JP2006277292A - Land sales method - Google Patents

Land sales method Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP2006277292A
JP2006277292A JP2005095028A JP2005095028A JP2006277292A JP 2006277292 A JP2006277292 A JP 2006277292A JP 2005095028 A JP2005095028 A JP 2005095028A JP 2005095028 A JP2005095028 A JP 2005095028A JP 2006277292 A JP2006277292 A JP 2006277292A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
land
target
stage
purification
sales
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
JP2005095028A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Inventor
Seiichi Yabe
誠一 矢部
Kiyoaki Okuda
清明 奥田
健 ▲高▼岸
Takeshi Takagishi
Yoshitaka Tanaka
良隆 田中
Takayuki Asano
孝行 浅野
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Takenaka Komuten Co Ltd
Takenaka Doboku Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Takenaka Komuten Co Ltd
Takenaka Doboku Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Takenaka Komuten Co Ltd, Takenaka Doboku Co Ltd filed Critical Takenaka Komuten Co Ltd
Priority to JP2005095028A priority Critical patent/JP2006277292A/en
Publication of JP2006277292A publication Critical patent/JP2006277292A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Abstract

<P>PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To enable a sales object person to acquire a land at a reasonable price while reducing the cost burden of a land owner in selling of a contaminated land. <P>SOLUTION: The land sales method for purifying and selling the contaminated land comprises a risk evaluation stage for investigating the contamination state of an object land to perform risk evaluation including determination of a purification method and a construction period and cost thereof; a guarantee setting stage for setting, for renting the object land to a rent object person T for a predetermined period, the guarantee of damage by contamination by the rental based on the risk evaluation; a rental rate setting stage for setting a land rental rate considering the risk evaluation and a damage insurance amount for the guarantee; a land renting stage for renting the object land to the rent object person T for the predetermined period at the set rental rate; and a land purification stage for performing purification of the object land in parallel to the land rental for the predetermined period. After the predetermined period, the object land is sold to the sales object person as a purification completed land. <P>COPYRIGHT: (C)2007,JPO&INPIT

Description

本発明は、汚染土壌を浄化して販売する土地販売方法に関する。   The present invention relates to a land sales method for purifying and selling contaminated soil.

例えば、工場や研究所や病院等の用途で使用されている土地は、それらの施設で使用された汚染物質(例えば、油や薬品等)が何らかの形で土地に侵入して、土壌汚染を受けている危険性がある。それらの土地の販売にあたって、土壌汚染の度合いが所定の環境基準値を超えるような場合は、その土地を浄化して良好な土壌に回復させる必要がある。そして、このような汚染された土地は、それまでの使用目的からして非常に便利な立地条件下にあることが多く、本来的な立地条件の価値を考慮すると、汚染土地のまま休眠させるより、土地の浄化を行って積極的に土地利用を図る価値がある。
従来、この種の土地販売方法としては、対象土地の汚染状況を調査して、浄化方法の決定とその工期と費用とを含めたリスク評価を行うリスク評価段階と、そのリスク評価に伴って所定の期間にわたって対象土地の浄化を行う土地浄化段階(例えば、特許文献1、特許文献2参照)とを経て、前記対象土地を浄化完了土地として販売対象者に販売する方法をとるのが一般的であった。
尚、この様な従来技術に関しては、当業者の間で広く知られているものであるが、販売方法に関して詳しく言及した特許文献などは見あたらないので、先行技術文献は示していない。
For example, for land used in applications such as factories, research laboratories, and hospitals, pollutants (such as oil and chemicals) used in those facilities infiltrate the land in some way and are subject to soil contamination. There is a risk of being. In selling such land, if the degree of soil contamination exceeds a predetermined environmental standard value, it is necessary to purify the land and restore it to good soil. Such contaminated land is often in very convenient location conditions for the purpose of use so far, and considering the value of the original location conditions, it is more likely than dormant leave of the contaminated land. It is worth pursuing land and actively using it.
Conventionally, this type of land sales method includes a risk evaluation stage in which the pollution status of the target land is investigated, a risk evaluation is performed that includes determination of the purification method, its construction period and cost, and a predetermined risk assessment. It is common to take a method in which the target land is sold to the sales target as the clean-up completed land through a land purification stage (see, for example, Patent Document 1 and Patent Document 2) for purifying the target land over a period of there were.
Such a prior art is widely known among those skilled in the art, but since there is no patent document or the like that has been mentioned in detail regarding the sales method, no prior art document is shown.

特開2004−122069号公報JP 2004-122069 A 特開2003−039080号公報JP 2003-039080 A

上述した従来の土地販売方法によれば、土地の販売に伴って、土地の所有者は、予め、対象土地に対する前記リスク評価や土地の浄化を、自らが費用負担して実施せざるを得ず、土地販売までの先行費用負担が非常に高額になってしまう問題点がある。また、土地販売に当たっては、前記先行費用を加えた販売価格の設定を行うと、周辺の非汚染土地との価格差が生じ、結果的に売れ難くなって、迅速な土地活用を図れない問題点がある。
従って、販売価格には土地の浄化費用を含め難く、結果的には、土地所有者の経済負担が非常に大きくなってしまう。
According to the conventional land sales method described above, the land owner is obliged to carry out the risk assessment and the land purification for the target land at his own expense in advance. There is a problem that the upfront cost burden for land sales becomes very high. In addition, in selling land, if the selling price is set with the preceding costs, there will be a price difference from the surrounding non-contaminated land, which will make it difficult to sell, and it will not be possible to use the land quickly. There is.
Therefore, it is difficult to include the land purification cost in the selling price, and as a result, the economic burden on the land owner becomes very large.

従って、本発明の目的は、上記問題点を解消し、販売対象の土地の汚染浄化を行う必要がある場合でも、土地の所有者の費用負担を低下させることができ、一方、販売対象者は、割高とならない価格で土地を手に入れることが可能な土地販売方法を提供するところにある。   Therefore, the object of the present invention is to eliminate the above-mentioned problems and reduce the cost burden of the land owner even when it is necessary to purify the pollution of the land to be sold. It is a place to provide a land sales method that can obtain land at a price that is not expensive.

本発明の第1の特徴構成は、汚染土壌を浄化して販売する土地販売方法において、対象土地の汚染状況を調査して、浄化方法の決定とその工期と費用とを含めたリスク評価を行うリスク評価段階と、所定の期間にわたって前記対象土地を貸与対象者に貸与するに当たり、その貸与による汚染被害の保証を前記リスク評価に基づいて設定する保証設定段階と、前記リスク評価と前記保証を行うための損害保険額とを考慮した土地貸与額を設定する貸与額設定段階と、設定された貸与額で前記対象土地を所定の期間にわたって貸与対象者に貸与する土地貸与段階と、前記所定の期間の土地貸与と並行して対象土地の浄化を行う土地浄化段階とを経て、前記所定の期間の満了後に、前記対象土地を浄化完了土地として販売対象者に販売するところにある。   The first characteristic configuration of the present invention is a land sales method for purifying and selling contaminated soil, investigating the pollution status of the target land, and performing a risk assessment including determination of the purification method, its construction period and cost. Performing a risk evaluation stage, a guarantee setting stage for setting a guarantee of pollution damage due to the loan based on the risk assessment, and performing the risk assessment and the guarantee, when renting the target land to a loan target person for a predetermined period of time A lending amount setting stage for setting a land lending amount in consideration of a non-life insurance amount, a land lending step for lending the target land to a lending target person for a predetermined period with the set lending amount, and the predetermined period After the expiration of the predetermined period, the target land is sold to the sales target as the completed land after the expiration of the predetermined period. That.

本発明の第1の特徴構成によれば、対象土地を販売対象者に販売する前に、前記貸与対象者に所定の期間にわたって対象土地を貸与するから、土地の所有者にはその貸与期間の土地貸与額が収益となり、土地販売に係わる土地所有者の費用負担を低下させることが可能となる。しかも、土地貸与額の設定は、前記リスク評価と、貸与による汚染被害の保証を行うための損害保険額とを考慮して行われるから、土地貸与に伴って汚染被害が発生しても損害保険で対応することができ、経済負担をより少なくすることが可能となる。
一方、貸与対象者は、対象土地を購入するのに比べて安い金額で所定の期間使用することができ、しかも、その貸与期間中には、汚染被害の保証を受けることができるから、安心して使用することが可能となる。
そして、販売対象者は、浄化完了土地を購入するわけであるから、新たな浄化費用が掛からず、通常の価格で購入することが可能となる。
また、土地の利用に関しては、浄化期間中は、貸与対象者が土地を使用し、販売後は販売対象者が使用することとなり、汚染土壌のまま休眠させるのに比べて、より地域への貢献度が向上し、合わせて地域の活性化を図ることが可能となる。
即ち、当該土地販売方法によれば、土地の所有者、貸与対象者、販売対象者、そしてその地域がそれぞれ恩恵を被ることが可能となる。
According to the first characteristic configuration of the present invention, before the target land is sold to the sales target person, the target land is lent to the loan target person for a predetermined period. The amount of land lending will be profitable, and it will be possible to reduce the cost burden on land owners for land sales. Moreover, since the land lending amount is set in consideration of the risk assessment and the amount of non-life insurance for guaranteeing pollution damage due to lending, non-life insurance will be provided even if pollution damage occurs due to land lending. It is possible to cope with this, and it becomes possible to reduce the economic burden.
On the other hand, the loan target person can use the land for a specified period at a lower price compared to purchasing the target land, and can receive a guarantee of pollution damage during the loan period. It can be used.
And since the sale target person purchases the land that has been cleaned, it can be purchased at a normal price without incurring new cleaning costs.
In terms of land use, the loan recipient uses the land during the cleanup period, and the seller uses the land after the sale. The degree will improve, and it will be possible to revitalize the region.
That is, according to the land sales method, the land owner, the loan target person, the sales target person, and the area can benefit from each.

本発明の第2の特徴構成は、前記貸与対象者は、公開された通信サイトで募集して決定するところにある。   The second characteristic configuration of the present invention resides in that the loan subject recruits and decides at a public communication site.

本発明の第2の特徴構成によれば、本発明の第1の特徴構成による上述の作用効果を叶えることができるのに加えて、より広域な範囲での貸与対象者の募集を行うことが可能となるから、より迅速に土地利用を促進することが可能となる。   According to the second characteristic configuration of the present invention, in addition to being able to achieve the above-described operational effects according to the first characteristic configuration of the present invention, it is possible to recruit a loan target person in a wider area. Because it becomes possible, it becomes possible to promote land use more quickly.

以下に本発明の実施の形態を図面に基づいて説明する。   Embodiments of the present invention will be described below with reference to the drawings.

図1は、本発明の土地販売方法の一例を示すフローチャートである。
対象となる土地は、一例として工場跡地であり、工場の操業時に土壌汚染があったものとして説明をする。
そして、土地の所有者は、該当する汚染土壌を浄化して販売対象者に販売するものである。
FIG. 1 is a flowchart showing an example of the land sales method of the present invention.
The target land is, for example, a factory site, and it is assumed that there was soil contamination during the operation of the factory.
The land owner purifies the corresponding contaminated soil and sells it to the sales target.

[1]対象土地に対するリスク評価を行う(リスク評価段階)。
具体的には、対象土地の汚染状況を調査し、その調査結果を基にして、現場に適した土壌浄化方法を検討する。汚染物質は、例えば、揮発性有機化合物(VOC)や、重金属や農薬や油等が挙げられる。また、土壌浄化方法は、例えば、化学分解、生物分解、電気修復、原位置洗浄、土壌置換等が挙げられる。そして、リスク評価は、例えば、図2に示すような表を作成して実施することができる。健康リスクに関しては、図に示すように、項目毎の汚染レベルや暴露経路等から想定した被害に対する確率が算出できて総合的なリスクが求まり、経済リスクに関しては、同様に項目毎の汚染レベルや想定した被害内容や対応する想定被害額等に発生確率を乗じて損害額が求まる。対策工法は汚染状況に応じて種々の原位置対策法を比較評価し、合わせて、浄化レベル、期間、費用等の効果も予測評価する。
[1] Perform risk assessment for the target land (risk assessment stage).
Specifically, the pollution status of the target land is investigated, and based on the survey results, a soil purification method suitable for the site is examined. Examples of the pollutant include volatile organic compounds (VOC), heavy metals, agricultural chemicals, oils, and the like. Examples of the soil purification method include chemical decomposition, biodegradation, electrical restoration, in-situ cleaning, and soil replacement. And risk evaluation can create and implement a table | surface as shown in FIG. 2, for example. Regarding health risks, as shown in the figure, the probability of damage assumed from the contamination level and exposure route of each item can be calculated, and comprehensive risk can be calculated. The damage amount is obtained by multiplying the assumed damage content and the corresponding assumed damage amount by the occurrence probability. The countermeasure method compares and evaluates various in-situ countermeasures according to the pollution status, and also predicts and evaluates the effects of purification level, period, cost, etc.

[2]所定の期間にわたって前記対象土地を貸与対象者に貸与するに当たり、上述のリスク評価に基づいて、貸与による汚染被害の保証を設定する(保証設定段階)。
汚染被害の保証に関しては、例えば、図3に示すような表を作成して実施することができる。浄化対策の確度推定に関しては、浄化目標の未達成の可能性として、対策法における不具合事象を網羅的に抽出し、それに起因する浄化レベルや浄化期間や浄化費用等の変化について整理すると共に、浄化漏れリスクとして、その作業から導かれる想定被害額や被害の深刻度、被害発生確率を踏まえて総合リスク額を推定することができる。また、一般的に、総合リスクは浄化の初期には高く浄化が低くなると考えられ、そのような総合リスク額と浄化時間との関係に基づき、保証額と浄化時間との関係は、図4に示すグラフのように表すことができる。
[2] In lending the target land to a lending subject over a predetermined period, a guarantee of pollution damage due to lending is set based on the risk assessment described above (guarantee setting stage).
Regarding the guarantee of contamination damage, for example, a table as shown in FIG. 3 can be created and implemented. Regarding the estimation of the accuracy of cleanup measures, as a possibility that the cleanup target has not been achieved, the failure events in the measure law are comprehensively extracted and the changes in cleanup level, cleanup period, cleanup costs, etc. resulting from this are organized and As leakage risk, the total risk amount can be estimated based on the estimated damage amount, severity of damage, and probability of occurrence of damage. In general, the overall risk is considered to be high at the initial stage of purification and the purification is low. Based on the relationship between the total risk amount and the purification time, the relationship between the guarantee amount and the purification time is shown in FIG. It can be expressed like the graph shown.

[3]前記リスク評価と前記保証を行うための損害保険料とを考慮した土地貸与額を設定する(貸与額設定段階)。
貸与額は、所有者利益+浄化費用+損害保険料+手数料で求めることができる。そして、保証額は、図5に示すように、個々のリスク額×発生確率、即ち総合リスク額の合計として求めることができ、損害保険料は、保証額×保険料率で求めることができる。
土地貸与額の設定に当たっては、例えば、図5に示すグラフのように、平均地代方式や、土地貸与の経過に伴って変化する逓増方式や階段方式等の各種方式によって設定することができる。
[3] A land loan amount is set in consideration of the risk assessment and the non-life insurance premium for performing the guarantee (lending amount setting stage).
The loan amount can be obtained by owner profit + purification cost + non-life insurance fee + commission. As shown in FIG. 5, the guaranteed amount can be obtained as the individual risk amount × the probability of occurrence, that is, the total risk amount, and the non-life insurance premium can be obtained by the guaranteed amount × the insurance premium rate.
In setting the land lending amount, for example, as shown in the graph of FIG. 5, the land lending amount can be set by various methods such as an average land rent method, a multiplying method that changes with the progress of land lending, and a staircase method.

[4]公開された通信サイトで、前記対象土地の貸与について募集する。
募集に当たっては、対象汚染土地の詳細事項の他、貸与期間や、貸与額を提示し、そのサイトにアクセスした応募者の中から貸与対象者を決定する。
[4] Recruit for the loan of the target land on the public communication site.
In recruiting, in addition to the details of the target contaminated land, the loan period and loan amount are presented, and the loan target person is determined from the applicants who have accessed the site.

[5]決定した貸与対象者と所有者との契約の後、対象土地における前記貸与対象者による使用が始まる(土地貸与段階)。 [5] After the contract between the determined loan target person and the owner, use by the loan target person in the target land starts (land loan stage).

[6]一方、貸与対象者による土地使用と並行して、所有者は選択された浄化方法によって対象土地の浄化を行う(土地浄化段階)。
その際、貸与期間中に、土地の浄化が終了することが好ましい。
[6] On the other hand, in parallel with land use by the loan target person, the owner cleans the target land by the selected cleanup method (land cleanup stage).
At that time, it is preferable that the purification of the land is completed during the lending period.

[7]契約貸与期間が経過して貸与対象者との契約が満了すれば、対象土地の浄化は完了しており、通常の土地として販売することができ、所有者は、販売対象者を募って決定した相手に販売する。 [7] If the contract loan period expires and the contract with the loan target person expires, the target land has been purified and can be sold as normal land, and the owner recruits the sales target person. Sell it to the other party.

次に、上述の土地販売方法を実施する上での運用形態について図6の模式図を用いて説明する。
土地の所有者S、及び、貸与対象者T、及び、サイト管理者K、保険会社Hが、それぞれ通信回線Nを介して情報を送受信自在に配置されている。
尚、サイト管理者Kは、当該土地販売方法の具体的なシステムを提供運営すると共に、土地の汚染浄化を請け負って実施するものであり、サイト管理に関しては、サイト用サーバ1を備えている。
そして、サイト管理者Kは、土地所有者Sからの要請によって、当該土地に関するリスク評価(汚染調査含む)、保険会社Hと協議した上での汚染被害に対する保証設定、貸与額設定準備、公募サイトの構築とメンテナンス、及び、公募の結果によって所有者Sが最終的に選択した貸与対象者Tと(所有者Sと)の契約手続き、土地浄化工事の発注、所有者Sが選択した販売対象者と(所有者Sと)の契約手続き等の一連のサービス、及び、土地貸与に伴う保証が発生した際の保険会社Hとの折衝と手続き等のサービスを行う。
また、サイト用サーバ1では、サーバ1を介して各関係者が情報の送受信ができると共に、例えば、土地浄化期間においては、浄化工事の進捗状況等もモニタリングすることが出来ように情報提供されている。
Next, an operation mode for carrying out the above-described land sales method will be described with reference to the schematic diagram of FIG.
The land owner S, the loan target person T, the site manager K, and the insurance company H are arranged so as to be able to send and receive information via the communication line N, respectively.
The site manager K provides and operates a specific system for the land sales method and contracts and cleans the land. The site manager K includes a site server 1 for site management.
Then, the site manager K, upon request from the landowner S, performs risk assessment on the land (including pollution investigation), guarantees for pollution damage after consultation with the insurance company H, preparation for loan amount setting, public offering site Construction and maintenance, and the contract procedure of the loan target person T and the owner S finally selected by the result of the public offering (with the owner S), the order of land purification work, the sales target selected by the owner S And a series of services such as contract procedures with (owner S), and services such as negotiations and procedures with insurance company H when a guarantee accompanying land lending occurs.
Further, in the site server 1, each party can send and receive information via the server 1. For example, during the land purification period, information is provided so that the progress of the purification work can be monitored. Yes.

本実施形態の土地販売方法によれば、土地の所有者Sは、土地販売までの間に定期借地権を利用した土地の貸与を行い、それに並行して浄化を行うから、その間の貸与収益によって浄化費用を賄うことも可能となり、汚染土壌の販売における費用負担が低減され、土地販売の収益を増加させることができる。
一方、貸与対象者は、対象土地を購入するのに比べて安い金額で所定の期間使用することができ、しかも、その貸与期間中には、汚染被害の保証を受けることができるから、安心して使用することが可能となる。
そして、販売対象者は、浄化完了土地を購入するわけであるから、新たな浄化費用が掛からず、通常の価格で購入することが可能となる。
また、対象の土地を汚染土壌のまま休眠させるのに比べて、土地の利用率が向上し、地域への貢献度が向上すると共に、地域の活性化を図ることが可能となる。
According to the land sales method of the present embodiment, the land owner S lends the land using the fixed-term leasehold right until the land sales and purifies it in parallel with it. It is also possible to cover the cost of remediation, reducing the cost burden of selling contaminated soil and increasing the profits of land sales.
On the other hand, the loan target person can use the land for a specified period at a lower price compared to purchasing the target land, and can receive a guarantee of pollution damage during the loan period. It can be used.
And since the sale target person purchases the land that has been cleaned, it can be purchased at a normal price without incurring new cleaning costs.
In addition, the land utilization rate is improved and the contribution to the region is improved, and the region can be activated as compared with the case where the target land is left dormant with contaminated soil.

〔別実施形態〕
以下に他の実施の形態を説明する。
[Another embodiment]
Other embodiments will be described below.

〈1〉 当該土地販売方法の対象となる土地は、先の実施形態で説明した工場跡地に限るものではなく、例えば、病院や研究所や工場等、汚染の可能性のある土地を対象とすることができ、それらを含めて対象土地という。
〈2〉 リスク評価や、保証設定、貸与額設定、土地浄化の各詳細方法は、先の実施形態で説明した方法に限るものではなく、広く公知の手法を適宜採用することができる。
<1> The land subject to the land sales method is not limited to the factory site described in the previous embodiment. For example, a land that may be contaminated, such as a hospital, a research institute, or a factory, is targeted. It can be called the target land including them.
<2> The detailed methods for risk evaluation, guarantee setting, loan amount setting, and land purification are not limited to the methods described in the previous embodiment, and widely known methods can be appropriately employed.

尚、上述のように、図面との対照を便利にするために符号を記したが、該記入により本発明は添付図面の構成に限定されるものではない。また、本発明の要旨を逸脱しない範囲において、種々なる態様で実施し得ることは勿論である。   In addition, as mentioned above, although the code | symbol was written in order to make contrast with drawing convenient, this invention is not limited to the structure of an accompanying drawing by this entry. In addition, it goes without saying that the present invention can be carried out in various modes without departing from the gist of the present invention.

土地販売のフローチャートLand sales flowchart リスク評価に使用する表を示す図Diagram showing tables used for risk assessment 保証設定に使用する表を示す図Diagram showing the table used for warranty settings リスクと時間との関係を示す図Diagram showing the relationship between risk and time 貸与額設定の考え方を示す図Diagram showing the concept of loan amount setting 土地販売の運用形態を示す模式図Schematic diagram showing the operation mode of land sales

符号の説明Explanation of symbols

T 貸与対象者   T loan target person

Claims (2)

汚染土壌を浄化して販売する土地販売方法であって、
対象土地の汚染状況を調査して、浄化方法の決定とその工期と費用とを含めたリスク評価を行うリスク評価段階と、所定の期間にわたって前記対象土地を貸与対象者に貸与するに当たり、その貸与による汚染被害の保証を前記リスク評価に基づいて設定する保証設定段階と、前記リスク評価と前記保証を行うための損害保険額とを考慮した土地貸与額を設定する貸与額設定段階と、設定された貸与額で前記対象土地を所定の期間にわたって貸与対象者に貸与する土地貸与段階と、前記所定の期間の土地貸与と並行して対象土地の浄化を行う土地浄化段階とを経て、前記所定の期間の満了後に、前記対象土地を浄化完了土地として販売対象者に販売する土地販売方法。
A land sales method for purifying and selling contaminated soil,
A risk assessment stage in which the pollution status of the target land is investigated and a risk assessment is performed including the determination of the purification method, its construction period and costs, and the loan for the target land to be loaned to the loanee over a predetermined period A guarantee setting stage for setting a guarantee for pollution damage based on the risk evaluation, and a lending amount setting stage for setting a land loan amount in consideration of the risk assessment and a non-life insurance amount for performing the guarantee. Through the land lending stage for lending the target land to the lending target for a predetermined period and the land purification stage for purifying the target land in parallel with the land lending for the predetermined period, A land sales method in which the target land is sold to the sales target as the completion of purification after the expiration of the period.
前記貸与対象者は、公開された通信サイトで募集して決定する請求項1に記載の土地販売方法。   The land sales method according to claim 1, wherein the loan target is recruited and determined on a public communication site.
JP2005095028A 2005-03-29 2005-03-29 Land sales method Pending JP2006277292A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2005095028A JP2006277292A (en) 2005-03-29 2005-03-29 Land sales method

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2005095028A JP2006277292A (en) 2005-03-29 2005-03-29 Land sales method

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2006277292A true JP2006277292A (en) 2006-10-12

Family

ID=37211999

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2005095028A Pending JP2006277292A (en) 2005-03-29 2005-03-29 Land sales method

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP2006277292A (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2012033066A (en) * 2010-07-30 2012-02-16 Mizuho Information & Research Institute Inc Land purification transaction evaluation system, method and program

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2012033066A (en) * 2010-07-30 2012-02-16 Mizuho Information & Research Institute Inc Land purification transaction evaluation system, method and program

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Ramirez Harrington Effectiveness of state pollution prevention programs and policies
Swickard Regulatory incentives to promote private sector brownfield remediation and reuse
Platt Death by Arugula: How Soil Contamination Stunts Urban Agriculture, and What the Law Should Do About It
Bridgen et al. Assessment of the value of ISO 14001 in improving environmental performance
JP2006277292A (en) Land sales method
JP5683861B2 (en) Land purification transaction evaluation system, land purification transaction evaluation method, and land purification transaction evaluation program
McMorrow CERCLA liability redefined: an analysis of the small business liability relief and brownfields revitalization act and its impact on state voluntary cleanup programs
Sommers The brownfield problem: Liability for lenders, owners, and developers in Canada and the United States
Hansen CERCLA Cost Allocation and Nonparties' Responsibility: Who Bears the Orphan Shares
Silverstein “Mechanics” of the Deal: Assembling the Brownfields Team
Espinoza et al. An Approximate Solution for Perpetual American Option with Time to Build: The Value of Environmental Remediation Investment Projects.
Sunding et al. Flexible technology and the cost of improving groundwater quality
Tomsana An analysis of environmental obligations and liabilities of a distribution division to improve ecologically sustainable development
Roddewig Using the cost of environmental insurance to measure contaminated property stigma
Nurul Syazreen Risk assessment in waste sampling activity for a selected food industry/Nurul Syazreen Razali
Marx et al. Connecting Wastewater Infrastructure and Rural Economic Development
Ebisu et al. Methods of Environmental Risk Management for Land Contamination Problems: Suggestions for Japan
Razali Risk Assessment in Waste Sampling Activity for a Selected Food Industry
Whitney Expediting Productive Reuse of Superfund Sites: Some Legislative Solutions for Virginia and the Nation
De Sousa Publicly Subsidized Brownfields Redevelopment
Brodsky et al. Enhancing Environmental Remediation in New York By Strengthening the Superfund Program and Expanding the Brownfields Program
Hines Examining Contractual Models for Transferring Environmental Liability: How They Work and Where They Are Headed
Sherman Contamination, collaboration, remediation, and restoration: lessons on first-and next-generation environmental policy approaches from the St. Paul Waterway Superfund Site in Tacoma, Washington
Goins et al. An Overview of State Programs to Investigate and Remediate Contaminated Dry Cleaner Sites
Schnapf Financing development of contaminated properties

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20080125

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20100708

A02 Decision of refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A02

Effective date: 20101118