JP2006170741A - Abnormality detector for motive power measurement system - Google Patents
Abnormality detector for motive power measurement system Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- JP2006170741A JP2006170741A JP2004362217A JP2004362217A JP2006170741A JP 2006170741 A JP2006170741 A JP 2006170741A JP 2004362217 A JP2004362217 A JP 2004362217A JP 2004362217 A JP2004362217 A JP 2004362217A JP 2006170741 A JP2006170741 A JP 2006170741A
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- abnormality
- test
- time
- determination
- operation pattern
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01M—TESTING STATIC OR DYNAMIC BALANCE OF MACHINES OR STRUCTURES; TESTING OF STRUCTURES OR APPARATUS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G01M13/00—Testing of machine parts
- G01M13/02—Gearings; Transmission mechanisms
- G01M13/025—Test-benches with rotational drive means and loading means; Load or drive simulation
Landscapes
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Testing Of Devices, Machine Parts, Or Other Structures Thereof (AREA)
- Testing Of Engines (AREA)
Abstract
Description
本発明は、自動運転機能を有する動力計測システム(エンジンベンチテスター、パワートレインテスター、シャシーダイナモメータ)において、試験体の自動耐久試験などの試験中に異常が発生したときにそれを検出する装置に関する。 The present invention relates to a device for detecting an abnormality when an abnormality occurs during a test such as an automatic durability test of a specimen in a power measurement system (engine bench tester, power train tester, chassis dynamometer) having an automatic driving function. .
図3に自動運転機能を有する動力計測システム(パワートレインテスター)の構成例を示す。本システムは、自動運転スケジュールの作成・実行指令出力機能をもつコンピュータ1及び試験対象と負荷装置(ダイナモメータ)の制御を行うコントローラ2、負荷装置の制御盤3および負荷装置(ダイナモメータ)4から構成され、試験体(試験対象)5の自動耐久試験などの試験を可能にする。
FIG. 3 shows a configuration example of a power measurement system (powertrain tester) having an automatic driving function. This system includes a
この試験を実現するため、動力計測システムのコンピュータ1は、あらかじめ試験者が作成した自動運転スケジュールを読み込み、試験体5及び負荷装置(ダイナモメータ)4を自動的に繰り返し動力運転する自動試験処理機能を有している。
In order to realize this test, the
自動試験処理機能は、ある運転パターンを繰り返し実行する運転スケジュールをもち、1回分の運転パターンと繰り返し回数の設定によって自動的に規定回数の繰り返し動力運転を行う構成にされる。運転パターンは、指令値とその指令値への変化率及び次の指令値への移行条件(時間、検出値の値等)の組の集合で記述される。この組のいくつかの固まりをグループ化し、その繰り返し回数を設定することで、試験体に繰り返し特定の運転パターンに従った自動動力運転を行う試験を無人で行うことを可能としている。 The automatic test processing function has an operation schedule for repeatedly executing a certain operation pattern, and is configured to automatically perform a predetermined number of repeated power operations by setting one operation pattern and the number of repetitions. The operation pattern is described by a set of a set of a command value, a rate of change to the command value, and a transition condition (time, detected value value, etc.) to the next command value. By grouping several clusters of this group and setting the number of repetitions, it is possible to perform an unmanned test for performing automatic power operation repeatedly according to a specific operation pattern on the test body.
さらに、自動試験処理機能は、試験情報を計測、記録および異常を検出する処理機能を有しており、試験体の計測値があらかじめ設定した範囲を超えた場合などに異常と判定し、試験停止処理を自動的に行い、異常状態に至った直前の試験情報を記録することができる。 Furthermore, the automatic test processing function has a processing function that measures, records, and detects abnormalities in test information. When the measured value of the specimen exceeds the preset range, it is judged as abnormal and the test is stopped. Processing is automatically performed, and the test information immediately before reaching the abnormal state can be recorded.
異常判定対象としては、例えば、試験体5および負荷装置4の回転数異常、試験トルクの上限/下限範囲異常などがあり、異常判定には判定対象項目毎の検出値とその設定値(閾値)を比較して判定し、警報出力する(例えば、特許文献1参照)。
The abnormality determination target includes, for example, a rotational speed abnormality of the
このような自動試験処理機能は、例えば自動耐久試験では図4に示す処理フローになる。試験者は自動運転スケジュールの作成とコンピュータ1への入力を行い(S1)、コンピュータ1による自動耐久試験を開始させる。コンピュータ1は、自動運転スケジュールに従い、試験体5および負荷装置4の制御指令を生成・出力し、1回の自動耐久運転を行う(S2)。コンピュータ1は、自動耐久運転中に、異常の有無をチェックする(S3)。この異常には、設備装置の異常、試験者が任意に設定した計測項目が正常範囲を越えたこと等によって検出する。
Such an automatic test processing function is, for example, a processing flow shown in FIG. 4 in an automatic durability test. The tester creates an automatic operation schedule and inputs it to the computer 1 (S1), and starts an automatic durability test by the
異常発生が無く、1回の自動耐久運転を終了したとき、コンピュータ1は、当該運転が規定回数の運転に達したか否かをチェックする(S4)。このチェックで、自動耐久運転が規定回数に達していない場合には再び自動耐久運転に戻り、規定回数に達していれば自動耐久試験が正常になされたとして試験を終了する。
When there is no abnormality and one automatic endurance operation is completed, the
コンピュータ1は、自動耐久運転中に何らかの異常が発生したとき、異常検出による運転停止処理を行い(S5)、異常発生前後の運転データの記録、表示を行い、自動耐久試験を終了する(S6)。
前記のように、現在の自動耐久試験などでは、試験者が試験体のある計測値に関して正常範囲を規定した項目に対してその値を超えた事による異常判定を行っている。 As described above, in the current automatic endurance test and the like, the tester performs an abnormality determination for an item that defines a normal range with respect to a certain measurement value of the test specimen, because the value is exceeded.
このため、計測を行っている項目でも試験者が想定していなかった項目の異常値に起因する異常発生や、試験者の規定範囲内の値でありながら、複数の項目の相関および計測できない試験体の異常な状態に起因する異常判定ができない。 For this reason, even if an item is being measured, an abnormality occurs due to an abnormal value of an item that the tester did not expect, or a test that cannot be correlated or measured between multiple items, even though the value is within the tester's specified range. Unable to determine abnormality due to abnormal body condition.
さらに、計測値が試験者の規定範囲を超えたときは既に異常になったあとであり、その要因が二次的であった場合や、一次要因であったとしても、停止までに複数の異常が発生した場合に、異常停止した試験体の調査から一次要因の発生経緯を観察することが困難である。 In addition, if the measured value exceeds the tester's specified range, it is already abnormal, and if the cause is secondary or even if it is a primary factor, multiple abnormalities will occur before stopping When this occurs, it is difficult to observe the generation of the primary factor from the investigation of the specimen that stopped abnormally.
図5は、上記問題の発生状況の例を示す。同図の(a)に示す運転パターンは、車速の場合で示し、運転区間R1では零速度から速度Aまで加速させ、速度Aになった次の運転区間R2では速度Aで設定時間t1秒だけ定速運転し、次の運転区間R3では速度Aから速度Bまで減速させ、速度Bになった次の運転区間R4では速度Bで設定時間t2秒だけ定速運転し、次の運転区間R5では速度Bから零速度まで減速運転する。 FIG. 5 shows an example of the occurrence situation of the above problem. The driving pattern shown in (a) of the figure is shown in the case of the vehicle speed, and is accelerated from the zero speed to the speed A in the driving section R1, and in the next driving section R2 that has reached the speed A, the speed A is set for the set time t1 seconds. Drive at a constant speed, decelerate from speed A to speed B in the next operation section R3, operate at a constant speed t2 seconds at speed B in the next operation section R4 that has reached speed B, and in the next operation section R5 Decelerate from speed B to zero speed.
上記の運転パターンの繰り返しによる自動耐久試験は、設定回数だけ繰り返し行われる。この設定回数の繰り返し試験における運転パターンのうち、運転区間R1とR2での車速が図5の(b)に示すように変化した場合、N回目からN+1回目の試験に異常が起き始めているが、車速が上限車速のみを越えていないため、異常検出がなされないまま次のN+2回目の運転に入り、このN+2回目で車速が上限車速を越えたときに異常検出がなされ、この検出で運転停止がなされる。 The automatic durability test by repeating the above operation pattern is repeatedly performed a set number of times. Among the driving patterns in this set number of repetition tests, when the vehicle speed in the driving sections R1 and R2 changes as shown in FIG. 5B, an abnormality starts to occur from the Nth test to the (N + 1) th test. Since the vehicle speed does not exceed the upper limit vehicle speed alone, the next N + 2th operation is entered without any abnormality being detected, and when the vehicle speed exceeds the upper limit vehicle speed at the N + 2th time, an abnormality is detected. Made.
このような異常検出では、実際の異常が起き始めたN回目の運転での各種の計測情報を得ることができないため、試験停止が遅れて試験体や負荷装置の保護が難しくなる。また、異常原因の究明が難しくなる。 In such an abnormality detection, various measurement information in the N-th operation where an actual abnormality has started cannot be obtained, so that the test stop is delayed and it is difficult to protect the specimen and the load device. In addition, it becomes difficult to investigate the cause of the abnormality.
本発明の目的は、異常が起き始めた時点で異常を検出してその時点の各種計測情報を取得でき、試験体や負荷装置の保護および異常原因の究明を確実、容易にする動力計測システムの異常検出装置を提供することにある。 An object of the present invention is to provide a power measurement system that can detect an abnormality when the abnormality starts and obtain various measurement information at that time, and reliably and easily investigate the cause of the abnormality and the protection of the specimen and the load device. An object of the present invention is to provide an abnormality detection device.
本発明は、前記の課題を解決するため、自動運転パターンの繰り返し運転における運転パターンの各運転時間と、予め設定又は計測された運転時間との偏差が許容偏差設定値内にあるか否かで異常の有無を判定する異常検出手段を備えること、さらには運転パターンの運転時間による異常判定に、試験体のトルクなどの他の計測対象の値が許容偏差設定値内にあるか否かの異常判定を組み合わせることで、計測値範囲による異常判定では検出できない、もしくはそこに至る経緯状態での運転に異常が現れた時点で異常検出できるようにしたもので、以下の構成を特徴とする。 In order to solve the above problem, the present invention determines whether or not the deviation between each operation time of the operation pattern in the repeated operation of the automatic operation pattern and the operation time set or measured in advance is within the allowable deviation setting value. Abnormality detection means for determining the presence or absence of abnormality, and whether or not other measurement target values such as torque of the test specimen are within the allowable deviation set value for abnormality determination based on the operation time of the operation pattern By combining the determinations, it is possible to detect an abnormality when the abnormality cannot be detected by the abnormality determination based on the measurement value range, or when an abnormality appears in the driving in the circumstances leading to the abnormality, and the following configuration is characteristic.
(1)試験体を負荷装置に接続し、自動運転パターンに従って試験体の動力運転を行い、この動力運転を規定回数だけ繰り返し実行して試験体の動力試験をする動力計測システムにおいて、
前記自動運転パターンの繰り返し動力運転における運転パターンの各運転時間と、予め設定又は計測された運転時間との偏差が許容偏差設定値内にあるか否かで異常の有無を判定する異常検出手段を備えたことを特徴とする。
(1) In a power measurement system in which a test body is connected to a load device, a power operation of the test body is performed according to an automatic operation pattern, and a power test of the test body is performed by repeatedly executing the power operation a specified number of times.
An abnormality detection means for determining whether there is an abnormality based on whether or not a deviation between each operation time of the operation pattern in the repeated power operation of the automatic operation pattern and the operation time set or measured in advance is within an allowable deviation setting value. It is characterized by having.
(2)前記異常検出手段は、試験中における試験体のトルクや速度、負荷装置の電流や電圧、試験体から発生する音のいずれか1つの計測値または複数を組み合わせた計測値と、予め設定又は計測された当該計測値との偏差が許容偏差設定値内にあるか否かを判定し、この判定結果と前記運転パターンの運転時間による異常の有無判定結果と組み合わせて異常の有無を判定することを特徴とする。 (2) The abnormality detecting means is set in advance with a measured value or a combination of a plurality of measured values of torque and speed of the test specimen during testing, current and voltage of the load device, and sound generated from the test specimen. Alternatively, it is determined whether or not the deviation from the measured value is within the allowable deviation setting value, and the presence / absence of abnormality is determined by combining this determination result and the determination result of abnormality due to the operation time of the operation pattern. It is characterized by that.
(3)前記異常検出手段は、異常の有りの判定で試験の停止処理を行い、その判定時点の試験情報を記録する手段を備えたことを特徴とする。 (3) The abnormality detection means is characterized by comprising means for performing a test stop process upon determination of presence of abnormality and recording test information at the time of determination.
以上のとおり、本発明によれば、自動運転パターンの繰り返し運転における運転パターンの各運転時間と、予め設定又は計測された運転時間との偏差が許容偏差設定値内にあるか否かで異常の有無を判定する異常検出手段を備えたため、以下の効果がある。 As described above, according to the present invention, whether or not the deviation between each operation time of the operation pattern in the repeated operation of the automatic operation pattern and the operation time set or measured in advance is within the allowable deviation setting value. Since the abnormality detection means for determining the presence / absence is provided, the following effects are obtained.
従来の異常検出機能よりも早期に異常検出ができ、試験者の想定外の何らかの異常により運転時間などが異常となった場合に試験体や負荷装置が計測値異常に至る前の試験体の異常を検出することが可能となる。また、試験体や負荷装置の保護および異常原因の究明が確実、容易になる。 Abnormalities in the specimen before the test specimen or load device becomes abnormal in measurement value when the abnormality can be detected earlier than the conventional abnormality detection function and the operating time becomes abnormal due to some abnormality unexpected by the tester Can be detected. In addition, the protection of the specimen and the load device and the investigation of the cause of the abnormality are ensured and easy.
また、運転パターンの運転時間による異常判定に、試験体のトルクなどの他の計測対象の値が許容偏差設定値内にあるか否かの異常判定を組み合わせることで、異常判定の確度を一層高めることができる。 In addition, the accuracy of abnormality determination is further improved by combining abnormality determination based on the operation time of the operation pattern with abnormality determination whether or not the value of another measurement target such as the torque of the test specimen is within the allowable deviation setting value. be able to.
図1は、本発明の実施形態を示す異常検出装置に設けた異常判定の模式図である。この異常判定には、試験体の異常を運転パターンの運転時間を基に判定する。 FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of abnormality determination provided in an abnormality detection device showing an embodiment of the present invention. In this abnormality determination, the abnormality of the specimen is determined based on the operation time of the operation pattern.
前記のように、自動耐久試験などの試験では特定の運転パターンを長時間繰り返し行う。このとき、運転パターンは各運転区間R1〜R5(図5参照)別に速度と運転時間が規定されているため、試験体が正常であれば、パターンを一回消化する時間はほぼ変化が無い筈である。 As described above, in a test such as an automatic durability test, a specific operation pattern is repeated for a long time. At this time, since the speed and driving time are defined for each driving section R1 to R5 (see FIG. 5), if the test specimen is normal, the time for digesting the pattern once does not change substantially. It is.
そこで、本実施形態では、1回目の運転パターンによる運転が開始された時点から1回目のパターン運転が終了するまでの時間T1を計測して記憶しておく。その後、2回目以降の運転パターンによる運転の所要時間TNを計測し、この時間TNと1回目の所要時間T1との偏差(±ΔT)が許容時間内にあるか否かを比べることにより、試験装置および試験体の異常の有無を判定する。 Therefore, in the present embodiment, the time T 1 from the time when the operation according to the first operation pattern is started to the end of the first pattern operation is measured and stored. After that, measure the required time T N of the driving pattern for the second and subsequent driving patterns, and compare whether the deviation (± ΔT) between this time T N and the first required time T 1 is within the allowable time. Thus, the presence or absence of abnormality of the test apparatus and the test body is determined.
なお、「偏差(±ΔT)の許容時間」は試験者があらかじめ設定し、2回目以降の運転パターンによる運転時間が1回目の所要時間に対して、「偏差の許容時間」以上ずれた時点で「パターン運転消化時間異常」として、車速異常時と同様に運転停止処理を行う。 Note that the “permissible time of deviation (± ΔT)” is set in advance by the tester, and when the driving time according to the second and subsequent driving patterns deviates by more than “allowable time of deviation” from the first required time. As “pattern driving digestion time abnormality”, operation stop processing is performed in the same manner as when the vehicle speed is abnormal.
図1では、図5と同様に、運転パターンが車速の場合で示し、1回目の運転時間T1と2回目以降の運転所要時間T2、T3、T4、…とを比較して異常の有無を判定する。図中では、N回目に異常が起き始めた場合を示し、異常判定処理にはその運転所要時間TNと時間T1との偏差が許容値を越えることでN回目の運転時に異常検出し、その時点で運転停止出力を得る。これにより、動力計測システムは、N+1回目以降の運転を停止して試験体や負荷装置を確実に保護し、さらに異常検出時点での各種計測情報を取得することで異常原因の究明を確実、容易にする。 In FIG. 1, as in FIG. 5, the driving pattern is the vehicle speed, and the first driving time T 1 is compared with the second and subsequent driving required times T 2 , T 3 , T 4 ,. The presence or absence of is determined. In the figure, the case where an abnormality starts to occur for the Nth time is shown, and the abnormality determination process detects an abnormality during the Nth operation because the deviation between the required operation time T N and the time T 1 exceeds an allowable value. At that time, the operation stop output is obtained. As a result, the power measurement system stops the operation after the (N + 1) th time to reliably protect the test specimen and the load device, and by acquiring various measurement information at the time of abnormality detection, the cause of the abnormality can be reliably and easily determined. To.
図2は、図1における異常判定処理の詳細な処理フローを示す。運転スケジュールによる試験開始で各回の運転時間を計測し(S11,S12)、当該運転が1回目の場合にはメモリに1回目の運転時間T1を記憶しておき(S13,S14)、2回目以降の運転時間TN(T2、T3、…)はそのつどメモリに記憶し(S15)、運転時間T1とTNとの偏差Teを求める(S16)。この偏差Teの絶対値と許容誤差設定値Tsの大小を比較する(S17)。偏差Teの絶対値が偏差許容設定値Tsよりも小さいときは、次の運転時間計測(S11)に戻り、偏差Teの絶対値が偏差許容設定値Tsを越えるときは、異常が起き始めていると判定してその時点の各種計測データを記録および試験停止指令を発生する(S18)。 FIG. 2 shows a detailed processing flow of the abnormality determination processing in FIG. Measuring each time the operating time the start of the test by operation schedule (S11, S12), when the operation of the first time stores the operating time T 1 of the first in the memory (S13, S14), 2 th The subsequent operation time T N (T 2 , T 3 ,...) Is stored in the memory each time (S15), and a deviation Te between the operation time T 1 and T N is obtained (S16). The absolute value of the deviation Te is compared with the allowable error set value Ts (S17). When the absolute value of the deviation Te is smaller than the allowable deviation setting value Ts, the process returns to the next operation time measurement (S11). When the absolute value of the deviation Te exceeds the allowable deviation setting value Ts, an abnormality has started to occur. Determination is made, various measurement data at that time is recorded, and a test stop command is generated (S18).
なお、実施形態では、運転パターンによる繰り返し試験において、その運転時間T1とTNの偏差を基に異常判定処理をする場合を示したが、この異常判定に際して、他の計測値を基にした同様の異常判定を行い、この判定結果を運転時間による異常判定と組み合わせて異常の有無を判定することで、異常判定の確度を一層高めることができる。 In the embodiment, the case where the abnormality determination process is performed based on the deviation between the operation times T 1 and T N in the repeated test based on the operation pattern is shown. However, when the abnormality is determined, another measurement value is used. By performing the same abnormality determination and determining the presence or absence of abnormality by combining the determination result with the abnormality determination based on the operation time, the accuracy of the abnormality determination can be further increased.
例えば、測定対象を、運転時間に加えて、トルクや速度とし、1回目と2回目以降の同じ運転区間でのトルクや速度をサンプリングし、両サンプリングデータ間の偏差が一定値を越えたか否かで異常の有無を判定し、この判定結果を運転時間による異常判定と組み合わせて異常の有無を判定することができる。 For example, the measurement target is set to the torque and speed in addition to the operation time, and the torque and speed in the same operation section after the first time and the second time are sampled, and whether or not the deviation between both sampling data exceeds a certain value The presence / absence of abnormality can be determined by combining the determination result with the abnormality determination based on the operation time.
また、測定対象を、運転時間に加えて、負荷装置の電流や電圧とし、1回目と2回目以降の同じ運転区間での負荷装置の電流や電圧をサンプリングし、両サンプリングデータ間の偏差が一定値を越えたか否かで異常の有無を判定することができる。さらに、測定対象を、運転時間に加えて、試験体から発生する音とし、1回目と2回目以降の同じ運転区間での音圧をサンプリングし、両サンプリングデータ間の偏差が一定値を越えたか否かで異常の有無を判定することができる。さらにまた、これら負荷装置の電流とトルクなど、複数の計測要素を組み合わせた異常の有無判定結果を運転時間による異常の有無判定結果と組み合わせて異常の有無を判定することもできる。 In addition to the operating time, the current and voltage of the load device are taken as the measurement object, and the current and voltage of the load device in the same operation section after the first time and the second time are sampled, and the deviation between the two sampling data is constant. Whether or not there is an abnormality can be determined based on whether or not the value is exceeded. Furthermore, the measurement object is the sound generated from the test specimen in addition to the operation time, and the sound pressure in the same operation section after the first time and the second time is sampled, and the deviation between the two sampling data exceeds a certain value The presence or absence of an abnormality can be determined based on the result. Furthermore, the presence / absence of abnormality can be determined by combining the abnormality determination result obtained by combining a plurality of measurement elements such as current and torque of the load device with the abnormality determination result based on the operation time.
また、実施形態では、1回目の運転時間を比較基準として、2回目以降の運転時間との偏差から異常を判定する場合を示すが、比較基準とする運転時間は、過去の試験や予備試験により求められる値を予め設定または計測された値として求めることができる。同様に、他の計測対象(試験体のトルクや速度、負荷装置の電流や電圧、試験体から発生する音)についても、過去の試験や予備試験により求められる値を予め設定または計測された値を比較基準とすることができる。 Further, in the embodiment, the case where abnormality is determined from the deviation from the operation time after the first operation time using the first operation time as a comparison reference is shown. However, the operation time used as the comparison reference is based on past tests and preliminary tests. The obtained value can be obtained as a preset or measured value. Similarly, for other measurement objects (torque and speed of the test piece, current and voltage of the load device, and sound generated from the test piece), values obtained by past tests or preliminary tests are set or measured in advance. Can be used as a reference for comparison.
1 コンピュータ
2 コントローラ
3 制御盤
4 負荷装置(ダイナモメータ)
5 試験体(試験対象)
1
5 Specimen (test object)
Claims (3)
前記自動運転パターンの繰り返し動力運転における運転パターンの各運転時間と、予め設定又は計測された運転時間との偏差が許容偏差設定値内にあるか否かで異常の有無を判定する異常検出手段を備えたことを特徴とする動力計測システムの異常検出装置。 In a power measurement system that connects a test body to a load device, performs power operation of the test body according to an automatic operation pattern, and repeatedly performs this power operation a specified number of times to perform a power test of the test body,
An abnormality detection means for determining whether there is an abnormality based on whether or not a deviation between each operation time of the operation pattern in the repeated power operation of the automatic operation pattern and an operation time set or measured in advance is within an allowable deviation setting value. An abnormality detection device for a power measurement system, comprising:
3. The abnormality detection of the power measurement system according to claim 1, wherein the abnormality detection means includes means for performing a test stop process when a determination is made that there is an abnormality and recording test information at the time of the determination. apparatus.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
JP2004362217A JP4492338B2 (en) | 2004-12-15 | 2004-12-15 | Abnormality detection device for power measurement system |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
JP2004362217A JP4492338B2 (en) | 2004-12-15 | 2004-12-15 | Abnormality detection device for power measurement system |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
JP2006170741A true JP2006170741A (en) | 2006-06-29 |
JP4492338B2 JP4492338B2 (en) | 2010-06-30 |
Family
ID=36671668
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
JP2004362217A Expired - Fee Related JP4492338B2 (en) | 2004-12-15 | 2004-12-15 | Abnormality detection device for power measurement system |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
JP (1) | JP4492338B2 (en) |
Cited By (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP2896951A1 (en) | 2013-12-27 | 2015-07-22 | Horiba, Ltd. | Vehicle drive system testing apparatus |
WO2019155562A1 (en) * | 2018-02-08 | 2019-08-15 | 株式会社小野測器 | Measurement device and measurement device control method |
CN110268348A (en) * | 2017-03-06 | 2019-09-20 | 欧姆龙株式会社 | Control device and control method |
KR20230162769A (en) * | 2021-03-22 | 2023-11-28 | 곽상인 | An Apparatus for Fixing a Fin and Checking a Fixed Condition |
Citations (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JPH01170828A (en) * | 1987-12-25 | 1989-07-05 | Toyota Motor Corp | Circuit for detecting failure in speed change of drive robot |
JPH063239A (en) * | 1992-06-18 | 1994-01-11 | Fujitsu Ltd | Method and device for fatigue test |
JPH06331503A (en) * | 1993-05-24 | 1994-12-02 | Meidensha Corp | Measurement processor for dynamometer |
JPH0915100A (en) * | 1995-06-30 | 1997-01-17 | Meidensha Corp | Abnormality detector for power train tester |
JPH10293048A (en) * | 1997-04-17 | 1998-11-04 | Mitsubishi Electric Corp | Durability-testing device |
JP2005077282A (en) * | 2003-09-01 | 2005-03-24 | Mitsubishi Motors Corp | Tester for body to be tested |
-
2004
- 2004-12-15 JP JP2004362217A patent/JP4492338B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Patent Citations (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JPH01170828A (en) * | 1987-12-25 | 1989-07-05 | Toyota Motor Corp | Circuit for detecting failure in speed change of drive robot |
JPH063239A (en) * | 1992-06-18 | 1994-01-11 | Fujitsu Ltd | Method and device for fatigue test |
JPH06331503A (en) * | 1993-05-24 | 1994-12-02 | Meidensha Corp | Measurement processor for dynamometer |
JPH0915100A (en) * | 1995-06-30 | 1997-01-17 | Meidensha Corp | Abnormality detector for power train tester |
JPH10293048A (en) * | 1997-04-17 | 1998-11-04 | Mitsubishi Electric Corp | Durability-testing device |
JP2005077282A (en) * | 2003-09-01 | 2005-03-24 | Mitsubishi Motors Corp | Tester for body to be tested |
Cited By (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP2896951A1 (en) | 2013-12-27 | 2015-07-22 | Horiba, Ltd. | Vehicle drive system testing apparatus |
US9841350B2 (en) | 2013-12-27 | 2017-12-12 | Horiba, Ltd. | Vehicle drive system testing apparatus |
CN110268348A (en) * | 2017-03-06 | 2019-09-20 | 欧姆龙株式会社 | Control device and control method |
CN110268348B (en) * | 2017-03-06 | 2022-03-11 | 欧姆龙株式会社 | Control device, control method, and computer-readable recording medium |
WO2019155562A1 (en) * | 2018-02-08 | 2019-08-15 | 株式会社小野測器 | Measurement device and measurement device control method |
KR20230162769A (en) * | 2021-03-22 | 2023-11-28 | 곽상인 | An Apparatus for Fixing a Fin and Checking a Fixed Condition |
KR102641725B1 (en) | 2021-03-22 | 2024-02-27 | 곽상인 | An Apparatus for Fixing a Fin and Checking a Fixed Condition |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
JP4492338B2 (en) | 2010-06-30 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
JP6382882B2 (en) | Brake inspection device and brake inspection method | |
JP4261588B2 (en) | Control device | |
US11892828B2 (en) | Fault diagnosis device, fault diagnosis method and machine to which fault diagnosis device is applied | |
US10859455B2 (en) | Brake inspection device and motor controller | |
CN103609014A (en) | Multiaxial motor drive system and multiaxial motor drive device | |
RU2007101318A (en) | RELIABILITY ASSESSMENT OF TECHNOLOGICAL EQUIPMENT | |
CN106985001B (en) | The main shaft abnormal detector and main shaft method for detecting abnormality of lathe | |
JP2006218618A (en) | Inspection method of device for working instruments | |
JP2007236100A (en) | Test system, test method and test program of protection relay, and recording medium for recording program | |
EP2120057A2 (en) | System and method for detecting wire breaks | |
US10899010B2 (en) | Cable damage detection assistance apparatus and cable damage detection assistance method in robot mechanism | |
JP4492338B2 (en) | Abnormality detection device for power measurement system | |
US20190020293A1 (en) | Motor controller | |
JP2006040122A (en) | Programmable controller | |
KR102571847B1 (en) | Impulse wrench rotation detection method and device | |
JP2010133330A (en) | Fan monitoring controller | |
CN106855615A (en) | A kind of abnormality of current sensor detection method and device | |
JP2002043943A (en) | Analog output device | |
KR19990008616A (en) | How to test spindle motor performance on CD-ROM drives | |
WO2010018689A1 (en) | Test module and test method | |
JP5692782B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for inspecting computer system having fan | |
Gordić et al. | Fully Integrated Torque-Based Collision Detection in Periodic Tasks for Industrial Robots with Closed Control Architecture | |
JP2004045085A (en) | Crossover voltage evaluation method and inspection device | |
JP4349080B2 (en) | Misalignment factor analyzer | |
JPH03149142A (en) | Screwing condition deciding device |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
A621 | Written request for application examination |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621 Effective date: 20070511 |
|
A977 | Report on retrieval |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007 Effective date: 20091019 |
|
A131 | Notification of reasons for refusal |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131 Effective date: 20091104 |
|
A521 | Request for written amendment filed |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523 Effective date: 20091221 |
|
TRDD | Decision of grant or rejection written | ||
A01 | Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01 Effective date: 20100316 |
|
A01 | Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01 |
|
A61 | First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure) |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61 Effective date: 20100329 |
|
R150 | Certificate of patent or registration of utility model |
Ref document number: 4492338 Country of ref document: JP Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150 |
|
FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20130416 Year of fee payment: 3 |
|
FPAY | Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database) |
Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20140416 Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
LAPS | Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees |