JP2006134135A - Rating system and method for measures against global warming for each enterprise - Google Patents

Abstract

<P>PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide a rating system for rating measures against global warming, in which the degree of achievement of measures against global warming is evaluated for each enterprise, and a method thereof. <P>SOLUTION: A guide planning system 1 for the measures against global warming prepares a guide for the measures against the global warming and a specific plan preparation system 2 prepares a plan based on the guide. After executing the plan, an evaluation system 3 performs evaluation for excellent work. A rating result output system 4 discloses and recognizes the excellent work on the basis of the evaluation. These results are fed back to the specific plan preparation system 2 and regression processing by an SPC 5 is repeated. <P>COPYRIGHT: (C)2006,JPO&NCIPI

Description

The present invention relates to a provider's global warming countermeasure rating system and method for evaluating the degree of achievement of global warming countermeasures for each provider in the reduction measures for warming substances such as CO ₂ .

In recent years, the problem of global warming due to increased emission of CO ₂ has become serious. In order to prevent global warming, the Kyoto Protocol was adopted at the 3rd Conference of the Parties to the Framework Convention on Climate Change in Kyoto in 1997. Under the Kyoto Protocol, Japan is obliged to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 6% over the five years from 2008 to 2012 compared to the base year.

  In order to achieve the goals of the Kyoto Protocol, industry efforts are being carried out in various fields, and evaluation methods have also been developed. For example, Patent Document 1 discloses a method and system for evaluating the degree of environmental compatibility for product development by an external organization for product development in a specific company.

  With regard to efforts by companies such as companies that take measures against global warming, the relative evaluation within the industry enables each company to clearly determine the position of its response and set goals for future efforts. Therefore, it is necessary to rank companies and other businesses with respect to global warming countermeasures. Patent Document 2 describes a rating system and method for financial contents of a company.

JP 2002-140471 A JP 2001-312584 A

  Patent Document 1 evaluates environmental measures for product development at a specific office. Therefore, since the global warming countermeasures in the industry to which the company belongs are not rated, the concerned company is uncertain about the relative evaluation of the industry, and has set specific targets when formulating global warming countermeasures. There was a problem that it was difficult. Further, Patent Document 2 is a rating method related to the financial contents of a company, and there is a problem that it cannot be applied to a rating of a countermeasure against global warming by an operator as it is.

  As described above, conventionally, companies or establishments have not been evaluated by specializing in measures against global warming based on corporate ratings. Each company's own rating index is not publicly available. In addition, when setting regulatory values and voluntary target standards for individual products and technologies, or when grading by environmental label classification, etc., evaluation is performed using definable intensity indicators such as energy consumption per performance. . For this reason, there was a problem that it was not possible to rank relative warming countermeasures according to the current situation.

In view of such a problem, the present invention evaluates the degree of achievement of global warming countermeasures for each business operator in the reduction measures for warming substances such as CO ₂ , The purpose is to provide a system and method for rating anti-aging measures.

The rating system for global warming countermeasures of a business according to the present invention includes a system for formulating a standard global warming countermeasure guideline formulation system and a standardized global warming countermeasure formulated by the global warming countermeasure guideline formulating system for each industry. A plan creation system, an evaluation system that evaluates the plan execution of each industry created by the materialization plan creation system for each business operator, and outputs a rating result of the business in the corresponding business industry based on the evaluation of the evaluation system It comprises a rating result output system, and the output result of the rating result output system is fed back to a specific plan creation system.

  In addition, the provider's global warming countermeasure rating system according to the present invention is configured to recursively evaluate the global warming countermeasures of an operator by arranging the materialization plan creation system, the evaluation system, and the rating result output system in a spiral structure. It is characterized by that.

  Further, according to the rating system for global warming countermeasures of the business operator of the present invention, the industry is classified into a primary industry, a secondary industry, and a tertiary industry, taking into account the actual state of energy consumption. The medium classification is further subdivided into small classifications.

  In addition, according to the rating system for global warming countermeasures of the business operators of the present invention, the evaluation is a relative evaluation based on the highest target achievement for each industry, and the superior business operators are subdivided by the business operators with the highest evaluation ranking. It is characterized by subdividing evaluation.

  In addition, the business warming countermeasure rating system of the present invention is characterized in that the relative evaluation is performed based on a normal distribution based on an average value and a maximum value of the industry.

In addition, the business warming countermeasure rating system of the present invention performs the warming countermeasure rating of the business using a CO ₂ emission basic unit or an energy basic unit per amount of corporate activity such as production. It is characterized by.

  In addition, the rating system for global warming countermeasures of the business operator according to the present invention is characterized in that the evaluation of the corporate activity performed at the time of the rating is based on an index in accordance with the actual situation according to the characteristics of the energy consumption form of each industry. .

Moreover, the warming countermeasure rating system of the business operator of the present invention is a CO ₂ used for evaluating the efficiency.
The range of emissions or energy consumption is characterized by the sum of fuel and electric power consumed in the office.

  In addition, the warming countermeasure rating system of the business of the present invention is characterized in that the warming countermeasure rating evaluation of the business is additionally added to the evaluation with respect to the efficiency change due to the efforts of SMEs and the like.

The method of rating the global warming countermeasures of the business operator of the present invention includes (a) a stage of formulating a global warming countermeasure guideline as a standard, and (b) a stage of creating a plan that embodies the global warming countermeasure guideline for each industry. , (C) a stage for executing the plan for each industry, (d) a stage for evaluating the achievement degree of the plan execution for each company, and (e) a rating result of the company in the corresponding industry based on the evaluation. And (b) to (e) are arranged in a spiral structure, the rating result of (e) is fed back to the specific plan of (b), and a countermeasure against global warming of the operator is performed. It is characterized by regression evaluation.

  According to the business warming countermeasure rating system and method according to the present invention, each business is objectively evaluated and rated for each industry classified according to the actual energy consumption. It becomes possible.

In the present invention, an operator rating for measures against global warming is performed using a CO ₂ emission basic unit or an energy basic unit (per business activity such as a production amount). The indicator is
(CO ₂ emission basic unit) = (CO ₂ emissions of business establishments) / (activity of business establishments),
(Energy consumption basic unit) = (Energy consumption of the establishment) / (Activity of the establishment),
Define in.

  In addition, the evaluation of the operator is a relative evaluation based on the highest value for each industry as will be described later. In the evaluation at this time, the superior business operators are subdivided and evaluated by subdividing the upper rank. When the overall distribution situation is not always clear at the time of relative evaluation, a normal distribution based on the average value and the maximum value is assumed.

With reference to the explanatory diagrams of FIGS. 6 to 13, a method for rating a countermeasure against global warming by a business operator which is a premise of the present invention will be described. FIG. 6 is an explanatory diagram showing an example of the rating industry classification 41. In this example, the industry category 41 of the rating is created by associating the industry category with the corresponding index (42). For example, as an index example of the secondary industry (manufacturing industry, etc.), CO ₂ emission amount (energy consumption amount) per production amount (production amount) is set.

As an example of business (information and telecommunications, wholesale / retail, etc.) indicators, CO ₂ emissions per floor area (
Energy consumption) is set. In addition, as an index example of energy conversion business, transportation, etc., power generation amount and CO ₂ emission amount (energy consumption amount) per transportation amount are set.

FIG. 7 is an explanatory diagram showing an example of a corporate environmental measure rating 43. Here, the results of outstanding initiatives are evaluated, published, and commended (promoted). As shown in 44, this rating is classified into industries as “concepts”, and the achievement level of global warming countermeasures is classified from the best value (top runner) and average value of efficiency data for each industry ( Classification). In addition, the “index” sets efficiency (an index consistent with the evaluation method) expressed by CO ₂ emissions (or energy consumption) after global warming countermeasures.

FIG. 8 is an explanatory diagram showing an example 45 of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications / industry classification and the economic / industry / average efficiency. Here, the meaning of “efficiency” is represented by CO ₂ emission (or energy consumption) as described above in the specification of the present invention. In the table 46 of FIG. 8, vertical columns (a) to (e) and horizontal columns (U) to (Y) are set. In the vertical column, the primary industry, the secondary industry, and the tertiary industry are set in the large classification column (a). Tertiary industry is divided into energy conversion business, transportation and business. In the column (b) of the standard industry classification, A agriculture, B forestry, and C fishery are set as primary industries. D mining industry, E construction industry, and F manufacturing industry are set as secondary industries.

  In the column (b) of the standard industry classification, G electricity / gas / heat supply / water supply is set as the energy conversion industry of the tertiary industry. The transportation of the tertiary industry is set as the I transportation industry. Tertiary industries include H information and communications, J wholesale and retail, K finance and insurance, L real estate, M restaurant and lodging, N medical and welfare, O education and learning support, P complex Service industry, Q service industry, R public affairs, and S classification impossible industry are set.

  In the column of industry example (c), the secondary industry D mining is set as limestone mining, E construction industry is construction industry, F manufacturing industry is steel industry, paper manufacturing industry, electrical electronics industry, and automobile industry. In the energy conversion industry of the tertiary industry, electric power is set as an example of the G electricity, gas, heat supply, and water supply industries. Furthermore, the truck industry is set as an example of the transportation of the tertiary industry and the I transportation industry.

In the column of efficiency (d) for 2002, the efficiency for 1990 is set in parentheses for comparison. For example, as the efficiency of fiscal 2002 (1990 fiscal year), limestone mining, 21.7t-CO ₂ / ten thousand t (22.9t-CO ₂ / ten thousand t), it is. The unit of efficiency varies depending on the production volume index set for each industry. If the power production index because it is sold power as described below, the efficiency of fiscal 2002 (1990 FY) _is a _{0.407kg-CO 2 /kWh(0.421kg-CO 2 / kWh} ) .

  In the column of production volume index (e), production volume (ea) for the limestone mining industry, floor area (eb) for construction of new buildings, crude steel production volume (ec) for the steel industry, and paper production for the paper manufacturing industry Volume (ed), production (ef) in the electrical and electronics industry, and production (eg) in the automobile industry are set.

  In the column of production volume index (e), in the energy conversion industry of the tertiary industry, as an example of G electricity / gas / heat supply / water supply, electric power is sales power (eh), and truck industry is freight transportation volume (ei) ), The total floor area (ej) is set in the tertiary industry.

  In the horizontal column of FIG. 8, the column (U) corresponds to the primary industry, and the column (V) corresponds to the secondary industry. The column (W) corresponds to the energy conversion industry of the tertiary industry, the column (X) corresponds to the transportation of the tertiary industry, and the column (Y) corresponds to the business of the tertiary industry.

FIG. 9 is an explanatory diagram showing considerations 47 for business classification in rating. The efficiency unit: kg-CO ₂ / m ² 48 shown in FIG. 8 requires special energy demand classification (a) such as nighttime energy and energy-intensive equipment. It is classified into business classification (b). (A) is, for example, a medical institution, lodging industry, retail store (convenience store, etc.), and (b) is, for example, a restaurant (Chinese restaurant, family restaurant, etc.).

In FIG. 9A, for example, there is a difference of about 10 times in the efficiency unit: kg-CO ₂ / m ² between a convenience store and other retailers. This is due to the fact that a convenience store is open 24 hours and consumes a large amount of power for lighting. In (b), there is a difference of three times or more in efficiency unit: kg-CO ₂ / m ² between the Chinese restaurant and the coffee shop. This is due to the high consumption of gas fired power at Chinese restaurants.

FIG. 10 is an explanatory diagram showing an example 49 of actual energy consumption. In this example, the vertical consumption unit is set on the vertical axis (unit: Mcal / m ² · year), and the business classification (third order) described in FIG. 8 is set on the horizontal axis. The standard industry classification “Office Building” is the sum of H Information and Communication Industry, K Finance / Insurance Industry, L Real Estate Industry, P Complex Service Industry, and R Public Service. In the example of FIG. 10, the energy consumption of the restaurant (M) is less than 10 times that of the school (O) in the industry classification.

  FIG. 11 is an explanatory diagram showing a classification example 50 in the rating. In FIG. 11, it is assumed that the characteristics in the efficiency (d) column described in FIG. 8 can be expressed by a standard normal distribution. A shows the best efficiency (13%) of the same industry, B shows the top 17%, C shows the average efficiency (40%) of the same industry, and D shows the distribution of the bottom 30%. When the standard deviation is σ, the average efficiency C is distributed in the range of 0.5σ to −0.5σ, and the higher ranks A and B are 1.5σ.

FIG. 12 is an explanatory diagram showing a supplement 51 of a classification example in the rating. FIG. 12 (a) evaluates the good ones with priority (52). The top 30% of the normal distribution curve is A and B, and A is further divided into AA and A. FIG. FIG. 12 (b) evaluates effort and improvement as appropriate (53), and classifies B into B ⁺ and B ⁺⁺ and C into C ⁺ and C ⁺⁺ . As shown in Fig. 12, by assessing the measures against global warming in a positive manner, businesses with a good level of achievement aim for higher evaluations, while those with intermediate evaluations are ranked higher. Motivation aiming at attaching will be given.

FIG. 13 is an explanatory diagram showing a rating evaluation example 54 of a certain local government office. In FIG. 13, the standard industry classification “office building” explained in FIG. 8 includes the H information communication industry, K finance / insurance industry, L real estate industry, P complex service industry, and R public service as the population, The efficiency is compared (54). The efficiency (56) of the government building is 0.063 t-CO ₂ / m ² . Here, the values of the study committee for the calculation method of greenhouse gas emissions from the Ministry of the Environment are applied as the emission factors related to electricity.

In addition, as for the characteristics of the corresponding population, the average efficiency is 0.071 t-CO ₂ / m ² and the top efficiency is 0.050 t-CO ₂ / m ² . The deviation value of the government building is 1.4σ, which is an evaluation of B. As described in the Gaussian distribution characteristics of FIG. 13, it is a small building with many partitions that has cleared the current thermal insulation standard that has been evaluated for the top efficiency AA. The Government building with an evaluation of B is indicated by the black circles in the Gaussian distribution characteristics.

  In the embodiment of the present invention, the evaluation of the business operator against global warming is a relative evaluation based on the highest value for each industry, and in this evaluation, the superior business operator is subdivided and the superior business operators are subdivided and evaluated. . When the overall distribution situation is not always clear at the time of relative evaluation, a normal distribution based on the average value and the maximum value is assumed as shown in FIGS.

  FIG. 2 is an explanatory diagram showing a flow of a processing procedure viewed from a survey side which is an evaluation organization. This evaluation organization conducts self-investigation rather than national or local government systems.

  In FIG. 2, (a) First, an overall policy is created (11). This overall policy formulates "needs, cost", "priority of investigation", "target industry, number of investigators" and so on. (B) A detailed policy is created (12). In the detailed policy, “survey contents (industry classification, activity amount index for each industry, etc.)” and “survey method” are determined. (C) Conduct a preliminary survey (13). Preliminary surveys include “investigation and calculation of industry averages based on existing statistics” and “survey on top runners of population”.

  (D) Conduct this survey. In this survey, “investigation to individual offices” and “counting” are performed. (E) Extract important indicators. Important indicators include “industry average, maximum, and intensity”. (F) Perform Evaluation 1 and Evaluation 2. In Evaluation 1, "Establishment of individual offices based only on main indicators" is performed. In Evaluation 2, “Evaluation that considers changes in basic units” is performed.

  (G) Announce the evaluation results (17). Publication of evaluation results will be made “publish survey results or provide information”. (H) The data is corrected. The correction of data involves "judgment of change in situation" and "examination of whether to investigate again". The data correction result is (a) fed back to the overall policy and reflected in the creation of the overall policy again.

  FIG. 3 is an explanatory diagram showing a flow of a processing procedure viewed from the investigation side which is an evaluation organization. This evaluation organization uses the survey results and systems of national and local governments for processing. In this example, (a) creation of the overall policy (11a) is the same as the processing flow of FIG. 2 except that “evaluation priority” and “examination of collected materials” are performed.

  FIG. 4 is an explanatory diagram showing a flow viewed from a company (evaluated side). In the example of FIG. 4, a corporate warming countermeasure rating 21 is a rating response 22 for a rating from the rating organization, such as “Rating and receiving a rating result”, “Rating credit rating survey”, “Evaluation axis / situation review”, “Response Measure review ”. Measures are promoted by such rating correspondence.

  There is a case where the company's response is further advanced and a statistical and technical survey 23 is performed. This survey includes “Industry Average Level Survey”, “Industry Highest Level Survey”, “Countermeasure Technology Trend Survey”, “Policy Trend, Economy, etc.”. By conducting such surveys, measures can be strengthened.

  On the other hand, as a corporate response when there is no rating for global warming countermeasures, an overall policy is created (31). This overall policy is carried out for “management, production planning”, “policy trend understanding and response”, and “improvement of corporate image”. Next, formulation of global warming countermeasures / global warming substance reduction plan (32) is carried out. Here, “technology selection for global warming countermeasures” and “target setting” are made.

  Subsequently, countermeasures are implemented (33). Implementation of this measure will be “introduction of reduction technology” and “arrangement of progress data”. Next, evaluation judgment of the countermeasure plan is performed (35). In this, “data analysis” and “countermeasure verification” are performed. Further, the plan is corrected (34). The plan is revised by performing “determination of whether or not the target is achieved” and “adding measures when the target is unsuccessful”, and feeding back the correction result to the formulation of the global warming countermeasure / warming substance reduction plan (32).

  FIG. 5 is an explanatory diagram showing an example of the industry classification at the time of evaluation of countermeasures against global warming according to the present invention. In this example, the classification for each industry is classified into A primary industry, B secondary industry, and C tertiary industry. A In the primary industry, agriculture, forestry and fisheries are separated. B Secondary industries are divided into (a) mining, (b) manufacturing, and (c) construction.

  (B) The manufacturing industry further includes the steel industry, ceramics and ceramics manufacturing industry, cement manufacturing industry, other ceramics and ceramics manufacturing industry, chemical industry, pulp and paper manufacturing industry, non-ferrous metal primary smelting industry, food manufacturing industry (Production volume can be expressed in quantity units), Textile industry (Production volume can be expressed in quantity units), and other manufacturing industries.

  C tertiary industry consists of (a) energy conversion business, (b) transportation business, (c) office, (d) retail, (e) restaurant, (f) accommodation business, (g) medical welfare, ( h) Classification into education / learning support, (i) water and sewage, and (j) waste disposal. (A) The energy conversion industry is further divided into the electric industry, gas industry, and heat supply industry. (B) The transportation industry is divided into bus transportation, taxis, trucks, railways, ships and aviation. (C) Offices are classified as wholesale, finance / insurance, real estate, composite service, service, public service, and unclassifiable.

  The industry classification in FIG. 5 is a modification of the conventional industry classification described in FIG. 8 based on the current situation such as the actual energy consumption. The classification of primary industries into agriculture, forestry, and fishery is the same as the industry classification in FIG. The secondary industry is classified into the middle classification of the mining, manufacturing, and construction industries in the same manner as the industry classification of FIG. 8, but the industry classification of the manufacturing industry is subdivided into small classifications. For example, the chemical industry, the textile industry, and the food manufacturing industry are classified.

  In the tertiary industry, in addition to the trucking industry shown in FIG. 8, the medium-class transportation industry is divided into sub-categories of bus transportation, taxis, railways, ships, and aviation. Further, as shown in FIG. 10, the actual energy consumption of the office building is 1/4 or less of the restaurant as a whole. Based on this situation, the industry classification (medium classification) is the sum of the H information and communication industry, K finance / insurance industry, L real estate industry, P complex service industry, R public service, and S non-classified industries in Figure 8. “Office” is set up.

  Further, in the business category classification of FIG. 8, M restaurants and lodging businesses are added together, but as shown in FIG. 10, the actual energy consumption of hotels and inns is greater than that of N hospitals. For this reason, in FIG. 5, (e) restaurant and (f) accommodation business are separated and divided. The energy consumption of hotels and ryokan is large because of the characteristics of the industry itself, such as hot water supply for bathrooms and baths that are not in the office, and the demand for heating at night.

Further, in the industry classification of FIG. 8, J wholesale / retail business is integrated, but in FIG. 5, the wholesale business is classified as (c) office and (d) retail.
This corresponds to the difference in the actual situation between the wholesale business, which is an office-centered business similar to other industries, and the retail business, where products must be installed and various ingenuity must be made for customers.

  In the present invention, the amount of business activity when calculating the efficiency of global warming countermeasures is defined by selecting one that can be easily externally evaluated for each industry. An example of the amount of corporate activity will be described with reference to FIG. For example, raw material manufacturing industry (steel industry among manufacturing industry, cement manufacturing industry and flat glass manufacturing industry among paper manufacturing industry, paper and pulp manufacturing industry, chemical industry, non-ferrous metal primary smelting industry, etc.) The production volume is used when the production volume is clearly indicated by mass display, such as in the food manufacturing industry and part of the textile industry.

  Among the manufacturing industries, the shipping value is used as the amount of corporate activity in the manufacturing industry where it is difficult to produce production such as the machine industry. Even in this case, if the production volume index is possible, the production volume is used as the corporate activity volume. In the construction industry, the new construction floor area is used as the amount of corporate activity in the construction industry as much as possible. If this is not possible, the sales amount is used as the amount of corporate activity. Energy industries such as the power industry, gas industry (city gas, LP gas), and heat supply industry, which are energy conversion industries, use energy supply as the amount of corporate activity. The transportation industry uses passenger or freight traffic as corporate activity. The floor area is used as the amount of corporate activity except for the tertiary industries listed above. As described above, the embodiment of the present invention is characterized in that the evaluation of the corporate activity performed at the time of rating is based on an index in accordance with the actual state according to the characteristics of the energy consumption form of each industry.

The range of CO ₂ emissions or energy consumption used for evaluating the efficiency of global warming countermeasures is mainly in the production facility in order to improve accuracy. If it belongs to the same industry and it is clear that some of the processes are outsourced, the emissions from the processes are separated and evaluated. If it is easy to evaluate, use CO ₂ emissions from purchase / procurement or transportation for the rating of the industry.

Energy consumption is the sum of fuel and electricity consumed in the office, and CO ₂ emissions are
The sum of fuel-derived CO ₂ emissions consumed in the office and the CO ₂ emissions generated when power generated in the office is generated at the power station. Energy consumption is expressed in joules.

The conversion of coal and some petroleum products (inherent units: tons), crude oil and petroleum products (inherent units: liters), city gas and refinery gas (inherent units: cubic meters) into energy consumption (joules) Follow the calorific value table published by the Agency for Natural Resources and Energy, Ministry of Industry. As the gas volume, the value at 0 degree and 1 atmosphere is used. The CO ₂ emission value is a CO ₂ equivalent value.

The conversion from energy consumption (Joule) to CO ₂ emissions (CO ₂ equivalent tons) uses the emission factor for each fuel described in the report of the Study Committee on Greenhouse Gas Emissions Calculation Method by the Ministry of the Environment. The emission factor is changed every year, so the latest one is used. As for electricity, the emission factor for each fuel described in the report of the Study Group on the Calculation Method of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from the Ministry of the Environment is used. However, the emission factor of electricity changes every year depending on the operation status of the thermal power plant. For this reason, if the Ministry of the Environment's Greenhouse Gas Emission Calculation Method Study Group has not announced for the year, use the emission factor reported by the Federation of Electric Power Companies for general electric utilities.

FIG. 1 is an explanatory diagram illustrating an example of a rating menu for countermeasures against global warming by the rating system for countermeasures against global warming according to an embodiment of the present invention. In this example, measures are promoted through the publication of relative evaluations. In the global warming countermeasure rating system 100 of the business operator, first, the global warming countermeasure guideline formulation system 1 formulates countermeasure guidelines for the global warming countermeasures in the business operator.
This countermeasure guideline is to create ○ 1 “formulation guideline”, ○ 2 “evaluation standard”, and ○ 3 “reduction measure guideline”.

  Next, based on the countermeasure guidelines for global warming countermeasures formulated by the global warming countermeasure guideline formulating system 1, the following concrete plan is created by the concrete plan creating system 2. That is, “setting of indicators and standards”, “collection of company information”, “classification of industry”, and “data analysis and statistics”. Here, in the “classification of industry”, the industry classification shown in FIG. 5 is performed.

  Furthermore, “industry average efficiency” and “best efficiency” are created for each applicable industry as a plan (2a) of another item derived from the items of the specific plan. In this creation process, as shown in FIG. 11, a standard normal distribution characteristic in the corresponding industry is created, and the average efficiency and the best efficiency are set from the characteristic.

  After executing the plan created by the materialization plan creation system 2, the evaluation system 3 evaluates the entire industry, and evaluates companies that have made excellent efforts to combat global warming. Next, based on the evaluation of the evaluation system 3, the rating result output system 4 announces and commends companies that have made excellent efforts. The output result from the rating result output system 4 is fed back to the specific plan creation system.

  Thereafter, the loop processes (2) to (4) are repeated. This closed-loop processing is defined as regression evaluation (SPC: Spiral Checking & Feedback). That is, in the example of FIG. 1, the loops (2) to (4) are set hierarchically, and this layer is subjected to regression evaluation while moving along a spiral path. In the embodiment of the present invention, since the countermeasure against global warming of the business operator is evaluated by such a spiral structure regression evaluation (SPC) method, the accuracy in performing the rating can be improved.

  1 is provided with input means such as a mouse and keyboard, a monitor as output means, internal and external storage means, and arithmetic processing means such as a CPU. Configured as a computer. An external output means such as a printer can be connected to the computer. 1 is highly specialized and functions as a third-party organization that can objectively evaluate the efforts of the operator.

In the embodiment of the present invention, the efficiency change due to the efforts of small and medium-sized enterprises is additionally included in the evaluation. As an additional evaluation, the CO ₂ emissions from the base year or the total energy consumption or the improvement rate of the basic unit are added to the evaluation.

The employer's global warming countermeasure rating system in FIG. 1 uses CO ₂ emission basic unit or energy basic unit (per business activity such as production amount) as an index of global warming countermeasure. Based on the standards established in Countermeasure Guideline 1 and Plan 2, the status of efforts by companies against global warming countermeasures is rated. In this case, the operator's evaluation 3 is a relative evaluation based on the highest value for each type of industry, and in the evaluation, the superior operator is subdivided and the superior operator is subdivided. When the overall distribution situation is not always clear at the time of relative evaluation, a normal distribution based on an average value and a maximum value is assumed as shown in FIGS.

Fig. 1 shows the method of rating global warming countermeasures by business operators: (a) the stage of formulating a global warming countermeasure guideline as a standard; And (c) a stage of executing the plan of each industry, (d) a stage of evaluating the achievement level of the plan execution for each company, and (e) a rating result of the company in the industry based on the evaluation. And (b) to (e) are arranged in a spiral structure, and the rating result of (e) is fed back to the actualization plan of (b), thereby preventing the global warming of the operator. Corresponds to the configuration for regression evaluation.

In the above description, CO ₂ is targeted as a warming substance, but the warming substance is not limited to CO ₂ . The warming countermeasures targeted by the present invention include warming gases such as chlorofluorocarbon and methane. The conversion factor in this case is the greenhouse effect factor described in the report of the IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). In addition, as the rating of air pollution, it is also applicable to the NO _X and SPM.

As described above, the present invention evaluates the degree of achievement of targets set for global warming countermeasures for each business operator in the reduction measures for warming substances such as CO ₂ , and performs rating. It provides a global warming countermeasure rating system and method.

It is a block diagram which shows embodiment of this invention. It is explanatory drawing which shows embodiment of this invention. It is explanatory drawing which shows embodiment of this invention. It is explanatory drawing which shows embodiment of this invention. It is explanatory drawing which shows embodiment of this invention. It is explanatory drawing which shows embodiment of this invention. It is explanatory drawing which shows embodiment of this invention. It is explanatory drawing which shows embodiment of this invention. It is explanatory drawing which shows embodiment of this invention. It is explanatory drawing which shows embodiment of this invention. It is explanatory drawing which shows an example of embodiment of this invention. It is explanatory drawing which shows an example of embodiment of this invention. It is explanatory drawing which shows an example of embodiment of this invention.

Explanation of symbols

  DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 1 ... Global warming countermeasure guideline formulation system, 2 ... Implementation plan creation system, 3 ... Evaluation system, 4 ... Rating result output system, 5 ... SPC (Spiral Checking & Feedback), 100 ... Business operators' global warming countermeasure rating system

Claims (10)

  Prepared by the globalization countermeasure guideline formulation system as a standard, a concrete plan creation system that materializes the global warming countermeasures standardized by the global warming countermeasure guideline formulation system for each industry, and the concrete plan creation system An evaluation system that evaluates the planned execution of each industry for each business operator, and a rating result output system that outputs a rating result of the business operator in the relevant industry based on the evaluation of the evaluation system. A global warming countermeasure rating system for business operators, which feeds back the output results to a concrete plan creation system.   2. The business operator according to claim 1, wherein the implementation plan creation system, the evaluation system, and the rating result output system are arranged in a spiral structure, and the global warming countermeasure of the business operator is regressed and evaluated. Global warming countermeasure rating system.   The industry is classified into the primary, secondary, and tertiary industries in the middle, taking into account the actual energy consumption, and the medium is further subdivided into smaller categories. The global warming countermeasure rating system for business operators according to claim 1 or 2, characterized in that   The evaluation is a relative evaluation based on the highest target achievement value for each industry, and subdivided evaluation of superior business operators by subdividing high-ranking business operators. The global warming countermeasure rating system for a business according to claim 3.   5. The global warming countermeasure rating system according to claim 4, wherein the relative evaluation is performed based on a normal distribution based on an average value and a maximum value of the industry. 6. The rating of global warming countermeasures of the business operator is performed using a CO ₂ emission basic unit or an energy basic unit per amount of corporate activity such as a production amount. The global warming countermeasure rating system for business operators described in 1.   The business activity according to any one of claims 1 to 6, wherein the evaluation of the corporate activity performed at the time of the rating is based on an index in accordance with the actual situation according to the characteristics of the energy consumption form of each industry. Rating system for global warming. The business according to any one of claims 1 to 7, wherein a range of CO ₂ emission amount or energy consumption amount used for the evaluation of efficiency is a sum of fuel and electric power consumed in the office. Rating system for global warming.   The rating of the business operator according to any one of claims 1 to 8, wherein the rating evaluation of the business enterprise is additionally added to an evaluation of an efficiency change due to an effort of a small business or the like. Global warming countermeasure rating system. (A) Formulating a global warming countermeasure guideline as a reference, (b) Creating a plan that embodies the global warming countermeasure guideline for each industry, and (c) Executing a plan for each industry And (d) a stage for evaluating the degree of achievement of the plan execution for each company, and (e) a stage for outputting a rating result of the company in the corresponding industry based on the evaluation, e) is arranged in a spiral structure, the rating result of (e) is fed back to the concrete plan of (b), and the warming measure of the business operator is evaluated by regression evaluation. Rating measures

Images