JP2008232823A - Expanded pipe crack evaluation device of welded steel pipe, and expanded pipe crack evaluation method - Google Patents

Expanded pipe crack evaluation device of welded steel pipe, and expanded pipe crack evaluation method Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP2008232823A
JP2008232823A JP2007072808A JP2007072808A JP2008232823A JP 2008232823 A JP2008232823 A JP 2008232823A JP 2007072808 A JP2007072808 A JP 2007072808A JP 2007072808 A JP2007072808 A JP 2007072808A JP 2008232823 A JP2008232823 A JP 2008232823A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
jig
welded
center
welding
curvature
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
JP2007072808A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Inventor
Atsushi Agata
淳 阿形
Eiji Tsuru
英司 津留
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Nippon Steel Corp
Original Assignee
Nippon Steel Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Nippon Steel Corp filed Critical Nippon Steel Corp
Priority to JP2007072808A priority Critical patent/JP2008232823A/en
Publication of JP2008232823A publication Critical patent/JP2008232823A/en
Withdrawn legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Abstract

<P>PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide a device and method for precisely evaluating the expanded pipe crack properties of a steel pipe, having welded parts parallel in its longitudinal direction. <P>SOLUTION: The expanded pipe crack evaluation device of the welded steel pipe comprises a jig 5 for a matrix and a jig 3 for a welded part both of which have the arcuate regions opposed to the interior of an annular test object 1 and a drive part 7 for linearly advancing the jig 5 for the matrix and the jig 3 for the welded part in mutually opposed directions and a welded part opposed groove 4 is provided to the top part of the jig 3 for the welded part. This expanded pipe crack evaluation device is characterized in that the radius Rc of curvature of the central parts 3c of the jig 3 for the welded part formed in adjacent relation to both sides of the welded part opposed groove 4 and the radius Rs of curvature of the end parts 3s of the jig 3 for the welded part formed in adjacent relation to the outsides of the central parts 3c of the jig 3 for the welded part satisfy the formula: 0.3Rc≤Rs≤0.8 Rc, and the central parts 3c of the jig 3 for the welded part are respectively formed within a range of 30-60° on both sides of the center of the welded part opposed groove 4 with the center of the radius Rc of curvature as a referance. <P>COPYRIGHT: (C)2009,JPO&INPIT

Description

本発明は、鋼板を管状に成形し、突合せ部を溶接して製造された、長手方向に平行な溶接部を有する鋼管の拡管割れ性を評価する装置及び方法に関する。   The present invention relates to an apparatus and a method for evaluating the expansion cracking property of a steel pipe having a welded portion parallel to the longitudinal direction, which is manufactured by forming a steel plate into a tubular shape and welding butt portions.

鋼板を管状に成形し、突合せ部をシーム溶接した鋼管のうち、特に、UOE方式により造管された鋼管は、真円度を向上させるために、拡管される。UOE造管プロセスにより、図1に示した拡管を施すと、シーム溶接部からの割れ、いわゆる拡管割れが発生することがある。   Among the steel pipes formed by forming a steel plate into a tubular shape and seam-welding the butt portion, in particular, a steel pipe formed by the UOE method is expanded in order to improve the roundness. When the pipe expansion shown in FIG. 1 is performed by the UOE pipe forming process, a crack from the seam welded portion, that is, a so-called pipe expansion crack may occur.

拡管割れは、鋼管の機械特性、溶接部の形状だけでなく、拡管機の工具、いわゆるセグメントの形状、材質や鋼管との摩擦係数など、種々の因子に支配される複雑な現象である。したがって、製造ラインで拡管を行う前に、拡管割れの発生の有無を予測することは困難であった。   The pipe expansion crack is a complex phenomenon governed not only by the mechanical characteristics of the steel pipe and the shape of the weld, but also by various factors such as the tool of the pipe expander, the so-called segment shape, the material and the friction coefficient with the steel pipe. Therefore, it has been difficult to predict the occurrence of pipe expansion cracks before performing pipe expansion on the production line.

また、近年、油井に挿入された鋼管を油井内で拡管することによって、掘削面積を低減し、かつ掘削工期を大幅に短縮可能な工法が提案されている。このような用途に適用される電縫鋼管の拡管割れ性を評価するため、円錐の治具で鋼管の端部を拡管し、割れが発生した部位の拡管率を測定している。しかし、この方法では、歪み量が連続的に変化しているため、正確に拡管割れ性を評価することができない。   In recent years, a construction method has been proposed in which a steel pipe inserted into an oil well is expanded in the oil well, thereby reducing a drilling area and greatly shortening a drilling construction period. In order to evaluate the expansion cracking property of an ERW steel pipe applied to such a use, the end of the steel pipe is expanded with a conical jig, and the expansion ratio of the portion where the crack occurs is measured. However, in this method, since the amount of strain is continuously changed, the pipe expansion crackability cannot be accurately evaluated.

鋼管の機械特性は評価が困難であり、通常、鋼管を切断してプレスなどによって扁平にし、試験片を採取している。そのため、導入される歪みの影響により、機械特性を性格に評価できていない。このような問題に対しては、鋼管をリング状に切断し、内側から周方向に引張力を作用させる引張試験装置が提案されている(例えば、特許文献1)。   The mechanical properties of steel pipes are difficult to evaluate. Usually, steel pipes are cut and flattened with a press or the like, and specimens are collected. For this reason, the mechanical characteristics cannot be evaluated properly due to the influence of the introduced strain. For such a problem, a tensile test apparatus that cuts a steel pipe into a ring shape and applies a tensile force in the circumferential direction from the inside has been proposed (for example, Patent Document 1).

この引張試験装置によれば、鋼管の母材の引張強さを測定することが可能である。しかし、溶接部の強度、特に拡管割れ性の評価を行なうことについては記載されていない。
特開昭63−182545号公報
According to this tensile test apparatus, it is possible to measure the tensile strength of the base material of the steel pipe. However, it does not describe the evaluation of the strength of the welded portion, particularly the pipe cracking property.
JP-A-63-182545

本発明は、母材の引張特性を測定する試験機に改良を加えて、長手方向に平行な溶接部を有する鋼管の拡管割れ性を精度良く評価する装置及び方法を提供するものである。   The present invention provides an apparatus and method for accurately evaluating the expansion cracking property of a steel pipe having a welded portion parallel to the longitudinal direction by improving the testing machine for measuring the tensile properties of the base material.

本発明の要旨は以下のとおりである。
(1)環状試験体の内部に対向する部位が弧状である母材用治具及び溶接部用治具と、該母材用治具及び該溶接部用治具を相反する方向に直進させる駆動部からなり、前記溶接部用治具の頂部に溶接部対向溝を設け、該溶接部対向溝の両側に隣接して形成される溶接部用治具中央部の曲率半径Rcと、該溶接部用治具中央部の外側に隣接して形成される溶接部用治具端部の曲率半径Rsが、
0.3Rc≦Rs≦0.8Rc
を満足し、前記溶接部用治具中央部が、曲率半径Rcの中心を基準として、前記溶接部対向溝の中心の両側にそれぞれ30〜60°の範囲に形成されていることを特徴とする、溶接鋼管の拡管割れ評価装置。
(2)前記曲率半径Rcの中心を基準として、前記溶接部対向溝の中心の両側にそれぞれ10°〜30°の範囲において、該溶接部用治具中央部の表面に分離可能な溶接部対向治具を設けたことを特徴とする、上記(1)に記載の溶接鋼管の拡管割れ評価装置。
(3)上記(1)又は(2)に記載の拡管割れ評価装置に、環状試験体の溶接部を溶接部対向溝に対向させて設置し、溶接部用治具と母材用治具を相反する方向に移動させながら、前記母材用治具及び前記溶接部用治具の間に作用する荷重及び変位を測定することを特徴とする、溶接鋼管の拡管割れ評価方法。
(4)環状試験体の溶接部もしくはその近傍に歪み計測手段を設け、溶接部の歪みを測定することを特徴とする上記(3)に記載の溶接鋼管の拡管割れ評価方法。
The gist of the present invention is as follows.
(1) A base material jig and a welding part jig that are arcuate in the part facing the inside of the annular test body, and a drive that linearly moves the base material jig and the welding part jig in opposite directions. A welded portion facing groove on the top of the welded portion jig, and a radius of curvature Rc of the welded portion jig central portion formed adjacent to both sides of the welded portion facing groove, and the welded portion The radius of curvature Rs of the welded jig end formed adjacent to the outside of the jig central part is:
0.3Rc ≦ Rs ≦ 0.8Rc
And the weld jig center part is formed in a range of 30 to 60 ° on both sides of the center of the weld-facing groove with respect to the center of the radius of curvature Rc. , Expansion crack evaluation equipment for welded steel pipes.
(2) With respect to the center of the radius of curvature Rc as a reference, facing the welded portion separable to the surface of the center portion of the welded jig in the range of 10 ° to 30 ° on both sides of the center of the welded portion facing groove. The apparatus for evaluating crack expansion of a welded steel pipe according to (1) above, wherein a jig is provided.
(3) In the tube cracking evaluation apparatus according to (1) or (2), the welded portion of the annular test body is installed facing the welded portion facing groove, and a welded portion jig and a base material jig are provided. A method for evaluating expansion cracking of a welded steel pipe, wherein a load and a displacement acting between the base material jig and the welding part jig are measured while moving in opposite directions.
(4) The method for evaluating crack expansion of a welded steel pipe according to (3) above, wherein a strain measuring means is provided at or near the welded portion of the annular specimen and the strain of the welded portion is measured.

本発明によれば、特に、UOE方式で製造される溶接鋼管の生産性を著しく阻害する要因である拡管割れの、発生因子の定量化を、簡易的かつ安価に行なうことが可能であり、産業上の貢献が極めて顕著である。   According to the present invention, in particular, it is possible to easily and inexpensively quantify the generation factor of pipe expansion cracks, which is a factor that significantly hinders the productivity of welded steel pipes manufactured by the UOE method. The above contribution is very remarkable.

図1に、通常のUOE造管プロセスに採用されている拡管機の概略図を示す。拡管を行う際には、鋼管20の内部において周方向に分割して配置された拡管セグメント21を、同時に放射状に広げる。   FIG. 1 shows a schematic view of a pipe expander employed in a normal UOE pipe making process. When the pipe expansion is performed, the pipe expansion segments 21 that are divided and arranged in the circumferential direction inside the steel pipe 20 are radially expanded at the same time.

本発明では、かかるUOE造管プロセスにおいて行われる拡管を精度良く再現させる。本発明では、機構を簡略化するため2つのセグメント(溶接部用治具3と母材用治具5)により鋼管を拡管することとした。   In the present invention, the pipe expansion performed in the UOE pipe making process is accurately reproduced. In the present invention, in order to simplify the mechanism, the steel pipe is expanded by two segments (a welding part jig 3 and a base material jig 5).

図2は、本発明の実施の形態にかかる試験機を示す模式図であり、(A)は環状試験体1の溶接部2を上から見た平面図、(B)は環状試験体1の内部に取り付けられた試験機を正面から見た正面図、(C)は溶接部用治具3と環状試験体1の部分拡大図である。図2に示したように、環状試験体1の溶接部2は、溶接部用治具3と接触しないように、溶接部用治具3の頂部に設けた溶接部対向溝4に対応する位置に設置される。環状試験体1は、UOE造管プロセスで製造された鋼管を適当な長さに切断したものである。環状試験体1の内部において、溶接部用治具3の反対側には、母材用治具5が配置される。これら溶接部用治具3と母材用治具5は、環状試験体1の内部に対向する部位が、環状試験体1の内部形状(円形状)に沿うように弧状に形成されている。溶接部用治具3と母材用治具5は、駆動部7により、相反する方向へ移動する。即ち図2の例では、駆動部7により、溶接部用治具3は相対的に上方に押し上げられ、母材用治具5は相対的に下方に押し下げられる。駆動部7により、溶接部用治具3と母材用治具5の両方を移動させても良く、何れか一方を固定し、他方を移動させても良い。駆動部7は、例えば油圧シリンダ等の載荷装置である。   2A and 2B are schematic views showing a testing machine according to an embodiment of the present invention, in which FIG. 2A is a plan view of the welded portion 2 of the annular test body 1 as viewed from above, and FIG. The front view which looked at the testing machine attached inside from the front, (C) is the elements on larger scale of the jig 3 for welding parts, and the cyclic | annular test body 1. FIG. As shown in FIG. 2, the welded portion 2 of the annular test body 1 corresponds to a welded portion facing groove 4 provided on the top of the welded portion jig 3 so as not to contact the welded portion jig 3. Installed. The annular test body 1 is obtained by cutting a steel pipe manufactured by the UOE pipe making process into an appropriate length. Inside the annular test body 1, a base material jig 5 is arranged on the opposite side of the welded part jig 3. The welded part jig 3 and the base material jig 5 are formed in an arc shape so that a portion facing the inside of the annular test body 1 follows the internal shape (circular shape) of the annular test body 1. The welding part jig 3 and the base material jig 5 are moved in opposite directions by the drive part 7. That is, in the example of FIG. 2, the welding portion jig 3 is pushed upward relatively by the driving portion 7, and the base material jig 5 is pushed downward relatively. Both the welding part jig 3 and the base material jig 5 may be moved by the driving part 7, or one of them may be fixed and the other may be moved. The drive unit 7 is a loading device such as a hydraulic cylinder.

また、溶接部用治具3の環状試験体1の内部に対向する部位の曲率半径をすべての範囲で同一にすると、環状試験体1の溶接部2以外に応力が集中して、溶接部2で割れが発生しないことがある。したがって、溶接部2で破断させるためには、環状試験体1の溶接部2の近傍に相当する溶接部用治具3の中央部3cの曲率を端部3sの曲率よりも小さくし、溶接部2に応力を集中させることが必要である。   Moreover, if the curvature radius of the site | part which opposes the inside of the cyclic | annular test body 1 of the jig | tool 3 for welding parts is made the same in all the ranges, stress will concentrate on other than the weld part 2 of the cyclic | annular test body 1, and the weld part 2 will be concentrated. May not crack. Therefore, in order to cause the welded portion 2 to break, the curvature of the central portion 3c of the welded portion jig 3 corresponding to the vicinity of the welded portion 2 of the annular specimen 1 is made smaller than the curvature of the end portion 3s. It is necessary to concentrate stress on 2.

具体的には、図3に示すように、溶接部用治具3の頂部の中央を基準として、溶接部用治具3の頂部(溶接部対向溝4)の中心の両側にそれぞれ30〜60°の範囲にある溶接部用治具中央部3cの曲率半径Rcと、溶接部用治具中央部3cの外側に隣接して形成される溶接部用治具端部3sの曲率半径Rsが、
0.3Rc≦Rs≦0.8Rc
を満足することが必要である。なお、溶接部用治具3は一転鎖線で示した中心線Lに対して左右線対称の形状をなしている。そのため、図3では、溶接部用治具3の左半分部のみを示している。
Specifically, as shown in FIG. 3, 30-60 respectively on both sides of the center of the top of the welding portion jig 3 (welded portion facing groove 4) with the center of the top portion of the welding portion jig 3 as a reference. The radius of curvature Rc of the welded part jig center part 3c in the range of ° and the curvature radius Rs of the welded part jig end part 3s formed adjacent to the outside of the welded part jig center part 3c are:
0.3Rc ≦ Rs ≦ 0.8Rc
It is necessary to satisfy In addition, the jig 3 for welding parts has comprised the left-right symmetric shape with respect to the center line L shown with the dashed line. Therefore, in FIG. 3, only the left half part of the jig 3 for welding parts is shown.

なお、図3に示したように、溶接部用治具中央部3cの角度の範囲は、溶接部用治具中央部3cの曲率半径Rcの曲率中心を基準とする中心角である。この角度が0°の位置は、一点鎖線で示したように、溶接部対向溝4を設けた溶接部用治具3の頂部である。また、溶接部用治具中央部3cと溶接部用治具端部3sの境界は破線Mで示している。溶接部用治具端部3sの曲率半径Rsの曲率中心は、×で示すように、溶接部用治具中央部3cと溶接部用治具端部3sの境界(破線M)上の、Rs/Rcが0.3〜0.8となる位置とする。   In addition, as shown in FIG. 3, the range of the angle of the welding part jig | tool center part 3c is a center angle on the basis of the curvature center of the curvature radius Rc of the jig | tool center part 3c for welding parts. The position where this angle is 0 ° is the top of the welded part jig 3 provided with the welded part facing groove 4 as indicated by the alternate long and short dash line. The boundary between the welded jig center portion 3c and the welded jig end portion 3s is indicated by a broken line M. The center of curvature of the radius of curvature Rs of the welded jig end 3s is Rs on the boundary (dashed line M) between the welded jig center 3c and the welded jig end 3s, as indicated by x. The position where / Rc is 0.3 to 0.8.

溶接部用治具5の頂部を中央として、少なくとも±30°(両側30°)の範囲(溶接部用治具中央部3c)の溶接部用治具3の曲率半径Rcを一定にするのは、製造ラインのセグメントによる拡管を精度良く再現するためである。一方、溶接部用治具5の頂部を中央として、±60°(両側60°)を超える範囲(溶接部用治具端部3s)の溶接部用治具3の曲率半径Rsが曲率半径Rcと同じであると、環状試験体1の溶接部2で割れが発生しないことがある。   The radius of curvature Rc of the welded part jig 3 in the range of at least ± 30 ° (both sides 30 °) (the welded part jig central part 3c) is made constant with the top of the welded part jig 5 as the center. This is because the pipe expansion by the segment of the production line is accurately reproduced. On the other hand, the radius of curvature Rs of the welded jig 3 in a range (weld jig end 3s) exceeding ± 60 ° (60 ° on both sides) with the top of the welded jig 5 as the center is the radius of curvature Rc. If the same, the crack may not occur in the welded portion 2 of the annular test body 1.

なお、前記溶接部用治具3の頂部を中央として両側30〜60°以内の溶接部用治具中央部3cの曲率半径Rcと母材用治具5の曲率半径は、製品(環状試験体1)の半径と同等であることが好ましい。これにより、製造ラインの拡管機のセグメントによる拡管時の鋼管の変形状態を極めて精度良く再現することができる。   The curvature radius Rc of the welding portion jig central portion 3c within 30 to 60 ° on both sides with the top portion of the welding portion jig 3 as the center and the curvature radius of the base material jig 5 are the product (annular specimen). It is preferable to be equivalent to the radius of 1). Thereby, the deformation state of the steel pipe at the time of pipe expansion by the segment of the pipe expander on the production line can be reproduced with extremely high accuracy.

また、溶接部2で破断させるためには、図2(A)に示すように、環状試験体1の溶接部2の近傍は幅を狭く加工することが好ましい。図2(A)では、シーム溶接による溶接部2が環状試験体1の減幅加工部に設けられている。   Further, in order to cause the welded portion 2 to break, it is preferable to process the vicinity of the welded portion 2 of the annular specimen 1 with a narrow width as shown in FIG. In FIG. 2 (A), the welded part 2 by seam welding is provided in the reduced width processed part of the annular test body 1.

また、溶接部用治具3は一体でも良いが、図4に示したように、溶接部対向溝4を含んだ溶接部対向治具3aと、それ以外の溶接部用基盤治具3bに分割されていることが好ましい。溶接部対向治具3aと溶接部用基盤治具3bとは、図4に例示したようにボルト6で接合される。   Further, the welded part jig 3 may be integrated, but as shown in FIG. 4, the welded part facing jig 3a including the welded part facing groove 4 and the other welded part base jig 3b are divided. It is preferable that The welded part facing jig 3a and the welded part base jig 3b are joined by bolts 6 as illustrated in FIG.

溶接部用治具3において、溶接部対向溝4の近傍、具体的には、溶接部対向溝4の中心から両側10〜30°以内の範囲は最も負荷が高い部位であり、損傷する可能性が他の部位よりも高い。したがって、この部位を分離可能にすることにより、保守のコストを削減することができる。なお、溶接部対向溝4の中心から両側10〜30°以内の範囲の中心角は、図3と同様、曲率半径Rcの曲率中心を基準としている。   In the welded part jig 3, the vicinity of the welded part facing groove 4, specifically, the range within 10 to 30 ° on both sides from the center of the welded part facing groove 4 is a portion with the highest load and may be damaged. Is higher than other parts. Therefore, maintenance costs can be reduced by making this part separable. In addition, the center angle within a range of 10 to 30 ° on both sides from the center of the weld-facing groove 4 is based on the center of curvature of the radius of curvature Rc as in FIG.

また、溶接部対向治具3aを分離可能にすることにより、拡菅割れ性に及ぼす拡管機のセグメントの摩擦係数の影響を調査することが可能になる。具体的には、溶接部用基盤治具3bとは摩擦係数が異なる溶接部対向治具3aを複数用意し、環状試験体1の溶接部2の近傍に接触する溶接部対向治具3aの摩擦係数を変化させて、拡管割れの評価を行う。なお、潤滑剤を併用すれば、摩擦係数を0.04〜0.4まで変化させることができる。   Further, by making the welded part facing jig 3a separable, it becomes possible to investigate the influence of the coefficient of friction of the pipe expander segment on the spread cracking property. Specifically, a plurality of welded portion facing jigs 3a having different friction coefficients from the welded portion base jig 3b are prepared, and the friction of the welded portion facing jig 3a contacting the vicinity of the welded portion 2 of the annular specimen 1 is prepared. The expansion crack is evaluated by changing the coefficient. If a lubricant is used in combination, the friction coefficient can be changed from 0.04 to 0.4.

駆動部7の荷重は荷重計8によって測定され、母材用治具5及び溶接部用治具3の間に生ずる変位は変位計9によって測定される。試験体1の溶接部2の近傍に歪み計測手段としての歪みゲージ11を貼付し、歪み計10で、周方向の歪みを測定することが好ましい。歪みゲージ11は、溶接部対向溝4を設けたことにより、溶接部2周辺の内面側の、溶接部用治具3と環状試験体1とが接触しない部分に貼付することができる。これにより、歪みが所定の値に達した時点で駆動部7を停止することができる。なお、歪みゲージ11は、溶接部2に貼付しても良い。   The load of the drive unit 7 is measured by a load meter 8, and the displacement generated between the base material jig 5 and the welded part jig 3 is measured by a displacement meter 9. It is preferable to attach a strain gauge 11 as a strain measuring means near the welded portion 2 of the test body 1 and measure the strain in the circumferential direction with the strain gauge 10. The strain gauge 11 can be affixed to a portion of the inner surface side around the welded portion 2 where the welded jig 3 and the annular test body 1 do not contact each other by providing the welded portion facing groove 4. Thereby, the drive part 7 can be stopped when distortion reaches a predetermined value. Note that the strain gauge 11 may be attached to the welded portion 2.

外径×肉厚が、それぞれ、φ914×16t、φ1016×19t、φ1219×20tであり、引張強度が840〜1040MPaの、拡管前のUOE鋼管を用いて、製造ラインの拡管機による拡管と、本発明の拡管試験機による拡管を行なった。   The outer diameter × wall thickness is φ914 × 16t, φ1016 × 19t, φ1219 × 20t, and the tensile strength is 840 to 1040 MPa before UBE steel pipe expansion. The pipe was expanded by the pipe expansion tester of the invention.

図5は、溶接部に割れが生じたときの実機での拡管率と試験機の変位とを比較したグラフである。実機において拡管割れが発生する限界拡管率と、本発明の試験機において割れが発生する限界変位に良好な相関があることを図5は示している。   FIG. 5 is a graph comparing the pipe expansion ratio in the actual machine and the displacement of the test machine when a crack occurs in the weld. FIG. 5 shows that there is a good correlation between the limit pipe expansion rate at which pipe expansion cracks occur in the actual machine and the limit displacement at which cracks occur in the test machine of the present invention.

また、図6は同一の鋼管の溶接部に割れが生じた際の溶接部周辺の周方向歪み量を、実機と試験機について比較したものである。周方向歪み量は、歪みゲージによって測定した。鋼管外面・内面ともに拡管割れ発生時の歪みはよく一致しており、本発明の試験機で実機拡管機におけるシーム溶接部周辺の変形状態を再現可能であることを示している。   FIG. 6 is a comparison of the amount of circumferential strain around the welded part when a crack occurs in the welded part of the same steel pipe, using an actual machine and a test machine. The amount of circumferential strain was measured with a strain gauge. The strains at the time of occurrence of pipe expansion cracks agree well on both the outer surface and the inner surface of the steel pipe, indicating that the deformation state around the seam weld in the actual pipe expansion machine can be reproduced with the test machine of the present invention.

以下に実施例と比較例により本発明の実施による効果を説明する。
表1は製品寸法φ914×16t、φ1016×19t、φ1219×20t、鋼管強度840〜1040MPaでピーキング値の異なる拡管前のUOE鋼管について、拡管機による拡管と本発明の拡管試験機による拡管、および比較例としてAPI Spec 5Lに従ったシーム溶接部を扁平後に試験片を採取する溶接継ぎ手引張試験を行ない、それぞれシーム溶接に割れが発生したときの歪みを比較した結果である。実機拡管と比較したとき、溶接継ぎ手試験は一度溶接部が扁平されるため、割れ発生時の歪みを正確に評価できないのに対し、試験機の歪みはよく実機と一致することが確認された。
The effect by implementation of this invention is demonstrated below by an Example and a comparative example.
Table 1 shows the UOE steel pipe before expansion with product dimensions φ914 × 16t, φ1016 × 19t, φ1219 × 20t, steel pipe strength 840 to 1040 MPa and different peaking values. As an example, a weld joint tensile test in which a test piece is taken after flattening a seam weld according to API Spec 5L was performed, and the strains were compared when cracks occurred in each seam weld. When compared with the actual machine expansion, the weld joint test was flattened once, so the distortion at the time of cracking could not be evaluated accurately, but the distortion of the test machine was confirmed to match the actual machine well.

Figure 2008232823
Figure 2008232823

表2は製品寸法φ1219×20t、強度870MPaおよびφ1016×19t、強度930MPaの拡管前の溶接鋼管に対して、セグメント曲率半径が製品半径と異なる範囲、およびその曲率半径の値を変化させ試験を行なった結果である。比較例1、2、5、6はセグメント曲率半径が製品半径と比較し80%以上あるいは30%以下である。また比較例3、4、7、8はセグメント曲率半径が製品半径と異なる範囲がシーム溶接部左右両側の30°以内あるいは60°以上であり、いずれも実機拡管と異なり割れがシーム溶接部から発生しない。   Table 2 shows the range in which the segment radius of curvature differs from the product radius and the value of the radius of curvature of the welded steel pipe before product expansion with product dimensions of φ1219 × 20t, strength of 870MPa and φ1016 × 19t, strength of 930MPa. It is a result. In Comparative Examples 1, 2, 5, and 6, the segment curvature radius is 80% or more or 30% or less compared to the product radius. In Comparative Examples 3, 4, 7, and 8, the range in which the segment curvature radius differs from the product radius is within 30 ° or 60 ° or more on the left and right sides of the seam weld. do not do.

Figure 2008232823
Figure 2008232823

本発明によれば、真円度を高めるための拡管工程、油井内で拡管される油井管、内圧によるラインパイプの破壊など、鋼管の拡管時における母材及び溶接部の引張特性、特に、歪み−強度曲線を精度良く測定することができる。したがって、拡管に伴う割れの発生の原因を、簡便に特定することが可能である。   According to the present invention, the tensile properties of the base metal and the welded part during the expansion of the steel pipe, such as the pipe expansion process for increasing the roundness, the oil well pipe expanded in the oil well, the line pipe breaking due to the internal pressure, in particular, -The intensity curve can be measured with high accuracy. Therefore, it is possible to easily identify the cause of the occurrence of cracks associated with tube expansion.

拡管機の模式図である。It is a schematic diagram of a pipe expander. 本発明の実施の形態にかかる試験機を示す模式図であり、(A)は環状試験体1の溶接部2を上から見た平面図、(A)は環状試験体1の内部に取り付けられた試験機を正面から見た正面図、(C)は溶接部用治具3と環状試験体1の部分拡大図である。BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS It is a schematic diagram which shows the testing machine concerning embodiment of this invention, (A) is the top view which looked at the welding part 2 of the cyclic | annular test body 1 from the top, (A) is attached inside the cyclic | annular test body 1. FIG. FIG. 2C is a partially enlarged view of the welding part jig 3 and the annular specimen 1. 本発明の試験機の溶接部用治具の模式図であり、左右線対称の形状をなす溶接部用治具の左半分部のみを示している。It is a schematic diagram of the jig for welding parts of the testing machine of this invention, and has shown only the left half part of the jig for welding parts which makes a left-right symmetric shape. 本発明の分離可能な溶接部対向治具の模式図である。It is a schematic diagram of the separable welding part opposing jig | tool of this invention. 拡管機による拡管率と本発明の試験機の変位を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the pipe expansion rate by a pipe expander, and the displacement of the testing machine of this invention. 拡管機及び本発明の試験機による拡管後の歪み分布を示す図である。It is a figure which shows the distortion distribution after the pipe expansion by the pipe expander and the testing machine of this invention.

符号の説明Explanation of symbols

1:環状試験体
2:溶接部
3:溶接部用治具
3a:溶接部対向治具
3b:溶接部用基盤治具
4:溶接部対向溝
5:母材用治具
6:ボルト
7:駆動部
8:荷重計
9:変位計
10:歪み計
11:歪みゲージ
1: Annular specimen 2: Welded portion 3: Welded portion jig 3a: Welded portion facing jig 3b: Welded portion base jig 4: Welded portion facing groove 5: Base material jig 6: Bolt 7: Drive Part 8: Load meter 9: Displacement meter 10: Strain meter 11: Strain gauge

Claims (4)

環状試験体の内部に対向する部位が弧状である母材用治具及び溶接部用治具と、該母材用治具及び該溶接部用治具を相反する方向に直進させる駆動部からなり、前記溶接部用治具の頂部に溶接部対向溝を設け、該溶接部対向溝の両側に隣接して形成される溶接部用治具中央部の曲率半径Rcと、該溶接部用治具中央部の外側に隣接して形成される溶接部用治具端部の曲率半径Rsが、
0.3Rc≦Rs≦0.8Rc
を満足し、前記溶接部用治具中央部が、曲率半径Rcの中心を基準として、前記溶接部対向溝の中心の両側にそれぞれ30〜60°の範囲に形成されていることを特徴とする、溶接鋼管の拡管割れ評価装置。
A base material jig and a welding part jig that are arc-shaped in a portion facing the inside of the annular test body, and a drive part that linearly moves the base material jig and the welding part jig in opposite directions. A welding portion facing groove on the top of the welding portion jig, and a radius of curvature Rc at the center of the welding portion jig formed adjacent to both sides of the welding portion facing groove, and the welding portion jig. The curvature radius Rs of the jig end portion for welding formed adjacent to the outside of the center portion is
0.3Rc ≦ Rs ≦ 0.8Rc
And the weld jig center part is formed in a range of 30 to 60 ° on both sides of the center of the weld-facing groove with respect to the center of the radius of curvature Rc. , Expansion crack evaluation equipment for welded steel pipes.
前記曲率半径Rcの中心を基準として、前記溶接部対向溝の中心の両側にそれぞれ10°〜30°の範囲において、該溶接部用治具中央部の表面に分離可能な溶接部対向治具を設けたことを特徴とする、請求項1に記載の溶接鋼管の拡管割れ評価装置。   With reference to the center of the curvature radius Rc, a welding part facing jig that can be separated on the surface of the center part of the welding part jig in a range of 10 ° to 30 ° on both sides of the center of the welding part facing groove. The expansion crack evaluation apparatus for welded steel pipes according to claim 1, wherein the apparatus is provided. 請求項1又は2に記載の拡管割れ評価装置に、環状試験体の溶接部を溶接部対向溝に対向させて設置し、溶接部用治具と母材用治具を相反する方向に移動させながら、前記母材用治具及び前記溶接部用治具の間に作用する荷重及び変位を測定することを特徴とする、溶接鋼管の拡管割れ評価方法。   In the pipe expansion crack evaluation apparatus according to claim 1 or 2, the welded portion of the annular test body is installed facing the groove facing the welded portion, and the welded portion jig and the base material jig are moved in opposite directions. However, a method for evaluating the expansion crack of a welded steel pipe, comprising measuring a load and a displacement acting between the base material jig and the welding part jig. 環状試験体の溶接部もしくはその近傍に歪み計測手段を設け、溶接部の歪みを測定することを特徴とする、請求項3に記載の溶接鋼管の拡管割れ評価方法。   The method for evaluating expansion cracks in a welded steel pipe according to claim 3, wherein a strain measuring means is provided at or near the welded portion of the annular test body to measure the strain at the welded portion.
JP2007072808A 2007-03-20 2007-03-20 Expanded pipe crack evaluation device of welded steel pipe, and expanded pipe crack evaluation method Withdrawn JP2008232823A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2007072808A JP2008232823A (en) 2007-03-20 2007-03-20 Expanded pipe crack evaluation device of welded steel pipe, and expanded pipe crack evaluation method

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2007072808A JP2008232823A (en) 2007-03-20 2007-03-20 Expanded pipe crack evaluation device of welded steel pipe, and expanded pipe crack evaluation method

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2008232823A true JP2008232823A (en) 2008-10-02

Family

ID=39905799

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2007072808A Withdrawn JP2008232823A (en) 2007-03-20 2007-03-20 Expanded pipe crack evaluation device of welded steel pipe, and expanded pipe crack evaluation method

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP2008232823A (en)

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2019124474A (en) * 2018-01-12 2019-07-25 日本製鉄株式会社 Expanded tube evaluation method and expanded tube evaluation metal mold
JP2019124475A (en) * 2018-01-12 2019-07-25 日本製鉄株式会社 Expanded tube evaluation method, expanded tube evaluation metal mold and expanded tube evaluation tube
CN113190789A (en) * 2021-04-29 2021-07-30 中国石油天然气集团有限公司 Gas pipeline crack propagation speed calculation method
CN113654904A (en) * 2017-06-20 2021-11-16 威尔德尔格管道科技有限公司 Pipe testing method and apparatus

Cited By (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN113654904A (en) * 2017-06-20 2021-11-16 威尔德尔格管道科技有限公司 Pipe testing method and apparatus
JP2019124474A (en) * 2018-01-12 2019-07-25 日本製鉄株式会社 Expanded tube evaluation method and expanded tube evaluation metal mold
JP2019124475A (en) * 2018-01-12 2019-07-25 日本製鉄株式会社 Expanded tube evaluation method, expanded tube evaluation metal mold and expanded tube evaluation tube
JP7102737B2 (en) 2018-01-12 2022-07-20 日本製鉄株式会社 Evaluation method of pipe expansion, mold for pipe expansion evaluation
JP7102738B2 (en) 2018-01-12 2022-07-20 日本製鉄株式会社 Evaluation method for pipe expansion, mold for pipe expansion evaluation, evaluation pipe for pipe expansion
CN113190789A (en) * 2021-04-29 2021-07-30 中国石油天然气集团有限公司 Gas pipeline crack propagation speed calculation method
CN113190789B (en) * 2021-04-29 2024-04-09 中国石油天然气集团有限公司 Gas pipeline crack propagation speed calculation method

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN101581200A (en) 120 steel grade drill pipe and manufacturing process method thereof
JP5086615B2 (en) Life evaluation method by creep elongation of high strength steel weld and life evaluation method of high strength steel weld
CN101403450A (en) Method of manufacturing lined tubing
JP2008232823A (en) Expanded pipe crack evaluation device of welded steel pipe, and expanded pipe crack evaluation method
Jiao et al. Fatigue behavior of very high strength (VHS) circular steel tube to plate T-joints under in-plane bending
WO2001094043A1 (en) High-strength steel pipe excellent in formability and burst characteristics
CN102407425A (en) Method for manufacturing ventilated steel tube made of hull steel
JP4903635B2 (en) UOE steel pipe with excellent deformability for line pipe
Igi et al. Strain Capacity of 48" OD X80 Pipeline in Pressurized Full-scale Bending Test
JPWO2016104706A1 (en) Manufacturing method of widened metal tube
JP2009222652A (en) Expansive property evaluation testing device and expansive property evaluation testing method
Reggiani et al. Comparison of experimental methods to evaluate seam welds quality in extruded profiles
KR101195733B1 (en) Method for evaluating fatigue property of t-joint portion at t-type welding joint structure
JP5145987B2 (en) Metal part processing method and metal part processing apparatus
JP2008105062A (en) Manufacturing method of electric welded tube having excellent characteristic of weld zone
JPH0933417A (en) Test method determining circumferential strength of steel pipe and test piece therefor
Kychma et al. Estimation of the pipelines working capacity basing on the results of semimode testing
JP5737217B2 (en) Test jig, stress tester and stress test method for arc specimen
Rodrigues et al. Measurement of residual stresses in UOE-saw line pipes
CN102407247A (en) Manufacturing method of steel longitudinal submerged arc welding steel pipe for high-temperature and high-pressure boiler
CN102407424A (en) Method for manufacturing steel tube made of low-temperature building structural steel
Marines-Garcia et al. Girth Weld Joints From Long Upset Pipe Ends for Improving Fatigue Strength of Offshore Oil and Gas Pipelines
KR100570730B1 (en) Optimization of reduction distribution in the two step tube drawing
Igi et al. Strain Capacity of 48-OD X80 Pipeline in Pressurized Full-scale Bending Test
KR20080102790A (en) Fatigue tester for pipe material

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A300 Withdrawal of application because of no request for examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A300

Effective date: 20100601