端末の移動速度および進行方向の情報を取得する取得手段と、前記受信手段が受信した前記他の端末の存在位置を基準にして、前記取得手段が取得した前記他の端末の移動速度および進行方向からつぎの時刻における前記他の端末の存在位置を推定する推定手段と、前記推定手段の前記他の端末の推定位置と、前記受信手段が前記つぎの時刻に受信した前記他の端末の存在位置との一致度に基づき、前記他の端末から前記受信手段が受信する前記他の端末の存在位置の情報の信頼度を判定する判定手段とを備え、少なくともいずれかの端末の前記判定手段は、前記各端末が互いの前記判定手段により判定した判定結果から前記端末システムの信頼度を判定することを特徴としている(請求項3)。   Furthermore, the terminal position determination system according to the present invention includes a receiving unit that receives information on the location of the other terminal that each of the plurality of terminals of the terminal system detects and transmits using the satellite. The acquisition means for acquiring the movement speed and traveling direction information of the other terminal, and the movement speed of the other terminal acquired by the acquisition means based on the location of the other terminal received by the reception means And an estimation means for estimating the location of the other terminal at the next time from the traveling direction, the estimated position of the other terminal of the estimation means, and the other terminal received by the reception means at the next time Determination means for determining the reliability of the information on the location of the other terminal received by the receiving unit from the other terminal based on the degree of coincidence with the location of the at least one terminal, The determination means, the respective terminal is characterized in determining the reliability of the terminal system from the judgment result of the judgment by said judging means to each other (claim 3).

請求項1に係る本発明の端末位置判定装置の場合、衛星を用いて他の端末が検出し車車間通信や歩車間通信で送信する存在位置の情報をGPS位置情報とすると、このGPS位置情報を受信手段により受信する。また、前記他の端末から受信したり前記GPS位置情報の時間変化から算出したりして、取得手段により少なくとも前記他の端末の移動速度および進行方向の情報を取得する。   In the case of the terminal position determination apparatus according to the first aspect of the present invention, if the position information that is detected by another terminal using a satellite and transmitted by inter-vehicle communication or inter-vehicle communication is GPS position information, the GPS position information Is received by the receiving means. Also, at least information on the moving speed and the traveling direction of the other terminal is obtained by the obtaining means by receiving from the other terminal or calculating from the time change of the GPS position information.

このとき、GPS位置情報は誤差を含んでいる。そして、受信手段が受信したGPS位置情報に基づく例えば時刻taの前記他の端末の存在位置を基準にして、前記取得手段が取得した前記他の端末の移動速度および進行方向から推定手段が推定するつぎの時刻tbの前記他の端末の存在位置は、GPS位置情報の誤差に応じて、時刻t2に受信手段が受信する前記他の端末のGPS位置情報の存在位置からずれ、このずれが受信したGPS位置情報の信頼度を示す。   At this time, the GPS position information includes an error. Based on the GPS position information received by the receiving means, for example, the estimating means estimates from the moving speed and the traveling direction of the other terminals acquired by the acquiring means with reference to the location of the other terminals at time ta, for example. The presence position of the other terminal at the next time tb is deviated from the existence position of the GPS position information of the other terminal received by the receiving means at time t2 according to the error of the GPS position information. The reliability of GPS position information is shown.

そこで、判定手段により、時刻taのGPS位置情報に基づいて推定手段が推定した前記他の端末の推定位置と、受信手段が時刻tbに受信したGPS位置情報に基づく前記他の端末の存在位置との一致度に基づいて、前記他の端末から受信手段が受信するGPS位置情報の信頼度を判定することができる。また、このような判定によりGPS位置情報の信頼度を判定できるのでコストも抑制できる。   Therefore, the determination means estimates the position of the other terminal estimated by the estimation means based on the GPS position information at time ta, and the presence position of the other terminal based on the GPS position information received by the reception means at time tb. The reliability of the GPS position information received by the receiving means from the other terminal can be determined based on the degree of coincidence. Moreover, since the reliability of GPS position information can be determined by such determination, the cost can be suppressed.

請求項2に係る本発明の端末位置判定装置の場合、例えば前記した時刻taのGPS位置情報に基づいて推定手段が推定した前記他の端末の推定位置と、受信手段が時刻tbに受信したGPS位置情報に基づく前記他の端末の存在位置とは、それぞれGPS位置情報の誤差を含み、それぞれ所定の誤差範囲を有する。そして、両存在位置の前記誤差範囲の円の位置が両存在位置に応じてずれるため、判定推断により、両存在位置の前記誤差範囲の円の重なり度合いから、受信したGPS位置情報の信頼度を判定する。   In the case of the terminal position determination device of the present invention according to claim 2, for example, the estimated position of the other terminal estimated by the estimating means based on the GPS position information at the time ta described above, and the GPS received by the receiving means at the time tb The presence positions of the other terminals based on the position information each include an error of GPS position information, and each has a predetermined error range. Then, since the positions of the circles in the error range at both the existence positions are shifted according to the both existence positions, the reliability of the received GPS position information is determined based on the degree of overlap of the circles in the error ranges at the both existence positions by judgment estimation. judge.

この場合、一層具体的で実用的な構成で受信したGPS位置情報の信頼度を判定することができる。   In this case, the reliability of GPS position information received with a more specific and practical configuration can be determined.

請求項3に係る本発明の端末位置判定システムの場合、例えば異なる方向から交差点に進入する複数の車両や歩行者それぞれが備えて相互に車車間通信や歩車間通信を行う複数の端末が構築する端末システムにおいて、各端末が前記した請求項1の構成の端末位置判定を備え、少なくともいずれかの端末の判定手段により、各端末が互いの判定手段により判定した判定結果から端末システムの信頼度を判定し、その結果をやり取りすることにより、相互ネットワーク診断を応用した手法で各端末が他の端末を相互診断し、端末システムの各端末の信頼度および全体の信頼度を判定して把握することができる。   In the case of the terminal position determination system according to the third aspect of the present invention, for example, a plurality of terminals that each have a plurality of vehicles and pedestrians entering the intersection from different directions and perform inter-vehicle communication and inter-pedestrian communication are constructed. In the terminal system, each terminal includes the terminal position determination of the configuration of claim 1 described above, and the reliability of the terminal system is determined from the determination result determined by each terminal by the determination means of each terminal by the determination means of at least one of the terminals. By judging and exchanging the results, each terminal mutually diagnoses other terminals using a technique that applies mutual network diagnosis, and determines and grasps the reliability and overall reliability of each terminal in the terminal system Can do.

本発明の一実施形態の端末位置判定システムの概略の模式図である。It is a schematic diagram of the outline of the terminal position determination system of one embodiment of the present invention. 免疫ネットワークの相互診断の説明図である。It is explanatory drawing of the mutual diagnosis of an immune network. 図1の車両の存在位置の推定の説明図である。It is explanatory drawing of estimation of the presence position of the vehicle of FIG. 図1の端末が備える端末位置判定装置のブロック図である。It is a block diagram of the terminal position determination apparatus with which the terminal of FIG. 1 is provided. 実験例の各車両のGPS位置情報の測定結果の位置の時間変化である。It is a time change of the position of the measurement result of GPS position information of each vehicle of an example of an experiment. 図5の各車両の評価値Tijの計算結果である。It is a calculation result of evaluation value Tij of each vehicle of FIG. 図6の評価値Tijに基づく信頼度Ri(t)の計算結果である。FIG. 7 is a calculation result of reliability Ri (t) based on the evaluation value Tij in FIG. 6. 図7の信頼度Ri(t)に基づく端末ネットワーク全体の信頼度Rの計算結果である。It is a calculation result of the reliability R of the whole terminal network based on the reliability Ri (t) of FIG. 図7の信頼度Ri(t)に基づく端末ネットワーク全体の評価値Tijの合計の計算結果である。FIG. 8 is a calculation result of the total evaluation value Tij of the entire terminal network based on the reliability Ri (t) in FIG. 7. GPS位置情報に基づく存在位置の誤差の説明図である。It is explanatory drawing of the error of a presence position based on GPS position information.

つぎに、本発明をより詳細に説明するため、一実施形態について、図1〜図10を参照して詳述する。   Next, in order to describe the present invention in more detail, an embodiment will be described in detail with reference to FIGS.

図1は本実施形態の端末位置判定システムの概略の構成を示す。本システムの場合、例えば交差点αに異なる方向の道路βから進入する複数台の車両1は車車間通信の端末2を搭載し、少なくとも車車間通信で互いにGPS位置情報等をやりとりして端末システムを形成する。また、各端末2の全てまたは一部は後述する端末位置判定装置3を備え、相互ネットワーク診断を応用した手法で端末2間を相互診断し、端末システムの各端末2の信頼度および全体の信頼度をそれぞれが判定する。   FIG. 1 shows a schematic configuration of a terminal position determination system according to the present embodiment. In the case of this system, for example, a plurality of vehicles 1 entering the intersection α from roads β in different directions are equipped with a terminal 2 for inter-vehicle communication, and at least exchanges GPS position information and the like by inter-vehicle communication. Form. In addition, all or a part of each terminal 2 includes a terminal position determination device 3 which will be described later, and performs mutual diagnosis between terminals 2 by a technique applying mutual network diagnosis, and the reliability and overall reliability of each terminal 2 in the terminal system. Each determines the degree.

ところで、車車間通信のシステムで構成されるネットワークは、どの車両といつ出会うかわからないため、一種のアドホックネットワークと見なすことができる。   By the way, the network configured by the inter-vehicle communication system can be regarded as a kind of ad hoc network because it does not know when to meet which vehicle.

生体における免疫ネットワークとは、アドホックに出会う抗原と抗体間の反応が周辺に広がっていく様子をモデル化したものであり、アドホックネットワークの一例といえる。この免疫ネットワークの考え方を応用したものが、相互診断ネットワークである。免疫系の抗体が抗原を認識し、その状況を他の抗体に伝達する状況を、相互に接続されるユニット同士が相互に診断しあうことに対応付けた考え方である。   An immune network in a living body is a model of how the reaction between an antigen and an antibody that meet ad hoc spreads to the periphery, and is an example of an ad hoc network. An application of this concept of immune network is the mutual diagnosis network. This is a concept that associates the situation in which mutually connected units mutually diagnose the situation in which an antibody of the immune system recognizes an antigen and transmits the situation to another antibody.

そして、抗原と抗体をユニットと見なしてネットワークを構成している場合、初期状態では、どのユニットが抗原でどのユニットが抗体かわからない。ここで、各ユニットは互いに他を独立にテストでき、ユニットUiがユニットUjをテストしたときの評価値Tijについては、つぎの数1の式(1)で示される。   When a network is configured by regarding antigens and antibodies as units, it is unknown in the initial state which unit is the antigen and which unit is the antibody. Here, each unit can test each other independently, and the evaluation value Tij when the unit Ui tests the unit Uj is expressed by the following equation (1).

(1)式は、ユニットUi が正常な場合(ユニットUiが抗体)、相手を正しく評価でき、ユニットUiが異常な場合(Uiが抗原)はなんらかの評価をするが、その値は正しいかどうか分からないことを示している。各々のユニットで単純に評価値を集計しただけでは、どのユニットが異常か判断はできない。そこで、このネットワークに例えばつぎの数2の式(2)、数3の式(3)のようなダイナミクスを与えることによって、どのユニットが異常であるが検出可能となる。   Equation (1) shows that if the unit Ui is normal (unit Ui is an antibody), the other party can be correctly evaluated. If the unit Ui is abnormal (Ui is an antigen), some evaluation is performed. It shows no. It is not possible to determine which unit is abnormal by simply counting the evaluation values for each unit. Therefore, by giving dynamics such as the following Equation (2) and Equation (3) of Equation 3 to this network, it becomes possible to detect which unit is abnormal.

ここでRi(t)は時刻tにおけるユニットUiの信頼度、ri(t)はその中間変数、TijはUiがUjをテストした評価値、βは診断調整量であり診断の厳しさを表す。   Here, Ri (t) is the reliability of the unit Ui at time t, ri (t) is an intermediate variable thereof, Tij is an evaluation value obtained by Ui testing Uj, and β is a diagnostic adjustment amount, which represents the severity of diagnosis.

式(2)、式(3)はネットワークを収束させるための更新式であり、一般に更新中は評価値Tijを一定とする。また、評価値Tijは最も整合している時は1を、全く整合しないときは−1をとり、通常はその間の連続値をとる。式(3)はシグモイド関数である。これはHopfield型ニューラルネットワークのダイナミクスの変形であり、ネットワークは収束することが知られている。また、このダイナミクスは、「Rjの大きなモジュールから高く評価され、またRjの大きなモジュールを高く評価できるときに自己のRiが増す」という自然な診断を与える。   Expressions (2) and (3) are update expressions for converging the network, and generally the evaluation value Tij is constant during the update. Further, the evaluation value Tij is 1 when it is most consistent, -1 when it is not consistent at all, and normally takes a continuous value therebetween. Equation (3) is a sigmoid function. This is a modification of the dynamics of the Hopfield type neural network, and the network is known to converge. In addition, this dynamics gives a natural diagnosis that “Ri is highly evaluated from a module having a large Rj, and that Ri is increased when a module having a large Rj can be highly evaluated”.

そして、簡単のため、ユニットが相手を正常であると診断したときの評価値Tijを1、異常であると診断したときの評価値Tijを−1とすると、初めは全ユニットが正常と仮定して、信頼度Ri(t)をつぎの数4の式(4)に示すように1.0と仮定する。   For the sake of simplicity, assuming that the evaluation value Tij when the unit diagnoses the other party as normal and the evaluation value Tij when the unit diagnoses as abnormal is −1, it is assumed that all units are normal at first. The reliability Ri (t) is assumed to be 1.0 as shown in the following equation (4).

その上で、上記のダイナミクスに基づいた相互診断により評価をくり返して、ネットワークが収束したときに最終的に信頼度の低下しているユニットを異常なユニットと判断する。   Then, the evaluation is repeated by mutual diagnosis based on the above dynamics, and when the network converges, the unit whose reliability is finally lowered is determined as an abnormal unit.

図2は5つのユニットU1、U2、U3、U4、U5の上記相互診断による評価値Tijのやり取りの例を示す。   FIG. 2 shows an example of the exchange of evaluation values Tij by the above mutual diagnosis of five units U1, U2, U3, U4, and U5.

以上が一般的なセンサの分散的な故障診断を行う手法であるが、この手法はすべてのセンサが並列で等価な関係を持っていることが前提である。したがって、この手法を本発明のような車車間通信や歩車間通信で情報をやり取りする端末システムのGPS位置情報の信頼度の判定に適用するには、テスト方法の記述や診断結果の扱いが重要となる。   The above is a general method for performing distributed fault diagnosis of sensors. This method is based on the premise that all sensors have an equivalent relationship in parallel. Therefore, in order to apply this method to the determination of the reliability of the GPS position information of a terminal system that exchanges information by inter-vehicle communication and inter-vehicle communication as in the present invention, it is important to describe the test method and handle the diagnostic results. It becomes.

そして、本実施形態のような車車通信を行う端末システムにおいて、通信により端末2間で相互に交換する情報は、受信したGPS位置情報による車両(自車両)1の現在の位置、車速(本発明の移動速度)、進行方向(移動方向)とする。GPS位置情報による現在の位置は緯度と経度、進行方向はその車両1が過去のGPS位置情報や舵角から自車の進行方向を推定したデータである。なお、車速や進行方向は、簡易には、車車間通信でGPS位置情報をやり取りすれば、その時間微分や積分から求めて取得することも可能である。   And in the terminal system which performs vehicle communication like this embodiment, the information mutually exchanged between the terminals 2 by communication is the current position of the vehicle (own vehicle) 1 based on the received GPS position information, the vehicle speed (this The moving speed of the invention) and the traveling direction (moving direction). The current position based on the GPS position information is latitude and longitude, and the traveling direction is data obtained by estimating the traveling direction of the vehicle 1 from the past GPS position information and the steering angle. Note that the vehicle speed and the traveling direction can be obtained and obtained from time differentiation or integration simply by exchanging GPS position information by inter-vehicle communication.

この前提に基づき、車車間通信する端末ネットワークに適用した場合の本発明によるGPS位置情報の信頼度の判定をつぎに説明する。   Based on this premise, the determination of the reliability of the GPS position information according to the present invention when applied to a terminal network for inter-vehicle communication will be described below.

図3は説明を簡単にするため、前後する車両V1と車両V2が車車間通信をして同方向に走行している状況を示す。この状況下、時刻t1のときに車両V2の端末(図示せず)から車両V1の端末(図示せず)に送信したGPS位置情報の現在位置にはGPSの誤差が含まれる。そこで、車両V2の端末位置判定装置(図示せず)において、その時点でのGPS位置情報の位置psを中心にしてGPS誤差を加えた位置psの所定の誤差範囲の存在可能円Csを求める。所定の誤差範囲はGPSの誤差を考慮して予め設定されるか、GPS位置情報とともに受信するDOP(精度低下率)情報に基づいてその都度設定される。また、時刻t1の存在可能円Csに、例えば車両V2から送られたその時点の車速と進行方向から合成された移動ベクトルにより予想されるつぎの時刻(受信時刻)t2での車両V2の端末の位置piを中心とする予想存在可能円Ciを求める。つぎに、時刻t2に実際に車両V2の端末から送られてきたGPS位置情報の位置pjを中心として存在可能円Csと同様の存在可能円Cjを求める。そして、時刻t2の車両V1の端末2の位置(車両V1の位置)について、車両V2の端末位置判定装置3により、予想存在可能円位置Ciと実際の存在可能円位置Cjとの前記誤差範囲の重なりから、位置piと位置jとの一致度を把握して車両V2の端末(本発明の他の端末)のGPS位置情報の信頼度Rを、つぎの数5の式(5)の評価値Tijで定義して判定する。なお、図3の斜線の重なりの範囲が時刻t2における車両V2の端末の存在位置の範囲である。   FIG. 3 shows a situation in which the front and rear vehicles V1 and V2 are traveling in the same direction through inter-vehicle communication for the sake of simplicity. Under this circumstance, the current position of the GPS position information transmitted from the terminal (not shown) of the vehicle V2 to the terminal (not shown) of the vehicle V1 at time t1 includes a GPS error. Therefore, a terminal position determination device (not shown) of the vehicle V2 obtains a possible circle Cs within a predetermined error range of the position ps obtained by adding a GPS error around the position ps of the GPS position information at that time. The predetermined error range is set in advance in consideration of the GPS error, or is set each time based on DOP (precision reduction rate) information received together with the GPS position information. Further, the terminal of the vehicle V2 at the next time (reception time) t2 predicted from the movement vector synthesized from the vehicle speed and the traveling direction of the vehicle V2 sent to the possible circle Cs at the time t1, for example. An expected existence possible circle Ci centered on the position pi is obtained. Next, an existable circle Cj similar to the existable circle Cs around the position pj of the GPS position information actually sent from the terminal of the vehicle V2 at time t2 is obtained. Then, with respect to the position of the terminal 2 of the vehicle V1 at time t2 (the position of the vehicle V1), the terminal position determination device 3 of the vehicle V2 determines the error range between the predicted possible circle position Ci and the actual possible circle position Cj. From the overlap, the degree of coincidence between the position pi and the position j is grasped, and the reliability R of the GPS position information of the terminal of the vehicle V2 (the other terminal of the present invention) is calculated as an evaluation value of the following expression (5) Define and determine with Tij. 3 is the range of the position where the terminal of the vehicle V2 exists at time t2.

式(5)において、xijは予想存在可能円Ciと存在可能円jの位置との距離、rは円Ci、Cjの半径である。この式(5)は、予想存在可能円Ciの位置と存在可能円Cjの位置が合致すれば情報が正しい(完全に信頼できる)と判定し、両円Ci、Cjの位置pi、pjが離れるにつれ信頼度が低下し、両円Ci、Cjが接しない程離れてしまうと情報が誤り(全く信頼できない)と判定することを意味する。   In Expression (5), xij is the distance between the expected existence circle Ci and the position of the existence circle j, and r is the radius of the circles Ci and Cj. This expression (5) determines that the information is correct (completely reliable) if the position of the expected existence circle Ci matches the position of the existence circle Cj, and the positions pi and pj of both the circles Ci and Cj are separated. As the reliability decreases, the circles Ci and Cj are so far apart that they do not touch each other, meaning that the information is determined to be erroneous (not reliable at all).

そして、式(5)の関係を複数の車両1の端末システムで形成される車車間通信網に適用し、式(5)の評価値TijからGPS位置情報の信頼度Ri(t)を判定する場合、各車両1をV1、V2、…、Vn、それらの端末の各時刻のGPS位置情報の信頼度Ri(t)をR1、R2、…,Rnとすると、信頼度R1、R2、…,Rnにより他の車両V1、V2、…、Vnの端末のGPS位置情報の信頼度Ri(t)を判定することができ、さらに、各端末が判定した決定した信頼度Ri(t)を互いにやり取りすることで、得られた信頼度R(i)の多数決原理により、端末システム全体の自車両も含む各車両の端末のGPS位置情報の信頼度Ri(t)の順を決定し、端末システム全体の信頼度Rをつぎの数6の式(6)から判定することができる。   And the relationship of Formula (5) is applied to the inter-vehicle communication network formed by the terminal systems of the plurality of vehicles 1, and the reliability Ri (t) of the GPS position information is determined from the evaluation value Tij of Formula (5). , Vn, and the reliability Ri (t) of the GPS position information at each time of those terminals is R1, R2,..., Rn, the reliability R1, R2,. Rn can determine the reliability Ri (t) of the GPS position information of the terminals of the other vehicles V1, V2,..., Vn, and exchanges the determined reliability Ri (t) determined by each terminal with each other. Thus, the order of the reliability Ri (t) of the GPS position information of the terminal of each vehicle including the host vehicle of the entire terminal system is determined based on the majority rule of the obtained reliability R (i), and the entire terminal system Is determined from the following equation (6). Door can be.

そして、式(6)から、ネットワーク全体がどのような状態にあるかを推定することも可能となる。   Then, from the equation (6), it is possible to estimate the state of the entire network.

図4は図1の端末2が備える端末位置判定装置3の概略の構成を示し、31はGPS測位システムのGPS受信部であり、GPS位置情報および関連するDOP(精度低下率)情報等を受信して出力する。32は周辺の他の各車両(以下、単に他の車両という)の端末2と車車間通信(無線通信)で情報をやり取りする車車間通信部であり、本発明の受信手段を形成する。そして、本実施形態の場合、端末位置判定装置3を備えるか否かに関わらず、他の車両1の端末2から、少なくとも、他の端末2が受信した存在位置の情報としてのGPS位置情報およびその関連情報、その車両1の端末(他の端末)2の移動速度すなわち車速、走行方向の情報を、車車間通信部32が受信する。なお、車速は例えば車速センサから得られ、走行方向は例えば舵角センサから得られるが、より簡単には前記したように車速はGPS位置情報の時間微分、走行方向はGPS位置情報の時間積分の走行軌跡の方向から得ることも可能である。   FIG. 4 shows a schematic configuration of the terminal position determination device 3 provided in the terminal 2 of FIG. 1, and 31 is a GPS receiver of the GPS positioning system, which receives GPS position information and related DOP (precision reduction rate) information and the like. And output. Reference numeral 32 denotes a vehicle-to-vehicle communication unit that exchanges information with the terminal 2 of each other nearby vehicle (hereinafter simply referred to as another vehicle) through vehicle-to-vehicle communication (wireless communication), and forms the receiving means of the present invention. In the case of the present embodiment, regardless of whether or not the terminal position determination device 3 is provided, at least GPS position information as information on the existing position received by the other terminal 2 from the terminal 2 of the other vehicle 1 and The inter-vehicle communication unit 32 receives the related information and information on the moving speed of the terminal (other terminal) 2 of the vehicle 1, that is, the vehicle speed and the traveling direction. The vehicle speed is obtained from, for example, a vehicle speed sensor, and the traveling direction is obtained from, for example, a rudder angle sensor. More simply, as described above, the vehicle speed is a time derivative of GPS position information, and the traveling direction is a time integral of GPS position information. It is also possible to obtain from the direction of the travel locus.

33は本発明の取得手段を形成する取得部であり、本実施形態の場合、車車間通信部32が受信した前記他の端末の移動速度である車速および進行方向の情報を取り込む。   Reference numeral 33 denotes an acquisition unit that forms acquisition means of the present invention. In the present embodiment, the vehicle speed and traveling direction information that is the moving speed of the other terminal received by the inter-vehicle communication unit 32 is captured.

34は本発明の推定手段を形成する推定部であり、例えば図3で説明した予想存在可能円Ci、存在可能円Cjから、時刻t1に車車間受信部32が受信した他の端末のGPS位置情報の存在位置を基準にして、取得部33が取得した他の端末の移動速度および進行方向からつぎの時刻t2における他の端末2の存在位置を推定する。なお、簡単には予想存在可能円Ci、存在可能円Cjの位置(存在位置)pi、pjから時刻t2における自端末の存在位置を推定してもよい。   34 is an estimation unit that forms the estimation means of the present invention. For example, the GPS position of another terminal received by the inter-vehicle reception unit 32 at time t1 from the predicted existence possible circle Ci and the existence possible circle Cj described in FIG. Based on the information existing position, the existing position of the other terminal 2 at the next time t2 is estimated from the moving speed and the traveling direction of the other terminal acquired by the acquiring unit 33. In addition, the presence position of the terminal at time t2 may be estimated from the positions (presence positions) pi and pj of the predicted existence circle Ci and the existence circle Cj.

35は本発明の判定手段を形成する判定部であり、例えば予想存在可能円Ci、存在可能円Cjの重なり度合いから、推定部34の時刻t2の他の端末の推定位置piと、車車間通信部32が時刻t2に受信した他の端末の存在位置pjとの一致度および、推定部34の時刻t2の自端末の推定位置piと、GPS受信部31が時刻t2に受信した自端末の存在位置pjとの一致度に基づき、端末システムの他の端末2の存在位置の情報の評価値Tijを求めて各端末2の信頼度Ri(t)を判定する。さらに、判定部35は判定結果の信頼度Ri(t)を車車間通信部32を介して他の端末2とやり取りし、自車両の端末2を含む全部または一部の端末2からの端末システム全体の各端末2の相互診断結果の信頼度Ri(t)を得、端末2毎に他の端末2から判定された信頼度(t)を総合し、その多数決原理の処理により、各端末の信頼度Ri(t)の順を決定するとともに、式(6)からシステム全体の信頼度Rを決定する。   Reference numeral 35 denotes a determination unit that forms the determination means of the present invention. For example, the estimated position pi of the other terminal at time t2 of the estimation unit 34 and the inter-vehicle communication based on the degree of overlap between the possible existence circle Ci and the existence possible circle Cj. The degree of coincidence with the existing position pj of the other terminal received by the unit 32 at time t2, the estimated position pi of the own terminal at time t2 of the estimating unit 34, and the presence of the own terminal received by the GPS receiving unit 31 at time t2 Based on the degree of coincidence with the position pj, the evaluation value Tij of the information on the existing position of the other terminal 2 of the terminal system is obtained, and the reliability Ri (t) of each terminal 2 is determined. Further, the determination unit 35 exchanges the reliability Ri (t) of the determination result with another terminal 2 via the inter-vehicle communication unit 32, and a terminal system from all or some of the terminals 2 including the terminal 2 of the own vehicle. The reliability Ri (t) of the mutual diagnosis result of each terminal 2 as a whole is obtained, the reliability (t) determined from the other terminals 2 is integrated for each terminal 2, and the process of the majority rule The order of the reliability Ri (t) is determined, and the reliability R of the entire system is determined from the equation (6).

36は車速の情報を出力する車速センサおよび走行方向の情報を出力する舵角センサを有する車両1のセンサ部であり、少なくともそれらの情報がGPS受信部31のGPS位置情報とともに短い周期で車車間通信部32から送信される。   Reference numeral 36 denotes a sensor unit of the vehicle 1 having a vehicle speed sensor that outputs vehicle speed information and a rudder angle sensor that outputs travel direction information, and at least such information together with the GPS position information of the GPS receiving unit 31 in a short cycle. It is transmitted from the communication unit 32.

そして、判定部3により、算出した評価値Tijに基づく他の端末2の信頼度Ri(t)の演算から、他の端末2が送信するGPS位置情報の信頼度Ri(t)を判定することができる。また、判定結果の各信頼度Ri(t)を他の端末2と互いにやりとりすることから、端末システム全体について、各端末2が送信するGPS位置情報の信頼度の順を決定してどの端末2が送信するGPS位置情報の信頼度Ri(t)が低いのかを把握することができる。さらに、車車間通信する端末システム全体の信頼度Rを把握することもできる。   Then, the determination unit 3 determines the reliability Ri (t) of the GPS position information transmitted by the other terminal 2 from the calculation of the reliability Ri (t) of the other terminal 2 based on the calculated evaluation value Tij. Can do. Further, since each reliability Ri (t) of the determination result is exchanged with the other terminals 2, the order of the reliability of the GPS position information transmitted from each terminal 2 is determined for each terminal 2 to determine which terminal 2 It is possible to grasp whether the reliability Ri (t) of the GPS position information transmitted by is low. Furthermore, the reliability R of the whole terminal system that communicates between vehicles can also be grasped.

したがって、端末システムの端末位置判定装置3を備えた端末2を搭載した車両1は、それぞれ上記の信頼度Ri(t)、Rを把握することができ、全ての車両1が端末位置判定装置3を備えた端末2を搭載すれば、システムの全ての車両1が信頼度Ri(t)、Rを把握することができる。   Therefore, the vehicle 1 equipped with the terminal 2 equipped with the terminal position determination device 3 of the terminal system can grasp the reliability Ri (t) and R, respectively, and all the vehicles 1 are connected to the terminal position determination device 3. If the terminal 2 provided with is installed, all the vehicles 1 of the system can grasp the reliability Ri (t), R.

(実験結果)
実験結果として、車車間通信で構成された車群の情報の通信状態を推定した結果を説明する。
(Experimental result)
As an experimental result, the result of estimating the communication state of the information of the vehicle group configured by inter-vehicle communication will be described.

まず、実験においては、端末位置判定装置3の各部31〜35の処理は、実際には各部31〜35を形成するマイクロコンピュータのソフトウエア処理で行なわれ、信頼度Ri(t)、Rの計算は他の端末2から必要な情報が得られてからの処理であって、車車間通信等には依存しないものであることから、各車両1のGPS位置情報、車速、進行方向のデータが収集された後、それら各データを端末位置判定装置3でオフライン処理して検証した。   First, in the experiment, the processing of each unit 31 to 35 of the terminal position determination device 3 is actually performed by software processing of a microcomputer that forms each unit 31 to 35, and the reliability Ri (t) and R are calculated. Is processing after necessary information is obtained from the other terminal 2 and does not depend on inter-vehicle communication or the like. Therefore, GPS position information, vehicle speed, and traveling direction data of each vehicle 1 are collected. After that, each of the data was processed offline by the terminal position determination device 3 and verified.

図5は各車両1として、交差点に進入して来る3台の車両V1、V2、V3のGPS位置情報の測定結果の位置の時間変化を示す。交差点付近は高層ビルの谷間となり、とくに車両V3のGPS位置情報の位置はマルチパスの影響を受けている。   FIG. 5 shows temporal changes in the positions of the measurement results of the GPS position information of the three vehicles V1, V2, and V3 entering the intersection as each vehicle 1. Near the intersection is a valley of a high-rise building, and in particular, the position of the GPS position information of the vehicle V3 is affected by multipath.

この3台の車両V1、V2、V3の端末2において、評価値Tijを計算した結果を図6に示す。この場合、原理的に他の車両からの評価の評価値Tijは同じ値となるため、3台の車両V1、V2、V3の端末2の場合、車両V1、V2が得る車両V3の評価値TijをT13、T23、車両V2、V3が得る車両V1の評価値TijをT21、T31、車両V1、V3が得る車両V2の評価値TijをT12、T32とすると、T21とT31、T21とT31、T12とT32は同じ評価値Tijとなるので、評価値Tijとして図6の3種類Ta、Tb、Tcが生成される。TaはT13、T23、TbはT21、T31、TcはT12、T3であり、22秒経過時に車両V3のGPS位置情報はマルチパスで急激に乱れ、評価値を一気に下げている。   FIG. 6 shows the result of calculating the evaluation value Tij in the terminals 2 of the three vehicles V1, V2, and V3. In this case, in principle, the evaluation value Tij of the evaluation from the other vehicle is the same value, and therefore, in the case of the terminal 2 of the three vehicles V1, V2, and V3, the evaluation value Tij of the vehicle V3 obtained by the vehicles V1 and V2 Is T13, T23, and the evaluation value Tij of the vehicle V1 obtained by the vehicles V2, V3 is T21, T31, and the evaluation value Tij of the vehicle V2 obtained by the vehicles V1, V3 is T12, T32. And T32 have the same evaluation value Tij, the three types Ta, Tb, and Tc in FIG. 6 are generated as the evaluation value Tij. Ta is T13, T23, Tb is T21, T31, Tc is T12, T3. When 22 seconds elapse, the GPS position information of the vehicle V3 is rapidly disturbed by multipath, and the evaluation value is lowered at a stretch.

この評価値Ta、Tb、Tcを用いて各車両V1〜V3の端末の信頼度Ri(t)を計算した一例を図7に示す。図中のR1が車両V1の端末の信頼度Ri(t)、R2が車両V2の端末の信頼度Ri(t)、R3が車両V3の端末の信頼度Ri(t)であり、車両V1〜V3の信頼度R1、R2、R3は初期値1.0から開始し、22秒経過時に信頼度R3が一気に下がっている。これは車両V3のGPS位置情報が急激に乱れたことに対応しており、この結果からも、本発明の手法による位置情報の信頼度の判定結果は妥当なものと思われる。   FIG. 7 shows an example in which the reliability Ri (t) of the terminals of the vehicles V1 to V3 is calculated using the evaluation values Ta, Tb, and Tc. In the figure, R1 is the reliability Ri (t) of the terminal of the vehicle V1, R2 is the reliability Ri (t) of the terminal of the vehicle V2, and R3 is the reliability Ri (t) of the terminal of the vehicle V3. The reliability R1, R2, and R3 of V3 starts from an initial value of 1.0, and the reliability R3 decreases at a stroke when 22 seconds elapse. This corresponds to a sudden disturbance in the GPS position information of the vehicle V3. From this result, it is considered that the determination result of the reliability of the position information by the method of the present invention is appropriate.

さらに、図8は3台の車両V1〜V3の端末で構成される端末ネットワークの状態を見るため、式(6)で定義した端末ネットワーク全体の信頼度Rの時間変化R*を示す。この変化からも22秒経過後のR3の信頼度低下の影響がわかる。また、図9のT*は各車両V1〜V3の評価値Tijの合計を示す。図9からも図8と同様な傾向が読み取られる。これは車両台数が3台と少なく、各評価値Tjiの変動が全体に影響するからである。よって、車両台数が少ない場合は、信頼度Ri(t)の変わりに直接、評価値Tijを合計してネットワーク全体の信頼度の状況とすることも可能である。   Further, FIG. 8 shows a time change R * of the reliability R of the entire terminal network defined by the equation (6) in order to see the state of the terminal network composed of the terminals of the three vehicles V1 to V3. This change also shows the influence of the decrease in the reliability of R3 after 22 seconds. Further, T * in FIG. 9 indicates the sum of the evaluation values Tij of the vehicles V1 to V3. The same tendency as in FIG. 8 is read from FIG. This is because the number of vehicles is as small as three, and the variation of each evaluation value Tji affects the whole. Therefore, when the number of vehicles is small, it is possible to directly add the evaluation values Tij instead of the reliability Ri (t) to obtain the reliability status of the entire network.

以上説明したように、本実施形態の場合、車車間通信でGPS位置情報をやり取りする車両1の端末2は、端末位置判定装置3を備えることにより、他の端末2のGPS位置情報の信頼度Ri(t)および端末システム全体の信頼度Rを把握することができる。また、どの端末2が送信するGPS位置情報の信頼度Ri(t)が低いのかを把握することもできる。   As described above, in the case of the present embodiment, the terminal 2 of the vehicle 1 that exchanges the GPS position information by inter-vehicle communication includes the terminal position determination device 3, and thus the reliability of the GPS position information of the other terminals 2. Ri (t) and the reliability R of the entire terminal system can be grasped. It is also possible to determine which terminal 2 transmits the GPS position information having a low reliability Ri (t).

そして、本発明は上記した実施形態に限定されるものではなく、その趣旨を逸脱しない限りにおいて上述したもの以外に種々の変更を行うことが可能であり、例えば、前記実施形態においては、車車間通信を行なう車両1の端末2のみの端末システムに適用したが、端末位置判定装置3の車車間通信部32を歩車間通信部に置き換えた構成の端末位置判定装置を歩行者が携行することにより、車両1の端末2と歩行者の端末とで歩車間通信を行なう端末システムにも本発明を同様に適用できる。この場合、歩行者の端末位置判定装置は受信したGPS位置情報とともに、例えばジャイロで得られた歩行速度や移動方向の情報を送信すればよい。   The present invention is not limited to the above-described embodiment, and various modifications other than those described above can be made without departing from the spirit thereof. Although it applied to the terminal system of only the terminal 2 of the vehicle 1 which communicates, when a pedestrian carries the terminal position determination apparatus of the structure which replaced the inter-vehicle communication part 32 of the terminal position determination apparatus 3 with the inter-vehicle communication part. The present invention can be similarly applied to a terminal system that performs inter-vehicle communication between the terminal 2 of the vehicle 1 and the terminal of the pedestrian. In this case, the pedestrian's terminal position determination device may transmit, for example, information on the walking speed and moving direction obtained by a gyro together with the received GPS position information.

また、取得部34は車速(歩車間通信の場合は歩行速度)、走行方向(歩車間通信の場合は移動方向)以外の走行(歩行)に関する種々の情報を取得するようにしてもよく、さらに、取得部34は、受信したGPS位置情報の時間微分、時間積分に基づいて、車速(歩行速度)、走行方向(移動方向)の情報を取得するようにしてもよい。   Further, the acquisition unit 34 may acquire various information related to traveling (walking) other than the vehicle speed (walking speed in the case of inter-step communication) and the traveling direction (moving direction in the case of inter-step communication). The acquiring unit 34 may acquire information on the vehicle speed (walking speed) and the traveling direction (moving direction) based on time differentiation and time integration of the received GPS position information.

つぎに、衛星を利用した存在位置の情報が、GPS位置情報以外の情報である場合にも本発明を適用できるのは勿論である。   Next, it is needless to say that the present invention can also be applied to the case where the location information using the satellite is information other than the GPS location information.

また、端末位置判定装置3の各部31〜35の構成等はどのようであってもよい。   Further, the configuration of each of the units 31 to 35 of the terminal position determination device 3 may be any.

そして、本発明は、車車間通信を行なう端末システム、歩車間通信を行なう端末システム、それらが混在した通信を行なう端末システム等の種々の端末システムの他の端末の存在位置の情報の信頼度の判定および端末テム全体の存在位置の情報の信頼度の判定に適用することができる。   And this invention is the reliability of the information of the location information of other terminals of various terminal systems, such as a terminal system that performs inter-vehicle communication, a terminal system that performs inter-vehicle communication, and a terminal system that performs communication in which they are mixed. The present invention can be applied to the determination and the determination of the reliability of the information on the location of the entire terminal tem.

1 車両
2 端末
3 端末位置判定装置
31 GPS受信部
32 車車間通信部
33 取得部
34 推定部
35 判定部
DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 1 Vehicle 2 Terminal 3 Terminal position determination apparatus 31 GPS receiving part 32 Inter-vehicle communication part 33 Acquisition part 34 Estimation part 35 Determination part

Claims (3)

衛星を用いて他の端末が検出して送信する前記他の端末の存在位置の情報を受信する受信手段と、前記受信手段が受信した前記他の端末の存在位置の情報の信頼度を判定する判定手段とを備えた端末位置判定装置であって、
少なくとも前記他の端末の移動速度および進行方向の情報を取得する取得手段と、
前記受信手段が受信した前記他の端末の存在位置を基準にして、前記取得手段が取得した前記他の端末の移動速度および進行方向からつぎの時刻における前記他の端末の存在位置を推定する推定手段とを備え、
前記判定手殴は、前記推定手段の前記他の端末の推定位置と、前記受信手段が前記つぎの時刻に受信した前記他の端末の存在位置との一致度に基づき、前記他の端末から前記受信手段が受信する前記他の端末の存在位置の情報の信頼度を判定することを特徴とする端末位置判定装置。
Receiving means for receiving the location information of the other terminal that is detected and transmitted by another terminal using a satellite, and determining the reliability of the location information of the other terminal received by the receiving means A terminal position determination device comprising determination means,
Acquisition means for acquiring at least information on the moving speed and traveling direction of the other terminal;
Estimating the existence position of the other terminal at the next time from the moving speed and traveling direction of the other terminal acquired by the acquisition means, based on the existence position of the other terminal received by the receiving means Means and
The determination procedure is based on the degree of coincidence between the estimated position of the other terminal of the estimating unit and the existing position of the other terminal received by the receiving unit at the next time. A terminal position determination apparatus, characterized in that the reliability of information on the position of the other terminal received by the receiving means is determined.
請求項1に記載の端末位置判定装置において、
前記つぎの時刻における前記他の端末の推定位置と、前記つぎの時刻に受信した前記他の端末の存在位置とは、それぞれ所定の誤差範囲を有し、
前記判定手段は、前記推定位置と前記つぎの時刻に受信した前記他の端末の存在位置との前記誤差範囲の重なり度合いから、前記他の端末の存在位置の情報の信頼度を判定することを特徴とする端末位置判定装置。
In the terminal position determination apparatus according to claim 1,
The estimated position of the other terminal at the next time and the presence position of the other terminal received at the next time each have a predetermined error range,
The determining means determines the reliability of the information on the location of the other terminal from the degree of overlap of the error range between the estimated location and the location of the other terminal received at the next time. A terminal position determination device.
端末システムの複数の端末それぞれが、
衛星を用いて他の端末が検出して送信する前記他の端末の存在位置の情報を受信する受信手段と、
少なくとも前記他の端末の移動速度および進行方向の情報を取得する取得手段と、
前記受信手段が受信した前記他の端末の存在位置を基準にして、前記取得手段が取得した前記他の端末の移動速度および進行方向からつぎの時刻における前記他の端末の存在位置を推定する推定手段と、
前記推定手段の前記他の端末の推定位置と、前記受信手段が前記つぎの時刻に受信した前記他の端末の存在位置との一致度に基づき、前記他の端末から前記受信手段が受信する前記他の端末の存在位置の情報の信頼度を判定する判定手段とを備え、
少なくともいずれかの端末の前記判定手段は、前記各端末が互いの前記判定手段により判定した判定結果から前記端末システムの信頼度を判定することを特徴とする前記端末位置判定システム。
Each terminal in the terminal system
Receiving means for receiving information on the location of the other terminal that is detected and transmitted by another terminal using a satellite;
Acquisition means for acquiring at least information on the moving speed and traveling direction of the other terminal;
Estimating the existence position of the other terminal at the next time from the moving speed and traveling direction of the other terminal acquired by the acquisition means, based on the existence position of the other terminal received by the receiving means Means,
Based on the degree of coincidence between the estimated position of the other terminal of the estimating means and the existing position of the other terminal received by the receiving means at the next time, the receiving means receives from the other terminal. Determining means for determining the reliability of the information on the location of other terminals,
The said terminal position determination system characterized by the said determination means of at least one terminal determining the reliability of the said terminal system from the determination result which each said terminal determined by the said determination means of each other.
JP2011077958A 2011-03-31 2011-03-31 Terminal position determination device and terminal position determination system Withdrawn JP2012211844A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2011077958A JP2012211844A (en) 2011-03-31 2011-03-31 Terminal position determination device and terminal position determination system

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2011077958A JP2012211844A (en) 2011-03-31 2011-03-31 Terminal position determination device and terminal position determination system

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2012211844A true JP2012211844A (en) 2012-11-01

Family

ID=47265921

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2011077958A Withdrawn JP2012211844A (en) 2011-03-31 2011-03-31 Terminal position determination device and terminal position determination system

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP2012211844A (en)

Cited By (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2016110915A1 (en) * 2015-01-09 2016-07-14 株式会社デンソー In-vehicle unit and in-vehicle unit diagnosis system
WO2016113814A1 (en) * 2015-01-15 2016-07-21 株式会社デンソー In-vehicle unit
JP2016538560A (en) * 2013-09-06 2016-12-08 コンティネンタル・テーベス・アクチエンゲゼルシヤフト・ウント・コンパニー・オッフェネ・ハンデルスゲゼルシヤフト Communication device and method for confirming data content of communication signal received wirelessly, and use of the communication device
JP2017067727A (en) * 2015-10-02 2017-04-06 株式会社デンソー Position estimation device
JP2018180280A (en) * 2017-04-13 2018-11-15 浜松ホトニクス株式会社 Image acquisition device, and image acquisition method
JP2020177316A (en) * 2019-04-16 2020-10-29 三菱電機株式会社 Driving support system and on-vehicle information processing device

Cited By (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2016538560A (en) * 2013-09-06 2016-12-08 コンティネンタル・テーベス・アクチエンゲゼルシヤフト・ウント・コンパニー・オッフェネ・ハンデルスゲゼルシヤフト Communication device and method for confirming data content of communication signal received wirelessly, and use of the communication device
US10018702B2 (en) 2013-09-06 2018-07-10 Continental Teves Ag & Co. Ohg Method and communication apparatus for validating a data content in a wirelessly received communication signal, and use of the communication apparatus
WO2016110915A1 (en) * 2015-01-09 2016-07-14 株式会社デンソー In-vehicle unit and in-vehicle unit diagnosis system
WO2016113814A1 (en) * 2015-01-15 2016-07-21 株式会社デンソー In-vehicle unit
JP2016133839A (en) * 2015-01-15 2016-07-25 株式会社デンソー Onboard machine
JP2017067727A (en) * 2015-10-02 2017-04-06 株式会社デンソー Position estimation device
JP2018180280A (en) * 2017-04-13 2018-11-15 浜松ホトニクス株式会社 Image acquisition device, and image acquisition method
US11249297B2 (en) 2017-04-13 2022-02-15 Hamamatsu Photonics K.K. Image acquisition device and image acquisition method
JP7032053B2 (en) 2017-04-13 2022-03-08 浜松ホトニクス株式会社 Image acquisition device and image acquisition method
JP2020177316A (en) * 2019-04-16 2020-10-29 三菱電機株式会社 Driving support system and on-vehicle information processing device

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US10650674B2 (en) Method for associating a transmitter with a detected object in car-to-car communication and motor vehicle
Jo et al. GPS-bias correction for precise localization of autonomous vehicles
KR102075110B1 (en) Apparatus of identificating vehicle based vehicle-to-vehicle communication, and method of thereof
JP2024050990A (en) Judging device
CN105682222B (en) A kind of vehicle location positioning information fusion method based on vehicle self-organizing network
US10247576B2 (en) Method and system for verifying measured data
JP2012211844A (en) Terminal position determination device and terminal position determination system
Ghaleb et al. Improved vehicle positioning algorithm using enhanced innovation-based adaptive Kalman filter
EP3136128A1 (en) Trajectory matching using peripheral signal
US20150153178A1 (en) Car navigation system and method in which global navigation satellite system (gnss) and dead reckoning (dr) are merged
US8892331B2 (en) Drive assist system and wireless communication device for vehicle
JP2018155732A (en) Self position estimation device
CN105809126A (en) Intelligent vehicle target tracking system and method employing DSRC and vehicle sensor in combination
CN112455331B (en) Vehicle anti-collision early warning method and system and vehicle-mounted computer equipment
US20200363214A1 (en) Method for using a feature-based localization map for a vehicle
CN114503176A (en) Method and electronic equipment for knowing own position
CN110203254B (en) Safety detection method for Kalman filter in train positioning system
CN108528453A (en) It is a kind of towards collaborative truck information uncertainty with control method for vehicle of speeding
Carmona et al. Embedded system for driver behavior analysis based on GMM
CN106796126A (en) Method and system for providing the dynamic error value of dynamic measurement in real time
CN114968187A (en) Platform for perception system development of an autopilot system
KR20110094982A (en) Preventing system and the method of car crash
JP2021085880A (en) Analysis of localization error in mobile object
WO2019188886A1 (en) Terminal device, information processing method, and storage medium
CN110411499A (en) The appraisal procedure and assessment system of sensor detection recognition capability

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A300 Withdrawal of application because of no request for examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A300

Effective date: 20140603