JP2011180027A - Control rod for nuclear reactor, nuclear lifetime adjustment method of the same, and its reactivity value adjustment method - Google Patents

Abstract

<P>PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To flatten a nuclear lifetime distribution in the shaft direction of a control rod, and to extend the nuclear lifetime of hafnium. <P>SOLUTION: The control rod includes: blades 1 formed respectively by facing a pair of blade pieces using a hafnium plate as a control rod effective part; a tie cross 4 provided along the control rod center shaft at intervals, for holding four blades 1 crosswise on the cross section; a trap provided on a facing space of the blade pieces, and filled with reactor water; an axial water region 5 provided in a space between locations of the tie cross 4, and filled with the reactor water; and a spacer 2 provided on the facing space of the blade pieces, maintaining the trap, configured such that a neutron absorbing material is increased gradually toward the insertion tip side from the insertion terminal side of the control rod for a nuclear reactor, following a tendency of the nuclear lifetime which becomes shorter gradually toward the insertion tip side from the insertion terminal side of the control rod for the nuclear reactor, and flattening the nuclear lifetime distribution in the shaft direction of the control rod for the nuclear reactor. <P>COPYRIGHT: (C)2011,JPO&INPIT

Description

  The present invention relates to a nuclear reactor control rod used for power control of a boiling water reactor, and more particularly to a long-life nuclear reactor control rod using hafnium as a main neutron absorber.

  Reactor control rods used in boiling water reactors are shutdown control rods that are inserted into the core for almost the entire period of the reactor operation cycle, and are extracted from the core during the reactor operation cycle. It can be classified as a stop control rod inserted into the core when the reactor is shut down. Coupled with the fact that stop control rods account for approximately 70% of all control rods, output control control rods also have the same reactivity value as stop control rods until they have reached their nuclear life and are replaced. It is desirable to maintain.

  According to the conventional practice of defining the nuclear life of a nuclear reactor control rod as “when the reactivity value is reduced by 10% from the initial value”, the reactivity value of the shutdown control rod is In comparison, the ideal model is 5% higher at the beginning of the lifetime (lifetime) and 5% lower at the end of the lifetime.

  Generally, in a conventional nuclear reactor control rod using boron carbide (B4C) as a main neutron absorber, it is not easy to increase its reactivity value, and the above ideal model is difficult to realize. It was. For this reason, a control rod for stopping that is inserted into the core during the nuclear reactor operation cycle and receives a large amount of neutron irradiation is targeted, and so long life has been required.

Against this background, hafnium, which can be expected to significantly increase the reactivity value as a neutron absorber compared to a control rod for stopping a B4C system, and can significantly suppress the decrease in neutron absorption capacity over time associated with neutron irradiation. Application of (Hf) was considered. However, hafnium has a very large specific gravity (13 g / cm ³ ) and is expensive. If the specific gravity is large, the load on the control rod drive mechanism will increase, and the scram characteristics of the reactor control rod will deteriorate, which will hinder the reactor shutdown in an emergency.

  In consideration of such circumstances, a hafnium plate (in a stainless steel sheath (coating material) having a deep U-shaped cross-section is targeted for a control blade for four-blade integrated stop arranged in a cross-shaped cross-section. Proposed Hf-based stop control rods in which each wing piece is configured with a Hf plate as a neutron absorber and a trap into which a moderator (light water) can enter between the Hf plates facing each other is formed. (See Patent Document 1 and Non-Patent Document 1). In this control rod for stopping, since the neutron is decelerated by the intrusion moderator between the Hf plates, the neutron absorption capability of the hafnium plate can be increased, and the required amount of hafnium having high specific gravity and high cost can be reduced. .

  However, the following problems emerged with the Hf-based stop control rod. Generally, the control rod for stopping has a higher neutron irradiation amount in the upper half (range from the insertion tip of the control rod effective portion to the insertion end) than the lower half due to the neutron flux distribution. For this reason, when the upper half reaches the nuclear lifetime and is replaced, the lower half of hafnium is still disposed of in a usable state, which is an economic and resource problem that wastes expensive hafnium. is there.

  For this reason, various split control rods have been proposed in which the thickness of the hafnium plate is gradually reduced from the insertion tip to the insertion end in consideration of the dose distribution accompanying the neutron flux distribution in the core ( (See Patent Documents 2 to 6). There has also been proposed a control rod for stopping which avoids electrochemical corrosion between the Hf plate and a dissimilar metal or a reduction in mechanical strength due to this without using a sheath (see Patent Document 7).

JP-A 63-008594 JP 62-235595 A JP-A-62-254098 Japanese Unexamined Patent Publication No. Sho 63-212289 Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 02-010299 Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 04-006493 JP 58-147687 A

M. Ueda T. Tanzawa, R. Yoshioka: “Critical Experiment on a Flux-Trap-Type Hafnium Control Rod for BWRs”, Transactions of the American Nuclear Society, Vol.55, p.616 (1987).

  In conventional Hf-based stop control rods, the larger the trap thickness (size in the blade thickness direction), the higher the neutron moderation effect and the more efficiently the neutrons are absorbed by the Hf plate. Large and expensive hafnium can be further reduced. However, because the control rod for a nuclear reactor has a narrow gap provided between a set of four fuel assemblies that serve as core insertion / extraction paths, the thickness of the wings is usually 8 mm (some reactors) Then, it is limited to about 6 to 7 mm).

  Due to this limitation, the thickness of the stainless steel sheath is reduced, or the gap between the sheath and the Hf plate (referred to as SH gap, which is provided mainly to avoid electrochemical corrosion reaction between different metals). ) Want to narrow. However, since the stop control rod is exposed to a harsh environment subjected to high temperature and pressure and a large amount of neutron irradiation for a long period of time, if such measures are taken, the Hf plate and the stainless steel constituting the stop control rod The mechanical strength is greatly reduced due to the electro-chemical corrosion reaction based on the close-to-face structure of dissimilar metals.

  According to recent research, when the effective part of the control rod is divided into approximately four equal parts from the insertion tip to the insertion end, other region divisions in the range of ½ division from the insertion tip to the insertion end, particularly in the range of ¼ division. It is known that the mechanical strength decrease and the exfoliation of the corrosive organisms become serious compared to the above. It has been found that a stop control rod that does not use a sheath has a problem of a decrease in mechanical strength based on a similar mechanism with a Hf plate when a stainless steel tie cloth is used.

  In addition, each Hf plate having a different thickness in the multi-divided stop control rod is placed on a spacer that also has a role of holding a trap gap called a top, and is welded to the sheath in this state. In addition, the spacer called the frame is also welded directly to the sheath (a part of the wing) to ensure structural stability. However, in the vicinity of the welding region, the thin sheath is bent toward the Hf plate due to welding deformation based on the residual stress, and the region of the SH gap is likely to be reduced.

  Shrinkage of the SH gap area reduces the area in which corrosion products originating from the constituent metals of the sheath can be retained, and is a constrained state that does not allow relative displacement based on thermal expansion and irradiation growth of the sheath or Hf plate. This increases the possibility of stress corrosion cracking of the sheath and Hf plate based on excessive stress.

  In addition, since various Hf plates having different thicknesses are used, the manufacturing cost associated with the processing of the Hf plate is increased, and a mechanically weak surface due to a decrease in the thickness of the Hf plate toward the insertion end remains. Yes. Furthermore, it is not easy to maintain a uniform SH gap that plays an important role in preventing electrochemical corrosion or stress corrosion cracking of a structure in a multi-segment type stop control rod.

  By the way, the long-life type control rod for long-life type shutdown using hafnium as the main neutron absorber is inserted into the core during the nuclear reactor operation cycle. Therefore, the region near the axis of the stop control rod in the fuel assembly is likely to form a combustion delay based on a decrease in neutron flux, that is, a state where the residual concentration of fuel nuclides is high. When the control rod for stopping is pulled out from the core in this state, the region output density of the fuel assembly that is close to the shaft center when the control rod is inserted becomes high, which may impair the fuel integrity. This is a so-called blade history problem.

  To alleviate this blade history problem, the amount of hafnium in the stop control rod can be reduced to reduce the reactivity value, but the necessary reactivity value cannot be obtained, or the above-described increase in reactivity value can be achieved. The inconvenience of going against the request arises.

  The present invention has been made in view of the above circumstances, and the nuclear life distribution in the control rod axis direction while eliminating various inconveniences caused by enlarging / reducing the trap gap or changing the thickness of the hafnium plate stepwise. Can be flattened, and when the control rod is taken out, the entire control rod can reach almost the nuclear life, and the hafnium that can still be used when the nuclear life is partially reached and the replacement time is reached. To provide a nuclear reactor control rod capable of extending the nuclear life while suppressing various wastes such as economic and resource aspects of hafnium, and a method for adjusting the nuclear lifetime of the nuclear reactor control rod. Main purpose.

  In addition, while responding to the demand for increased reactivity value, the blade history problem caused by the decrease in neutron flux near the central axis of the control rod can be alleviated, and the average lifetime of the stop control rod and the stop control rod The main object is to provide a method for adjusting the reactivity value of a nuclear reactor control rod that can achieve the same reactivity value.

  Other purposes are listed below.

  Provided is a “flexible” control rod for a nuclear reactor whose rigidity is reduced and structural damage is suppressed.

  Moreover, even if the Hf plate is covered with a stainless steel or other sheath, a nuclear reactor control rod is provided that can securely fix a spacer used for trap maintenance without welding deformation (shrinkage of SH gap). .

  In order to achieve the above-described object, the reactor control rod according to the present invention uses hafnium as a main neutron absorber and controls the hafnium plate in the reactor control rod used for adjusting the output of the boiling water reactor. A pair of opposed wing pieces as the rod effective portion, a tie cloth that is provided at intervals along the central axis of the control rod and holds the four wings in a cross-sectional shape, and an opposed wing piece The trap is provided in the space between the wings and the trap water filled with reactor water, the space between the tie cloths, the axial water area filled with reactor water, and the space between the blades facing each other. In addition, the neutron absorber gradually increases from the insertion end side of the nuclear reactor control rod toward the insertion tip side in accordance with the tendency of the nuclear life gradually decreasing from the insertion end side of the nuclear reactor control rod toward the insertion tip side. Increase Is configured, characterized in that it comprises a spacer for flattening the nuclear lifetime distribution in the axial direction of the reactor control rods.

  In the nuclear control method for nuclear reactor control rods according to the present invention, in the nuclear control method for nuclear reactor control rods used for adjusting the power output of a boiling water reactor, the blades serving as control rod effective portions are Reactor control intended for a pair of wing pieces, a trap in which the space between the wing pieces is filled with reactor water, and a control rod for a reactor having a spacer that maintains the space between the wing pieces. Distribution of nuclear lifetime that gradually decreases from the insertion end side of the reactor control rod toward the insertion tip side by gradually increasing the neutron absorber contained in the spacer from the insertion end side of the rod toward the insertion tip side Is flattened.

  In a method for adjusting the reactivity value of a control rod for a nuclear reactor used to adjust the power output of a boiling water reactor, a blade piece formed by a pair of blades serving as control rod effective parts, and a furnace in the space between the blades A trap filled with water, a water window that creates a partial defect in the effective part of the control rod of the blade and creates a local change in the reactivity value of the blade, and a spacing along the central axis of the control rod A tie cloth that is placed and holds four blades in a cross-shaped cross section, and a reactor control rod that is provided in a space between the tie cloths and is filled with reactor water. The reactivity value is adjusted to alleviate the blade history problem by adjusting at least one of the area of the water window and the capacity of the axial water region.

  According to the nuclear reactor control rod and nuclear control lifetime adjustment method of the nuclear reactor control rod according to the present invention, various inconveniences caused by enlarging / reducing the gap of the trap or changing the thickness of the hafnium plate stepwise can be obtained. It is possible to flatten the nuclear life distribution in the control rod axis direction while eliminating the hafnium economic aspect that usable hafnium still remains at the time when the nuclear life is partially completed and the replacement time is reached. Nuclear life can be extended while reducing various wastes such as resources.

  According to the reactivity value adjustment method for a control rod for a nuclear reactor according to the present invention, it is possible to alleviate a blade history problem caused by a decrease in neutron flux in the vicinity of the central axis of the control rod while responding to a demand for an increase in reactivity value, and It is also possible to equalize the reactivity value of the average nuclear lifetime between the stop control rod and the stop control rod.

1 is a side perspective view showing a first embodiment of a control rod for a nuclear reactor according to the present invention. FIG. 2 is an enlarged cross-sectional view taken along line I-I in FIG. 1. FIG. 2 is an enlarged sectional view taken along line II-II in FIG. 1. FIG. 2 is a detailed view of the spacer of FIG. 1, (A) is a blade side perspective view showing a wide absorbent spacer piece, and (B) is a blade side perspective view showing a narrow absorbent spacer piece. It is a figure which shows the indirect welding fixation structure of the spacer of FIG. 1, (A) is an assembly figure before spacer fixation, (B) is a state figure after spacer fixation. It is a figure which shows the calculation conditions of the correlation evaluation of the axial area provided in the nuclear reactor control rod of FIG. 1, and a reactivity value, (A) is a figure which shows the simulation system of the nuclear reactor control rod of FIG. B is a diagram showing a simulation system (for comparison) of a control rod for stopping. The figure which shows the result of the correlation evaluation of the axial center water area | region and reactivity value of the control rod for reactors of FIG. The figure which shows the result of the correlation evaluation of the water window provided in the control rod for reactors of FIG. 1, and reactivity value. The figure which shows the calculation conditions of the correlation evaluation of the water window provided in the control rod for reactors of FIG. 1, and a reactivity value. The figure which shows the result of the correlation evaluation of the water window provided in the control rod for reactors of FIG. 1, and reactivity value. The figure which shows the calculation conditions of the correlation evaluation of the power distribution in the water window and axial center water area | region and fuel assembly in the control rod for reactors of FIG. It is a figure which shows the result of the correlation evaluation of the power distribution in the water window and axial water area | region and fuel assembly in the control rod for reactors of FIG. 1, (A) is a figure which shows power distribution, (B) is an axial center. Correlation enhancement diagram of water region and output distribution, (C) is a correlation enhancement diagram of water window and output distribution. The figure which shows the result of the correlation evaluation of the thickness of the Hf board and nuclear lifetime in the control rod for nuclear reactors of FIG. The figure which shows the calculation conditions of the correlation evaluation of the absorber spacer piece provided in the control rod for reactors of FIG. 1, and nuclear lifetime. The figure which shows the result of the correlation evaluation with the width | variety of the absorber spacer piece and nuclear lifetime in the control rod for reactors of FIG. The figure which shows the variation of the new nuclear reactor control rod. The figure which shows the variation of the new nuclear reactor control rod. The figure which shows the variation of the new nuclear reactor control rod. The figure which shows the variation of the new nuclear reactor control rod.

  FIG. 1 is a side perspective view showing a first embodiment of a control rod for a nuclear reactor according to the present invention. 2 is an enlarged sectional view taken along line II in FIG. 1, and FIG. 3 is an enlarged sectional view taken along line II-II in FIG.

  The nuclear reactor control rod CR of the present embodiment is provided so as to be insertable / removable through an arrangement gap (not shown) of a set of four fuel assemblies loaded on the core of a boiling water reactor (BWR). This is a long-life reactor control rod using hafnium as the main neutron absorber. As shown in FIGS. 1 to 3, the nuclear reactor control rod CR includes a blade 1, a spacer 2 (a wide absorbent spacer piece 21, a narrow absorbent spacer piece 22, and a non-absorbent spacer piece 23), a water window 3, the tie cloth 4, the axial center water area | region 5, the front-end | tip structure material 6, and the terminal structure material 7 are made into the main structures.

[Wings]
As shown in FIG. 2, the blade 1 of the nuclear reactor control rod CR is composed of a pair of blade pieces 10 that face each other at a predetermined interval and bear a control rod effective portion.

  Note that the thickness of the blade 1 (distance between the outer surfaces of the blade 1) is limited to 6.5 mm to 8.5 mm depending on the current specifications of the nuclear reactor.

  Each blade piece 10 is configured by sandwiching both surfaces of a hafnium plate (Hf plate) 12 that is not divided and has a uniform thickness by a zircaloy coating layer (Zry coating layer) 11. The Zry coating layer 11 is directly pressed against the Hf plate 12 so that direct contact between the surface layer of the Hf plate 12 and the reactor water is suppressed.

  The thickness of the Hf plate 12 is set to 1.4 mm to 2.6 mm, for example. The Zry coating layer 11 may be configured to be indirectly pressure-bonded to the Hf plate 12 via a mediating layer such as zirconium that is compatible with both the Hf plate 12 and the Zr alloy.

  Reactor water (light water) enters the space between the pair of blades 10 and decelerates the neutrons that have passed through the blades 10 by colliding with hydrogen nuclei or the like of the intrusion reactor water, and the neutron absorption by the Hf plate 12 A trap 13 is formed to increase efficiency.

[Spacer]
As shown in FIG. 1, the spacer 2 of the nuclear reactor control rod CR has a wide absorbent spacer piece 21, a narrow absorbent spacer piece 22, and a non-absorbent material, all of which are significantly shorter than the blade 1. The spacer piece 23 is configured to play a role of holding the wing piece 10 facing structure or the trap 13 together with the tie cloth 4, the tip structure material 6 and the end structure material 7.

  The wide absorbent material spacer piece 21 and the narrow absorbent material spacer piece 22 are composed of hafnium as a main nuclide, and bear a control rod effective portion that greatly contributes to the reactivity adjustment of the core. The wide absorbent material spacer piece 21 and the narrow absorbent material spacer piece 22 are produced in the same manufacturing process (rolling, processing, etc.) and have the same composition, but the width (blade shown in FIG. 2). 1 in the width direction W), the wide absorbent spacer piece 21 is larger than the narrow absorbent spacer piece 22. That is, the amount of hafnium is larger in the wide absorbent spacer piece 21.

  The wide absorbent spacer pieces 21 and the narrow absorbent spacer pieces 22 are not directly made of natural hafnium metal, but are improved in corrosion resistance by surface treatment, additive treatment or other methods.

  When the wing 1 is divided into approximately four equal parts and divided into a 1/4 section, a 2/4 section, a 3/4 section, and a 4/4 section from the insertion tip of the blade 1 toward the insertion end, the wide absorbent spacer piece 21 is The narrow absorbent spacer pieces 22 are provided in a discrete manner limited to the 2/4 section. In addition, the wide absorbent material spacer piece 21 is provided excluding the attachment allowance (for example, 10 cm) of the tip structure material 6.

  The non-absorbent spacer piece 23 is a spacer that does not expect to flatten the nuclear life distribution (details will be described later) of the reactor control rod CR required for the wide absorbent spacer piece 21 and the narrow absorbent spacer piece 22. It is. This non-absorbing material spacer piece 23 is a spacer piece having a lower neutron absorption effect than the narrow absorbing material spacer piece 22, and is divided into 3/4 and 4/4 sections from the insertion tip to the insertion end of the blade 1. It is limited and provided in a discrete manner. The non-absorbent spacer piece 23 is made of zircaloy that is compatible with hafnium of the blade 1 and hardly corrodes.

  4A and 4B are detailed views of the spacer 2. FIG. 4A is a side perspective view of the blade 1 showing the wide absorbent spacer piece 21, and FIG. 4B is a side perspective view of the blade 1 showing the narrow absorbent spacer piece 22. FIG.

  FIG. 4 (A) shows an example in which a fragile portion 24 in which deformation based on stress mainly in the control rod axis direction is easily concentrated is provided for the wide absorbent spacer piece 21. The fragile portion 24 is constituted by a notch. One or a plurality of the notches are formed, and the spacer defect portion is formed so as to extend in the spacer width direction.

  Further, as shown in FIG. 4A, the wide absorbent spacer piece 21 has a gradient angle θ that gradually rises as the upper and lower end surfaces move away from the axial center side of the reactor control rod CR, that is, reactor water. An ascending gradient is set along the flow direction. The gradient angle θ plays a role of facilitating the circulation of reactor water by facilitating the flow of reactor water that has entered the trap 13 to the outside of the blade 1.

  The shape, size, number, and other properties of the notches are set in consideration of the direction and degree of deformation expected for each spacer piece. In addition, the fragile portion 24 only needs to be a portion where a slight deformation is concentrated on the spacer piece based on acceleration or its own weight when the control rod is driven, and is not limited to the notch, for example, it is processed thinner than other portions. The following means may be used. Further, the arrangement interval S of the wide absorbent spacer pieces 21 is set in consideration of low rigidity (flexibility) of the nuclear reactor control rod CR, and is set to about 5 to 10 mm, for example.

  FIG. 4B shows an example in which the same notch is formed as the fragile portion 24 for the narrow absorbent spacer piece 22.

  The wide absorbent material spacer piece 21 and the narrow absorbent material spacer piece 22 are fixed by an indirect welding fixing structure provided at two or more locations so as to sandwich the fragile portion 24.

  5A and 5B are diagrams showing an indirect welding fixing structure, where FIG. 5A is an assembly diagram before fixing the spacer, and FIG. 5B is a state diagram after fixing the spacer.

  As shown in FIG. 5A, the indirect welding and fixing structure includes a male pin 25 and a female pin 26, a pair of blade pieces 10 and a spacer 2 (for example, a wide absorbent spacer 21) sandwiched between the blade pieces 10. It has a through-hole 27 through which the male pin 25 and female pin 26 can be inserted.

  The male pin 25 is constituted by a truncated cone-shaped flange portion 25a whose outer diameter gradually decreases toward the depth of the through hole 27 and a shaft portion 25b protruding from the flange portion 25a. The shaft portion 25b is formed in the through hole 27. The flange portion 25a is locked at the edge of the through hole 27 in the inserted state, and the shape is set so that the male pin 25 stops halfway without completely passing through.

  The female pin 26 is configured to be inserted into the through-hole 27 from the opposite side of the male pin 25 and to be able to insert the flange portion 25a of the male pin 25. Further, the mespin 26 has a truncated cone shape whose outer diameter gradually decreases toward the depth of the through hole 27, and is locked at the edge of the through hole 27 so that the mespin 26 stops halfway without completely passing through. The shape is set.

  The size of the through hole 27 is adjusted so that a slight gap is generated between the male pin 25 and the female pin 26 in a state where the male pin 25 and the female pin 26 are attached (FIG. 5B).

  The male pin 25 and the female pin 26 are made of hafnium, zircaloy, or an alloy of hafnium and zirconium.

  The flange portion 25b of the male pin 25 is dimensioned so as to be flush with the exposed surface of the female pin 26 in a state where it is fitted to the female pin 26 (see FIG. 5B), and is spot-welded to the female pin 26. The As shown in FIG. 5B, the spot welded portion 28 has a portion where the tip portion of the shaft portion 25 b of the male pin 25 is partially scraped to form a gap with the female pin 26 as a welding allowance.

  Further, the shaft portion 25b of the male pin 25 is cut or punched from the tip toward the pin head 25a, and is partially deformed by receiving the residual stress based on the point welding of the male pin 25 and the female pin 26. An easily deformable portion 25c (so-called welded deformation relief structure) is provided.

  The indirect welding fixing structure is used not only for fixing the wide absorbent spacer piece 21 but also for fixing the narrow absorbent spacer piece 22 and the non-absorbent spacer piece 23.

  In other words, the various spacers 2 such as the wide absorbent spacer pieces 21 are arranged on the side of the blade 10 so that the upper and lower end surfaces do not protrude from the side surface of the blade 10 and are not caught by the fuel support fitting (not shown) when the control rod is inserted or removed. It is preferable to slightly retract from the end face toward the inside.

[Water window]
As shown in FIG. 1, the water window 3 of the nuclear reactor control rod CR is provided throughout the blade pieces 10. The water window 3 is configured by being penetrated into a long hole shape or a substantially rectangular shape having a long axis in the insertion direction of the blade piece 10, and produces a local change in the reactivity value of the blade piece 10.

  Further, as shown in FIG. 2, the water windows 3 are arranged in steps so that the water windows 3 provided on the wing pieces 10 facing each other do not overlap partly or entirely. For example, if the fuel assembly is composed of 8 x 8 fuel rods, 9 x 9 or 10 x 10 in the vertical and horizontal directions, it is provided on the blade 10 on one side. The center of the water window 3 is positioned at the third or fourth, and the center of the water window 3 provided on the other wing piece 10 is positioned at the fourth to sixth counter on the same basis. .

[Tycross]
The tie cloth 4 of the reactor control rod CR forms a four-wing integrated reactor control rod CR by holding the four blades 1 in a cross-shaped cross shape. At least the surface of the tie cloth 4 is made of Zircaloy, and as shown in FIG. 1, the tie cloth 4 is intermittently provided at a predetermined interval on the central axis of the nuclear reactor control rod CR.

  Here, the wing 1 is divided into approximately four equal parts, and the ¼ section is divided into ¼ section, 2/4 section, 3/4 section, and 4/4 section from the insertion tip of the wing 1 toward the insertion end. And the 3/4 section is an exclusion area of the tie cloth 4.

  Further, as shown in FIG. 2, the tie cloth 4 has four arms 41 extending in directions orthogonal to each other and has a cross-shaped cross section, and each arm 41 has a blade holding portion 42 at the tip side thereof. have.

  The wing holding portion 42 of the tie cloth 4 is configured to bear an attachment allowance for holding the wing piece 10 and to play a role of maintaining the trap 13 like the spacer 2. In other words, the wing piece 10 and the wing holding part 42 of the tie cloth 4 are joined together in a state where the two wing pieces 10 sandwich the wing holding part 42 of the tie cloth 4. This joining is performed using the male pin 25, the female pin 26, the through hole 27, and the spot welded portion 28 based on an indirect welding fixing structure (see FIG. 5B). There is no limitation on the fixing method.

[Axial water area]
As shown in FIG. 3, the axial water region 5 of the nuclear reactor control rod CR is provided along the axial center C of the nuclear reactor control rod CR, and the tie cloth 4 (see FIG. 2) is not provided. This is the area where the reactor water is guided and filled.

  The axial center water region 5 is dimensioned so that the lower half is wider than the upper half. For example, in the upper half (1/4 section and 2/4 section) of the nuclear reactor control rod CR, the axial water region 5 extends from the axial center C to the blade piece 10 of the nuclear reactor control rod CR. The shortest distance (axial water width CW) is 10 mm to 40 mm, and in the lower half of the reactor control rod CR (3/4 section and 4/4 section), the axial water width CW is 30 mm to 50 mm. The size is set so that the lower half is larger than the upper half and is enlarged toward the insertion end from the insertion tip of the blade piece 10 within a range not exceeding 50 mm.

[Advanced structural materials and terminal structural materials]
As shown in FIG. 1, the tip structural member 6 and the end structural member 7 of the nuclear reactor control rod CR serve as a structural support and insertion / extraction guide for the nuclear reactor control rod CR. The tip structure material 6 and the end structure material 7 are made of Zircaloy, and are joined at the insertion tip portion and the insertion end portion of the blade 1, respectively. This joining is performed using the male pin 25, the female pin 26, the through hole 27, and the spot welded portion 28 based on an indirect welding fixing structure (see FIG. 5B).

  The material of the tip structural member 6 and the terminal structural member 7 is not particularly limited, and at least the surface may be composed of Zircaloy and the interior may be composed of stainless steel or other metals.

  Next, the operation of the nuclear reactor control rod CR will be described using the results of evaluation calculations related to the control rod characteristics. Note that, among the configurations of the calculation models used for each evaluation calculation, configurations corresponding to the reactor control rod CR are denoted by the same reference numerals.

[Evaluation calculation of reactivity value (1)]
The first reactivity value evaluation calculation relates to a correlation evaluation between the axial water region 5 provided in the reactor control rod CR and the reactivity value.

  FIG. 6 is a diagram showing calculation conditions for correlation evaluation, (A) is a diagram showing a simulation system of a reactor control rod CR, and (B) is a diagram showing a simulation system of a control rod for shutdown (for comparison). is there.

  Reactor control rod CR simulation system (Hf control rod model) CR is a two-dimensional calculation model composed of four blades 1 (only one blade is shown in FIG. 6A) arranged in a cross-shaped cross section. is there. The width W of the blade 1 was 125 mm, the thickness TT was 8.3 mm, the thickness HT of the Hf plate 12 was 1.8 mm, and the thickness ZT of the Zry coating layer 11 was 0.4 mm. The axial center water width CW was handled as a variable parameter, and the distance from the axial center C of the Hf control rod model CR to the blade piece 10 was changed between 5 mm and 40 mm.

  On the other hand, the simulation system (B4C control rod model) CRa of the control rod for stopping is similar to the Hf control rod model CR. Four blades 1a arranged in a cross-shaped cross section (only one blade is shown in FIG. 6B) Is a two-dimensional calculation model composed of The width W of the blade 1a is 125 mm, the thickness TT is 8.3 mm, the thickness ST of the sheath 11a is 1.1 mm, the outer diameter RO of the B4C tube 12a that is a tube filled with B4C is 5.6 mm, and the inner diameter RI is 4. 2 mm.

  The tie rod 4a corresponding to the tie cloth 4 has a distance CT from the axial center Ca to the blade piece 10a of 20 mm, and no axial water region is provided. Furthermore, the sheath 11a and the B4C tube 12a are made of stainless steel, and the packing density of the B4C powder is 70% in terms of theoretical density.

  The reactivity values of the Hf control rod model CR and the B4C control rod model CRa are both Monte Carlo methods (reference: Japan Atomic Energy Society "Spring of Spring 2002" G58, P367, Yoshioka, Ando, Mitsuhashi, Sakurada, Monte Carlo combustion calculation code Development).

  FIG. 7 is a diagram showing the result of evaluation calculation. In addition, the horizontal axis | shaft of FIG. 7 is a dimension of the axial center water width CW, and a vertical axis | shaft is a relative value of reactivity value. The relative value of the reactivity value is (reactivity value of Hf control rod model CR) / (reactivity value of B4C control rod model CRa). In addition, FIG. 7 is normalized by the reactivity value when the axial center water width CW is 5 mm.

  As shown in FIG. 7, the reactivity value 902 of the Hf control rod model CR is 13.4% higher than the reactivity value 901 of the B4C control rod model CRa when the axial center water width CW is 5 mm. When the axial center water width CW is 30 mm, the value is 5% higher than the reactivity value 901 of the B4C control rod model CRa. In addition, when the axial center water width CW of the Hf control rod model CR is changed from 30 mm to 40 mm, the rate of decrease in the reactivity value is large and decreases by 7.9%, but the decrease gradient is substantially constant (linear). It became.

  As a result, for example, as a means for increasing the reactivity value of the nuclear reactor control rod CR by 5% in comparison with that of the shutdown control rod at the beginning of the lifetime, the width adjustment of the axial water region 5 of the nuclear reactor control rod CR is performed. It can be understood that it is effective. The same applies to the case where the reactivity value of the nuclear reactor control rod CR is lowered by 5% at the end of the lifetime, compared with that of the shutdown control rod.

[Evaluation calculation of reactivity value (2)]
The second evaluation calculation of the reactivity value relates to a correlation evaluation between the thickness of the Hf plate 12 in the reactor control rod CR and the reactivity value.

  The reactivity value of the nuclear reactor control rod CR is such that, in the Hf control rod model CR shown in FIG. 6A, the axial center water width CW is constant at 30 mm, and the thickness (dimension in the blade thickness direction) TW of the trap 13 is 3 When the thickness HT of the Hf plate 12 is a variable parameter (case 1), and when the thickness ZT of the Zry coating layer 11 is constant 0.4 mm and the thickness HT of the Hf plate 12 is a variable parameter (case 1) A total of two cases, including case 2), were performed. In addition, the reaction value of the control rod for a stop used as a reference | standard was calculated using B4C control rod model CRa shown in FIG.6 (B).

  FIG. 8 is a diagram showing the result of evaluation calculation. 8 is the thickness HT of the Hf plate 12, and the vertical axis is the relative value of the reactivity value. The relative value of the reactivity value is (reactivity value of Hf control rod model CR) / (reactivity value of B4C control rod model CRa).

  As shown in FIG. 8, the reactivity value 903 of the Hf control rod model CR in the case 1 is greater than the reactivity value 901 of the B4C control rod model CRa when the thickness of the Hf plate exceeds about 1.5 mm. . Further, the reactivity value 904 of the Hf control rod model CR in the case 2 is larger than the reactivity value 901 of the B4C control rod model CRa when the thickness of the Hf plate exceeds about 1.4 mm. In addition, the increase in the reactivity value accompanying the increase in the Hf plate 12 is smaller in the case 2 than in the case 1, but this is because the increase in the reactivity value was suppressed by the reduction in the thickness TW of the trap 13. by.

  As a result, for example, as a means for increasing the reactivity value of the reactor control rod CR 5% higher than that of the shutdown control rod at the beginning of the lifetime, the thickness of the Hf plate 12 of the reactor control rod CR and the trap 13 It can be understood that the thickness adjustment is effective. The same applies to the case where the reactivity value of the nuclear reactor control rod CR is lowered by 5% at the end of the lifetime, compared with that of the shutdown control rod.

[Reactivity Value Evaluation Calculation (Part 3)]
The third reactivity value evaluation calculation relates to a correlation evaluation between the water window 3 provided in the reactor control rod CR and the reactivity value.

  FIG. 9 shows the calculation conditions for the correlation evaluation, and is a diagram showing a simulation system of the reactor control rod CR.

  Reactor control rod CR simulation system (Hf control rod model) CR is a two-dimensional structure composed of four blades (only one blade is shown in FIG. 9) arranged in a cross-shaped cross section as shown in FIG. It is a calculation model. The width W of the blade 1 was 125 mm, its thickness TT was 8.3 mm, and the thickness ZT of the Zry coating layer 11 was 0.4 mm. The axial center water width CW was constant at 30 mm.

  The water window width WW was handled as a variable parameter, and was changed in a range of 0 mm to 15 mm from a position 60 mm away from the axis C of the Hf control rod model CR.

  FIG. 10 is a diagram showing the result of evaluation calculation. The horizontal axis in FIG. 10 is the water window width WW, and the vertical axis is the normalized reactivity value. This normalization is performed based on the reactivity value when the water window width WW is 0 mm.

  As shown in FIG. 10, the reactivity value 905 decreases as the water window width WW increases in the Hf control rod model CR. Compared to the case where the water window width WW is 10 mm, the water window width WW is 0 mm. The value was 3.1% lower. This decrease in reactivity value of 3.1% is equivalent to the decrease in reactivity value when the axial center water width CW is increased by 4 mm from 26 mm to 30 mm.

  As a result, for example, adjusting the size of the water window 3 of the nuclear reactor control rod CR is effective as a means for increasing the reactivity value of the nuclear reactor control rod CR by 5% more than that of the shutdown control rod at the beginning of the lifetime. I can understand. The same applies to the case where the reactivity value of the nuclear reactor control rod CR is lowered by 5% at the end of the lifetime, compared with that of the shutdown control rod. Further, in reducing the reactivity value by a required amount, the hafnium saving effect is greater when the water window 3 is adjusted than when the axial water region 5 is adjusted.

[Evaluation calculation of output distribution]
The power distribution evaluation calculation relates to the correlation evaluation of the power distribution in the water window 3 and the axial water region 5 in the nuclear reactor control rod CR and the fuel assembly.

  FIG. 11 shows calculation conditions for correlation evaluation, and is a diagram showing a core simulation system loaded with a reactor control rod CR.

  The core simulation system CRE is loaded with a cross-sectional cross-section nuclear reactor control rod CR simulation system (Hf control rod model) CR between fuel assemblies FLA in which fuel rods FLR are bundled in a matrix of 9 × 9. A two-dimensional calculation model that includes a water rod WRR and the like and simulates an actual machine BWR as a coolant temperature and other core parameters.

  The basic condition of the Hf control rod model CR is the same as that of FIG. 10, the Hf control rod model (case 1) without the water window 3 and the axial center water width CW of 5 mm, the shaft without the water window 3 and the shaft. The Hf control rod model (case 2) with a water width CW of 26 mm and the water window 3 are arranged in steps so as to correspond to the positions of the fuel rods (4, 1) and the fuel rods (5, 1) shown in FIG. The Hf control rod model (case 3) with a water window width WW of 7.8 mm and an axial center water width CW of 26 mm was used for a total of 3 cases.

  FIG. 12 is a diagram showing the results of the evaluation calculation, (A) is a diagram showing the output distribution of the case 1 (symbol 906), the output distribution of the case 2 (symbol 907), and the output distribution of the case 3 (symbol 908). (B) Correlation emphasis diagram of axial center water region 5 and output distribution (output distribution of case 2-output distribution of case 1), (C) Correlation emphasis diagram of water window 3 and output distribution (output distribution of case 3) -Output distribution of Case 2). Note that the outputs in FIGS. 12A to 12B are normalized with respect to the output of the fuel rods (9, 9), which are less susceptible to the nuclear effects of the control rods.

  Here, based on the asymmetric structure of the blade 1 (the difference in the arrangement of the water windows 3), a slight asymmetry of the power distribution occurs in the fuel assemblies FLA on both sides of the blade 1. For this reason, the output distribution of the case 3 uses the average value of the outputs of the fuel assemblies FLA on both sides of the blade 1.

  As shown in FIG. 12A, it can be seen that Case 1 to Case 3 have different contributions to the output distribution of the fuel assembly FLA. Further, as shown in FIG. 12B, the influence of the axial water width CW (difference in output distribution due to the difference of the axial water width CW) appears prominently in the vicinity of the axial center C of the Hf control rod model CR. . Further, as shown in FIG. 12C, a significant difference in the output distribution depending on the presence or absence of the water window 3 appeared in the vicinity of the water window 3 of the Hf control rod model CR.

  From these facts, it is effective to adjust the size of the water window 3 and the axial water region 5 of the reactor control rod CR as a means for flattening the power distribution inside the fuel assembly and alleviating the blade history problem. Understandable.

[Evaluation calculation of nuclear lifetime (part 1)]
The first nuclear lifetime evaluation calculation relates to a correlation between the thickness of the Hf plate 12 in the nuclear reactor control rod CR and the nuclear lifetime of the nuclear reactor control rod CR.

  The evaluation calculation of the nuclear lifetime is performed in the Hf control rod model CR shown in FIG. 6A, with the thickness HT of the Hf plate 12 as a variable parameter, and at the time when the initial reactivity value is reduced by 10% according to convention. As a lifetime. In addition, the nuclear life of the control rod used as a reference was calculated using the B4C control rod model CRa shown in FIG. 6 (B).

  FIG. 13 is a diagram showing the result of evaluation calculation. The horizontal axis represents the thickness HT of the Hf plate 12, and the vertical axis represents the nuclear life of the Hf control rod model CR.

  As shown in FIG. 13, the nuclear life 909 of the Hf control rod model CR becomes longer as the thickness HT of the Hf plate 12 increases, and when the thickness HT of the Hf plate 12 is 1.3 mm or more, the increase in thickness occurs. The extension ratio of the nuclear lifetime 909 becomes linear and increases. That is, the thicker the Hf plate 12, the longer the nuclear life of the nuclear reactor control rod CR.

  As a result, for example, the thickness adjustment of the Hf plate 12 is effective as a means for increasing the nuclear life of the nuclear reactor control rod CR. When the Hf plate 12 exceeds a specific thickness, the effect of extending the nuclear life by this means is achieved. Becomes prominent.

  However, since the control rod CR for the nuclear reactor is inserted and removed in the core through the gap between the adjacent fuel assemblies, the thickness of the blade 1 is usually about 8 mm (in some reactors, about 6 to 7 mm). Limited to

  For this reason, if the thickness of the Hf plate 12 is increased, the nuclear lifetime increases linearly, but the width of the trap 13 becomes narrower, and the blade piece 10 sandwiching the trap 13, the tie cloth 4, and the tip structure It is difficult to connect the material 6 and the end structure material 7 to each other from the viewpoint of structural integrity. That is, only by depending on the thickness of the Hf plate 12, the size of the water window 3, and the axial water region 5, there is a limit to extending the nuclear life due to the thickness limitation of the Hf plate 12 based on the structural design of the reactor. is there.

  However, by adopting the spacer 2 constituted by the wide absorbent material spacer piece 21, the narrow absorbent material spacer piece 22, and the non-absorbent material spacer piece 23, it is possible to limit the nuclear life extension based on the thickness restriction of the Hf plate 12. Can break through. Hereinafter, the relationship between the spacer 2 and the nuclear lifetime will be described.

[Evaluation calculation of nuclear lifetime (2)]
The evaluation calculation of the second nuclear lifetime is based on the width (neutron absorber content) and atoms of the absorber spacer pieces (corresponding to the wide absorber spacer pieces 21 and the narrow absorber spacer pieces 22) that bear the control rod effective part. This is related to the correlation evaluation of the nuclear life of the furnace control rod CR.

  FIG. 14 is a diagram showing calculation conditions for correlation evaluation, and shows a simulation system of a control rod CR for a nuclear reactor.

  The simulation system (Hf control rod model) of the nuclear reactor control rod CR is a two-dimensional calculation model composed of four blades 1 (only one blade is shown in FIG. 14) arranged in a cross shape in cross section. The evaluation calculation was performed in a total of 2 cases.

  Regarding the case 1, the thickness HT of each Hf plate 12 constituting the pair of blade pieces 10 was 2.0 mm, and the thickness ZT of each Zry coating layer 11 was 0.37 mm. For the absorbent spacer piece 20 that simulates the wide absorbent spacer piece 21 and the wide absorbent material 22 responsible for core reactivity control, the thickness ZH ′ of the Hf piece 201 constituting the absorbent spacer piece 20 is 2.0 mm, and Zry coating The layer thickness TZ ′ was 0.37 mm, the width W ′ of the absorber spacer piece 20 was treated as a variable parameter, and the distance from the outer end point of the blade piece 10 was varied between 0 and 100 mm. The width W of the blade 1 is 125 mm, the thickness TT is 8.22 mm, and the axial center water width CW is 30 mm.

  Regarding the case 2, the thickness HT of each Hf plate 12 constituting the pair of blade pieces 10 was 1.5 mm, and the thickness ZT of each Zry coating layer 11 was 0.37 mm. With respect to the absorbent spacer piece 20, the thickness ZH ′ of the Hf piece 201 constituting the absorbent spacer piece 20 is 3.0 mm, the thickness TZ ′ of the Zry coating layer is 0.37 mm, and the width W ′ of the absorbent spacer piece 20 is set. Was treated as a variable parameter, and the distance from the outer end point of the blade piece 10 was varied between 0 and 100 mm. The width W of the blade 1 is 125 mm, the thickness TT is 8.22 mm, and the axial center water width CW is 30 mm.

  FIG. 15 is a diagram showing the results of the evaluation calculation, where the horizontal axis is the width W ′ of the absorbent spacer piece 20 and the vertical axis is the relative value of the nuclear lifetime of the Hf control rod model CR. The relative value of the nuclear lifetime is (nuclear lifetime of the Hf control rod model CR) / (nuclear lifetime of the B4C control rod model CRa) similarly to the relative value of the reactivity value shown in FIG.

  As shown in FIG. 15, the change in the nuclear lifetime corresponding to the change in the width W ′ of the absorbent spacer piece 20 shows the same tendency in the case 1 (reference numeral 911) and the case 2 (reference numeral 912). . In both cases, the nuclear life of the Hf control rod model CR is in the range where the width W ′ of the absorber spacer piece 20 is up to about 30 mm (this range is the distribution of neutron flux along the width W of the blade 1 (not shown)). In the range in which the neutron flux is relatively large), the gradient (increase in nuclear lifetime relative to the increment in width W ′) was relatively large.

  In the range where the width W ′ of the absorber spacer piece 20 exceeds about 30 mm to about 80 mm (this range is a range in which the neutron flux becomes relatively small), the gradient seems to increase substantially linearly. become.

  In the range where the width W ′ of the absorber spacer piece 20 exceeds about 80 mm (this range is a range in which the neutron flux rises and recovers in the vicinity of the axial center water region), the gradient increases again.

Based on the trend of nuclear lifetime fluctuation gradient, the following can be said.
When the absorber spacer piece having the same reactivity value and the same kind and density of the absorber nuclide contained in the spacer piece and the shape and size of the spacer piece are used, the absorber spacer piece is located near the center of the blade 1 in the width direction. Compared to the arrangement, the arrangement near the outside of the blade 1 and the vicinity of the axis C contributes significantly to the extension of the nuclear life.

  In particular, since the outside of the blade 1 is a place where the neutron absorption rate is relatively high and the nuclear life is likely to be shortened, providing the absorber spacer piece at such a place means that the nuclear life is reduced. This means that the absorber spacer piece is arranged in a place where it is likely to be shortened. Therefore, it can be said that the absorber spacer piece contributes more to the extension of the nuclear life when it is arranged near the outside of the blade 1 than when it is arranged near the axis C of the nuclear reactor control rod CR.

The nuclear life extension effect of the absorber spacer piece will be specifically described.
In consideration of manufacturability, mechanical soundness and other circumstances, the nuclear reactor control rod is configured so that the control rod effective portion (for example, hafnium plate) is uniform in the insertion direction and the orthogonal direction thereof. The neutron irradiation unevenness is caused by the spatial nonuniformity of the core neutron flux distribution.

  The neutron irradiation unevenness of the nuclear reactor control rod causes the nuclear lifetime to be different in each place in the insertion direction of the nuclear reactor control rod and in the orthogonal direction, which is the cause of the "non-uniform nuclear lifetime distribution". . The non-uniform nuclear lifetime distribution eventually leads to an event in which a portion that has not yet reached the nuclear lifetime and a portion that has already reached the nuclear lifetime are mixed in a neutron absorber such as hafnium. If the control rod for the nuclear reactor partially reaches the nuclear lifetime, the atomicity can be maintained from the viewpoint of maintaining the reactor reactivity control function in a healthy state even if the portion that has not reached the nuclear lifetime remains. The reactor control rod CR must be removed from the reactor and replaced. In particular, in a control rod for a reactor using hafnium as a main neutron absorber, hafnium that can still be used is processed and disposed of, so that expensive hafnium is wasted economically and resources.

  In consideration of manufacturability and mechanical soundness, the control rod effective portion (Hf plate 12) is configured to be uniform in the insertion direction and the orthogonal direction thereof. As an effective measure to solve the waste of hafnium, the necessary amount of hafnium is secured based on the part where the nuclear life is long, and the part where the nuclear life is shortened as necessary (nuclear life Adding hafnium (so that the distribution is uniform).

  For this reason, the reactor control rod CR of the present embodiment has a structure for suppressing the waste of hafnium based on the non-uniform nuclear lifetime distribution, and maintains the trap 13 that enhances the neutron absorption effect and saves hafnium. That is, the spacer 2 is provided.

  In the nuclear reactor control rod CR, in order to flatten the nuclear life distribution in the direction orthogonal to the control rod insertion direction, as shown in FIG. A wide absorbent material spacer piece 21 and a narrow absorbent material spacer 22 having a large neutron absorption capacity are arranged on the outer side.

  Further, the reactor control rod CR is assumed to be used as a stop control rod that is inserted into the core during normal reactor operation. Therefore, in the control rod CR for the nuclear reactor, in order to flatten the nonuniformity of the nuclear life distribution in the control rod insertion direction (axial direction), as shown in FIG. A wide absorbent spacer piece 21 is placed in the shortest place (1/4 section), and then a narrow absorbent spacer spacer is placed in a place where the nuclear life is shortened (2/4 section). Non-absorbing material spacers are arranged in places (3/4 section and 4/4 section) that become longer.

Next, the effect will be described.
(1) In the nuclear reactor control rod CR according to the present embodiment, the blades 10 each having the Hf plate 12 as a control rod effective portion are opposed to each other along the control rod central axis. Between the arrangement of the tie cloth 4 and the tie cloth 4 provided in the space between the tie cloth 4 that holds the four blades 1 in a cross-shaped cross section and the blade piece 10 and filled with reactor water. It is provided in the space and is provided in the space between the axial water region 5 filled with reactor water and the space between the blade pieces 10 to maintain the trap 13 and from the insertion end side to the insertion tip side of the reactor control rod CR The neutron absorber gradually increases from the insertion end side of the reactor control rod CR toward the insertion tip side in accordance with the tendency of the nuclear lifetime to gradually decrease toward the insertion point. Flatten axial nuclear lifetime distribution And a pacer 2.

  For this reason, control rods are eliminated while eliminating various inconveniences (such as unhealthyness due to mechanical imbalance and unmanufacturing ease) caused by expanding or reducing the gap of the trap 13 or changing the thickness of the Hf plate 12 stepwise. Various types of hafnium, such as the economic and resource aspects of hafnium, which can flatten the axial nuclear life distribution, and still have usable hafnium remaining at the time of replacement after partial nuclear life. The nuclear life can be extended while reducing waste.

  By the way, if the Hf plate 12 and the spacer 2 are produced through different manufacturing processes and there is a slight difference between the two metal crystals, a difference in irradiation growth occurs because they are exposed to a neutron irradiation environment for a long period of time. There is a possibility that the blade 1 of the control rod CR will be deformed or damaged. The disadvantage of this point is that by making the Hf plate 12 and the spacer 2 in the same manufacturing process and aligning the crystal structure, the difference in irradiation growth is reduced and the structure constrained state due to irradiation growth becomes difficult to form. The stress applied to the blade 1 is reduced, and the deterioration of the soundness of the nuclear reactor control rod CR can be effectively suppressed.

  (2) Since the spacer 2 uses hafnium as a main neutron absorber, the spacer 2 is in direct contact with the Hf plate 12 (also having hafnium as the main neutron absorber) constituting the blade piece 10. In addition, the effect of (1) can be obtained while avoiding electrochemical corrosion between different metals.

  (3) The spacer 2 is composed of a plurality of spacer pieces arranged side by side in the control rod axis direction. A spacer piece having a stepwise width increases from the insertion terminal side of the nuclear reactor control rod toward the insertion tip side. Is provided. That is, the narrow absorbent spacer pieces 22 → the wide absorbent spacer pieces 21 are provided in the order from the insertion end toward the insertion tip. Thereby, in consideration of the difference in irradiation growth due to neutron irradiation, even when using a spacer piece (spacer piece in which the amount adjustment of the neutron absorber is limited) as manufactured by the same rolling process, The effect (1) can be obtained.

  (4) The length of the spacer piece is set shorter than the length of the quarter section of the blade 1. This is because, for convenience, the reactor control rod divides the blade 1 into four equal parts, from the insertion tip of the blade 1 toward the insertion end, 1/4 section, 2/4 section, 3/4 section, and 4/4. This is because it is often designed in units of divisions. In this way, by using a spacer piece shorter than the quarter section of the blade 1, in other words, by not using a spacer piece having a length extending over the section, the control rod CR for the nuclear reactor is provided for convenience of design. Can be ensured. “Flexibility” allows slight deformation of the blade 1 based on its acceleration and acceleration of the control rod CR for nuclear reactors with hafnium having a large specific gravity as the main neutron absorber, or due to its own weight. This is an advantageous mechanical property for reducing the above.

  (5) Since the spacer piece has the fragile portion 24 in which deformation due to stress in the control rod axis direction tends to concentrate, the “flexibility” of the reactor control rod CR is further enhanced, and the effect of (4) Is increased.

  (6) An indirect welding fixing structure in which the blade piece 10 and the spacer piece are fixed to each other without being directly welded is provided at two or more positions sandwiching the weakened portion 24 of the spacer piece. For this reason, since the residual stress by welding does not act directly on the wing | blade 1, the welding deformation of the wing | blade 1 can be reduced significantly.

  (7) The indirect welding and fixing structure includes a through hole 27 provided in the laminated body of the blade piece 10 and the spacer 2 constituting the blade 1, a male pin 25 inserted into the through hole 27 and locked in the middle, and the male pin. 25 is inserted into the through hole 27 of the laminated body from the opposite side of the laminated body, locked in the middle and fitted with the male pin 25, and the spot welded portion 28 where the male pin 25 and the female pin 26 are spot-welded in the fitted state. It has the structure which has. That is, by pressing the male pin 25 against the laminated body of the wing 1 and pressing the female pin 26 against the laminated body of the wing 1 from the opposite side, a sandwiching pressure can be applied to the laminated body. Therefore, the effect of (6) can be obtained while maintaining the structure of the blade 1 firmly.

  (8) The indirect welding fixing structure has a deformation permissible portion 29 that is easily deformed partially by receiving the residual stress based on the point welding of each other at least one of the male pin 25 and the female pin 26. For this reason, the welding deformation that can occur in the male pin 25 and the female pin 26 by spot welding is easily absorbed by the male pin 25 or the female pin 26, and the welding deformation hardly propagates to the blade 1, and the effect of (6) is enhanced.

  The male pin 25 and the female pin 26 are set slightly smaller than the diameter of the through hole 27, so that the stress load due to thermal expansion is alleviated, and the mechanical soundness of the reactor control rod CR based on the fixing of the spacer is reduced. Can be prevented.

  (9) Since the Hf plate 12 of the blade piece 10 having a uniform thickness is used, the manufacturability of the control rod for the nuclear reactor is good.

  (10) The tie cloth 4 is provided only in the 1/4 section and the 4/4 section of the wing 1. That is, the tie cloth is eliminated from the 2/4 section and the 3/4 section located in the center of the reactor control rod CR, and the overall rigidity of the reactor control rod CR is likely to be lowered. For this reason, even with the configuration of the tie cloth, the “flexibility” of the nuclear reactor control rod CR can be obtained, and the effect of (4) is enhanced.

  (11) The surface of the Hf plate 12 of the blade 1 is coated with zircaloy. For this reason, plant radioactivity based on exfoliation of hafnium as a neutron absorber can be suppressed.

  To explain, hafnium generally has high corrosion resistance, but it has been found that when it is exposed to high temperature water for a long period of time, a slight amount of corrosion products are generated on the surface and peeled off for some reason. This exfoliated corrosion product is radioactive. The contained nuclides are mainly Hf-181 and emit relatively low energy gamma rays (482 keV, 346 keV and 133 keV) with a half-life of 43 days. A small amount of Ta-182 that emits 1.2 MeV gamma rays with a half-life of 111 days is also produced. In recent years, the quality of BWR water has been significantly improved compared to the initial stage of introduction of BWR, and the radioactivity level has been significantly reduced, so that the low radioactivity of Hf-181 can be confirmed. Hf-181 has a relatively short half-life and is weak in radioactivity, so there are almost no problems with the external environment, but it can be a target nuclide for radioactivity reduction measures in the reactor building. In the nuclear reactor control rod CR of the present embodiment, the surface of the Hf plate 12 of the blade 1 is covered with the Zry coating layer 11, so that the radioactivity based on the above-described origin can be greatly suppressed.

  (12) By adjusting the area of the water window 3, the thickness of the trap 13, the axial water width CW of the axial water region 5 or its capacity, etc., in other words, a plurality of Hf plates having different thicknesses as in the prior art are used. Without obtaining the desired power distribution and reactivity value.

  Regarding the reactivity value, for example, the average reactivity value of the lifetime is equal to the reactivity value of the stop control rod, or the reactivity value at the beginning of the lifetime is 5% of the reactivity value of the stop control rod. The reactivity value at the end of the lifetime may be adjusted to be 5% smaller than the reactivity value of the stop control rod. Therefore, while reducing the blade history problem, which is generally a problem for nuclear reactor control rods, and eliminating the inconvenience of adopting a neutron absorber plate splitting method, the average lifetime lifetime reactivity value can be reduced. Can be equivalent to reactivity value.

  As described above, the nuclear reactor control rod, the nuclear lifetime adjustment method, and the reactivity value adjustment method according to the present invention have been described based on one embodiment. However, the specific configuration is limited to this embodiment. However, design changes and additions are permitted without departing from the spirit of the invention described in the claims.

  For example, since the “non-absorbent spacer piece” plays a role of flattening the nuclear lifetime distribution, the wide absorbent spacer piece 21 and the narrow absorbent spacer piece in the plan for flattening the nuclear lifetime distribution. It may be necessary to use a neutron absorbing material such as hafnium as in the case of 22.

  In short, various variations of the spacer 2 of the reactor control rod CR can be considered. The spacer 2 is provided in the space between the blade pieces 10 to maintain the trap 13 and inserted from the insertion end side of the reactor control rod CR. According to the trend of nuclear life which gradually decreases toward the tip side, the neutron absorber is configured to gradually increase from the insertion end side of the reactor control rod toward the insertion tip side, and the control rod for the reactor. The geometry, volume, and components are appropriately adjusted so as to flatten the axial lifetime distribution of the CR.

  Moreover, the water window 3 and the axial center water area | region 5 are adjusted in adjustment of the reactivity value and nuclear lifetime of the control rod CR for reactors, and are set to various shapes and dimensions. For example, in the present embodiment, the water window 3 has a shape having a long axis in the control rod axis direction, but does not exclude circular, square, or other shapes. Similarly, the axial water region 5 has a two-stage structure with different widths in the range from the 1/4 section to the 2/4 section and in the range from the 3/4 section to the 4/4 section. The width may be uniform, or the width may be changed in more detail to adjust the reactivity value or the like in more detail.

(reference)
16-19 is a figure which shows the variation of the control rod for nuclear reactors.
FIG. 16 shows a nuclear reactor control rod in which the width of the absorber spacer is expanded to the center in the blade width direction, targeting a quarter section. The hafnium plate and the spacer are exposed without being covered with the zircaloy coating layer, and are made of hafnium metal or hafnium-zirconium alloy. As described above, when the hafnium plate is not coated with the zircaloy coating layer, the hafnium plate and the spacer are all preferably improved in corrosion resistance by surface polishing, film formation or mixing of additives.

  FIG. 17 shows a nuclear reactor control rod in which the width of the absorber spacer is expanded to the center in the blade width direction, targeting the quarter section. The hafnium plate is covered with the zircaloy coating layer, while the spacer is exposed without being covered with the zircaloy coating layer. In the case where the spacer pieces are not covered with the Zircaloy coating layer, the spacers should be improved in corrosion resistance by surface polishing, film formation or mixing of additives.

  In addition, FIG. 17 shows an example in which the thickness of the spacer is different from the thickness of the hafnium plate. This is an example in which the spacer and the hafnium plate are produced in different manufacturing processes, in other words, in the case where the nuclear lifetime distribution is flattened, resulting in the spacer being thicker than the hafnium plate of the blade. is there. If the manufacturing process is different, the hafnium plate and the spacer have different crystal structures and cause a difference in irradiation growth. In this case, the deterioration of the structural integrity of the control rod for the reactor based on the difference in irradiation growth can be mitigated by concentrating the deformation at a specific location by providing the above-described fragile portion 24 or the like.

  FIG. 18 shows a thin nuclear reactor control rod whose blade thickness is limited to 6.0 to 7.0 mm. Specific design values are as follows: the thickness of the hafnium plate of the blade piece = 1.5 mm, the thickness of the hafnium plate of the spacer = 1.5 mm, the thickness of the zircaloy coating layer covering both hafnium plates = 0.35 mm, The total length is 6.6 mm, which is suitable for a thin reactor control rod limited to 6.0 to 7.0 mm. Therefore, when using the hafnium plate and zircaloy coating layer prepared in the same manufacturing process as the blade piece and the spacer, the thicknesses of the hafnium plate and zircaloy coating layer are 1.5 mm and 0.35 mm, respectively. It is good to do.

FIG. 19 shows a thick-type nuclear reactor control rod (reactor control rod that occupies most of the actual equipment) having a blade thickness of about 8.0 mm.
This thick reactor control rod is characterized in that two spacers are stacked. Specific design values are as follows: the thickness of the hafnium plate of the blade piece = 1.45 mm, the thickness of the hafnium plate of the spacer = 1.45 mm, and the thickness of the zircaloy coating layer covering both hafnium plates = 0. The overall length is 8.2 mm, which is suitable for a thin reactor control rod limited to about 8.0 mm.

  CR: Reactor control rod, 1 ... Wing, 10 ... Blade, 11 ... Zircaloy coating layer, 12 ... Hafnium plate, 13 ... Trap, 2 ... Spacer, 21 ... Wide absorber spacer , 22 ... narrow absorber spacer piece, 23 ... non-absorber spacer piece, 24 ... weak part, 25 ... male pin, 25a ... male pin flange part, 25b ... male pin shaft part, 26 ... ... Mespin, 27 ... Through hole, 28 ... Spot weld, 29 ... Deformable part, 3 ... Water window, 4 ... Tie cloth, 5 ... Axial water region, 6 ... Tip structure material, 7: Terminal structural material, C: Reactor control rod axial center, CW: Reactor control rod axial water region, S: Spacer spacing, θ: Spacer end gradient angle.

Claims (14)

In a control rod for a reactor that uses hafnium as a main neutron absorber and is used to adjust the output of a boiling water reactor,
A pair of wing pieces facing each other with a hafnium plate as a control rod effective part;
A tie cloth that is provided at intervals along the central axis of the control rod and that holds the four blades in a cross-shaped cross section;
A trap provided in a space between the blades facing the blade, and filled with reactor water;
An axial water region provided in a space between the tie cloths and filled with reactor water;
Inserting the control rod for the nuclear reactor according to the trend of the nuclear life gradually shortening from the insertion end side of the nuclear reactor control rod toward the insertion tip side while maintaining the trap provided in the space between the blades facing the blade A neutron absorber is configured to gradually increase from the terminal side toward the insertion tip side, and a spacer for flattening the nuclear life distribution in the axial direction of the nuclear reactor control rod;
A control rod for a nuclear reactor, comprising: In the nuclear reactor control rod according to claim 1,
The control rod for a nuclear reactor, wherein the spacer is made of hafnium as a main neutron absorber. In the control rod for a nuclear reactor according to claim 1 or 2,
The spacer is composed of a plurality of spacer pieces arranged side by side in the control rod axis direction, and a spacer piece that is gradually increased in width from the insertion end side of the nuclear reactor control rod toward the insertion tip side is provided. Reactor control rod. The reactor control rod according to any one of claims 1 to 3,
The control rod for a nuclear reactor, wherein the spacer piece is set to have a length shorter than a quarter length of the blade piece. In the nuclear reactor control rod according to any one of claims 1 to 4,
The control rod for a nuclear reactor, wherein the spacer piece has a fragile portion in which deformation based on stress in the control rod axis direction tends to concentrate. In the nuclear reactor control rod according to any one of claims 1 to 5,
A control rod for a nuclear reactor comprising an indirect welding fixing structure in which the blade piece and the spacer piece are fixed to each other without being directly welded at two or more positions sandwiching the fragile portion of the spacer piece. . The control rod for a nuclear reactor according to any one of claims 1 to 6,
The indirect welding and fixing structure includes a through hole provided in a laminated body of blade pieces and spacers constituting a wing, a male pin inserted into the through hole and locked in the middle, and a laminated body penetrating from the opposite side of the male pin. A control rod for a nuclear reactor, comprising: a mespin inserted into a hole and locked halfway and fitted with a male pin; and a spot welded portion where the male pin and the female pin are spot-welded in the fitted state. In the control rod for a nuclear reactor according to any one of claims 1 to 7,
The control rod for a nuclear reactor according to claim 1, wherein the indirect welding fixing structure has at least one of a male pin and a female pin a deformation allowing portion where deformation is partially concentrated by receiving a residual stress based on each point welding. The control rod for a nuclear reactor according to any one of claims 1 to 8,
The control rod for a nuclear reactor, wherein the hafnium plate of the blade has a uniform thickness. The reactor control rod according to any one of claims 1 to 9,
A control rod for a nuclear reactor according to claim 1, wherein the blade has a water window that forms a partial hafnium defect and creates a local change in the reactivity value of the blade. The reactor control rod according to any one of claims 1 to 10,
When the wing is divided into approximately four equal parts, from the insertion tip of the wing toward the insertion end, it is divided into 1/4 section, 2/4 section, 3/4 section, and 4/4 section.
The nuclear reactor control rod according to claim 1, wherein the tie cloth is provided only in a quarter section and a fourth section of the blade. In the nuclear life adjustment method of the control rod for the reactor used to adjust the output of the boiling water reactor,
A control for a nuclear reactor comprising a pair of wing pieces facing each other as a control rod effective portion, a trap filled with reactor water in the space between the wing pieces, and a spacer for maintaining the space between the wing pieces. For sticks,
Nuclei that gradually become shorter from the insertion end side of the reactor control rod toward the insertion tip side by gradually increasing the neutron absorber contained in the spacer from the insertion end side of the reactor control rod toward the insertion tip side A method for adjusting the nuclear lifetime of a control rod for a nuclear reactor, characterized in that the distribution of the lifetime is flattened. The method for adjusting the nuclear life of a nuclear reactor control rod according to claim 12,
The spacer is composed of a plurality of spacer pieces that are shorter than the length of the blade, and the spacer pieces that are gradually wider from the insertion end side of the reactor control rod toward the insertion tip side are included in the spacer. A method for adjusting the nuclear life of a control rod for a nuclear reactor, characterized by gradually increasing the number of neutron absorbers. In the method of adjusting the reactivity value of the control rod for the reactor used for adjusting the output of the boiling water reactor,
A wing consisting of a pair of wings serving as control rod effective parts, a trap filled with reactor water in the space between the wings, and a wing that forms a partial defect in the control rod effective part of the wings A water window that creates a local change in the reactivity value of the piece, a tie cloth that is spaced along the central axis of the control rod and holds the four wings in a cross-shaped cross, and between the placement of the tie cloths Targeting a reactor control rod having an axial water area that is provided in a space and filled with reactor water,
The reactivity value of the reactor control rod is characterized in that the reactivity value is adjusted so as to alleviate the blade history problem through adjustment of at least one of the area of the water window and the capacity of the axial water region. Value adjustment method.

Images