JP2007066273A - Excretion care supply and service evaluation system - Google Patents

Excretion care supply and service evaluation system Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP2007066273A
JP2007066273A JP2005278706A JP2005278706A JP2007066273A JP 2007066273 A JP2007066273 A JP 2007066273A JP 2005278706 A JP2005278706 A JP 2005278706A JP 2005278706 A JP2005278706 A JP 2005278706A JP 2007066273 A JP2007066273 A JP 2007066273A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
facility
questionnaire
care
evaluation
excretion
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
JP2005278706A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Inventor
Toshiya Masaki
俊也 正木
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Individual
Original Assignee
Individual
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Individual filed Critical Individual
Priority to JP2005278706A priority Critical patent/JP2007066273A/en
Publication of JP2007066273A publication Critical patent/JP2007066273A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Landscapes

  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
  • Medical Treatment And Welfare Office Work (AREA)

Abstract

<P>PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To create a value evaluation system which quantitatively measures usability/value of a product and service provided by a manufacturer and provides the information to a facility, for improving selection tendency of excretion care supplies (diapers) in the facility where cost performance is emphasized, which could be the cause of deterioration in excretion care quality and deterioration in the working environment or a greater burden on the mind and body of care workers provided at the facility. <P>SOLUTION: The system has a questionnaire 002 having a question group concerning three evaluation items in an excretion care service, an input device 003 for inputting answer data collected by the questionnaire 002, a computer 004 including a memory device 005 for retaining inputted data and a program for generating a report 006 by processing data, and the report 006 generated thereby. <P>COPYRIGHT: (C)2007,JPO&INPIT

Description

発明の詳細な説明Detailed Description of the Invention

本発明は排泄補助用品(大人用オムツ)を販売する事業者(以下メーカーと称す)が失禁症状のある高齢者を収容する介護福祉施設・病院(以下施設と称す)に対し提供する自社の製品及びサービスの有用性・価値を評価するシステムに関する。The present invention is an in-house product provided to a nursing care welfare facility / hospital (hereinafter referred to as a facility) that accommodates elderly persons with incontinence symptoms by a business operator (hereinafter referred to as a manufacturer) that sells excretion aids (adult diapers). And a system for evaluating the usefulness and value of the service.

従来から、定量化が困難な「生活の質」を測定する方法として「Q.O.L.評価法」が有名であり、医療・福祉分野でも特に高齢者、障害者を対象としてその重要性が高まっている。しかし、一般的にこの評価手法は学術的な統計調査や施設が主体的に自施設での治療方針・介護方針策定に利用するものとして認知されており、産業上の利用を目的としたものではなかった。Traditionally, the “QOL evaluation method” has been well-known as a method of measuring “quality of life”, which is difficult to quantify, and is especially important for the elderly and disabled in the medical and welfare fields. Is growing. However, this evaluation method is generally recognized by academic statistical surveys and facilities as being used mainly for the establishment of treatment policies and nursing care policies at its own facilities, and is not intended for industrial use. There wasn't.

発明が解決しようとする課題Problems to be solved by the invention

現在、日本の高齢者人口は約2500万人となり、2015年にはいわゆるベビーブーム世代が初期高齢者世代に入る。このような状況下で施設における介護サービスの重要性は年々高まり、介護保険法改定においては2006年度より施設が提供する介護サービスに関する第三者評価の情報を公に開示することが義務化される。しかし一方で、介護保険法の改定において施設は介護報酬の実質的な減収に直面することになり、言い換えれば施設はコストを抑えながら更に質の高い介護サービスの提供を実現することが求められている。Currently, the elderly population in Japan is about 25 million, and the so-called baby boom generation will enter the early elderly generation in 2015. Under these circumstances, the importance of long-term care services at facilities has been increasing year by year, and the revision of the Long-term Care Insurance Law has made it mandatory to publicly disclose information on third-party evaluations regarding long-term care services provided by facilities since FY2006. . However, on the other hand, the revision of the Long-term Care Insurance Law will cause the facility to face a substantial decrease in nursing care rewards.In other words, the facility is required to provide higher-quality care services while keeping costs down. Yes.

また、施設ではコスト削減と介護サービスの質向上の両立を迫られる中で、そこで介護に携わる職員は過剰な業務負担を強いられるケースも多く、心身を病む介護職員が増加している。また他職種に比べ介護職員の離職率の高さは有名であり、施設の介護職員に対する残業代未払い記事が新聞を賑わせたことも記憶に新しい。このような介護職員の業務環境・過度な業務による心身への影響は介護サービスの質低下を招く一因とされており、介護サービスの質向上と併せ介護職員の業務環境改善・過度な労働による心身への負担軽減を、効率的なコスト運用と併せて実現することが求められている。In addition, there are many cases where facilities are forced to reduce the cost and improve the quality of long-term care services, and there are many cases where the staff involved in long-term care are forced to overburden the work, and the number of care staff who are physically and mentally ill is increasing. In addition, the high turnover rate of care workers compared to other occupations is famous, and it is also a new memory that unpaid articles for overtime pay for care workers at the facility buzzed the newspaper. The impact on the mind and body of the care worker's work environment and excessive work is considered to be a cause of the deterioration of the quality of the care service. There is a need to reduce mental and physical burdens together with efficient cost management.

ところが現状、介護サービスの質や介護職員の業務環境・心身への負担の状態を定量的に捉える手法が確立されていないため、例えば施設が排泄補助用品を選択する際、そこに付随して提供されるサービスを含めどのメーカーの製品がどの程度その施設の排泄介護サービスの質向上や介護職員の業務環境改善・心身の負担軽減に対し有用なのかを定量的に比較検討することが困難なため、値段の安さのみを重視して排泄補助用品を選定する傾向が強く、この傾向がさらに排泄介護サービスの質低下、または介護職員の業務環境悪化を生み出すという悪循環が起きている。However, there is currently no established method for quantitatively assessing the quality of care services, the work environment of caregivers, and the state of burden on the mind and body. For example, when a facility selects an excretion aid, it is provided along with it. any manufacturer of a product how the facility excretion care services of quality improvement and nursing staff of the business environment improvement and mental and physical burden because it is difficult to quantitatively compare how useful for of including the services that are However, there is a strong tendency to select excretion aids with emphasis only on the low price, and this trend further creates a vicious circle in which the quality of excretion care services deteriorates or the work environment of care workers deteriorates.

本発明は上記の問題を解決するために、施設の排泄介護サービスに関する評価3項目(「個別排泄ケア実施度」「介護職員の業務環境・心身への負担度」「排泄介護サービスへの投資コスト」、以下評価3項目と称す)を設定し、それらを定量化して測定・評価することで施設が排泄介護サービスの質向上のための適切な製品及びサービスを選択することを可能にする評価システムを提供することを課題とする。In order to solve the above-mentioned problems, the present invention provides three evaluation items related to facility excretion care services ("degree of individual excretion care implementation", "degree of care staff's work environment and mental and physical burden", "cost of investment in excretion care services" ”, Hereinafter referred to as three evaluation items), and an evaluation system that enables facilities to select appropriate products and services for improving the quality of excretion care services by quantifying and measuring and evaluating them It is an issue to provide.

課題を解決するための手段Means for solving the problem

上記課題を解決するために、本発明は排泄介護サービスに関する評価3項目を設定し、それらを定量化して測定するために複数段階評価方式を採用した設問群で構成される質問票と、質問票により収集したデータを入力する入力装置と、入力装置により入力されたデータを保持する記憶装置及び保持したデータを加工し定型のレポートを生成するプログラムを備えたコンピュータと、そこで生成され施設へ提供されるレポートにより構成されている。In order to solve the above-mentioned problems, the present invention sets up three evaluation items related to the excretion care service, and forms a questionnaire composed of a group of questions adopting a multi-stage evaluation method in order to quantify and measure them. An input device for inputting the data collected by the computer, a storage device for holding the data input by the input device, a computer having a program for processing the held data and generating a standard report, and generated and provided to the facility It is composed of reports.

まず請求項1に係わる発明について説明する。上記質問票は評価3項目においてそれぞれの項目を測定するための複数の設問群から構成され、それぞれの設問は回答を定量化して測定するよう複数段階評価方式を採用する。質問票は顧客施設内の複数の介護職員に対して実施されるが、そこで収集されたデータは入力装置で入力されコンピュータ内の記憶装置で保持する。記憶装置で保持されたデータにおいて、まずコンピュータ内のプログラムにより設問各々について収集された回答の平均値が計算され、次いで評価3項目毎に各項目を評価するために用意された全ての設問における回答の平均値が計算される。これにより、各設問間や各項目間での平均値の高低、バランスの良し悪しを定量化して評価することが可能になる。またこれらの平均値はその施設へ提供するレポートが生成される際、各設問や各評価項目を指標としたレーダーチャートグラフを用いて表現することで、視覚的によりわかりやすく把握することを可能にする。First, the invention according to claim 1 will be described. The questionnaire is composed of a plurality of question groups for measuring each item in the three evaluation items, and each question adopts a multi-stage evaluation method so that the answers are quantified and measured. The questionnaire is implemented for a plurality of care workers in the customer facility, and data collected therein is input by an input device and held in a storage device in a computer. In the data held in the storage device, the average value of the answers collected for each question is first calculated by the program in the computer, and then the answers in all questions prepared to evaluate each item for every three evaluation items The average value of is calculated. This makes it possible to quantify and evaluate the average value between each question and each item and the balance. In addition, when a report to be provided to the facility is generated, these average values can be visually understood in a more easily understandable manner by using a radar chart graph with each question and each evaluation item as an index. To do.

次に請求項2に係わる発明について説明する。本評価システムをメーカーが活用する際、まず施設に対し自社の製品及びサービスの提供を開始する前に上述の一連の過程を実施しておく。次にメーカーから製品及びサービスの提供が開始された後、一定期間(半年から1年)が過ぎたところで再度同様の過程を実施する。これにより、各々計算された製品及びサービス提供開始前後における同じ設問間・項目間での平均値の変化・差異を比較することで、製品及びサービスの有用性・価値を定量的に評価することを可能にする。Next, the invention according to claim 2 will be described. When the manufacturer uses this evaluation system, first, the above-described series of processes is performed before the company starts providing its products and services to the facility. Next, after the start of the provision of products and services from the manufacturer, the same process is carried out again after a certain period (half year to one year) has passed. This allows us to quantitatively evaluate the usefulness and value of products and services by comparing the average value changes and differences between the same questions and items before and after the start of provision of products and services. enable.

発明実施の形態Embodiment of the Invention

以下、図面を参照して本発明の実施形態について説明する。図1は本発明の実施形態にかかる評価システムの全体構成図を示す。図1において、001は本システムを利用する施設を示し、002は施設001に対し実施される質問票を示す。施設001で配布・回収された質問票002のデータは入力装置003で入力されコンピュータ004内に存在する記憶装置005に保持され、同じコンピュータ004内に存在するプログラムにより加工された後レポート006として生成される。レポート006は施設001に対し、紙・電子メールやインターネットの媒体手段を通じ提供される。Hereinafter, embodiments of the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings. FIG. 1 is an overall configuration diagram of an evaluation system according to an embodiment of the present invention. In FIG. 1, 001 indicates a facility that uses the present system, and 002 indicates a questionnaire executed for the facility 001. The data of the questionnaire 002 distributed / collected at the facility 001 is input by the input device 003, held in the storage device 005 existing in the computer 004, and generated as a report 006 after being processed by the program existing in the same computer 004. Is done. The report 006 is provided to the facility 001 through paper / e-mail or Internet media.

次に、図1に示したシステムを構成するそれぞれの要素について例を示して説明する。図2は質問票002の実施例を示したものである。特に質問票002aは評価3項目中「排泄介護サービスの質」「介護者の業務環境・心身への負担」の項目を評価するための複数の設問で構成されており、主に排泄介護サービスの提供に携わる介護職員を対象に実施される。質問票002bは「排泄介護サービスへの投資コスト」の項目を評価するためのもので、「排泄補助用品の購入コスト」「排泄介護サービス提供に伴う労働(オムツ交換労働、スキンケア労働、カバー類の洗濯労働)コスト」「使用済み紙オムツの廃棄コスト」におけるトータルコストを評価するための数値指標を収集するための複数の設問で構成されており、経営・費用管理に携わる施設長、院長、事務長などに対し実施される。Next, each element constituting the system shown in FIG. 1 will be described with an example. FIG. 2 shows an example of the questionnaire 002. In particular, Questionnaire 002a is composed of multiple questions to evaluate the items of “Quality of Excretion Care Service” and “Worker's Work Environment and Mind and Body Burden” among the three evaluation items. It is implemented for care workers who are involved in the provision. Questionnaire 002b is for evaluating the item “Investment costs for excretion care services”, “Purchase cost of excretion aids” “Labor care services (diaper replacement labor, skin care labor, cover It consists of multiple questions for collecting numerical indicators to evaluate the total cost in “Laundry labor” cost ”and“ Disposal cost of used paper diapers ”. It is carried out for the head.

図3は、図1の記憶装置005の構造を示したものである。コンピュータ004内に存在する記憶装置005内部では、本システムが実施された一施設に対し一つの記録用シート007が割り当てられ、また一つの記録用シート007はその施設において回収された質問票の回答データが、製品及びサービスの提供前後それぞれに分けて記録されるよう複数のマトリックス表008で構成されている。マトリックス表008は縦軸に質問票を構成する設問分の行数、横軸には回収された質問票の枚数分の列数で構成されている。このマトリックス表008に質問票の回答データが記録されるとプログラムがコンピュータを機能させ、まずマトリックス表008内における設問各々について回収された質問票の回答データの平均値が計算され、次いで評価3項目について各々の項目を構成する全設問の回答データの平均値が計算される。この過程をメーカーからの製品及びサービス提供開始前後で実施することで、一つの記録用シート007内における複数のマトリックス表008で各設問・各項目毎の平均値を保持することになり、それら複数のマトリックス008間で同じ設問・同じ項目のそれら平均値を比較することで、製品及びサービス提供の前後における平均値の変化・差異を定量的に確認することが可能になる。FIG. 3 shows the structure of the storage device 005 of FIG. In the storage device 005 existing in the computer 004, one recording sheet 007 is assigned to one facility where the present system is implemented, and one recording sheet 007 is an answer to a questionnaire collected at the facility. A plurality of matrix tables 008 are configured so that data is recorded separately before and after the provision of products and services. The matrix table 008 is composed of the number of rows for the questions constituting the questionnaire on the vertical axis and the number of columns for the number of collected questionnaires on the horizontal axis. When the answer data of the questionnaire is recorded in this matrix table 008, the program causes the computer to function. First, the average value of the answer data of the questionnaire collected for each question in the matrix table 008 is calculated, and then the evaluation three items The average value of the answer data of all questions constituting each item is calculated. By carrying out this process before and after the start of product and service provision from the manufacturer, a plurality of matrix tables 008 in one recording sheet 007 hold the average value for each question and each item. By comparing those average values of the same question and the same item between the matrix 008, it is possible to quantitatively confirm the change / difference of the average value before and after the provision of products and services.

図4は、サーバ004において自動生成されるレポート006の実施例を示したものである。レポート006のシート構成は、評価3項目のそれぞれの項目に対し1シートが割り当てられ、1シートはさらに上下に分割され、上段にメーカーからの製品及びサービス提供前、下段に提供開始後の設問群を指標としたレーダーチャートグラフが表示される。006aはその実施例である。また同様に評価3項目の項目を指標とした三角形のレーダーチャートグラフに関するシートも生成される。006bはその実施例である。FIG. 4 shows an example of a report 006 that is automatically generated by the server 004. In the sheet structure of report 006, one sheet is assigned to each of the three evaluation items, and one sheet is further divided into upper and lower parts, and the upper part is a group of questions before provision of products and services from the manufacturer, and the lower part after provision is started. A radar chart graph with the index as the index is displayed. 006a is an example thereof. Similarly, a sheet relating to a triangular radar chart graph using the three evaluation items as an index is also generated. 006b is an example thereof.

発明の効果The invention's effect

上述の通り、本システムによって施設はメーカーから提供される製品及びサービスが、その施設から入居・入院する高齢者に対し提供される介護サービスの質向上という点において、評価3項目に関する測定データから定量的に評価することが可能になる。またそれにより、排泄補助用品(オムツ)を選択する際に単なる価格の安さを重視するのではなく、その製品及びサービスが排泄介護サービスの質向上とそれに携わる介護職員の業務環境改善・心身への負担軽減にどれだけ有用であるかを数値も伴って客観的に捉えながら、且つコストとのバランスを考慮して選択することが可能になる。また同時にメーカーは、自社の製品及びサービスの有用性・価値を証明する機会が与えられ、施設に対し数値を伴った価値の証明が可能になる。As described above, facilities and products provided by manufacturers using this system are quantified from the measurement data on the three evaluation items in terms of improving the quality of care services provided to elderly people who are moving in or hospitalized from the facilities. Evaluation becomes possible. In addition, when choosing an excretion aid (diaper), it is not just a matter of low price, but the product and service improve the quality of excretion care service and the work environment of the care staff involved. It is possible to select how much it is useful for reducing the burden objectively with numerical values and considering the balance with cost. At the same time, manufacturers are given the opportunity to prove the usefulness and value of their products and services, and it is possible to prove the value with numerical values for facilities.

本発明実施形態に係わる価値評価システムを示す全体構成図である。It is a whole lineblock diagram showing the value evaluation system concerning the embodiment of the present invention. 図1の質問票2の実施例である。It is an Example of the questionnaire 2 of FIG. 図1のコンピュータ4の構成図である。It is a block diagram of the computer 4 of FIG. 図1のレポート6の実施例である。It is an Example of the report 6 of FIG.

符号の説明Explanation of symbols

001 施設
002 質問票
002a 「排泄介護サービスの質」「介護者の業務環境・心身への負担」の質問票実施例
002b 「排泄介護サービスへの投資コスト」の質問票実施例
003 (回収データ入力用)入力装置
004 (記憶装置及びプログラムを内包する)コンピュータ
005 記憶装置
006 (施設への提供用)レポート
006a (設問ベースで製品・サービス提供前後を比較した)レポートの実施例
006b (項目ベースで製品・サービス提供前後を比較した)レポートの実施例
007 記録用シート
008 マトリックス表
001 Facility 002 Questionnaire 002a “Quality of excretion care service” “Career's work environment and burden on mind and body” Example 002b “Investment cost for excretion care service” Example 003 (Input of collected data) ) Input device 004 (Contains storage device and program) Computer 005 Storage device 006 (For provision to facilities) Report 006a (Comparison before and after product / service provision on a question basis) Example of report 006b (Item basis) Report example 007 (sheet before and after product / service provision comparison) Recording sheet 008 Matrix table

Claims (2)

排泄補助用品(大人用オムツ)を販売する事業者(以下メーカーと称す)が失禁症状のある高齢者を収容する介護福祉施設・病院(以下施設と称す)へ提供する製品及びサービスに関して、その施設から入居・入院する高齢者へ提供される排泄介護サービスの質の向上に対しどの程度有用であったかを、排泄介護サービスに関する3つの評価項目(「個別排泄ケア実施度」「介護者の業務環境・心身への負担度」「排泄介護サービスへの投資コスト」以下評価3項目と称す)の観点から定量的に測定・評価するシステムであり、評価3項目を定量化するために複数段階評価方式を採用した設問群で構成される質問票と、質問票により収集したデータを入力するための入力装置と、入力装置により入力されたデータを保持する記憶装置及び保持したデータを加工し定型のレポートを生成するプログラムを備えたコンピュータと、コンピュータにより生成され施設へ提供されるレポートから成る製品及びサービス評価システム。A facility that sells excretion aids (adult diapers) (hereinafter referred to as a manufacturer) with regard to products and services provided to nursing care welfare facilities / hospitals (hereinafter referred to as facilities) that accommodate elderly people with incontinence symptoms The three evaluation items ("Individual Excretion Care Implementation", "Career's Work Environment, It is a system that measures and evaluates quantitatively from the viewpoint of “the burden on the mind and body” and “investment care service investment cost” (hereinafter referred to as three evaluation items). A multi-stage evaluation method is used to quantify the three evaluation items. Questionnaire composed of the adopted question group, input device for inputting data collected by the questionnaire, storage device for holding data input by the input device, and holding And a computer with a program for generating a processed standard reports data, products and services evaluation system consisting of reports provided to the generated facility by a computer. 請求項1に記載した測定・評価を行う手段として、まずメーカーが施設に対し自社の製品及びサービスを提供する前に予め上記質問票を実施し、回収した質問票の設問群に対する回答データからその施設における評価3項目を測定しておき、次に製品及びサービスの提供開始時より一定期間の後に同様の測定を行い、製品及びサービス提供前後の測定結果を比較してその差異や変化を定量的に測ることで、評価3項目に関する有用性・価値について数値を以って評価することを特徴とした製品及びサービス評価システム。As a means for performing the measurement and evaluation described in claim 1, the manufacturer first carries out the above questionnaire before providing the company's products and services to the facility, and from the answer data to the question group of the collected questionnaire Measure the three evaluation items at the facility, then perform the same measurement after a certain period from the start of product and service provision, compare the measurement results before and after product and service provision, and quantify the differences and changes A product and service evaluation system characterized by evaluating the usefulness and value of three evaluation items with numerical values.
JP2005278706A 2005-08-26 2005-08-26 Excretion care supply and service evaluation system Pending JP2007066273A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2005278706A JP2007066273A (en) 2005-08-26 2005-08-26 Excretion care supply and service evaluation system

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2005278706A JP2007066273A (en) 2005-08-26 2005-08-26 Excretion care supply and service evaluation system

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2007066273A true JP2007066273A (en) 2007-03-15

Family

ID=37928337

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2005278706A Pending JP2007066273A (en) 2005-08-26 2005-08-26 Excretion care supply and service evaluation system

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP2007066273A (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN109831923A (en) * 2016-09-28 2019-05-31 公益财团法人神户医疗产业都市推进机构 Dementia, which is situated between, protects burden degree judgment means, dementia Jie's shield burden degree judgment method, dementia Jie shield burden degree determining program, dementia therapeutic effect judgment means, dementia therapeutic effect judgment method, dementia therapeutic effect determining program
JP7510780B2 (en) 2019-06-21 2024-07-04 ユニ・チャーム株式会社 Output device, output method, and output program

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN109831923A (en) * 2016-09-28 2019-05-31 公益财团法人神户医疗产业都市推进机构 Dementia, which is situated between, protects burden degree judgment means, dementia Jie's shield burden degree judgment method, dementia Jie shield burden degree determining program, dementia therapeutic effect judgment means, dementia therapeutic effect judgment method, dementia therapeutic effect determining program
JP7510780B2 (en) 2019-06-21 2024-07-04 ユニ・チャーム株式会社 Output device, output method, and output program

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Taylor et al. Do nurse and patient injuries share common antecedents? An analysis of associations with safety climate and working conditions
Farrelly et al. Surgical tray optimization as a simple means to decrease perioperative costs
Bradley et al. Care delivery and self management strategies for adults with epilepsy
Dall'Ora et al. Association of 12 h shifts and nurses’ job satisfaction, burnout and intention to leave: findings from a cross-sectional study of 12 European countries
Rigobello et al. The perception of the patient safety climate by professionals of the emergency department
Farquharson et al. Nursing stress and patient care: real‐time investigation of the effect of nursing tasks and demands on psychological stress, physiological stress, and job performance: study protocol
Coffman et al. Minimum nurse-to-patient ratios in acute care hospitals in California
Myny et al. Non‐direct patient care factors influencing nursing workload: A review of the literature
Varkey et al. Basics of quality improvement in health care
Nahm Data quality in clinical research
Tubbs-Cooley et al. Hospital Magnet® designation and missed nursing care in neonatal intensive care units
Otto et al. Interventions to promote physical and mental health of nurses in elderly care: A systematic review
Furniss et al. 7 Themes for guiding situated ergonomic assessments of medical devices: A case study of an inpatient glucometer
Tveito et al. Impact of organizational policies and practices on workplace injuries in a hospital setting
McCaughey et al. Safety leadership: extending workplace safety climate best practices across health care workforces
Rolander et al. Working conditions, health and productivity among dentists in Swedish public dental care–a prospective study during a 5-year period of rationalisation
Patrician et al. Twenty years of staffing, practice environment, and outcomes research in military nursing
Dhaini et al. A longitudinal study on implicit rationing of nursing care among Lebanese patients–Study protocol
Grota et al. Electronic surveillance systems in infection prevention: organizational support, program characteristics, and user satisfaction
Gehri et al. Matching registered nurse services with changing care demands in psychiatric hospitals: protocol for a multicenter observational study (matchrn psychiatry study)
JP2007066273A (en) Excretion care supply and service evaluation system
Khan et al. Relationship between Psychological Capital and Job Engagement: A Study on Public Healthcare Providers.
Colombet et al. Long-term effects of a multifaceted intervention to encourage the choice of the oral route for proton pump inhibitors: an interrupted time-series analysis
Reilly Development of the work productivity and activity impairment (WPAI) questionnaire
McCaughey et al. Leadership and safety excellence: The experience of hospital support service workers