JP2007220044A - Crime prevention design technique - Google Patents

Abstract

<P>PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide a crime prevention design technique allowing a salesperson of a house construction company or a customer, who is not a specialist such as a qualified architect, to check design of a building by himself/herself from three different crime prevention viewpoints such as a peripheral environment, a building, and a lifestyle by using a table. <P>SOLUTION: In this crime prevention design technique, a weak point from a crime prevention viewpoint of the building 0104 is graded by using the table 0102, and a crime prevention countermeasure card 0103 corresponding to the graded result can be selected. The selected crime prevention countermeasure card 0103 carries crime prevention countermeasures for overcoming the weak point from the crime prevention viewpoint of the building 0104, so that a person having no special knowledge can perform crime prevention design while efficiently extracting the weak point from the crime prevention viewpoint. <P>COPYRIGHT: (C)2007,JPO&INPIT

Description

  The present invention relates to a technique for checking whether a design corresponds to a crime prevention design in the design of a building and showing an appropriate crime prevention design in a place not corresponding to the design.

  In recent years, invasion damage to companies, shops, buildings, etc. has been increasing year by year. According to the investigation by the Metropolitan Police Department, 60% or more is caused by empty nests in the situation of occurrence of burglary by mouth, and 70% or more is caused by buildings in the situation of occurrence by location (Non-Patent Document 1).

In view of such a situation, interest in crime prevention buildings is increasing year by year from those who plan to purchase buildings or from residents of buildings that have already lived. Therefore, for example, a device for explaining the function of the crime prevention equipment actually installed in a building exhibition building is disclosed (Patent Document 1).
http://www.keishicho.metro.tokyo.jp/seian/ppiking/ppiking.htm JP-A-2005-249900

  However, even if the above technology can confirm the function of the crime prevention equipment in the building exhibition building, the customer actually wants to know the design of the building that he intends to purchase or the building he already has. In order to confirm this point, it is necessary to seek the evaluation of an expert engineer. However, since it is sales representatives who actually engage in dialogue with customers, even if they do not have such specialized knowledge, it is necessary to determine whether or not they fall under crime prevention design efficiently. There is a need for a technique that can do this.

  In order to solve such a problem, the first invention includes a plurality of check items defined from three viewpoints: a building that is difficult to target, a building that is difficult to enter, or a building that is difficult to damage, A table that can be used to score any building by checking the check items from the three aspects of the surrounding environment, building, and lifestyle, and the crime prevention measures that should be taken according to each point scored using this table A security card design method using a countermeasure card, and a surrounding environment scoring process for scoring security problems in the surrounding environment of the building using the surrounding environment checklist of the table, and a building check of the table The building scoring process, which uses a list to score the crime prevention performance of the building, and the lifestyle checklist of the table, the lifestyle habits of the residents of the building. A crime prevention design method for a building including a lifestyle scoring process for scoring security problems and a crime prevention card selection process for selecting a security card based on the scoring result of the checklist for each of the scoring processes. suggest.

  In the second invention, the crime prevention design method according to the first invention, further comprising a crime prevention design step of performing a crime prevention design according to the description of the crime prevention measure card selected in the crime prevention measure card selection step Propose.

  In the third invention, the crime prevention design method according to the second invention, wherein the building after the crime prevention design in the crime prevention design process is subjected to the building checklist again, and the building is subjected to scoring the crime prevention performance. A re-scoring step, and a security measure card re-selecting step for re-selecting a security measure card based on the score result of the building check list of the building re-scoring step. In the security design step, the security measure card is re-selected. We propose a crime prevention design method that performs crime prevention design according to the description of the crime prevention countermeasure card selected in the process.

  According to a fourth invention, the crime prevention design method according to the third invention, wherein the building re-scoring step and the security countermeasure card re-selection step are repeated until the scoring result reaches a predetermined value. A design method is proposed.

  According to a fifth invention, in the crime prevention design method according to any one of the first invention to the fourth invention, the crime prevention design step is performed when the building to be scored is a building to be built. Proposes a crime prevention design method including a building design plan change step for changing the building design plan according to the description of the crime prevention card.

  In the sixth invention, a security design card set comprising a table sheet, which is a table including a table including the surrounding environment checklist, the building checklist, and the lifestyle checklist described in the first invention, and a security countermeasure card suggest.

  In the crime prevention design method of the present invention having the above-described configuration, even if it is a sales person or a customer of a housing contractor who is not an expert such as an architect, the design of the building is performed by using the table by the surrounding environment, the building Because it is possible to check from three different crime prevention viewpoints of lifestyle habits, it is possible to grasp in a multifaceted manner what kind of crime prevention design the building lacks and what kind of crime prevention measures should be taken . For this reason, not only can the security measures be efficiently reflected in the design, but also the resident can have an excellent effect of improving the awareness of crime prevention.

  Moreover, in the crime prevention design method of the present invention, since the building is repeatedly evaluated after the crime prevention design is performed, new security weak points to be prioritized can be sequentially extracted. Therefore, it is possible to easily perform a crime prevention design that matches an arbitrary budget and a crime prevention function.

  Furthermore, in the crime prevention design method of the present invention, when the scoring target is a building to be built, the crime prevention measure can be efficiently taken by changing the building design plan itself. Moreover, since it is a stage before construction, construction costs etc. do not occur, and it is possible to take crime prevention measures at low cost. Further, the building design plan in which the crime prevention design method of the present embodiment is always applied or more can be proposed to the customer by using the crime prevention design method of the present embodiment.

  Hereinafter, embodiments of the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings. Note that the present invention is not limited to these embodiments, and can be implemented in various modes without departing from the spirit of the present invention. The first embodiment will mainly describe claims 1, 2, and 6. The second embodiment will mainly describe claims 3 and 4. The third embodiment will mainly describe claim 5.

  Embodiment 1

  (Concept of Embodiment 1) FIG. 1 is a diagram showing an outline of a crime prevention design method of this embodiment. First, a table with a plurality of check items (0101) determined from the three viewpoints that are difficult to target, intrusion, and damage is difficult to occur, and these check items are divided into three viewpoints: surrounding environment, building, and lifestyle ( 0102) and a security measure card (0103) indicating a security measure to be taken against the building in accordance with the scoring performed using the table. Next, using the surrounding environment checklist (0102a), the building checklist (0102b), and the lifestyle checklist (0102c) of the table (0102), the specific building (0104) is scored by dividing it into three viewpoints. It is possible to extract security weak points regarding the target building. When the security countermeasure card (0103) is selected based on the result of scoring on the table (0102), the selected security countermeasure card (0103a) has a crime prevention countermeasure for overcoming the security weakness of the target building. The design is described, and the security design to be applied to the target building can be easily grasped.

  (Configuration of Embodiment 1) FIG. 2 shows a flow of processing of the crime prevention design method in this embodiment. The crime prevention design method in the present embodiment includes “surrounding environment scoring process” (S0201), “building scoring process” (S0202), “lifestyle scoring process” (S0203), and “crime prevention card selection process” (S0204). ) And has a “security design process” (S 0205) as necessary.

  (Description of Configuration of Embodiment 1) First, “table” (0102) and “crime prevention card” (0103) used in each step of this embodiment will be described.

  The “table” (0102) is configured such that an arbitrary building can be scored by checking a plurality of check items from the first viewpoint which is three categories of surrounding environment, building, and lifestyle. Buildings to be scored can be not only for buildings that actually exist, but also for buildings that will be built in the future. When scoring a building that is scheduled to be built in the future, it is assumed to some extent that the building has been built, depending on the construction site of the building, the blueprint and housing plan of the building, and the residents who are expected to live in the building. If possible. The first viewpoints, which are the three categories, are in an independent relationship with each other, and the crime prevention degree of each viewpoint can be designed to a desired degree by performing the crime prevention design for each viewpoint independently. However, the multiple check items in each checklist that make up the table are defined from the common viewpoint of “a building that is difficult to target”, “a building that is difficult to enter”, and “a building that is difficult to damage” By improving the crime prevention performance of any of the three viewpoints of the surrounding environment, the building, and the lifestyle, the crime prevention degree can be increased as a whole.

  The surrounding environment refers to the state of the surroundings of the site where the building is built or will be built. A building refers to a building that has been built or is scheduled to be built, and facilities (exterior and parts) attached to the building. The lifestyle habits refer to habits in daily life of a resident of a building or a planned resident. A part of the table that can be scored from the viewpoint of the surrounding environment is “peripheral environment check list” (FIG. 3: 0300), a part of the table that can be scored from the viewpoint of the building is “building check list” (FIG. 4: 0400), A part of the table that can be scored from the lifestyle is a “lifestyle checklist” (FIG. 5: 0500). That is, as shown in FIG. 1, the table (0102) includes a surrounding environment checklist (0300), a building checklist (0400), and a lifestyle checklist (0500). These check lists may be formed using a computer or the like. The surrounding environment checklist (0300) is a checklist for extracting what kind of security weak points exist in the surrounding environment of the target building. The building checklist (0400) is a checklist for extracting what kind of security weak points the building design has. The lifestyle checklist (0500) is a checklist for extracting what kind of security weaknesses the usual lifestyle and crime prevention awareness of the residents or planned residents of the target building have. .

  The check items described in these checklists are determined from three viewpoints: buildings that are difficult to target, buildings that are difficult to enter, and buildings that are difficult to damage. For example, the check item (0301) in FIG. 3 that “the roadside trees are thick and the street view is bad” is mainly determined from the viewpoint of “a building that is difficult to target” and “a building that is difficult to enter”. Check items. Further, since this check item relates to the state of the surrounding environment of the building, it is one element of the table as a check item of the surrounding environment check list. Similarly, the check item (0401) “The fence, fence, and fence have a good view” in FIG. 4 is a check item mainly determined from the viewpoint of “a building that is difficult to target”. Since it relates to the structure of the building, it becomes one element of the table as a check item of the building check list. Furthermore, the check item (0501) of “Knowing what kind of crime is happening in the neighborhood” in FIG. 5 is mainly from the viewpoint of “a building that is difficult to target” and “a building that is difficult to damage”. Since it is a predetermined check item and relates to the state of daily lifestyle, it becomes one element of the table as a check item of the lifestyle check list. As described above, each check list mainly includes an item column (0302, 0402, 0502) for describing a plurality of check items and a column (0303, 0403, 0503) for checking a specific building for each item. Is done. Further, as shown in FIG. 4, a crime prevention design column (0404) may be provided to clearly indicate from which viewpoint each check item is defined. By scoring each specific building (0104) using the table configured by these checklists, it is possible to acquire the scoring results by dividing it into three viewpoints: surrounding environment, building, and lifestyle.

  “Scoring” is performed by the grader answering each check item. In the present embodiment, all check items are configured to answer in a two-choice format, but for example, even in a format in which scoring is made in five stages of “1, 2, 3, 4, 5”, etc. It is good or it is good also as scoring in the form which fills in the check item which actually writes the score. In the following description of each process, a method for scoring using each checklist will be described.

  In the “surrounding environment scoring step” (S0201), scoring of security problems in the surrounding environment of the building (0104) is performed using the surrounding environment checklist (0300) of the table (0102). In the surrounding environment check list (0300) shown in FIG. 3, a check column (0303) is checked whether the surrounding environment of the target building corresponds to the A column or the B column for each check item (0302). Scoring. In the case of corresponding to column A, check items and check fields are configured so that it is determined that the surrounding environment is desirable for crime prevention. Therefore, the item corresponding to the column B can be extracted as a problem in crime prevention in the surrounding environment of the building to be scored. In addition, the more items that fall in the column B, the more problems there are in the crime prevention in the surrounding environment of the target building. In the surrounding environment check list (0300) of FIG. 3, 6 items out of 17 items are checked in the B column. In other words, the buildings that are subject to scoring have problems for 35% of all check items in the surrounding environment checklist.

  In the “building scoring process” (S0202), the crime prevention performance of the building (0104) is scored using the building checklist (0400) of the table (0102). In the building check list (0400) shown in FIG. 4, scoring is performed by checking in the check column (0403) whether the design of the target building corresponds to YES or NO for each check item (0402). . If the answer is YES, check items and check fields are configured so that it is determined that the design is desirable for crime prevention. Therefore, an item corresponding to NO can be extracted as a weak point in crime prevention in the design of a building to be scored. In addition, the more items that correspond to NO, the more problematic the crime prevention is in designing the target building. In the building check list (0400) of FIG. 4, 18 items out of 45 items are all checked with NO. In other words, the buildings that are subject to scoring have problems for 40% of all check items in the building checklist.

  In the “lifestyle scoring process” (S0203), a crime prevention problem in the lifestyle of the resident of the building (0104) is scored using the lifestyle checklist (0500) of the table (0102). No matter how high the crime prevention performance is, if the resident's awareness of crime prevention is low, it cannot be said that thorough crime prevention measures are taken. Therefore, in the lifestyle scoring process, the resident's security awareness is scored. In the lifestyle check list (0500) shown in FIG. 5, the check column (0503) checks whether the lifestyle of the resident of the target building corresponds to YES or NO for each check item (0502). Scoring. When it corresponds to YES, the check item and the check column are comprised so that it may be judged that it is a lifestyle habit desirable for crime prevention. Therefore, the item corresponding to NO can be extracted as a problem in crime prevention in the lifestyle of the resident of the building targeted for scoring. In addition, the more items that correspond to NO, the more crime prevention problems exist in the lifestyle of the residents of the target building. In the lifestyle check list (0500) of FIG. 5, 3 items out of 12 items are all checked with NO. In other words, the buildings that are subject to scoring have problems for 25% of all check items in the surrounding environment checklist.

  As described above, by using the table (0102), the surrounding environment scoring step (S0201), the building scoring step (S0202), and the lifestyle scoring step (S0203) are performed, so that the surrounding environment, building, and lifestyle 3 A particular building (0104) can be scored from one perspective.

  In the “security countermeasure card selection process” (S0204), a security countermeasure card is selected based on the scoring result of the checklist of each process.

  The “security measure card” (0103) is configured to indicate a security measure corresponding to the scoring performed using the table (0102). As shown in FIG. 1, the security countermeasure card (0103) is composed of a plurality of security countermeasure cards, and the corresponding security countermeasure card (0103a) is selected based on the result of scoring in each scoring process. The corresponding crime prevention countermeasure card may be one or a plurality of cards. The crime prevention card may be formed using a computer. If there are no security problems, no security card is selected.

  Specific examples of the security measures card are shown in FIGS. 6 to 8, for example, 1- (1) and the crime prevention number (0601, 0701, 0801) are enclosed in a circle instead of () in the figure. The same applies throughout this specification). A design guideline suitable for crime prevention corresponding to each check item of the building checklist is described as a guideline (0602, 0702, 0802) substantially below the crime prevention measure number (0601, 0701, 0801). A security measure column (0603, 0703, 0803) is provided substantially below the guideline (0602, 0702, 0802). In the crime prevention measures column (0603, 0703, 0803), a design method for designing in accordance with the design guideline is described together with simple drawings and explanations.

  FIG. 6 is a crime prevention card for mainly knowing the crime situation in the surrounding environment. FIG. 7 is a crime prevention card for mainly performing crime prevention design on a building. FIG. 8 is a security countermeasure card for enhancing security awareness in daily life of a resident of a building or a prospective resident. 6 to 8 are examples of the crime prevention card, and are not limited to these crime prevention cards, and further include a plurality of crime prevention cards. In the security countermeasure card selection step (S0202), these security countermeasure cards are selected according to the scoring result acquired in the scoring result acquisition step.

  For example, in the surrounding environment check list (0300) shown in FIG. 3, a check item (0301) that “the roadside trees are thick and the street prospect is bad” and a crime prevention countermeasure card for knowing the surrounding environment shown in FIG. If the score “Bad” in column B is obtained, the card shown in FIG. 6 is referred to in order to know the crime situation in the surrounding environment. The card shown in FIG. 6 describes how to know the criminal situation. By referring to this card, knowledge about the criminal situation of the surrounding environment can be deepened. Further, when the check item (0301) is associated with a security countermeasure card for performing a security design on the building itself shown in FIG. 7, a fence or a fence is attached to the building as described on the security countermeasure card. It can be seen that the design should be changed so that the prospects on the site are better. Thus, it is good also as compensating for the weak point corresponding to the said check item (0301) indirectly rather than directly by making it link with the crime prevention measure card | curd of a different viewpoint. In addition, since the crime prevention measures card for applying crime prevention design to buildings has crime prevention guidelines and specific crime prevention measures in accordance with the crime prevention guidelines, it should be applied to the buildings that are subject to check. Therefore, it is possible to make a design that compensates for the security weakness.

  Further, the association may be performed explicitly by providing a security measure card number corresponding to the check item by providing a security measure card column (0405) in the table as shown in FIG.

  Moreover, it is good also as selecting a security countermeasure card | curd by weighting each check list. For example, as described above, in the peripheral environment check list (0300) of FIG. In the building check list (0400) of FIG. 4, 18 items out of 45 items are all checked by NO. In the lifestyle check list (0500) of FIG. 5, 3 items out of 12 items are all checked with NO. If these are totaled, a scoring result is obtained that the surrounding environment checklist is 35%, the building checklist is 40%, and the surrounding environment checklist is 25%. If this is expressed as the weakness rate of each checklist, it can be said that it is necessary to preferentially select a security countermeasure card corresponding to each check item of the building checklist having the highest weakness rate. Therefore, in the crime prevention countermeasure card selection step (S0204), the card corresponding to the check item determined to correspond to NO in the building checklist (0400) based on the scoring result is preferentially selected. For example, in the building checklist of FIG. 4, the check item (0401) “The fence, fence, and fence have a structure with good visibility” corresponds to NO, so the security card selection step (S0204) Then, in order to compensate for the security weakness of this building, a corresponding security countermeasure card as shown in FIG. 7 is selected.

  In addition, the crime prevention design should be given priority by summing up the scoring results in each scoring process for each of the three viewpoints: buildings that are difficult to target, buildings that are difficult to enter, or buildings that are difficult to damage. You may choose to rank them. Below, a specific example is shown using a building checklist (0400). In FIG. 4, each check item (0402) related to crime prevention design has three viewpoints: “Is it difficult to be targeted”, “Is it difficult to enter”, or “It is difficult to damage”? Of these, the point of view is determined by indicating a circle in the crime prevention design column (0404). “It is difficult to invade” is further subdivided into “it takes time to invade” and “it can detect intrusions”. Each check item can be weighted according to the security design determined from which viewpoint. For example, in the building check list shown in FIG. 4, the number of check items corresponding to “NO” is described for each viewpoint in the lower column of the check column (0406). In FIG. 4, the item regarding the viewpoint of “a building that is difficult to target” is 7 items out of 15 items, the item regarding the viewpoint of “is a building that is difficult to enter” is 10 items out of 27 items, and is “a building that is difficult to damage”? The item related to the viewpoint corresponds to 1 of 3 items, NO. Then, according to the number of items, it is possible to rank which type of security design should be preferentially performed. As an example, as described above, when the weakness rate is calculated for each item related to each viewpoint, the item related to “Is it difficult to target” is 47%, the item related to “is difficult to enter” is 37%, and “damage occurs”. The item regarding “is difficult” is 33%. Furthermore, weighting is performed according to the order of the weakness rates. For example, according to the weakness rate, the item related to “Is it difficult to target” is set to 10 points, the item related to “Is difficult to enter” is set to 7 points, the item related to “Is it difficult to damage” is set to 3 points, etc. (0407) ). Then, the crime prevention countermeasure card | curd corresponding to each check item can be weighted with the accumulated value of these points. For example, a security measure card identified by a security measure card number of 4- (1) is associated with a plurality of check items (0408), and the cumulative value of points of each check item is 4- (1). It can be given as points for security measures cards. Similarly, by weighting all the security countermeasure cards, the security countermeasure cards can be weighted. With these weightings, it is possible to prioritize which crime prevention measure should be preferentially performed on which crime prevention measure card. From the scoring results shown in FIG. 4, points are given to each security measure card and the priorities are given in FIG. The results shown in FIG. 9 indicate that the security measures described in the 4- (1) security card should be preferentially performed. A specific example of the 4- (1) security countermeasure card is shown in FIG. The security countermeasure cards ranked as shown in FIG. 9 can be clarified in priority by rearranging according to the ranking. In addition, although it demonstrated using the building checklist here, it can rank also in each check item by setting it as the same structure also about a surrounding environment checklist and a lifestyle checklist. Moreover, when using a computer for the structure of a crime prevention design check list | wrist, you may make these ranking process by a computer.

  Further, as shown in FIG. 1, it includes a table sheet that is a sheet on which a table including a surrounding environment checklist, a building checklist, and a lifestyle checklist for performing these processes, and a security countermeasure card. It is desirable to have a security design card set in advance.

  In the “security design process” (S 0205), the security equipment is designed to be incorporated into the building according to the description of the security card selected in the security card selection process. The crime prevention countermeasure card describes a guideline for performing a crime prevention measure corresponding to the check item, and a design method for designing according to the guideline. In the security design process, the design technique described in the security card is incorporated into the building design. For example, when the crime prevention card shown in FIG. 10 is selected, in the crime prevention design process, the crime prevention measures for the door are taken into the building design according to the description of the crime prevention card.

  (Processing Flow of Embodiment 1) The processing flow in this embodiment will be described with reference to FIG. First, in the surrounding environment scoring step (S0201), scoring for security problems in the surrounding environment of the building is performed using the surrounding environment checklist (0300) of the table (0102). Next, in the building scoring step (S0202), the building crime prevention performance is scored using the building checklist (0400) of the table (0102). Next, in the lifestyle habit scoring step (S0203), the crime prevention problem in the lifestyle of the resident of the building is scored using the lifestyle checklist (0500). In each of the above scoring steps, problems in building crime prevention can be extracted from the three viewpoints of the surrounding environment, the building, and the lifestyle. Note that S0201 to S0203 are not necessarily performed in this order. Then, in the security countermeasure card selection step (S0204), a security countermeasure card (0103) is selected based on the scoring result of the checklist of each scoring step. Since one or a plurality of crime prevention countermeasure cards (0103a) selected in the crime prevention countermeasure card selection step (S0204) indicate the crime prevention measures to be taken, they were selected in the crime prevention design step (S0205). Design crime prevention according to the security card description.

  (Effect of Embodiment 1) In the crime prevention design method of this embodiment, even if it is a sales person or a customer of a housing contractor who is not an expert such as an architect, the design of the building is performed by the surrounding environment by using a table. Since it is possible to check from three different crime prevention viewpoints of buildings and lifestyles, it is possible to grasp in a multifaceted manner what kind of crime prevention design is lacking in the building and what kind of crime prevention measures should be taken. it can. For this reason, not only can the security measures be efficiently reflected in the design, but also the resident can have an excellent effect of improving the awareness of crime prevention.

  << Embodiment 2 >>

  (Summary of Embodiment 2) In the crime prevention design method described in Embodiment 1, as long as all the crime prevention designs described in the selected crime prevention countermeasure card can be incorporated, in principle, the crime prevention of the surrounding environment, buildings, and lifestyle habits All the problems are solved. However, in reality, there are cases where it is difficult to perform all of the crime prevention performance of a building due to a budget problem or the like. Therefore, in this embodiment, when the security design described in a part of the selected security card is incorporated into the building design, the building checklist is used again for the building after the security design. Evaluate crime prevention performance.

  (Configuration of Embodiment 2) FIG. 11 shows a flow of processing of the crime prevention design method in this embodiment. The crime prevention design method in the present embodiment includes “surrounding environment scoring process” (S1101), “building scoring process” (S1102), “lifestyle scoring process” (S1103), and “crime prevention card selection process” (S1104). ) And a “crime prevention design process” (S1105), and further includes a “building re-scoring process” (S1106) and a “crime prevention card reselection process” (S1107). Since the steps other than “building re-scoring step” (S1106) and “crime prevention card reselection step” (S1107) have already been described, description thereof will be omitted.

  (Description of Configuration of Embodiment 2) In the “building re-scoring process” (S1106), the building check list is used again for the building after the crime prevention design in the crime prevention design process (S1105), and the building crime prevention performance is verified. Scoring. As the building check list, a check list similar to the building check list (0400) illustrated in FIG. 4 described in the first embodiment is used. The scoring method is also the same as the building scoring process described in the first embodiment.

  For example, as shown in FIG. 9, when crime prevention countermeasure cards are ranked, it is efficient not to capture all crime prevention designs from the balance with the budget etc. The crime prevention performance of the building can be improved. Now, it is assumed that all of the security measures described in the 4- (1) security measure card (FIG. 10) having the highest priority in FIG. 9 are incorporated into the building design. Then, when the building is re-scored in the building re-scoring process, as shown in FIG. 12, the check item (1201) related to the 4- (1) security countermeasure card is checked. Are all YES. For this reason, in FIG. 12, the item regarding the viewpoint of “a building that is difficult to target” is 6 out of 15 items, the item regarding the viewpoint of “a building that is difficult to enter” is 8 items out of 27, and “not easily damaged” The item regarding the viewpoint of “building” is one of three items, and the number of items corresponding to NO changes. This is described on the lower side (1202) of the check column.

  In the “security countermeasure card reselecting step” (S1107), the security countermeasure card is selected again based on the scoring result of the check list of the building re-scoring step. The method for selecting a security countermeasure card is the same as the security countermeasure card selection step (S1104) described in the first embodiment.

  For example, the case where the scoring result shown in FIG. 12 is acquired in the building re-scoring step (S1106) will be described. Similar to the case shown in FIG. 4, in FIG. 12, when the weakness rate is calculated for each item relating to each viewpoint, the item relating to “Is it difficult to target” is 40%, and the item relating to “Is difficult to enter” is 29 %, The item regarding “is it hard to cause damage” is 33%, which changes from the case of FIG. If weighting is newly performed according to the order of the weakness rate, 10 points for the item “Is it difficult to aim at”, 3 points for the item “Is it difficult to enter?”, “Is it hard to cause damage?” The item regarding can be set to 7 points or the like (1203). Then, the cumulative value of the points of the security countermeasure card corresponding to each check item also changes, and the number of points of each security countermeasure card becomes as shown in FIG. Comparing the ranks of the crime prevention card shown in FIG. 9 and FIG. 13, in FIG. 13, the priority of 4- (5) was lower than the crime prevention card of 2- (3) and 3- (3). Security cards have a higher priority. Therefore, it can be seen that the security design to be prioritized next is the security design described in the security countermeasure card of 4- (5). For this reason, in the crime prevention countermeasure card reselection step, the crime prevention countermeasure card 4- (5) is preferentially selected.

  As described above, a security countermeasure card can be selected in the security countermeasure card reselecting step (S1107) according to the scoring result obtained by performing the re-scoring step (S1106) on the building after the security design is performed. . In the above example, the case where all the crime prevention measures described in one crime prevention countermeasure card are performed in the crime prevention design process (S1105) is illustrated. However, the number of crime prevention countermeasure cards selected for the crime prevention measure and the crime prevention The result of scoring in the security measure card reselection process varies depending on the achievement level of the security measure described on the countermeasure card.

  In the “security design process” in the present embodiment, the security design is performed again according to the description of the security countermeasure card selected in the security countermeasure card reselection process. After performing the security design again, the re-scoring step (S1106) and the security design card reselecting step (S1107) may be repeated. The repetition of the re-scoring step (S1106) and the crime prevention design card re-selection step (S1107) may be performed by setting a specific number of times (for example, three times) as the number of repetitions. For example, 20% or less may be repeated. In this way, if the scoring is repeated until the scoring result is equal to or lower than the predetermined value, all buildings that have been scoring will have a crime prevention performance exceeding a certain standard. And, by improving the crime prevention performance from the viewpoint of the building, we took the viewpoint of “a building that is difficult to target”, “a building that is difficult to enter”, and “a building that is difficult to damage” that is common to other viewpoints. The degree of crime prevention performance can be enhanced as a whole.

  Assuming that the building re-scoring step (S1106) is included in the building scoring step (S1102) and the security countermeasure card re-selection step (S1107) is included in the security countermeasure card selection step (S1104), each step is as shown in FIG. It can also be shown as follows. In FIG. 14, a determination step (S1108) for repeating is added. The building scoring process (S1102) is performed after the lifestyle scoring process (S1103).

  (Processing Flow of Embodiment 2) The processing flow in this embodiment will be described with reference to FIG. First, in the surrounding environment scoring step (S1101), scoring of security problems in the surrounding environment of the building is performed using the surrounding environment checklist (0300) of the table (0102). Next, in the building scoring step (S1102), the building crime prevention performance is scored using the building checklist (0400) of the table (0102). Next, in the lifestyle scoring step (S1103), the crime prevention problem in the lifestyle of the resident of the building is scored using the lifestyle check list (0500). In each of the above scoring steps, problems in building crime prevention can be extracted from the three viewpoints of the surrounding environment, the building, and the lifestyle. Note that S1101 to S1103 are not necessarily performed in this order. Then, in the security countermeasure card selection step (S1104), the security countermeasure card (0103) is selected based on the scoring result in the checklist of each scoring step. Since one or a plurality of crime prevention countermeasure cards (0103a) selected in the crime prevention countermeasure card selection step (S1104) indicate the crime prevention measures to be taken, they were selected in the crime prevention design step (S1105). Design crime prevention according to the security card description. In the building re-scoring step (S1106), the building crime prevention performance is scored again using the building checklist for the building for which the security measures were taken in the crime prevention design step (S1105). In the security countermeasure card reselecting step (S1107), one or more security countermeasure cards are selected again based on the scoring result of the building check list in the building re-scoring step (S1106). Then, in the crime prevention design step (S1105), the crime prevention design of the building is performed according to the description of the crime prevention countermeasure card selected again.

  (Effect of Embodiment 2) In the crime prevention design method of the present invention having the above-described configuration, even a sales person or customer of a housing contractor who is not an expert such as an architect uses a table to build the building by himself / herself. Because it is possible to check the design of the building from the viewpoint of crime prevention, it is easy to refer to the crime prevention countermeasure card what kind of crime prevention design is missing in the building and what kind of crime prevention measures should be taken Can be caught.

  Moreover, in the crime prevention design method of the present invention, since the building is repeatedly evaluated after the crime prevention design is performed, new security weak points to be prioritized can be sequentially extracted. Therefore, it is possible to easily perform a crime prevention design that matches an arbitrary budget and a crime prevention function.

  << Embodiment 3 >>

  (Summary of Embodiment 3) In the crime prevention design method of Embodiment 1 or 2, a problem in crime prevention of a building to be scored is extracted and this problem is overcome. Therefore, in order to take the crime prevention measures described in the crime prevention measure card, crime prevention equipment and the like will be newly added based on the building to be scored. However, when scoring a building that has not yet been constructed, and when problems in the structure of the building are identified, the person who changed the building design plan rather than adding security equipment However, the crime prevention performance may be improved efficiently. Therefore, in the present embodiment, a crime prevention design technique related to the crime prevention design technique including a process of changing the building design plan according to the crime prevention countermeasure card will be described.

  (Configuration of Embodiment 3) FIG. 15 shows a flow of processing of the crime prevention design method in this embodiment. The security design method according to the present embodiment includes “surrounding environment scoring process” (S1501), “building scoring process” (S1502), “lifestyle scoring process” (S1503), and “crime prevention card selection process” (S1504). ) And “crime prevention design step” (S1505), and “crime prevention design step” (S1505) includes “building design plan change step” (S1506). Since steps other than the “building design plan changing step” (S1506) have already been described, the description thereof will be omitted.

  (Description of Configuration of Embodiment 3) In “building design plan change process” (S1506), if the building to be scored is a building scheduled to be built, the building design is made according to the description on the security card. Change the plan. A building design plan is a design that is the basis for building a building. The building design plan is generally called a housing plan, a design plan, a building plan, a housing design plan, or the like. When purchasing a house, the prospective purchaser usually selects one building design plan from several building design plans. Based on the selected building design plan, various options and the like are added to design according to the wishes of the prospective purchaser. In the design plan change process, the building design plan itself as a basis is changed. In this respect, it is different from the security design process of the first or second embodiment in which a design for taking security measures is incorporated into the base design.

  For example, a case will be described in which a security card shown in FIG. 16 is selected on the assumption that a window provided in a building is a security weak point. As shown in FIG. 16, when there is a possibility that the window is used as an intrusion route, A: the ridge / bay window is shaped and arranged so as not to enter the building, B: an opening or bay window with a ridge, and Install lighting, sensors, and security cameras in the nearby openings, C: Take measures to prevent crimes such as strengthening the openings near the fences and bay windows, and not creating anything that can be used as scaffolding near the fences and bay windows Thus, the crime prevention performance against intrusion from the window can be improved. Here, in order to perform the crime prevention design described in A, the shape and arrangement of the ridge and the bay window must be changed. However, in an already constructed building, it may not be easily changed depending on the structure. Even in such a case, if the building to be scored is a pre-construction building, security measures can be taken easily by changing the base design itself through the building design plan change process. .

  FIG. 17 shows a case where the repetition process described in FIG. 14 of the second embodiment is included. About building to be built from now on, building re-scoring process (S1706) → security measures card reselection process (S1707) → building design plan change process (S1708) A building design plan that satisfies the desired crime prevention performance can be found. Moreover, the building supply side can propose to the customer a building design plan in which a crime prevention design exceeding a certain standard is always performed by repeating the above steps in advance when designing the building design plan.

  (Processing Flow of Embodiment 3) The processing flow in this embodiment will be described with reference to FIG. First, in the surrounding environment scoring step (S1501), the crime prevention problem in the surrounding environment of the building is scored using the surrounding environment checklist (0300) of the table (0102). Next, in the building scoring step (S1502), the building crime prevention performance is scored using the building checklist (0400) of the table (0102). Next, in the lifestyle habit scoring step (S1503), the crime prevention problem in the lifestyle of the resident of the building is scored using the lifestyle checklist (0500). In each of the above scoring steps, problems in building crime prevention can be extracted from the three viewpoints of the surrounding environment, the building, and the lifestyle. Note that S1501 to S1503 are not necessarily performed in this order. Then, in the security countermeasure card selection step (S1504), a security countermeasure card (0103) is selected based on the scoring result in the checklist of each scoring step. Since one or a plurality of crime prevention countermeasure cards (0103a) selected in the crime prevention countermeasure card selection step (S1504) indicate the crime prevention measures to be taken, in the crime prevention design step (S1505), the selected crime prevention Design crime prevention according to the countermeasure card. In the crime prevention design step (S1505), if the crime prevention design to be performed is more efficient when the building design plan is changed, the building design plan itself is changed in the building design plan change step (S1506).

  (Effects of Embodiment 3) In the crime prevention design method according to this embodiment, when the scoring target is a building to be built, it is possible to efficiently take crime prevention measures by changing the building design plan itself. Moreover, since it is a stage before construction, construction costs etc. do not occur and it is possible to take crime prevention measures at low cost.

  Furthermore, for the building supplier, by using the crime prevention design method of the present embodiment, it is possible to propose to the customer a building design plan in which a crime prevention design exceeding a certain standard is always performed.

The figure which shows the outline | summary of Embodiment 1. The figure which shows the flow of a process of Embodiment 1. Figure showing the surrounding environment checklist Diagram showing building checklist Diagram showing lifestyle checklist Figure showing security measures card for the surrounding environment Illustration showing crime prevention card for building Figure showing a crime prevention card related to lifestyle Illustration illustrating ranking of crime prevention card by points Figure illustrating security card for selected building The figure which shows the flow of a process of Embodiment 2. Figure illustrating an example of a rechecked building checklist Diagram illustrating ranking of crime prevention card by points at the time of re-scoring Diagram showing the flow of processing when scoring is repeated The figure which shows the flow of a process of Embodiment 3. Figure which illustrates crime prevention measures card about window The figure which shows the flow of a process in case scoring is repeatedly performed in the crime prevention design method of Embodiment 3.

Explanation of symbols

0101 Check item 0102 Table 0102a, 0300 Surrounding environment checklist 0102b, 0400 Building checklist 0102c, 0500 Lifestyle checklist 0103 Crime prevention card 0103a Selected crime prevention card 0104 Building S0201 Surrounding environment scoring process S0202 Building scoring process S0203 Lifestyle Scoring process S0204 Crime prevention card selection process S0205 Crime prevention design process

Claims (6)

It includes a number of check items defined from three viewpoints: a building that is difficult to target, a building that is difficult to enter, and a building that is difficult to damage. It is a technique for crime prevention design using a table that can mark any building by checking from and a crime prevention countermeasure card that indicates the crime prevention measures to be taken according to the scoring for each viewpoint performed using this table ,
A surrounding environment scoring step of scoring security problems in the surrounding environment of the building using the surrounding environment checklist of the table;
A building scoring process for scoring the crime prevention performance of the building using the building checklist of the table;
A lifestyle scoring process for scoring security problems in the lifestyle of the residents of the building using the lifestyle checklist of the table;
A security measure card selection step of selecting a security measure card based on the scoring result of the checklist of each of the scoring steps;
Crime prevention design techniques for buildings.   The crime prevention design method according to claim 1, further comprising a crime prevention design step of performing a crime prevention design in accordance with a description of the crime prevention measure card selected in the crime prevention measure card selection step. For the building after the crime prevention design in the crime prevention design process, again the building re-scoring step for scoring the crime prevention performance of the building using the building checklist,
A security countermeasure card reselection step of re-selecting a security countermeasure card based on the building checklist scoring result of the building re-scoring step;
Have
The crime prevention design method according to claim 2, wherein in the crime prevention design process, the crime prevention design is performed in accordance with the description of the crime prevention countermeasure card selected in the crime prevention countermeasure card reselection step.   The crime prevention design method according to claim 3, wherein the building re-scoring step and the security countermeasure card re-selecting step are repeated until the scoring result reaches a predetermined value. The crime prevention design process
5. The building design plan change step of changing a building design plan according to the description of the crime prevention card when the building subject to scoring is a building planned to be built. The crime prevention design method described in Kaichi.   A crime prevention design card set comprising a table sheet that is a sheet on which a table including the surrounding environment check list, the building check list, and the lifestyle check list according to claim 1 is described, and a security countermeasure card.