JP2007251995A - Multilevel antenna - Google Patents

Abstract

<P>PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide an antenna which operates simultaneously at a plurality of frequencies and of which the size is reduced. <P>SOLUTION: A radiation element of the antenna includes at least one multilevel structure formed from a series of elements (polygons or polyhedrons) in similar geometrical shapes, and the plurality of elements are electromagnetically coupled and divided into groups so as to discriminate each of fundamental elements forming the multilevel structure. In one embodiment, two significant merits are provided that the antenna is capable of simultaneously operating in a plurality of frequency bands and/or the antenna size is remarkably reduced. Thus, multiband wireless electrical operation is achieved, namely, the antenna is capable of similarly operating in a plurality of different frequency bands. <P>COPYRIGHT: (C)2007,JPO&INPIT

Description

  The scope of application of the present invention is primarily in the field of telecommunications, and more specifically in the field of wireless communications.

  The antenna is James C.I. It was first developed near the end of the 19th century after Maxwell established the fundamental laws of electromagnetism in 1864. The invention of the first antenna can be attributed to that of 1886 Heinrich Hertz, which demonstrated the propagation of electromagnetic waves in the air. In the mid-1940s, fundamental limitations of the antenna were shown with respect to reducing the size of the antenna with respect to wavelength, and in the early 60's the first antenna unrelated to frequency appeared. At that time, structures defined only by helices, spirals, logarithmic periodic groups, cones, and angles were proposed for the construction of wideband antennas.

  In 1995, a fractal or multifractal antenna (Patent Document 1) was introduced, which, due to its geometry, operates at multiple frequencies and is small in certain cases. Later, multi-triangular antennas (Patent Document 2) operating simultaneously in the GSM900 and GSM1800 bands were introduced.

  The antennas described herein have their origins in fractal and multifractal antennas, but have some practical properties that limit the operation of the antenna and reduce its applicability in the real environment. To solve the problem.

  Since a fractal object is a mathematical abstract concept including an infinite number of elements, a fractal antenna is strictly impossible from a scientific point of view. It is possible to create an antenna with a shape based on the fractal object incorporating a finite number of iterations. The performance of such antennas is limited to one specific geometric shape each. For example, the position of the band and its relative spacing are related to the fractal geometry, but the antenna is designed to set the band within the correct region of the wireless electrical spectrum while maintaining its fractal appearance. It is not always possible, feasible or economical. First, the effect of truncation implies a clear example of the limitations caused by using a real fractal antenna that attempts to approximate the theoretical behavior of an ideal fractal antenna. This effect deviates from the ideal fractal structure behavior in the lower band, shifts it from its theoretical position relative to the other bands, and in summary, requires a size that is too large for the antenna. This hinders real applications.

  In addition to such practical problems, it is not always possible to deform a fractal structure to provide an impedance level or radiation pattern suitable for each application requirement. For these reasons, we followed fractal geometries and other types of geometries that provide greater flexibility in antenna frequency band location, adaptation levels, and impedance, polarization, and radiation patterns. It is often necessary to

The multi-triangular structure (US Pat. No. 5,697,097) was an example of a non-fractal structure with a geometry designed so that the antenna could be used in GSM and DCS cellular telephone base stations. The antenna described in Patent Document 2 consisted of three triangles joined at their vertices, sized appropriately for use in the bands 890 MHz to 960 MHz and 1710 MHz to 1880 MHz. This was a specific solution for a specific environment and did not provide the flexibility and versatility needed to deal with other antenna designs for other environments.
Spanish patent application number 9501019. Spanish patent application number 9800954. International publication WO 97/06578 of international application.

  The present invention is formed by a set of a plurality of similar geometric elements (polygons, polyhedra) that are electromagnetically coupled and grouped so that each of the basic elements forming the antenna in the antenna structure can be distinguished. Related to the antenna.

  More particularly, it relates to a specific geometric design of the antenna that provides two major advantages: That is, the antenna may operate simultaneously at multiple frequencies and / or its size can be significantly reduced.

  Multi-level antennas solve the operational limitations of fractal and multi-triangular antennas. Their geometries are much more flexible, rich and varied, and just giving a few examples not only provides greater diversity regarding patterns, band positions, and impedance levels, It also allows antenna operation from bands to more bands. Although multilevel antennas are not fractals, they are characterized in that they comprise a number of elements that can be distinguished from one another in the overall structure. To be precise, antennas provide multi-band operation and / or small size because they clearly present multiple levels of detailed structure (the level of the overall structure, and the level of the individual elements that make up it). provide. The origin of these names is also in the above characteristics.

  The invention basically comprises an antenna having a plurality of radiating elements each characterized by a geometry comprising a plurality of polygons or polyhedrons of the same type. That is, the geometric shape includes, for example, a triangle, a square, a pentagon, a hexagon, or a circular and elliptical element as an extreme polygon having a large number of sides, and includes a tetrahedron, a hexahedron, and a prism. , Dodecahedrons, etc., which are electrically coupled to each other (through at least one contact or through a small separation providing capacitive coupling), and these elements are also Are grouped into higher level structures so that polygons or polyhedral elements can be identified. The structures thus generated can then be grouped into higher order structures in a manner similar to that of the base element, and so on, as many levels as the antenna designer desires. A similar process can be repeated until a state exists.

  The name multi-level antenna is exactly due to the fact that the body of the antenna can specify at least two levels of detailed structure. That is, the level of the overall structure and the level of the majority of the elements (polygon or polyhedron) that make it up. This means that the contact range or the intersection range (if it exists) between the majority of the elements forming the antenna is only part of the perimeter or surface of the polygon or polyhedron, or the surrounding area. This is achieved by ensuring the condition.

  A unique property of multilevel antennas is that their radioelectric behavior can be similar in several frequency bands. Antenna input parameters (impedance and radiation pattern) are similarly maintained in multiple frequency bands (ie, antennas have the same level of adaptation or standing wave ratio relationship in different bands), often The antenna presents almost the same radiation pattern at various frequencies. This is exactly due to the fact that it remains possible to specify the majority of the basic elements (homogeneous polygons or polyhedrons) that make up the antenna in its multi-level structure, ie the antenna. . The number of frequency bands is proportional to the number of scales or sizes of multiple polygon elements contained in the main radiating element geometry, or to the number of scales or sizes of similar sets in which the polygon elements are grouped To do.

  In addition to its multi-band operation, a multi-level structure antenna is generally more general than other antennas of a simpler structure (such as those consisting of a single polygon or polyhedron). Has a small size. This is because, due to the empty space between a large number of polygonal or polyhedral elements, the path of current flow in a multilevel structure is longer and more tortuous than in a simple geometric shape. is there. The empty space forces the current to flow through the specified path (the current must bypass the space), and the current travels a longer distance, thus causing resonance at a lower frequency . In addition, the edge-rich and discontinuity-rich structure simplifies the radiation process, relatively increases the radiation resistance of the antenna, and reduces the quality factor. That is, increase its bandwidth.

Therefore, the main characteristics of the multilevel antenna are as follows.
A multi-level geometry comprising a plurality of polygon or polyhedron elements of the same class, electromagnetically coupled and grouped to form a larger structure. In multilevel geometries, the majority of these elements have a range of contact, intersection or interconnection with other elements (if they exist) always less than 50% of their circumference or surface, Clearly visible.
-Wireless electrical movement resulting from geometry. That is, multi-level antennas can exhibit multi-band operation (same or similar in multiple frequency bands) and / or operate at reduced frequencies, which reduces their size Enable.

  In the specialist literature it is already possible to find descriptions of certain antenna designs that make it possible to cover several bands. However, in these designs, multiband operation is achieved by grouping multiple single-band antennas or reactance elements (such as lumped elements such as inductors or capacitors, or pillars or notches, etc.) that force the appearance of new resonant frequencies. Its integrated version) is built into the antenna. In contrast, multi-level antennas are based on their specific geometry in their operation, with respect to the number, position, relative spacing and width of the band (proportional to the number of levels of detail structure). Provides designers greater flexibility, thereby providing better and more varied properties of the final product.

  Multi-level structures can be used with known antenna configurations. For example, a dipole, a monopole, a patch or microstrip antenna, a coplanar antenna, a reflector antenna, a wound antenna, or an antenna array can be used, but is not limited thereto. The manufacturing technology also does not characterize the multi-level antenna, so the most suitable technology can be used for each structure or application. For example, printing on a dielectric substrate by photolithography (printed circuit board technology), die forming on a metal plate (thin plate), die repulsion, etc.

  Patent Document 3 discloses a fractal antenna that is not related to a multi-level antenna, and both geometric shapes are essentially different.

  Further features and advantages of the present invention will become apparent from the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments of the invention, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings. However, the following detailed description is presented for illustrative purposes only and is not intended to limit the definition of the invention.

  In the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments of the present invention, consistent reference numerals are used throughout the drawings, where the same numbers indicate the same or similar parts.

  The present invention relates to an antenna comprising at least one component element in the form of a multilevel structure. Multi-level structures are composed of multiple polygons or polyhedron elements of the same type (eg, triangles, parallelepipeds, pentagons, hexagons, etc., as well as round and elliptical polygons as extreme polygons with many sides) Together with the elements, characterized as being formed by collecting the elements of tetrahedrons, hexahedrons, prisms, dodecahedrons, etc.), where these elements are either through a proximity of a predetermined distance between the elements, Or coupled to each other electromagnetically, either through direct contact. A multilevel structure or shape is clearly distinguished from another conventional shape by the interconnection (if it exists) between its component elements (polygons or polyhedra). In at least 75% of the component elements of the multilevel structure, more than 50% of its circumference (in the case of a polygon) does not contact any of the other elements of the structure. In this way, in a multi-level structure, it is easy to geometrically identify and distinguish most of its basic component elements and present at least two levels of detailed structure. Yes. That is, the level of the overall structure and the level of the polygon or polyhedron elements that form it. The name “multilevel” is exactly due to this property and is due to the fact that it includes polygons or polyhedra of various sizes. Furthermore, a plurality of multi-level structures are grouped and electromagnetically coupled together to form a higher level structure. In a multilevel structure, all component elements are polygons with the same number of sides or polyhedra with the same number of faces. Of course, this property does not hold when multiple levels of multi-level structures are grouped and electromagnetically coupled to form a higher level meta-structure.

  Thus, some specific examples of multilevel structures are shown in FIGS.

  FIG. 1 shows a multi-level element constructed with only triangles of various sizes and shapes. Note that in this particular case, all the elements (black triangles) can be individually distinguished because the triangles overlap only in the narrow region of the circumference, in this case only at the vertices.

  FIG. 2 shows an example of an assembly (assembly) of multi-level antennas having various configurations. That is, monopole (21), dipole (22), patch (23), coplanar antenna (24), coil in side view (25) and front view (26), and array (27). With respect to these examples, it should be noted that a multi-level antenna differs from other antennas in its characteristic radiating element geometry regardless of its configuration.

  FIG. 3 shows another example of a multi-level structure (3.1-3.15) having a triangular origin, where all are composed of triangles. Note that the case of (3.14) is an evolution of the case of (3.13). Despite the fact that the four triangles are in contact with each other, in 75% of the elements (three triangles excluding the central triangle), more than 50% of the circumference is free.

  FIG. 4 shows multi-level structures (4.1 to 4.14) formed by parallelepipeds (square, rectangle, diamond ...). Note that the component elements are always individually identifiable (at least most of them are identifiable). In particular, in the case of (4.12), 100% of the circumference of a plurality of elements is in a free state, and there is no physical connection between them (coupling is a part close to each other by mutual capacitance between elements). Achieved through).

  5, 6 and 7 show examples of other multi-level structures based on pentagons, hexagons and polyhedra, respectively, but the multi-level structures are not limited to these examples.

  It should be noted that the difference between a multi-level antenna and other existing antennas lies in the particular geometry, not the configuration of the antenna or the material used for manufacturing There is. Thus, multi-level structures are used with known antenna configurations such as, but not limited to, dipoles, monopoles, patches, or microstrip antennas, coplanar antennas, reflector antennas, wound antennas, or arrays May be. In general, a multi-level structure is, for example, an arm, a ground plane, or both in the case of a monopole, and one or both arms in the case of a dipole, and is a microstrip, patch or common. A radiating element featuring a configuration that is a patch or printed element in the case of a planar antenna, a reflector in the case of a reflector antenna, or a conical section or antenna wall in the case of a horn type antenna Form a part of It is also possible to use a helical antenna configuration, in which case the geometric part of the loop or loops is the outer periphery of the multilevel structure. In all cases, the difference between a multi-level antenna and a conventional antenna is in the geometry of the radiating element, or in the geometry of its components, not in its specific configuration.

  Since the essence of the present invention is not in its specific configuration but in the geometry used in the multilevel structure, the realization of the multilevel antenna is particularly limited by both the manufacturing material and the technology. And any existing or future technology deemed most suitable for each application can be used. In this way, multi-level structures can always be formed according to the specific requirements of each case and application, e.g. formed by sheets or parts of conductor material or superconductor material, As in the case of a printed circuit, it is formed by printing on a dielectric substrate (non-flexible (rigid) or flexible) with a metal coating, or multiple dielectric materials forming a multi-level structure, etc. May be formed. Once the multilevel structure is formed, the realization of the antenna depends on the chosen configuration (monopole, dipole, patch, horn, reflector ...). In the case of monopole antennas, spiral antennas, dipole antennas and patch antennas, multiple similar structures are realized on a metal support (a simple procedure is used for an unused printed circuit dielectric substrate). This structure is provided on a standard microwave connector, and in the case of a monopole or patch, this connector is then the same as in any conventional antenna Connected to a ground plane (typically a metal plate or housing). For the dipole case, two identical multi-level structures form the two arms of the antenna. In the case of an aperture antenna, the multilevel geometry may be part of the metal wall of the horn or a section thereof, and finally, in the case of a reflector, a plurality of similar elements or collections of these May be formed or covered.

  The most relevant characteristics of multi-level antennas are mainly due to their geometry, and the following are listed in the same way (similar impedance and radiation pattern) simultaneously in several frequency bands: It is operable and can be reduced in size compared to other conventional antennas based only on a single polygon or polyhedron. Such characteristics are particularly relevant in the field of communication systems. The ability to operate simultaneously in several frequency bands allows a single multi-level antenna to be incorporated into several communication systems, rather than assigning one antenna to each system or service as is conventional. It becomes possible. The reduction in size is particularly useful when the antenna must be hidden due to its visual impact in its urban or rural landscape, or its non-aesthetic or non-aerodynamic effect when incorporated into a vehicle or portable communication device.

  An example of the benefits gained by using a multi-band antenna in a real environment is the multi-level antenna AM1, described further below, used in GMS and DCS environments. These antennas are designed to meet the radio specifications in both cell phone systems. By using a single GSM and DCS multi-level antenna for both bands (900 MHz and 1800 MHz), mobile phone operators can increase the cost and station network while increasing the number of users (customers) supported by the network. Can reduce the environmental impact.

  It is particularly important to differentiate multilevel antennas from fractal antennas. The latter is based on fractal geometry and based on abstract mathematical concepts that are difficult to implement in practice. The scientific and technical literature in the specialized field usually defines geometric objects with non-integer Hausdorff dimensions as fractals. This means that a fractal object exists only as an abstract or concept, and its geometric shape is not (strictly) considered as a concrete object or shape, while the technical term Strictly speaking, fractals have a shape, but it is also true that antennas based on such geometric shapes have been developed and widely described in scientific literature. Some of these antennas provide multiband operation (its impedance and radiation pattern remain virtually constant in several frequency bands), but antennas are required for use in real environments Not all actions themselves provide. Thus, for example, a Shelpinski antenna has multi-band operation with N-bands spaced twice, and according to such spacing, the antenna is connected to communication networks GSM 900 MHz and GSM 1800 MHz (or DCS). May be conceived to be used), but its radiation pattern and size at these frequencies is inadequate, which prevents it from being used in actual environments. In short, in order to obtain an antenna that meets all the specifications required for each specific application in addition to providing multi-band operation, abandon the fractal geometry, for example multi-level geometry It is almost always necessary to rely on shaped antennas. As an example, none of the structures shown in FIGS. 1, 3, 4, 5 and 6 are fractals. These Hausdorff dimensions are all equal to 2 and are equal to these topological dimensions. Similarly, none of the multilevel structures in FIG. 7 are fractals, and their Hausdorff dimensions are equal to 3 as is the topological dimension.

  In any case, multilevel structures should not be confused with antenna arrays. While it is true that the array is formed by a set of multiple identical antennas, in these elements the elements are electromagnetically separated, exactly the opposite of what is intended for multilevel antennas. is there. In an array, each element is either powered independently by a particular single transmitter or receiver for each element, or powered by a single distribution network, while In a level antenna, the structure is excited in several of its elements and the remaining elements are connected electromagnetically or by direct connection (in less than 50 percent of the circumference or surface of adjacent elements). Yes. In arrays, it is sought to improve the directional gain of individual antennas or to form patterns for specific applications, whereas in multi-level antennas to achieve multi-band operation or antenna size. , Which means that the application is completely different from the array.

  For purposes of illustration only, two examples of (but not limited to) modes of operation of multilevel antennas (AM1 and AM2) in specific environments and applications are described below.

AM1 Mode This model consists of the multi-level patch antenna shown in FIG. 8, which operates simultaneously in the GSM900 (890 MHz to 960 MHz) and GSM1800 (1710 MHz to 1880 MHz) bands and provides a sector radiation pattern in the horizontal plane. The antenna is considered to be used primarily in (but is not limited to) GSM 900 and 1800 mobile phone base stations.

  The multilevel structure (8.10) or antenna patch consists of a copper sheet printed on a conventional glass fiber printed circuit board. The multilevel geometry is configured with five triangles (8.1-8.5) connected to each other at the vertices, as shown in FIG. It is formed to be a regular triangle having a height of 13.9 centimeters (8.6). The lower triangle has a height of 8.2 centimeters (8.7), and the lower triangle and the two adjacent triangles both have a height of 10.7 centimeters (8.8). ) To form a structure having a circumference that becomes a triangle.

  The multi-level patch (8.10) is provided parallel to the 22 x 18.5 centimeter rectangular aluminum ground plane (8.9). The distance between the patch and the ground plane is 3.3 centimeters, and this distance is maintained by a pair of dielectric spacers (8.12) that act as support members.

  The connection to the antenna is made at two points in the multilevel structure, one point being used for each of the operating bands (GSM900 and GSM1900). Excitation is performed by metal posts that are provided perpendicular to the ground plane and the multilevel structure and that are capacitively terminated by a metal sheet. Here, the metal sheet is electrically coupled by a proximity portion (capacity effect) at a predetermined distance from the patch. This is a standard system for patch-structured antennas, but its purpose is to compensate for the post inductive effect by the capacitive effect at its end.

  At the base of the excitation post, there is connected a circuit that interconnects the element and a port accessing the antenna or connector (8.13). This interconnect circuit may be formed by microstrip, coaxial or stripline technology, to name a few, at the input / output antenna connector the impedance measured at the base of the post. Incorporates prior art adaptive networks to convert to the required 50 ohms (typical standing wave ratio relationship (SWR) tolerance in these applications is less than 1.5) It is a thing. This connector is generally N-type or SMA type for microcell base stations.

  In addition to adapting the impedance and interconnecting with the radiating elements, the interconnection network (8.11) is for a configuration in which one antenna has two connectors (one for each band). A diplexer may be provided that allows it to be provided or to a single connector for both bands.

  For the dual connector structure, the base of the DCS band excitation post has an electrical length equal to half the wavelength at the DCS center frequency to increase isolation between the GSM900 and GSM1800 (DCS) terminals. It may be connected to a parallel stub terminated with a dovetail circuit. Similarly, a parallel stub may be connected at the end of the GSM 900 lead and terminated with an open circuit and having an electrical length slightly longer than ¼ of the wavelength at the center frequency of the GSM band. This stub provides a capacitance at the base of the connection that can be adjusted to compensate for post-inductive residual effects. In addition, the stub exhibits very low impedance in the DCS band, which helps isolation between connectors in this band.

  FIGS. 9 and 10 illustrate typical wireless electrical operation in this specific embodiment of a dual multi-level antenna.

FIG. 9 shows the return loss (L _τ ) in GSM (FIG. 9.1) and DCS (FIG. 9.2), which is typically −14 dB (this value is for SWR <1.5). Less than). This allows the antenna to be well adapted in both operating bands (890 MHz to 960 MHz and 1710 MHz to 1880 MHz).

  FIG. 10 shows radiation pattern diagrams in the vertical plane (FIGS. 10.1 and 10.3) and horizontal plane (FIGS. 10.2 and 10.4) in both bands. Both antennas radiate using a main lobe in a direction perpendicular to the antenna (FIGS. 10.1 and 10.3) and both patterns in the horizontal plane (FIGS. 10.2 and 10.4). It can clearly be seen that the figure is a sector type with a typical beam width of 3 dB at 65 °. The typical directional gain (d) for both bands is d> 7 Db.

AM2 mode This model consists of a multi-level antenna in the monopole configuration shown in FIG. 11 for a wireless communication system in a local access environment using indoors or wireless.

  This antenna operates in the same way simultaneously in the 1880 MHz to 1930 MHz band and the 3400 MHz to 3600 MHz band, such as equipment with a DECT system. This multilevel structure is formed by three or five triangles (see FIGS. 11 and 3.6), to which an induction loop (11.1) may be added. The antenna emits omnidirectional radiation in a horizontal plane, and is mainly considered to be installed on the roof or floor (but not limited to this).

  The multi-level structure is a Rogers (R) RO4003 dielectric substrate (11.2) having a width of 5.5 centimeters, a height of 4.9 centimeters, a thickness of 0.8 millimeters and a dielectric constant of 3.38. ) Printed on top. The multi-level element consists of three triangles (11.3 to 11.5) joined together at the apex, while the lower triangle (11.3) is 1.82 centimeters in height, The overall height of the level structure is 2.72 centimeters. In order to reduce the overall size of the antenna, in this particular application, a trapezoidal induction loop (11.1) is provided on top of the multilevel element. This results in an overall size of the radiating element of 4.5 centimeters.

The multi-level structure is provided perpendicular to a square or circular ground plane (11.6) made of metal (such as aluminum) and having a length or diameter of about 18 centimeters. The lowest vertex of the element is located in the center of the ground plane and forms the excitation point for the antenna. In this respect, an interconnection network connecting the radiating elements to the input / output connectors is connected. This interconnect network may be implemented by microstrip, stripline, or coaxial technology, to name a few examples. In this particular embodiment, a microstrip structure was employed. In addition to the interconnection between the radiating element and the connector, the network takes the impedance at the apex of the multilevel element to 50 ohms required for the input / output connector (L _τ <-14 dB, SWR <1.5). It can also be used as an impedance converter that adapts to

  12 and 13 schematically illustrate the radio electrical operation of the antenna in the low band (1900) and the high band (3500).

  FIG. 12 shows the standing wave ratio (SWR) for both bands. FIG. 12.1 shows the band between 1880 and 1930 MHz, and FIG. 12.2 shows the band between 3400 and 3600 MHz. From these figures, it can be seen that the antenna is well adapted because the return loss is less than 14 dB for the entire band of interest, that is, SWR <1.5.

  FIG. 13 shows a typical radiation pattern diagram. Figures (13.1), (13.2), and (13.3) show the patterns at 1905 MHz measured on the vertical plane, horizontal plane, and antenna plane, respectively. .5) and Figure (13.6) show the pattern at 3500 MHz measured on the vertical, horizontal, and antenna planes, respectively.

  A pattern with omnidirectional motion in the horizontal plane and two typical lobes in the vertical plane can be observed, where the typical antenna directivity gain is greater than 4 dBi in the 1900 band, In the 3500 band, the value is larger than 6 dBi.

  It should be noted that in this antenna operation, the operation is very similar for both bands (both SWR and pattern), making it a multi-band antenna.

  Both AM1 and AM2 antennas are typically coated with a dielectric radome that effectively transmits electromagnetic radiation to protect the radiating elements and connection network from external infringement and provide a beautiful appearance. .

  In an antenna with a patch configuration, the multi-level structure may be one of a plurality of radiating elements that are planar microstrips or patch structures with a plurality of parasitic patches of a plurality of levels. . A multi-level structure may be loaded with capacitive or inductive elements to change its size, resonant frequency, radiation pattern, or impedance. In order for those skilled in the art to understand the scope of the invention and the resulting advantages and reproduce the invention, further description beyond the disclosure herein will not be required.

  However, it should be understood that various modifications of the details can be introduced into the essence of the present invention, as the above description relates only to the preferred embodiment. It should be understood that the size and / or materials used in producing the whole or any of its parts are also protected.

A specific example of a multi-level element comprising only triangular polygons is shown. Examples of multi-level antenna assemblies with multiple configurations: monopole (2.1), dipole (2.2), patch (2.3), coplanar antenna (2.4), horn (2.5 -2.6), and array (2.7). An example of a multi-level structure based on a triangle is shown. An example of a multi-level structure based on a parallelepiped is shown. An example of a multi-level structure based on a pentagon A multi-level structure based on a hexagon is shown. Fig. 2 shows a multi-level structure based on a polyhedron. Fig. 3 shows an example of a specific mode of operation of a multi-level antenna in a patch configuration for GSM (900 MHz) and DCS (800 MHz) cellular telephone base stations. FIG. 9 shows input parameters (reflection loss at 50 ohms) of the multilevel antenna shown in FIG. The radiation pattern diagram of the multilevel antenna of FIG. 8 is shown in the horizontal plane and the vertical plane. Fig. 4 illustrates an example of a specific mode of operation of a multi-level antenna in a monopole configuration for an indoor wireless communication system or in a radio access local network environment. FIG. 12 shows input parameters (a return loss at 50 ohms) of the multilevel antenna of FIG. FIG. 12 is a radiation pattern diagram of the multilevel antenna of FIG. 11.

Claims (24)

Including at least one multi-level structure that is a collection of polygon elements or polyhedral elements of the same type (with the same number of sides or faces) that are not necessarily of the same size;
The multi-level structure and the polygon or polyhedron forming the multi-level structure have different geometric shapes;
The contact area between the elements does not cover most of the circumference or surface area in at least the majority of the polygon or polyhedron, and the contact area between the elements in the circumference or at least 75% of the polygon or polyhedron. The polygons or polyhedra are electromagnetically coupled to each other such that they are less than 50% of the surface area,
Thereby, in the multilevel structure, the majority of polygons or polyhedrons forming the multilevel structure can be geometrically distinguished.   The multi-level antenna according to claim 1, wherein the multi-level structure is formed by only a plurality of triangles.   The multi-level structure is formed by only a single type of polygon such as a quadrangle, pentagon, hexagon, heptagon, octagon, decagon, dodecagon, circle, ellipse, or the like. The multi-level antenna according to claim 1.   The multi-level antenna according to claim 1, wherein the multi-level structure is formed of only a polyhedron, a cylinder, or a cone.   The multilevel antenna according to any one of claims 1 to 4, wherein the multilevel structure is provided in a monopole configuration so as to be perpendicular to a ground plane.   The multilevel antenna according to any one of claims 1 to 3, wherein the multilevel structure is provided in a patch or microstrip antenna configuration so as to be parallel to the ground plane. .   In an antenna with a patch configuration, the multi-level structure is one of a plurality of radiating elements that are planar microstrips or patch structures with a plurality of parasitic patches of a plurality of levels. The multi-level antenna according to claim 5 or 6.   The multilevel structure forms both arms of a dipole antenna, forms part of a coplanar antenna, and forms at least one of the faces of a pyramidal horn. The multilevel antenna according to any one of claims 1 to 3.   The multilevel antenna according to any one of claims 1 to 4, wherein the multilevel structure or its periphery forms a cross section of a conical horn type or pyramidal horn type antenna.   The multilevel antenna according to any one of claims 1 to 4, wherein a circumference of the multilevel structure determines a shape of at least one loop of the spiral antenna.   The multilevel antenna according to any one of claims 1 to 4, wherein the antenna is a part of an array antenna.   The multilevel antenna according to any one of claims 1 to 4, wherein the multilevel structure is made of a conductor material, a superconductor material, a dielectric material, or a combination thereof.   The multilevel antenna according to claim 12, wherein the multilevel structure follows a geometric shape of a space formed in a metal structure, a superconductor structure, or a dielectric structure.   The antenna has multi-band operation, and the impedance level and radiation pattern of the plurality of frequencies are such that the antenna maintains essentially the same radio electrical operability and functionality in a plurality of frequency bands. The multi-level antenna according to any one of claims 1 to 4, wherein the multi-level antenna is similar in band.   The antenna has a small size as compared with a circular antenna, a square antenna, or a triangular antenna having a circumference having room for forming a multi-level structure and operating at the same frequency (resonance frequency). Item 5. The multilevel antenna according to any one of Items 1 to 4.   The multi-level antenna according to claim 14, wherein the antenna can be operated simultaneously at a plurality of frequencies by multi-band operation, and thereby can be shared by a plurality of communication services or systems.   15. The multilevel antenna according to claim 14, wherein the antenna is used in a mobile phone base station, a communication terminal device (transmitter or receiver), a vehicle, a communication satellite, or a radar system.   5. The multi-level structure according to claim 1, wherein the multi-level structure is used as a multi-band resonator or a small resonator when the antenna radiates inefficiently. Multi-level antenna.   In addition to the multi-level element, the antenna includes an interconnection circuit that links the multi-level structure to an input / output connector and is used to incorporate an impedance adaptation network, filter or diplexer. The multilevel antenna according to any one of claims 1 to 4, wherein the multilevel antenna is provided.   The multi-level structure is loaded with capacitive or inductive elements to change its size, resonant frequency, radiation pattern, or impedance. The multilevel antenna according to one. The antenna is a multi-level structure of the same type that is considered a first level multi-level structure (the same number of identical polygonal or polyhedral elements, the same arrangement and the same coupling between the elements) With
The plurality of multi-level structures are grouped into a higher-level structure in the same manner as the polygon element or polyhedral element that forms the first level multi-level structure. The multilevel antenna according to any one of claims 1 to 4.   2. The multilevel antenna according to claim 1, wherein at least some of the polygons overlap in a region where the circumferences of the polygons are connected to each other.   The multilevel antenna according to claim 1, wherein at least some of the polygons have both a linear circumferential portion and a non-linear circumferential portion.   The multi-level antenna according to claim 1, wherein the antenna operates in a plurality of frequency bands, and at least one of the plurality of frequency bands is used by a GSM communication service.

Images