JP2011013903A - Message comparison decision method, message comparison decision device and message comparison decision program - Google Patents

Abstract

PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide a message comparison decision method, device and program, allowing efficient verification of difference in message contents between signal files wherein encoded messages are mixed.SOLUTION: This message comparison decision method includes: an arithmetic processing step of executing arithmetic processing to temporary files generated from the messages recorded in two signal files; and a comparison decision step of deciding whether or not the contents of the messages respectively recorded in the two signal flies accord. The arithmetic processing step has: an encoding decision step of deciding whether or not the encoded message that is the message wherein at least a part of the message is encoded is present in the temporary file; a decoding processing step of performing decoding processing of the encoded message of the temporary file based on a prescribed definition; and a recording step of recording the message generated in the decoding processing step into the temporary file.

Description

  The present invention relates to a message comparison determination method, a message comparison determination device, and a message comparison determination program for comparing two messages.

  Conventionally, as an apparatus for comparing two messages, a device that analyzes a communication protocol signal file in which a communication protocol signal of a mobile phone or the like is recorded is known (for example, see Patent Document 1). The apparatus described in Patent Document 1 performs evaluation determination by comparing the response signal of the terminal under test with respect to the test signal transmitted from the base station and the response signal of the reference terminal with respect to the test signal transmitted from the base station. is there.

JP 2008-277914 A

  By the way, the communication protocol signal includes a message composed of characters, symbols or numbers. As these messages, there are a normal message that can understand the content of the message from the character side and a specific message that is partially or entirely encoded. The content of this particular message cannot be recognized without decoding the encoded part. That is, in the conventional message comparison determination method, when comparing communication protocol signal files that include a specific message, even if the difference between the character strings can be verified for the specific message, the comparison result The message content difference cannot be verified based on

  Here, when comparing communication protocol signal files containing specific messages, the user extracts specific messages from the two communication protocol signal files as a method for verifying the difference in message contents based on the comparison result. Then, a method of comparing after decoding is conceivable.

  However, since the above comparison processing needs to be executed separately from the normal message comparison processing, it takes time and is displayed separately from the display of the comparison results between the normal messages. For this reason, it may take time and effort to verify the difference.

  The present invention has been made in view of the above, and efficiently verifies the difference in message contents between signal files in which a normal message that can understand the message contents and a specific encoded message are mixed. An object of the present invention is to provide a message comparison determination method, a message comparison determination device, and a message comparison determination program.

  That is, the message comparison determination method according to the present invention is a message comparison determination method executed by an information processing apparatus that determines whether or not the contents of messages recorded in two signal files match each other. An input step for inputting the message recorded in the signal file for each signal file to generate a temporary file for each signal file, and performing arithmetic processing on each of the temporary files generated in the input step Whether the contents of the messages recorded in the two signal files match each other by determining whether the messages recorded in the temporary file after the calculation process match with each other. A comparison determination step for determining the input step, and the calculation processing step includes the input step. An encoding determination step for determining, for each temporary file, whether or not there is an encoded message that is the message at least partially encoded in the temporary file generated in step If it is determined that the encoded message exists in at least one of the temporary files, the encoded message of the temporary file is decoded based on a predetermined definition to generate the unencoded message. A decoding process step, and a recording step for recording the message generated in the decoding process step in the temporary file determined in the determination step that the encoded message exists when the decoding process step is executed. It is characterized by having.

  In this message comparison determination method, messages recorded in two signal files are input for each signal file, a temporary file is generated for each signal file, an arithmetic process is executed for each temporary file, By determining whether or not the messages recorded in the temporary file match, it is determined whether or not the contents of the messages recorded in the two signal files match. In the arithmetic processing, it is determined for each temporary file whether or not there is an encoded message that is a message at least partially encoded, and when it is determined that an encoded message exists in at least one temporary file. The encoded message of the temporary file is decoded based on a predetermined definition to generate an unencoded message, and the unencoded message is recorded in the temporary file that is determined to have an encoded message. Is done. By configuring in this way, before comparing the messages in the signal file, the process of decoding the specific encoded message (encoded message) is executed to make the message understandable, and the generated message is The comparison process can be executed in the included state. For this reason, even if an encoded message is included in the signal file, it is possible to compare the message contents themselves rather than just comparing the face, so the difference in the contents of the signal file can be recognized immediately. can do. In addition, since the comparison process is executed in a state where the message after the decoding process is merged with the message existing in the original signal file, it is possible to display the comparison result between normal messages simultaneously. For this reason, since it is possible to reduce the time and effort for verifying the difference, it is possible to efficiently verify the difference in message contents between the signal files.

  Here, when there are a plurality of the encoded messages determined in the encoding determination step, the arithmetic processing step determines whether or not the encoded messages are related based on a predetermined definition. A relevance determining step, and a combining step of combining a group of the encoded messages determined to be related between the encoded messages in the relevance determining step, the decoding processing step comprising: It is preferable that the group of the encoded messages combined in the combining step is decoded based on a predetermined definition to generate the unencoded message.

  With this configuration, the relevance of each encoded message is determined, the related encoded messages are combined, and the combined encoded message is decoded. For this reason, even if a specific message is divided into a plurality of encoded messages, it is possible to efficiently verify a difference in message contents between signal files.

  Further, the comparison determination step is generated by the decoding processing step compared to the comparison processing for the encoded message when determining whether or not the messages recorded in the temporary file match each other. It is preferable to preferentially perform the comparison process for the message.

  With this configuration, messages generated by the decoding process are preferentially compared, so that the difference in message contents between signal files can be reliably verified without being affected by the encoded message. .

  The recording step is generated based on the encoded message in the decoding processing step when the encoded message is determined not to be related to another encoded message in the relevance determining step. When the message is inserted and recorded in the temporary file so that it is located immediately after the encoded message, and the encoded message is determined to be related to another encoded message in the relevance determining step Is preferably inserted and recorded in the temporary file so that the message generated based on the encoded message in the decoding step is located immediately after the group of related encoded messages. is there.

  By configuring in this way, the relationship between the encoded message and the message generated by the decoding process can be included in the comparison result in an easily understandable form.

  Further, the message is arranged in a hierarchy in the signal file, and one of the two signal files is a reference file on which the signal file is a reference, and the other signal file is a test subject to be tested. It is a target file, and at least one of presence / absence, number, order, value, and conditions inside / outside the range is set for at least one item of message, information element and information element value before the input step. A comparison condition setting step for setting the compared condition, wherein the comparison determination step is based on a determination result of whether or not the messages and information elements recorded in the temporary file after the arithmetic processing match. It is preferable to determine whether or not the comparison condition set in the comparison condition setting step is satisfied.

  With this configuration, when comparing a reference file for signal file verification and a test target file to be tested, hierarchical messages can be compared with each other, and messages and information elements can be compared. In addition, for at least one item of the value of the information element, a detailed determination process is performed using a comparison condition in which at least one of presence / absence, number, order, value, and conditions within and outside the range is set. Therefore, it is possible to efficiently verify the difference in message contents between signal files.

  The message comparison / determination apparatus according to the present invention is a message comparison / determination apparatus that determines whether or not the contents of messages recorded in two signal files match each other, and is recorded in the two signal files. Input means for inputting the message for each signal file and generating a temporary file for each signal file; arithmetic processing means for executing arithmetic processing for each of the temporary files generated by the input means; and Comparison determination means for determining whether or not the contents of the messages recorded in the two signal files match by determining whether or not the messages recorded in the temporary file after the arithmetic processing match. The arithmetic processing means includes at least a part of the temporary file generated by the input means. Encoding determination means for determining whether or not an encoded message that is the encoded message exists for each temporary file, and the encoded message exists in at least one of the temporary files by the encoding determination means. If it is determined, when the encoded message of the temporary file is decoded based on a predetermined definition to generate the unencoded message, and the decoding processor is executed. Comprises a recording means for recording the message generated by the decoding processing means in the temporary file determined by the determining means that the encoded message exists.

  A message comparison determination program according to the present invention is a message for causing an information processing apparatus to function as a message comparison determination apparatus for determining whether or not the contents of messages recorded in two signal files match each other. A comparison determination program, wherein the message recorded in two signal files is input for each signal file and a temporary file is generated for each signal file, and the temporary file generated by the input means It is recorded in each of the two signal files by determining whether the arithmetic processing means for executing arithmetic processing on each file and the messages recorded in the temporary file after the arithmetic processing match. Comparing and determining means for determining whether or not the contents of the messages match, For each temporary file, the arithmetic processing means determines whether or not there is an encoded message that is the message at least partially encoded in the temporary file generated by the input means. When it is determined by the encoding determination unit that determines that the encoded message exists in at least one of the temporary files, the encoded message of the temporary file is determined based on a predetermined definition. Decoding processing means for generating the message that has been decoded and unencoded, and when the decoding processing means is executed, the determination means determines that the encoded message is present in the temporary file, Recording means for recording the message generated by the decoding processing means. Configured as.

  The message comparison determination device and the message comparison determination program described above have the same effects as the message comparison determination method described above.

  ADVANTAGE OF THE INVENTION According to this invention, the difference of the message content of the signal files in which the normal message which can understand a message content, and the specific message encoded can be verified efficiently.

It is a function block diagram of the message comparison determination apparatus which concerns on 1st Embodiment. It is a hardware block diagram of the message comparison determination apparatus which concerns on 1st Embodiment. It is a figure which shows the example of the file of a process target, (a) has shown the 1st file, (b) has shown the 2nd file. It is a figure which shows the concept of a message comparison process. It is a flowchart which shows operation | movement of the message comparison determination apparatus which concerns on 1st Embodiment. It is a flowchart which shows the operation | movement regarding the pre-comparison process of the message comparison determination apparatus which concerns on 1st Embodiment. It is a figure which shows the example of a process of the file of the process target shown in FIG. 3, (a) has shown the 1st file, (b) has shown the 2nd file. It is a figure which shows the comparison result of the file of the process target shown in FIG. It is another example of the comparison result which a display part shows. It is a function block diagram of the message comparison determination apparatus which concerns on 2nd Embodiment. It is a figure which shows the example of a setting of a comparison condition, (a) has shown the 1st hierarchy and (b) has shown the 2nd hierarchy and below. The example of the comparison result of the 1st hierarchy is shown. The example of the comparison result of the 1st hierarchy is shown. The example of the comparison result of the 1st hierarchy is shown. The example of the comparison result of the 1st hierarchy is shown. The example of the comparison result of the 1st hierarchy is shown. The example of the comparison result of the 1st hierarchy is shown. The example of the comparison result of the 1st hierarchy is shown. The example of the comparison result of the 1st hierarchy is shown. The example of the comparison result of the 1st hierarchy is shown. The example of the comparison result of the 2nd, 3rd hierarchy is shown. The example of the comprehensive determination result of the 2nd, 3rd hierarchy is shown. It is explanatory drawing of the conventional comparison process.

  Hereinafter, a message comparison determination method, a message comparison determination device, and a message comparison determination program according to embodiments of the present invention will be described with reference to the accompanying drawings. In the description of the drawings, the same elements are denoted by the same reference numerals, and redundant description is omitted.

(First embodiment)
The message comparison / determination apparatus, message comparison / determination program, and method therefor according to the present embodiment are suitably employed for, for example, comparison processing between signal data files related to a mobile communication protocol.

  First, an outline of the configuration of the message comparison determination device 1 according to the present embodiment will be described with reference to FIG. FIG. 1 is a diagram illustrating a functional configuration of the message comparison determination device.

  As shown in FIG. 1, the message comparison determination device 1 includes a file input unit 10, an arithmetic processing unit 11, a comparison determination unit 14, and a display unit 15 as functional components.

  FIG. 2 is a diagram illustrating a hardware configuration of the message comparison determination device. As shown in FIG. 2, the message comparison / determination apparatus 1 is physically configured as a computer system including a CPU 101, a ROM 102, a RAM 103, a hard disk drive (HDD) 104, a keyboard 105, and a display 106. Each component shown in FIG. 1 is realized by reading predetermined software on the CPU 101, ROM 102, or RAM 103 shown in FIG. 2 and reading / writing data from / to the ROM 102, RAM 103, or HDD 104.

  Returning to FIG. 1, the file input unit 10 has a function of reading two files (first file and second file) including messages arranged hierarchically. For example, the file input unit 10 has a function of reading each file stored in the storage device. The file input unit 10 has a function of writing the read two files into two temporary files (first temporary file and second temporary file) and outputting them to the arithmetic processing unit 11. Yes. Each of the first file and the second file includes a plurality of messages, and these messages are recorded in a hierarchy in each file.

  An example of the file read by the file input unit 10 is shown in FIG. FIG. 3A shows the first file, and FIG. 3B shows the second file. In FIG. 3, the first file contains eight messages and respective information elements. Among these, the messages “System Info”, “AAAAA”, and “BBBBB” are the first layer (upper layer), and the remaining information elements are the second layer (lower layer). On the other hand, the second file contains 8 messages. Among these, the messages “System Info”, “AAAAA”, and “CCCCC” are the first layer, and the remaining information elements are the second layer. As described above, the message is usually shown in the first layer, and the information elements in the message and the values that each information element can take are stored in the second layer and below. Note that each file shown in FIG. 3 includes a message hierarchized in two stages, but the number of hierarchies of the message is not limited.

  In the messages of the first file and the second file, there are a normal message that can understand the message contents from the letter and a specific message (encoded message) partially or entirely encoded. An encoded message is a message in which at least a part of the message is encoded with numbers, characters, or symbols, and the message content cannot be understood from the face. The encoded message exists, for example, as information on a layer below the first layer described above, and information on a layer below the first layer is encoded based on the message name on the first layer described above. It is possible to determine whether or not it is information. For example, as shown in FIG. 3A, the hierarchy belonging to the message name “System Info” includes “W-1,” “W-2,” “W-3,” “Y- 1 "," Z-1 ", and" Z-2 "exist.

  In addition, the encoded message can be converted into a message such as a character string from which the message content can be understood by performing decoding processing based on a preset criterion. In addition, the encoded message may be one of the message contents encoded and divided into a plurality of parts. Regarding such an encoded message, a plurality of related encoded messages are concatenated and subjected to a decoding process so that the message can be converted into a message that can be understood from the text. The encoded message includes an identifier indicating the type of the encoded message in the message, except when all of the encoded message is encoded. For example, as shown in FIG. 3A, the encoded message includes identifiers such as “W”, “Y”, and “Z”. Then, for example, by combining “W−1”, “W-2”, and “W-3” indicated by the identifier W and performing decoding processing, it is possible to generate a message that can understand the message content from the character side.

  The type of file to be read (comparison target file) is not limited. For example, the message comparison / determination apparatus 1 includes data files related to mobile communication protocols such as IMT-2000, GSM (Global System for Mobile Communications), CDMA-2000, LTE (Long Term Evolution), ASN. Any file such as a signal file described in 1 (Abstract Syntax Notation One), an XML (Extensible Markup Language) file, and an HTML (HyperText Markup Language) file can be processed.

  Further, the file input unit 10 inputs a reference file in which standard values and the like for test items are described as a first signal file, and uses the test file acquired from the mobile device to be tested as a second signal file. You may enter.

  Returning to FIG. 1, the arithmetic processing unit 11 has a function of performing arithmetic processing before comparison processing based on the first temporary file and the second temporary file output by the file input unit 10. The arithmetic processing unit 11 includes an encoding determination unit 11a, a relevance determination unit 11b, a combining unit 11c, a decoding processing unit 11d, and a recording unit 11e as functional components that perform arithmetic processing.

  The encoding determination unit 11a has a function of determining whether or not an encoded message is stored in each of the first temporary file and the second temporary file output by the file input unit 10. . For example, the encoding determination unit 11a has a function of determining whether or not the information of the second layer below the first layer is encoded based on the message name of the first layer described above. The encoding determination unit 11a has a function of outputting the determination result to the relevance determination unit 11b.

  The relevance determination unit 11b has a function of determining whether relevance exists between a plurality of encoded messages. For example, the relationship determination unit 11b has a function of determining whether or not there is a relationship between a plurality of encoded messages based on an identifier recorded in the information of the second layer. For example, the relationship determination unit 11b determines that there is a relationship between encoded messages having the same identifier. The relevance determining unit 11b has a function of outputting the determination result to the combining unit 11c.

  The combining unit 11c has a function of combining encoded messages that are determined to be related by the relatedness determining unit 11b based on the determination result output by the relatedness determining unit 11b. For example, the combining unit 11c combines only encoded messages having the same related identifier. The combining unit 11c has a function of outputting the encoded message after the combining process to the decoding processing unit 11d.

  The decoding processing unit 11d performs, for each temporary file on the basis of a predetermined definition, the encoded message output by the combining unit 11c and the encoded message in which one message is encoded independently. It has a function of decoding and converting it into a recognizable message such as characters. As the predetermined definition, for example, an existing definition for converting a hex code to a character notation may be used, or a table storing characters associated with a code may be used. These predetermined definitions may be associated with the identifier of the encoded message. For example, if the identifier is A, the conversion definition is changed according to the identifier, such as conversion from a hex code to a character string, and if the identifier is B, conversion to a character string using a table. May be. The decode processing unit 11d has a function of outputting the converted message in association with each temporary file to the recording unit 11e.

  The recording unit 11e has a function of recording the converted message of each temporary file output by the decoding processing unit 11d in association with each temporary file output by the file input unit 10. For example, the recording unit 11e has a function of inserting and recording the converted message immediately after the encoded message. In addition, for example, when the related encoded message is concatenated and decoded by the decode processing unit 11d, the recording unit 11e inserts the converted message immediately after the concatenated last line encoded message. Has the function of recording. Here, the recording unit 11e has a function of recording the converted message as a message in the first layer in the same row as “AAAAA” or “BBBBB”. The recording unit 11 e has a function of outputting each recorded temporary file to the comparison determination unit 14.

  The comparison determination unit 14 has a function of comparing temporary files stored by the recording unit 11e. The comparison determination unit 14 has a function of determining whether or not messages arranged hierarchically in the temporary file match between both files. More specifically, the comparison / determination unit 14 sequentially compares the first temporary file and the second temporary file in the same hierarchy, and determines whether or not messages (information elements) in the same hierarchy match. It has a function to do. If it is determined that the messages of both files match, the first temporary file and the second temporary file are sequentially compared in the same hierarchy for the lower hierarchy of both messages, and the messages in the lower hierarchy are compared. It has a function of determining whether (information elements) match.

  Further, the comparison / determination unit 14 has a function of preferentially comparing a message generated by decoding from an encoded message over an upper layer message (eg, “System Info”) to which the encoded message belongs. Yes. For example, the comparison determination unit 14 has a function of assigning a priority to each message before the comparison and executing a comparison process according to the assigned priority. Assuming that processing is prioritized as the priority increases, for example, the comparison / determination unit 14 sets the priority of the upper layer message to which the encoded message belongs to be lower than the priority of the message generated by decoding. It has a function to do.

  The comparison determination unit 14 has a function of executing the above-described comparison process from the highest layer to the lowest layer. For example, as shown in FIG. 4, when message # 7 in the highest layer (first layer) matches between two files, M2 pieces of information in the lower layer (second layer) of message # 7 Comparison processing is executed for # 7-1 to # 7-M2. In this comparison process, for example, when the message # 7-5 matches between both files, the comparison process is executed for one or more pieces of information in the lower layer (third layer) of the message # 7-5. Such processing can be executed up to the lowest layer (Nth layer). The comparison determination unit 14 has a function of outputting a determination result indicating whether or not the messages match to the display unit 15.

  The display unit 15 has a function of notifying the user of the determination result calculated by the comparison determination unit 14. For example, a display is used as the display unit 15. The display unit 15 can display the determination result in various expression formats. For example, the display unit 15 may highlight the matched messages or display them hierarchically. Moreover, the display part 15 may display a determination result combining text, a table | surface, a figure, etc. In the present embodiment, a display is used as the display unit 15, but the determination result output method is not limited to this. For example, printing, recording on a recording medium, or other information processing via a network is possible. The determination result may be output by transmission to the apparatus.

  Next, the operation of the message comparison / determination device 1 according to the present embodiment will be described. FIG. 5 is a flowchart showing the operation of the message comparison determination device 1 according to the present embodiment. The flowchart shown in FIG. 5 is executed, for example, at a timing when the message comparison determination device 1 is activated by the user.

  As shown in FIG. 5, the message comparison / determination apparatus 1 starts with a file input process (S10). The process of S10 is a process executed by the file input unit 10 to input two files to be compared and record each in a temporary file. The file input unit 10 inputs, for example, the first file and the second file shown in FIG. When the process of S10 ends, the process proceeds to the pre-comparison process (S12).

  The process of S12 is a process executed by the arithmetic processing unit 11 and changed to a format in which the message contents can be compared based on the two temporary files generated by the process of S10. Details of the processing of S12 will be described with reference to FIG. FIG. 6 is a flowchart for explaining the pre-comparison process. As shown in FIG. 6, the arithmetic processing unit 11 starts an encoding determination process (S20). The process of S20 is a process executed by the encoding determination unit 11a to determine whether or not each temporary file includes an encoded code. For example, the encoding determination unit 11a determines whether or not there is a message whose file name is “System Info” in the first layer, thereby determining whether or not an encoded message is included in the message in the file. Determine. If it is determined in step S20 that the encoded message is not included, it is not necessary to perform the decoding process, and the control process shown in FIG. 6 is terminated. On the other hand, in the process of S20, when it determines with the encoding message being contained, it transfers to a relevance determination process (S22).

  The process of S22 is a process executed by the relevance determination unit 11b to determine whether or not a relevance exists between encoded messages. For example, the relevancy determination unit 11b refers to an identifier included in the encoded message, and determines that the encoded message having the same identifier is related. For example, for the encoded message in FIG. 3A, it is determined that the encoded messages “W−1”, “W-2”, and “W-3” including the identifier “W” are related to each other. Also, it is determined that the encoded messages “Z−1” and “Z-2” including the identifier “Z” are related to each other. If it is determined in the process of S22 that there is no relationship between the encoded messages, the process proceeds to a decoding process (S26). On the other hand, when it is determined in the process of S22 that there is a relationship between the encoded messages, the process proceeds to a combination process (S24).

  The process of S24 is a process executed by the combining unit 11c to combine related encoded messages. The combining unit 11c combines the encoded messages determined to be relevant in the process of S24 into one encoded message. For example, since the encoded messages “W−1”, “W-2”, and “W-3” in FIG. 3A include the same identifier “W”, these encoded messages are encoded. Combine the parts. Also, since the encoded messages “Z-1” and “Z-2” include the same identifier “Z”, the encoded portions of these encoded messages are combined. When the process of S24 is completed, the process proceeds to a decoding process (S26).

  The process of S26 is a process executed by the decode processing unit 11d to decode the encoded message. The decode processing unit 11d decodes at least one of the single encoded message and one encoded message combined by the process of S26, and generates a message that can be recognized from the face. For example, the message “WWW” and the message from the encoded message “Y−1” are combined from the encoded message obtained by combining the encoded messages “W−1”, “W-2”, and “W-3” in FIG. The message “ZZZ” is decoded from the encoded message obtained by combining “YYY” and the encoded messages “Z−1” and “Z-2”. Also, the message “WWW” and the message “Y−1” are encoded from the encoded message obtained by combining the encoded messages “W−1”, “W-2”, and “W-3” in FIG. The message “ZZZ” is decoded from the encoded message obtained by combining “YYY” and the encoded messages “Z−1” and “Z-2”. When the process of S26 ends, the process proceeds to a recording process (S28).

  The process of S28 is a process that is executed by the recording unit 11e and records the message generated by the decoding process of S26 in each temporary file. The recording unit 11e records the converted message of each temporary file generated in the process of S26 in association with each temporary file generated in the process of S10. This process will be described with reference to FIG. FIG. 7A shows the file contents after the message generated by the decoding process is recorded in the temporary file generated based on the first file shown in FIG. As shown in FIG. 7A, for example, the recording unit 11e inserts and records the message “YYY” generated from the encoded message “Y−1” immediately after the encoded message “Y−1”. . For “W−1”, “W-2”, and “W-3” that are determined to be related to each other between the encoded messages, the generated message “WWW” is replaced with the code of the concatenated last line. Insert and record immediately after the digitization message “W-3”. In addition, the message to be recorded is recorded in a higher layer than the encoded message, here, in the same row as the message of the first layer. The same processing as described above is performed for all the messages generated in S26. Further, as shown in FIG. 7B, the same processing as that described above is performed on the temporary file generated based on the second file. When all the messages generated in the process of S26 are recorded for the two files, the control process shown in FIG. 6 is terminated. This completes the pre-comparison process (S12 in FIG. 5).

  Returning to S12 of FIG. 5, the process proceeds to the comparison process (S14). The process of S14 is a process executed by the comparison / determination unit 14 to compare the decoded temporary files. The comparison / determination unit 14 extracts the first hierarchy message of each file and determines whether the messages match each other. Here, the comparison determination unit 14 sets a priority for each message before the comparison determination. For example, the priority for the message “System Info” is set lower than the message generated in the process of S26. Then, it is determined whether the messages match in order of priority. If it is determined that the messages in the files match, the first temporary file and the second temporary file are sequentially compared in the same hierarchy with respect to the lower hierarchy of both messages, and the information elements in the lower hierarchy are compared. It is determined whether or not. FIGS. 8A and 8B show the messages of the first layer of the messages shown in FIGS. 7A and 7B, which are extracted and displayed. The comparison results after comparing the lower layers are shown. It is shown. In the figure, “◯” indicates that the messages are completely the same up to a lower layer, and “X” indicates that the messages are not completely the same up to the lower layer. When the process of S14 ends, the process proceeds to a display process (S16).

  The process of S16 is a process of displaying the result of the comparison process performed by the display unit 15 and performed in the process of S14. For example, the display unit 15 displays the comparison result in which “◯” and “×” shown in FIG. 8 are entered on the display. For example, as shown in FIG. 9, the contents of two files may be displayed hierarchically using the same format. As a result, the user of the message comparison / determination device 1 can easily visually confirm the difference between the two files. When the process of S16 ends, the control process shown in FIG. 5 ends.

  This is the end of the control process shown in FIG. By executing the control process shown in FIG. 5, even when an encoded message is included, it is possible to compare at a time including the message content.

  Next, a message comparison determination program for causing a computer to function as the message comparison determination apparatus 1 will be described.

  The message comparison determination program includes a main module, a file input module, an arithmetic processing module, a comparison determination module, and a display module. The main module is a part that comprehensively controls the message comparison determination process. The arithmetic processing module includes an encoding determination module, an association determination module, a combination module, a decoding processing module, and a recording module. The functions realized by executing the file input module, arithmetic processing module (encoding determination module, relevance determination module, combination module, decoding processing module and recording module), comparison determination module and display module are the message comparisons described above. Functions of the file input unit 10, the arithmetic processing unit 11 (encoding determination unit 11 a, relevance determination unit 11 b, combination unit 11 c, decode processing unit 11 d and recording unit 11 e), comparison determination unit 14, and display unit 15 of the determination apparatus 1. And the same for each.

  The message comparison determination program is provided by a storage medium such as a CD-ROM, a DVD, or a ROM, or a semiconductor memory, for example. The message comparison / determination program may be provided as a computer data signal superimposed on a carrier wave via a network.

  By the way, in the conventional message comparison / determination apparatus, message comparison / determination program, and method thereof, when encoded messages are mixed in the signal file, even if the character strings can be compared, the difference in the message contents is verified. I couldn't. FIG. 23 shows a comparison determination result by a conventional method. In FIG. 23, for the sake of convenience, messages in the first hierarchy of two files are shown. For ease of understanding, the contents of messages below “System Info” are shown in parentheses. Further, “Δ” indicates that the message matches but the included information element is different, and “◯” indicates that the message completely matches the information element included therein. As shown in FIG. 23, with the conventional method, even if it can be understood that there is a difference in information elements of “System Info”, it is not possible to understand what kind of difference is in content. For this reason, it is necessary to extract a message related to “System Info”, individually perform a concatenation process and a decoding process, and then perform a comparison process individually.

  On the other hand, in the message comparison determination device 1, the message comparison determination program, and the method according to the first embodiment, the messages recorded in the two signal files by the file input unit 10 (file input module) are separated for each signal file. A temporary file is generated for each signal file by input, the arithmetic processing unit 11 (arithmetic processing module) performs arithmetic processing on each temporary file, and the comparison determination unit 14 (comparison determination module) performs the arithmetic processing. By determining whether or not the messages recorded in the temporary file match, it is determined whether or not the contents of the messages recorded in the two signal files match. In the arithmetic processing, whether or not there is an encoded message (such as “W−1” in FIG. 8) that is a message at least partially encoded by the encoding determination unit 11a (encoding determination module). And when it is determined that an encoded message exists in at least one temporary file, the decoding processing unit 11d (decoding processing module) decodes the encoded message of the temporary file based on a predetermined definition. And a non-encoded message (such as “WWW” in FIG. 8) is generated, and the non-encoded message is recorded in the temporary file determined by the recording unit 11e (recording module) to have the encoded message. Is done. Thus, before comparing the messages in the signal file, the encoded specific message is decoded into a message that can be understood, so that the comparison process is executed with the generated message included. be able to. For this reason, even when the encoded message is included in the signal file, it is possible to compare the contents of the message itself rather than merely comparing the face. Therefore, the content difference of the signal file can be visually recognized immediately. Further, since the comparison process is executed in a state where the message after the decoding process is merged with the message existing in the original signal file, the comparison result between the normal messages (such as “AAAAA” in FIG. 8) is displayed at the same time. It becomes possible. For this reason, since it is possible to reduce the time and effort for verifying the difference, it is possible to efficiently verify the difference in message contents between the signal files. In addition, since it is not necessary to individually select, extract and decode the encoded message, it is possible to improve work accuracy.

  In addition, according to the message comparison / determination device 1, the message comparison / determination program, and the method thereof according to the first embodiment, it is possible to determine the relevance of each encoded message, combine them, and decode the combined encoded message. . For this reason, even if a specific message is divided into a plurality of encoded messages, it is possible to efficiently verify a difference in message contents between signal files.

  Further, according to the message comparison determination device 1, the message comparison determination program, and the method thereof according to the first embodiment, the comparison determination unit 14 (comparison determination module) uses the priority of the processing of the message generated by the decoding process. The priority of the upper layer message of the encoded message is set low. Therefore, the messages generated by the decoding process are preferentially compared, and as a result, the message contents can be reliably compared without being affected by the lines related to the encoded messages.

  In addition, according to the message comparison / determination device 1, the message comparison / determination program, and the method thereof according to the first embodiment, the message generated by the decoding process is recorded immediately after the encoded message. The comparison result can be included in the comparison result in an easily understandable manner.

(Second Embodiment)
Next, a message comparison / determination apparatus, a message comparison / determination program, and a method thereof according to the second embodiment of the present invention will be described.

  The message comparison / judgment device according to the second embodiment is configured in substantially the same manner as the message comparison / judgment device 1 according to the first embodiment shown in FIG. 1, and is different in that the comparison condition can be set. To do. Therefore, the same components as those of the first embodiment are denoted by the same reference numerals as those of the first embodiment, description thereof is omitted, and differences will be mainly described.

  FIG. 10 is a functional configuration diagram of the message comparison determination device 2 according to the present embodiment. As shown in FIG. 10, the message comparison determination device 2 is different from the message comparison determination device 1 according to the first embodiment in that it includes a comparison condition setting interface unit 12 and a comparison condition setting unit 13, and is compared. Some functions of the determination unit 14 are different.

  The comparison condition setting interface unit 12 functions as a user interface for setting comparison conditions. Here, the comparison condition defines how to compare which part of the signal files input by the file input unit 10 are compared. The comparison condition is set, for example, for at least one item of “message”, “information element”, and “information element value”. For example, a comparison condition including at least one of presence / absence, number, order, value, and conditions inside and outside the range is set. For example, the comparison condition setting interface unit 12 is configured to present all the above-described comparison conditions and select a necessary comparison condition by a user operation. The comparison condition setting interface unit 12 has a function of outputting the set comparison condition to the comparison condition setting unit 13.

  The comparison condition setting unit 13 has a function of setting the comparison condition output by the comparison condition setting interface unit 12 to one of the two signal files input by the file input unit 10. For example, when the file input unit 10 inputs a reference file in which reference information set based on a test procedure manual or the like is stored in advance as the first file, the comparison condition setting unit 13 includes a comparison condition setting interface. The comparison function set by the unit 12 is set to the first file.

  The comparison determination unit 14 has a function of comparing the reference file in which the comparison condition is set by the comparison condition setting unit 13 and the test file that is the file to be tested. And it has the function to determine whether conditions are satisfy | filled for every comparison condition, and to output the comprehensive determination result in a test file finally. Other configurations are the same as the comparison determination unit 14 of the message comparison determination device 1 according to the first embodiment.

  Next, the operation of the message comparison / determination device 2 according to this embodiment will be described. In the following description, it is assumed that the file input unit 10 inputs a reference file as a first file and a test file as a second file in consideration of ease of understanding. The reference file is a file in which reference information set based on a test procedure manual or the like is stored in advance for evaluation of the test file. The test file is a file to be tested.

  The operation of the message comparison / determination apparatus 2 according to the present embodiment is almost the same as that of the first embodiment, and the comparison condition setting process is executed for the reference file before the file input process of S10 in FIG. This is different from part of the comparison determination process in S14 of FIG. First, the comparison condition setting process will be described.

  The comparison condition setting process is a process executed by the comparison condition setting interface unit 12 and the comparison condition setting unit 13 to set the comparison condition in the reference file. The comparison condition setting interface unit 12 causes the user to present and select the comparison condition for the message in the first layer, the information element in the second layer and below, and the comparison condition for the value. As a comparison condition regarding the message of the first layer, for example, “a plurality of set messages exist in random order (message comparison condition 1)”, “at least one or more set messages exist. (Message comparison condition 2) "," one or more set messages exist multiple times (message comparison condition 3) "," select a condition according to the message that follows the set message (message comparison condition 4) ) ”,“ There is a message that satisfies the setting condition in the specified message sequence (message comparison condition 5) ”.

  Further, as a comparison condition regarding information elements in the second hierarchy and below, for example, “the set information element does not exist (information element condition 1)”, “the set information element exists at least (information element condition 2 ) ”And“ the number of set information elements exists as specified (information element condition 3) ”. Further, as comparison conditions relating to values of information elements in the second and lower layers, for example, “analysis value is identical to determination value (value condition 1)”, “analysis value is other than determination value (value condition 2) ””, “Being within the specified range (value condition 3)”, “existing in the specified order (value condition 4)”, “analysis value is less than the judgment value (value condition) 5) "," Analysis value is greater than judgment value (value condition 6) "," Analysis value is less than judgment value (value condition 7) "," Analysis value is greater than or equal to judgment value (value condition 8) ".

  In addition, when there are a plurality of information elements below the second hierarchy, as a comparison condition, for example, “the corresponding information element of the test file satisfies all the conditions specified in the reference file (multiple information element condition 1)”, “The corresponding information element in the test file satisfies at least one of the conditions specified in the reference file (multiple information element condition 2)”, “It is determined that all the conditions specified in the reference file are satisfied (multiple information elements Condition 3) "is used.

  As for the above-described conditions, none of the conditions may be selected by the user, or a plurality of conditions may be selected. The comparison condition setting interface unit 12 outputs the comparison condition selected by the user to the comparison condition setting unit 13. The comparison condition setting unit 13 sets the selected comparison condition for the reference file. First, the comparison condition setting unit 13 sets a comparison condition for a message existing in the first layer. For example, the comparison condition setting unit 13 sets “there is a message in the desired order (message comparison condition 0)” as a comparison condition for messages existing in the first layer. Then, a comparison condition for messages existing in the first hierarchy selected by the user is set.

  This process will be described with reference to FIG. FIG. 11A shows from the “Message” column in which the first layer message of the reference file is stored, the “No.” column that is an identifier corresponding to each message, and the “Condition” column in which the comparison condition is recorded. It is a table. The comparison condition setting unit 13 sets a character string corresponding to the selected comparison condition (message comparison conditions 1 to 4) in the “Condition” field. For example, when the message comparison condition 1 is applied to the messages “AAAAA” and “BBBBB”, the character string “exist” indicating the message comparison condition 1 is displayed in each “Condition” column corresponding to the messages “AAAAA” and “BBBBB”. Set “#” (#: integer). # Is a number for identifying a group of messages to be set. Similarly, “one #” is set when the message comparison condition 2 is set, “times #” is set when the message comparison condition 3 is set, and “choice #” is set when the message comparison condition 4 is set, It is set in the “Condition” field. The above table is only used for easy understanding of the explanation, and it is only necessary to record which of the above conditions is selected. For example, the comparison condition may be stored in another record of the reference file or in another memory, and the comparison determination unit 14 may refer to the comparison condition. For example, when the message comparison condition 5 is designated, the comparison condition setting unit 13 stores the character string “* Message (code value) [#B; #E]” indicating the message comparison condition 5 in the memory. . In “* Message (signed value) [#B; #E]”, set the message to be specified in Message, set the condition in (signed value), and use #B to set the starting line number of the message subject to the condition, Use #E to set the end line number of the message subject to the condition. For (code value), for example, if (<1), (= 0) is set, it indicates “does not exist”, and if (> 0) is set, it indicates that “at least one exists”. When (> n, <m) is set, “(n−1) to (m−1) exists” is indicated. When (* n) is set, “n exists”. "

  The comparison condition setting unit 13 sets a comparison condition for an information element and its value in the second and lower layers after setting a comparison condition for a message existing in the first layer. FIG. 11B shows a “Message” column in which the first layer message of the reference file is stored, an “IE-1” column in which the second layer information elements and comparison conditions of the reference file are stored, It is a table composed of “IE-2” columns in which information elements and comparison conditions of the third layer of the file are stored. The comparison condition setting unit 13 sets a comparison condition relating to information elements and values below the second hierarchy as conditional expressions in the “IE-1” column or the “IE-2” column. The conditional expression is described after the target information element. For example, when a condition is set for the information element “aaa”, it is described as “aaa [conditional expression]”. The conditional expression corresponding to information element condition 1 is [not exist], the conditional expression corresponding to information element condition 2 is [exist], and the conditional expression corresponding to information element condition 3 is [* n] (n: the specified number) The conditional expression corresponding to value condition 1 is [= x] (x: determination value), the conditional expression corresponding to value condition 2 is [! = X] (x: determination value), and the conditional expression corresponding to value condition 3 Is [n; m] (n to m: specified range), the conditional expression corresponding to the value condition 4 is [n, m,...], And the conditional expression corresponding to the value condition 5 is [<x] (x: determination Value), the conditional expression corresponding to the value condition 6 corresponds to [> x] (x: determination value), the conditional expression corresponding to the value condition 7 corresponds to [<= x] (x: determination value), and the value condition 8 The conditional expression is [> = x] (x: judgment value). Moreover, the conditional expressions of the multiple information element conditions 1 to 3 are expressed by writing a plurality of the above conditional expressions together. The above table is only used for easy understanding of the explanation, and it is only necessary to record which of the above conditions is selected.

  The file input process (S10 in FIG. 5) and the pre-comparison process (S12 in FIG. 5) in which the comparison conditions are set are the same as those in the first embodiment.

  Subsequently, a comparison determination process corresponding to the process of S14 of FIG. 5 will be described. The comparison determination unit 14 performs the same comparison process as in the first embodiment while referring to the comparison condition set in the comparison condition setting process. First, the comparison / determination unit 14 extracts the first layer message of each file, and determines whether or not the messages set by the comparison condition match.

  For example, the comparison / determination unit 14 extracts a test file message that matches the base message in the reference file and also extracts a reference file message that matches the base message in the test file. Subsequently, for each of the reference file and the test file, an interval from the determined message to the extracted message is calculated. If the interval in the test file is smaller than the interval in the reference file, it is determined that the base message in the reference file matches the extracted message in the test file. On the other hand, if the interval in the test file is greater than or equal to the interval in the reference file, it is determined based on the dictionary order of the messages, or it is determined that there is no matching message.

  After determining whether the messages match each other, the comparison determination unit 14 determines whether or not the comparison condition is satisfied. For example, the comparison determination unit 14 outputs “O” when the messages match, “X” when the messages do not match, and “D / C” as the comparison result when the messages do not match. . The comparison determination unit 14 individually outputs “◯” as a determination result when the comparison condition is satisfied, and “x” when the comparison condition is not satisfied. Furthermore, the comparison / determination unit 14 combines the individual determination results, and outputs “◯” as a comprehensive determination result when all the comparison conditions are satisfied, and “×” when all the comparison conditions are not satisfied.

  If the comparison / determination unit 14 determines that the messages in the first layer match, the comparison file 14 sequentially compares the reference file and the test file in the same layer for the lower layers of both messages, and fills in the conditional expression. It is determined whether or not the information elements being matched match. Then, it is determined whether or not the information element satisfies the comparison condition, and the comprehensive determination result is output. The comparison result and the comprehensive determination result are output in the same format as the message comparison determination process. Information elements without a conditional expression are handled as simple path information, and the comparison result is “D / C”. When multiple information element conditions 1 to 3 are set, it is determined whether or not these conditions are satisfied based on the comparison result, and the comprehensive determination result is output. If the comparison determination part 14 determines about all the conditions, the display part 15 will display a comparison determination result. With the above, the operation of the message comparison determination device 2 according to the present embodiment is completed.

  Next, the result of setting and comparing the comparison conditions will be described with reference to the drawings. 12 to 22 show the results of comparing and determining test files based on the comparison conditions set in the reference file.

  FIG. 12A shows a reference file in which comparison conditions are set in the left table, and a test file to be compared and a comparison determination result in the right table. In the table on the left, messages “AAAAA” and “BBBBB” are all present in any order (exist1) in the reference file in which the messages are sequentially arranged in the format “AAAAA” to “GGGGG” in the format shown in FIG. Message comparison condition 1 is set such that messages “DDDDD” and “EEEEE” are all in no particular order (exist2). On the other hand, in the table on the right, the comparison result is shown in the “Message” column in which the first level message of the test file to be compared is stored and the “Judgment” column corresponding to the “Message” column. The “Judgment” column may indicate individual determination results as necessary. Further, when comparing messages, a message comparison condition 0 is set that messages in the first layer exist in order, but are not shown here for convenience. The comparison / determination unit 14 compares the messages for each line in order from “AAAAA” in the first line to determine whether the message in the reference file is included in the message in the test file, and determines whether or not the messages match. As a result, it is determined that the messages exist in the order of “BBBBB”, “AAAAA”, “CCCCC”, “EEEEE”, “DDDDD”. In the figure, the relationship between the message in which only the message comparison condition 0 is set and the message in the test file is shown by a solid line, and a comparison condition other than the message comparison condition 0 (here, the message comparison condition 1) is also set. Regarding the message, the relationship between the message and the test file message is indicated by a thick solid line. Then, based on the comparison result in the “Judgment” field, it is determined whether or not the message comparison condition 0 and the message comparison conditions 0 and 1 are satisfied. As shown in the bold frame in the figure, since all the set message comparison conditions 1 are satisfied, “◯” is output as a comprehensive determination result.

  FIG. 12 (b) shows the comparison results as in FIG. 12 (a). In FIG. 12B, a comparison condition similar to that in FIG. 12A is set as the comparison condition. The comparison judging unit 14 judges that the message exists in the order of “BBBBB”, “EEEEE”, “CCCCC”, “DDDDD”, etc. (solid line, thick solid line in the figure) in the test file, and about the message “AAAAA” “X” is stored in the “Judgment” column of the associated blank line, and “◯” is stored in the corresponding “Judgment” column for other messages. Then, based on the comparison result in the “Judgment” column, it is determined whether or not the message comparison conditions 0 and 1 are satisfied. The condition “exist2” is satisfied (thick frame in the figure), but the condition “exist1” is not satisfied. For this reason, “x” is output as the comprehensive determination result.

  FIG. 12 (c) shows the comparison results as in FIG. 12 (a). In FIG. 12C, as comparison conditions, message comparison condition 0 and messages “AAAAA” and “EEEEE” are all present in no particular order (exist1), and messages “BBBBB” and “DDDDD” are present in no particular order (exist2). ) Message comparison condition 1 is set. The comparison determination unit 14 determines that messages exist in the order of “EEEEE”, “DDDDD”, “CCCCC”, “BBBBB”, “AAAAA”,... (In the figure, solid line, thick solid line) and corresponding. “O” is stored in the “Judgment” column. In this case, since the message comparison condition 0 or the message comparison conditions 0 and 1 are satisfied (thick frame in the figure), “◯” is output as the comprehensive determination result.

  FIG. 13 (a) shows the comparison results as in FIG. 12 (a). In FIG. 13A, a comparison condition similar to that in FIG. 12A is set as the comparison condition. The comparison / determination unit 14 determines that messages exist in the order of “AAAAA”, “BBBBB”, “CCCCC”, “FFFFF”, and “GGGGG” in the test file (solid line and thick solid line in the figure). In this case, “X” is stored in the “Judgment” column of the blank line associated with the messages “DDDDD” and “EEEEE” in the reference file, and “○” is displayed in the corresponding “Judgment” column for other messages. Stored. Based on the comparison result in the “Judgment” column, it is determined that the condition “exist1” is satisfied (thick frame in the figure), but the condition “exist2” is not satisfied. For this reason, “x” is output as the comprehensive determination result.

  FIG. 13 (b) shows the comparison results as in FIG. 12 (a). In FIG. 13B, a comparison condition similar to that in FIG. 12A is set as the comparison condition. The comparison / determination unit 14 determines that messages exist in the order of “AAAAA”, “EEEEE”, “CCCCC”, “DDDDD”, “BBBBB”,... (In the figure, solid line, thick solid line). In this case, “x” is stored in the “Judgment” column of the line associated with the messages “EEEEE” and “BBBBB” in the reference file, and “○” is displayed in the “Judgment” column of the corresponding line for other messages. Is stored. Based on the comparison result in the “Judgment” column, it is determined that none of the conditions “exist1” and “exist2” are satisfied. For this reason, “x” is output as the comprehensive determination result.

  FIG. 13 (c) shows the comparison results as in FIG. 12 (a). In FIG. 13C, the message comparison condition 0 and the message comparison condition 1 that the messages “AAAAA” and “BBBBB” are all present in no particular order (exist1) are set as comparison conditions. The comparison / determination unit 14 determines that messages exist in the test file in the order of “AAAAA”, “BBBBB”, “CCCCC”, etc. (solid line, thick solid line in the figure). In this case, “◯” is stored in the “Judgment” column corresponding to these messages. Then, based on the comparison result in the “Judgment” column, it is determined that the message comparison conditions 0 and 1 are satisfied (thick frame in the figure). For this reason, “◯” is output as the comprehensive determination result.

  FIG. 14 (a) shows the comparison results as in FIG. 12 (a). In FIG. 14A, as a comparison condition, message comparison condition 0 and message comparison condition 2 in which at least one of messages “BBBBB” and “CCCCC” exists (one1) are set. The comparison / determination unit 14 determines that the messages exist in the order of “AAAAA”, “BBBBB”, “DDDDD”... In the test file (solid line, thick solid line in the figure), and determines that the message “CCCCC” does not exist. (Dotted line in the figure). In this case, “◯” is stored in the “Judgment” column corresponding to these messages. Based on the comparison result in the “Judgment” column, it is determined that the message comparison conditions 0 and 2 are satisfied (thick frame in the figure). For this reason, “◯” is output as the comprehensive determination result.

  FIG. 14 (b) shows the comparison results as in FIG. 12 (a). In FIG. 14B, a comparison condition similar to that in FIG. 14A is set as the comparison condition. The comparison / determination unit 14 determines that messages exist in the order of “AAAAA”, “CCCCC”, “DDDDD”... In the test file (solid line, thick solid line in the figure), and determines that the message “BBBBB” does not exist. (Dotted line in the figure). In this case, “◯” is stored in the “Judgment” column corresponding to these messages. Based on the comparison result in the “Judgment” column, it is determined that the message comparison conditions 0 and 2 are satisfied (thick frame in the figure). For this reason, “◯” is output as the comprehensive determination result.

  FIG. 14 (c) shows the comparison results as in FIG. 12 (a). In FIG. 14C, message comparison condition 0 and message comparison condition 2 that at least one of messages “BBBBB” and “DDDDD” exists (one1) are set as comparison conditions. The comparison / determination unit 14 determines that messages exist in the order of “AAAAA”, “CCCCC”, “DDDDD”... In the test file (solid line, thick solid line in the figure), and determines that the message “BBBBB” does not exist. (Dotted line in the figure). In this case, “◯” is stored in the “Judgment” column corresponding to these messages. Based on the comparison result in the “Judgment” column, it is determined that the message comparison conditions 0 and 2 are satisfied (thick frame in the figure). For this reason, “◯” is output as the comprehensive determination result.

  FIG. 15 shows the comparison results as in FIG. In FIG. 15, the same comparison condition as that in FIG. 14A is set as the comparison condition. The comparison / determination unit 14 determines that messages exist in the test file in the order of “AAAAA”, “BBBBB”, “CCCCC”, etc. (solid line, thick solid line in the figure). In this case, “◯” is stored in the “Judgment” column corresponding to these messages. Based on the comparison result in the “Judgment” column, it is determined that the message comparison conditions 0 and 2 are satisfied (thick frame in the figure). For this reason, “◯” is output as the comprehensive determination result.

  FIG. 16 (a) shows the comparison results as in FIG. 12 (a). In FIG. 16A, the message comparison condition 0 is set as the comparison condition, and the message comparison condition 0 that there are a plurality of messages “BBBBB” less than three (times [<3]). The comparison / determination unit 14 determines that the messages exist in the order of “AAAAA”, “BBBBB”, “BBBBB”, “CCCCC”,... (In the figure, solid line, thick solid line). In this case, each determination result “◯” is stored in the “Judgment” column corresponding to these messages, and it is determined that the message comparison conditions 0 and 3 are satisfied (thick frame in the figure). For this reason, “◯” is output as the comprehensive determination result.

  FIG. 16 (b) shows the comparison results as in FIG. 12 (a). In FIG. 16B, a comparison condition similar to that in FIG. 16A is set as the comparison condition. The comparison / determination unit 14 determines that messages exist in the test file in the order of “AAAAA”, “BBBBB”, “BBBBB”, “BBBBB”, “CCCCC”, etc. (solid line, thick solid line in the figure). In this case, for the third “BBBBB”, the comparison result is “◯”, but the determination result is “×”. For other messages, the individual determination result “◯” is stored in the “Judgment” column corresponding to these messages. Since there are three messages “BBBBB” (thick frame in the figure), “x” is output as the comprehensive judgment result.

  FIG. 16 (c) shows the comparison results as in FIG. 12 (a). In FIG. 16C, a comparison condition similar to that in FIG. 16A is set as the comparison condition. The comparison / determination unit 14 determines that messages exist in the order of “AAAAA”, “BBBBB”, “BBBBB”, “CCCCC”,... In the test file (solid line in the figure, thick solid line). “O” is stored in the “Judgment” column corresponding to these messages. Note that the message “BBBBB” indicated by the dotted frame in the figure is not subject to processing, and therefore “D / C” is stored in the “Judgment” column. Since there are two messages “BBBBB” (thick frame in the figure), “◯” is output as the comprehensive judgment result.

  FIG. 17 (a) shows the comparison results as in FIG. 12 (a). In FIG. 17A, message comparison condition 0, message “AAAAA” followed by message “BBBBB”, “CCCCC”, and “DDDDD” are present as comparison conditions (choice [B1, E1] ), And the message “DDDDD”, the message comparison condition 4 is set (choice [B2, E2]) in which there is a message group in the order of the messages “EEEEE” and “FFFFF”. The comparison judgment unit 14 determines that the messages exist in the order of “AAAAA”, “BBBBB”, “CCCCC”, “DDDDD”, “GGGGG”,... (In the figure, solid line, thick solid line). “O” is stored in the “Judgment” field corresponding to the message. Based on the comparison result in the “Judgment” column, it is determined that the condition “choice [B1, E1]” is satisfied (thick frame in the figure), but the condition “choice [B2, E2]” is not satisfied. For this reason, “x” is output as the comprehensive determination result.

  FIG. 17 (b) shows the comparison results as in FIG. 12 (a). In FIG. 17B, message comparison condition 0, message “AAAAA” followed by messages “BBBBB”, “CCCCC” (choice [B1, E1]) and message are present as comparison conditions. The message comparison condition 4 is set that there is a message group in the order of messages “EEEEE” and “FFFFF” next to “DDDDD” (choice [B2, E2]). The comparison determination unit 14 determines that messages are present in the test file in the order of “AAAAA”, “BBBBB”, “CCCCC”, “DDDDD”, “GGGGG”, etc. (solid line in the figure, thick solid line). “O” is stored in the “Judgment” field corresponding to the message. Based on the comparison result in the “Judgment” column, it is determined that the condition “choice [B1, E1]” is satisfied (thick frame in the figure), but the condition “choice [B2, E2]” is not satisfied. For this reason, “x” is output as the comprehensive determination result.

  FIG. 17 (c) shows the comparison results as in FIG. 12 (a). In FIG. 17C, a comparison condition similar to that in FIG. 17B is set as the comparison condition. The comparison / determination unit 14 determines that messages exist in the test file in the order of “AAAAA”, “DDDDD”, “EEEEE”, “FFFFF”, “GGGGG”, etc. (solid line, thick solid line in the figure). Since there are no corresponding messages for the messages “BBBBB” and “CCCCC”, the “Judgment” column is blank, and “J” is stored in the corresponding “Judgment” column for other messages. Based on the comparison result in the “Judgment” column, it is determined that the condition “choice [B2, E2]” is satisfied (thick frame in the figure), but the condition “choice [B1, E1]” is not satisfied. For this reason, “x” is output as the comprehensive determination result.

  FIG. 18 (a) shows the comparison results as in FIG. 12 (a). In FIG. 18A, message comparison condition 0, message “AAAAA” followed by messages “BBBBB”, “CCCCC”, “DDDDD”, and “EEEEE” are present as comparison conditions (choice [ B1, E1]), and the message comparison condition that there is a message group (choice [B2, E2]) in the order of messages "CCCCC", "DDDDD", "EEEEE", and "FFFFF" after message "BBBBB" 4 is set. The comparison / determination unit 14 determines that the messages exist in the order of “AAAAA”, “BBBBB”, “CCCCC”, “DDDDD”, “EEEEE”, “GGGGG”,... (In the figure, solid line, thick solid line) ), “O” is stored in the “Judgment” field corresponding to these messages. Based on the comparison result in the “Judgment” column, it is determined that the condition “choice [B1, E1]” is satisfied (thick frame in the figure), but the condition “choice [B2, E2]” is not satisfied. For this reason, “x” is output as the comprehensive determination result.

  FIG. 18 (b) shows the comparison results as in FIG. 12 (a). In FIG. 18B, a comparison condition similar to that in FIG. 18A is set as the comparison condition. The comparison / determination unit 14 determines that messages are present in the test file in the order of “AAAAA”, “CCCCC”, “DDDDD”, “EEEEE”, “FFFFF”, “GGGGG”, etc. (solid line in the figure, thick solid line) ), “O” is stored in the “Judgment” field corresponding to these messages. Based on the comparison result in the “Judgment” column, it is determined that the condition “choice [B2, E2]” is satisfied (thick frame in the figure), but the condition “choice [B1, E1]” is not satisfied. For this reason, “x” is output as the comprehensive determination result.

  FIG. 18 (c) shows the comparison results as in FIG. 12 (a). In FIG. 18C, message comparison condition 0, message “AAAAA” followed by message “BBBBB”, “CCCCC”, “DDDDD”, “EEEEE”, “FFFFF” are present as comparison conditions. (Choice [B1, E1]), and the message comparison condition that there is a message group (choice [B2, E2]) in the order of the messages “CCCCC”, “DDDDD”, and “EEEEE” after the message “BBBBB” 4 is set. The comparison / determination unit 14 determines that messages exist in the order of “AAAAA”, “BBBBB”, “CCCCC”, “DDDDD”, “EEEEE”, “FFFFF”, “GGGGG”,... (Solid line, thick solid line), “◯” is stored in the “Judgment” column corresponding to these messages, and it is determined that the message comparison conditions 0 and 4 are satisfied (thick frame in the figure). For this reason, “◯” is output as the comprehensive determination result.

  FIG. 19 shows the comparison results in the same manner as FIG. In FIG. 19, the same comparison conditions as in FIG. 18C are set as the comparison conditions. The comparison / determination unit 14 determines that messages exist in the test file in the order of “AAAAA”, “CCCCC”, “DDDDD”, “EEEEE”... (Corresponding to these messages). “O” is stored in the “Judgment” column. Based on the comparison result in the “Judgment” column, it is determined that the condition “choice [B2, E2]” is satisfied (thick frame in the figure), but the condition “choice [B1, E1]” is not satisfied. For this reason, “x” is output as the comprehensive determination result.

  FIG. 20 (a) shows the comparison results as in FIG. 12 (a). In FIG. 20A, as a comparison condition, there are 0 message comparison conditions and 0 message “YYYYY” between message “BBBBB” and message “EEEEE” (* YYYYY (<1) [2; 5 ]) Message comparison condition 5 is set. It is determined by the comparison / determination unit 14 that messages exist in the order of “AAAAA”, “BBBBB”, “CCCCC”, “DDDDD”, “EEEEE”... (In the figure, solid line, thick solid line). “O” is stored in the “Judgment” field corresponding to the message, and it is determined that the message comparison conditions 0 and 5 are satisfied (solid line in the figure, thick frame in the figure). For this reason, “◯” is output as the comprehensive determination result.

  FIG. 20 (b) shows the comparison results as in FIG. 12 (a). In FIG. 20B, as a comparison condition, message comparison condition 0 and at least one message “YYYYY” exist between message “BBBBB” and message “EEEEE” (* YYYYY (> 0) [2; Message comparison condition 5 of 5]) is set. The comparison judgment unit 14 judges that messages exist in the order of “AAAAA”, “BBBBB”, “CCCCC”, “DDDDD”, “EEEEE”, etc. in the test file (solid line in the figure) and correspond to these messages. “○” is stored as a comparison result in the “Judgment” column. However, since the message comparison condition 5 is not satisfied (thick frame in the figure), the determination result “x” is stored in the “Judgment” column corresponding to these messages. For this reason, “x” is output as the comprehensive determination result.

  FIG. 20 (c) shows the comparison results as in FIG. 12 (a). In FIG. 20C, as comparison conditions, there are 3 to 5 message comparison conditions 0 and message “YYYYY” between message “BBBBB” and message “EEEEE” (* YYYYY (> 2, <6 ) [2; 5]) message comparison condition 5 is set. The comparison / determination unit 14 determines that messages exist in the order of “AAAAA”, “BBBBB”, “YYYYY”, “CCCCC”, “YYYYY”, “YYYYY”, “DDDDD”, “EEEEE”. Then, a count value is set in the “Judgment” field corresponding to the message “YYYYY”, and “◯” is stored as a comparison result in the “Judgment” field corresponding to the other messages. Based on the “Judgment” field, it is determined that the message comparison conditions 0 and 5 are satisfied (thick frame in the figure), and “◯” is output as the comprehensive determination result.

  FIG. 21A shows a reference file in which comparison conditions are set in the left table, and a test file to be compared and a comparison determination result in the right table. In the left table, information elements “aaa”, “bbb”, and “eee” exist in the second layer of the message “AAAAA” in the format shown in FIG. 11B, and the third layer of the information element “bbb”. Information element “xxx”, “yyy” and information element “zzz” exists in the third layer of information element “eee”, information element “aaa” exists in the second layer of message “AAAAA” (Exist) information element condition 2, information element condition “xxx” is not present in the third layer of information element “bbb”, information element condition 1, information element “yyy” exists (* 2 ), And information element condition 3 is set (* 2) in which there are two information elements “zzz” in the third hierarchy of the information element “eee”. On the other hand, in the table on the right, the comparison result is shown in the “Message” column in which the messages of the first to third layers of the test file to be compared are stored and the “Judgment” column corresponding to the “Message” column. The “Judgment” column may indicate individual determination results as necessary. The comparison / determination unit 14 compares the messages for each line in order from “AAAAA” in the first line to determine whether the message in the reference file is included in the message in the test file, and determines whether the messages match or not. A match / mismatch of the information elements is determined. As a result, the test file contains information element “aaa” in the second layer of message “AAAAA”, information elements “xxx”, “yyy”, “yyy”, information element “eee” in the third layer of information element “bbb”. It is determined that the information element “zzz” exists in the third hierarchy (“solid line” in the figure). Therefore, information element condition 2 that the information element “aaa” exists in the second layer of the message “AAAAA” (exist), and two information elements “yyy” exist in the third layer of the information element “bbb”. It is determined that the information element condition 3 (* 2) is satisfied, and “◯” is stored as a determination result in the “Judgment” column corresponding to these information elements. On the other hand, information element condition 1 that the information element “xxx” does not exist in the third layer of the information element “bbb” and two information elements “zzz” exist in the third layer of the information element “eee” It is determined that the information element condition 3 of “Yes” (* 2) is not satisfied, and “X” is stored as a determination result in the “Judgment” column corresponding to these information elements. Information elements for which no conditional expression is set are handled as simple path information and are not compared (dotted line in the figure), and “D / C” is stored in the “Judgment” column.

  FIG. 21 (b) shows the comparison results as in FIG. 21 (a). The reference file shown in FIG. 21 (b) has the same message and information elements as the reference file shown in FIG. 21 (a), but only the conditional expressions are different. In FIG. 21B, as a comparison condition, a value condition 1 that the information element “aaa” exists in the second hierarchy of the message “AAAAA” and the value thereof is “1” ([= 1]), The value condition that the information element “xxx” having the value “2” does not exist in the third hierarchy of the information element “bbb”, the range of the value “1-5” in the third hierarchy of the information element “bbb”, and Information element “yyy” with value condition 3, and information element “zzz” with values “1”, [2], and [3] in the third hierarchy of information element “eee” ([1 , 2, 3]) is set. The comparison determination unit 14 causes the test file to include an information element “aaa” having a value “1” in the second hierarchy of the message “AAAAA” and an information element “xxx” having a value “1” in the third hierarchy of the information element “bbb”. ”, Information element“ yyy ”with value“ 3 ”, and information elements“ zzz ”with values“ 2 ”,“ 3 ”, and“ 1 ”are sequentially present in the third hierarchy of information element“ eee ”(FIG. Solid line). Therefore, the value condition 1 that the information element “aaa” exists in the second layer of the message “AAAAA” and the value thereof is “1” ([= 1]), the third of the information element “bbb” Value condition 2 that the information element “xxx” with the value “2” does not exist in the hierarchy, and the information element “yyy” that has the value “1 to 5” exists in the third hierarchy of the information element “bbb” It is determined that the value condition 3 of “Yes” is satisfied, and “◯” is stored as the determination result in the “Judgment” column corresponding to these information elements. On the other hand, the value condition 4 that the information element “zzz” having the values “1”, [2], and [3] exists in order in the third hierarchy of the information element “eee” ([1,2,3]) is satisfied. “X” is stored as the determination result in the “Judgment” column corresponding to these information elements. Information elements for which no conditional expression is set are handled as simple path information and are not compared (dotted line in the figure), and “D / C” is stored in the “Judgment” column.

  FIG. 21 (c) shows the comparison results as in FIG. 21 (a). The reference file shown in FIG. 21C has the same message and information elements as the reference file shown in FIG. 21A, but only the conditional expressions are different. In FIG. 21C, as a comparison condition, the value condition 5 that the information element “aaa” exists in the second layer of the message “AAAAA” and the value is less than “2” ([<2]). , Value condition 6 that the information element “xxx” having a value greater than “2” exists in the third layer of the information element “bbb”, and the value is “2” or less in the third layer of the information element “bbb” A value condition 7 that the information element “yyy” exists, and a value condition 8 that the information element “zzz” that has a value of “2” or more exists in the third hierarchy of the information element “eee” are set. The comparison determination unit 14 causes the test file to include the information element “aaa” having the value “1” in the second layer of the message “AAAAA” and the information element “xxx” having the value “3” in the third layer of the information element “bbb”. ”, The information element“ yyy ”having the value“ 1 ”, and the information element“ zzz ”having the value“ 1 ”exist in the third hierarchy of the information element“ eee ”(solid line in the figure). Therefore, the value condition 5 that the information element “aaa” exists in the second layer of the message “AAAAA” and its value is less than “2” ([<2]), and the information element “bbb” Value condition 6 that information element “xxx” having a value greater than “2” exists in the third hierarchy, information element “yyy” having a value of “2” or less exists in the third hierarchy of information element “bbb” It is determined that the value condition 7 is satisfied, and “◯” is stored as a determination result in the “Judgment” column corresponding to these information elements. On the other hand, it is determined that the value condition 8 that the information element “zzz” whose value is “2” or more exists in the third hierarchy of the information element “eee” is not satisfied, and the “Judgment” column corresponding to these information elements “×” is stored as the determination result. Information elements for which no conditional expression is set are handled as simple path information and are not compared (dotted line in the figure), and “D / C” is stored in the “Judgment” column.

  Next, FIG. 22 shows the determination results when the information element described in FIGS. 21A to 21C has a plurality of values. In FIG. 22, the reference file setting condition and line determination result, test file output result and line determination result, and comprehensive determination result are shown for each number (row) in order from the left column. The comprehensive judgment results are displayed by being classified into “And”, “Or”, and “All”. The comprehensive judgment result “And” stores “◯” when all the corresponding information elements of the test file satisfy the conditions specified in the reference file. The comprehensive determination result “Or” stores “◯” when at least one of the corresponding information elements of the test file satisfies the condition specified in the reference file. The comprehensive determination result “All” stores “◯” when all the conditions specified in the reference file are satisfied regardless of the information elements of the test file. That is, the comprehensive judgment result “And” is “○” if all the row judgment results of the information elements of the test file are “O”, and even one “×” is present in the row judgment result of the information elements of the test file. It will be “x”. The overall judgment result “Or” is “Yes” if there is at least one “○” in the row judgment result of the information element of the test file, and all the row judgment results of the information element of the test file are “X”. Only “×”. In addition, the overall determination result “Or” is “○” if all the line determination results of the reference file are “◯”, and “×” if there is even one “×” in the line determination result of the reference file. Become.

  In “No. 1,” conditional expressions “= 100” and “= 200” are set for the information element “aaa” of the reference file, and the output result of the information element of the test file is “aaa 100”. It shows that there is. In this case, since the condition “= 100” of the standard file is satisfied, “○” is stored in the “line determination” column, and “x” is stored in the “line determination” column because the condition “= 200” of the standard file is not satisfied. Is stored. On the other hand, since the output result “aaa 100” of the test file satisfies the condition “= 100”, “◯” is stored in the “line determination” column. In the comprehensive judgment “And” and “Or” fields, “◯” is stored based on the “line judgment” field of the test file. On the other hand, in the comprehensive determination “All” column, “x” is stored based on the “line determination” column of the reference file.

  In “No. 2”, the conditional expression “! = 0” is set for the information element “aaa” of the reference file, and the output result of the information element of the test file is “aaa 100”, “aaa 200” It is shown that. In this case, since the condition “! = 0” of the reference file is satisfied, “◯” is stored in the “line determination” column. On the other hand, since the output results “aaa 100” and “aaa 200” of the test file satisfy the condition “! = 0”, “◯” is stored in the “line determination” column. In the comprehensive judgment “And” and “Or” fields, “◯” is stored based on the “line judgment” field of the test file. On the other hand, in the comprehensive determination “All” column, “◯” is stored based on the “line determination” column of the reference file.

  In “No. 3,” the conditional expression “> 100” is set for the information element “aaa” of the reference file, and the output result of the information element of the test file is “aaa 100”, “aaa 200”. It shows that there is. In this case, since “aaa 200” satisfies the condition “> 100” of the reference file, “◯” is stored in the “line determination” column. On the other hand, since the test file output result “aaa 100” does not satisfy the condition “> 100”, “x” is stored in the “line judgment” column, and the test file output result “aaa 200” In order to satisfy “100”, “◯” is stored in the “line determination” column. In the comprehensive judgment “And” and “Or” fields, “x” and “◯” are stored based on the “line judgment” field of the test file. On the other hand, in the comprehensive determination “All” column, “◯” is stored based on the “line determination” column of the reference file.

  In “No.4”, the conditional expression “<= 300” is set for the information element “aaa” of the reference file, and the output result of the information element of the test file is “aaa 400”. ing. In this case, since “aaa 400” does not satisfy the condition “<= 300” of the reference file, “x” is stored in the “line determination” column. On the other hand, since the test file output result “aaa 400” does not satisfy the condition “<= 300”, “x” is stored in the “line determination” column. In the comprehensive judgment “And” and “Or” fields, “x” is stored based on the “line judgment” field of the test file. On the other hand, in the comprehensive determination “All” column, “x” is stored based on the “line determination” column of the reference file.

  In “No. 5”, the conditional expression “100,300” is set for the information element “aaa” of the reference file, and the output result of the information element of the test file is “aaa 100”, “aaa 200”, “ "aaa 300". In this case, since “aaa 100” and “aaa 300” satisfy the condition “100, 300” of the reference file, “◯” is stored in the “line determination” column. On the other hand, since the test file output results “aaa 100” and “aaa 300” satisfy the condition “100,300”, “O” is stored in the “line judgment” column, and the test file output result “aaa 200” Since the condition “100, 300” is not satisfied, “x” is stored in the “line determination” column. In the comprehensive judgment “And” and “Or” fields, “x” and “◯” are stored based on the “line judgment” field of the test file. On the other hand, in the comprehensive determination “All” column, “◯” is stored based on the “line determination” column of the reference file.

  In “No.6”, the conditional expression “100,300” is set for the information element “aaa” of the reference file, and the output result of the information element of the test file is “aaa 300”, “aaa 200”, “ "aaa 100". In this case, the reference file condition “100, 300” stores “x” in the “line determination” column because the information elements of the test file do not satisfy the order. On the other hand, since the output result of the test file does not satisfy the condition “100,300”, “x” is stored in the “line determination” column. In the comprehensive judgment “And” and “Or” fields, “x” is stored based on the “line judgment” field of the test file. On the other hand, in the comprehensive determination “All” column, “x” is stored based on the “line determination” column of the reference file.

  In “No. 7,” conditional expressions “= 100” and “= 300” are set for the information element “aaa” of the reference file, and the output result of the information element of the test file is “aaa 300”, “Aaa 200” and “aaa 100” are indicated. In this case, it is not necessary to consider the order of the information elements in the test file. Therefore, it is determined that the conditions “= 100” and “= 300” of the reference file are satisfied, and “○” is displayed in the “line determination” column. Stored. On the other hand, the test file output results “aaa 300” and “aaa 100” satisfy the conditions “= 100” and “= 300”, so “○” is stored in the “line judgment” column, and the test file output results Since “aaa 200” does not satisfy the conditions “= 100” and “= 300”, “x” is stored in the “line determination” column. In the comprehensive judgment “And” and “Or” fields, “x” and “◯” are stored based on the “line judgment” field of the test file. On the other hand, in the comprehensive determination “All” column, “◯” is stored based on the “line determination” column of the reference file.

  In “No.8”, the conditional expression “9,1” is set for the information element “aaa” of the reference file, and the output result of the information element of the test file is “9”, “0”, “ 1 ”. In the case of comma designation, the comparison with the value designated by the condition is performed only once, and the second and subsequent times are determined to be NG. When it is necessary to determine a plurality of the same values such as telephone numbers, a plurality of specified conditions are required. In the case of “No. 8”, the condition “9, 1” of the reference file is satisfied, so “◯” is stored in the “line determination” column. On the other hand, because the test file output results “9” and “1” satisfy the condition “9, 1”, “O” is stored in the “line judgment” column, and the test file output result “0” Since “9, 1” is not satisfied, “x” is stored in the “line determination” column. In the comprehensive judgment “And” and “Or” fields, “x” and “◯” are stored based on the “line judgment” field of the test file. On the other hand, in the comprehensive determination “All” column, “◯” is stored based on the “line determination” column of the reference file.

  In “No. 9”, the conditional expression “9,0,1” is set for the information element “aaa” of the reference file, and the output result of the information element of the test file is “9”, “0” , “1”. In this case, since the condition “9, 0, 1” of the reference file is satisfied, “◯” is stored in the “line determination” column. On the other hand, since the test file output results “9”, “0”, and “1” satisfy the condition “9,0,1”, “◯” is stored in the “line determination” column. In the comprehensive judgment “And” and “Or” fields, “◯” is stored based on the “line judgment” field of the test file. On the other hand, in the comprehensive determination “All” column, “◯” is stored based on the “line determination” column of the reference file.

  Next, a message comparison determination program for causing a computer to function as the message comparison determination device 2 will be described. Note that the message comparison determination program according to the present embodiment is substantially the same as the message comparison determination program according to the first embodiment, and includes a comparison condition setting interface module and a comparison condition setting module, and a part of the comparison determination module. The operation is different. The functions realized by executing the comparison condition setting interface module, the comparison condition setting module, and the comparison determination module are the same as those of the comparison condition setting interface unit 12, the comparison condition setting unit 13, and the comparison determination unit 14 described above. Each function is the same.

  As described above, since the message comparison determination device 2, the message comparison determination program, and the method thereof according to the second embodiment have the same configuration as that of the first embodiment, the message comparison determination device 1, the message comparison determination according to the first embodiment. The same effects as the program and its method are achieved.

  Further, in the message comparison determination device 2, the message comparison determination program, and the method thereof according to the second embodiment, the comparison condition setting interface unit 12 (comparison condition setting interface module) and the comparison condition setting unit 13 are input before the file is input. The comparison condition in which at least one of presence / absence, number, order, value, or condition within or outside the range is set for at least one item of the message, information element, or information element value by the (comparison condition setting module). The comparison determination unit 14 (comparison determination module) determines whether or not the set comparison condition is satisfied based on the determination result of whether or not the messages and information elements match. Therefore, when comparing a reference file for signal file verification and a test target file to be tested, hierarchical messages can be compared with each other, and the value of the message, information element, or information element can be compared. For at least one item, it is possible to perform a detailed determination process using a comparison condition in which at least one of presence / absence, number, order, value, or condition within or outside the range is set. It becomes possible to efficiently verify the difference in message contents between signal files. Also, for example, in the IMT-2000 system, when used for analysis of communication protocol signals between a mobile device such as a mobile terminal and a network such as a test pseudo base station, a mobile device to be tested, a test procedure manual, etc. When performing a judgment test by comparison with a signal file in which reference information is set, various conditions can be set in the reference signal file.

  As mentioned above, although preferred embodiment of this invention was described, it cannot be overemphasized that this invention is not limited to embodiment mentioned above.

  For example, in the above-described first embodiment, an example in which the signal file is hierarchized has been described. However, the signal file may be performed on a non-hierarchized signal file.

  In the above-described second embodiment, the example in which the comparison condition is set for the created reference file has been described. However, the comparison condition setting unit 13 is based on the comparison condition set by the comparison condition setting interface unit 12. And may have a function of creating a reference file.

DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 1, 2 ... Message comparison determination apparatus, 10 ... File input part, 11 ... Operation processing part, 11a ... Encoding determination part, 11b ... Relevance determination part, 11c ... Combining part, 11d ... Decoding processing part, 11e ... Recording part , 12 ... Comparison condition setting interface unit, 13 ... Comparison condition setting unit, 14 ... Comparison determination unit, 15 ... Display unit.

Claims (7)

A message comparison and determination method executed by an information processing apparatus for determining whether or not the contents of messages recorded in two signal files respectively match,
An input step of inputting the message recorded in two signal files for each signal file to generate a temporary file for each signal file;
An arithmetic processing step for performing arithmetic processing on each of the temporary files generated in the input step;
A comparison and determination step of determining whether or not the contents of the messages recorded in the two signal files match by determining whether or not the messages recorded in the temporary file after the arithmetic processing match. When,
With
The arithmetic processing step includes
An encoding determination step for determining, for each temporary file, whether or not there is an encoded message that is the message at least partially encoded in the temporary file generated in the input step;
If it is determined in the encoding determination step that the encoded message exists in at least one of the temporary files, the encoded message of the temporary file is decoded and unencoded based on a predetermined definition. A decoding process step for generating the message;
When performing the decoding process step, the recording step for recording the message generated in the decoding process step in the temporary file determined in the determination step that the encoded message exists;
A message comparison / determination method comprising: The arithmetic processing step includes
A relevance determination step for determining whether or not there is a relevance between the encoded messages based on a predetermined definition when there are a plurality of the encoded messages determined in the encoding determination step;
Combining a group of the encoded messages determined to be related between the encoded messages in the relevance determining step;
Further including
The decoding processing step generates a non-encoded message by decoding the group of the encoded messages combined in the combining step based on a predetermined definition;
The message comparison determination method according to claim 1.   In the comparison determination step, the message generated by the decoding processing step compared to the comparison processing for the encoded message when determining whether or not the messages recorded in the temporary file match each other. 3. The message comparison / determination method according to claim 1, wherein the comparison processing for the message is preferentially performed. The recording step includes
If it is determined in the relevancy determination step that the encoded message is not related to another encoded message, the message generated based on the encoded message in the decoding processing step is the encoded message. And insert it into the temporary file so that it is located immediately after
If it is determined in the relevance determination step that the encoded message is related to another encoded message, the message generated based on the encoded message in the decoding processing step is related Inserting and recording in the temporary file to be located immediately after the group of the encoded messages;
The message comparison determination method according to claim 2 or 3, In the signal file, the messages are arranged in a hierarchy, and one of the two signal files is a reference file based on one of the signal files, and the other signal file is a test target file to be tested. And
Before the input step, a comparison condition in which at least one of presence / absence, number, order, value, and condition within / outside range is set for at least one item of message, information element and value of information element It further includes a comparison condition setting step for setting,
The comparison determination step satisfies the comparison condition set in the comparison condition setting step based on a determination result of whether or not messages and information elements recorded in the temporary file after the arithmetic processing match. To determine whether or not
The message comparison determination method according to any one of claims 2 to 4. A message comparison and determination device that determines whether or not the contents of messages recorded in two signal files match each other,
Input means for inputting the message recorded in two signal files for each signal file and generating a temporary file for each signal file;
Arithmetic processing means for executing arithmetic processing on each of the temporary files generated by the input means;
Comparison determining means for determining whether or not the contents of the messages recorded in the two signal files match by determining whether or not the messages recorded in the temporary file after the arithmetic processing match. When,
With
The arithmetic processing means includes:
Encoding determination means for determining, for each temporary file, whether or not there is an encoded message that is the message at least partially encoded in the temporary file generated by the input means;
If it is determined by the encoding determination means that the encoded message exists in at least one of the temporary files, the encoded message of the temporary file is decoded and decoded based on a predetermined definition. Decoding processing means for generating the message;
When the decoding processing unit is executed, a recording unit that records the message generated by the decoding processing unit in the temporary file determined by the determining unit to determine that the encoded message exists;
A message comparison and determination device characterized by comprising: A message comparison determination program for causing an information processing apparatus to function as a message comparison determination apparatus for determining whether or not the contents of messages recorded in two signal files match each other,
Input means for inputting the message recorded in two signal files for each signal file and generating a temporary file for each signal file;
Arithmetic processing means for executing arithmetic processing on each of the temporary files generated by the input means;
Comparison determining means for determining whether or not the contents of the messages recorded in the two signal files match by determining whether or not the messages recorded in the temporary file after the arithmetic processing match. When,
Is executed by the information processing apparatus,
The arithmetic processing means includes:
Encoding determination means for determining, for each temporary file, whether or not there is an encoded message that is the message at least partially encoded in the temporary file generated by the input means;
If it is determined by the encoding determination means that the encoded message exists in at least one of the temporary files, the encoded message of the temporary file is decoded and decoded based on a predetermined definition. Decoding processing means for generating the message;
When the decoding processing unit is executed, a recording unit that records the message generated by the decoding processing unit in the temporary file determined by the determining unit to determine that the encoded message exists;
A message comparison / determination program characterized by comprising:

Images