JP2010233719A - Action choice presentation method and apparatus - Google Patents

Action choice presentation method and apparatus Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP2010233719A
JP2010233719A JP2009083421A JP2009083421A JP2010233719A JP 2010233719 A JP2010233719 A JP 2010233719A JP 2009083421 A JP2009083421 A JP 2009083421A JP 2009083421 A JP2009083421 A JP 2009083421A JP 2010233719 A JP2010233719 A JP 2010233719A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
action
presenting
brain
user
electroencephalogram
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
JP2009083421A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP5366083B2 (en
Inventor
Yasuhiro Kato
康広 加藤
Hideyuki Ando
英由樹 安藤
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corp
Osaka University NUC
Original Assignee
Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corp
Osaka University NUC
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corp, Osaka University NUC filed Critical Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corp
Priority to JP2009083421A priority Critical patent/JP5366083B2/en
Publication of JP2010233719A publication Critical patent/JP2010233719A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP5366083B2 publication Critical patent/JP5366083B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Abstract

<P>PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide an action choice presentation method for presenting choices of an action to a user on the basis of a mental state determined by the observation result of brain waves over two or more bands. <P>SOLUTION: A brain wave measuring step of measuring the brain wave of a user, an information processing step of analyzing the brain wave, determining which of two or more kinds of brain states it is pertinent to, and outputting a determined result, and a choice presenting step of presenting the choices of the action to the user according to the determined brain state, are performed. <P>COPYRIGHT: (C)2011,JPO&INPIT

Description

本発明は、ユーザの脳波の測定結果に基づき、測定以後の行動の選択肢をユーザに提示する行動選択肢提示方法および装置に関する。   The present invention relates to a behavior option presentation method and apparatus for presenting a user with behavior options after measurement based on a measurement result of a user's brain wave.

ユーザの精神状態を評価する方法として、Trail Making Test (TMT)、さらにTMTを発展させたAdvanced Trail Making Test(ATMT)(特許文献1参照)などの精神機能検査方法がある。TMT法による精神機能検査は、情報処理や注意力の全般的機能障害を示唆するために開発された。さらにTMT法を発展させたATMT法による精神機能検査は、視覚刺激による反応をタッチパネル等で回答して、visuospatial working memory(VWM)を定量評価するものである。この方法は、知能、教育年数、繰り返しによる学習効果の影響を受けることなく検査できる上、再現性及び信頼性が高い方法と位置づけられている。   As a method for evaluating the mental state of the user, there are mental function testing methods such as Trail Making Test (TMT) and further Advanced Trail Making Test (ATMT) (see Patent Document 1) developed from TMT. A mental function test by the TMT method was developed to suggest general impairment of information processing and attention. Furthermore, the mental function test based on the ATMT method, which is an extension of the TMT method, quantitatively evaluates the visuospatial working memory (VWM) by responding to a visual stimulus response using a touch panel or the like. This method can be inspected without being influenced by intelligence, years of education, and learning effects due to repetition, and is positioned as a method having high reproducibility and reliability.

また、利用者の心的状況に対応する嗜好に応じて、利用者の嗜好に合致する情報コンテンツを提供する技術が知られている(特許文献2参照)。ここでは、ある課題下において、好きか嫌いかをα波などにより弁別する手法が開示されている。   In addition, a technique is known that provides information content that matches a user's preference according to the preference corresponding to the user's mental condition (see Patent Document 2). Here, there is disclosed a technique for discriminating whether a user likes or dislikes by an α wave under a certain problem.

特開2002−112981号公報JP 2002-112981 A 特開2004−70510号公報Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 2004-70510

特許文献1の精神機能検査には、脳波測定が含まれていないため、脳の状態を直接反映した精神状態の評価方法ではない。   Since the mental function test of Patent Document 1 does not include electroencephalogram measurement, it is not a mental state evaluation method that directly reflects the state of the brain.

また、特許文献2の手法のように一つの脳波帯域(α波)のみを観察するだけでは、好き嫌いの判別は困難である。つまり、賦活強度(スカラー量)で表す好きと嫌いの程度がわかっても、好きか嫌いという意味付け(ベクトル量)としての判別ができない。また、測定毎(昨日と今日、朝と夜など)によって、脳波の波形(特に絶対量)が異なるため、一義的に判別ができない。   Moreover, it is difficult to discriminate between likes and dislikes only by observing only one brain wave band (α wave) as in the method of Patent Document 2. In other words, even if the degree of likes and dislikes expressed by the activation intensity (scalar amount) is known, it cannot be determined as a meaning (vector amount) of like or dislike. Moreover, since the waveform (especially absolute amount) of the electroencephalogram differs depending on the measurement (yesterday and today, morning and night, etc.), it cannot be uniquely determined.

本発明の目的は、複数帯域にわたる脳波の観測結果により判別された精神状態に基づき行動の選択肢を提示することが可能な行動選択肢提示方法および装置を提供することにある。   An object of the present invention is to provide an action option presentation method and apparatus capable of presenting action options based on a mental state determined by an electroencephalogram observation result over a plurality of bands.

本発明の行動選択肢提示方法は、ユーザの脳波を計測する脳波計測ステップと、上記脳波を解析し複数種類の脳の状態のうちいずれに該当するかを判定して判定結果を出力する情報処理ステップと、上記判定結果に応じ上記ユーザに行動の選択肢を提示する選択肢提示ステップと、を実行する。   The action option presentation method of the present invention includes an electroencephalogram measurement step that measures a user's electroencephalogram, and an information processing step that analyzes the electroencephalogram and determines which one of a plurality of types of brain states corresponds and outputs a determination result And an option presentation step of presenting the user with action options according to the determination result.

本発明の行動選択肢提示方法および装置によれば、複数帯域にわたる脳波の観測結果により判別された精神状態に基づき行動の選択肢を提示することが可能となる。   According to the action option presentation method and apparatus of the present invention, it is possible to present action options based on the mental state determined by the observation result of the electroencephalogram over a plurality of bands.

行動選択肢提示装置100の機能構成例を示す図。The figure which shows the function structural example of the action choice presentation apparatus 100. FIG. 行動選択肢提示装置100の処理フロー例を示す図。The figure which shows the example of a processing flow of the action choice presentation apparatus 100. 事象に関連した反応応答波形における各部の名称を説明する図。The figure explaining the name of each part in the response response waveform relevant to the event. 脳に活力がある状態における安静時、集中時、瞑想時の脳波の周波数スペクトルの例を示す図。The figure which shows the example of the frequency spectrum of the electroencephalogram at the time of resting, concentration, and meditation in the state where the brain has vitality. 脳に活力がない状態における安静時、集中時、瞑想時の脳波の周波数スペクトルの例を示す図。The figure which shows the example of the frequency spectrum of the electroencephalogram at the time of resting, concentration, and meditation in the state where the brain has no vitality.

図1に本発明の行動選択肢提示装置100の機能構成例を、図2にその処理フロー例を示す。行動選択肢提示装置100は、脳波計測部101と情報処理部102と選択肢提示部103とを備える。   FIG. 1 shows a functional configuration example of the action option presentation device 100 of the present invention, and FIG. The action option presentation device 100 includes an electroencephalogram measurement unit 101, an information processing unit 102, and an option presentation unit 103.

脳波計測部101は、ユーザ1に装着された探査電極2を通じ、ユーザ1の脳波を計測する(S1)。計測は、情報処理部102での状態判定方法に応じて、例えば「五感への各種刺激による誘発電位の脳波」、「五感への各種刺激時や各種課題時(計算課題など)における事象関連電位の脳波」「各種課題時における脳波」などについて行う。   The electroencephalogram measurement unit 101 measures the electroencephalogram of the user 1 through the exploration electrode 2 attached to the user 1 (S1). The measurement is performed according to the state determination method in the information processing unit 102, for example, “an electroencephalogram of an evoked potential by various stimuli to the five senses”, “event-related potential at the time of various stimuli to the five senses and at various tasks (such as a calculation task). "EEG" and "EEG during various tasks".

情報処理部102は、脳波計測部101で計測した脳波を解析し、複数種類の脳の状態のうちいずれに該当するかを判定して判定結果を出力する(S2)。解析は例えば次の事象に着目して行う。
・脳波の特定の周波数成分(α波、β波、θ波など)の周波数や位相
・各周波数成分相互の相関(どの成分の強度が大きいか、課題時において優位な成分がどのように変化するかなど)
・事象に関連した反応応答(ある時間間隔又は時刻における脳波の強度、頂点間振幅、頂点潜時、基線・頂点振幅、立ち上がり、立ち下がりなどの変位。なお、反応応答波形におけるこれら各名称が指す部分は図3参照。)
・最大強度の脳波の周波数が特定周波数に遷移又は特定周波数において特定強度に遷移するまでの時間又は刺激提示毎の変動(ゆらぎ、他の周波数成分との相関、事象関連電位など)
このような事象に基づき、予め複数種類の脳の状態を定義しておく。そして、脳波計測部101で計測した脳波を解析し、その解析結果が複数種類の脳の状態のうちいずれに該当するかを判定する。
The information processing unit 102 analyzes the electroencephalogram measured by the electroencephalogram measurement unit 101, determines which one of a plurality of types of brain states corresponds, and outputs a determination result (S2). The analysis is performed by paying attention to the following events, for example.
・ Frequency and phase of specific frequency components (α wave, β wave, θ wave, etc.) of brain waves ・ Correlation between each frequency component (which component is strong, how the dominant component changes at the time of the task) Or the like)
-Responses related to events (displacement such as brain wave intensity, vertex amplitude, vertex latency, baseline / vertical amplitude, rise, fall, etc. at a certain time interval or time. Each of these names in the response response waveform indicates (See Figure 3 for the part.)
・ Time until the maximum intensity of the electroencephalogram frequency changes to a specific frequency or changes to a specific intensity at a specific frequency or fluctuations for each stimulus presentation (fluctuation, correlation with other frequency components, event-related potential, etc.)
Based on such events, a plurality of types of brain states are defined in advance. Then, the electroencephalogram measured by the electroencephalogram measurement unit 101 is analyzed, and it is determined which of the plural types of brain states the analysis result corresponds to.

選択肢提示部103は、情報処理部102での状態判定結果に応じ、ユーザ1に行動の選択肢を提示する。選択肢は、単に状態判定結果のみに基づき提示してもよいし、ユーザの環境や先天的要素、趣向性などの個人情報、特許文献1の精神機能検査の結果などを入力し、これらを加味して提示してもよい。また、行動の選択肢の提示の際、あわせて選択肢に応じた、天気や経済や行事などの社会情報や広告を提示するようにしてもよい。更に、提示した選択肢の中での選択結果を保存し、傾向を分析して以後の選択肢提示に反映してもよい。ユーザの個人情報を入力する場合には、例えば、身体データ、健康診断データ、生活習慣データ、食生活データなどを入力項目とすることが考えられる。具体的には、身体データとしては、生年月日、身長、体重、性別、血液型、体脂肪率などが挙げられる。健康診断データとしては、視力、血圧、X線検査データ、尿検査データ、血液検査データ、心電図検査データ、疾患(病気)名などが挙げられる。生活習慣データとしては、宗教や思想信条、生活地域、運動量、睡眠時間、仕事内容、趣味趣向(読書、スポーツ、料理その他)などが挙げられる。食生活データとしては、毎回の食事メニューや品目、食事時刻、1日のアルコール摂取量やタバコの本数などが挙げられる。これらの情報や行動の選択肢の各データは選択肢提示装置103自身で持ってもよいし、データベース104を設けてそこに保存し、ローカル又はネットワーク105を介してアクセスする形をとってもよい。ネットワークを介してアクセスする形をとった場合には、情報や行動の選択肢を複数人で共有することができる。   The option presenting unit 103 presents action options to the user 1 in accordance with the state determination result in the information processing unit 102. The options may be presented based solely on the state determination result, or personal information such as the user's environment, innate elements, preferences, etc., the result of the mental function test of Patent Document 1, and the like are taken into account. May be presented. In addition, when presenting action options, social information such as weather, economy, and events, and advertisements may be presented according to the options. Further, the selection result in the presented options may be stored, and the tendency may be analyzed and reflected in the subsequent option presentation. When inputting personal information of a user, for example, body data, health check data, lifestyle data, dietary data, and the like may be used as input items. Specifically, the body data includes date of birth, height, weight, sex, blood type, body fat percentage, and the like. Examples of the medical examination data include visual acuity, blood pressure, X-ray examination data, urine examination data, blood examination data, electrocardiogram examination data, and disease (disease) name. Examples of the lifestyle data include religion and ideology, living area, amount of exercise, sleep time, work content, hobbies (reading, sports, cooking, etc.). The dietary data includes meal menus and items for each time, meal time, daily alcohol intake, the number of cigarettes, and the like. Each piece of information and action option data may be stored in the option presentation device 103 itself, or may be stored in the database 104 and accessed via the network 105 or the local area. When it is accessed via a network, information and action options can be shared by multiple people.

以下、脳波からユーザの状態を判定し、行動の選択肢を提示する具体例を説明する。
まず、脳波計測部101において、安静時(測定開始時)、集中を必要とするような課題を与えた時(集中時)とリラックスできるような課題を与えた時(瞑想時)の3つの事象下においてユーザの脳波の各周波数成分の強度を測定する。通常、安静時ではβ波、集中時ではα波、瞑想時ではθ波が出現することは既知である。ここで3つの事象のうち「集中」と「瞑想」は必ずしも「集中」と「瞑想」でなくても構わないが、「集中」と「瞑想」のように相反する事象下での脳波を計測することにより、より高精度にユーザの状態を推定することができる。
Hereinafter, a specific example in which the user's state is determined from the electroencephalogram and action options are presented will be described.
First, in the electroencephalogram measurement unit 101, there are three events: when resting (at the start of measurement), when giving a task that requires concentration (when concentrating), and when giving a task that can be relaxed (during meditation) Below, the intensity | strength of each frequency component of a user's brain wave is measured. In general, it is known that a β wave appears at rest, an α wave appears during concentration, and a θ wave appears during meditation. Of these three events, “concentration” and “meditation” do not necessarily have to be “concentration” and “meditation”, but EEG is measured under conflicting events such as “concentration” and “meditation”. By doing so, the state of the user can be estimated with higher accuracy.

続いて情報処理部102において、脳波計測部101で計測した脳波について周波数4Hz〜7Hzがθ波、8Hz〜13Hzがα波、14Hz〜30Hzがβ波、に相当するとして、安静時・集中時・瞑想時のそれぞれの事象下において脳波の各周波数成分の強度を比較し、比較結果の相関関係からユーザの状態を判定する。   Subsequently, in the information processing unit 102, regarding the brain wave measured by the brain wave measuring unit 101, the frequency 4 Hz to 7 Hz corresponds to the θ wave, 8 Hz to 13 Hz corresponds to the α wave, and 14 Hz to 30 Hz corresponds to the β wave. The intensity of each frequency component of the electroencephalogram is compared under each event during meditation, and the state of the user is determined from the correlation of the comparison results.

例えば、下記の3つの条件を全て満たす場合(図4参照)は、脳に活力がある状態と判定する。
・安静時における各周波数成分の強度を比較したとき、β波に相当する周波数成分(14Hz〜30Hz)の強度が他の周波数成分の強度よりも大きい。
・集中時における各周波数成分の強度を比較したとき、α波に相当する周波数成分(8Hz〜13Hz)の強度が他の周波数成分の強度よりも大きい。
・瞑想時における各周波数成分の強度を比較したとき、θ波に相当する周波数成分(4Hz〜7Hz)の強度が他の周波数成分の強度よりも大きい。
For example, when all of the following three conditions are satisfied (see FIG. 4), it is determined that the brain has vitality.
When comparing the intensity of each frequency component at rest, the intensity of the frequency component (14 Hz to 30 Hz) corresponding to the β wave is greater than the intensity of the other frequency components.
When comparing the intensity of each frequency component at the time of concentration, the intensity of the frequency component (8 Hz to 13 Hz) corresponding to the α wave is greater than the intensity of the other frequency components.
When comparing the intensity of each frequency component during meditation, the intensity of the frequency component (4 Hz to 7 Hz) corresponding to the θ wave is greater than the intensity of the other frequency components.

また、安静時・集中時・瞑想時のすべてにおいて、β波に相当する周波数成分の強度が他の周波数成分の強度よりも大きい場合(図5参照)には,脳の活力がない状態と判定する。   Also, at all times of rest, concentration, and meditation, if the intensity of the frequency component equivalent to the β wave is greater than the intensity of other frequency components (see Fig. 5), it is determined that the brain is inactive. To do.

なお、より細やかな脳の状態を判定するために、安静時・集中時・瞑想時の脳波を、それぞれ一定の時間間隔で計測し、特定の周波数成分が所定の強度に到達するまでの時間や、特定の脳波成分(α、β、θ のうち1つ)が優位な状態に至るまでにかかる時間などによって前述の2種類の脳の状態(活力があるorない)をさらに細分化して設定しても良い。このようにすることで、より細やかな脳の状態に適応した情報の提示を行うことができる。この場合、脳の状態を判定は、以下の手順により実現することができる。
(1)安静時・集中時・瞑想時の脳波をそれぞれ一定の時間間隔で計測し、周波数成分と強度を解析する。
(2)各時刻における周波数成分と強度変化(相対値と微分値)を比較することにより、予め決めておいた複数種類の脳の状態のうちいずれに該当するかを判定する。
In order to determine a more detailed brain state, the brain waves at rest, concentration, and meditation are measured at regular time intervals, and the time until a specific frequency component reaches a predetermined intensity The above-mentioned two types of brain states (active or not) are further subdivided and set according to the time taken for a specific electroencephalogram component (one of α, β, θ) to reach a dominant state. May be. In this way, it is possible to present information adapted to a more detailed brain state. In this case, the determination of the state of the brain can be realized by the following procedure.
(1) Measure EEG at rest, concentration and meditation at regular time intervals, and analyze frequency components and intensity.
(2) By comparing the frequency component and intensity change (relative value and differential value) at each time, it is determined which one of a plurality of types of brain states determined in advance corresponds.

また、測定結果の履歴を保存し、過去の脳波の状態と比較することにより、昨日と比較して今日の脳の状態がどう変わってきているか、といった時系列での脳の状態の変化を判断し、それを提示する情報に反映させることもできる。   In addition, by storing the history of measurement results and comparing it with the past EEG status, it is possible to determine changes in the brain status over time such as how the current brain status has changed compared to yesterday. It can also be reflected in the information presented.

そして、選択肢提示部103は、情報処理部102での状態判定結果に応じ、
活力がある状態と判定された場合には活力に満ち溢れた選択肢を提示し、活力がない状態と判定された場合には活力を高めるような選択肢を提示する。例えば、活力がない状態と判定された場合には、行動の選択肢として「映画を見る」、「牛丼を食べる」、「遊園地に行く」、「赤い服を着る」を提示することが考えられる。更に、この提示に連動して、例えば「牛丼を食べる」について広告主の割引券や商品情報が提示されるようにしてもよい。具体的には、ユーザが昼食前だったので「牛丼を食べる」という肢を選択した場合、牛丼販売店としてA社、B社、C社、D社、E社のうち、広告主として登録されていたB社のクーポンなどの割引券や、商品情報が提示される。このように情報提示を連動させることで、広告主は売り上げを増やすことができるとともに、ユーザはより良いサービスを受けることができる。
Then, the option presentation unit 103 responds to the state determination result in the information processing unit 102,
When it is determined that there is a vitality, options full of vitality are presented, and when it is determined that there is no vitality, options that increase vitality are presented. For example, when it is determined that there is no vitality, it is possible to present “watch movie”, “eat beef bowl”, “go to amusement park”, “wear red clothes” as action options. It is done. Further, in conjunction with this presentation, for example, an advertiser's discount coupon or product information may be presented for “eating beef bowl”. Specifically, since the user was before lunch, if the user selected “eat beef bowl”, he / she registered as an advertiser among A company, B company, C company, D company, and E company as beef bowl stores. Discount coupons such as coupons of company B and merchandise information are presented. By linking information presentation in this way, advertisers can increase sales and users can receive better services.

以上のように、本発明の行動選択肢提示方法および装置は、複数の事象下において脳波の各周波数成分の強度等を比較し、比較結果の相関関係に基づき脳の状態を判定するため、例えば好きか嫌いかについて、従来のように好き嫌いの程度(スカラー量)によるのみではなく、好き嫌いの内容(ベクトル量)についても加味して脳の状態を判定することが可能となる。また、複数の事象について、集中時と瞑想時など、脳波の周波数スペクトルの相違が特徴的に表れる課題を利用することで、課題間の変動(ダイナミックレンジ)を大きくし、ユーザの状態の相違に対する感度を高めることができる。   As described above, the action option presentation method and apparatus of the present invention compares the intensity of each frequency component of an electroencephalogram under a plurality of events, and determines the state of the brain based on the correlation of the comparison results. Whether or not he / she likes or dislikes can be determined not only by the degree of liking / dislike (scalar amount) as in the past, but also by the content of liking / dislike (vector amount). In addition, for multiple events, by using tasks that have distinctive differences in the frequency spectrum of brain waves, such as when concentrating and meditation, the fluctuation (dynamic range) between tasks is increased, and the difference in user status Sensitivity can be increased.

そのため、利用時におけるユーザの精神状態を適切に反映した行動の選択肢を提示することが可能になる。また、日々変化するユーザの精神状態や社会情報に応じて行動の選択肢を提示することができる。さらに、広告主によって選択肢の重み付けを行い、ユーザの趣向性に応じた広告とサービスの提供を可能にすることができる。新製品の告知などにも使用することができる。   Therefore, it is possible to present action options that appropriately reflect the mental state of the user at the time of use. Moreover, the choice of action can be shown according to a user's mental state and social information which change every day. Furthermore, it is possible to weight the choices by the advertiser and to provide advertisements and services according to user preferences. It can also be used for announcements of new products.

Claims (8)

ユーザの脳波を計測する脳波計測ステップと、
上記脳波を解析し、複数種類の脳の状態のうちいずれに該当するかを判定して判定結果を出力する情報処理ステップと、
上記判定結果に応じ、上記ユーザに行動の選択肢を提示する選択肢提示ステップと、
を実行する行動選択肢提示方法。
An electroencephalogram measurement step for measuring a user's electroencephalogram,
An information processing step of analyzing the electroencephalogram, determining which one of a plurality of types of brain states corresponds, and outputting a determination result;
In accordance with the determination result, an option presenting step for presenting the user with action options,
A method for presenting action choices.
請求項1に記載の行動選択肢提示方法であって、
上記計測は、安静時、課題時、刺激時など複数の事象下において行い、
上記脳の状態は、上記複数の事象下におけるそれぞれの脳波を比較することにより判定する行動選択肢提示方法。
The action option presenting method according to claim 1,
The above measurements are performed under multiple events such as rest, task, and stimulus.
The action option presenting method for determining the state of the brain by comparing the electroencephalograms under the plurality of events.
請求項2に記載の行動選択肢提示方法であって、
上記複数の事象は、安静時、集中時、瞑想時であり、
上記脳の状態は、安静時、集中時、瞑想時のそれぞれの事象下において脳波の各周波数成分の強度を比較し、比較結果の相関関係に基づき判定する行動選択肢提示方法。
The action option presenting method according to claim 2,
The above events are resting, concentrating, meditation,
A method for presenting action options in which the state of the brain is determined based on the correlation of the comparison results by comparing the intensity of each frequency component of the electroencephalogram under each event of rest, concentration and meditation.
請求項1乃至3のいずれかに記載の行動選択肢提示方法であって、
上記行動の選択肢は、上記判定結果に加え、先天的要素や趣向性等の上記ユーザの特性や上記ユーザの精神機能検査結果を加味して提示する行動選択肢提示方法。
The action option presentation method according to any one of claims 1 to 3,
The action option presenting method in which the action options are presented in consideration of the user characteristics such as innate elements and preferences and the mental function test results of the user in addition to the determination result.
ユーザの脳波を計測する脳波計測部と、
上記脳波を解析し、複数種類の脳の状態のうちいずれに該当するかを判定して判定結果を出力する情報処理部と、
上記判定結果に応じ、上記ユーザに行動の選択肢を提示する選択肢提示部と、
を備える行動選択肢提示装置。
An electroencephalogram measurement unit that measures the user's electroencephalogram,
An information processing unit that analyzes the electroencephalogram, determines which one of a plurality of types of brain states corresponds to, and outputs a determination result;
In accordance with the determination result, an option presenting unit that presents the user with action options;
An action option presentation device comprising:
請求項5に記載の行動選択肢提示装置であって、
上記計測は、安静時、課題時、刺激時など複数の事象下において行い、
上記脳の状態は、上記複数の事象下におけるそれぞれの脳波を比較することにより判定する行動選択肢提示装置。
The action option presentation device according to claim 5,
The above measurements are performed under multiple events such as rest, task, and stimulus.
The action option presentation device for determining the state of the brain by comparing the brain waves under the plurality of events.
請求項6に記載の行動選択肢提示装置であって、
上記複数の事象は、安静時、集中時、瞑想時であり、
上記脳の状態は、安静時、集中時、瞑想時のそれぞれの事象下において脳波の各周波数成分の強度を比較し、比較結果の相関関係に基づき判定する行動選択肢提示装置。
The action option presentation device according to claim 6,
The above events are resting, concentrating, meditation,
The action option presenting device for comparing the intensity of each frequency component of an electroencephalogram under each event of rest, concentration, and meditation, and determining the brain state based on the correlation of the comparison results.
請求項5乃至7のいずれかに記載の行動選択肢提示装置であって、
上記行動の選択肢は、上記判定結果に加え、先天的要素や趣向性等の上記ユーザの特性や上記ユーザの精神機能検査結果を加味して提示する行動選択肢提示装置。
The action option presentation device according to any one of claims 5 to 7,
The action option presenting apparatus presenting the action options in consideration of the user characteristics such as innate elements and preferences and the user's mental function test result in addition to the determination result.
JP2009083421A 2009-03-30 2009-03-30 Action option presentation method and apparatus Active JP5366083B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2009083421A JP5366083B2 (en) 2009-03-30 2009-03-30 Action option presentation method and apparatus

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2009083421A JP5366083B2 (en) 2009-03-30 2009-03-30 Action option presentation method and apparatus

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2010233719A true JP2010233719A (en) 2010-10-21
JP5366083B2 JP5366083B2 (en) 2013-12-11

Family

ID=43088667

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2009083421A Active JP5366083B2 (en) 2009-03-30 2009-03-30 Action option presentation method and apparatus

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP5366083B2 (en)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2013094181A (en) * 2011-10-28 2013-05-20 Architect Co Ltd Love degree diagnostic device, love degree diagnostic system and computer program
JP2017122958A (en) * 2016-01-04 2017-07-13 パイオニア株式会社 Information processor and computer program
US11270368B2 (en) * 2015-02-05 2022-03-08 Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. Method and apparatus for presenting object based on biometric feature

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2000279388A (en) * 1999-03-30 2000-10-10 Nec Medical Systems Kk Method and device for monitoring activation brain wave
JP2002058744A (en) * 2000-08-21 2002-02-26 Yukihiko Takahashi Software and system for mental disorder or fatigue restoration
JP2002125945A (en) * 2000-10-24 2002-05-08 Technos Japan:Kk Method and equipment for using brain wave by biological feedback
JP2004070510A (en) * 2002-08-02 2004-03-04 Sharp Corp Device, method and program for selecting and providing information, and recording medium for program for selecting and providing information
JP2005032167A (en) * 2003-07-11 2005-02-03 Sony Corp Apparatus, method, and system for information retrieval, client device, and server device

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2000279388A (en) * 1999-03-30 2000-10-10 Nec Medical Systems Kk Method and device for monitoring activation brain wave
JP2002058744A (en) * 2000-08-21 2002-02-26 Yukihiko Takahashi Software and system for mental disorder or fatigue restoration
JP2002125945A (en) * 2000-10-24 2002-05-08 Technos Japan:Kk Method and equipment for using brain wave by biological feedback
JP2004070510A (en) * 2002-08-02 2004-03-04 Sharp Corp Device, method and program for selecting and providing information, and recording medium for program for selecting and providing information
JP2005032167A (en) * 2003-07-11 2005-02-03 Sony Corp Apparatus, method, and system for information retrieval, client device, and server device

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2013094181A (en) * 2011-10-28 2013-05-20 Architect Co Ltd Love degree diagnostic device, love degree diagnostic system and computer program
US11270368B2 (en) * 2015-02-05 2022-03-08 Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. Method and apparatus for presenting object based on biometric feature
JP2017122958A (en) * 2016-01-04 2017-07-13 パイオニア株式会社 Information processor and computer program

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP5366083B2 (en) 2013-12-11

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Smets et al. Large-scale wearable data reveal digital phenotypes for daily-life stress detection
Pinquart Systematic review: bullying involvement of children with and without chronic physical illness and/or physical/sensory disability—a meta-analytic comparison with healthy/nondisabled peers
Flessner et al. Styles of pulling in trichotillomania: exploring differences in symptom severity, phenomenology, and functional impact
Fallon et al. Prevalence of body dissatisfaction among a United States adult sample
Sobocko et al. Trait sensory-processing sensitivity and subjective well-being: Distinctive associations for different aspects of sensitivity
Hapidou et al. Fear and avoidance of movement in people with chronic pain: psychometric properties of the 11-item Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK-11)
Kronenfeld et al. Ethnic and racial differences in body size perception and satisfaction
Pila et al. Intrapersonal characteristics of body-related guilt, shame, pride, and envy in Canadian adults
Zlomke Psychometric properties of internet administered versions of Penn state worry questionnaire (PSWQ) and depression, anxiety, and stress scale (DASS)
Takano et al. Repetitive thought impairs sleep quality: An experience sampling study
Park et al. Standardized tests of heart rate variability for autonomic function tests in healthy Koreans
Coker et al. Body weight dissatisfaction: a comparison of women with and without eating disorders
Andriani et al. Effects of changes in smoking status on blood pressure among adult males and females in Indonesia: a 15-year population-based cohort study
Silvia et al. Does baseline heart rate variability reflect stable positive emotionality?
Smither et al. The relationship between core self-evaluations, views of God, and intrinsic/extrinsic religious motivation
KR101721230B1 (en) System and Method for Evaluation of Brain Function and Recommendation for personalized brain wellness
Hardan-Khalil Factors affecting health-promoting lifestyle behaviors among Arab American women
Hattier et al. Stereotyped behaviours in children with autism spectrum disorders and atypical development as measured by the BPI-01
CN106250680A (en) Health of heart index detecting system and model building method
Rabadi et al. Comparison of the Kurtkze expanded disability status scale and the functional independence measure: measures of multiple sclerosis-related disability
Thurn et al. Validation of physical activity habit strength with subjective and objective criterion measures
Handy et al. Differences in perceived and physiologic genital arousal between women with and without sexual dysfunction
Samtani et al. Higher order repetitive negative thinking is more robustly related to depression, anxiety, and mania than measures of rumination or worry
Suschinsky et al. Assessing the relationship between sexual concordance, sexual attractions, and sexual identity in women
JP5366083B2 (en) Action option presentation method and apparatus

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
RD03 Notification of appointment of power of attorney

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A7423

Effective date: 20111121

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A821

Effective date: 20111121

A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20120214

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A821

Effective date: 20120214

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20130411

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20130507

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20130614

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20130827

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20130903

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Ref document number: 5366083

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

S531 Written request for registration of change of domicile

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313531

R350 Written notification of registration of transfer

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R350

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250