JP2009176023A - Program for converting examination value of medical examination - Google Patents

Program for converting examination value of medical examination Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP2009176023A
JP2009176023A JP2008013729A JP2008013729A JP2009176023A JP 2009176023 A JP2009176023 A JP 2009176023A JP 2008013729 A JP2008013729 A JP 2008013729A JP 2008013729 A JP2008013729 A JP 2008013729A JP 2009176023 A JP2009176023 A JP 2009176023A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
conversion
value
inspection
distribution type
test
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
JP2008013729A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP5199685B2 (en
Inventor
Kunihide Ino
邦英 井野
Osamu Kinoshita
修 木下
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Kobayashi Create Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Kobayashi Create Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Kobayashi Create Co Ltd filed Critical Kobayashi Create Co Ltd
Priority to JP2008013729A priority Critical patent/JP5199685B2/en
Publication of JP2009176023A publication Critical patent/JP2009176023A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP5199685B2 publication Critical patent/JP5199685B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Abstract

<P>PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide a program for easily converting an examination value of a medical examination into a numerical value comparable with an examination value measured on a different measurement condition. <P>SOLUTION: A distribution type of the examination value before the conversion is decided based on previously acquired attribute information of the examination value before the conversion. When the decided distribution type is a normal distribution type, the numerical value having the same deviation value as that of the examination value before the conversion is calculated as the examination value after the conversion in a distribution of a target examination value, based on: the examination value before the conversion; a reference range of the examination value before the conversion; and a reference range of the target examination value. <P>COPYRIGHT: (C)2009,JPO&INPIT

Description

本発明は、異なる測定条件で測定された健康診断の検査値を一元的に管理するための検査値換算プログラムに関する。   The present invention relates to a test value conversion program for centrally managing health check test values measured under different measurement conditions.

健康診断の結果は、各検査項目に対して検査値と基準範囲(正常範囲)が併記されるのが通常である。この基準範囲は、健常者の検査値の分布において上位2.5%と、下位2.5%を除く95%の検査値が含まれることとなる範囲であり、NCCLS(米国臨床検査標準委員会)の定める算出方法によって検査施設ごとに設定している(非特許文献1参照)。   As a result of the health check, the test value and the reference range (normal range) are usually written together for each test item. This reference range is a range that includes 95% of test values excluding the upper 2.5% and the lower 2.5% in the distribution of test values of healthy subjects. NCCLS (US National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards) ) Is set for each laboratory according to the calculation method defined by (see Non-Patent Document 1).

上記検査値の基準範囲は検査施設ごとにかなりばらつきがある。例えば、生化学検査の検査項目の一つであるγ−GTPは、ある検査施設の基準範囲が10〜47(IU/l)であるのに対し、別の検査施設の基準範囲は16〜73(IU/l)である。このように基準範囲にばらつく理由は、同一検査項目の検査に多くの測定方法や分析装置が存在しており、測定条件によって検査値がばらつくためである。   The reference range of the inspection values varies considerably from inspection facility to inspection facility. For example, γ-GTP, which is one of the inspection items for biochemical inspection, has a reference range of 10 to 47 (IU / l) for one inspection facility, while a reference range of another inspection facility is 16 to 73. (IU / l). The reason for the variation in the reference range is that many measurement methods and analyzers exist for the inspection of the same inspection item, and the inspection value varies depending on the measurement conditions.

健康診断の結果は、過去の数値と比較して悪化や改善を判断するのが好ましいとされているが、こうした健康診断の検査値のばらつきは、被検者が検査値の経時変化を観察する妨げとなっている。すなわち、被検者が、前回と異なる検査施設で健康診断を受信した場合、被検者は得られた検査値を前回の検査値と直接比較することができない。また、同じ検査施設で継続的に健康診断を受けている被検者であっても、検査施設が測定方法や分析装置を変更してしまうと、過去の検査結果との対比ができなくなってしまう。   It is said that it is preferable to judge the deterioration or improvement of the results of health examinations compared with the past values, but this variation in the examination values of the health examinations allows the subject to observe the changes in the examination values over time It is a hindrance. That is, when a subject receives a health check at a different inspection facility from the previous time, the subject cannot directly compare the obtained test value with the previous test value. In addition, even if a subject undergoes a medical examination continuously at the same inspection facility, if the inspection facility changes the measurement method or analyzer, it will not be possible to compare with past inspection results. .

井野邦英,基準範囲の設定方法,岐阜QA研究会1995年度研究集会報告書,p.7−13Kunihide Ino, how to set the standard range, Gifu QA workshop report in 1995, p. 7-13

上記のような不具合を解決するために、近年、各検査項目の測定方法や分析装置の仕様を標準化しようとする動きがある。しかしながら、臨床の検体は採取する量、部位などの制約を受け、検体成分は多くの混在成分を含んでおり、その中から単一物質を短時間に多数の検体を測定しなければならないため、最適な測定方法を一義的に決定し難いという問題があり、標準化はなかなか進んでいない。また、標準的な測定条件が決定されたとしても、全ての検査施設で測定条件を統一するには、分析装置の買換え等に伴う検査施設の金銭的負担が大きく、また、過去に蓄積さいた検査値との比較が難しくなるという問題があり、簡単ではない。   In recent years, there has been a movement to standardize the measurement method of each inspection item and the specifications of the analysis apparatus in order to solve the above-described problems. However, clinical specimens are limited by the amount and location of collection, and sample components contain many mixed components, and it is necessary to measure a large number of samples in a short time from a single substance. There is a problem that it is difficult to unambiguously determine the optimal measurement method, and standardization has not progressed easily. In addition, even if standard measurement conditions are determined, in order to unify the measurement conditions at all inspection facilities, the financial burden on the inspection facilities accompanying the replacement of analyzers, etc. is large, and it has to be accumulated in the past. There is a problem that it becomes difficult to compare with the inspection value, which is not easy.

一方、一の測定条件で測定された測定データを、該測定条件と異なる測定条件で測定される測定データと比較可能な数値に換算する方法として、同一試料を用いて二つの測定条件の相関を調べ、当該相関に基づく換算式によって測定データを換算する方法が一般的に行われている(以下、相関法という。)。しかしながら、かかる相関法を健康診断の検査値の換算に応用する場合、換算式の決定に人手、検体、時間、試薬など多大な資源が必要となるため、約700項目にも及ぶ検査項目に対して相関法を採用するのは現実的でない。   On the other hand, as a method of converting measurement data measured under one measurement condition into a numerical value comparable to measurement data measured under a measurement condition different from the measurement condition, the correlation between the two measurement conditions using the same sample is obtained. A method of examining and converting measurement data by a conversion formula based on the correlation is generally performed (hereinafter referred to as a correlation method). However, when this correlation method is applied to the conversion of test values for medical examinations, it takes a lot of resources such as human resources, specimens, time, and reagents to determine the conversion formula. Therefore, it is not realistic to use the correlation method.

本発明はかかる現状に鑑みてなされたものであり、健康診断の検査値を異なる測定条件で測定された検査値と比較可能な数値に簡便に換算するためのプログラムの提供を目的とする。   The present invention has been made in view of the present situation, and an object of the present invention is to provide a program for easily converting a test value of a health check into a numerical value that can be compared with a test value measured under different measurement conditions.

本発明者は、上記課題の解決を目的として鋭意検討を重ねた末に、測定方法や分析装置などの測定条件が異なっても健常者の検査値の分布型が同じである点に着目し、試行錯誤を重ねた末に本発明を完成した。   The present inventor has focused on the fact that the distribution type of the test value of the healthy person is the same even if the measurement conditions such as the measurement method and the analysis apparatus are different, after extensive studies for the purpose of solving the above problems, After trial and error, the present invention was completed.

すなわち、第一の発明は、一の測定条件で測定された換算前検査値を、該測定条件と異なる対象測定条件で測定される対象検査値と比較可能な換算後検査値に換算する処理をコンピュータに実行させるプログラムであって、正規分布型の分布をする換算前検査値、換算前検査値の基準範囲、及び対象検査値の基準範囲に基づいて、対象検査値の分布において、前記換算前検査値の偏差値と同じ偏差値となる数値を換算後検査値として算出する正規分布型換算処理をコンピュータに実行させることを特徴とする健康診断の検査値換算プログラムである。   That is, the first invention is a process for converting the pre-conversion test value measured under one measurement condition into a post-conversion test value that can be compared with a target test value measured under a target measurement condition different from the measurement condition. A program to be executed by a computer, wherein the pre-conversion test value having a normal distribution type, the reference range of the pre-conversion test value, and the reference test value in the distribution of the target test value, the pre-conversion An inspection value conversion program for health check, which causes a computer to execute a normal distribution type conversion process for calculating a numerical value having the same deviation value as the deviation value of an inspection value as an inspection value after conversion.

上述のように検査値の分布型は測定方法や分析装置といった測定条件には依存しないため、換算前検査値の分布型が正規分布型であれば、対象検査値の分布型も正規分布型となる。本発明における正規分布型処理では、図1に示すように、換算前検査値の正規分布における当該換算前検査値の偏差値と、対象検査値の正規分布における換算後検査値の偏差値が同じとなるように換算後検査値を算出する。このように正規分布から他の正規分布へ同一偏差値となるよう換算された換算後検査値は、相関法によって換算される数値と遜色ない値となる。   As described above, since the distribution type of test values does not depend on the measurement conditions such as the measurement method and the analyzer, if the distribution type of the test values before conversion is the normal distribution type, the distribution type of the target test values is also the normal distribution type. Become. In the normal distribution type processing in the present invention, as shown in FIG. 1, the deviation value of the inspection value before conversion in the normal distribution of the inspection value before conversion and the deviation value of the inspection value after conversion in the normal distribution of the target inspection value are the same. The post-conversion inspection value is calculated so that Thus, the post-conversion inspection value converted so as to have the same deviation value from the normal distribution to another normal distribution is a value comparable to the numerical value converted by the correlation method.

換算前検査値及び対象検査値の基準範囲の上限値と下限値は、各検査値の分布における2.5パーセンタイル(下限値)と97.5パーセンタイル(上限値)であるから、分布型が正規分布であれば、各基準範囲から夫々の分布の平均値や標準偏差を算出し、各検査値の偏差値を算出するのは容易である。したがって、かかる検査値換算プログラムによれば、換算前検査値の基準範囲と対象検査値の基準範囲さえ与えられれば、換算前検査値を対象検査値と比較可能な換算後検査値に換算できる。各検査値の基準範囲は、上述のように検査施設ごとに所定の方法で設定される値であって、健康診断の検査結果にも併記される一般的な情報であるから、別途調査を行うことなく簡単に入手することができる。したがって、かかる検査値換算プログラムによれば正規分布型の換算前検査値を極めて簡便な方法によって換算後検査値に換算できる。   Since the upper limit and lower limit of the reference range of the inspection value before conversion and the target inspection value are 2.5 percentile (lower limit) and 97.5 percentile (upper limit) in the distribution of each inspection value, the distribution type is normal. In the case of a distribution, it is easy to calculate the average value and standard deviation of each distribution from each reference range and calculate the deviation value of each inspection value. Therefore, according to the inspection value conversion program, as long as the reference range of the inspection value before conversion and the reference range of the target inspection value are given, the inspection value before conversion can be converted into the inspection value after conversion that can be compared with the target inspection value. The reference range of each test value is a value set by a predetermined method for each test facility as described above, and is general information that is also written in the test result of the health checkup. It can be easily obtained without. Therefore, according to the inspection value conversion program, the normal distribution type inspection value before conversion can be converted into the inspection value after conversion by a very simple method.

また、第二の発明は、一の測定条件で測定された換算前検査値を、該測定条件と異なる対象測定条件で測定される対象検査値と比較可能な換算後検査値に換算する処理をコンピュータに実行させるプログラムであって、非正規分布型の分布をする換算前検査値、換算前検査値の基準範囲、及び対象検査値の基準範囲を、該非正規分布型の分布が正規分布型となるように夫々変数変換し、変数変換後の換算前検査値、変数変換後の換算前検査値の基準範囲、及び対象検査値の変数変換後の基準範囲に基づいて、対象検査値を前記変数変換した分布において、変数変換後の換算前検査値の偏差値と同じ偏差値となる数値を算出し、さらに該数値を、前記変数変換の逆変換を行い、換算後検査値として算出する非正規分布型換算処理をコンピュータに実行させることを特徴とする健康診断の検査値換算プログラムである。   Moreover, 2nd invention is the process which converts the test value before conversion measured on one measurement condition into the test value after conversion which can be compared with the target test value measured on target measurement conditions different from this measurement condition. A program to be executed by a computer, wherein a non-normalized distribution type inspection value, a pre-conversion inspection value reference range, and a target inspection value reference range are defined as a normal distribution type distribution. Each of the variables is converted so that the inspection value before conversion after the variable conversion, the reference range of the inspection value before conversion after the variable conversion, and the reference range after the variable conversion of the target inspection value are converted into the variables. In the converted distribution, a numerical value that is the same deviation value as the deviation value of the pre-conversion inspection value after variable conversion is calculated, and further, the numerical value is subjected to inverse conversion of the variable conversion and calculated as a post-conversion inspection value Distributed conversion processing computer Healthy diagnostic test value conversion program, characterized in that to execute.

本発明における非正規分布型処理では、まず、図2に示すように、換算前検査値の分布型に応じて各パラメータを変数変換することにより、各パラメータを正規分布型に準じた数値に変換し、しかる後に、図3に示すように、上記正規分布型処理と同様に、変数変換後の換算前検査値の正規分布における当該換算前検査値の偏差値と、変数変換後の対象検査値の正規分布における換算後検査値の偏差値が同じとなる数値を算出し、さらに該数値を逆変換することにより換算後検査値を算出する。   In the non-normal distribution type processing in the present invention, first, as shown in FIG. 2, each parameter is converted into a numerical value according to the normal distribution type by performing variable conversion of each parameter according to the distribution type of the inspection value before conversion. Thereafter, as shown in FIG. 3, as in the normal distribution type process, the deviation value of the pre-conversion test value in the normal distribution of the pre-conversion test value after variable conversion and the target test value after variable conversion The numerical value with which the deviation value of the inspection value after conversion in the normal distribution is the same is calculated, and the inspection value after conversion is calculated by further inversely converting the numerical value.

このように正規分布型に準じた形に変数変換可能な分布型としては、対数正規分布型やべき乗分布型などが挙げられる。対数正規分布型は対数変換により、べき乗分布型はべき乗変換により正規分布型に変換できる。対数正規分布やべき乗分布は正規分布とは分布型が大きく異なるため、そのままでは偏差値に基づく換算を適切に行うことはできないが、本発明の非正規分布型換算処理のように、変数変換により該分布型を正規分布型に準ずる形に変換してから偏差値に基づく換算を行えば、換算前検査値の分布型が正規分布型でない場合でも、相関法によって換算される数値と遜色ない換算後検査値が得られる。したがって、かかる検査値換算プログラムによれば、正規分布型以外の分布型となる換算前検査値を、換算前検査値と対象検査値の基準範囲のみによって、簡便に、かつ適切に換算できる。   Examples of distribution types that can be variable-converted into a form conforming to the normal distribution type include a log normal distribution type and a power distribution type. The lognormal distribution type can be converted into a normal distribution type by logarithmic conversion, and the power distribution type can be converted into a normal distribution type by power conversion. Since the lognormal distribution and the power distribution are significantly different from the normal distribution, conversion based on the deviation value cannot be appropriately performed as it is, but, as in the non-normal distribution conversion processing of the present invention, by variable conversion. If the distribution type is converted to a form that conforms to the normal distribution type and then converted based on the deviation value, even if the pre-conversion test value distribution type is not the normal distribution type, the conversion is equivalent to the value converted by the correlation method Post test values are obtained. Therefore, according to the inspection value conversion program, the pre-conversion inspection value that is a distribution type other than the normal distribution type can be simply and appropriately converted only by the reference range of the inspection value before conversion and the target inspection value.

また、第三の発明は、一の測定条件で測定された換算前検査値を、該測定条件と異なる対象測定条件で測定される対象検査値と比較可能な換算後検査値に換算する処理をコンピュータに実行させるプログラムであって、換算前検査値の基準範囲における中央値の比率と同じ比率となるように、対象検査値の基準範囲における推定中央値を算出し、続いて、換算前検査値を、換算前検査値の中央値と比較し、換算前検査値が該中央値より大きい場合は、対象検査値の基準範囲の上限値と前記推定中央値の差に対する換算後検査値と該推定中央値の差の比率が、換算前検査値の基準範囲の上限値と中央値の差に対する換算前検査値と該中央値の差の比率と同じとなる換算後検査値を算出し、換算前検査値が該中央値より小さい場合は、対象検査値の推定中央値と基準範囲の下限値の差に対する該推定中央値と換算後検査値の差の比率が、換算前検査値の中央値と基準範囲の上限値の差に対する該中央値と換算前検査値の差の比率と同じとなる換算後検査値を算出するノンパラメトリック換算処理を実行させることを特徴とする健康診断の検査値換算プログラムである。   The third invention is a process for converting the pre-conversion test value measured under one measurement condition into a post-conversion test value that can be compared with a target test value measured under a target measurement condition different from the measurement condition. A program to be executed by a computer that calculates the estimated median value in the reference range of the target test value so that the ratio is the same as the ratio of the median value in the reference range of the test value before conversion. Is compared with the median of the test value before conversion, and if the test value before conversion is greater than the median value, the test value after conversion for the difference between the upper limit value of the reference range of the target test value and the estimated median value and the estimate Calculate the post-conversion test value so that the ratio of the median difference is the same as the ratio of the median difference between the upper limit of the reference range of the pre-conversion test value and the median difference. If the test value is smaller than the median, the target test value The ratio of the difference between the estimated median value and the converted inspection value to the difference between the estimated median value and the lower limit value of the reference range is the difference between the median value of the inspection value before conversion and the upper limit value of the reference range. A non-parametric conversion process for calculating a post-conversion test value that is the same as a value difference ratio is a health check test value conversion program.

本発明に係るノンパラメトリック換算処理は、図4に示すように、換算前検査値の分布と対象検査値の分布が相似形となることを利用して換算を行うものである。かかるノンパラメトリック換算処理は、換算前検査値の分布型の種類とは無関係に換算を行うものであるから、換算前検査値の分布型が未知であったり、正規分布に変数変換不能なものであったりしても換算後検査値を算出できるという利点がある。また、分布型に替えて換算前検査値の中央値をパラメータとすることによって相関法によって換算される数値に近い値を得ることができる。換算前検査値の中央値は、検査施設が基準範囲を設定する際に得られる統計量であり簡単に取得可能な数値である。   As shown in FIG. 4, the non-parametric conversion process according to the present invention performs conversion using the fact that the distribution of inspection values before conversion and the distribution of target inspection values are similar. This non-parametric conversion process performs conversion regardless of the type of distribution of the inspection value before conversion, so the distribution type of the inspection value before conversion is unknown or cannot be converted to a normal distribution. Even if there is, there is an advantage that the inspection value after conversion can be calculated. Moreover, a value close to a numerical value converted by the correlation method can be obtained by using the median value of the inspection value before conversion as a parameter instead of the distribution type. The median of the inspection value before conversion is a statistic obtained when the inspection facility sets the reference range, and is a numerical value that can be easily obtained.

また、第四の発明は、検査値の属性に対する分布型のリストが記憶されたコンピュータに、一の測定条件で測定された換算前検査値を、該測定条件と異なる対象測定条件で測定される対象検査値と比較可能な換算後検査値に換算する処理を実行させるプログラムであって、予め取得された換算前検査値の属性情報から、前記分布型のリストに基づいて該換算前検査値の分布型を判定する分布型判定処理を実行させ、前記分布型判定処理において換算前検査値の分布型が正規分布型であると判定した場合は、前記正規分布型換算処理をコンピュータに実行させ、前記分布型判定処理において分布型が正規分布型以外の所定の分布型であると判定した場合は、前記非正規分布型換算処理をコンピュータに実行させ、前記分布型判定処理において分布型が正規分布型でも前記所定の分布型でもないと判定した場合は、前記ノンパラメトリック換算処理をコンピュータに実行させることを特徴とする健康診断の検査値換算プログラムである。   According to a fourth aspect of the present invention, a pre-conversion inspection value measured under one measurement condition is measured under a target measurement condition different from the measurement condition in a computer storing a distribution type list for the inspection value attribute. A program that executes a process of converting into a converted inspection value that can be compared with a target inspection value, from the attribute information of the pre-conversion inspection value acquired in advance, based on the distribution type list, When the distribution type determination process for determining the distribution type is executed, and when the distribution type determination process determines that the distribution type of the inspection value before conversion is a normal distribution type, the normal distribution type conversion process is executed by a computer, When it is determined in the distribution type determination process that the distribution type is a predetermined distribution type other than the normal distribution type, the non-normal distribution type conversion process is executed by a computer, and the distribution type determination process is performed. If the type is determined not in the predetermined distributed in a normal distribution type, a health diagnostic test value conversion program, characterized in that to execute the non-parametric conversion process on the computer.

かかる検査値換算プログラムによれば、換算前検査値の分布型に応じて適切な換算方法によって換算後検査値を算出することが可能となる。検査値の属性に対する分布型の多くは文献に記載されているため、前記分布型のリストはそれらの情報に基づいて作成できる。また、同じ測定方法で測定された健常者の検査値が十分な数存在する場合には、それらから検査値の分布型を判定して分布型のリストに加えることも可能である。   According to such an inspection value conversion program, it is possible to calculate the inspection value after conversion by an appropriate conversion method according to the distribution type of the inspection value before conversion. Since many of the distribution types for the inspection value attribute are described in the literature, the distribution type list can be created based on the information. Further, when there are a sufficient number of test values of healthy persons measured by the same measurement method, it is also possible to determine the distribution type of the test values from them and add it to the distribution type list.

本発明において、検査値の属性とは、当該検査値の分布型を決定するための属性情報であり、必須な属性情報は検査項目名である。また、幾つかの検査項目では被検者の性別ごとによって検査値の分布型が異なるものが知られており、これらについては検査値の属性として被検者の性別情報が必要となる。   In the present invention, the inspection value attribute is attribute information for determining the distribution type of the inspection value, and the essential attribute information is the inspection item name. Some of the test items are known to have different test value distribution types depending on the gender of the subject. For these, the gender information of the subject is required as an attribute of the test value.

以上のように、本発明の健康診断の検査値換算プログラムによれば、換算前検査値の分布型に基づいて換算を行うことにより、相関法に比べて極めて簡単に換算後検査値を算出することができる。したがって、かかる検査値換算プログラムを用いれば、複数の検査施設で健康診断を受診した受診者の検査結果を比較可能な形に変換することができ、当該被検者は検査結果の経時変化を把握することが可能となる。また、かかる検査値換算プログラムを用いれば、検査施設は、過去の検査結果データを別の測定条件による検査値と比較可能な形に換算できるため、測定方法や分析装置を変更した場合でも、検査施設は検査結果の一元管理を続けることができる。   As described above, according to the test value conversion program for health examination of the present invention, the post-conversion test value is calculated extremely easily compared with the correlation method by performing conversion based on the distribution type of the pre-conversion test value. be able to. Therefore, by using such a test value conversion program, the test results of medical examinees who have undergone health examinations at multiple test facilities can be converted into a comparable form, and the subject can grasp changes in test results over time. It becomes possible to do. In addition, by using such a test value conversion program, inspection facilities can convert past test result data into a form that can be compared with test values under different measurement conditions, so even if the measurement method or analyzer is changed, The facility can continue to centrally manage test results.

本発明の実施形態を、以下の実施例に従って説明する。   Embodiments of the present invention are described according to the following examples.

図5は、本実施例の検査値換算システムの概要を示したものである。検査値換算システムは、検査値換算プログラムがインストールされたコンピュータによって構成されるものである。該コンピュータは、検査施設ごとの検査結果データを取り込んで、それらの検査結果データに含まれる各換算前検査値を所定の対象測定条件によって測定される対象検査値と比較可能な換算後検査値に変換し、換算結果データとして出力する。   FIG. 5 shows an outline of the inspection value conversion system of this embodiment. The inspection value conversion system is configured by a computer in which an inspection value conversion program is installed. The computer captures inspection result data for each inspection facility, and converts each pre-conversion inspection value included in the inspection result data into a post-conversion inspection value that can be compared with a target inspection value measured according to a predetermined target measurement condition. Convert and output as conversion result data.

表1は、前記コンピュータの記憶装置に記憶された、検査値の属性に対する分布型のリストである。分布型は検査項目によって一義的に決定されるものと、検査項目に加えて被検者の性別によって決定されるものがある。

Figure 2009176023
Table 1 is a distribution type list for the inspection value attribute stored in the storage device of the computer. The distribution type is uniquely determined by the inspection item, and the distribution type is determined by the gender of the subject in addition to the inspection item.
Figure 2009176023

表2は、コンピュータの記憶装置に記憶された、対象検査値の基準範囲のリストである。基準範囲は被検者を区別せずに設定される検査項目と、被検者の性別ごとに基準範囲が設定される検査項目とがある。

Figure 2009176023
Table 2 is a list of reference ranges of target inspection values stored in the storage device of the computer. The reference range includes an inspection item set without distinguishing the subject, and an inspection item where the reference range is set for each gender of the subject.
Figure 2009176023

検査施設から送られる検査結果データには、検査施設情報、被検者情報、そして検査項目ごとの検査値情報が含まれる。前記検査施設情報には、施設IDや該検査施設における各検査項目の基準範囲及び中央値が含まれる。また、前記被検者情報には、被検者IDや被検者の性別、年齢層等の情報が含まれる。そして前記検査値情報には、被検者情報と関連付けられた検査項目ごとの換算前検査値が含まれる。   The inspection result data sent from the inspection facility includes inspection facility information, subject information, and inspection value information for each inspection item. The inspection facility information includes a facility ID, a reference range and a median value of each inspection item in the inspection facility. The subject information includes information such as the subject ID, the sex of the subject, and the age group. The inspection value information includes an inspection value before conversion for each inspection item associated with the subject information.

コンピュータが出力する換算結果データには、検査施設情報、被検者情報及び換算結果情報が含まれる。検査施設情報及び被検者情報は検査結果データと同じものである。換算結果情報には、被検者情報と関連付けられた検査項目ごとの換算前検査値及び換算後検査値が含まれる。さらに、換算結果情報には、換算後検査値ごとの換算処理方法及び対象測定方法の基準範囲も含まれる。   The conversion result data output by the computer includes laboratory information, subject information, and conversion result information. The inspection facility information and the subject information are the same as the inspection result data. The conversion result information includes a pre-conversion inspection value and a post-conversion inspection value for each inspection item associated with the subject information. Furthermore, the conversion result information includes the reference processing range for the conversion processing method and the target measurement method for each post-conversion inspection value.

本実施例の検査値換算プログラムは、コンピュータに以下の各処理を実行させる。
・分布型設定処理
・対象基準範囲設定処理
・検査結果データ取込処理
・検査値換算処理
・換算結果データ出力処理
The inspection value conversion program of this embodiment causes a computer to execute the following processes.
・ Distribution type setting processing ・ Target standard range setting processing ・ Inspection result data import processing ・ Inspection value conversion processing ・ Conversion result data output processing

分布型設定処理は、各種調査により検査項目や性別に対する検査値の分布型が新たに判明した場合に、最新の分布型のリストを外部から取得し更新する処理である。対象基準範囲設定処理は、前記対象検査値の基準範囲のリストを外部から取得して記憶する処理である。また、検査結果データ取込処理は、検査施設から送られた検査結果データを取込み、記憶装置に記憶する処理である。さらに、検査値換算処理は、取り込んだ検査結果データに含まれる検査値情報を換算後検査値に変換する処理である。そして、換算結果データ出力処理は、検査値換算処理で算出した換算後検査値を含む換算結果データを出力する処理である。   The distribution type setting process is a process of acquiring and updating the latest distribution type list from the outside when a distribution type of inspection values for inspection items and sex is newly found by various investigations. The target reference range setting process is a process of acquiring and storing a list of reference ranges of the target inspection values from the outside. The inspection result data fetching process is a process for fetching the inspection result data sent from the testing facility and storing it in the storage device. Further, the inspection value conversion process is a process of converting the inspection value information included in the acquired inspection result data into a converted inspection value. The conversion result data output process is a process of outputting conversion result data including the post-conversion inspection value calculated in the inspection value conversion process.

本発明の要部に係る検査値換算処理の制御処理内容について図6を参照して説明する。   The control processing content of the inspection value conversion processing according to the main part of the present invention will be described with reference to FIG.

検査値換算処理では、まず、換算する換算前検査値に係る検査項目名及び被検者の性別を分布型のリスト(表1参照)と比較することにより、当該換算前検査値の分布型を判定する(S1)。具体的には、本実施例のプログラムは、正規分布、対数正規分布型、そして、べき乗分布型として平方根分布や立方根分布など12種類の分布型に対応しており、換算前検査値の分布型がいずれの分布型に該当するか、またはいずれにも該当しないかを判定する。   In the test value conversion process, first, the distribution type of the pre-conversion test value is determined by comparing the inspection item name related to the pre-conversion test value to be converted and the gender of the subject with the list of distribution types (see Table 1). Determine (S1). Specifically, the program of the present embodiment corresponds to 12 types of distribution types such as a square distribution and a cubic root distribution as a normal distribution, a log normal distribution type, and a power distribution type. It is determined which of the distribution types corresponds to or does not correspond to any of them.

換算前検査値の分布型の判定後は、ステップS2に移行し、判定した分布型が正規分布型であるか否かを判定する。そして、正規分布型であると判定した場合には、正規分布型換算処理(S4)を実行し、算出した換算後検査値を格納して(S7)、検査値換算処理を終了する。   After determining the distribution type of the inspection value before conversion, the process proceeds to step S2 to determine whether or not the determined distribution type is a normal distribution type. If the normal distribution type is determined, the normal distribution type conversion process (S4) is executed, the calculated inspection value after conversion is stored (S7), and the inspection value conversion process is terminated.

一方、ステップS2において正規分布型でないと判定した場合にはステップS3へ移行し、判定した分布型が所定の分布型であるか否かを判定する。本実施例では、非正規分布型及び10種類のべき乗分布型が所定の分布型として設定されており、判定した分布型かこれらに該当する場合には、非正規分布型換算処理(S5)を実行し、算出した換算後検査値を格納して(S7)、検査値換算処理を終了する。一方、判定した分布型が所定の分布型でないと判定された場合は、ノンパラメトリック換算処理(S6)を実行し、算出した換算後検査値を格納して(S7)、検査値換算処理を終了する。   On the other hand, if it is determined in step S2 that the distribution type is not normal, the process proceeds to step S3, and it is determined whether or not the determined distribution type is a predetermined distribution type. In the present embodiment, the non-normal distribution type and the ten power distribution types are set as the predetermined distribution types. If the determined distribution type or these correspond to these, the non-normal distribution type conversion process (S5) is performed. The calculated inspection value after conversion is stored (S7), and the inspection value conversion process is terminated. On the other hand, if it is determined that the determined distribution type is not the predetermined distribution type, the non-parametric conversion process (S6) is executed, the calculated converted inspection value is stored (S7), and the inspection value conversion process is terminated. To do.

次に、上記正規分布型換算処理(図6、S4)における制御処理内容を図7にしたがって説明する。   Next, the contents of the control process in the normal distribution type conversion process (FIG. 6, S4) will be described with reference to FIG.

正規分布型換算処理では、まず、以下のパラメータが存在するか否かを判定する(S11)。
Xi:換算前検査値
RL:換算前基準範囲下限値(換算前検査値の基準範囲の下限値)
RH:換算前基準範囲上限値(換算前検査値の基準範囲の上限値)
oRL:対象基準範囲下限値(対象検査値の基準範囲の下限値)
oRH:対象基準範囲上限値(対象検査値の基準範囲の上限値)
ここで上記パラメータが一つでも存在しないと判定した場合には、換算不能であるため正規分布型換算処理を終了する。
In the normal distribution type conversion process, first, it is determined whether or not the following parameters exist (S11).
Xi: Inspection value before conversion
RL: Lower limit of the reference range before conversion (lower limit of the reference range of the inspection value before conversion)
RH: Reference range upper limit value before conversion (upper limit value of reference range for inspection value before conversion)
oRL: Lower limit value of target reference range (lower limit value of target test value reference range)
oRH: Target standard range upper limit value (Target test value standard range upper limit value)
Here, when it is determined that even one of the above parameters does not exist, the normal distribution type conversion process is terminated because conversion is impossible.

次に、換算前基準範囲下限値RL及び上限値RHに基づいて換算前検査値Xiの平均値Xbと標準偏差SDを算出する(S12,S13)。具体的には、平均値XBと標準偏差SDは以下の数式より求められる。
XB=(RL+RH)/2
SD=|RL−RH|/(2×1.96)
Next, the average value Xb and standard deviation SD of the inspection value Xi before conversion are calculated based on the reference range lower limit value RL and the upper limit value RH (S12, S13). Specifically, the average value XB and the standard deviation SD are obtained from the following mathematical formula.
XB = (RL + RH) / 2
SD = | RL−RH | / (2 × 1.96)

次に、上記ステップS12,S13と同様にして、対象基準範囲下限値oRL及び上限値oRHに基づいて対象検査値の平均値oXBと標準偏差oSDを算出する(S14,S15)。   Next, in the same manner as in steps S12 and S13, the average value oXB and standard deviation oSD of the target test values are calculated based on the target reference range lower limit value oRL and the upper limit value oRH (S14, S15).

次に、換算前検査値Xiの平均値XBと標準偏差SDに基づいて、以下の式により換算前検査値Xiの標準偏差指数ZXiを算出する(S16)。
ZXi=(Xi−XB)/SD
Next, based on the average value XB of the inspection value Xi before conversion and the standard deviation SD, the standard deviation index ZXi of the inspection value Xi before conversion is calculated by the following formula (S16).
ZXi = (Xi−XB) / SD

次に、標準偏差指数ZXi、平均値oXB及び標準偏差oSDに基づいて、対象検査値の分布において、標準偏差指数ZXiと同じ標準偏差指数となる数値を換算後検査値aXiとして算出し、正規分布型換算処理を終了する(S17)。具体的には、換算後検査値aXiは以下の数式より求められる。
aXi=ZXi×oSD+oXB
Next, based on the standard deviation index ZXi, the average value oXB, and the standard deviation oSD, in the distribution of the target test value, the numerical value that becomes the same standard deviation index as the standard deviation index ZXi is calculated as the converted test value aXi, and the normal distribution The mold conversion process is terminated (S17). Specifically, the post-conversion inspection value aXi is obtained from the following mathematical formula.
aXi = ZXi × oSD + oXB

次に、上記非正規分布型換算処理(図6、S5)における制御処理内容を図8にしたがって説明する。   Next, the contents of the control processing in the non-normal distribution type conversion processing (FIG. 6, S5) will be described with reference to FIG.

非正規分布型換算処理では、まず、以下のパラメータが存在するか否かを判定する(S21)。
Xi:換算前検査値
RL:換算前基準範囲下限値(換算前検査値の基準範囲の下限値)
RH:換算前基準範囲上限値(換算前検査値の基準範囲の上限値)
oRL:対象基準範囲下限値(対象検査値の基準範囲の下限値)
oRH:対象基準範囲上限値(対象検査値の基準範囲の上限値)
CD:換算前検査値の分布型
ここで上記パラメータが一つでも存在しないと判定した場合には、換算不能であるため非正規分布型換算処理を終了する。
In the non-normal distribution type conversion process, it is first determined whether or not the following parameters exist (S21).
Xi: Inspection value before conversion
RL: Lower limit of the reference range before conversion (lower limit of the reference range of the inspection value before conversion)
RH: Reference range upper limit value before conversion (upper limit value of reference range for inspection value before conversion)
oRL: Lower limit value of target reference range (lower limit value of target test value reference range)
oRH: Target standard range upper limit value (Target test value standard range upper limit value)
CD: Distribution type of inspection value before conversion When it is determined that there is no parameter, the non-normal distribution type conversion process is terminated because conversion is impossible.

次に、換算前検査値の分布型CDに基づいて変換式を選択し、上記パラメータXi,RL,RH,oRL,oRHを、正規分布型に準ずる値cXi,cRL,cRH,coRL,coRHに変換する(S22)。具体的には、以下のように、対数正規分布型に対しては対数変換を、べき乗分布型に対してはべき乗変換を行う。なお、下記数式において、pはべき乗分布型における指数である。
対数正規分布の場合: Xi、RL、RH → cXi=ln(Xi)、cRL=ln(RL)、cRH=ln(RH)
べき乗分布の場合 : Xi、RL、RH → cXi=Xip、cRL=RLp、cRH=RHp
Next, a conversion formula is selected based on the distribution type CD of the inspection value before conversion, and the above parameters Xi, RL, RH, oRL, oRH are converted to values cXi, cRL, cRH, coRL, coRH according to the normal distribution type. (S22). Specifically, as described below, logarithmic transformation is performed for the lognormal distribution type, and power transformation is performed for the power distribution type. In the following formula, p is an exponent in the power distribution type.
For lognormal distribution: Xi, RL, RH → cXi = ln (Xi), cRL = ln (RL), cRH = ln (RH)
Power distribution: Xi, RL, RH → cXi = Xi p , cRL = RL p , cRH = RH p

次に、変数変換した換算前基準範囲下限値cRL及び上限値cRHに基づいて、変数変換後の換算前検査値の平均値cXBと標準偏差cSDを算出する(S23,S24)。具体的には、平均値cXBと標準偏差cSDは以下の数式より求められる。
cXB=(cRL+cRH)/2
cSD=|cRL−cRH|/(2×1.96)
Next, the average value cXB and the standard deviation cSD of the inspection values before conversion after the variable conversion are calculated based on the variable-converted reference range lower limit value cRL and the upper limit value cRH (S23, S24). Specifically, the average value cXB and the standard deviation cSD are obtained from the following mathematical formula.
cXB = (cRL + cRH) / 2
cSD = | cRL−cRH | / (2 × 1.96)

次に、上記ステップS23,S24と同様にして、変数変換後の対象基準範囲下限値coRL及び上限値coRHに基づいて、対象検査値の変数変換後の平均値coXBと標準偏差coSDを算出する(S25,S26)。   Next, in the same manner as in steps S23 and S24, based on the target reference range lower limit value coRL and upper limit value coRH after variable conversion, the average value coXB and standard deviation coSD of the target test value after variable conversion are calculated ( S25, S26).

次に、平均値cXBと標準偏差cSDに基づいて、以下の式により変数変換後の換算前検査値cXiの標準偏差指数cZXiを算出する(S27)。
cZXi=(cXi−cXB)/cSD
Next, based on the average value cXB and the standard deviation cSD, the standard deviation index cZXi of the inspection value cXi before conversion after variable conversion is calculated by the following formula (S27).
cZXi = (cXi−cXB) / cSD

次に、標準偏差指数cZXi、平均値coXB及び標準偏差coSDに基づいて、対象検査値の変数変換後の分布において、標準偏差指数cZXiと同じ標準偏差指数となる数値を変数変換後の換算後検査値caXiとして算出する(S28)。具体的には、変数変換後の換算後検査値caXiは以下の数式より求められる。
caXi=cZXi×coSD+coXB
Next, based on the standard deviation index cZXi, the average value coXB, and the standard deviation coSD, in the distribution after the variable conversion of the target inspection value, the numerical value that becomes the same standard deviation index as the standard deviation index cZXi is the post-conversion inspection after the variable conversion The value caXi is calculated (S28). Specifically, the post-conversion inspection value caXi after the variable conversion is obtained from the following mathematical formula.
caXi = cZXi x coSD + coXB

最後に、換算前検査値の分布型CDに基づいて、変数変換後の換算後検査値caXiを逆変換して換算後検査値aXiを算出し(S29)、非正規分布型換算処理を終了する。   Finally, based on the distribution type CD of the pre-conversion inspection value, the post-conversion inspection value caXi after the variable conversion is inversely converted to calculate the post-conversion inspection value aXi (S29), and the non-normal distribution type conversion process is terminated. .

次に、上記ノンパラメトリック換算処理(図6、S6)における制御処理内容を図9にしたがって説明する。   Next, the contents of the control process in the nonparametric conversion process (FIG. 6, S6) will be described with reference to FIG.

ノンパラメトリック換算処理では、まず、以下のパラメータが存在するか否かを判定する(S31)。
Xi:換算前検査値
RL:換算前基準範囲下限値(換算前検査値の基準範囲の下限値)
RH:換算前基準範囲上限値(換算前検査値の基準範囲の上限値)
RM:換算前基準範囲中央値(換算前検査値の中央値)
oRL:対象基準範囲下限値(対象検査値の基準範囲の下限値)
oRH:対象基準範囲上限値(対象検査値の基準範囲の上限値)
ここで上記パラメータが一つでも存在しないと判定した場合には、換算不能であるためノンパラメトリック換算処理を終了する。
In the non-parametric conversion process, first, it is determined whether or not the following parameters exist (S31).
Xi: Inspection value before conversion
RL: Lower limit of the reference range before conversion (lower limit of the reference range of the inspection value before conversion)
RH: Reference range upper limit value before conversion (upper limit value of reference range for inspection value before conversion)
RM: Median of reference range before conversion (median of inspection value before conversion)
oRL: Lower limit value of target reference range (lower limit value of target test value reference range)
oRH: Target standard range upper limit value (Target test value standard range upper limit value)
Here, when it is determined that even one of the above parameters does not exist, the non-parametric conversion process is terminated because conversion is impossible.

次に、換算前基準範囲下限値RL、上限値RH、及び対象基準範囲下限値oRL、上限値oRHに基づいて、以下の式により換算前検査値の基準範囲の幅TRと対象検査値の基準範囲の幅oTRを算出する(S32,33)。
TR = RH − RL
oTR = oRH − oRL
Next, based on the reference range lower limit value RL, upper limit value RH, and target reference range lower limit value oRL, upper limit value oRH, the range TR of the test value before conversion and the standard of the target test value are calculated using the following formulas: The range width oTR is calculated (S32, 33).
TR = RH − RL
oTR = oRH − oRL

次に、換算前基準範囲下限値RL、上限値RH及び中央値RMに基づいて、以下の式により、換算前検査値の分布における上ヒンジHH及び下ヒンジHLの推定値を算出する(S34)。
HH =| RM − RH |× k (k = 25/47.5)
HL =| RM − RL |× k (k = 25/47.5)
Next, based on the reference range lower limit value RL before conversion, the upper limit value RH, and the median value RM, the estimated values of the upper hinge HH and the lower hinge HL in the distribution of the inspection value before conversion are calculated by the following formula (S34). .
HH = | RM − RH | × k (k = 25 / 47.5)
HL = | RM-RL | x k (k = 25 / 47.5)

次に、前記各基準範囲の幅TR、oTR、上ヒンジHH及び下ヒンジHLに基づいて、以下の式により、対象検査値の分布における上ヒンジoHH及び下ヒンジoHLの推定値を算出する(S35)
oHL = HL / TR × oTR
oHH = HH / TR × oTR
Next, based on the widths TR, oTR, the upper hinge HH, and the lower hinge HL of each reference range, the estimated values of the upper hinge oHH and the lower hinge oHL in the distribution of the target inspection value are calculated by the following formula (S35). )
oHL = HL / TR x oTR
oHH = HH / TR x oTR

次に、対象基準範囲下限値oRL、測定検査値の分布における下ヒンジoHLに基づいて、以下の式により、対象検査値の推定中央値oRMを算出する(S36)。なお、下記数式において、kは係数(k = 25/47.5)である。
oRM = oRL + (oHL / k)
Next, based on the target reference range lower limit value oRL and the lower hinge oHL in the distribution of measured test values, the estimated median value oRM of the target test values is calculated by the following formula (S36). In the following formula, k is a coefficient (k = 25 / 47.5).
oRM = oRL + (oHL / k)

次に、換算前検査値Xiが中央値RM以上であるか否かを判定する(S37)。   Next, it is determined whether or not the pre-conversion inspection value Xi is greater than or equal to the median value RM (S37).

前記ステップS37において換算前検査値Xiが中央値RM以上であると判定した場合には、以下の式により標準のヒンジ値HXiを算出し(S38)、算出したヒンジ値HXiに基づいて換算後検査値aXiを算出して(S39)、ノンパラメトリック換算処理を終了する。
HXi=(Xi−RM)/HH
aXi=oRM+HXi×oHH
If it is determined in step S37 that the pre-conversion inspection value Xi is equal to or greater than the median value RM, the standard hinge value HXi is calculated by the following equation (S38), and the post-conversion inspection is performed based on the calculated hinge value HXi. The value aXi is calculated (S39), and the nonparametric conversion process is terminated.
HXi = (Xi−RM) / HH
aXi = oRM + HXi × oHH

一方、ステップS37において換算前検査値Xiが中央値RM以上でないと判定した場合には、以下の式により標準のヒンジ値HXiを算出し(S40)、算出したヒンジ値HXiに基づいて換算後検査値aXiを算出して(S41)、ノンパラメトリック換算処理を終了する。
HXi=(Xi−RM)/HL
aXi=oRM−HXi×oHL
On the other hand, if it is determined in step S37 that the pre-conversion inspection value Xi is not equal to or greater than the median value RM, the standard hinge value HXi is calculated by the following equation (S40), and the post-conversion inspection is performed based on the calculated hinge value HXi. The value aXi is calculated (S41), and the nonparametric conversion process is terminated.
HXi = (Xi−RM) / HL
aXi = oRM−HXi × oHL

このように、本実施例の検査値換算プログラムによれば、入手容易なパラメータのみによって、一の測定条件で測定された検査値を、他の対象測定条件で測定される対象検査値と比較可能な値に簡単に換算することができる。また、本実施例の検査値換算プログラムによって算出された換算後検査値は、検査値の分布型に基づいて換算を行うものであるから、パラメータの数が少なくても相関法による換算値に匹敵する信頼性の高い換算後検査値が得られる。   Thus, according to the test value conversion program of this embodiment, the test value measured under one measurement condition can be compared with the target test value measured under another target measurement condition only with easily available parameters. Can be easily converted into a simple value. In addition, the post-conversion test value calculated by the test value conversion program of the present embodiment is converted based on the distribution type of the test value. Therefore, even if the number of parameters is small, it is comparable to the conversion value by the correlation method. A highly reliable inspection value after conversion can be obtained.

なお、本発明の検査値換算プログラムは、上記実施例の形態に限らず本発明の要旨を逸脱しない範囲内において種々変更を加えることができる。   The inspection value conversion program of the present invention is not limited to the embodiment described above, and various modifications can be made without departing from the spirit of the present invention.

例えば、上記実施例の検査値換算プログラムは、検査施設から送られる検査結果データを一括して換算するプログラムであるが、本発明の検査値換算プログラムは、被検者個人の検査結果を個別に換算するプログラムであっても構わない。   For example, the test value conversion program of the above embodiment is a program that collectively converts the test result data sent from the test facility, but the test value conversion program of the present invention individually converts the test result of the individual subject. It may be a program for conversion.

また、上記実施例の検査値換算プログラムにあっては、検査値の属性に対する分布型のリストを外部から取り込むようにしているが、同じ測定条件で測定された健常者の検査値を収集して、該検査値の分布から分布型を決定して、リストを更新するようにしてもかまわない。   In the test value conversion program of the above embodiment, the distribution type list for the attribute of the test value is fetched from the outside, but the test values of healthy persons measured under the same measurement conditions are collected. The list may be updated by determining the distribution type from the distribution of the inspection values.

また、上記実施例の検査値換算プログラムにあっては、対象検査値の基準範囲が予めリスト化されているが、検査結果データを換算するたびに対象検査値の基準範囲を設定するようにしてもよい。   Further, in the inspection value conversion program of the above embodiment, the reference range of the target inspection value is listed in advance, but the reference range of the target inspection value is set every time the inspection result data is converted. Also good.

また、上記実施例の検査値換算プログラムは、検査結果データに含まれる換算前検査値の基準範囲や中央値を利用していたが、検査結果データに含まれる健常者の換算前検査値の分布から該換算前検査値の基準範囲や中央値を算出するようにしてもよい。   Moreover, although the test value conversion program of the said Example utilized the reference | standard range and median value of the test value before conversion contained in test result data, distribution of the test value before conversion of the healthy person contained in test result data From this, the reference range or median value of the inspection value before conversion may be calculated.

また、上記実施例の検査値換算プログラムにあっては、検査値の分布型や基準範囲が、検査項目と被検者の性別によって決定されていたが、検査値の分布型や基準範囲を被検者の年齢層や国籍等によってさらに細分化して決定するようにしてもよい。   In the inspection value conversion program of the above embodiment, the distribution type and reference range of the inspection value are determined by the inspection item and the gender of the subject. It may be determined by further subdividing according to the age group or nationality of the examiner.

なお、上記実施例の検査値換算プログラムにおいて、検査値換算処理は、基準範囲の上限値又は下限値の一方のみしか設定されない検査値に関しては換算対象としていないが、かかる検査値に関しては、別途換算処理を行うようにしてもよい。   In the inspection value conversion program of the above embodiment, the inspection value conversion processing is not subject to conversion for inspection values for which only one of the upper limit value or the lower limit value of the reference range is set. However, such inspection values are converted separately. Processing may be performed.

また、上記実施例の検査値換算プログラムにあっては、全ての換算前検査値を分布型に基づいて換算するようにしているが、本発明の検査値換算プログラムは、相関法による換算と分布型に基づく換算を併用するものであってもよい。具体的には、相関法による換算式が確立している検査項目に関しては相関法による換算を行い、残りの検査項目に関して分布型に基づく換算を行う構成などが挙げられる。   Moreover, in the inspection value conversion program of the above embodiment, all inspection values before conversion are converted based on the distribution type. However, the inspection value conversion program of the present invention uses the conversion and distribution by the correlation method. You may use conversion based on a type | mold together. Specifically, the inspection item for which the conversion method by the correlation method is established may be converted by the correlation method, and the remaining inspection items may be converted based on the distribution type.

正規分布型換算処理の概要を示す説明図である。It is explanatory drawing which shows the outline | summary of a normal distribution type conversion process. 非正規分布型換算処理の概要を示す説明図である。It is explanatory drawing which shows the outline | summary of a non-normal distribution type conversion process. 図2から続く、非正規分布型換算処理の概要を示す説明図である。It is explanatory drawing which shows the outline | summary of the non-normal distribution type conversion process continued from FIG. ノンパラメトリック換算処理の概要を示す説明図である。It is explanatory drawing which shows the outline | summary of a nonparametric conversion process. 検査値換算システムの概要を示す概念図である。It is a conceptual diagram which shows the outline | summary of a test value conversion system. 検査値換算処理の制御処理内容を示すフローチャートである。It is a flowchart which shows the control processing content of a test value conversion process. 正規分布型換算処理の制御処理内容を示すフローチャートである。It is a flowchart which shows the control processing content of a normal distribution type conversion process. 非正規分布型換算処理の制御処理内容を示すフローチャートである。It is a flowchart which shows the control processing content of a non-normal distribution type conversion process. ノンパラメトリック換算処理の制御処理内容を示すフローチャートである。It is a flowchart which shows the control processing content of a nonparametric conversion process.

Claims (4)

一の測定条件で測定された換算前検査値を、該測定条件と異なる対象測定条件で測定される対象検査値と比較可能な換算後検査値に換算する処理をコンピュータに実行させるプログラムであって、
正規分布型の分布をする換算前検査値、換算前検査値の基準範囲、及び対象検査値の基準範囲に基づいて、対象検査値の分布において、前記換算前検査値の偏差値と同じ偏差値となる数値を換算後検査値として算出する正規分布型換算処理をコンピュータに実行させることを特徴とする健康診断の検査値換算プログラム。
A program for causing a computer to execute a process of converting a pre-conversion inspection value measured under one measurement condition into a post-conversion inspection value that can be compared with a target inspection value measured under a target measurement condition different from the measurement condition. ,
The same deviation value as the deviation value of the pre-conversion test value in the distribution of the target test value based on the pre-conversion test value having a normal distribution type, the reference range of the test value before conversion, and the reference range of the target test value A test value conversion program for health examination, which causes a computer to execute a normal distribution type conversion process for calculating a numerical value to be a converted test value.
一の測定条件で測定された換算前検査値を、該測定条件と異なる対象測定条件で測定される対象検査値と比較可能な換算後検査値に換算する処理をコンピュータに実行させるプログラムであって、
非正規分布型の分布をする換算前検査値、換算前検査値の基準範囲、及び対象検査値の基準範囲を、該非正規分布型の分布が正規分布型となるように夫々変数変換し、
変数変換後の換算前検査値、変数変換後の換算前検査値の基準範囲、及び対象検査値の変数変換後の基準範囲に基づいて、
対象検査値を前記変数変換した分布において、変数変換後の換算前検査値の偏差値と同じ偏差値となる数値を算出し、
さらに該数値を、前記変数変換の逆変換を行い、換算後検査値として算出する非正規分布型換算処理をコンピュータに実行させることを特徴とする健康診断の検査値換算プログラム。
A program for causing a computer to execute a process of converting a pre-conversion inspection value measured under one measurement condition into a post-conversion inspection value that can be compared with a target inspection value measured under a target measurement condition different from the measurement condition. ,
Converting the non-normal distribution type pre-conversion test value, the pre-conversion test value reference range, and the target test value reference range into variables so that the non-normal distribution type distribution is a normal distribution type, respectively,
Based on the test value before conversion after variable conversion, the standard range of test value before conversion after variable conversion, and the standard range after variable conversion of target test value,
In the distribution obtained by converting the target inspection value into the variable, a numerical value that is the same deviation value as the deviation value of the inspection value before conversion after the variable conversion is calculated,
Further, a test value conversion program for health check, which causes a computer to execute non-normal distribution type conversion processing in which the numerical value is subjected to inverse conversion of the variable conversion and calculated as a converted test value.
一の測定条件で測定された換算前検査値を、該測定条件と異なる対象測定条件で測定される対象検査値と比較可能な換算後検査値に換算する処理をコンピュータに実行させるプログラムであって、
換算前検査値の基準範囲における中央値の比率と同じ比率となるように、対象検査値の基準範囲における推定中央値を算出し、
続いて、換算前検査値を、換算前検査値の中央値と比較し、
換算前検査値が該中央値より大きい場合は、対象検査値の基準範囲の上限値と前記推定中央値の差に対する換算後検査値と該推定中央値の差の比率が、換算前検査値の基準範囲の上限値と中央値の差に対する換算前検査値と該中央値の差の比率と同じとなる換算後検査値を算出し、
換算前検査値が該中央値より小さい場合は、対象検査値の推定中央値と基準範囲の下限値の差に対する該推定中央値と換算後検査値の差の比率が、換算前検査値の中央値と基準範囲の上限値の差に対する該中央値と換算前検査値の差の比率と同じとなる換算後検査値を算出するノンパラメトリック換算処理を実行させることを特徴とする健康診断の検査値換算プログラム。
A program for causing a computer to execute a process of converting a pre-conversion inspection value measured under one measurement condition into a post-conversion inspection value that can be compared with a target inspection value measured under a target measurement condition different from the measurement condition. ,
Calculate the estimated median in the reference range of the target test value to be the same ratio as the ratio of the median in the reference range of the test value before conversion,
Subsequently, the inspection value before conversion is compared with the median of the inspection value before conversion,
When the inspection value before conversion is larger than the median value, the ratio of the difference between the inspection value after conversion and the estimated median value relative to the difference between the upper limit value of the reference range of the target inspection value and the estimated median value is the inspection value before conversion. Calculate the inspection value after conversion that is the same as the ratio of the difference between the inspection value before conversion and the median value relative to the difference between the upper limit value and the median value of the reference range,
If the test value before conversion is smaller than the median value, the ratio of the difference between the estimated median value of the target test value and the lower limit value of the reference range to the difference between the estimated median value and the test value after conversion is the center of the test value before conversion. Non-parametric conversion processing for calculating a post-conversion test value that is the same as the ratio of the difference between the median value and the pre-conversion test value relative to the difference between the value and the upper limit value of the reference range. Conversion program.
検査値の属性に対する分布型のリストが記憶されたコンピュータに、一の測定条件で測定された換算前検査値を、該測定条件と異なる対象測定条件で測定される対象検査値と比較可能な換算後検査値に換算する処理を実行させるプログラムであって、
予め取得された換算前検査値の属性情報から、前記分布型のリストに基づいて該換算前検査値の分布型を判定する分布型判定処理を実行させ、
前記分布型判定処理において換算前検査値の分布型が正規分布型であると判定した場合は、請求項1記載の正規分布型換算処理をコンピュータに実行させ、
前記分布型判定処理において分布型が正規分布型以外の所定の分布型であると判定した場合は、請求項2記載の非正規分布型換算処理をコンピュータに実行させ、
前記分布型判定処理において分布型が正規分布型でも前記所定の分布型でもないと判定した場合は、請求項3記載のノンパラメトリック換算処理をコンピュータに実行させることを特徴とする健康診断の検査値換算プログラム。
Conversion in which a pre-conversion test value measured under one measurement condition can be compared with a target test value measured under a target measurement condition different from the measurement condition in a computer storing a distribution type list for the attribute of the test value A program for executing a process for converting to a post-inspection value,
From the attribute information of the pre-conversion inspection value acquired in advance, a distribution type determination process for determining the distribution type of the pre-conversion inspection value based on the distribution type list is performed,
If it is determined in the distribution type determination process that the distribution type of the inspection value before conversion is a normal distribution type, the computer executes the normal distribution type conversion process according to claim 1,
If the distribution type determination process determines that the distribution type is a predetermined distribution type other than the normal distribution type, the computer executes the non-normal distribution type conversion process according to claim 2,
4. A test value for health check, which causes a computer to execute the non-parametric conversion process according to claim 3 when the distribution type determination process determines that the distribution type is neither the normal distribution type nor the predetermined distribution type. Conversion program.
JP2008013729A 2008-01-24 2008-01-24 Examination value conversion program for health check Active JP5199685B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2008013729A JP5199685B2 (en) 2008-01-24 2008-01-24 Examination value conversion program for health check

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2008013729A JP5199685B2 (en) 2008-01-24 2008-01-24 Examination value conversion program for health check

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2009176023A true JP2009176023A (en) 2009-08-06
JP5199685B2 JP5199685B2 (en) 2013-05-15

Family

ID=41031046

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2008013729A Active JP5199685B2 (en) 2008-01-24 2008-01-24 Examination value conversion program for health check

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP5199685B2 (en)

Cited By (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2009247688A (en) * 2008-04-08 2009-10-29 Kochi Univ Clinical test data analysis support apparatus, method, and program
JP2012256196A (en) * 2011-06-08 2012-12-27 Yamaguchi Univ Clinical examination device, clinical examination method, and clinical examination program
JP2014032069A (en) * 2012-08-02 2014-02-20 Gifu Univ Detection of radiopharmaceutical abnormal accumulation
JP2015032013A (en) * 2013-07-31 2015-02-16 Kddi株式会社 Numeric data analyzer and program
JP2017004327A (en) * 2015-06-12 2017-01-05 株式会社日立製作所 Analysis support device and analysis support method of clinical examination data
JP2018060239A (en) * 2016-09-30 2018-04-12 富士通株式会社 Inspection result conversion program, inspection result conversion apparatus and inspection result conversion method
JP2020126462A (en) * 2019-02-05 2020-08-20 キヤノンメディカルシステムズ株式会社 Medical information processing system

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH01198530A (en) * 1988-02-03 1989-08-10 Secom Co Ltd Health control apparatus
JPH0779930A (en) * 1993-09-10 1995-03-28 Fukuda Denshi Co Ltd Method to represent measured values on medical information system upon conversion
JPH07296089A (en) * 1994-04-28 1995-11-10 Fujitsu Ltd Method and device for controlling, processing and displaying inspection data in medical system
JP2003085396A (en) * 2001-09-10 2003-03-20 Fujitsu Ltd Medical checkup intermediary system

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH01198530A (en) * 1988-02-03 1989-08-10 Secom Co Ltd Health control apparatus
JPH0779930A (en) * 1993-09-10 1995-03-28 Fukuda Denshi Co Ltd Method to represent measured values on medical information system upon conversion
JPH07296089A (en) * 1994-04-28 1995-11-10 Fujitsu Ltd Method and device for controlling, processing and displaying inspection data in medical system
JP2003085396A (en) * 2001-09-10 2003-03-20 Fujitsu Ltd Medical checkup intermediary system

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
JPN6012051944; 原 正一郎: '健診情報システムの高度化と健診業務の落差について-システム普及に向けての問題点-' 第4回日本医療用光カード研究会論文集 , 1993, pp.25-28 *

Cited By (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2009247688A (en) * 2008-04-08 2009-10-29 Kochi Univ Clinical test data analysis support apparatus, method, and program
JP2012256196A (en) * 2011-06-08 2012-12-27 Yamaguchi Univ Clinical examination device, clinical examination method, and clinical examination program
JP2014032069A (en) * 2012-08-02 2014-02-20 Gifu Univ Detection of radiopharmaceutical abnormal accumulation
JP2015032013A (en) * 2013-07-31 2015-02-16 Kddi株式会社 Numeric data analyzer and program
JP2017004327A (en) * 2015-06-12 2017-01-05 株式会社日立製作所 Analysis support device and analysis support method of clinical examination data
JP2018060239A (en) * 2016-09-30 2018-04-12 富士通株式会社 Inspection result conversion program, inspection result conversion apparatus and inspection result conversion method
JP2020126462A (en) * 2019-02-05 2020-08-20 キヤノンメディカルシステムズ株式会社 Medical information processing system
JP7346036B2 (en) 2019-02-05 2023-09-19 キヤノンメディカルシステムズ株式会社 Medical information processing system

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP5199685B2 (en) 2013-05-15

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP5199685B2 (en) Examination value conversion program for health check
Jørgensen et al. Comparison of two automated assays of BTM (CTX and P1NP) and reference intervals in a Danish population
Westgard et al. Analytical Sigma metrics: a review of Six Sigma implementation tools for medical laboratories
JP5693325B2 (en) Medical examination result output system and medical examination result output program
JP4369749B2 (en) Method and system for predicting initial value of analyte in sample
US7925461B2 (en) Quality control system, analyzer, and quality control method
Inal et al. Indirect reference intervals estimated from hospitalized population for thyrotropin and free thyroxine
JP2012506051A5 (en)
Kacker et al. Free testosterone by direct and calculated measurement versus equilibrium dialysis in a clinical population
JP2002022748A (en) Clinical inspection system
JP2016220832A (en) Visual field testing apparatus
JP2019049529A (en) Blood testing system result interpreter interface and methods
Taher et al. A novel Sigma metric encompasses global multi-site performance of 18 assays on the Abbott Alinity system
Uysal et al. How reliable are electrolyte and metabolite results measured by a blood gas analyzer in the ED?
Zaki et al. Testing the agreement of medical instruments: Overestimation of bias in the Bland–Altman analysis
Zafari et al. Diagnostic performance of the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation at estimating glomerular filtration rate in adults with diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol
JP2018033516A (en) Brain information analysis device and brain health index arithmetic device
CN107003315B (en) Insulin secreting ability analytical equipment, the insulin secreting ability analysis system and insulin secreting ability analysis method for having the device
JP2018134211A (en) Brain information analysis device and brain information imitation arithmetic unit
KR100984665B1 (en) Method and device for outputting medical information
WO2017063598A1 (en) Cloud processing method for collected optical information
Wong et al. Muscle thickness assessment of the forearm via ultrasonography: is experience level important?
JP2009098072A (en) Examination precision managing device, examination precision management method, and examination precision management program
Kang et al. Establishment of an assigned value and its uncertainty for tumour markers in proficiency testing in China
Mansourvar et al. Automatic method for bone age assessment based on combined method

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20110119

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20121016

A521 Request for written amendment filed

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20121203

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20130115

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20130208

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20160215

Year of fee payment: 3

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Ref document number: 5199685

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250