JP2007240589A - Speech recognition reliability estimating device, and method and program therefor - Google Patents

Abstract

<P>PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To find reliability of a recognition result of a long section of each utterance, each sentence, etc., rather than a short section of a word, a syllable, etc. <P>SOLUTION: In a speech recognition reliability estimating device, a speech recognition section 6 divides an input digital speech signal into word series 50 by utterances and imparts part-of-speech information 52, a sound likelihood score 54, a language likelihood score 55, a word likelihood score 56, a word continuance time length 58, the number 60 of phonemes, and a phoneme continuance time length 62 of each word to the word. An information conversion section 20 performs conversion into utterance feature quantity vectors, by utterance units 54, 55, 56, 58, 60, and 62, which include statistic values such as mean values and variance values by the utterance units and decision values by classification using the part-of-speech information 52 as elements, and a reliability imparting section 22 finds reliability based upon the degree of recognition estimated by using the vectors and an identification model previously found by learning. <P>COPYRIGHT: (C)2007,JPO&INPIT

Description

  The present invention relates to a speech recognition reliability estimation apparatus, method and program for estimating and outputting the reliability of a recognition result obtained by speech recognition processing on an input speech signal.

  In speech recognition, the likelihood is generally calculated between a sequence of acoustic feature vectors obtained by analyzing the input speech signal and the acoustic model that models speech, and the vocabulary to be recognized and the connection between words are connected. The candidate with the highest likelihood is output as the recognition result in the linguistic constraints such as the language model representing the ease and the rule. However, the possibility of outputting an erroneous recognition result increases due to the ambiguity of occurrence in the input audio signal and the input of acoustic signals other than noise and audio signals. In addition, when the input speech is an unregistered word in the dictionary, a correct recognition result cannot be output.

For the above problems, by adding reliability to the speech recognition result, it becomes possible to accept, reject, or confirm the result with high reliability. The problem caused by the voice recognition error can be avoided in this apparatus. For example, it is possible to prevent an unexpected operation of the user (user) from being caused by misrecognition.
In Non-Patent Document 1 and Non-Patent Document 2, reliability is calculated using word posterior probabilities. In this method, the reliability of a word in a sentence is calculated using the acoustic likelihood score of the word, the language likelihood score of the word, the forward probability, and the backward probability.

In Non-Patent Document 1, the reliability is calculated using N-best candidates. In this method, recognition result candidates are created up to the Nth position using an acoustic likelihood score, a language likelihood score, and the like, and the reliability is calculated using the created candidates. In this method, a word that appears frequently in a plurality of candidates is considered highly reliable.
In patent document 1, the reliability based on linguistic validity is calculated. In this method, identification learning is performed on the validity of the sequence of word sequences in the speech recognition result, and the correctness of the word is determined.

In Patent Document 2, the reliability is determined using a competitive model. In this method, two types of models, that is, a model used for a speech recognition result and a competitive model are used. Likelihood is obtained for each model, a likelihood ratio is calculated from the obtained likelihood, and is given as the reliability of the recognition result.
In Non-Patent Document 3, the reliability is determined using a plurality of speech recognition models. In this method, speech recognition is performed using two or more speech recognition models, and it is determined that a common part determined to be reliable in all speech recognition models is reliable.
JP 2005-275348 A Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 11-85188 Frank Wassel, Ral Schlitter, Klaus Machaley, Hermann Ney: “Confidence Measurement for Large Vocational Proceeds Recon Revelations”, IE. 9 No. 3 pp. 288-298, 2001 Thomas Kemp, Thomas Schaaf: “Estimating confidence using word lattices”, Proc. 5th Eurospeech, pp. 827-830, 1997 Takehito Utsuro, Hiromitsu Nishizaki, Yasuhiro Kodama, Seiichi Nakagawa: “Estimation of high-reliability parts using common parts of outputs of multiple large vocabulary continuous speech recognition models”, IEICE Transactions D-II Vol. J86-D-II No. 7 pp. 974-987, 2003

  In the practical aspect of speech recognition technology, it is often desirable to determine whether or not a speech or sentence can be recognized with higher accuracy than correctness of short sections such as words and syllables. However, with the existing technology, the reliability is calculated only for words and speech units, so it has been difficult to meet practical demands.

  According to the present invention, the input digital speech signal is divided into utterance units, the acoustic feature parameters are extracted from the divided utterance unit digital speech signals, and the given linguistic features are extracted from the acoustic feature parameters. Under the constraints, calculate the score based on the probability to be output to the probability model expressing the features of each category of linguistic units, recognize at least the category represented by the model showing the highest score, and for each utterance Generate a word sequence to which information based on the recognition for each word in the word sequence is given, and for each utterance unit, utterance feature amount of the utterance unit for information based on the recognition of each word unit included in the word sequence It is converted into vector information, and the recognition rate is estimated using the utterance feature vector information and the identification model for each utterance unit. Based on the estimated recognition rate, the utterance unit Determining a reliability for speech recognition result as the information of the group.

  According to the above configuration, since the information in the word sequence of the relatively long section of the utterance unit is used when calculating the reliability, global information can be used, and it is used daily by the target speech. Highly reliable reliability can be output for each utterance or sentence.

Example 1
FIG. 1 shows a first embodiment of the present invention. The voice recognition unit 6 includes an acoustic analysis unit 8 and a recognition search unit 9.
When a digital voice signal that has been digitally converted is input to the input terminal 2, the digital voice signal is once stored in the storage unit 4, and the stored digital voice signal is divided into voice signals in units of utterances in the utterance division unit 5. . In this division, for example, an input voice signal sandwiched between silent periods that continue for a predetermined value or more is divided into one utterance. In this division, the start of the first utterance voice signal and the end of the last utterance voice signal may be known in advance by the target input digital voice signal. In such a case, the first utterance voice signal and the last utterance voice signal are Although not sandwiched between silent sections that continue beyond the predetermined value, these are naturally detected and divided as one utterance. Examples of utterance units are shown below.

(1) “I think there will be a lot of profits in that area.”
(2) “I see.”
(3) “I'm doing a shopping tour that goes to Korea right now.
(4) "N-"
The voice signal for each utterance unit divided in this way is input to the voice recognition unit 6. In the speech recognition unit 6, the input digital signal is speech-recognized using the acoustic model stored in the acoustic model storage unit 10 and the dictionary / language model stored in the dictionary / language model storage unit 12. .

  From the speech recognition unit 6, the speech recognition result word series 50 and information based on the speech recognition result are added to each word and output for each utterance unit. The information based on the speech recognition result of the word is the acoustic likelihood of the word obtained using the part-of-speech information 52 (for example, conjunction, noun, adverb, etc.) and HMM (Hidden Markov Model) of each word included in the utterance unit. Degree score 54, language likelihood score 55 of the word obtained using the word n-gram, word likelihood score 56 obtained by the sum of acoustic likelihood score 54 and language likelihood score 55, input speech and recognition result The phoneme duration length indicating the average duration length of the phoneme number 60, the phoneme number of the word, calculated from the start time and end time of the word / phoneme unit based on the temporal correspondence of the matching situation 62. Specific generation and calculation methods are shown below. Note that the utterance unit is divided based on the length of the silent interval between the words in the recognition result word sequence. Alternatively, the word part of speech information 52 may be used to divide the part of speech with an arbitrarily determined part of speech.

  The information conversion unit 20 converts the information based on the voice recognition result given to each word described above given to each word by the voice recognition unit 6 into information of an utterance unit and outputs the information. Here, the utterance unit information may be, for example, an utterance feature amount vector. In the following description, information on an utterance unit is described as an utterance feature amount vector. The information converted into the utterance feature quantity vector includes part-of-speech information 52, acoustic likelihood score 54, language likelihood score 55, word likelihood score 56, word duration time given to each word in the word sequence 50 described above. All or part of the information generated by the speech recognition unit 6 having the length 58, the number of phonemes 60, and the phoneme duration 62 is used.

In the reliability providing unit 22, the reliability is obtained using the utterance feature vector 64 output from the information conversion unit 20 and the identification model stored in the identification model storage unit 29. Details of how to find it are described below.
The output unit 26 outputs the reliability of the utterance recognition result. Here, only the reliability may be output, or the reliability may be given to the speech recognition result and output.
FIG. 2 shows details of the recognition search unit 9 in FIG. 1 and a diagram of parts related thereto. The recognition search unit 9 includes an acoustic likelihood score calculation unit 90, a language likelihood score calculation unit 92, a word likelihood score calculation unit 96, a phoneme number counting unit 100, a word duration calculation unit 102, a phoneme duration calculation unit 104, a part of speech. The information adding unit 105 and the word information adding unit 106 are configured.

The digital speech signal in units of speech input to the speech recognition unit 6 is first converted into acoustic feature parameters by the acoustic analysis unit 8. The acoustic feature parameters are LPC cepstrum, MFCC, and other parameters obtained by analyzing the input voice signal in units called frames of several tens of msec.
For this acoustic feature parameter, the acoustic likelihood score calculation unit 90 refers to the acoustic model stored in the acoustic model storage unit 10 and searches for a plurality of phoneme sequence candidates. The language likelihood score calculation unit 92 and the word likelihood score calculation unit 96 refer to the dictionary / language model stored in the dictionary / language model storage unit 12 for the plurality of phoneme sequence candidates. A plurality of candidates are searched. In other words, for the input acoustic feature parameters, the score based on the probability to be output to the probability model expressing the features of each category of linguistic units under the given linguistic constraints is calculated, and the highest score is obtained. The category represented by the model shown is taken as the recognition result.

In this speech recognition, for each word, an acoustic likelihood score 54, a language likelihood score 55, a word likelihood score 56 that is the sum of the acoustic likelihood score 54 and the language likelihood score 55, and a word duration calculation unit The word duration 58 from 102, the number of phonemes 60 from the phoneme number counting unit 100, the phoneme duration 62 from the phoneme duration calculation unit 104, and the part of speech information 52 from the part of speech information adding unit 105 are obtained.
For each utterance unit, for example, N-best candidates up to the top N of the total value of the word likelihood score 56 are selected. Of these N word sequences 50 for one utterance, each word of each word sequence 50 has a part of speech information 52, an acoustic likelihood score 54, a language likelihood score 55, a word likelihood score 56, a word duration length 58, and a phoneme number 60. The phoneme duration 62 is given by the word information giving unit 106 and outputted from the voice recognition unit 6.

  A single utterance unit provided by the speech recognition unit 6 is configured, and words to which information based on the above-described speech recognition is provided are denoted by A1, A2,. . . , Ax. An arbitrary word in each word is Am (m = 1,..., X), and the acoustic likelihood score 54, the language likelihood score 55, the word likelihood score 56, the word duration length 58 of the word Am, When the values indicating the number of phonemes 60, the phoneme duration 62, and the part of speech information 52 are am, bm, cm, dm, em, fm, and gm, respectively, for example, as shown in FIG. In 31, information based on voice recognition is stored for each word Am.

  In the information conversion unit 20, the words A1, A2,. . . , Ax acoustic likelihood score 54, language likelihood score 55, word likelihood score 56, word duration length 58, phoneme number 60, phoneme duration length 62, for example, average value, variance value, Find the maximum and minimum values respectively. First, the words A1, A2,. . . , Ax acoustic likelihood scores a1, a2,. . . , Ax are all input to the acoustic likelihood score average value unit 201, and the average value P is calculated. Acoustic likelihood scores a1, a2,. . . , Ax are all input to the acoustic likelihood score variance value unit 202, and these variance values Q are calculated. Acoustic likelihood scores a1, a2,. . . , Ax are all input to the acoustic likelihood score maximum value section 203, and their maximum value R is obtained. Acoustic likelihood scores a1, a2,. . . , Ax are all input to the acoustic likelihood score minimum value unit 204, and these minimum values S are obtained. These statistical values are not limited to these, and only some of them may or may not be used. The case where it is not used will be described below.

As described above, the calculated average value P, variance value Q, maximum value R, and minimum value S are the acoustic likelihood score average value normalization unit 205, the acoustic likelihood score variance value normalization unit 206, and the acoustic likelihood, respectively. The average value P, the variance value Q, the maximum value R, and the minimum value S are each normalized to a value of 0 to 1 and input to the maximum score normalization unit 207 and the minimum acoustic likelihood score normalization unit 208. The calculated values Pa, Qa, Ra, Sa are calculated.
Similarly, for the remaining information, that is, the language likelihood score 55, the word likelihood score 56, the word duration length 58, the phoneme number 60, and the phoneme duration length 62, the average value and the variance value are obtained by the same processing. Find the normalized value of the maximum and minimum values. When expressed as a normalized average value, normalized variance value, normalized maximum value, normalized minimum value, that is, statistical values Pb, Qb, Rb, Sb, and words of language likelihood score 55 Statistical values Pc, Qc, Rc, Sc of likelihood score 56, statistical values Pd, Qd, Rd, Sd of word duration 58, statistical values Pe, Qe, Re, Se, phoneme duration 62 of phoneme number 58 The statistical values Pf, Qf, Rf, and Sf are calculated. These normalized values are combined as one element, that is, in this case, an utterance feature amount vector composed of 24 elements is combined by the combining unit 260. It is not necessary to use all 24 elements, and there is no problem even if one or more of these elements are used. And there is no need to calculate unused statistical values.

  In addition, by classifying a plurality of words used when assigning reliability into a word class represented by one symbol by the classification unit 21 in FIG. 1 and FIG. More highly reliable reliability can be obtained. Here, the word class represented by one symbol is (for example, when one symbol is set to start with the word “a”), for example, a word starting with “a” is a word class a, “ A word class starting with “I” belongs to b, a word class starting with “wa”, and a word starting with a word other than these is set as word class x. For example, as an example of an utterance unit, “I love you” explains, the word sequence is “I”, “Ha”, “You”, “I”, “I love”, “Te”, “I”, “Masu”. When separated, “you” and “love” belong to the word class a, and “i” belong to the word class b. “I” belongs to the word class w, and “ha”, “wo”, “te”, and “mas” belong to the word class x.

Using such a word class, if there is at least one word belonging to the word class a among a plurality of words in the utterance, the word class a is set to “1”, otherwise, it is set to “0”. Find out about the class. That is, assuming that the number of word classes is n, each element is “0” or “1”, and is output as a vector having n elements.
As an example of word class clustering in which one symbol is represented by a word class, the part of speech information 52 can be used to efficiently classify words. For example, four word classes of a conjunction class a, a noun class b, a case particle class c, and a conjunction particle class d are set in advance for four parts of speech, “conjunction”, “noun”, “case particle”, and “participant”. If one or more of the four parts of speech are included in a plurality of words in one utterance, “1” is output, and if not included, “0” is output. For example, when the utterance unit of the input sentence voice is “But I run today”, the divided word series are “But”, “Today”, “I”, “Ha”, “Run”. “But” is the conjunction class a, “Today” and “I” are the noun class b, “ha” is the case particle class c, and the conjunction particle class d does not belong to any word, and “run” belongs to any class Does not belong. Thus, if “but I run today” is the input speech, the word class vector is (1, 1, 1, 0).

As described above, for example, when classifying a word class such as a word starting with “A”, as shown by a broken line in FIG. Information g ′ _i indicating what word class each word in the word sequence belongs to is generated and stored in the word class string information generation unit 108, and is output to the word information addition unit 106. In the class determination unit in FIG. 3 (the mth part-of-speech class determination unit 250m in FIG. 3), as in the case of the part-of-speech class, there may be one or more utterance word strings belonging to the word class for each word class. If there is no “1”, “0” is assumed.

  Returning to the explanation of FIG. 3, m arbitrary parts of speech are set, and each of the m classes is designated as a first part of speech class 2491, a second part of speech class 2492,. . . Suppose that the mth part-of-speech class is 249m. However, m is an integer of 1 or more. Words A1, A2,. . . , Ax part-of-speech information 52, g1, g2,. . . , Gx, the classifying unit 21 determines which part-of-speech class to belong to, classifies, and classifies the words A1, A2,. . . , Ax are the corresponding first part-of-speech class 2491, second part-of-speech class 2492,. . . , Belonging to the mth part-of-speech class 249m. As for the part of speech information 52, for any part of speech, “1” is output if the part of speech is included in the utterance unit, and “0” is output if it is not included. That is, as a result of classification, if a word is included, “1” is output from the j-th part of speech class determination unit 250j corresponding to the j-th class (j = 1,..., M), and the word is included. If not, “0” is output, and each of these is set as one element, and the synthesizer 260 constructs an utterance feature quantity vector.

As an example of a word class represented by one symbol, part-of-speech information 52 is used, m arbitrary parts-of-speech are set, and an acoustic likelihood score 54 and a language-likelihood score for each word in one utterance unit. 55, a word likelihood score 56, a word duration 58, a phoneme number 60, and a phoneme duration 62, each of an average value, variance, maximum value, and minimum value of an utterance feature quantity vector composed of all elements. A specific configuration example is shown in FIG.
Not only such an utterance feature quantity vector but also only some elements in this vector may be used as an utterance feature quantity vector.

When the number of parts of speech m is 37, highly reliable reliability can be output. As shown in FIG. 4, the acoustic likelihood score 54, the language likelihood score 55, the word likelihood score 56, the word duration length 58, the phoneme number 60, and the phoneme duration length 62 within the respective utterances. , Statistical values such as variance value, maximum value, minimum value, and values output from the above word classes, 61 dimensions (6 × 4 + 37 utterance feature quantity vectors are converted into utterance feature quantity vectors for each utterance unit. It is synthesized and output from the synthesis unit 260.
When N-best candidates are obtained by the speech recognition unit 6, an utterance feature amount vector is obtained for each of the N candidates.

  Returning to the description of FIG. An utterance feature amount vector is input from the information conversion unit 20 to the reliability assigning unit 22, and the input utterance feature amount vector is evaluated using the identification model stored in the identification model storage unit 29. Is output. For this reason, a large number of utterance feature amount vectors are created in advance from the learning speech signal as described above, and the recognition rate of the speech recognition result from which the vectors are obtained for these learning utterance feature amount vectors is n% (0 ≦ n). ≦ 100) or more is learned, and an identification model with a recognition rate of n% is created and stored in the identification model storage unit 29. This identification model is usually created in the required density in the range of 0 ≦ n ≦ 100. For example, if the reliability is required at 10% intervals (n = 0%, 10%, 20%, 30%, ..., 90%, 100%) or more, 11 pieces can be evaluated. Are created in advance and stored in the identification model storage unit 29.

  In order to obtain the reliability of an utterance unit feature vector to be evaluated using such an identification model, for example, the utterance feature vector is first evaluated using an identification model of n = 0% and recognized. It is determined whether the result is 0% or more. If it is determined that it is 0% or more, the evaluation target speech feature vector is evaluated using an identification model of n = 10%, and it is determined whether or not n = 10% or more. Hereinafter, when these processes are repeated and evaluation is performed using an identification model of n = 80%, if it is determined that the recognition rate is not n = 80% or more, the basis of the utterance feature quantity vector to be evaluated is The recognition rate of the uttered speech recognition result is determined to be 70% or more and 80% or less. This determination result is used as the reliability for the speech recognition result based on the speech feature vector.

When determining only whether or not the speech recognition rate is 70% or more, one identification model with n = 70% may be created and stored in the identification model storage unit 29.
As described above, using the utterance feature amount vector, the reliability of the recognition rate of the utterance speech recognition result that is the basis of the utterance feature amount vector is estimated.
When an utterance amount feature vector having a very large number of dimensions as described above is used, a very large amount of learning data is required, and a small amount often causes an overlearning problem. Thus, for example, a statistical identification model using a support vector machine (SVM) may be used as the identification model. For example, to create an identification model with a recognition rate of 70% using the support vector machine, a z-dimensional utterance feature vector with a recognition rate of 70% or more and a z-dimensional utterance feature vector with a recognition rate of less than 70% are used. A plurality of support vectors are obtained by learning, and an identification function f (x) using the utterance feature quantity vector x as a variable is obtained from these, and this is used as an identification model.

  In order to evaluate the z-dimensional utterance feature quantity vector obtained from the actually obtained input speech signal using this discrimination model, the utterance feature quantity vector is set as x and substituted into the discrimination function f (x), If the calculation result is positive, it is determined that there is reliability with a recognition rate of 70% or more, and if it is negative, it is determined that there is reliability with a recognition rate of less than 70%. The details of the support vector machine are described in IEICE Journal vol. 83 No. 6 June 2000, pages 460-466. The support vector machine automatically selects only a small number of learning samples near the identification plane and configures the identification plane based on the criterion of “maximizing margin”, so that relatively good discrimination performance can be obtained even with a small amount of learning data. Therefore, when used in the present invention, the creation efficiency of the recognition model is good.

Note that N word sequences of N-best candidates are recognized for each utterance, and based on these N speech recognitions, each utterance feature amount vector is estimated using the identification model to estimate the reliability of the speech result. The word sequence of the speech recognition result corresponding to the highest one is output. Alternatively, N word sequences and their reliability may be output as a set.
As described above, as the utterance feature quantity vector, only the above-mentioned various statistics may be used, and one or a plurality of the statistics, average value, variance value, maximum value, minimum value are used. Further, only the values for the acoustic likelihood score 54, the language likelihood score 55, and the word likelihood score 56 may be used, or only the word class series may be used.
Experimental results Experimental results showing that the present invention is superior will be described below.

  Part-of-speech information 52, acoustic likelihood score 54, language likelihood score 55, word likelihood score 56, word duration length 58, phoneme number 60, phoneme duration length 62 assigned to each word in the word series 50 of the utterance unit 61-dimensional utterance feature vector synthesized using a word class using 37 types of part-of-speech information 52 as a value obtained by normalizing the average value, variance value, maximum value, minimum value, and the number of types of part-of-speech It was used. In continuous word recognition of 14 broadcast news data, evaluation was performed using a trigram language model with about 30,000 vocabularies, a gender-independent, about 5000 states, and a state sharing triphone acoustic model with 8 states. An overview of the data used is shown in FIG. 5A. Assume that the total number of words in the 14 news data is 100, 541, and the word correct accuracy 83.59% measured in advance.

For broadcast news data, cross-evaluation is performed with 10% of all data as evaluation data and the remaining 90% as learning data, and 80% close to the correct word accuracy of the used data is set as a threshold and estimated to be equal to or higher than the threshold. The extracted utterances were extracted as utterances recognized with high accuracy. In the present invention, machine learning is used as one of means for estimating the recognition rate. The recall rate of the extracted utterance was obtained by Equation (1), and the relevance rate was obtained by Equation (2).
Formula (1) Reproducibility = H / C
Formula (2) Conformity rate = H / N
Where C is the actual number of utterances with a recognition rate of 80% or higher, N is the number of utterances with a recognition rate of 80% or higher, and H is the utterance with a recognition rate of 80% or higher. The actual number of utterances was 80% or more.

  For comparison, the recognition rate was estimated using an N-best confidence measure which is a conventional method. This is an estimation of the recognition rate assuming that a word to which a value equal to or greater than a certain threshold is assigned is correct and a word that is not correct is an incorrect answer. ) To calculate. The comparative evaluation results are shown in FIG. 5B. When the N-best confidence measure is used, the recall rate is 91.76% and the matching rate is 75.62%. In the present invention, the recall rate is 91.87% and the matching rate is 85.64. It can be seen that both the recall ratio and the precision ratio are improved. Therefore, it can be seen that, in continuous word recognition, selection using an utterance feature amount vector for each utterance leads to a highly accurate result.

In the invention of the present application, in the creation of a sentence corresponding to the input voice, it is possible to use more efficiently by deleting a portion with low reliability or emphasizing a portion with high reliability.
In the information recognized by the spoken dialogue system that communicates between the computer and humans using voice dialogue, weighting the parts with high reliability, using them, reconfirming the parts with low reliability, etc. Efficient dialogue can be conducted. When learning an acoustic model to be used for speech recognition, data has been created and learned by hand in the past, but speech recognition is performed and learning is performed using only utterances recognized with high accuracy. Therefore, unsupervised learning can be performed. As in the above example, by using the invention of the present application, a more efficient speech recognition device can be developed.

The block diagram which shows the structural example of the system of this invention. The block diagram which shows the structural example of the speech recognition part 6. FIG. The figure which shows the example of a specific memory content of the word sequence memory | storage part 31 with information, and the structural example of the information conversion part 20. FIG. 37 (m) types of part-of-speech information, average values and variances of acoustic likelihood score 54, language likelihood score 55, word likelihood score 56, word duration 58, phoneme number 60, and phoneme duration 62 The figure which shows the speech feature-value vector comprised by making all the value, the maximum value, and the minimum value into an element. It is a table | surface which shows the data in the experiment which shows the effect of this invention, A is the data used for learning and evaluation, B is a table | surface which shows the comparative evaluation result of this invention and N-best confidence measure.

Claims (13)

The input digital speech signal is divided into utterance units, and acoustic feature parameters are extracted from the digital speech signals of the utterance units. Calculate the score based on the probability to be output to the probability model expressing the characteristics of each category, recognize at least the category represented by the model showing the highest score, obtain the word sequence for each utterance, and in the word sequence A speech recognition unit that generates a word sequence to which information based on the recognition for each word is given;
An information conversion unit that converts information based on the recognition of each word unit included in the word series into utterance feature amount vector information of the utterance unit for each of the divided utterance units;
A reliability that estimates the recognition rate using the utterance feature vector information and the identification model of the utterance unit, and obtains the reliability of the utterance speech recognition result that is the basis of the information of the utterance unit based on the estimated recognition rate An assigning unit and an output unit for outputting the reliability,
A speech recognition reliability estimation device comprising: The speech recognition reliability estimation apparatus according to claim 1,
The information conversion unit generates and stores a word class information string indicating which word class each word in one utterance belongs to for different word classes each representing a group of a plurality of words with one symbol A class string information generator,
Based on the word class information sequence, it is determined whether there is a word class belonging to each word class in the word series, and the determination result is used as at least a part of the utterance feature quantity vector When,
A speech recognition reliability estimation apparatus comprising: In the speech recognition reliability estimation apparatus according to claim 2,
The speech recognition reliability estimation apparatus, wherein the symbol uses part-of-speech information for each word in the information. In the speech recognition reliability estimation apparatus according to any one of claims 1 to 3,
The information conversion unit uses one or more of an acoustic likelihood score, a language likelihood score, a word likelihood score, a word duration length, a phoneme number, and a phoneme duration length obtained at the time of recognition. A speech recognition reliability estimation apparatus characterized in that it is at least part of the utterance feature quantity vector. In the voice recognition reliability estimation device according to any one of claims 1 to 4,
A speech recognition reliability estimation device created based on a support vector machine (SVM) as the identification model. In the speech recognition reliability estimation device according to any one of claims 1 to 5,
The information conversion unit converts a value of information based on the recognition given to each word included in the utterance unit into statistical information, and uses it as at least a part of the utterance feature amount vector. Recognition reliability estimation device. The input digital speech signal is divided into utterance units, and acoustic feature parameters are extracted from the divided utterance unit digital speech signals, and the language is applied to the acoustic feature parameters under given linguistic constraints. Calculate the score based on the probability to be output to the probability model expressing the characteristics of each category of the target unit, and at least the category represented by the model showing the highest score is the recognition result, and each included in the word sequence of the recognition result A speech recognition step for obtaining a word sequence provided with information based on the recognition in units of words;
An information conversion step of converting information based on the recognition of each word unit included in the word sequence of the utterance unit into an utterance feature vector of the utterance unit;
A speech recognition reliability estimation method characterized by comprising: The speech recognition reliability estimation method according to claim 7,
The information converting step includes a step of converting a word class representing a group of a plurality of predetermined words by one symbol into a word class string indicating whether or not there is an item belonging to the word class. A speech recognition reliability estimation method as a feature. The speech recognition reliability estimation method according to claim 8,
The speech recognition reliability estimation method, wherein the word class is a part of speech of a word. The speech recognition reliability estimation method according to any one of claims 7 to 9,
In the dividing step, information to be added to each word is an acoustic likelihood score, a language likelihood score, a word likelihood score, a word duration length, a phoneme number, a phoneme duration length in information based on the recognition of each word, A speech recognition reliability estimation method characterized by including one or a plurality of values. The speech recognition reliability estimation method according to claim 10,
The information conversion step includes a step of converting a value given to the word into statistical information in an utterance, the speech recognition reliability estimation method. The speech recognition reliability estimation method according to any one of claims 7 to 11,
The method for estimating a speech recognition reliability, wherein the reliability providing step is a step of using an identification model created in advance by a support vector machine (SVM).   The program for making a computer perform each step of the speech recognition reliability estimation method in any one of Claims 7-12.

Images