JP2008035778A - Chemiluminescent analysis method and analyzer - Google Patents

Abstract

<P>PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To consider the temporal change of chemiluminescent intensity to highly accurately correct and measure the chemiluminescent intensity, and to accurately correct and compare the differences of the chemiluminescent intensity among measurement items, in a chemiluminescent analysis method and its analyzer. <P>SOLUTION: This chemiluminescent analysis method comprises flowing and supplying a solution containing an enzyme substrate on carriers arranged on a flow route and having an enzyme on their surfaces to cause a chemiluminescent reaction of the enzyme with the substrate, temporally optically detecting in a region containing the carriers to perform a chemiluminescent detection, calculating the luminescent decay-correcting curve of the chemiluminescent reaction from the detection results, and correcting the optical detection result in an at least one part of the carriers on the basis of the luminescent decay-correcting curve. <P>COPYRIGHT: (C)2008,JPO&INPIT

Description

  The present invention relates to a chemiluminescence analysis method and a chemiluminescence analyzer. The present invention also relates to a chemiluminescence analysis method and a chemiluminescence analysis apparatus using an analysis device in which a substance that specifically captures a biochemical substance is immobilized on a solid phase. The present invention also belongs to the field of bead arrays in which probe-fixed beads are arranged in a flow path to constitute an analysis device.

  Conventionally, fluorescence methods have been used for highly sensitive detection of biochemical substances. Compared to the previous method using radioisotopes, it was easier to handle and required no safety measures against radioactivity. The fluorescence method includes a method of directly labeling a fluorescent substance to a biochemical substance to be detected and a method of indirectly labeling. Taking fluorescence immunoassay as an example, the former is that the biochemical substance to be detected is directly labeled with a fluorescent substance, and this fluorescently labeled biochemical substance is captured and detected with an antibody immobilized on a solid phase. is there. So-called competition methods are also included in this category. The latter includes a sandwich assay in which an antibody having affinity for the same biochemical substance is fluorescently labeled and then reacted secondarily.

  On the other hand, chemiluminescence has been developed. In the case of chemiluminescence, since scattering of excitation light is not measured as background light, more sensitive measurement can be realized. In the case of chemiluminescence, there are cases where an enzyme is directly or indirectly labeled on a biochemical substance to be detected, and a fluorescent substance is labeled. In the former case, peroxidase or alkaline phosphatase is often used as the enzyme. The so-called Eliza method falls into this category. An antibody that captures a target biochemical substance is fixed to a microplate wall or the like, and a solution containing the detection target substance is added. The substance to be detected in the solution is captured on the wall surface by the antibody, and the excess solution is washed away. An enzyme-labeled antibody against the substance to be detected is added thereto, and after waiting for the enzyme-labeled antibody to bind to the substance to be detected, the excess solution is washed away. Finally, a solution containing a luminescent reagent that reacts with the enzyme is added, and the resulting chemiluminescence is detected. When the fluorescent substance is labeled, for example, in the case of application as an HPLC detector, each fluorescently labeled molecule flowing out from the HPLC is mixed and reacted with a chemical excitation agent, and the labeled fluorescent substance Detects the chemiluminescence emitted by chemical excitation.

  As a multi-detection device using a plurality of carriers, there is a device (hereinafter referred to as a bead array) in which beads to which probes are bound are arranged in a narrow tube (for example, Patent Document 1). There is also a report on a detection device in which a molecule that captures a target substance is bound to a solid phase using a microchannel (for example, Patent Document 2).

Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 11-243997 Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 11-075812 JP-A-8-38195

  When a probe is fixed on a solid phase to capture a substance to be analyzed, labeled with an enzyme, and detected and analyzed by a chemiluminescence method, the resulting chemiluminescence intensity changes with time. For example, a chemiluminescence ELISA method using a microplate corresponds to this system. This change in luminescence intensity is such that the luminescence intensity increases after the luminescent substrate is added, reaches a peak, and then decreases. In typical cases, it takes several minutes to reach the peak from the input of the luminescent substrate. Since various factors overlap in the increase and decrease of the emission intensity, it is difficult to express it with a simple function form, and the form is usually different for each measurement. Therefore, when performing chemiluminescence analysis, measure the emission intensity at the timing when the emission intensity reaches a peak and reach a comparatively gentle curve, and discuss this emission intensity and the amount of the substance to be measured. There are many cases. However, in actuality, the light emission intensity does not change with time, and strictly speaking, the light emission intensity decreases past the peak. Therefore, the light emission intensity measured may vary depending on the measurement timing. Also, the timing of increase / decrease of the light emission height is not the same for each measurement and for each item, but causes an error. Therefore, if the correction conditions for considering the measurement conditions to be substantially the same for each measurement and each item can be set in consideration of the timing such as the start point of the emission intensity change, the measurement results can be compared with high accuracy. Can be realized. Under such conditions, taking into account the change in emission intensity due to the difference in measurement timing, each measurement when the measurement is performed at the same timing and the estimated value of the emission intensity of each item are calculated as correction values. Using this calculated value (correction value), it is possible to accurately compare the emission intensity for each measurement and each item.

  When chemiluminescence analysis is applied to a reaction in a solution, that is, a reaction in a liquid phase, chemiluminescence decays with time (for example, Patent Document 3). When the chemiluminescence reaction in the liquid phase is compared with the chemiluminescence reaction on the solid phase, when the enzymatic activity of peroxidase in the solution is detected and analyzed in the liquid phase by the chemiluminescence method, the change curve of the chemiluminescence intensity May be measured as a relatively simple attenuation without being complicated. Here, the aspect of attenuation of the analysis in the liquid phase is relatively simple, but does not have the same function form. Not only the case where the absolute value of the rate of change monotonously decreases, but also decays with a downwardly convex curve, and other behaviors such as an upwardly convex time-dependent change and a downwardly convex time-dependent change There is. As a result, it is difficult to predict the change according to the elapsed time, and it is difficult to cope with the case where accurate time-dependent data adjustment, that is, correction is attempted. In addition, for liquid-phase analysis, the composition conditions including the concentration reduction due to the reaction of the chemiluminescent substrate solution and the chemiluminescence conditions such as reaction temperature are made uniform accurately for measurement of multiple items using multiple containers. It's not easy. Also, when using the inner marker for correction and calibration comparison, it is possible to use the inner marker by placing the inner marker in the same solution because it measures multiple items using multiple containers. Sometimes it is not. For this reason, it is difficult to easily perform measurement and correction with higher accuracy.

  As described above, there is a problem in that it is difficult to improve the correction accuracy when the emission intensity is corrected in consideration of the temporal change of the emission intensity in the chemiluminescence analysis. On the other hand, when measuring chemiluminescence intensity with a general luminescence measuring device, especially when using measuring means with a difference in measurement timing, such as scanning, there is a difference in luminescence intensity depending on the timing of each measurement. Has occurred. In addition, in the comparison of luminescence intensity between analysis tubes that measure different analysis items and analysis objects at the same time and between each well on the microplate, the time for the change in chemiluminescence intensity between the analysis tubes and between each well on the microplate Since the dependence is not uniform, for example, even if means such as a CCD camera is used, it is theoretically difficult to compare the emission intensities and accurately correct and calibrate between them.

  An object of the present invention is to provide a chemiluminescence analysis method and apparatus for correcting and measuring the chemiluminescence intensity with high accuracy in consideration of the temporal change of the chemiluminescence intensity. As a result of correcting with high accuracy, the sensitivity can be improved. It is also an object to accurately calibrate the difference in emission intensity between measurement items so that the emission intensity can be compared.

  In the present invention, as a means for solving the above-mentioned problem, first, a solution containing an enzyme substrate is continuously flowed into a plurality of regions where the enzyme exists, which are installed in the flow path, and the enzyme, the substrate, The chemiluminescence reaction is caused to occur, and the region is optically detected over time to detect chemiluminescence. Further, an emission decay curve is calculated using at least a part of the chemiluminescence optical detection results from the plurality of regions, and at least a part of the chemiluminescence optical detection results from the plurality of regions is used as the emission decay curve. Correct based on.

  As an example, the analyzer according to the present invention supplies a flow path holding unit that holds a flow path including a plurality of solid phase regions to which an enzyme is fixed, and a solution containing the enzyme substrate flowing through the flow path. A solution supply unit that performs optical detection of a chemiluminescence reaction between the enzyme and the substrate, a calculation unit that calculates a luminescence decay curve of the chemiluminescence reaction based on a detection result of the detection unit, And a correction unit that corrects at least a part of the detection result based on the emission decay curve.

  The analysis method according to the present invention, as an example, supplies a plurality of solid phase regions arranged in a flow path and fixed with an enzyme while supplying a solution containing the enzyme substrate while flowing the solution between the enzyme and the substrate. A chemiluminescence reaction is caused, optical detection is performed over time for a plurality of regions where the enzyme is present, a light emission decay curve is calculated using at least a part of the result of the optical detection, and based on the light emission decay curve At least a part of the result of the optical detection is corrected.

  According to the present invention, it is possible to realize a chemiluminescence analysis that can be corrected, calibrated, and compared with higher accuracy and accuracy in consideration of time changes. In addition, chemiluminescence analysis with high sensitivity can be realized by adding together accurate signals taking time changes into account.

  In order to correct the chemiluminescence intensity, it is effective to make the change of the luminescence intensity simple and predictable. Further, when measuring a plurality of items, it is necessary to be able to correct each of them accurately. Therefore, a structure in which a probe corresponding to a plurality of items is fixed on a solid phase, a chemiluminescent reaction enzyme is labeled on the probe, and a chemiluminescence reaction is simultaneously performed on a plurality of items in the same solution containing a chemiluminescent substrate. did. A method was adopted in which the luminescent substrate in the chemiluminescent solution was made excessive with respect to the chemiluminescent reaction enzyme, and the chemiluminescent substrate solution was kept flowing relatively to the solid phase by the liquid flow. Since the luminescent substrate is usually consumed by the enzyme reaction, the concentration of the luminescent substrate decreases around the enzyme. Since the molecular diffusion of the luminescent substrate is not sufficient, if the chemiluminescent substrate solution is stopped, the decrease in the concentration of the luminescent substrate around the enzyme cannot be stopped sufficiently. Continuously supplied, it is possible to produce a state in which the concentration of the luminescent substrate around the luminescent enzyme is sufficient and does not change with time.

  Under these conditions, with an appropriate solution flow rate and an appropriate flow path and carrier configuration, the emission curve will not be the traditional complex form of peaking and then decaying, but simply a decaying curve. . At this time, the net emission intensity is time-dependent in the form of a negative power function, that is, y = a × exp (−b × t) (y: emission intensity, t: time, a, b: coefficient). Become. Therefore, if this attenuation curve is taken, the emission intensity at an arbitrary time point can be determined by putting the time when the emission is measured into the attenuation curve. For example, the luminescence intensity 1 minute after the start of introduction of the luminescent substrate can be obtained and corrected by calculation, or the virtual luminescence intensity immediately after the introduction of the luminescent substrate (time t = 0) can also be calculated.

  Even when measuring multiple items, it is possible to align the solution composition, temperature, and the timing of substantial emission start by flowing the same solution, so the time dependence of the emission intensity from each item is absolute. It is similar when the magnitude of the signal amount is excluded from consideration. The time dependence here is similar because the emission intensity at the same measurement time is used as a reference, and the specific intensity obtained by dividing the emission intensity at each measurement time by this reference is the emission intensity of each item. When it is determined from the time change, it means that the time change curves of the specific intensities of the respective items are substantially the same (hereinafter, the similar meanings are assumed to be the same). Therefore, the magnitude of the emission intensity between the items can be corrected with respect to time dependency and appropriately compared. In particular, when measuring a plurality of items sequentially by scanning, the measurement timing differs for each item, and it is effective to correct for time dependency. However, when the chemiluminescent substrate solution is kept flowing relative to the solid phase by the liquid flow, the emission intensity for each item draws an attenuation curve and is calculated by putting the same time into the time of the attenuation curve. By doing so, it is possible to compare the emission intensity accurately. For example, the virtual luminescence intensity immediately after introduction of the luminescent substrate (time t = 0) can be calculated and easily compared. In addition, it is not always necessary to calculate this attenuation curve for all items, create attenuation curves for some measurement items, calculate representative attenuation rates from this, and calculate other attenuation items for other measurement items. Can also be applied and corrected.

  A standard inner marker that is supposed to emit light when the enzyme is immobilized can be arranged in advance in the channel. At this time, if the attenuation curve is created by measuring multiple times only for this inner marker at the time of measurement, the measurement result for the other measurement items can be obtained by measuring the inner marker once or less. What is necessary is just to correct using the attenuation curve.

  In addition, since a plurality of measurement results having different chemiluminescence detection timings can be corrected, it is possible to repeat the detection of the same item a plurality of times and correct the detection results for addition. Addition improves the S / N ratio and improves detection sensitivity. When adding signals having low signal strength, it is necessary to distinguish whether it is a signal or not from noise. When performing measurement by the scan method, it is desirable to use in combination with another means for grasping the position in the flow path where the item expected to emit light exists. If the position where light emission is assumed is identified, the timing of measurement at that position where light emission is expected can be predicted from the start point of the scan and its scan speed, so even if the signal intensity obtained is not sufficient The data corresponding to the measurement timing corresponding to can be mechanically determined as a signal to be detected. In order to grasp the position in the channel of the item that is supposed to emit light, a method of performing image recognition using a CCD camera, or by scanning the light receiving element while irradiating the channel and the carrier with light, A method of estimating the position from the feature can be considered. The position where the light emission is assumed may be determined before or after the light emission measurement separately from the light emission measurement, or may be performed simultaneously during the light emission measurement. When it is performed simultaneously with luminescence measurement, irradiation with light having a wavelength other than the emission wavelength is desirable in order to suppress the influence on the measured luminescence intensity. A method for performing image recognition using a CCD camera, a method for obtaining position recognition by irradiating a channel and a carrier at a wavelength other than the emission wavelength, and scanning them are conceivable. If the position where light emission is assumed is identified, the timing of measurement can be predicted from the start point of the scan and the scan speed, so even if the signal intensity obtained is insufficient, the data corresponding to that position is mechanically detected. It can be distinguished from the signal to be. Conventionally, even if signal measurement is performed a plurality of times, the intensity of chemiluminescence changes with time, and if it is simply added and averaged, an accurate measurement result cannot be obtained. However, in this method, an emission decay calibration curve can be created from changes over time in luminescence intensity such as other items with sufficient chemiluminescence intensity, and this can be applied to other items, so each signal can be matched to the timing of each measurement. Can be corrected. For example, based on the attenuation rate obtained from the emission attenuation calibration curve created for a specific item or the like, each measured value can be corrected to a value at time t = 0, and then added to obtain an average. As a result, improvement in S / N is expected, and highly sensitive measurement can be realized. Even in the case of collective detection as in a CCD camera, there is a similar problem in that it is not possible to determine whether the signal is a signal when the obtained signal intensity is small. In order to solve this problem, a method of recognizing the position of the solid phase that is supposed to emit light by irradiating the flow path and the solid phase with light, and obtaining a signal at that location can be considered. If this operation is performed before or after the luminescence measurement, light of any wavelength may be used. However, if the position of the solid phase is recognized simultaneously with the luminescence measurement, the luminescence measurement is not hindered. Thus, it is desirable to irradiate with a wavelength other than the emission wavelength.

  A highly accurate correction taking into account the temporal change in chemiluminescence intensity will be described below. As major factors that influence the behavior of chemiluminescence intensity change, changes in the amount of luminescent substrate, changes in the amount of luminescent enzyme, and changes in activity can be considered. When the luminescent enzyme is on the surface of the solid phase, it is necessary to consider not only the simple average amount of the luminescent substrate but also the amount in the vicinity of the enzyme on the solid surface. For this reason, it is necessary to consider whether the mass transfer efficiency for supplementing the amount consumed by the luminescence reaction on the solid phase surface from the outside is sufficient. As will be described later, the efficiency of this mass transfer depends on the movement of the solution including the flow path and carrier configuration and flow rate. Changes in the activity of the luminescent enzyme can be attributed to a decrease in activity due to inactivation and temperature dependence of the reaction rate. In particular, in the case of some chemiluminescence, it is necessary to consider the effect that radicals generated by the enzyme reaction attack and deactivate the enzyme.

  Here, in order to compare the mode of the chemiluminescent reaction in the liquid phase and the mode of the chemiluminescent reaction in the solid phase, the situation of the chemiluminescent reaction in the solid phase will be described. First, the change in luminescence intensity when an enzyme is immobilized on the solid phase surface in the chemiluminescence analysis method will be described. In the case of a chemiluminescence ELISA method using a microplate, the emission curve rises gently with the addition of a solution containing a luminescent substrate, reaches a peak, and then decreases. This is thought to be based on the following physicochemical process. When adding a solution containing a luminescent substrate, simply dropping the solution does not move all the liquid that was present in the vicinity of the enzyme on the surface of the solid phase before that. The film having a thin film or a solution having a low concentration of the luminescent substrate is present in the vicinity of the enzyme on the surface of the solid phase. Therefore, the emission intensity immediately after dropping the luminescent substrate is substantially zero or low. As the time elapses, the luminescent substrate diffuses from the region where the luminescent substrate concentration is high (substantially the same as the solution containing the dropped luminescent substrate) away from the region where the luminescent enzyme is immobilized. The amount (concentration) of the luminescent substrate in the vicinity of the enzyme increases, and as a result, the luminescence intensity increases. The rate at which the luminescent substrate is consumed increases as the luminescence intensity increases, but the amount of luminescent substrate per unit time reaching the solid surface by molecular diffusion is larger than the amount consumed per unit time. During this period, the emission intensity increases. As time passes, the amount of luminescent substrate consumed by chemiluminescence and its supply amount are balanced, and the luminescence intensity reaches a peak. At this time, the luminescent substrate concentration on the surface decreases due to the consumption of the luminescent substrate, and the luminescent substrate is supplied with a concentration gradient between the concentration near the surface and the luminescent substrate concentration in the solution away from the surface. Here, since the solution containing the luminescent substrate is supplied from the outside only, the diffusion distance to the solid surface is long and the mass transfer efficiency is poor and unstable. Therefore, even if the amount of the luminescent substrate as a whole is sufficient, it is considered that a phenomenon occurs in which the concentration of the luminescent substrate is greatly reduced and is not stable near the surface where the actual reaction occurs. After the emission intensity reaches a peak, the emission intensity decreases. This is mainly because the activity of the enzyme is reduced and the luminescent substrate is consumed and the luminescent substrate concentration is reduced overall. These factors can contribute to the temporal change of the light emission intensity even when the light emission intensity increases. The decrease in enzyme activity and temporal change in luminescent substrate concentration depend on, for example, the amount of luminescence, so at least the change in luminescence time due to differences in these factors between different tubes and different wells on a microplate. Are never the same. As described above, the chemiluminescence reaction in the solid phase has many factors that change the chemiluminescence intensity with time, and is different from the chemiluminescence reaction in the liquid phase. In the case of the solid phase, the intertwining of the factors complicates the change in emission intensity, makes it not the same, and makes accurate correction difficult by prediction.

  In the present invention, the problem of the conventional method is solved by adopting a method in which a solution containing a luminescent substrate is allowed to flow relatively to a solid phase by a liquid flow in a plurality of regions where an enzyme in one channel is fixed. Resolve. First, the process from when the initial emission intensity increases until it reaches a peak can be substantially eliminated by flowing the solution. By flowing the solution containing the luminescent substrate through the region in the flow path where the enzyme is fixed, the liquid existing in the vicinity of the enzyme on the surface of the solid phase before that can be moved and moved downstream. Therefore, the enzyme comes into contact with the luminescent substrate solution itself at its original concentration, and high luminescence intensity can be obtained. In addition, although the phenomenon that the luminescence increases momentarily immediately after flowing the luminescent substrate is confirmed, since the measurement is performed after this moment point, in this specification, for the sake of simplicity of explanation, the reaction process excluding this event Will be described. By continuing to flow the solution containing the chemiluminescent substrate, it is possible to maintain a higher mass transfer efficiency to the surface of the carrier than when the solution is stopped, and the efficiency depends on the flow rate and structure of the solution. And can be stabilized at a sufficiently high place. The luminescent substrate concentration does not change as the reaction proceeds and is kept constant. Similarly, changes in the concentration of the luminescent substrate can be substantially ignored in the upstream and downstream regions of the luminescent region. Therefore, the solution composition of the luminescent substrate between the regions where the items are located can be made substantially the same and not change with time, and the reaction conditions including the temperature can be made constant. By applying the present invention, the decay curves of chemiluminescence from a plurality of regions can be kept similar.

Under the condition that the concentration of the luminescent substrate is sufficient, when the method of the present invention is used, it is considered that the main cause of the change with time of the chemiluminescence intensity is a decrease in the activity of the enzyme. The decrease in enzyme activity seen in macro is thought to be a decrease in the number of molecules of the enzyme that maintained the activity, so the amount of time change in the activity is a negative coefficient to the amount of enzyme present at that time. Is considered to be proportional. This coefficient is determined by the reaction conditions of chemiluminescence and the amount of generated radicals proportional to the amount of luminescence at that time. Under the conditions of the present invention, since the concentration of the luminescent substance is set to be sufficient, the luminescence intensity is proportional to the activity of the enzyme, and thus shows a negative power time dependence, i.e., y = a × exp It is time-dependent in the function form of (−b × t) (y: emission intensity, t: time, a, b: coefficient). The half-life t _{1/2 at which the} emission intensity is halved can be expressed as t _1/2 = ln 2 / b. The light emission intensity shows such time dependence on the contribution of the net light emission minus the background in optical measurement. According to this method, the main factor of the change in luminescence intensity can be attributed to the temporal change in enzyme activity, and thus the luminescence intensity shows such a simple behavior. Therefore, it is possible to predict a change in the light emission intensity with a simple expression and correct the light emission intensity accurately using the prediction. The effect of this correction is particularly important when the time required for measurement is not negligible compared to the size of t1 _{/ 2} . Moreover, it is important when performing highly accurate measurement even when the measurement time is short.

  The magnitude of enzyme activity and the change in activity over time also depend on the temperature of the reaction. Therefore, it is important for accurate measurement and correction to keep the temperature of the solution containing the luminescent substrate to be sent and the place where chemiluminescence is generated. For the present invention, a solution containing the device and the luminescent substrate is allowed to stand at room temperature, and a chemiluminescence analysis is performed as it is, so that sufficiently accurate measurement and correction can be performed. It is effective to control the temperature. In addition, when the reaction temperature is made constant at various values using temperature control, the magnitude of the enzyme activity itself and the decay rate change simultaneously. When chemiluminescence is performed near the optimum reaction temperature of the enzyme, the highest luminescence is detected, but at the same time the attenuation rate is often large. According to the present invention, even in a situation where the attenuation rate is large and the error is large when comparing the emission intensities without correction, the attenuation in the functional form is observed with a simple expression. Correction is possible. Since accurate correction is possible, it is possible to perform chemiluminescence analysis with high sensitivity by adjusting the temperature to a reaction temperature with high chemiluminescence intensity.

  When using chemiluminescence analysis using the present invention, various combinations of flow paths and areas where enzymes are immobilized are possible. For example, a configuration in which carriers such as beads are arranged in the flow path using the inside of the capillary as a flow path (hereinafter referred to as a bead array) can be employed. In this bead array, mass transfer to the bead surface can be made more efficient by flowing the solution through the flow path. Other than this, a system in which the flow path is filled with fine particles and a system in which the substance corresponding to the analysis item is fixed in order on the inner wall of the flow path and the enzyme is modified to perform chemiluminescence analysis can be considered. .

  When performing a test using chemiluminescence analysis using the present invention, probes to be immobilized are deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA), ribonucleic acid (RNA), peptide nucleic acid (PNA), adenine, thymine, cytosine, guanine, Artificial nucleic acids containing at least one of uridine and inosine, or nucleic acid derivatives are common, but those that can supplement these and complementary molecules such as peptides, glycopeptides, proteins, glycoproteins, polysaccharides or chemically synthesized polymers preferable. However, it is not limited to this. When a nucleic acid probe is used, it can be applied to nucleic acid detection, and when a protein is used as a probe, it can be applied to an antibody test, an antigen test, and the like. For example, it can be applied to food allergen tests, allergen-specific IgE tests, infectious disease tests, chemical substance specific tests, and pollutant tests. Furthermore, probes relating to the sugar-lectin reaction, various receptors, and the like can also be used as probes. Probe designs for DNA-protein interactions and enzyme-substrate reactions such as biotin-avidin reactions are also possible.

  FIG. 1 is a schematic view showing an apparatus used in the first embodiment. Details of implementation will be described later. In this example, an example in which a bead array is used as a device for measuring chemiluminescence by providing a plurality of carriers as a solid phase in a flow path and flowing a chemiluminescent substrate by a liquid flow relative to the solid phase. Show. The bead array 101 is a device in which beads are aligned in a row inside a narrow tube, and a chemiluminescence reaction is performed in the vicinity of the bead surface. A syringe 103 is connected to the bead array 101 on one side via a capillary pipe 102, and the syringe 103 is driven by a syringe pump 104. The syringe and syringe pump function as a solution supply unit that supplies various liquids to the bead array while flowing. A waste liquid tube 106 is connected to the other end of the bead array 101 via a capillary pipe 105. The capillary pipes 102 and 105 also function as a flow path holding unit that holds a bead array as a flow path for various solutions. The beads are accommodated inside the capillary pipe, and the positions of both ends of the array are defined by the stoppers 200 and 201. The chemiluminescence emitted from the beads in the bead array 101 is measured by relatively scanning the entire chemiluminescence measuring optical system 111 in the longitudinal direction of the bead array 101. The light collected by the objective lens 112 close to the bead array 101 passes through the dichroic mirror 118 and the optical filter 117, reaches the imaging lens 113, and forms an image at the position of the optical slit 114. A part of the light selected by the optical slit 114 is received by the photomultiplier tube 115 installed immediately thereafter, and measured as a signal by the personal computer 116. On the other hand, the light component bent by the dichroic mirror 118 passes through the optical filter 119, forms an image on the light receiving surface of the CCD camera 121 by the imaging lens 120, and is measured as a signal by the personal computer 116. When irradiating the bead array 101, an illumination 122 is used. The entire system excluding the personal computer 116 is installed in the dark box 123 in order to block external light that becomes an obstacle to luminescence measurement.

  In this example, a chemiluminescence system using horseradish peroxidase, luminol, and hydrogen peroxide is measured (emission wavelength: 420 nm). A photomultiplier tube 115 is used to measure the chemiluminescence intensity, and a CCD camera 121 is used to recognize the beads in the bead array. Position identification means for identifying the position of a bead, that is, a solid phase on which an enzyme is immobilized, is provided, and position correspondence means for associating the identification result with the luminescence measurement result is provided. A dichroic mirror 118 that reflects light having a wavelength longer than red light is used, and a band pass filter centered at 420 nm is used as the optical filter 117. A red LED (maximum emission wavelength 650 m) is used for the illumination 122 that irradiates the bead array 101 for bead recognition, and a long pass filter that transmits light having a longer wavelength than red light is used for the optical filter 119. The light emitted from the red LED does not reach the photomultiplier tube 115 by the dichroic mirror 118 and the optical filter 117, and therefore does not hinder the light emission measurement. The image of the bead array 101 irradiated by the red LED as the illumination 122 is measured by the CCD camera 121 and image analysis is performed on the personal computer 121. In this image analysis, first, a bead is discriminated from the image of the bead array 101, the number of the bead from the end, and the distance of the bead, particularly the center position, in the scanning direction from the measurement point. Determine. Since the optical scanning system knows the current time and where in the channel the light emission is being measured, it matches the permutation and position recognition information of the beads obtained by image analysis. Thus, it is possible to calculate and correspond to which time the signal when measuring which bead corresponds to the relationship between the signal intensity obtained by the photomultiplier tube 115 and the time. For example, in the graph showing the time change of the emission intensity, the time when the center position of each bead is measured can be displayed on the monitor of the personal computer 121 together. It is possible to determine which beads in the bead array 101 are currently measured by image analysis, and to associate the signal intensity obtained by the photomultiplier tube 115 with individual beads. Luminescence measurement is possible without image data of beads obtained by the CCD camera 121 by irradiation with a red LED. At this time, the measurement timing and the positional relationship during scanning of the entire optical system may be associated with each other.

  FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram for explaining signals obtained from the optical detection system used in the first embodiment. FIG. 2A is a schematic diagram of scanning the entire optical system 111 relative to the bead array 101. In this example, the bead array 101 has a configuration in which beads 131 are arranged in a row in capillaries 132, and chemiluminescence occurs near the surface of each bead 131, and the chemiluminescence is measured. FIG. 2B is a schematic diagram of an image obtained by measuring this with the CCD camera 121. A part of the bead array 101 shown in FIG. 2A is obtained as an image. In this embodiment, the light having the emission wavelength is not measured by the CCD camera 121, and this image is of the wavelength component of red light obtained by being illuminated by the illumination 122. This image can be continuously acquired while scanning to recognize the position of each bead and its center. FIG. 2C-1 shows how the chemiluminescence on the beads 131 is imaged on the optical slit 114 placed in front of the photomultiplier tube 115 and between the photomultiplier tube 115 and the bead array 101. It is a schematic diagram showing whether or not it is selected. In the case of this figure, it is schematically shown that part of the light emitted from the central bead 131 passes through the optical slit 114. In order to distinguish the light emission from each bead while scanning, this optical slit 114 uses an optical slit whose width in the scanning direction is narrower than the width in the scanning direction of the beads. FIG. 2 (C-2) is a schematic diagram showing a signal obtained through the photomultiplier tube 115 from chemiluminescence near each of the beads 131 when scanned. The small downward triangle corresponds to the center position of the bead recognized from the image obtained by the CCD camera 121, and it can be seen that chemiluminescence from each bead 131 is obtained as a signal. In this example, all the beads are scanned in one direction with a constant scanning speed, but this is not necessarily required in actual measurement. That is, the scanning speed may be changed according to the bead and measurement conditions. By adding the position recognition of the beads by image analysis of the image obtained by the CCD camera 121, it is possible to accurately capture a signal even with a low emission intensity. Details of this will be described later.

  The bead array and reaction conditions used in this example are as follows. For the beads, white polystyrene beads (4310A, manufactured by Duke Science, 102 μm) are used. Horseradish peroxidase is used as a chemiluminescent enzyme. For the chemiluminescence reaction, a conjugate with an antibody (anti-mouse IgG antibody-horseradish peroxidase conjugate, manufactured by DAKO) is physically adsorbed to the beads. When a probe (for example, an antibody) that captures a molecule to be measured is bound to the bead surface to capture the molecule to be measured and a sandwich assay is performed with an enzyme-linked probe (for example, an antibody), chemiluminescence analysis should be performed in the following procedure. Can do. In order to block light emission between the beads for analysis and prevent reflection of light emission on the adjacent beads, light-shielding beads are appropriately arranged. As the light-shielding beads, light-shielding beads are used. Here, black polystyrene beads (BK100TA, manufactured by Duke Science, 96 μm) are used. Block ace (manufactured by Snow Brand Milk Products), which is a blocking agent, was physically adsorbed on the surface of the black polystyrene beads and used. A fused silica capillary (manufactured by GL Science) having an inner diameter of 150 μm is used as a capillary for the bead array, and analytical beads and light-shielding beads are appropriately arranged inside the capillary. Here, the chemiluminescence reaction is performed at room temperature unless otherwise stated, and a solution containing luminol and hydrogen peroxide is used as the luminescent substrate. Delivery of the solution containing the luminescent substrate starts at time zero (t = 0)), and continues to be delivered throughout the subsequent chemiluminescence measurement. Describe the speed of liquid delivery.

FIG. 3 is a graph showing the change over time of the signal intensity measured repeatedly for a single luminescent bead in the bead array 101. The luminescent substrate is introduced at time zero, and the solution is continuously fed at a flow rate of 10 μl per minute. The optical system 111 is disposed at a position where light emission from an arbitrary light-emitting bead in the bead array 101 to be measured is not measured at time zero, and then scans to reciprocate across the beads. The scanning speed is 10 μm per second. Each peak in the graph shows the result of luminescence measurement obtained each time the optical system 111 passes through the bead. When the peak maximum values are connected, it can be seen that the light emission attenuates cleanly with time, that is, monotonously decreases. When the curve connecting the maximum values of these peaks is approximated to an exponential function, y = 1.4184 x exp (-0.00068602 x t) (y: signal strength, t: time) and the correlation coefficient is high (R = 0.99885) ). The calculated half-life t _{1/2 in} this example is 1010 seconds.

  The attenuation curve shown in FIG. 3 is similarly obtained for a large number of luminescent beads. FIG. 4 shows an example of measurement of reciprocal scanning for 10 luminescent beads. The beads arranged in the first pass are scanned in order, and the beads are scanned in the reverse order in the first pass. Further, the second pass scans the beads in the same order as the first pass, and the second pass scans the beads in the same order as the first return pass. The luminescent substrate is introduced at time zero, and the solution is continuously fed at a flow rate of 10 μl per minute. Since the liquid feeding speed is sufficiently high, the time (time zero) when the luminescent substrate reaches each luminescent bead may be considered to be substantially the same. FIG. 4A is a graph showing the entire signal obtained in two round trips. The emission intensity pattern is reversed on the forward and return paths, and each is measured twice. Compared to the first return trip, the corresponding peak height of the first outbound trip is lower, compared to the first return trip, the corresponding peak height of the second outbound trip is even lower, and compared to the second return trip, the second return trip The height of the corresponding peak is further reduced, and it is shown that the peak corresponding to each bead is attenuated over time. FIG. 4B is an enlarged view of the first part of the forward path. It can be seen that there are 10 peaks from the luminescent beads (i) to (x), respectively. Although only (vi) is clearly shown in FIG. 4A, it can be seen that each peak appears on this graph four times. Focusing on the intensity change of each peak shows that every peak is similarly attenuated with respect to time. In addition, when performing such chemiluminescence measurements, even if you simply compare the intensity of each peak, the comparison results will differ depending on which measurement timing is selected. Indicates that a highly accurate correction is desirable.

  FIG. 5 is a graph showing the effect of correction in this embodiment. Relative intensities obtained from the data group of the first outbound pass and the first return pass are calculated in two ways, with and without correction, and the relative error values calculated therefrom are shown. In the calculation of the relative intensity, when correction is performed, an attenuation curve with respect to the peak (i) is obtained, the attenuation rate is applied to all the peaks, and the peak intensity at time zero is calculated. The attenuation curve for peak (i) in this case is y = 0.088004 x exp (-0.000609 x t), where each peak value is y (t) and time is t. Specifically, the correction value for obtaining the peak intensity at time t = 0 (time zero) is y (0) = y (t) ÷ exp (−0.000609 × t). This correction value y (0) is obtained for each peak, and the intensity ratio of the peak (i) with respect to the correction value is calculated as the relative intensity with respect to the peak (i) with correction. In the case of no correction, the ratio of the emission intensity of the obtained peak is simply calculated as the relative intensity. The measurement timing of peak (i) is the first on the forward path and the last on the return path, and the decay time is the longest when measuring on the return path. Therefore, the relative intensity with respect to peak (i) is all of peaks (ii) to (x). On the other hand, the value using the light emission intensity in the return path is larger. The relative error is calculated from the relative intensities of the first and backward passes for the calculated peak (i). The relative error is calculated by dividing the difference between the relative intensities calculated for the first pass and the first return pass by the average value of the relative intensities. The fact that the relative error is large indicates that the difference in relative intensity obtained between the first pass and the first return pass is large, and that the relative strength is not accurately measured depending on the order of measurement. As shown in FIG. 5, in the case where there is no correction, the relative error increases as the measurement timing of each peak moves away from the measurement timing of the peak (i), and the error spreads up to a maximum of 24.7%. . On the other hand, when correction is performed, an increase in relative error is suppressed, and the maximum is 4.8%, which is suppressed to about one fifth. As described above, the more the measurement time deviates from the measurement of the reference peak, the higher the correction effect. However, even in the case of a peak close to the reference peak, the relative error is significantly smaller when correction is performed, indicating that correction is effective particularly when high-precision measurement is required. This indicates that correction using this attenuation is effective for highly accurate measurement.

  FIG. 6A shows an example of reciprocal measurement with respect to 10 luminescent beads when the luminescent substrate was stopped after the luminescent substrate was introduced. The bead array used here has the same bead arrangement as that shown in FIG. 4, but is prepared separately. Here, the portions of the first outbound route, the first inbound route and the second outbound route are enlarged and displayed. Unlike FIGS. 3 and 4, it can be seen that when the change of the peak corresponding to each bead is followed, the attenuation curve is not clearly monotonous. That is, it is shown that the light emission intensity increases in the peak of the first return pass with respect to the first pass, and decreases in the second return pass thereafter. This is because the luminescence intensity gradually increases after the addition of the luminescent substrate, as in the conventional chemiluminescent analysis in the system where the luminescent substrate is not fed, for example, the chemiluminescence analysis in ELISA on a microplate. Corresponds to reaching a peak and then decaying. The ratio of peak intensities varies greatly between the first pass, the first return pass, and the second return pass. For example, the peak (i) (ii) (iii) cannot be measured with the same tendency even in magnitude. . In other words, the relative intensity is not accurately measured at all.

  It is shown above that the monotonous decay curves shown in FIGS. 3 to 5 and the correction method using the same require conditions for feeding the luminescent substrate and cannot be applied well when the feeding is stopped. FIG. 6B shows the result of calculating the relative error without correction as in FIG. As shown in FIG. 5, the relative error when corrected is within 4.8%, but when the condition shown in FIG. It can be seen that even if it is small, it is 15% or more. As described above, the correction under the condition of feeding the luminescent substrate enables a highly accurate correction, and this effect can be achieved by a system that measures chemiluminescence by continuously feeding the luminescent substrate. Is shown.

  FIG. 7 is a graph showing the change over time of the signal intensity measured repeatedly for a single luminescent bead in the bead array 101, as in FIG. However, while FIG. 3 shows that the liquid-feeding rate of the luminescent substrate is constant at a flow rate of 10 μl / min, the liquid-feeding rate of the luminescent substrate is changed for each measurement. The flow velocity when each peak is measured is shown in the graph corresponding to the peak. The liquid feeding rate of the luminescent substrate is set in the range of 0.001 μl (1 nl) to 100 μl per minute. Looking at the peak for each feeding speed, it can be seen that the degree of attenuation is the same and constant regardless of the flow rate. In order to obtain a monotonic decay curve and to make corrections using it, it is necessary to pump the luminescent substrate. At least the pumping rate of the luminescent substrate is 0.001 μl (1 nl) per minute. It is shown that it can be in the range of ~ 100 μl. When the liquid feeding speed of the luminescent substrate is increased, the above correction condition is satisfied from the improvement of the uniformity of the chemiluminescence conditions, and the upper limit of the liquid feeding speed is not limited to this.

  FIG. 8 is an analysis of the data of FIG. A decay curve was created based on the group of peaks when pumping at 1 μl per minute, and the peak intensity at each flow rate was corrected and displayed as relative intensity for the decay curve. FIG. 8B shows the full width at half maximum of 8 (A) and the peak. From Fig. 8 (A), the peak intensity tends to be almost the same or slightly decreased at a flow rate of 1 μl / min or less, whereas the peak intensity decreases when the flow rate is increased at 1 μl / min or more. I understand. In addition, it can be seen from FIG. 8B that the half-value width increases and reaches a plateau as the flow velocity is decreased, whereas it decreases significantly when the flow velocity is increased. In this system, it is understood that the liquid feeding speed of the luminescent substrate is decreased when it is desired to increase the sensitivity, and the liquid feeding speed is increased when the resolution between peaks is desired to be improved.

The measurement and correction described above can be applied under conditions other than room temperature. A Peltier and the thermistor were installed in the vicinity of the bead array, and an experiment was conducted in which the temperature was controlled while flowing the luminescent substrate. The liquid-feeding speed of the luminescent substrate was 10 μl per minute. When the temperature control is set to 15 ° C., 25 ° C., 37 ° C., and 50 ° C., a beautiful decay curve is obtained at any temperature, and y = a × exp (−b × t) (y: luminescence) Intensity, t: time, a, b: coefficient). When taken at 25 ° C., the half-life t _1/2 = ln 2 / b ratio at which the emission intensity is halved is 1.086, 0.823, and 0.432 at 15 ° C., 37 ° C., and 50 ° C., respectively. It was. Depending on the temperature, the decay rate changes, but it is shown that correction is possible. In addition, the emission intensity at 37 ° C. was the highest in this experimental range. When the above correction cannot be performed, the change rate of the emission intensity at 37 ° C. and 50 ° C. is large, so that a large error occurs. However, it can be seen that measurement with high accuracy is possible by applying the above correction. On the other hand, by applying the above correction, there is an effect that it is possible to perform an emission analysis with high accuracy, particularly at 37 ° C. where the emission intensity is high. In addition, by applying the above correction, it is possible to perform highly accurate measurement even when the temperature is lower than room temperature and the attenuation rate is small.

  FIG. 9 is a schematic diagram for explaining the second embodiment. This is an example in which chemiluminescence analysis was performed on the bead array 151 using the apparatus of FIG. 1 in which chemiluminescence measurement was also used in the first embodiment. FIG. 9A is a schematic diagram of a bead array. In the bead array 151, a standard light emission measurement bead 153, a light shielding bead 154, and an analysis bead 155 for chemiluminescence are arranged inside a capillary 152. The standard luminescence measurement beads 153 are obtained by immobilizing a luminescent enzyme on the surface of the standard amount beads so that a prescribed amount of luminescence is generated when the luminescent substrate solution is fed. The light shielding bead 154 is a light shielding bead colored in black, and is installed in order to prevent the light emission of the standard light emitting bead 153 and the analyzing bead 154 from being reflected in each other. In this example, every other light shielding bead is arranged. FIGS. 9B and 9C are diagrams showing the correspondence between the scan position at the time of chemiluminescence measurement and the signal intensity obtained at that time. FIG. 9B is a diagram showing the scan position with respect to time. The Roman numerals and triangles on the vertical axis indicate the position of each bead. First, in this example, it is shown that scanning is started from a position away from the position where the beads are present in the bead array, and scanning is performed at a constant speed from beads I to VII. FIG. 9C is a schematic diagram of the signal intensity change obtained at this time. Luminescence from standard luminescence measuring beads 153 (I) and analytical beads 155 (III, V, VII) is observed as peaks, and luminescence is measured from light shielding beads 154 (II, IV, VI). Absent. The triangle above the peak indicates the center position of each bead obtained by recognition by the CCD camera. The light emission from the standard light-emitting bead 153 (I) is particularly small in light emission from the analytical bead 155 (III) and cannot be measured with sufficient intensity. Although the noise is not clearly shown in the schematic diagram for the sake of easy understanding, in reality, a sufficient signal strength against the noise cannot be obtained. 9D and 9E are diagrams showing the correspondence between the scan position at the time of chemiluminescence measurement subsequent to FIGS. 9B and 9C and the signal intensity obtained at that time. Here, in order to improve the S / N ratio of the analytical beads 155 (III), a scanning method in which measurement is repeatedly performed is shown. Standard particles 153 (I) are measured, and then analytical beads 155 (III) are measured repeatedly. Actually, the scanning method shown here was repeated 20 times to measure the signal. In order to calculate the intensity using the signal intensity change curve, the following correction was performed. First, the net peak intensity is calculated by subtracting the peak intensities obtained from the standard luminescent beads 153 from the surrounding background. Next, a decay curve of light emission of the standard light-emitting bead is created using the change in the net peak intensity with time. The attenuation curve obtained here can be described in the form of an exponential function y = a * exp (−b * t) (y: signal intensity, t: time, a, b: constant). Since the signal intensity from the analysis bead 155 (V, VII) is sufficiently high, a sufficiently accurate value can be obtained by correcting the attenuation factor in consideration. When the net peak intensities yV and yVII and the measurement timing are tV and tVII, the values yV (0) and yVII (0) virtually corrected to the time t = 0 by correction are yV (0) = yV ÷ exp (−b * tV), yVII (0) = yVII / exp (−b * tVII). This is a correction value that takes attenuation into account. The intensity comparison with the standard luminescence measurement bead 153 (I) may be made by comparing a with yV (0) and yVII (0). Although the emission intensity from the analytical bead 155 (III) is small, high precision comparison can be performed by performing integration including correction. Since the emission intensity is low, accurate peak determination is inherently difficult, but here we use the bead position determination with a CCD camera to determine the peak intensity at the timing of scanning the bead center from the surrounding background. It can be subtracted and calculated as the net peak intensity. As a result, n = 81 (1 + 4 × 20) values having low emission intensity and affected by noise are obtained. Even if these values themselves are averaged, only the inaccurate values can be obtained because they do not take into account the temporal change of the emission intensity. Therefore, yIIIk (0) where each value is corrected to the light emission value at time t = 0 based on the attenuation curve of the standard light emission measurement beads yIIIk (k is 1 to 81, each measurement timing is tIIIk). = yIIIk / exp (−b * tIIIk) was corrected and averaged to obtain a corrected value yIII (0) = ΣyIIIk (0) ÷ n. Comparison of emission intensity with standard luminescent beads is possible by comparing a with this correction value yIII (0). By this method, it is possible to repeatedly measure a peak having a low emission intensity and substantially integrate it to increase the S / N. With this method, the emission intensity can be accurately obtained even for beads with low emission intensity, and can be compared with the emission intensity of other beads.

  In the embodiments so far, the optical system shown in FIG. 1 is used, the emission intensity is detected using a photomultiplier tube, and the position of the bead is recognized simultaneously using a CCD camera. Is not limited to this optical system. For example, the optical system used in FIG. 1 may be measured only by capturing a signal into the photomultiplier tube 115 without using the dichroic mirror 118, the optical filter 119, the imaging lens 120, and the CCD camera 121. On the contrary, the dichroic mirror 118 used in FIG. 1 is changed to a normal mirror, and the CCD camera 121 is not used without using the optical filter 117, the imaging lens 113, the optical slit 114, and the photomultiplier tube 115. It is also possible to measure with a system using only Further, for example, the dichroic mirror 118 used in FIG. 1 is changed to a normal mirror, the bead array is scanned, the position of the bead is recognized using an image entering the CCD camera 121, and the scan position for each bead is determined. After confirming, remove the mirror and then take the light emission signal with the photomultiplier tube, or conversely remove the mirror first and take the light emission signal with the photomultiplier tube, then install the mirror and position the beads Recognition can also be performed using a CCD camera. It is also possible to set up an optical system that captures the entire bead array using an optical system that uses only a CCD camera, measure the chemiluminescence from the beads after taking an image of the bead array and recognizing the position of the beads. it can. In addition, a system using two photomultiplier tubes as shown in FIG. 10 can be considered. This is a configuration in which the configuration around the CCD camera 121 is changed to a photomultiplier tube with respect to the optical system described with reference to FIG. 1, and is composed of an optical filter 161, an imaging lens 162, an optical slit 163, and a photomultiplier tube 164. Is done. Similarly to the optical system in the preceding stage of the photomultiplier tube 115, the optical system is set so that an image is formed at the position of the optical slit 163, and light is scanned by the optical slit 163 in order to ensure spatial resolution. Block in the direction. In this newly installed photomultiplier tube 164, the position of the bead is recognized instead of the removed CCD. When the bead array 101 is scanned, an image of the bead array irradiated with illumination other than the emission wavelength enters the photomultiplier tube 164 and is measured as a signal. In this case, since a change in signal intensity reflecting the position of the beads in the bead array 101 is obtained, the position of the beads can be recognized using this as in the case of the CCD camera. The system using a CCD camera is easier to recognize the exact bead position because it is an image, but this system using a photomultiplier has the advantage that the device can be constructed at low cost. In addition to the photomultiplier tube and CCD camera described above, a method using another optical element such as a photodiode can also be applied to the correction.

  When this measurement / correction method is applied to a bead array, the beads in the bead array may move a little while the luminescent substrate is fed. For example, when the tip of the optical fiber is fixed close to the bead to be measured and the opposite end of the optical fiber is measured with a photomultiplier tube, the position of the bead may not be constant with respect to the optical fiber. However, there may be cases where accurate measurement is not possible. However, in the case of the scanning method as shown in the embodiment, measurement at the center position is always performed even if the bead is slightly moved, and the fluctuation of the detection result due to this fine movement can be avoided. In addition, accurately measuring the emission intensity by accurately recognizing the position of the beads is also effective for more accurate measurement of the emission intensity.

  Moreover, although the bead array is used as a chemiluminescence analysis object in the examples so far, the present method is not necessarily limited to this structure. Any system may be used as long as the substance to be subjected to chemiluminescence analysis is substantially present on the surface of the solid phase, the concentration of the chemiluminescent substrate is sufficiently high, and the solution is fed. For example, any system may be used as long as the inner wall of the microchannel is used as a solid phase and a luminescent substrate is fed to the microchannel. As the structure of the micro flow path, for example, a structure that performs chemical analysis on the inner wall of a capillary, a structure that performs chemical analysis on the inner wall of a resin microchip manufactured by cutting or die processing, and the like are conceivable. In addition, a system in which fine particles are filled in the flow path and arranged can be applied.

  In these examples, the description is limited to chemiluminescence measurement using peroxidase, luminol, and hydrogen peroxide, but the chemiluminescence reaction system that can be used in this method is not limited to this. . A chemical reaction system generally used in biochemical measurement can be basically applied. For example, a chemiluminescence reaction system using alkaline phosphatase or a chemiluminescence reaction system using luciferin-luciferase can be applied. In this case, an optical filter, a dichroic mirror, or the like of the optical system may be appropriately changed according to each emission wavelength.

  FIG. 11 is a flowchart showing an outline of correction. FIG. 11A shows a correction flowchart of the first embodiment, and FIG. 11B shows a correction flowchart of the second embodiment. As shown in FIG. 11 (A), in the present invention, chemiluminescence is detected while a luminescent substrate is allowed to flow in the flow path, and the luminescence position and the detection signal are made to correspond to each other. A decay curve is created by measuring a change in luminescence intensity from the region (which may be a region), the luminescence intensity is corrected using the decay curve, and the corrected chemiluminescence intensity is displayed. In addition, as shown in FIG. 11B, in the present invention, chemiluminescence is detected while a luminescent substrate is allowed to flow in the flow path, and the light emission position and the detection signal are made to correspond to each other. A decay curve is created by measuring the change in luminescence intensity from a single luminescent region), the luminescence intensity is corrected using the decay curve, the corrected chemiluminescence intensity is integrated, and the integrated luminescence intensity is calculated. indicate. Details are as described in the embodiments.

  FIG. 12 is a diagram illustrating an apparatus configuration related to correction. In this configuration, there is a luminescence measurement unit that detects chemiluminescence while flowing a luminescent substrate in the flow path, an analysis control unit that controls the measurement, an analysis processing unit that processes the analysis, and an output display unit that outputs the result . The analysis processing unit uses a measurement time-measurement position correspondence calculation unit that performs a calculation to associate the measurement time with the measurement position, an attenuation curve calculation unit that calculates an attenuation curve using the measured emission intensity, and an attenuation curve. There is a correction calculation unit that performs correction calculation of light emission intensity. Further, in this configuration, the analysis processing unit has a light emission region recognition unit that recognizes a region that is expected to emit light or a region that emits light, and a measurement time-light emission region that calculates the correspondence between the recognized light emission region and its measurement time. There are cases where either a correspondence calculation unit or an integration calculation unit that performs integration calculation of light from the same light emitting area measured a plurality of times is included. The measurement time-measurement position correspondence calculation unit, the light emission region recognition unit, and the measurement time-light emission region correspondence calculation unit include position identification means for identifying the position of the solid phase region, the position and the detection result of the detection unit. Corresponding position correspondence means and solid phase recognition means for recognizing the solid phase may be included. Details are as described in the embodiments.

The schematic diagram of the apparatus structure used in one Example of this invention. The schematic diagram explaining the signal obtained from the optical detection system used in one Example of this invention. The graph which shows the result of the repeated measurement with respect to the single luminescent bead of one Example of this invention. The graph which shows the result of the repeated measurement with respect to many luminescent beads of one Example of this invention. . The graph which shows the result of having compared the relative error of one Example of this invention by the presence or absence of the correction method of this invention. The graph which shows the result of the repeated measurement with respect to the number of luminous beads on the conditions which stopped the liquid feeding of one Example of this invention. The graph which shows the result of having changed the liquid feeding speed by the repeated measurement with respect to the single luminous bead of one Example of this invention. The graph which shows the result of having analyzed the result of having changed the liquid feeding speed by the repeated measurement with respect to the single luminous bead of one Example of this invention. The schematic diagram explaining the relationship between the scanning of the optical detection system of one Example of this invention, and the signal obtained. The schematic diagram of the apparatus structure of one Example of this invention. The flowchart which shows the outline | summary of correction | amendment. The figure showing the apparatus structure concerning correction | amendment.

Explanation of symbols

101: Bead array, 102: Capillary piping, 103: Syringe, 104: Syringe pump, 105: Capillary piping, 106: Waste tube, 111: Whole chemiluminescence measuring optical system, 112: Objective lens, 113: Imaging lens, 114 : Optical slit, 115: photomultiplier tube, 116: personal computer, 117: optical filter, 118: dichroic mirror, 119: optical filter, 120: imaging lens, 121: CCD camera, 122: illumination, 123: dark box, 131: beads, 132: capillaries, 151: bead array, 152: capillaries, 153: standard light-emitting beads, 154: beads for light shielding, 155: beads for analysis, 161: optical filter, 162: imaging lens, 163: optical slit 164: Photomultiplier tube, 200: S Wrapper, 201: stopper.

Claims (17)

Supplying a plurality of solid phase regions arranged in the flow path and having the enzyme fixed thereto while flowing a solution containing the enzyme substrate,
Causing a chemiluminescent reaction between the enzyme and the substrate;
Optical detection is performed over time for a plurality of regions where the enzyme is present, and an emission decay curve is calculated using at least a part of the result of the optical detection,
A chemiluminescence analysis method comprising correcting at least a part of a result of the optical detection based on the emission decay curve.   The chemiluminescence analysis method according to claim 1, wherein the plurality of solid phase regions are a plurality of carriers.   2. The chemiluminescence analysis method according to claim 1, wherein the solution containing the enzyme substrate is caused to flow relative to the solid phase region by a liquid flow. A flow path holding unit for holding a flow path including a plurality of solid phase regions to which an enzyme is fixed;
A solution supply unit for supplying a solution containing the enzyme substrate to the flow path while flowing;
A light detection unit for optically detecting a chemiluminescence reaction between the enzyme and the substrate;
A calculation unit for calculating an emission decay curve of the chemiluminescence reaction based on the detection result of the detection unit;
An analyzer including a correction unit that corrects at least a part of the detection result based on the emission decay curve.   The analyzer according to claim 4, further comprising position identifying means for identifying positions of the plurality of solid phase regions, and position correspondence means for associating the positions with detection results of the detection unit.   The calculation unit calculates the emission decay curve by approximating the emission decay curve to y = a × exp (−b × t) (a and b are coefficients), where y is the emission intensity of chemiluminescence. The analyzer according to claim 4, wherein the analyzer is characterized.   The analyzer according to claim 4, wherein the light detection unit detects the chemiluminescence reaction by scanning.   The analyzer according to claim 4, wherein the light detection unit is a photomultiplier tube.   The analyzer according to claim 4, further comprising a solid phase recognition unit for recognizing the solid phase.   The solid phase recognition means includes a red light source that irradiates the solid phase with red light, and a solid phase detector that optically detects the solid phase irradiated with the red light. Item 10. The analyzer according to Item 9.   The analyzer according to claim 4, wherein the solid phase is a bead.   The analyzer according to claim 4, further comprising an optical slit disposed between the light detection unit and the solid phase.   5. The analyzer according to claim 4, further comprising a measurement standard solid phase region as a standard of luminescence measurement when optically detecting the chemiluminescence reaction, and a light shielding solid phase region having a light shielding property. .   It further includes an integration unit that performs integration processing on at least a part of the detection result of the light detection unit, and the light detection unit detects a plurality of times for at least one region of the plurality of solid phase regions, The correction unit corrects each of the detection results of the plurality of detections, and the integration unit performs integration and / or average value calculation on the detection results of the plurality of detections corrected by the correction unit. The analyzer according to claim 4, wherein the analyzer is performed.   The solid phase recognizing unit scans light having a wavelength other than the emission wavelength generated in the chemiluminescent reaction, and the light detection unit detects the chemiluminescent reaction by scanning. Item 10. The analyzer according to Item 9.   The analyzer according to claim 4, wherein the enzyme is peroxidase.   5. The analyzer according to claim 4, wherein the solution supply unit sends a solution containing the enzyme substrate in a range of 1 nanoliter per minute to 100 microliters per minute.

Images