JP2008172116A - Reactor magnetic core and reactor - Google Patents

Abstract

<P>PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide an annular reactor magnetic core and a reactor using a plural gap structure, wherein a shape of each magnetic core part is optimized and an increase of copper loss is minimized. <P>SOLUTION: The annular reactor magnetic core comprises: two magnetic core continual parts 5 opposed to each other; and a plurality of magnetic core leg parts 6 disposed between the magnetic core continual parts 5. The magnetic core continual part 5 has a projection part 2 directing to the magnetic core leg part 6, and the magnetic core leg part 6 is formed with a gap G between the magnetic core leg parts 6 and the magnetic core continual parts 5 and is constituted of n (n: an integer of 3 or over) pieces of magnetic core blocks 3. Further, a ratio A/B of a length A of the projection part 2 of the magnetic core continual part 5 to a mean length B in a magnetic path direction of the magnetic core block 3 is 0.3 to 4.0. <P>COPYRIGHT: (C)2008,JPO&INPIT

Description

  The present invention relates to a power supply circuit, particularly to a reactor magnetic core and a reactor used in a hybrid vehicle.

  The magnetic core of the power circuit reactor can be roughly divided into three. In the region of several tens of kHz or less, silicon steel plates, amorphous soft magnetic ribbons, nanocrystalline soft magnetic ribbons, etc. are mainly used as magnetic core materials. These magnetic core materials are mainly composed of iron, and have the advantages of high saturation magnetic flux density Bs and magnetic permeability μ, but silicon steel sheet has the disadvantage of high frequency magnetic core loss, and amorphous soft magnetic ribbon and nanocrystalline material. The soft magnetic ribbon has a defect that its magnetic core shape is restricted to a wound core shape or a laminated magnetic core shape and is difficult to be formed into various shapes such as ferrite described later.

  In the region of several tens of kHz or more, ferrite cores typified by Mn-Zn and Ni-Zn are widely used. Since this ferrite core has a small high-frequency core loss and is relatively easy to mold, it has the feature that various shapes can be mass-produced. However, since the saturation magnetic flux density Bs is only about one-quarter to one-half that of the above-mentioned silicon steel sheet, amorphous soft magnetic ribbon, and nanocrystalline soft magnetic ribbon, to avoid magnetic saturation in a high-current reactor. In addition, the magnetic core cross-sectional area increases.

  A dust core is used in a region from several kHz to several hundred kHz. The dust core is formed by subjecting the surface of the magnetic powder to insulation treatment and then processing, and generation of eddy current loss is suppressed by the insulation treatment.

  Recently, a hybrid vehicle that has begun to spread rapidly has a high-output electric motor, and a power circuit for driving the motor uses a reactor that can withstand a high voltage and a large current. There is a strong demand for miniaturization, low noise and low loss in this reactor, and the magnetic properties of the magnetic core material used in the reactor are required to have a high saturation magnetic flux density Bs and an appropriate range of permeability μr. The appropriate range of permeability μr here will be described below. The magnetic field H and the magnetic flux density B have a relationship of B = μoμrH. Here, μo represents the magnetic permeability in vacuum, and the magnetic field H is proportional to the current flowing through the reactor. For this reason, in a magnetic core material having a high magnetic permeability, even when a small reactor current is reached, the saturation magnetic flux density Bs is reached and the magnetic core is saturated. Therefore, conventionally, a magnetic material with a high saturation magnetic flux density Bs is used as the reactor magnetic core material, and a gap is provided in this magnetic core material to reduce the effective magnetic permeability (effective magnetic permeability) μre, which is necessary by adjusting the number of windings. Designed to obtain a good inductance. The practical effective permeability μre in this application is in the range of approximately 10 to 50, and the above-described dust core is preferably used.

  A magnetic material having a high saturation magnetic flux density Bs and a low loss is used for the reactor core for high current. In general, a magnetic material having a high saturation magnetic flux density Bs and a low loss has a high magnetic permeability, and therefore a gap (air gap) is provided when used for a reactor magnetic core. Since the magnetic permeability of the member constituting this gap is approximately 1, a fringing magnetic flux is generated in which the magnetic flux leaks outside the magnetic path. For this reason, there is a problem that eddy current is generated on the coil surface in the vicinity of the gap and the loss increases.

  For example, Patent Document 1 discloses an annular reactor magnetic core using a dust core as an example. In order to suppress an increase in loss due to fringing magnetic flux, this reactor magnetic core uses a multi-gap structure with a small gap length per location, and describes a reactor core having a total of 6 gaps. Moreover, there exists patent document 2 etc. as a reactor magnetic core which has a gap of a total of eight places.

Japanese Patent Laying-Open No. 2005-50918 JP 2005-19764 A

Although other applications have been filed for these reactor cores using a multi-gap structure, the shape has not been studied in detail. As a result of the study by the present inventors, when a reactor for a hybrid vehicle is formed of a green compact using soft magnetic powder, a total of eight or more gaps are necessary to obtain at least effective effective magnetic permeability μre. I understood that there was. However, conventional reactor cores and reactors having a multi-gap structure have a problem that magnetic flux leaks from the gap to the coil and copper loss tends to increase. For example, Patent Document 2 discloses a reactor core having a total of eight gaps, but technical considerations for suppressing copper loss have not been made, and there is room for examination.
Therefore, the present invention optimizes the shape of each core part in an annular reactor core and reactor using a multi-gap structure with a total number of gaps of 8 or more (the number of blocks on one side of the core leg is 3 or more). It is an object to provide a device that suppresses the increase in loss as much as possible.

  The present invention is an annular reactor magnetic core comprising two opposing magnetic core joint portions 5 and a plurality of magnetic core leg portions 6 disposed between the magnetic core joint portions 5, wherein the magnetic core joint portion 5 is the magnetic core leg 5. Having a protrusion toward the portion 6, the magnetic core leg 6 is formed with a gap between the magnetic core joint 5 and n (n is an integer of 3 or more) magnetic core blocks 3, The ratio A / B between the length A of the protruding portion of the magnetic core joint 5 and the average length B in the magnetic path direction of the magnetic core block 3 is 0.3 or more and 4.0 or less.

When n is 3, the A / B is preferably 0.6 or more and 2.4 or less.
When n is 4, the A / B is preferably 0.5 or more and 3.5 or less.
When n is 5, the A / B is preferably 0.6 or more and 3.3 or less.

  The reactor core is preferably formed of a green compact including magnetic powder and resin. The green compact preferably has a magnetic permeability of 200 or less.

  It can be set as the reactor using these reactor magnetic cores which wound the coil around the magnetic core leg. It is particularly useful as a reactor for a hybrid vehicle (HEV).

  ADVANTAGE OF THE INVENTION According to this invention, the highly efficient reactor magnetic core and the reactor which suppressed the increase in the copper loss by the leakage magnetic flux of a gap part can be obtained.

The reactor of the present invention forms a protruding portion that protrudes from the magnetic core joint portion 5 toward the magnetic core leg portion 6. The length A of this protruding portion and the magnetic path direction of the magnetic core block 3 that constitutes the magnetic core leg portion 6 are formed. It has been found that an increase in copper loss can be easily suppressed by optimizing the ratio A / B with the average length B.
That is, when the ratio A / B is smaller than 0.3, the return of magnetic flux from one projecting portion (21, 22) to the other projecting portion (23, 24) through the magnetic core joint 1 is stagnant. This increases the amount of leakage magnetic flux in the outermost gap and increases the coil AC resistance. Further, when the ratio A / B is larger than 4.0, a plurality of gaps of the magnetic core leg portions are concentrated in the center because the protruding portion is long, so that the magnetic resistance of this portion increases, and the overall The amount of fringing magnetic flux increases, and the coil AC resistance increases. Therefore, by setting the ratio A / B to 0.3 or more and 4.0 or less, the fringing magnetic flux is reduced, and the eddy current loss generated in the coil can be reduced. By using this magnetic core, a low-loss reactor can be realized.

In the present invention, “the length A of the protruding portion” means, as shown in FIG. 8A, a portion protruding from the valley portion of the magnetic core joint portion which is substantially U-shaped toward the opposing magnetic core joint portion. Length. The protrusion of the magnetic core joint 5a may be formed integrally with the end as shown in FIG. 4, or the end and the protrusion may be separately manufactured and bonded as shown in FIG. Good. When the inner diameter side of the magnetic core joint portion 5b has an arc shape as shown in FIG. 8B, the length protruding from the valley portion 7 farthest from the joint portion at the other end is defined as the length A of the protruding portion. When the lengths (A1 to A4) of the projecting portions of the magnetic core joint portions 51c and 52c are different as shown in FIG. 8C, the average value of the lengths of the projecting portions ((A1 + A2 + A3 + A4) / 4) is the length A of the protrusion.
In the present invention, the “average length B in the magnetic path direction of the magnetic core block” is an average value of the lengths of the magnetic core blocks.

It is preferable that the cross-sectional area of the projecting portion 2 in the magnetic path direction is the same as the cross-sectional area of the magnetic core block 3 in the magnetic path direction. If the cross-sectional areas are the same, it is difficult to generate a leakage magnetic flux in the gap therebetween, and an increase in copper loss can be suppressed.
The cross-sectional area of the magnetic core joint 5 in the magnetic path direction is preferably the same as or larger than the cross-sectional area of the protrusion 2 in the magnetic path direction and the cross-sectional area of the magnetic core block 3 in the magnetic path direction. By forming with this dimension, an increase in copper loss can be suppressed as described above.
The magnetic core block 3 is preferably a rectangular parallelepiped I-type magnetic core block for easy assembly and press molding of the magnetic core. When a trapezoidal shape or the like is applied, the average length B in the magnetic path direction of the magnetic core block is a length along the center of the magnetic path (the center of gravity of the magnetic path cross section).

  As a result of examination, it was found that the optimum ratio A / B varies depending on the number of magnetic core blocks. Although details will be described in the embodiment, when the number of blocks is three, the ratio A / B between the length A of the projecting portion of the core joint and the length B in the magnetic path direction of the core block is 0.6. It is preferable that it is 2.4 or less. The coil AC resistance can be reduced by 30% or more compared to the case where no protrusion is provided at the magnetic core joint (when the ratio A / B = 0). Furthermore, the ratio A / B is preferably 0.8 or more and 2.0 or less. By setting this range, the coil AC resistance can be reduced by 35% or more.

  When the number of the core blocks is four, the ratio A / B between the length A of the projecting portion of the core joint and the length B in the magnetic path direction of the core block is 0.5 or more and 3.5 or less. It is preferable. The coil AC resistance can be reduced by 15% or more compared to the case where no protrusion is provided at the magnetic core joint (when the ratio A / B = 0). Furthermore, the ratio A / B is preferably 0.8 or more and 2.2 or less. By setting this range, the coil AC resistance can be reduced by 20% or more.

  When the number of core blocks is five, the ratio A / B between the length A of the projecting portion of the core joint and the length B in the magnetic path direction of the core block is 0.6 or more and 3.3 or less. It is preferable. The coil AC resistance can be reduced by 13% or more compared to the case where no protrusion is provided at the magnetic core joint (when the ratio A / B = 0). Furthermore, the ratio A / B is preferably 0.8 or more and 2.8 or less. By setting this range, the coil AC resistance can be reduced by 15% or more.

  The reactor core is preferably made of a green compact containing soft magnetic powder and resin. By insulating each soft magnetic powder, it can be set as a reactor core with a small iron loss. As a material for the reactor core, a laminate of known materials such as a silicon steel plate, an amorphous soft magnetic ribbon, and a nanocrystalline soft magnetic ribbon is applied. When these laminates are used, the permeability μr This is because the ratio A / B between the length A of the protruding portion of the magnetic core joint and the length B in the magnetic path direction of the magnetic core block is in a greatly different range.

  Examples of the magnetic powder include pure iron powder, Fe-Si alloy powder, Fe-Al alloy powder, Fe-Si-Al alloy powder, Fe-Ni alloy powder, Fe-Co alloy powder, amorphous soft magnetic powder, and nanocrystals. Soft magnetic powders, etc., and these may be used alone or in combination as appropriate. Since the magnetic permeability μr of these magnetic powder compacts is in the range of 200 or less at the maximum, a highly efficient reactor with small copper loss can be obtained by configuring the reactor magnetic core with the dimensional ratio defined in the present invention. . The magnetic permeability μr is preferably 150 or less, more preferably 100 or less.

  As the resin used in the present invention, the surface of the magnetic powder is coated so that the powders are insulatively provided with sufficient electric resistance so that the eddy current loss for the AC magnetization of the entire magnetic core does not increase. It also functions as a binder for binding powder. Examples of such a resin include various resins such as an epoxy resin, a polyamide resin, a polyimide resin, and a polyester resin, and these may be used alone or in appropriate combination.

  As a method of molding the magnetic core of the green compact used in the present invention, the mixture of the magnetic powder and the resin is once liquefied and then cast and cured, or it is molded by injection molding into a mold. There are an injection molding method, a press molding method in which a mixture of a magnetic powder and an organic or inorganic material is filled in a mold and pressed to mold a dust core.

  The gap G is a portion having a magnetic permeability equivalent to that of the gap, and may be not only an air gap but also a plate-like member made of a nonmagnetic material such as a resin. Positioning can be easily performed by this plate-like member.

  The thickness of the magnetic core joint portion 5 and the magnetic core leg portion 6 is appropriately determined depending on the dimensions of the reactor of the final product and the required reactor characteristics. In a reactor using laminated steel plates, it is necessary to consider such as reducing the lamination direction of each part and reducing the number of laminated steel plates. What applied the green compact like this invention can be designed freely, without considering those concerns. When the reactor core height is h and the width perpendicular to the magnetic path of each part is d, the cross-sectional area s perpendicular to the magnetic path is h × d. In particular, since the magnetic core leg 5 needs to be wound around a coil, it is preferable that the peripheral length of the magnetic core leg 6 is short. Therefore, even if the same cross-sectional area s is obtained, the circumference becomes shorter as the height h and the width d are closer. As a result, the coil to be wound can be shortened, and the cost can be reduced and the weight can be reduced. However, as described above, these dimensional ratios need to be combined with the desired storage properties as the final product.

EXAMPLES Next, although an Example demonstrates this invention concretely, this invention is not limited by these Examples.
(Example 1)
As the reactor core of the present invention, an annular reactor core having the shape shown in FIG. 4 was first created. In FIG. 4, the magnetic core joint 5 is a U-shaped magnetic core including the end 11 and the protrusions 21 and 23, and the magnetic core joint 5 provided at the other end includes the end 12 and the protrusion 22, 24 is a U-shaped magnetic core. The shape of the end 11 at this time is separately shown in FIG. The end portion 11 and the protruding portions 21 and 23 are fixed to form a magnetically integrated magnetic core joint portion 5. The same applies to the end portion 12 and the protruding portions 22 and 24. The end portion 11 and the protruding portions 21 and 23 may be configured as a single unit from the beginning in addition to the case where they are separately configured and then fixed.
Further, each of the magnetic core legs 6 forms a gap G between each of the magnetic core legs 5, and I-shaped magnetic core blocks 31 to 36 are formed in the same size and shape as the protruding portion 21. Three (31, 32, 33 and 34, 35, 36) were connected in series. Further, the I-type magnetic core block 3 of the magnetic core leg 6 is arranged so that gaps G1 to G4 and G5 to G8 are formed at both ends. The gaps G1 to G8 are provided between the respective I-type magnetic core blocks and between the I-type magnetic core block 3 and the protruding portion 2, and although not shown, a plate-like ceramic is used as the gap material. .
The total gap length obtained by adding all the gaps G1 to G8 was 10.8 mm.
Each I-type magnetic core block 3 of the magnetic core joint 5 and the magnetic core leg 6 is obtained by adding 1.5 parts by weight of kaolin and 1.5 parts by weight of water glass to Fe-6.5% Si-based alloy powder. It is compression-molded at a molding pressure of 1200 MPa at room temperature, and then subjected to a heat treatment at a temperature of 1073K in a nitrogen atmosphere. The green compact had a magnetic permeability μr of 50. The distance between the magnetic core joint portions 11 and 12 (the length obtained by adding the protruding portions 21 and 22, the gaps G1 to G4, and the I-type magnetic core blocks 31 to 33) was 87.9 mm.
The ends 11 and 12 of the magnetic core joint portion 5 have opposite shapes to which the projecting portions 21 to 24 are fixed, and the outside is rounded so as to draw an arc along the magnetic path. The end portions 11 and 12, the projecting portions 21 to 24, and the cross-sectional areas perpendicular to the magnetic paths of the I-type magnetic core blocks 31 to 36 of the magnetic core leg portion 6 were all made the same. The dimensions of the end portion 11 are a height h of 32 mm, a vertical width w of 60 mm, a horizontal width d of 20.5 mm, and a curved surface r of the end portion having a radius of 20.5. Moreover, the dimension of the protrusion parts 21-24 is 16.5 mm in length A, and 32 mm in height. The ratio A / B between the length A of the protrusion and the average length B in the magnetic path direction of the I-type core block is 1.0. (Numbers 1-4 in Table 1)

  Moreover, each reactor magnetic core which changed the length A of the protrusion parts 21 and 22 and the length B of each I-type magnetic core block was created. The distance between the magnetic core joint portions 11 and 12 (the length obtained by adding the protruding portions 21 and 22, the gaps G1 to G4, and the I-type magnetic core blocks 31 to 33) is constant 87.9 mm so that the magnetic path length is constant. did. The gap length (the length obtained by adding G1 to G8) was also constant 10.8 mm (5.4 mm on one side). A 76-turn coil of the same wire is attached to the magnetic core leg of this reactor magnetic core, and 7 reactors having an inductance of about 275 μH at a DC superimposed current of 60 A are produced. How the coil AC resistance changes depending on the ratio A / B I compared. Table 1 shows the length A of the protruding portion, the length B of the I-type magnetic core block, the dimension ratio A / B, and the value of the coil AC resistance in each of the compared reactors. The coil AC resistance in Table 1 is obtained by measuring the series resistance of the reactor at a voltage level of 0.5 V and a frequency of 10 kHz using a measuring instrument of Precision LCR meter 4284A (manufactured by Agilent). The AC resistance of only the 76-turn coil was 0.121 ohm. The relationship between the ratio A / B and the coil AC resistance is shown in FIG.

  FIG. 1 shows a graph of the relationship between the ratio A / B and the coil AC resistance in Table 1. From FIG. 1, it was found that the coil AC resistance is minimized when the ratio A / B is near 1.2. When the ratio A / B is in the range of 0.3 to 4, the coil AC resistance is 0.35 ohms or less. When the ratio A / B is in the range of 0.6 to 2.4, the coil AC resistance is 0.3 ohms or less. Further, FIG. 1 shows that the coil AC resistance is 0.27 ohms or less in the region where the ratio A / B is 0.8 to 2.0.

  The magnetic core joint of the above-described embodiment has a circular shape with an outer dihedral surface of R20.5 mm, but the ratio A / B and the coil AC resistance have the same tendency even if the magnetic core joint is a rectangular parallelepiped shape. It was observed.

(Example 2)
In Example 1, it was examined how the relationship between the ratio A / B and the coil AC resistance changes by changing the dimensions of the three I-type magnetic core blocks of the magnetic core leg 5.
As in Example 1, an annular reactor magnetic core was created. As in FIG. 4, the magnetic core joint 5 includes a U-shaped magnetic core composed of 11 end portions and 21 and 23 protruding portions, 12 end portions provided at the other end, and 22 and 24 protruding portions. A U-shaped magnetic core made of
On the other hand, the magnetic core leg portion 6 formed an I-type magnetic core block and three in series with the magnetic core leg portion 6 on one side were used. The I-type magnetic core block of the magnetic core leg 6 was arranged so that a gap was formed at both ends. The distance between the magnetic core joint portions 11 and 12 (the length obtained by summing the protruding portions 21 and 22, the gaps G1 to G4, and the I-type magnetic core blocks 31 to 33) was set to 87.9 mm as in the first embodiment. The gap length (total length of G1 to G8) was also constant 10.8 mm (5.4 mm on one side).
Other dimensions, materials of the magnetic core joint portion 5 and the magnetic core leg portion 6, the manufacturing method, and the like are the same as those in the first embodiment.
FIG. 6 schematically shows the arrangement of the projecting portions 21 and 22 and the I-type magnetic core blocks 31 to 36 of the reactor magnetic core. There are gaps between the protrusions and the I-type core blocks and between the I-type core blocks.
In FIG. 6 (2-1), the length ratio of the I-type magnetic core blocks 31, 32, 33 is 1.5: 1.0: 1.5. In FIG. 6 (2-2), the length ratio of the I-type magnetic core blocks 31, 32, 33 is 1.0: 1.5: 1.0. In FIG. 6 (2-3), the length ratio of the I-type magnetic core blocks 31, 32, 33 is 1.0: 1.2: 1.44.
Table 2 shows the dimensional ratio of each I-type magnetic core block 31, 32, 33, the ratio A / B, and the value of the coil AC resistance. The length B of the I-type magnetic core block is an average length of the respective I-type magnetic core blocks 31, 32, 33, and is obtained by dividing the total I-type magnetic core block length by the number of blocks.
In the table, number 2-1 is the one shown in FIG. 6 (2-1), in which the blocks on both sides are made 1.5 times larger than the center block among the three I-type magnetic core blocks, number 2-2 Is the one shown in FIG. 6 (2-2) in which the central block of the three I-type magnetic core blocks is 1.5 times larger than the blocks on both sides, and reference numeral 2-3 denotes the three I-type magnetic cores. FIG. 6 (2-3) shows the block enlarged by 1.2 times in order from one side.
Others were the same as in Example 1, and a 76-turn coil of the same wire material was attached to the core leg of the reactor core to produce a reactor having an inductance of about 275 microH when the DC superimposed current was 60 A, and the ratio A / A comparison was made as to how the coil AC resistance changed by B.
FIG. 2 shows a graph obtained by superimposing the results of Table 2 on FIG.

  As can be seen from FIG. 2, changing the dimensions of each I-type magnetic core block does not affect the relationship between the ratio A / B and the coil AC resistance. From this, it can be seen that, in order to reduce the coil AC resistance, even if each I-type magnetic core block of the magnetic core leg is appropriately changed, the effect is not so much obtained, and it is important to control the ratio A / B. It is preferable in terms of molding that each I-type magnetic core block has the same length as much as possible. It is preferable to suppress the length error of all I-type magnetic core blocks within a range of 20%, or even 10%. In addition, since the entire reactor magnetic core approaches a point-symmetric shape, there is an effect of reducing noise.

(Example 3)
The influence of the number of I-type magnetic core blocks of the magnetic core leg 6 on the relationship between the ratio A / B and the coil AC resistance was examined.
A schematic diagram of the used annular reactor magnetic core is shown in FIG. Similarly to the first embodiment, the magnetic core joint 5 includes a U-shaped magnetic core composed of 11 end portions and 21 and 23 protruding portions, 12 end portions provided at the other ends, and 22 and 24 protruding portions. It is a U-shaped magnetic core consisting of parts.
On the other hand, the magnetic core leg 6 used was one in which three to five I-type magnetic core blocks were arranged in series on one magnetic core leg 6 (FIGS. 7A to 7C). The length of each I-type magnetic core block was made equal, and the I-type magnetic core block was arranged so that a gap was formed at both ends. The distances between the magnetic core joints 11 and 12 (projections 21 and 22, gaps (not shown), length obtained by adding the I-type magnetic core blocks 31 to 40 in each magnetic leg) are the same as in the first embodiment. Similarly, it was 87.9 mm. Each gap length was also constant 10.8 mm (5.4 mm on one side).
Other dimensions, materials of the magnetic core joint portion 5 and the magnetic core leg portion 6, the manufacturing method, and the like are the same as those in the first embodiment.
In the same manner as in Example 1, a 76-turn coil of the same wire is attached to the core leg of this reactor magnetic core to produce a reactor having an inductance of about 275 microH when the DC superimposed current is 60 A, and the ratio A / B We compared how the coil AC resistance changes.
Table 3 shows the ratio A / B and the value of the coil AC resistance. Moreover, the graph is shown in FIG.

As shown in FIG. 3, it can be seen that the coil AC resistance decreases as the number of I-type magnetic core blocks increases. Further, it can be seen that as the number of I-type magnetic core blocks increases, the value of the ratio A / B in which the coil AC resistance decreases becomes larger.
When the number of I-type core blocks is three, the range of the ratio A / B between the length A of the projecting portion of the core joint and the length B in the magnetic path direction of the I-type core block is 0.3. If it is 4.0 or less, the coil AC resistance can be reduced by 15% or more compared to the case where no protrusion is provided at the magnetic core joint (when the ratio A / B = 0). Further, if the range of the ratio A / B is 0.6 or more and 2.4 or less, it is 25% or more of the coil as compared with the case where no protrusion is provided in the magnetic core joint (when the ratio A / B = 0). AC resistance can be reduced. Furthermore, if the ratio A / B is 0.8 or more and 2.0 or less, the coil AC resistance can be reduced by 30% or more.
When the number of I-type magnetic core blocks is four, the range of the ratio A / B between the length A of the protruding portion of the magnetic core joint and the magnetic path direction length B of the I-type magnetic core block is 0. If it is .3 or more and 4.0 or less, the coil AC resistance can be reduced by 10% or more compared to the case where no protrusion is provided in the magnetic core joint (when the ratio A / B = 0). Furthermore, if the ratio A / B is in the range of 0.5 to 3.5, the coil AC resistance can be reduced by 15% or more. Furthermore, if the ratio A / B is in the range of 0.8 to 2.2, the coil AC resistance can be reduced by 20% or more.
When the number of I-type magnetic core blocks is five, the range of the ratio A / B between the length A of the protruding portion of the magnetic core joint and the magnetic path direction length B of the I-type magnetic core block is 0. If it is .3 or more and 4.0 or less, the coil AC resistance can be reduced by 7% or more as compared with the case where no protrusion is provided in the magnetic core joint (when the ratio A / B = 0). Furthermore, if the range of ratio A / B is 0.6 or more and 3.3 or less, coil alternating current resistance can be reduced 13% or more. Furthermore, if the ratio A / B is 0.8 or more and 2.8 or less, the coil AC resistance can be reduced by 15% or more.

  When the number of I-type magnetic core blocks is six or more, the ratio A / B may be set in the same range as when the number of I-type magnetic core blocks is five. However, increasing the number of I-type magnetic core blocks causes an increase in processing cost, so it is preferable that the number of I-type magnetic core blocks be substantially within five.

Example 4
When the same examination as in Examples 1 to 3 was verified using magnetic field analysis software, a difference occurred in the value of the coil AC resistance, but the magnitude relationship between the coil AC resistance and the ratio A / B was correlated. It was confirmed that
Other soft magnetic powders (pure iron powder, Fe-Al alloy powder, Fe-Si-Al alloy powder, Fe-Ni alloy powder, Fe-Co alloy powder, amorphous soft magnetic powder, nanocrystalline soft magnetic powder ) Was used, and the relationship between the coil AC resistance and the ratio A / B was analyzed with the magnetic field analysis software. Although there was a slight difference in the value of the coil AC resistance, the ratio A / B and the coil AC resistance Similar results were obtained for the magnitude relationship. When the green compact is used for the annular reactor magnetic core, it is desirable that the ratio A / B is within the range of the present invention regardless of which of the above alloy powders is used.

It is a characteristic view which shows the relationship between the coil alternating current resistance and ratio A / B of the reactor which concerns on this invention. It is a characteristic view which shows the relationship between coil alternating current resistance and ratio A / B when the dimension of each I-type magnetic core block in a reactor is changed. It is a characteristic view which shows the relationship between coil alternating current resistance and ratio A / B when the number of I type magnetic core blocks is changed. It is a figure which shows the whole magnetic core of the reactor which concerns on this invention. It is a figure which shows the magnetic core joint part of the reactor which concerns on this invention. It is a schematic diagram which shows the dimensional relationship of the magnetic core of a reactor. It is a schematic diagram of each reactor magnetic core from which the number of magnetic core blocks differs. It is a schematic diagram for demonstrating the protrusion part of a magnetic core joint part.

Explanation of symbols

DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 11, 12: End part, 21-24: Projection part, 31-40: I-type magnetic core block, G: Gap, 5: Magnetic core joint part, 6: Magnetic core leg part, 7, Valley part

Claims (8)

An annular reactor core composed of two opposing magnetic core joints 5 and a plurality of magnetic core legs 6 disposed between the magnetic core joints 5,
The magnetic core joint 5 has a protruding portion toward the magnetic core leg 6,
The magnetic core leg portion 6 is formed with a gap between the magnetic core joint portion 5 and n (n is an integer of 3 or more) magnetic core blocks,
A reactor in which a ratio A / B between the length A of the protruding portion of the core joint 5 and the average length B in the magnetic path direction of the core block 3 is 0.3 or more and 4.0 or less. core. The reactor magnetic core according to claim 1, wherein the n is 3 and the A / B is 0.6 or more and 2.4 or less. The reactor magnetic core according to claim 1, wherein the n is 4, and the A / B is 0.5 or more and 3.5 or less. The reactor magnetic core according to claim 1, wherein the n is 5, and the A / B is 0.6 or more and 3.3 or less. The reactor core according to claim 1, wherein the magnetic core joint portion and the magnetic core leg portion are made of a green compact containing magnetic powder and resin. The reactor magnetic core according to claim 5, wherein the green compact has a magnetic permeability of 200 or less. A reactor using the reactor magnetic core according to claim 1, wherein a coil is wound around the magnetic core leg. The reactor according to claim 7, which is for a hybrid vehicle.

Images