JP2005092818A - Commodity development support system, method, and program - Google Patents

Commodity development support system, method, and program Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP2005092818A
JP2005092818A JP2003329106A JP2003329106A JP2005092818A JP 2005092818 A JP2005092818 A JP 2005092818A JP 2003329106 A JP2003329106 A JP 2003329106A JP 2003329106 A JP2003329106 A JP 2003329106A JP 2005092818 A JP2005092818 A JP 2005092818A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
customer satisfaction
product
specifications
additional cost
distribution
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
JP2003329106A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Inventor
Yasuhiro Nomoto
泰弘 野本
Takashi Nishihara
太可史 西原
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Seiko Epson Corp
Original Assignee
Seiko Epson Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Seiko Epson Corp filed Critical Seiko Epson Corp
Priority to JP2003329106A priority Critical patent/JP2005092818A/en
Publication of JP2005092818A publication Critical patent/JP2005092818A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Landscapes

  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)

Abstract

<P>PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To objectively decide a specification to be improved, a specification value after improvement and the like based on a questionnaire survey result of a customer using a commodity. <P>SOLUTION: This commodity development support system, which selects a specification of the commodity to be improved according to a customer satisfaction degree, is provided with a customer satisfaction distribution storage part storing a customer satisfaction degree distribution about each of a plurality of commodity specifications, a contribution ratio storage part storing a contribution ratio of each of a plurality of specifications to the customer satisfaction degree for the product, an additional cost storage part storing an additional cost required when the specification value is increased by a unit quantity in each of a plurality of specifications, and an improved specification selection part selecting a specification optimizing an improvement ratio of the customer satisfaction degree per an additional cost on the basis of the customer satisfaction degree distribution, the contribution ratio, and the additional cost of each of a plurality of specifications. <P>COPYRIGHT: (C)2005,JPO&NCIPI

Description

本発明は、商品開発支援システム、商品開発支援方法、及び商品開発支援プログラムに関する。特に本発明は、商品の顧客満足度に基づいて、改良すべき当該商品の仕様を選択する商品開発支援システム、商品開発支援方法、及び商品開発支援プログラムに関する。   The present invention relates to a product development support system, a product development support method, and a product development support program. In particular, the present invention relates to a product development support system, a product development support method, and a product development support program that select specifications of the product to be improved based on the customer satisfaction of the product.

従来、商品を購入したユーザにアンケート等を行い、当該商品についての顧客満足度を調査していた。そして、調査結果に基づいて、改良すべき仕様を定性的に判断し、新商品を含む改良商品の仕様を決定していた。なお、現時点で先行技術文献の存在を認識していないので、先行技術文献に関する記載を省略する。   Conventionally, a questionnaire or the like is performed on a user who has purchased a product, and the customer satisfaction level of the product is investigated. Based on the survey results, specifications to be improved are qualitatively determined, and specifications for improved products including new products are determined. In addition, since the presence of a prior art document is not recognized at this time, the description regarding a prior art document is abbreviate | omitted.

上記の方法においては、改良すべき仕様を定性的に判断するため、顧客満足度の調査結果から改良すべき仕様を決定する仕様決定者の主観に左右されやすく、改良すべき仕様や改良後のスペック値等を客観的に決定するのが困難であった。   In the above method, since the specifications to be improved are qualitatively determined, it is easily influenced by the subject of the specification decision maker who determines the specifications to be improved from the survey results of customer satisfaction. It was difficult to objectively determine spec values and the like.

そこで本発明は、上記の課題を解決することのできる商品開発支援システム、商品開発支援方法、及び商品開発支援プログラムを提供することを目的とする。この目的は特許請求の範囲における独立項に記載の特徴の組み合わせにより達成される。また従属項は本発明の更なる有利な具体例を規定する。   Accordingly, an object of the present invention is to provide a product development support system, a product development support method, and a product development support program that can solve the above-described problems. This object is achieved by a combination of features described in the independent claims. The dependent claims define further advantageous specific examples of the present invention.

本発明の第1の形態によると、商品の顧客満足度に基づいて、改良すべき当該商品の仕様を選択する商品開発支援システムであって、前記商品が有する複数の仕様のそれぞれについて、当該仕様について取り得るスペック値毎に、当該仕様が当該スペック値を満たす場合に当該仕様について満足する顧客数の分布である顧客満足度分布を格納する顧客満足度分布格納部と、前記複数の仕様のそれぞれについて、前記商品の顧客満足度に対する当該仕様の寄与率を格納する寄与率格納部と、前記複数の仕様のそれぞれについて、前記商品の当該仕様についての前記スペック値を予め定められた単位量向上させた場合に発生する追加費用を格納する追加費用格納部と、前記複数の仕様のそれぞれについての前記顧客満足度分布、前記寄与率、及び前記追加費用に基づいて、追加費用当たりの顧客満足度の向上率が最大となる前記仕様を選択する向上仕様選択部とを備える商品開発支援システムを提供する。当該商品開発支援システムによれば、改良すべき仕様を定量的に判断し、改良すべき仕様や改良後のスペック値等を客観的に決定することができる。   According to the first aspect of the present invention, there is provided a product development support system for selecting specifications of a product to be improved based on customer satisfaction of the product, and each of a plurality of specifications of the product includes the specification. A customer satisfaction distribution storage unit that stores a customer satisfaction distribution, which is a distribution of the number of customers satisfied with the specification when the specification satisfies the specification value, and each of the plurality of specifications A contribution rate storage unit for storing a contribution rate of the specification with respect to customer satisfaction of the product, and for each of the plurality of specifications, the spec value for the specification of the product is improved by a predetermined unit amount. An additional cost storage unit that stores an additional cost generated in the case of a plurality of specifications, the customer satisfaction distribution for each of the plurality of specifications, the contribution rate, and Based on the serial additional cost, to provide a product development support system and a improved specification selection section for selecting the specification improvement rate of customer satisfaction per additional cost is maximized. According to the product development support system, specifications to be improved can be determined quantitatively, and specifications to be improved, spec values after improvement, and the like can be objectively determined.

前記追加費用格納部は、前記複数の仕様のそれぞれについて、前記商品の当該仕様についての前記スペック値を予め定められた単位量向上させるための開発費用を前記追加費用として格納し、前記向上仕様選択部は、前記複数の仕様のそれぞれについての前記顧客満足度分布、前記寄与率、及び前記開発費用に基づいて、開発費用当たりの顧客満足度の向上率が最大となる前記仕様を選択してもよい。追加費用として開発費用を用いることにより、当該商品開発支援システムを用いて開発費用当たりの商品の顧客満足度の向上率が最大となる仕様を選択することができ、アンケート等の回答に基づいて最も開発効率が高い仕様を定量的に決定することができる。   The additional cost storage unit stores, as the additional cost, a development cost for improving a predetermined unit amount of the specification value for the specification of the product for each of the plurality of specifications. The section may select the specification that maximizes the improvement rate of customer satisfaction per development cost based on the customer satisfaction distribution, the contribution rate, and the development cost for each of the plurality of specifications. Good. By using development costs as additional costs, the product development support system can be used to select the specifications that maximize the rate of improvement in customer satisfaction per product cost, and the most based on responses such as questionnaires Specifications with high development efficiency can be determined quantitatively.

また、前記顧客満足度分布格納部、前記寄与率格納部、及び前記追加費用格納部は、価格帯が異なる複数の前記商品のそれぞれについて、当該商品が有する複数の前記仕様毎の前記顧客満足度分布、前記寄与率、及び前記追加費用をそれぞれ格納し、当該商品開発支援システムの利用者から、価格帯の指定を入力する価格帯指定入力部を更に備え、前記向上仕様選択部は、入力された前記価格帯に含まれる前記商品における、前記複数の仕様のそれぞれについての前記顧客満足度分布、前記寄与率、及び前記追加費用に基づいて、追加費用当たりの顧客満足度の向上率が最大となる前記仕様を選択してもよい。これにより当該商品開発支援システムを用いて改良すべき仕様等の決定を商品の価格帯毎に行うことができるため、商品の価格帯によって異なる顧客の要求を適切に商品に反映することができる。   In addition, the customer satisfaction distribution storage unit, the contribution rate storage unit, and the additional cost storage unit, for each of the plurality of products having different price ranges, the customer satisfaction for each of the plurality of specifications that the product has Each of the distribution, the contribution rate, and the additional cost is stored, and further includes a price range designation input unit that inputs designation of a price range from a user of the product development support system, and the improvement specification selection unit is input Based on the customer satisfaction distribution, the contribution rate, and the additional cost for each of the plurality of specifications in the product included in the price range, the improvement rate of the customer satisfaction per additional cost is maximum. The above specifications may be selected. Thereby, since the specification etc. which should be improved can be determined for every price range of goods using the said product development support system, a different customer's request | requirement according to the price range of goods can be reflected in goods appropriately.

また、当該商品開発支援システムの利用者から、顧客満足度の向上率の目標値である目標向上率を入力する目標向上率入力部を更に備え、前記向上仕様選択部は、前記複数の仕様のそれぞれについての前記顧客満足度分布、前記寄与率、及び前記追加費用に基づいて、前記顧客満足度を前記目標向上率向上させる場合における追加費用当たりの顧客満足度の向上率が最大となる前記仕様を選択し、更に、前記向上仕様選択部が選択した前記仕様を向上させて顧客満足度を前記目標向上率だけ向上させるための前記追加費用を算出する追加費用算出部を備えてもよい。これにより、目標向上率が入力された場合に、当該商品開発支援システムを用いて、商品の顧客満足度を目標向上率だけ向上させるために改良すべき仕様を定量的に決定すると共に、目標向上率を達成するために要する追加費用を算出することができ、達成すべき顧客満足度に応じて適切な開発投資を決定することができる。   The product development support system further includes a target improvement rate input unit that inputs a target improvement rate that is a target value of the improvement rate of customer satisfaction, and the improvement specification selection unit includes the plurality of specifications. Based on the customer satisfaction distribution for each, the contribution rate, and the additional cost, the specification that maximizes the improvement rate of the customer satisfaction per additional cost when the customer satisfaction is improved the target improvement rate And an additional cost calculation unit for calculating the additional cost for improving the specification selected by the improvement specification selection unit and improving customer satisfaction by the target improvement rate. As a result, when the target improvement rate is input, the product development support system is used to quantitatively determine the specifications to be improved in order to improve the customer satisfaction of the product by the target improvement rate, and to improve the target. The additional costs required to achieve the rate can be calculated and the appropriate development investment can be determined according to the customer satisfaction to be achieved.

また、当該商品開発支援システムの利用者から、追加費用の予算額を入力する予算額入力部を更に備え、前記向上仕様選択部は、前記複数の仕様のそれぞれについての前記顧客満足度分布、前記寄与率、及び前記追加費用に基づいて、予算額当たりの顧客満足度の向上率が最大となる前記仕様を選択し、更に、前記向上仕様選択部が選択した前記仕様を前記予算額分向上させた場合における顧客満足度の向上率を算出する顧客満足度向上率算出部を備えてもよい。これにより、予算額が入力された場合に、当該商品開発支援システムを用いて、予算額の範囲内で改良した場合に商品の満足度を最も高めることができる仕様と、この改良に伴う顧客満足度の向上率とを算出することができ、予算額に応じて最適な開発投資を決定すると共に、その効果を予め見積もることができる。   Further, a budget amount input unit for inputting a budget amount of additional costs from a user of the product development support system, the improvement specification selection unit, the customer satisfaction distribution for each of the plurality of specifications, Based on the contribution rate and the additional cost, the specification that maximizes the improvement rate of customer satisfaction per budget amount is selected, and the specification selected by the improvement specification selection unit is further improved by the budget amount. A customer satisfaction improvement rate calculation unit for calculating the improvement rate of customer satisfaction in the case of the customer. As a result, when the budget amount is entered, the product development support system can be used to improve the product satisfaction level when it is improved within the budget amount, and the customer satisfaction associated with this improvement. The degree of improvement can be calculated, and an optimum development investment can be determined according to the budget amount, and the effect can be estimated in advance.

また、本発明の第2の形態によると、商品の顧客満足度に基づいて、改良すべき当該商品の仕様を選択する商品開発支援システムをコンピュータにより実現する商品開発支援方法であって、前記コンピュータは、前記商品が有する複数の仕様のそれぞれについて、当該仕様について取り得るスペック値毎に、当該仕様が当該スペック値を満たす場合に当該仕様について満足する顧客数の分布である顧客満足度分布を格納する顧客満足度分布格納部と、前記複数の仕様のそれぞれについて、前記商品の顧客満足度に対する当該仕様の寄与率を格納する寄与率格納部と、前記複数の仕様のそれぞれについて、前記商品の当該仕様についての前記スペック値を予め定められた単位量向上させた場合に発生する追加費用を格納する追加費用格納部とを備え、前記複数の仕様のそれぞれについての前記顧客満足度分布、前記寄与率、及び前記追加費用に基づいて、追加費用当たりの顧客満足度の向上率が最大となる前記仕様を前記コンピュータにより選択する向上仕様選択段階を備える商品開発支援方法を提供する。   According to the second aspect of the present invention, there is provided a product development support method for realizing a product development support system by a computer, which selects a specification of the product to be improved based on customer satisfaction of the product, the computer Stores, for each of a plurality of specifications that the product has, for each spec value that can be taken for the specification, a customer satisfaction distribution that is a distribution of the number of customers that satisfy the specification when the specification satisfies the specification value A customer satisfaction distribution storage unit for each of the plurality of specifications, a contribution rate storage unit for storing a contribution rate of the specification with respect to a customer satisfaction degree of the product, and for each of the plurality of specifications, An additional cost storage unit for storing additional costs incurred when the spec value for the specification is improved by a predetermined unit amount; The computer selects the specification that maximizes the improvement rate of customer satisfaction per additional cost based on the customer satisfaction distribution, the contribution rate, and the additional cost for each of the plurality of specifications. A product development support method including an improvement specification selection stage is provided.

また、本発明の第3の形態によると、コンピュータを、商品の顧客満足度に基づいて、改良すべき当該商品の仕様を選択する商品開発支援システムとして機能させる商品開発支援プログラムであって、当該商品開発支援プログラムは、前記コンピュータを、前記商品が有する複数の仕様のそれぞれについて、当該仕様について取り得るスペック値毎に、当該仕様が当該スペック値を満たす場合に当該仕様について満足する顧客数の分布である顧客満足度分布を格納する顧客満足度分布格納部と、前記複数の仕様のそれぞれについて、前記商品の顧客満足度に対する当該仕様の寄与率を格納する寄与率格納部と、前記複数の仕様のそれぞれについて、前記商品の当該仕様についての前記スペック値を予め定められた単位量向上させた場合に発生する追加費用を格納する追加費用格納部と、前記複数の仕様のそれぞれについての前記顧客満足度分布、前記寄与率、及び前記追加費用に基づいて、追加費用当たりの顧客満足度の向上率が最大となる前記仕様を選択する向上仕様選択部として機能させる商品開発支援プログラムを提供する。   According to a third aspect of the present invention, there is provided a product development support program for causing a computer to function as a product development support system for selecting specifications of a product to be improved based on customer satisfaction of the product, The product development support program, for each of a plurality of specifications that the product has, for each specification value that can be taken for the specification, distribution of the number of customers that satisfy the specification when the specification satisfies the specification value A customer satisfaction distribution storage unit that stores a customer satisfaction distribution, a contribution rate storage unit that stores a contribution rate of the specification with respect to a customer satisfaction level of the product for each of the plurality of specifications, and the plurality of specifications Occurs when the spec value for the product specification is improved by a predetermined unit amount. An additional cost storage unit for storing additional costs, and a customer satisfaction improvement rate per additional cost based on the customer satisfaction distribution, the contribution rate, and the additional cost for each of the plurality of specifications. A product development support program that functions as an improved specification selection unit that selects the above specifications is provided.

なお、上記の発明の概要は、本発明の必要な特徴の全てを列挙したものではなく、これらの特徴群のサブコンビネーションもまた、発明となりうる。   The above summary of the invention does not enumerate all the necessary features of the present invention, and sub-combinations of these feature groups can also be the invention.

以下、発明の実施の形態を通じて本発明を説明するが、以下の実施形態は特許請求の範囲にかかる発明を限定するものではなく、また実施形態の中で説明されている特徴の組み合わせの全てが発明の解決手段に必須であるとは限らない。   Hereinafter, the present invention will be described through embodiments of the invention. However, the following embodiments do not limit the invention according to the scope of claims, and all combinations of features described in the embodiments are included. It is not necessarily essential for the solution of the invention.

図1は、本実施形態に係る商品開発支援システム10の構成を示す。本実施形態に係る商品開発支援システム10は、商品を購入したユーザに対して行ったアンケート等により得られた商品の顧客満足度に基づいて、改良すべき当該商品の仕様を選択することを目的とするシステムである。
商品開発支援システム10は、回答入力部100と、回答格納部105と、顧客満足度分布生成部110と、顧客満足度分布格納部115と、構造解析部120と、寄与率格納部125と、追加費用格納部130と、価格帯指定入力部135と、目標向上率入力部145と、予算額入力部155と、向上仕様選択部140と、追加費用算出部150と、顧客満足度向上率算出部160と、出力部165とを備える。
FIG. 1 shows a configuration of a product development support system 10 according to the present embodiment. The product development support system 10 according to the present embodiment aims to select the specification of the product to be improved based on the customer satisfaction of the product obtained by a questionnaire or the like conducted for the user who purchased the product. It is a system.
The product development support system 10 includes an answer input unit 100, an answer storage unit 105, a customer satisfaction distribution generation unit 110, a customer satisfaction distribution storage unit 115, a structure analysis unit 120, a contribution rate storage unit 125, Additional cost storage unit 130, price range designation input unit 135, target improvement rate input unit 145, budget amount input unit 155, improvement specification selection unit 140, additional cost calculation unit 150, and customer satisfaction improvement rate calculation Unit 160 and an output unit 165.

回答入力部100は、商品を購入したユーザに対して行ったアンケート等の回答を入力し、回答格納部105に格納させる。顧客満足度分布生成部110は、回答格納部105に格納された回答に基づいて、商品が有する各仕様についてスペック値毎の顧客満足度を示す顧客満足度分布を生成する。顧客満足度分布格納部115は、顧客満足度分布生成部110により生成された、商品が有する複数の仕様のそれぞれについての顧客満足度分布を格納する。ここで顧客満足度分布格納部115は、価格帯が異なる複数の商品のそれぞれについて、当該商品の識別情報、当該商品の価格帯、及び当該商品が有する複数の仕様毎の顧客満足度分布を格納してよい。   The answer input unit 100 inputs an answer such as a questionnaire given to the user who purchased the product, and stores it in the answer storage unit 105. Based on the answer stored in the answer storage unit 105, the customer satisfaction distribution generation unit 110 generates a customer satisfaction distribution indicating customer satisfaction for each specification value for each specification of the product. The customer satisfaction distribution storage unit 115 stores the customer satisfaction distribution for each of a plurality of specifications of the product generated by the customer satisfaction distribution generation unit 110. Here, for each of a plurality of products having different price ranges, the customer satisfaction distribution storage unit 115 stores the identification information of the product, the price range of the product, and the customer satisfaction distribution for each of the specifications of the product. You can do it.

構造解析部120は、回答格納部105に格納された回答に基づいて、商品の顧客満足度に対する各仕様の寄与率を生成する。寄与率格納部125は、構造解析部120により生成された、商品が有する複数の仕様のそれぞれについて、商品の顧客満足度に対する当該仕様の寄与率を格納する。ここで寄与率格納部125は、価格帯が異なる複数の商品のそれぞれについて、当該商品の識別情報、当該商品の価格帯、及び当該商品が有する複数の仕様毎の寄与率を格納してよい。 Based on the answer stored in the answer storage unit 105, the structure analysis unit 120 generates a contribution ratio of each specification to the customer satisfaction of the product. The contribution rate storage unit 125 stores, for each of a plurality of specifications of the product, generated by the structure analysis unit 120, the contribution rate of the specification with respect to the customer satisfaction of the product. Here, for each of a plurality of products having different price ranges, the contribution rate storage unit 125 may store the identification information of the product, the price range of the product, and the contribution rate for each of the specifications of the product.

追加費用格納部130は、商品が有する複数の仕様のそれぞれについて、商品の当該仕様についてのスペック値を予め定められた単位量向上させた場合に発生する追加費用を格納する。ここで追加費用格納部130は、価格帯が異なる複数の商品のそれぞれについて、当該商品の識別情報、当該商品の価格帯、及び当該商品が有する複数の仕様毎の追加費用をそれぞれ格納してよい。   The additional cost storage unit 130 stores, for each of a plurality of specifications of a product, an additional cost that is generated when the spec value for the specification of the product is improved by a predetermined unit amount. Here, the additional cost storage unit 130 may store the identification information of the product, the price range of the product, and the additional cost for each of the specifications of the product for each of a plurality of products having different price ranges. .

価格帯指定入力部135は、改良すべき仕様を選択する対象となる商品についての価格帯の指定を、商品開発支援システム10の利用者から入力する。目標向上率入力部145は、当該商品開発支援システム10の利用者から、顧客満足度の向上率の目標値である目標向上率を入力する。予算額入力部155は、商品開発支援システム10の利用者から、追加費用の予算額を入力する。   The price range designation input unit 135 inputs a price range designation for a product for which a specification to be improved is selected from a user of the product development support system 10. The target improvement rate input unit 145 inputs a target improvement rate that is a target value of the improvement rate of customer satisfaction from the user of the product development support system 10. The budget amount input unit 155 inputs a budget amount for additional costs from the user of the product development support system 10.

向上仕様選択部140は、商品が有する複数の仕様のそれぞれについての顧客満足度分布、寄与率、及び追加費用を顧客満足度分布格納部115、寄与率格納部125、及び追加費用格納部130から取得する。そして向上仕様選択部140は、商品が有する複数の仕様のそれぞれについての顧客満足度分布、寄与率、及び追加費用に基づいて、追加費用当たりの顧客満足度の向上率が最大となる仕様を選択する。ここで、価格帯指定入力部135により価格帯の指定が入力されている場合、向上仕様選択部140は、入力された価格帯に含まれる商品における、複数の仕様のそれぞれについての顧客満足度分布、寄与率、及び追加費用に基づいて、追加費用当たりの顧客満足度の向上率が最大となる仕様を選択する。   The improved specification selection unit 140 obtains the customer satisfaction distribution, contribution rate, and additional cost for each of a plurality of specifications of the product from the customer satisfaction distribution storage unit 115, the contribution rate storage unit 125, and the additional cost storage unit 130. get. The improvement specification selection unit 140 selects a specification that maximizes the improvement rate of customer satisfaction per additional cost based on the customer satisfaction distribution, contribution rate, and additional cost for each of the plurality of specifications of the product. To do. Here, when the specification of the price range is input by the price range specification input unit 135, the improved specification selection unit 140 displays the customer satisfaction distribution for each of a plurality of specifications in the product included in the input price range. Based on the contribution rate and the additional cost, the specification that maximizes the improvement rate of the customer satisfaction per additional cost is selected.

ここで目標向上率入力部145により目標向上率が入力されている場合、向上仕様選択部140は、複数の仕様のそれぞれについての顧客満足度分布、寄与率、及び追加費用に基づいて、顧客満足度を目標向上率だけ向上させる場合における追加費用当たりの顧客満足度の向上率が最大となる仕様を選択する。一方、予算額入力部155により追加費用の予算額が入力されている場合、向上仕様選択部140は、複数の仕様のそれぞれについての顧客満足度分布、寄与率、及び追加費用に基づいて、予算額当たりの顧客満足度の向上率が最大となる仕様を選択する。   When the target improvement rate is input by the target improvement rate input unit 145, the improvement specification selection unit 140 determines the customer satisfaction based on the customer satisfaction distribution, the contribution rate, and the additional cost for each of the plurality of specifications. Select a specification that maximizes the improvement rate of customer satisfaction per additional cost when improving the target improvement rate by the target improvement rate. On the other hand, when the budget amount of the additional cost is input by the budget amount input unit 155, the improvement specification selection unit 140 determines the budget based on the customer satisfaction distribution, the contribution rate, and the additional cost for each of the plurality of specifications. Select specifications that maximize customer satisfaction per value.

追加費用算出部150は、顧客満足度分布格納部115に格納された顧客満足度分布、寄与率格納部125に格納された寄与率、及び追加費用格納部130に格納された追加費用に基づいて、向上仕様選択部140が選択した仕様を目標向上率入力部145が入力した目標向上率だけ向上させて顧客満足度を向上させるための追加費用を算出する。   The additional cost calculation unit 150 is based on the customer satisfaction distribution stored in the customer satisfaction distribution storage unit 115, the contribution rate stored in the contribution rate storage unit 125, and the additional cost stored in the additional cost storage unit 130. The additional cost for improving the customer satisfaction by improving the specification selected by the improvement specification selection unit 140 by the target improvement rate input by the target improvement rate input unit 145 is calculated.

顧客満足度向上率算出部160は、顧客満足度分布格納部115に格納された顧客満足度分布、寄与率格納部125に格納された寄与率、及び追加費用格納部130に格納された追加費用に基づいて、向上仕様選択部140が選択した仕様を予算額分向上させた場合における顧客満足度の向上率を算出する。   The customer satisfaction improvement rate calculation unit 160 includes a customer satisfaction distribution stored in the customer satisfaction distribution storage unit 115, a contribution rate stored in the contribution rate storage unit 125, and an additional cost stored in the additional cost storage unit 130. Based on the above, the improvement rate of the customer satisfaction when the specification selected by the improvement specification selection unit 140 is improved by the budget amount is calculated.

出力部165は、向上仕様選択部140により選択された、追加費用当たりの顧客満足度の向上率が最大となる仕様と、追加費用算出部150により算出された、当該仕様を目標向上率だけ向上させて顧客満足度を向上させるための追加費用と、顧客満足度向上率算出部160により算出された、当該仕様を予算額分向上させた場合における顧客満足度の向上率とを、顧客満足度の解析結果として商品開発支援システム10の利用者に対して出力する。   The output unit 165 improves the specification calculated by the additional cost calculation unit 150 by the target improvement rate, which is selected by the improvement specification selection unit 140 and has the maximum improvement rate of customer satisfaction per additional cost. And the additional cost for improving the customer satisfaction and the customer satisfaction improvement rate calculated by the customer satisfaction improvement rate calculation unit 160 when the specification is improved by the budget amount. The analysis result is output to the user of the product development support system 10.

図2は、本実施形態に係る顧客満足度分布210の生成方法を示す。
まず、回答入力部100は、商品が有する複数の仕様のそれぞれについて、当該仕様のスペック値に対する顧客満足度についての回答を入力する。例えば商品がプリンタである場合、商品が有する複数の仕様として、印刷速度、解像度、インストールのわかりやすさ、外観又はデザイン、及び付属ソフトウェアの使い勝手等が挙げられる。本実施形態に係る回答入力部100は、これらの各仕様について、非常に満足、満足、普通、不満、又は非常に不満のいずれかを顧客に選択させた回答を入力する。図2においては、プリンタの仕様の一つである印刷速度を例に説明する。
FIG. 2 shows a method for generating the customer satisfaction distribution 210 according to this embodiment.
First, the answer input unit 100 inputs, for each of a plurality of specifications of a product, an answer about customer satisfaction with respect to the specification values of the specifications. For example, when the product is a printer, examples of the specifications of the product include printing speed, resolution, ease of installation, appearance or design, and usability of attached software. The answer input unit 100 according to the present embodiment inputs an answer that causes the customer to select either very satisfied, satisfied, normal, dissatisfied, or very dissatisfied for each of these specifications. In FIG. 2, a description will be given taking as an example the printing speed which is one of the printer specifications.

次に、顧客満足度分布生成部110は、各仕様についての回答の分布である回答分布から、各仕様についての顧客満足度分布を生成する。ここで顧客満足度分布とは、商品が有する複数の仕様のそれぞれについて生成され、当該仕様について取り得るスペック値毎に、当該仕様が当該スペック値を満たす場合に当該仕様について満足する顧客数の分布である。例えば、顧客満足度分布210は、印刷速度について取り得るスペック値8ppm(ページ/分)、10ppm、12ppm、14ppm、16ppmのそれぞれ毎に、印刷速度についての仕様が当該スペック値を満たす場合に印刷速度について満足する顧客数の分布である。顧客満足度分布生成部110は、回答分布200における各満足度、すなわち非常に満足、満足、普通、不満、及び非常に不満のそれぞれに対応して、当該回答を選択した顧客が満足すると判断されるスペック値、すなわち例えば8ppm、10ppm、12ppm、14ppm、及び16ppmをそれぞれ割り当てることにより、顧客満足度分布210を生成する。この際顧客満足度分布生成部110は、満足であるという回答に対して、当該回答を選択した顧客が満足すると判断されるスペック値を、現商品の当該仕様についてのスペック値とする。そして、顧客満足度分布生成部110は、以上に示した処理により生成した顧客満足度分布を、商品及び仕様毎に顧客満足度分布格納部115に格納する。   Next, the customer satisfaction distribution generation unit 110 generates a customer satisfaction distribution for each specification from an answer distribution that is a distribution of responses for each specification. Here, the customer satisfaction distribution is a distribution of the number of customers that are generated for each of a plurality of specifications of a product and are satisfied with the specification when the specification satisfies the specification value for each spec value that can be taken for the specification. It is. For example, the customer satisfaction distribution 210 indicates that the printing speed specification satisfies the specification value for each of the spec values 8 ppm (pages / minute), 10 ppm, 12 ppm, 14 ppm, and 16 ppm that can be taken for the printing speed. Is the distribution of the number of customers satisfied. The customer satisfaction distribution generation unit 110 determines that the customer who selected the answer is satisfied corresponding to each satisfaction degree in the response distribution 200, that is, very satisfied, satisfied, normal, dissatisfied, and very dissatisfied. The customer satisfaction distribution 210 is generated by assigning spec values, for example, 8 ppm, 10 ppm, 12 ppm, 14 ppm, and 16 ppm, respectively. At this time, the customer satisfaction distribution generation unit 110 sets the specification value that is determined to be satisfied by the customer who has selected the answer to the answer of satisfaction as the specification value for the specification of the current product. Then, the customer satisfaction distribution generation unit 110 stores the customer satisfaction distribution generated by the processing described above in the customer satisfaction distribution storage unit 115 for each product and specification.

向上仕様選択部140、追加費用算出部150、及び顧客満足度向上率算出部160は、顧客満足度分布を参照して、当該仕様のスペック値と、当該仕様についての顧客満足度との関係を得ることができる。例えば、目標向上率入力部145に入力された目標向上率に基づいて、印刷速度の顧客満足度を8割に向上させる必要が生じた場合、追加費用算出部150は、顧客満足度分布210に基づいて印刷速度を13ppmに向上させる必要があると判断する。そして追加費用算出部150は、追加費用格納部130を参照して印刷速度を10ppmから13ppmに向上させるための追加費用を算出することができる。   The improvement specification selection unit 140, the additional cost calculation unit 150, and the customer satisfaction improvement rate calculation unit 160 refer to the customer satisfaction distribution to determine the relationship between the specification value of the specification and the customer satisfaction for the specification. Can be obtained. For example, when it is necessary to improve the customer satisfaction of the printing speed to 80% based on the target improvement rate input to the target improvement rate input unit 145, the additional cost calculation unit 150 displays the customer satisfaction distribution 210 in the customer satisfaction distribution 210. Based on this, it is determined that the printing speed needs to be improved to 13 ppm. The additional cost calculation unit 150 can calculate an additional cost for improving the printing speed from 10 ppm to 13 ppm with reference to the additional cost storage unit 130.

図3は、本実施形態に係る構造解析部120が生成するモデル構造の一例を示す。構造解析部120は、回答格納部105に格納された回答に基づいて、商品が有する複数の仕様のそれぞれの顧客満足度に対応する観測変数300a〜gと、当該商品の顧客満足度に対応する観測変数300h〜iとの関係をモデル化する。このモデルを生成するために、回答入力部100は、当該商品の顧客満足度についての回答を更に入力し、観測変数300h〜iとして用いてもよい。   FIG. 3 shows an example of a model structure generated by the structure analysis unit 120 according to this embodiment. Based on the answer stored in the answer storage unit 105, the structure analysis unit 120 corresponds to the observation variables 300a to 300g corresponding to the customer satisfaction of each of the specifications of the product and the customer satisfaction of the product. The relationship with the observation variables 300h to i is modeled. In order to generate this model, the answer input unit 100 may further input an answer about the customer satisfaction of the product and use it as the observation variables 300h to 300i.

構造解析部120は、回答格納部105に格納された回答に基づいて、商品の顧客満足度に対する各仕様の寄与率を生成する。ここで構造解析部120は、例えば商品の顧客満足度と各仕様の顧客満足度の相関関係に基づいて寄与率を生成してもよい。また構造解析部120は、図3に示した様に、例えば潜在変数310a〜b等の中間パラメータを導入した上で、共分散構造解析等の手法を用いて寄与率を生成してもよい。この場合、例えば顧客満足度(観測変数300h)に対する印刷速度(観測変数300a)の寄与率は、魅力的品質(潜在変数310a)に対する印刷速度の寄与率0.48と、顧客満足度に対する魅力的品質の寄与率0.89との積により算出できる。構造解析部120は、以上に示した処理により生成した寄与率を、商品及び仕様毎に寄与率格納部125に格納する。   Based on the answer stored in the answer storage unit 105, the structure analysis unit 120 generates a contribution ratio of each specification to the customer satisfaction of the product. Here, the structure analysis unit 120 may generate a contribution rate based on, for example, the correlation between the customer satisfaction of the product and the customer satisfaction of each specification. Further, as shown in FIG. 3, the structure analysis unit 120 may generate a contribution rate using a technique such as covariance structure analysis after introducing intermediate parameters such as latent variables 310a to 310b, for example. In this case, for example, the contribution rate of the printing speed (observation variable 300a) to the customer satisfaction (observation variable 300h) is 0.48 as the contribution rate of the printing speed to the attractive quality (latent variable 310a) and attractive to the customer satisfaction. It can be calculated by the product of the quality contribution ratio 0.89. The structure analysis unit 120 stores the contribution rate generated by the processing described above in the contribution rate storage unit 125 for each product and specification.

図4は、本実施形態に係る追加費用格納部130の内容の一例を示す。追加費用格納部130は、価格帯が異なる複数の商品のそれぞれについて、当該商品の名称等の当該商品を識別する識別情報、当該商品の価格帯、及び当該商品が有する複数の仕様毎の追加費用をそれぞれ格納する。例えば、図4に示した追加費用格納部130は、商品「A」に対応付けて、商品の価格帯「〜30,000円」、印刷速度を予め定められた単位量向上させるための追加費用「2,000円」、解像度を予め定められた単位量向上させるための追加費用「3,000円」の各情報を格納する。   FIG. 4 shows an example of the contents of the additional cost storage unit 130 according to the present embodiment. For each of a plurality of products having different price ranges, the additional cost storage unit 130 includes identification information for identifying the product, such as the name of the product, the price range of the product, and additional costs for each of the specifications of the product. Is stored respectively. For example, the additional cost storage unit 130 illustrated in FIG. 4 associates the product “A” with the product price range “˜30,000 yen” and the additional cost for improving the printing speed by a predetermined unit amount. Each information of “2,000 yen” and additional cost “3,000 yen” for improving the resolution by a predetermined unit amount is stored.

ここで、仕様を予め定められた単位量向上させるための追加費用は、例えば印刷速度を2ppm向上させるために要する費用や、解像度を倍に向上させるために要する費用等であってよい。また、仕様のスペック値を現在の値から、予め定められた単位量向上させて、新たなスペック値とするために要する費用であってもよく、例えば印刷速度を10ppmから12ppmに向上させるために要する費用及び10ppmから14ppmに向上させるために要する費用等を個別に格納してもよい。   Here, the additional cost for improving the predetermined unit amount of the specification may be, for example, a cost required to improve the printing speed by 2 ppm, a cost required to double the resolution, or the like. Further, it may be the cost required to increase the predetermined specification amount of the specification from the current value to a new specification value. For example, in order to improve the printing speed from 10 ppm to 12 ppm. Costs required and costs required to improve from 10 ppm to 14 ppm may be stored individually.

以上において、追加費用格納部130は、追加費用として、仕様を予め定められた単位量向上させるために増加する商品の原価を格納する。これに代えて追加費用格納部130は、複数の仕様のそれぞれについて、商品の当該仕様についてのスペック値を予め定められた単位量向上させるための開発費用を追加費用として格納してもよい。   In the above, the additional cost storage unit 130 stores, as the additional cost, the cost of the product that increases in order to improve the predetermined unit amount of the specification. Instead, the additional cost storage unit 130 may store, as an additional cost, a development cost for improving a predetermined unit amount of the specification value for the specification of the product for each of a plurality of specifications.

図5は、本実施形態に係る商品開発支援システム10の動作フローを示す。
まず、回答入力部100は、商品を購入したユーザに対して行ったアンケート等の回答を入力し、回答格納部105に格納させる(ステップS500)。次に、顧客満足度分布生成部110は、回答に基づいて、商品が有する各仕様についての顧客満足度分布を生成する(S510)。次に、構造解析部120は、回答格納部105に格納された回答に基づいて共分散構造解析等を行い、商品の顧客満足度に対する各仕様の寄与率を生成する(S520)。次に、価格帯指定入力部135は、改良すべき仕様を選択する対象となる商品についての価格帯の指定を、商品開発支援システム10の利用者から入力する(S530)。
FIG. 5 shows an operation flow of the product development support system 10 according to the present embodiment.
First, the answer input unit 100 inputs an answer such as a questionnaire given to the user who purchased the product and stores it in the answer storage unit 105 (step S500). Next, the customer satisfaction distribution generation unit 110 generates a customer satisfaction distribution for each specification of the product based on the answer (S510). Next, the structure analysis unit 120 performs a covariance structure analysis or the like based on the answer stored in the answer storage unit 105, and generates a contribution rate of each specification to the customer satisfaction of the product (S520). Next, the price range designation input unit 135 inputs the price range designation for the product for which the specification to be improved is selected from the user of the product development support system 10 (S530).

次に、目標向上率入力部145及び予算額入力部155は、商品開発支援システム10の利用者に目標向上率及び予算額をそれぞれ入力することを促す(S535)。目標向上率及び予算額が入力されなかった場合(S540:No、S550:No)、向上仕様選択部140は、入力された価格帯に含まれる商品が有する複数の仕様のそれぞれについての顧客満足度分布、寄与率、及び追加費用に基づいて、仕様のスペック値を予め定められた単位量向上させた場合における追加費用当たりの顧客満足度の向上率が最大となる仕様を選択する(S555)。より具体的には、向上仕様選択部140は、複数の仕様のうち、スペック値を予め定められた単位量向上させた場合における当該仕様の顧客満足度の向上率と、商品の顧客満足度に対する当該仕様の顧客満足度の寄与率との積が最大となる仕様を選択する。   Next, the target improvement rate input unit 145 and the budget amount input unit 155 prompt the user of the product development support system 10 to input the target improvement rate and the budget amount, respectively (S535). When the target improvement rate and the budget amount are not input (S540: No, S550: No), the improvement specification selection unit 140 satisfies the customer satisfaction for each of the plurality of specifications included in the product included in the input price range. Based on the distribution, the contribution rate, and the additional cost, a specification that maximizes the improvement rate of the customer satisfaction per additional cost when the spec value of the specification is improved by a predetermined unit amount is selected (S555). More specifically, the improvement specification selection unit 140 corresponds to the improvement rate of the customer satisfaction of the specification and the customer satisfaction of the product when the specification value of the plurality of specifications is increased by a predetermined unit amount. A specification that maximizes the product of the customer satisfaction and the contribution rate of the specification is selected.

目標向上率が入力された場合(S540:Yes)、向上仕様選択部140は、入力された価格帯に含まれる商品が有する複数の仕様のそれぞれについての顧客満足度分布、寄与率、及び追加費用に基づいて、顧客満足度を目標向上率だけ向上させる場合における追加費用当たりの顧客満足度の向上率が最大となる仕様を選択する(S560)。より具体的には、向上仕様選択部140は、複数の仕様のそれぞれについて、商品の顧客満足度に対する当該仕様の顧客満足度の寄与率に基づいて、商品の顧客満足度を目標向上率向上させる場合における当該仕様の顧客満足度の向上率を算出する。そして、向上仕様選択部140は、当該仕様の顧客満足度を算出した向上率向上させるために要する追加費用が最小となる仕様を選択する。次に、追加費用算出部150は、顧客満足度分布、寄与率、及び追加費用に基づいて、向上仕様選択部140が選択した仕様を目標向上率だけ向上させて顧客満足度を向上させるための追加費用を算出する(S565)。   When the target improvement rate is input (S540: Yes), the improvement specification selection unit 140 determines the customer satisfaction distribution, the contribution rate, and the additional cost for each of a plurality of specifications included in the product included in the input price range. Based on the above, the specification that maximizes the improvement rate of the customer satisfaction per additional cost when the customer satisfaction is improved by the target improvement rate is selected (S560). More specifically, for each of a plurality of specifications, the improvement specification selection unit 140 improves the customer satisfaction of the product based on the contribution rate of the customer satisfaction of the specification with respect to the customer satisfaction of the product. In this case, the improvement rate of customer satisfaction of the specification is calculated. Then, the improved specification selection unit 140 selects a specification that minimizes the additional cost required to improve the improvement rate calculated for the customer satisfaction of the specification. Next, the additional cost calculation unit 150 improves the customer satisfaction by improving the specification selected by the improvement specification selection unit 140 by the target improvement rate based on the customer satisfaction distribution, the contribution rate, and the additional cost. An additional cost is calculated (S565).

一方、目標向上率が入力されず、予算額が入力された場合(S540:No、S550:Yes)、向上仕様選択部140は、入力された価格帯に含まれる商品が有する複数の仕様のそれぞれについての顧客満足度分布、寄与率、及び追加費用に基づいて、予算額当たりの顧客満足度の向上率が最大となる仕様を選択する(S570)。より具体的には、向上仕様選択部140は、複数の仕様のそれぞれについて、当該仕様のスペック値を予算額相当の追加費用分向上させた場合における当該仕様の顧客満足度の向上率と、商品の顧客満足度に対する当該仕様の顧客満足度の寄与率との積が最大となる仕様を選択する。次に、顧客満足度向上率算出部160は、顧客満足度分布、寄与率、及び追加費用に基づいて、向上仕様選択部140が選択した仕様を予算額分向上させた場合における顧客満足度の向上率を算出する(S575)。   On the other hand, when the target improvement rate is not input and the budget amount is input (S540: No, S550: Yes), the improvement specification selection unit 140 has each of a plurality of specifications included in the product included in the input price range. Based on the customer satisfaction distribution, contribution rate, and additional cost, a specification that maximizes the improvement rate of the customer satisfaction per budget is selected (S570). More specifically, for each of a plurality of specifications, the improvement specification selection unit 140 increases the customer satisfaction improvement rate of the specification when the specification value of the specification is increased by an additional cost corresponding to the budget amount, The specification that maximizes the product of the contribution ratio of the customer satisfaction degree of the specification to the customer satisfaction degree is selected. Next, the customer satisfaction improvement rate calculation unit 160 calculates the customer satisfaction when the specification selected by the improvement specification selection unit 140 is improved by the budget amount based on the customer satisfaction distribution, the contribution rate, and the additional cost. An improvement rate is calculated (S575).

そして、出力部165は、S555による解析結果、S560及びS565による解析結果、又はS570及びS575による解析結果を出力する(S580)。   And the output part 165 outputs the analysis result by S555, the analysis result by S560 and S565, or the analysis result by S570 and S575 (S580).

図6は、本実施形態に係るコンピュータ1200のハードウェア構成の一例を示す。本実施形態に係るコンピュータ1200は、CPU1100、ROM1110、RAM1120、通信インターフェイス1130、ハードディスク・ドライブ1140、フレキシブルディスク・ドライブ1150、及びCD−ROMドライブ1160を備える。   FIG. 6 shows an example of the hardware configuration of the computer 1200 according to this embodiment. A computer 1200 according to this embodiment includes a CPU 1100, ROM 1110, RAM 1120, communication interface 1130, hard disk drive 1140, flexible disk drive 1150, and CD-ROM drive 1160.

CPU1100は、ROM1110及びRAM1120に格納されたプログラムに基づいて動作し、各部の制御を行う。ROM1110は、コンピュータ1200の起動時にCPU1100が実行するブートプログラムや、コンピュータ1200のハードウェアに依存するプログラム等を格納する。RAM1120は、CPU1100が実行するプログラム及びCPU1100が使用するデータ等を格納する。通信インターフェイス1130は、通信ネットワークを介して他の装置と通信する。ハードディスク・ドライブ1140は、コンピュータ1200が使用するプログラム及びデータを格納し、RAM1120を介してCPU1100に供給する。フレキシブルディスク・ドライブ1150は、フレキシブルディスク1190からプログラム又はデータを読み取り、RAM1120に提供する。CD−ROMドライブ1160は、CD−ROM1195からプログラム又はデータを読み取り、RAM1120に提供する。   The CPU 1100 operates based on programs stored in the ROM 1110 and the RAM 1120 and controls each unit. The ROM 1110 stores a boot program executed by the CPU 1100 when the computer 1200 is started, a program depending on the hardware of the computer 1200, and the like. The RAM 1120 stores programs executed by the CPU 1100, data used by the CPU 1100, and the like. The communication interface 1130 communicates with other devices via a communication network. The hard disk drive 1140 stores programs and data used by the computer 1200 and supplies them to the CPU 1100 via the RAM 1120. The flexible disk drive 1150 reads a program or data from the flexible disk 1190 and provides it to the RAM 1120. The CD-ROM drive 1160 reads a program or data from the CD-ROM 1195 and provides it to the RAM 1120.

RAM1120を介してCPU1100に提供されるプログラムは、フレキシブルディスク1190、CD−ROM1195、又はICカード等の記録媒体に格納されて利用者によって提供される。プログラムは、記録媒体から読み出され、RAM1120を介してコンピュータ1200にインストールされ、コンピュータ1200において実行される。   A program provided to the CPU 1100 via the RAM 1120 is stored in a recording medium such as the flexible disk 1190, the CD-ROM 1195, or an IC card and provided by the user. The program is read from the recording medium, installed in the computer 1200 via the RAM 1120, and executed in the computer 1200.

コンピュータ1200にインストールされて実行され、コンピュータ1200を商品開発支援システム10として機能させる商品開発支援プログラムは、回答入力モジュールと、回答格納部105を管理する回答管理モジュールと、顧客満足度分布生成モジュールと、顧客満足度分布格納部115を管理する顧客満足度分布管理モジュールと、構造解析モジュールと、寄与率格納部125を管理する寄与率管理モジュールと、追加費用格納部130を管理する追加費用管理モジュールと、価格帯指定入力モジュールと、向上仕様選択モジュールと、目標向上率入力モジュールと、追加費用算出モジュールと、予算額入力モジュールと、顧客満足度向上率算出モジュールと、出力モジュールとを備える。これらのプログラム又はモジュールは、コンピュータ1200を、回答入力部100と、回答格納部105と、顧客満足度分布生成部110と、顧客満足度分布格納部115と、構造解析部120と、寄与率格納部125と、追加費用格納部130と、価格帯指定入力部135と、向上仕様選択部140と、目標向上率入力部145 と、追加費用算出部150と、予算額入力部155と、顧客満足度向上率算出部160と、出力部165としてそれぞれ機能させる。   A product development support program that is installed and executed on the computer 1200 and causes the computer 1200 to function as the product development support system 10 includes an answer input module, an answer management module that manages the answer storage unit 105, and a customer satisfaction distribution generation module. A customer satisfaction distribution management module for managing the customer satisfaction distribution storage unit 115, a structure analysis module, a contribution rate management module for managing the contribution rate storage unit 125, and an additional cost management module for managing the additional cost storage unit 130. A price range designation input module, an improvement specification selection module, a target improvement rate input module, an additional cost calculation module, a budget amount input module, a customer satisfaction improvement rate calculation module, and an output module. These programs or modules include a computer 1200, an answer input unit 100, an answer storage unit 105, a customer satisfaction distribution generation unit 110, a customer satisfaction distribution storage unit 115, a structure analysis unit 120, and a contribution rate storage. Unit 125, additional cost storage unit 130, price range designation input unit 135, improvement specification selection unit 140, target improvement rate input unit 145, additional cost calculation unit 150, budget amount input unit 155, customer satisfaction The degree improvement rate calculation unit 160 and the output unit 165 function.

以上に示したプログラム又はモジュールは、外部の記録媒体に格納されてもよい。記録媒体としては、フレキシブルディスク1190、CD−ROM1195の他に、DVDやPD等の光学記録媒体、MD等の光磁気記録媒体、テープ媒体、ICカード等の半導体メモリ等を用いることができる。また、専用通信ネットワークやインターネットに接続されたサーバシステムに設けたハードディスク又はRAM等の記憶装置を記録媒体として使用し、通信ネットワークを介して外部のネットワークからプログラムをコンピュータ1200に提供してもよい。   The program or module shown above may be stored in an external recording medium. As a recording medium, in addition to the flexible disk 1190 and the CD-ROM 1195, an optical recording medium such as a DVD or PD, a magneto-optical recording medium such as an MD, a tape medium, a semiconductor memory such as an IC card, or the like can be used. Further, a storage device such as a hard disk or a RAM provided in a server system connected to a dedicated communication network or the Internet may be used as a recording medium, and the program may be provided to the computer 1200 from an external network via the communication network.

以上に示した商品開発支援システム10によれば、改良すべき仕様を定量的に判断し、改良すべき仕様や改良後のスペック値等を客観的に決定することができる。すなわち、商品開発支援システム10によれば、顧客満足度分布、寄与率、及び追加費用に基づいて、追加費用当たりの商品の顧客満足度の向上率が最大となる仕様を定量的に判断して選択することができる。また、追加費用として開発費用を用いることにより、開発費用当たりの商品の顧客満足度の向上率が最大となる仕様を選択することができ、アンケート等の回答に基づいて最も開発効率が高い仕様を定量的に決定することができる。また、上記の処理を商品の価格帯毎に行うことができるため、商品の価格帯によって異なる顧客の要求を適切に商品に反映することができる。   According to the product development support system 10 described above, the specification to be improved can be quantitatively determined, and the specification to be improved, the specification value after the improvement, and the like can be objectively determined. That is, according to the product development support system 10, based on the customer satisfaction distribution, the contribution rate, and the additional cost, the specification that maximizes the improvement rate of the customer satisfaction of the product per additional cost is determined quantitatively. You can choose. In addition, by using development costs as additional costs, it is possible to select the specification that maximizes the improvement rate of the customer satisfaction level of the product per development cost, and the specification with the highest development efficiency can be selected based on responses such as questionnaires. It can be determined quantitatively. In addition, since the above-described processing can be performed for each price range of a product, customer requests that differ depending on the price range of the product can be appropriately reflected in the product.

また、商品開発支援システム10によれば、目標向上率が入力された場合に、商品の顧客満足度を目標向上率だけ向上させるために改良すべき仕様を定量的に決定すると共に、目標向上率を達成するために要する追加費用を算出することができ、達成すべき顧客満足度に応じて適切な開発投資を決定することができる。そして、予算額が入力された場合に、予算額の範囲内で改良した場合に商品の満足度を最も高めることができる仕様と、この改良に伴う顧客満足度の向上率とを算出することができ、予算額に応じて最適な開発投資を決定すると共に、その効果を予め見積もることができる。   Further, according to the product development support system 10, when the target improvement rate is input, the specification to be improved is quantitatively determined to improve the customer satisfaction of the product by the target improvement rate, and the target improvement rate The additional cost required to achieve this can be calculated, and an appropriate development investment can be determined according to the degree of customer satisfaction to be achieved. Then, when the budget amount is input, it is possible to calculate the specifications that can maximize the satisfaction of the product when it is improved within the range of the budget amount, and the improvement rate of the customer satisfaction associated with this improvement. It is possible to determine the optimum development investment according to the budget amount and estimate the effect in advance.

以上、本発明を実施の形態を用いて説明したが、本発明の技術的範囲は上記実施の形態に記載の範囲には限定されない。上記実施の形態に、多様な変更または改良を加えることが可能であることが当業者に明らかである。その様な変更または改良を加えた形態も本発明の技術的範囲に含まれ得ることが、特許請求の範囲の記載から明らかである。   As mentioned above, although this invention was demonstrated using embodiment, the technical scope of this invention is not limited to the range as described in the said embodiment. It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications or improvements can be added to the above-described embodiment. It is apparent from the scope of the claims that the embodiments added with such changes or improvements can be included in the technical scope of the present invention.

本実施形態に係る商品開発支援システム10の構成を示す。1 shows a configuration of a product development support system 10 according to the present embodiment. 本実施形態に係る顧客満足度分布210の生成方法を示す。A method for generating a customer satisfaction distribution 210 according to the present embodiment will be described. 本実施形態に係る構造解析部120が生成するモデル構造の一例を示す。An example of the model structure which the structure analysis part 120 concerning this embodiment produces | generates is shown. 本実施形態に係る追加費用格納部130の内容の一例を示す。An example of the content of the additional expense storage part 130 which concerns on this embodiment is shown. 本実施形態に係る商品開発支援システム10の動作フローを示す。The operation | movement flow of the product development support system 10 which concerns on this embodiment is shown. 本実施形態に係るコンピュータ1200のハードウェア構成の一例を示す。2 shows an exemplary hardware configuration of a computer 1200 according to the present embodiment.

符号の説明Explanation of symbols

10 商品開発支援システム、100 回答入力部、105 回答格納部、110 顧客満足度分布生成部、115 顧客満足度分布格納部、120 構造解析部、125 寄与率格納部、130 追加費用格納部、135 価格帯指定入力部、140 向上仕様選択部、145 目標向上率入力部、150 追加費用算出部、155 予算額入力部、160 顧客満足度向上率算出部、165 出力部、200 回答分布、210 顧客満足度分布、300a〜i 観測変数、310a〜b 潜在変数、1100 CPU、1110 ROM、1120 RAM、1130 通信インターフェイス、1140 ハードディスク・ドライブ、1150 フレキシブルディスク・ドライブ、1160 CD−ROMドライブ、1190 フレキシブルディスク、1195 CD−ROM、1200 コンピュータ DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 10 Product development support system, 100 Reply input part, 105 Reply storage part, 110 Customer satisfaction distribution generation part, 115 Customer satisfaction distribution storage part, 120 Structure analysis part, 125 Contribution rate storage part, 130 Additional cost storage part, 135 Price range designation input unit, 140 improvement specification selection unit, 145 target improvement rate input unit, 150 additional cost calculation unit, 155 budget amount input unit, 160 customer satisfaction improvement rate calculation unit, 165 output unit, 200 answer distribution, 210 customers Satisfaction distribution, 300a-i observed variable, 310a-b latent variable, 1100 CPU, 1110 ROM, 1120 RAM, 1130 communication interface, 1140 hard disk drive, 1150 flexible disk drive, 1160 CD-ROM drive, 1190 flexible disk, 1 95 CD-ROM, 1200 computer

Claims (7)

商品の顧客満足度に基づいて、改良すべき当該商品の仕様を選択する商品開発支援システムであって、
前記商品が有する複数の仕様のそれぞれについて、当該仕様について取り得るスペック値毎に、当該仕様が当該スペック値を満たす場合に当該仕様について満足する顧客数の分布である顧客満足度分布を格納する顧客満足度分布格納部と、
前記複数の仕様のそれぞれについて、前記商品の顧客満足度に対する当該仕様の寄与率を格納する寄与率格納部と、
前記複数の仕様のそれぞれについて、前記商品の当該仕様についての前記スペック値を予め定められた単位量向上させた場合に発生する追加費用を格納する追加費用格納部と、
前記複数の仕様のそれぞれについての前記顧客満足度分布、前記寄与率、及び前記追加費用に基づいて、追加費用当たりの顧客満足度の向上率が最大となる前記仕様を選択する向上仕様選択部と
を備える商品開発支援システム。
A product development support system that selects the specifications of the product to be improved based on the customer satisfaction of the product,
For each of a plurality of specifications of the product, for each spec value that can be taken for the specification, a customer that stores a customer satisfaction distribution that is a distribution of the number of customers that satisfy the specification when the specification satisfies the specification value A satisfaction distribution storage unit;
For each of the plurality of specifications, a contribution rate storage unit that stores a contribution rate of the specification with respect to customer satisfaction of the product;
For each of the plurality of specifications, an additional cost storage unit that stores an additional cost generated when the spec value for the specification of the product is improved by a predetermined unit amount;
An improved specification selection unit that selects the specification that maximizes the improvement rate of customer satisfaction per additional cost based on the customer satisfaction distribution, the contribution rate, and the additional cost for each of the plurality of specifications; Product development support system with
前記追加費用格納部は、前記複数の仕様のそれぞれについて、前記商品の当該仕様についての前記スペック値を予め定められた単位量向上させるための開発費用を前記追加費用として格納し、
前記向上仕様選択部は、前記複数の仕様のそれぞれについての前記顧客満足度分布、前記寄与率、及び前記開発費用に基づいて、開発費用当たりの顧客満足度の向上率が最大となる前記仕様を選択する
請求項1記載の商品開発支援システム。
The additional cost storage unit stores, as the additional cost, a development cost for improving a predetermined unit amount of the specification value for the specification of the product for each of the plurality of specifications.
The improvement specification selection unit is configured to determine the specification that maximizes the improvement rate of customer satisfaction per development cost based on the customer satisfaction distribution, the contribution rate, and the development cost for each of the plurality of specifications. The product development support system according to claim 1 to be selected.
前記顧客満足度分布格納部、前記寄与率格納部、及び前記追加費用格納部は、価格帯が異なる複数の前記商品のそれぞれについて、当該商品が有する複数の前記仕様毎の前記顧客満足度分布、前記寄与率、及び前記追加費用をそれぞれ格納し、
当該商品開発支援システムの利用者から、価格帯の指定を入力する価格帯指定入力部を更に備え、
前記向上仕様選択部は、入力された前記価格帯に含まれる前記商品における、前記複数の仕様のそれぞれについての前記顧客満足度分布、前記寄与率、及び前記追加費用に基づいて、追加費用当たりの顧客満足度の向上率が最大となる前記仕様を選択する
請求項1記載の商品開発支援システム。
The customer satisfaction distribution storage unit, the contribution rate storage unit, and the additional cost storage unit, for each of the plurality of products having different price ranges, the customer satisfaction distribution for each of the plurality of specifications that the product has, Storing the contribution rate and the additional cost,
From the user of the product development support system, further comprises a price range designation input unit for inputting the designation of the price range,
The improved specification selection unit is configured to calculate the per-addition cost based on the customer satisfaction distribution, the contribution rate, and the additional cost for each of the plurality of specifications in the product included in the input price range. The product development support system according to claim 1, wherein the specification that maximizes the improvement rate of customer satisfaction is selected.
当該商品開発支援システムの利用者から、顧客満足度の向上率の目標値である目標向上率を入力する目標向上率入力部を更に備え、
前記向上仕様選択部は、前記複数の仕様のそれぞれについての前記顧客満足度分布、前記寄与率、及び前記追加費用に基づいて、前記顧客満足度を前記目標向上率向上させる場合における追加費用当たりの顧客満足度の向上率が最大となる前記仕様を選択し、
更に、前記向上仕様選択部が選択した前記仕様を向上させて顧客満足度を前記目標向上率だけ向上させるための前記追加費用を算出する追加費用算出部
を備える請求項1記載の商品開発支援システム。
It further comprises a target improvement rate input unit for inputting a target improvement rate that is a target value of the improvement rate of customer satisfaction from the user of the product development support system,
The improvement specification selection unit is configured to increase the customer satisfaction per target additional cost based on the customer satisfaction distribution, the contribution rate, and the additional cost for each of the plurality of specifications. Select the specification that maximizes customer satisfaction,
2. The product development support system according to claim 1, further comprising: an additional cost calculation unit that calculates the additional cost for improving the specification selected by the improvement specification selection unit and improving customer satisfaction by the target improvement rate. .
当該商品開発支援システムの利用者から、追加費用の予算額を入力する予算額入力部を更に備え、
前記向上仕様選択部は、前記複数の仕様のそれぞれについての前記顧客満足度分布、前記寄与率、及び前記追加費用に基づいて、予算額当たりの顧客満足度の向上率が最大となる前記仕様を選択し、
更に、前記向上仕様選択部が選択した前記仕様を前記予算額分向上させた場合における顧客満足度の向上率を算出する顧客満足度向上率算出部
を備える請求項1記載の商品開発支援システム。
A budget amount input unit for inputting the budget amount of the additional cost from the user of the product development support system is further provided.
The improvement specification selection unit determines the specification that maximizes the improvement rate of customer satisfaction per budget amount based on the customer satisfaction distribution, the contribution rate, and the additional cost for each of the plurality of specifications. Selected,
The product development support system according to claim 1, further comprising: a customer satisfaction improvement rate calculation unit that calculates an improvement rate of customer satisfaction when the specification selected by the improvement specification selection unit is improved by the budget amount.
商品の顧客満足度に基づいて、改良すべき当該商品の仕様を選択する商品開発支援システムをコンピュータにより実現する商品開発支援方法であって、
前記コンピュータは、前記商品が有する複数の仕様のそれぞれについて、当該仕様について取り得るスペック値毎に、当該仕様が当該スペック値を満たす場合に当該仕様について満足する顧客数の分布である顧客満足度分布を格納する顧客満足度分布格納部と、
前記複数の仕様のそれぞれについて、前記商品の顧客満足度に対する当該仕様の寄与率を格納する寄与率格納部と、
前記複数の仕様のそれぞれについて、前記商品の当該仕様についての前記スペック値を予め定められた単位量向上させた場合に発生する追加費用を格納する追加費用格納部と
を備え、
前記複数の仕様のそれぞれについての前記顧客満足度分布、前記寄与率、及び前記追加費用に基づいて、追加費用当たりの顧客満足度の向上率が最大となる前記仕様を前記コンピュータにより選択する向上仕様選択段階
を備える商品開発支援方法。
A product development support method for realizing a product development support system by a computer, which selects a specification of the product to be improved based on customer satisfaction of the product,
The computer, for each of a plurality of specifications that the product has, for each specification value that can be taken for the specification, customer satisfaction distribution that is a distribution of the number of customers that satisfy the specification when the specification satisfies the specification value A customer satisfaction distribution storage unit for storing,
For each of the plurality of specifications, a contribution rate storage unit that stores a contribution rate of the specification with respect to customer satisfaction of the product;
For each of the plurality of specifications, an additional cost storage unit that stores additional costs generated when the spec value for the specification of the product is improved by a predetermined unit amount, and
Based on the customer satisfaction distribution, the contribution rate, and the additional cost for each of the plurality of specifications, the improved specification for selecting, by the computer, the specification that maximizes the improvement rate of customer satisfaction per additional cost. Product development support method with a selection stage.
コンピュータを、商品の顧客満足度に基づいて、改良すべき当該商品の仕様を選択する商品開発支援システムとして機能させる商品開発支援プログラムであって、
当該商品開発支援プログラムは、前記コンピュータを、
前記商品が有する複数の仕様のそれぞれについて、当該仕様について取り得るスペック値毎に、当該仕様が当該スペック値を満たす場合に当該仕様について満足する顧客数の分布である顧客満足度分布を格納する顧客満足度分布格納部と、
前記複数の仕様のそれぞれについて、前記商品の顧客満足度に対する当該仕様の寄与率を格納する寄与率格納部と、
前記複数の仕様のそれぞれについて、前記商品の当該仕様についての前記スペック値を予め定められた単位量向上させた場合に発生する追加費用を格納する追加費用格納部と、
前記複数の仕様のそれぞれについての前記顧客満足度分布、前記寄与率、及び前記追加費用に基づいて、追加費用当たりの顧客満足度の向上率が最大となる前記仕様を選択する向上仕様選択部と
して機能させる商品開発支援プログラム。
A product development support program for causing a computer to function as a product development support system for selecting specifications of a product to be improved based on customer satisfaction of the product,
The product development support program includes the computer,
For each of a plurality of specifications of the product, for each spec value that can be taken for the specification, a customer that stores a customer satisfaction distribution that is a distribution of the number of customers that satisfy the specification when the specification satisfies the specification value A satisfaction distribution storage unit;
For each of the plurality of specifications, a contribution rate storage unit that stores a contribution rate of the specification with respect to customer satisfaction of the product;
For each of the plurality of specifications, an additional cost storage unit that stores an additional cost generated when the spec value for the specification of the product is improved by a predetermined unit amount;
An improved specification selection unit that selects the specification that maximizes the improvement rate of customer satisfaction per additional cost based on the customer satisfaction distribution, the contribution rate, and the additional cost for each of the plurality of specifications; Product development support program to make it function.
JP2003329106A 2003-09-19 2003-09-19 Commodity development support system, method, and program Pending JP2005092818A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2003329106A JP2005092818A (en) 2003-09-19 2003-09-19 Commodity development support system, method, and program

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2003329106A JP2005092818A (en) 2003-09-19 2003-09-19 Commodity development support system, method, and program

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2005092818A true JP2005092818A (en) 2005-04-07

Family

ID=34458445

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2003329106A Pending JP2005092818A (en) 2003-09-19 2003-09-19 Commodity development support system, method, and program

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP2005092818A (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2009054021A (en) * 2007-08-28 2009-03-12 Toshiba Corp Business negotiation support apparatus and business negotiation support program
JP2013517561A (en) * 2010-01-13 2013-05-16 アリババ・グループ・ホールディング・リミテッド Attribute aggregation for standard product units

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2009054021A (en) * 2007-08-28 2009-03-12 Toshiba Corp Business negotiation support apparatus and business negotiation support program
JP2013517561A (en) * 2010-01-13 2013-05-16 アリババ・グループ・ホールディング・リミテッド Attribute aggregation for standard product units

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Abdillah FinTech E-commerce payment application user experience analysis during COVID-19 pandemic
Melnikov Demand for differentiated durable products: The case of the US computer printer market
US7707068B2 (en) Method and device for calculating trust values on purchases
US7594189B1 (en) Systems and methods for statistically selecting content items to be used in a dynamically-generated display
US8650084B2 (en) Tool for analysis of advertising auctions
JP4465417B2 (en) Customer segment estimation device
JP5253519B2 (en) Method, apparatus and storage medium for generating smart text
US8606608B2 (en) Offline counterfactual analysis
Morozov et al. Estimation of preference heterogeneity in markets with costly search
JP2009169968A (en) Method and system for determining market demand based on consumer contribution
US20080288327A1 (en) Store management system and program
WO2003009199A1 (en) Providing marketing decision support
Etzion et al. e-CLV: a modelling approach for customer lifetime evaluation in e-commerce domains, with an application and case study for online auctions
JP2018077615A (en) Advertising image generation device, advertising image generation method and program for advertising image generation device
US20200320561A1 (en) Method and apparatus using context to determine consumer deals
CN102880696A (en) Advertisement placement
Pantano et al. Digital contents management for improving consumers’ experience
JP2021149445A (en) Information processing apparatus, information processing method, and information processing program
US20140180794A1 (en) Methods and apparatus for generating an online marketing campaign
US7987114B2 (en) Method of managing advertisers and system for executing the method
KR100891930B1 (en) Method, system and computer-readable recording medium for providing popular goods by using evaluation data on goods
JP2005092818A (en) Commodity development support system, method, and program
JP2020154841A (en) Determination device, determination method, and determination program
US9805388B2 (en) Premium instant messaging space
Kamis Search strategies in shopping engines: An experimental investigation