JP2007213348A - Depreciation cost calculation program and depreciation cost calculation method - Google Patents

Abstract

<P>PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To improve credibility of an income and expenditure analysis result in a medical institution. <P>SOLUTION: Based on depreciation costs of medical instruments, the number of specific medical practices which can be performed using arbitrary medical instruments from among a plurality of medical practices, and the number of patients subjected to each specific medical practice, a depreciation cost per usage of each medical instrument is calculated. The number of patients is specified according to whether a medical practice which is comprehensively evaluated according to a comprehensive payment method based on diagnosis group classification is performed thereto or not. The resulting calculation result is displayed on a medical practice-based income and expenditure analysis screen 1700 for each specific medical practice. <P>COPYRIGHT: (C)2007,JPO&INPIT

Description

  The present invention relates to a depreciation cost calculation program and a depreciation cost calculation method for calculating a depreciation cost of a medical device.

  Conventionally, in order to calculate the income and expenditure at medical institutions, the depreciation of medical equipment used for medical practice, for example, the depreciation cost per use of medical equipment and the depreciation of each medical practice are calculated. ing.

  The depreciation cost per use of the medical device is calculated by dividing the depreciation cost of the medical device by the number of times the medical device is used. In addition, the depreciation cost for each medical practice is calculated by adding the number of times the medical practice has been performed to the depreciation cost per use of the medical equipment.

  For example, in a medical institution having multiple medical departments such as hospitals, the above-mentioned depreciation expenses per use of medical equipment and depreciation expenses by medical practice are used for the purpose of profit analysis for each medical department. It may be calculated for each medical department. In this case, the original depreciation cost of the medical device is allocated to each medical department according to the ratio between the total number of medical treatments performed using the medical device and the number of medical treatments for each medical department.

  Specifically, for example, when a medical practice using a medical device for which a depreciation cost is calculated is performed twice in Department A and three times in Department B, the total number of clinical actions is five. 40% of the depreciation cost of the medical device is allocated to the A department and 60% is allocated to the B department.

  Further, Patent Document 1 below discloses a medical accounting system in which profit / loss analysis is performed by breaking down into a department or a medical practice. Further, Patent Document 2 below discloses a cost calculation method for each medical department for appropriately performing cost calculation in a hospital.

Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 2003-242251 JP 2004-362556 A

  By the way, the number of medical treatments using a medical device that can perform a plurality of types of tests in one use does not necessarily match the number of times the medical device is used. And the insurance points for medical practice using such medical devices are comprehensive payments according to the comprehensive payment method based on the diagnosis group classification because the labor of the examination can be saved by conducting multiple types of examinations at the same time. Evaluation (so-called “rounding calculation”) is applied.

  When a medical institution applies for an insurance score according to the medical practice, the medical fee is paid from the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare according to the applied insurance score. The medical fee is paid according to the insurance points.

  However, in the above-described conventional technology, the number of times of use of a medical device is not necessarily the same as the number of times of medical treatment using the medical device, but the number of times of use of the medical device is regarded as the number of medical acts using the medical device. Therefore, there has been a problem that the depreciation cost per use of the medical device cannot be accurately calculated according to the actual number of uses of the medical device.

  Further, in the above-described prior art, since the depreciation cost per use of the medical device is not accurately calculated, there is a problem that the depreciation cost for each medical practice cannot be accurately calculated.

  In addition, since the depreciation cost per use of medical equipment and the depreciation cost by medical practice cannot be accurately calculated, taking into account these depreciation costs and medical fees paid according to the comprehensive payment method, Even when analyzing the income and expenditure in a medical institution, there was a problem that the credibility of the analysis result was lacking.

  In order to eliminate the above-mentioned problems caused by the prior art, the present invention accurately calculates the depreciation cost of a medical device according to the actual number of times the medical device is used, and the reliability of the balance analysis result in the medical institution. It is an object of the present invention to provide a depreciation cost calculation program capable of improving, a recording medium recording the program, a depreciation cost calculation device, and a depreciation cost calculation method.

  In order to solve the above-described problems and achieve the object, a depreciation cost calculation program, a recording medium recording the program, a depreciation cost calculation device, and a depreciation cost calculation method according to the present invention include a plurality of medical practices. Detecting a specific medical practice that can be performed using any medical device (hereinafter referred to as “specific medical practice”), and the number of specific medical practices detected and the patients for whom the specific medical practice was performed And calculating the depreciation cost per use of the medical device for each specific medical practice based on the depreciation cost of the medical equipment and the number of the specific medical practice and the number of patients. It is characterized by doing.

  According to the present invention, for each specific medical practice, the depreciation cost per use of the medical device accurately calculated according to the actual number of times the medical device is used is used. It is possible to improve the performance.

  Further, in the above invention, it is determined whether or not the patient is a patient who has undergone a medical practice that is comprehensively evaluated according to a comprehensive payment method based on a diagnosis group classification (hereinafter referred to as “comprehensive medical practice”). And based on the determined determination result, it is good also as specifying the number of the said patients in whom the said comprehensive medical treatment act was performed.

  According to this invention, by using the depreciation cost per use of the medical device accurately calculated according to the number of times of use of the medical device counted according to the comprehensive payment method, the credibility of the balance analysis result in the medical institution is obtained. It is possible to improve the performance.

  In the above invention, based on the depreciation cost of the medical device and the number of patients specified by the specific process, the depreciation cost per use of the medical device (hereinafter referred to as “depreciation by number of times”). It is also possible to calculate the depreciation cost per use of the medical device for each specific medical practice using the depreciation cost for each number of times.

  According to the present invention, by using the depreciation cost per use of the medical device for each specific medical practice accurately calculated according to the actual number of use of the medical device, the credibility of the balance analysis result in the medical institution Can be improved.

  Further, in the above invention, the number of the specific medical practice is counted for each patient, and the number of the specific medical practice counted and the depreciation expense according to the number of times of the medical equipment for each specific medical practice The depreciation cost may be calculated for each patient.

  According to this invention, by using the depreciation cost of the medical device for each specific medical practice accurately calculated according to the actual number of times of use of the medical device for each patient, the credibility of the balance analysis result in the medical institution Can be improved.

  Moreover, in the said invention, it is good also as calculating the depreciation expense of the said medical device for every said specific medical practice based on the said depreciation expense per said specific medical practice calculated for every said patient.

  According to this invention, by using the depreciation cost of the medical device accurately calculated according to the actual number of times of use of the medical device for each specific medical practice, the credibility of the balance analysis result in the medical institution is improved. Can be planned.

  Moreover, in the said invention, it is good also as making the number of the specific medical treatment detected and the number of the patients in which the said specific medical treatment performed be identified by day.

  According to this invention, by using the depreciation cost per use of the medical device accurately calculated according to the number of uses of the medical device counted according to the current comprehensive payment method, the balance analysis result in the medical institution Credibility can be improved.

  Moreover, in the said invention, it is good also as specifying the number of the specific medical treatments detected and the number of the patients in whom the said specific medical treatments were performed for every predetermined period.

  According to the present invention, even when the provisions in the comprehensive payment method are changed in the future, the medical device 1 accurately calculated according to the number of times of use of the medical device counted according to the changed comprehensive payment method. By using the depreciation cost per use, it is possible to improve the credibility of the balance analysis result in the medical institution.

  Moreover, in the said invention, it is good also as outputting the calculated depreciation expense so that it can display in an operator's client terminal.

  According to the present invention, the operator can be confirmed by notifying the operator of the calculated depreciation expense via the client terminal, and the reliability of the balance analysis result in the medical institution can be improved. it can.

  According to the depreciation cost calculation program, the recording medium on which the program is recorded, the depreciation cost calculation device, and the depreciation cost calculation method according to the present invention, it is possible to improve the credibility of the balance analysis result in the medical institution. .

  Exemplary embodiments of a depreciation expense calculation program, a recording medium recording the program, a depreciation expense calculation apparatus, and a depreciation expense calculation method according to the present invention will be described below in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings. .

(System configuration of depreciation cost calculation system)
First, a system configuration of a depreciation cost calculation system according to an embodiment of the present invention will be described. FIG. 1 is a system configuration diagram of a depreciation expense calculation system according to an embodiment of the present invention. In FIG. 1, a depreciation cost calculation system 100 is installed in a medical institution such as a hospital or clinic. In the depreciation cost calculation system 100, a depreciation cost calculation apparatus 101 and a client terminal 102 are connected to a network 110 such as a LAN, WAN, or the Internet, and can communicate with each other.

  The depreciation expense calculation device 101 is a computer device that calculates the depreciation expense of a medical device using data stored in various tables in the database 103. In addition, the client terminal 102 is installed in a medical office section in charge of paperwork such as reception in a medical institution or an examination room where a doctor performs a medical practice, and accesses the depreciation cost calculation apparatus 101 to perform medical treatment. It is a computer device that executes various processes such as input, registration, update, call, and display of information used for calculating the depreciation cost of a device.

(Hardware configuration of computer device)
Next, the hardware configuration of the computer apparatus (depreciation expense calculation apparatus 101 or client terminal 102) shown in FIG. 1 will be described. FIG. 2 is a block diagram showing a hardware configuration of the computer apparatus shown in FIG. In FIG. 2, the computer apparatus includes a CPU 201, a ROM 202, a RAM 203, an HDD (hard disk drive) 204, an HD (hard disk) 205, an FDD (flexible disk drive) 206, and an example of a removable recording medium. An FD (flexible disk) 207, a display 208, an I / F (interface) 209, a keyboard 210, a mouse 211, a scanner 212, and a printer 213 are provided. Each component 201 to 213 is connected by a bus 200.

  Here, the CPU 201 controls the entire computer apparatus. The ROM 202 stores a program such as a boot program. The RAM 203 is used as a work area for the CPU 201. The HDD 204 controls data read / write with respect to the HD 205 according to the control of the CPU 201. The HD 205 stores data written under the control of the HDD 204.

  The FDD 206 controls reading / writing of data with respect to the FD 207 according to the control of the CPU 201. The FD 207 stores data written under the control of the FDD 206 or causes the computer device to read data stored in the FD 207.

  In addition to the FD 207, the removable recording medium may be a CD-ROM (CD-R, CD-RW), MO, DVD (Digital Versatile Disk), memory card, or the like. The display 208 displays data such as a document, an image, and function information as well as a cursor, an icon, or a tool box. As the display 208, for example, a CRT, a TFT liquid crystal display, a plasma display, or the like can be adopted.

  The I / F 209 is connected to a network 110 such as the Internet through a communication line, and is connected to other devices via the network 110. The I / F 209 controls an internal interface with the network 110 and controls input / output of data from an external device. For example, a modem or a LAN adapter may be employed as the I / F 209.

  The keyboard 210 includes keys for inputting characters, numbers, various instructions, and the like, and inputs data. Moreover, a touch panel type input pad or a numeric keypad may be used. The mouse 211 performs cursor movement, range selection, window movement, size change, and the like. A trackball or a joystick may be used as long as they have the same function as a pointing device.

  The scanner 212 optically reads an image and takes in the image data into the computer apparatus. The scanner 212 may have an OCR function. The printer 213 prints image data and document data. As the printer 213, for example, a laser printer or an ink jet printer can be employed.

(Table in database 103)
Next, a table stored in the database 103 shown in FIG. 1 will be described. The database 103 includes a simultaneous examination group master (FIG. 3), a fixed asset master (FIG. 4), a medical master (FIG. 5), a fixed asset detailed data file (FIG. 6), a medical detailed data file (FIG. 7), and by action. A depreciation calculation data file (FIG. 8) is stored. Hereinafter, it demonstrates in order using drawing.

  FIG. 3 is an explanatory diagram showing the simultaneous inspection group master. The simultaneous examination group master 300 is a master file that stores examination information that can be simultaneously examined using the same medical device. As shown in FIG. 3, “simultaneous inspection group ID”, “simultaneous inspection group name”, and “fixed asset code” are registered in the simultaneous inspection group master 300 for each simultaneous inspection group.

  Here, the simultaneous examination group is a group of a plurality of types of examinations in which examinations associated with medical practice are grouped for each examination that can be simultaneously examined using the same medical device. The “simultaneous examination group ID” is information for identifying each simultaneous examination group. The “simultaneous inspection group name” is the name of the simultaneous inspection group, and is information that is expressed by characters in the client terminal 102. By the “simultaneous inspection group name”, the contents of the inspection grouped into each simultaneous inspection group can be easily communicated to the user of the depreciation cost calculation system 100.

  “Fixed asset code” is information for identifying a fixed asset. Here, the fixed assets are medical devices installed in medical institutions such as hospitals and clinics. Therefore, for example, the examination belonging to “bacterial urine-bacterial culture G (group)” of the simultaneous examination group ID: KG001 is performed by the medical device specified by the fixed asset code: S001.

  In the simultaneous examination group master 300, “simultaneous examination group ID”, “simultaneous examination group name”, and “fixed asset code” can be set by operating the client terminal 102 by the office staff in the medical office, for example. .

  Next, the fixed asset master will be described. FIG. 4 is an explanatory diagram showing the fixed asset master. The fixed asset master 400 is a master file in which information related to fixed assets is stored. In FIG. 4, “Fixed asset code” and “Fixed asset name” are registered in the fixed asset master 400 for each fixed asset.

  Among the items in the fixed asset master 400, the description of each item is omitted for the same definition as the definition shown in FIG. “Fixed asset name” is the name of a fixed asset, such as “bacteria culture tester”. The “fixed asset code” is used when the computer apparatus identifies each fixed asset, and the “fixed asset name” is used when the office worker identifies each fixed asset mainly in the medical office.

  Next, the medical treatment master will be described. FIG. 5 is an explanatory diagram showing a medical care master. The medical master 500 is a master file that stores information indicating to which simultaneous examination group each medical practice belongs. In FIG. 5, “item attribute code”, “item code”, “fixed asset code”, and “simultaneous examination group ID” are registered in the medical care master 500 for each examination item. Of the items in the medical care master 500, the descriptions of the same items as those shown in FIG. 3 are omitted.

  The “item attribute code” is information indicating the attribute to which the medical practice belongs. In FIG. 5, only item attribute codes belonging to “ET1 (inspection)” are shown. “Item code” is information for identifying a medical practice. The item code may be associated with name information of a medical practice specified by the item code. In FIG. 5, for example, the item code “EP001” is associated with the name of the medical practice “bacteriuria test”.

  In the medical care master 500, the “simultaneous examination group ID” is set, for example, by operating the client terminal 102 by the office worker in the medical office. In the medical care master 500, the “item attribute code”, “item code”, and “fixed asset code” may be set by operating the client terminal 102 by the office worker in the medical office, for example, It can also be obtained from information stored in an electronic medical record system. Since the electronic medical chart system is a known technique, the description thereof is omitted here.

  Next, the fixed asset detail data file will be described. FIG. 6 is an explanatory diagram showing a fixed asset detail data file. The fixed asset detail data file 600 is a data file that stores information related to depreciation costs of fixed assets for each target period for which depreciation costs are calculated.

  In FIG. 6, the fixed asset detail data file 600 includes “target date”, “fixed asset code”, “depreciation amount” for the target year, and “usage count” for the target year. ”And asset use“ depreciation per time ”are recorded for each year. Of the items in the fixed asset description data file 600, the description of each item is omitted for the same definition as that shown in FIGS.

  The “target date” is information representing a period for which depreciation expenses are calculated. In the fixed asset detail data file 600 shown in FIG. 6, the target date is set in units of one month.

  The “depreciation amount” is information representing the depreciation expense for one month in the target year and month. Depreciation varies depending on the fixed asset. The depreciation amount varies depending on the time when the fixed asset is introduced even if it is the same type of fixed asset.

  “Use count” is information indicating the number of times the fixed asset corresponding to the target date has been used. Here, the number of times of use is the number of times that the fixed asset is actually operated for inspection. A method of counting the number of times of use will be described later (see FIG. 16).

  “Depreciation cost per time” is information that represents the depreciation cost of using a fixed asset once. Specifically, “depreciation cost per time” is represented by a value obtained by dividing the depreciation cost in the target year by the number of times of use. That is, the “depreciation cost per time” becomes smaller as the number of times of use in the target year increases.

  In the fixed asset detail data file 600, “target date”, “fixed asset code”, and “depreciation amount” can be acquired from the fixed asset system. Here, the fixed asset system is a system that manages data related to fixed assets owned by medical institutions such as hospitals and clinics. Since methods and techniques for managing data related to fixed assets are known, the description of the fixed asset system is omitted here.

  Next, a medical description data file will be described. FIG. 7 is an explanatory diagram showing a medical statement data file. The medical treatment details data file 700 is a data file that stores information representing a medical history for each examination item. In FIG. 7, “medical treatment date”, “patient ID”, “document type”, and “item code” are recorded for each examination item in the medical statement data file 700. Among the items in the medical treatment details data file 700, the description of each item is omitted for the same definition as the definition shown in FIGS.

  “Medical date” is information indicating the date of medical treatment. “Patient ID” is patient-specific information for identifying a patient. By operating the client terminal 102 and inputting the “patient ID”, the medical information of the corresponding patient can be called from the depreciation cost calculating apparatus 101 and displayed on the client terminal 102.

  The “document type” is information indicating the type of a document created according to the inspection item represented by the “item code”. In the “document type” in the medical care details data file 700 shown in FIG. 7, the same information as the “item attribute code” in the medical care master 500 shown in FIG. 5 is set.

  Each data in the medical care details data file 700 can be acquired from information stored in the electronic medical chart system described above, for example. In addition, each data in the medical treatment details data file 700 may be set by operating the client terminal 102 by an office worker in the medical office, for example.

  Next, an act-specific depreciation calculation data file will be described. FIG. 8 is an explanatory diagram showing an act-specific depreciation calculation data file. The act-specific depreciation calculation data file 800 is a data file that stores information representing the depreciation of the examination using each fixed asset for each medical practice. In FIG. 8, the depreciation calculation data file 800 classified by action records “target date”, “item code”, and “depreciation expense classified by action” for each inspection item.

  The “depreciation expense by action” is information representing the depreciation expense of the inspection performed in each target period for each inspection. The “depreciation expense by action” differs depending on the depreciation expense in the target year and the number of times each inspection item has been inspected. By “depreciation expense by action”, for example, whether the depreciation efficiency is good or bad can be grasped for each inspection item.

(Functional configuration of the depreciation cost calculation apparatus 101)
Next, a functional configuration of the depreciation cost calculating apparatus 101 according to the embodiment of the present invention will be described. FIG. 9 is a block diagram showing a functional configuration of the depreciation cost calculating apparatus 101 according to the embodiment of the present invention. In FIG. 9, the depreciation cost calculation apparatus 101 includes a storage unit 901, a detection unit 902, a specification unit 903, a calculation unit 904, an output unit 905, a determination unit 906, and a counting unit 907. Yes.

  First, the storage unit 901 stores various masters and data files 300 to 800 shown in FIGS. The storage unit 901 stores information transmitted from the client terminal 102 via the network 110. Specifically, the storage unit 901 realizes its function by a recording medium such as the ROM 202, the RAM 203, and the HD 205 shown in FIG.

  The detection unit 902 detects a specific medical practice that can be performed using an arbitrary medical device from among a plurality of medical practices. Specifically, a specific medical practice is detected using the simultaneous examination group master 300 shown in FIG. 3, the fixed asset master 400 shown in FIG. 4, and the medical master 500 shown in FIG. Hereinafter, the medical practice detected by the detection unit 902 will be described as “specific medical practice” as appropriate.

  The identifying unit 903 identifies the number of specific medical practices detected by the detecting unit 902 and the number of patients who have performed the specific medical practices. The identifying unit 903 can identify a patient by referring to the medical statement data file 700 illustrated in FIG.

  The identification unit 903 identifies the number of specific medical treatments detected by the detection unit 902 and the number of patients who have performed the specific medical treatment on a daily basis. Accordingly, the depreciation cost per use of the medical device can be accurately calculated according to the number of times of use of the medical device counted according to the current comprehensive payment method. A specific example of calculating the depreciation cost per use of the medical device will be described later in detail (see FIGS. 15, 16, and 17).

  The specifying unit 903 may specify the number of specific medical practices detected by the detecting unit 902 and the number of patients who have performed the specific medical practices for each predetermined period. As a result, even if the provisions in the comprehensive payment method are changed in the future, the depreciation cost per use of the medical device depends on the number of uses of the medical device counted according to the changed comprehensive payment method. Can be calculated accurately.

  In addition, the calculation unit 904 determines the depreciation cost per use of the medical device based on the depreciation cost of the medical device and the number of specific medical treatment activities and the number of patients specified by the specifying unit 903. Calculate for each action. Thereby, the depreciation expense of the medical device for every specific medical practice can be calculated correctly. Details of a specific calculation example of the depreciation cost of the medical device for each specific medical practice will be described later (see FIGS. 15, 16, and 17).

  The determination unit 906 determines whether or not the patient has undergone a medical practice that is comprehensively evaluated according to a comprehensive payment method based on the diagnosis group classification. Hereinafter, the medical practice that is comprehensively evaluated according to the comprehensive payment method based on the diagnosis group classification will be referred to as “comprehensive medical practice” as appropriate.

  When the determination is made by the determination unit 906, the specifying unit 903 described above specifies the number of patients on which comprehensive medical practice has been performed based on the determination result determined by the determination unit 906. Specifically, for example, when there are patients who have been subjected to a plurality of comprehensive medical practices on the same day, the number of the patients is specified as one regardless of the number of comprehensive medical practices.

  As a result, the depreciation cost per use of the medical device can be accurately calculated according to the actual number of uses of the medical device. By accurately calculating the depreciation cost per use of the medical device, it is possible to improve the credibility of the balance analysis result performed using this calculation result in the medical institution.

  When the determination is made by the determination unit 906, the calculation unit 904 described above is based on the depreciation cost of the medical device and the number of patients specified by the specifying unit 903, and the per-use of the medical device. The depreciation cost for each medical device is calculated for each specific medical practice using the depreciation cost for each number of times. Hereinafter, the depreciation cost per use of the medical device will be referred to as “depreciation cost by number of times” as appropriate. Note that a specific calculation example of the depreciation cost per use of the medical device for each specific medical practice, that is, the depreciation cost by frequency for each specific medical practice will be described in detail later (FIGS. 15, 16, and 16). FIG. 17).

  As a result, the depreciation cost per use of the medical device can be accurately calculated according to the number of times of use of the medical device counted according to the comprehensive payment method. By accurately calculating the depreciation cost per use of the medical device, it is possible to improve the credibility of the balance analysis result performed using this calculation result in the medical institution.

  The counting unit 907 counts the number of specific medical treatments identified by the identifying unit 903 for each patient. In this case, the calculation unit 904 described above calculates the depreciation cost per specific medical procedure for each patient based on the number of specific medical procedures counted by the counting unit 907 and the above-described depreciation cost according to the number of times. calculate. A specific example of calculating the depreciation cost per specific medical practice for each patient will be described later (see FIGS. 15, 16, and 17).

  And the calculation part 904 calculates the depreciation expense of a medical device for every specific medical treatment based on the depreciation expense per specific medical treatment calculated for every patient. Details of a specific calculation example of the depreciation cost of the medical device for each specific medical practice will be described later (see FIGS. 15, 16, and 17).

  Thereby, the depreciation expense per specific medical practice can be calculated correctly for every patient. By accurately calculating the depreciation cost per specific medical practice for each patient, it is possible to improve the credibility of the balance analysis result performed using this calculation result in the medical institution.

  Further, the output unit 905 outputs the depreciation cost calculated by the calculation unit 904 so that it can be displayed on the client terminal 102 of the operator. Specifically, for example, the depreciation cost calculated by the calculation unit 904 is transmitted to the client terminal 102 via the network 110.

  Thereby, for example, the calculated depreciation expense can be notified to the administrative staff of the medical office through the client terminal 102, and confirmation regarding the notified depreciation expense can be promoted. It is possible to improve the credibility of the balance analysis result in the institution.

  Specifically, the detection unit 902, the specifying unit 903, the calculation unit 904, the output unit 905, the determination unit 906, and the counting unit 907 described above, for example, on a recording medium such as the ROM 202, the RAM 203, and the HD 205 illustrated in FIG. The recorded program is implemented by the CPU 201 or by the I / F 209.

(Depreciation calculation procedure)
Next, the depreciation expense calculation processing procedure of the depreciation expense calculation apparatus 101 according to the embodiment of the present invention will be described. FIG. 10 is a flowchart showing the depreciation cost calculation processing procedure of the depreciation cost calculation apparatus 101 according to the embodiment of the present invention. In the flowchart of FIG. 10, first, simultaneous inspection group setting processing is executed (step S1001). The simultaneous examination group setting process in step S1001 is mainly executed in the depreciation expense calculation apparatus 101 in accordance with an instruction operation received in the client terminal 102 of the medical office.

  Next, a fixed asset depreciation expense calculation process is executed (step S1002), and a series of processes in the depreciation expense calculation process procedure is completed. The fixed asset depreciation cost calculation processing in step S1002 is executed in the depreciation cost calculation apparatus 101 mainly in accordance with the instruction operation received at the client terminal 102 of the medical office. Below, each process in step S1001 and step S1002 is demonstrated in detail.

  When the simultaneous inspection group setting process in step S1001 is executed, the client terminal 102 includes a simultaneous inspection group list screen (see FIG. 11), a fixed asset master list screen (see FIG. 12), an inspection name list / simultaneous inspection setting. Various screens such as a screen (see FIG. 13) are displayed. Hereinafter, various screen examples displayed on the client terminal 102 in the simultaneous inspection group setting process will be described.

  First, the simultaneous inspection group list screen will be described. FIG. 11 is an explanatory diagram showing an example of the simultaneous examination group list screen. A simultaneous examination group list screen 1100 shown in FIG. 11 is displayed on the client terminal 102 on which an instruction operation for requesting a list of simultaneous examination groups has been performed.

  Here, when an instruction operation for requesting a list of simultaneous inspection groups is performed on the client terminal 102, a simultaneous inspection group list display request is transmitted to the depreciation expense calculation apparatus 101.

  In the simultaneous inspection group list screen 1100, an area 1101 displays a list in which “simultaneous inspection group ID”, “simultaneous inspection group name”, and “fixed asset code” are associated with each other. In the area 1101, information called from the simultaneous inspection group master 300 shown in FIG. 3 is displayed.

  In the simultaneous inspection group list screen 1100, an area 1102 can be input with a simultaneous inspection group ID. In the area 1103, the name of the simultaneous inspection group identified by the simultaneous inspection group ID input in the area 1102 can be input. Information is input to the areas 1102 and 1103 when a simultaneous examination group is newly set. Information input to the areas 1102 and 1103 can be newly registered in the simultaneous inspection group master 300 by clicking a registration button 1104.

  Note that information displayed in the area 1101 can be selected or deleted by operating the selection button 1105 or the delete button 1106 in a state instructed using a cursor (not shown). The selection button 1105 is operated, for example, when changing information registered in the simultaneous inspection group master 300 once.

  Next, the fixed asset master list screen will be described. FIG. 12 is an explanatory diagram illustrating an example of a fixed asset master list screen. The fixed asset master list screen 1200 shown in FIG. 12 is displayed on the client terminal 102 when setting fixed assets to be used in each inspection grouped into simultaneous inspection groups.

  The fixed asset master list screen 1200 calculates the depreciation cost based on the data stored in the fixed asset master 400 in response to a click on the registration button 1104 on the simultaneous inspection group list screen 1100 shown in FIG. Displayed when transmitted from the device 101. The fixed asset master list screen 1200 is also displayed when the fixed asset list data is transmitted from the depreciation expense calculation apparatus 101 in accordance with a predetermined operation received at the client terminal 102.

  In the fixed asset master list screen 1200, the simultaneous inspection group ID is displayed in the area 1201, and the simultaneous inspection group name corresponding to the simultaneous inspection group ID is displayed in the area 1202. In the area 1203, the fixed asset code used in the inspection of the simultaneous inspection group specified by the information displayed in the areas 1201 and 1202 is displayed, and the fixed asset name corresponding to the fixed asset code is displayed in the area 1204. .

  If the information input in the areas 1201 and 1202 is information already stored in the simultaneous inspection group master 300, the area is displayed when the search button 1205 is clicked with the information input in the areas 1201 and 1202. Information displayed in 1203 and 1204 can also be searched. Information displayed in the areas 1201 to 1204 can be reflected in the fixed asset master 400 when the registration button 1206 is clicked.

  Next, the examination name list / simultaneous examination setting screen will be described. FIG. 13 is an explanatory diagram showing an example of the examination name list / simultaneous examination setting screen. The examination name list / simultaneous examination setting screen 1300 shown in FIG. 13 is displayed on the client terminal 102 when setting a medical practice belonging to the simultaneous examination group. Here, a medical practice belonging to the simultaneous examination group is a medical practice that can be performed using the same fixed asset, and more specifically, a medical practice involving a test that can be performed simultaneously using the same fixed asset. It is an act.

  In the examination name list / simultaneous examination setting screen 1300, the same information as the areas 1201 to 1204 in the fixed asset master list screen 1200 shown in FIG. In the examination name list / simultaneous examination setting screen 1300, the above-described item codes and item names are displayed in an area 1305 in association with each other.

  In the area 1305, each item is displayed with a corresponding check box for setting whether or not to set the same simultaneous examination group. Items corresponding to the checked check boxes (check boxes filled in black in FIG. 13) can be reflected in the medical care master 500 when the registration button 1306 is clicked.

  In addition, when executing the fixed asset depreciation calculation processing in step S1002, the client terminal 102 displays a cost calculation execution registration screen (see FIG. 14) for each action. Here, FIG. 14 is an explanatory diagram showing an example of the action-specific cost calculation execution registration screen. An act-specific cost calculation execution registration screen 1400 shown in FIG. 14 is displayed on the client terminal 102. On the cost calculation execution registration screen 1400 for each action, the execution status of each process executed in the medical institution such as revenue, expense, cost, etc., is displayed for each process type.

  In the cost calculation execution registration screen 1400 by action, the area 1401 includes “medical accounting medical revenue calculation processing”, “distribution goods and medicine cost calculation processing”, “personnel salary personnel cost calculation processing”, “fixed asset depreciation cost calculation processing” ”And“ Financial Accounting Non-Medical Revenue Expense Calculation Processing ”are displayed for each processing type and information indicating the execution status and the presence / absence of an error / warning in each processing.

  In the cost calculation execution registration screen 1400 for each action, an area 1402 displays the year and month for displaying the execution status for each process type. Information displayed in the area 1402 can be arbitrarily selected from selection items (not shown) displayed by clicking the area 1403.

(Simultaneous inspection group setting process)
Next, the simultaneous inspection group setting process shown in step S1001 of FIG. 10 will be described in detail. FIG. 15 is a flowchart showing the simultaneous examination group setting processing procedure shown in step S1001 of FIG. In the flowchart of FIG. 15, first, it waits until a simultaneous inspection group list display request is received from the client terminal 102 (step S1501: No).

  If a simultaneous inspection group list display request is received in step S1501 (step S1501: Yes), the simultaneous inspection group master 300 is read (step S1502), and the simultaneous inspection group list display request received in step S1501: Yes is the first time. It is determined whether or not this is a display request (step S1503).

  In step S1503, when it is the first display request (step S1503: Yes), the data for displaying the simultaneous examination group list screen is transmitted to the client terminal 102 (step S1504), and the series of processes is terminated.

  As a result, the simultaneous inspection group list screen 1100 shown in FIG. 11 is displayed on the client terminal 102. When newly registering a simultaneous examination group, for example, an office worker in the medical office operates the client terminal 102 to input information on the simultaneous examination group to be newly registered, and clicks a registration button 1104.

  Although not shown, when the registration button 1104 is clicked on the client terminal 102 while the simultaneous inspection group list screen 1100 is displayed, the above-described simultaneous inspection group list display request is transmitted from the client terminal 102. . That is, the simultaneous inspection group setting process is started again from step S1501.

  On the other hand, if it is not the first display request in step S1503 (step S1503: No), it is determined whether new registration data of the simultaneous inspection group is received from the client terminal 102 (step S1505). If it has been received (step S1505: Yes), a simultaneous inspection group is newly registered in the simultaneous inspection group master 300 based on the received new registration data (step S1506), and the process proceeds to step S1507.

  In step S1505, if new registration data of the simultaneous inspection group has not been received (step S1505: No), the fixed asset master 400 is read (step S1507), and the client terminal 102 displays the fixed asset master list screen. Data is transmitted (step S1508).

  As a result, the fixed asset master list screen 1200 shown in FIG. 12 is displayed on the client terminal 102. When searching for an already registered fixed asset code, for example, a person in charge of the medical office section operates the client terminal 102 to input the fixed asset code to be searched, and clicks a search button 1205.

  Although illustration is omitted, when the search button 1205 is clicked in the state where the fixed asset master list screen 1200 is displayed on the client terminal 102, the fixed asset code for search is transmitted from the client terminal 102.

  On the other hand, when newly registering a fixed asset code, for example, an office worker in the medical office section operates the client terminal 102 to input a new fixed asset code and clicks a registration button 1206. . In this case, information such as a simultaneous inspection group name for identifying a fixed asset code to be newly registered may be input.

  Although illustration is omitted, when the registration button 1206 is clicked on the client terminal 102 while the fixed asset master list screen 1200 is displayed, new registration data of the fixed asset code is transmitted from the client terminal 102.

  Subsequently, it is determined whether or not a fixed asset code has been received (step S1509), and if not received (step S1509: No), it is determined whether or not new registration data of a fixed asset code has been received. (Step S1510). If it has not been received (step S1510: NO), the series of processing is terminated.

  If new registration data of fixed asset code is received in step S1510 (step S1510: Yes), the received fixed asset code is newly registered in the simultaneous inspection group master 300 shown in FIG. 3 (step S1511). . Then, the fixed asset master 400 in which the fixed asset code is newly registered is read (step S1512), the data for displaying the fixed asset master list screen is transmitted to the client terminal 102 (step S1513), and the series of processing ends. .

  On the other hand, in step S1509, when the search fixed asset code is received (step S1509: Yes), the medical care master 500 shown in FIG. Data for displaying the examination setting screen is transmitted (step S1515).

  As a result, the examination name list / simultaneous examination setting screen 1300 shown in FIG. 13 is displayed on the client terminal 102. When setting a medical practice belonging to the simultaneous examination group, for example, a person in charge of the medical office section operates the client terminal 102 to check the medical practice belonging to the simultaneous examination group and clicks a registration button 1306.

  Although illustration is omitted, when the registration button 1306 is clicked on the client terminal 102 while the examination name list / simultaneous examination setting screen 1300 is displayed, the client terminal 102 displays a new setting item representing the set contents. Data is sent.

  Subsequently, it is determined whether or not new setting item data has been received (step S1516). If no new setting item data has been received (step S1516: No), a series of processing ends. In step S1516, for example, it is determined whether new setting item data has been received for a predetermined time after transmitting the examination name list / simultaneous examination setting screen display data in step S1515.

  When new setting item data is received in step S1516 (step S1516: Yes), a simultaneous examination including a new medical practice in the medical care master 500 shown in FIG. 5 is performed based on the received new setting item data. A group is registered (step S1517). Then, the medical care master 500 in which a simultaneous examination group including a new medical practice is registered is read (step S1518), and new examination name list / simultaneous examination setting screen display data is transmitted to the client terminal 102 (step S1518). S1519), a series of processing ends.

(Fixed asset depreciation calculation processing)
Next, the fixed asset depreciation cost calculation process shown in step S1002 of FIG. 10 will be described in detail. FIG. 16 is a flowchart showing the fixed asset depreciation expense calculation processing procedure shown in step S1002 of FIG. In the flowchart shown in FIG. 16, first, it waits until it receives an instruction to start calculation of fixed asset depreciation (step S1601: No). Here, the calculation start instruction for fixed asset depreciation is transmitted from the client terminal 102 when, for example, a person in charge of the medical office operates the client terminal 102 to perform a predetermined input operation. .

  If an instruction to start calculation of fixed asset depreciation expenses is received in step S1601 (step S1601: Yes), the fixed asset detail data file 600 is read for one record (step S1602), and whether or not the corresponding record exists. Is determined (step S1603). In step S1603, the corresponding record is fixed asset detail data for which depreciation expenses are not calculated among the fixed asset detail data recorded in the fixed asset detail data file 600.

  If there is a corresponding record in step S1603 (step S1603: Yes), the fixed asset code is specified, and the medical care master 500 shown in FIG. 5 is read (step S1604), and if it corresponds in step S1603: Yes. The item code associated with the fixed asset code in the determined record is extracted.

  Next, the medical record data file 700 shown in FIG. 7 is read for one record (step S1605), and it is determined whether or not the corresponding record exists (step S1606). In step S1606, the corresponding record is the medical specification data associated with the item code extracted in step S1604 among the information recorded in the medical specification data file 700.

  If there is a corresponding record in step S1606 (step S1606: Yes), the corresponding record (corresponding to the medical record data for one record (hereinafter referred to as “corresponding medical description data”)) is applicable. It is determined whether or not the medical treatment date in the medical treatment details data matches the previous medical treatment date (step S1607). Here, the previous medical date is the medical date of the medical statement details data used for the determination in step S1607 performed last time.

  In step S1607, if it does not coincide with the previous medical date (step S1607: No), the process proceeds to step S1611. If it matches the previous medical date (step S1607: Yes), it is determined whether or not the patient ID in the corresponding medical description data matches the previous patient ID (step S1608). Here, the previous patient ID is the patient ID of the medical treatment details data used for the determination in step S1608 performed last time.

  In step S1608, when it does not coincide with the previous patient ID (step S1608: No), the process proceeds to step S1611. If it coincides with the previous patient ID (step S1608: Yes), it is determined whether or not the simultaneous examination group ID is set in the item code in the corresponding medical description data based on the medical care master 500 shown in FIG. Judgment is made (step S1609).

  In step S1609, when the simultaneous examination group ID is not set (step S1609: No), the process proceeds to step S1611. When the simultaneous examination group ID is set (step S1609: Yes), it is determined whether or not the previous simultaneous examination group ID in the corresponding medical examination detail data matches the previous simultaneous examination group ID (step S1610). .

  Here, the previous simultaneous examination group ID is a simultaneous examination group ID associated with the item code in the medical treatment details data used for the determination performed in the previous step S1610. In step S1610, when it does not coincide with the previous simultaneous inspection group ID (step S1610: No), the process proceeds to step S1611.

  In step S1611, the usage count of the corresponding fixed asset is incremented by 1 in the fixed asset detail data file 600 shown in FIG. 6 (step S1611), and the process proceeds to step S1612.

  In step S1610, when it coincides with the previous simultaneous examination group ID (step S1610: Yes), the simultaneous examination group ID associated with the item code in the corresponding medical examination detail data is saved as a new previous simultaneous examination group ID. (Step S1612).

  Then, the date of medical care in the corresponding medical care details data is saved as a new previous medical care date (step S1613), and the patient ID in the relevant medical care details data is saved as a new previous patient ID ( Step S1614), the process returns to step S1602.

  On the other hand, if there is no corresponding record in step S1603 (step S1603: No), the depreciation cost per use of the fixed asset is calculated (step S1615). In step S1615, the depreciation cost per use of the fixed asset is calculated by dividing the depreciation cost of the fixed asset by the number of uses in the fixed asset detail data file 600 shown in FIG. The calculated depreciation cost per use of the fixed asset is recorded in the fixed asset detail data file 600 shown in FIG.

  Here, when the depreciation cost per use of the fixed asset is calculated for each predetermined period, for example, in units of one month, in step S1615, the fixed asset allocated for the predetermined period is calculated. By dividing the depreciation expense by the above-mentioned number of uses, the depreciation expense per fixed asset use for a predetermined period is calculated.

  Subsequently, the fixed asset detail data file 600 is read for one record (step S1616), and it is determined whether or not the corresponding record exists (step S1617). In step S1617, the corresponding record is the depreciation cost based on the depreciation cost per use of the fixed asset calculated in step S1615 among the fixed asset detail data recorded in the fixed asset detail data file 600. This is fixed asset detail data that has not been calculated.

  In step S1617, when the corresponding record does not exist (step S1617: No), the series of processing ends. When the corresponding record exists (step S1617: Yes), the fixed asset code in the record determined to exist is specified, and the medical care master 500 shown in FIG. 5 is read (step S1618). It is determined whether or not it exists (step S1619).

  In step S1619, the corresponding record is an item code associated with the fixed asset code in the record determined to be applicable in step S1617: Yes among the item codes recorded in the medical care master 500. In step S1618, the corresponding record is read for each item code associated with the simultaneous inspection group ID.

  If there is no corresponding record in step S1619 (step S1619: No), the process returns to step S1616. If the corresponding record exists (step S1619: Yes), the medical care details data file 700 shown in FIG. 7 is read (step S1620), and it is determined whether the corresponding record exists (step S1621). In step S1621, it is determined whether there is medical specification data associated with the item code in the record determined to exist in step S1619.

  If there is no corresponding record in step S1621, the process returns to step S1618. When the corresponding record exists (step S1621: Yes), the addition amount of depreciation expense classified by act is calculated (step S1622). Here, the addition amount of the depreciation expense by action calculated for each action is added to the depreciation expense by action in the action depreciation calculation data file 800 shown in FIG. 8 (step S1623), and the process proceeds to step S1620. Return.

(Specific calculation example)
Next, a specific calculation example by executing the fixed asset depreciation expense calculation process shown in FIG. 16 will be described in comparison with a conventional calculation method.

(Conventional calculation method)
First, a conventional calculation method will be described with reference to Table 1.

  Table 1 shows a part of the data recorded in the medical statement data file. As shown in Table 1, for “Patient A”, four types of “Examination A”, “Examination B”, “Examination C”, and “Examination D” were issued on “April 1, 2005”. The examination is being conducted, and “patient B” is being examined on “April 1, 2005”, two examinations, “examination A” and “examination B”.

  “Examination A”, “Examination C”, and “Examination D” are all medical practices belonging to the simultaneous examination group identified by the simultaneous examination group ID “KG001”. “Examination A”, “Examination C”, and “Examination D” are medical treatments that are performed once using a medical device to which a fixed asset code “S001” is assigned (hereinafter referred to as “medical device S001”). It is an act. Here, it is assumed that the depreciation cost of the medical device S001 is “1 million yen”.

  In the conventional calculation method as described above, the number of medical treatments using the medical device S001 is counted as the number of times the medical device S001 is used. For this reason, in the example of Table 1, the number of uses of the medical device S001 is counted as “3 times” for the patient A, “1 time” for the patient B, and “4 times” in total.

  Since the depreciation cost of the medical device S001 is 1 million yen, the depreciation cost per use of the medical device S001 (corresponding to the above-mentioned “depreciation cost per use of medical device”) is 100 (10,000 Yen) / 4 (times) = 25 (10,000 yen).

  Of the four medical practices using the medical device S001, since the examination A is performed twice, the depreciation cost of the medical equipment S001 related to the examination A (the above-mentioned “description of medical equipment for each specific medical practice” Is equivalent to 25 (10,000 yen) x 2 (times) = 50 (10,000 yen).

(Calculation method of this embodiment)
Next, the calculation method of the present embodiment will be described with reference to Table 1. “Depreciation cost per use of medical device for each specific medical practice”, “Depreciation cost per use of medical equipment”, “Specific medical practice for each patient” calculated using the calculation method described below The “depreciation cost per time”, “depreciation cost per specific medical practice”, and “depreciation cost of medical equipment for each specific medical practice” are calculated by the calculation unit 904 shown in FIG. 9 described above. Is done.

  In the calculation method of the present embodiment, among the examinations A to D performed on the patient A, “examination A”, “examination C”, and “examination D” belong to the same simultaneous examination group. The number of times the medical device S001 has been used for the examination performed on is counted as “1”. Similarly, the number of times the medical device S001 is used for the examination performed on the patient B is counted as “1 time”. For this reason, the number of uses of the medical device S001 is counted as “twice” in total.

  Since the depreciation cost of the medical device S001 is 1 million yen, the depreciation cost per use of the medical device S001 (corresponding to the above-mentioned “depreciation cost per use of medical device”) is 100 (10,000 Yen) / 2 (times) = 50 (10,000 yen).

  Here, for the patient A, since three types of medical treatments “inspection A”, “inspection C”, and “inspection D” are performed using the medical device S001, the inspection A1 in the case of the patient A The depreciation cost per time (equivalent to the above-mentioned “depreciation cost per specific medical treatment per patient”) is 50 (10,000 yen) / 3 (times) = 16.67 (10,000 yen) Calculated.

  Similarly, for the patient B, since one type of medical treatment of “examination A” is performed using the medical device S001, the depreciation cost per examination for the patient B (the above-mentioned “per patient” Is equivalent to 50 (10,000 yen) / 1 (times) = 50 (10,000 yen).

  Thereby, in this embodiment, the depreciation cost of the medical device S001 related to the examination A (corresponding to the above-mentioned “depreciation cost of the medical device for each specific medical practice”) is 16.67 (10,000 yen) +50 ( 10,000 yen) = 66.67 (10,000 yen). Thus, according to the calculation method of the present embodiment, the depreciation cost for each medical practice can be calculated.

  Furthermore, the depreciation cost per medical practice of examination A (corresponding to the above-mentioned “depreciation cost per specific medical practice”) is 66.67 (10,000 yen) / 2 (times) = 33.33. Calculated as (10,000 yen).

  FIG. 17 is an explanatory diagram illustrating an example of a balance analysis screen for each medical practice. 17 is displayed on the client terminal 102 on which the instruction operation for displaying the medical treatment balance analysis screen 1700 has been performed. When an instruction operation for displaying the medical treatment activity balance analysis screen 1700 is performed, the client terminal 102 transmits a request for data for displaying the medical treatment balance analysis screen to the depreciation cost calculation apparatus 101, and responds to the request. Based on the data for displaying the balance analysis screen for medical practice transmitted in response, the balance analysis screen for medical practice 1700 is displayed.

  On the balance analysis screen 1700 for each medical practice, the area 1701 includes “medical accounting medical revenue”, “logistics goods / material cost”, “personnel salary personnel cost”, “fixed asset depreciation cost”, “financial accounting non-medical revenue”. ”And“ Financial Accounting Non-Medical Expenses ”are displayed as bar graphs showing the amount of income and expenditure by medical practice. In the area 1701, “fixed asset depreciation expense” is displayed based on the calculation result calculated by the fixed asset depreciation expense calculation process shown in FIG. 16 described above.

  In the area 1702, the accounting date of the balance for each medical practice to be displayed in the area 1701 is displayed on a monthly basis. The accounting date displayed in the area 1702 can be arbitrarily selected from the selection items (not shown) displayed by clicking the area 1703. An area 1704 displays the name of the simultaneous examination group that is the display target of the balance by medical practice. The simultaneous examination group name to be displayed in the area 1704 can be arbitrarily selected from selection items (not shown) displayed by clicking the area 1705.

  In the area 1706, the unit of the balance of medical treatments to be displayed in the area 1701 is displayed. A unit to be displayed in the area 1706 can be arbitrarily selected from selection items (not shown) displayed by clicking the area 1707. The length of the bar graph displayed in the area 1701 varies depending on the unit displayed in the area 1706.

  As described above, according to the depreciation cost calculation program, the recording medium recording the program, the depreciation cost calculation device, and the depreciation cost calculation method according to the present invention, the medical device can be used for the balance analysis at the medical institution. The depreciation cost per use of the medical device accurately calculated according to the actual number of uses can be used, and the credibility of the balance analysis result in the medical institution can be improved.

  The depreciation cost calculation method described in this embodiment can be realized by executing a program prepared in advance on a computer such as a personal computer or a workstation. This program is recorded on a computer-readable recording medium such as a hard disk, a flexible disk, a CD-ROM, an MO, and a DVD, and is executed by being read from the recording medium by the computer. The program may be a transmission medium that can be distributed via a network such as the Internet.

(Supplementary Note 1) A detection step of detecting a specific medical practice (hereinafter referred to as “specific medical practice”) that can be performed using an arbitrary medical device from a plurality of medical practices;
A specific step of identifying the number of specific medical practices detected by the detection step and the number of patients who have performed the specific medical practices;
Based on the depreciation cost of the medical device and the number of specific medical treatment activities and the number of patients specified by the specific process, the depreciation cost per use of the medical device is calculated for each specific medical treatment activity A calculation step of
A program for calculating depreciation expenses, which causes a computer to execute.

(Supplementary Note 2) Determination to determine whether or not the patient has undergone a medical practice that is comprehensively evaluated in accordance with a comprehensive payment method based on a diagnosis group classification (hereinafter referred to as “comprehensive medical practice”). Causing the computer to execute a process;
The specific process includes
The depreciation cost calculation program according to appendix 1, wherein the number of the patients for whom the comprehensive medical practice has been performed is specified based on the determination result determined by the determination step.

(Supplementary note 3)
Based on the depreciation cost of the medical device and the number of patients specified by the specific process, the depreciation cost per use of the medical device (hereinafter referred to as “depreciation cost by number of times”) is calculated. Then, the depreciation cost calculation program according to appendix 1, wherein the depreciation cost per use of the medical device is calculated for each specific medical practice using the depreciation cost according to the number of times.

(Additional remark 4) Let the said computer perform the counting process which counts the number of the specific medical treatment actions specified by the said specific process for every said patient,
The calculation step includes
Note that the medical device depreciation cost for each specific medical practice is calculated for each patient based on the number of the specific medical practice counted in the counting step and the depreciation expense for each number of times. 3. Depreciation cost calculation program described in 3.

(Supplementary Note 5) The calculation step includes
The depreciation method according to appendix 4, wherein the depreciation cost of the medical device is calculated for each specific medical practice based on the depreciation cost per one specific medical practice calculated for each patient. Cost calculation program.

(Appendix 6)
The depreciation cost calculation program according to appendix 1, characterized in that the number of specific medical practices detected by the detection step and the number of patients who have performed the specific medical practices are identified on a daily basis.

(Supplementary note 7)
The depreciation cost calculation program according to appendix 1, wherein the number of specific medical practices detected by the detection step and the number of patients who have performed the specific medical practices are specified for each predetermined period.

(Supplementary note 8) Any one of Supplementary notes 1 to 7, which causes the computer to execute an output step for outputting the depreciation cost calculated in the calculation step so that the depreciation cost can be displayed on the client terminal of the operator. Depreciation cost calculation program as described in one.

(Additional remark 9) The said computer-readable recording medium which recorded the depreciation expense calculation program as described in any one of additional marks 1-8.

(Supplementary Note 10) Detection means for detecting a specific medical practice (hereinafter referred to as “specific medical practice”) that can be performed using an arbitrary medical device from a plurality of medical practices;
A specifying means for specifying the number of specific medical care activities detected by the detection means and the number of patients for whom the specific medical care action was performed;
Based on the depreciation cost of the medical device and the number of specific medical treatment activities and the number of patients specified by the specifying means, the depreciation cost per use of the medical device is calculated for each specific medical care operation Calculating means for
A depreciation cost calculation device comprising:

(Additional remark 11) The detection process which detects the specific medical practice (henceforth "a specific medical practice") which can be performed using arbitrary medical equipment out of several medical practice,
A specific step of identifying the number of specific medical treatments detected by the detection step and the number of patients who have performed the specific medical treatment;
Based on the depreciation cost of the medical device and the number of specific medical treatment activities and the number of patients specified by the specific process, the depreciation cost per use of the medical device is calculated for each specific medical treatment activity A calculation step to perform,
Depreciation cost calculation method characterized by including.

  As described above, the depreciation cost calculation program, the recording medium recording the program, the depreciation cost calculation device, and the depreciation cost calculation method according to the present invention are useful for calculating the depreciation cost for medical institutions. .

It is a system configuration figure of a depreciation expense calculation system concerning an embodiment of this invention. It is a block diagram which shows the hardware constitutions of the computer apparatus shown in FIG. It is explanatory drawing which shows a simultaneous inspection group master. It is explanatory drawing which shows a fixed asset master. It is explanatory drawing which shows a medical treatment master. It is explanatory drawing which shows a fixed asset detailed data file. It is explanatory drawing which shows a medical treatment description data file. It is explanatory drawing which shows the depreciation calculation data file classified by act. It is a block diagram which shows the functional structure of the depreciation expense calculation apparatus concerning embodiment of this invention. It is a flowchart which shows the depreciation expense calculation processing procedure of the depreciation expense calculation apparatus concerning embodiment of this invention. It is explanatory drawing which shows an example of a simultaneous inspection group list screen. It is explanatory drawing which shows an example of a fixed asset master list screen. It is explanatory drawing which shows an example of a test name list / simultaneous test setting screen. It is explanatory drawing which shows an example of the cost calculation execution registration screen according to action. It is a flowchart which shows the simultaneous test | inspection group setting process procedure shown to step S1001 of FIG. It is a flowchart which shows the fixed asset depreciation expense calculation processing procedure shown to step S1002 of FIG. It is explanatory drawing which shows an example of the balance analysis screen according to medical treatment.

Explanation of symbols

DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 101 Depreciation expense calculation apparatus 901 Memory | storage part 902 Detection part 903 Specification part 904 Calculation part 905 Output part 906 Judgment part 907 Count part

Claims (5)

A detection step of detecting a specific medical practice (hereinafter referred to as “specific medical practice”) that can be performed using any medical device from a plurality of medical practice;
A specific step of identifying the number of specific medical practices detected by the detection step and the number of patients who have performed the specific medical practices;
Based on the depreciation cost of the medical device and the number of specific medical treatment activities and the number of patients specified by the specific process, the depreciation cost per use of the medical device is calculated for each specific medical treatment activity A calculation step of
A program for calculating depreciation expenses, which causes a computer to execute. A determination step for determining whether or not the patient is a patient who has undergone a medical practice that is comprehensively evaluated in accordance with a comprehensive payment method based on a diagnosis group classification (hereinafter referred to as “global medical practice”), Let the computer run,
The specific process includes
The depreciation cost calculation program according to claim 1, wherein the number of the patients for whom the comprehensive medical practice has been performed is specified based on the determination result determined by the determination step. The calculation step includes
Based on the depreciation cost of the medical device and the number of patients specified by the specific process, the depreciation cost per use of the medical device (hereinafter referred to as “depreciation cost by number of times”) is calculated. The depreciation expense calculation program according to claim 1, wherein the depreciation expense per use of the medical device is calculated for each specific medical practice using the depreciation expense according to the number of times. Causing the computer to execute a counting step for causing the patient to count the number of specific medical practices identified by the identifying step;
The calculation step includes
The medical device depreciation cost for each specific medical practice is calculated for each patient based on the number of specific medical practice counted by the counting step and the depreciation expense for each number of times. Item 4. The depreciation cost calculation program according to item 3. A detection step of detecting a specific medical practice (hereinafter referred to as “specific medical practice”) that can be performed using any medical device from a plurality of medical practice;
A specific step of identifying the number of specific medical treatments detected by the detection step and the number of patients who have performed the specific medical treatment;
Based on the depreciation cost of the medical device and the number of specific medical treatment activities and the number of patients specified by the specific process, the depreciation cost per use of the medical device is calculated for each specific medical treatment activity A calculation step to perform,
Depreciation cost calculation method characterized by including.

Images