JP2005252700A - Method for determining acceptance/rejection of antenna installation - Google Patents

Method for determining acceptance/rejection of antenna installation Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP2005252700A
JP2005252700A JP2004060970A JP2004060970A JP2005252700A JP 2005252700 A JP2005252700 A JP 2005252700A JP 2004060970 A JP2004060970 A JP 2004060970A JP 2004060970 A JP2004060970 A JP 2004060970A JP 2005252700 A JP2005252700 A JP 2005252700A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
radio wave
antenna
value
radio
field intensity
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
JP2004060970A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP4014572B2 (en
Inventor
Seiji Kawanishi
清司 川西
Yasuro Kondo
靖郎 近藤
Tadaaki Chiba
忠昭 千葉
Shigeyoshi Nakamura
成良 中村
Noriyoshi Sasaki
規能 佐々木
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Hitachi Building Systems Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Hitachi Building Systems Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Hitachi Building Systems Co Ltd filed Critical Hitachi Building Systems Co Ltd
Priority to JP2004060970A priority Critical patent/JP4014572B2/en
Publication of JP2005252700A publication Critical patent/JP2005252700A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP4014572B2 publication Critical patent/JP4014572B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Landscapes

  • Monitoring And Testing Of Transmission In General (AREA)

Abstract

<P>PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide an antenna installation acceptance/rejection determining method that is convenient to determine the installation place of an antenna. <P>SOLUTION: This antenna installation acceptance/rejection determining method comprises a first process S2 in which a radio measuring instrument measures the radio intensity of radios from one and the same base station by the number of specified times or more or for specified hours or more to obtain a radio intensity measured value; a second process S3 for determining whether the radio intensity measured value obtained in the first process S2 is always equal to or greater than a performance limit determination value; a third process S4 for calculating an average value of radio intensity measured values obtained in the first process S2; and a fourth process S6 for determining whether the average value obtained in the third process S4 is equal to or greater than an average determination value, and determines that an antenna can be installed when the radio intensity measured value is determined to be always equal or greater than the performance limit determination value in the second process S3 and when the average value of the radio intensity measured values is determined to be equal to or greater than the average determination value in the fourth process S6. <P>COPYRIGHT: (C)2005,JPO&NCIPI

Description

本発明は、無線通信網を利用したビル設備監視に使用する無線装置のアンテナの設置場所を決めるのに便利なアンテナ設置可否判定方法に関するものである。   The present invention relates to an antenna installation feasibility determination method that is convenient for determining an installation location of an antenna of a wireless device used for building facility monitoring using a wireless communication network.

従来、エレベーターなどのビル設備を監視するためのビル設備遠隔監視システムとしては、ビル内のビル設備を監視するビル監視装置とこのビル監視装置の設置場所から離れた場所にある遠隔監視センターとの間で、無線装置により、監視情報信号の送受信を可能にする無線通信網を備えるようにしたものが知られていた(例えば、特許文献1参照)。
特開2002−20049号公報(段落番号0007〜段落番号0011、図1)
Conventionally, as a building equipment remote monitoring system for monitoring building equipment such as an elevator, a building monitoring apparatus for monitoring the building equipment in the building and a remote monitoring center located at a location away from the installation location of the building monitoring apparatus are used. In the meantime, there has been known a wireless device provided with a wireless communication network that enables transmission and reception of monitoring information signals (see, for example, Patent Document 1).
Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 2002-20049 (paragraph number 0007 to paragraph number 0011, FIG. 1)

しかしながら、上述したビル設備遠隔監視システムは、都心では、乱立する高層ビルや高架橋上を通行するトラックなどの影響を受け、フェージング現象が発生してしまうために、無線装置と遠隔監視センターとの各種信号の送受信を高品質で行うことができなくなるので、無線装置のアンテナの設置場所をどこに決めるかはきわめて重要な問題である。また、無線装置のアンテナの設置場所を一旦決めてその場所に無線装置のアンテナを取り付けた後に、無線装置と遠隔監視センターとの各種信号の送受信が高品質で行われないことがわかって、無線装置のアンテナの取り付け作業をやり直すことになれば、工事費等が増大してしまう問題がある。   However, in the city center, the above-mentioned remote monitoring system for building facilities is affected by turbulent high-rise buildings and trucks passing over the viaduct, and fading phenomenon occurs. Since it becomes impossible to perform signal transmission / reception with high quality, it is an extremely important issue where the antenna installation location is determined. In addition, once the installation location of the antenna of the wireless device is determined and the antenna of the wireless device is attached to that location, it is understood that transmission and reception of various signals between the wireless device and the remote monitoring center is not performed with high quality. If it is necessary to redo the work of attaching the antenna of the apparatus, there is a problem that the construction cost increases.

本発明は、上述した問題点に鑑みて、なされたもので、その目的は、アンテナを設置する際、各種信号の送受信を高品質で行われる設置場所を決めるのに便利なアンテナ設置可否判定方法を提供するにある。   The present invention has been made in view of the above-described problems, and an object of the present invention is to determine an antenna installation availability determination method that is convenient for deciding an installation location where various signals are transmitted and received with high quality when an antenna is installed. To provide.

上記目的は、ビル設備の故障を監視する監視装置に接続した無線装置のアンテナが受信する電波の電波強度を、電波測定器にて測定してアンテナの設置可否を判定するアンテナ設置可否判定方法において、同一基地局からの電波につき、その電波強度を、前記電波測定器により規定回数以上若しくは規定時間以上測定して電波強度測定値を得る第1の工程と、前記第1の工程で得られた電波強度測定値と性能限界判定値と比較して前記電波強度測定値が常に性能限界判定値以上であるか否かを判定する第2の工程と、前記第1の工程で得られた電波強度測定値の平均値を算出する第3の工程と、前記第3の工程で得られた平均値が平均判定値以上であるか否かを判定する第4の工程とを少なくとも備え、前記第2の工程にて前記電波強度測定値が常に性能限界判定値以上であると判定されて、かつ、前記第4の工程にて前記電波強度測定値の平均値が平均判定値以上であると判定されたときに、アンテナが設置可能であると判定すると共に、前記第2の工程にて前記電波強度測定値が常に性能限界判定値以上でないと判定されたとき若しくは前記第4の工程にて前記電波強度測定値の平均値が平均判定値以上でないと判定されたときに、アンテナが設置不可であると判定するようにすることにより、達成できる。   An object of the present invention is to provide an antenna installation propriety determination method for determining whether an antenna can be installed by measuring the radio field intensity of a radio wave received by an antenna of a wireless device connected to a monitoring device that monitors a building equipment failure. The first step of obtaining the radio field intensity measurement value by measuring the radio field intensity of the radio wave from the same base station by the radio wave measuring instrument more than a specified number of times or more than a specified time was obtained in the first step. A second step of determining whether or not the radio field intensity measurement value is always equal to or greater than the performance limit determination value by comparing the radio field intensity measurement value and the performance limit determination value; and the radio field intensity obtained in the first step At least a third step of calculating an average value of the measured values and a fourth step of determining whether or not the average value obtained in the third step is equal to or greater than an average determination value. Radio wave intensity measurement in the process of Is always determined to be equal to or greater than the performance limit determination value, and the antenna can be installed when it is determined in the fourth step that the average value of the radio wave intensity measurement values is equal to or greater than the average determination value. When it is determined that the radio field intensity measurement value is not always equal to or greater than the performance limit determination value in the second step, or the average value of the radio field intensity measurement value is determined to be an average determination in the fourth step. This can be achieved by determining that the antenna cannot be installed when it is determined that the value is not greater than or equal to the value.

本発明によれば、各種信号の送受信を高品質で行われるアンテナの設置場所を、難なく即座に判定でき、アンテナの取り付け作業を効率よく行うことを可能にすると共に、アンテナの取り付け作業のやり直しを防止することを可能にするアンテナ設置可否判定方法を提供できる。   ADVANTAGE OF THE INVENTION According to this invention, the installation location of the antenna which performs transmission / reception of various signals with high quality can be determined immediately without difficulty, and it is possible to perform the antenna installation work efficiently and to perform the antenna installation work again. It is possible to provide a method for determining whether or not an antenna can be installed.

以下、本発明に係るアンテナ設置可否判定方法の一実施形態を図面に基づいて説明する。図1は、本発明の一実施形態を示す電波測定器による電波強度測定状態図である。図2は、本発明の一実施形態を示す電波測定器の外観斜視図である。図3は、本発明の一実施形態を示す電波測定器のパーソナルコンピューター部に測定内容表示欄が表示された状態の画面図である。図4は、本発明の一実施形態を示す電波強度の測定チャートである。図5は、本発明の一実施形態に係わるアンテナ設置可否判定の手順を示すフローチャートである。   Hereinafter, an embodiment of a method for determining availability of an antenna according to the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings. FIG. 1 is a state diagram of radio wave intensity measurement by a radio wave measuring instrument showing an embodiment of the present invention. FIG. 2 is an external perspective view of a radio wave measuring instrument showing an embodiment of the present invention. FIG. 3 is a screen view showing a state in which a measurement content display column is displayed on the personal computer unit of the radio wave measuring instrument showing an embodiment of the present invention. FIG. 4 is a radio wave intensity measurement chart showing an embodiment of the present invention. FIG. 5 is a flowchart showing a procedure for determining whether or not to install an antenna according to an embodiment of the present invention.

図1において、ビル設備の故障を監視する監視装置(図示せず)を設けたビル1には、そのビル1の屋上に電波測定器2が設置される。ビル1を建てた地域には、電波を発信する基地局3、4、5が複数個建設されている。基地局3は、図1に示すように、他の基地局4、5に比べて、ビル1に最も近く、しかも、その基地局3からビル1に向う電波F1を遮るものがない位置に建設されている。基地局4は、その基地局4とビル1との間に高架橋6が設けられており、その高架橋6上を大型トラック7が通行した場合に基地局4からビル1に向う電波F2が遮られる位置に建設されている。基地局5は、他の基地局3、4に比べて、ビル1から最も遠く、しかも、その基地局5からビル1に向う電波F3を遮るものがない位置に建設されている。   In FIG. 1, in a building 1 provided with a monitoring device (not shown) for monitoring a failure of a building facility, a radio wave measuring device 2 is installed on the roof of the building 1. In the area where the building 1 is built, a plurality of base stations 3, 4, and 5 that transmit radio waves are constructed. As shown in FIG. 1, the base station 3 is located closer to the building 1 than the other base stations 4 and 5, and is constructed at a position that does not block the radio wave F1 from the base station 3 toward the building 1. Has been. In the base station 4, a viaduct 6 is provided between the base station 4 and the building 1. When a large truck 7 passes on the viaduct 6, the radio wave F <b> 2 from the base station 4 toward the building 1 is blocked. Built in position. The base station 5 is constructed farther away from the building 1 than the other base stations 3 and 4, and at a position that does not block the radio wave F <b> 3 from the base station 5 toward the building 1.

ビル1の監視装置に接続した無線装置のアンテナを、ビル1の屋上などに設置する場合には、アンテナを設置する前に、アンテナを設置する場所における、複数個の基地局3、4、5から発信されるそれぞれの電波につき、電波強度を、電波測定器2にて測定する。ビル1の監視装置に接続した無線装置とビル1から遠く離れた遠隔監視センターとの各種信号の送受信は、複数個の基地局3、4、5を含む無線通信網を利用して行われる。その場合の無線通信網は、PHS電話網、携帯電話網、無線LAN網などから選択するようにしている。   When the antenna of the wireless device connected to the monitoring device of the building 1 is installed on the roof of the building 1 or the like, before installing the antenna, a plurality of base stations 3, 4, 5 at the place where the antenna is installed. The radio wave intensity is measured by the radio wave measuring device 2 for each radio wave transmitted from the radio wave. Various signals are transmitted and received between the wireless device connected to the monitoring device of the building 1 and the remote monitoring center far away from the building 1 using a wireless communication network including a plurality of base stations 3, 4, and 5. In this case, the wireless communication network is selected from a PHS telephone network, a mobile phone network, a wireless LAN network, and the like.

電波測定器2は、図2に示すように、電波測定部8とパーソナルコンピューター部9(以下、パソコン部9と称する)とを少なくとも備えている。電波測定部8は、電波の電波強度を測定した各種データをパソコン部9に送信する機能を有している。パソコン部9は、電波測定部8から送信されてきた各種データを基に、演算その他の処理をして、そのパソコン部9の表示画面9Aに、測定内容表示欄10を表示する機能を有している。測定内容表示欄10は、図3に示すように、電波強度の測定状況表示欄10A、電波強度の測定結果表示欄10B及びアンテナ設置可否の判定結果表示欄10Cから構成されている。パソコン部9には、そのパソコン部9の表示画面9Aの下部に測定開始釦11が表示される。   As shown in FIG. 2, the radio wave measuring instrument 2 includes at least a radio wave measuring unit 8 and a personal computer unit 9 (hereinafter referred to as a personal computer unit 9). The radio wave measuring unit 8 has a function of transmitting various data obtained by measuring the radio wave intensity of the radio wave to the personal computer unit 9. The personal computer unit 9 has a function of performing a calculation and other processing based on various data transmitted from the radio wave measuring unit 8 and displaying a measurement content display column 10 on the display screen 9A of the personal computer unit 9. ing. As shown in FIG. 3, the measurement content display column 10 includes a radio wave intensity measurement status display column 10A, a radio wave intensity measurement result display column 10B, and an antenna installation availability determination result display column 10C. In the personal computer unit 9, a measurement start button 11 is displayed at the bottom of the display screen 9 </ b> A of the personal computer unit 9.

パソコン部9の表示画面9Aに表示される電波強度の測定状況表示欄10Aは、図3に示すように、基地局を表わす番号を縦に複数個並べ、それら番号の横に該当する基地局の電波強度測定値をそれぞれ表示するようにしている。電波強度の測定結果表示欄10Bは、図3に示すように、基地局を表わす番号を縦に複数個並べ、それら番号の横に該当する基地局の平均値をそれぞれ表示すると共に、電波強度測定値の平均値が平均判定値以上である基地局の数(合格最大局数)も表示するようにしている。アンテナ設置可否の判定結果表示欄10Cは、アンテナが設置可能であると判定されるとその旨の表示、例えば、「使用可能」と表示され、かつ、アンテナが設置不可であると判定するとその旨の表示、例えば、「使用不可」と表示されるようにしてある。   As shown in FIG. 3, the radio field intensity measurement status display column 10A displayed on the display screen 9A of the personal computer unit 9 is arranged with a plurality of numbers representing base stations in the vertical direction, Each radio field strength measurement value is displayed. As shown in FIG. 3, the radio field intensity measurement result display column 10B has a plurality of numbers representing base stations arranged vertically, and the average value of the corresponding base station is displayed next to the numbers, and the radio field intensity measurement. The number of base stations whose average value is equal to or greater than the average judgment value (the maximum number of accepted stations) is also displayed. When it is determined that the antenna can be installed, the determination result display field 10C indicates that the antenna can be installed, for example, “usable” is displayed, and if it is determined that the antenna cannot be installed, that fact is displayed. For example, “unusable” is displayed.

図4に示す電波強度の測定チャートは、図1に示す基地局3、4、5から発信される電波F1、F2、F3の電波強度を測定したものであり、グラフG1は、基地局3から発信される電波F1の電波強度測定値を、グラフG2は、基地局4から発信される電波F2の電波強度測定値を、グラフG3は、基地局5から発信される電波F3の電波強度測定値を、それぞれ表している。   The radio field intensity measurement chart shown in FIG. 4 is obtained by measuring the radio field intensity of radio waves F1, F2, and F3 transmitted from the base stations 3, 4, and 5 shown in FIG. The radio field intensity measurement value of the radio wave F1 transmitted, the graph G2 represents the radio field intensity measurement value of the radio wave F2 transmitted from the base station 4, and the graph G3 represents the radio field intensity measurement value of the radio wave F3 transmitted from the base station 5. Respectively.

基地局3から発信される電波F1の電波強度は、図4のグラフG1に示すように、電波強度測定値が常に性能限界判定値D1以上であり、しかも、電波強度測定値の平均値が平均判定値D2以上であることがわかる。基地局4から発信される電波F2の電波強度は、図4のグラフG2に示すように、通常は電波強度測定値の平均値が平均判定値D2以上であって電波強度測定値が性能限界判定値D1以上であるが、高架橋6上を大型トラック7が通行した時間帯では電波強度測定値が性能限界判定値D1よりも小さくなることがわかる。基地局5から発信される電波F3の電波強度は、図4のグラフG3に示すように、電波強度測定値が常に性能限界判定値D1以上であるが、電波強度測定値の平均値が平均判定値D2より常に小さいことがわかる。ここで、性能限界判定値D1とは、無線装置の受信性能限界値をいう。平均判定値D2とは、ビル1の監視装置に接続した無線装置とビル1から遠く離れた遠隔監視センターとの各種信号の送受信を高品質で行うことを可能にする電波強度の平均値をいう。   As shown in the graph G1 of FIG. 4, the radio field intensity of the radio wave F1 transmitted from the base station 3 is always equal to or greater than the performance limit determination value D1, and the average value of the radio field intensity measurements is an average. It turns out that it is more than judgment value D2. As shown in the graph G2 in FIG. 4, the radio field intensity of the radio wave F2 transmitted from the base station 4 is normally the average value of the radio field intensity measurement value is equal to or greater than the average judgment value D2, and the radio field intensity measurement value is the performance limit judgment. Although it is equal to or greater than the value D1, it can be seen that the radio field intensity measurement value is smaller than the performance limit judgment value D1 in the time zone when the large truck 7 passes on the viaduct 6. As shown in the graph G3 of FIG. 4, the radio field intensity of the radio wave F3 transmitted from the base station 5 is always equal to or greater than the performance limit judgment value D1, but the average value of the radio field intensity measurement values is the average judgment. It can be seen that it is always smaller than the value D2. Here, the performance limit determination value D1 refers to the reception performance limit value of the wireless device. The average determination value D2 is an average value of radio field intensity that enables transmission and reception of various signals between a wireless device connected to the monitoring device of the building 1 and a remote monitoring center far from the building 1 with high quality. .

次に、上記構成の電波測定器2を用いたアンテナ設置可否判定の手順を、図5に基づいて、詳説する。     Next, the procedure for determining whether an antenna can be installed using the radio wave measuring instrument 2 having the above-described configuration will be described in detail with reference to FIG.

まず、始めに、アンテナを設置しようとする場所に電波測定器2を設置し、その後、図5の工程S1に示すように、電波強度の測定を開始するか否かを判断して、開始する場合には、図5の工程S2に進む。   First, the radio wave measuring device 2 is installed at a place where an antenna is to be installed, and then, as shown in step S1 of FIG. In that case, the process proceeds to step S2 in FIG.

図5の工程S2(第1の工程)では、電波測定器2のパソコン部9における表示画面9A上の測定開始釦11をクリックすることで、電波測定器2の電波測定部8を作動させて、その電波測定部8に基地局3、4、5から発信されてくる電波F1、F2、F3の電波強度を測定すると共に、電波測定器2のパソコン部9における表示画面9Aの電波強度の測定状況表示欄10Aに、測定状況を、表示する(図3参照)。工程S2が終了後、図5の工程S3に進む。   In step S2 (first step) of FIG. 5, by clicking the measurement start button 11 on the display screen 9A in the personal computer unit 9 of the radio wave measuring device 2, the radio wave measuring unit 8 of the radio wave measuring device 2 is operated. The radio field intensity of the radio waves F1, F2, and F3 transmitted from the base stations 3, 4, and 5 to the radio wave measuring unit 8 is measured, and the radio field intensity of the display screen 9A in the personal computer unit 9 of the radio wave measuring instrument 2 is measured. The measurement status is displayed in the status display column 10A (see FIG. 3). After step S2 ends, the process proceeds to step S3 in FIG.

次いで、図5の工程S3(第2の工程)では、工程S2(第1の工程)で得られた電波強度測定値と性能限界判定値D1と比較して電波強度測定値が常に性能限界判定値D1以上であるか否かを、電波測定器2のパソコン部9で判定する。そして、電波強度測定値が常に性能限界判定値D1以上でないと判定されたときには、図5の工程S9及び工程S10と進み、電波測定器2のパソコン部9における表示画面9Aのアンテナ設置可否の判定結果表示欄10Cに、「使用不可」と表示して、アンテナを設置する場所としては、不適切であることを知らしめる。また、図5の工程S3(第2の工程)において、電波強度測定値が常に性能限界判定値D1以上であると判定されたときには、図5の工程S4に進む。   Next, in step S3 (second step) in FIG. 5, the radio field intensity measurement value is always a performance limit determination compared to the radio field intensity measurement value obtained in step S2 (first step) and the performance limit determination value D1. Whether or not the value is greater than or equal to the value D1 is determined by the personal computer unit 9 of the radio wave measuring instrument 2. When it is determined that the radio field intensity measurement value is not always greater than or equal to the performance limit determination value D1, the process proceeds to step S9 and step S10 in FIG. “Unusable” is displayed in the result display column 10C to inform the user that the antenna is not suitable for installation. If it is determined in step S3 (second step) in FIG. 5 that the radio field intensity measurement value is always greater than or equal to the performance limit determination value D1, the process proceeds to step S4 in FIG.

次いで、図5の工程S4(第3の工程)では、電波測定器2のパソコン部9にて、電波強度測定値の平均値を算出した後、図5の工程S5に進む。工程S5においては、電波強度の測定が連続して規定時間または規定回数行われないと、電波強度の異常変動を捉えることができないので、電波強度の測定が連続して規定時間または規定回数行われたか否かを、電波測定器2のパソコン部9で判定する。そして、工程S5において、電波強度の測定が規定時間または規定回数行われていないと判定された場合には、工程S2(第1の工程)に戻って、規定時間または規定回数に達するまで、工程S2(第1の工程)から工程S5を繰り返し実行する。   Next, in step S4 (third step) in FIG. 5, after the average value of the radio field intensity measurement values is calculated by the personal computer unit 9 of the radio wave measuring instrument 2, the process proceeds to step S5 in FIG. In step S5, if the measurement of the radio field intensity is not continuously performed for the specified time or the specified number of times, the abnormal fluctuation of the radio field intensity cannot be captured. Therefore, the measurement of the radio field intensity is continuously performed for the specified time or the specified number of times. The personal computer unit 9 of the radio wave measuring instrument 2 determines whether or not If it is determined in step S5 that the measurement of the radio field intensity has not been performed for the specified time or the specified number of times, the process returns to step S2 (first step) until the specified time or the specified number of times is reached. Step S2 (first step) to step S5 are repeated.

図5の工程S5において、電波強度の測定が規定時間または規定回数行われたと判定された場合には、図5の工程S6(第4の工程)に進み、工程S4(第3の工程)で得られた平均値が平均判定値D2以上であるか否かを、電波測定器2のパソコン部9で判定する。工程S6(第4の工程)において、算出した平均値が平均判定値D2以上でないと判定された場合には、図5の工程S9及び工程S10と進み、電波測定器2のパソコン部9における表示画面9Aのアンテナ設置可否の判定結果表示欄10Cに、「使用不可」と表示して、アンテナを設置する場所としては、不適切であることを、自動的に知らしめる。図5の工程S9では、工程S4(第3の工程)で得られた平均値及び該当の基地局番号を、電波強度の測定結果表示欄10Bに表示する。   If it is determined in step S5 in FIG. 5 that the measurement of the radio field intensity has been performed for a specified time or a specified number of times, the process proceeds to step S6 (fourth process) in FIG. 5 and in step S4 (third process). The personal computer unit 9 of the radio wave measuring device 2 determines whether or not the obtained average value is equal to or greater than the average determination value D2. If it is determined in step S6 (fourth step) that the calculated average value is not equal to or greater than the average determination value D2, the process proceeds to step S9 and step S10 in FIG. “Unusable” is displayed in the determination result display field 10C of whether or not the antenna can be installed on the screen 9A, and it is automatically notified that the antenna is not suitable for installation. In step S9 of FIG. 5, the average value obtained in step S4 (third step) and the corresponding base station number are displayed in the radio field intensity measurement result display column 10B.

図5の工程S6(第4の工程)において、算出した平均値が平均判定値D2以上であると判定された場合には、図5の工程S7に進み、工程S4(第3の工程)で得られた平均値及び該当の基地局番号を、電波強度の測定結果表示欄10Bに表示した後、図5の工程S8に進む。   When it is determined in step S6 (fourth step) in FIG. 5 that the calculated average value is equal to or greater than the average determination value D2, the process proceeds to step S7 in FIG. 5 and in step S4 (third step). After the obtained average value and the corresponding base station number are displayed in the radio wave intensity measurement result display column 10B, the process proceeds to step S8 in FIG.

次いで、図5の工程S8では、電波測定器2のパソコン部9における表示画面9Aのアンテナ設置可否の判定結果表示欄10Cに、「使用可能」と表示して、アンテナを設置する場所としては、適切であることを、自動的に知らしめる。   Next, in step S8 of FIG. 5, "Available" is displayed in the determination result display column 10C of the antenna installation feasibility on the display screen 9A of the personal computer unit 9 of the radio wave measuring instrument 2, and the place where the antenna is installed is Automatically inform you that it is appropriate.

上記構成の電波測定器2を用いた上記手順で、 図1に示す基地局3、4、5から発信される電波F1、F2、F3につき、アンテナ設置可否の判定を行うと、次のようになる。   In the above procedure using the radio wave measuring instrument 2 configured as described above, whether or not an antenna is installed is determined for the radio waves F1, F2, and F3 transmitted from the base stations 3, 4, and 5 shown in FIG. Become.

まず、基地局3から発信される電波F1は、図4のグラフG1に示すように、電波強度測定値が常に性能限界判定値D1以上であるので、図5の工程S3から工程S4に進み、電波強度測定値の平均値が算出される。その後、工程S5に進んで、電波強度の測定が規定時間または規定回数行われたと判定されれば、さらに、工程S6に進む。電波F1の電波強度測定値の平均値は、図4のグラフG1に示すように、平均判定値D2以上であるので、図5の工程S7に進んで、工程S4(第3の工程)で得られた平均値及び該当の基地局番号が、パソコン部9における表示画面9Aの測定結果表示欄10Bに表示され、その後、図5の工程S8に進み、電波測定器2のパソコン部9における表示画面9Aのアンテナ設置可否の判定結果表示欄10Cに、「使用可能」が表示される。これにより、基地局3から発信される電波F1の電波強度を測定するために電波測定器2を設置した場所が、アンテナの設置場所として「可」であることを、パソコン部9における表示画面9A上で、容易に確認することができる。   First, as shown in the graph G1 of FIG. 4, the radio wave F1 transmitted from the base station 3 always proceeds from step S3 to step S4 in FIG. An average value of the radio field intensity measurement values is calculated. Thereafter, the process proceeds to step S5, and if it is determined that the measurement of the radio field intensity has been performed for the specified time or the specified number of times, the process further proceeds to step S6. Since the average value of the radio field intensity measurement values of the radio wave F1 is equal to or greater than the average judgment value D2, as shown in the graph G1 in FIG. 4, the process proceeds to step S7 in FIG. 5 and obtained in step S4 (third step). The average value and the corresponding base station number are displayed in the measurement result display column 10B of the display screen 9A in the personal computer unit 9, and then the process proceeds to step S8 in FIG. “Available” is displayed in the determination result display column 10 </ b> C of whether or not the antenna installation of 9 </ b> A is possible. Thereby, the display screen 9A on the personal computer unit 9 indicates that the place where the radio wave measuring device 2 is installed to measure the radio field intensity of the radio wave F1 transmitted from the base station 3 is “possible” as the antenna installation location. Above, it can be easily confirmed.

次に、基地局4から発信される電波F2は、図4のグラフG2に示すように、
測定開始後、約30秒経過した時点で、電波強度測定値が性能限界判定値D1より小さくなるため、図5の工程S3から工程S9に進み、工程S4(第3の工程)で得られた平均値及び該当の基地局番号が、電波強度の測定結果表示欄10Bに表示され、その後、図5の工程S10と進み、電波測定器2のパソコン部9における表示画面9Aのアンテナ設置可否の判定結果表示欄10Cに、「使用不可」が表示される。これにより、基地局4から発信される電波F2の電波強度を測定するために電波測定器2を設置した場所が、アンテナの設置場所として「否」であることを、パソコン部9における表示画面9A上で確認することができる。
Next, as shown in the graph G2 in FIG.
Since about 30 seconds have elapsed after the start of measurement, the radio field intensity measurement value becomes smaller than the performance limit judgment value D1, so the process proceeds from step S3 to step S9 in FIG. 5 and obtained in step S4 (third step). The average value and the corresponding base station number are displayed in the radio field intensity measurement result display field 10B, and then the process proceeds to step S10 in FIG. 5 to determine whether the antenna on the display screen 9A of the personal computer unit 9 of the radio wave measuring instrument 2 can be installed. “Unusable” is displayed in the result display column 10C. Accordingly, the display screen 9A on the personal computer unit 9 indicates that the place where the radio wave measuring device 2 is installed to measure the radio field intensity of the radio wave F2 transmitted from the base station 4 is “No” as the antenna installation location. You can check above.

次に、基地局5から発信される電波F3は、図4のグラフG3に示すように、電波強度測定値が常に性能限界判定値D1以上であるので、図5の工程S3から工程S4に進み、電波強度測定値の平均値が算出される。その後、工程S5に進んで、電波強度の測定が規定時間または規定回数行われたと判定されれば、さらに、工程S6に進む。電波F3の電波強度測定値の平均値は、図4のグラフG3に示すように、平均判定値D2よりも小さいので、図5の工程S6から工程S9に進み、工程S4(第3の工程)で得られた平均値及び該当の基地局番号が、電波強度の測定結果表示欄10Bに表示され、その後、図5の工程S10と進み、電波測定器2のパソコン部9における表示画面9Aのアンテナ設置可否の判定結果表示欄10Cに、「使用不可」が表示される。これにより、基地局5から発信される電波F3の電波強度を測定するために電波測定器2を設置した場所が、アンテナの設置場所として「否」であることを、パソコン部9における表示画面9A上で確認することができる。   Next, as shown in the graph G3 in FIG. 4, the radio wave F3 transmitted from the base station 5 always has a radio field intensity measurement value equal to or greater than the performance limit determination value D1, and thus the process proceeds from step S3 to step S4 in FIG. Then, an average value of the radio field intensity measurement values is calculated. Thereafter, the process proceeds to step S5, and if it is determined that the measurement of the radio field intensity has been performed for the specified time or the specified number of times, the process further proceeds to step S6. Since the average value of the radio field intensity measurement value of the radio wave F3 is smaller than the average judgment value D2, as shown in the graph G3 of FIG. 4, the process proceeds from step S6 to step S9 in FIG. 5, and step S4 (third step). And the corresponding base station number are displayed in the radio field intensity measurement result display column 10B. Thereafter, the process proceeds to step S10 in FIG. 5 and the antenna of the display screen 9A in the personal computer unit 9 of the radio wave measuring instrument 2 is displayed. “Unusable” is displayed in the determination result display column 10C of whether or not installation is possible. Accordingly, the display screen 9A on the personal computer unit 9 indicates that the place where the radio wave measuring device 2 is installed to measure the radio field intensity of the radio wave F3 transmitted from the base station 5 is “No” as the antenna installation location. You can check above.

以上のように、電波測定器2が受信する電波F1、F2、F3のすべてにつき、電波測定器2により、電波強度測定値を測定して、電波強度測定値と性能限界判定値D1を比較判定すると共に、電波強度測定値の平均値と平均判定値D2を比較判定することにより、複数個の基地局3、4、5のうち、「電波強度測定値が常に性能限界判定値D1以上であると判定されて、かつ、電波強度測定値の平均値が平均判定値D2以上であると判定される」基地局が、少なくとも1個あれば、ビル1の監視装置に接続した無線装置とビル1から遠く離れた遠隔監視センターとの各種信号の送受信を高品質で行うことができるので、電波測定器2により電波強度の測定を行った場所に、アンテナを取り付けるようにすればよい。   As described above, for all of the radio waves F1, F2, and F3 received by the radio wave measuring instrument 2, the radio wave intensity measuring value is measured by the radio wave measuring instrument 2, and the radio wave intensity measured value is compared with the performance limit judgment value D1. In addition, by comparing and determining the average value of the radio field intensity measurement value and the average determination value D2, among the plurality of base stations 3, 4, and 5, "the radio field intensity measurement value is always greater than or equal to the performance limit determination value D1. And the average value of the radio field intensity measurement values is determined to be equal to or greater than the average determination value D2. If there is at least one base station, the wireless device connected to the monitoring device of the building 1 and the building 1 Since it is possible to transmit and receive various signals to and from a remote monitoring center far away from the station, it is only necessary to attach an antenna to a place where the radio wave intensity is measured by the radio wave measuring device 2.

上記実施形態では、電波測定器2の電波測定部8にてアンテナが受信する電波の電波強度を測定して、電波測定器2のパソコン部9の画面に、電波強度の測定状況、電波強度の測定結果及びアンテナ設置可否の判定結果を表示するようにしたので、1台の電波測定器2にて、アンテナの設置場所として「可」であるか、「否」であるかを、容易に確認することができ、電波強度の測定作業が簡単であって、円滑にアンテナの取り付け作業に移行させることができる。   In the above embodiment, the radio wave intensity of the radio wave received by the antenna is measured by the radio wave measuring unit 8 of the radio wave measuring instrument 2, and the measurement status of the radio wave intensity and the radio wave intensity are displayed on the screen of the personal computer unit 9 of the radio wave measuring instrument 2. Since the measurement result and the determination result of whether or not the antenna can be installed are displayed, it is easy to check whether the antenna installation location is “possible” or “no” with one radio wave measuring instrument 2 Thus, the measurement work of the radio field intensity is simple, and the process can be smoothly shifted to the antenna installation work.

上記実施形態の電波測定器2を用いたアンテナ設置可否判定の手順では、複数個の基地局3、4、5から発信される電波F1、F2、F3につき、1個毎に、電波強度測定値の測定、電波強度測定値と性能限界判定値D1との比較判定などを別々に行い、アンテナの設置場所として「可」であるか、「否」であるかを判定しているが、複数個の基地局3、4、5から発信される電波F1、F2、F3のすべてにつき、連続的に電波強度測定値の測定や電波強度測定値と性能限界判定値D1との比較判定などを行うようにして、パソコン部9の画面に、電波強度の測定状況や測定結果及びアンテナ設置可否の判定結果などを、同時に表示されるようにしてもよい。   In the procedure for determining whether or not the antenna can be installed using the radio wave measuring instrument 2 of the above embodiment, the radio field intensity measurement value for each of the radio waves F1, F2, and F3 transmitted from the plurality of base stations 3, 4, 5 , Measurement comparison of radio field intensity and performance limit determination value D1 are separately performed to determine whether the antenna is installed as “possible” or “not”. For all the radio waves F1, F2, and F3 transmitted from the base stations 3, 4, and 5, the radio field intensity measurement value is continuously measured and the radio field intensity measurement value is compared with the performance limit determination value D1. Thus, the measurement status of the radio wave intensity, the measurement result, the determination result of whether or not the antenna can be installed, and the like may be simultaneously displayed on the screen of the personal computer unit 9.

上記実施形態では、無線装置のアンテナの取り付け作業を行う前に、電波測定器2により電波強度の測定を行った場所が、アンテナの設置場所として「可」であるか、「否」であるかを判定した後、その判定が「可」である場合に、電波測定器2により電波強度の測定を行った場所に、アンテナを取り付けるようにしているが、これに限定されない。無線装置のアンテナを所定の場所に取り付けた後、その所定の場所における周囲の環境の変化により、無線装置のアンテナを別の場所に取り付け直す必要性が生じた場合に、上記実施形態の電波測定器2を用いたアンテナ設置可否判定方法によって、アンテナの取り付け場所を探すようにしてもよい。   In the above-described embodiment, whether the place where the radio wave intensity is measured by the radio wave measuring device 2 before performing the mounting operation of the antenna of the wireless device is “possible” or “no” as the antenna installation location. After the determination, the antenna is attached to the place where the radio wave intensity is measured by the radio wave measuring instrument 2 when the determination is “OK”, but the present invention is not limited to this. When the antenna of the wireless device is attached to a predetermined location, and the surrounding environment at the predetermined location changes, and it becomes necessary to reattach the antenna of the wireless device to another location, the radio wave measurement of the above embodiment You may make it look for the installation place of an antenna with the antenna installation propriety determination method using the apparatus 2. FIG.

本発明の一実施形態に係わる電波測定器による電波強度測定状態図である。It is a radio wave intensity measurement state diagram by the radio wave measuring instrument concerning one embodiment of the present invention. 本発明の一実施形態に係わる電波測定器の外観斜視図である。1 is an external perspective view of a radio wave measuring instrument according to an embodiment of the present invention. 本発明の一実施形態を示す電波測定器のパーソナルコンピューター部に測定内容表示欄が表示された状態の画面図である。It is a screen figure of the state by which the measurement content display column was displayed on the personal computer part of the radio wave measuring device which shows one Embodiment of this invention. 本発明の一実施形態に係わる電波測定器により測定された電波強度の測定チャートである。It is a measurement chart of the radio wave intensity measured by the radio wave measuring instrument concerning one embodiment of the present invention. 本発明の一実施形態に係わるアンテナ設置可否判定の手順を示すフローチャートである。It is a flowchart which shows the procedure of the antenna installation availability determination concerning one Embodiment of this invention.

符号の説明Explanation of symbols

1 ビル
2 電波測定器
3、4、5 基地局
6 高架橋
7 大型トラック
8 電波測定部
9 パソコン部
9A 表示画面
10 測定内容表示欄
10A 電波強度の測定状況表示欄
10B 電波強度の測定結果表示欄
10C アンテナ設置可否の判定結果表示欄
11 測定開始釦
D1 性能限界判定値
D2 平均判定値
F1、F2、F3 電波
G1、G2、G3 グラフ
DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 1 Building 2 Radio wave measuring device 3, 4, 5 Base station 6 Viaduct 7 Large truck 8 Radio wave measuring part 9 Personal computer part 9A Display screen 10 Measurement content display column 10A Radio wave intensity measurement status display column 10B Radio wave intensity measurement result display column 10C Judgment result display field of antenna installation availability 11 Measurement start button D1 Performance limit judgment value D2 Average judgment value F1, F2, F3 Radio wave G1, G2, G3 Graph

Claims (5)

ビル設備の故障を監視する監視装置に接続した無線装置のアンテナが受信する電波の電波強度を、電波測定器にて測定してアンテナの設置可否を判定するアンテナ設置可否判定方法において、同一基地局からの電波につき、その電波強度を、前記電波測定器により規定回数以上若しくは規定時間以上測定して電波強度測定値を得る第1の工程と、前記第1の工程で得られた電波強度測定値と性能限界判定値と比較して前記電波強度測定値が常に性能限界判定値以上であるか否かを判定する第2の工程と、前記第1の工程で得られた電波強度測定値の平均値を算出する第3の工程と、前記第3の工程で得られた平均値が平均判定値以上であるか否かを判定する第4の工程とを少なくとも有し、前記第2の工程にて前記電波強度測定値が常に性能限界判定値以上であると判定されて、かつ、前記第4の工程にて前記電波強度測定値の平均値が平均判定値以上であると判定されたときに、前記アンテナが設置可能であると判定すると共に、前記第2の工程にて前記電波強度測定値が常に性能限界判定値以上でないと判定されたとき若しくは前記第4の工程にて前記電波強度測定値の平均値が平均判定値以上でないと判定されたときに、前記アンテナが設置不可であると判定するようにしたことを特徴とするアンテナ設置可否判定方法。   The same base station in the antenna installation feasibility judging method for measuring the radio wave intensity of the radio wave received by the antenna of the wireless device connected to the monitoring device for monitoring the failure of the building equipment by using a radio wave measuring device A first step of obtaining a radio field intensity measurement value by measuring the radio field intensity of the radio wave from the radio wave measuring instrument by the radio wave measuring instrument more than a specified number of times or for a specified time, and the radio field intensity measurement value obtained in the first step And a second step of determining whether or not the radio field intensity measurement value is always equal to or greater than the performance limit determination value compared with the performance limit determination value, and an average of the radio field intensity measurement values obtained in the first step A third step of calculating a value and a fourth step of determining whether or not the average value obtained in the third step is equal to or greater than an average determination value; The radio field strength measurement It is determined that the antenna can be installed when it is determined that the field determination value is greater than or equal to and the average value of the radio field intensity measurement values is determined to be greater than or equal to the average determination value in the fourth step. And determining that the radio field intensity measurement value is not always equal to or greater than the performance limit determination value in the second step or that the average value of the radio field intensity measurement value is equal to or greater than the average determination value in the fourth step. When it is determined that the antenna is not, it is determined that the antenna cannot be installed. 前記アンテナに電波を発信するところの複数個の基地局につき、電波の電波強度を電波測定器にて測定して、それら基地局のうち、前記第2の工程にて前記電波強度測定値が常に性能限界判定値以上であると判定されて、かつ、前記第4の工程にて前記電波強度測定値の平均値が平均判定値以上であると判定される基地局が少なくとも1個ある場合に、アンテナが設置可能であると判定するようにしたことを特徴とする請求項1記載のアンテナ設置可否判定方法。   For a plurality of base stations that transmit radio waves to the antenna, the radio wave intensity of the radio waves is measured with a radio wave measuring instrument, and among the base stations, the radio wave intensity measurement value is always in the second step. In the case where there is at least one base station that is determined to be equal to or higher than the performance limit determination value and that is determined to have an average value of the radio field intensity measurement value equal to or higher than an average determination value in the fourth step, 2. The antenna installation availability determination method according to claim 1, wherein it is determined that the antenna can be installed. 前記アンテナが設置可能であると判定されるとその旨の表示がなされると共に、前記アンテナが設置不可であると判定するとその旨の表示がなされるようにしたことを特徴とする請求項1もしくは2記載のアンテナ設置可否判定方法。   2. The display according to claim 1, wherein when it is determined that the antenna can be installed, a message to that effect is displayed, and when it is determined that the antenna cannot be installed, a message to that effect is displayed. 2. The antenna installation availability determination method according to 2. 前記性能限界判定値は、前記無線装置の受信性能限界値であることを特徴とする請求項1、2若しくは3記載のアンテナ設置可否判定方法。   4. The antenna installation availability determination method according to claim 1, wherein the performance limit determination value is a reception performance limit value of the wireless device. 前記電波測定器を、アンテナが受信する電波の電波強度を測定する電波測定部と、パーソナルコンピューター部とからなるものとし、そのパーソナルコンピューター部の画面に、電波強度の測定状況、電波強度の測定結果及びアンテナ設置可否の判定結果を表示するようにしたことを特徴とする請求項1、2、3若しくは4記載のアンテナ設置可否判定方法。
The radio wave measuring device is composed of a radio wave measuring unit for measuring the radio wave intensity of the radio wave received by the antenna and a personal computer unit. On the screen of the personal computer unit, the radio wave intensity measurement status, the radio wave intensity measurement result 5. The antenna installation availability determination method according to claim 1, wherein the determination result of whether or not the antenna is installed is displayed.
JP2004060970A 2004-03-04 2004-03-04 Antenna installation availability judgment method Expired - Lifetime JP4014572B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2004060970A JP4014572B2 (en) 2004-03-04 2004-03-04 Antenna installation availability judgment method

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2004060970A JP4014572B2 (en) 2004-03-04 2004-03-04 Antenna installation availability judgment method

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2005252700A true JP2005252700A (en) 2005-09-15
JP4014572B2 JP4014572B2 (en) 2007-11-28

Family

ID=35032767

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2004060970A Expired - Lifetime JP4014572B2 (en) 2004-03-04 2004-03-04 Antenna installation availability judgment method

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP4014572B2 (en)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2013223170A (en) * 2012-04-18 2013-10-28 Hitachi Building Systems Co Ltd Antenna installation propriety determination method and device
JP2016046743A (en) * 2014-08-26 2016-04-04 株式会社日立ビルシステム Communication state confirmation device for radio communication device
JP2019083621A (en) * 2017-10-30 2019-05-30 京セラ株式会社 Measurement method, measurement program, and measurement device

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2013223170A (en) * 2012-04-18 2013-10-28 Hitachi Building Systems Co Ltd Antenna installation propriety determination method and device
JP2016046743A (en) * 2014-08-26 2016-04-04 株式会社日立ビルシステム Communication state confirmation device for radio communication device
JP2019083621A (en) * 2017-10-30 2019-05-30 京セラ株式会社 Measurement method, measurement program, and measurement device
US11644495B2 (en) 2017-10-30 2023-05-09 Kyocera Corporation Measurement method, non-transitory computer-readable medium and measurement apparatus for determining whether a radio wave receiving apparatus can operate at an installable position

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP4014572B2 (en) 2007-11-28

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP2117141B1 (en) Method and apparatuses for signal strength indication
US7155167B1 (en) Wireless LAN monitoring device
JP2008514111A (en) How to provide accurate capability indicators to mobile phone users
JP2006324831A (en) Network incorporation system for radio base station for home use and its method, base station management device used therefor, and mobile communication terminal
KR20160059679A (en) Apparatus and method for recognizing peripheral device using distance and intimacy
US20120208525A1 (en) Compact base station and program
WO2007119314A1 (en) Communication area detection system, method thereof, and base station and mobile device used for the same
GB2347826A (en) Measurement of cell coverage of DECT system
JP4014572B2 (en) Antenna installation availability judgment method
JP2006333090A (en) Device and system for radio communication
JP2007005883A (en) Wireless communication system, wireless communication terminal, and method for acquiring wireless communication quality information
JP2010244152A (en) Device, system and method for work support, and program
JP2004235827A (en) -method for detecting insensitive area, method for monitoring operating condition and mobile communication system
JP2005303669A (en) Radio lan system, transmission power control method, position managing method and transmission power control program
JP2007116282A (en) Portable terminal and communication method
JP2005210530A (en) Dead zone measurement system and method thereof
JP2005210241A (en) Mobile radio communication system, mobile radio communication terminal, and off-zone location information transmitting method and program for use therein
JP4487451B2 (en) Mobile terminal maintenance system and method
JP2013223170A (en) Antenna installation propriety determination method and device
JP2005286864A (en) Mobile communication terminal, location positioning server, location positioning system, and location positioning method
JP2006087068A (en) Measuring device and measuring method for frequency assignment radio communication electric wave environment
KR100716416B1 (en) Method for measuring quality of mobile communication data using messaging service and managing system for the same
JPH09247737A (en) Position information detection system
JP6163470B2 (en) Wireless communication device communication status confirmation device
JP5527788B2 (en) COMMUNICATION TERMINAL DEVICE MOUNTING MULTIPLE RADIO DEVICE, RADIO CIRCUIT DIAGNOSIS METHOD IN THE SAME, AND PROGRAM FOR THE METHOD

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20050817

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20070821

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20070828

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20070911

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20100921

Year of fee payment: 3

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Ref document number: 4014572

Country of ref document: JP

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20100921

Year of fee payment: 3

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20110921

Year of fee payment: 4

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20130921

Year of fee payment: 6

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20130921

Year of fee payment: 6

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20160921

Year of fee payment: 9

S531 Written request for registration of change of domicile

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313531

R350 Written notification of registration of transfer

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R350