JP2006026724A - Joined body made of different kinds of metals of iron based alloy member and aluminum based alloy member by welding - Google Patents

Joined body made of different kinds of metals of iron based alloy member and aluminum based alloy member by welding Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP2006026724A
JP2006026724A JP2004213426A JP2004213426A JP2006026724A JP 2006026724 A JP2006026724 A JP 2006026724A JP 2004213426 A JP2004213426 A JP 2004213426A JP 2004213426 A JP2004213426 A JP 2004213426A JP 2006026724 A JP2006026724 A JP 2006026724A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
based alloy
alloy member
aluminum
iron
welding
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
JP2004213426A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP4178134B2 (en
Inventor
Koichiro Oka
紘一郎 岡
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Nichirin Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Nichirin Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Nichirin Co Ltd filed Critical Nichirin Co Ltd
Priority to JP2004213426A priority Critical patent/JP4178134B2/en
Publication of JP2006026724A publication Critical patent/JP2006026724A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP4178134B2 publication Critical patent/JP4178134B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Landscapes

  • Laser Beam Processing (AREA)

Abstract

<P>PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide a joined body made of different kinds of metals of an iron based alloy member and an aluminum based alloy member by welding which can obtain advantages such as excellent joining strength and high productivity substantially similar to those by welding the same kind of members, and to provide a joining technique therefor. <P>SOLUTION: This joined body obtained by joining the iron based alloy member and the aluminum based alloy member by welding is characterized in that the joint part between the iron based alloy member and the aluminum based alloy member has a structure including a supersaturated solid solution phase in which aluminum enters into solid solution in iron in a supersaturated manner. <P>COPYRIGHT: (C)2006,JPO&NCIPI

Description

本発明は、鉄系合金部材とアルミニウム系合金部材を溶接により接合して得られる接合体に関し、特にその溶接部の接合強度に優れた異種金属溶接接合体に関するものである。   The present invention relates to a joined body obtained by joining an iron-based alloy member and an aluminum-based alloy member by welding, and more particularly to a dissimilar metal welded joint having excellent joint strength at the welded portion.

近年、排ガス規制など地球環境改善のため、車の軽量化による燃費改善が強く求められている。   In recent years, in order to improve the global environment such as exhaust gas regulations, there has been a strong demand for improved fuel consumption by reducing the weight of vehicles.

アルミニウム(以下、アルミと略称することがある)は鋼と比べて比重が約三分の一と軽く、耐食性がよく、複雑形状の素材でも押出工法により比較的簡単に得られることと、アルミの材料特性とが相まってクラッシャブル性に優れているなどの特長を有しているため、車の軽量化に望ましい金属である。反面、鋼と比べてアルミは剛性および強度と材料コスト面で劣る。   Aluminum (hereinafter sometimes abbreviated as “aluminum”) has a specific gravity that is about one-third lighter than steel, and has good corrosion resistance. It is a desirable metal for reducing the weight of a car because it has features such as excellent crushability combined with material properties. On the other hand, aluminum is inferior in rigidity, strength and material cost compared to steel.

従って、車の構成部品を鋼とアルミの各々の利点を活して使い分けてハイブリット化できれば、車の軽量化だけでなくリサイクル性、車の安全性向上にもつながる。   Therefore, if the components of the car can be hybridized by making the best use of the advantages of steel and aluminum, not only the weight of the car but also the recyclability and the safety of the car can be improved.

この鋼とアルミを併用するハイブリット化に当たっては、鋼とアルミの部品毎の具体的な使い分けやそれらの材料設計が重要となることはもちろんだが、両材料の接合技術が必須となる。   For hybridization using both steel and aluminum, it is important to use steel and aluminum in specific parts and material design, but it is essential to join both materials.

ところが、鉄系合金とアルミ系合金を溶接により溶解にして直接接合すると脆い金属間化合物が生成し、そのため十分な接合強度が得られず、実用化が極めて難しかった。このためこの溶接法に代えてカニカル接合法、ロー付け法、摩擦圧接法及びインサート材による接合工法が実用化されてきた。   However, when an iron-based alloy and an aluminum-based alloy are dissolved and welded directly to each other, a brittle intermetallic compound is generated, so that a sufficient joint strength cannot be obtained and it is extremely difficult to put it to practical use. For this reason, instead of this welding method, a canonical joining method, a brazing method, a friction welding method, and a joining method using an insert material have been put into practical use.

しかし、これらの接合技術はいずれも一長一短があり、特に以下のような不利や問題を有しており、いまだ十分に満足できる接合法とはいえない状況にある。
(メカニカル接合法)
ボルト接合、リベット接合、ネジ接合、メカニカルクリンチ、ヘミング、メカニカル成形接合など、部材同士を機械的に接合する方法である。しかし、この方法は、接合部品の形状制約、接合精度、生産性、及び汎用性などの面で同質材料(鋼同士など)の溶接より一般的に劣る。
(ロー付け法)
部材同士を媒介となるロー材を溶かして接合する方法である。この方法は鋼とアルミの接合法としても提案(特許文献1など)されてはいるが、フラックスにより鋼、アルミの酸化皮膜を除去し、母材を溶解することなく、両金属の活性面とロー材とで適切な化合物を生成することが必要になる。この適切な化合物を得るためロー材の材料、接合品の材質・形状、接合強度、接合品質の信頼性に制約が付される。従って、接合の作業性、生産性、汎用性はやはり、同質材料(鋼同士など)の溶接より一般的に不利を伴う。
(摩擦圧接法)
部材同志を加圧しながら回転させ、その際の摺動に伴う摩擦熱を利用した固相接合である。しかし、この方法は加圧回転が必要なことから接合部品に形状制約があり、接合で生じるバリの処理が必要なこと、ビート゛溶接のような長手方向の溶接が難しいことやMg含有合金(5000系)の場合は酸化物(MgO)の発生により溶接が困難になるなど作業性、汎用性、生産性の面でやはり同質材料(鋼同士など)の溶接より一般的に劣る。
(インサート材接合法)
部材同志間にクラッド材をインサートしてスポット溶接などによって接合する方法である。しかし、この方法はクラッド材のインサートに伴う部品形状に制約が付されることと、作業性に劣ることおよびコスト面の課題を有し、やはり同質材料(鋼同士など)の溶接より一般的に劣るものである。
特開平5−111757号
However, each of these joining techniques has advantages and disadvantages, and has the following disadvantages and problems, and is still not a satisfactory joining method.
(Mechanical joining method)
This is a method of mechanically joining members together such as bolt joining, rivet joining, screw joining, mechanical clinch, hemming, and mechanical molding joining. However, this method is generally inferior to welding of homogeneous materials (such as steels) in terms of shape constraints, joining accuracy, productivity, and versatility of joined parts.
(Brazing method)
In this method, the brazing material that serves as a medium between the members is melted and joined. Although this method has also been proposed as a method for joining steel and aluminum (Patent Document 1, etc.), the active surface of both metals is removed without removing the oxide film of steel and aluminum by flux and dissolving the base metal. It is necessary to produce an appropriate compound with the raw material. In order to obtain this appropriate compound, restrictions are imposed on the reliability of the material of the brazing material, the material and shape of the joined product, the joining strength, and the joining quality. Therefore, the workability, productivity and versatility of joining are generally accompanied by disadvantages compared to welding of homogeneous materials (such as steel).
(Friction welding method)
This is a solid phase bonding that uses frictional heat generated by sliding the members while rotating the members while applying pressure. However, since this method requires pressurization and rotation, there are restrictions on the shape of the joined parts, the treatment of burrs generated in the joining is necessary, longitudinal welding such as beat welding is difficult, and Mg-containing alloys (5000 In the case of the system), it is generally inferior to welding of homogeneous materials (such as steel) in terms of workability, versatility, and productivity, such as the difficulty of welding due to the generation of oxide (MgO).
(Insert material joining method)
In this method, a clad material is inserted between members and joined by spot welding or the like. However, this method has restrictions on the part shape associated with the insert of the clad material, inferior workability and cost problems, and is generally more common than welding of homogeneous materials (such as steel). It is inferior.
JP-A-5-111757

本発明は、上述した従来の鋼とアルミニウムなど鉄系合金部材とアルミニウム系合金部材の接合技術の背景に鑑み、これらの不利や問題点を全面的に解消し、同質部材同志の溶接と実質的に変わらない優れた接合強度と高い生産性などの利点を享受し得る画期的な異種金属接合体ならびにその接合技術の開発と実用化をその課題としてなされたものである。   The present invention eliminates these disadvantages and problems entirely in view of the background of the joining technology of the above-mentioned conventional steel and aluminum-based alloy members such as aluminum and aluminum-based alloy members, and substantially eliminates these disadvantages and problems. The development and commercialization of a revolutionary dissimilar metal joint that can enjoy advantages such as excellent joint strength and high productivity, as well as its joining technology, have been made as its issues.

本発明はこのような課題の解決のために完成されたものであって、その要旨とする特徴は以下の通りである。   The present invention has been completed to solve such a problem, and the gist of the present invention is as follows.

(1)鉄系合金部材とアルミニウム系合金部材を溶接により接合した異種金属溶接接合体であって、前記鉄系合金部材と前記アルミニウム系合金部材の溶接接合部が、鉄にアルミニウムが過飽和に固溶した過飽和固溶体相を含む組織からなることを特徴とする鉄系合金部材とアルミニウム系合金部材の異種金属溶接接合体。   (1) A dissimilar metal welded joint in which an iron-based alloy member and an aluminum-based alloy member are joined by welding, wherein a welded joint between the iron-based alloy member and the aluminum-based alloy member is fixed to iron in a state where aluminum is supersaturated. A dissimilar metal welded joint of an iron-based alloy member and an aluminum-based alloy member, comprising a structure containing a molten supersaturated solid solution phase.

(2)前記溶接接合部が急冷凝固組織である上記(1)に記載の鉄系合金部材とアルミニウム系合金部材の異種金属溶接接合体。   (2) The dissimilar metal welded joined body of the iron-based alloy member and the aluminum-based alloy member according to (1), wherein the welded joint has a rapidly solidified structure.

(3)前記溶接接合部が、鉄系合金部材側がアルミニウム系合金部材側に砲弾状に食込んだ境界に形成されたものである上記(1)又は(2)に記載の鉄系合金部材とアルミニウム系合金部材の異種金属溶接接合体。   (3) The iron-based alloy member according to (1) or (2), wherein the welded joint is formed at a boundary where the iron-based alloy member side bites into the aluminum-based alloy member side in a bullet shape. Dissimilar metal welded joint of aluminum alloy member.

(4)前記鉄系合金部材がステンレス鋼であり、前記アルミニウム系合金部材がアルミニウム合金で構成されたものである上記(1)〜(3)のいずれかに記載の鉄系合金部材とアルミニウム系合金部材の異種金属溶接接合体。   (4) The iron-based alloy member according to any one of the above (1) to (3), wherein the iron-based alloy member is stainless steel, and the aluminum-based alloy member is made of an aluminum alloy. Dissimilar metal welded joints of alloy members.

(5)溶接接合部がレーザ溶接により形成されたものである上記(1)〜(4)のいずれかに記載の鉄系合金部材とアルミニウム系合金部材の異種金属溶接接合体。   (5) The dissimilar metal welded joint of the iron-based alloy member and the aluminum-based alloy member according to any one of (1) to (4) above, wherein the welded joint is formed by laser welding.

(6)レーザ溶接が前記鉄系合金部材側からの入熱を行うものである上記(5)に記載の鉄系合金部材とアルミニウム系合金部材の異種金属溶接接合体。   (6) The dissimilar metal welded joint of the iron-based alloy member and the aluminum-based alloy member according to (5) above, wherein laser welding performs heat input from the iron-based alloy member side.

本発明によれば、優れた接合強度を備えた鉄系合金部材とアルミニウム系合金部材の異種金属接合体を提供することができ、しかもレーザー溶接などの溶接法により直接接合することが可能なため高い生産性を実現でき、その実用性においても有利であるなど顕著な効果を奏するものである。   According to the present invention, it is possible to provide a dissimilar metal joined body of an iron-based alloy member and an aluminum-based alloy member having excellent bonding strength, and can be directly bonded by a welding method such as laser welding. High productivity can be realized, and there are remarkable effects such as advantageous in practical use.

本発明者らは異種の金属である鋼(鉄系合金部材の例して代表させる)とアルミ(アルミニウム系合金部材例して代表させる)の接合について、従来困難が故に断念されている溶接法を見直し、その実現の可能性がないかどうか改めて検討を試みることにした。   The present inventors have conventionally abandoned welding methods because of difficulties in joining different metals such as steel (represented as an example of an iron-based alloy member) and aluminum (represented as an example of an aluminum-based alloy member). And decided to try again to see if it could be realized.

溶接法による接合の大きな障害は前述の通り、その接合部にFeAl3、Fe2Al5などのアルミリッチな金属間化合物が発生し、これが接合強度を大幅に低下させてしまうことにある。 As described above, a major obstacle to joining by the welding method is that an aluminum-rich intermetallic compound such as FeAl 3 or Fe 2 Al 5 is generated at the joint, and this greatly reduces the joint strength.

そこで、本発明者らは、この有害な金属間化合物の発生を阻止することを最大の命題として、種々の観点から研究、実験を積み重ねた結果、その極めて有効な解決策として次のような考え方に到達し、溶接法によっても接合部の強度に優れた鋼とアルミの接合体が得られると確信した。   Therefore, the present inventors have made research and experiments from various viewpoints with the greatest proposition to prevent the generation of this harmful intermetallic compound, and as a result, the following concept is considered as an extremely effective solution. I was convinced that a welded steel / aluminum joint with excellent joint strength could be obtained by welding.

(1)過飽和の固溶体相
本発明においては接合部の組織として、鉄中にアルミをその固溶限を超えて過飽和に固溶させた固溶体相を含むものとする。以下、この組織をFe−Al過飽和固溶体組織あるいは単に過飽和固溶体組織と言う。これによって、前述の脆い、鉄とアルミの金属間化合物の発生がなくなり、優れた接合強度がもたらされる。勿論、FeAlやFe3Alなどの鉄リッチな金属間化合物は後述する急冷凝固によりその強度低下を防止できるためこの組織中での存在を許容する。
(1) Supersaturated solid solution phase In the present invention, the structure of the joint includes a solid solution phase in which aluminum is supersaturated in a solid solution exceeding its solid solubility limit. Hereinafter, this structure is referred to as an Fe—Al supersaturated solid solution structure or simply a supersaturated solid solution structure. This eliminates the generation of the aforementioned brittle iron-aluminum intermetallic compound and provides excellent bonding strength. Of course, iron-rich intermetallic compounds such as FeAl and Fe 3 Al are allowed to exist in this structure because their strength can be prevented from decreasing by rapid solidification described later.

そして、アルミニウムの母相に含まれる過飽和固溶体相は具体的には鉄にアルミニウムが4〜50%原子%固溶した状態が好ましい。これは、4原子%未満の固溶では上記の有害な金属間化合物が接合部の組織に一部混在して接合強度を低下させる恐れがあり、また50原子%を超えて固溶させることは技術的に困難であり、且つこれ以下の固溶量で十分な接合強度を保持できるからである。   The supersaturated solid solution phase contained in the aluminum parent phase is specifically preferably in a state where aluminum is solid-solved in an amount of 4 to 50% atomic% in iron. This is because if the solid solution is less than 4 atomic%, the harmful intermetallic compounds may be partially mixed in the structure of the joint portion to reduce the joint strength. This is because it is technically difficult and sufficient bonding strength can be maintained with a solid solution amount less than this.

(2)急冷凝固
接合部の組織を上記の過飽和の固溶体相として形成させるためには、接合部が急冷凝固される状態を作ることが重要となる。この急冷凝固により、上記金属間化合物が冷却過程で析出する余裕がなく、鉄中にアルミが過飽和に取り込まれたままで凝固することになる。しかも、この急冷凝固によって接合部の組織は母相のアルミ並びに前記過飽和固溶体相の結晶粒度が微細化された所謂急冷凝固組織となり、前記過飽和固溶体相組織と相俟ってさらに強度の高い接合部が得られることになる。
(2) Rapid solidification In order to form the joint structure as the above-described supersaturated solid solution phase, it is important to create a state in which the joint is rapidly solidified. By this rapid solidification, there is no room for the intermetallic compound to precipitate in the cooling process, and solidification occurs while aluminum is supersaturated in iron. In addition, the rapid solidification of the joint becomes a so-called rapid solidification structure in which the grain size of the matrix aluminum and the supersaturated solid solution phase is refined, and a joint having higher strength in combination with the supersaturated solid solution phase structure. Will be obtained.

(3)レーザ溶接
前記過飽和固溶体相並びに急冷凝固組織を達成するのに好ましい溶接方法としてレーザー溶接法を採用する。このレーザー溶接法はアーク溶接法などと異なり、入熱密度(106W/cm2以上)が非常に高く、アスペクト比(溶け込み深さ/溶け込み幅)が極めて高い溶接ビードが得られる特徴がある。従って、鋼とアルミの接合部の溶け込み幅を小さくした状態で溶解接合に十分な入熱を瞬時に行うことができるため、入熱後の冷却が急速に進行し、接合部を急冷凝固させることができ、これにより接合部を急冷凝固組織とすることができると同時に過飽和固溶体相を得ることができるのである。また、レーザー溶接によって鋼とアルミを溶接する場合は、その入熱を鋼側から行うことが好ましい。
(3) Laser welding As a preferable welding method for achieving the supersaturated solid solution phase and the rapidly solidified structure, a laser welding method is adopted. Unlike the arc welding method, this laser welding method is characterized in that a weld bead having a very high heat input density (10 6 W / cm 2 or more) and an extremely high aspect ratio (penetration depth / penetration width) can be obtained. . Therefore, since the heat input sufficient for melting and joining can be instantaneously performed with the penetration width of the steel-aluminum joint reduced, the cooling after heat input proceeds rapidly and the joint is rapidly solidified. As a result, the joint can be made into a rapidly solidified structure, and at the same time, a supersaturated solid solution phase can be obtained. Moreover, when welding steel and aluminum by laser welding, it is preferable to perform the heat input from the steel side.

本発明を、以下に代表的な実験例を基にさらに詳述して行くことにする。   The present invention will be described in further detail below based on typical experimental examples.

(実験例1)
図1に示すとおり、JIS316Lステンレスパイプ(鉄)1(12Φ×1.0t×40L)にJIS3003のアルミ棒材2を圧入したサンプルを炭酸ガスレーザー溶接機4(松下溶接システム製YB-L150A8、ノズル径:5Φ、溶接速度:400mm/分、出力:700Wm、出力形態:CW)を用いてステンレスパイプ側(上方)からレーザーを照射、入熱して接合した。なお、図において5は溶接ビードを示す。そして、接合後、試作品2本を引張試験を行ったところ、いずれもアルミ側で母材破断し、優れた接合強度を有することを確認した。
(Experimental example 1)
As shown in FIG. 1, a sample obtained by press-fitting a JIS 3003 aluminum rod 2 into a JIS 316L stainless steel pipe (iron) 1 (12Φ × 1.0t × 40L) is a carbon dioxide laser welding machine 4 (YB-L150A8, Matsushita Welding Systems, Using a diameter of 5Φ, a welding speed of 400 mm / min, an output of 700 Wm, and an output form of CW, laser was irradiated from the stainless steel pipe side (above), and heat was applied to join. In the figure, 5 indicates a weld bead. And after joining, when the two prototypes were subjected to a tensile test, it was confirmed that both of them were fractured from the base metal on the aluminum side and had excellent joining strength.

そこで、本発明者らは、かかる優れた接合強度を有する接合体が溶接法により得られた理由を解明するために種々の調査、解析を行った。  Therefore, the present inventors conducted various investigations and analyzes in order to elucidate the reason why a joined body having such excellent joint strength was obtained by the welding method.

先ず、接合体の溶接部断面を顕微鏡(×10)にてマクロ観察を行った。図2は顕微鏡写真の模式図である。図1よりステンレスパイプ1の溶接をされた領域にはワイングラス状を呈したステンレス再凝固相A(以下、単に鉄再凝固相ということがある)が生成されており、その下部は砲弾状をなしてアルミ棒材2の中に没入した食込み部aとなっていることが分かる。そして、このステンレス鋼の食込み部aとアルミ棒材2の境界に両者の接合部Cが形成されている。Bはアルミ再凝固相を示している。  First, the cross section of the welded portion of the joined body was macro-observed with a microscope (× 10). FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of a photomicrograph. As shown in FIG. 1, a stainless steel re-solidification phase A (hereinafter sometimes referred to simply as an iron re-solidification phase) is formed in a region where the stainless steel pipe 1 is welded. It turns out that it becomes the biting part a immersed in the aluminum bar 2. And the junction part C of both is formed in the boundary of this biting part a and the aluminum bar 2 of this stainless steel. B shows the aluminum resolidification phase.

さらに、この接合部断面を顕微鏡(×100)によりミクロ観察を行った顕微鏡写真の模式図が図3である。図3から接合部Cはその両側の鉄再凝固相Aとアルミ再凝固相Aに複雑に絡み合った独立した境界相となっていることが知れる。  Furthermore, the schematic diagram of the microscope picture which performed micro observation of this junction cross section with a microscope (x100) is FIG. It can be seen from FIG. 3 that the joint C is an independent boundary phase intricately intertwined with the iron resolidification phase A and the aluminum resolidification phase A on both sides.

次に、この接合部(接合境界相)Cを電子線マイクロアナライザー(島津製EPMA−1400)で面分析と線分析を行った。図4は面分析観察の結果で、黒色が100%鉄、白色が100%アルミで、この間の組成を濃淡で示したものであり、同図下欄の数値はAl%でこれに相当す部分を引き出し腺で示した。これより、接合境界相はアルミを10〜50原子%含んでいることが判明した。また、図5は鋼再凝固相からアルミ再凝固相(アルミの地)の部位まで線分析により図3の矢印Xに沿って測定した結果である。図5より前記食込み部a(図2)を形成している鉄再凝固相Aはアルミを4原子%以上含み、接合部Cではアルミ再凝固相側に向かって鉄(Fe)が減少すると共にアルミ(Al)が増加し、鉄対アルミが等量からなる点を経て、アルミ量が急上昇してアルミ100原子%のアルミ再凝固相に至ることが分る。ニッケル(Ni)も鉄(Fe)と同様な変化を示している。  Next, surface analysis and line analysis were performed on this bonding portion (bonding boundary phase) C with an electron beam microanalyzer (EPMA-1400 manufactured by Shimadzu Corp.). Fig. 4 shows the results of surface analysis observation, where black is 100% iron and white is 100% aluminum, and the composition in the meantime is shown in shades. Is shown in the pull-out gland. From this, it was found that the joining boundary phase contains 10 to 50 atomic% of aluminum. FIG. 5 shows the results of measurement along the arrow X in FIG. 3 by line analysis from the steel resolidification phase to the aluminum resolidification phase (aluminum ground). From FIG. 5, the iron resolidification phase A forming the encroaching part a (FIG. 2) contains 4 atomic% or more of aluminum, and at the joint C, iron (Fe) decreases toward the aluminum resolidification phase side. It can be seen that aluminum (Al) increases, and the amount of aluminum rapidly rises to the aluminum resolidification phase of 100 atomic% of aluminum through the point where the amount of iron to aluminum is equal. Nickel (Ni) shows the same change as iron (Fe).

また、この接合部をオージェ電子分光分析(AES)により、鉄再凝固相側、中間部及びアルミ再凝固相側の3箇所について組成分析を行った。表1がその結果を示すものである。   Further, this joint was subjected to composition analysis at three locations on the iron resolidification phase side, the intermediate portion, and the aluminum resolidification phase side by Auger electron spectroscopy (AES). Table 1 shows the results.

Figure 2006026724
Figure 2006026724

表1の結果から接合部Cでは20〜29原子%のAlが存在していることが知れる。   From the results in Table 1, it is known that 20 to 29 atomic% Al is present in the joint C.

また、同接合部CをSEM分析で組織観察した結果、数ミクロンから十数ミクロンの大きさの急冷凝固組織が認められた。   Further, as a result of observing the structure of the joint C by SEM analysis, a rapidly solidified structure having a size of several to tens of microns was observed.

発明者らは、次にこの接合部Cに問題の金属間化合物が存在するかどうかを調査することにした。図6はX腺回折装置(理学電機製 RINT1500)を用いて接合部断面研磨面で測定を行ったX回折図形である。図7から、検出されたピークはAl、Fe及びFe−Cr−Niに相当するものでFe−Alの化合物に相当するピークは一切検出されなかった。   The inventors next decided to investigate whether or not the intermetallic compound in question exists in the joint C. FIG. 6 is an X diffraction pattern measured on the polished surface of the joint section using an X-ray diffraction apparatus (RINT 1500 manufactured by Rigaku Corporation). From FIG. 7, the detected peaks correspond to Al, Fe and Fe—Cr—Ni, and no peaks corresponding to the Fe—Al compound were detected.

これらの結果から、接合部の組織は鉄に対するアルミの固溶限(0.15%)を大幅に超えた状態になっており、しかもFe−Al金属間化合物が検出できなかったことから、結局Fe−Alの過飽和固溶体相として存在しているとの確信を得た。   From these results, the structure of the joint was in a state that greatly exceeded the solid solubility limit of aluminum (0.15%) with respect to iron, and Fe-Al intermetallic compounds could not be detected. The conviction that it exists as a supersaturated solid solution phase of Fe-Al was obtained.

また、この接合部に隣接している鉄再凝固相の砲弾状の食込み部aについてもAlがその固溶限を超える4%以上含有されていることから、やはりFe−Alの過飽和固溶体相であることが知れる。この食込み部aにおける過飽和に固溶したAlは、レーザー溶接時に高温となって発生したアルミ蒸気が溶融鉄内に分散して凝固したためである。   In addition, since the shell-like encroaching part a of the iron resolidification phase adjacent to this joint contains 4% or more exceeding its solid solubility limit, it is also a supersaturated solid solution phase of Fe-Al. I know that there is. This is because the Al dissolved in the supersaturation in the encroaching portion a is solidified by being dispersed in the molten iron by the aluminum vapor generated at a high temperature during laser welding.

そして、上記接合部における過飽和固溶体相は前述の如く急冷凝固によって得られたものであり、特にレーザー溶接が溶接法のなかで接合部が最も急冷される方式であること、鉄とアルミの融点差が1000℃以上あること、さらにアルミの熱伝導特性が極めて高いことなどにより、急冷凝固が容易に実現されたものといえる。ここで言う、急冷凝固に必要な冷却速度は10K/s以上であれば足り、好ましくは100K/s以上である。これによって、数μ〜10μ以下の微細な凝固組織が得られる。   The supersaturated solid solution phase in the joint is obtained by rapid solidification as described above. In particular, laser welding is the method in which the joint is most rapidly cooled among the welding methods, and the melting point difference between iron and aluminum. It can be said that the rapid solidification is easily realized by the fact that the temperature is 1000 ° C. or higher and the thermal conductivity of aluminum is extremely high. Here, the cooling rate required for rapid solidification is 10 K / s or more, preferably 100 K / s or more. Thereby, a fine solidified structure of several μ to 10 μm or less is obtained.

次に本発明接合体の好ましい溶接条件などについて述べる。   Next, preferred welding conditions for the joined body of the present invention will be described.

十分な接合強度が得られるレーザー溶接条件は基本的には高エネルギー密度で鉄側から安定的に入熱し、溶解した鉄を短時間にアルミに適量砲弾状に食い込ませることを可能にすることである。この条件を満たすために、図7に示すように、まず、鉄(1)側からレーザー光(R)を照射して入熱を行い、溶融鉄(M)の内側に生成されたキーホール(K)内に金属蒸気(V)が封じ込められない様にし、この蒸気(V)による突沸を防ぐことが必要になる。また溶融鉄(M)が飛び散らないよう入熱を調整する必要がある。溶融鉄(M)がアルミ(2)に差し込むことにより凝固後鉄側表面に引けによる凹みが発生し易い。凝固表面の過度な凹み発生を防ぐためには、入熱は溶接深さ方向だけでなく、凝固時に入熱周辺から溶融鉄(M)量を補充するため、幅方向にも行う必要がある。この幅方向の入熱はキーホール(K)生成に伴って得られる金属蒸気(V)を鉄表面上すなわちキーホール(K)の上方近傍でプラズマ発光させて、ここに発生したプラズマ雲(P)継続的に維持させることが重要となる。   Laser welding conditions that can provide sufficient bonding strength are basically to stably input heat from the iron side at a high energy density, and to allow the molten iron to bite into the aluminum in an appropriate amount in a short time. is there. In order to satisfy this condition, as shown in FIG. 7, first, a laser beam (R) is irradiated from the iron (1) side to perform heat input, and a keyhole (inside the molten iron (M)) ( It is necessary to prevent the metal vapor (V) from being contained in K) and to prevent bumping by the vapor (V). Moreover, it is necessary to adjust heat input so that molten iron (M) does not scatter. When the molten iron (M) is inserted into the aluminum (2), a dent due to shrinkage tends to occur on the iron side surface after solidification. In order to prevent the occurrence of excessive dents on the solidified surface, the heat input needs to be performed not only in the welding depth direction but also in the width direction in order to supplement the amount of molten iron (M) from around the heat input during solidification. The heat input in the width direction causes the metal vapor (V) obtained with the generation of the keyhole (K) to emit plasma on the iron surface, that is, near the upper side of the keyhole (K), and a plasma cloud (P ) It is important to maintain it continuously.

このような状況を達成するための具体的な条件としては、レーザー出力は650〜850W(特に700〜750W)とし、溶接速度は375〜400mm/分とすることが好ましい。   As specific conditions for achieving such a situation, the laser output is preferably 650 to 850 W (particularly 700 to 750 W), and the welding speed is preferably 375 to 400 mm / min.

以下に、実施例として複数の実験例を挙げて本発明の効果を明確にする。
(実施例)
SUS304規格パイプとアルミ棒材、パイプをそれぞれ圧入した状態で、レーザー溶接機(松下溶接システム製YB−L150A8;アルゴンシール、ノズル径5φ)により溶接条件を変化させて接合試験を行った。その結果を表2に示す。No1〜No3は本発明の実施例(No1は前述の実験例と同じ)、No4〜No8は比較例である。SUSパイプは、No1〜5は12φ×1.0t×45L、No6〜7は12φ×1.0t×45Lの寸法のものを用いた。またアルミは、No1〜2は10φ×60L、No3〜5及びNo8は10φ×1.4t×60L,No6は14φ×40L、No7は17.3φ×2.0t×40Lの寸法のものを用いた。
Hereinafter, a plurality of experimental examples will be given as examples to clarify the effects of the present invention.
(Example)
A SUS304 standard pipe, an aluminum bar, and a pipe were press-fitted, and a joining test was performed by changing welding conditions with a laser welding machine (YB-L150A8 manufactured by Matsushita Welding Systems; argon seal, nozzle diameter 5φ). The results are shown in Table 2. No1 to No3 are examples of the present invention (No1 is the same as the above experimental example), and No4 to No8 are comparative examples. As the SUS pipes, No. 1 to No. 5 of 12φ × 1.0t × 45L and No. 6 to 7 of 12φ × 1.0t × 45L were used. In addition, aluminum having a size of 10φ × 60L, No3 to 5 and No8 is 10φ × 1.4t × 60L, No6 is 14φ × 40L, and No7 is 17.3φ × 2.0t × 40L. .

Figure 2006026724
Figure 2006026724

表2から明かなように、本発明の実施例によれば何れも比較例に比べて著しく高い接合強度を有する鉄(SUS)とアルミの接合体が得られており、本発明の優れた効果を実証するものである。   As can be seen from Table 2, according to the examples of the present invention, a bonded body of iron (SUS) and aluminum having a significantly higher bonding strength than the comparative examples is obtained, and the excellent effects of the present invention are obtained. It is to prove.

実験例1におけるステンレスパイプとアルミ棒材のレーザー接合(溶接)の概要を示す斜視図。The perspective view which shows the outline | summary of the laser joining (welding) of the stainless steel pipe and aluminum bar in Experimental example 1. FIG. 実験例1においてレーザー接合された接合部(断面)の顕微鏡(×10)観察結果に基づく模式図。The schematic diagram based on the microscope (x10) observation result of the junction part (cross section) laser-joined in Experimental example 1. FIG. 実験例1においてレーザー接合された接合部(断面)の顕微鏡(×100)観察結果に基づく模式図。The schematic diagram based on the microscope (x100) observation result of the junction part (cross section) laser-joined in Experimental example 1. FIG. 実験例1においてレーザー接合された接合部(断面)の面分析結果を示すAl組成分布図。The Al composition distribution map which shows the surface analysis result of the junction part (cross section) laser-joined in Experimental example 1. FIG. 実験例1においてレーザー接合された接合部(断面)の腺分析結果を示す図。The figure which shows the glandular analysis result of the junction part (cross section) laser-joined in Experimental example 1. FIG. 実験例1においてレーザー接合された接合部(断面)のX線回折図。FIG. 3 is an X-ray diffraction diagram of a bonded portion (cross section) laser-bonded in Experimental Example 1. 本発明におけるレーザー溶接による鉄とアルミの接合時の状態を示す模式図。The schematic diagram which shows the state at the time of joining of iron and aluminum by the laser welding in this invention.

符号の説明Explanation of symbols

1:ステンレスパイプ 2:アルミ棒
A:鉄(ステンレス鋼)再凝固相 B:アルミ再凝固相 C:接合部
a:食込み部 4:レーザー溶接機 5:溶接ビード
R:レーザー光 M:溶融鉄 K:キーホール V:金属蒸気
P:プラズマ雲
1: Stainless steel pipe 2: Aluminum rod A: Iron (stainless steel) resolidification phase B: Aluminum resolidification phase C: Joining part a: Biting part 4: Laser welding machine 5: Welding bead R: Laser beam M: Molten iron K : Keyhole V: Metallic vapor P: Plasma cloud

Claims (6)

鉄系合金部材とアルミニウム系合金部材を溶接により接合した異種金属溶接接合体であって、前記鉄系合金部材と前記アルミニウム系合金部材の溶接接合部が、鉄にアルミニウムが過飽和に固溶した過飽和固溶体相を含む組織からなることを特徴とする鉄系合金部材とアルミニウム系合金部材の異種金属溶接接合体。 A dissimilar metal welded joint obtained by welding an iron-based alloy member and an aluminum-based alloy member by welding, wherein the welded joint between the iron-based alloy member and the aluminum-based alloy member is supersaturated in which aluminum is solid-solved in iron A dissimilar metal welded joint of an iron-based alloy member and an aluminum-based alloy member, characterized by comprising a structure containing a solid solution phase. 前記溶接接合部が急冷凝固組織である請求項1に記載の鉄系合金部材とアルミニウム系合金部材の異種金属溶接接合体。 The dissimilar metal welded joint of an iron-based alloy member and an aluminum-based alloy member according to claim 1, wherein the welded joint has a rapidly solidified structure. 前記溶接接合部が、鉄系合金部材側がアルミニウム系合金部材側に砲弾状に食込んだ境界に形成されたものである請求項1又は2のいずれかに記載の鉄系合金部材とアルミニウム系合金部材の異種金属溶接接合体。 3. The iron-based alloy member and the aluminum-based alloy according to claim 1, wherein the welded joint is formed at a boundary where the iron-based alloy member side bites into the aluminum-based alloy member side in a bullet shape. 4. Dissimilar metal welded joints of members. 前記鉄系合金部材がステンレス鋼であり、前記アルミニウム系合金部材がアルミニウム合金で構成されたものである請求項1〜3のいずれかに記載の鉄系合金部材とアルミニウム系合金部材の異種金属溶接接合体。 The dissimilar metal welding of the iron-based alloy member and the aluminum-based alloy member according to any one of claims 1 to 3, wherein the iron-based alloy member is stainless steel and the aluminum-based alloy member is made of an aluminum alloy. Joined body. 前記溶接接合部がレーザ溶接により形成されたものである請求項1〜4のいずれかに記載の鉄系合金部材とアルミニウム系合金部材の異種金属溶接接合体。 5. The dissimilar metal welded joint of an iron-based alloy member and an aluminum-based alloy member according to any one of claims 1 to 4, wherein the welded joint is formed by laser welding. 前記レーザ溶接が前記鉄系合金部材側からの入熱を行うものである請求項5に記載の鉄系合金部材とアルミニウム系合金部材の異種金属溶接接合体。






The dissimilar metal welded joint of an iron-based alloy member and an aluminum-based alloy member according to claim 5, wherein the laser welding performs heat input from the iron-based alloy member side.






JP2004213426A 2004-07-21 2004-07-21 Method of joining an iron-based alloy member and an aluminum-based alloy member Expired - Fee Related JP4178134B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2004213426A JP4178134B2 (en) 2004-07-21 2004-07-21 Method of joining an iron-based alloy member and an aluminum-based alloy member

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2004213426A JP4178134B2 (en) 2004-07-21 2004-07-21 Method of joining an iron-based alloy member and an aluminum-based alloy member

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2006026724A true JP2006026724A (en) 2006-02-02
JP4178134B2 JP4178134B2 (en) 2008-11-12

Family

ID=35893674

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2004213426A Expired - Fee Related JP4178134B2 (en) 2004-07-21 2004-07-21 Method of joining an iron-based alloy member and an aluminum-based alloy member

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP4178134B2 (en)

Cited By (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2006320953A (en) * 2005-05-20 2006-11-30 Nichirin Co Ltd Body joined by welding dissimilar metal members made of ferrous alloy and aluminum alloy
WO2014020426A3 (en) * 2012-08-03 2014-03-27 Lincoln Global, Inc. Method of joining pipes using a first heat source creating a keyhole; joint system comprising two pipes
CN106271069A (en) * 2016-08-31 2017-01-04 武汉华工激光工程有限责任公司 A kind of rustless steel and the method for laser welding of aluminium alloy
CN106735894A (en) * 2016-12-13 2017-05-31 大族激光科技产业集团股份有限公司 A kind of dissimilar metal micro-bonding method
CN109079324A (en) * 2018-09-30 2018-12-25 大族激光科技产业集团股份有限公司 The method for laser welding of copper-nickel alloy
US10464168B2 (en) 2014-01-24 2019-11-05 Lincoln Global, Inc. Method and system for additive manufacturing using high energy source and hot-wire
US11027362B2 (en) 2017-12-19 2021-06-08 Lincoln Global, Inc. Systems and methods providing location feedback for additive manufacturing
JP7473615B2 (en) 2019-06-28 2024-04-23 株式会社神戸製鋼所 Method for joining dissimilar materials using a joining device for tubular members and method for manufacturing a tubular member with an auxiliary member for joining dissimilar materials

Cited By (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2006320953A (en) * 2005-05-20 2006-11-30 Nichirin Co Ltd Body joined by welding dissimilar metal members made of ferrous alloy and aluminum alloy
WO2014020426A3 (en) * 2012-08-03 2014-03-27 Lincoln Global, Inc. Method of joining pipes using a first heat source creating a keyhole; joint system comprising two pipes
US9683682B2 (en) 2012-08-03 2017-06-20 Lincoln Global, Inc. Methods and systems of joining pipes
US10464168B2 (en) 2014-01-24 2019-11-05 Lincoln Global, Inc. Method and system for additive manufacturing using high energy source and hot-wire
CN106271069A (en) * 2016-08-31 2017-01-04 武汉华工激光工程有限责任公司 A kind of rustless steel and the method for laser welding of aluminium alloy
CN106735894A (en) * 2016-12-13 2017-05-31 大族激光科技产业集团股份有限公司 A kind of dissimilar metal micro-bonding method
CN106735894B (en) * 2016-12-13 2018-12-28 大族激光科技产业集团股份有限公司 A kind of dissimilar metal micro-bonding method
US11027362B2 (en) 2017-12-19 2021-06-08 Lincoln Global, Inc. Systems and methods providing location feedback for additive manufacturing
CN109079324A (en) * 2018-09-30 2018-12-25 大族激光科技产业集团股份有限公司 The method for laser welding of copper-nickel alloy
JP7473615B2 (en) 2019-06-28 2024-04-23 株式会社神戸製鋼所 Method for joining dissimilar materials using a joining device for tubular members and method for manufacturing a tubular member with an auxiliary member for joining dissimilar materials

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP4178134B2 (en) 2008-11-12

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US20070119908A1 (en) Titanium-Aluminide Turbine Wheel and Shaft Assembly
Chen et al. Microstructures and mechanical properties of laser penetration welding joint with/without Ni-foil in an overlap steel-on-aluminum configuration
Zhang et al. Interfacial phenomena of cold metal transfer (CMT) welding of zinc coated steel and wrought aluminium
WO2018042679A1 (en) Arc-spot welding method for joining different materials, joining auxiliary member, and different materials welding joint
Zhang et al. Research and development of welding methods and welding mechanism of high-entropy alloys: A review
Zhang et al. The mechanical properties and interface bonding mechanism of Molybdenum/SUS304L by laser beam welding with nickel interlayer
JP2018051570A (en) Dissimilar material jointing spot welding method, joint auxiliary member, and dissimilar material welding coupling
Winiczenko et al. Friction welding of ductile cast iron using interlayers
Song et al. Effect of laser-GTAW hybrid welding heat input on the performance of Mg/Steel butt joint
JP4178134B2 (en) Method of joining an iron-based alloy member and an aluminum-based alloy member
JP5098792B2 (en) Dissimilar metal joining method of magnesium alloy and steel
Kotadia et al. Challenges and opportunities in remote laser welding of steel to aluminium
Giri et al. Joining of titanium and stainless steel by using different welding processes: A review
Shan et al. Dissimilar joining of AZ31B magnesium alloy and pure copper via thermo-compensated resistance spot welding
JP2006021249A (en) Bonded joint of dissimilar materials composed of iron-based material and aluminum-based material, and bonding method by welding
Chu et al. Structure-Property correlation in weld metals and interface regions of titanium/steel dissimilar joints
Li et al. Joining technologies for aluminium castings—A review
JP2016121385A (en) Aluminum alloy sheet for case and case
Ogura et al. Microstructure and mechanical properties in laser brazing of A5052/AZ31 dissimilar alloys
JP2017080791A (en) Weld conjugant of ferrous metal/aluminum-based metal, and method for production thereof
JP6153744B2 (en) Manufacturing method of welded joint
Kurabayashi et al. Dissimilar Joining of Immiscible Fe–Mg using Solid Metal Dealloying
JP2006320954A (en) Body joined by welding dissimilar metal members made of ferrous alloy and aluminum alloy
JP6426883B2 (en) Method of manufacturing joined body excellent in corrosion resistance
Fan et al. Influence of shoulder diameter on interfacial microstructure and mechanical behavior in dieless friction stir riveting of CP-Copper to 321 stainless steel

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20070419

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20070424

A521 Written amendment

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20070620

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20080422

A521 Written amendment

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20080425

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20080603

A521 Written amendment

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20080605

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20080819

A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20080825

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20170829

Year of fee payment: 9

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20170829

Year of fee payment: 9

LAPS Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees