JP2006260618A - Evaluation method and device of magnetic recording medium - Google Patents

Evaluation method and device of magnetic recording medium Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP2006260618A
JP2006260618A JP2005072446A JP2005072446A JP2006260618A JP 2006260618 A JP2006260618 A JP 2006260618A JP 2005072446 A JP2005072446 A JP 2005072446A JP 2005072446 A JP2005072446 A JP 2005072446A JP 2006260618 A JP2006260618 A JP 2006260618A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
frequency
signal
recording medium
output
magnetic recording
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
JP2005072446A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Inventor
Yoshihisa Tabata
慶久 田端
Yoshikazu Suzuki
芳和 鈴木
Sadamu Kuze
定 久世
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Maxell Holdings Ltd
Original Assignee
Hitachi Maxell Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Hitachi Maxell Ltd filed Critical Hitachi Maxell Ltd
Priority to JP2005072446A priority Critical patent/JP2006260618A/en
Publication of JP2006260618A publication Critical patent/JP2006260618A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Landscapes

  • Manufacturing Of Magnetic Record Carriers (AREA)

Abstract

<P>PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide a simple method based on the actual operating environments to evaluate the magnetic layer surface projections causing a thermal asperity phenomenon or spacing losses which degrades the error rates when recording or reproducing a magnetic recording medium. <P>SOLUTION: This is an evaluation method of the surface projections on a magnetic recording medium based on the reproduced signals after recording signals on the medium. It has a step of recording signals of a predetermined frequency, a step of reproducing the signals, a step of monitoring the output power and frequency of the reproduced signals, and a step of comparing and operating the output power and frequency with the predetermined values (L, H) each other. When the output power exceeds the threshold L, it decides there are projections, and detects the surface projections at the same time by classifying them depending on whether the frequency exceeds the threshold H or not. <P>COPYRIGHT: (C)2006,JPO&NCIPI

Description

本発明は、磁気記録媒体の評価方法に関し、詳しくは、磁気録媒体を実際の再生時と同様な条件で磁性層の突起を評価できる評価方法および装置に関する。   The present invention relates to a method for evaluating a magnetic recording medium, and more particularly, to an evaluation method and apparatus capable of evaluating protrusions of a magnetic layer under the same conditions as when a magnetic recording medium is actually reproduced.

磁気記録媒体は、オーディオテープ、ビデオテープ、コンピューターテープ、磁気ディスクなど種々の用途があるが、特にデータバックアップ用の磁気テープ(バックアップテープ)の分野ではバックアップ対象となるハードディスクの大容量化に伴い、1巻当たり数百GB以上の記憶容量のものが商品化されている。今後もハードディスクの更なる大容量化に対応するため、この種のバックアップテープの高容量化は不可欠となっている。   Magnetic recording media have various uses such as audio tapes, video tapes, computer tapes, magnetic disks, etc., especially in the field of magnetic tapes for data backup (backup tapes), as the capacity of hard disks to be backed up increases, Those with a storage capacity of more than several hundred GB per volume have been commercialized. In order to cope with the further increase in capacity of hard disks in the future, it is essential to increase the capacity of this type of backup tape.

バックアップテ−プ1巻当たりの高容量化のためには、テープ全厚を薄くして1巻あたりのテープ長さを長くすること、磁性層厚さを薄くすることで厚さ減磁を小さくして短波長出力を大きくすること、記録トラック幅を25μm以下、特に15μm以下と狭くして幅方向の記録密度を高くすることなどが検討されている。   To increase the capacity per roll of backup tape, the total tape thickness is reduced to increase the tape length per roll, and the magnetic layer thickness is reduced to reduce the thickness demagnetization. Thus, increasing the short wavelength output, and increasing the recording density in the width direction by reducing the recording track width to 25 μm or less, particularly 15 μm or less, are being studied.

また、記録トラック幅を25μm以下、特に15μm以下と狭くして幅方向の記録密度を高くすると磁気テープからの漏れ磁束が小さくなるため、再生ヘッドに微小磁束でも高い出力が得られる磁気抵抗効果(MR)素子を利用したMRヘッドを使用するのが主流となっている。近年、データのバックアップ容量が急増していることに伴い、信号再生用にMRヘッドを搭載したデータバックアップ用テープドライブがデータストレージの分野で普及している。MRヘッドはMR素子により磁束の変化を抵抗値の変化に置き換えるものであり誘導コイルを有しないので、インダクティブヘッドに比較して高いS/Nが得られる。   Further, when the recording track width is narrowed to 25 μm or less, particularly 15 μm or less and the recording density in the width direction is increased, the leakage magnetic flux from the magnetic tape is reduced. The mainstream is to use an MR head using an MR element. In recent years, with the rapid increase in data backup capacity, data backup tape drives equipped with MR heads for signal reproduction have become widespread in the field of data storage. The MR head replaces a change in magnetic flux with a change in resistance value by an MR element, and does not have an induction coil. Therefore, a high S / N ratio can be obtained as compared with an inductive head.

しかし、MR素子は、温度変化により特性が変化しやすく、再生中に磁気記録媒体の記録面に存在する突起と衝突すると、衝突の際に発生する熱(摩擦熱)でMR素子の温度が急上昇し、抵抗値が変化して、これがノイズの原因となる。MRヘッドは、ヘッドの磁性層との摺動面に対して、所定の深さ凹んだ部分にMR素子を設けた構造になっており、通常、微小な突起に対してはMR素子との衝突が起こらないように設計されている。   However, the characteristics of MR elements are likely to change due to temperature changes, and when they collide with protrusions existing on the recording surface of a magnetic recording medium during reproduction, the temperature of the MR element rises rapidly due to the heat (friction heat) generated during the collision. However, the resistance value changes, which causes noise. The MR head has a structure in which an MR element is provided in a portion recessed by a predetermined depth with respect to the sliding surface with the magnetic layer of the head. Usually, a small protrusion collides with the MR element. It is designed not to happen.

記録トラック幅が狭くなり、記録波長が短くなると再生信号の出力はテープ磁性層表面とMR素子との距離(スペーシング)に対して敏感になる。例えば、磁気テープ磁性層表面に突起やへこみがあるとスペーシングロスによる出力の低下により、エラーレートが高くなる。また、MR素子は温度変化により特性(抵抗値)が変化しやすいため、磁気テープの記録データ再生中に、磁気テープ磁性層表面に存在する突起物と衝突すると、MR素子の温度が変化することで、MR素子から出力される電圧値の予期せぬ変動が発生し、いわゆるサーマルアスペリティ現象による読み取りエラーが発生する場合がある。   When the recording track width is narrowed and the recording wavelength is shortened, the output of the reproduction signal becomes sensitive to the distance (spacing) between the surface of the tape magnetic layer and the MR element. For example, if there are protrusions or dents on the surface of the magnetic layer of the magnetic tape, the error rate increases due to a decrease in output due to spacing loss. In addition, since characteristics (resistance values) of MR elements are likely to change due to temperature changes, the MR element temperature changes when it collides with protrusions existing on the magnetic tape magnetic layer surface during reproduction of recorded data on the magnetic tape. Therefore, an unexpected fluctuation of the voltage value output from the MR element may occur, and a reading error may occur due to a so-called thermal asperity phenomenon.

サーマルアスペリティはデータの読み取り失敗につながるだけではなく、突起がMR素子と衝突することで発生する急激な温度変化により、MR素子に損傷を与えるので、非常に好ましくない現象として認知されている。そのため、これまでに数多くのサーマルアスペリティの防止や低減方法、評価測定方法などが提案されている。例えば、特許文献1では、MR素子を利用したデータ再生方式において磁気テープ磁性層表面に存在する突起によるサーマルアスペリティ現象とその測定方法について開示されている。特許文献1の測定方法では、信号が記録されていない磁気テープを走行させ、前記磁気テープが走行する途中に、MR素子とシールド面(ヘッドの磁性層との摺動面)の距離がそれぞれ異なる複数のMRヘッドを前記磁気テープの幅方向に並列に配置しておき、前記MRヘッド毎に、前記磁気テープの再生時に出力された信号を周波数分析した結果と、非再生時に出力された信号を周波数分析した結果とを比較することによりサーマルアスペリティノイズを検出している。   Thermal asperity not only leads to data reading failure, but is also recognized as a very undesirable phenomenon because it damages the MR element due to a rapid temperature change that occurs when the protrusion collides with the MR element. For this reason, a number of methods for preventing and reducing thermal asperities and methods for evaluating and measuring have been proposed. For example, Patent Document 1 discloses a thermal asperity phenomenon caused by protrusions present on the surface of a magnetic tape magnetic layer and a measuring method thereof in a data reproducing method using an MR element. In the measuring method of Patent Document 1, a magnetic tape on which no signal is recorded is run, and the distance between the MR element and the shield surface (sliding surface with the magnetic layer of the head) is different while the magnetic tape is running. A plurality of MR heads are arranged in parallel in the width direction of the magnetic tape, and for each MR head, the result of frequency analysis of the signal output during reproduction of the magnetic tape and the signal output during non-reproduction are Thermal asperity noise is detected by comparing the result of frequency analysis.

特許文献2では、インダクティブ型磁気ヘッドによって検査用の信号を記録し、磁気抵抗効果型磁気ヘッドによって信号を再生し、この信号を、フィルタによって所定の周波数よりも低周波数の第1の信号成分と、高周波数の第2の信号成分とに分離し、低周波数の信号成分によって磁気ディスクの表面の突起を検出し、高周波数の信号成分によってエラーを検出する磁気ディスクの検査方法が開示されている。   In Patent Document 2, a test signal is recorded by an inductive magnetic head, a signal is reproduced by a magnetoresistive magnetic head, and this signal is converted into a first signal component having a frequency lower than a predetermined frequency by a filter. A magnetic disk inspection method is disclosed that separates into a high-frequency second signal component, detects a protrusion on the surface of the magnetic disk with a low-frequency signal component, and detects an error with a high-frequency signal component. .

一方、バックアップテープメディアの更なる高容量化に伴い、データ記録トラック幅が狭まり、テープ磁性層表面とMR素子との距離(スペーシング)の最適値が小さくなっている。そのため、MR素子には衝突しないが、スペーシングロスを引き起こすような磁気テープ磁性層表面に存在する突起が、これまで以上にエラーレートに影響を与え始めており、突起によるスペーシングロス現象もサーマルアスペリティ同様にテープ使用時において無視できない状況となっている。
On the other hand, with the further increase in capacity of backup tape media, the data recording track width is narrowed, and the optimum value of the distance (spacing) between the tape magnetic layer surface and the MR element is reduced. For this reason, protrusions on the magnetic tape magnetic layer surface that do not collide with the MR element but cause spacing loss are starting to affect the error rate more than ever, and the spacing loss phenomenon caused by protrusions is also a thermal asperity phenomenon. Similarly, the situation cannot be ignored when using the tape.

特開2003−346331号公報JP 2003-346331 A 特開平11−328670号公報Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 11-328670

前述の特許文献1でのテープ磁性層表面の突起評価方法では、サーマルアスペリティを引き起こすものを対象としており、MR素子に衝突はせず、サーマルアスペリティを引き起こさないものの、スペーシングロスを引き起こして書き込みおよび読み取りエラーを発生させるような小さな突起については、評価の対象外になっていた。また、この評価方法では、MR素子とシールド面の距離が異なる複数のヘッドが必要であり評価装置が高価になる問題があった。   The method for evaluating protrusions on the surface of the tape magnetic layer in the above-mentioned Patent Document 1 is intended for the one that causes thermal asperity, and does not collide with the MR element and does not cause thermal asperity. Small protrusions that would cause reading errors were not subject to evaluation. In addition, this evaluation method requires a plurality of heads having different distances between the MR element and the shield surface, and there is a problem that the evaluation apparatus is expensive.

一方、MRヘッドの機能に影響を与えるような磁性層表面の突起評価については、レーザー干渉型顕微鏡や原子間力顕微鏡(AFM)などを用いて行われてきたが、1回の観察可能範囲が非常に狭い範囲に限られており、実際のエラー発生との相関を得るためには、非常に多くの個所を観察する必要があり、その比較検証作業が困難となっている。   On the other hand, evaluation of protrusions on the surface of the magnetic layer that affects the function of the MR head has been performed using a laser interference microscope, an atomic force microscope (AFM), or the like. It is limited to a very narrow range, and in order to obtain a correlation with actual error occurrence, it is necessary to observe a very large number of places, and the comparison and verification work is difficult.

本発明では、磁気記録媒体の記録再生時のエラーレートを悪化させる原因となる、サーマルアスペリティ現象やスペーシングロス等を引き起こす磁性層表面の突起を簡便かつ実際の使用条件に即し、分別して評価する方法を提供することにある。   In the present invention, protrusions on the surface of the magnetic layer causing thermal asperity phenomenon and spacing loss, which cause the error rate at the time of recording / reproducing of the magnetic recording medium to be deteriorated, are easily evaluated according to actual use conditions and classified. It is to provide a way to do.

前記課題を解決するため、請求項1に記載の磁気記録媒体の評価方法は、所定の周波数の信号を記録する工程と、前記信号を再生する工程と、前記再生信号の出力と周波数とをモニタする工程と、前記再生信号の出力と周波数とを所定の値(L,H)とそれぞれ比較演算する工程とを有し、前記出力が閾値Lを超えた時に、突起であると判定し、同時に、前記周波数が閾値Hを超えているか、以下であるかにより、前記表面突起を分別して検出することを特徴とする。   In order to solve the above-mentioned problem, the magnetic recording medium evaluation method according to claim 1, wherein a step of recording a signal having a predetermined frequency, a step of reproducing the signal, and an output and a frequency of the reproduction signal are monitored. And a step of comparing and calculating the output and frequency of the reproduction signal with predetermined values (L, H), respectively, and when the output exceeds a threshold value L, it is determined as a protrusion, and at the same time The surface protrusions are classified and detected depending on whether the frequency exceeds a threshold value H or below.

また、請求項2に記載の磁気記録媒体の評価装置は、磁気記録媒体に信号を記録再生し、再生信号に基づいて磁気記録媒体の表面突起を評価する磁気記録媒体の評価装置であって、
所定の周波数の信号を記録する手段と、記録した信号を再生する手段と、再生信号の出力と周波数とをモニタする手段と、前記出力と周波数とを所定の値(L,H)とそれぞれ比較演算する手段とを備え、前記出力が閾値Lを超えた時に、突起であると判定し、同時に、前記周波数が閾値Hを超えているか、以下であるかにより、前記表面突起を分別して検出することを特徴とする。
The apparatus for evaluating a magnetic recording medium according to claim 2 is an apparatus for evaluating a magnetic recording medium that records and reproduces a signal on the magnetic recording medium and evaluates a surface protrusion of the magnetic recording medium based on the reproduction signal.
Means for recording a signal of a predetermined frequency, means for reproducing the recorded signal, means for monitoring the output and frequency of the reproduction signal, and comparing the output and frequency with predetermined values (L, H), respectively A means for calculating, and when the output exceeds a threshold L, it is determined as a protrusion, and at the same time, the surface protrusion is classified and detected depending on whether the frequency exceeds a threshold H or below. It is characterized by that.

なお、前述の特許文献2の評価方法は、インダクティブ型磁気ヘッドによって検査用の信号を記録し、磁気抵抗効果型磁気ヘッドによって信号を再生し、この信号を、フィルタによって所定の周波数よりも低周波数の第1の信号成分と、高周波数の第2の信号成分とに分離し、低周波数の信号成分によって磁気ディスクの表面の突起を検出し、高周波数の信号成分によってエラーを検出する磁気ディスクの検査方法であり、本発明の再生信号の出力を閾値Lと比較し、出力が閾値Lを超えた時に、突起であると判定し、同時に、前記周波数が閾値Hを超えているか、以下であるかにより、前記表面突起を分別して検出する方法とは異なる。   In the evaluation method described in Patent Document 2, a test signal is recorded by an inductive magnetic head, a signal is reproduced by a magnetoresistive magnetic head, and this signal is reduced to a frequency lower than a predetermined frequency by a filter. The first signal component and the second signal component of high frequency are separated, the protrusion on the surface of the magnetic disk is detected by the low frequency signal component, and the error is detected by the high frequency signal component. It is an inspection method, and the output of the reproduction signal of the present invention is compared with a threshold value L. When the output exceeds the threshold value L, it is determined that it is a protrusion, and at the same time, the frequency exceeds the threshold value H or below. Therefore, the method is different from the method of detecting the surface protrusions by classification.

本発明の評価方法によれば所定の周波数の信号を記録する工程と、前記信号を再生する工程と、前記再生信号の出力と周波数とをモニタする工程と、前記出力と周波数とを所定の値(L,H)とそれぞれ比較演算する工程とを有し、前記出力の閾値Lにより突起を検出し、前記周波数の閾値Hにより、前記突起がスペーシングロスによるものか、もしくはサーマルアスペリティ現象によるものかを区別し、それぞれの存在頻度を評価することができる。   According to the evaluation method of the present invention, a step of recording a signal of a predetermined frequency, a step of reproducing the signal, a step of monitoring the output and frequency of the reproduction signal, and the output and frequency are set to a predetermined value. (L, H) and a step of performing a comparison operation, detecting a protrusion based on the threshold value L of the output and determining whether the protrusion is caused by a spacing loss or a thermal asperity phenomenon based on the frequency threshold value H. And the existence frequency of each can be evaluated.

また、請求項2に記載の磁気記録媒体の評価装置によれば、信号を記録する手段と、記録した信号を再生する手段と、再生信号の出力と周波数とをモニタする手段と、前記出力と周波数とを所定の値(L,H)とそれぞれ比較演算する手段とを備え、前記と同様に、閾値L、Hにより突起の検出と、突起がスペーシングロスによるものか、もしくはサーマルアスペリティ現象によるものかを区別し検出することができ、また図示しない出力装置により分析結果を集計し出力や保存ができる。
According to the apparatus for evaluating a magnetic recording medium according to claim 2, means for recording a signal, means for reproducing the recorded signal, means for monitoring the output and frequency of the reproduction signal, and the output Means for comparing and calculating the frequency with a predetermined value (L, H), respectively, and detecting the protrusion by the threshold values L and H and whether the protrusion is caused by the spacing loss or the thermal asperity phenomenon, as described above. It is possible to distinguish and detect whether it is a thing, or to collect and output and save the analysis results by an output device (not shown).

本発明は磁気記録媒体に関するものであるが、以下、磁気テープを例にとって本発明の評価方法および評価装置について、図面を用いて説明する。参照する図面において、図1は、本発明の一実施形態である磁気テープ評価装置の構成の一例を示す模式図である。   The present invention relates to a magnetic recording medium. Hereinafter, an evaluation method and an evaluation apparatus of the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings, taking a magnetic tape as an example. In the drawings to be referred to, FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram showing an example of the configuration of a magnetic tape evaluation apparatus according to an embodiment of the present invention.

図1で示すように、本発明の評価装置は、磁気テープTを送り出す巻き出しリール1と、送り出された磁気テープTを巻き取る巻取りリール2、走行する磁気テープTの走行方向を案内する複数の走行ガイド3、信号処理回路C、磁気ヘッド4、前記巻き出しリール1及び巻取りリール2を駆動する図示しない駆動装置から構成されている。磁気テープTの走行系については、磁気テープTを走行させる機能を有するのであればどのような走行系の装置であってもよい。磁気テープTは構成する材料や表面状態等は特に限定しない。前記の信号処理回路Cや走行系はデータバックアップ用テープドライブに含まれているものを利用してもよい。   As shown in FIG. 1, the evaluation apparatus of the present invention guides the running reel 1 for feeding the magnetic tape T, the take-up reel 2 for taking up the fed magnetic tape T, and the running direction of the running magnetic tape T. It comprises a plurality of travel guides 3, a signal processing circuit C, a magnetic head 4, and a driving device (not shown) for driving the take-up reel 1 and take-up reel 2. The traveling system of the magnetic tape T may be any traveling system device as long as it has a function of traveling the magnetic tape T. There are no particular limitations on the material, surface state, etc. of the magnetic tape T. The signal processing circuit C and the running system may be those included in a data backup tape drive.

前記信号処理回路Cは、信号を記録する手段を構成する信号発生回路5、信号を再生する手段を構成する信号再生回路6、再生信号の出力と周波数とをモニタする手段である手段である出力・周波数検出回路7、出力と周波数とを所定の値(L,H)とそれぞれ比較演算する比較演算回路とから構成される。   The signal processing circuit C is a signal generation circuit 5 that constitutes a means for recording a signal, a signal reproduction circuit 6 that constitutes a means for reproducing a signal, and an output that is means for monitoring the output and frequency of a reproduction signal The frequency detection circuit 7 is composed of a comparison operation circuit that compares the output and frequency with predetermined values (L, H).

まず、信号を記録する手段である信号発生回路5、磁気ヘッド4に配設されている図示しない記録ヘッド(インダクティブヘッド)により、所定の周波数(H)の信号が走行する磁気テープTに記録される。Hの値は特に制限されないが、1〜50MHzの範囲が好ましい。通常、データバックアップ用テープドライブで使用されている記録周波数を用いることが好ましい。磁気テープTに記録された信号は、信号を再生する手段である磁気ヘッド4に配設されている図示しない再生ヘッド(MRヘッド)、信号再生回路6により再生され図2〜図10で示したような再生信号の波形が得られる。図2は磁気テープTの正常部の波形、図5,図8はそれぞれ、磁気テープT表面の突起部(サーマルアスペリティなし)、サーマルアスペリティを起こした突起部の波形を示す。 First, a signal having a predetermined frequency (H 0 ) is recorded on the magnetic tape T by a signal generating circuit 5 which is a means for recording a signal and a recording head (inductive head) (not shown) disposed in the magnetic head 4. Is done. The value of H 0 is not particularly limited, but a range of 1 to 50 MHz is preferable. Usually, it is preferable to use the recording frequency used in the data backup tape drive. The signal recorded on the magnetic tape T is reproduced by a reproduction head (MR head) (not shown) disposed in the magnetic head 4 which is a means for reproducing the signal and the signal reproduction circuit 6 and shown in FIGS. Such a reproduced signal waveform is obtained. FIG. 2 shows the waveform of the normal part of the magnetic tape T, and FIGS. 5 and 8 show the waveform of the protrusion on the surface of the magnetic tape T (no thermal asperity) and the protrusion that caused thermal asperity, respectively.

前記再生信号を再生信号の出力と周波数とをモニタする手段である出力・周波数検出回路7では図示しない波形二乗回路、ノイズ除去回路、ピークホールド回路を含み、図3で示すような極性が正の二乗信号波形を取り出す。この二乗信号波形の示す出力の値と閾値Lとを後述の比較演算回路8により比較する。図3は磁気テープTの正常部の二乗信号波形、図6,図9はそれぞれ、磁気テープT表面の突起部(サーマルアスペリティなし)、サーマルアスペリティを起こした突起部の二乗信号波形を示す。   The output / frequency detection circuit 7 which is means for monitoring the output and frequency of the reproduction signal includes a waveform squaring circuit, a noise removal circuit, and a peak hold circuit (not shown), and has a positive polarity as shown in FIG. Extract the square signal waveform. The output value indicated by the square signal waveform and the threshold value L are compared by a comparison operation circuit 8 described later. FIG. 3 shows the square signal waveform of the normal part of the magnetic tape T, and FIGS. 6 and 9 show the square signal waveform of the protrusion on the surface of the magnetic tape T (without thermal asperity) and the protrusion that caused thermal asperity, respectively.

また、出力・周波数検出回路7は、図示しない周波数カウント回路を含み再生信号のベースラインでの極性変化により再生波形の一定区間(図では200μs)から周波数を取り出す。図4は磁気テープT正常部の拡大波形、図7、図10は磁気テープT表面のサーマルアスペリティなしおよびサーマルアスペリティを起こした突起部の時間軸の拡大波形を示す(図では5μs区間)。図7のサーマルアスペリティなし突起部の拡大波形では正常部と比べて周波数の変化はみられない。しかし、図10のサーマルアスペリティ突起部拡大波形では、ベースラインでの極性変化の無い、周波数無カウント部分が存在するためカウント周波数が減少する。   Further, the output / frequency detection circuit 7 includes a frequency count circuit (not shown), and extracts a frequency from a certain section (200 μs in the drawing) of the reproduction waveform by a change in the polarity of the reproduction signal at the baseline. FIG. 4 shows an enlarged waveform of the normal part of the magnetic tape T, and FIGS. 7 and 10 show an enlarged waveform of the time axis of the protrusion having no thermal asperity and the thermal asperity on the surface of the magnetic tape T (5 μs interval in the figure). In the enlarged waveform of the protrusion portion without thermal asperity in FIG. 7, no change in frequency is observed compared to the normal portion. However, in the enlarged waveform of the thermal asperity protrusion in FIG. 10, the count frequency decreases because there is a non-frequency-counting portion with no polarity change at the baseline.

出力と周波数とを所定の値(L、H)とそれぞれ比較演算する手段としての比較演算回路8は、前記の二乗信号波形の出力値が所定の閾値Lを超えると、磁性層に突起が在ったとものと判定する。それと同時に、前記周波数の値が所定の閾値Hを超えているか、以下であるかを比較し、Hを超えているとサーマルアスペリティは起こさないがスペーシングロスを起こす突起、H以下であるとサーマルアスペリティを起こす突起であると判定する。これにより、突起を、引き起こすエラーの種類別に区別することが可能となる。比較演算回路8のフローチャートを図11に示す。   When the output value of the square signal waveform exceeds a predetermined threshold value L, the comparison operation circuit 8 as means for comparing the output and frequency with predetermined values (L, H) respectively has a protrusion on the magnetic layer. It is determined that it was correct. At the same time, a comparison is made as to whether the value of the frequency exceeds a predetermined threshold value H or below, and if it exceeds H, thermal asperity does not occur but a projection causing spacing loss. It is determined that the protrusion causes asperity. This makes it possible to distinguish the protrusions according to the type of error that causes them. A flowchart of the comparison operation circuit 8 is shown in FIG.

閾値Lは、正常部の出力をLとしたとき、Lより大きな値を設定すればよいが、あまりにLに近い値を設定すると、エラーにならない小さな突起まで検出することになり、また大きすぎる値を設定すると、エラーになる突起が検出されなくなるので、データバックアップ用テープドライブの条件に応じて適宜設定するのが好ましいが、通常、1.2≦(L/L)≦5の範囲に設定するのが好ましく、1.5≦(L/L)≦3がより好ましい。閾値Hは、記録周波数をHとしたとき、Hより小さな値を設定すればよいが、あまりにHに近い値を設定すると、ノイズや走行速度変動の影響を受けて正しい検出ができなくなり、また、小さすぎる値を設定すると、小さなサーマルアスペリティを検出できなくなるので、データバックアップ用テープドライブの条件に応じて適宜設定するのが好ましいが、通常、5≦(H-H)≦50の範囲に設定するのが好ましく、10≦(H−H)≦30がより好ましい。周波数をカウントする区間は、通常100〜500μsの区間の周波数をカウントすればよい。図2〜図10では、200μs区間でのデータを示す。 The threshold value L may be set to a value larger than L 0 when the output of the normal part is L 0 , but if a value that is too close to L 0 is set, even a small protrusion that does not cause an error will be detected. If an excessively large value is set, an error-protruding protrusion will not be detected. Therefore, it is preferable to set it appropriately according to the conditions of the data backup tape drive, but normally 1.2 ≦ (L / L 0 ) ≦ 5 The range is preferably set, and 1.5 ≦ (L / L 0 ) ≦ 3 is more preferable. The threshold value H may be set to a value smaller than H 0 when the recording frequency is H 0 , but if the value is set too close to H 0 , correct detection cannot be performed due to the influence of noise and travel speed fluctuations. If a value that is too small is set, a small thermal asperity cannot be detected. Therefore, it is preferable to set it appropriately according to the conditions of the tape drive for data backup. Usually, however, 5 ≦ (H 0 -H) ≦ 50 The range is preferably set, and more preferably 10 ≦ (H 0 −H) ≦ 30. The section for counting the frequency may normally count the frequency in the section of 100 to 500 μs. 2 to 10 show data in a 200 μs section.

また、図6、図9の突起部の出力波形、図10の周波数無カウント幅を詳細に観察すると、本発明の評価方法(装置)をもとに、さらに、以下のことが分る。すなわち、突起部の出力の値は、突起の高さと相関があり、また、突起部の出力波形の前後の出力がLより小さい部分の時間幅(W)は、突起の磁気テープT長手方向の大きさと相関があり、周波数無カウント幅は、突起の磁気抵抗効果素子当たる部分の大きさと相関するので、これらの情報を元に、突起を分別集計して磁気テープTの表面突起の状況をさらに詳細に分析することが可能である。
Further, when the output waveforms of the protrusions in FIGS. 6 and 9 and the frequency countless width in FIG. 10 are observed in detail, the following can be found based on the evaluation method (apparatus) of the present invention. That is, the value of the output of the protrusions has a height and the correlation of the projections, also, the time width of the output is L 0 smaller portions before and after the output waveform of the projections (W), the magnetic tape T longitudinal projection The frequency countless width correlates with the size of the portion corresponding to the magnetoresistive effect element of the protrusion, so based on this information, the protrusions are separated and aggregated to determine the state of the surface protrusion of the magnetic tape T. A more detailed analysis is possible.

本発明の一実施形態である磁気テープ評価装置の構成の一例を示す模式図The schematic diagram which shows an example of a structure of the magnetic tape evaluation apparatus which is one Embodiment of this invention 正常部波形図Normal part waveform diagram 正常部の二乗信号波形図Normal part square signal waveform diagram 正常部の拡大波形図Enlarged waveform diagram of normal part 突起部(サーマルアスペリティなし)波形図Protrusion (without thermal asperity) waveform diagram 突起部(サーマルアスペリティなし)の二乗信号波形図Square signal waveform diagram of protrusion (no thermal asperity) 突起部(サーマルアスペリティなし)の拡大波形図Enlarged waveform diagram of protrusion (no thermal asperity) 突起部(サーマルアスペリティ)波形図Protrusion (thermal asperity) waveform diagram 突起部(サーマルアスペリティ)の二乗信号波形図Square signal waveform diagram of protrusion (thermal asperity) 突起部(サーマルアスペリティ)の拡大波形図Enlarged waveform diagram of protrusion (thermal asperity) 比較演算回路8のフローチャートFlowchart of comparison operation circuit 8

符号の説明Explanation of symbols

T 磁気テープ
C 信号処理回路
1 巻き出しリール
2 巻取りリール
3 走行ガイド
4 磁気ヘッド(MRヘッド、インダクティブヘッドを含む)
5 信号発生回路
6 信号再生回路
7 出力・周波数検出回路
8 比較演算回路


T magnetic tape C signal processing circuit 1 unwinding reel 2 take-up reel 3 traveling guide
4 Magnetic head (including MR head and inductive head)
5 Signal Generation Circuit 6 Signal Recovery Circuit 7 Output / Frequency Detection Circuit 8 Comparison Operation Circuit


Claims (2)

磁気記録媒体に信号を記録再生し、再生信号に基づいて磁気記録媒体の表面突起を評価する磁気記録媒体の評価方法であって、所定の周波数の信号を記録する工程と、前記信号を再生する工程と、前記再生信号の出力と周波数とをモニタする工程と、前記再生信号の出力と周波数とを所定の値(L,H)とそれぞれ比較演算する工程とを有し、前記出力が閾値Lを超えた時に、突起であると判定し、同時に、前記周波数が閾値Hを超えているか、以下であるかにより、前記表面突起を分別して検出することを特徴とする磁気記録媒体の評価方法。   A method for evaluating a magnetic recording medium that records and reproduces a signal on a magnetic recording medium and evaluates surface protrusions of the magnetic recording medium based on the reproduced signal, the step of recording a signal of a predetermined frequency, and reproducing the signal And a step of monitoring the output and frequency of the reproduction signal, and a step of comparing the output and frequency of the reproduction signal with predetermined values (L, H), respectively, the output being a threshold value L A method for evaluating a magnetic recording medium comprising: determining that the protrusion is a protrusion when the frequency exceeds the threshold value, and simultaneously detecting the surface protrusion depending on whether the frequency exceeds a threshold value H or below. 磁気記録媒体に信号を記録再生し、再生信号に基づいて磁気記録媒体の表面突起を評価する磁気記録媒体の評価装置であって、信号を記録する手段と、記録した信号を再生する手段と、再生信号の出力と周波数とをモニタする手段と、前記出力と前記周波数とを所定の値(L,H)とそれぞれ比較演算する手段とを備え、前記出力が閾値Lを超えた時に、突起であると判定し、同時に、前記周波数が閾値Hを超えているか、以下であるかにより、前記表面突起を分別して検出することを特徴とする磁気記録媒体の評価装置。
An apparatus for evaluating a magnetic recording medium that records and reproduces a signal on a magnetic recording medium and evaluates surface protrusions of the magnetic recording medium based on the reproduced signal, the means for recording the signal, the means for reproducing the recorded signal, Means for monitoring the output and frequency of the reproduction signal, and means for comparing the output and the frequency with predetermined values (L, H), respectively, and when the output exceeds a threshold value L, An apparatus for evaluating a magnetic recording medium, characterized in that it is determined that the surface protrusion is present and at the same time, the surface protrusions are classified and detected depending on whether the frequency exceeds a threshold value H or below.
JP2005072446A 2005-03-15 2005-03-15 Evaluation method and device of magnetic recording medium Pending JP2006260618A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2005072446A JP2006260618A (en) 2005-03-15 2005-03-15 Evaluation method and device of magnetic recording medium

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2005072446A JP2006260618A (en) 2005-03-15 2005-03-15 Evaluation method and device of magnetic recording medium

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2006260618A true JP2006260618A (en) 2006-09-28

Family

ID=37099689

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2005072446A Pending JP2006260618A (en) 2005-03-15 2005-03-15 Evaluation method and device of magnetic recording medium

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP2006260618A (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2007149268A (en) * 2005-11-29 2007-06-14 Fujifilm Corp Method and device for determining surface state of magnetic recording medium

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH04117623A (en) * 1990-09-06 1992-04-17 Hitachi Electron Eng Co Ltd Failure detecting and processing method for protrusion detecting head
JPH0882504A (en) * 1994-09-12 1996-03-26 Hoya Corp Surface irregularities detection method and apparatus and magnetic disc inspection method
JPH08167121A (en) * 1994-12-12 1996-06-25 Hitachi Ltd Method for detecting abnormal projection on magnetic disk and magnetic disk device
JP2002175301A (en) * 2000-12-07 2002-06-21 Nippon Telegraph & Telephone West Corp Map information retrieving device and its method
JP2002260222A (en) * 2001-03-05 2002-09-13 Sony Corp Method for recognizing magnetic disk individually

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH04117623A (en) * 1990-09-06 1992-04-17 Hitachi Electron Eng Co Ltd Failure detecting and processing method for protrusion detecting head
JPH0882504A (en) * 1994-09-12 1996-03-26 Hoya Corp Surface irregularities detection method and apparatus and magnetic disc inspection method
JPH08167121A (en) * 1994-12-12 1996-06-25 Hitachi Ltd Method for detecting abnormal projection on magnetic disk and magnetic disk device
JP2002175301A (en) * 2000-12-07 2002-06-21 Nippon Telegraph & Telephone West Corp Map information retrieving device and its method
JP2002260222A (en) * 2001-03-05 2002-09-13 Sony Corp Method for recognizing magnetic disk individually

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2007149268A (en) * 2005-11-29 2007-06-14 Fujifilm Corp Method and device for determining surface state of magnetic recording medium

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US6288856B1 (en) Real-time head-to-disk clearance measuring method and apparatus
US7227708B2 (en) System and method for determining long-range erasure of adjacent tracks in hard disk drive
JP4054640B2 (en) Method and apparatus for recovering head instability in data storage system
JP2008299979A (en) Damage predictive diagnosis of reproduction element of magnetic head and control circuit for executing protection operation of record data
US8908312B2 (en) Dynamic fly height control that is insensitive to off-track motion
JP3909044B2 (en) Method and apparatus for measuring magnetic recording width of magnetic head
US6437930B1 (en) Method of estimating the clearance between a read/write transducer head and a magnetic recording medium
JP2006260618A (en) Evaluation method and device of magnetic recording medium
US7054084B2 (en) Method, apparatus and program storage device for sensing increased resistance changes in an MR element to detect MR sensor events
JP6348962B2 (en) Method and apparatus for verifying servo patterns in tape media
Tang et al. Overview of fly height control applications in perpendicular magnetic recording
US6407874B1 (en) Method and apparatus for detection slider airbearing resonance using SAT P-list data
US7379260B2 (en) Control apparatus, storage device, and head retracting method
JP2008077742A (en) Evaluation method and evaluation device for magnetic recording medium and evaluation device
US20090244750A1 (en) Magnetic-recording-medium testing apparatus, magnetic-recording-medium testing method, and magnetic recording apparatus
JP2007172729A (en) Information storage device and storage medium
JP2006172670A (en) Magnetic recording/reproducing device
US20030218461A1 (en) Magnetic recording medium inspection method
JP2003007017A (en) Magnetic disk device and flying height measuring circuit to be applied to the same device
KR100660887B1 (en) Method for detecting the weak write characteristic and apparatus thereof
JPH07320216A (en) Magnetic disk device
JP3544832B2 (en) Magnetic recording / reproducing method and apparatus
JP2000251430A (en) Magnetic disk device and head collision monitoring device applied to the same device
US20120194939A1 (en) Patterned medium inspection method and inspection apparatus
Peng et al. MoA-1-3 STORAGE DISK SUBSTRATE EFFECT ON DC AND AC RESPONSE OF EMBEDDED CONTACT SENSOR

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Effective date: 20071218

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

A977 Report on retrieval

Effective date: 20090924

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20091222

A521 Written amendment

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20100203

A02 Decision of refusal

Effective date: 20101005

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A02