JP2011228320A - Separator for solid electrolytic capacitor, and solid electrolytic capacitor using the same - Google Patents

Abstract

PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide a separator for a solid electrolytic capacitor hard to cause loosening of a record roll, capable of lowering a carbonization temperature, and excellent in carrying property of a conductive polymer, and the solid electrolyte capacitor having a low short circuit failure rate, a low ESR, and limited variations of the ESR.SOLUTION: The separator for the solid electrolytic capacitor is made of a wet type nonwoven fabric containing a solvent spun cellulose fiber and a synthetic fiber as essential components, containing no coating, and having a porosity of 60.0-86.0%, and the freeness variation of the solvent spun cellulose fiber measured based on JIS P8121 except that sample concentration is set at 0.1% by using a 80 mesh wire net having a wire diameter of 0.14 mm and an opening of 0.18 mm as a sieve plate is 0-250 ml. The solid electrolytic capacitor is equipped with the separator.

Description

  The present invention relates to a separator for a solid electrolytic capacitor and a solid electrolytic capacitor.

  As a separator for a solid electrolytic capacitor using a conductive polymer, a separator made only of vinylon fibers and a synthetic fiber separator mainly composed of vinylon fibers (for example, see Patent Document 1) are disclosed. Moreover, the solid electrolytic capacitor using the separator which consists of a wet nonwoven fabric containing a polyester resin is also disclosed (for example, refer patent document 2). Since these separators have large gaps between fibers and lack in denseness, the conductive polymer is not sufficiently carried inside the separator, the capacitance of the solid electrolytic capacitor is reduced, and the ESR variation is increased. And the problem that the burrs of the electrode easily penetrate the separator and the short-circuit defect rate increases. In addition, since the vinylon fiber forms a film, there is a problem that conduction of the conductive polymer is deteriorated and ESR is increased. Insufficient support means that the filling amount of the conductive polymer in the separator is insufficient.

  The most commonly used separator for a solid electrolytic capacitor is a paper separator made of 100% cellulose fiber such as esparto or hemp pulp. The paper separator has a drawback that it reacts with an oxidant used when polymerizing the conductive polymer to inhibit the polymerization of the conductive polymer. The paper separator is preliminarily carbonized so as not to inhibit the polymerization. In general, carbonization is often performed at a temperature of 280 ° C. or higher. Therefore, the production process of the solid electrolytic capacitor becomes complicated, the paper separator becomes brittle and easily broken by carbonization treatment, the burr of the electrode easily penetrates the separator, and the short-circuit defect rate becomes high. There were problems such as deterioration of capacitor parts.

  Moreover, the separator for solid electrolytic capacitors containing the fibrillated acrylic fiber is also disclosed (for example, refer patent document 3). When the amount of the fibrillated acrylic fiber is small, the separator containing the fibrillated acrylic fiber has insufficient support for the conductive polymer inside the separator because the gap between the fibers is too large. There are problems such as a decrease in the capacitance of the solid electrolytic capacitor and a large variation in ESR, and a problem that the burr of the electrode easily penetrates the separator and the short-circuit defect rate increases. On the other hand, when the amount of fibrillated acrylic fiber is large, there is a problem that the conduction of the conductive polymer is deteriorated due to the presence of the fibril and the ESR is increased.

  An electrolytic capacitor provided with a separator having a polyamide fiber as a main fiber is disclosed (for example, see Patent Document 4). A separator mainly composed of polyamide fiber has a gap that is too large, so that the conductive polymer is not sufficiently supported inside the separator, the capacitance of the solid electrolytic capacitor is reduced, and the ESR variation is increased. There is a problem that the burr of the electrode easily penetrates the separator and the short-circuit defect rate is increased. Further, when the wet heat fusion resin is contained, since the resin forms a film, there is a problem that the conduction of the conductive polymer is deteriorated and the ESR is increased.

  The present inventors include a separator containing acrylic short fibers and fibrillated cellulose (see, for example, Patent Document 5), a separator containing cellulose fibers, fibril-like heat-resistant fibers, and acrylic short fibers as essential components (for example, Patent Document 6). Reference), fibrillated cellulose, non-fibrillated fiber, softening point, melting point, and thermal decomposition temperature are all made of a wet non-woven fabric containing fibrillated heat-resistant fiber of 250 ° C. or higher and 700 ° C. or lower. Electrochemical element separator characterized by having a dimensional change rate of MD (machine direction) and CD (direction perpendicular to MD) both of −3% to + 1% when heat-treated at 50 ° C. for 50 hours. For example, Patent Document 7) is disclosed. In any of these separators, the type of cellulose fiber and the freeness were not optimized, so that the carrying ability of the conductive polymer might be insufficient, and there was room for improvement in capacitance and ESR. The separators of Patent Documents 6 and 7 have not been able to lower the carbonization temperature.

  Furthermore, since the separators of Patent Documents 1 to 7 are all slippery and have no waist, for example, they are slit to a width of about 3 mm or less and finished into a roll that is wound concentrically at the same position called record winding. In such a case, there was a problem that the roll would collapse during handling.

Japanese Patent No. 3319501 Japanese Patent No. 3606137 JP 2006-344742 A JP 2002-198263 A JP 2009-59730 A JP 2009-1441047 A International Publication No. 2005/101432 Pamphlet

  The object of the present invention is to solve the above-mentioned situation, and the winding of the record winding does not occur, the carbonization temperature can be lowered, and the separator for the solid electrolytic capacitor excellent in the carrying property of the conductive polymer, and the short-circuit defect rate, To provide a solid electrolytic capacitor having low ESR and small variations in ESR.

  As a result of diligent research to solve this problem, the inventors of the present invention contain solvent-spun cellulose fibers and synthetic short fibers having modified freeness in a specific range as essential components, A separator for a solid electrolytic capacitor made of a wet non-woven fabric having a porosity does not cause the winding of the record winding, the carbonization temperature can be lowered, and the conductive polymer is highly supported. The solid electrolytic capacitor equipped with the separator is The present inventors have found that the short-circuit defect rate and ESR are low and excellent, and that the variation of ESR is small, and have reached the present invention.

  That is, the present invention was measured in accordance with JIS P8121, except that a synthetic short fiber and an 80 mesh wire net having a wire diameter of 0.14 mm and an aperture of 0.18 mm were used as a sieve plate, and the sample concentration was 0.1%. It contains a solvent-spun cellulose fiber having a modified freeness of 0 to 250 ml as an essential component, does not contain a film, and consists of a wet nonwoven fabric having a porosity of 60.0 to 86.0%. It is a solid electrolytic capacitor separator.

  The present invention is a solid electrolytic capacitor comprising the solid electrolytic capacitor separator of the present invention.

  The separator for a solid electrolytic capacitor of the present invention is a variable measured according to JIS P8121, except that an 80-mesh wire mesh having a wire diameter of 0.14 mm and an aperture of 0.18 mm is used as a sieve plate, and the sample concentration is 0.1%. A wet nonwoven fabric containing solvent-spun cellulose fibers and synthetic short fibers having a freeness of 0 to 250 ml as essential components, no film, and a porosity of 60.0 to 86.0% Therefore, the pores of the separator are uniformly formed, have an appropriate denseness, and the monomer solution and the polymerization solution are uniformly impregnated in the separator without unevenness. Can be formed uniformly in sufficient amount. Moreover, the strength of the separator after polymerizing the conductive polymer is strong and hardly broken. Therefore, the solid electrolytic capacitor provided with the separator is excellent in that the short-circuit defect rate and the ESR are low, the variation of the ESR is small. Since the separator for a solid electrolytic capacitor of the present invention contains synthetic short fibers, the carbonization temperature can be lowered, and since the solvent-spun cellulose fibers are contained, the surface is not slippery and is not easily charged with static electricity. I don't get up.

It is an electron micrograph (500 magnifications) of the surface of the separator produced in Example 3 of this invention. It is an electron micrograph (100 magnifications) of the surface of the separator produced in the comparative example 11 of this invention.

In the present invention, the expression “separator” means a solid electrolytic capacitor separator. The film in the present invention refers to a film that is not in the form of a fiber but is formed in an indefinite shape in a plan view, and has an area of a portion having no through hole of at least 2500 μm ² or more.

  The synthetic short fiber in the present invention has a fiber length of 0.5 to 10 mm, and preferably 1 to 6 mm. If the fiber length is less than 0.5 mm, it may be easy to fall off from the separator, and if it is longer than 10 mm, the fibers may come apart and the formation and thickness may become uneven. The fineness of the synthetic short fiber is preferably 0.001 to 1.7 dtex, more preferably 0.05 to 1.1 dtex. If it is less than 0.001 dtex, the strength of the fiber itself is weak and the separator may be easily broken. If it is thicker than 1.7 dtex, it may be difficult to reduce the thickness of the separator. Examples of the synthetic short fibers in the present invention include short fibers obtained by spinning resins of polyesters, acrylics, and polyamides.

  Examples of polyesters include polyethylene terephthalate, polybutylene terephthalate, and polyethylene isophthalate. As acrylics, those made of a 100% acrylonitrile polymer, acrylonitrile was copolymerized with (meth) acrylic acid derivatives such as acrylic acid, methacrylic acid, acrylic ester, methacrylic ester, vinyl acetate, etc. Things. Examples of polyamides include aliphatic polyamides, aromatic polyamides, and wholly aromatic polyamides. Synthetic short fibers made of polyesters and acrylics tend to provide low ESR. Synthetic short fibers made of wholly aromatic polyamide can improve the heat resistance of the separator and can eliminate the need for carbonization.

  The modified freeness in the present invention is measured by using an 80-mesh wire mesh instead of the sieve plate defined in the Canadian standard freeness measurement method of JIS P8121, and setting the sample concentration to 0.1%. Freeness. The wire diameter of 80 mesh was 0.14 mm in diameter, and a wire mesh (manufactured by PULP AND PAPER RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF CANADA) having an opening of 0.18 mm was used. The reason for using the modified freeness is that when solvent-spun cellulose fibers are refined and the fiber length is shortened to some extent, the solvent-spun cellulose fibers themselves slip through the sieve plate defined in JIS P8121, and the accurate Canadian This is because the standard freeness is not measured.

  The solvent-spun cellulose fiber having a modified freeness of 0 to 250 ml has a thin fiber diameter and high uniformity, so that the pore diameter of the separator is relatively uniform, and the monomer solution and polymerization solution in the separator are biased. The conductive polymer can be uniformly formed on the separator. The solvent-spun cellulose fiber of the present invention preferably has a modified freeness of 0 to 200 ml, more preferably 0 to 160 ml. If the modified freeness exceeds 250 ml, the refinement process is insufficient, the fiber division does not proceed sufficiently, and the proportion of the original thick fiber diameter remains large, so a large through-hole is formed in the separator. Even after the conductive polymer is formed, the burrs at the edge portions of the electrode foil are likely to penetrate, and the short-circuit defect rate is increased.

  To obtain solvent-spun cellulose fibers having a modified freeness of 0 to 250 ml, disperse solvent-spun cellulose short fibers in water at an appropriate concentration, and use this as refiner, beater, mill, milling device, high-speed rotating Rotating blade type homogenizer that gives shearing force by blade, double-cylindrical high-speed homogenizer that generates shearing force between a cylindrical inner blade that rotates at high speed and a fixed outer blade. It may be finely processed by passing through an ultrasonic crusher, a high-pressure homogenizer, or the like and adjusting conditions such as the shape of the blade, the sample concentration, the flow rate, the number of treatments, and the treatment speed.

  The length-weighted average fiber length of solvent-spun cellulose fibers having a modified freeness of 0 to 250 ml in the present invention is preferably 0.2 to 3.0 mm, and more preferably 0.2 to 2.0 mm. If it is less than 0.2 mm, the fiber length is too short, and it may be easy to fall off the separator. If it exceeds 3.0 mm, the refinement is insufficient, the ratio of the thick fiber diameter increases, a large through-hole tends to open in the separator, or the fiber is kinked, resulting in variations in formation and thickness, and ESR. In some cases, the variation in the size of the image becomes large. The length-weighted average fiber length of the solvent-spun cellulose fiber in the present invention can be measured using a commercially available fiber length measuring device that is obtained by utilizing the deflection characteristics obtained by applying laser light to the fiber.

  The total content of the synthetic short fiber and the solvent-spun cellulose fiber having a modified freeness of 0 to 250 ml in the separator of the present invention is preferably 40 to 100% by mass, more preferably 60 to 100% by mass, and 80 to 100% by mass. % Is more preferable. If it is less than 40% by mass, the impregnation property of the conductive polymer may be insufficient, the ESR of the solid electrolytic capacitor equipped with the separator may be high, or the variation of ESR may be large. The mass ratio of the synthetic short fiber and the solvent-spun cellulose fiber having a modified freeness of 0 to 250 ml in the separator of the present invention is preferably 1: 9 to 9: 1, more preferably 1: 5 to 5: 1. If the ratio of the synthetic short fibers is less than 1: 9, the carbonization temperature of the separator may not be sufficiently lowered. If it is more than 9: 1, the record winding may be unrolled or the ESR may be increased.

  The separator of the present invention may contain fibers other than synthetic short fibers and solvent-spun cellulose fibers having a modified freeness of 0 to 250 ml. For example, it consists of solvent-spun cellulose and regenerated cellulose short fibers, natural cellulose fibers, pulped and fibrillated natural cellulose fibers, solvent-spun cellulose fibers with a modified freeness of more than 250 ml, glass, alumina, silica, rock wool, etc. Inorganic fibers. The fineness of solvent-spun cellulose and regenerated cellulose short fibers is preferably 0.001 to 2.0 dtex. If the fineness is less than 0.001 dtex, the strength of the fiber itself is weak and the separator may be easily broken. If it is thicker than 2.0 dtex, it may be difficult to reduce the thickness of the separator or uneven thickness may occur. is there. The average fiber diameter of the inorganic fibers is preferably 0.1 to 10 μm, more preferably 0.1 to 5 μm, and further preferably 0.1 to 3 μm. If the average fiber diameter of the inorganic fibers is less than 0.1 μm, the inorganic fibers are likely to be broken, so that they may easily fall off from the separator, and the gaps in the separator may be blocked. May fall off. The average fiber length of the inorganic fibers is preferably 0.1 to 10 mm, and more preferably 0.1 to 5 mm. When the average fiber length is less than 0.1 mm, the inorganic fibers may easily fall off from the separator. When the average fiber length is longer than 10 mm, the formation and thickness of the separator may be easily uneven.

  When the pulped product or fibrillated product of natural cellulose fiber is contained, the modified drainage is preferably 0 to 400 ml. When the modified freeness exceeds 400 ml, the ratio of the thick fiber diameter increases, and the thickness unevenness is likely to occur in the separator.

FIG. 1 is an electron micrograph of the surface of the separator of the present invention. It turns out that the film is not contained. FIG. 2 is an electron micrograph of the surface of a separator outside the present invention. It can be seen that a film of about 0.4 mm ² is present. A wet heat fusion resin such as fiber or powder made of polyvinyl alcohol forms a film. Since the separator of the present invention does not contain these wet heat fusion resins, it does not have a film.

  The separator of the present invention has a porosity of 60.0 to 86.0%. More preferably, it is 62.0-80.0%, More preferably, it is 65.0-80.0%. The porosity means a value obtained by dividing the value obtained by subtracting the density of the separator from the specific gravity of the separator by the specific gravity of the separator and multiplying by 100. The specific gravity of the separator is calculated from the specific gravity and ratio of the fibers constituting the separator. When the porosity is less than 60.0%, the conduction of the conductive polymer is deteriorated, and the ESR of the solid electrolytic capacitor is increased. In addition, the surface becomes slippery and the roll of the record roll collapses. When the porosity is larger than 86.0%, the supporting property of the conductive polymer becomes insufficient, the capacity of the solid electrolytic capacitor is reduced, the burr of the electrode is easily penetrated, and the short-circuit defect rate is increased.

  The separator of the present invention can be produced by a wet papermaking method. One layer may be used, or two or more layers may be combined. Specifically, a slurry in which a predetermined fiber is dispersed at a predetermined concentration is prepared, and a circular paper machine, a long paper machine, an inclined paper machine, a short paper machine, an inclined short paper machine, and a combination thereof are combined. What is necessary is just to make wet paper using any of a paper machine. After wet papermaking, heat treatment, calendering, thermal calendering, etc. are performed as necessary.

  In order to set the porosity of the separator of the present invention to 60.0 to 86.0%, the density of the separator may be adjusted so as to obtain a desired porosity based on the specific gravity of the separator. When the content of thick fibers is increased, the density of the separator is reduced and the porosity is increased. When the thickness is reduced by calendering to increase the density of the separator, the porosity decreases. Increasing the content of fibers with a high specific gravity tends to increase the porosity.

  The separator of the present invention preferably has a thickness of 15 to 100 μm, more preferably 20 to 60 μm. If the thickness is less than 15 μm, it may be broken during handling or processing, or a hole may be formed. If it is thicker than 100 μm, the ESR of the solid electrolytic capacitor may increase.

  The separator of the present invention preferably has a Gurley air permeability of 0.01 to 3.00 s / 100 ml, more preferably 0.05 to 2.00 s / 100 ml, and even more preferably 0.10 to 2.00 s / 100 ml. The Gurley air permeability is measured according to JIS P8117. If the Gurley air permeability is less than 0.02 s / 100 ml, burrs on the edge of the electrode foil are likely to penetrate, and the short-circuit defect rate of the solid electrolytic capacitor may be increased. If it is larger than 3.00 s / 100 ml, the ESR of the solid electrolytic capacitor may become high.

  The solid electrolytic capacitor in the present invention refers to a solid electrolytic capacitor using a conductive polymer as an electrolyte. Examples of the conductive polymer include polypyrrole, polythiophene, polyaniline, polyacetylene, and derivatives thereof. In the present invention, the solid electrolytic capacitor may be a combination of a conductive polymer and an electrolytic solution.

  EXAMPLES Hereinafter, although an Example demonstrates this invention in more detail, this invention is not limited to an Example.

  Slurries 1 to 22 shown in Table 1 were prepared and used as wet papermaking slurries.

Examples 1, 3, and 7
As shown in Table 2, the slurry corresponding to Examples 1, 3, and 7 was diluted to a predetermined concentration, wet-made using a circular paper machine, and both sides were brought into contact with a metal roll heated to 180 ° C. The separators of Examples 1, 3, and 7 were manufactured by heat treatment and calendering to adjust the thickness.

Examples 2, 4-6, 8-14
As shown in Table 2, the slurry corresponding to Examples 2, 4 to 6 and 8 to 14 was diluted to a predetermined concentration, wet papermaking was performed using a circular net paper machine, and the thickness was adjusted by calendering. And the separator of Examples 2, 4-6, and 8-14 was produced. The calendar pressure in Example 8 was higher than the calendar pressure in Example 7. The calendar pressure in Example 11 was higher than the calendar pressure in Example 10. The calendar pressure of Example 14 was made stronger than the calendar pressure of Example 13.

(Comparative Examples 1, 2, 4-8, 10-13)
As shown in Table 2, the slurry corresponding to Comparative Examples 1, 2, 4 to 8, and 10 to 13 was diluted to a predetermined concentration, wet-made using a circular net paper machine, and calendered to adjust the thickness. And the separator of Comparative Examples 1, 2, 4-8, and 10-13 was produced.

(Comparative Example 3)
As shown in Table 2, the slurry corresponding to Comparative Example 3 was diluted to a predetermined concentration, wet papermaking was performed using a circular net paper machine, both surfaces were brought into contact with a metal roll heated to 180 ° C., and heat-treated. Calendering was performed to adjust the thickness, and the separator of Comparative Example 3 was produced.

(Comparative Example 9)
As shown in Table 2, the slurry corresponding to Comparative Example 9 was diluted to a predetermined concentration, wet papermaking was performed using a circular net paper machine, and the separator of Comparative Example 9 was used as it was without calendar treatment.

  A1 to A6 in Table 1 mean solvent-spun cellulose fibers, and their modified freeness is as shown in Table 1. B1 is acrylic short fiber having a fineness of 0.1 dtex and a fiber length of 3 mm (product name: Bonnell), B2 is acrylic short fiber having a fineness of 0.4 dtex and a fiber length of 5 mm (product name: Bonnell), B3 is an acrylic short fiber having a fineness of 1.0 dtex and a fiber length of 5 mm (product name: Bonnell), and B4 is a polyester short fiber having a fineness of 0.06 dtex and a fiber length of 3 mm (product name: TP04N), B5 is a polyester short fiber having a fineness of 0.1 dtex and a fiber length of 3 mm (trade name: TM04PN), B6 is a polyester short fiber having a fineness of 0.5 dtex and a fiber length of 5 mm (product name: TA04N), B7 is a polyester short fiber having a fineness of 1.1 dtex and a fiber length of 5 mm (manufactured by Teijin Fibers, trade name: J04CN), B8 has a fineness of 0.3 dtex, nylon 6 and 6 short fibers with a fiber length of 3 mm, B9 is a fibrillated acrylic fiber with a Canadian standard freeness of 100 ml, and B10 is a polyvinyl alcohol resin powder (manufactured by Denki Kagaku Kogyo, trade name: Denkapoval K-VG), B11 means a fibrillated wholly aromatic polyamide fiber (fibril-like heat-resistant fiber) having a Canadian freeness of 80 ml. C1 is a solvent-spun cellulose short fiber having a fineness of 1.7 dtex and a fiber length of 4 mm (trade name: Tencel, manufactured by Lenzing), and C2 is a linter fiber having a modified freeness of 270 ml and a length-weighted average fiber length of 0.21 mm. To do. D1 means Manila hemp with a Canadian standard freeness of 640 ml, and D2 means esparto pulp with a Canadian standard freeness of 640 ml. The modified freeness of D1 and D2 were both 800 ml. The specific gravity of solvent-spun cellulose fiber, solvent-spun cellulose short fiber, linter fiber, Manila hemp, and esparto pulp with various modified freeness values was 1.50. The specific gravity of the acrylic short fiber was 1.17. The specific gravity of the polyester short fiber was 1.40. The specific gravity of nylon 6,6 fiber was 1.14. The specific gravity of the polyvinyl alcohol resin powder was 1.25. The specific gravity of the fibrillated wholly aromatic polyamide fiber was 1.44.

  The separators of Examples and Comparative Examples were evaluated by the following test methods, and the results are shown in Table 2.

<Thickness>
The thickness of the separator was measured according to JIS C2111.

<Density>
The density of the separator was measured according to JIS C2111.

<Porosity>
The porosity of the separator was calculated by dividing the value obtained by subtracting the density of the separator from the specific gravity of the separator by the specific gravity of the separator and multiplying by 100.

<Air permeability>
Using a Gurley permeability meter having a circular hole with an outer diameter of 28.6 mm, the time required for 100 ml of air to pass through the separator was measured at any five or more locations per sample, and the average value was obtained.

<Crumbling>
The separator was slit to a width of 2.8 mm to produce a record winding having a length of 500 m. The tip of the separator was fixed with tape, and it was examined whether or not the separator surface slipped and collapsed when the side of the record winding was pressed with a finger.

<Film>
The surface of the separator was observed with an electron microscope to examine the presence or absence of a film. A film having a through-hole-free film area of 2500 μm ² or more was defined as a film, and “Yes” was given when there was one or more films per arbitrary observation region of 40000 μm ² , and “None” was given.

<Supportability>
After the separator cut into 50 mm squares is immersed in 3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene solution, the excess liquid is sucked off with filter paper and immersed in a 50% by weight butanol solution of ferric p-toluenesulfonate as it is soaked sufficiently. After that, the excess liquid was sucked with a filter paper and heated to 100 ° C. to polymerize polyethylenedioxythiophene. The number of polymerizations was one. After polymerization, washing with methanol was performed to remove unreacted substances, and the mass W1 of the separator after drying was weighed. The value (%) obtained by subtracting the original mass W0 of the separator from W1 and dividing the value W2 by W0 and multiplying it by 100 was defined as the supportability.

<Polymerization strength>
In the evaluation of <supportability>, polyethylene dioxythiophene was polymerized, and the separator strength when the dried separator was pinched with tweezers was determined. The case where the separator was lifted without being cut or torn was rated as ◯, and the case where the separator was brittle and was torn or collapsed was marked as x.

<Solid electrolytic capacitor>
The surface of an aluminum foil having a thickness of 50 μm and etching holes of 1 to 5 μm was oxidized to form an aluminum oxide dielectric, which was used as an anode. The aluminum foil before the oxidation treatment was used as the cathode. A solid electrolytic capacitor separator was placed on the anode dielectric and wound together with the cathode to produce a solid electrolytic capacitor element. After heating the device at a predetermined temperature for a certain time to carbonize the separator, the device was mixed with a 50% by weight butanol solution of 3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene: ferric p-toluenesulfonate in a mass ratio of 1 by weight. : It was immersed in the solution (polymerization solution) mixed so that it might become 20, and it pulled up and heated at 200 degreeC for 5 minute (s), and polymerized polyethylene dioxythiophene. This element was washed with methanol to remove unreacted 3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene and ferric p-toluenesulfonate remaining in the separator, and then dried at 120 ° C. Similarly, after the polymerization of polyethylenedioxythiophene was repeated once more, the device was housed in an aluminum outer can and sealed to produce a solid electrolytic capacitor with a rated voltage of 25 V and a rated capacitance of 33 μF. The carbonization conditions for the separators of the examples and comparative examples are as shown in Table 3.

  The solid electrolytic capacitors of Examples and Comparative Examples were evaluated by the following test methods, and the results are shown in Table 3.

<Capacitance>
The capacitance of the solid electrolytic capacitor was measured, and an average value of 1000 was calculated.

<ESR>
The ESR of the solid electrolytic capacitor was measured using an LCR meter at a frequency of 20 ° C. and 100 kHz, and an average value of 1000 pieces was calculated.

<Variation>
The standard deviation of the ESR of the solid electrolytic capacitor was used as an index of variation. The smaller the standard deviation value, the smaller the variation and the better.

<Short defective rate>
The presence or absence of conduction of the solid electrolytic capacitor was confirmed with a tester. The proportion of the solids in 1000 solid electrolytic capacitors was defined as the short-circuit defect rate.

  The separators of Examples 1 to 14 contain synthetic short fibers and solvent-spun cellulose fibers having a modified freeness of 0 to 250 ml as essential components, do not contain a film, and have a porosity of 60.0 to 86. Since it is made of 0.0% wet nonwoven fabric, there was no collapse of the record winding, and the carrying property of the conductive polymer was excellent. The solid electrolytic capacitors equipped with the separators of Examples 1 to 14 were excellent in that the short-circuit defect rate and ESR were low, and the variation in ESR was small. The separators of Examples 2 to 14 can significantly reduce the carbonization temperature, and Example 1 did not require carbonization.

  Since the separator of Comparative Example 1 does not contain solvent-spun cellulose fibers having a modified freeness of 0 to 250 ml and contains solvent-spun cellulose fibers having a modified freeness of 260 ml, the separator has a large through-hole. Since the burr of the electrode foil became easy to penetrate, the solid electrolytic capacitor of Comparative Example 1 equipped with the separator had a slightly high short-circuit defect rate. Moreover, since a lot of solvent-spun cellulose fibers having a large fiber diameter coexist, the formation of the separator is uneven and the thickness is uneven, and the polymerization of the conductive polymer is not uniform. The solid electrolytic capacitor has a large variation in ESR.

  Since the separator of Comparative Example 2 does not contain synthetic short fibers and consists of 100% cellulose fibers, the carbonization temperature cannot be lowered. Further, the strength after carbonization treatment was remarkably weak, and the strength was remarkably weak after polymerization of the conductive polymer. The solid electrolytic capacitor of Comparative Example 2 equipped with the separator had a high short-circuit defect rate.

  Since the separator of Comparative Example 3 was composed of 100% synthetic short fibers, the surface was slippery, and the winding of the record winding produced by slitting to a width of 3 mm or less occurred. Moreover, the gap between the fibers in the separator was too large, and the conductive polymer was poorly supported. The solid electrolytic capacitor of Comparative Example 3 equipped with the separator had a small capacity and a large variation in ESR. Moreover, the burr | flash of electrode foil penetrated easily and the solid electrolytic capacitor of the comparative example 3 which comprised this separator had a high short circuit defect rate.

  The separator of Comparative Example 4 does not contain solvent-spun cellulose fibers having a modified freeness of 0 to 250 ml, and is mainly composed of acrylic short fibers, so that the surface is slippery and is made by slitting to a width of 3 mm or less. The roll collapsed. Further, the gap between the fibers in the separator was too large, and the conductive polymer was poorly supported. The solid electrolytic capacitor of Comparative Example 4 equipped with the separator had a small capacity and a large variation in ESR.

  Since the separator of Comparative Example 5 does not contain synthetic short fibers and consists of 100% solvent-spun cellulose fibers having a modified freeness of 80 ml, the carbonization temperature cannot be lowered. Further, the strength after carbonization treatment was remarkably weak and the strength was remarkably weak after polymerizing the conductive polymer, and the solid electrolytic capacitor of Comparative Example 5 equipped with the separator had a high short-circuit defect rate.

  Since the separator of Comparative Example 6 does not contain synthetic short fibers and solvent-spun cellulose fibers with a modified freeness of 0 to 250 ml, it consists of Manila hemp and esparto with a Canadian standard freeness of 640 ml (modified freeness of 800 ml). The carbonization temperature cannot be lowered. Further, the strength after carbonization treatment was remarkably weak, and the strength was remarkably weak after polymerization of the conductive polymer. The solid electrolytic capacitor of Comparative Example 6 equipped with the separator had a high short-circuit defect rate.

  Since the separator of Comparative Example 7 was composed of fibrillated acrylic fibers and acrylic short fibers, the surface was slippery, and the winding of the record winding produced by slitting to a width of 3 mm or less occurred. Further, since the blending ratio of the fibrillated acrylic fiber was as high as 80%, the conductive polymer was poorly conductive, and the solid electrolytic capacitor of Comparative Example 7 equipped with the separator had a high ESR.

  The separator of Comparative Example 8 contains synthetic short fibers and solvent-spun cellulose fibers having a modified freeness of 0 to 250 ml. However, since the porosity was less than 60.0%, the conductivity of the conductive polymer was poor. Thus, the solid electrolytic capacitor of Comparative Example 8 equipped with the separator had a high ESR.

  The separator of Comparative Example 9 contains synthetic short fibers and solvent-spun cellulose fibers having a modified freeness of 0 to 250 ml. However, since the porosity exceeded 86.0%, the burrs of the electrodes easily penetrated. The solid electrolytic capacitor of Comparative Example 9 equipped with the separator was produced from the same slurry and had a higher short-circuit defect rate than the separators of Examples 13 and 14 having a porosity of 60.0 to 86.0%. . Moreover, the carrying | support property of the conductive polymer became inadequate, the capacity | capacitance was small and the dispersion | variation in ESR was large.

  Since the separator of Comparative Example 10 is made of polyamide fiber and a wet heat fusible resin, the wet heat fusible resin forms a film, and the conductive polymer is poorly supported and electrically conductive. The solid electrolytic capacitor of Example 10 had a small capacity, a high ESR, and a large variation in ESR. Further, the separator surface was slippery, and the roll of the record winding produced by slitting to a width of 3 mm or less occurred.

  Since the separator of Comparative Example 11 contains a wet heat fusible resin, the resin forms a film, the conductive polymer is poorly supported and conductive, and the solid electrolytic of Comparative Example 11 having the separator is provided. The capacitor had a small capacitance, a high ESR, and a large variation in ESR. Thus, at the carbonization temperature of 230 ° C., sufficient characteristics were not obtained with the electrostatic capacity and ESR, and thus it can be said that the separator of Comparative Example 11 cannot lower the carbonization temperature.

  The separator of Comparative Example 12 does not contain solvent-spun cellulose fibers having a modified freeness of 0 to 250 ml, and is composed of cellulose fibers, fibril heat resistant fibers, and acrylic short fibers. Conductive polymer was poor in conduction, and the solid electrolytic capacitor of Comparative Example 12 equipped with the separator had high ESR. Thus, at the carbonization temperature of 230 ° C., sufficient characteristics were not obtained with the capacitance and ESR, and therefore it can be said that the separator of Comparative Example 12 cannot lower the carbonization temperature. Further, since it contains a large amount of fibril-like heat-resistant fibers, it was charged with static electricity during the slitting operation, and the roll of the record winding collapsed.

  The separator of Comparative Example 13 does not contain solvent-spun cellulose fibers having a modified freeness of 0 to 250 ml, and is composed of cellulose fibers, fibrillar heat-resistant fibers, short acrylic fibers, and the gap between the fibers is too large. The solid electrolytic capacitor of Comparative Example 13 provided with the separator had a small capacity and a large variation in ESR. Thus, at the carbonization temperature of 230 ° C., sufficient characteristics could not be obtained with the capacitance and ESR, so it can be said that the separator of Comparative Example 13 cannot lower the carbonization temperature.

Claims (2)

  A solvent having a modified freeness of 0 to 250 ml measured according to JIS P8121, except that an 80-mesh wire mesh having a wire diameter of 0.14 mm and an aperture of 0.18 mm is used as the sieve plate, and the sample concentration is 0.1%. A solid electrolytic capacitor characterized by comprising a spun cellulose fiber and a synthetic short fiber as essential components, a wet nonwoven fabric having no porosity and a porosity of 60.0 to 86.0% Separator.   A solid electrolytic capacitor comprising the separator for a solid electrolytic capacitor according to claim 1.