JP2007191879A - Boring method selecting method - Google Patents

Boring method selecting method Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP2007191879A
JP2007191879A JP2006009239A JP2006009239A JP2007191879A JP 2007191879 A JP2007191879 A JP 2007191879A JP 2006009239 A JP2006009239 A JP 2006009239A JP 2006009239 A JP2006009239 A JP 2006009239A JP 2007191879 A JP2007191879 A JP 2007191879A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
self
drilling
drilling method
next step
clear
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
JP2006009239A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Inventor
Kazunori Maeda
和徳 前田
Naoto Iwasa
直人 岩佐
Takao Mitsuhashi
隆夫 三ツ橋
Takaaki Kato
貴章 加藤
Takeo Ikeda
武穂 池田
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Nippon Steel Metal Products Co Ltd
Okabe Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Okabe Co Ltd
Nippon Steel and Sumikin Metal Products Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Okabe Co Ltd, Nippon Steel and Sumikin Metal Products Co Ltd filed Critical Okabe Co Ltd
Priority to JP2006009239A priority Critical patent/JP2007191879A/en
Publication of JP2007191879A publication Critical patent/JP2007191879A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Abstract

<P>PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide a boring method selecting method for easily selecting an appropriate boring method in a slope stabilizing method for stabilizing the ground while leaving standing trees which have grown on the slope. <P>SOLUTION: In a first step S01, whether the standing trees exist is determined, and if no standing tree exists, it is regarded as outside the object. In a second step S02, whether the density of the standing trees is denser or sparser than a predetermined reference is determined, and if sparser, it is regarded as outside the object. In a third step S03, whether non-self-support of hole walls is clear is determined, and if non-self-support is clear, a double pipe boring method is selected. In a fourth step S04, whether self-support of the hole walls is clear is determined, and if self-support is not clear, a self-boring method is selected. In a fifth step S05, whether a borehole length is longer or shorter than a predetermined value is determined, and if longer, the self-boring method is selected, while if shorter, a single pipe boring method is selected. <P>COPYRIGHT: (C)2007,JPO&INPIT

Description

本発明は、斜面に生えている立木類を残しながら安定化を図る斜面安定化工法において適切な削孔方式をより簡便に選定し得るように開発した削孔選定方法に関する。   The present invention relates to a drilling selection method that has been developed so that an appropriate drilling method can be selected more easily in a slope stabilization method that stabilizes trees while leaving standing trees growing on a slope.

自然斜面や人工斜面に対する地盤安定化手段として、斜面に対してアンカー材を設置し、そのアンカー材を活用して更に安定化手段を施す工法は従来から広く知られている。このアンカー材の設置には、予め対象地盤に対して設置孔を形成するための削孔作業が必要とされるが、その削孔作業に使用する削孔方式の選定は、作業の難易にも大きく影響するため、きわめて重要であった。しかしながら、安定化の対象地盤における地質などの削孔条件は多様であり、当該対象地盤に形成した孔壁が果して自立し得るかどうかに関して明確な判断が下せない場合も少なくなく、当該対象地盤に適応し得る適切な削孔方式を選定することは簡単ではなかった。とりわけ、斜面に生えている立木類を残しながら安定化を図る斜面安定化工法において適切な削孔方式を選定するには困難が伴った。   2. Description of the Related Art Conventionally, as a ground stabilization means for natural slopes and artificial slopes, a construction method in which an anchor material is installed on a slope, and further stabilization means is applied using the anchor material. The installation of the anchor material requires a drilling operation for forming an installation hole in the target ground in advance, but the selection of the drilling method used for the drilling operation is difficult. It was very important because it had a big impact. However, there are various conditions for drilling conditions such as geology in the target ground for stabilization, and there are many cases where it is not possible to make a clear judgment as to whether the hole wall formed in the target ground can be self-supported. It is not easy to select an appropriate drilling method that can be adapted to. In particular, it was difficult to select an appropriate drilling method in the slope stabilization method that stabilizes trees while leaving the standing trees on the slope.

従来からアンカー材を用いて斜面の安定化を図る場合のアンカー材の配置や施工方法を決定する設計支援手段に関しては開示されたものもあるが(特許文献1参照)、削孔方式まで選定し得るものではなかった。
特開2005−248501号公報
Conventionally, some design support means for determining the placement and construction method of the anchor material when stabilizing the slope using the anchor material have been disclosed (see Patent Document 1). I didn't get it.
JP 2005-248501 A

本発明は、以上のような従来の技術的状況に鑑みて開発したものであり、斜面に生えている立木類を残しながら地盤の安定化を図る斜面安定化工法において、より簡便に適切な削孔方式を選定し得る削孔方式の選定方法を提供することを目的とするものである。   The present invention has been developed in view of the above-described conventional technical situation, and is more easily and appropriately used in a slope stabilization method that stabilizes the ground while leaving standing trees on the slope. An object of the present invention is to provide a method for selecting a drilling method that can select a hole method.

前記課題を解決するため、請求項1の発明では、立木類が存在するか否かを判断し、存在する場合には次ステップに進み、存在しない場合には対象外とする第1ステップと、前記立木類の疎密度が予め定めた設定基準より密か疎かを判断し、密の場合には次ステップに進み、疎の場合には対象外とする第2ステップと、孔壁の不自立が明らかか否かを判断し、不自立が明らかな場合には二重管削孔方式を選定し、不自立が明らかでない場合には次ステップに進む第3ステップと、前記孔壁の自立が明らかか否かを判断し、自立が明らかでない場合には自穿孔削孔方式を選定し、自立が明らかな場合には次ステップに進む第4ステップと、削孔長が予め定めた設定値より長いか短いかを判断し、長い場合には自穿孔削孔方式を選定し、短い場合には単管削孔方式を選定する第5ステップを用いて削孔方式を選定するという選定方法を採用した。また、請求項2の発明では、前記第4ステップにおける選定対象として二重管削孔方式を加え、立木類が存在するか否かを判断し、存在する場合には次ステップに進み、存在しない場合には対象外とする第1ステップと、前記立木類の疎密度が予め定めた設定基準より密か疎かを判断し、密の場合には次ステップに進み、疎の場合には対象外とする第2ステップと、孔壁の不自立が明らかか否かを判断し、不自立が明らかな場合には二重管削孔方式を選定し、不自立が明らかでない場合には次ステップに進む第3ステップと、前記孔壁の自立が明らかか否かを判断し、自立が明らかでない場合には自穿孔削孔方式又は二重管削孔方式を選定し、自立が明らかな場合には次ステップに進む第4ステップと、削孔長が予め定めた設定値より長いか短いかを判断し、長い場合には自穿孔削孔方式を選定し、短い場合には単管削孔方式を選定する第5ステップを用いて削孔方式を選定するという選定方法を採用した。前記第5ステップにおける設定値は、請求項3のように例えば3mに設定される。なお、ここで、孔壁が不自立とは、削孔作業により形成される孔壁が自立しない状態を指す。また、自穿孔削孔方式とは単管の先端部に設けた掘削手段により掘削するとともにその単管自体をそのままアンカー材として使用する方式を指し、単管削孔方式とは自穿孔削孔方式以外の単管削孔方式を指す。   In order to solve the above-mentioned problem, in the invention of claim 1, it is determined whether or not standing trees are present, and if present, the process proceeds to the next step, and if not, the first step is excluded. It is judged whether the density of the standing trees is denser or sparser than a predetermined setting standard. If dense, the process proceeds to the next step. If the independence is obvious, select the double-pipe drilling method. If the independence is not obvious, proceed to the next step and whether the hole wall is self-supporting. If self-supporting is not clear, select the self-drilling drilling method, and if self-supporting is obvious, the fourth step to proceed to the next step, and whether the drilling length is longer than a preset value Judge whether it is short, if it is long, select the self-drilling method, if it is short Adopted selection method of selecting a drilling method using a fifth step of selecting a single pipe drilling system. Further, in the invention of claim 2, a double-pipe drilling method is added as a selection target in the fourth step, and it is determined whether or not standing trees are present. In the case where the sparse density of the standing trees and the sparse density of the standing trees are denser or sparser than a predetermined setting standard, the process proceeds to the next step. The second step determines whether or not the independence of the hole wall is obvious. If the independence is obvious, the double-pipe drilling method is selected. If the independence is not obvious, proceed to the next step. 3 steps and whether or not the self-supporting of the hole wall is obvious. If self-supporting is not clear, select the self-drilling drilling method or double-pipe drilling method, and if self-supporting is obvious, the next step 4th step to go to step 4, and whether the drilling length is longer than a preset value It determines squid, if long selects the self drilling drilling method, when short adopted selection method of selecting a drilling method using a fifth step of selecting a single pipe drilling system. The set value in the fifth step is set to 3 m, for example, as in claim 3. Here, the term “independence of the hole wall” refers to a state in which the hole wall formed by the drilling operation is not independent. In addition, the self-drilling drilling method refers to a method in which the single pipe itself is used as an anchor material as it is excavated by a drilling means provided at the tip of the single pipe. Refers to a single pipe drilling method other than.

本発明に係る削孔方式選定方法によれば、当該安定化対象地盤に形成された削孔の孔壁が自立し得るのか、あるいは自立し得ないのかが明らかでない場合を含めて、その孔壁の自立、不自立に関して判っている状況に応じて、当該安定化対象地盤に適応し得る適切な削孔方式を簡便かつ的確に選定することが可能である。   According to the drilling method selection method according to the present invention, including the case where it is not clear whether the hole wall of the drilled hole formed in the stabilization target ground can be self-supporting or not self-supporting. It is possible to easily and accurately select an appropriate drilling method that can be adapted to the stabilization target ground according to the situation that is known regarding the independence and independence of the soil.

本発明の前記第2ステップにおける立木類の疎密度に関する設定基準については種々の設定が可能である。この設定基準は、当該安定化対象地盤に生えている立木類の疎密状態が、削孔作業のための足場の設置を大きく制約することなく、例えば削孔径が90mmを超える従来の削孔装置が難なく適用できるような状態の場合には、対象外として本選定方法の適用から排除するように設定される。立木類の疎密度を表す具体的な表示方法としては種々のものがある。例えば、森林の閉鎖密度を示す樹冠投影面積の占める比率を用い、その比率が5/10以下の場合には「疎」、6/10〜8/10の場合には「中」、9/10以上の場合には「密」と区分表示するものがある。また、平均樹高に対する平均樹間距離の比率も立木類の疎密度の指標となり、相対幹距=10000/(H×√N)(ただし、H:平均樹高(m)、N:本数密度(本/ha))を用い、その相対幹距が25%以上の場合には「疎」、15%以上25%未満の場合には「中」、15%未満の場合には「密」と区分表示するものもある。さらに、収量比数(RY)を用い、そのRYが0.55未満の場合には「疎」、0.55以上0.7未満の場合には「中」、0.7以上の場合には「密」と区分表示するものもある。前記第2ステップにおける設定基準の設定に際しては、それらの立木類の疎密度を表す適宜の表示方法を活用して設定することも可能であり、単独の表示方法に基づく評価、あるいはそれらを組合わせて総合評価するようにしてもよい。なお、前記第2ステップの設定基準に関する設定では、立木類の疎密度が設定基準に等しい場合について、第3ステップへ進むように設定してもよいし、対象外となるように設定してもよい。同様に、前記第5ステップの設定値に関する設定では、削孔長が予め定めた設定値に等しい場合について、自穿孔削孔方式を選定するように設定してもよいし、単管削孔方式を選定するように設定してもよい。   Various settings can be made with respect to the setting criteria regarding the density of standing trees in the second step of the present invention. This setting criterion is that the density of standing trees growing on the stabilization target ground does not greatly restrict the installation of the scaffold for drilling work, for example, a conventional drilling device having a drilling diameter exceeding 90 mm is used. In a state where it can be applied without difficulty, it is set to be excluded from the application of this selection method as out of the target. There are various specific display methods for representing the density of standing trees. For example, the ratio of the projected area of the canopy indicating the forest closing density is used, and when the ratio is 5/10 or less, “sparse”, when 6/10 to 8/10, “medium”, 9/10 In the above cases, there are some that are classified as “dense”. The ratio of the average tree distance to the average tree height is also an indicator of the sparse density of standing trees, and the relative trunk distance = 10000 / (H × √N) (where H: average tree height (m), N: number density (books) / Ha)), when the relative trunk distance is 25% or more, “sparse”, 15% or more and less than 25%, “medium”, and less than 15%, “dense” Some will do. Further, the yield ratio (RY) is used. When the RY is less than 0.55, it is “sparse”, when it is 0.55 or more and less than 0.7, “medium”, and when it is 0.7 or more, Some are classified as “dense”. In setting the setting criteria in the second step, it is possible to set by using an appropriate display method representing the sparse density of the trees, evaluation based on a single display method, or a combination thereof May be comprehensively evaluated. In the setting related to the setting criteria in the second step, when the sparse density of the trees is equal to the setting criteria, the setting may proceed to the third step or may be set so as not to be the target. Good. Similarly, in the setting related to the set value in the fifth step, when the drilling length is equal to a predetermined set value, the self-drilling drilling method may be selected, or the single-pipe drilling method may be selected. It may be set to select.

次に、図1を参照しながら請求項1の発明における削孔方式の選定フローに関して説明する。先ず、第1ステップS01では、当該安定化対象地盤に立木類が存在するか否かを判断し、存在する場合には第2ステップS02へ進む。当該安定化対象地盤に立木類が存在しない場合には本選定方法の対象外とする。次に、第2ステップS02では、前記立木類の疎密度が予め定めた設定基準より密か否かを判断する。この場合の設定基準は、前述のように当該安定化対象地盤に生えている立木類の疎密状態(樹間距離等)が、削孔作業のための足場の設置を大きく制約することなく、例えば削孔径が90mmを超える従来の削孔装置が難なく適用し得るような状態かどうかを判断するとの観点から予め設定される。そして、その設定基準より密の場合には第3ステップS03へ進み、当該対象地盤の立木類の疎密状態が前記設定基準より疎の場合には本選定方法の対象外とする。   Next, a drilling method selection flow in the invention of claim 1 will be described with reference to FIG. First, in the first step S01, it is determined whether or not standing trees exist on the stabilization target ground, and if present, the process proceeds to the second step S02. If there are no standing trees on the stabilization target ground, it will be excluded from this selection method. Next, in a second step S02, it is determined whether or not the sparse density of the standing trees is denser than a predetermined setting standard. The setting standard in this case is, as described above, the density of standing trees (the distance between trees, etc.) growing on the stabilization target ground does not greatly restrict the installation of a scaffold for drilling work, for example, It is set in advance from the viewpoint of determining whether or not a conventional drilling device having a drilling diameter exceeding 90 mm can be applied without difficulty. If it is denser than the setting criterion, the process proceeds to the third step S03. If the density of standing trees on the target ground is sparser than the setting criterion, it is excluded from this selection method.

第3ステップS03では、孔壁の不自立が明らかか否かを判断し、不自立すなわち孔壁が自立しないことが明らかな場合には二重管削孔方式を選定する。この二重管削孔方式の選定により、孔壁が自立しなくても安定した削孔作業が可能となり、グラウト材がアンカー材の周囲に的確に充填された良好な定着状態が得られる。因みに、ここにいう二重管削孔方式としては、前記第2ステップS02における設定基準との関係から、例えば削孔径が90mmを超える削孔装置が難なく適用し得る場合は本選定方法の対象外と設定した場合には、削孔径が90mm以下の小口径用の二重管削孔装置が適用されることになる。なお、孔壁の不自立が明らかでない場合には第4ステップS04へ進む。   In a third step S03, it is determined whether or not the hole wall is not self-supporting. If it is clear that the hole wall is not self-supporting, that is, the hole wall is not self-supporting, the double-pipe drilling method is selected. By selecting this double-pipe drilling method, stable drilling work is possible even if the hole wall is not self-supporting, and a good fixing state in which the grout material is accurately filled around the anchor material is obtained. Incidentally, as the double pipe drilling method mentioned here, from the relationship with the setting standard in the second step S02, for example, when a drilling device having a drilling diameter exceeding 90 mm can be applied without difficulty, it is out of the scope of this selection method. In this case, a double-pipe drilling device for small caliber having a drilling diameter of 90 mm or less is applied. If it is not clear that the hole wall is not independent, the process proceeds to the fourth step S04.

第4ステップS04では、前記孔壁の自立が明らかか否かを判断し、自立が明らかでない場合には単管の先端部に設けた掘削手段により掘削するとともにその単管自体をそのまま残してアンカー材として使用する自穿孔削孔方式を選定する。孔壁の自立が明らかな場合には第5ステップS05へ進み、削孔長が予め定めた設定値、例えば3m以下か否かを判断し、削孔長が3m以下の場合には単管削孔方式を選定し、それより長い場合には自穿孔削孔方式を選定する。すなわち、削孔長が設定値より長い場合には、単管をアンカー材としてそのまま残し、単管の引抜き作業を伴わない自穿孔削孔方式が選定されることになる。   In the fourth step S04, it is determined whether or not the self-supporting of the hole wall is obvious. Select the self-drilling method to be used as the material. If it is clear that the hole wall is self-supporting, the process proceeds to step S05, where it is determined whether or not the drilling length is a preset value, for example, 3 m or less. If the drilling length is 3 m or less, single pipe cutting is performed. Select the hole method, and if longer than that, select the self-drilling method. In other words, when the drilling length is longer than the set value, the self-drilling drilling method is selected in which the single pipe is left as an anchor material and the single pipe is not pulled out.

図2は請求項2の発明における削孔方式の選定フローを示したものである。図示のように、この請求項2に係る発明の実施形態は、前記請求項1に係る実施形態と比べ、第4ステップS04において孔壁の自立が明らかでない場合に選定される削孔方式として前記自穿孔削孔方式に二重管削孔方式を加え、場合に応じてそれらのいずれか一方の削孔方式を選択できるようにした点で相違する。他の点では異なるところはなく、同様の選定機能を奏する。因みに、以上の図1あるいは図2の選定フローにおいて、第1ステップS01の上流側、第5ステップS05の下流側、あるいは各ステップ相互間に他のステップを追加することは可能である。   FIG. 2 shows a selection flow of the drilling method in the invention of claim 2. As shown in the figure, the embodiment of the invention according to claim 2 is the drilling method selected when the self-supporting of the hole wall is not obvious in the fourth step S04, compared with the embodiment according to claim 1. A difference is that a double-pipe drilling method is added to the self-drilling drilling method, and one of these drilling methods can be selected depending on the case. There is no difference in other points, and the same selection function is achieved. Incidentally, in the above selection flow of FIG. 1 or FIG. 2, it is possible to add another step upstream of the first step S01, downstream of the fifth step S05, or between each step.

請求項1の発明における削孔方式の選定フローを示したフロー図である。FIG. 3 is a flowchart showing a selection flow of a drilling method in the invention of claim 1. 請求項2の発明における削孔方式の選定フローを示したフロー図である。It is the flowchart which showed the selection flow of the drilling system in invention of Claim 2.

符号の説明Explanation of symbols

S01…第1ステップ、S02…第2ステップ、S03…第3ステップ、S04…第4ステップ、S05…第5ステップ

S01 ... 1st step, S02 ... 2nd step, S03 ... 3rd step, S04 ... 4th step, S05 ... 5th step

Claims (3)

立木類が存在するか否かを判断し、存在する場合には次ステップに進み、存在しない場合には対象外とする第1ステップと、前記立木類の疎密度が予め定めた設定基準より密か疎かを判断し、密の場合には次ステップに進み、疎の場合には対象外とする第2ステップと、孔壁の不自立が明らかか否かを判断し、不自立が明らかな場合には二重管削孔方式を選定し、不自立が明らかでない場合には次ステップに進む第3ステップと、前記孔壁の自立が明らかか否かを判断し、自立が明らかでない場合には自穿孔削孔方式を選定し、自立が明らかな場合には次ステップに進む第4ステップと、削孔長が予め定めた設定値より長いか短いかを判断し、長い場合には自穿孔削孔方式を選定し、短い場合には単管削孔方式を選定する第5ステップとを含むことを特徴とする削孔方式選定方法。   It is determined whether or not a standing tree exists, and if it exists, the process proceeds to the next step. If it does not exist, the first step to be excluded and the sparse density of the standing tree are denser than a predetermined setting standard. If it is dense, proceed to the next step. If it is sparse, determine whether the second step to be excluded and whether the independence of the hole wall is obvious. Selects the double-pipe drilling method, and if the independence is not clear, determines whether the third step proceeds to the next step and whether the hole wall is self-supporting. Select the drilling method, and if self-supporting is obvious, determine the fourth step to proceed to the next step and whether the drilling length is longer or shorter than the preset value. And a fifth step of selecting a single pipe drilling method if it is short. Drilling method selecting method, characterized in that. 立木類が存在するか否かを判断し、存在する場合には次ステップに進み、存在しない場合には対象外とする第1ステップと、前記立木類の疎密度が予め定めた設定基準より密か疎かを判断し、密の場合には次ステップに進み、疎の場合には対象外とする第2ステップと、孔壁の不自立が明らかか否かを判断し、不自立が明らかな場合には二重管削孔方式を選定し、不自立が明らかでない場合には次ステップに進む第3ステップと、前記孔壁の自立が明らかか否かを判断し、自立が明らかでない場合には自穿孔削孔方式又は二重管削孔方式を選定し、自立が明らかな場合には次ステップに進む第4ステップと、削孔長が予め定めた設定値より長いか短いかを判断し、長い場合には自穿孔削孔方式を選定し、短い場合には単管削孔方式を選定する第5ステップとを含むことを特徴とする削孔方式選定方法。   It is determined whether or not a standing tree exists, and if it exists, the process proceeds to the next step. If it does not exist, the first step to be excluded and the sparse density of the standing tree are denser than a predetermined setting standard. If it is dense, proceed to the next step. If it is sparse, determine whether the second step to be excluded and whether the independence of the hole wall is obvious. Selects the double-pipe drilling method, and if the independence is not clear, determines whether the third step proceeds to the next step and whether the hole wall is self-supporting. Select the drilling method or double tube drilling method, and if self-supporting is obvious, determine whether the drilling length is longer or shorter than the preset value and the fourth step to proceed to the next step. If so, select the self-drilling method. If it is short, select the single-drilling method. Drilling method selecting method which comprises 5 steps. 前記設定値を3mに設定した請求項1又は2に記載の削孔方式選定方法。


The drilling method selection method according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the set value is set to 3 m.


JP2006009239A 2006-01-17 2006-01-17 Boring method selecting method Pending JP2007191879A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2006009239A JP2007191879A (en) 2006-01-17 2006-01-17 Boring method selecting method

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2006009239A JP2007191879A (en) 2006-01-17 2006-01-17 Boring method selecting method

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2007191879A true JP2007191879A (en) 2007-08-02

Family

ID=38447795

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2006009239A Pending JP2007191879A (en) 2006-01-17 2006-01-17 Boring method selecting method

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP2007191879A (en)

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2000186326A (en) * 1998-12-18 2000-07-04 Okabe Co Ltd Slope stabilizing method
JP2004068526A (en) * 2002-08-09 2004-03-04 Sato Kogyo Co Ltd Slope reinforcing method

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2000186326A (en) * 1998-12-18 2000-07-04 Okabe Co Ltd Slope stabilizing method
JP2004068526A (en) * 2002-08-09 2004-03-04 Sato Kogyo Co Ltd Slope reinforcing method

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US4605339A (en) Situ pile construction in ground liable to uplift
US20050000686A1 (en) Contractable and expandable tubular wellbore system
CN110617029B (en) Drilling segmented retreating type grouting method
JP6634219B2 (en) Ground anchor installation method
US7544015B2 (en) Composite form for stabilizing earthen embankments
JP4901593B2 (en) Underground bite type anchor and its anchor method
JP4658685B2 (en) Calculation method of pulling resistance of knotted pile using support pressure acting on inclined surface of enlarged diameter part, calculation method of indentation resistance, design method of knotted pile, knotted pile
JP2006322256A (en) Calculation method of extraction resistance force of pile with node using bearing force and shearing force acting on inclined face of expanded diameter part, calculation method of pushing-in resistance force, design method of pile with node and pile with node
JP2007191879A (en) Boring method selecting method
JP2005105677A (en) Construction method for hole-in anchor
JP2009013611A (en) Reinforcement structure and method for earth retaining wall
US20140212223A1 (en) System and Apparatus for Repairing a Foundation
JP3126389U (en) Stone connection anchor
WO2003083316A8 (en) Bonding anchor
CN113622978A (en) Construction process of buried deep support of semi-open and semi-concealed bias tunnel
JP4455471B2 (en) Tunnel face management method using spring water pressure
JP2008045327A (en) Construction method for head-enlarged pile
KR200392200Y1 (en) Nailing Fixing Device For Reinforcing Rod Of The Surfacereinforcement
CN105019449B (en) Prestressed concrete pipe pile and its construction method with degassing function
JP2011006968A (en) Pile with node, and load support method therefor
JP2011163064A (en) Driving method of ground reinforcement pile and preceding excavation rod, and driving device used for the same
CN203834472U (en) Prestressed concrete pipe pile with exhaust function
JP2004332334A (en) Anchor construction method
JP2006348564A (en) Construction method of foundation pile and foundation consolidation structure of foundation pile
JP2006348578A (en) Knotted pile pull-out resistance calculating method using shearing force acting on slope of diameter-expanded portion, push-in resistance calculating method, knotted pile design method, and knotted pile

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20081219

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20100728

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20100813

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20110217

A02 Decision of refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A02

Effective date: 20110714