JP2009226086A - Method for evaluating softened degree of hair and its treatment method - Google Patents

Method for evaluating softened degree of hair and its treatment method Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP2009226086A
JP2009226086A JP2008076796A JP2008076796A JP2009226086A JP 2009226086 A JP2009226086 A JP 2009226086A JP 2008076796 A JP2008076796 A JP 2008076796A JP 2008076796 A JP2008076796 A JP 2008076796A JP 2009226086 A JP2009226086 A JP 2009226086A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
hair
treatment
degree
softening
evaluating
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
JP2008076796A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Inventor
Tomoya Tanaka
智也 田中
Hiroshi Tanaka
博 田中
Tsunayuki Ishimori
綱行 石森
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Shiseido Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Shiseido Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Shiseido Co Ltd filed Critical Shiseido Co Ltd
Priority to JP2008076796A priority Critical patent/JP2009226086A/en
Publication of JP2009226086A publication Critical patent/JP2009226086A/en
Withdrawn legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Landscapes

  • Measurement Of The Respiration, Hearing Ability, Form, And Blood Characteristics Of Living Organisms (AREA)

Abstract

<P>PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide a method for evaluating the softened degree of hair and its treatment method, where the softened degree of hair is objectively and reliably determined without relying on the technique of a skilled practitioner. <P>SOLUTION: The softened degree of hair is evaluated from the information of the ratio of hair diameter measured in substantially non-pressured conditions to that measured in pressured conditions. The method of removing the hair treatment agent containing a reducing agent from the hair after the treatment is that if the ratio of hair diameter measured in substantially non-pressured conditions to that measured in pressured conditions is in the range of a prescribed value, the treatment is regarded as complete and the hair treatment agent is removed from the hair. <P>COPYRIGHT: (C)2010,JPO&INPIT

Description

本発明は、パーマネント施術等において第一剤で毛髪を還元処理したときの毛髪の所望の軟化状態を判断する技術に関する。   The present invention relates to a technique for determining a desired softened state of hair when the hair is reduced with a first agent in a permanent treatment or the like.

例えばパーマネント処理(ウェーブ処理)では、還元剤を含む第一剤を毛髪に塗布して、毛髪のジスルフィド結合を切断して毛髪を柔らかくした後(以下、これを軟化という。)水洗し、その後に髪の形状を整える。そして、さらに酸化剤を含む第二剤を毛髪に塗布して、毛髪のジスルフィドを再結合することで整えた毛髪の形状を固定する。縮毛矯正処理(ストレート処理)においても同様の処理が行われる。   For example, in the permanent treatment (wave treatment), a first agent containing a reducing agent is applied to the hair, the disulfide bond of the hair is cut to soften the hair (hereinafter referred to as softening), and then washed with water. Arrange hair shape. And the 2nd agent containing an oxidizing agent is apply | coated to hair, and the shape of the hair prepared by fixing the disulfide of hair is fixed. The same process is performed in the curly hair straightening process (straight process).

これらの処理において、好ましい髪の形状(ヘアスタイル)を得るためには、毛髪の最適な軟化状態を見極めることが重要である。このとき、判断を誤って、第一剤を毛髪に塗布した状態で長時間水洗することなく放置すると、毛髪が軟化しすぎて、第二剤で処理したときに毛髪の顕著な損傷を生じるおそれがある。また、このとき、施術(処理)対象である毛髪のもともとの損傷度合いや髪質あるいは使用する第一剤の種類によって軟化の程度や軟化速度が異なることも知られており、例えば、毛髪の損傷度合いが顕著に大きくなるほど毛髪の軟化速度が速くなるとされている。
毛髪の最適な軟化状態は、これらの諸事情を熟知した施術者の熟練した技術により判断されているのが現状である。
In these treatments, in order to obtain a preferable hair shape (hairstyle), it is important to determine an optimum softened state of the hair. At this time, if the judgment is mistaken and the first agent is applied to the hair without being washed for a long time without washing with water for a long time, the hair may become too soft and may cause significant damage to the hair when treated with the second agent. There is. At this time, it is also known that the degree of softening and the speed of softening differ depending on the original damage degree, hair quality, or type of the first agent used. It is said that the higher the degree, the faster the hair softening speed.
At present, the optimum softening state of hair is determined by skilled techniques of practitioners who are familiar with these circumstances.

したがって、何らかの手法を用いることで、施術者の熟練した技術に頼ることなく、経験の浅い施術者でも毛髪の最適な軟化状態を判断することができれば望ましい。また、これにより、パーマネント処理等の施術をより的確に行うことが可能となる。
ところが、日本国特許出願データを調べてみても、そのような検討が行われた例はほとんど見ることができず、唯一以下の例のみが見出された。
Therefore, it is desirable that an inexperienced practitioner can determine an optimum softening state of hair by using any technique without relying on the skill of the practitioner. This also makes it possible to perform treatments such as permanent processing more accurately.
However, even if the Japanese patent application data was examined, there were hardly any examples of such examinations, and only the following examples were found.

すなわち、弾性体の反発力を利用して毛髪の伸縮を計る測定器が提案されている。ただし、この提案では、毛髪の伸びる長さを数値で表し、その値を毛髪軟化、損傷状態の目安とすることが述べられているが、それ以上の説明はなく、具体的にどのように判断するかについての記載は皆無である(特許文献1参照)。このため、軟化度等の判断手段としての意義について具体的な評価を行うことは難しい。
特開2003−126065号公報
That is, a measuring instrument that measures the expansion and contraction of hair using the repulsive force of an elastic body has been proposed. However, in this proposal, it is stated that the length of hair growth is expressed as a numerical value, and that value is used as a guideline for hair softening and damage state, but there is no further explanation and how it is specifically determined. There is no description about whether to do it (refer patent document 1). For this reason, it is difficult to make a concrete evaluation of the significance as a determination means such as the degree of softening.
JP 2003-126065 A

本発明が解決しようとする問題点は、毛髪の軟化度の判断が施術者の熟練した技術に依存しており、客観的で確実な判断手法がない点である。   The problem to be solved by the present invention is that the determination of the degree of softening of hair depends on the skill of the practitioner and there is no objective and reliable determination method.

すなわち、本発明は、毛髪の軟化度を施術者の熟練した技術に依存することなく客観的で確実に判断できる毛髪の軟化度評価方法および毛髪処理方法を提供することを目的とする。   That is, an object of the present invention is to provide a method for evaluating the degree of softness of hair and a method for treating hair that can objectively and reliably determine the degree of softening of hair without depending on the skill of the practitioner.

本発明に係る毛髪の軟化度評価方法は、毛髪を加圧状態で測定して得られる毛髪径寸法の情報に基づいて評価することを特徴とする。   The method for evaluating the degree of softening of hair according to the present invention is characterized in that evaluation is performed based on information on a hair diameter obtained by measuring hair in a pressurized state.

また、本発明に係る毛髪の軟化度評価方法は、好ましくは、加圧状態で測定する毛髪の同一箇所を実質的に非加圧状態で測定して得られる毛髪径寸法の情報をさらに加えて評価することを特徴とする。   In addition, the method for evaluating the softness of hair according to the present invention preferably further adds information on the diameter of the hair obtained by measuring the same part of the hair measured in a pressurized state in a substantially non-pressurized state. It is characterized by evaluating.

また、本発明に係る毛髪の軟化度評価方法は、好ましくは、加圧状態で測定して得られる毛髪径寸法に対する実質的に非加圧状態で測定して得られる毛髪径寸法の比の情報に基づいて評価することを特徴とする。   In addition, the method for evaluating the degree of softening of hair according to the present invention is preferably information on the ratio of the hair diameter dimension obtained by measurement in a substantially non-pressurized state to the hair diameter dimension obtained by measurement in a pressurized state. It is characterized by evaluating based on.

また、本発明に係る毛髪の軟化度評価方法は、好ましくは、還元剤を含有する毛髪処理剤で処理するときの毛髪の軟化度を評価することを特徴とする。   In addition, the method for evaluating the degree of softening of hair according to the present invention is preferably characterized by evaluating the degree of softening of hair when it is treated with a hair treatment agent containing a reducing agent.

また、本発明に係る毛髪の軟化度評価方法は、好ましくは、加圧力計測・調整機構を備えた微細寸法測定器を用いて毛髪径寸法を測定することを特徴とする。   In addition, the method for evaluating the degree of softening of hair according to the present invention is preferably characterized in that the hair diameter is measured using a fine dimension measuring instrument equipped with a pressure measurement / adjustment mechanism.

また、本発明に係る毛髪処理方法は、還元剤を含有する毛髪処理剤で処理した後に、該毛髪処理剤を毛髪から取り除く毛髪処理方法において、
上記の毛髪の軟化度評価方法を用い、加圧状態で測定して得られる毛髪径寸法に対する実質的に非加圧状態で測定して得られる毛髪径寸法の比が所定の数値範囲内に入った時点で、還元剤を含有する毛髪処理剤での処理が完了したものと判断して、該毛髪処理剤を毛髪から取り除くことを特徴とする。
Further, the hair treatment method according to the present invention is a hair treatment method for removing the hair treatment agent from the hair after treatment with a hair treatment agent containing a reducing agent.
Using the hair softening degree evaluation method described above, the ratio of the hair diameter obtained by measuring in a substantially non-pressurized state to the hair diameter obtained by measuring in a pressurized state falls within a predetermined numerical range. At this point, it is judged that the treatment with the hair treatment agent containing the reducing agent is completed, and the hair treatment agent is removed from the hair.

また、本発明に係る毛髪処理方法は、好ましくは、処理する毛髪の損傷度、前記毛髪処理剤の種類または髪質に応じて前記所定の数値範囲を設定することを特徴とする。   The hair treatment method according to the present invention is preferably characterized in that the predetermined numerical range is set according to the degree of damage to the hair to be treated, the type of the hair treatment agent, or the hair quality.

本発明に係る毛髪の軟化度評価方法は、毛髪を加圧状態で測定して得られる毛髪径寸法の情報に基づいて評価するため、毛髪の軟化度を施術者の熟練した技術に依存することなく客観的で確実に判断することができる。
また、本発明に係る毛髪処理方法は、上記の毛髪の軟化度評価方法を用い、加圧状態で測定して得られる毛髪径寸法に対する実質的に非加圧状態で測定して得られる毛髪径寸法の比が所定の数値範囲内に入った時点で、還元剤を含有する毛髪処理剤での処理が完了したものと判断して、毛髪処理剤を毛髪から取り除くため、上記毛髪の軟化度評価方法の効果を好適に得ることができるとともに、さらに毛髪処理剤での処理を適正に行うことができる。
Since the method for evaluating the softness of hair according to the present invention is evaluated based on information on the hair diameter obtained by measuring the hair under pressure, the softness of the hair depends on the skill of the practitioner. It can be judged objectively and reliably.
In addition, the hair treatment method according to the present invention uses the hair softening degree evaluation method described above, and the hair diameter obtained by measuring in a substantially non-pressurized state with respect to the hair diameter obtained by measuring in a pressurized state. When the ratio of dimensions falls within the specified numerical range, it is judged that the treatment with the hair treatment agent containing the reducing agent is completed, and the hair treatment agent is removed from the hair. The effect of the method can be suitably obtained, and the treatment with the hair treatment agent can be appropriately performed.

本発明の実施の形態について、以下に説明する。   Embodiments of the present invention will be described below.

本発明者等は、施術者の熟練した技術に依存することなく、客観的で確実な判断を可能とする毛髪の軟化度の評価方法について鋭意検討した結果、毛髪に圧力を加えた状態で測定して得られる毛髪径寸法の情報を軟化度の指標とすることができることを見出し、本発明に至った。   As a result of earnestly examining the method for evaluating the degree of softening of the hair that enables objective and reliable judgment without depending on the skill of the practitioner, the present inventors have measured the hair under pressure. The present inventors have found that the hair diameter information obtained in this way can be used as an indicator of the degree of softening, and have reached the present invention.

加圧力計測・調整機構を備えた微細寸法測定器であるマイクロメータ(尾崎製作所社製 PEACOCK Model G)を用いて、パーマ液第一剤(還元剤を含有する毛髪処理剤)で処理したときの毛髪径(ここでは直径)寸法変化の一例を図1に示す。ここで、実験の繰り返し数はN=3であり、寸法測定時の非加圧状態条件は毛髪に対する接触圧力(加圧力)が0.01kg/cmG(ゲージ圧)の実質的に非加圧状態の条件であり、加圧状態条件は接触圧力(加圧力)が2.5kg/cmG(ゲージ圧)で加圧したときのものである。非加圧状態条件および加圧状態条件での寸法測定は毛髪の同一箇所(部位)について行った。
なお、本実施の形態において、実質的に非加圧状態の条件とは、毛髪に対する接触圧力が0.02kg/cmG以下であることをいう。また、加圧状態条件における接触圧力(加圧力)は、特に限定するものではないが、図8に示した接触圧力の違いによる毛髪の直径の変化のデータ(2.5kg/cmGのデータと3.0kg/cmGのデータは完全に重なっている)から明らかなように、本発明の効果を奏するには2.5kg/cmG(ゲージ圧)程度であれば十分である。
Using a micrometer (PEACOCK Model G manufactured by Ozaki Mfg. Co., Ltd.), a micro-dimension measuring instrument equipped with a force measurement / adjustment mechanism, when treated with the first permanent solution (hair treatment containing a reducing agent) An example of the dimensional change of the hair diameter (here, the diameter) is shown in FIG. Here, the number of repetitions of the experiment is N = 3, and the non-pressurized condition at the time of dimension measurement is substantially non-pressurized with a contact pressure (pressurizing force) on the hair of 0.01 kg / cm 2 G (gauge pressure). The pressure state condition is when the contact pressure (pressing force) is pressurized at 2.5 kg / cm 2 G (gauge pressure). The dimension measurement under the non-pressurized condition and the pressurized condition was performed on the same portion (part) of the hair.
In the present embodiment, the substantially non-pressurized condition means that the contact pressure on the hair is 0.02 kg / cm 2 G or less. Further, the contact pressure (pressurizing force) under the pressurized condition is not particularly limited, but is data on changes in hair diameter due to the difference in contact pressure shown in FIG. 8 (data of 2.5 kg / cm 2 G). As is clear from the above, the data of 3.0 kg / cm 2 G are completely overlapped), and 2.5 kg / cm 2 G (gauge pressure) is sufficient to obtain the effect of the present invention.

図1より、以下のことが分かる。
(1)非加圧状態条件での毛髪径寸法は、パーマ液第一剤で処理した後、時間経過とともに、一旦処理開始前の毛髪径寸法よりも大きくなった後、最終的に処理開始前の毛髪径寸法よりもわずかに小さくなる。
この現象は、パーマ液第一剤で処理した直後は毛髪が径方向に膨潤し、その後は毛髪が長さ方向に膨潤するとともに径方向では収縮することによるものではないかとも考えられるが、定かではない。いずれにしろ、毛髪の軟化現象は、パーマ液第一剤で処理した後時間経過とともに毛髪の軟化度(軟化度合い)は単調に増加すると考えられることからみて、および毛髪径寸法の経時変化量が小さすぎることからみて、少なくともこの条件での毛髪径寸法あるいはその変化のみを軟化度の指標とすることは適当ではない。
As can be seen from FIG.
(1) After treatment with the first agent of the permanent liquid, the hair diameter size under the non-pressurized state condition is once larger than the hair diameter size before the start of treatment, and finally before the start of treatment. Slightly smaller than the diameter of the hair.
This phenomenon is thought to be due to the fact that the hair swells in the radial direction immediately after treatment with the first permanent solution, and then the hair swells in the length direction and contracts in the radial direction. is not. In any case, the softening phenomenon of hair is considered to be due to the fact that the degree of softening (softening degree) of hair increases monotonically with the passage of time after treatment with the first agent of permanent solution, and the amount of change in the hair diameter dimension with time is From the viewpoint of being too small, it is not appropriate to use at least the hair diameter dimension or the change under these conditions as an indicator of the degree of softening.

(2)加圧状態条件での毛髪径寸法は、パーマ液第一剤で処理した後時間経過とともに、処理開始前の毛髪径寸法からほぼ単調に小さくなり、処理開始後40分経過時点では、処理開始前の毛髪径寸法に比べて約23%小さくなっている。
この現象は、毛髪が軟化して弾力性を持つことによって、加圧して測定されるときの毛髪の径寸法が収縮して小さくなるという、想定されるメカニズムと符合する。また、処理開始後の時間経過とともに毛髪径寸法がほぼ単調に小さくなるという現象は、上記した毛髪の軟化メカニズムとも対応する。また、毛髪径寸法の経時変化量は、少なくとも非加圧状態条件での毛髪径寸法に比べて十分に大きい。
(2) The hair diameter dimension under the pressurized condition is almost monotonically smaller from the hair diameter dimension before the treatment start with the passage of time after the treatment with the first agent of the permanent solution, It is about 23% smaller than the hair diameter before the start of treatment.
This phenomenon coincides with an assumed mechanism in which the hair is softened and has elasticity, so that the diameter of the hair when measured by pressurization contracts and becomes smaller. In addition, the phenomenon that the hair diameter dimension decreases substantially monotonically with the passage of time after the treatment starts corresponds to the above-described hair softening mechanism. Further, the amount of change with time of the hair diameter dimension is sufficiently larger than at least the hair diameter dimension under the non-pressurized condition.

上記の知見に基づき、本実施の形態の第一の例に係る毛髪の軟化度評価方法は、毛髪を加圧状態で測定して得られる毛髪径寸法の情報に基づいて評価する。
この毛髪を加圧状態で測定して得られる毛髪径寸法と、施術者の熟練した技術により毛髪を触って得られる軟化度の評価(官能評価)の相関関係(あるいは回帰関係)データをあらかじめ得ておくことで、毛髪径寸法の情報に基づいて、毛髪の軟化度を毛髪の軟化度を施術者の熟練した技術に依存することなく客観的にかつ確実に判断することが可能となる。
ここで、図1より、このような評価指標を用いることなく、経過時間を指標として、すなわち、パーマ液第一剤で処理した後、所定時間経過した時点で軟化度が適当になったと判断することが可能なようにも考えられるが、先に説明したように、軟化度の程度や軟化速度は、毛髪のもともとの損傷度合いや髪質あるいは使用する第一剤の種類によって大きく異なるため、採用できないことは明らかであり、また、熟練した技術を持つ施術者が時間経過のみに基づいて軟化度を判断することはないのが実情である。
なお、本実施の形態の第一の例に係る毛髪の軟化度評価方法は、還元剤を含有する毛髪処理剤で処理するときの毛髪の軟化度を評価するときに好適に用いることができるが、これに限らず、例えば毛髪の損傷程度やウェーブ効率等の軟化度と相関する指標、特性を評価する際にも用いることができることはいうまでもない。
Based on the above findings, the method for evaluating the degree of softening of hair according to the first example of the present embodiment evaluates based on the information on the hair diameter obtained by measuring the hair in a pressurized state.
Correlation (or regression relationship) data of the hair diameter size obtained by measuring this hair under pressure and the softness evaluation (sensory evaluation) obtained by touching the hair with the skill of the practitioner is obtained in advance. Thus, it is possible to objectively and reliably determine the degree of softening of the hair without depending on the skill of the practitioner based on the information on the diameter of the hair.
Here, from FIG. 1, without using such an evaluation index, the elapsed time is used as an index, that is, it is determined that the degree of softening has become appropriate after a predetermined time has elapsed after processing with the first permanent liquid agent. However, as explained earlier, the degree of softening and the speed of softening vary greatly depending on the original damage level of hair, the quality of the hair, and the type of first agent used. It is clear that this is not possible, and it is the actual situation that a practitioner who has skilled skills does not judge the degree of softening based only on the passage of time.
In addition, although the softening degree evaluation method of the hair which concerns on the 1st example of this Embodiment can be used suitably when evaluating the softening degree of the hair when processing with the hair processing agent containing a reducing agent. Needless to say, the present invention is not limited to this, and can be used, for example, when evaluating indices and characteristics correlating with the degree of softening such as the degree of hair damage and wave efficiency.

図1をさらに詳細に検討すると、加圧状態条件での毛髪径寸法は、マクロ的には単調減少傾向にあるものの、パーマ液第一剤で処理した後15分経過時までの間は、処理開始前の毛髪径寸法とほぼ同じであり、一時的には、処理開始前の毛髪径寸法よりも大きくなる傾向も見られる。
この現象は、毛髪の軟化メカニズムと対応しないものと考えることができる。あるいはまた、この現象は、非加圧状態条件での毛髪径寸法の経時変化挙動と同一の原因によるものと考えることができる。
したがって、加圧状態で測定する毛髪の同一箇所を実質的に非加圧状態で測定して得られる毛髪径寸法の情報をさらに加えて、例えば、加圧状態で測定して得られる毛髪径寸法と実質的に非加圧状態で測定して得られる毛髪径寸法のバイアス(数値の差)の経時変化を見ると、毛髪径寸法のバイアスは時間経過とともに単調増加しており、この複合指標を用いることが軟化度の評価方法として有意であることが分かる。
Examining FIG. 1 in more detail, the hair diameter under the pressurized condition tends to be monotonously decreasing macroscopically, but the treatment is continued for 15 minutes after the treatment with the first permanent liquid. It is almost the same as the hair diameter before the start, and temporarily, a tendency to become larger than the hair diameter before the start of treatment is also seen.
This phenomenon can be considered as not corresponding to the softening mechanism of hair. Alternatively, this phenomenon can be considered to be caused by the same cause as the change with time of the hair diameter under the non-pressurized condition.
Therefore, in addition to the information on the hair diameter obtained by measuring the same portion of the hair measured in the pressurized state in a substantially non-pressurized state, for example, the hair diameter obtained by measuring in the pressurized state Looking at the change over time in the hair diameter dimension bias (difference in numerical values) obtained by measuring in a substantially non-pressurized state, the hair diameter dimension bias increased monotonically over time, and this composite index It can be seen that the use is significant as a method for evaluating the degree of softening.

上記の知見に基づき、本実施の形態の第二の例に係る毛髪の軟化度評価方法は、毛髪を加圧状態で測定して得られる毛髪径寸法の情報に、加圧状態で測定する毛髪の同一箇所を実質的に非加圧状態で測定して得られる毛髪径寸法の情報をさらに加えて評価する。
これにより、毛髪の軟化度評価をより客観的で確実に行うことができる。
Based on the above knowledge, the hair softening degree evaluation method according to the second example of the present embodiment uses the hair diameter measurement information obtained by measuring the hair in a pressurized state to measure the hair in the pressurized state. In addition, information on the hair diameter obtained by measuring the same portion in a substantially non-pressurized state is further evaluated.
Thereby, the softening degree evaluation of hair can be performed more objectively and reliably.

つぎに、本実施の形態の第三の例に係る毛髪の軟化度評価方法は、加圧状態で測定して得られる毛髪径寸法に対する実質的に非加圧状態で測定して得られる毛髪径寸法の比の情報に基づいて評価する。具体的には、{(実質的に非加圧状態で測定して得られる毛髪径寸法)−(加圧状態で測定して得られる毛髪径寸法)}/(加圧状態で測定して得られる毛髪径寸法)×100を軟化度指標(単位:%)として評価する。   Next, the hair softening evaluation method according to the third example of the present embodiment is a hair diameter obtained by measuring in a substantially non-pressurized state with respect to the hair diameter obtained by measuring in a pressurized state. Evaluation is based on information on the ratio of dimensions. Specifically, {(hair diameter size obtained by measuring in a substantially non-pressurized state) − (hair diameter size obtained by measuring in a pressurized state)} / (obtained by measuring in a pressurized state) Hair diameter dimension) × 100 is evaluated as a softness index (unit:%).

図1のデータから、軟化度指標を求めて、その値の時間経過による変化を図2に示した。
図2によれば、軟化度指標の値は、時間経過により、変曲点を有する曲線ではあるものの、きれいな単調増加曲線となっている。したがって、軟化度の評価方法として有意であることが分かる。
The softening index is obtained from the data of FIG. 1, and the change of the value over time is shown in FIG.
According to FIG. 2, the value of the softening degree index is a beautiful monotonically increasing curve, although it is a curve having an inflection point with time. Therefore, it turns out that it is significant as an evaluation method of a softening degree.

つぎに、本実施の形態の第四の例に係る毛髪の軟化度評価方法は、加圧力計測・調整機構を備えた微細寸法測定器を用いて毛髪径寸法を測定するものである。
このような微細寸法測定器は、マイクロメータ、ノギスまたはシックネスノギス等として広く市販されているため、容易に入手して、本実施の形態の毛髪径寸法を簡易かつ正確に測定することができる。
Next, the hair softening degree evaluation method according to the fourth example of the present embodiment measures the hair diameter using a fine dimension measuring instrument equipped with a pressure measurement / adjustment mechanism.
Since such a fine dimension measuring instrument is widely marketed as a micrometer, a caliper, a thickness caliper or the like, it can be easily obtained and the hair diameter dimension of the present embodiment can be measured easily and accurately.

つぎに、本実施の形態の第五の例に係る毛髪処理方法は、還元剤を含有する毛髪処理剤で処理した後に、毛髪処理剤を毛髪から取り除く毛髪処理方法において、本実施の形態に係る毛髪の軟化度評価方法を用い、加圧状態で測定して得られる毛髪径寸法に対する実質的に非加圧状態で測定して得られる毛髪径寸法の比(軟化度指標の値)が所定の数値範囲内に入った時点で、還元剤を含有する毛髪処理剤での処理が完了したものと判断して、毛髪処理剤を毛髪から取り除くものである。
ここで、還元剤を含有する毛髪処理剤は、薬事法の医薬部外品パーマネントウェーブ剤の第一剤もしくは医薬部外品縮毛矯正剤の第一剤、または化学品分類のウェーブ剤、カーリング剤もしくはストレート剤等を挙げることができる。
毛髪処理剤を例えば水洗によって毛髪から取り除いた後は、施術(処方)目的に応じた適宜の処理を行う。
Next, a hair treatment method according to a fifth example of the present embodiment relates to the hair treatment method in which the hair treatment agent is removed from the hair after being treated with the hair treatment agent containing the reducing agent. The ratio of the hair diameter obtained by measuring in a substantially non-pressurized state to the hair diameter obtained by measuring in a pressurized state using a method for evaluating the softness of hair (the value of the softening index) is predetermined. When entering the numerical range, it is judged that the treatment with the hair treating agent containing the reducing agent is completed, and the hair treating agent is removed from the hair.
Here, the hair treatment agent containing a reducing agent is a first part of a quasi-drug permanent wave agent or a first part of a quasi-drug curly hair straightener, or a chemical class wave agent or curling. Agent or straightener.
After removing the hair treatment agent from the hair, for example, by washing with water, an appropriate treatment according to the treatment (prescription) purpose is performed.

軟化度指標は、施術者の熟練した技術により毛髪を触って得られる軟化度の評価(官能評価)との相関関係データ(あるいは回帰関係データ)をあらかじめ得ておくことで、望ましい所定の数値範囲内の値を決定することができる。   The softening degree index is obtained by obtaining correlation data (or regression relation data) with the evaluation (sensory evaluation) of the softening degree obtained by touching the hair with the skill of the practitioner in advance. The value in can be determined.

ここで、毛髪処理を受ける被験者の処理前の毛髪の損傷程度および毛髪の形状(ストレートかカールか)が毛髪径の値および毛髪径の経時変化ならびに軟化度指標の値および軟化度指標の値の経時変化に与える影響を検討する。
先に説明した図1および図2のデータは、毛髪に損傷を受けていないと熟練した技術を有する施術者が判断したストレートヘアの被験者に毛髪処理を施したときのものである。この場合、熟練した技術を有する施術者は、処理開始後およそ20分〜30分の間に毛髪に触れて判断したときの軟化度を適当なものと判断しており、このとき、図2によれば、軟化度指標の値は、およそ10〜15%の範囲にある。
Here, the degree of hair damage and hair shape (straight or curl) before treatment of the subject undergoing hair treatment are the values of the hair diameter value, the hair diameter change over time, the softness index value, and the softness index value. Examine the effect on aging.
The data shown in FIGS. 1 and 2 described above are obtained when hair treatment was performed on a straight hair test subject judged by a practitioner having skill in the art that hair was not damaged. In this case, a practitioner who has a skilled technique has determined that the degree of softening when touching the hair is determined to be appropriate between about 20 minutes and 30 minutes after the start of treatment. According to this, the value of the softening index is in the range of approximately 10-15%.

これに対して、図3および図4は、毛髪に損傷を受けていないと熟練した技術を有する施術者が判断したカーリーヘアの被験者に、図1および図2の場合と同様の処理条件で毛髪処理を施したときのものである。この場合、被験者の髪は、カーリーヘアであるため、ストレートヘアの被験者と比べて実際には毛髪に損傷を受けているということができる。
実質的に非加圧状態で測定して得られる毛髪径寸法の経時変化および加圧状態で測定して得られる毛髪径寸法の経時変化および軟化度指標の値の経時変化は、それぞれいずれも図1および図2のものと同様の傾向を示す。ただし、同一の経過時間において得られる具体的な数値は、図1および図2とは異なっており、軟化度指標でみると、熟練した技術を有する施術者が軟化度を適当なものと判断したときの軟化度指標の値は、15〜20%の範囲にあり、図2の場合より0.05大きい値にシフトしている。
つぎに、図5および図6は、毛髪に損傷を受けていることが明らかに分かるカーリーヘアの被験者に、図1および図2の場合と同様の処理条件で毛髪処理を施したときのものである。
実質的に非加圧状態で測定して得られる毛髪径寸法の経時変化、加圧状態で測定して得られる毛髪径寸法の経時変化および軟化度指標の経時変化は、それぞれいずれもマクロ的には図1および図2のものと同様の傾向を示す。ただし、これらの値が短時間で大きく変化している点が図1および図2とは顕著に異なるとともに図3および図4の場合とも異なる。軟化度指標でみると、熟練した技術を有する施術者が軟化度を適当なものと判断したときの軟化度指標の値は、図4のものと同様に、15〜20%の範囲にあり、図2の場合より、0.05大きい値にシフトしている。
On the other hand, FIG. 3 and FIG. 4 show the hair under the same treatment conditions as those in FIG. 1 and FIG. 2 to the curly hair subject judged by a practitioner having skill in the art that the hair is not damaged. This is when processing is performed. In this case, since the hair of the subject is curly hair, it can be said that the hair is actually damaged compared to the subject of straight hair.
The time-dependent changes in the hair diameter obtained by measurement in a substantially non-pressed state, the time-dependent changes in the hair diameter obtained by measuring in the pressurized state, and the time-dependent change in the value of the softness index are shown in the figure. A tendency similar to that of FIG. 1 and FIG. 2 is shown. However, the specific numerical values obtained in the same elapsed time are different from those in FIGS. 1 and 2, and a practitioner having a skillful technique determined that the softening degree was appropriate when viewed from the softening degree index. The value of the softness index at the time is in the range of 15 to 20%, and is shifted to a value larger by 0.05 than in the case of FIG.
Next, FIGS. 5 and 6 are obtained when a curly hair subject who clearly shows that the hair is damaged is subjected to hair treatment under the same treatment conditions as in FIGS. 1 and 2. is there.
The changes over time in the hair diameter obtained by measurement in a substantially non-pressurized state, the changes over time in the hair diameter obtained by measurement in the pressurized state, and the change over time in the softening index are both macroscopic. Shows the same tendency as in FIG. 1 and FIG. However, the point that these values change greatly in a short time is significantly different from FIGS. 1 and 2 and also different from FIGS. 3 and 4. When looking at the softening degree index, the value of the softening degree index when the practitioner having a skilled technique judges that the softening degree is appropriate is in the range of 15 to 20%, as in FIG. It is shifted to a value larger by 0.05 than in the case of FIG.

したがって、本実施の形態の第五の例に係る毛髪処理方法における軟化度指標の所定の数値範囲は、上記した髪の状態の違いによる数値のシフトを考慮すると、例えば10〜20%とすることができる。
さらにこのとき、処理する毛髪の損傷度、毛髪処理剤の種類または髪質に応じて上記所定の数値範囲を適正な異なる範囲に設定すると、これらの条件によって異なる軟化傾向に応じた的確な軟化度の評価を行うことができる。また、これにより、毛髪処理剤での処理をより適正に行うことができる。
Therefore, the predetermined numerical range of the softness index in the hair treatment method according to the fifth example of the present embodiment is, for example, 10 to 20% in consideration of the shift of the numerical value due to the difference in the hair state described above. Can do.
Furthermore, at this time, if the predetermined numerical range is set to an appropriate different range according to the degree of damage to the hair to be treated, the type of hair treatment agent, or the hair quality, an appropriate softening degree corresponding to a different softening tendency depending on these conditions. Can be evaluated. Thereby, the treatment with the hair treatment agent can be performed more appropriately.

(軟化度指標の妥当性の検証:施術者による評価との整合性)
被験者37人に対して同一の施術者が還元剤を含有する毛髪処理剤での処理を同一条件で実施し、軟化度指標の値が10〜20%の範囲内に入った時点で、水洗等の後処理を行ってウェーブ処理または縮毛矯正処理の毛髪処理を行った。
このとき、軟化度指標の値が10〜20%の範囲内に入った時点で上記施術者が軟化度を判断した結果は、「軟化度が適正」が28人分、「軟化度がほぼ適正」が9人分であり、「軟化度が適正でない」は皆無であった。
(Verification of validity of softness index: consistency with evaluation by practitioner)
When the same practitioner performs the treatment with the hair treatment agent containing the reducing agent on the same conditions for 37 subjects, and the softening index value falls within the range of 10 to 20%, washing with water, etc. The post-treatment was performed, and the wave treatment or the hair straightening treatment was performed.
At this time, when the value of the softening degree index falls within the range of 10 to 20%, the result of the determination by the practitioner is that “softening degree is appropriate” for 28 persons, and “softening degree is almost appropriate. "Is for 9 people, and there is no" softening degree is not appropriate ".

(軟化度指標の有効性の検証その1:仕上がりの満足度)
上記の毛髪処理において、仕上がり状態の満足度を各被験者が評価した結果、「希望通り」が29人、「ほぼ希望通り」が6人、「わずかに異なる」が2人であり、「希望とは異なる」は0人であった。
(Verification of the effectiveness of the softness index 1: Finishing satisfaction)
In the above hair treatment, each subject evaluated the degree of satisfaction of the finished state. As a result, “as desired” was 29 people, “almost as desired” was 6 people, “slightly different” was 2 people, “Different” was 0 people.

(軟化度指標の有効性の検証その2:毛髪の損傷度合いの異なるケースでの仕上がりの満足度)
上記軟化度指標の妥当性の検証試験の結果を、施術者が判断する毛髪の損傷度に応じて層別し、毛髪の損傷度大の被験者3人、毛髪の損傷度中の被験者19人および毛髪の損傷度小の被験者15人についてそれぞれパーマネント処理の仕上がり状態の満足度を各被験者が評価した。結果は表1のとおりである。
(Verification of effectiveness of softness index part 2: Satisfaction of finish in cases with different hair damage levels)
The results of the verification test for the validity of the softness index are stratified according to the degree of hair damage determined by the practitioner. Three subjects with a large degree of hair damage, 19 subjects with a degree of hair damage and Each subject evaluated the degree of satisfaction of the finish state of the permanent treatment for each of 15 subjects with small hair damage. The results are shown in Table 1.

Figure 2009226086
Figure 2009226086

(軟化度指標の有効性の検証その3:毛髪処理の異なるケースでの仕上がりの満足度)
上記軟化度指標の妥当性の検証試験の結果を、毛髪処理のケース、すなわち、ウェーブ処理と縮毛処理とで層別し、ウェーブ処理の被験者16人および縮毛処理の被験者21人についてそれぞれ仕上がり状態の満足度を各被験者が評価した結果は表2のとおりである。
(Verification of effectiveness of softness index Part 3: Satisfaction of finishing in different cases of hair treatment)
The results of the verification test of the softness index validity are stratified in the case of hair treatment, that is, wave treatment and curly hair treatment, and finished for 16 wave treatment subjects and 21 hair treatment subjects, respectively. Table 2 shows the results of each subject's evaluation of the degree of satisfaction with the state.

Figure 2009226086
Figure 2009226086

(軟化度指標の有効性の検証その4:ウェーブ効率)
軟化度指標の値とウェーブ効率との関係を検討した。検討条件は、以下のとおりである。
<毛髪試料の作製>
健常毛試料:毛髪20本の束を試料とした
損傷毛試料:健常毛試料に以下の処理を施し損傷毛試料とした
クリームライトナー:染毛用第2剤(過酸化水素6%)= 1:1
35℃、30分間放置後水洗、乾燥
<ウェーブ効率の測定>
使用するパーマネントウェーブ剤は、以下のものを用いた。
第1剤:チオグリコール酸アンモニウム 6.5%、pH 9
第2剤:臭素酸ナトリウム 6.5%、pH6
上記のパーマネントウェーブ用剤により以下の手順でキルビー法により測定した。
(1)冶具に毛髪をセットした後、第1剤を約1ml塗布する。
(2)塗布と同時に軟化度指標の測定を行い各軟化度指標の値(0.95、0.90、0.85、0.80、0.75、0.70)に達した時点で速やかに流水で毛髪を水洗後、毛髪に第2剤を塗布する。
(3)第2剤を15分間作用させた後流水で毛髪を水洗し、ウェーブ効率を測る。なお、ウェーブ効率はキルビー法により得られる値である。
得られた軟化度指標の値とウェーブ効率の関係を図7に示す。
(Verification of the effectiveness of the softness index Part 4: Wave efficiency)
The relationship between the softness index value and wave efficiency was investigated. The examination conditions are as follows.
<Preparation of hair sample>
Healthy hair sample: A sample of 20 hair bundles Damaged hair sample: A healthy hair sample was treated as follows to obtain a damaged hair sample
Cream Lightner: 2nd hair dyeing agent (hydrogen peroxide 6%) = 1: 1
35 ° C, left for 30 minutes, washed with water, dried <Wave efficiency measurement>
The following permanent wave agents were used.
First agent: ammonium thioglycolate 6.5%, pH 9
Second agent: Sodium bromate 6.5%, pH6
Measurement was performed by the Kilby method according to the following procedure using the above-described permanent wave agent.
(1) After setting the hair on the jig, apply about 1 ml of the first agent.
(2) The softness index is measured at the same time as the application, and promptly when the softness index values (0.95, 0.90, 0.85, 0.80, 0.75, 0.70) are reached. After washing the hair with running water, apply the second agent to the hair.
(3) Allow the second agent to act for 15 minutes, then wash the hair with running water and measure the wave efficiency. The wave efficiency is a value obtained by the Kilby method.
FIG. 7 shows the relationship between the obtained softness index value and the wave efficiency.

ストレートヘアの被験者を対象にパーマ液第一剤で処理したときの毛髪径寸法の経時変化の一例を示す図である。It is a figure which shows an example of a time-dependent change of the hair diameter dimension when the test subject of straight hair is processed with the 1st permanent liquid. 図1のデータから求めた軟化度指標の値の経時変化を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the time-dependent change of the value of the softening degree parameter | index calculated | required from the data of FIG. 毛髪に損傷を受けていないと熟練した技術を有する施術者が判断したカーリーヘアの被験者を対象にパーマ液第一剤で処理したときの毛髪径寸法の経時変化の一例を示す図である。It is a figure which shows an example of a time-dependent change of the hair diameter dimension when treating the test subject of curly hair judged by the practitioner who has the skill that it is not damaged to hair with the first permanent liquid. 図3のデータから求めた軟化度指標の値の経時変化を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the time-dependent change of the value of the softening degree parameter | index calculated | required from the data of FIG. 毛髪に損傷を受けていることが明らかに分かるカーリーヘアの被験者を対象にパーマ液第一剤で処理したときの毛髪径寸法の経時変化の一例を示す図である。It is a figure which shows an example of a time-dependent change of the hair diameter dimension when the test subject of curly hair who understands that the hair is damaged is treated with the first permanent liquid. 図5のデータから求めた軟化度指標の値の経時変化を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the time-dependent change of the value of the softening degree parameter | index calculated | required from the data of FIG. 軟化度指標の値とウェーブ効率の関係を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the relationship between the value of a softening degree parameter | index, and wave efficiency. 接触圧力の違いによる毛髪の直径の変化を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the change of the diameter of the hair by the difference in contact pressure.

Claims (7)

毛髪を加圧状態で測定して得られる毛髪径寸法の情報に基づいて評価することを特徴とする毛髪の軟化度評価方法。   A method for evaluating the degree of softness of hair, comprising evaluating hair based on information on a hair diameter obtained by measuring hair under pressure. 加圧状態で測定する毛髪の同一箇所を実質的に非加圧状態で測定して得られる毛髪径寸法の情報をさらに加えて評価することを特徴とする請求項1記載の毛髪の軟化度評価方法。   The evaluation of softness of hair according to claim 1, wherein the evaluation is performed by further adding information on the hair diameter obtained by measuring the same portion of the hair measured in a pressurized state in a substantially non-pressurized state. Method. 加圧状態で測定して得られる毛髪径寸法に対する実質的に非加圧状態で測定して得られる毛髪径寸法の比の情報に基づいて評価することを特徴とする請求項2記載の毛髪の軟化度評価方法。   3. The hair according to claim 2, wherein the evaluation is based on information on a ratio of a hair diameter dimension obtained by measurement in a substantially non-pressurized state to a hair diameter dimension obtained by measurement in a pressurized state. Softening degree evaluation method. 還元剤を含有する毛髪処理剤で処理するときの毛髪の軟化度を評価することを特徴とする請求項1〜3のいずれか1項に記載の毛髪の軟化度評価方法。   The method for evaluating the degree of softness of hair according to any one of claims 1 to 3, wherein the degree of softening of the hair when treated with a hair treatment agent containing a reducing agent is evaluated. 加圧力計測・調整機構を備えた微細寸法測定器を用いて毛髪径寸法を測定することを特徴とする請求項1〜4のいずれか1項に記載の毛髪の軟化度評価方法。   The method for evaluating the softness of hair according to any one of claims 1 to 4, wherein the hair diameter is measured using a fine dimension measuring instrument equipped with a pressure measurement / adjustment mechanism. 還元剤を含有する毛髪処理剤で処理した後に、該毛髪処理剤を毛髪から取り除く毛髪処理方法において、
請求項4記載の毛髪の軟化度評価方法を用い、加圧状態で測定して得られる毛髪径寸法に対する実質的に非加圧状態で測定して得られる毛髪径寸法の比が所定の数値範囲内に入った時点で、還元剤を含有する毛髪処理剤での処理が完了したものと判断して、該毛髪処理剤を毛髪から取り除くことを特徴とする毛髪処理方法。
In a hair treatment method for removing a hair treatment agent from hair after treatment with a hair treatment agent containing a reducing agent,
The ratio of the hair diameter dimension obtained by measuring in a substantially non-pressurized state to the hair diameter dimension obtained by measuring in a pressurized state using the method for evaluating the softness of hair according to claim 4 is within a predetermined numerical range. A hair treatment method characterized in that, when it enters the hair, it is judged that the treatment with the hair treatment agent containing the reducing agent is completed, and the hair treatment agent is removed from the hair.
処理する毛髪の損傷度、前記毛髪処理剤の種類または髪質に応じて前記所定の数値範囲を設定することを特徴とする請求項6記載の毛髪処理方法。   7. The hair treatment method according to claim 6, wherein the predetermined numerical range is set according to the degree of damage to the hair to be treated, the type of the hair treatment agent, or the hair quality.
JP2008076796A 2008-03-24 2008-03-24 Method for evaluating softened degree of hair and its treatment method Withdrawn JP2009226086A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2008076796A JP2009226086A (en) 2008-03-24 2008-03-24 Method for evaluating softened degree of hair and its treatment method

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2008076796A JP2009226086A (en) 2008-03-24 2008-03-24 Method for evaluating softened degree of hair and its treatment method

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2009226086A true JP2009226086A (en) 2009-10-08

Family

ID=41242193

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2008076796A Withdrawn JP2009226086A (en) 2008-03-24 2008-03-24 Method for evaluating softened degree of hair and its treatment method

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP2009226086A (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2019031469A (en) * 2017-08-09 2019-02-28 有限会社春うらら Permanent wave treatment method

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2019031469A (en) * 2017-08-09 2019-02-28 有限会社春うらら Permanent wave treatment method

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Maddox et al. A case study of the use of ultrasonic peening for upgrading a welded steel structure
JP2017525430A (en) Method for measuring and / or adjusting the rolling resistance by using a brush
JP2009226086A (en) Method for evaluating softened degree of hair and its treatment method
KR20020095180A (en) Improved hair styling method
JP4268073B2 (en) Permanent wave forming ability diagnosis method, hair treatment agent, and hair treatment method
KR102106852B1 (en) A method of perm for minimizing hair damage
KR101988831B1 (en) Treatment method of permenent wave
JP6774373B2 (en) Straight perm method
KR20140076000A (en) Treatment method for protecting protein damage in hair
JP2001247436A (en) Single bath type hair-transforming agent
NL8500333A (en) METHOD FOR RE-STRUCTURING HAIR AND COMPOSITION THEREFOR.
KR20140121607A (en) hair repair and regeneration treatment method for heating perm hair damage
JP3779225B2 (en) Permanent wave or second hair straightening agent and method for using the same
JP5635433B2 (en) Perm hair softening checker
JP2010105926A (en) Hair treatment
US5080890A (en) Permanent waving lotion and a process for permanent waving of hair
JP2008266235A (en) Hair-treating method
KR101790163B1 (en) Method for evaluating the effect on maintenance and improvement of skin elasticity
KR102335709B1 (en) System and Method for measuring elastic and viscous properties of skin
JP5775219B2 (en) Method for assessing fiber condition
Jeong et al. Hair Damage and Wave Efficiency according to the Degree of Alkalinity in Permanent Wave
JP2009107936A (en) Method for frizzy hair straightening treatment
WO2022181006A1 (en) Hair/scalp care method and hair/scalp care device
JP2002282240A (en) Evaluation method for hair damage
KR20170087806A (en) Method for evaluating skin flexibility or smoothness through the analysis of skin friction sound

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A300 Withdrawal of application because of no request for examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A300

Effective date: 20110607